Data [7:30074]
Please is need i help in relation to above subject. Is there any other way that i can transfer data from one pc to another,without using Dial up modem? My company is in the business of data transering & am looking into this issue. Kind regards, Mike. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30074&t=30074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subinterface P-2-P [7:30070]
Can you do a "sh ru" and post it! Thanks - Original Message - From: "Ash Aslam" To: Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Subinterface P-2-P [7:30070] > Hello group, > > I am trying to set-up a point-to-point subinterface but I do not see the > point-to-point or multipoint options under the physical interface as > follows: > > r5-s(config)#interface serial 0.1 ? > > > I am having problems creating the point-to-point subinterface on both the > 2500 and 2600 router platforms. 2503 has IOS Version 12.1(5) and 2612 has > IOS Version 12.1(4). I am not sure if this is IOS bug related. > > I have tried various things but to no avail. Can anyone shed some light > with a brief example? > > Thanks in adv, > Ash Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30073&t=30070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how do I add the vpn dial network adapter in win98 ? [7:30072]
qwe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30072&t=30072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subinterface P-2-P [7:30070]
> I am trying to set-up a point-to-point subinterface but I do not see the > point-to-point or multipoint options under the physical interface as > follows: > > r5-s(config)#interface serial 0.1 ? > > > I am having problems creating the point-to-point subinterface on both the > 2500 and 2600 router platforms. 2503 has IOS Version 12.1(5) and 2612 has > IOS Version 12.1(4). I am not sure if this is IOS bug related. > > I have tried various things but to no avail. Can anyone shed some light > with a brief example? Have you define the "encapsulation frame-relay" command first? If that doesn`t help, then your IOS doesn`t support for "Frame Relay SVC Support (DTE)". Try upgrading the IOS, you can lookup which IOS that supports subinterfaces from Cisco IOS Feature Navigator link. HTH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30071&t=30070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subinterface P-2-P [7:30070]
Hello group, I am trying to set-up a point-to-point subinterface but I do not see the point-to-point or multipoint options under the physical interface as follows: r5-s(config)#interface serial 0.1 ? I am having problems creating the point-to-point subinterface on both the 2500 and 2600 router platforms. 2503 has IOS Version 12.1(5) and 2612 has IOS Version 12.1(4). I am not sure if this is IOS bug related. I have tried various things but to no avail. Can anyone shed some light with a brief example? Thanks in adv, Ash Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30070&t=30070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Happy Holidays [7:30045]
A true mac user at heart :) -jMh On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: A Macintosh > instead of a PC > On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to > ...hey, wait a minute, this thing works! > > Priscilla > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30069&t=30045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Activating VPN slows connection drastically, Why? [7:30043]
I don't know much about CheckPoint's VPN solutions but the logical things that could cause degradation in performance could be either client PC's that now with VPN are required to encrypt/decrypt data, the end point machine that has to do the same things, some issues within the infrastructure beyond the VPN Checkpoint machine, all or some of the above issues could cause problems. Simply more information is required for better analysis. ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > can you clarify for me? > > HQinternet827bunch of PC's > > PC's are running the Checkpoint VPN client. VPN tunnels go from PC to HQ > Checkpoint device, with the 827 doing only routing/bridging ( depending on > how the ISP is set up ) > > Is this correct? > > When you say "the connection slows down" does that mean that prior to using > the VPN client, connection to HQ was fast? Or were you gauging by internet > access, as the PC's cannot access HQ without the client? > > You will want to differentiate what is slow and what is fast. Then it will > be easier to focus in on a cause. > > Chuck > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Bruce Williams > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 12:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Activating VPN slows connnection drastically, Why? [7:30043] > > > We have a DSL line connected through a Cisco 800 series router. The > connection is very fast until the checkpoint client software is activated to > access a checkpoint firewall vpn in the corporate office. This slows down > the connection drastically. What in the VPN could cause this? I just want to > get an idea where to start troubleshooting? > > Bruce Williams > Verizon > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30068&t=30043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
according to the tenets of socialism, a publisher would be compensated only the cost of producing the book. i.e. the cost of paper, the cost of ink, the cost of binding, etc. authors would be compensated based on their need. Since, under socialism, everyone is equal, all you writers would live in the same quality shack the rest of us live in, and you would therefore get about the same as you do now. ;-> under the tenets of socialism CCIE's would achieve because it is "according to their ability" and they would be compensated only enough to support them and their shack, which is identical to those of non CCIE's. Sure makes one wish for socialism ;-> Merry Christmas. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] At 05:40 PM 12/24/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >3) books cost too much, and too many of them, particularly in the >certification arena, are of limited value. Still, I have no reasonable >expectation that a publisher owes me the opportunity to buy only particular >chapters, or give me my money back after I have discovered how useless their >title is. I can't remember the title of that Upton Sinclair socialist book >published in the early part of the century, but IIRC, there was an >interested discussion in their about cost of books and compensation to >authors. "From each according to his ability and to each according to his >need" was twisted mightily in that justification, IIRC. I can't follow your logic, but regarding compensation to authors: We make enough on each book sold to cover the cost of a latte. That's all. We don't see the money. ;-) You may be thinking of the Abbie Hoffman book "Steal this Book." Just kidding! Priscilla >Something else to consider. I've rented rack time from both NLI and IP >Expert. With NLI, I was able to call, and have someone actually test some >voice configurations I was working on. With IP Experts, no such help was >available. NLI has been quite responsive to calls for support. IP Expert >leaves something to be desired there. I say that even though I prefer IP >Expert training materials at this point in time, for reasons I have stated >elsewhere. > >Best wishes and merry Christmas. > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Wojtek Zlobicki >Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > > > > Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity, > > skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles, > > and other resources. The results may be proprietary and there's nothing > > wrong with charging for them. I can't comment on the pricing. (Setting a > > good price has always seemed like a black art to me, having only taken one > > business/marketing type class in my life.) It does seem like different > > prices for different countries makes sense, as others have said. > >A copy of your book graces my bookshelf (I have to admit that I have not >had a chance to read it yet). I do not mind paying for the book. There are >a number of people here financing their own CCIE, it would be nice if the >labs were available in parts (I would be interested in labs 1-10 for >example). >The labs are extensive (having seen Lab 1 as an example) but are they >really worth $650. After having sold 100/1000/2000 lab sets, it becomes >less and less clear to me why the $650 fee is warranted. For $650 I can >buy about 10 books that help me prep for my CCIE. Are the works of >Doyle, Halabi, Caslow, Lee et all now worth as much. I don't believe >that each lab takes more work that a book such as yours or Halabi's, >the $650 fee may have been appropriate during the boom but >I do not believe that such a fee is still reasonable. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30066&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Activating VPN slows connection drastically, Why? [7:30043]
can you clarify for me? HQinternet827bunch of PC's PC's are running the Checkpoint VPN client. VPN tunnels go from PC to HQ Checkpoint device, with the 827 doing only routing/bridging ( depending on how the ISP is set up ) Is this correct? When you say "the connection slows down" does that mean that prior to using the VPN client, connection to HQ was fast? Or were you gauging by internet access, as the PC's cannot access HQ without the client? You will want to differentiate what is slow and what is fast. Then it will be easier to focus in on a cause. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Williams Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Activating VPN slows connnection drastically, Why? [7:30043] We have a DSL line connected through a Cisco 800 series router. The connection is very fast until the checkpoint client software is activated to access a checkpoint firewall vpn in the corporate office. This slows down the connection drastically. What in the VPN could cause this? I just want to get an idea where to start troubleshooting? Bruce Williams Verizon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30065&t=30043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
At 05:40 PM 12/24/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >3) books cost too much, and too many of them, particularly in the >certification arena, are of limited value. Still, I have no reasonable >expectation that a publisher owes me the opportunity to buy only particular >chapters, or give me my money back after I have discovered how useless their >title is. I can't remember the title of that Upton Sinclair socialist book >published in the early part of the century, but IIRC, there was an >interested discussion in their about cost of books and compensation to >authors. "From each according to his ability and to each according to his >need" was twisted mightily in that justification, IIRC. I can't follow your logic, but regarding compensation to authors: We make enough on each book sold to cover the cost of a latte. That's all. We don't see the money. ;-) You may be thinking of the Abbie Hoffman book "Steal this Book." Just kidding! Priscilla >Something else to consider. I've rented rack time from both NLI and IP >Expert. With NLI, I was able to call, and have someone actually test some >voice configurations I was working on. With IP Experts, no such help was >available. NLI has been quite responsive to calls for support. IP Expert >leaves something to be desired there. I say that even though I prefer IP >Expert training materials at this point in time, for reasons I have stated >elsewhere. > >Best wishes and merry Christmas. > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Wojtek Zlobicki >Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > > > > Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity, > > skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles, > > and other resources. The results may be proprietary and there's nothing > > wrong with charging for them. I can't comment on the pricing. (Setting a > > good price has always seemed like a black art to me, having only taken one > > business/marketing type class in my life.) It does seem like different > > prices for different countries makes sense, as others have said. > >A copy of your book graces my bookshelf (I have to admit that I have not >had a chance to read it yet). I do not mind paying for the book. There are >a number of people here financing their own CCIE, it would be nice if the >labs were available in parts (I would be interested in labs 1-10 for >example). >The labs are extensive (having seen Lab 1 as an example) but are they >really worth $650. After having sold 100/1000/2000 lab sets, it becomes >less and less clear to me why the $650 fee is warranted. For $650 I can >buy about 10 books that help me prep for my CCIE. Are the works of >Doyle, Halabi, Caslow, Lee et all now worth as much. I don't believe >that each lab takes more work that a book such as yours or Halabi's, >the $650 fee may have been appropriate during the boom but >I do not believe that such a fee is still reasonable. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30064&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP classless command [7:30056]
12/24/2001 5:35pm Monday Well said - Original Message - From: ""Mike"" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 5:35 PM Subject: Re: IP classless command [7:30056] > The best way to explain IP classless is to explain how a router works with > "no ip classless". Suppose you have a router with a static route configured > to 10.1.1.0/24 out some interface and you also have a default gateway > configured. Again, ip classless is disabled, "no ip classless". > > A packet comes into the router destined for 10.1.1.2, the router looks at > the routing table, sees the static route and forwards as expected. > > A packet comes into the router destined for 11.x.x.x, the router looks at > the routing table, sees the default gateway and forwards as expected. > > A packet comes into the router destined for 10.10.10.1, you would expect the > router to forward the packet via the default gateway. However, because the > router is operting in "classful mode", the router drops the packet rather > then using the default gateway. This is because the router is in the same > classful network as the 10.1.1.0/24 network used for the static route. > > If the "ip classless" command was used, the dropped packet would actually be > forwarded via the default gateway. There really is no reason not to use "ip > classless" on all router configurations. > > Mike > > > > ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can anyone please explain to me what is "ip classless" used for? I looked > > it up on the Caslow book, and it states that by enabling IP classless, it > > allows one to override the contiguous subnet rule and allow the router to > > look for the longest match beyond the listed subnets. > > > > But I still don't understand what it means? Can anyone give me some > > examples? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Best Regards, > > Hunt Lee > > IP Solution Analyst > > Cable & Wireless Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30063&t=30056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
back to back ATM NM-1A-T3 w/ 3620's [7:30062]
12/24/2001 5:30pm Monday Has any one set up back to back ATM with these modules ? I am looking to do it so I can improve my ATM skills. Richard // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30062&t=30062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP Error [7:30030]
At 05:14 PM 12/24/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >is an ICMP response SUPPOSED to go to a broadcast address? In general, ICMP messages should go to a unicast address. A device could be misconfigured with the wrong subnet mask, causing it to send to an address that it thinks is a unicast but the recipients think is a broadcast. I've seen that. Or it could just be a software bug, in other words, a poor implementation of ICMP. > I'm probably off >in left field here, but your server should be sending UDP to a directed >broadcast address, shouldn't it? ICMP doesn't use UDP. I don't know if that's what you had in mind since I'm not in left field with you. ;-) NIS uses UDP and could send to broadcast or directed broadcast. >Hi All, > >I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server which is working with >broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. Server IP is >192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server starts to work all clients >and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > >" 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to broadcast" It means exactly what it says. The server sent an ICMP error to the broadcast address. That's bizarre, so it's letting you know. ICMP messages go to a unicast address usually. It would be worthwhile to figure out which ICMP message the server sent. There are many. This may not copy and paste correctly, but it's worth a try. ICMP Types and Codes TypeCodeMeaning 8 0 Echo (ping) 0 0 Echo reply (ping reply) 3 x Destination unreachable (generic category) 3 0 Network unreachable 3 1 Host unreachable 3 2 Protocol unreachable 3 3 Port unreachable 3 4 Fragmentation was needed and the don't fragment (DF) bit was set 3 5 Source route failed 3 13 Packet administratively prohibited 4 0 Source quench 11 x Time exceeded (generic category) 11 0 Time-to-live (TTL) exceeded 11 1 Fragment reassembly time exceeded >Can it be because of "no ip directed-broadcast" command on the >interface. That probably has nothing to do with it. Good luck with this. Let us know what you find out. Thanks, Priscilla >Any help will be appreciated? > >Best regards, Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30061&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed 2926T Problem [7:30034]
I tried to disable fast etherchanel, trunking, etc, could not fix it. Well, The problem is resolved now. I read on CCO that the CatOS on here is 4.5(1) Early developement, I flashed 4.5(8) as recommended on the CatOS Compat advisor and all is ok. Thanks to everyone for your help! -Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30060&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Skroo Boat Comp [7:30027]
Pure genius. ""Skroos Mom"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Mommy is so proud of you, the way you stand up to > those mean people at Boat Comp. You certainly told off > that horrible Mork Rossol. How dare he claim to help > people, when my katykins is unable to benefit? You are > > still my brave little soldier. I am reminded of that > time when you were in kindergarten. You had just > turned 9, and the other children were picking on you. > So you threw sand in their faces and squished their > candy into the dirt. You certainly stood tall that > day, and you are standing even taller today, lifters > notwithstanding. > > Remember, Mommy will always love you, even though you > can't hold down a job. You are still Mommy's favorite > little lambkins. > > By the way, when are you coming over again with your > laundry? Mommy has a new treatment, one that is sure > to remove those horrible yellow and brown stains. I > must confess, though, I remain uncertain how you will > correctly dress without those stains to guide you. > > Keep up the good fight, my Little Man. Keep reminding > all those so called professionals at groupstudy and > boat comp that you are a mighty mite, and you won't > tolerate them. You don't need them. You have a good > job now with Roto Rooter. Which puzzles me. Do people > really pay you to give you your enemas? > > Love, > > Mommy > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30059&t=30027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP classless command [7:30056]
The best way to explain IP classless is to explain how a router works with "no ip classless". Suppose you have a router with a static route configured to 10.1.1.0/24 out some interface and you also have a default gateway configured. Again, ip classless is disabled, "no ip classless". A packet comes into the router destined for 10.1.1.2, the router looks at the routing table, sees the static route and forwards as expected. A packet comes into the router destined for 11.x.x.x, the router looks at the routing table, sees the default gateway and forwards as expected. A packet comes into the router destined for 10.10.10.1, you would expect the router to forward the packet via the default gateway. However, because the router is operting in "classful mode", the router drops the packet rather then using the default gateway. This is because the router is in the same classful network as the 10.1.1.0/24 network used for the static route. If the "ip classless" command was used, the dropped packet would actually be forwarded via the default gateway. There really is no reason not to use "ip classless" on all router configurations. Mike ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone please explain to me what is "ip classless" used for? I looked > it up on the Caslow book, and it states that by enabling IP classless, it > allows one to override the contiguous subnet rule and allow the router to > look for the longest match beyond the listed subnets. > > But I still don't understand what it means? Can anyone give me some > examples? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Hunt Lee > IP Solution Analyst > Cable & Wireless Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30058&t=30056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
selam 2 [7:30057]
Selam sana bir site oneriyorum kesin bak! , OYUNLAR SADECE 2.750.000 TL! http://www.alisveris.sehri.com http://www.alisveris.sehri.com iyi gunler, Bu mesaj htp://www.aslan.mekani.com |zerinden yollanmistir! Uye olmak icin ; http://astavilla.kolayweb.com/haber.htm ### Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30057&t=30057 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP classless command [7:30056]
Can anyone please explain to me what is "ip classless" used for? I looked it up on the Caslow book, and it states that by enabling IP classless, it allows one to override the contiguous subnet rule and allow the router to look for the longest match beyond the listed subnets. But I still don't understand what it means? Can anyone give me some examples? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable & Wireless Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30056&t=30056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Just a couple of things, here. Again, with regards to NLI and their business model, I agree that IMHO it could use some rethinking. HOWEVER.. 1) your money buys you all labs and what so far has been unlimited ongoing support. I.e. any new lab that comes out. Any corrections issued. Who anywhere gives unlimited perpetual support for their products these days? 2) simple economics applies - if you don't like NLI's price, don't pay it. Buy from their competition. IP Expert costs less. Fatkid is free. There are some others around whose names I can't recall off hand, but if memory serves, offer some good study materials. A search of the archives, particularly on the CCIE Lab list, should turn up the names. If NLI finds themselves with no customers, they will lower their price. Simple supply and demand. 3) books cost too much, and too many of them, particularly in the certification arena, are of limited value. Still, I have no reasonable expectation that a publisher owes me the opportunity to buy only particular chapters, or give me my money back after I have discovered how useless their title is. I can't remember the title of that Upton Sinclair socialist book published in the early part of the century, but IIRC, there was an interested discussion in their about cost of books and compensation to authors. "From each according to his ability and to each according to his need" was twisted mightily in that justification, IIRC. Something else to consider. I've rented rack time from both NLI and IP Expert. With NLI, I was able to call, and have someone actually test some voice configurations I was working on. With IP Experts, no such help was available. NLI has been quite responsive to calls for support. IP Expert leaves something to be desired there. I say that even though I prefer IP Expert training materials at this point in time, for reasons I have stated elsewhere. Best wishes and merry Christmas. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wojtek Zlobicki Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682] > Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity, > skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles, > and other resources. The results may be proprietary and there's nothing > wrong with charging for them. I can't comment on the pricing. (Setting a > good price has always seemed like a black art to me, having only taken one > business/marketing type class in my life.) It does seem like different > prices for different countries makes sense, as others have said. A copy of your book graces my bookshelf (I have to admit that I have not had a chance to read it yet). I do not mind paying for the book. There are a number of people here financing their own CCIE, it would be nice if the labs were available in parts (I would be interested in labs 1-10 for example). The labs are extensive (having seen Lab 1 as an example) but are they really worth $650. After having sold 100/1000/2000 lab sets, it becomes less and less clear to me why the $650 fee is warranted. For $650 I can buy about 10 books that help me prep for my CCIE. Are the works of Doyle, Halabi, Caslow, Lee et all now worth as much. I don't believe that each lab takes more work that a book such as yours or Halabi's, the $650 fee may have been appropriate during the boom but I do not believe that such a fee is still reasonable. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30053&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Happy Holidays [7:30045]
Priscilla, To you and all the other members of our Groupstudy family, Happy Holidays and a fervent wish for a more peaceful New Year. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Hey Group Study, I realize not everyone celebrates Christmas, but for those of you that do, I hope you have a safe, happy, peaceful holiday with family and friends, far away from your Cisco lab! ;-) We may not always get along here at GroupStudy, but, in general, this is a beneficial group with some very helpful people to whom I don't express enough gratitude probably. So, at the risk of wasting bandwidth and starting flames, thanks to everyone! This joke needs updating, but it's still sort of funny: 12 Days of Microsoft Christmas by Gil Glass (trust me, it's singable) On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: Windows 95 for my PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 3rd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 4th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 5th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 6th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 7th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 8th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 9th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 10th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 11th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 12th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 12 sound cards silent 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC And now, the long awaited folow-up: On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: A Macintosh instead of a PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to ...hey, wait a minute, this thing works! Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30054&t=30045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP Error [7:30030]
is an ICMP response SUPPOSED to go to a broadcast address? I'm probably off in left field here, but your server should be sending UDP to a directed broadcast address, shouldn't it? what does your server / application documentation say? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Breaker Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ICMP Error [7:30030] Hi All, I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server which is working with broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. Server IP is 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server starts to work all clients and NIS server is receiving a message at below, " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to broadcast" What is the meaning of this message, I searched on cisco but didnt find anything. Can it be because of "no ip directed-broadcast" command on the interface. Any help will be appreciated? Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30052&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Happy Christmas and Merry New Year!!! [7:30051]
Wait... maybe that's why I'm having so many troubles... Lyxdexia. :-) For those of you gainfully employed, may your holidays be void of distracting network problems and full of time that you can actually spend with your family and friends. For the rest of us, may we be blessed with gainful employment, along with the precious time with our family and friends. Anyway, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Ken Diliberto CCNA, CCNP, E1, E2, Psychotic. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30051&t=30051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Happy Holidays [7:30045]
Thanks Priscilla! I hope you have a very peaceful and joyful Christmas. Thanks to you for your input and everyone else who contributes to help each other out. Merry Christmas, Steve -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Happy Holidays [7:30045] Hey Group Study, I realize not everyone celebrates Christmas, but for those of you that do, I hope you have a safe, happy, peaceful holiday with family and friends, far away from your Cisco lab! ;-) We may not always get along here at GroupStudy, but, in general, this is a beneficial group with some very helpful people to whom I don't express enough gratitude probably. So, at the risk of wasting bandwidth and starting flames, thanks to everyone! This joke needs updating, but it's still sort of funny: 12 Days of Microsoft Christmas by Gil Glass (trust me, it's singable) On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: Windows 95 for my PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 3rd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 4th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 5th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 6th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 7th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 8th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 9th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 10th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 11th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 12th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 12 sound cards silent 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC And now, the long awaited folow-up: On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: A Macintosh instead of a PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to ...hey, wait a minute, this thing works! Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30050&t=30045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
> Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity, > skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles, > and other resources. The results may be proprietary and there's nothing > wrong with charging for them. I can't comment on the pricing. (Setting a > good price has always seemed like a black art to me, having only taken one > business/marketing type class in my life.) It does seem like different > prices for different countries makes sense, as others have said. A copy of your book graces my bookshelf (I have to admit that I have not had a chance to read it yet). I do not mind paying for the book. There are a number of people here financing their own CCIE, it would be nice if the labs were available in parts (I would be interested in labs 1-10 for example). The labs are extensive (having seen Lab 1 as an example) but are they really worth $650. After having sold 100/1000/2000 lab sets, it becomes less and less clear to me why the $650 fee is warranted. For $650 I can buy about 10 books that help me prep for my CCIE. Are the works of Doyle, Halabi, Caslow, Lee et all now worth as much. I don't believe that each lab takes more work that a book such as yours or Halabi's, the $650 fee may have been appropriate during the boom but I do not believe that such a fee is still reasonable. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30048&t=29682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 2926T Problem [7:30034]
Ok, I ran set port channel 1/1-1/2 off No change. Same error. The machine can communicate to others through the port, so I am thinking it is a software problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30049&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Happy Holidays [7:30045]
Thank you Priscilla, and I wish you and everyone in this newsgroup a Merry Christmas. I joined this newsgroup about a year and a half ago when I began studying for my CCNP. Now I have my CCNP, CCDP and I am taking the CCIE lab in June. This newsgroup has been a tremendous help to me. I would like to thank everyone and especially you Priscilla for taking the time to respond to my emails personally. Thanks and Merry Christmas Everyone! Bruce ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey Group Study, > > I realize not everyone celebrates Christmas, but for those of you that do, > I hope you have a safe, happy, peaceful holiday with family and friends, > far away from your Cisco lab! ;-) > > We may not always get along here at GroupStudy, but, in general, this is a > beneficial group with some very helpful people to whom I don't express > enough gratitude probably. So, at the risk of wasting bandwidth and > starting flames, thanks to everyone! > > This joke needs updating, but it's still sort of funny: > > 12 Days of Microsoft Christmas > by Gil Glass > (trust me, it's singable) > > On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > Windows 95 for my PC > > > On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 3rd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 4th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 5th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 6th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 7th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 8th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 8 Megs overflowin' > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 9th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 9 apps a crashin' > 8 Megs overflowin' > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 10th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 10 modes not supported > 9 apps a crashin' > 8 Megs overflowin' > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 11th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 11 instructions faulty > 10 modes not supported > 9 apps a crashin' > 8 Megs overflowin' > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs > and Windows 95 for my PC > > On the 12th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: > 12 sound cards silent > 11 instructions faulty > 10 modes not supported > 9 apps a crashin' > 8 Megs overflowin' > 7 files missin' > 6 ints conflictin' > 5 eighty six > 4 sectors bad > 3 ports not responding > 2 GPFs and > Windows 95 for my PC > > And now, the long awaited folow-up: > > > On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: A Macintosh > instead of a PC > On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to > ...hey, wait a minute, this thing works! > > Priscilla > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30047&t=30045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 2926T Problem More info [7:30034]
What state is the port in for channelling? And does "set port channel 1/1-2 mode off" have any effect? Just seems that the error is a problem with creating an etherchannel, so if you don't have any channeling, it may not error. Just guessing?? Regards, Gaz ""Phil Barker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Then basically you have a crackered port. > > Phil. > --- Barbee Jason wrote: > > Right, this is the only document I can find related. > > I have tried "reset 1", which reboots the switch. No > > improvement. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30046&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Happy Holidays [7:30045]
Hey Group Study, I realize not everyone celebrates Christmas, but for those of you that do, I hope you have a safe, happy, peaceful holiday with family and friends, far away from your Cisco lab! ;-) We may not always get along here at GroupStudy, but, in general, this is a beneficial group with some very helpful people to whom I don't express enough gratitude probably. So, at the risk of wasting bandwidth and starting flames, thanks to everyone! This joke needs updating, but it's still sort of funny: 12 Days of Microsoft Christmas by Gil Glass (trust me, it's singable) On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: Windows 95 for my PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 3rd day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 4th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 5th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 6th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 7th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 8th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 9th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 10th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 11th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC On the 12th day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: 12 sound cards silent 11 instructions faulty 10 modes not supported 9 apps a crashin' 8 Megs overflowin' 7 files missin' 6 ints conflictin' 5 eighty six 4 sectors bad 3 ports not responding 2 GPFs and Windows 95 for my PC And now, the long awaited folow-up: On the 1st day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: A Macintosh instead of a PC On the 2nd day of Christmas, my true love gave to ...hey, wait a minute, this thing works! Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30045&t=30045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About ACS 2.3.5 for UNIX [7:30002]
He asked about running it on Solaris 8. If he's like me, the thought of using any security product on Windoze is frightening. I personally do not want NT/2000 handling any security if I can help it. That's why I still run 2.3.6 on Solaris. John Kaberna CCIE #7146 NETCG Inc. www.netcginc.com (415) 750-3800 Instructor for CCBootcamp 5-day class www.ccbootcamp.com __ CCIE Security Training www.netcginc.com/training.htm ""Ocsic"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Why not use ACS 3.0 ? > It is released! > > ""fmxiao"" Hi all in group > > > > anyone can answer the question below. > > > >does Cisco ACS 2.3.5 (for UNIX) can install and run under solaris 8 ? > > > > thx in advance. > > > > Roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30042&t=30002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149]
In a message dated 12/24/2001 9:03:51 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Subj:Re: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149] > Date:12/24/2001 9:03:51 AM Central Standard Time > From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (c1sc0k1d) > Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (c1sc0k1d) > To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yeah, with all due respect, the CCIE Written is a QUALIFICATION EXAM, not a > cert..I wish people would not use it!! My .02c, Rob H. NP, DP, blah,blah,blah > > What is this new certification you have... the CCIE(Write)? Does that mean > you write code for the IOS? > > > > ""Sureshhomepage .com"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > thanks for the excellant notes! > > > > cheers! > > suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) > > http://www.sureshhomepage.com > > > > > > >From: "John Neiberger" > > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149] > > >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:40:08 -0500 > > > > > >Someone just asked me off-list how to summarize a certain range of > > >addresses and I thought it might be helpful to post my reply to the > > >list. It seems like everybody has their own shortcut to doing this, but > > >this is how I learned how to do it. Once you learn it there are plenty > > >of shortcuts. > > > > > > > > > > > >As far as summarization goes, to really understand what you're doing > > >you need to think in binary. Write out those addresses in binary > > >first: > > > > > >1010.0001.0001.= 10.1.1.0/24 > > >1010.0001.0011.= 10.1.3.0/24 > > >1010.0001.1110.0100=10.1.14.64/26 > > > > > >You can see that in binary they are all the same up to the 20th bit. > > >If you slice the above table into two pieces at the 20th bit, on the > > >left side you are left with: > > > > > >1010.0001. > > > > > >This, translated back to decimal, is 10.1.0.0/20, which is your > > >summarized address. However, this is an awful example. Those would be > > >really bad addresses to try to summarize. A better example would be > > >this: > > > > > >10.1.0.0/24 > > >10.1.1.0/24 > > >10.1.2.0/24 > > >10.1.3.0/24 > > > > > >1010.0001.. > > >1010.0001.0001. > > >1010.0001.0010. > > >1010.0001.0011. > > > > > >You can see that these are the same up to the 22nd bit. Slice the > > >diagram into to pieces at the 22nd bit and on the left side you are left > > >with: > > > > > >1010.0001.00 > > > > > >which translates back to decimal as 10.1.0.0/22. Now you can see that > > >a /22 precisely summarizes four /24s !! Cool, huh? > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > >JohnPrecedence: bulk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30039&t=29149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 2926T Problem More info [7:30034]
Then basically you have a crackered port. Phil. --- Barbee Jason wrote: > Right, this is the only document I can find related. > I have tried "reset 1", which reboots the switch. No > improvement. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30044&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Activating VPN slows connnection drastically, Why? [7:30043]
We have a DSL line connected through a Cisco 800 series router. The connection is very fast until the checkpoint client software is activated to access a checkpoint firewall vpn in the corporate office. This slows down the connection drastically. What in the VPN could cause this? I just want to get an idea where to start troubleshooting? Bruce Williams Verizon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30043&t=30043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 2926T Problem More info [7:30034]
Right, this is the only document I can find related. I have tried "reset 1", which reboots the switch. No improvement. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30041&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 2926T Problem More info [7:30034]
>From cisco.com Port Aggregation Protocol/EtherChannel Messages This section contains the switch Port Aggregation Protocol (PAgP) and EtherChannel messages. PAGP-3-CONFPORTCHNLFAIL: Failure = [dec] in configPortChannel for mNo/pNo = [dec]/[dec] Explanation This message indicates that the system was unable to configure the channel properly; [dec] is the return status, and [dec]/[dec] is the module number/port number. Recommended Action Try to reset the failing ports. If the message reappears, contact your technical support representative. --- Barbee Jason wrote: > The buzzing noise was one of the power supplies, I > switched to the second > RPS and the sound is much less, but I can still hear > a slight buzzing noise > during acitivity. > Both uplink ports work when connected to a device. I > can transmit data > between computers. > On the console I get the message referenced about > every 3 seconds output to > the console. > 2001 Dec 24 12:48:04 > %PAGP-3-CONFPORTCHNLFAIL:Failure = -1 in > configPortChannel for mNo/pNo = 1/2 > -Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30040&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DSL [7:30032]
Hello Farhn, www.dslreports.com can tell you a lot of about your provider. Like who provides the loop, the distance between you and the CO... Check it out. Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30038&t=30032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Afterthoughts - CCIE written [7:29885]
>>> "ramnath" 12/22/01 03:50PM >>> Hi, Frm where can i download "Lou Rossi's TR White Paper". Can u pls provide me the link. Thanxs & Rgds, 2 b CCIE "Blanco Lam" wrote in message ... >Hi there, > >Took the CCIE Written today and passed. Here's my 2 cents worth: > >The test is quite tricky although I wouldn't use the word "tough" to >describe it. If you went through the CCNA/CCNP track and took the time to >*understand* (i.e. not memorising the stuff in a parrot fashion) the topics >in the CCNP track then you should be okay. 85% of this exam is like an >extension to the CCNP topics and perhaps 15% are not covered in the CCNP >track. > >For anybody that's taken the CID exam, this exam feels and looks similar in >my opinion. Also 100 questions, 2 hours and quite tricky. > >I've seen posts whereby people say they think this exam is harder because it >doesn't tell you how many correct answers. Personally, I think if you know >your stuff, you should already *know* what the correct answers are. Some of >the answers are clearly wrong anyway. You shouldn't depend on the question >to tell you which answers are correct. Besides, I think about 80% of the >questions are single answers and 20% multiple answers. > >Very important that you spend the time to actually read the questions >carefully. Read if twice, three times or even four times if you have to. >Just make sure you know what they're asking. Can't stress this enough. > >Pick out the key words. For example, if it asks you something like "Host A >sends a packet to Host B on an Ethernet segment, what is the RIF?" The key >word is Ethernet, there is no such thing as RIFs in Ethernet!! > >The test has 100 questions with 120 minutes. I would say don't spend more >than 1 minute per question. If you get stuck, mark the question and go back >later at the end. > >Just before anybody asks, here are the resources I used to study: > >- Caslow's book (I read it 3 times over and over again. Although a bit >overkill for the written test, I think it builds a solid foundation for the >lab) > >- Lou Rossi's Token Ring paper. (Go through it until you are 100% confident >you know what you're doing) Make sure you go through the exercises. > >- CCO - not extensively, but just to clarify some topics. > >- CCIE Studyguide from Cramsession. Very good to refresh all the >topics once you've covered them. I'd not use it as the primary study >resource though. > >Good luck to all. > >Blanco Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30037&t=29885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 2926T Problem More info [7:30034]
The buzzing noise was one of the power supplies, I switched to the second RPS and the sound is much less, but I can still hear a slight buzzing noise during acitivity. Both uplink ports work when connected to a device. I can transmit data between computers. On the console I get the message referenced about every 3 seconds output to the console. 2001 Dec 24 12:48:04 %PAGP-3-CONFPORTCHNLFAIL:Failure = -1 in configPortChannel for mNo/pNo = 1/2 -Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30036&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ICMP Error [7:30030]
RFC 1256 looks interesting. >>> SNIP This document specifies an extension of the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) to enable hosts attached to multicast or broadcast networks to discover the IP addresses of their neighboring routers. >>> END SNIP --- Cisco Breaker wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server > which is working with > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. > Server IP is > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server > starts to work all clients > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to > broadcast" > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on > cisco but didnt find > anything. Can it be because of "no ip > directed-broadcast" command on the > interface. > > Any help will be appreciated? > > Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30035&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 2926T Problem [7:30034]
I'm testing out a 2926T I recently bought for my lab at my house. The 24 10/100 ports seem ok. I have tried plugging devices into the 2 100Mbps uplink ports, but I get a continuous repeating error about every 2-3 seconds. 2001 Dec 24 12:01:23 %PAGP-3-CONFPORTCHNLFAIL:Failure = -1 in configPortChannel for mNo/pNo = 1/1 when I plug in the other port, it says port 1/2 I have tried another generic switch and a PC. I have "set clear all" to erase the NVRAM of the switch to get it back to factory config. This is the first 5000 platform switch I have purchased and logged into, maybe I am confused about the use of the uplink ports. Are they *only* uplinks to another cisco ISL switch? I have searched Cisco.com, and most search engines. It is documented at Cisco, and they recommend that you contact your "Technical Support Rep" about this problem. Another behavior I noticed, When I transmit data over the switch (computer to computer), there is a slight buzzing noise. It immediately stops when I abort a file transfer. Is this normal? Thank you for any help. -Jason Barbee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30034&t=30034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ICMP Error [7:30030]
Have you got a sniffer to trace the error ? It would be interesting to see the packet in question since ICMP has 20 ish different error codes. The ICMP error should not be broadcast either, it should be unicast back to the originator of the erroring device. Off the top of my head I cannot think of a purpose for b/cast ICMP. I'll have a dig around in the RFC to confirm. Phil. --- Cisco Breaker wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server > which is working with > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. > Server IP is > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server > starts to work all clients > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to > broadcast" > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on > cisco but didnt find > anything. Can it be because of "no ip > directed-broadcast" command on the > interface. > > Any help will be appreciated? > > Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30033&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DSL [7:30032]
I'm forwarding to the list so others can benefit. >Hi Howard, >Thank you for your good advice. > >I'm getting the DSL line from SOURCEONE-and Iam not sure whom they >are contracting from. Any idea about this company? who is the best >for the DSL business? No idea. Maybe someone else does. > >What type of Netgear router are you currently using and does this >support well if you connect them 10-15 stations same time? I'm not >sure if you tried connecting using more than one computer to the DSL >line. How is throughput when connected to as many as 10 computers? >Thanks again for your time. > >Farhn Haven't tried that many. > > > > > > > >** >First, be careful in all residential broadband, even before you get >to the equipment. I went through a long and painful experience with >"business grade" DSL, which often was down for a week at a time. My >chief problem was that there were far too many players involved, all >delaying and fingerpointing. I directly contracted with a >DSL-supportive ISP (then CAIS, renamed Ardent, and then renamed >something I forget). They contracted with Covad, who ran the actual >DSL layer 1 network over facilities leased from Verizon. Even when I >had an obvious local loop problem, the reporting had to go from CAIS >to Covad to Verizon, which could take 24-48 hours at each stage, >after which CAIS and Verizon might wait 3-5 days to dispatch >technicians independently. If there was a question of Verizon being >at fault, then it was necessary to wait a few more days to schedule >both Verizon and Covad technicians to be at my site at the same time. >Just to add to the fun, the first-line ISP often had 20-30 minute >waits for trouble calls. > >One interesting sidebar about "business grade" DSL is Verizon has a >4-hour response commitment for T1, fractional T1, and Frame Relay >loops, but only 24 hour for DSL. This 24 hour often seemed to be >interpreted as 24 business hours. > >In frustration, I finally gave up on DSL both for technical reasons >and the awareness that both Covad and CAIS were in financial trouble. > >I then went to cable access with Comcast, which contracted with @home >for the actual IP connectivity. I have nothing but good things to say >about their tech support, although I am now experiencing SEVERE >congestion at peak times. Comcast did not offer a business grade >service. Of course, @home is now in apparently terminal financial >problems, so Comcast is looking elsewhere for connectivity. I'll give >Comcast credit for making a major effort to keep their customers >operational, in contrast to AT&T. Still, I'm having substantial >problems. > >At this point, as a home-based worker who MUST have connectivity, I'm >leaning to getting fractional T1 with dial backup. > >Anyway, to return to your original question, I had a /29 subnet from >the DSL provider, and an Efficient Networks (Cabletron spinoff) >router with integral DSL modem supplied by the carrier. It had to be >swapped out twice in a year. > >Now, I have a Netgear router/firewall connected to the cable modem, >and it's worked out well so far. I selected that simply because I >knew it was compatible with a particular IPsec client I needed to use. > >My next router will probably be a Cisco 2600 class, depending on my >VoIP and crypto requirements. > > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30032&t=30032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please Help me. [7:30031]
Hi We want to configure cisco3660 for VOIP termination(Just Termination) We have 6 VIC-2FXO (12 Line PSTN) . our router has 2 LAN port that one of them is connected to Internet and one another is shutdown. A company would like to send their traffic for termination. Please help me to configure this router for termination and tell me how can I configure it. (Which commands are necessary for termination) Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30031&t=30031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICMP Error [7:30030]
Hi All, I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server which is working with broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. Server IP is 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server starts to work all clients and NIS server is receiving a message at below, " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to broadcast" What is the meaning of this message, I searched on cisco but didnt find anything. Can it be because of "no ip directed-broadcast" command on the interface. Any help will be appreciated? Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30030&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About ACS 2.3.5 for UNIX [7:30002]
Why not use ACS 3.0 ? It is released! ""fmxiao"" Hi all in group > > anyone can answer the question below. > >does Cisco ACS 2.3.5 (for UNIX) can install and run under solaris 8 ? > > thx in advance. > > Roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30029&t=30002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best Labs for CCIE studies [7:30025]
check out www.fatkid.com. the free labs there are very good. Very few are multi-protocol, but some fo them have similar topologies that you could combine. -e- - Original Message - From: "Shawn" To: Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Best Labs for CCIE studies [7:30025] > Ho Ho Ho, > > I was wondering what are the best labs out there for CCIE study. I'm > scheduled > to take my lab pretty soon, and I wanted to tune up with some terrific labs. > I'm a former INS'er so I've got about 10 pretty good labs here at home. > > Any info would be terrific, and I must tell you that I'm leaning towards Brad > and Marc's labs, just because the reviews are so good. > > Thanks > > Shawn _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30028&t=30025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skroo Boat Comp [7:30027]
Mommy is so proud of you, the way you stand up to those mean people at Boat Comp. You certainly told off that horrible Mork Rossol. How dare he claim to help people, when my katykins is unable to benefit? You are still my brave little soldier. I am reminded of that time when you were in kindergarten. You had just turned 9, and the other children were picking on you. So you threw sand in their faces and squished their candy into the dirt. You certainly stood tall that day, and you are standing even taller today, lifters notwithstanding. Remember, Mommy will always love you, even though you can't hold down a job. You are still Mommy's favorite little lambkins. By the way, when are you coming over again with your laundry? Mommy has a new treatment, one that is sure to remove those horrible yellow and brown stains. I must confess, though, I remain uncertain how you will correctly dress without those stains to guide you. Keep up the good fight, my Little Man. Keep reminding all those so called professionals at groupstudy and boat comp that you are a mighty mite, and you won't tolerate them. You don't need them. You have a good job now with Roto Rooter. Which puzzles me. Do people really pay you to give you your enemas? Love, Mommy __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30027&t=30027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multihoming load balancing BGP [7:30011]
If I may suggestPlease pay particularly close attention to how you address the devices that you intend to advertise. I often have customers who purchase 2 T1s and want to acquire equal loads on both. The mistake is when they advertise a www server that takes all of the traffic. Based on source/destination cache, all traffic for that server comes across one link. As Howard suggested, please take the time to draw this out. If you truly want load sharing, redundancy, telco diversity, ISP/NSP diversity and ISP/NSP POP diversity. It really is not as simple as buying multiple WAN circuits. You can get as granular as making a request to get the telco DLRs in an attempt to reduce possible single points of failure. Chris -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multihoming load balancing BGP [7:30011] >Any ideas to load balance when multihoming ? > >Best Regards, >Mohamed Saro > > The first thing is defining exactly what you mean by load balancing and multihoming, the expected return, and the investment you are willing to make. These are complex topics: see http://www.ietf.org/draft-ietf-berkowitz-multireq-02.txt Some things you will need to know, assuming you are talking about Internet connectivity, is how many external destinations will you have? How many routable prefixes will you advertise? Do you need to load share based on address or on traffic type? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30026&t=30011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Labs for CCIE studies [7:30025]
Ho Ho Ho, I was wondering what are the best labs out there for CCIE study. I'm scheduled to take my lab pretty soon, and I wanted to tune up with some terrific labs. I'm a former INS'er so I've got about 10 pretty good labs here at home. Any info would be terrific, and I must tell you that I'm leaning towards Brad and Marc's labs, just because the reviews are so good. Thanks Shawn Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30025&t=30025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's the news address of deja? [7:30009]
groups.google.com ""chenyan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > asd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30024&t=30009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149]
What is this new certification you have... the CCIE(Write)? Does that mean you write code for the IOS? ""Sureshhomepage .com"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > thanks for the excellant notes! > > cheers! > suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) > http://www.sureshhomepage.com > > > >From: "John Neiberger" > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149] > >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:40:08 -0500 > > > >Someone just asked me off-list how to summarize a certain range of > >addresses and I thought it might be helpful to post my reply to the > >list. It seems like everybody has their own shortcut to doing this, but > >this is how I learned how to do it. Once you learn it there are plenty > >of shortcuts. > > > > > > > >As far as summarization goes, to really understand what you're doing > >you need to think in binary. Write out those addresses in binary > >first: > > > >1010.0001.0001.= 10.1.1.0/24 > >1010.0001.0011.= 10.1.3.0/24 > >1010.0001.1110.0100=10.1.14.64/26 > > > >You can see that in binary they are all the same up to the 20th bit. > >If you slice the above table into two pieces at the 20th bit, on the > >left side you are left with: > > > >1010.0001. > > > >This, translated back to decimal, is 10.1.0.0/20, which is your > >summarized address. However, this is an awful example. Those would be > >really bad addresses to try to summarize. A better example would be > >this: > > > >10.1.0.0/24 > >10.1.1.0/24 > >10.1.2.0/24 > >10.1.3.0/24 > > > >1010.0001.. > >1010.0001.0001. > >1010.0001.0010. > >1010.0001.0011. > > > >You can see that these are the same up to the 22nd bit. Slice the > >diagram into to pieces at the 22nd bit and on the left side you are left > >with: > > > >1010.0001.00 > > > >which translates back to decimal as 10.1.0.0/22. Now you can see that > >a /22 precisely summarizes four /24s !! Cool, huh? > > > > > > > >Regards, > >John > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30023&t=29149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Book Review [7:28991]
Elijah, I used the 1st edition book and found good with very little amt of errors. The only problem with the book is that it lacked extensive multi protocol labs, which I heard got added in the new 2nd ed. It is no doubt a comprehensive book though I do not suggest this as the best for the CCIE lab goers but a bible for the CCNP aspirants. CCIE lab goers really need a tasty, delicious and immense one to read! cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "Elijah Savage" >Reply-To: "Elijah Savage" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCIE Lab Book Review [7:28991] >Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:02:22 -0500 > >Does anyone have any comments on this book not many reviews on Amazon. A >guy at work said this thing was so full of mistakes that he got so angry >and took it out to the gun range and filled it full of 44magnum holes >and has it displayed on his desk now, I just can't take his word for it >and the few reviews on Amazon were good reviews. > >Cisco CCIE >All In One Lab Lab Study Guide >ISBN 0-07-212760-0 >By Stephen Hutnik & Micheal Satterlee _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30012&t=28991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Afterthoughts - CCIE written [7:29885]
Well done Ram! The token ring white paper is available at www.ccprep.com cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30018&t=29885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP EXAMS [7:29466]
I prefer the most bscn-->bcmsn-->bcran-->cit cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "Ntia Yinka" >Reply-To: "Ntia Yinka" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCNP EXAMS [7:29466] >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:33:31 -0500 > >Which is more rigorous: taking the CCNP 509 Exam or taking the 503,504 and >505 Exams separately? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30020&t=29466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the best way to study for CCNP Routing [7:29918]
Suranjith, Get hold of the book BSCN by Catherine Paquest and Diane Teare from Cisco press. It is the bible for the routing exam, to start with. I stronhgly recommend it. cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "Suranjith Ariyapperuma" >Reply-To: "Suranjith Ariyapperuma" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: What is the best way to study for CCNP Routing [7:29918] >Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:11:05 -0500 > >Dear Friends, >I am in the process of studying for CCNP Routing exam, What would be the >best way to study for this exam ? (ie Books,labs) >Suranjith > _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30019&t=29918 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic: Flash RAMs needed [7:30017]
Hi, I am looking for couple of 8Mb used flash memory sticks for my 2501 routers at home. If anyone have them for sale, please writeme back with the chipset number. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30017&t=30017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RRs and Confeds as they relate to IE studies [7:29968]
I've read Doyle Vol II. Now I'm reading Caslow. I've flipped through Halabi's book. He actually has a statement regarding RR vs. Confed. According to Halabi, "Cisco recommends RRs to solve the full-mesh IBGP issue." It would seem that RRs are easier to implement if you take into account that only the RRs need to have their configuration altered. The Clients of the RRs take the neighbor statement as nothing more than an IBGP peer. One of the responders recommended Parkhurst's book. Yes I have it. But haven't gotten to it yet. Since it's all config examples I am saving it for a wrap up of my BGP studies. Could we make a list of pros/cons to each? Or what solution each implementation offers? RR = possibly less config, only RR is altered (in the neighbor statement) RR = continues to offer loop prevention with use of Cluster_List and Cluster_ID RR = solves the need to have full-mesh IBGP RR = Question, are RR solutions easy to troubleshoot/maintain? Confeds = offers chance to create a backbone of backbones Confeds = use of Private ASs Confeds = allows implementation of an IGP between confeds for further policy implementation Confeds = adds complexity when considering route announcements and behavior of EBGP as an IBGP Confeds = Question, are Confed solutions easy to troubleshoot/maintain? Any other thoughts? Chris -Original Message- From: Gregg Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RRs and Confeds as they relate to IE studies [7:29968] Good question. I don't claim to be an expert on BGP and will not comment on the advantages and disadvantages of RR/Confeds in large/small environments. I've only config'ed BGP once in a prod net. Seems to me tho that there is an important distinction between the two as they might pertain to the lab test. Both allow the use of weight and local preference (IBGP). Confeds allow the use of MED since the connections between the confeds is EBGP. You could also config multiple RR's (clusters) to allow the use of the MED between the clusters but to me, confeds are easier. I'm sure that there are other reasons to use one or the other as they relate to the lab, but I haven't run into it yet. Maybe I'm wrong, but this is my take on RR's/confeds. Would love to hear comments to enlighten me. ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm currently tearing apart BGP as part of my IE studies. It's not too bad > since I come from a Network Service Provider background. But, I have run > into a conflict in regards to RRs vs. Confeds. I probably don't need to > straighten this out for the Written but when it comes to the lab I'd like to > know which route to go down. I have no idea how the lab poses it's topology > but if given the requirement to configure a simulated "large" network and > then having to choose whether to implement RRs or Confeds I wonder which one > Cisco prefers. I'm assuming that as part of the lab, the idea is to create > solutions that work and in doing so, solutions that are as simple as > possible and as short as possible. > > I'd like to hear comments about the pros and cons of each option in regards > to how Cisco might prefer to see implementation. Meanwhile, I'm going to > review all available case studies on CCO. > > Thanks, > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30022&t=29968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's the news address of deja? [7:30009]
cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "chenyan" >Reply-To: "chenyan" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: what's the news address of deja? [7:30009] >Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 04:15:39 -0500 > >asd _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30016&t=30009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149]
thanks for the excellant notes! cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "John Neiberger" >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: How to Summarize Network Addresses [7:29149] >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:40:08 -0500 > >Someone just asked me off-list how to summarize a certain range of >addresses and I thought it might be helpful to post my reply to the >list. It seems like everybody has their own shortcut to doing this, but >this is how I learned how to do it. Once you learn it there are plenty >of shortcuts. > > > >As far as summarization goes, to really understand what you're doing >you need to think in binary. Write out those addresses in binary >first: > >1010.0001.0001.= 10.1.1.0/24 >1010.0001.0011.= 10.1.3.0/24 >1010.0001.1110.0100=10.1.14.64/26 > >You can see that in binary they are all the same up to the 20th bit. >If you slice the above table into two pieces at the 20th bit, on the >left side you are left with: > >1010.0001. > >This, translated back to decimal, is 10.1.0.0/20, which is your >summarized address. However, this is an awful example. Those would be >really bad addresses to try to summarize. A better example would be >this: > >10.1.0.0/24 >10.1.1.0/24 >10.1.2.0/24 >10.1.3.0/24 > >1010.0001.. >1010.0001.0001. >1010.0001.0010. >1010.0001.0011. > >You can see that these are the same up to the 22nd bit. Slice the >diagram into to pieces at the 22nd bit and on the left side you are left >with: > >1010.0001.00 > >which translates back to decimal as 10.1.0.0/22. Now you can see that >a /22 precisely summarizes four /24s !! Cool, huh? > > > >Regards, >John _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30013&t=29149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966]
ospf allows you to go for small segmentations called area. The routing updates can be summarized and filtered area-specific. though Eigrp supports summrization whereever you want, ospf has beeen adopted most worldwide. EIGRP is cisco propriety. cheers! suresh CNE,MCSE+I,CLS,SCSA,CCNA,CCNP,MCNS,CCIE(Write) http://www.sureshhomepage.com >From: "Angel Leiva" >Reply-To: "Angel Leiva" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966] >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:03:14 -0500 > >Rob, > >If your network environment is IP based, and if MPLS support is on your >backbone's growth path, you'll be better off using OSPF now. > >On top of that, OSPF offers faster convergence time, and is Industry >Standards compliant (allowing your company to use non-cisco gear as well, >i.e. Juniper/Foundry/others, unless your company wants to remain a cisco >"shop"). > >So, from a routing protocol stand point, you shouldn't have >interoperability >issues using OSPF. > >My 2 cents, hth, > >Angel > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Mears, Rob >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:54 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966] > > >Hi all, > >We are in the middle of building out a new ATM network for the Core and on >the outside we are going to be running about 80 3640 or 2600. We are in a >big debate about the routing protocol, we are currently EIGRP. > >I have collected lots of info off Cisco's Web site about the two but wanted >to hear it from the Engineers in the trenches. >What's your take on it? If it were you what would you run (EIGRP, OSPF) and >why? > > > >Thanks >Rob _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30014&t=28966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multihoming load balancing BGP [7:30011]
>Any ideas to load balance when multihoming ? > >Best Regards, >Mohamed Saro > > The first thing is defining exactly what you mean by load balancing and multihoming, the expected return, and the investment you are willing to make. These are complex topics: see http://www.ietf.org/draft-ietf-berkowitz-multireq-02.txt Some things you will need to know, assuming you are talking about Internet connectivity, is how many external destinations will you have? How many routable prefixes will you advertise? Do you need to load share based on address or on traffic type? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30021&t=30011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multihoming load balancing BGP [7:30011]
Any ideas to load balance when multihoming ? Best Regards, Mohamed Saro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30011&t=30011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
