RE: Pix 520 [7:37836]
U might need more Flash size -Original Message- From: ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:""[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:15 AM To: Subject: Pix 520 [7:37836] I currently am trying to upgrade a pix 520 from pix ios 4.7(7) to 6.2 and am having some difficulty or errors more like. When upgrading the pix I am using the 6.1 boothelper on the floppy to upgrade the pix. It gives me an error telling me that the pix's flash is obsolete. It then reboots the pix. I have never seen this before and have worked with plenty of pix's before. The pix runs fine with version 4.7 and has 8mb of flash for upgrade. Anybody have any ideas of what I can do to trick it possibly or a work around. Thanks, Jason Pehrson Systems Administrator Information Systems Department Naval Support Activity Naples, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (39) 081-568-4316 Cell: (39) 347-381-1060 Fax:(39) 081-568-5689 > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Pehrson, Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63).vcf] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37839&t=37836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix 520 [7:37836]
Jason- I might be wrong, but I think the 6.x PIX software requires the 16MB Flashcard. You might check CCO to confirm. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix 520 [7:37836] I currently am trying to upgrade a pix 520 from pix ios 4.7(7) to 6.2 and am having some difficulty or errors more like. When upgrading the pix I am using the 6.1 boothelper on the floppy to upgrade the pix. It gives me an error telling me that the pix's flash is obsolete. It then reboots the pix. I have never seen this before and have worked with plenty of pix's before. The pix runs fine with version 4.7 and has 8mb of flash for upgrade. Anybody have any ideas of what I can do to trick it possibly or a work around. Thanks, Jason Pehrson Systems Administrator Information Systems Department Naval Support Activity Naples, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (39) 081-568-4316 Cell: (39) 347-381-1060 Fax:(39) 081-568-5689 > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Pehrson, Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63).vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37838&t=37836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pix 520 [7:37836]
I currently am trying to upgrade a pix 520 from pix ios 4.7(7) to 6.2 and am having some difficulty or errors more like. When upgrading the pix I am using the 6.1 boothelper on the floppy to upgrade the pix. It gives me an error telling me that the pix's flash is obsolete. It then reboots the pix. I have never seen this before and have worked with plenty of pix's before. The pix runs fine with version 4.7 and has 8mb of flash for upgrade. Anybody have any ideas of what I can do to trick it possibly or a work around. Thanks, Jason Pehrson Systems Administrator Information Systems Department Naval Support Activity Naples, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (39) 081-568-4316 Cell: (39) 347-381-1060 Fax:(39) 081-568-5689 > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Pehrson, Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63).vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37836&t=37836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Q on FR spoke configuration. [7:36293]
Hello Rajesh, The "Frame-relay interface dlci" statement shouldn't be needed for (a) - Physical interface, since the command is used to associate a DLCI to a point-to-point / multipoint "sub-interface" ONLY. Best Regards, Hunt ""Rajesh Kumar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Can somebody clarify me the following : > > 1. In a Hub-Spoke configuration of FR network, what is the appropriate > configuration on the spoke side when it is a > > (a) Physical Interface : FR map statements / > Interface-dlci > > (b) Point-Point interface :I am pretty sure it is > Interface-dlci config. > > (c)Multipoint interface :FR map / Interface-dlci > ( I know it doesn't mean much by making a spoke to be a > multipoint > interface, but lets keep for argument sake..) > > > Thanks, > Rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37837&t=36293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: point-to-point subinterface [7:37831]
Hi, Is there already a s0.1 interface defined? Try creating a s0.2 or something that doesn't exist. Once you create a sub-interface you can't change it from multipoint to point-to-point and vice versa. Also, if you remove sub interfaces they aren't completely removed from memory until the router is reloaded/reset. Perhaps, you deleted the s0.1 interface and are running into this. HTH, Erick --- Richard Yun wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to create a point-to-point subinterface > under s0 inteface and I'm > getting the following warning message: > > interface Serial0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > no fair-queue > clockrate 200 > r1(config)#int s0.1 point > % Warning: cannot change link type > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37835&t=37831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: point-to-point subinterface [7:37831]
At some point since the last time you rebooted this router, you must have configured the same subinterface as multipoint. Either choose a different subinterface number or remove the subinterface and reboot the router. That will allow you to use the same number with a different link type. HTH, John On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Richard Yun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to create a point-to-point subinterface under s0 inteface and > I'm > getting the following warning message: > > interface Serial0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > no fair-queue > clockrate 200 > r1(config)#int s0.1 point > % Warning: cannot change link type > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37834&t=37831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818]
I personally used BCMSN and Cisco LAN Switching, the latter is a really really really really good book! ""Shivjit Patil"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi..I have just finished my BSCN examinations. I used the Cisco BSCN book > for the examination. I found that book real good cause it was very > comprehensive and had a lot of lab execises. > > Now I want to study for the BCMSN examination and I have to purchase a book > for it. I have two options i.e either buy the individual BCMSN book or the > CCNP Preparation Library. > > I prefer books that are complelty exhaustive and give you full knowledge on > the subject. I was wondering if the CCNP Preparation Library is as > exhaustive as the individual CCNP examination books. > > Could anyone please advice me as to what I should go ahead and buy. > > Thank you > Shivjit Patil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37833&t=37818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Made CCNP! [7:37720]
yes and yes. (off the top of my head). ""colin newman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > > Are you referring to the BSCN book by Paquest and Teare? Is the Routing > book Vol 1 by Doyle? > > Thanks > > Colin > > Kenneth wrote: > > > > use the BSCN and Routing TCP/IP, it's really good. > > > > ""colin newman"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Congrats > > > > > > What book(s) did you use for the Routing exam? > > > > > > Colinscott wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks to everyone! Now onward to the holy grail > > > > > > > > Scott Chapin, CCNA, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37832&t=37720 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
point-to-point subinterface [7:37831]
Hello, I'm trying to create a point-to-point subinterface under s0 inteface and I'm getting the following warning message: interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 200 r1(config)#int s0.1 point % Warning: cannot change link type FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
Thanks Mike , please do not miss understand me by saying openion , I will upgrade the IOS and I will give you feed back , thanks again. :) -Original Message- From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 10:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] Well it's not really an opinion, it's a fact. We could readily reproduce the problem. Cisco confirmed that there was a problem and told us to upgrade, after we did the issue went away. - Original Message - From: "Ismail Al-Shelh" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 7:25 AM Subject: RE: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > Hello Mike I appreciate your openion .. I need more people to give me more > comments, this is would be great to know the options > > Ismail Al-shelh, > Thanks Alot > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 6:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > > > There were some bugs with 12.0(5) with regards to hyperterm, causing the > switch to reboot was one of them. Try upgrading. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ismail Al-Shelh" > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:12 AM > Subject: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > > > > Hello all > > I have two Cat 2950-24 switches , when I connect to the first switch > > through hyper terminal , something strange happening to me , that strange > > thing is when I try to type any letter on the keyboard it gives me another > > letter or symbols I do not know why this is happening the only thing > I > > can see is when one of the fastethernet port state is up or down but its > > not allowing me to write proper letters , I tried to plug the cable out > and > > plug it again it gives me the following > > > > C2950 Boot Loader (CALHOUN-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), MAINTENANCE > > INTERIM > > SOFTWARE > > Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal > > WS-C2950-24 starting... > > Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:ec:02:67:00 > > Xmodem file system is available. > > Initializing Flash... > > flashfs[0]: 161 files, 2 directories > > flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories > > flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 7741440 > > flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2960896 > > flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 4780544 > > flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. > > ...done initializing flash. > > Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3 > > Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4 > > Loading > > "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin"...## > > > > > > > # > > > > File "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin" uncompressed and installed, > > entry p > > oint: 0x8001 > > executing... > > > > Restricted Rights Legend > > > > Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is > > subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph > > (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted > > Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph > > (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer > > Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. > > > >cisco Systems, Inc. > >170 West Tasman Drive > >San Jose, California 95134-1706 > > > > > > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), > MAINTENANCE > > INT > > ERIM SOFTWARE > > Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. > > Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal > > Image text-base: 0x8001, data-base: 0x8031A000 > > > > > > Initializing flashfs... > > flashfs[1]: 161 files, 2 directories > > flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories > > flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 7741440 > > flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2960896 > > flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 4780544 > > flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. > > flashfs[1]: Initialization complete. > > Done initializing flashfs. > > C2950 POST: System Board Test : Passed > > C2950 POST: Ethernet Controller Test : Passed > > C2950 POST: MII TEST : Passed > > > > cisco WS-C2950-24 (RC32300) processor (revision B0) with 22260K bytes of > > memory. > > > > Processor board ID FAB0544P2EE > > Last reset from system-reset > > > > Processor is running Enterprise Edition Software > > Cluster command switch capable > > Cluster member switch capable > > 24 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > > > > 32K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory. > > Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:EC:02:67:00 > > Motherboard assembly number: 73-5781-08 > > Motherboard serial number: FAB0544789W > > Model revision number: B0 > > Model number: WS-C2950-24 > > System serial number: FAB0544P2EE > > C2950 INIT: Complete > > > > 00:00:17: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >
RE: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773]
I seem to remember someone posted that a 3640 power supply would do fine for a 4000. NealR from Omaha are you out there? > -Original Message- > From: Zahid Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773] > > > Hi All, > > I would appreciate if somebody would provide any information where > I would be able to buy cheap power supply replacement for my > Cisco 4000-M ? > I have been searching in Ebay but haven't had any luck up to now. > > Many thanks. > > Zahid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37828&t=37773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773]
Zahid, there used to be a site in Australia that had instructions for using a PC power supply as a replacement. Perhaps you can find it with a little searching. Good Luck Rick On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Zahid Hassan wrote: :Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:46:59 -0500 :From: Zahid Hassan :To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Subject: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773] : :Hi All, : :I would appreciate if somebody would provide any information where :I would be able to buy cheap power supply replacement for my Cisco 4000-M ? :I have been searching in Ebay but haven't had any luck up to now. : :Many thanks. : :Zahid : : : : : -- --Rick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37814&t=37773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773]
They're out there, you've just missed them. http://search-completed.ebay.com/search/search.dll?query=cisco+4000+powe r&ht=1&combine=y&SortProperty=MetaEndSort Wait a week or two, I'm sure people will begin to list again. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Zahid Hassan Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Power Supply [7:37773] Hi All, I would appreciate if somebody would provide any information where I would be able to buy cheap power supply replacement for my Cisco 4000-M ? I have been searching in Ebay but haven't had any luck up to now. Many thanks. Zahid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37816&t=37773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: MPLS in the Enterprise [7:36670]
Interesting, let me also bring few things up here, not that I have much experience in MPLS/VPN but who does ? :-) I suppose one of the problems with this particular service is that not all SP's or Enterprises fully understand the potential, or technology in general. First, SP's might not be able to provide overall cheaper connectivity for the Ent's if their network doesn't span around the existing Ent's POP's. I suppose when considering the service, one needs to realize all the advantages of it and compare it to what they have now. As with any technology, there are many ways to implement it. One might be able to just start the service for interconnecting the HUB locations for example. Another advantage could be the Internet traffic which no more has to travel thru dedicated lines which are shared thru the whole Enterprise. Referring to John's original post, the CE equipment doesn't have to participate in the MPLS, so the MPLS looks like any other connection to the rest of your network. Now, it's a choice or not, depending on the service and possibly other customer requirements, whether CE participates in MPLS. In general, SP would take care of the routing between the sites, the routing would be totally independent of their other MPLS/VPN's or Internet routing which gives the Enterprise traffic protection in the form of invisibility to other SP customers or Internet users when required. It all depends, the best thing is to study the technology and the the details of offerings. I personally have no real time experience in this whole new area but I hope in theory I should be pretty close to what one needs to be aware of. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To make things even more interesting... > > While discussing this with a few different vendors I decided > that this particular solution is smoke-and-mirrors, at least in > our area. We'd have to buy new point-to-point circuits that > all point to a _single_ POP. > > MPLS isn't even needed in this case because every location > would be hitting the same POP! Unless, of course, they have a > whole bunch of routers at the POP but then we're really using > MPLS to get from one side of the room to the other. > > We'd be better off simply buying a couple of frame DS3 circuits > for our hub and repointing all the branch PVCs to those > circuits. Cheaper and we accomplish the same thing without > using another vendor and without buying a whole bunch of new > circuits. > > In fact, one vendor that I asked about this proposed this very > solution, except he was suggesting we use their facilities. > They offered to set up a couple of routers exclusively for our > company to connect to. Again, we don't really accomplish much > with that solution since we can do that at our own facility if > we want to. > > John > > > > On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Kent Yu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > John, > > > > I think you brought an interesting topic. > > > > With all these pitches about Layer 3 VPN, the question has > been > > bothering me > > for a while, how many enterprises out there really need to > have an > > any-to-any solution? Less than 0.5% is my guess. Most of the > enterprise > > client/server applications fit into the hub-spoke topology > pretty well, > > really have no reasons to get direct connections among their > branches. > > > > > > > > Theoretically, MPLS should give the service providers the > ability to > > provide > > more scalable and cheaper fully meshed VPN solution, as the > SPs do not > > have > > to manage those hundreds of thousands PVCs, ect. From the > enterprises' > > perspective, if this gives them a reliable and affordable > alternative to > > the > > traditional hub-spoke frame relay network, it sounds > attractive, but > > seems > > to me all the current implementations are even more > expensive, not to > > mention their reliability probably is no where near the > legacy frame > > network, at least not for a while. > > > > > > > > The vendors want to sell their MPLS VPN solutions to SPs, the > SPs who > > built > > the network want to sell it enterprises , but my guess is > that 99% > > enterprises will not buy it, not till... > > > > > > > > My .02 > > > > Kent > > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Okay, I'm about to show how clueless I am when it comes to > MPLS > > > > > > I've been getting calls from multiple providers lately all > trying to > > > suggest that I migrate our 100-site frame relay network to > their MPLS > > > network, suggesting that we'll have any-to-any connectivity > and the > > > ability to prioritize traffic classes within the MPLS > network. > > > > > > Are any of you doing something like this? I'm going to > read up on it > > > but I'm having trouble visualizing it. Does this basically > turn our > > > network into a giant multipoint network? Do our branch > routers need > > to > > > be aware
Re: books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818]
Actually, if you go the route of CCNP Exam Certification Guide series, the Switching and Remote Access ones have labs to follow along, that is, if you have a Cat5000 and ISDN BRI and PRI for your home lab. BTW - except for the official BSCN book, the other courses are better explained in the Exam Guides than the official course/curriculum, in particular Remote Access. Good Luck. Elmer - Original Message - From: "s vermill" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 6:36 PM Subject: RE: books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818] > The libraries contain the exact books that you would buy individually (BSCN > BCMSN BCRAN & CIT). It is just a marketing thing - one that will save you > lots of money. > > However, BSCN is the only one of any of the CCNP course books that has labs > to follow. Too bad. > > Shivjit Patil wrote: > > > > Hi..I have just finished my BSCN examinations. I used the Cisco > > BSCN book for the examination. I found that book real good > > cause it was very comprehensive and had a lot of lab execises. > > > > Now I want to study for the BCMSN examination and I have to > > purchase a book for it. I have two options i.e either buy the > > individual BCMSN book or the CCNP Preparation Library. > > > > I prefer books that are complelty exhaustive and give you full > > knowledge on the subject. I was wondering if the CCNP > > Preparation Library is as exhaustive as the individual CCNP > > examination books. > > > > Could anyone please advice me as to what I should go ahead and > > buy. > > > > Thank you > > Shivjit Patil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37827&t=37818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting [7:37826]
IN this newsgroup if you type a special sign , the news will be break by the newsgroup ... > this sign is OK but if you use the arrow pointing to the left sign, the news will be stoped. so in my previous news, 2 of them are chopped off by the news server. ^_^ " Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37826&t=37826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Understaning Custom Queue - dual link (PPP _Frame relay) [7:37825]
may be you can use the following mathod instead of CQ. Cause CQ is custom queue, maybe it will lead to a delay in the VOIP if the queue-size is not optimized well. So, may be you can use NBAR to adjust the bandwidth consumption between the Voice IP traffic and normal IP traffic first you define the Access-list for your IP traffic eg. in your first site, a network 192.168.100.X / 24 second site , a network 192.168.101.X/24 access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 then create a Class MAP for the IP traffic class-map IPTraffic match access-group 101 then, create a POLICY Class for the IP traffic and define the bandwidth you would like to used for the IP traffic policy-map IPTraffic class IPTraffic bandwidth 1 (if you like to only give 10Kb for the IP Traffic) The final Thing is to set the IP POlicy map on your Interface eg. on the serial or ethernet connection int Serial 1or int Fa0/1 service-policy output IPTraffic (becareful of the traffic direction passing through the interface, and each interface can only be apply one input and one output traffic policy class only) Last thing is to verify whther the above config is work or not. show class-map IPTraffic show policy-map IPTraffic show int Hope this can soothe your in-sufficient bandwidth problem. wuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwu wuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwuwu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37825&t=37825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Understaning Custom Queue - dual link (PPP / Frame relay) [7:37824]
may be you can use the following mathod instead of CQ. Cause CQ is custom queue, maybe it will lead to a delay in the VOIP if the queue-size is not optimized well. So, may be you can use NBAR to adjust the bandwidth consumption between the Voice IP traffic and normal IP traffic first you define the Access-list for your IP traffic eg. in your first site, a network 192.168.100.X / 24 second site , a network 192.168.101.X/24 access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 then create a Class MAP for the IP traffic class-map IPTraffic match access-group 101 then, create a POLICY Class for the IP traffic and define the bandwidth you would like to used for the IP traffic policy-map IPTraffic class IPTraffic bandwidth 1 Hi there, > > I have a setup where I think I 'd need to use CQ but the documents that > I found at cisco's site where not enough to understand / "master" the > subject. > >Here is my scenario : > >I have a cisco 1750 in my branch office and another one on a remote > site. Each cisco has two leased lines, one PPP and the other > Frame-relay, both operating with 64K. I use VoIP to make the phone > calls and I have database systems located at the remote site. > >I need to set up some sort of priority so I could optimize the > overall usage "reserving" bandwidth for more critical applications. > After searching I found that either policy routing or custom queue > should do the job (in one way or another), with CQ being the "correct" one. > >Can you help me out ? The examples that I found were too simple for > me to make any kind of decision. > > I am specially confused with the decision of setting a queue size. > > Best regards, >Mario Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37824&t=37824 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Understaning Custom Queue - dual link (PPP / Frame relay) [7:37823]
may be you can use the following mathod instead of CQ. Cause CQ is custom queue, maybe it will lead to a delay in the VOIP if the queue-size is not optimized well. So, may be you can use NBAR to adjust the bandwidth consumption between the Voice IP traffic and normal IP traffic first you define the Access-list for your IP traffic eg. in your first site, a network 192.168.100.X / 24 second site , a network 192.168.101.X/24 access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 then create a Class MAP for the IP traffic class-map IPTraffic match access-group 101 then, create a POLICY Class for the IP traffic and define the bandwidth you would like to used for the IP traffic policy-map IPTraffic class IPTraffic bandwidth 1 Hi there, > > I have a setup where I think I 'd need to use CQ but the documents that > I found at cisco's site where not enough to understand / "master" the > subject. > >Here is my scenario : > >I have a cisco 1750 in my branch office and another one on a remote > site. Each cisco has two leased lines, one PPP and the other > Frame-relay, both operating with 64K. I use VoIP to make the phone > calls and I have database systems located at the remote site. > >I need to set up some sort of priority so I could optimize the > overall usage "reserving" bandwidth for more critical applications. > After searching I found that either policy routing or custom queue > should do the job (in one way or another), with CQ being the "correct" one. > >Can you help me out ? The examples that I found were too simple for > me to make any kind of decision. > > I am specially confused with the decision of setting a queue size. > > Best regards, >Mario Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37823&t=37823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Networkers information [7:37822]
For those who are interested, presentations from Networkers 2002 (Brisbane) are at the following location - click on "Sessions/Levels" or "Presentations", then click on the session that interests you and there should be a link to download or view the presentation. If anyone spots a consolidated list, let me know :-) http://www.cisco.com.au/networkers/ JMcL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37822&t=37822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Understaning Custom Queue - dual link (PPP / Frame relay) setup [7:37821]
Hi there, I have a setup where I think I 'd need to use CQ but the documents that I found at cisco's site where not enough to understand / "master" the subject. Here is my scenario : I have a cisco 1750 in my branch office and another one on a remote site. Each cisco has two leased lines, one PPP and the other Frame-relay, both operating with 64K. I use VoIP to make the phone calls and I have database systems located at the remote site. I need to set up some sort of priority so I could optimize the overall usage "reserving" bandwidth for more critical applications. After searching I found that either policy routing or custom queue should do the job (in one way or another), with CQ being the "correct" one. Can you help me out ? The examples that I found were too simple for me to make any kind of decision. I am specially confused with the decision of setting a queue size. Best regards, Mario Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37821&t=37821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT concepts [7:37815]
Found this on CCO, I assume the prefix would be the same concept, a sanity
check. Link is at the bottom, HTH.
Q. Why do I need to specify a subnet mask when configuring a NAT address
pool?
A. The subnet mask is used to sanity-check the addresses allocated from the
pool (so we don't allocate the subnet broadcast address, for example). The
subnet mask must match the size of the subnet into which you are
translating.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/iofwft/prodlit/iosnt_qp.htm
~-Original Message-
~From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
~Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 5:49 PM
~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~Subject: NAT concepts [7:37815]
~
~
~Hi,
~
~I am trying to conceptually understand the NAT command:
~
~ip nat pool name start-ip end-ip {netmask netmask | prefix-length
~prefix-length}[type rotary]
~
~Why do you need to specify the netmask or prefix-length of the
~network? You
~are already specifying the IP range.
~
~The NAT function should not need to know the netmask of the
~network. The
~address range does not appear in the forwarding table so it
~does not seem to
~be used for routing.
~
~Paul Borghese
~
~
~
~
~Report misconduct
~and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37820&t=37815
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818]
The libraries contain the exact books that you would buy individually (BSCN BCMSN BCRAN & CIT). It is just a marketing thing - one that will save you lots of money. However, BSCN is the only one of any of the CCNP course books that has labs to follow. Too bad. Shivjit Patil wrote: > > Hi..I have just finished my BSCN examinations. I used the Cisco > BSCN book for the examination. I found that book real good > cause it was very comprehensive and had a lot of lab execises. > > Now I want to study for the BCMSN examination and I have to > purchase a book for it. I have two options i.e either buy the > individual BCMSN book or the CCNP Preparation Library. > > I prefer books that are complelty exhaustive and give you full > knowledge on the subject. I was wondering if the CCNP > Preparation Library is as exhaustive as the individual CCNP > examination books. > > Could anyone please advice me as to what I should go ahead and > buy. > > Thank you > Shivjit Patil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37819&t=37818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818]
Hi..I have just finished my BSCN examinations. I used the Cisco BSCN book for the examination. I found that book real good cause it was very comprehensive and had a lot of lab execises. Now I want to study for the BCMSN examination and I have to purchase a book for it. I have two options i.e either buy the individual BCMSN book or the CCNP Preparation Library. I prefer books that are complelty exhaustive and give you full knowledge on the subject. I was wondering if the CCNP Preparation Library is as exhaustive as the individual CCNP examination books. Could anyone please advice me as to what I should go ahead and buy. Thank you Shivjit Patil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37818&t=37818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: info on virus attack [7:37798]
Hi Paul, Sorry, I neglected to defend the group there, but you are of course correct. The virus was always direct to me, not through your server. It's never normally a problem, just clean or delete, I just messed up and used my work e-mail for a while some time ago, so I got nagged by our net admins during the spate of virus's. Sh*t happens when you're stupid :-) Gaz ""Paul Borghese"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What are you guys talking about? It is highly unlikely that a Virus will > go through the server as all messages are stripped of their attachments and > converted to plain-text before posting. Plus messages that look like they > could contain (or at one time did contain) viruses are filtered. > > What could happen is someone catches a virus and the virus scans the inbox. > Of course the Inbox is full of messages from this list. The virus then > proceeds to send itself to everyone who has posted to the list and thus has > a message in the client Inbox. Unfortunately GroupStudy can not stop it as > the virus is never propagated through the server. > > One way to prevent this is to use the web discussion board to participate > where a valid e-mail address is not required (in fact you have the option of > putting any e-mail address you desire as your public address). That way, > you can not be forwarded viruses - of course you also eliminate private > e-mail concerning your posting. > > Take care, > > Paul Borghese > > > > - Original Message - > From: "edna helem" > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:18 PM > Subject: Re: info on virus attack [7:37798] > > > > Gaz, > > > > You sent out an email re: virus being sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] I > am > > the wife of Abdi. Let me explain to you and others concerned. My husband > > and I ordered DSL with verizon about 12 days ago. We did not have a > > firewall or virus software installed. After about 3 days of servi our > > computer began to lock up and finally we had no service at all. I had > been > > troubleshooting with verizon tech support for about 5 days before they > could > > tell me that there was a virus on my computer. I immediately went out and > > purchased the McAfee firewall and virus protection software. The virus > > appears to have been removed. I still do not have DSL service. I am > using > > a dial-up connection. The name of the virus was the SirCam virus. I > found > > out that the email was being propagated outside of my computer through > your > > email to the cisco study group in which I am a member. I apologize for > any > > inconvenience, but we had no idea what has been going on. Verizon tech > > support had me contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] by email to try and resolve > this > > problem. They are not accessible by phone and their response to me by > email > > has been that they have received my email and due to so many cases it may > > take a few days to follow up with an investigation. It has been 4 days. > > Does anyone have any suggestions on who I can contact at verizon and their > > phone number? > > > > > > >From: "Gaz" > > >Reply-To: "Gaz" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] > > >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:31:39 -0500 > > > > > >Joel, > > > > > >Have a look at www.kg2.com > > >Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. > I've > > >noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for > around > > >20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - > > >whatever > > >length you want, and I believe the full crossover cables were around 25 > > >dollars. > > > > > >I must add I have no links with Kelly or the company and not enough > > >knowledge of them to recommend, but prices look decent and I know he's > been > > >around a while now. > > >I keep meaning to buy the same but never got round to it. > > > > > >Gaz > > > > > >""Joel Satterley"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT > > >crossover > > > > equivalent ? > > > > > > > > I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a > > >kilostream > > > > simulator. > > > > > > > > Any help would be gratefully rec'd. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37817&t=37798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT concepts [7:37815]
Hi,
I am trying to conceptually understand the NAT command:
ip nat pool name start-ip end-ip {netmask netmask | prefix-length
prefix-length}[type rotary]
Why do you need to specify the netmask or prefix-length of the network? You
are already specifying the IP range.
The NAT function should not need to know the netmask of the network. The
address range does not appear in the forwarding table so it does not seem to
be used for routing.
Paul Borghese
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37815&t=37815
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
moving on.. I switched to a different router - a 4500M. Now I'm able to do all tftp actions. I think my 2509 has the write protect jumper on. I can't remember ever upgrading the code on this router since it is my terminal server. But the Boson tftp server is still dead. The Cisco and SolarWinds servers work fine on a router that has read/write flash. So I guess I don't have an XP problem after all.. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Mark Odette II" To: Sent: Sunday, 10 March, 2002 14:01 Subject: RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > Just a quick reply: > > No Personal FW enabled; default installation of XP with Static/Pvt. IP with > /24 and default GW, of course. > > Netstat -a shows: > > UDP MachineName:tftp *.* ]-- So I know it's listening. > > As I said before, I've gotten connections every time, it just failes to > follow through on the process of sending the file upon request for one > reason or another; also, default file permission are on the folder that the > image resides in and I even re-downloaded the image to make sure it > wasn't corrupt. I further proved it not being corrupt by moving it to the > laptop running W2K with 100% success for every download attempt. > > Strange > > I'll let everyone know what I find when I get back to it. > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Gaz > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > Just to give you some hope, I'm using Pumpkin on my XP laptop. > I never have a single problem with it. > > I don't really know what to suggest, but feel free to e-mail me direct if > you would like to compare any specific setings you may suspect. > > Mine's been on that long that I don't really remember if I had to change > anything initially. > I know mines fairly open as far as security goes. > > Does a 'netstat -a' show tftp as listening, or is it not getting that far? > > > Gaz > > > > ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > well you got me curious. > > > > I "upgraded" to XP Pro a while back on my desktop but haven't tried tftp > on > > it yet. I usually do that from my notebook and it's still Win98. > > > > I have been using the TFTP server from Boson so I tried that first. > > > > Nope, failed with the error "Runtime error 13, type mismatch" on the boson > > end. > > > > Then I tried the Cisco tftp server. > > > > It worked just fine! Wrote config to tftp, wrote flash to tftp. > > > > I read the config back from the tftp and it worked. > > > > Tried copying the flash back and it failed!!! After a few auto retries > the > > router (2509) reloaded with a wiped config! - gotta love having a home > > lab > > > > but - was able to get the config back. > > > > Tried fiddling with permissions of the tftp directory and file with no > luck. > > Messed around some more and it seems I can get the config back and forth > but > > I can only save the IOS to the tftp server but not copy it back to the > > router. > > > > I haven't tried pumpkin. > > > > Guess I'm keeping my notebook at Win98 for awhile longer. > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mark Odette II" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, 09 March, 2002 18:29 > > Subject: RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > > > > > Jeff- As a matter of fact, YES! > > > > > > Dunno why, as I didn't have time to try figuring it out, but this was my > > > scenario. > > > > > > Klever Nothings PumpKIN TFTP Server installed on WinXP workstation, and > > > running with proper folder specified for images. > > > > > > Cisco 1750 Router configured to boot loading image from above mentioned > > TFTP > > > Server. > > > > > > When the router boots, it does it's normal process and sends its > broadcast > > > request for TFTP service, and PumpKIN responds. > > > > > > But, the problem was that it would always fail, stating that there was a > > > buffer overflow error from the PumpKIN side, and either an error reading > > the > > > file (invalid file) on the TFTP server, or a timeout error reading the > > file > > > from the Router side. > > > > > > This Router had its FastEthernet port plugged into a 1548 Switch that > also > > > had the XP workstation plugged into said switch. > > > > > > So, I put PumpKIN on a laptop with W2K Professional, jack into the > > Routers' > > > ethernet port with a cross-over cable, and try the TFTP boot again, and > it > > > works like a champ. > > > > > > Now mind you, I tried specifying a specific TFTP server address, and > using > > > broadcast, and neither worked for connecting to the TFTP server on the > XP > > > box. I did the same on the directly-connected W2K laptop, and it worked > > > either way. The only difference that I didn't investigate was plugging > in > > > the laptop to the 1548 Switch. > > > > > >
Re: AS/400 Cluster Controller 5394 [7:37759]
This might sound really strange, but, if you are using a normal D25way connector (v.24) see if it works when pin 13 isn't connected. I once had all sorts of problems with IBM controllers both 5394 / 5494 and 3174 / 3274, after hours of troubleshooting finally ran through a breakout box and found that some of the controllers didn't like pin 13. Don't know why, but as soon as I removed it they all worked fine. I wasn't able to nail it down to a particular device / sw / fw combination but it worked for me. I suggest doing it with a breakout box before you start breaking pins with snip nosed pliars though ! :) Jon. ""Ashok C Braganza"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone help me in configuring AS/400 Controller 5394 > > Here is my configuration > interface Serial1/0 > no ip address > encapsulation sdlc > no keepalive > nrzi-encoding > clockrate 9600 > sdlc role prim-xid-poll > sdlc vmac 4030.. > sdlc T1 2 > sdlc address 01 > sdlc xid 01 05F1 > sdlc partner 8800..0040 01 > sdlc dlsw default > > > I have two controllers 5394 & 5494. I have no problem with 5494. > Any idea? > Thanks in advance, > > Ashok Braganza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37812&t=37759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796]
OK I read into the message a little more than I should have. But the point still remains that the lawyers bothered you without researching the issue. - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 3:20 PM Subject: Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796] > >Howard, this is *almost* hilarious, they tried to sue you on something that > >they stole from you? > > I wouldn't go so far as to say "sue" or "stole." As far as I was > concerned, the material was public domain. The lawyer demanded it be > removed, but didn't actually threaten suit. > > Lots of nasty legal letters, when you are in the right, can be > handled with a confident "prove your point and we'll take you > seriously." > > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > >To: > >Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:16 PM > >Subject: Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796] > > > > > >> First, THANK YOU for the image of MIB's as non-SNMP. It has given me > >> an occasional giggle since I read it, which was especially helpful in > >> the emergency room last night (when you are cutting chain, do NOT > >> have a finger between the handles of the bolt cutters). > >> > >> But this is one of the reasons I personally don't take the CCIE > >> lab--there's no way to accuse me of disclosing a question I've never > >> seen. That doesn't preclude me from having CCIE's, or at least > >> people who have taken the lab, review scenarios before they go live, > >> and being very open to feedback once they are public. > >> > >> I have dealt with Cisco lawyers in a publishing context, and they > >> definitely can be annoying. Of course, in that context, one can push > >> back with a knowledge of case law on intellectual property. One of > >> their complaints was that I published a graphic that was in a Cisco > >> course--which turned out to be something I originally wrote, on which > >> Cisco had no IPR, and I put into the Cisco University seminar as > >> labeled supplemental material. It was a good slide and propagated > >> into several Cisco courses, which was the first place the lawyer saw > >> it. > >> > >> > >> > >> >Hello, > >> > > >> > > >> >Please, don't over-interpret this email. > >> >I really would appreciate your opinion, > >> >I am not trying to be sarcastic, assertive or whatever. > >> > > >> > > >> >I blow my lab approximatelly 2 weeks ago. > >> > > >> >Since then, I have seen at least 3 or 4 questions taken > >> >varbatim from my scenario, posted to this group. > >> > > >> >Because some of those question confused me, I would like > >> >to discuss generic technology behind them on this forum. > >> > > >> >On the other hand, even participating in the thread started > >> >as verbatim copy of original CCIE LAB makes me feel, well, > >> >unconfortable, because I don't want to be accused of violation of NDA. > >> >I don't want to be even remotly associated with such possible > >> >accusition, by merely participating in those threads. > >> > > >> >But I still want to discuss with someone some issues, which > >> >IMHO are at least not clear, (or to be frank -- CCO has contradictory > >> >examples about them) without taking a risk of steping on the thin ice > >> >of NDA violation. > >> > > >> >Also, as I can tell that at least 4 threads are about problems > >> >taken verbatim from MY scenario, how many otheres threads are > >> >verbatim copies of OTHER scenarios? > >> > > >> >I felt much more confortable and "free" to be active here before > >> >my actual exam. Should I look for those cool flashlights, > >> >used by MIBs (not SNMP :-) to eradicate my memory about my scenario ? > >> > > >> >Any thoughts? > >> > > >> >Maybe someone from cisco will voice their opinon? > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> > > >> >Przemek > >> >_ > >> >Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html > >> >Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37811&t=37796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ebay description for a 2503 [7:37708]
The sellers name is "2oldfarts50", wonder if maybe it's now just one old fart that's 50? -Julian ""colin newman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Check out the Ebay description for this 2503 router. This router has had a > devious past. > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2008152304 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37755&t=37708 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Power Supply [7:37773]
Hi All, I would appreciate if somebody would provide any information where I would be able to buy cheap power supply replacement for my Cisco 4000-M ? I have been searching in Ebay but haven't had any luck up to now. Many thanks. Zahid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37773&t=37773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: concentrator 3000 vs. checkpoint vpn [7:37474]
Agree. I used both, Concentrator is very impressive. Support from Cisco TAC is great. Checkpoint VPN is good too, but their support is horrible. And their licensing is confusing. Jim --- Joseph Brunner wrote: > The checkpoint is the black sheep of the industry. > It is a poorly > documented, un-intuative, overly licensed > B.S. interface. The checkpoint where I used to work > (nokia IP 440) reminded > me of this cartoon with porky pig > and daffy duck. Porky pig gets a hotel room for > .10Cents. The mouse comes > and starts chewing celery so he can't > sleep. Then daffy wants like $10 for a cat to get > rid of the mouse. Then the > cat keeps him from sleeping > so daffy wants $20 for a dog to get rid of the cat, > and its goes all the way > till an elephant to get rid of a > lion for several hundred dollars. And guess what > gets rid of the elephant, > (now taking up all the space in his > hotel room) ? You guessed it a MOUSE !. Moral of the > story, they string you > along with different answers on each > call (so issues just go in circles), the licenses > make the product too > expensive, while not as good at VPN tunneling > as a Cisco VPN Concentrator, which comes with 100 > USERS for only around $4K. > The Checkpoint is garbage. Avoid it > at all costs. Long live Altiga (Cisco) VPNs. > > Joseph Brunner > ASN 21572 > MortgageIT MITLending > New York, NY 10038 > (212) 651 - 7695 Voice > > > > > -Original Message- > From: ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:""[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: concentrator 3000 vs. checkpoint vpn > [7:37474] > > > I've worked with the 3000 concentrator but not with > the Checkpoint. The > 3000 is very user friendly and easy to use. You > have to do minor > configuration via console and then you're off with > the web interface which > is very simple to use. I can't make a > recommendation for which you should > buy but the Cisco products always make me happy. > I've set up a vpn tunnel > from a cisco router to a checkpoint firewall and it > seemed like the person > on the configuring end of the checkpoint had a lot > of problems with > upgrading software and technical support but that > may have been a one person > scenario. I can't say for sure. > > Jason > > -Original Message- > From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: concentrator 3000 vs. checkpoint vpn > [7:37474] > > > I haven't used both but I had to reply. I had set up > a CheckPoint > SecuRemote VPN, the VPN package that came with CP > 2000 on a Nokia box > and I have to say, it's not worth the hassle. CP > tossed in the VPN > component as a selling point so they could say, "Hey > our firewall does > it all". I should also mention that their > documentation on getting > SecuRemote up and running is sad, if not almost > non-existent. > > Colin > > Alex Lei wrote: > > > Group, > > > > Has anyone used both concentrator 3000 and > checkpoint vpn (either software > > or hardware)? What are each's advantages and > disadvantages? I am > interested > > in the following factors: Ease of installation and > configuration, > security, > > manageability, reporting and logging, scalability, > and pricing. I've > > searched the archives but couldn't find any real > world advices. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37758&t=37474 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Infrastructure Upgrade..... [7:37627]
A fine point, probably not what was originally meant but worth
mentioning. While a switch cannot and should not prevent broadcasts,
it can help limit broadcast storms with port-level broadcast rate
limiting.
Used in conjunction with a router and CGMP, a switch can reduce the
level of irrelevant multicasts to a given port, if that's an issue.
Yes, I know broadcasts are a special case of multicast. But they are
rather like Groucho Marx's opinion "I wouldn't join any club that
would have me as a member." Broadcasts just don't have any
exclusivity, my deah, don't you know.
But that does bring up the issue, not a common one but still to be
considered, if there are unusual sources of broadcasts, and if they
possibly can be converted to multicasts. For some reason, there are
a fair number of healthcare applications that broadcast when they
could multicast. Real-time financial applications like stock quotes
are much better. Bloomberg financial news, for example, uses a huge
multicast network to its subscribers.
>1 24 port hub hanging off of a switch port will be in it's own collision
>domain...and will not be that bad at all. Broadcasts however will not
>change... all f's get forwarded through every port on a switch or a hub.
>
>-Patrick
>
"Juan Blanco" 03/07/02 11:33PM >>>
>Actually what we are trying to do is increase speed, eliminate collisions
>and reduce any kind of broadcasting in the LAN
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:19 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Infrastructure Upgrade. [7:37627]
>
>
>Well,
>
>You did pick a pretty expensive switch to purchase...hehe
>
>the 1900's are 10mb to the desktop... You'll see some improvement over 10mb
>hubs on the lan but across the frame connection, it's really irrelevant.
>Are you looking to increase lan speed?
>
>In this day in age, I never reccommend hubs...but if you are really tight on
>cash flow, you would probably do better to purchase a 12 port 100mb switch
>and 8 100mb hubs.
>
>-Patrick
>
"Juan Blanco" 03/07/02 10:27PM >>>
>Team,
>
>I am in the process of upgrading all hubs in 4 different sites, each site
>has 8 hubs, I will replace each site with a 2950(24 ports)10/100mbs. I will
>connect each switch(2,3,4) to the switch(1) on the basement where a router
>will be available to connect to the Frame Relay cloud.
>
>Questions:
>
> Will it make more sense to get the 1900 switch(10mbs) and not the 2950
> Will I be able to set any one port to full(100mbs) on the 2950
> Will I be able to set up vlans and isl (as long as my route has a
>fastethernet port)
> Is this the appropriate replacements for the hubs(we don't
>have a lot of
>money to spend)
>Thanks,
>
>
>JB
>> Confidentiality Disclaimer Confidentiality
>Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain
confidential and
>/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
>Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
>addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
>privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
>the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
>copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
>subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
>email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
>email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37795&t=37627
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796]
>Howard, this is *almost* hilarious, they tried to sue you on something that >they stole from you? I wouldn't go so far as to say "sue" or "stole." As far as I was concerned, the material was public domain. The lawyer demanded it be removed, but didn't actually threaten suit. Lots of nasty legal letters, when you are in the right, can be handled with a confident "prove your point and we'll take you seriously." > >- Original Message - >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >To: >Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:16 PM >Subject: Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796] > > >> First, THANK YOU for the image of MIB's as non-SNMP. It has given me >> an occasional giggle since I read it, which was especially helpful in >> the emergency room last night (when you are cutting chain, do NOT >> have a finger between the handles of the bolt cutters). >> >> But this is one of the reasons I personally don't take the CCIE >> lab--there's no way to accuse me of disclosing a question I've never >> seen. That doesn't preclude me from having CCIE's, or at least >> people who have taken the lab, review scenarios before they go live, >> and being very open to feedback once they are public. >> >> I have dealt with Cisco lawyers in a publishing context, and they >> definitely can be annoying. Of course, in that context, one can push >> back with a knowledge of case law on intellectual property. One of >> their complaints was that I published a graphic that was in a Cisco >> course--which turned out to be something I originally wrote, on which >> Cisco had no IPR, and I put into the Cisco University seminar as >> labeled supplemental material. It was a good slide and propagated >> into several Cisco courses, which was the first place the lawyer saw >> it. >> >> >> >> >Hello, >> > >> > >> >Please, don't over-interpret this email. >> >I really would appreciate your opinion, >> >I am not trying to be sarcastic, assertive or whatever. >> > >> > >> >I blow my lab approximatelly 2 weeks ago. >> > >> >Since then, I have seen at least 3 or 4 questions taken >> >varbatim from my scenario, posted to this group. >> > >> >Because some of those question confused me, I would like >> >to discuss generic technology behind them on this forum. >> > >> >On the other hand, even participating in the thread started >> >as verbatim copy of original CCIE LAB makes me feel, well, >> >unconfortable, because I don't want to be accused of violation of NDA. >> >I don't want to be even remotly associated with such possible >> >accusition, by merely participating in those threads. >> > >> >But I still want to discuss with someone some issues, which >> >IMHO are at least not clear, (or to be frank -- CCO has contradictory >> >examples about them) without taking a risk of steping on the thin ice >> >of NDA violation. >> > >> >Also, as I can tell that at least 4 threads are about problems >> >taken verbatim from MY scenario, how many otheres threads are >> >verbatim copies of OTHER scenarios? >> > >> >I felt much more confortable and "free" to be active here before >> >my actual exam. Should I look for those cool flashlights, >> >used by MIBs (not SNMP :-) to eradicate my memory about my scenario ? >> > >> >Any thoughts? >> > >> >Maybe someone from cisco will voice their opinon? >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> >Przemek >> >_ >> >Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html >> >Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37810&t=37796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: info on virus attack [7:37798]
What are you guys talking about? It is highly unlikely that a Virus will go through the server as all messages are stripped of their attachments and converted to plain-text before posting. Plus messages that look like they could contain (or at one time did contain) viruses are filtered. What could happen is someone catches a virus and the virus scans the inbox. Of course the Inbox is full of messages from this list. The virus then proceeds to send itself to everyone who has posted to the list and thus has a message in the client Inbox. Unfortunately GroupStudy can not stop it as the virus is never propagated through the server. One way to prevent this is to use the web discussion board to participate where a valid e-mail address is not required (in fact you have the option of putting any e-mail address you desire as your public address). That way, you can not be forwarded viruses - of course you also eliminate private e-mail concerning your posting. Take care, Paul Borghese - Original Message - From: "edna helem" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:18 PM Subject: Re: info on virus attack [7:37798] > Gaz, > > You sent out an email re: virus being sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am > the wife of Abdi. Let me explain to you and others concerned. My husband > and I ordered DSL with verizon about 12 days ago. We did not have a > firewall or virus software installed. After about 3 days of servi our > computer began to lock up and finally we had no service at all. I had been > troubleshooting with verizon tech support for about 5 days before they could > tell me that there was a virus on my computer. I immediately went out and > purchased the McAfee firewall and virus protection software. The virus > appears to have been removed. I still do not have DSL service. I am using > a dial-up connection. The name of the virus was the SirCam virus. I found > out that the email was being propagated outside of my computer through your > email to the cisco study group in which I am a member. I apologize for any > inconvenience, but we had no idea what has been going on. Verizon tech > support had me contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] by email to try and resolve this > problem. They are not accessible by phone and their response to me by email > has been that they have received my email and due to so many cases it may > take a few days to follow up with an investigation. It has been 4 days. > Does anyone have any suggestions on who I can contact at verizon and their > phone number? > > > >From: "Gaz" > >Reply-To: "Gaz" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] > >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:31:39 -0500 > > > >Joel, > > > >Have a look at www.kg2.com > >Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. I've > >noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for around > >20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - > >whatever > >length you want, and I believe the full crossover cables were around 25 > >dollars. > > > >I must add I have no links with Kelly or the company and not enough > >knowledge of them to recommend, but prices look decent and I know he's been > >around a while now. > >I keep meaning to buy the same but never got round to it. > > > >Gaz > > > >""Joel Satterley"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT > >crossover > > > equivalent ? > > > > > > I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a > >kilostream > > > simulator. > > > > > > Any help would be gratefully rec'd. > > > > > > Thanks. > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37809&t=37798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37802]
it is probably that your switch does have Enterprise code. Catalyst 1900 Management Console Copyright (c) Cisco Systems, Inc. 1993-1998 All rights reserved. Enterprise Edition Software Ethernet Address: 00-D0-06-81-24-40 PCA Number:73-3122-03 PCA Serial Number: FAB03203536 Model Number: WS-C1912-EN System Serial Number: FAB0323U01C Power Supply S/N: PHI031302VU PCB Serial Number: FAB03203536,73-3122-03 - 1 user(s) now active on Management Console. User Interface Menu [M] Menus [K] Command Line [I] IP Configuration Enter Selection: * notice the WS-C1912-EN in the Model Number. also from the Firmware menu: Catalyst 1900 - Firmware Configuration --- System Information - FLASH: 1024K bytes V8.01.02: Enterprise Edition Upgrade status: No upgrade currently in progress. --- Settings --- [S] TFTP Server name or IP address [F] Filename for firmware upgrades [A] Accept upgrade transfer from other hostsEnabled --- Actions [T] System TFTP upgrade[X] Exit to Main Menu Enter Selection: * notice that it says: V8.01.02: Enterprise Edition check to see if youo are running Enterprise code Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Raza Shah" To: Sent: Sunday, 10 March, 2002 14:15 Subject: CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37802] > Hi All, > > I am looking how to access CLI on a 1900 Switch. > > When I start the switch, I get "User Interface Menu" with only two > options: > > [M] Menu > > [IP] IP > > And always [K] Command Line options are missing. How to access CLI, any > advice? > > Raza Shah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37808&t=37802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
Well it's not really an opinion, it's a fact. We could readily reproduce the problem. Cisco confirmed that there was a problem and told us to upgrade, after we did the issue went away. - Original Message - From: "Ismail Al-Shelh" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 7:25 AM Subject: RE: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > Hello Mike I appreciate your openion .. I need more people to give me more > comments, this is would be great to know the options > > Ismail Al-shelh, > Thanks Alot > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 6:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > > > There were some bugs with 12.0(5) with regards to hyperterm, causing the > switch to reboot was one of them. Try upgrading. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ismail Al-Shelh" > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:12 AM > Subject: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724] > > > > Hello all > > I have two Cat 2950-24 switches , when I connect to the first switch > > through hyper terminal , something strange happening to me , that strange > > thing is when I try to type any letter on the keyboard it gives me another > > letter or symbols I do not know why this is happening the only thing > I > > can see is when one of the fastethernet port state is up or down but its > > not allowing me to write proper letters , I tried to plug the cable out > and > > plug it again it gives me the following > > > > C2950 Boot Loader (CALHOUN-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), MAINTENANCE > > INTERIM > > SOFTWARE > > Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal > > WS-C2950-24 starting... > > Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:ec:02:67:00 > > Xmodem file system is available. > > Initializing Flash... > > flashfs[0]: 161 files, 2 directories > > flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories > > flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 7741440 > > flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2960896 > > flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 4780544 > > flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. > > ...done initializing flash. > > Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3 > > Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4 > > Loading > > "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin"...## > > > > > > > # > > > > File "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin" uncompressed and installed, > > entry p > > oint: 0x8001 > > executing... > > > > Restricted Rights Legend > > > > Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is > > subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph > > (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted > > Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph > > (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer > > Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. > > > >cisco Systems, Inc. > >170 West Tasman Drive > >San Jose, California 95134-1706 > > > > > > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), > MAINTENANCE > > INT > > ERIM SOFTWARE > > Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. > > Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal > > Image text-base: 0x8001, data-base: 0x8031A000 > > > > > > Initializing flashfs... > > flashfs[1]: 161 files, 2 directories > > flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories > > flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 7741440 > > flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2960896 > > flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 4780544 > > flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. > > flashfs[1]: Initialization complete. > > Done initializing flashfs. > > C2950 POST: System Board Test : Passed > > C2950 POST: Ethernet Controller Test : Passed > > C2950 POST: MII TEST : Passed > > > > cisco WS-C2950-24 (RC32300) processor (revision B0) with 22260K bytes of > > memory. > > > > Processor board ID FAB0544P2EE > > Last reset from system-reset > > > > Processor is running Enterprise Edition Software > > Cluster command switch capable > > Cluster member switch capable > > 24 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > > > > 32K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory. > > Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:EC:02:67:00 > > Motherboard assembly number: 73-5781-08 > > Motherboard serial number: FAB0544789W > > Model revision number: B0 > > Model number: WS-C2950-24 > > System serial number: FAB0544P2EE > > C2950 INIT: Complete > > > > 00:00:17: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), > MAINTENANCE > > INT > > ERIM SOFTWARE > > Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. > > Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal > > > > --- System Configuration Dialog --- > > > > At any point you may enter a question mark '?' for help. > > Use ctrl-c
RE: CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37802]
If the size of your 1900 cat is that of a pizza box, with a 9 pin console port, then you can not run CLI. If its half the size of one, with an rj45 console port, you need the Enterprise version of IOS to run CLI. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37806&t=37802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37805]
Hi All, I am looking how to access CLI on a 1900 Switch. When I start the switch, I get "User Interface Menu" with only two options: [M] Menu [IP] IP And always [K] Command Line options are missing. How to access CLI, any advice? Raza Shah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37805&t=37805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE #8886 [7:37530]
John, Congrats. You are a bulldog. I think I would have jumped off a bridge if I failed twice. Jack Ross Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37804&t=37530 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37802]
Some of the older 1900 switches don't offer command line access. We have quite a variety of both the older and newer 1900s and the newer ones all have the [K] Command Line option. HTH, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37803&t=37802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CLI for 1900 Switch [7:37802]
Hi All, I am looking how to access CLI on a 1900 Switch. When I start the switch, I get "User Interface Menu" with only two options: [M] Menu [IP] IP And always [K] Command Line options are missing. How to access CLI, any advice? Raza Shah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37802&t=37802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Just a quick reply: No Personal FW enabled; default installation of XP with Static/Pvt. IP with /24 and default GW, of course. Netstat -a shows: UDP MachineName:tftp *.* ]-- So I know it's listening. As I said before, I've gotten connections every time, it just failes to follow through on the process of sending the file upon request for one reason or another; also, default file permission are on the folder that the image resides in and I even re-downloaded the image to make sure it wasn't corrupt. I further proved it not being corrupt by moving it to the laptop running W2K with 100% success for every download attempt. Strange I'll let everyone know what I find when I get back to it. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gaz Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] Just to give you some hope, I'm using Pumpkin on my XP laptop. I never have a single problem with it. I don't really know what to suggest, but feel free to e-mail me direct if you would like to compare any specific setings you may suspect. Mine's been on that long that I don't really remember if I had to change anything initially. I know mines fairly open as far as security goes. Does a 'netstat -a' show tftp as listening, or is it not getting that far? Gaz ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > well you got me curious. > > I "upgraded" to XP Pro a while back on my desktop but haven't tried tftp on > it yet. I usually do that from my notebook and it's still Win98. > > I have been using the TFTP server from Boson so I tried that first. > > Nope, failed with the error "Runtime error 13, type mismatch" on the boson > end. > > Then I tried the Cisco tftp server. > > It worked just fine! Wrote config to tftp, wrote flash to tftp. > > I read the config back from the tftp and it worked. > > Tried copying the flash back and it failed!!! After a few auto retries the > router (2509) reloaded with a wiped config! - gotta love having a home > lab > > but - was able to get the config back. > > Tried fiddling with permissions of the tftp directory and file with no luck. > Messed around some more and it seems I can get the config back and forth but > I can only save the IOS to the tftp server but not copy it back to the > router. > > I haven't tried pumpkin. > > Guess I'm keeping my notebook at Win98 for awhile longer. > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Odette II" > To: > Sent: Saturday, 09 March, 2002 18:29 > Subject: RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > > Jeff- As a matter of fact, YES! > > > > Dunno why, as I didn't have time to try figuring it out, but this was my > > scenario. > > > > Klever Nothings PumpKIN TFTP Server installed on WinXP workstation, and > > running with proper folder specified for images. > > > > Cisco 1750 Router configured to boot loading image from above mentioned > TFTP > > Server. > > > > When the router boots, it does it's normal process and sends its broadcast > > request for TFTP service, and PumpKIN responds. > > > > But, the problem was that it would always fail, stating that there was a > > buffer overflow error from the PumpKIN side, and either an error reading > the > > file (invalid file) on the TFTP server, or a timeout error reading the > file > > from the Router side. > > > > This Router had its FastEthernet port plugged into a 1548 Switch that also > > had the XP workstation plugged into said switch. > > > > So, I put PumpKIN on a laptop with W2K Professional, jack into the > Routers' > > ethernet port with a cross-over cable, and try the TFTP boot again, and it > > works like a champ. > > > > Now mind you, I tried specifying a specific TFTP server address, and using > > broadcast, and neither worked for connecting to the TFTP server on the XP > > box. I did the same on the directly-connected W2K laptop, and it worked > > either way. The only difference that I didn't investigate was plugging in > > the laptop to the 1548 Switch. > > > > None the less, I couldn't get it to work on XP. > > > > Mark > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Jeff D > > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 2:30 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > > > > Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work > with > > my XP box. > > > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37801&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: info on virus attack [7:37798]
Hi Edna, Good to hear you're all cleaned up again. There seems to be a different contact number for every state. You can probably pick yours from the page below (although I don't think this is for security): http://www.verizon.net/contact/ Thanks for the update, although I knew which virus it was, I think I received it about 18 times in all :-) Do me a favour though - don't put me in your address book :-) Good luck, Gaz ""edna helem"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Gaz, > > You sent out an email re: virus being sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am > the wife of Abdi. Let me explain to you and others concerned. My husband > and I ordered DSL with verizon about 12 days ago. We did not have a > firewall or virus software installed. After about 3 days of servi our > computer began to lock up and finally we had no service at all. I had been > troubleshooting with verizon tech support for about 5 days before they could > tell me that there was a virus on my computer. I immediately went out and > purchased the McAfee firewall and virus protection software. The virus > appears to have been removed. I still do not have DSL service. I am using > a dial-up connection. The name of the virus was the SirCam virus. I found > out that the email was being propagated outside of my computer through your > email to the cisco study group in which I am a member. I apologize for any > inconvenience, but we had no idea what has been going on. Verizon tech > support had me contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] by email to try and resolve this > problem. They are not accessible by phone and their response to me by email > has been that they have received my email and due to so many cases it may > take a few days to follow up with an investigation. It has been 4 days. > Does anyone have any suggestions on who I can contact at verizon and their > phone number? > > > >From: "Gaz" > >Reply-To: "Gaz" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] > >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:31:39 -0500 > > > >Joel, > > > >Have a look at www.kg2.com > >Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. I've > >noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for around > >20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - > >whatever > >length you want, and I believe the full crossover cables were around 25 > >dollars. > > > >I must add I have no links with Kelly or the company and not enough > >knowledge of them to recommend, but prices look decent and I know he's been > >around a while now. > >I keep meaning to buy the same but never got round to it. > > > >Gaz > > > >""Joel Satterley"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT > >crossover > > > equivalent ? > > > > > > I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a > >kilostream > > > simulator. > > > > > > Any help would be gratefully rec'd. > > > > > > Thanks. > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37800&t=37798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Cisco Secure ACS Server [7:37797]
While I dont know if ACS was free.. the TACACS server was free. I have a few different TACACS servers and docs for downloading at: www.packetattack.com/downloads.html MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37799&t=37797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: info on virus attack [7:37798]
Gaz, You sent out an email re: virus being sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am the wife of Abdi. Let me explain to you and others concerned. My husband and I ordered DSL with verizon about 12 days ago. We did not have a firewall or virus software installed. After about 3 days of servi our computer began to lock up and finally we had no service at all. I had been troubleshooting with verizon tech support for about 5 days before they could tell me that there was a virus on my computer. I immediately went out and purchased the McAfee firewall and virus protection software. The virus appears to have been removed. I still do not have DSL service. I am using a dial-up connection. The name of the virus was the SirCam virus. I found out that the email was being propagated outside of my computer through your email to the cisco study group in which I am a member. I apologize for any inconvenience, but we had no idea what has been going on. Verizon tech support had me contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] by email to try and resolve this problem. They are not accessible by phone and their response to me by email has been that they have received my email and due to so many cases it may take a few days to follow up with an investigation. It has been 4 days. Does anyone have any suggestions on who I can contact at verizon and their phone number? >From: "Gaz" >Reply-To: "Gaz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:31:39 -0500 > >Joel, > >Have a look at www.kg2.com >Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. I've >noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for around >20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - >whatever >length you want, and I believe the full crossover cables were around 25 >dollars. > >I must add I have no links with Kelly or the company and not enough >knowledge of them to recommend, but prices look decent and I know he's been >around a while now. >I keep meaning to buy the same but never got round to it. > >Gaz > >""Joel Satterley"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT >crossover > > equivalent ? > > > > I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a >kilostream > > simulator. > > > > Any help would be gratefully rec'd. > > > > Thanks. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37798&t=37798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Cisco Secure ACS Server [7:37797]
Cisco use to offer a version of Cisco Secure ACS server that was free. The limitations were you could only configure one NAS and had to use the TACACS protocol. Does anyone know if that version is still available? Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37797&t=37797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no flames -- please (about NDA) [7:37796]
First, THANK YOU for the image of MIB's as non-SNMP. It has given me an occasional giggle since I read it, which was especially helpful in the emergency room last night (when you are cutting chain, do NOT have a finger between the handles of the bolt cutters). But this is one of the reasons I personally don't take the CCIE lab--there's no way to accuse me of disclosing a question I've never seen. That doesn't preclude me from having CCIE's, or at least people who have taken the lab, review scenarios before they go live, and being very open to feedback once they are public. I have dealt with Cisco lawyers in a publishing context, and they definitely can be annoying. Of course, in that context, one can push back with a knowledge of case law on intellectual property. One of their complaints was that I published a graphic that was in a Cisco course--which turned out to be something I originally wrote, on which Cisco had no IPR, and I put into the Cisco University seminar as labeled supplemental material. It was a good slide and propagated into several Cisco courses, which was the first place the lawyer saw it. >Hello, > > >Please, don't over-interpret this email. >I really would appreciate your opinion, >I am not trying to be sarcastic, assertive or whatever. > > >I blow my lab approximatelly 2 weeks ago. > >Since then, I have seen at least 3 or 4 questions taken >varbatim from my scenario, posted to this group. > >Because some of those question confused me, I would like >to discuss generic technology behind them on this forum. > >On the other hand, even participating in the thread started >as verbatim copy of original CCIE LAB makes me feel, well, >unconfortable, because I don't want to be accused of violation of NDA. >I don't want to be even remotly associated with such possible >accusition, by merely participating in those threads. > >But I still want to discuss with someone some issues, which >IMHO are at least not clear, (or to be frank -- CCO has contradictory >examples about them) without taking a risk of steping on the thin ice >of NDA violation. > >Also, as I can tell that at least 4 threads are about problems >taken verbatim from MY scenario, how many otheres threads are >verbatim copies of OTHER scenarios? > >I felt much more confortable and "free" to be active here before >my actual exam. Should I look for those cool flashlights, >used by MIBs (not SNMP :-) to eradicate my memory about my scenario ? > >Any thoughts? > >Maybe someone from cisco will voice their opinon? > >Thanks, > >Przemek >_ >Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html >Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37796&t=37796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d) [7:37794]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS
EMAIL
YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE
POSTED.
By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
6. The message is NOT a test message.
To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary.
Once
confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
--ORIGINAL MESSAGE-
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 8 18:35:37 2002
Received: from imsmq08.netvigator.com (imsmq08.netvigator.com
[208.139.127.40])
by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA27812
GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:35:36 -0500
Received: (qmail 23992 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 23:36:55 -
Received: from pcd293153.netvigator.com (HELO Home) (203.218.83.153)
by imsmq08.netvigator.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 23:36:55 -
From: "Francis"
To:
Subject: 7206 self Reset frequently
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 07:36:27 +0800
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just checking if anyone has the experience on 7206 reset problem. Here
is my config.
7206 VXR
NPE-300
I/O card with one FE
2 x 1-port 100BaseTX
3 x 4-port Multichannel T1
Dual Power supply
128M RAM
CPU loading around 20%
My 7206 has reset frequently. Any suggestion what sort of information I
should check?
Thanks.
Francis
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Clean
Clean
DocumentEmail
=
0
=
2
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */=20
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
Ju
s=
t
checking if anyone has the experience on 7206 reset =
problem. Here is my config.
7206 =
VXR
NPE-300
I/O card with one =
FE
2 x 1-port =
100BaseTX
3 x 4-port Multichannel T1
Dual Power =
supply
128M =
RAM
CPU loading around =
20%
My 7206 has reset
frequently. Any suggestion what sort of information I should =
check?
Thanks.
Francis
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37794&t=37794
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d) [7:37793]
-Original Message-
From: Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
[7:37713]
-Original Message-
From: Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 7:29 PM
To: 'Francis'
Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
[7:37713]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Francis
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
[7:37713]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS
EMAIL
YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE
POSTED.
By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
6. The message is NOT a test message.
To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary.
Once
confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
--ORIGINAL MESSAGE-
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 8 18:35:37 2002
Received: from imsmq08.netvigator.com (imsmq08.netvigator.com
[208.139.127.40])
by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA27812
GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:35:36 -0500
Received: (qmail 23992 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 23:36:55 -
Received: from pcd293153.netvigator.com (HELO Home) (203.218.83.153)
by imsmq08.netvigator.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 23:36:55 -
From: "Francis"
To:
Subject: 7206 self Reset frequently
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 07:36:27 +0800
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just checking if anyone has the experience on 7206 reset problem. Here
is my config.
7206 VXR
NPE-300
I/O card with one FE
2 x 1-port 100BaseTX
3 x 4-port Multichannel T1
Dual Power supply
128M RAM
CPU loading around 20%
My 7206 has reset frequently. Any suggestion what sort of information I
should check?
Thanks.
Francis
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Clean
Clean
DocumentEmail
=
0
=
2
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */=20
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
Ju
s=
t
checking if anyone has the experience on 7206 reset =
problem. Here is my config.
7206 =
VXR
NPE-300
I/O card with one =
FE
2 x 1-port =
100BaseTX
3 x 4-port Multichannel T1
Dual Power =
supply
128M =
RAM
CPU loading around =
20%
My 7206 has reset
frequently. Any suggestion what sort of information I should =
check?
Thanks.
Francis
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C1C73D.2F09D2F0--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37793&t=37793
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Has anyone tried running the TFTP server in emulation mode? -Colin ""Jeff D"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with > my XP box. > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37792&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:37757]
Try this: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cddhcp.htm#xtocid198289 - Original Message - From: "Jim Bond" To: Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:41 PM Subject: DHCP [7:37757] > Hello, > > I used to use Linksys router connect to cable modem. > Linksys router outside interface gets IP addresses, > default gateway and DNS from ISP, then it will give > DNS information to inside PCs. > > Will 1605 router do the same thing? My 1605 only gets > IP address, not DNS (I turned on debug and noticed > this). How do I have 1605 get DNS and pass on to > inside PCs? > > By the way, both Linksys and 1605 were configured to > use PAT. > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37791&t=37757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is Refubished or New? [7:37774]
If it is a refurbished item then it was most likely refurbished by Cisco. They have a database will all refurbished items sold. So, the best bet is to call Cisco. Adrian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all > > I have purchased a 3662 access server recently. I would like to > be sure that the device is not refurbished. We appreciate if you > help me to get a list of sold 3662, or hint me to any other way > to check the matter. > > Regards, > Ali. > > > -- > This mail sent through UI webmail. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37790&t=37774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Home LAB for CCIE ??? [7:37618]
The Catalyst 2924XL uses IOS . Catalyst 5000 series switches uses CatOS (the set based OS). You need at least a switch that is running CatOS in your home lab. Adrian ""mindiani mindiani"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am building my home CCIE lab. I got already 8 X 2500 series router , a > 4000 router and a 2924XL catalyst switch. I am wondering whether this > catalyst has everything I need to cover CAT 5000 OS.Should I need a > 2926T or a CAT 5000 ?. > > > > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37789&t=37618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN problems in IOS 12.1(5)T10 [7:37782]
Use 12.1(5)T9. 12.1(5)T10 has tons of IOS issues. ""Rick Foster"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Have faced some weird problems when working with 4 port BRI module in 3662 > router. The 3662 router has 12.1(5)T10 IP Plus IOS. > > Some of the problems faced are as under : > > The "dialer idle-timeout" on dialer interfaces does not work. The > connections (ppp multilink bundle) are disconnected after a interval of 150 > seconds (the dialer idle-timeout configured value) even though the IDLE time > has always been 0 seconds. > > The "dialer pool-member 1 min-link 1" command simply blocks the B channel of > that BRI interface even though there is traffic from a dialer belonging to > Pool 1. ( i.e. when "dialer load-threshold 1 either " command has been > configured on dialer, yet even after the load on BRI2/0:1 goes beyond > 254/255 yet the second B channel never comes up. ) In the trace it shows > that the BRI is trying to bring up the second interface but is unable to do > so since Both channels are already busy. > > The most important flaw was : we have configured BRI2/0 and BRI2/1 both as > members of Pool1 such that BRI2/0 has priority 100 and BRI2/1 has priority > 50. Yet whenever there is interesting traffic for dialer1 (belonging to > Pool1) it always tries to bring up BRI2/1 and BRI2/0 is never touched. > > This behavior is not noticed when BRI2/1 and BRI2/2 are configured members > of the same pool (e.g. pool2) with BRI2/1 given the higher priority. ( i.e. > dialer2, belonging to pool2, always brings up BRI2/1 first and then BRI2/2) > > > relevant Configuration is as below : > > ! > interface Serial1/0 > bandwidth 2048 > backup delay 260 360 > backup interface Dialer1 > ip address 14.29.0.18 255.255.255.252 > no ip mroute-cache > no cdp enable > ! > interface BRI2/0 > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > no ip mroute-cache > dialer pool-member 2 priority 50 > dialer pool-member 1 priority 100 min-link 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > no cdp enable > ppp authentication chap > ppp multilink > ! > interface BRI2/1 > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > no ip mroute-cache > dialer pool-member 1 priority 50 > dialer pool-member 2 priority 100 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > isdn T310 6 > no cdp enable > ppp authentication chap > ppp multilink > ! > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool 1 > dialer remote-name flex3662vp > dialer idle-timeout 150 > dialer fast-idle 90 > dialer string 0228241482 > dialer load-threshold 30 either > dialer-group 1 > pulse-time 0 > ppp authentication chap > ppp multilink > ! > interface Dialer2 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 > encapsulation ppp > dialer pool 2 > dialer remote-name flex3662rt > dialer idle-timeout 150 > dialer string 0805597611 > dialer string 0805597622 > dialer load-threshold 192 either > dialer-group 2 > no cdp enable > ppp authentication chap > ppp multilink > ! > > Any help will be grately appreciated... > Thanks and Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37785&t=37782 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is Refubished or New? [7:37774]
call Cisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all > > I have purchased a 3662 access server recently. I would like to > be sure that the device is not refurbished. We appreciate if you > help me to get a list of sold 3662, or hint me to any other way > to check the matter. > > Regards, > Ali. > > > -- > This mail sent through UI webmail. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37786&t=37774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA (B) [7:37659]
this is will be more great ... about me I have lack of this technology specially about fiber optic cables. Ismail Al-shelh -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA (B) [7:37659] Has anyone heard of CCNA (B)? Supposedly they will be updating the CCNA exam to include more cabling technologies? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37784&t=37659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP using AS_PATH attribute [7:37749]
Yep.. and traceroute.. the failure is at R2.. I can ping the interface facing R1 and the loopback(different subnet) but can NOT ping the outgoing interface to R3. R2 can ping everybody R3 can only ping R2 incoming interface and loopback.. It's like R2 is not passing between AS100 and AS65000 even though it has complete routes and Sync is off. MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37783&t=37749 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN problems in IOS 12.1(5)T10 [7:37782]
Hi all, Have faced some weird problems when working with 4 port BRI module in 3662 router. The 3662 router has 12.1(5)T10 IP Plus IOS. Some of the problems faced are as under : The "dialer idle-timeout" on dialer interfaces does not work. The connections (ppp multilink bundle) are disconnected after a interval of 150 seconds (the dialer idle-timeout configured value) even though the IDLE time has always been 0 seconds. The "dialer pool-member 1 min-link 1" command simply blocks the B channel of that BRI interface even though there is traffic from a dialer belonging to Pool 1. ( i.e. when "dialer load-threshold 1 either " command has been configured on dialer, yet even after the load on BRI2/0:1 goes beyond 254/255 yet the second B channel never comes up. ) In the trace it shows that the BRI is trying to bring up the second interface but is unable to do so since Both channels are already busy. The most important flaw was : we have configured BRI2/0 and BRI2/1 both as members of Pool1 such that BRI2/0 has priority 100 and BRI2/1 has priority 50. Yet whenever there is interesting traffic for dialer1 (belonging to Pool1) it always tries to bring up BRI2/1 and BRI2/0 is never touched. This behavior is not noticed when BRI2/1 and BRI2/2 are configured members of the same pool (e.g. pool2) with BRI2/1 given the higher priority. ( i.e. dialer2, belonging to pool2, always brings up BRI2/1 first and then BRI2/2) relevant Configuration is as below : ! interface Serial1/0 bandwidth 2048 backup delay 260 360 backup interface Dialer1 ip address 14.29.0.18 255.255.255.252 no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable ! interface BRI2/0 no ip address encapsulation ppp no ip mroute-cache dialer pool-member 2 priority 50 dialer pool-member 1 priority 100 min-link 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! interface BRI2/1 no ip address encapsulation ppp no ip mroute-cache dialer pool-member 1 priority 50 dialer pool-member 2 priority 100 isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn T310 6 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer remote-name flex3662vp dialer idle-timeout 150 dialer fast-idle 90 dialer string 0228241482 dialer load-threshold 30 either dialer-group 1 pulse-time 0 ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! interface Dialer2 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 encapsulation ppp dialer pool 2 dialer remote-name flex3662rt dialer idle-timeout 150 dialer string 0805597611 dialer string 0805597622 dialer load-threshold 192 either dialer-group 2 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! Any help will be grately appreciated... Thanks and Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37782&t=37782 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
i used to use cisco's tftp server on win 98/2000/xp and there have been no problems. however, one day my tftp on xp suddenly doesn't work for no reason. No matter what i do, it just timed out. I then download 3com's tftp server s/ware (another freeware) and it works again! so it's worth trying. hktco - Original Message - From: "Jeff D" To: Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 4:30 AM Subject: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with my XP box. Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37781&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brand New Simline 2 ISDN Simulator for SALE! [7:37780]
Hi, I am selling a BRAND NEW *OPEN BOX* Simline 2 ISDN Simulator. Just bought this last week and have proof of purchase. (Packing Slip date 3/4/02). I need to sell this due to financial difficulties. $1350 takes it. I only accept certified checks or money order. Buyer pay for all s/h + insurance. Thanx, Chi Wong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37780&t=37780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 1750 Router [7:37396]
Every thing was normal believe me as the router is not hanging every thing is okay the only thing that after 5 minutes or 10 minutes (it depend upon luck ) the router stop responding , another thing the Ok LED blink all the time and when the router stop responding it gets off but the PWR LED is on. -Original Message- From: Michael J. Doherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 1750 Router [7:37396] Have you console-connected to it and monitored it for a while to see if anything unusual is happening? - Original Message - From: "Ismail Al-Shelh" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:44 AM Subject: 1750 Router [7:37396] > Hello all > I have 1750 router , I just take it out from the box , when I turn it on it > works fine for a 15 mutinies after that it stop responding to me > when I turn it off and turn it on again all the LEDS remain on which is > > > Front panel > > PWRSLOT0 SLOT1 SLOT2 > PORT0 PORT0 PORT0 > ON ON ONON > > OK PORT1 PORT1 PORT1 > ON ONON ON > > > Rear status > > ONON ONON ON ON > ON > SLOT 1 OK SLOT 0 OK FDX 100 LINK PVDM OK SLOT 2 OK > > Its staying like that as much as the router button is on , I do not know > what's going on with me nowadays I feel I have no luck with any thing. > > Note : I did not yet connect the router to any thing I was in the beginning > to fix the modules , please help > > Ismail Al-shelh > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37779&t=37396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
Hello Mike I appreciate your openion .. I need more people to give me more
comments, this is would be great to know the options
Ismail Al-shelh,
Thanks Alot
-Original Message-
From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
There were some bugs with 12.0(5) with regards to hyperterm, causing the
switch to reboot was one of them. Try upgrading.
- Original Message -
From: "Ismail Al-Shelh"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
> Hello all
> I have two Cat 2950-24 switches , when I connect to the first switch
> through hyper terminal , something strange happening to me , that strange
> thing is when I try to type any letter on the keyboard it gives me another
> letter or symbols I do not know why this is happening the only thing
I
> can see is when one of the fastethernet port state is up or down but its
> not allowing me to write proper letters , I tried to plug the cable out
and
> plug it again it gives me the following
>
> C2950 Boot Loader (CALHOUN-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), MAINTENANCE
> INTERIM
> SOFTWARE
> Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal
> WS-C2950-24 starting...
> Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:ec:02:67:00
> Xmodem file system is available.
> Initializing Flash...
> flashfs[0]: 161 files, 2 directories
> flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories
> flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 7741440
> flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2960896
> flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 4780544
> flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds.
> ...done initializing flash.
> Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3
> Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4
> Loading
> "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin"...##
>
>
> #
>
> File "flash:c2950-c3h2s-mz.120-5.3.WC.1.bin" uncompressed and installed,
> entry p
> oint: 0x8001
> executing...
>
> Restricted Rights Legend
>
> Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is
> subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph
> (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted
> Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph
> (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer
> Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013.
>
>cisco Systems, Inc.
>170 West Tasman Drive
>San Jose, California 95134-1706
>
>
>
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1),
MAINTENANCE
> INT
> ERIM SOFTWARE
> Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal
> Image text-base: 0x8001, data-base: 0x8031A000
>
>
> Initializing flashfs...
> flashfs[1]: 161 files, 2 directories
> flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories
> flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 7741440
> flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2960896
> flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 4780544
> flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds.
> flashfs[1]: Initialization complete.
> Done initializing flashfs.
> C2950 POST: System Board Test : Passed
> C2950 POST: Ethernet Controller Test : Passed
> C2950 POST: MII TEST : Passed
>
> cisco WS-C2950-24 (RC32300) processor (revision B0) with 22260K bytes of
> memory.
>
> Processor board ID FAB0544P2EE
> Last reset from system-reset
>
> Processor is running Enterprise Edition Software
> Cluster command switch capable
> Cluster member switch capable
> 24 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
>
> 32K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory.
> Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:EC:02:67:00
> Motherboard assembly number: 73-5781-08
> Motherboard serial number: FAB0544789W
> Model revision number: B0
> Model number: WS-C2950-24
> System serial number: FAB0544P2EE
> C2950 INIT: Complete
>
> 00:00:17: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted --
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1),
MAINTENANCE
> INT
> ERIM SOFTWARE
> Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal
>
> --- System Configuration Dialog ---
>
> At any point you may enter a question mark '?' for help.
> Use ctrl-c to abort configuration dialog at any prompt.
> Default settings are in square brackets '[]'.
>
> Continue with configuration dialog? [yes/no]: oo4[j}~}{|u
>
>
>
> As you see I was trying to say NO but this No came to be oo4[j}~}{|u,
> please somebody tell me the secret.
>
> Note: I do not have any problem with the second switch I can easily login
to
> the user exec mode and configure it.
>
> Ismail Al-shelh.
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37778&t=37724
-
RE: BGP using AS_PATH attribute [7:37749]
Have you tried an extended PING. I have not seen the lab. rgs Grant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3&t=37749 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
modification to halabi bgp book (ospf/bgp) [7:37776]
I built the bgp lab on page 302 of halabi's book (Internet Routing Architectures).If you do not have the book, youmay still be able to answer the question. A simple diagram is as follows RTA-RTF ===AS3 | \ | \ RTC =AS1 RTE-RTD ===AS2 However I did not use bgp multihop. I had an ebgp session from RTE to RTF. All routers except for rtc were running ospf with all networks included. When bgp network statements were added to RTA via redistribute connected command and to RTE via the network 192.68.12.0 and network 192.68.5.0 commands. I thought I would have full bgp connectivity to all networks from RTC even though synchronisation was on on each router. RTE bgp table had all routes in it with the correct as paths as well as all being best. Same was true for RTF, however RTA did not receive the 192.68.12.0 or 192.68.5.0 routes as best from RTF which prevented RTA from sending them to RTC. rtf#show ip bgp nei 172.16.1.1 adv BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 172.16.1.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 192.68.5.0 192.68.5.20 0 2 i *> 192.68.12.0 192.68.5.2 0 0 2 i rta#show ip bgp nei 172.16.1.2 rout BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 172.16.1.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 192.68.5.0 192.68.5.20 0 2 i * 192.68.12.0 192.68.5.2 0 0 2 i This seems very strange. I believe that even with synchronisation on RTA should still advertise the routes to RTC because it has all the routes in the routing table from the ospf processes. please advise thanks Grant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37776&t=37776 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is Refubished or New? [7:37774]
Hello all I have purchased a 3662 access server recently. I would like to be sure that the device is not refurbished. We appreciate if you help me to get a list of sold 3662, or hint me to any other way to check the matter. Regards, Ali. -- This mail sent through UI webmail. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37774&t=37774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:37757]
Any reason you can't just use fixed Name Servers on the router? What's the benefit of getting them from ISP? Gaz ""Jim Bond"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I used to use Linksys router connect to cable modem. > Linksys router outside interface gets IP addresses, > default gateway and DNS from ISP, then it will give > DNS information to inside PCs. > > Will 1605 router do the same thing? My 1605 only gets > IP address, not DNS (I turned on debug and noticed > this). How do I have 1605 get DNS and pass on to > inside PCs? > > By the way, both Linksys and 1605 were configured to > use PAT. > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37772&t=37757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Just to give you some hope, I'm using Pumpkin on my XP laptop. I never have a single problem with it. I don't really know what to suggest, but feel free to e-mail me direct if you would like to compare any specific setings you may suspect. Mine's been on that long that I don't really remember if I had to change anything initially. I know mines fairly open as far as security goes. Does a 'netstat -a' show tftp as listening, or is it not getting that far? Gaz ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > well you got me curious. > > I "upgraded" to XP Pro a while back on my desktop but haven't tried tftp on > it yet. I usually do that from my notebook and it's still Win98. > > I have been using the TFTP server from Boson so I tried that first. > > Nope, failed with the error "Runtime error 13, type mismatch" on the boson > end. > > Then I tried the Cisco tftp server. > > It worked just fine! Wrote config to tftp, wrote flash to tftp. > > I read the config back from the tftp and it worked. > > Tried copying the flash back and it failed!!! After a few auto retries the > router (2509) reloaded with a wiped config! - gotta love having a home > lab > > but - was able to get the config back. > > Tried fiddling with permissions of the tftp directory and file with no luck. > Messed around some more and it seems I can get the config back and forth but > I can only save the IOS to the tftp server but not copy it back to the > router. > > I haven't tried pumpkin. > > Guess I'm keeping my notebook at Win98 for awhile longer. > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Odette II" > To: > Sent: Saturday, 09 March, 2002 18:29 > Subject: RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > > Jeff- As a matter of fact, YES! > > > > Dunno why, as I didn't have time to try figuring it out, but this was my > > scenario. > > > > Klever Nothings PumpKIN TFTP Server installed on WinXP workstation, and > > running with proper folder specified for images. > > > > Cisco 1750 Router configured to boot loading image from above mentioned > TFTP > > Server. > > > > When the router boots, it does it's normal process and sends its broadcast > > request for TFTP service, and PumpKIN responds. > > > > But, the problem was that it would always fail, stating that there was a > > buffer overflow error from the PumpKIN side, and either an error reading > the > > file (invalid file) on the TFTP server, or a timeout error reading the > file > > from the Router side. > > > > This Router had its FastEthernet port plugged into a 1548 Switch that also > > had the XP workstation plugged into said switch. > > > > So, I put PumpKIN on a laptop with W2K Professional, jack into the > Routers' > > ethernet port with a cross-over cable, and try the TFTP boot again, and it > > works like a champ. > > > > Now mind you, I tried specifying a specific TFTP server address, and using > > broadcast, and neither worked for connecting to the TFTP server on the XP > > box. I did the same on the directly-connected W2K laptop, and it worked > > either way. The only difference that I didn't investigate was plugging in > > the laptop to the 1548 Switch. > > > > None the less, I couldn't get it to work on XP. > > > > Mark > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Jeff D > > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 2:30 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] > > > > > > Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work > with > > my XP box. > > > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37771&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
I've done plenty of TFTP transfers in Win XP with Pumpkin with no problem. It's all I use for TFTP. Their website is www.klever.net/kin but it appears to be down at the moment. It's been awhile since I've been there... The stories they had about the programs were funny. __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37770&t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
