MIB For Cisco AS5300 [7:39880]
Hello can anyone help me in finding out the MIB for active users on individual PRI (E1) on Cisco AS5300. I already have and making an MRTG for total ppp users but i am finding MIB for ASYNC and SYNC users individually. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39880&t=39880 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: routing between vlans in 2900 throuh external [7:39762]
apparently another person who has not seen the thread about dot1Q working on 10bt now Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: routing between vlans in 2900 throuh external [7:39762] Vlan works on fastethernet.It should be full-duplex and 100M speed.Your router is C2610,it has only one 10M ethernet port,so it will not work for VLAN communication . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39881&t=39762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time server problem [7:39882]
Hi guys Has anybody tried using windows 2000 server as time server. I tried but failed.Debug output shows response from server but router does not change clock. Any idea or other time server suggestions.? (especially free ones) Thanks . "Bu mesaj ve mesaja eklenmis olan dosyalar, gvnderilen kisiye vzeldir. Eger mesaj bir hata sonucu size ulasmissa ve mesajin gvnderilmek istendigi kisi degilseniz, mesaji derhal siliniz ve l|tfen gvnderen kisiye olusan yanlisligi bildiriniz. Mesaj}n gvnderildipi ki~i siz depilseniz, mesaji ya da eklerini kopyalayamaz, ba~kas}na gvnderemez ve ba~kalar}na ag}klayamazs}n}z. Internet iletisiminde g|venlik ve hatasiz gvnderim garanti edilemeyeceginden, mesajin yerine ulasmamasi, geg ulasmasi,igeriginin bozulmasi yada mesajin virus tasimasi gibi problemler olusabilir. Gvnderen taraf, bu tip sorunlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. Bu mesajdaki ifadelerin t|m| mesaji gvnderen kisiye aittir. HSBC Bank A.S. mesajin gvnderiminden veya igeriginden sorumlu tutulamaz." "This message and any attachments are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee, you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of this message or its attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your system. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of Internet transmission.Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by the HSBC Group company or office through which this message is sent." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39882&t=39882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error: Session Timed or Logged Out: 2 [7:39884]
when i change my password on cisco ACS for windows by IE5.0,i can login to change password page, but when i type my old pwd,new pwd,confirm new pwd,press submit button,it prompt :"Error: Session Timed or Logged Out: 2". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39884&t=39884 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvm [7:39885]
dear all: when i install the cvm ,the server show that have a fatal wrong .how can i do? thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39885&t=39885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM and Voice [7:39849]
haha...touche, chuck! no, this is seriously going to be my first time. i've done a lot of research, and am modeling my lab around the needs of the "CCIE Practical Studies Vol. 1" book by Karl Solie. I figure, how can I model my lab more accurately than if I do so from Cisco's book itself? i am also using all my research from this group, as well as any internet-based research i can find on the subject... anyway, good point about the "good, cheap, accurate..." deal. i guess i'd say "cheap/accurate" is my requirement. anyway, thanks for your response. i'm wondering if i overwhelmed everyone with too much info. maybe i should focus on one at a time. therefore... ...ATM: for all your presale engineers out there...if i was to put together an ATM lab with two ATM routers and 1 ATM switch, what would you purchase as a minimum requirement while still being able to use all the features that the lab would require? so far, i am thinking LS1010 with CAM/PAM and the two routers with ATM interfaces are up in the air. i was thinking of OC-3 interfaces all around, but even those are expensive. can i use a T1 or ATM25 or T3 (etc.) interface to cut my costs? would that mess up my lab environment? thanks, and PLEASE help me out, here. i can see there are some well-educated people on this list... ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM and Voice [7:39849] unless you've already been through the lab, how do you know just how accurate your emulation is? ;-> to paraphrase someone smarter than me, good, cheap, accurate lab emulation - you can only have two. :-> ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hello > > after much research, i can't figure out a way to get cheap voice/ATM > combo routers to cut my costs. does anyone have any suggestions as to > how i can get ATM AND VoIP in my home lab. i want to purchase > everything myself, but at the same time, i want to do so in a way that > i can save money in the process. for example, (assuming i have a > lightstream switch) if i get a 3600 router with voice and ATM > installed, it will be well over $4K for each router with all those > interfaces. however, if i combine an MC3810 with voice and a 4000 with > ATM, i can cut my costs. but with this latter situation, will i still > be able to practice VoATM effectively? i really want to ACCURATELY > model a lab after cisco's CCIE lab environment. how can i do this > with the voice and ATM components? > > thanks in advance for your replies. btw, renting telnet access and or > going to another lab is not an option for me. > > thanks, > > eddie > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a > name of > Notebook.jpg] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39886&t=39849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how can I join the mail-list only for the lab in g [7:39883]
Hi All, Please I need assistance of all on these issue: 1. Is there a mailing-list for CCIE -Lab? 2. If there is, how can I subscribe to this list? Regards, Oke. = Regards, Banji (MCSE,CCNP). Snr. Technical Trainer. USG Technology Ltd. 15/17 Opebi Road. Ikeja, Lagos. Tel: 234-01-4932401-6 ICQ #: 75533196 __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39883&t=39883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traceback message [7:39887]
I have read a caveat of IOS 12.2(8)T and it mentions about traceback message. What is a traceback message? How bad is it? Does it relate to performance, security or other issues? Does it worth to sacrifice CEF in order to stop traceback messages? Thanks! hktco + CSCdw40174 If the fast switching is enabled on a dialer interface, traceback messages are generated with every echo reply. Workaround: Disable fast switching on the dialer interface. + Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39887&t=39887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch Design Question [7:39888]
Hi All, I am looking at this configuration: [PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the clients are accessing the Internet. Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the design. TIA KM _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39888&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 types of BPDUs? [7:39865]
They're not refering to the Configuration BPDU and Topology Change BPDU are they. Read Radia Perlman's book entitled "Interconnections". It's the bomb! Tim -Original Message- From: x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 types of BPDUs? [7:39865] The CID exam requirements state "Identify the two types of BPDUs." I can't find a reference to this anywhere. Any idea as to what this means? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards. http://movies.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39890&t=39865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAU 8228 [7:39891]
Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39891&t=39891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
At 9:26 AM -0500 3/29/02, KM Reynolds wrote: >Hi All, > >I am looking at this configuration: > >[PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] > >The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be >a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one >switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the >clients are accessing the Internet. > >Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the >design. > >TIA >KM Possibly. But the largest source of delay is probably your Internet link, unless it's 10 Mbps or faster. Some of the questions to answer about replacing the switches: Do the separate switches pass traffic (e.g., printer) that stays in their workgroup? Are there any distance restrictions between switch 2 and 3? Do separate switches help you distinguish between business units? Is the required number of ports due to increase, so you need to add capacity? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39898&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and it only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, though. -- James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP Sr. Network/Security Engineer "non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rik Guyler Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] Another bit of good info to know: Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid the necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 and 1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. Rik -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work in a 2600 router at 10mb Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. You could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years ago, given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost about $1000 per port. Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable option. Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with subinterfaces on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route between these vlans. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39893&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAU 8228 [7:39892]
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:22 AM To: Cisco Subject: MAU 8228 Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39892&t=39892 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traceback message [7:39887]
MADMAN wrote: > This particular bug doesn't seem as catastrophic but I > wouldn't worry > too much about disabling fast switching on a dialer interface > until a > bug fix is available or of coarse you can backrev. Also, assuming your dialer interfaces are relatively low speed, disabling fast switching on the dialer interface really won't impact the performance of that link. It might increase CPU usage, but again, if it's a slower link, it won't cause a huge increase. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39899&t=39887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fw: you American need to think [7:38323]
I replied to the guy posting 'you americans' and didn't see it on the list, too many short phrases that described colostomy bags, I think my company filtered it. But eff ewemight get past the filter...what do you think jimm? Kevin McCarty CCNA CCNP Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector JIm McDowell cc: Sent by: Subject: Fw: you American need to think [7:38323] nobody 03/28/2002 11:53 PM Please respond to JIm McDowell The words "DROP DEAD" immediately come to mind. Sorry for wasting your bandwidth, but I have to say this. Being rich is good; being smart is good. But if you treat others like sxxt, others will treat you like sxxt too. Think about this: if you are a CCNA and your CCIE co-worker say your "stupid" or "dumb", will you respect him? There are so many knowledgeable and friendly people on this list, but there are some rude and arrogant people too. I agree that Bin Laden is a murderer, an evil, but you American need to think why he only attacks US, not Germany or Russia or Japan or others. Show some respect to others, it won't make you poor. Also remember that there are always someone richer and smarter than you. Over. Dismiss. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39900&t=38323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
In a 10Mb environ, what the heck! I would speculate that double-up won't make an ROI out of consolidation. However, this brings up a nasty little problem I'm looking at, and I might phrase this another way. "How many cascaded switching devices can exist in a broadcast domain without creating unacceptable latency in the network?" I see some scary practices with repeated arrays of inexpensive switches, "RAIS", if you will. Each time a new workstation room is set up, the answer is to cascade more and more unmanaged hub/switches (sorry Cisco, it's a money thing) on the rack or down the copper to the room, or both. While the sweetness of low cost is succulent, surely there is a theoretical limit of how many members of a "RAIS array" one can cram into a building. So, boy and girl wonders, I've heard the magic number of "7". Anyone want to "do the math"? Very best and happy Friday, G. VP OGC > Subject: Switch Design Question [7:39888] > I am looking at this configuration: > > [PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBr > idge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[R > outer]---[ISPInternet] > > The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. > Whould it not be > a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace > it with one > switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to > traverse when the > clients are accessing the Internet. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39901&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traceback message [7:39887]
Tracebacks are generally baaad, they report internl errors, usually sofware and are most useful to TAC engineers who can run them thru their secret decoder ring and identify what process caused said errors. This particular bug doesn't seem as catastrophic but I wouldn't worry too much about disabling fast switching on a dialer interface until a bug fix is available or of coarse you can backrev. Dave David Wong wrote: > > I have read a caveat of IOS 12.2(8)T and it mentions about traceback > message. What is a traceback message? How bad is it? Does it relate to > performance, security or other issues? Does it worth to sacrifice CEF > in order to stop traceback messages? Thanks! > > hktco > + > CSCdw40174 > > If the fast switching is enabled on a dialer interface, traceback > messages are generated with every echo reply. > > Workaround: Disable fast switching on the dialer interface. > + -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39894&t=39887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
If the reason for the second switch is you ran out of ports, replacing it with a larger switch is fine if money in no object or you have another use for these two switches. Otherwise I wouldn't worry, the latency, though measurable is nothing to worry about compared to your Internet connection. Dave KM Reynolds wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am looking at this configuration: > > [PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] > > The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be > a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one > switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the > clients are accessing the Internet. > > Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the > design. > > TIA > KM > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39895&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Syslog/RMON recommendations [7:39897]
I'm looking to purchase Syslog and RMON software packages, does anybody have any good suggestions as to what works well with a nice price point. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39897&t=39897 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSH client for windows 95 [7:39869]
but when i connect using the ssh client i get this security alert. do you know what this means ? "PuTTY security alert The server's host key is not cached in the registry. You have no guarantee that the server is the computer you think it is. The server's key fingerprint is " 2048 1e:45:22:44:..:55:9a:7b If you trust this host hiy Yes and add the keys to the PuTTy's cache on connecting." how to recognise the fingerprint numbers that they belong to the host to which we are connecting. i don't think they refer to the MAC address because that is unique to the host. --- colin newman wrote: > Putty is a great SSH windows client. It supports > SSH versions 1 and 2. You __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39896&t=39869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
Do you know if there was a reason for Switch 3 being in the design? That's what I would try to find out Maybe it was necessary because Switch 2 is located in a wiring closet, whereas Switch 3 and the Wireless Bridge are in the main distribution frame. Or maybe Switch 2 only has fiber-optic ports (not likely, but you never know). Or maybe Switch 3 also connects a server farm. Or maybe the network designer wanted to keep things modular, which is a good idea. Maybe the designer added Switch 3 to try to contain problems related to the wireless bridge being flaky. Or maybe it's there just because that's the equipment that was available and there's no budget for a bigger switch. These days switches are so fast that I don't think you need to be too concerned about the switch adding any noticeable delay. But if there's no good reason for it being there, then you're right to question it. Simplifying the design would have some advantages: fewer devices to fail, a network design that is easier to understand and troubleshoot, etc. If you do buy another switch, you could really go wild and design a topology with more redundancy and fail-over in it! Use all the switches maybe. Priscilla At 09:26 AM 3/29/02, KM Reynolds wrote: >Hi All, > >I am looking at this configuration: > >[PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] > >The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be >a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one >switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the >clients are accessing the Internet. > >Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the >design. > >TIA >KM > > > >_ >MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: >http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39902&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM and Voice [7:39849]
first off, I can't resist being a smart ass, as most list members who've been around more than a couple of weeks will tell you. secondly, with regards to the Lab topology, the Soltie book doesn't even come close, based upon my last visit. that is not to say that Soltie is not worth studying. He covers the issues quite well indeed. My point is that if you focus on issues, as demonstrated in a number of study materials such as Soltie, Caslow, BootCamp, IPExpert, and others, you will acquire the skills that are necessary to pass. the core topics are no secret - and the biggest and most important thing one can spend time on is redistribution between any two routing protocols over any network topology or link. The success of accomplishing this, or the lack thereof effects reachability, and if you don't have reachability, none of the other stuff will work, be that voice, dlsw, ipx, or anything else they throw at you. with regards to your subsequent question, I'm in pre-sales myself, and I often use my home lab to mock up customer networks and test concepts for designs I am proposing. I don't have ATM, but I like your idea. I have not priced this out, but I would thing that T1 ATM would be sufficient. If you can do ILMI and various kinds of QoS that would be great. Sure wish I had the capability. Having the LS1010, if you had edge equipment such as 3810's or 2650's with the ATM module, so that you could emulate a cloud, I can see the practical advantage, not to mention the advantage for study. Regards Chuck ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > haha...touche, chuck! no, this is seriously going to be my first time. > i've done a lot of research, and am modeling my lab around the needs of > the "CCIE Practical Studies Vol. 1" book by Karl Solie. I figure, how > can I model my lab more accurately than if I do so from Cisco's book > itself? i am also using all my research from this group, as well as any > internet-based research i can find on the subject... > > anyway, good point about the "good, cheap, accurate..." deal. i guess > i'd say "cheap/accurate" is my requirement. anyway, thanks for your > response. i'm wondering if i overwhelmed everyone with too much info. > maybe i should focus on one at a time. therefore... > > ...ATM: for all your presale engineers out there...if i was to put > together an ATM lab with two ATM routers and 1 ATM switch, what would > you purchase as a minimum requirement while still being able to use all > the features that the lab would require? so far, i am thinking LS1010 > with CAM/PAM and the two routers with ATM interfaces are up in the air. > i was thinking of OC-3 interfaces all around, but even those are > expensive. can i use a T1 or ATM25 or T3 (etc.) interface to cut my > costs? would that mess up my lab environment? > > thanks, and PLEASE help me out, here. i can see there are some > well-educated people on this list... > > ed > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Chuck > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ATM and Voice [7:39849] > > > unless you've already been through the lab, how do you know just how > accurate your emulation is? ;-> > > to paraphrase someone smarter than me, good, cheap, accurate lab > emulation - you can only have two. :-> > > > > ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hello > > > > after much research, i can't figure out a way to get cheap voice/ATM > > combo routers to cut my costs. does anyone have any suggestions as to > > > how i can get ATM AND VoIP in my home lab. i want to purchase > > everything myself, but at the same time, i want to do so in a way that > > > i can save money in the process. for example, (assuming i have a > > lightstream switch) if i get a 3600 router with voice and ATM > > installed, it will be well over $4K for each router with all those > > interfaces. however, if i combine an MC3810 with voice and a 4000 with > > > ATM, i can cut my costs. but with this latter situation, will i still > > > be able to practice VoATM effectively? i really want to ACCURATELY > > model a lab after cisco's CCIE lab environment. how can i do this > > with the voice and ATM components? > > > > thanks in advance for your replies. btw, renting telnet access and or > > > going to another lab is not an option for me. > > > > thanks, > > > > eddie > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a > > name > of > > Notebook.jpg] > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39903&t=39849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisc
RE: ATM and Voice [7:39849]
For voice i'm looking at the mc3810, check those out and see if that will meet your needs. Still researching but there real cheap on ebay. HTH Jeff Edward Sohn wrote: > > hello > > after much research, i can't figure out a way to get cheap > voice/ATM > combo routers to cut my costs. does anyone have any > suggestions as to > how i can get ATM AND VoIP in my home lab. i want to purchase > everything myself, but at the same time, i want to do so in a > way that i > can save money in the process. for example, (assuming i have a > lightstream switch) if i get a 3600 router with voice and ATM > installed, > it will be well over $4K for each router with all those > interfaces. > however, if i combine an MC3810 with voice and a 4000 with ATM, > i can > cut my costs. but with this latter situation, will i still be > able to > practice VoATM effectively? i really want to ACCURATELY model > a lab > after cisco's CCIE lab environment. how can i do this with the > voice > and ATM components? > > thanks in advance for your replies. btw, renting telnet access > and or > going to another lab is not an option for me. > > thanks, > > eddie > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which > had a name of Notebook.jpg] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39889&t=39849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
Isn't the issue of the maximum number of cascaded switches mostly a questions of how long it would take to reconfigure the spanning tree when problems occur? A max of 7 is recommended based on the timing of Configuration BPDUs, etc. I don't think it's really an issue of how much latency is involved in forwarding frames. The delay can be as small as 10 microseconds for 64-byte Ethernet frames crossing high-end switches. In this particular design, reconvergence of the spanning tree isn't really an issue. His network is just one linear branch of a tree no matter how you look at it! ;-) Of course, he could fix that Priscilla At 11:51 AM 3/29/02, Hartnell, George wrote: >In a 10Mb environ, what the heck! I would speculate that double-up won't >make an ROI out of consolidation. > >However, this brings up a nasty little problem I'm looking at, and I might >phrase this another way. "How many cascaded switching devices can exist in a >broadcast domain without creating unacceptable latency in the network?" > >I see some scary practices with repeated arrays of inexpensive switches, >"RAIS", if you will. Each time a new workstation room is set up, the answer >is to cascade more and more unmanaged hub/switches (sorry Cisco, it's a >money thing) on the rack or down the copper to the room, or both. While the >sweetness of low cost is succulent, surely there is a theoretical limit of >how many members of a "RAIS array" one can cram into a building. > >So, boy and girl wonders, I've heard the magic number of "7". Anyone want >to "do the math"? > >Very best and happy Friday, G. >VP OGC > > > > > Subject: Switch Design Question [7:39888] > > I am looking at this configuration: > > > > [PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBr > > idge]---distance2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[R > > outer]---[ISPInternet] > > > > The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. > > Whould it not be > > a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace > > it with one > > switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to > > traverse when the > > clients are accessing the Internet. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39904&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
In the topology given, the real bottleneck is the wireless bridge ( assuming 11 meg shared ), and of course the ISP link speed. the switch to switch latency is not the killer here. other factors are numbers of users, especially the numbers crossing the wireless link. These suckers still tend to be half duplex. you running full duplex into your other switches? ""KM Reynolds"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > I am looking at this configuration: > > [PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---distan ce2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] > > The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be > a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one > switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the > clients are accessing the Internet. > > Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the > design. > > TIA > KM > > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39905&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSH client for windows 95 [7:39869]
John, 3 ways to verify the host key: 1) Connect over a network which you have a reasonable degree of confidence is secure. This would normally mean connecting over a LAN to the host in question to get its key. For the truly paranoid, this would mean connecting over a x-over cable to the host in question. 2) Have someone send you the host key and then cut and paste the key into the appropriate file. To have a degree of confidence you would have to receive the key through some fairly secure means, i.e. have a floppy fedexed to you, sent imbedded in an email with PGP, etc. 3) Call the person who manages the server, connect to the server, get the key and have them verify the received key over the phone. (this is proabably the easiest method) The keys are stored in files on each host. For example, using openssh, the hosts key is normally stored in a file called ssh_host_rsa_key.pub. Different client ssh programs store the public keys of the servers they talk to in different places. F-Secure's ssh client store them in a directory called 'hostkeys' and they have names like 'key_22_10.1.1.1.pub'. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Green Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SSH client for windows 95 [7:39869] but when i connect using the ssh client i get this security alert. do you know what this means ? "PuTTY security alert The server's host key is not cached in the registry. You have no guarantee that the server is the computer you think it is. The server's key fingerprint is " 2048 1e:45:22:44:..:55:9a:7b If you trust this host hiy Yes and add the keys to the PuTTy's cache on connecting." how to recognise the fingerprint numbers that they belong to the host to which we are connecting. i don't think they refer to the MAC address because that is unique to the host. --- colin newman wrote: > Putty is a great SSH windows client. It supports > SSH versions 1 and 2. You __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39906&t=39869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That could have helped :-) Thank you. >From: "James Wilson" >Reply-To: "James Wilson" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and >it >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, >though. > >-- >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP >Sr. Network/Security Engineer >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Rik Guyler >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Another bit of good info to know: > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid >the >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 >and >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > >Rik > >-Original Message- >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. >You >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years >ago, >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost >about $1000 per port. > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable >option. > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with >subinterfaces >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route >between these vlans. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39907&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Designated Port/Switch and Root Port?? [7:39811]
That was an excellent explanationThank you very much!! >From: "Rik Guyler" >Reply-To: "Rik Guyler" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Designated Port/Switch and Root Port?? [7:39811] >Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:10:09 -0500 > >I'll try to explain this: > >Think of a root port as the closest port to the root bridge on a given >BRIDGE. Think of a designated port as the closest port to the root bridge >on a given SEGMENT. This is the port used by all bridges on a given >segment >to get to the ROOT. Consider the following basic diagram to explain this >further with 1 root bridge, 3 non-root bridges and 3 segments: > >|ROOT|--segment 1--|A|--segment 2--|B|--segment 3--|C| > >The root port on bridge A is the closet int to ROOT - the int on the left. >The designated port on segment 1 is actually the int on ROOT that's in >segment 1. The root port on Bridge B is the closest int to ROOT - the int >on the left. The designated port on segment 2 is the closet interface to >ROOT in segment 2 - the int on the right side of bridge A. The root port >on >bridge C is the the closest int to ROOT - the int on the left. The >designated port on segment 3 is the port closest to ROOT - the int on the >right side of bridge B. > >So, you wind up with something like a consistent and logical topology: > >ROOT(DP)--(RP)A(DP)--(RP)B(DP)--(RP)C > >The real distinction is knowing that a root port is a designation specific >to a switch and a designated port is specific to a segment. To show this, >we can make the following modification to the above topology: > >ROOT(DP)--(RP)A(DP)--(RP)B(DP)--(RP)C > | > |--(RP)D(DP)--(RP)E > >In this case, there are 2 root ports in segment 2 but there will always be >ONLY 1 designated port per segment. This is one of the foundational >concepts of STP. Also, the ROOT will never have a root port, all non-root >bridges will have ONLY 1 root port (per VLAN) and there will ONLY be 1 >designated port per segment (per VLAN). Root ports send BPDUs and >designated ports receive BPDUs. > >Hope this helps, > >Rik > >-Original Message- >From: Lomker, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Designated Port/Switch and Root Port?? [7:39811] > > > > Hello,If every non-root bridge elects one root port to get to the > > root-bridge, then why do we still need a designated switch/port per > > segment? Do these two have different functions altogether?Thank you. > >I did a few searches on cisco.com and google and they appear to be >different >works for the same thing. I'll agree that the explanation I read in my >Examcram wasn't that explicit. > >http://netcert.tripod.com/ccna/switches/2switch.html > >"Ports that have the lowest cost to the root bridge are called designated >ports. The other ports on the bridge are considered non designated and >will >not send or receive traffic, (blocking mode)." _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39908&t=39811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP....... [7:39741]
You may want to check out the Partner E-Learning section of Cisco's website. If you have a CCO id you can access some of their VoD and web based FREE training such as IP Telephony Fundamentals. Cheers ""Mahesh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Any one can guide me for the VOIP Basic Technology. So that it can help me > for understanding the technology. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39909&t=39741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I have problem with IP telephony [7:39721]
What type of FXO card are you using? VIC-2FXO ? I was speaking with one of our local Cisco office SE's and they are pushing the VIC-2FXO-M1 which has the reversal on it and may help with your problems. Just a though. They are the same list price still. Cheers ""Pc9101"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear Group +ACE- > I've set up a system with an MCS server running Call Manager 3.1, a voice > gateway (router 3660 with FXO cards) some 7910. > > The problem is when I make phone call from PSTN to IP Phone, if i hang up the > analog phone, the IP phone still ring ring and ring ... it cannot stop until > I > pick it up. > > Do you know how to stop the ring when remote phone hung up ? > Thank you in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39910&t=39721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Study Kits [7:39911]
Sorry for the repost again but the buyer backed out at the last minute. I am selling brand new student kits for the following exams/classes to attain the CCNP certification. These are the actual materials/kit they gave you if you enroll in classes like BCRAN which cost about $2,000+. Each kit contains 2 volumes of book, CD, etc. These student kits are very very helpful in passing the exam. You will know what I mean, after you read and study using this, and pass the exam. Go to the exam blueprint in the Cisco website and compare the sections of the exam to the chapters of this materials and you will know I have the following: BCMSN - SWITCHING BCRAN - REMOTE ACCESS CIT - TROUBLESHOOTING Email me an offer for the 3 of them or anyone of them _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39911&t=39911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
A quick glance on the feature navigator afirms that you need the plus version. Memory is much cheaper if you don't buy it from Cisco!!! Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: > > So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus > feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this > absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just > the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus > feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my > 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That > could have helped :-) > Thank you. > > >From: "James Wilson" > >Reply-To: "James Wilson" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > > > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and > >it > >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, > >though. > > > >-- > >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP > >Sr. Network/Security Engineer > >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" > >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Rik Guyler > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Another bit of good info to know: > > > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or > >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to > >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid > >the > >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > > > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking > >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over > >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 > >and > >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > > > >Rik > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work > >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > > > > > > >Larry Letterman > >Cisco Systems > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked > >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > > > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. > >You > >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for > >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years > >ago, > >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost > >about $1000 per port. > > > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast > >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable > >option. > > > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port > >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, > >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with > >subinterfaces > >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route > >between these vlans. > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39912&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Min. IOS ver./Feature Set to run ISL trunking?? [7:39913]
Hello, The following link (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml) states that the min. ios ver and feature set for isl/802.q trunking on a Cisco 2620 is 12.1(5)T and 12.1(5)IP PLUS? Is there any way that it can be done with 12.0.7T or 12.0.5T1IP/IPX feature set? Can someone please confirm this? Thank you. _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39913&t=39913 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS5301 modem question [7:39917]
I have a 5301 that I'm trying to deploy. It has a quad T1 card in it. Is this where the modems are? It also has (2) AS53-CC2-DM cards in it. One of the AS53-CC2-DM cards has modems in SIMM slots 1 & 2. I'm not sure if they are 6 or 12's. My question is this, if they are sixes, does this mean I have only 12 modems total with this unit, or if they are 12's does this mean I have only 24 modems with this unit? If so, what good is the Quad T1 card? I just need a little help. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39917&t=39917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch Design Question [7:39888]
I was gonna say, perhaps the Switch2 has a Fiber connection, and thus the Switch3 was put in place because of lacking port density. Is it going to be cost effective to by a replacement larger switch with a Fiber port on it -just- so you can consolidate space/hops?? Of course, this is assuming that the distance b/t SW1 and SW2 is more than 100 meters, perhaps between buildings. If this is not the case, and the Fiber is simply providing a "Fast" Switch-to-Switch uplink and they are within the same closet... I would think that, providing "Money is not an issue", than why not consolidate all switches into one big switch. I agree though... if it's just a thang about speed to the 'Net then the Switches are the least of your worries... unless they are old, flaky, begging to be decommissioned so they can RIP :) I guess the big question is, where is each switch Geographically located, and of course... "What Problem Are You Trying To Solve?!?!" :-) Happy Easter folks! (for those who observe it) Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch Design Question [7:39888] At 9:26 AM -0500 3/29/02, KM Reynolds wrote: >Hi All, > >I am looking at this configuration: > >[PC]---[Switch1]---Fiber---[Switch2]---[Switch3]---[WirelessBridge]---dista nce2miles---[WirelessBridge]---[4Switch10Mb]---[Router]---[ISPInternet] > >The switches are all consist of 10Mb ports. The question. Whould it not be >a better design to take out switch2 and switch3 and replace it with one >switch with more ports. This would elimate one switch to traverse when the >clients are accessing the Internet. > >Any thoughts on this or if you see other things that may help with the >design. > >TIA >KM Possibly. But the largest source of delay is probably your Internet link, unless it's 10 Mbps or faster. Some of the questions to answer about replacing the switches: Do the separate switches pass traffic (e.g., printer) that stays in their workgroup? Are there any distance restrictions between switch 2 and 3? Do separate switches help you distinguish between business units? Is the required number of ports due to increase, so you need to add capacity? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39915&t=39888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Job opening [7:39916]
Hey guys/gals,
I realize this is not a job posting forum but wanted to give this to the
list before we posted on monster... :)
My manager is leaving for a new job and we have decided to replace her with
an engineer and divy up the managerial chores she once handled between the
team members. (adding a body to the on call rotation is the key drive
here!) :)
We are in the Atlanta area (Windy hill rd) if any are interested. Our
network consists of around 40 smaller sites and 5 major facillities.
(sonet mesh/45mb frame/t-1 up to shaped 6mb back/gig core/mixed dark fiber)
blah blah blah. about 100 servers, 80 or so intel/novell/nt, the rest
*nix (oh and 1 linux! ) :)
This is not an entry level position. Certification is not required and
frankly we could care less as long as you fit the bill. We would prefer
sombody with strong troubleshooting skills outside the realm of
connectivity. Connectivity is constantly called on to solve problems with
applications/workstations/servers and must have an open mind towards problem
solution.
(this is a 24x7 operation so you will be on call!)
Please do not respond to the list!
oh...and you must like linux... :)
-Patrick
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39916&t=39916
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FD change in EIGRP [7:39918]
Hi group, I was studying EIGRP on Jeff Doyle's Roting TCP/IP and came to a question: When is the FD for a destination updated and what triggeres the FD to be updated? In the followong scenario would FD change or not: In an EIGRP environment, a Router (RTC) has 2 feasible successors to network 10.1.7.0; RTA & RTB. Currently RTA is the seccessor so RTC's FD to 10.1.7.0 is the locally calculated metric through RTA. RTA's link to 10.1.7.0 fails and RTB becomes the new successor. Now will the FD on RTC change (increase) or not? Any inputs will be appreciated, Hamid __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39918&t=39918 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2600 with IPSEC to wins2000 environment [7:39798]
Try this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/2000.html -Mohinder ""Ricky Chan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Is there any good articles about how to configure c2600 with IPSEC to > connect to Windows2000 (IPSEC ready) environment? > > Thanks > > Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39919&t=39798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FD change in EIGRP [7:39922]
I found the answer on EIGRP's white paper: Yes the FD will be updated. But on Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP, chapter 8 before figure 8.15 it says that the FD will remain unchanged at Lilienthal: Because the distance to 10.1.7.0 has increased and the route did not become active, the FD is unchanged at Lilienthal. Can anybody explain why FD remain's unchanged? Thanks, Hamid __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39922&t=39922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AGS+ parts needed! [7:39921]
Hi all, I recently purchased an AGS+ on eBay and unfortunately it was damaged in shipment. Please don't waste BW telling me the shortcomings of the AGS+ over the 2520 series -- I already know that -- but cost was a major factor! Anyway, the area that was damaged was the on/off switch. Also the metal guard around the switch and the back plate. Very simply, the seller did not package the router correctly and left a space between the rear of the router and the side of the box. During shipment, the router probably constantly slid back and forth, with the switch each time hitting against the side of the box and whatever solid object was on the outside. The plates probably can be reshaped with some careful "banging" and "tapping." But the main item is the on/off switch! It has a neck which broke off from the main part of the switch with each part having a part that the other needs for the whole to function. In any event, I have searched the CCO to no avail!! Does anyone have any idea as to how/where I can obtain a replacement switch?? Any and all suggestions will be quite welcome. Thanks to all in advance. Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime AARP member Retired Attorney/Law Professor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39921&t=39921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanning Tree Enhancements [7:39920]
Hi Folks, Can someone please answer my following questions regarding various IEEE Standards that have been advanced to enhance the Spanning Tree Protocol: 1. Has some vendor implemented the 802.1V, 802.1W, and 802.1X standards in their equipment ? 2. If yes, then has it resulted in addition of more switching commands to augment STP implementation ? 3. With STP enhancements, is there a possibility that Ethernet networks can rival SONET's restoration times of 50msec or less in practical reality ? Any information will be welcome. TIA. Aziz S. Islam Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39920&t=39920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traceback message [7:39887]
Tracebacks are HEX dumps that, when decoded, tell the exact story of which process or harwdare/software components and routine casued the problem. Usually in case of exception or crash. IOS Developers use so called "symbol files:" to decode these messages. They build the symbol files when the IOS image is built. Nadeem == David Wong wrote: > I have read a caveat of IOS 12.2(8)T and it mentions about traceback > message. What is a traceback message? How bad is it? Does it relate to > performance, security or other issues? Does it worth to sacrifice CEF > in order to stop traceback messages? Thanks! > > hktco > + > CSCdw40174 > > If the fast switching is enabled on a dialer interface, traceback > messages are generated with every echo reply. > > Workaround: Disable fast switching on the dialer interface. > + Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39923&t=39887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name in ISDN mapping statement [7:39924]
Hello Folks, In ISDN configuration, there is an option to use hostname in the mapping command. For example, rtrA: dialer map ip 138.2.80.2 name rtrB broadcast 2005 rtrB: dialer map ip 138.2.80.1 name rtrA broadcast 2004 What is the main purpose of using the remote hostnames in the mapping commands. I have tried all combination and it works just fine without it. If I remove name from one side, I would still be able ping between each other and vice versa. If I remove name from the both sides, I would still be able to ping. Tried CCO, but no real explanation. Regards, Ali Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39924&t=39924 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Name in ISDN mapping statement [7:39924]
Its for use with CALLBACK secure and so on, its a way to verify that the calling router dialing the called router is the right one. It uses the hostanme, so the name rtrA is actually the hostname of rtrA. Its for callback secure. Cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39925&t=39924 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
It should work with IP feature. IP Plus is not mandatory but recommended. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That could have helped :-) Thank you. >From: "James Wilson" >Reply-To: "James Wilson" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and >it >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, >though. > >-- >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP >Sr. Network/Security Engineer >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Rik Guyler >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Another bit of good info to know: > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid >the >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 >and >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > >Rik > >-Original Message- >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. >You >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years >ago, >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost >about $1000 per port. > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable >option. > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with >subinterfaces >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route >between these vlans. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39926&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ parts needed! [7:39921]
It's been awhile since I saw an AGS+ so I hope that the following applies. If cosmetics is not an issue then I'd suggest any old AC power switch that can be purchased at Radio Shack. If necessary, let it hang out of the case. Just make sure that no energized bare metal parts are exposed. They sell shrink tubing and other such coverings that can be slipped over wires and terminals. The covering is then shrunk to fit by applying heat. > -Original Message- > From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 6:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AGS+ parts needed! [7:39921] . the main item is the on/off switch! > > It has a neck which broke off from the main part of the > switch with each > part having a part that the other needs for the whole to function. > > In any event, I have searched the CCO to no avail!! Does > anyone have any > idea as to how/where I can obtain a replacement switch?? Any and all > suggestions will be quite welcome. > > Thanks to all in advance. > > Greg Macaulay > Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth > Lifetime AARP member > Retired Attorney/Law Professor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39927&t=39921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router question.. [7:39788]
how to use secondary ip address or sub-interface routing 3 different and separate LANs? how the 3 LANs connect to one interface of a router ? Thank you. mlh - Original Message - From: "Roberts, Larry" To: Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: RE: Router question.. [7:39788] > Several ways. > > Sub-interfaces and inter-vlan routing ( 802.1q or isl ) or the less secure > but easier way of just using secondary IP's on the Ethernet interfaces. > > Thanks > > Larry > > -Original Message- > From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Router question.. [7:39788] > > > Hi all, > > My boss just come up and give me a senario question like this. He told me > that I owned a company which uses 3 different LANs, for example, > 172.27.10.x, 172.27.11.x, 172.27.12.x. But I only have one cisco 2600 series > router and 2900 series switch. I can't use the serial ports from the router. > Just the two ethernet ports (by default). My question is, is it possible? > Please advice. > > Thanks > > Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39928&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CoS on 6500 [7:39929]
Hi All - I am having "priority default" value of 5 for Class of Service on Cisco 3548s. I wonder what value should I should on other Cisco switches, say 6500s or 4000s? Is it the same value of 5 for the CoS on these Cisco switches? Thanks! Thomas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39929&t=39929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CoS on 6500 [7:39929]
By the way, I intention for using CoS is for VoIP, Video over IP. ""Thomas"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All - I am having "priority default" value of 5 for Class of Service on > Cisco 3548s. I wonder what value should I should on other Cisco switches, > say 6500s or 4000s? Is it the same value of 5 for the CoS on these Cisco > switches? Thanks! > > Thomas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39930&t=39929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: do you know anything like this [7:39932]
Sorry it must be: I have discovered www.elance.com. Anything similar with this one ? Forums Canada wrote: > > I have discovered www.elance.com ? > Anything similar with this one ? > > Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39933&t=39932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Syslog/RMON recommendations [7:39897]
See Kiwi Syslog Daemon. (kiwi enterprise) I dont remeber the website The only Rmon agent I tested was: Rmonster website: www.triticom.com I guess travis marlow wrote: > > I'm looking to purchase Syslog and RMON software packages, does anybody have > any good suggestions as to what works well with a nice price point. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39934&t=39897 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: do you know anything like this [7:39932]
I have discovered www.elance.com ? Anything similar with this one ? Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39932&t=39932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router question.. [7:39788]
that issue was covered yesterday extensively by myself and several other people... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mlh Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Router question.. [7:39788] how to use secondary ip address or sub-interface routing 3 different and separate LANs? how the 3 LANs connect to one interface of a router ? Thank you. mlh - Original Message - From: "Roberts, Larry" To: Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: RE: Router question.. [7:39788] > Several ways. > > Sub-interfaces and inter-vlan routing ( 802.1q or isl ) or the less secure > but easier way of just using secondary IP's on the Ethernet interfaces. > > Thanks > > Larry > > -Original Message- > From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Router question.. [7:39788] > > > Hi all, > > My boss just come up and give me a senario question like this. He told me > that I owned a company which uses 3 different LANs, for example, > 172.27.10.x, 172.27.11.x, 172.27.12.x. But I only have one cisco 2600 series > router and 2900 series switch. I can't use the serial ports from the router. > Just the two ethernet ports (by default). My question is, is it possible? > Please advice. > > Thanks > > Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39935&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router question.. [7:39788]
A sample config with secondary ip addresses might look like: int e0 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 If you were to connect a hub to that interface you could assign connected PCs to either subnet. Those PCs could communicate with each other. If you have the equipment, create a small lab to verify this. If the same scenario as above were repeated, but this time a switch was substituted for the hub - it would still work. All switch ports would be in the same VLAN. The switch is clueless about the ip addressing of the PCs. While this is possible - it is not best design practice. Larry's prior post also mentioned using trunking between the router and switch. In that case, the switch would be divided into "virtual switches" by assigning groups of switch ports to seperate VLANs. PCs associated with different VLANs cannot communicate without benefit of a routing function. Usual practice is to associate an ip subnet with a VLAN. If there were two VLANs and the local router had two or more Ethernet interfaces then a switch port from each VLAN could be connected to its own router interface. Nothing fancy here. Not much different from two hubs. As the number of VLANs grew it would chew up switch and router ports. Read 'gets expensive fast.' Again, if you have the equipment - try it. A better solution is to use trunking. One switch port is connected to one router port. aka "Router on a stick." The switch port is configured to do trunking. Encapsulation is determined. The router interface would be configured with subinterfaces corresponding to the various subnets and their associated VLANs. The encapsulation would match that configured on the switch. My guess is this is the solution desired by Ricky's boss. > -Original Message- > From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Router question.. [7:39788] > > > how to use secondary ip address or sub-interface routing 3 > different and > separate LANs? how the 3 LANs connect to one interface of a router ? > > Thank you. > > mlh > > > - Original Message - > From: "Roberts, Larry" > To: > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:46 AM > Subject: RE: Router question.. [7:39788] > > > > Several ways. > > > > Sub-interfaces and inter-vlan routing ( 802.1q or isl ) or > the less secure > > but easier way of just using secondary IP's on the Ethernet > interfaces. > > > > Thanks > > > > Larry > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Router question.. [7:39788] > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > My boss just come up and give me a senario question like > this. He told me > > that I owned a company which uses 3 different LANs, for example, > > 172.27.10.x, 172.27.11.x, 172.27.12.x. But I only have one > cisco 2600 > series > > router and 2900 series switch. I can't use the serial ports from the > router. > > Just the two ethernet ports (by default). My question is, > is it possible? > > Please advice. > > > > Thanks > > > > Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39936&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Written... [7:39937]
I passed the written today..thanks to all the posters, and the great info.. I am relatively new on the list, but I still got some great help here..keep up the good work... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Forums Canada Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: do you know anything like this [7:39932] Sorry it must be: I have discovered www.elance.com. Anything similar with this one ? Forums Canada wrote: > > I have discovered www.elance.com ? > Anything similar with this one ? > > Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39937&t=39937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Written... [7:39937]
Hi Larry, list of books? courses taken? tips? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39938&t=39937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Written... [7:39937]
I only used the Caslow book and then practiced the Boson #3 test by Dennis L.his test is almost a mirror of the test...Some router and switch lab time and hands on at work is invaluable ... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Written... [7:39937] Hi Larry, list of books? courses taken? tips? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39939&t=39937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
