Re: How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013]
Yeah.. SOrry for Typp From: Ocsic Reply-To: Ocsic To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 02:51:38 -0500 do you mean Mobile IP ? IT Guy Guys, Can you pleasee help me to forward some Link or Right procedure for HOW to configure Mobile ARP?? I can see the Docs in CD and on CISCO but its very long procedure whereas the procedure the guys are used to discussed here on list is a short one ..which is the right way to go??? Thanks for help TOM _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40018t=40013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013]
at cisco web site.. you can find out the sample config for the mobile ip solution with clear explanation ~ Cool~~~ ^o^ IT Guy Yeah.. SOrry for Typp From: Ocsic Reply-To: Ocsic To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 02:51:38 -0500 do you mean Mobile IP ? IT Guy Guys, Can you pleasee help me to forward some Link or Right procedure for HOW to configure Mobile ARP?? I can see the Docs in CD and on CISCO but its very long procedure whereas the procedure the guys are used to discussed here on list is a short one ..which is the right way to go??? Thanks for help TOM _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40019t=40013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: help for STUN [7:40012]
The whole idea is to try and use a dial-up modem and simulate it to make it work as a serial modem. The answering modem has a PSTN line connected to it.Thats the reason... We needed to get it working with a Point Of Sale terminal. Pankaj Haiping Li wrote: You should use another modem, such as RAD or Motorola serial modem to implement the dialing and sychronization. Richard Lee - Original Message - From: pankaj kulkarni Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:27 PM Subject: help for STUN [7:40012] gt; Dear All, gt; gt; gt; I require certain help regarding serial tunneling (STUN). The modem gt; connected to the home router is US Robotics 33.6k courier. gt; gt; gt; Here are the details of the current scenario in the Serial Tunneling issue: gt; gt; gt; 1. Serial interfaces of the 2 routers (home and remote)have been configured gt; for Stun. gt; gt; gt; 2. The serial interface on the home router is showing UP, but needs the gt; modem to provide the clocking(DCE). How do u do that? gt; gt; gt; 3. The handshake process is not going through when the call lands on the gt; answering modem connected to the home router. How do u set this right? gt; gt; gt; Pls find below the configs for both the routers along with the connectivity gt; diagram: gt; gt; gt; RouterA#show run gt; gt; gt; Building configuration... gt; gt; gt; Current configuration: gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; version 12.0 gt; gt; gt; service timestamps debug uptime gt; gt; gt; service timestamps log uptime gt; gt; gt; no service password-encryption gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; hostname RouterA gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ip subnet-zero gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; stun peer-name 10.1.2.50 gt; gt; gt; stun protocol-group 1 basic gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Ethernet0/0 gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Serial0/0 gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; encapsulation stun gt; gt; gt; nrzi-encoding gt; gt; gt; stun group 1 gt; gt; gt; stun route all tcp 10.1.2.51 gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Ethernet0/1 gt; gt; gt; ip address 10.1.2.50 255.255.255.0 gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Serial0/1 gt; gt; gt; physical-layer async gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ip classless gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; tftp-server flash exit gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; line con 0 gt; gt; gt; transport input none gt; gt; gt; line 2 gt; gt; gt; line aux 0 gt; gt; gt; line vty 0 4 gt; gt; gt; login gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; end gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; RouterB#show run gt; gt; gt; Building configuration... gt; gt; gt; Current configuration: gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; version 12.0 gt; gt; gt; service timestamps debug uptime gt; gt; gt; service timestamps log uptime gt; gt; gt; no service password-encryption gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; hostname RouterB gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ip subnet-zero gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; stun peer-name 10.1.2.51 gt; gt; gt; stun protocol-group 1 basic gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Ethernet0/0 gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Serial0/0 gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; encapsulation stun gt; gt; gt; no ip mroute-cache gt; gt; gt; nrzi-encoding gt; gt; gt; clockrate 56000 gt; gt; gt; stun group 1 gt; gt; gt; stun route all tcp 10.1.2.50 gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Ethernet0/1 gt; gt; gt; ip address 10.1.2.51 255.255.255.0 gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; interface Serial0/1 gt; gt; gt; no ip address gt; gt; gt; no ip directed-broadcast gt; gt; gt; shutdown gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ip classless gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; line con 0 gt; gt; gt; transport input none gt; gt; gt; line aux 0 gt; gt; gt; line vty 0 4 gt; gt; gt; login gt; gt; gt; ! gt; gt; gt; end gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; Regards, gt; gt; gt; Pankaj gt; Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com gt; Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from gt; http://www.planetm.co.in gt; gt; gt; gt; gt; Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40020t=40012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
RE: root switch [7:39975]
If you turn off Spanning Tree, the switch will never become root. Tim 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40021t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX and OSPF Updates [7:40022]
Hi Guys, There was a thread going around regarding PIX and OSPF updates. I need those emails as I accidently deleted them. Plz anyone can forward me those mails? I'll be grateful. Shahid = Shahid Muhammad Shafi Every man dies; not every man really lives Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40022t=40022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
Hi, Just a reminder,Higher priority means lower value.. If still not becoming a root bridge,use this command set spantree root Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Tim O'Brien cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupsSubject: RE: root switch [7:39975] tudy.com 01/04/2002 12:57 Please respond to Tim O'Brien If you turn off Spanning Tree, the switch will never become root. Tim 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40023t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
I agree...always enter a specific value. Yonghai, there is one thing I want to clear up after reading your posts. MAC address only comes into the root election process AFTER the bridge ID selection process. Since the default bridge ID on a Cisco switch will always be the same value, MAC addresses are the only DEFAULT value that will be unique. Once you specify a given bridge ID, the MAC address is no longer used for root election. Rik -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] How about setting your priority to 1? That will make it the root :D or even 0! Default is 32768. We always make ours 0 or 1, I never use set spantree root.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40024t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSEC question scenario [7:40025]
Hi all, I have another scenario question and would like to hear from your expertise opinion. machine A 10.10.10.1/24 machine B 10.10.10.2/24 machine c 10.10.100.1/24 I configured IPSEC for all these machines. Machine A can talk to Machine B, but Neither A and B can talk to Machine C. Obviously, Machine C belongs to diff network. If I put a router in between. I need to configure IPSEC in the router in order to let them talk to each other. Do you know how to complish this? Thanks alot. Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40025t=40025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aux - aux 2501-2501 frame relay switch [7:40026]
Hi group Someone posted sometime ago how to configure two 2501 to act as a frame relay switch by connecting them via the aux ports can someone please post the configuration again please. Thanks Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40026t=40026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAU 8228 [7:39891]
Hi Pierre, Yes, I am using IBM 8228 as the Token-Ring Hub, connecting two Cisco 2612, with a straigth UTP cable. No problem so far, the Token-ring interface can run on 16MB speed. HTH Engelhard M. Labiro Security Group, Technical Solution Center, Netmarks Inc. 2-13-34 Konan, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0075 Tel: +81-3-5461-2575, Fax: +81-3-5461-2093 - Original Message - From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL To: Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 12:24 AM Subject: MAU 8228 [7:39891] Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40028t=39891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSEC question scenario [7:40025]
Hi Rik, You can include a access-list on your router to permit esp,ahp and UDP port 500 for isakmp Ur access-list should like one given below, access-list acl-name permit esp src_ip dest_ip access-list acl-name permit ahp src_ip dest_ip access-list acl-name permit udp src_ip dest_ip eq isakmp Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Ricky Chan cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupsSubject: IPSEC question scenario [7:40025] tudy.com 01/04/2002 14:01 Please respond to Ricky Chan Hi all, I have another scenario question and would like to hear from your expertise opinion. machine A 10.10.10.1/24 machine B 10.10.10.2/24 machine c 10.10.100.1/24 I configured IPSEC for all these machines. Machine A can talk to Machine B, but Neither A and B can talk to Machine C. Obviously, Machine C belongs to diff network. If I put a router in between. I need to configure IPSEC in the router in order to let them talk to each other. Do you know how to complish this? Thanks alot. Ricky ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40027t=40025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
Using this command only sets the bridge priority to 8192, meaning that anything lower than 8192 would take over as root. To give a switch the best chance to become and stay root, I would probably use this command as well as then setting the priority to 0. The only way that a different switch would take over after applying both of these commands would be a preferred MAC address. You can edit this also if you really wanna mess with things. Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] Hi, Just a reminder,Higher priority means lower value.. If still not becoming a root bridge,use this command set spantree root Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Tim O'Brien cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupsSubject: RE: root switch [7:39975] tudy.com 01/04/2002 12:57 Please respond to Tim O'Brien If you turn off Spanning Tree, the switch will never become root. Tim 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40029t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
Hi, Its true I forgot to mention that Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Tim O'Brien , i.rr.com cc: Fax to: 01/04/2002 Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] 14:35 Using this command only sets the bridge priority to 8192, meaning that anything lower than 8192 would take over as root. To give a switch the best chance to become and stay root, I would probably use this command as well as then setting the priority to 0. The only way that a different switch would take over after applying both of these commands would be a preferred MAC address. You can edit this also if you really wanna mess with things. Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] Hi, Just a reminder,Higher priority means lower value.. If still not becoming a root bridge,use this command set spantree root Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Tim O'Brien cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupsSubject: RE: root switch [7:39975] tudy.com 01/04/2002 12:57 Please respond to Tim O'Brien If you turn off Spanning Tree, the switch will never become root. Tim 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40030t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Len Lee/CHI/NTRS is out of the office. [7:40031]
I will be out of the office starting March 25, 2002 and will not return until April 1, 2002. I will respond to your message when I return. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40031t=40031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switching [7:40033]
I passed Switching with an 899 this Saturday. Boooyaa! I am = of the way there to CCNP. After that test, I felt like my brain was fried from all the studying. Afterwords I went out and had a few drinks, which I have not done in a long while. My head hurt even more the next day. That was kinda dumb of me :-) I did manage to study some for the CIT when it wore off! I was checking out the learnkey videos CIT, man they pack a lot of stuff on those video CDs. Brian CCNA, MCSE, A+ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40033t=40033 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switchs Environment Question [7:40034]
Switch Setups Opinion Team, The following is how we setup our switches in our network in one building: All ports are configure to full, 10mb and enable port fast The up link is configure as full, 100, not enable port fast The rest of the switch configuration is using the default settings (SWITCH MODEL 2950) Network layout (FRAME-RELAY SPOKE)5 floors, a switch in each floor all connected to a switch in the first floor, which connects to a 1600 router, which has a connection To a frame-relay network. (FRAME-RELAY HUB) All PC's are configure to a 10mb-full My question, is this an efficient way of this configuration... Thanks, J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40034t=40034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40035t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
That's funny. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS David Wolsefer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40036t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40037t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
what's funny? At 10:49 AM 4/1/2002 -0500, James Haynes wrote: That's funny. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS David Wolsefer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40038t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034]
Design sounds reasonable to me from what the info I have below. Fan out from 10 to 100 looks good. I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router anyone else ? Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J-B Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Switch Setups Opinion Team, The following is how we setup our switches in our network in one building: All ports are configure to full, 10mb and enable port fast The up link is configure as full, 100, not enable port fast The rest of the switch configuration is using the default settings (SWITCH MODEL 2950) Network layout (FRAME-RELAY SPOKE)5 floors, a switch in each floor all connected to a switch in the first floor, which connects to a 1600 router, which has a connection To a frame-relay network. (FRAME-RELAY HUB) All PC's are configure to a 10mb-full My question, is this an efficient way of this configuration... Thanks, J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40039t=40034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40040t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Thats hebrew is it?? David Wolsefer @groupstudy.com on 04/01/2002 10:21:18 AM Please respond to David Wolsefer Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40041t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034]
I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router My biggest concern is the lack of redundancy in this design. If the basement switch goes out then the entire company is down. I have a Cat 4006 or 5500 on each of the floors. I utilize a daisy-chain approach with Gig Ethernet over fiber. This way if any one switch fails it'll only take out one floor. You'll want a lot of redundancy in your server room switch because if it goes out, then once again, your entire network is down. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40042t=40034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034]
I would choose the trunking method of connecting switches over the daisy chain. The 5 switches can be trunked to the bottom basement switch, yielding less delay and providing a smoother convergence for STP. If you want redundant links, use a 2nd switch in the basement and apply 2nd links from the basement switch's to the floor switch's. You can either have seperate vlans or one flat vlan network, altho I'd choose a vlan per floor with 10bt to prevent broadcast from slowing the whole network down. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router My biggest concern is the lack of redundancy in this design. If the basement switch goes out then the entire company is down. I have a Cat 4006 or 5500 on each of the floors. I utilize a daisy-chain approach with Gig Ethernet over fiber. This way if any one switch fails it'll only take out one floor. You'll want a lot of redundancy in your server room switch because if it goes out, then once again, your entire network is down. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40043t=40034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pix: static translation how to ? [7:40044]
INTERNET | | 205.11.22.9 PIX | 10.10.10.1 --- | | | | | | 10.10.10.2 10.10.10.3 10.10.10.4 WEB SERVER host host requirement : web server running at 10.10.10.2 at port 80 should be accessible by users on the internet, they connect to 205.11.22.9:80 instead. what should be the nat/global statements for such a scenario ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40044t=40044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Regular Expression [7:40045]
I am multihomed to two ISP's. I want to choose ISP#1 for reaching the IP addresses which belongs to ISP #1 and its directly connected ASs and use ISP #2 to reach all other IP addresses. I have a default running towards ISP#2 and learning specifics from ISP#1. I tried filtering routes I recieved from ISP #1 using as-path acl as below: IP AS-PATH ACCESS-LIST 20 PERMIT ^2914_[0-9]*$ From: Larry Letterman Reply-To: Larry Letterman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:26:17 -0500 Design sounds reasonable to me from what the info I have below. Fan out from 10 to 100 looks good. I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router anyone else ? Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J-B Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Switch Setups Opinion Team, The following is how we setup our switches in our network in one building: All ports are configure to full, 10mb and enable port fast The up link is configure as full, 100, not enable port fast The rest of the switch configuration is using the default settings (SWITCH MODEL 2950) Network layout (FRAME-RELAY SPOKE)5 floors, a switch in each floor all connected to a switch in the first floor, which connects to a 1600 router, which has a connection To a frame-relay network. (FRAME-RELAY HUB) All PC's are configure to a 10mb-full My question, is this an efficient way of this configuration... Thanks, J _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40045t=40045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I am not fluent in Russian, but I am fluent on how to translate stuff using Office XP. I have a plugin that translates any document language to any other language. Check out Worldlingo.com, you might be able to translate it there for free. There are some cool free plug ins for Office XP. I can do really cool stuff, not just the simple stuff like Spanish or French. I can translate my English documents to Japanese, or even Chinese, Viet etc. and vice versa. So the joke is not on me :) Thanks for the free guide :) -Original Message- From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40047t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus on RFCs [7:40046]
I think that we don't often enough point people toward reading RFCs during their studies. Some people, like Steven Ridder (as evidenced by his email sig) do take the time to read through RFCs to make sure they really understand the technology. On that note, here is a link to one of the more recent RFCs that I find particularly enlightening: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3251.txt Very interesting reading, I must say. Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40046t=40046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Regular Expression [7:40049]
I am multihomed to two ISP's. I want to choose ISP#1 for reaching the IP addresses which belongs to ISP #1 and its directly connected ASs and use ISP #2 to reach all other IP addresses. I have a default running towards ISP#2 and learning specifics from ISP#1. I tried filtering routes I recieved from ISP #1 using as-path acl as below: IP AS-PATH ACCESS-LIST 20 PERMIT ^2914_[0-9]*$ which works fine, but problem is that I m recieving some of the prefixes with AS prepend. As above mentioned as-path acl will accept from 2 as at the most, i m not getting the prefixes with AS prepend in my bgp routing table. Can I modify the AS-PATH ACL in such a way that I can EVEN see the prefixes which are prepended multiple times? Thanks Veerender Attri CCIE #8964 From: Larry Letterman Reply-To: Larry Letterman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:26:17 -0500 Design sounds reasonable to me from what the info I have below. Fan out from 10 to 100 looks good. I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router anyone else ? Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J-B Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Switch Setups Opinion Team, The following is how we setup our switches in our network in one building: All ports are configure to full, 10mb and enable port fast The up link is configure as full, 100, not enable port fast The rest of the switch configuration is using the default settings (SWITCH MODEL 2950) Network layout (FRAME-RELAY SPOKE)5 floors, a switch in each floor all connected to a switch in the first floor, which connects to a 1600 router, which has a connection To a frame-relay network. (FRAME-RELAY HUB) All PC's are configure to a 10mb-full My question, is this an efficient way of this configuration... Thanks, J _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40049t=40049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034]
over the daisy chain. The 5 switches can be trunked to the bottom basement switch, yielding less delay and providing a smoother convergence for STP. If you want redundant links, I don't see why STP delay would be an issue; perhaps you are referring to ethernet traffic? With a Gig backbone my trunk utilization is under 2%. There is only one blocked link (top floor to basement). Regardless of approach, there will be a 30 second delay if you use backbonefast. Separate VLANs per floor would be be nice but redesigning the network isn't an option right now. They just went from public IP's to a single /16 network last year. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40050t=40034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpls vpns [7:40052]
Hi All: Could some one point me to the working configuration of MPLS Based VPNs in Multi-Autonomus systems in which ASBRs are not Provider Edge Routers. Thank you Salman __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40052t=40052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
No but a previous RFC was used in this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm Watch the wrap -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040] Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40051t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Uhh, No Speaka Rusky Free Cisco Cisco Stuff at http://www.gdd.net - Original Message - From: David Wolsefer To: Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40048t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Equipment [7:40032]
I'm planning on setting up a home lab and I've noticed that most places offer a 30 day warranty on used Cisco equipment...(usedrouter.com)... Tancom.net offers a one year warranty...they will swap out the defective piece for another working 'used' one... However, their prices are significantly higher than usedrouter.com... eg. UsedRouter.com - 2503 - 435.00 Tancom - 2503 - 695.00 on one hand I feel like the peace of mind is worth some more money but on the other hand, what is the likelihood there will be a problem...AND I won't be buying just one router, so the cost difference will be huge for the entire lab... What experience have others had with purchasing used equipment? warranties? etc? If the router does go bad and you have no warranty? what options are available at that stage? Any help greatly appreciated. Shaun Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40032t=40032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 May I point out today's date? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40053t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multi Link PPP ( MLP ) questions [7:39961]
I checked this out and you are correct. Interesting. someday when I have less to do I'll revisit this using the multilink interfaces on both ends and see if this phenomenon happens out of the box. I am curious about the CEF option. I checked, and CEF does appear to be available on the 36xx platform ( and maybe lower ) these days. Do you still have the issues of per packet versus per destination? Chuck Lupi, Guy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Try no peer neighbor-route on the multilink interfaces, that should get rid of your /32. It is part of ppp, when the negotiation takes place a /32 is input for the other side. I do not use multilink unless it cannot be avoided, I have had issues that make the use of it unappealing. Is there any reason you can't just use CEF or fast switching and have multiple routes to the spokes, one down each T1? If you are using CEF, it is more efficient to do it this way because there is no overhead. In multilink each packet gets an additional 4 byte (I think) header. By the way, I believe that the virtual template method is outdated and no longer used. You don't need it anyway, just the multilink interface and the serials specified as part of it. Of course this assumes that you are using a recent IOS version. HTH. Guy ~-Original Message- ~From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:25 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: Multi Link PPP ( MLP ) questions [7:39961] ~ ~ ~not that I enjoy rattling around CCO researching obscure ~topics, but I have ~had two different customers raise the specter of multilink ppp ~(use multiple ~T1's to increase bandwidth without having to resort to the ~expense of ATM or ~DS3 ) ~ ~CCO tends to be rather obscure on this topic, with most of the coverage ~devoted to ISDN links for dial access. see ~http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121 ~/121cgcr/dial ~ts_c/dtsprt4/dcdppp.htm#xtocid44 ~ ~as an example. ~ ~in any case, the basic case of 2 serial links between two routers is ~relatively simple, provide you follow the setup procedure carefully. ~otherwise you end up in reload hell ;- ~ ~But then I got curious about the case where you have three ~routers in a hub ~and spoke. Two serial links to one spoke, two serial links to ~the other. ~This got to be rather involved, and the final working result ~has left me ~with a situation I can't explain rationally. ~ ~the process: ~ ~Spoke router ~ ~1) multilink virtual-template x ~ ~2) interface virtual-template x ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~ ~3) interface serial 0 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~ ~4) interface serial 1 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~ ~Hub router ~ ~1) multilink virtual-template x (apparently you can only ~have one of ~these commands, even though x may have a value of 1-25) ~ ~2) interface multilink 1 ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~3) interface serial 0 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~4) interface serial 1 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~5) interface multilink 2 ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~6) interface serial 2 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~7) interface serial 3 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~this configuration works. but here is the kicker. in the ~following routing ~table, note the /32's associated with the virtual-access ~interface on the ~spoke router. the hub router shows /32's associated with the multilink ~interfaces. ~ ~Spoke router ~ ~Gateway of last resort is not set ~ ~ 172.21.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets ~C 172.21.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 ~C 172.21.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback1 ~ 22.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks ~D 22.29.1.0/24 [90/5948928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~D 22.29.1.1/32 [90/5948928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~ 129.7.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets ~D 129.7.22.0 [90/6076928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~D 129.7.44.0 [90/6076928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:11, ~Virtual-Access1 ~ 26.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks ~C 26.44.1.2/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1 ~C 26.44.1.0/24 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1 ~ ~Hub router ~ ~Gateway of last resort is not set ~ ~ 172.21.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets ~D 172.21.1.0 [90/3312896] via 26.44.1.1, 00:22:31, Multilink1 ~D 172.21.2.0 [90/3312896] via 26.44.1.1, 00:22:31, Multilink1 ~ 22.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks ~C 22.29.1.0/24 is directly connected, Multilink2 ~C 22.29.1.1/32 is directly connected, Multilink2 ~
JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40056t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
It is not permited to sse it! yousiad it is free today!! Julio Garcia - Original Message - From: David Wolsefer To: Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:21 AM Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40055t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
those preparing for upcoming lab dates, not to mention dealing with crabby customers, have no sense of humor. BTW, Howard, I ran into a quote of yours on a terrorism newsgroup of all places. something about false pregnancy being the result of laboring under a misconception. Chuck Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 May I point out today's date? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40057t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
APRIL FOOLS GUYS!!! =0) B Rudy wrote: JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40058t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISCO STOCK SOON TO SELL FOR $150 [7:40059]
contact me off line and you can have mine for only $75 Chuck APRIL FOOL!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40059t=40059 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
potential candidate: Common Reliable Accounting for Network Element (CRANE) Protocol the ietf pages seem to stop at 3/28/02. maybe I don't know where to look? Robert Fowler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No but a previous RFC was used in this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm Watch the wrap -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040] Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40060t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40061t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]
Well-described comments on your part, may I add. Perhaps a shade off the mark, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Focus on RFCs [7:40046] I think that we don't often enough point people toward reading RFCs during their studies. Some people, like Steven Ridder (as evidenced by his email sig) do take the time to read through RFCs to make sure they really understand the technology. On that note, here is a link to one of the more recent RFCs that I find particularly enlightening: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3251.txt Very interesting reading, I must say. Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40062t=40046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Not yet on the IETF-announce list, but the RFC editor is in California. The day is young. -- Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 703-998-5819 Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications Technical Director, CertificationZone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40063t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN issues [7:40064]
Well, I am having some trouble with VPN sessions getting disconnected. I have a Cisco VPN 3005 at the main office that sits in the DMZ zone of a Cisco PIX-515-R and at the remote end I have a Sonicwall ProVX that VPNs into the VPN concentrator. We are using IPSec Lan-to-Lan IKE-3DES-MD5 for the tunnel and have no trouble establishing a connection. But after a few day the Sonicwall disconnects from the VPN and the only way to get it to reconnect is to logout the session on the VPN concentrator. Also the syslog output from the concentrator says key exchange is failing and on the log for the Sonicwall it indicates that it is not getting a response from the remote end. What can I do to prevent this from happening? Thanks, Joe Carr MCDBA, CCDA, CCNP, CCIE (written) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40064t=40064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
One of today's new RFCs can be found at: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3251.txt Good stuff! John On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: potential candidate: Common Reliable Accounting for Network Element (CRANE) Protocol the ietf pages seem to stop at 3/28/02. maybe I don't know where to look? Robert Fowler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No but a previous RFC was used in this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm Watch the wrap -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040] Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40065t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Line protocol goes up and down [7:39766]
i agree. looks like facilities issue. check back with your provider. if not bad facilities, then misconfigured or bad optioning on lec's transport equipment. Tom XU wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... you should ask your isp to check the line again carefully,i think there is something wrong on this line. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40067t=39766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multi Link PPP ( MLP ) questions [7:39961]
You should be able to use CEF on anything above or equal to a 2600, and maybe the 1600's? Not positive. There are no issues that I know of as far as per-packet versus per-destination, you can define on a per interface basis that the load sharing is to be per-packet with ip load-sharing per-packet, or per-destination with ip load-sharing per-destination. It works very well. Guy -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multi Link PPP ( MLP ) questions [7:39961] I checked this out and you are correct. Interesting. someday when I have less to do I'll revisit this using the multilink interfaces on both ends and see if this phenomenon happens out of the box. I am curious about the CEF option. I checked, and CEF does appear to be available on the 36xx platform ( and maybe lower ) these days. Do you still have the issues of per packet versus per destination? Chuck Lupi, Guy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Try no peer neighbor-route on the multilink interfaces, that should get rid of your /32. It is part of ppp, when the negotiation takes place a /32 is input for the other side. I do not use multilink unless it cannot be avoided, I have had issues that make the use of it unappealing. Is there any reason you can't just use CEF or fast switching and have multiple routes to the spokes, one down each T1? If you are using CEF, it is more efficient to do it this way because there is no overhead. In multilink each packet gets an additional 4 byte (I think) header. By the way, I believe that the virtual template method is outdated and no longer used. You don't need it anyway, just the multilink interface and the serials specified as part of it. Of course this assumes that you are using a recent IOS version. HTH. Guy ~-Original Message- ~From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:25 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: Multi Link PPP ( MLP ) questions [7:39961] ~ ~ ~not that I enjoy rattling around CCO researching obscure ~topics, but I have ~had two different customers raise the specter of multilink ppp ~(use multiple ~T1's to increase bandwidth without having to resort to the ~expense of ATM or ~DS3 ) ~ ~CCO tends to be rather obscure on this topic, with most of the coverage ~devoted to ISDN links for dial access. see ~http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121 ~/121cgcr/dial ~ts_c/dtsprt4/dcdppp.htm#xtocid44 ~ ~as an example. ~ ~in any case, the basic case of 2 serial links between two routers is ~relatively simple, provide you follow the setup procedure carefully. ~otherwise you end up in reload hell ;- ~ ~But then I got curious about the case where you have three ~routers in a hub ~and spoke. Two serial links to one spoke, two serial links to ~the other. ~This got to be rather involved, and the final working result ~has left me ~with a situation I can't explain rationally. ~ ~the process: ~ ~Spoke router ~ ~1) multilink virtual-template x ~ ~2) interface virtual-template x ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~ ~3) interface serial 0 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~ ~4) interface serial 1 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~ ~Hub router ~ ~1) multilink virtual-template x (apparently you can only ~have one of ~these commands, even though x may have a value of 1-25) ~ ~2) interface multilink 1 ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~3) interface serial 0 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~4) interface serial 1 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 1 ~ ~5) interface multilink 2 ~ip address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~6) interface serial 2 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~7) interface serial 3 ~encap ppp ~ppp multilink ~multilink-group 2 ~ ~this configuration works. but here is the kicker. in the ~following routing ~table, note the /32's associated with the virtual-access ~interface on the ~spoke router. the hub router shows /32's associated with the multilink ~interfaces. ~ ~Spoke router ~ ~Gateway of last resort is not set ~ ~ 172.21.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets ~C 172.21.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 ~C 172.21.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback1 ~ 22.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks ~D 22.29.1.0/24 [90/5948928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~D 22.29.1.1/32 [90/5948928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~ 129.7.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets ~D 129.7.22.0 [90/6076928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:10, ~Virtual-Access1 ~D 129.7.44.0 [90/6076928] via 26.44.1.2, 00:20:11, ~Virtual-Access1 ~ 26.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2
RE: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]
A 'shade' off the mark? Would that be a regular lampshade or perhaps a MPLampS shade? ;-) Tom Ranalli 4/1/02 10:45:47 AM Well-described comments on your part, may I add. Perhaps a shade off the mark, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Focus on RFCs [7:40046] I think that we don't often enough point people toward reading RFCs during their studies. Some people, like Steven Ridder (as evidenced by his email sig) do take the time to read through RFCs to make sure they really understand the technology. On that note, here is a link to one of the more recent RFCs that I find particularly enlightening: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3251.txt Very interesting reading, I must say. Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40068t=40046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cat5505 and bootp [7:40069]
I have a Cat5505 with RSM. I have multiple vlans setup and use the RSM for the routing. I have a bootp server on one vlan that supports all the clients on all the vlans. It recently quit working. Upon sniffing the segment where the bootp server is, it shows the requests coming from vlan ip address (ie 192.168.4.1) instead of the actual client (ie 192.168.4.10)(it used to show up as the actual client.) My client has stated nothing in the config has changed, and from what I can see everything looks good. Is there a command similiar to ip helper-address I can use in CatOS? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40069t=40069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wireless certification [7:40071]
Hi, I passed CWNA (Certified Wireless Network Administrator) exam last week. I guess someone, in this mailing list, wrote about cisco certification in wireless domain. I looked at the cisco site but could not find any (or may be I just overlooked them)... Does anyone know about those certifications. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40071t=40071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Contest [7:40072]
I'll give you another, www.cisco.com Brian Zeitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ill give you a free website that you can find tons of Free white papers, Recourses and everything you need for your exams if you can tell me who AKA William S. Bonnie is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40074t=40072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contest [7:40072]
OK you didn't catch that the middle initial isn't an S. but ill give it to you anyway. The site is www.cisco.com -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:09 PM To: Brian Zeitz Subject: Re: Contest [7:40072] EVERYONE knows that one! bang bang you're politically correctly having the pistol shot out of your hand ;- Chuck - Original Message - From: Brian Zeitz Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, 01 April, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Contest [7:40072] Ill give you a free website that you can find tons of Free white papers, Recourses and everything you need for your exams if you can tell me who AKA William S. Bonnie is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40075t=40072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cat5505 and bootp [7:40069]
changed, and from what I can see everything looks good. Is there a command similiar to ip helper-address I can use in CatOS? You'd use the ip helper command on the RSM, under each VLAN interface. Have you checked the RSM config to see if they are there? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40076t=40069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Contest [7:40072]
It is an S, but the alias is William H. Brian Zeitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... OK you didn't catch that the middle initial isn't an S. but ill give it to you anyway. The site is www.cisco.com -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:09 PM To: Brian Zeitz Subject: Re: Contest [7:40072] EVERYONE knows that one! bang bang you're politically correctly having the pistol shot out of your hand ;- Chuck - Original Message - From: Brian Zeitz Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, 01 April, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Contest [7:40072] Ill give you a free website that you can find tons of Free white papers, Recourses and everything you need for your exams if you can tell me who AKA William S. Bonnie is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40078t=40072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab Equipment [7:40032]
I personally don't think my piece of mind would be worth that much. Buy hardware from a reputable source on E-bay or I have the number of an individual I had GREAT success with in California. They sell large volumes of hardware and I also have the number of someone for memory which you will need. The hardware person goes under the name of BabyJake on E-bay and I have nothing but good things to say about them or the way they conduct business. You can call them direct and have them check inventory if you don't see what you want on E-bay. Contact me offline if interested for their number also. -Original Message- From: Shaun Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Equipment [7:40032] I'm planning on setting up a home lab and I've noticed that most places offer a 30 day warranty on used Cisco equipment...(usedrouter.com)... Tancom.net offers a one year warranty...they will swap out the defective piece for another working 'used' one... However, their prices are significantly higher than usedrouter.com... eg. UsedRouter.com - 2503 - 435.00 Tancom - 2503 - 695.00 on one hand I feel like the peace of mind is worth some more money but on the other hand, what is the likelihood there will be a problem...AND I won't be buying just one router, so the cost difference will be huge for the entire lab... What experience have others had with purchasing used equipment? warranties? etc? If the router does go bad and you have no warranty? what options are available at that stage? Any help greatly appreciated. Shaun Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40073t=40032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]
No matter how many times I subscribe, unsubscribe, and re-subscribe, I can't get the GroupStudy Listserve server to send me only 1 copy of all messages, it always sends me at least 2. Has anyone who has recently subscribed or re-subscribed having the same problem? I don't want to bother the list moderator or Paul until I can confirm the problem is not on my end. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40077t=40077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40070t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Level of Support [7:40079]
OK, I am back to being serious :-) What is the difference in support from a router under warranty, VS. if you bought a router with a Smartnet contract? Is Smartnet only so you can get parts faster? If you have a router that is only under warranty WITHOUT a smartnet contract, can you just call in and talk to a TAC engineer? Or is buying a router with Smartnet so you CAN call in and talk to a TAC engineer? Thanks in Advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40079t=40079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Contest [7:40072]
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Brian Zeitz wrote: :Ill give you a free website that you can find tons of Free white papers, :Recourses and everything you need for your exams if you can tell me who :AKA William S. Bonnie is. Billy The Kid -- --Rick Meader's Law: Whatever happens to you, it will previously have happened to everyone you know, only more so. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40080t=40072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cat5505 and bootp [7:40069]
My understanding is what your seeing is correct. Your client boots up and is braindead, does a bootp request. Router, with ip-helper address configured, forwards. (routes) bootp request to server with it's own address as the source. Bootp server gets request and routes brains back to router which hands it over to soon to be smarter client. The cat operates at layer 2 in which casse the helper address is irrelevant. Dave NetEng wrote: I have a Cat5505 with RSM. I have multiple vlans setup and use the RSM for the routing. I have a bootp server on one vlan that supports all the clients on all the vlans. It recently quit working. Upon sniffing the segment where the bootp server is, it shows the requests coming from vlan ip address (ie 192.168.4.1) instead of the actual client (ie 192.168.4.10)(it used to show up as the actual client.) My client has stated nothing in the config has changed, and from what I can see everything looks good. Is there a command similiar to ip helper-address I can use in CatOS? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40082t=40069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stranger than April 1 [7:40083]
True, not April 1, followup. If you look on the copyright/trademark page of the IOS 9.1 documentation, you will find Trouter among the trademarks. It was intended to be Cisco's trade name for a combined router/terminal server. Apparently, the name seemed fishy to many potential customers, and it didn't scale well. There is, incidentally, a small form of trout called a cisco. Cisco and Synoptics discussed a merger before the Bay merger. Cisco was going to contribute Router information, while Synoptics had the hUB expertise. If you go to an early Cisco Internetworking Glossary, you will find the terms Rub and Rubsystem. Clearly, very Californian. When Cisco first came out with 2500 series routers with built-in hubs, they officially called them hublets. The name never caught on. I did mention this in one of my CID courses, and a student observed that if one considered the British pronunciation, the combination of a hub and router could be a hooter. Cisco political correctness could never handle this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40083t=40083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40081t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Regular Expression [7:40049]
Better yet why not get only default via BGP from ISP2 and receive partial routes from ISP1 with floating static pointing at ISP1. Not as fancy but it works. Dave Mahesh Manjanatha wrote: I am multihomed to two ISP's. I want to choose ISP#1 for reaching the IP addresses which belongs to ISP #1 and its directly connected ASs and use ISP #2 to reach all other IP addresses. I have a default running towards ISP#2 and learning specifics from ISP#1. I tried filtering routes I recieved from ISP #1 using as-path acl as below: IP AS-PATH ACCESS-LIST 20 PERMIT ^2914_[0-9]*$ which works fine, but problem is that I m recieving some of the prefixes with AS prepend. As above mentioned as-path acl will accept from 2 as at the most, i m not getting the prefixes with AS prepend in my bgp routing table. Can I modify the AS-PATH ACL in such a way that I can EVEN see the prefixes which are prepended multiple times? Thanks Veerender Attri CCIE #8964 From: Larry Letterman Reply-To: Larry Letterman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:26:17 -0500 Design sounds reasonable to me from what the info I have below. Fan out from 10 to 100 looks good. I might question the ability of the aggregation switch buffering the data from 5 switches while passing data to the router anyone else ? Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J-B Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switchs Environment Question [7:40034] Switch Setups Opinion Team, The following is how we setup our switches in our network in one building: All ports are configure to full, 10mb and enable port fast The up link is configure as full, 100, not enable port fast The rest of the switch configuration is using the default settings (SWITCH MODEL 2950) Network layout (FRAME-RELAY SPOKE)5 floors, a switch in each floor all connected to a switch in the first floor, which connects to a 1600 router, which has a connection To a frame-relay network. (FRAME-RELAY HUB) All PC's are configure to a 10mb-full My question, is this an efficient way of this configuration... Thanks, J _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40084t=40049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Authentication between hub and one spoke only [7:40085]
Given the following frame-relay setup: rtrA - hub, no subinterface rtrB - spoke, one subinterface rtrC - spoke, one subinterface All of the frame-relay interfaces are in OSPF area 0 Does anyone have any tips for enabling OSPF MD5 authentication between just rtrA and rtrB? If rtrA had a dedicated subinterface for each spoke, then you could simply use the IOS 12.0 command of ip ospf authentication message-digest on the subinterface connected to rtrB. However, the scenario I'm working with stated that the hub router had no subinterfaces. Thanks in advance. Treece Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40085t=40085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contest [7:40072]
If memory serves, William S. Bonnie is Billy the Kid -K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Zeitz Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Contest [7:40072] Ill give you a free website that you can find tons of Free white papers, Recourses and everything you need for your exams if you can tell me who AKA William S. Bonnie is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40086t=40072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
Yes..my mistake.. Portfast for access ports, bpdu-guard for switch protection. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:11 PM To: Larry Letterman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] At 01:50 AM 4/1/02, Larry Letterman wrote: For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing the set spantree root command. This should lower the prio. of the root/sec root switches to insure that they will always be the roots... We also use portfast to insure no unwanted switches are plugged into our network and allowed to become live Does that really work? A port in portfast mode still listens to BPDUs in case another switch instead of a workstation gets connected. If another switch gets connected, the port will do its normal blocking, listening, learning, and forwarding state transitions. I don't think just configuring portfast will stop an unwanted switch from becoming live?? Were you thinking of something else maybe? Thanks, Priscilla Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40088t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring Switch [7:40087]
Hello I have had a chance to look at the IBM Nways 8272 token ring switch and realized that the CLI looks hauntingly familiar to a Cat 3920. Does anyone have experience using the 8272 and know if it has vlan capabilities ? Any information is greatly appreciated. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40087t=40087 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reposting: cisco secure authentication agent ? [7:40089]
reposting as i got just one reply [7:39972] what is this cisco secure authentication agent ? CS ACS server is understood fine, but what is this authentication agent ? can someone explain ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40089t=40089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access-list problem [7:40092]
I want to use NAT and access-list to protect our web server with private ips 172.16.1.3 to .12 The following is the configuration file. If my web server ip is 172.16.1.3, then from outside I cannot get anything if I search pub_ip_3 If I added access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www, which is working fine. Can someone correct this problem? Also I know it is not good access list, especially icmp and telnet, I don't want to disable them, but what is good way to do it? Thank you very much Shawn ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname 1605 ! boot system flash c1600-sy.mz.120-9.bin no logging console enable secret 5 $1$iMHN$BUS2hInuqH0G5AvS4FHc1/ ! ip subnet-zero no ip source-route ip telnet source-interface Ethernet0 ip name-server name_server_ip ! snmp community public ro 5 ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside no shutdown no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Ethernet1 ip address pub_ip-1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside no shutdown no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ip access-group 101 in ip access-group 102 out ! ip nat inside source list 99 interface Ethernet1 overload ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.3 pub_ip_3 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.4 Pub_ip_4 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.5 pub_ip_5 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.6 pub_ip_6 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.7 pub_ip_7 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.8 pub_ip_8 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.9 pub_ip_9 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.10 pub_ip_10 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.11 pub_ip_11 ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.12 pub_ip_12 ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 gateway ! access-list 99 permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 !permit all redirects access-list 101 permit icmp any any redirect ! !permit ping access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo ! !stop localhost from going anywhere access-list 101 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any ! !stop multicast from going anywhere access-list 101 deny ip 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 any ! !stop 172.16.1.0/24 from getting to anything access-list 101 deny ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any ! !permit telnet from anywhere access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet ! !permit anything from established connection access-list 101 permit tcp any any established ! !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 2121--ftp server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq 2121 ! !permit external dns servers to go anywhere access-list 101 permit ip host dns_ip any access-list 101 permit ip host dns_ip any ! !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 80--web server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq www ! !permit terminal service access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq 3389 ! !permit web sites analysis monitoring for Azeb access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq 8080 ! !permit SNMP for traffic monitor access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 161 access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 162 ! !permit ping from local to anywhere access-list 101 permit icmp any any ! !Access-list 102 is for outgoing traffic, which means any packet !leaving my network has a source address from my net so that it !will prevent people from sending spoofed packets via my net. access-list 102 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 102 permit ip 66.x.x.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 102 deny ip any any ! !access-list 5 is for SNMP and Telnet access-list 5 permit 66.x.x.0 0.0.0.255 ! _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40092t=40092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I noticed a Galina Pildush was listed as CCIE # 5858, but using Cisco's on-line verification tool it shows a David Wolsefer as being CCIE # 5858. Does Cisco has a certification path for people with split personalities? :) -Original Message- From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40094t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40095t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
April Fools!! From: B Rudy Reply-To: B Rudy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:27:28 -0500 JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40096t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
It's actually in Russian, but it turned out that it was highly dependent on browser. Word 2000, almost any browser on the Mac as long as the OS is Mac X, etc., work, as do an assortment of other things. I personally can't read it, but I promise: the April Fool's part really is in Russian, the MPLS paper proper is in English. The Russian goes away tomorrow and everyone should be able to read the paper. For the record, I neither read Russian nor formatted the page! -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40098t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I don't know, last time someone made a pitch like that. I found out they got paid for doing work for the site. My employer gives me 3500 a year for educational stuff, and that money is going for a Masters degree. All I need is an internet terminal and some free time to get those things you mentioned :-) Anyway, to each his own -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:00 PM To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag i=40070t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40090t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
perhaps a better name would be cissi-fer( sissy fur ) anyone any good at anagrams. maybe among the combined letter of cisco and juniper there is some good pun or other. B Rudy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40097t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]
Perhaps your E-mail Client is having an issue, or your firewall is experiencing an issue similar to the issue reported with the Ciso PIX Firewal and SMTP Fixup. Just a couple of ideas to look at. I occasionally experience a duplicate message from the GroupStudy server, but I think it may have something to do with duplicated submissions in the Moderators Que... of which they don't realize until its all said and done. Again, this only happens occasionally... not with every single message. HTHs -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] No matter how many times I subscribe, unsubscribe, and re-subscribe, I can't get the GroupStudy Listserve server to send me only 1 copy of all messages, it always sends me at least 2. Has anyone who has recently subscribed or re-subscribed having the same problem? I don't want to bother the list moderator or Paul until I can confirm the problem is not on my end. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40093t=40077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Do you really want to trust the management of your core equipment to anything microsoft puts out? Mann, Chris 04/01/02 04:05PM Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40099t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buy Vs. Virtual Rack Time for CCIE [7:40100]
I'm looking for comments about preparing for the CCIE Lab Exam. Do you NEED to buy the equipment to build a home lab, or is it possible to be enough prepared by practicing totally through renting rack time? (and in this dream world, money isn't an issue) I would really like to hear feedback about this. Thanks Bill Mckenzie, MCP+I,MCSE,CCNA,CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40100t=40100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buy Vs. Virtual Rack Time for CCIE [7:40101]
I'm looking for comments about preparing for the CCIE Lab Exam. Do you NEED to buy the equipment to build a home lab, or is it possible to be enough prepared by practicing totally through renting rack time? (and in this dream world, money isn't an issue) I would really like to hear feedback about this. Thanks Bill Mckenzie, MCP+I,MCSE,CCNA,CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40101t=40101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
cyrillic characters. Good April Fool to create some buzz. Fred. Brian Zeitz wrote: I am not fluent in Russian, but I am fluent on how to translate stuff using Office XP. I have a plugin that translates any document language to any other language. Check out Worldlingo.com, you might be able to translate it there for free. There are some cool free plug ins for Office XP. I can do really cool stuff, not just the simple stuff like Spanish or French. I can translate my English documents to Japanese, or even Chinese, Viet etc. and vice versa. So the joke is not on me :) Thanks for the free guide :) -Original Message- From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40103t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Chris, We've been looking into several network management packages. The answers all seem to be the same. Network management software can find devices via a number of methods but all need the hardware vendor's specific management software to adequately work with each company's devices. In the case of Cisco that would of course be Cisco Works. I don't know yet whether MS's SMS software interfaces with CiscoWorks or not but it would certainly be able to manage it via Active Directory. There are several other companies that have similar software that would integrate with Active Directory as well. Hope that helps some, David Armstrong Mann, Chris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40104t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
I used this on a couple of my friend. I said the Cisco and Juniper were Merging. I think that is more believable :) -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] perhaps a better name would be cissi-fer( sissy fur ) anyone any good at anagrams. maybe among the combined letter of cisco and juniper there is some good pun or other. B Rudy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40106t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redistribution Matrix is back (2) [7:40107]
Several people have mentioned they had trouble pulling up the page, but if they tried a few minutes later they were able to bring it up. This may have something to do with the site, or the traffic to it, but if you are interested and still can't get to it, let me know off-line. Thanks -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 8:56 AM Subject: FW: Redistribution Matrix is back A few months ago I proposed a document with examples of IGP redistribution. I finished putting together a first draft, and have posted it at www.laganiere.net. Comments are welcome, and if anybody has anything to add, please let me know... Thanks... --- Dennis Laganiere _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40107t=40107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I wish I got paid for doing work for them. However even if I had the knowledge to write one of the papers they don't have, I would probably lack the technical writing skills. However if they want to start paying me I'd probably be a less obvious in my praise. I would agree that anything on their site is obtainable for free from anywhere else. However reading the papers I find that they written in an easy to understand form, so you spend less time having to reread information and can spend more time thinking about it. Granted I don't think it's perfect, I'd like a better structure on the site, I think it's an excellent tool for someone who isn't pursuing their Masters degree but instead one of the Cisco Certifications. :) (that'd be me) Robert Fowler Unpaid, Unofficial site endorser of certificationzone.com who is merely stating his long winded opinion in pursuit of his 3rd major certification. :) -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I don't know, last time someone made a pitch like that. I found out they got paid for doing work for the site. My employer gives me 3500 a year for educational stuff, and that money is going for a Masters degree. All I need is an internet terminal and some free time to get those things you mentioned :-) Anyway, to each his own -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:00 PM To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag i=40070t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40102t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]
Just ask the Moderator to use some Hold down Timers... -Original Message- From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] Perhaps your E-mail Client is having an issue, or your firewall is experiencing an issue similar to the issue reported with the Ciso PIX Firewal and SMTP Fixup. Just a couple of ideas to look at. I occasionally experience a duplicate message from the GroupStudy server, but I think it may have something to do with duplicated submissions in the Moderators Que... of which they don't realize until its all said and done. Again, this only happens occasionally... not with every single message. HTHs -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] No matter how many times I subscribe, unsubscribe, and re-subscribe, I can't get the GroupStudy Listserve server to send me only 1 copy of all messages, it always sends me at least 2. Has anyone who has recently subscribed or re-subscribed having the same problem? I don't want to bother the list moderator or Paul until I can confirm the problem is not on my end. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40105t=40077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Written... [7:39937]
Did you use the First addition or the second addition of Caslows' book Ko Larry Letterman wrote: I only used the Caslow book and then practiced the Boson #3 test by Dennis L.his test is almost a mirror of the test...Some router and switch lab time and hands on at work is invaluable ... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Written... [7:39937] Hi Larry, list of books? courses taken? tips? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40108t=39937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Today's date? Here? The 2nd of April (when the mail was sent)! Gee, some countries are just sooo behind the times sometimes... ;-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/04/2002 08:40 am - Howard C. Berkowitz Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/04/2002 03:19 am Please respond to Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 May I point out today's date? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40110t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The best practice for Standard QoS with Cat 2900/3500xl and [7:40111]
Has anynoe implemented end-to-end QoS with Cat2900/3500XL and 2600 over mixture of Frame-Relay and leased T1s with multiple vendor IP Phones(Especially Avaya 4600 Series)? I am looking for a detailed config information on this. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40111t=40111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reposting: cisco secure authentication agent ? [7:40089]
According to CCO: The CiscoSecure Authentication Agent (CAA) sits on a remote SOHO site client PC or a dial-in client PC served by a host network and provides a user GUI for end users to access and manage their ISDN or dial-in connections to their host network with CiscoSecure ACS for Windows NT or CiscoSecure ACS for UNIX installed. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/secureaa/csa a3b.htm John Green wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... reposting as i got just one reply [7:39972] what is this cisco secure authentication agent ? CS ACS server is understood fine, but what is this authentication agent ? can someone explain ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40112t=40089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: static translation how to ? [7:40044]
1)nat (inside) 1 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.255 nat (inside) 2 0 0 global (outside) 1 205.11.22.9 global (outside) 2 interface if you are using 205.11.22.9 as outside ip address of the PIX, then just: nat (inside) 1 0 0 global (outside) 1 interface 2) You have to have static, if connection is being initiated from the outside: static (inside,outside) tcp 205.11.22.9 80 10.10.10.2 80 netmask 255.255.255.255 3) Allow port 80 traffic from outside: conduit permit tcp host 205.11.22.9 eq 80 any or if you are using acl: access-list name permit tcp any host 205.11.22.9 eq 80 Port Redirection with Statics http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/28.html#port -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Green Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pix: static translation how to ? [7:40044] INTERNET | | 205.11.22.9 PIX | 10.10.10.1 --- | | | | | | 10.10.10.2 10.10.10.3 10.10.10.4 WEB SERVER host host requirement : web server running at 10.10.10.2 at port 80 should be accessible by users on the internet, they connect to 205.11.22.9:80 instead. what should be the nat/global statements for such a scenario ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40114t=40044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Chris, Let me add to what David has said well. While Active Directory is Microsoft Directory service and is based on industry standard X.500 and LDAP and Kerboros. It is SNMP that is the only link between your Microsoft and Cisco devices. Therefore, management at best is monitoring the whole network. I think you will find that programs, such as Ciscoworks, are written because of the nature of business. Every manufacture wants his product to be unique. As far as SMS goes, it is capable of detection and monitor any snmp device. The key would be the response to the monitoring. SMS could only notify you at certain alert levels. This may be fine for your purposes. As final thought, consider your purposes and needs for management. I think that a combination of products is currently your best for full management! Bill Harrison MCSE, CCNP Instructor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Armstrong Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Chris, We've been looking into several network management packages. The answers all seem to be the same. Network management software can find devices via a number of methods but all need the hardware vendor's specific management software to adequately work with each company's devices. In the case of Cisco that would of course be Cisco Works. I don't know yet whether MS's SMS software interfaces with CiscoWorks or not but it would certainly be able to manage it via Active Directory. There are several other companies that have similar software that would integrate with Active Directory as well. Hope that helps some, David Armstrong Mann, Chris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40113t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
At 01:50 AM 4/1/02, Larry Letterman wrote: For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing the set spantree root command. This should lower the prio. of the root/sec root switches to insure that they will always be the roots... We also use portfast to insure no unwanted switches are plugged into our network and allowed to become live Does that really work? A port in portfast mode still listens to BPDUs in case another switch instead of a workstation gets connected. If another switch gets connected, the port will do its normal blocking, listening, learning, and forwarding state transitions. I don't think just configuring portfast will stop an unwanted switch from becoming live?? Were you thinking of something else maybe? Thanks, Priscilla Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40115t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN issues [7:40064]
Make sure that timeouts/sa lifetime for phase 1 and phase 2 are identical. Possibly Sonic firewall sa reaches its lifetime, but it's not notifying VPN 3000 that it's bringing the tunnel down. So when Sonic tries to re-negotiate a new sa, VPN 3000 ignores that request as it still has the old valid sa. -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joseph Carr Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN issues [7:40064] Well, I am having some trouble with VPN sessions getting disconnected. I have a Cisco VPN 3005 at the main office that sits in the DMZ zone of a Cisco PIX-515-R and at the remote end I have a Sonicwall ProVX that VPNs into the VPN concentrator. We are using IPSec Lan-to-Lan IKE-3DES-MD5 for the tunnel and have no trouble establishing a connection. But after a few day the Sonicwall disconnects from the VPN and the only way to get it to reconnect is to logout the session on the VPN concentrator. Also the syslog output from the concentrator says key exchange is failing and on the log for the Sonicwall it indicates that it is not getting a response from the remote end. What can I do to prevent this from happening? Thanks, Joe Carr MCDBA, CCDA, CCNP, CCIE (written) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40116t=40064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Whether it's April 1st, or April 2nd, all I can say is that someone over at CertificationZone obviously had too much time on their hands! Russian? -- Leigh Anne PS. I wonder if CertZone has any readers that are fluent in Russian. I'd love to see how the translation did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Today's date? Here? The 2nd of April (when the mail was sent)! Gee, some countries are just sooo behind the times sometimes... ;-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/04/2002 08:40 am - Howard C. Berkowitz Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/04/2002 03:19 am Please respond to Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 May I point out today's date? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** ** ** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40117t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplicate messages problem fixed [7:40118]
My duplicate messages problem from the GroupStudy Listserve server has been fixed. It was my client's filters and copying instead of simply moving to another mailbox. Thanks everyone for your help! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40118t=40118 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
! ! ! Howard: It's in cyrillic characters but it certainly isn't in Russian. The English can be read if one sounds out the cyrillic characters. I'm not a Russian reader but I do know how to sound out most of the alphabet. This was confirmed by a native Russian speaker. One of the first lines reads phonetically - What is traffic engineering? Cheers, Fred Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: It's actually in Russian, but it turned out that it was highly dependent on browser. Word 2000, almost any browser on the Mac as long as the OS is Mac X, etc., work, as do an assortment of other things. I personally can't read it, but I promise: the April Fool's part really is in Russian, the MPLS paper proper is in English. The Russian goes away tomorrow and everyone should be able to read the paper. For the record, I neither read Russian nor formatted the page! -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40120t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access-list for 3548 XL switch [7:40121]
Can someone tell me the command sequence for creating an access-list on a Cisco 3548 XL switch? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40121t=40121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
