RE: bonehead move [7:40991]
Edward, could you possibly take your flash card to your local cisco office and see if'll they'll throw a valid catos image on it. If they can't, what about your local cisco reseller. I'm sure they'll be happy to help a person that has boxes like that in their home lab. Heck, I put an ad in my local newspaper looking for a study partner in my city (of 200k people) and found someone that has about the same amount of equipment. And here I thought I was the only one in my hick town with that kinda gear. tim -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bonehead move [7:40991] If all else fails, I'll send you a flash card. Let me know if you need it(assuming you dont get something else) Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward Sohn Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bonehead move [7:40991] hey all i was trying to upgrade my flash on my Cat5/SupIII to the latest version, when I decided to delete the old flash first...well, ater rebooting--DUH--the Cat booted into rommon mode...i didn't have an image on file, and i couldn't do an xmodem via rommon mode, because the CCO site says i have to have version 5 rommon or later, which i don't (4.2). thus, according to the CCO site, the only ways to restore an image is to (1) use a flash card with an image (which i don't have); (2) install a flash chip with the image already on it; or (3) upgrade the ROM to version 5 and do an xmodem via the console port. ugggh...i knew i was reckless going into this, but i guess i didn't think ahead enough...anyway, i'm just sending this out in hopes that one of you has encountered this situation before and has a solution...otherwise, i gotta dig into the pockets again... please help... thanks, eddie _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41000&t=40991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAT port range on a Cisco 1604? [7:41001]
Is it possible to specify a port range in IOS 12.0(15) on a Cisco 1604? Could some point me in the right direction for the command format is possible? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41001&t=41001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please help!!! [7:41002]
I need some help for a Access Server setup.
I am trying to setup a modem (netcomm 56.6k) to connect to a 2511. The
modem is currently connected to the AUX port. However, no matter what I
tried from my PC, everytime I make a connection, it comes up with a whole
bunch of garbage.
OK
OK
OK
CARRIER 31200
PROTOCOL: NONE
CONNECT 31200
__sSM~ErX9D`?ro"x`?@!S,@@`# B
#o `@DZG?@"Z(S(?|p?
cF42EmXUj"hYLh8[$ DD<>>06#"\(sqOKobt^U"Bt08
S,,R '! P kfh(?L^H
&E`jeDL?ez^P}}N\NAs-)
^al8b.ZTa!('P"Q-7sE-aOP> qGU!'!8"d/^erK? Oni`Stn!ma}8.e"j? zCg_$!hG"3gO?P
g77 (FE. FpO]%?XB^P
S.TS&eT8'
1gciz$F~?*@yV
-=Thttp://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41002&t=41002
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can this be HSRP on a single router [7:40995]
load balance it and then if either side drops the other will take over the full load anyway... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of nrf Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can this be HSRP on a single router [7:40995] You can't do that. HSRP only works for LAN's. ""Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hai, > > I've recived a config that contain a sound like HSRP on a single router. > The function is for Serial 0 to back up Serial 1 and vice versa. > I am unable to see how does it works :( > Can some help me on this > > > Interface serial1/1 > bandwidth 128 > no ip addres > encaps fr > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial1/1.2 point-to-point > bandwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > no arp fr > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > interface serial 1/2 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ecnaps fr ietf > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial 1/2.8 point-to-point > badwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > * The link is not having any load balancing configured on it. > * If serial 0 is down all route will be auto rerouted to S1 > > Question: > > 1) How those this works ?, since both subinterface is having the same ip > address. > 2) From the branch site, how do they chose the correct route?. > 3) Can this be define as HSRP ? > > I hope that some one can help me on this matters. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41003&t=40995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Default Route set by BGP Local_Pref [7:40144]
Thanks for getting back to me. So u are saying that any routes that is originated from AS 300 will be assigned with a BGP Local_Pref of 400, while all other traffic will be given a Local_Pref of 150? But wouldn't this set all inbound routes from AS 300 to have a Local_pref of 400, instead of just the default route (0/0)? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee ""pankaj kulkarni"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You could use a route map along with the neighbour command to set the local > preferance.The configuration should be similar to that below. > > > RTD# > router bgp 256 > neighbor 3.3.3.4 remote-as 300 > neighbor 3.3.3.4 route-map setlocalin in > > ... > ip as-path access-list 7 permit ^300$ > .. > route-map setlocalin permit 10 > match as-path 7 > set local-preference 400 > route-map setlocalin permit 20 > set local-preference 150 > > > > "Hunt Lee" wrote: > > > > Can a default route (0/0) learned from another AS be assigned a BGP > Local_Preference? My understanding is that a default route can be assigned > an "Admin Dist" to setup a preference between multiple default routes, but > not by Local_Pref. I tried to look on Internet Routing Arch (by Halabi) but > Halabi seems to say that Local_Pref works also... Any ideas? > > From Halabi on p229:- "The default route AS2 is learning from AS3 should not > need to be set at a lower Local_Pref than the full routing AS2 learns from > the provider" > > Thanks, > > Hunt > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com > > Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from > http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41004&t=40144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDP OUTLINE [7:41005]
I looked at the exam outline for 640-025 and it does not include X.25, IPX, Appletalk and SNA and yet in the recommended CID 3.0 training, these stuff are in the training. Anyone taken the CCDP yet? Comments? thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41005&t=41005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about Boson softare [7:41006]
It's good but i don't know how to crack,i have no visa to pay ,and also it is a little expensive . Thanks. zhangnan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41006&t=41006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX problem [7:40928]
Could you explain why this is the case? You can do it with a router !! :-) - Original Message - From: "Lidiya White" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:53 PM Subject: RE: PIX problem [7:40928] > You'll never be able to ping interface of the PIX that is not directly > connected to you (like in your case). Not access-list, not icmp commands > can enable that 'feature'. > > > -- Lidiya White > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > dk > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PIX problem [7:40928] > > Thanks for the input, I have allowed the required icmp access ... > > To try and clarify ... > > I'm trying to ping the pix interface E1 (ip address 10.222.62.1) through > pix > interface E0 (ip address 10.222.33.1) from my workstation (ip address > 10.222.32.100) I can successfully ping the PIX E0 interface and any > devices > on the 10.222.62.0 network going through the PIX E1 interface. but when > I > try to ping the PIX E1 interface itself I get no response no error is > logged > and the conduit hitcount is not incremented. > > Is it a feature? > > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "HORVATH TAMAS" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:04 PM > Subject: Re: PIX problem [7:40928] > > > > Hi! > > > > See http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/110/31.html > > > > > > According to this document "Inbound ICMP through the PIX is denied by > > default; outbound ICMP is permitted, but the incoming reply is denied > by > > default." So you can ping every PIX interface from the PIX and from > the > > directly connected LAN, but can't ping through the pix. > > > > I think you should not ping through the PIX default, just from the PIX > (from > > Telnet console). > > > > According to this document: "In PIX Software versions 4.1(6) until > 5.2.1, > > ICMP traffic to the PIX's own interface is permitted; the PIX cannot > be > > configured to not respond. Beginning in PIX Software version 5.2.1, > ICMP > is > > still permitted by default, but PIX ping responses from its own > interfaces > > can be disabled with the icmp command (that is, a "stealth PIX")" > > > > > > By, HT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41007&t=40928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Now What???????? [7:40988]
Juan, I bet you've waited a long time to get the CCIE written. Why don't you wait a few months more and announce your number... Be patient CCIE number worths it.. Dvass p.s. we're all Cisco maniacs! ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41008&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: about Boson softare [7:41006]
Hi Zhangan, I used the Boson CCIE Prep tests, and I must say they are really excellent. I would just send them a mail and ask how you can pay when you don't have a credit card. The tests are definitely worth their money, and I actually hope that there are NO cracks out there. If you have no money...well, what can I say ? Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41009&t=41006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help!!! [7:41002]
Hi Lee, if you can reverse telnet into the modem, try to reset the modem to factory defaults with the 'at&f' command, that might help. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41010&t=41002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advertise the network with secondary ip address [7:41011]
Hi all, Our network are using Cisco router to connect and some of their ethernet interfaces have secondary ip address. I find that EIGRP does not advertise the network of the secondary ip address unless I disable split horizon. Could anyone tell me is there any problems if I disable split horizon? Is there any alternative to do so? Regards, Dovelet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41011&t=41011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAT port range on a Cisco 1604? [7:41001]
Hi Stephen, are you looking for a command to limit the ports used by PAT ? AFAIK, this is not possible through the 'overload' command. If you know exactly which ports your hosts use, you could set up an extended access list specifying the ports that you want to allow. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41012&t=41001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Advertise the network with secondary ip address [7:41011]
Hi, I have read this long back that this is a limitation of EIGRP,Pls confirm it. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "dovelet" cc: Sent by:Fax to: nobody@groupstudSubject: Advertise the network with secondary ip address [7:41011] y.com 10/04/2002 10:12 Please respond to "dovelet" Hi all, Our network are using Cisco router to connect and some of their ethernet interfaces have secondary ip address. I find that EIGRP does not advertise the network of the secondary ip address unless I disable split horizon. Could anyone tell me is there any problems if I disable split horizon? Is there any alternative to do so? Regards, Dovelet ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41013&t=41011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi Muhammad, I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I am not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41014&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi, Just to add some more info , policy routing cannot dominate the entire path from source to destination.It can only influence the path upto the next hop.And also it is not advisable to enable policy routing on the core networking devices as they add more processing ovehead. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "Georg Pauwen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: RE: content based switching?? [7:40990] nobody@groups tudy.com 10/04/2002 11:07 Please respond to "Georg Pauwen" Hi Muhammad, I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I am not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. Regards, Georg ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41015&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: content based switching?? [7:40990]
Hi Thangavel, agreed, but Mohammad is looking for a cheap solution. If he uses VLAN interfaces to put the servers on, e.g. each server on a different VLAN, policy routing will still work fine. The problem with the processing overhead remains...;) Regards, Georg >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Georg Pauwen" >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: content based switching?? [7:40990] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:23:42 +0100 > > >Hi, > >Just to add some more info , policy routing cannot dominate the entire path >from source to destination.It can only influence the path upto the next >hop.And also it is not advisable to enable policy routing on the core >networking devices as they add more processing ovehead. > >Kind Regards /Thangavel > >186K >Reading,Brkshire >Direct No -0118 9064259 >Mobile No -07796292416 >Post code: RG16LH >www.186k.co.uk > >-- >The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, > but in rising every time we fall ." > -- Nelson Mandela > > > > > > "Georg > Pauwen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > il.com> Fax to: > Sent by: Subject: RE: content based >switching?? [7:40990] > nobody@groups > tudy.com > > > 10/04/2002 > 11:07 > Please > respond to > "Georg > Pauwen" > > > > > > >Hi Muhammad, > >I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With >policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I >am >not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the >following link: > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm > >If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. > >Regards, > >Georg >** >This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the >addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential >or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or >the person responsible for delivering the message to the named >addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The >contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies >taken. >186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England >& Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street >London SW1Y 4UR >** > _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41016&t=40990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41017&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tftp packets [7:41018]
hi to all Our cisco 7100 router sends tftp read request packets to 255.255.255.255 frequently. There is nothing about tftp in configuration. Is there anybody has an idea what may caiuse this? thanks all... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41018&t=41018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Broadcast [7:41019]
Hi group , I have network of 172.16.32/24 .When i put debug of ip icmp i see all ip in this network r pinging 172.16.255.255.Can somebody will help me to tell whis this is so. Thanx kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41019&t=41019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tftp packets [7:41018]
this is known as configuration auto-loading to disable on a router use: no boot network no service config hope this helps Mark ""Semih \st|n"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi to all > Our cisco 7100 router sends tftp read request packets to 255.255.255.255 > frequently. There is nothing about tftp in configuration. Is there anybody > has > an idea what may caiuse this? > thanks all... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41020&t=41018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me off the list if you are interested. -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41021&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX + NAT Question [7:41022]
I am having problems to get a certain configuration to work with my PIX, I use NAT for all network to a Public IP address range, then I also use PAT for my 10.100.0.0 network so all machines comming from that network use the public address ending with .50. Now I need to use PAT for a client that is not on the 10.100.0.0 network, I have tried to add a NAT statment just for that client, and that does not work, the client always uses the NAT statment and not the PAT ?? any thoughts ? here is the config global (outside) 1 212.100.128.100-212.100.128.200 global (outside) 2 212.100.128.50 global (dmz) 1 123.123.148.150 nat (inside) 0 access-list 100 nat (inside) 2 123.123.144.251 255.255.255.255 0 0 nat (inside) 2 10.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0 nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Best regards, Arni V. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41022&t=41022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
win98 pptp connection to cisco vpn 3005 at only 9.6kbps [7:41023]
hi all, I have a problem where a win98 pptp client can connect to a cisco vpn 3005 at only 9.6kbps even if my pstn connection to the internet is 56kbps. However, using the same client connecting to a ms win2k vpn server does not have this problem . any form of inputs will be greatly appreciated regards, suaveguru __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41023&t=41023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCNP Exam [7:40967]
What is the major change. Anybody? - Original Message - From: "Matthew Meiers" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:31 PM Subject: RE: New CCNP Exam [7:40967] > It appears to be soon. Cisco is already listing the old 500 series > exams as no longer applicable on the tracking page. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: New CCNP Exam [7:40967] > > Cisco has finished the beta testing to CCNP exams. Does anyone know > when > are they going to roll out and replace the current CCNP 2.0? > > Tony > > > *** > This message is a private communication. If you are not the intended > recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it > to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying > to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. > > > - > Visit http://www.ballfoundation.org for our latest news. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41024&t=40967 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can this be HSRP on a single router [7:40995]
that looks odd, but I noticed different in the 2 configs was this: 1) Frame encapsulation was different (one was default, i.e. cisco, the other was ietf (I Eat ToFu)) making it look like at different times, there were different vendors routers across the link. 2) the bandwidth, which makes it look like (to me) that the link has ben upgraded. My deduction: when the line was upgraded and the equipment was switched, somebody left the old config on one subif and put the new config on another. Probably so if things crashed, they had something to fall back on. Of course, I could be totally wrong. :-) --Tim Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki wrote: > > Hai, > > I've recived a config that contain a sound like HSRP on a > single router. > The function is for Serial 0 to back up Serial 1 and vice versa. > I am unable to see how does it works :( > Can some help me on this > > > Interface serial1/1 > bandwidth 128 > no ip addres > encaps fr > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial1/1.2 point-to-point > bandwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > no arp fr > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > interface serial 1/2 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ecnaps fr ietf > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial 1/2.8 point-to-point > badwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > * The link is not having any load balancing configured on it. > * If serial 0 is down all route will be auto rerouted to S1 > > Question: > > 1) How those this works ?, since both subinterface is having > the same ip > address. > 2) From the branch site, how do they chose the correct route?. > 3) Can this be define as HSRP ? > > I hope that some one can help me on this matters. > > Thanks > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41025&t=40995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New CCNP Exam [7:40967]
>From what I have heard, the changes are going to be similar to the CCNA. -Original Message- From: philip lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:00 AM To: Matthew Meiers; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New CCNP Exam [7:40967] What is the major change. Anybody? - Original Message - From: "Matthew Meiers" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:31 PM Subject: RE: New CCNP Exam [7:40967] > It appears to be soon. Cisco is already listing the old 500 series > exams as no longer applicable on the tracking page. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: New CCNP Exam [7:40967] > > Cisco has finished the beta testing to CCNP exams. Does anyone know > when > are they going to roll out and replace the current CCNP 2.0? > > Tony > > > *** > This message is a private communication. If you are not the intended > recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it > to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying > to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. > > > - > Visit http://www.ballfoundation.org for our latest news. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41026&t=40967 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can you block spam email with NBAR? [7:41029]
Can spam be blocked with NBAR? Perhaps similar to how urls can be blocked with match protocol http url "iishack" ? The match protocol option does not allow any granularity with the smtp directive. THanks! b Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41029&t=41029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX + NAT Question [7:41022]
First of all, you have a NAT (INSIDE) statement with a 123.123... address - shouldn't that have been a NAT (DMZ), or do you have more than one network connected to the same (INSIDE) interface? Let me know what networks you have, and what interface they're connected to. Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX + NAT Question [7:41022] I am having problems to get a certain configuration to work with my PIX, I use NAT for all network to a Public IP address range, then I also use PAT for my 10.100.0.0 network so all machines comming from that network use the public address ending with .50. Now I need to use PAT for a client that is not on the 10.100.0.0 network, I have tried to add a NAT statment just for that client, and that does not work, the client always uses the NAT statment and not the PAT ?? any thoughts ? here is the config global (outside) 1 212.100.128.100-212.100.128.200 global (outside) 2 212.100.128.50 global (dmz) 1 123.123.148.150 nat (inside) 0 access-list 100 nat (inside) 2 123.123.144.251 255.255.255.255 0 0 nat (inside) 2 10.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0 nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Best regards, Arni V. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41030&t=41022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About IOS question [7:41031]
Hi, Does anyone know which IOS version can support PPPoE + NAT + Firewall function. Please let me know. Thanks Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41031&t=41031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
I aggreed with Jeremy. I read the same material. To pass the test, you just need the ccie exam cram and Boson test # 3. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me off the list if you are interested. -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41032&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Now What???????? [7:40988]
> Passed CCIE Written, Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) I listed the written on my resume prior to applying for my current job. I thought it was appropriate since I was applying for a Cisco position. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41033&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7200VXR [7:41034]
Is it possible for the 7200VXR to be one client of a VTP which server is a 6506 ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41034&t=41034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tftp packets [7:41018]
thanks. it worked. Semih - Original Message - From: "Mark Patrick" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:14 PM Subject: Re: tftp packets [7:41018] > this is known as configuration auto-loading > > to disable on a router use: > > no boot network > no service config > > hope this helps > > Mark > > ""Semih \st|n"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hi to all > > Our cisco 7100 router sends tftp read request packets to 255.255.255.255 > > frequently. There is nothing about tftp in configuration. Is there anybody > > has > > an idea what may caiuse this? > > thanks all... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41035&t=41018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Now What???????? [7:40988]
Juan, Send me your resume and I will help you with it. A resume is a way of giving a hiring manager a 30 second snapshot of your career. 1.) I passed the CCIE written and I consider it a big accomplishment, so I have it on my resume. 2.) I have heard the All in one study guide is a good starting point, but I haven't gotten into it yet. 3.) no idea --- Juan Blanco wrote: > Team, > After your pass the written what do you do in > reference to the following: > > 1) Do you mention it in your resume and if you do > any suggestions (I know it > is not a certification). > CCIE Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > Passed CCIE Written, Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > Working on the CCIE Lab > Put nothing because the written is not a > certification.. > > 2) Any book which will help you to put together a > very organize and > structure plan of studding for the lab(very similar > to Caslow's book) > I already have the following books: > CASLOW, HUTNIX, DOYLE > 3) How similar are the labs and hardware layout from > the FATKID to the real > thing.I planning to use the same format (what is > your recommendation) > > Wow, the more we think we know the less we > know...I feel very > goodsome people are saying that I don't have a > life because all I talk > about is > Cisco...Cisco...routersswitchesbridges > > > Thanks, > > > JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41037&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static NAT with HSRP - longish [7:41036]
Hi all, We have 6509 with Dual Sup1A and dual MSFC/PFC. Sup1A is running CatOS ver 5.5(6a) and MSFC is running IOS ver 12.0(3)XE2. These dual engines have been configured for "high availability" and "config redundancy". Multiple vlan interfaces have been configured on the MSFC. HSRP configuration is such that: vlan 10, 20 and 30 have MSFC15 as the primary MSFC and vlan 11, 12 and 13 have MSFC16 as the primary MSFC vlan 10 has subnet 192.168.10.0, vlan 20 has 192.168.20.0 vlan 11 has subnet 10.0.11.0 subnet and vlan 12 has 10.0.12.0 subnet A printer has been assigned the IP 192.168.10.56 (and thus belongs to vlan10). Users in vlan11 need to access this printer. Users are not aware that 192.168.10.0 subnet exists hence for simplicity we decided to configure a static nat on MSFC15 (the designated MSFC) for the printer ! ip nat inside source static 192.168.10.56 10.0.11.56 ! int vlan 10 ip address 192.168.10.7/24 alt ip address 192.168.10.8/24 standby 10 priority 10 alt standby 10 priority 9 standby 10 ip 192.168.10.1/24 alt standby 10 ip 192.168.10.1/24 ip nat inside ! int vlan 11 ip address 10.0.11.7/24 alt ip address 10.0.11.8/24 standby 11 priority 11 alt standby 11 priority 10 standby 11 ip 10.0.11.1/24 alt standby 11 ip 10.0.11.1/24 ip nat outside ! int vlan 20 ip address 192.168.20.7/24 alt ip address 192.168.20.8/24 standby 20 priority 10 alt standby 20 priority 9 standby 20 ip 192.168.20.1/24 alt standby 20 ip 192.168.20.1/24 ip nat outside ! With this config, users in vlan 11 are able to access 192.168.10.56 however the ping response time is only 50%. ( i.e. even numbered pings to 10.0.11.56 are successful, note here vlan11 has MSFC16 as primary i/f) vlan 20 has also been configured as the "outside" interface for NAT. vlan20 interface has MSFC15 as the primary i/f. Even vlan20 users get 50% ping response if they ping to 10.0.11.56. Any help will be grately appreciated. Thanks & Regards ... Rohit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41036&t=41036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
that was a key part. but nli's book is great. hint hint..get that! -Original Message- From: Nguyen, Cuong Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:41 AM To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] I aggreed with Jeremy. I read the same material. To pass the test, you just need the ccie exam cram and Boson test # 3. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me off the list if you are interested. -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41038&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP exams [7:41039]
Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting me schedule 500 series exams :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41039&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Now What???????? [7:40988]
I used to complain that the CCIE written isn't a cert, therefore you shouldn't list it, but I applied to a CCIE level position, and told them in the resume that I was studying for the CCIE and that I'd have it by end of year, and I got the job (that wasn't the only reason I got the job, but atleast I overcame the objection that I wasn't a CCIE). -- RFC 1149 Compliant Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""x"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Juan, > Send me your resume and I will help you with it. A > resume is a way of giving a hiring manager a 30 second > snapshot of your career. > > 1.) I passed the CCIE written and I consider it a big > accomplishment, so I have it on my resume. > > 2.) I have heard the All in one study guide is a good > starting point, but I haven't gotten into it yet. > > 3.) no idea > > > > > --- Juan Blanco wrote: > > Team, > > After your pass the written what do you do in > > reference to the following: > > > > 1) Do you mention it in your resume and if you do > > any suggestions (I know it > > is not a certification). > > CCIE Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > > Passed CCIE Written, Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > > Working on the CCIE Lab > > Put nothing because the written is not a > > certification.. > > > > 2) Any book which will help you to put together a > > very organize and > > structure plan of studding for the lab(very similar > > to Caslow's book) > > I already have the following books: > > CASLOW, HUTNIX, DOYLE > > 3) How similar are the labs and hardware layout from > > the FATKID to the real > > thing.I planning to use the same format (what is > > your recommendation) > > > > Wow, the more we think we know the less we > > know...I feel very > > goodsome people are saying that I don't have a > > life because all I talk > > about is > > Cisco...Cisco...routersswitchesbridges > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > JB > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41040&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
where can I find this Exam Cram? How about this NLI book and site that was mentioned b4? Persio - Original Message - From: "Nguyen, Cuong Q" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > I aggreed with Jeremy. I read the same material. To pass the test, you just > need the ccie exam cram and Boson test # 3. > > C.Q.Nguyen > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Wright, Jeremy > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, > nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st > time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie > routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me > off the list if you are interested. > > -Original Message- > From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > Hi All, > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > Please help... > > Thanks! > Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41042&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP OUTLINE [7:41005]
The exam was updated about 2 months ago and the new outline as you describe is accurate. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of dawn davis Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP OUTLINE [7:41005] I looked at the exam outline for 640-025 and it does not include X.25, IPX, Appletalk and SNA and yet in the recommended CID 3.0 training, these stuff are in the training. Anyone taken the CCDP yet? Comments? thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41041&t=41005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP exams [7:41039]
I'v just passed the BCRAN, there's no exam about 500 series Best Regard Samuel zou Tel: 62259099E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Brian Zeitz" >Reply-To: "Brian Zeitz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCNP exams [7:41039] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:27:39 -0400 > >Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting me schedule misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] SkA*;z5DEsSQ=xPP=;Aw#,GkJ9SC MSN Messenger#:5%;w4K4& Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41043&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what does 0 in 0Xnnnn mean? [7:40372]
I asked a couple of "old" IBMers, (20+ and 30+ years). They both said it was around before they were. Wes Stevens wrote: > > We need to find an old ibm'er for that answer I think. I know > that 0x has > been used on ibm systems since before cisco made it's first > router. > > > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: what does 0 in 0X mean? [7:40372] > >Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:22:17 -0500 > > > >I think editors like to thrown in leading zeros. For example, > you will > >notice that they never let you get away with saying something > like .534. It > >has to be 0.534. Supposedly that's easier to read. > > > >I didn't know octal was 0d. I bet they had to do that because > of the other > >rule that you have to start with 0. 0o or 0O would be too hard > to parse if > >they were to use o or O for octal. ;-) > > > >Priscilla > > > >At 04:40 PM 4/3/02, John Neiberger wrote: > > >I think the question is what does the '0' specifically refer > to? We > > >know that 0x indicates hex, but I'm guessing he's asking why > we don't > > >simply use x instead of 0x, or d for octal instead of 0d. > > > > > >Speaking of that, why is octal 0d? I'd think that 'd' > should mean > > >decimal. > > > > > >John > > > > > > >>> "Persio Pucci" 4/3/02 2:16:55 PM >>> > > >That indicates that the notation in use is hexadecimal for > the > > >registry > > >number i.e. 0x2102 set the registry bits to 110010 > > > > > >Persio > > > > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "Jeffrey Reed" > > >To: > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:12 PM > > >Subject: what does 0 in 0X mean? [7:40372] > > > > > > > > > > Here s a good question an intern asked me and I couldn t > even > > >make-up an > > > > answer > > > > > > > > I was working with him showing how to recover a password > and we were > > > > changing the confreg setting. He asked what the leading 0 > before the > > >X > > > > represented. I m not sure any help from the group is > > >appreciated. > > > > > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > > > Office 717-737-8586 > > > > FAX 717-737-0290 > > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >http://www.priscilla.com > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: > http://messenger.msn.com > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41044&t=40372 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advertise the network with secondary ip address [7:41011]
Redistribute connected -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of dovelet Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Advertise the network with secondary ip address [7:41011] Hi all, Our network are using Cisco router to connect and some of their ethernet interfaces have secondary ip address. I find that EIGRP does not advertise the network of the secondary ip address unless I disable split horizon. Could anyone tell me is there any problems if I disable split horizon? Is there any alternative to do so? Regards, Dovelet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41045&t=41011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP exams [7:41039]
I kinda hope that was meant to be funny. :-) --Timsamuel zou wrote: > > I'v just passed the BCRAN, there's no exam about 500 series > > Best Regard Samuel zou Tel: 62259099E-mail: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: > "Brian Zeitz" >Reply-To: "Brian Zeitz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CCNP exams [7:41039] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:27:39 > -0400 > > >Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting me > schedule > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > SkA*;z5DEsSQ=xPP=;Aw#,GkJ9SC MSN Messenger#:5%;w4K4& > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41047&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uptime MIB [7:41046]
We have 40 or so 75xx routers and we are looking for a SNMP MIB that we could uses to check the uptime on them. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41046&t=41046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broadcast [7:41019]
What are you trying to ping when you see the broadcasts? is it local or remote? is there a chance you are seeing the pre-ping arp requests? --Tim kaushalender wrote: > > Hi group , > > I have network of 172.16.32/24 .When i put debug of ip icmp i > see all ip > in this network r pinging 172.16.255.255.Can somebody will help > me to > tell whis this is so. > > Thanx > kaushalender > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41048&t=41019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
That is because they have not started the 600 series for CCNP. There is no word on when the new tests are supposed to go live. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP exams [7:41039] Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting me schedule 500 series exams :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41049&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAT port range on a Cisco 1604? [7:41001]
Well I was looking for a way to specify a port range in a nat statement. For example: standart nat/pat statement. ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.1 21 208.192.100.100 21 I need something like this: ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.1 64300-64400 208.192.100.100 64300-64400 What I am trying to do is open up a PASV FTP data port range for use on a FTP server with non standard ports. As long as I have the server on 20/21 PASV and PORT seem to work fine, but when I move the ports to something non standard, I cannot connect on the PASV command without having the ports specified and nat'd. I tried using cisco's ip nat service command as referenced: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/6.html but apparently I am a gump and can't make it work :) Stephen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg Pauwen Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PAT port range on a Cisco 1604? [7:41001] Hi Stephen, are you looking for a command to limit the ports used by PAT ? AFAIK, this is not possible through the 'overload' command. If you know exactly which ports your hosts use, you could set up an extended access list specifying the ports that you want to allow. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41050&t=41001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSNT SP requirement? [7:41052]
The Cisco Press MCNS book claims CSNT needs SP4 at the begining of the chapter and SP 5 or 6 later on. The Boson tests claim SP 5 or 6. Which is it? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41052&t=41052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
Um, I was referring to the 640-50x exams. -Original Message- From: samuel zou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP exams [7:41039] I'v just passed the BCRAN, there's no exam about 500 series Best Regard Samuel zou Tel: 62259099E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Brian Zeitz" >Reply-To: "Brian Zeitz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCNP exams [7:41039] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:27:39 -0400 > >Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting me schedule misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] SkA*;z5DEsSQ=xPP=;Aw#,GkJ9SC MSN Messenger#:5%;w4K4& Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41051&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
> Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting > me schedule > 500 series exams :) They are still listed on Cisco's web as exams for CCNP, so I guess that they are valid until officially revoked. One question here. If someone (me) passes exam from 500 series, and the test is revoked before I pass all 4 four CCNP. Does the "old" one I passed cound for new CCNP? Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41054&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iBGP full mesh ? [7:40741]
Peter, - Original Message - From: "Peter van Oene" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:51 PM Subject: Re: iBGP full mesh ? [7:40741] > inline > > > >I know that's how Juniper defaults its BGP synch. I agree that synch should > >be disabled by default, really do not think people will put a non-bgp > >speaking router in the middle of their network by design, of course, unless > >we are talking about using stuff like MPLS at the core and pushing BGP out > >to the edge. > > > >But I still do not like the fact that Juniper makes BGP synch > >non-configurable, why not giving users the knob? > > Hi Kent. Juniper makes routers positioned to play in SP networks. These > networks generally maintain routing information for thousands of > prefixes. Pushing these large volumes of routing information into an IGP > simply isn't a good idea. In general, any redistribution in either > direction between BGP and IGP's is frowned upon. Many routing > implementations will struggle greatly with 100k+ prefixes in OSPF (they > don't fit in IS-IS).I expect the folks at Juniper who wrote the BGP > implementation were mostly concerned with things people actually use. > I hope I did not give the impression the I am even remotely behind the idea of redistributing BGP into IGP. This draft http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hermelin-ext-lsp-frags-03.txt is trying to lift the 30K routes limit. I actually hope the authors will give more explanation of the reasons they listed that can contribute to exceeding this limit in the draft. > I'm personally not aware of any situation where BGP synchronization would > represent the best solution to a given problem. To be honest, in the last > bunch of years, the only place I've even heard the feature discussed has > been in vendor certification forums where best practises (and reality for > that matter) seem secondary to passing tests. Agree, hope cisco can change the default to disable. > > Of note, building a BGP free core using MPLS for transport doesn't not > create a situation where external routing information external to the AS > needs to be passed into a non BGP routing domain in the same way that using > an IGP in the core would. > > Pete As you mentioned here that they are not the same way, I assume you meant that they are certainly not the same because if we have mpls at the core, the only thing we need is IGP and mpls, there will be no need for any external information in the core, in that case they are, of course, not the same. Hope I am not repeating or misreading you, maybe both? :-) Thanks Kent > > > > > > >Thanks > >Kent > > > > > > > At 11:28 AM 4/8/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > > >It's not default for the same reason why unicast rpf (antispoofing) is > > > >not default in ISO; because people are stupid, and under poor design, it > > > >could produce very undesirable and hard to troubleshoot results. In > > > >other words, if you don't know why you are disabling synchronization, > > > >don't do it. > > > > > > > >Take the following scenario: A multihop iBGP link between routers (A) > > > >and (B) in which a non-bgp IGP router (C) is routing packets between > > > >them. Both BGP links are advertising full tables to each other, and, > > > >under your suggested default config, would attempt to forward packets to > > > >destinations that router C has no clue about. Then what does router C > > > >do with these destinations? > > > > > > > >The answer, of course, is to set up a iBGP full mesh, and then to > > > >disable synchronization , and if you are smart, design your network so > > > >that your IGP learns only about downstream routes and set a default > > > >route up to the core of your network. > > > > > > > >Anyway, the point being, sync is enabled by default because you really > > > >should know what you are doing before you disable it. > > > > > > > >On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 10:44, MADMAN wrote: > > > > > I can think one one good reason why you would disable sync, you can't > > > > > redistribute 100K routes into ANY IGP. Why are you so concerned > about > > > > > disabling sync?? It should be default. > > > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > Jay wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > BGP Rules of thumb: > > > > > > > > > > > > BGP advertised prefix must also exist in local IGP table. > > > > > > iBGP learned prefix must also exist in local IGP table > > > > > > -or use #no sync on iBGP learning router, but if you do, you'd > >sure > > > as > > > > > > hell better know why you disabled it. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 09:22, Phil Barker wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope someone can help out with this as I don4t have > > > > > > > access to my kit at the moment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried to set up my first BGP lab last week. > > > > > > > I configured a full iBGP mesh, three routers connected > > > > > > > in a triangle via serial lines. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I set up (neighb
Re: About IOS question [7:41031]
Ricky, Use this link to find out what IOS supports the features you are looking for. www.cisco.com/go/fn Brent --- Ricky Chan wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know which IOS version can support PPPoE > + NAT + Firewall > function. Please let me know. > > Thanks > > Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41057&t=41031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uptime MIB [7:41046]
.iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.system.sysUpTime or .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3 or it's part of MIB-II. collin ""John Jackson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We have 40 or so 75xx routers and we are looking for a SNMP MIB that we > could uses to check the uptime on them. Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance. > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41059&t=41046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7200VXR [7:41034]
No, the VXR is a router. You could route between VLANs via a trunk to the VXR but it will not particpate in VTP. Dave cage wrote: > > Is it possible for the 7200VXR to be one client of a VTP which server is a > 6506 ? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41060&t=41034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
I am not sure, haven't heard much about it yet. But I am taking a "wait and see" attitude for buying any books until the release the new exams. Because as soon at the CCNA 600 exam was out, there were new books for it on BN.com and Amazon. Last think you want to do is buy a book, and the next day its considered "Old". -Original Message- From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:41039] > Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting > me schedule > 500 series exams :) They are still listed on Cisco's web as exams for CCNP, so I guess that they are valid until officially revoked. One question here. If someone (me) passes exam from 500 series, and the test is revoked before I pass all 4 four CCNP. Does the "old" one I passed cound for new CCNP? Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41061&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
Yes they still count -Original Message- From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:41039] > Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting > me schedule > 500 series exams :) They are still listed on Cisco's web as exams for CCNP, so I guess that they are valid until officially revoked. One question here. If someone (me) passes exam from 500 series, and the test is revoked before I pass all 4 four CCNP. Does the "old" one I passed cound for new CCNP? Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41062&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670]
I haven't tested it, but according to the Linksys release notes, they support IPSec passthrough for multiple IPSec tunnels beginning in version 1.42.3 released Jan 25, 02. Regards, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fly Ers Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670] I didn't see an update on this, but unless there has been an upgrade to the linksys, it will only pass 1 Ipsec tunnel. If there is an existing connection, and another is attempted, the original one will be dropped. there are some higher end (higher priced) firewall devices, that will pass large number of tunnels. How many clients are you trying to terminate? you might think about pix 501 hope this helps >From: "Curious" >Reply-To: "Curious" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Client & PIX [7:40670] >Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:48:48 -0500 > >Clients are behind Linksys Cable/DSL router and in the office we have PIX >515. >PIX assigns IP address from Local IP address Pool. > >""Curious"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am using Cisco VPN Client to connect with my Office PIX 515 firwall >over > > IPSEC 3DES encryption. My connection is droping automatically. It is not > > because of idle time out or maximum time out. it happens on radomly. If >some > > one has any information on it. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41063&t=40670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uptime MIB [7:41046]
use a mib walker and walk through your entire snmp tree. Pull ouot the
oid's you need and script accordingly.
I use mg-soft's mib browser...
http://www.mg-soft.si/
>>> "John Jackson" 04/10/02 11:17AM >>>
We have 40 or so 75xx routers and we are looking for a SNMP MIB that we
could uses to check the uptime on them. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
John
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41064&t=41046
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
You should all use www.bookpool.com to buy your tech books. The prices are much better than BN and Amazon. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:41039] I am not sure, haven't heard much about it yet. But I am taking a "wait and see" attitude for buying any books until the release the new exams. Because as soon at the CCNA 600 exam was out, there were new books for it on BN.com and Amazon. Last think you want to do is buy a book, and the next day its considered "Old". -Original Message- From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:41039] > Funny, I just logged into 2test.com and it still is letting > me schedule > 500 series exams :) They are still listed on Cisco's web as exams for CCNP, so I guess that they are valid until officially revoked. One question here. If someone (me) passes exam from 500 series, and the test is revoked before I pass all 4 four CCNP. Does the "old" one I passed cound for new CCNP? Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41065&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Now What???????? [7:40988]
x and Juan, After getting to the point in your network careers of being so close to the CCIE, I would do an executive summary. Much more unique than a resume, resumes come in more flavors than fruit and make it impossible to guess which format the reader likes, who is 90% of the time not the person who makes the decision of who to bring in for the first interview. A summary jumps out and says 'I am different', and will stick in the mind of the screener. An exec summary combines the strength's of a cover lettter and the experience/project listing of a resume.http://www.cio.com has great threads for exec summaries, salary negotiation, etc Just my two cents. Have a great day. Kevin McCarty CCNA CCNP Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector x To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: nobody Subject: Re: Now What [7:40988] 04/10/2002 09:18 AM Please respond to x Juan, Send me your resume and I will help you with it. A resume is a way of giving a hiring manager a 30 second snapshot of your career. 1.) I passed the CCIE written and I consider it a big accomplishment, so I have it on my resume. 2.) I have heard the All in one study guide is a good starting point, but I haven't gotten into it yet. 3.) no idea --- Juan Blanco wrote: > Team, > After your pass the written what do you do in > reference to the following: > > 1) Do you mention it in your resume and if you do > any suggestions (I know it > is not a certification). >CCIE Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) >Passed CCIE Written, Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) >Working on the CCIE Lab >Put nothing because the written is not a > certification.. > > 2) Any book which will help you to put together a > very organize and > structure plan of studding for the lab(very similar > to Caslow's book) >I already have the following books: > CASLOW, HUTNIX, DOYLE > 3) How similar are the labs and hardware layout from > the FATKID to the real > thing.I planning to use the same format (what is > your recommendation) > > Wow, the more we think we know the less we > know...I feel very > goodsome people are saying that I don't have a > life because all I talk > about is > Cisco...Cisco...routersswitchesbridges > > > Thanks, > > > JB [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41066&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed IE Written [7:41067]
I passed the IE Written earlier this week. I'd like to thank the group for all of the quality posts. Chuck L. - Are you the moderator for the Groupstudy Lab list, or is it Paul? Just curious. Along those lines, I am trying to come up with a game plan for my studies. I plan to use Solie's outline as a base and was wondering if anyone cared to share what kind of study schedule they've come up with. Just looking for ideas. Thanks, -chris ^ Christopher A. KaneCCNP/CCDP/CCAI Advanced Technical Support WorldCom ^ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41067&t=41067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Kris, I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. Strategies are different from person to person. I used the following to pass my written: -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) -Boson #1 by Bernard -CCO You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an avid reader. They have excellent white papers. During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can read: Halabi Jeff Doyle (1 &2) BGP-4 by parkhurst and many more. Good luck, A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) Quoting Kris Keen : > Hi All, > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > Please help... > > Thanks! > Kris -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41068&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX upgrading? [7:41070]
I have some questions a few questions about upgrading my PIX. 1.) My boss did some research on IDS systems and got very interested in fragmented packet protection. I was looking at our PIX and found the command... sysopt security fragguard Has anyone used this? Are there any pitfalls like using the fixup commands? What version does this come in? 2.) I am running version 5.3(1). I know I should upgrade to 6.1. I have a PIX 520 with 128 MB RAM and 16 MB Flash. What are the selling points I can tell management? 3.) How smooth would it be to upgrade from 5.3 to 6.1? 4.) I have a vpn connection between our New York and London offices in a PIX to PIX vpn setup. If I upgrade one PIX will I lose the vpn? 5.) What version of the PIX switches to access-lists? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41070&t=41070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDP [7:41071]
As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41071&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Bernard's test does not work well, I would advise using dennis L.'s boson # 3 test. Its a better test for written. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Kris, I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. Strategies are different from person to person. I used the following to pass my written: -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) -Boson #1 by Bernard -CCO You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an avid reader. They have excellent white papers. During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can read: Halabi Jeff Doyle (1 &2) BGP-4 by parkhurst and many more. Good luck, A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) Quoting Kris Keen : > Hi All, > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > Please help... > > Thanks! > Kris -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41072&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
Hi Chris, The CCDA exam is a requirement to get your CCDP certification. You will have to pass the CCDA and then CID, if you are already a CCNP, to achieve CCDP status. Scott -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41073&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
You have to take the CCDA -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41077&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi [7:41078]
I was reading some RFC's (791 for example) and had a question. It states what the maximum size of a Packet is, what is the minimum packet size? If I recall its 572? Max is 1500? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41078&t=41078 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41080&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packet size [7:41079]
Oops I found the answer, I thought it was over 500, cause I was looking at IPV6 specs. Minimum Packet Size According to Ethernet specifications, the size of a packet should be between 64 Bytes and 1518 Bytes. Therefore, the minimum packet size is 64 Bytes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41079&t=41079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Broadcast [7:41019]
Are you saying that all your hosts are pinging 172.16.255.255 continually? What OS are the hosts running? What applications are they running? When did this start? Did you change anything before it started? Have you done some research on the Internet for problems related to your symptoms? How secure is your network? Do you have any disgruntled employees that could be playing a trick on you? How secure are your firewalls? Do you protect from SMURF and other attempts? You may be under attack. If you think that could be the case, I recommend you get some professional help right away. On the other hand, it may be normal. I remember seeing something similar with HP's JetAdmin. Some printer device drivers erroneously install JetAdmin, including the part that really should only be used by network management. The end result is that every device continuously tries to discover printers on the subnet by broadcasting. One thing that sticks out as a little strange is that with a /24 subnet mask, your hosts think they are sending to subnet 255. Could this be a clue? Are some hosts misconfigured? Do they use DHCP to get their address or are they manually configured? Priscilla At 08:14 AM 4/10/02, kaushalender wrote: >Hi group , > >I have network of 172.16.32/24 .When i put debug of ip icmp i see all ip >in this network r pinging 172.16.255.255.Can somebody will help me to >tell whis this is so. > >Thanx >kaushalender Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41081&t=41019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX upgrading? [7:41070]
Thanks, Patrick. I already have a des key.
I didn't know 5.3 supported acls and 6.x handles
conduits. I did a PIX upgrade a long time ago and I
remember it being a snap, I think the same box from
4.4 to 5.3.
--- Patrick Ramsey
wrote:
> we're not using frag guard but upgrading sftware is
> a snap...
>
> with failover config it is a couple'a more steps but
> with a single firewall, ther's nothing to it!
>
> The registration for des and 3des is tied to the
> serial number so a software upgrade should use the
> same key.
>
> watch wrap!
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_61/config/upgrade.htm
>
>
> and if you are runnign 5.3, acl's are already
> used... (I think even 6.x still supports
> conduits..either way, you could use acl's on
> yoru current software.
>
> -Patrick
>
> >>> 04/10/02 02:44PM >>>
> I have some questions a few questions about
> upgrading
> my PIX.
>
> 1.) My boss did some research on IDS systems and got
> very interested in fragmented packet protection. I
> was looking at our PIX and found the command...
>
> sysopt security fragguard
>
> Has anyone used this? Are there any pitfalls like
> using the fixup commands? What version does this
> come
> in?
>
> 2.) I am running version 5.3(1). I know I should
> upgrade to 6.1. I have a PIX 520 with 128 MB RAM
> and
> 16 MB Flash. What are the selling points I can tell
> management?
>
> 3.) How smooth would it be to upgrade from 5.3 to
> 6.1?
>
> 4.) I have a vpn connection between our New York
> and
> London offices in a PIX to PIX vpn setup. If I
> upgrade one PIX will I lose the vpn?
>
> 5.) What version of the PIX switches to
> access-lists?
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Confidentiality Disclaimer
> This email and any files transmitted with it may
> contain confidential and /or proprietary information
> in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc.
> ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual
> or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain
> information that is held to be privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution
> or copying of any information from this email is
> strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal
> and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply
> email and then delete this email and its attachments
> from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41082&t=41070
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packet size [7:41079]
actually both IPV6 and IPV4 are 512 bits or 64 bytes. ""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Oops I found the answer, I thought it was over 500, cause I was looking > at IPV6 specs. > > > > > Minimum Packet Size > > > According to Ethernet specifications, the size of a packet should be > between 64 Bytes and 1518 Bytes. Therefore, the minimum packet size is > 64 Bytes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41083&t=41079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: packet size [7:41079]
64 bytes ... Priscilla is this correct... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Zeitz Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: packet size [7:41079] Oops I found the answer, I thought it was over 500, cause I was looking at IPV6 specs. Minimum Packet Size According to Ethernet specifications, the size of a packet should be between 64 Bytes and 1518 Bytes. Therefore, the minimum packet size is 64 Bytes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41084&t=41079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
No. Just you need CCDA, routing, switching, remote and Design to be CCDP. No need to have CCNA. Ricky -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41085&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
I am sorry but you are incorrect. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/cc dp.html -Original Message- From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: 'Andy Barkl'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] No. Just you need CCDA, routing, switching, remote and Design to be CCDP. No need to have CCNA. Ricky -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41087&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broadcast [7:41019]
This may be WAY off, but as insane as this may sound. I have heard of certain keyboards that are written with drivers that constantly try to ping a certain domain. I heard of a home user getting a lot of ping entries in the firewall logs. Just a shot in the dark... -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Broadcast [7:41019] Are you saying that all your hosts are pinging 172.16.255.255 continually? What OS are the hosts running? What applications are they running? When did this start? Did you change anything before it started? Have you done some research on the Internet for problems related to your symptoms? How secure is your network? Do you have any disgruntled employees that could be playing a trick on you? How secure are your firewalls? Do you protect from SMURF and other attempts? You may be under attack. If you think that could be the case, I recommend you get some professional help right away. On the other hand, it may be normal. I remember seeing something similar with HP's JetAdmin. Some printer device drivers erroneously install JetAdmin, including the part that really should only be used by network management. The end result is that every device continuously tries to discover printers on the subnet by broadcasting. One thing that sticks out as a little strange is that with a /24 subnet mask, your hosts think they are sending to subnet 255. Could this be a clue? Are some hosts misconfigured? Do they use DHCP to get their address or are they manually configured? Priscilla At 08:14 AM 4/10/02, kaushalender wrote: >Hi group , > >I have network of 172.16.32/24 .When i put debug of ip icmp i see all ip >in this network r pinging 172.16.255.255.Can somebody will help me to >tell whis this is so. > >Thanx >kaushalender Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41086&t=41019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written and Lab [7:41088]
How much time do I have to schedule the lab after passing the written? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41088&t=41088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
I'm sorry. -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:13 PM To: Ricky Chan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] I am sorry but you are incorrect. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/cc dp.html -Original Message- From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: 'Andy Barkl'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] No. Just you need CCDA, routing, switching, remote and Design to be CCDP. No need to have CCNA. Ricky -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41089&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:41039]
Matthew Meiers wrote: > > You should all use www.bookpool.com to buy your tech books. > The prices > are much better than BN and Amazon. I would have to second this. I think, with the exception of maybe two books, every book I've bought related to Cisco and networking I got from Bookpool. I'm sure if you search the archives, you'll see posts by me to this effect. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41076&t=41039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tftp packets [7:41018]
You should add the following line to your config: no service config Otherwise the router will try to automatically load its config from a server. If the router SLARPed (got its IP address from the other end), it tends to do service config even if you never told it to. Priscilla At 07:11 AM 4/10/02, Semih \st|n wrote: >hi to all >Our cisco 7100 router sends tftp read request packets to 255.255.255.255 >frequently. There is nothing about tftp in configuration. Is there anybody >has >an idea what may caiuse this? >thanks all... Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41069&t=41018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: positions' names [7:40986]
I think you should put your actual job titles on your resume. Your new company may check with your old companies and if you said you were a network engineer when you were really a janitor, that wouldn't look good. ;-) If your job titles were meaningless, then maybe you could use one of the ones you mentioned, but be careful not to sound like something you aren't. People can correct me, but I think the positions you mentioned have approximately the following meanings, starting with the most experienced and highly-paid and working down from there. Network engineer: experienced person who does design, optimization, planning of new installations, and support for the more difficult problems escalated by the support engineers Network analyst: (not sure about this one but here's a guess) experienced person who does some design, protocol analysis for optimization and troubleshooting, and planning of new network installations; probably does some support too, but that's not the focus; may help application people figure out what they will need from the network Support engineer: a person who works in the trenches to keep the network running on a daily basis, also gets involved in new network installations System administrator: a person who manages the servers more than the network infrastructure Priscilla At 11:04 PM 4/9/02, Forums Canada wrote: >Hi to the group > >I am working to make my resume. I am a little confused with >the positions I should put on the resume. It is because I read >a lot of job descriptions on Monster.com, Workopolis and other >sites like these. > >The questions is : which are the differences between network analyst, >network engineer, network support engineer, system administrator and >many others. > >Mainly it seems that the same duties are covered by different titles on >different companies. >Could you help me or give me some useful links for this matter ? > >Thanks in advance for any clue Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41074&t=40986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX upgrading? [7:41070]
we're not using frag guard but upgrading sftware is a snap...
with failover config it is a couple'a more steps but with a single firewall,
ther's nothing to it!
The registration for des and 3des is tied to the serial number so a software
upgrade should use the same key.
watch wrap!
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_61/config/upgrade.htm
and if you are runnign 5.3, acl's are already used... (I think even 6.x
still supports conduits..either way, you could use acl's on yoru current
software.
-Patrick
>>> 04/10/02 02:44PM >>>
I have some questions a few questions about upgrading
my PIX.
1.) My boss did some research on IDS systems and got
very interested in fragmented packet protection. I
was looking at our PIX and found the command...
sysopt security fragguard
Has anyone used this? Are there any pitfalls like
using the fixup commands? What version does this come
in?
2.) I am running version 5.3(1). I know I should
upgrade to 6.1. I have a PIX 520 with 128 MB RAM and
16 MB Flash. What are the selling points I can tell
management?
3.) How smooth would it be to upgrade from 5.3 to 6.1?
4.) I have a vpn connection between our New York and
London offices in a PIX to PIX vpn setup. If I
upgrade one PIX will I lose the vpn?
5.) What version of the PIX switches to access-lists?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41075&t=41070
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
configure VPN on PIX which behind PAT router [7:41090]
I am configuring a PIX firewall behind a Cayman DSL router. The whole network only has one public IP address which is on the DSL interface. I need to configure the PIX firewall for the remote VPN clients. My solution is to encapsulate all IPSEC traffic with TCP 1, or UDP 1, so the Cayman router could be configured Pinhole the port 1 to the PIX outside interface. But I could not find documents on how to configure it. It will be greatly appreciated if anyone could help me out, or probably you have better solutions. Thanks, Daniel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41090&t=41090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broadcast [7:41019]
I've seen this when Windows has a mis-configured subnet mask. Remember, Windows defaults to 255.255.0.0 for a 172.16.x.x address, and many network admins forget and/or don't know to change it. Windows sends all sorts of broadcast stuff, and it'll all be sent to 172.16.255.255 if the mask is mis-configured. (I found this out while troubleshooting why an ISDN line kept dialing - the router was routing all 172.16.255.255 packets to the 172.16.0.0/16 floating static because there was no 172.16.255.0/24 network, and the floating static was the longest match... Turned out to be mis-configured masks on random systems.) Good luck. --Wes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41091&t=41019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
The CCDA requires the CCNA, so in effect you need a CCNA, CCDA, bcmsn, bcran, bscn and CID to get the CCDP. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] I am sorry but you are incorrect. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/cc dp.html -Original Message- From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: 'Andy Barkl'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] No. Just you need CCDA, routing, switching, remote and Design to be CCDP. No need to have CCNA. Ricky -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41092&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
You need the CCNA to get the CCNP. So, to summarize: - CCNA CCNA Test, No Prerequisites - CCNP * Valid CCNA Routing, Switching, Remote, and Troubleshooting tests (or foundation) - CCDP * Valid CCNA ** Valid CCNP CID test The CCIE doesn't require any previous certs. - Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ricky Chan Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] No. Just you need CCDA, routing, switching, remote and Design to be CCDP. No need to have CCNA. Ricky -Original Message- From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDP [7:41071] You must have the CCNA, CCDA, and the 3 CCNP exams (routing, switching, and remote access), to qualify for the CCDP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41094&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Books [7:41093]
Hello, I have been checking out this board for a couple of days and figured I would post this question here. I currently two tests away from ccnp I have routing and switching left. I know that is not that big of a deal here, but this is just another step towards my CCIE. I am getting ready for my routing exam and I used Caslow's book to help me with my Bcran test and that is where I found how valuable these CCIE books are. Anyway I used the CCIE lan switching book to help me with the switching test and I rocked it so I was wondering if you were to choose between Salami's or Doyle V2 for bgp which one would you choose or would you use both. I have already purchased Doyle vol 1. Any thoughts would be appreciated. This is a great site. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41093&t=41093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TACACS+ [7:41095]
I am using Cisco Secure ACS v2.6 I can't find the location in the software where I can set the commands users can use (Authorization). Can you give me a hint? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41095&t=41095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: packet size [7:41079]
The minimum size for an Ethernet frame is 64 bytes. This includes the Ethernet header and FCS, but not the preamble or inter-frame gap. The minimum Ethernet frame size has to do with the ability of a sender to recognize a collision reflecting back from the other side of a maximum-sized Ethernet segment, while still sending the frame. The minimum size for Token Ring is 18 bytes, if I recall. This includes the header and FCS, but not the starting or ending delimiter or the frame status byte. I didn't know IP had a minimum, although RFC 791 does say that "Every internet destination must be able to receive a datagram of 576 octets either in one piece or in fragments to be reassembled." Priscilla At 04:05 PM 4/10/02, Larry Letterman wrote: >64 bytes ... > >Priscilla is this correct... > > >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Brian Zeitz >Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:32 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: packet size [7:41079] > > >Oops I found the answer, I thought it was over 500, cause I was looking >at IPV6 specs. > > > > > Minimum Packet Size > > >According to Ethernet specifications, the size of a packet should be >between 64 Bytes and 1518 Bytes. Therefore, the minimum packet size is >64 Bytes. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41098&t=41079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX upgrading? [7:41070]
Starting with 5.0 version access-lists were introduces for the PIX
Firewall. All codes do support conduits.
-- Lidiya White
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
x
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX upgrading? [7:41070]
Thanks, Patrick. I already have a des key.
I didn't know 5.3 supported acls and 6.x handles
conduits. I did a PIX upgrade a long time ago and I
remember it being a snap, I think the same box from
4.4 to 5.3.
--- Patrick Ramsey
wrote:
> we're not using frag guard but upgrading sftware is
> a snap...
>
> with failover config it is a couple'a more steps but
> with a single firewall, ther's nothing to it!
>
> The registration for des and 3des is tied to the
> serial number so a software upgrade should use the
> same key.
>
> watch wrap!
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_61/config/
upgrade.htm
>
>
> and if you are runnign 5.3, acl's are already
> used... (I think even 6.x still supports
> conduits..either way, you could use acl's on
> yoru current software.
>
> -Patrick
>
> >>> 04/10/02 02:44PM >>>
> I have some questions a few questions about
> upgrading
> my PIX.
>
> 1.) My boss did some research on IDS systems and got
> very interested in fragmented packet protection. I
> was looking at our PIX and found the command...
>
> sysopt security fragguard
>
> Has anyone used this? Are there any pitfalls like
> using the fixup commands? What version does this
> come
> in?
>
> 2.) I am running version 5.3(1). I know I should
> upgrade to 6.1. I have a PIX 520 with 128 MB RAM
> and
> 16 MB Flash. What are the selling points I can tell
> management?
>
> 3.) How smooth would it be to upgrade from 5.3 to
> 6.1?
>
> 4.) I have a vpn connection between our New York
> and
> London offices in a PIX to PIX vpn setup. If I
> upgrade one PIX will I lose the vpn?
>
> 5.) What version of the PIX switches to
> access-lists?
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Confidentiality Disclaimer
> This email and any files transmitted with it may
> contain confidential and /or proprietary information
> in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc.
> ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual
> or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain
> information that is held to be privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution
> or copying of any information from this email is
> strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal
> and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply
> email and then delete this email and its attachments
> from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41096&t=41070
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
I would say for BGP Jeff Doyle TCP Vs2, Half the book is about BGP. And Halabi book is a must have as well for BGP. I have not bought Caslow's books, I think I will borrow someone else's before buying it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Kris, I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. Strategies are different from person to person. I used the following to pass my written: -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) -Boson #1 by Bernard -CCO You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an avid reader. They have excellent white papers. During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can read: Halabi Jeff Doyle (1 &2) BGP-4 by parkhurst and many more. Good luck, A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) Quoting Kris Keen : > Hi All, > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > Please help... > > Thanks! > Kris -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41097&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX problem [7:40928]
I didn't see a clear explanation regarding this icmp behavior on the PIX on CCO. But I do know for sure that there is not workaround for this. I guess you can just call it a "security feature" :-). -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: dk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:17 AM To: Lidiya White Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX problem [7:40928] Could you explain why this is the case? You can do it with a router !! :-) - Original Message - From: "Lidiya White" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:53 PM Subject: RE: PIX problem [7:40928] > You'll never be able to ping interface of the PIX that is not directly > connected to you (like in your case). Not access-list, not icmp commands > can enable that 'feature'. > > > -- Lidiya White > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > dk > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PIX problem [7:40928] > > Thanks for the input, I have allowed the required icmp access ... > > To try and clarify ... > > I'm trying to ping the pix interface E1 (ip address 10.222.62.1) through > pix > interface E0 (ip address 10.222.33.1) from my workstation (ip address > 10.222.32.100) I can successfully ping the PIX E0 interface and any > devices > on the 10.222.62.0 network going through the PIX E1 interface. but when > I > try to ping the PIX E1 interface itself I get no response no error is > logged > and the conduit hitcount is not incremented. > > Is it a feature? > > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "HORVATH TAMAS" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:04 PM > Subject: Re: PIX problem [7:40928] > > > > Hi! > > > > See http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/110/31.html > > > > > > According to this document "Inbound ICMP through the PIX is denied by > > default; outbound ICMP is permitted, but the incoming reply is denied > by > > default." So you can ping every PIX interface from the PIX and from > the > > directly connected LAN, but can't ping through the pix. > > > > I think you should not ping through the PIX default, just from the PIX > (from > > Telnet console). > > > > According to this document: "In PIX Software versions 4.1(6) until > 5.2.1, > > ICMP traffic to the PIX's own interface is permitted; the PIX cannot > be > > configured to not respond. Beginning in PIX Software version 5.2.1, > ICMP > is > > still permitted by default, but PIX ping responses from its own > interfaces > > can be disabled with the icmp command (that is, a "stealth PIX")" > > > > > > By, HT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41099&t=40928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
On Aug 31, 11:40am, "Sean Knox" wrote: } } You need the CCNA to get the CCNP. So, to summarize: } - CCDP } * Valid CCNA } ** Valid CCNP } CID test Actually, you need valid CCNA, valid CCDA, Routing, Switching, Remote Access, and CID (see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccdp/ ). Of course, once you have all this, you just need one more test (Troubleshooting) in order to get CCNP as well, so you might as well get it. One curious thing is that you no longer need CCNA to CCDA, i.e. it is standalone (see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccda/ ). }-- End of excerpt from "Sean Knox" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41100&t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX + NAT Question [7:41022]
the nat "(inside) 2 123.123.144.251 255.255.255.255 0 0" is somthing I added to try to get the host 123.123.144.251 to PAT to the .50 address, but that´s not working, the network connected to the inside interface is 123.123.144.0/24 the "nat (inside) 2 10.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0" statment is what I use to PAT the 10.100.0.0 network and that works, ? so how do I ad the single host from the other network ??? Tahnx for the information Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41101&t=41022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSMA/CD [7:41105]
Does anyone have any good links for CSMA/CD, I want to really understand the process of collisions. What is the best RFC? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41105&t=41105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TACACS+ [7:41103]
I have read the documentation for ACS v2.6 I went to IOS commands (under group) in the IOS Commands sections I am getting error message whenever I enter something in the "command" and "argument" window. (for example: configure terminal gives me the error "exec terminal:incorrect format" Any idea? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41103&t=41103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written and Lab [7:41088]
You have to have the lab within 18 months or you will have to retake the written -Original Message- From: Manny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written and Lab [7:41088] How much time do I have to schedule the lab after passing the written? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41102&t=41088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
