7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit command,but it doesn't work! interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point description DS3 bandwidth 45000 ip address 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 153 in ip access-group 111 out no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop pvc 19/555 encapsulation aal5snap thnks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54987t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
redundant power feed for 3548 XL [7:54988]
Hi All, The 3548XL has like the 2900 a DC input as well as a AC input. Has anyone of you guys tried to connect both? The manuals says not to do it. If this works you'll have a very cheap redundant power solution, of course Cisco doesn't like it and will say it's impossible ;-) Any experience connecting the AC to wall power and DC with a external power supply? grtz, Koen --- Cleanliness is next to impossible. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54988t=54988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2282 (Out of the Office) [7:54989]
I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office on October 15, 2002. Thanks, Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54989t=54989 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSCI Passing Score [7:54990]
Dear All, Anybody knows the passing score for BSCI ? Regards,Yasser Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54990t=54990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lan Inventory. [7:54991]
Hi all, I want a software which audits the Lan Hardware inventory for M$ **nix platforms. The software must be for Win platform only as it is for a non technical person who has to audit this at client places for taking up AMC. Anybody using this, guide me. Regards Manjunath Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54991t=54991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redundant power feed for 3548 XL [7:54988]
Without going to much into it, if you connect both sources of power, you are in fact supplying the switch with 2 sources of power simulataneously. There is no power 'switching' (excuse the pun) mechanism on switch by itself. You'll probably blow up the switch! Manish -Original Message- From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 09:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: redundant power feed for 3548 XL [7:54988] Hi All, The 3548XL has like the 2900 a DC input as well as a AC input. Has anyone of you guys tried to connect both? The manuals says not to do it. If this works you'll have a very cheap redundant power solution, of course Cisco doesn't like it and will say it's impossible ;-) Any experience connecting the AC to wall power and DC with a external power supply? grtz, Koen --- Cleanliness is next to impossible. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54992t=54988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
I think the response for this question is: The access list: access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any !-you need to detect your incoming www traffic. !-You can use also your network address for the first any. !-route map statement route-map http_access permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.141 The policy map statement need to be place on the interface that is facing your network not to the interface near by the host 10.10.10.141. Regards, Stefan PS. I think we need to help each other not to give life lessons. It is a Cisco study list not the church. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54994t=54910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Resources for Writing Proposals [7:54995]
Hello Group, Could anyone point me to any resources (ie. web, books) for writing pre-sales/tendering documentation which might include such things as proposed solutions, pricing, etc. Thanks Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54995t=54995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. do you have CEF turned on? how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic on your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you sure you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what are you doing to test? -- sisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit command,but it doesn't work! interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point description DS3 bandwidth 45000 ip address 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 153 in ip access-group 111 out no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop pvc 19/555 encapsulation aal5snap thnks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54996t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lan Inventory. [7:54991]
You're in the wrong group... Try a M$ group... -- Johnny Routin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I want a software which audits the Lan Hardware inventory for M$ **nix platforms. The software must be for Win platform only as it is for a non technical person who has to audit this at client places for taking up AMC. Anybody using this, guide me. Regards Manjunath Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54997t=54991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inside Interface accepts DHCP lease...but it has a static [7:54998]
Hi all, I have a problem with a client on a dsl connection. Ethernet 0 and 1 both have statically assigned IP addresses. I leave the customer site and 3 days later they call and have no internet. I check the router config and E0 has the wrong IP address. I check the Win2000 DHCP server and that address is listed as leased to the router. Any ideas why the router is allowing this to happen? -- Dain Deutschman CNA, MCP, CCNA Data Communications Manager Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54998t=54998 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSEC Accounting [7:54993]
Hi, Has anyone in this group tried doing IPSEC accounting yet? We're implementing an MPLS solution for a client of ours and we need to be able to determine how long our IPSEC clients are connected. Xauth is current being used. Is there anyway we can extract accounting data for such sessions similar to the start- stop accounting we get off from dial-up customers? Best Regards, Rex This mail was sent through Internet Manila I-Mail: https://www.i-mail.com.ph Visit the I-Manila Forums at http://forum.i-manila.com.ph/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54993t=54993 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
Why don't you use ATM's inherent policing attributes like vbr-nrt ? Schwantz Chuck's Long Road wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. do you have CEF turned on? how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic on your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you sure you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what are you doing to test? -- sisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit command,but it doesn't work! interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point description DS3 bandwidth 45000 ip address 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 153 in ip access-group 111 out no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop pvc 19/555 encapsulation aal5snap thnks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54999t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QOS VoIP [7:55000]
I need to get some insights into designing and installing a IP Phone network, with CISCO switches and routers, but IP phones from another vendor, and I am looking for some courses that can help me desing and implement the QOS features, I was thinking about the DQOS course, any thoughts or suggestions. best regards, Arni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55000t=55000 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-books [7:55001]
Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55001t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QOS VoIP [7:55000]
I have the Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Configuration Guide. I'll be glad to email it to you if your interested. Other than that I have not jumped into QoS (yet). Collin Arni V. Skarphedinsson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I need to get some insights into designing and installing a IP Phone network, with CISCO switches and routers, but IP phones from another vendor, and I am looking for some courses that can help me desing and implement the QOS features, I was thinking about the DQOS course, any thoughts or suggestions. best regards, Arni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55002t=55000 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
Sorry..the access-list is not corect. Should be: access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 80 Regards Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55004t=54910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
Schwantz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why don't you use ATM's inherent policing attributes like vbr-nrt ? CL: I'm asking because I don't know - for an ATM edge device, like the router in question, can you configure various ATM characteristics like this even if they do not match the ATM service type that your carrier has provided on their ATM switch? Schwantz Chuck's Long Road wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. do you have CEF turned on? how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic on your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you sure you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what are you doing to test? -- sisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit command,but it doesn't work! interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point description DS3 bandwidth 45000 ip address 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 153 in ip access-group 111 out no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop pvc 19/555 encapsulation aal5snap thnks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55005t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
What do you mean inherent? You still need to define the shaping charateristics when using vbr-nrt, default is line rate and the public ATM network will police. Dave Schwantz wrote: Why don't you use ATM's inherent policing attributes like vbr-nrt ? Schwantz Chuck's Long Road wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. do you have CEF turned on? how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic on your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you sure you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what are you doing to test? -- sisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit command,but it doesn't work! interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point description DS3 bandwidth 45000 ip address 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 153 in ip access-group 111 out no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop pvc 19/555 encapsulation aal5snap thnks! -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55006t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off topic - Cisco's jazzy web site [7:54966]
Ugh...I just took a look. Am I the only one who thinks this is horrid? Perhaps I'm too used to the old layout but this seems to be much more difficult to follow. Oh well, in a few months I'm sure it will be old-hat. John Nigel Taylor 10/6/02 1:13:25 PM Hey Chuck, Yep, I noticed this as well. The greatest addition to the new site is the button/link(image) that read Go to the old Site. After mastering where all the information is on CCO, it's going to take sometime to fimilarize myself with the new layout.. Nigel - Original Message - From: Chuck's Long Road To: Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: Off topic - Cisco's jazzy web site [7:54966] Apparently the elves were busy last night. CCO has a new look. www.cisco.com -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55007t=54966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic - Cisco's jazzy web site [7:54966]
I'm seeing more integration between the marketing materials and the technical materials. As expected, the marketing seems to be prominent. I'll keep an open mind as to its improved/not improved logic. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Ugh...I just took a look. Am I the only one who thinks this is horrid? Perhaps I'm too used to the old layout but this seems to be much more difficult to follow. Oh well, in a few months I'm sure it will be old-hat. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55008t=54966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flash Memory and DRAM [7:55009]
Hi, has anyone found any places for cheap flash memory for the 2500 4000 series routers. Also, can we use pc memory I mean DRAM in Routers. Appreciate the help. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55009t=55009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it when you set ip next-hop it forces the packet to go out a particular interface. How about if you want the destination address changed for a particular type of traffic so HTTP traffic goes to an HTTP server and FTP to an FTP server. For example, if you have only one Public IP Address and if HTTP comes in you want its destination address changed to 192.168.1.10, if FTP change its destination address to 192.168.1.20 -Original Message- From: Stefan Razeshu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910] I think the response for this question is: The access list: access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any !-you need to detect your incoming www traffic. !-You can use also your network address for the first any. !-route map statement route-map http_access permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.141 The policy map statement need to be place on the interface that is facing your network not to the interface near by the host 10.10.10.141. Regards, Stefan PS. I think we need to help each other not to give life lessons. It is a Cisco study list not the church. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55011t=54910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
Port Address Translation. -Original Message- From: Harold Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910] This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it when you set ip next-hop it forces the packet to go out a particular interface. How about if you want the destination address changed for a particular type of traffic so HTTP traffic goes to an HTTP server and FTP to an FTP server. For example, if you have only one Public IP Address and if HTTP comes in you want its destination address changed to 192.168.1.10, if FTP change its destination address to 192.168.1.20 -Original Message- From: Stefan Razeshu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910] I think the response for this question is: The access list: access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any !-you need to detect your incoming www traffic. !-You can use also your network address for the first any. !-route map statement route-map http_access permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.141 The policy map statement need to be place on the interface that is facing your network not to the interface near by the host 10.10.10.141. Regards, Stefan PS. I think we need to help each other not to give life lessons. It is a Cisco study list not the church. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55012t=54910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resources for Writing Proposals [7:54995]
Try the DCN book Albert Lu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello Group, Could anyone point me to any resources (ie. web, books) for writing pre-sales/tendering documentation which might include such things as proposed solutions, pricing, etc. Thanks Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55013t=54995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-books [7:55001]
Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55014t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tech Tips [7:55015]
Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55015t=55015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55019t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Nanog Post: redistribute bgp considered harmfu [7:54961]
Nigel Taylor wrote: All, This was a recent post on the Nanog list which I thought could get some interest on the list. Basically, the poster is questioning the relevance or real world requirements/need for certain commands, in this case it's the redistribute bgp command. Here's the original post... Sean Donelan wrote: Should the Service Provider version of routing software include the redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, I haven't seen a real-world use for redistributing the BGP route table into any IGP. If the command was removed (or included a Are your sure? question) what would the affect be on ISPs, other than improving reliability by stopping network engineers from fubaring a backbone? Cisco engineering (IOS development especially) has never had the philosophy that they should stop someone from fubaring their network, and they probably won't change that. They've always given us enough rope to hang ourselves. :-) Luckily they couple that with good documentation, field support, TAC, and certification programs that (hopefully?) have some emphasis on when and when not to use commands. The more interesting question is the technical one. Is it true that there's never any reason to redistrubte BGP routes into an IGP? That sounds believable, but probably worth more discussion ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Thoughts! Nigel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55018t=54961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAT 3550 for L2 [7:55017]
Hi, I am replacing my 3524 XL switches with the 3550's. Can I use the 3550 EMI strikly as a L2 device or so I need to purchase the 3550 SMI. What I would like to do is purchase the 3550 EMI now to replace our Layer 2 CAT 3524 XL. When we are ready to use the Layer 3 technology, it will already be available to me. Naomi James Computer Services and Information Technology Savannah State University 912-356-2509 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelt.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelb.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55017t=55017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$1000.00 a Day for the Practise Labs now?? What's up Cisco? [7:55021]
Hello, BTW: Looks like Cisc has bumped up the fees for the CCIE Practice Labs to $1000.00 per day!! I thought it was something like $250.00 a day before. What's up with Cisco? Q: How much does it cost to use the CCIE Practice Labs? A: Contact the University CCIE Practice Labs for fees, refund and scheduling policies. Cisco CCIE Lab facilities may be scheduled for a cost of $1000 per day. Come'on Cisco.Are you kidding?? For that kind of money, I would attempt the Lab once every month till I pass it?? Anyone ?? MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55021t=55021 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55020t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55015]
Persio Pucci wrote: Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( According to the Tools Utilities page, Tech Tips have been folded into the Product Technology Support Pages here: http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/browse/index.pl Also the Tech Notes are easily found now. Yeah! From the main page, click on Technical Support and select Technology Support. There's a wealth of info there. __ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55022t=55015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55016t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55026]
You should be able to access the old-style web pages at http://www.cisco.com/cco.shtml --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tech Tips Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55026t=55026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Nanog Post: redistribute bgp considered harmfu [7:55023]
The more interesting question is the technical one. Is it true that there's never any reason to redistrubte BGP routes into an IGP? That sounds believable, but probably worth more discussion The first thing comes to mind is MPLS L3VPN. Thanks --kent ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Thoughts! Nigel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55023t=55023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55024t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CAT 3550 for L2 [7:55017]
the answer is yes you can use the EMI image and still have strictly L2, but why? the 3550-12G's come with EMI standard the 3550-12,24, and 48 boxes come with SMI unless you specify EMI. You can always upgrade SMI to EMI later with the appropriate license upgrade. You could also save a buck or two by getting the 2950 line of switches. No routing ever, and somewhat scaled down QoS capability. Depends on what you want and need. HTH -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! Naomi James wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I am replacing my 3524 XL switches with the 3550's. Can I use the 3550 EMI strikly as a L2 device or so I need to purchase the 3550 SMI. What I would like to do is purchase the 3550 EMI now to replace our Layer 2 CAT 3524 XL. When we are ready to use the Layer 3 technology, it will already be available to me. Naomi James Computer Services and Information Technology Savannah State University 912-356-2509 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelt.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelb.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55025t=55017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask - let us know. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55027t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
David j wrote: See inline.. Chuck's Long Road wrote: as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have to look at this from the user standpoint. Why are users throwing their own hubs onto the network? Is there a business case to be made? Is facilities too slow getting requested cable pulls done? what is the concern with a user plugging a hub in at the desk and then connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem is one of dual homing by accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with spanning tree recalculations. But in a single home situation, what do you see as the issues? I see one issue: collisions, if you have a switched network you don't want to deal with collisions that hubs normally produce. I have to recognize, though, that hubs sometimes are very convenient and I'm the first on using them. Collisions are only a problem for the hubbed network that the user made for him/her self. The switched network is isolated from the collisions (with the exception of the one switch port that connects the user's hub). I say, let 'em do it! What's the harm? Don't you have way more bandwidth than you need anyway?? ;-) A lot of companies do. Reference the disussion of Cisco stock. Nobody's buying, because, guess what, we don't need it!?? Tech support is an issue, though, of course, for example, the user that is clueful enough to know he/she needs a hub but not clueful enough to select the right cable (x-over versus s/t) and duplex mode. Well a hub should defaul to half, but a lot of devices that are marketed as hubs are really switches or bridges. But could you say they aren't supported rather than out right disallowing them? Is there a comprosmise somewhere?? ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com when you say that politically, it's a mess what does that mean? high powered sales people throwing their weight around? management does not respect your input or concerns? something bad is happening, and it's rolling downhill? In some environments it's politically unacceptable, I know some hospitals in which you have to fill in a lot papers before being allowed to use a PC, so in that environments this could perfectly be part of the policy. I'm not questioning the wisdom or the necessity for doing what others have suggested. I'm just wondering why it is necessary for the network manager / network staff to unilaterally cut off user access. John Zaggat wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks guys that's pretty good information, but do you think in your opinion is that good approach to deal with this problem. Do you see any caveats and are there any other ways this can be dealt with. Kevin Wigle wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... take a look into Port Security. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration _guide_chapter09186a008007f2dd.html In the event of a security violation, you can configure the port to go into shutdown mode or restrictive mode. The shutdown mode option allows you to specify whether the port is permanently disabled or disabled for only a specified time. The default is for the port to shut down permanently. The restrictive mode allows you to configure the port to remain enabled during a security violation and drop only packets that are coming in from insecure hosts. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: John Zaggat To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 5:01 PM Subject: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] I am just trying to think of how to restrict Hubs from being used in the LAN. Politically it's a mess and despite a lot of discussions certain people are able to add hubs at will where ever they want. So I was trying to think of a way to stop that within the switch. Now normally these ports that the hubs are connected to show several mac addresses when I do show cam which gives me an idea is there any way to restrict host ports to only accept one mac-address. I don't want to hardcode the mac-address because that would be too much a administrative burden. But if I could restrict the port to accept just one mac-address then that will make these hubs useless. Well anyways let me know if I am way off here but are there any other tricks in use by any of you guys. I'll appreciate any pointers. JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55028t=54937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
Re: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
There is a bigger question, maybe even a mystery here. I have heard that Cisco is experiencing a severe decline in the numbers of people actually showing up for their Lab exams. A lot of employers ( including mine :- wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55029t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55030]
George CCIE #9781 -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tech Tips Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55030t=55030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
fracking html filter let me try again without the html marking. Chuck's Long Road wrote in message news:... There is a bigger question, maybe even a mystery here. I have heard that Cisco is experiencing a severe decline in the numbers of people actually showing up for their Lab exams. A lot of employers ( including mine :-O ) are no longer paying for any training or tests because of the poor economy. I have heard that Cisco has even been holding a lottery, the prize being a free lab test for people who work for Cisco partners, in order to encourage people to pay up and show up. Yet I haven't seen any spots opening up. Wonder what's going on? Wonder what is true? Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55031t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55026]
How about: http://www.cisco.com/public/technotes/tech_protocol.shtml From: Dennis Laganiere Reply-To: Dennis Laganiere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tech Tips [7:55026] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:07:02 GMT You should be able to access the old-style web pages at http://www.cisco.com/cco.shtml --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tech Tips Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55032t=55026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
Erick B. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greg, Windows XP does this by default in some situations. Talk about giving the users enough rope to hang themselves! ;-) I guess Microsoft does that as much as Cisco does. One final comment on the idea of giving the users a low-end switch. The comment also applies to the XP machine becoming a bridge. You will want to have good control of which switch in your campus network becomes the root, using the various Cisco featuers like root guard, etc. This could make for a great troubleshooting exercise. Have a low-end user's Windows XP machine become the root of a large campus network and see what happens!? Anyway, please keep us posted if you can, John. It will be informative for us all to learn how you work this out, even if the major issues are L8 and not the more technical lower layers. Thanks. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com If you have a PC with a Ethernet NIC and firewire adapter, it will bridge the 2 interfaces together and create a logical L3 interface that the protocols are bound to all by default. --- Greg Reaume wrote: John, If WindowsXP is bridging two NICs it actually runs spanning-tree. It is a very nice feature for L1 redundancy. Though in your scenario I don't really see why they think that's necessary. I'm planning to use this functionality in the upcoming Windows.NET server to multihome all my servers, as long as it supports the concept of a loopback or virtual interface for L3 connectivity, to two different switches to protect against 48 servers failing because a switch burns out. I just wish MS had an add-on for Windows2K Server with this functionality so I don't have to wait. Check out these links: http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsXP/pro/techinfo/administration/homenetbridge /default.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/columns/c ableguy/cg0102.asp Correct me if I'm wrong but, from what I gather in your previous postings, loops seem to be your main concern. You say that it may very well be justified that these users need up to 5 PCs in their cube, or that you don't really want to get into that fight (whichever way you want to put it). You also say that it is very hard to run new drops. Why don't you take the approach of supporting them then, and instead of going through the work of running new drops, provide them with a small switch that runs spanning-tree. A 1548M (8-port desktop chassis) would do nicely for around $1K list. It allows for up to 4 local VLANs so the techs can do whatever they want on their own little switch. It also runs CDP so you can keep track of where they are through management tools like CiscoWorks, etc. If they want to clog up their link to the rest of the network with 5 PCs doing whatever, why not let them (as long as they do it safely)? Check here for more info on the 1548M: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps211/index.html HTH Greg Reaume JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, when I wrote the orginal post I knew I will have these questions. Basically the first layer of support or help desk if you will have more PCs then the drops in their cubes. This is an old building not meant for an IS staff so there is some frustration on their part. I am not going to question if there is a legit need for folks to have 5 PCs when there is infact a seperate staging area to set up and test pcs for users. Any ways they know enough to be dangerous and there is no standard on hubs and I have seen where folks have created loops. Now with Windows XP I have seen some configs where 2 nics have been bridged via software I am not sure with what intent. Although it's been made clear many times not to use hubs but this is never enforced and I did not want to spend my time daily trying to hunt down the lawless. So that's when I thought if I could config the switch this will discourage the hub usage or bridging within pcs. I hope that answers most of the questions here. David j wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... See inline.. Chuck's Long Road wrote: as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have to look at this from the user standpoint. Why are users throwing their own hubs onto the network? Is there a business case to be made? Is facilities too slow getting requested cable pulls done? what is the concern with a user plugging a hub in at the desk and then connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem is one of dual homing by accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with spanning tree recalculations. But in a single home situation, what do you
Re: CAT 3550 for L2 [7:55017]
Naomi James wrote: Hi, I am replacing my 3524 XL switches with the 3550's. Can I use the 3550 EMI strikly as a L2 device Yes Dave David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55037t=55017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tech Tips [7:55034]
Ya I'm trying to feel my way around this new and improved format with mixed results!! I think this is what your looking for: http://www.cisco.com/public/support/tac/technologies.shtml Dave Persio Pucci wrote: Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55034t=55034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
Hello, Now I am even more confused: Based on the link that Dennis put out: www.cisco.com/cco.shtml It pulls up the previous Cisco web-page which states on the CCIE Lab policy page: 3.Written Exam Expiry Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within 18 months of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. OK, Did Cisco's web master/programmer just do a copy and paste the original policy (within 1 year) to the new web-page and just overlooked the existing one as put up on www.cisco.com/cco.shtml?? Cisco, any comments?? Bottomline: Are candidates like me then still safe?? (I would like to be :-) Thank you. Sincerely. From: Clubb, Steven To: 'Cisco Nuts' , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:17:03 -0500 Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask - let us know. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55035t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL Vs. SDSL [7:54909]
We do use Verizon as well as several others. It IS possible to have ADSL with the same up and down. SDSL isn't be definition just the same bi-directional throughput speed. I have with Verizon as well as SWB ADSL customers who get the same up and down speed. They are, however, still held by the limits of ADSL. IE wire distance from the telco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55038t=54909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55039t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade memory in Native mode [7:55040]
I have two sup1/w MSFC2. I converted them to Native and I want to run them in redundant mode. Problem is one has 128M and the other has 512M. I want to upgrade the 128 to 512 but thinking a moment I wasn't sure what memory to upgrade. My gut feel says the MSFC2 but I can find no docs to verify this before I upgrade. Has anyone upgraded DRAM on a 6500 running native mode?? Thanks Dave David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55040t=55040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic - Cisco's jazzy web site [7:54966]
I think that's what's bugging me. The main page is WAY too busy; too much information makes it difficult to take in. I think they should include an expert mode that turns off the 'helpful' notes about which links do what. If they really wanted to be helpful, they should allow customizable home pages so that when we log in we have the items most important to us immediately available. If Excite can do it, I'm sure Cisco can. :-) John Daniel Cotts 10/7/02 10:32:16 AM I'm seeing more integration between the marketing materials and the technical materials. As expected, the marketing seems to be prominent. I'll keep an open mind as to its improved/not improved logic. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Ugh...I just took a look. Am I the only one who thinks this is horrid? Perhaps I'm too used to the old layout but this seems to be much more difficult to follow. Oh well, in a few months I'm sure it will be old-hat. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55041t=54966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
Isn't there a limitation on the number of MACs that a port will handle? Won't hubs share all those macs with each port, and possibly cause the max limit to be reached? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] David j wrote: See inline.. Chuck's Long Road wrote: as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have to look at this from the user standpoint. Why are users throwing their own hubs onto the network? Is there a business case to be made? Is facilities too slow getting requested cable pulls done? what is the concern with a user plugging a hub in at the desk and then connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem is one of dual homing by accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with spanning tree recalculations. But in a single home situation, what do you see as the issues? I see one issue: collisions, if you have a switched network you don't want to deal with collisions that hubs normally produce. I have to recognize, though, that hubs sometimes are very convenient and I'm the first on using them. Collisions are only a problem for the hubbed network that the user made for him/her self. The switched network is isolated from the collisions (with the exception of the one switch port that connects the user's hub). I say, let 'em do it! What's the harm? Don't you have way more bandwidth than you need anyway?? ;-) A lot of companies do. Reference the disussion of Cisco stock. Nobody's buying, because, guess what, we don't need it!?? Tech support is an issue, though, of course, for example, the user that is clueful enough to know he/she needs a hub but not clueful enough to select the right cable (x-over versus s/t) and duplex mode. Well a hub should defaul to half, but a lot of devices that are marketed as hubs are really switches or bridges. But could you say they aren't supported rather than out right disallowing them? Is there a comprosmise somewhere?? ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com when you say that politically, it's a mess what does that mean? high powered sales people throwing their weight around? management does not respect your input or concerns? something bad is happening, and it's rolling downhill? In some environments it's politically unacceptable, I know some hospitals in which you have to fill in a lot papers before being allowed to use a PC, so in that environments this could perfectly be part of the policy. I'm not questioning the wisdom or the necessity for doing what others have suggested. I'm just wondering why it is necessary for the network manager / network staff to unilaterally cut off user access. John Zaggat wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks guys that's pretty good information, but do you think in your opinion is that good approach to deal with this problem. Do you see any caveats and are there any other ways this can be dealt with. Kevin Wigle wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... take a look into Port Security. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration _guide_chapter09186a008007f2dd.html In the event of a security violation, you can configure the port to go into shutdown mode or restrictive mode. The shutdown mode option allows you to specify whether the port is permanently disabled or disabled for only a specified time. The default is for the port to shut down permanently. The restrictive mode allows you to configure the port to remain enabled during a security violation and drop only packets that are coming in from insecure hosts. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: John Zaggat To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 5:01 PM Subject: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] I am just trying to think of how to restrict Hubs from being used in the LAN. Politically it's a mess and despite a lot of discussions certain people are able to add hubs at will where ever they want. So I was trying to think of a way to stop that within the switch. Now normally these ports that the hubs are connected to show several mac addresses when I do show cam which gives me an idea is there any way to restrict host ports to only accept one mac-address. I don't want to hardcode the mac-address because that would be too much a administrative burden. But if I could restrict the port to accept just one mac-address then that will make these hubs useless. Well anyways let me know if I am way off here but are there any other tricks in
NAT question? [7:55043]
Can some one give me an example of using ip nat inside destination ? I know it enables NAT of the inside destination address. But I would like to see an example of how it is used. I check the cisco site but it doesn't go into detail or maybe I just didn't find it. Thanks Karl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55043t=55043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55044t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
Daren Presbitero wrote: Isn't there a limitation on the number of MACs that a port will handle? Probably, but I bet the number is way bigger than he needs to worry about. There's probably a max number of addresses for generic learning purposes and a max number related to port security, which appears to be 132 from an earlier post. There's also the issue of how many MACs can eat up all of the available 100 Mbps, but once again, that's the user's problem. Won't hubs share all those macs with each port, and possibly cause the max limit to be reached? All the MAC addressess behind the hub will be visible to all the switched ports. Is that what you're getting at? It's a good point. The learning process will need to know about all the MACs. But the max number of MAC addresses that a switch can learn is large and not something he needs to worry about. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] David j wrote: See inline.. Chuck's Long Road wrote: as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have to look at this from the user standpoint. Why are users throwing their own hubs onto the network? Is there a business case to be made? Is facilities too slow getting requested cable pulls done? what is the concern with a user plugging a hub in at the desk and then connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem is one of dual homing by accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with spanning tree recalculations. But in a single home situation, what do you see as the issues? I see one issue: collisions, if you have a switched network you don't want to deal with collisions that hubs normally produce. I have to recognize, though, that hubs sometimes are very convenient and I'm the first on using them. Collisions are only a problem for the hubbed network that the user made for him/her self. The switched network is isolated from the collisions (with the exception of the one switch port that connects the user's hub). I say, let 'em do it! What's the harm? Don't you have way more bandwidth than you need anyway?? ;-) A lot of companies do. Reference the disussion of Cisco stock. Nobody's buying, because, guess what, we don't need it!?? Tech support is an issue, though, of course, for example, the user that is clueful enough to know he/she needs a hub but not clueful enough to select the right cable (x-over versus s/t) and duplex mode. Well a hub should defaul to half, but a lot of devices that are marketed as hubs are really switches or bridges. But could you say they aren't supported rather than out right disallowing them? Is there a comprosmise somewhere?? ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com when you say that politically, it's a mess what does that mean? high powered sales people throwing their weight around? management does not respect your input or concerns? something bad is happening, and it's rolling downhill? In some environments it's politically unacceptable, I know some hospitals in which you have to fill in a lot papers before being allowed to use a PC, so in that environments this could perfectly be part of the policy. I'm not questioning the wisdom or the necessity for doing what others have suggested. I'm just wondering why it is necessary for the network manager / network staff to unilaterally cut off user access. John Zaggat wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks guys that's pretty good information, but do you think in your opinion is that good approach to deal with this problem. Do you see any caveats and are there any other ways this can be dealt with. Kevin Wigle wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... take a look into Port Security. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration _guide_chapter09186a008007f2dd.html In the event of a security violation, you can configure the port to go into shutdown mode or restrictive mode. The shutdown mode option allows you to specify whether the port is permanently disabled or disabled for only a specified time. The default is for the port to shut down permanently. The restrictive mode allows you to configure the port to remain enabled during a security violation and drop only packets that are coming in from insecure hosts. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: John Zaggat To:
Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55046]
So Cisco's CCIE Team does listen...right away :-) That's good. Here is the link, Melody: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/learning_ccie_lab_exam_policies.html Is this a mistake then?? Hopefully!! Sincerely. From: Melody Green To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] (EVA-Lite Redirect) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:57:14 -0400 Hi, The policy is that candidates must make their first lab attempt within 18 months of passing their written exam. Can you provide me with the link where you saw the policy stated as 12 months? Thanks, Melody At 11:52 AM 10/7/2002 -0700, you wrote: Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Now I am even more confused: Based on the link that Dennis put out: www.cisco.com/cco.shtml It pulls up the previous Cisco web-page which states on the CCIE Lab policy page: 3.Written Exam Expiry Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within 18 months of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. OK, Did Cisco's web master/programmer just do a copy and paste the original policy (within 1 year) to the new web-page and just overlooked the existing one as put up on www.cisco.com/cco.shtml?? Cisco, any comments?? Bottomline: Are candidates like me then still safe?? (I would like to be :-) Thank you. Sincerely. From: Clubb, Steven To: 'Cisco Nuts' , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:17:03 -0500 Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask - let us know. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com - Melody Green Cisco Systems - CCIE Lab 7025 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 Phone: (919) 392-0210 Facsimile: (919) 392-0166 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Check out our CCIE Website at: http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie/ _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55046t=55046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019]
So what is really true?? No spots opening up YET a severe decline in signing up?? What's really going on? Anyone?? From: Chuck's Long Road Reply-To: Chuck's Long Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:25:11 GMT fracking html filter let me try again without the html marking. Chuck's Long Road wrote in message news:... There is a bigger question, maybe even a mystery here. I have heard that Cisco is experiencing a severe decline in the numbers of people actually showing up for their Lab exams. A lot of employers ( including mine :-O ) are no longer paying for any training or tests because of the poor economy. I have heard that Cisco has even been holding a lottery, the prize being a free lab test for people who work for Cisco partners, in order to encourage people to pay up and show up. Yet I haven't seen any spots opening up. Wonder what's going on? Wonder what is true? Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55047t=55019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
cuz thay r easy to read this way Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55049t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DQoS Course Book [7:55050]
Team, I am looking to buy the DQoS course book, if any one is interested please let me know. Thanks, JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55050t=55050 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT question? [7:55043]
Ok, consider this. You have a server behind a router and you want others on the Internet to be able to use the services on this server. The server's IP address is 172.16.1.10. You have a block of IP address given to you by your ISP. The addresses are 192.1.1.1 - 192.1.1.14 (this implies a subnet mask of 255.255.255.240). Now, you want the users on the Internet to use the IP address 192.1.1.2 to connect to your internal router. Your router is on interface Ethernet1 and your internet connection is on interface Serial0.1. The point to point link between you and your ISP uses the address 192.1.1.16/30. Your end is 192.1.1.17 and theirs is 192.1.1.18. Your config would look something like this. interface Ethernet1 description Ethernet Connection to WEBSERVER ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside defines the Ethernet 1 interface as an inside address interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description Full T-1 to ISP ip address 192.1.1.17 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside -defines Serial0.1 as outside ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.10 192.1.1.2 -assigns the outside address of 192.1.1.2 to the server at 172.16.1.10 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.1.1.18 -default route, using ISP's router ip route 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 Ethernet1 -if the server is directly connected to Ethernet1, route it this way I hope this helps. Karl West wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can some one give me an example of using ip nat inside destination ? I know it enables NAT of the inside destination address. But I would like to see an example of how it is used. I check the cisco site but it doesn't go into detail or maybe I just didn't find it. Thanks Karl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55051t=55043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-books [7:55001]
or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55052t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
You can't read a book on a plane??? - Original Message - From: Ellis, Andrew To: 'Michael Linehan' ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: E-books [7:55001] or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55053t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? [7:55046]
Hmm... I don't see where it says one year, I do see that it says 18 months, and then within 12 months after the first attempt (if failed of course). fgm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55055t=55046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DQoS Course Book [7:55054]
Team, I am looking to buy the DQoS course book, if any one is interested please let me know. Thanks, JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55054t=55054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT question? [7:55043]
The following link has a configuration example of TCP load distribution using NAT, that command is there: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cdipadr.htm#xtocid2215662 -Original Message- From: Karl West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT question? [7:55043] Can some one give me an example of using ip nat inside destination ? I know it enables NAT of the inside destination address. But I would like to see an example of how it is used. I check the cisco site but it doesn't go into detail or maybe I just didn't find it. Thanks Karl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55056t=55043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
Yes you can, and you can also read it on your laptop which weighs a lot less than lugging around Caslow and Doyle's books. Give the guy a break. He did ask in his email of any website that SELLS pdf formats of books. Michael Linehan wrote: You can't read a book on a plane??? - Original Message - From: Ellis, Andrew To: 'Michael Linehan' ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: E-books [7:55001] or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55057t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2283 (Out of the Office) [7:55058]
I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office on October 15, 2002. Thanks, Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55058t=55058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT question? [7:55043]
Thanks Guy...that was the information I was looking for... Karl Lupi, Guy wrote: The following link has a configuration example of TCP load distribution using NAT, that command is there: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cdipadr.htm#xtocid2215662 -Original Message- From: Karl West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT question? [7:55043] Can some one give me an example of using ip nat inside destination ? I know it enables NAT of the inside destination address. But I would like to see an example of how it is used. I check the cisco site but it doesn't go into detail or maybe I just didn't find it. Thanks Karl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55059t=55043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? [7:55046]
Well, well, well!!! I have been monitoring the web-page for a couple of hours now and based on the email that I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a cut and paste has now been performed to reflect the old policy, that of taking the Lab exam within 18 months. Hooray!! Thank you Melody Green, Manager from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for resolving this right away. Sincerely. From: Frank Merrill Reply-To: Frank Merrill To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? [7:55046] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:05:04 GMT Hmm... I don't see where it says one year, I do see that it says 18 months, and then within 12 months after the first attempt (if failed of course). fgm _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55060t=55046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
I like pdf format myself. I often print out a few pages or a chapter to study from. Then I can highlight different parts for different areas of study. This avoids messing up the original book. I have done this may times with the Lanmmle books, all of which I paid for myself. In fact, I am doing this right now as I leave for class. I need to brush up on VLAN configuration. While the students are doing a lab on their own, I will be reviewing VLAN information so I can create a new lab for VLANs in a CAN. I wish all books came hardcover and pdf. Ben W wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yes you can, and you can also read it on your laptop which weighs a lot less than lugging around Caslow and Doyle's books. Give the guy a break. He did ask in his email of any website that SELLS pdf formats of books. Michael Linehan wrote: You can't read a book on a plane??? - Original Message - From: Ellis, Andrew To: 'Michael Linehan' ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: E-books [7:55001] or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55061t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55062]
Hi, The information posted at this link is incorrect. This is a new website format but seems to contain some of our older policy information. I've contacted the team in charge of the new website and they'll be making the corrections soon. Regards, Melody At 07:23 PM 10/7/2002 +, Cisco Nuts wrote: So Cisco's CCIE Team does listen...right away :-) That's good. Here is the link, Melody: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/learning_ccie_lab_exam_policies.html Is this a mistake then?? Hopefully!! Sincerely. From: Melody Green To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] (EVA-Lite Redirect) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:57:14 -0400 Hi, The policy is that candidates must make their first lab attempt within 18 months of passing their written exam. Can you provide me with the link where you saw the policy stated as 12 months? Thanks, Melody At 11:52 AM 10/7/2002 -0700, you wrote: Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Now I am even more confused: Based on the link that Dennis put out: www.cisco.com/cco.shtml It pulls up the previous Cisco web-page which states on the CCIE Lab policy page: 3.Written Exam Expiry Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within 18 months of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. OK, Did Cisco's web master/programmer just do a copy and paste the original policy (within 1 year) to the new web-page and just overlooked the existing one as put up on www.cisco.com/cco.shtml?? Cisco, any comments?? Bottomline: Are candidates like me then still safe?? (I would like to be :-) Thank you. Sincerely. From: Clubb, Steven To: 'Cisco Nuts' , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:17:03 -0500 Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask - let us know. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCIE Lab Policy?? Why?? [7:55019] Hello, Has anyone noticed the new CCIE Lab policy on this Cisco's new jazzy web-site? They have stated that: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. It was set to 18 months as of last week. I had planned to schedule my lab for the last day of the 18 month period, just looking for any open slots anywhere. My question is: What happens to candidates like me that have not scheduled and it's been over a year since I took my written exam? Am I pretty much scr@!$...?? If so, this is bad, real bad!! Can any one ask Cisco if this applies to candidates after Oct. 5th or to everyone else?? Anyone else have any other ideas?? Thank you. Sincerely. Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com - Melody Green Cisco Systems - CCIE Lab 7025 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 Phone: (919) 392-0210 Facsimile: (919) 392-0166 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Check out our CCIE Website at: http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie/ _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx - Melody Green Cisco Systems - CCIE Lab 7025 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 Phone: (919) 392-0210 Facsimile: (919) 392-0166 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Check out our CCIE Website at: http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55062t=55062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade memory in Native mode [7:55063]
I'm a little slow today I guess. After I sent the mail it occured to me I have both cards why not swap the memory of the MSFC's and see if my suspicions are correct. It is the MSFC DRAM that you upgrade!! Dave MADMAN wrote: I have two sup1/w MSFC2. I converted them to Native and I want to run them in redundant mode. Problem is one has 128M and the other has 512M. I want to upgrade the 128 to 512 but thinking a moment I wasn't sure what memory to upgrade. My gut feel says the MSFC2 but I can find no docs to verify this before I upgrade. Has anyone upgraded DRAM on a 6500 running native mode?? Thanks Dave David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55063t=55063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration Plan (6509) [7:55064]
What is the best way to perform Migration? I have a customer who has currently running CAT5000 as a backbone switch and tons of 3COM switches at access layer. We would be installing (2) 6509 switches with 3524 switches will be used at access layers and server farms. It is a campus environments and they have tons of IDFs. We will have about 15 VLANS will be load balancing between (2) 6509 switches along with HSRP for Layer 3 redundancy. During the First phase, I want to configure (2) 6509 along with the Serverfarm switches. The way I would migrate is that I will connect their Existing backbone Cat 5000 with (2) 6509 switches, and will also force to Cat5000 to become non-root switch. By doing that I could slowly move users from their current network to the new switches and both the newtworks will have an access to the servers which will be on its own subnet in (5) 3524 gigastack switches. The only problem I see it here is these 15 VLANS. I guess I will also have to configure their existing subnets and VLANS to the 6509 switches only temporarily basis because those VLANS and Subnets coming from 3com switches to new 6509 via Cat5000, and in order to reply back, 6509 will have to know the routes and vlans. Is it right approach or someone have a better suggestion? Regards, Teza Changed your e-mail? Keep your contacts! Use this free e-mail change of address service from Return Path. Register now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55064t=55064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
That is something that you could do using NAT statements (port address translation/port forwarding/network address port translation, etc.): ! int fa0/0 desc external interface ! ip below used as an example, I apologize if it, although unlikely, matches anyone's config. ip add 216.253.64.2 255.255.255.252 ip nat outside ! int fa0/1 desc internal interface ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ! ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.10 80 216.253.64.2 80 ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.20 21 216.253.64.2 21 ! Of course, if this router is acting in this fashion when it comes to NAT, it would be assumed that it will also run the firewall feature-set and be secured appropriately. You would have to permit this particular traffic in your external access-lists. HTH Greg Reaume Harold Monroe wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it when you set ip next-hop it forces the packet to go out a particular interface. How about if you want the destination address changed for a particular type of traffic so HTTP traffic goes to an HTTP server and FTP to an FTP server. For example, if you have only one Public IP Address and if HTTP comes in you want its destination address changed to 192.168.1.10, if FTP change its destination address to 192.168.1.20 -Original Message- From: Stefan Razeshu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910] I think the response for this question is: The access list: access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any !-you need to detect your incoming www traffic. !-You can use also your network address for the first any. !-route map statement route-map http_access permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.141 The policy map statement need to be place on the interface that is facing your network not to the interface near by the host 10.10.10.141. Regards, Stefan PS. I think we need to help each other not to give life lessons. It is a Cisco study list not the church. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55065t=54910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inside Interface accepts DHCP lease...but it has a static [7:55066]
That is strange. What type of router and IOS version? Just to clarify, the interface has 'ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y' config and not 'ip address dhcp' with a static DHCP assigned address. Being DSL, is it PPPoE by chance? Does e0 connect to DSL/Internet and e1 to their network or vice versa? --- Dain Deutschman wrote: Hi all, I have a problem with a client on a dsl connection. Ethernet 0 and 1 both have statically assigned IP addresses. I leave the customer site and 3 days later they call and have no internet. I check the router config and E0 has the wrong IP address. I check the Win2000 DHCP server and that address is listed as leased to the router. Any ideas why the router is allowing this to happen? -- Dain Deutschman CNA, MCP, CCNA Data Communications Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55066t=55066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message for jstrain@pomeroy.com (Jim) [7:55067]
Jim, I try to replay back to you but I am getting the following message: The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail address access denied) Possibly truncated original message follows: If you get back to me with a valid e-mail address I really appreciate it. Juan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55067t=55067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recall: Message for jstrain@pomeroy.com (Jim) [7:55068]
Juan Blanco would like to recall the message, Message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55068t=55068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written revised [7:53972]
dude, This is cisco we are talking about. This is not some 24.95 t shirt. tell her that and if she dosnt get it send her over here and i will gear her up with a 7507 and a 5505 haha Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55069t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
Michael Linehan wrote: You can't read a book on a plane??? Or an electronic document that's not PDF since PDF is so easy to share. I was wondering if there's anything so great about PDF. I wrote a longer message but it was filtered, despite having very nice language. ;-) Priscilla - Original Message - From: Ellis, Andrew To: 'Michael Linehan' ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: E-books [7:55001] or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55071t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55015]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Persio Pucci Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tech Tips [7:55015] Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55072t=55015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network security on Frame Relay, ATM and IP netwoks [7:55073]
All, any information sources, like websites, regarding network security on service providers Frame Relay, ATM, or IP networks? what are the vulnerabilities that a service provider's Frame Relay, ATM or IP networks have? Thanks a lot! Yatou _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55073t=55073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-books [7:55001]
I haven't looked into how Cisco Press is doing their online books. I think you have to subscribe or something. The publishers are interested in technical feedback on what works for people. They know they need to address the need for electronic access at a reasonable price. Most of them are kind of fumbling around trying to figure this out. If there's legitimate reasons for liking PDF, I think that's good feedback. I doubt they'll use PDF, though, because it's too easy to share. The publishers will definitely need to make money on the electronic products and they will want to minimize easy access to the products by people who want to get something for nothing, or, worse, people who want to sell the publisher's property without the publisher's consent. Hey, I'm beginning to sound like a lawyer. Seriously, there's lots of room for innovation here with results that please the customer and make business sense for the publisher. Now I sound like a marketer. From an author's point of view, I want people to see all that content I worked so hard on. The money is nice but so small, it's secondary. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Ken Chipps wrote: I like pdf format myself. I often print out a few pages or a chapter to study from. Then I can highlight different parts for different areas of study. This avoids messing up the original book. I have done this may times with the Lanmmle books, all of which I paid for myself. In fact, I am doing this right now as I leave for class. I need to brush up on VLAN configuration. While the students are doing a lab on their own, I will be reviewing VLAN information so I can create a new lab for VLANs in a CAN. I wish all books came hardcover and pdf. Ben W wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yes you can, and you can also read it on your laptop which weighs a lot less than lugging around Caslow and Doyle's books. Give the guy a break. He did ask in his email of any website that SELLS pdf formats of books. Michael Linehan wrote: You can't read a book on a plane??? - Original Message - From: Ellis, Andrew To: 'Michael Linehan' ; Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: E-books [7:55001] or maybe he wants to read it on his laptop while commuting. -Drew :^) -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] I know you know this already but the only logical conclusion is that he wants PDF format so its easily illegally copied and distributed. This of course places him directly in what I like to call the get it for free, society. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] WHY do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: yes Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Why do you want PDF format? Aser Anani wrote: nothing in PDF format Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Aser Anani wrote: Hi there , does anybody know a website that sell PDF format cisco books , i am looking for Caslow Bridging book Routing TCP/IP by Doyle Vol I Thanks Go to www.ciscopress.com and click on the Online Books tab. Priscilla Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55070t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash Memory and DRAM [7:55009]
The cheapest place I have found is Ebay.com they go for about $20 each. I just got 2 for my 2500 routers. hope this helps Reza Vik Da mon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, has anyone found any places for cheap flash memory for the 2500 4000 series routers. Also, can we use pc memory I mean DRAM in Routers. Appreciate the help. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55010t=55009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: CSCO stock [7:54957]
Sorry to be so pessimistic. NRF - got anything to add? Oh, I got lots to add. But let me try to keep it short by couching things in the following bullet points: *If you want money, somebody has to be ultimately paying. Money in, money out. Cisco is not a mint. No vendor is a mint. Cisco can only earn money sustainably if their customers are making money. And not just making money, but making money by using Cisco gear. You can only get money out if there is money coming in. Is that really happening? Let me explain. Let's look at the Internet. Many studies have shown a boom in Internet usage. A boom in traffic. A boom in users. A boom in time spent on the Internet. In all categories there is a boom, except for the one category that matters - a boom in profits. How many dotcoms actually make money? Few, very few. How many service-providers actually make profit from providing Internet access? Again, few, very few. If you tally the aggregate of all the profit and losses derived from Internet operations, you will see that the Internet has been nothing but a financial debacle of the first order. A business model where you, as a vendor, are making record profits while many of your customers are unprofitable is a business model that is unsustainable. True, Cisco is not just all about the Internet. So let's look at Cisco's bread-and-butter - the enterprise customer. Enterprises will continue to invest in their network only to the degree that it is profitable to do so. Has Cisco, or any other networking vendor, been able to demonstrate a solid ROI from upgrading the network?In many cases, no. Companies don't just build out networks 'for fun', they do so because there is a clear business reason to do so. What are these reasons? Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that there are no good reasons to do a network buildout. Indeed there are often many good reasons. But my point is that we need engineers who are not only technically strong, but can also articulate a strong business case as to why money should be spent. In short, we engineers need to know more about the business and financial side of things. *How many people really care about the network? By that, I mean how many regular (non-technical) people really care about a network at all? Are they going to be dazzled with mentions of BGP and VoIP and all that crap? Hardly. Regular people care about the services that a network can provide. It is the services that people are willing to pay for, not the network itself. But that begs the question - are there really all these jazzy services out there that regular people are willing to pay for? Before you answer, you may wish to consider the following snippet from the Hart-Winston study: The bottom line is that among people who are most likely to subscribe to high-speed Internet access, the obstacles are price and lack of appeal, said Hart, CEO of Hart Research. Forty-eight percent have no interest regardless of price and another 21 percent are willing to pay at most $20 per month. If you cannot win over the people who are currently using the Internet, consumer acceptance of high-speed access will be slow and limited...Findings about consumer interest in subscribing to high-speed service also apply to those who use it at work, the poll found, indicating that even those exposed to the service find little reason to subscribe at home http://www.comptel.org/press/nov29_2001_voices.html Then of course there was that incident in Oregon where a whole town was offered free broadband for a year, and only half the households signed up (can't find the article unfortunately, but you may wish to talk to Steven Ridder if you want to see it). The point is, at this time, very few regular people actually care about the Internet because there are no truly compelling services out there, and especially not much that people are willing to pay serious money for. * Cisco isn't going anywhere. All the nasty invective aside, the fact is that Cisco holds more of a premier position in the industry than perhaps at any other time. They got billions of dollars in the bank, and very importantly, no debt. The disaster of the service-provider market was something of a godsend to Cisco in the sense that it has crushed its competitors like Nortel and Lucent. Just a few years ago there was talk of how Cisco was going to have its lunch eaten by those Nor/cent because of their long-standing close relationships with service-providers. You don't hear that kind of talk anymore. The fact is, Cisco has basically been handed another few years for which it can develop a strong service-provider initiative (no, Stratacom didn't really work out, and the GSR is a point product, it's not an initiative). *The best move may be not to play. Cisco and networking in general most likely has its glory days behind it. Things will probably never be as good as they were. Cisco will probably never reach a market cap of
Security inside TPIPS cloud [7:55074]
Hi All, I use Telstra to provide my frame relay cloud, next hop service. Like the question earlier, is there any mechanism in place, so I can see if Telstra is doing the job its paid to do in relation to: * Security * Traffic shaping within the cloud Thanks all for your help. John Sydney, Australia ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55074t=55074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redundant power feed for 3548 XL [7:54988]
I've done it...it took both feeds fine (for a few minutes...didn't run it too long), however does not act redundant The switch will loose power going to DC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Koen Zeilstra Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: redundant power feed for 3548 XL [7:54988] Hi All, The 3548XL has like the 2900 a DC input as well as a AC input. Has anyone of you guys tried to connect both? The manuals says not to do it. If this works you'll have a very cheap redundant power solution, of course Cisco doesn't like it and will say it's impossible ;-) Any experience connecting the AC to wall power and DC with a external power supply? grtz, Koen --- Cleanliness is next to impossible. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55075t=54988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IDS Sensor action [7:54762]
Hi Bruno, When the IDS detects an unauthorized activity, the posibly action for the sensor are: 1. TCP Reset, 2. IP Log 3. IP Block The sensor cannot shutdown an interface and do not do a trace route to the attackers. CMIAW Best Regards, HATO From: Bruno Fernandes Reply-To: Bruno Fernandes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IDS Sensor action [7:54762] Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:23:20 GMT Hi !!! If a sensor detects unauthorized activity, are the following possible action ? (action1) -- Shutdown Interface (action2) -- Perform a traceroute to the source of the attack I am taking the Vconsole tests and some of their answers follow this actions, but this doesn't make much sense to me, to what i have read about it. Thanks in advance BF _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55076t=54762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Plan (6509) [7:55064]
interesting. The following may or may not be feasible, depending upon space in closets, and cost of implementation. It is something my employer is supposed to be doing for the various branch offices of a major customer we have during a major network forklift upgrade. It has tended not to happen this way for a lot of reasons, political and practical. 1) Place all new switches into the various closets. Connect them up 2) set up a gateway ( single link ) between the new core switch(s) and the old core switch(s) 3) test connectivity by taking a laptop with as many user applications as practical, and go from closet to closet testing connectivity to the various servers, services, etc. 4) assuming point three results in connectivity everywhere, do a closet by closet migration of users from the old switches to the new switches. 5) migrate all devices ( servers, internet, etc ) onto the new core switches. 6) assuming all remains well, unplug the old stuff and if Cisco is not offering you a generous trade in, sell it on one of the auction sites. Like I said, sometimes time, space, and cost does not permit this. Chuck -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! Azhar Teza wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What is the best way to perform Migration? I have a customer who has currently running CAT5000 as a backbone switch and tons of 3COM switches at access layer. We would be installing (2) 6509 switches with 3524 switches will be used at access layers and server farms. It is a campus environments and they have tons of IDFs. We will have about 15 VLANS will be load balancing between (2) 6509 switches along with HSRP for Layer 3 redundancy. During the First phase, I want to configure (2) 6509 along with the Serverfarm switches. The way I would migrate is that I will connect their Existing backbone Cat 5000 with (2) 6509 switches, and will also force to Cat5000 to become non-root switch. By doing that I could slowly move users from their current network to the new switches and both the newtworks will have an access to the servers which will be on its own subnet in (5) 3524 gigastack switches. The only problem I see it here is these 15 VLANS. I guess I will also have to configure their existing subnets and VLANS to the 6509 switches only temporarily basis because those VLANS and Subnets coming from 3com switches to new 6509 via Cat5000, and in order to reply back, 6509 will have to know the routes and vlans. Is it right approach or someone have a better suggestion? Regards, Teza Changed your e-mail? Keep your contacts! Use this free e-mail change of address service from Return Path. Register now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55077t=55064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Daren Presbitero wrote: Isn't there a limitation on the number of MACs that a port will handle? Probably, but I bet the number is way bigger than he needs to worry about. There's probably a max number of addresses for generic learning purposes CL: in case anyone is interested, the max number of macs supported on any of the Cisco switches is fluid, depending on other features turned on, amount of memory, etc. . The 3550 documentation states that depending upon the SDM template that is active, one may have anywhere from 2,000 to 12,000 unicast MAC's in the CAM table. I am assuming this means that if you have lots of hubs and switches daisy chanined down the line, that the MAC's of end stations will show up in the root switch CAM. Obviously, if all you have are end stations in a single switch, that number is smaller. CL: this does bring up a good point about size ( number of devices - servers, PC's, and other switches ) in a bridged network. and a max number related to port security, which appears to be 132 from an earlier post. There's also the issue of how many MACs can eat up all of the available 100 Mbps, but once again, that's the user's problem. Won't hubs share all those macs with each port, and possibly cause the max limit to be reached? All the MAC addressess behind the hub will be visible to all the switched ports. Is that what you're getting at? It's a good point. The learning process will need to know about all the MACs. But the max number of MAC addresses that a switch can learn is large and not something he needs to worry about. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] David j wrote: See inline.. Chuck's Long Road wrote: as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have to look at this from the user standpoint. Why are users throwing their own hubs onto the network? Is there a business case to be made? Is facilities too slow getting requested cable pulls done? what is the concern with a user plugging a hub in at the desk and then connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem is one of dual homing by accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with spanning tree recalculations. But in a single home situation, what do you see as the issues? I see one issue: collisions, if you have a switched network you don't want to deal with collisions that hubs normally produce. I have to recognize, though, that hubs sometimes are very convenient and I'm the first on using them. Collisions are only a problem for the hubbed network that the user made for him/her self. The switched network is isolated from the collisions (with the exception of the one switch port that connects the user's hub). I say, let 'em do it! What's the harm? Don't you have way more bandwidth than you need anyway?? ;-) A lot of companies do. Reference the disussion of Cisco stock. Nobody's buying, because, guess what, we don't need it!?? Tech support is an issue, though, of course, for example, the user that is clueful enough to know he/she needs a hub but not clueful enough to select the right cable (x-over versus s/t) and duplex mode. Well a hub should defaul to half, but a lot of devices that are marketed as hubs are really switches or bridges. But could you say they aren't supported rather than out right disallowing them? Is there a comprosmise somewhere?? ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com when you say that politically, it's a mess what does that mean? high powered sales people throwing their weight around? management does not respect your input or concerns? something bad is happening, and it's rolling downhill? In some environments it's politically unacceptable, I know some hospitals in which you have to fill in a lot papers before being allowed to use a PC, so in that environments this could perfectly be part of the policy. I'm not questioning the wisdom or the necessity for doing what others have suggested. I'm just wondering why it is necessary for the network manager / network staff to unilaterally cut off user access. John Zaggat wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks guys that's pretty good information, but do you think in your opinion is that good approach to deal with this problem. Do you see any caveats and are there any other ways
RE: Tech Tips [7:55080]
I am not quite sure what the original poster meant by where did the pages go? What link were you using that isn't working now. 1. I have this in my bookmarks for tech notes and it still works. It is distinctly different interface than below. This heirarchy is listed down center of page. http://www.cisco.com/public/technotes/serv_tips.shtml 2. And this for tech support which still works with heirarchy on left. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/index.pl?i=Technologies Which look identical to this link which MADMAN says is new? http://www.cisco.com/public/support/tac/technologies.shtml 3. The link from the top page of cisco.com now takes you here, and this the new technology support portal, no? After going a little deeper, looks like the interface of the 2 above with the heirearchy on the left, but end pages are different. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/index.html No 1, 2, and 3 are all distinctly different portals into the tech support. The organization top down is different, but the final pages seem identical. I went to the top of each and headed for OSPF troubleshooting. The resulting page of no 1 and 2 above both point to same URL. No 3 point to different URL, with same information...probably just a server side function taking the original html of 1 or 2 and re-framing it. Best to get use to new one as this will be on the DOC CDs in the lab in the future. Nice to know more of this from Cisco. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:36 AM To: Persio Pucci Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tech Tips Ya I'm trying to feel my way around this new and improved format with mixed results!! I think this is what your looking for: http://www.cisco.com/public/support/tac/technologies.shtml Dave Persio Pucci wrote: Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55080t=55080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to interpret lab score [7:55081]
Hello, all I'll be taking my lab in a few weeks, and I want to make sure I understand how the scoring system works. I've seen a lot of differing opinions and reports on the subject, and I was wondering if there was an accurate way to interpret the score. For example, I understand that there is a percentage breakdown. How does this translate into a passing/failing grade? I don't *think* I am violating any NDA rules in asking this question. Obviously, please respond within that context. Thanks in advance, Ed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55081t=55081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
