Sybex CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080]
Please can someone tell me the correct syntax.. The Sybex CCNA lab simulator does not like my syntax for #int fastethernet I can get it to work with int f0/0 Is this a simulator bug or am I doing something wrong? Thanks -Anil Router#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Router(config)#hostname 2621A 2621A(config)#int fas 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0? % Unrecognized command 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f 0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int f0/0 2621A(config-if)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27080&t=27080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Skybox CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080]
Jason, http://web.mit.edu/net-security/Camp/2001/camp.pdf Page 11 of this pdf, written by the security guys at MIT shows int f0/0 clearly.. Cisco home page (do a search for int f0/0) also shows http://www-search.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/search/public.pl?q=int+f0%2F0&num=10&se archselector=0 ... interface only. The following example shows such a display: R7732-01-uBR7111_Router#sh int f0/0 FastEthernet 1/0 is up, There are 9 other hits for the search on CISCO's home page. I guess the f0/0 can be used when there is no "int fddi" present. The int fA0/0 would make it unique in that case. The IOS just needs a command which is unique to the hardware. Hope this clears up the confusion. Thanks -Anil (CCNA wannabee) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Skybox CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080] It's actually int fA0/0 ... That's the problem with using Simulators... :-) . Sort of scary to see so many whose entire experiences is based on simulator... ""Scott Nawalaniec"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > just use int f0/0 > > Scott > -Original Message- > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sybex CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080] > > > Well, the real router don't like it either. > > ""anil"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Please can someone tell me the correct syntax.. > > The Sybex CCNA lab simulator does not like my syntax for > > #int fastethernet > > I can get it to work with int f0/0 > > Is this a simulator bug or am I doing something wrong? > > Thanks > > -Anil > > > > > > Router#config t > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > > Router(config)#hostname 2621A > > 2621A(config)#int fas > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 > >^ > > > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0? > > % Unrecognized command > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f 0/0 > >^ > > > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 > >^ > > > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > > > 2621A(config)#int f0/0 > > 2621A(config-if)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27124&t=27080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
The 1st router I ever set up was the Cisco 765. At that time (3 years ago) it did *not* run the CISCO IOS. I guess it still does not run the IOS. It runs/ran a quirky version of the IOS. So any questions they would ask you about the 7xx series would have to take that into account (I guess). Hope this helps -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] Hai, I just taken BCRAN 20/11/01, on my exam there was no Cisco 700. Even when I took the BCRAN tranning from cisco tranning center, they skip the subject. > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] > > Hello, > > (This is my first post in this wonderful newsgroup) > > > Will the said content (700 series router) still tested on the real > test? > I'll take the test on next week. > > And it still occupied one chapter in the book "CCNP remote access > exam > certification Guide", but not on the exam topics published by Cisco.. > > Any folks taken the exam recently can share the experiences? > > Thanks a lot :> > > > Regards, > c.h.Ip > > > > ps. Any people in Hong Kong here? want to find one or more study > parthers~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27185&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sybex virtual lab sim users [7:27307]
I am looking to meet other users of this software. If you are also using this software we can share experiences, and pass the groups comments back to Sybex on what we require. We can also exchange configs quite easily and help each other. Maybe even get the next software release free? Look forward to your e-mail. Thanks -Anil PS I am using the gold version with 4 routers and 2 cat1900's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27307&t=27307 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What's it worth... [7:27400]
Part of the problem is caused by people who claim to be CCIE *without* having done the lab. They have just done the written exam, and I have heard one person say "The lab is easy, I just don't have the time"! -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What's it worth... [7:27400] I'll agree with that last statement. It used to be CCIE ment you knew your stuff and if all hell broke loose you could hang with the smoke. People are getting their CCIE in an attempt to get big bucks. I always here I need to get my CCIE and/or my MCSE to get into the computer feild. That's what happened to the CNE. People studied their little brains out, past the test but when the server crashed they had no experience to get it back up because as we all know there is a HUGE difference between the controlled lab and a real WAN. This made employers think why should I hire one of these guys if they can not even do what they are "certified" to do. The same thing happened to the MCSE which is one "supposed" reason MS has made it a hell of a lot harder to pass. My 2 cents, Steve -Original Message- From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What's it worth... [7:27400] to be a certified Cisco engineer ? Answer these days appears to be 'not a lot' I have been with 3 clients today who are all trying to recruit CCNP or CCIE staff and they had asked for help in the interview process. The followign is just one example of an interview, but it goes for all 3 and more. All goes well until the first CCIE candidate asks about money and was told its 60K (UK Sterling) no frills no overtime, maybe a car, but you only work at one site. This to work in London, where CCIE used to command 100K+ So I did some checking with some friends who work as recruitment consultants and yes 60-70K is topline now for a CCIE, and 30K for CCNP with 5 years experience, its a lot less without experience IF you get a job. The reasons behind this a. Recession - so everyone will run for cover and take a permanent job. b. CCIE's are plentiful and therefore cheap and CCNP's are even worse off Now this is the view from the employer(s). I can print here what the Cisco account manager(s) said to me afterwards as we talked on the train home, but they and some of their associates are taking the message back, 'we have got it wrong' in trying to turen out CCIE's too quickly. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27483&t=27400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
Tom, I don't think you can!! HDLC is the default, and requires cable attached in order for the router to show "up". There is no way to simulate as far as I am aware. Having said that, someone will prove me wrong no doubt. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom E Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27610&t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
yesm both end must be connected, but: Ethernet also has a link light showing as soon as both ends are connected. There should be an LED on each NIC which lights up as soon as noth ends are connected. The ethernet link layer LED works in the same way. Please correct me if I am mistaken. -Anil -Original Message- From: Ali, Abbas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:59 AM To: 'anil'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] It is correct, but according to my knowledge, it will still show down/down even the cable is attached. The only way to bring it to up/up if other side is also connected along with the encapuslation and other parameters. It is different then Ethernet where the physical port will go up as soon as the cable is detected. Abbas -Original Message----- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] Tom, I don't think you can!! HDLC is the default, and requires cable attached in order for the router to show "up". There is no way to simulate as far as I am aware. Having said that, someone will prove me wrong no doubt. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom E Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27616&t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27735]
Using the MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55 you can write the config to a tftp server on your network. "to write the configuration of a Cisco router to tftp server the command would be: snmpset -c .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55. octetstring " Does anyone happen to know what the *OCTECTSTRING* is? I presume the filename is the name of the file to be saved on the TFTP server. Has anyone aactually tried this command? Thanks -Anil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27735&t=27735 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]
The IP adress of router 2 needs to be changed. Try 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.0 Thats what I would do.. This wuld put it on the same subnet. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James gruggett Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2500 Router problem [7:27695] I have a lab setup as follows: 2 2500 series routers connected to a 2900 switch. Router1 E0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 Router 2 E0 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 SwitchIP 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 I can ping and telnet to Router 1 and the switch. I can not ping Router2. When I telnet I receive this error message(Cam't open connection to host on port 23, a socket operation was attempted to an unreachable host) I console into Router 2 and E0 looks fine with ip ans it states it is administrately up. Any suggestions? Thanks, James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27744&t=27695 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS [7:27743]
from Amazon.com: What is "RWAN, LMS"? Thanks -Anil -- CISCO CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS No photo available Price: $68.87 s&h fee $8.00 Description: CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS Note: This merchant will not ship this item outside of United States. Merchant: microtechonline zShop (9) Seller: microtechonline zShop Details: CISCOWORKS USER GUIDE RWAN LMS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Circusnuts Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CiscoWorks, Cisco Secure [7:27563] Nope- I had to purchase the courseware and a documentation kit off of Ebay. Cisco does offer a CBT for $10 + shipping. There is always the Global Knowledge bootcamp for $5,000 :o)> All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: "D sam" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:35 PM Subject: CiscoWorks, Cisco Secure [7:27563] > does any one know if there are any books for cisco works and Cisco secure > that can be purchased by the public. > > rick > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27743&t=27743 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27791]
Hope someone can help: Is it possible to upgrade my c1603 to IOS 12.x using the existing hardware? Do I need to upgrade the RAM? Thanks -Anil -- rustyb#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 1600 Software (C1600-Y-L), Version 11.1(12)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1997 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 09-Jun-97 14:20 by krunyan Image text-base: 0x0801A214, data-base: 0x02005000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(10)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc 1) ROM: 1600 Software (C1600-BOOT-R), Version 11.1(10)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) rustyb uptime is 1 day, 21 minutes System restarted by power-on System image file is "flash:c1600-y-l.111-12.AA", booted via flash cisco 1603 (68360) processor (revision C) with 17920K/512K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 11324937 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface. System/IO memory with parity disabled 2048K bytes of DRAM onboard 16384K bytes of DRAM on SIMM System running from FLASH 8K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 4096K bytes of processor board PCMCIA flash (Read ONLY) Configuration register is 0x2102 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27791&t=27791 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27792]
Using the MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55 you can write the config to a tftp server on your network. "to write the configuration of a Cisco router to tftp server the command would be: snmpset -c .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.55. octetstring " Does anyone happen to know what the *OCTECTSTRING* is? I presume the filename is the name of the file to be saved on the TFTP server. Has anyone aactually tried this command? Thanks -Anil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27792&t=27792 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial Line is up and line protocol is up Question [7:27929]
If the show interface serial 0 command is executed and the message Serial Line is up and line protocol is up appears then the exact correct interpretation of this is A) The frame relay connection is active B) The connection is sending and receiving data - Answer is given in next message with subject line "Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSWER" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27929&t=27929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSWER [7:27930]
The answer given by CISCO is "A" Is this really correct?! I hate to doubt the experts, but I just need re-assurance. Thanks --- If the show interface serial 0 command is executed and the message Serial Line is up and line protocol is up appears then the exact correct interpretation of this is A) The frame relay connection is active B) The connection is sending and receiving data - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27930&t=27930 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSWER [7:27930]
Gregg, Who said anything about frame relay (except for the answer).. What about PPP or any other encap? Does your explanation hold for *all* encaps? Confused.. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 1:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSWER [7:27930] Maybe this will explain it..Just because a serial int is UP/UP, it doesn't necessarily mean that data is able to be xfered. The serial int could be connected to a CSU/DSU which might give the int the correct control signal states to make the serial int appear to be up (example would be that the remote CSU/DSU is broken but carrier signal is up on local int). In this case, since it's frame relay, the 2nd up would not occur unless LMI keepalives were occuring. What cisco is saying is UP/UP is just the int status. Doesn't mean that data is being xfered. The most popular way to know that an interface is in use is to watch in/out stats (via sh int). Clear counters is another usefull cmd. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27946&t=27930 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
>The question seems geared toward trying to trick the >engineer into thinking that data is being xfered vs. >could be. Yep, it certianly had me fooled. Many thanks for clearing the confusion -Anil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27951&t=27930 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
secondary ip address on e0? [7:28012]
Configuring Sub-interfaces on a c1603 What could possibly go wrong?? It looked so easy in the book. Does this mean I must use secondary IP addresses on the e0, and sub-interfaces only on s0? Eg., #int e0 ip address [i.p.address] [subnet.mask] secondary #int s0.1 ip address [i.p.address] [subnet.mask] In the book it said that "secondary" IP addresses were being phased out in the newer IOS. Help please... -Anil - Rustyb#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. rustyb(config)#int e0 rustyb(config-if)#ip address 193.9.56.1 255.255.255.0 rustyb(config-if)#int e0.1 rustyb(config-subif)#ip address 192.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN. rustyb(config-subif)#exit rustyb(config)#int e0 rustyb(config-if)#no shut rustyb(config-if)# rustyb(config-if)# rustyb(config-if)#int e0.1 rustyb(config-subif)#ip address 192.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN. rustyb(config-subif)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28012&t=28012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: secondary ip address on e0? [7:28027]
Configuring Sub-interfaces on a c1603 What could possibly go wrong?? It looked so easy in the book. Does this mean I must use secondary IP addresses on the e0, and sub-interfaces only on s0? Eg., #int e0 ip address [i.p.address] [subnet.mask] secondary #int s0.1 ip address [i.p.address] [subnet.mask] In the book it said that "secondary" IP addresses were being phased out in the newer IOS. Help please... -Anil - Rustyb#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. rustyb(config)#int e0 rustyb(config-if)#ip address 193.9.56.1 255.255.255.0 rustyb(config-if)#int e0.1 rustyb(config-subif)#ip address 192.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN. rustyb(config-subif)#exit rustyb(config)#int e0 rustyb(config-if)#no shut rustyb(config-if)# rustyb(config-if)# rustyb(config-if)#int e0.1 rustyb(config-subif)#ip address 192.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN. rustyb(config-subif)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28027&t=28027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]
2 C1603's connected to a hub. It should be simple but I cannot see why RIP does not update the routing tables (in either direction). I added secondary addresses to both routers e0, and want RIP to send these routes. Any comments/suggestions welcome. Many thanks -Anil - rustya#sh ip route Gateway of last resort is not set C193.9.200.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 C192.9.200.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 rustya# -- hostname rustya ! enable secret 5 $1$Ws8V$mRIwI97bc/Iv7PAEKFBVo1 ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 193.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown ! router rip network 193.9.200.0 ! no ip classless ! line con 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end rustyb#sh ip route Gateway of last resort is not set C192.9.200.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 C196.9.200.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 rustyb# hostname rustyb ! enable secret 5 $1$JycL$W4sNa8kuL2.tppX2IYQJU/ ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 196.9.200.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.9.200.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown ! router rip network 196.9.200.0 ! no ip classless ! line con 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28327&t=28327 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318]
I don't know about you, but 1) I hate to lose #125 for each test, 2) The practise tests have a money back guarantee. 3) The practice tests help me to gauge my progress by how many I get wrong. 4) I am ready for the real test when I score 99% on the practise *without guessing* any answer. In other words "testing" is an aid to learning... Just like any tool (a knife, etc) it can be abused. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] Tim, I disagree with you. May be I'm wrong because my lack of expecience in practice tests. I had only one experience with practice test (CSPFA exam #2) and still now I had more than 30 Sylvan exams (Novell, MS, Cisco), this was my first time that I bought a practice test. I my opinion the questions ARE NOT the same as the Cisco's exam. The CSPFA exam that I took today had NO question as the Boson practice test. Similar? May be some of them, but if you do not know answer, surely you will loose the question. I think that with a practice test you will not learn more, but it will give you what type of questions the exam MAY ask for, not the exact questions. The pactice exams will only help you how to take the test, not what answers to choose. Thanks, Hugo -Original Message- From: Tim Toole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quinta-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2001 19:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] Hey Gang, Why do people use the Boson practice tests when they know that the questions are almost exactly like the real Cisco test? Do people think that it is just a coincidence that the questions are almost the exact same as the real Cisco test? It's almost like cheating. This would to me seem to devalue the Cisco certifications if I could practically buy the same test from Boson. Help me out here. I'm I off base on this one? TimT __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28337&t=28318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need BCRAN latest Dumps! [7:28236]
There was a girl who walked into the professor's office 1 day before the finals. "Professor, I'll do anything, just ANYthing you want if I could just pass that exam of yours tomorrow" she said in her sweetest voice. "Anything?" asked the professor.. "Sure, I'll do JUST ANY thing, " she said putting his hand on her thigh. "Well that's wonderful" he replied... "You have a lot of work to catch up on and only 24 hours left to do it, why don't you run to the library before it closes" -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mcfadden, Chuck Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Need BCRAN latest Dumps! [7:28236] We not prone to liking dumps around here. You see, there's this thing called a confidentiality agreement. You know, that pesky thing that keeps us who have work our tails off to earn a certification or two by reading books, doing installations, asking questions, and buying labs for our homes. You know, those of us who care more about the technology than the piece of paper on the wall. My feeling is, "to each his own." If you want to cheat to gain your certification, fine. However, don't fault me when our certification levels are equal and we are vying for the same customer or job. I can assure you, it may take me longer to get my certifications than you, but when we come face to face with the same customer or job...stand aside, it's all mine. So you go ahead and cheat then wonder why you can't rate amongst your peers. I seem to remember Microsoft had this problem with the MCSE NT4.0 certification. After a while everyone had their MCSE. Maybe 15% of the MCSE were worth a salt because everyone cheated. Let's not let this guy decline our value in the market. I may seem a bit extreme, but we need to ban all of these cheater sites. They destroy everything we value with the certification. Even if you only use them to brush up before the test. If you can't pass the test do more, do cheat!! ccie1ab -Original Message- From: SA J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Need BCRAN latest Dumps! [7:28236] Hi All, This is my first email on groupstudy mailing list! i will be giving BCRAN this weekend! i have read the book of BCRAN - Cisco Press! also did some practice of BOSON! now i need some latest Dumps of BCRAN, if available anywhere pls. do let me know! B'Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28349&t=28236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27735]
David >OCTECTSTRING is another word for an SNMP variable. Did you use SNMP for this? Do you happend to remember what command you typed? I am *NOT* referring to "copy run tftp" IOS commands I am referring to SNMP commands from a unix server such as snmpwalk, snmpget, snmpset etc, . Thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 12:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Retrieve Cisco config (via SNMP) [7:27735] Yes, I have. And it works fine, but i don4t have any idea about what OCTECTSTRING means, I presume that it4s something related with tftp. You have to create the file (empty) on the TFTP server before executing the command (at least on UNIX machines), and you need the RW community string, of course. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28377&t=27735 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Ports and sockets. The session layer only needs to know about a "session", no matter where that session is located on the network. The upper layers use ports, for individual application requests, eg FTP port 23, and each FTP session opened up has a unique socket number. So if you have 2 FTP sessions each will have a seperate socket number. The IP and MAC address do not enter the equation here. That is my understanding. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mlh Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] Hi, there, I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: "Remember that none of the upper layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am wondering if the session layer doesn't use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session layer in other host? Thank you for your time. mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28391&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? Someone please correct me. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: >Hi, there, > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: "Remember >that none of the upper >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am wondering >if the session layer doesn't >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session >layer in other host? I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the statement is definitely "wrong." However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking to the same layer on another host. So the session layer talks to the session layer on the other host. That's probably what Todd was getting at. However, the pictures also show vertical lines. A layer calls on a layer below to provide services. Each layer offers services to layers above it. The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much. But one example might help. NetBIOS is a session layer. On a Windows client, when you access a Server Message Block (SMB) server, NetBIOS has the job of setting up a session with the server. Before it can do that, however, it must find the address of the server. If it's a modern Windows network, then SMB and NetBIOS are probably running above TCP/IP and UDP/IP. So NetBIOS sends a DNS or WINS query to find the IP address of the named server. It then sets up a NetBIOS session with the server. Actually, first, the client sets up a TCP connection. TCP has port numbers. The client sends to the well-known TCP port for NetBIOS session (139) and use an ephemeral port on its side. These port numbers could be considered "addresses" at the transport layer. Anyway, back to the question. The statement is at best over-simplified. I recommend you get yourself a sniffer and watch what really happens between layers. (Ethereal is free by the way.) Priscilla >Thank you for your time. > >mlh Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28487&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Yes, I checked it out.. Session layer protocols include: SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? Someone please correct me. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: >Hi, there, > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: "Remember >that none of the upper >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am wondering >if the session layer doesn't >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session >layer in other host? I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the statement is definitely "wrong." However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking to the same layer on another host. So the session layer talks to the session layer on the other host. That's probably what Todd was getting at. However, the pictures also show vertical lines. A layer calls on a layer below to provide services. Each layer offers services to layers above it. The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much. But one example might help. NetBIOS is a session layer. On a Windows client, when you access a Server Message Block (SMB) server, NetBIOS has the job of setting up a session with the server. Before it can do that, however, it must find the address of the server. If it's a modern Windows network, then SMB and NetBIOS are probably running above TCP/IP and UDP/IP. So NetBIOS sends a DNS or WINS query to find the IP address of the named server. It then sets up a NetBIOS session with the server. Actually, first, the client sets up a TCP connection. TCP has port numbers. The client sends to the well-known TCP port for NetBIOS session (139) and use an ephemeral port on its side. These port numbers could be considered "addresses" at the transport layer. Anyway, back to the question. The statement is at best over-simplified. I recommend you get yourself a sniffer and watch what really happens between layers. (Ethereal is free by the way.) Priscilla >Thank you for your time. > >mlh Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28490&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html It must be out of date :-) -Anil 5. Session Layer The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] That's 40% right. SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol behavior is concerned. A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. Priscilla At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much >Yes, I checked it out.. >Session layer protocols include: >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > >-Anil > > > > >-Original Message- >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? >Someone please correct me. >-Anil > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > >Hi, there, > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: "Remember > >that none of the upper > >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am wondering > >if the session layer doesn't > >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session > >layer in other host? > >I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of >context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the >statement is definitely "wrong." > >However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of >them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking to the same >layer on another host. So the session layer talks to the session layer on >the other host. That's probably what Todd was getting at. > >However, the pictures also show vertical lines. A layer calls on a layer >below to provide services. Each layer offers services to layers above it. > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much. But one >example might help. NetBIOS is a session layer. On a Windows client, when >you access a Server Message Block (SMB) server, NetBIOS has the job of >setting up a session with the server. Before it can do that, however, it >must find the address of the server. If it's a modern Windows network, then >SMB and NetBIOS are probably running above TCP/IP and UDP/IP. So NetBIOS >sends a DNS or WINS query to find the IP address of the named server. It >then sets up a NetBIOS session with the server. Actually, first, the client >sets up a TCP connection. TCP has port numbers. The client sends to the >well-known TCP port for NetBIOS session (139) and use an ephemeral port on >its side. These port numbers could be considered "addresses" at the >transport layer. > >Anyway, back to the question. The statement is at best over-simplified. I >recommend you get yourself a sniffer and watch what really happens between >layers. (Ethereal is free by the way.) > >Priscilla > > > > >Thank you for your time. > > > >mlh > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28543&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > > >Hi, there, > > > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: >"Remember > > >that none of the upper > > >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am >wondering > > >if the session layer doesn't > > >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session > > >layer in other host? > > > >I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of > >context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the > >statement is definitely "wrong." > > > >However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of > >them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking t
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > > >Hi, there, > > > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: >"Remember > > >that none of the upper > > >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am >wondering > > >if
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28848&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
This group sure is a great way to make friends, aint it. Tend to get intimate real quick. Caps off, coats off and gloves off...here we go :-) Just my type... -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:38 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28849&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? - Priscilla Just in case you were wondering, that was a rhetorical question. Which means I do *not expect* a reply from your ego-centric highness. Suggest you look up "rhetorical" when you grow up. It is rather a long word. Thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From:
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Miss Priscilla >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Yes, well the level of research that went into your statement matches the intelligence of a newt, doesn't it? If you had a brain cell it would die of loneliness. -Anil PS fun isn't it, attacking someone's intelligence in public. Strongly suggest you apologise to protect yourself against further remiss. -- >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28855&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>The session layer is an elusive beast The only elusive beast around here is a public apology. Looking forward to it. -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:12 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? - Priscilla Just in case you were wondering, that was a rhetorical question. Which means I do *not expect* a reply from your ego-centric highness. Suggest you look up "rhetorical" when you grow up. It is rather a long word. Thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Priscilla I have a lot to learn from you (and others), and I mean that in all honesty. Thank you for being so patient and understanding. It's good to see the "real" you again. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 09:11 AM 12/11/01, anil wrote: > >Please stop sending messages about this topic > >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I'm sorry I was so hard on you. You're right that I don't have a right to tell you what to send. You irritated me because you kept sending links to wrong info and I misunderstood your motive for doing that. I gave more thought to NFS and the issue of wrong info everywhere. I stick to my guns that you have to dig deeper sometimes and investigate the messages that the protocol sends, the services it offers, the services below it that it uses, what problem the creators of the protocol were trying to solve, etc. Knowing (or investigating) some history helps. Sun developed NFS as part of their Open Network Computing platform in the late 1980s. The OSI model was already being used for what it's good for. NFS was designed to be an application-layer protocol that ran above a session-layer protocol and uses XDR at the presentation layer. This is not a good one to turn into an arguable issue. It's straight forward. Because it's a Sun protocol, I wasn't really sure if there was an RFC, but there does seem to be one, RFC 1094. I found it by searching on "NFS RFC" in Google. It was the first hit. Regarding the existence of session-layer protocols, there really are very few in the IP world. RPC is one. NetBIOS is one. AppleTalk has the AppleTalk Session Protocol (ASP), but when Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) runs above TCP, the session layer disappears. There is something called Data Stream Identifier (DSI) between AFP and TCP, but it doesn't do much. OSI did a good job of defining the session layer. Believe it or not, Cisco Network Academy materials describe it reasonably well and cover two-way alternating and two-way simultaneous relationships, etc. But then they categorized the wrong protocols as being session-layer protocols. OSI's definitions for the session layer are just academic these days. Even the protocols I mentioned, such as NetBIOS, etc. don't behave the way OSI said would!? ;-) Priscilla >I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. >My sincere apologies > >-Anil > Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
How can you attack someone for bringing this URL to your attention? There is even a feedback address. You would have been better off sending your attacks to the people who print the mistakes. Not the person who brings them to your attention. Strongly suggest you apologise. -Anil At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28857&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>He certainly did not learn that type of behavior in Japan. Sore de watashi wa nihon de nani wo benkyou shita ka anata ga shiterru beki desuka? Dou yatte watashi no koto wo handan dekiru no? Sore ijou, minna ni shiraseru..! Shinjirarenai. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] / In reference to Anil and regardless of the level of education he claims, his behavior towards some of the group members was unconscionable. He certainly did not learn that type of behavior in Japan. \ Original message >Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:25:28 -0500 >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On May 3, 4:27am, "anil" wrote: >} >} -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) >} Does that count?? > > Since this thread seems to have concluded, I won't belabour the >point. However, comp-sci is a huge field with many specialities and in >many cases, subspecialities. You say that you have a PhD in comp-sci, >but you didn't tell us what the topic of your thesis was or anything >else about your background. For all we know, you could have studied >something human interface design or something else that has nothing to >do with networking. So, saying that you have a PhD in comp- sci really >doesn't tell us anything. > > As another example, somebody on one of the other mailing lists I'm >on tried to claim that you can do full-duplex with a hub. When people >corrected him, he said that he was an Electronics Engineer and that he >should know. Electronics Engineering is a very large field, so unless >he specifically studied physical networking hardware, he wouldn't >know. Anybody that knows anything about networking knows that a hub is >a dumb multiport repeater (i.e. not much more then a signal amplifier) >and therefore can't support full-duplex connections (for that, you need >some smarts). Needless to say, he got thoroughly trounced for his >haughty attitude. > >}-- End of excerpt from "anil" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29012&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7505 Reboots randomly Please HELP
this is what I got on cisco site.. Error Message %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after [chars], elapsed [int], status 0x[hex] ExplanationAn interface processor failed to come online after being reset. A software or hardware error occurred. Recommended ActionCopy the error message exactly as it appears on the console or in the system log. Issue the show tech-support command to gather data that may provide information to determine the nature of the error. If you cannot determine the nature of the error from the error message text or from the show tech-support output, call your Cisco technical support representative and provide the representative with the gathered information. HTH Anil Yadav On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Desai, Inamul wrote: > > We got 7505 router reboots randomly twice a week or > when you write to config file. We gone thru changing > VIP card, resetting all cards, resetting mem modules, swapping > mem modules on VIP card, powering up and down and talked to Cisco. > It's running IOS 12.0(7)T with RSM, VIP2 and one PRI module. > No matter how many times you cold boot it, it brings all > enable LEDs except one on fastEthenet card. It does help > some time when I reset FLASH cards. > D u think it's flash cards ? > > here is startup info: > System Bootstrap, Version 5.3.2(3.2) [kmac 3.2], MAINTENANCE INTERIM > SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1994 by cisco Systems, Inc. > RSP processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory > > > Creading the file into memory... > Self decompressing the image : > # > > > ### [OK] > %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after HARD RESET, elapsed 12032, > stat > us 0x0 > -Traceback= 60192B5C 60195A84 60195B3C 6015444C 601546C8 60128990 600109B0 > %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after HARD_RESET, elapsed 12032, > stat > us 0x0 > -Traceback= 60192B5C 60194BA0 60195008 6019845C 600F4E64 600F4ECC 600E9090 > 600E9 > 298 600EA3B0 600EA39C > %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after RESET, elapsed 12032, > status 0x > 40 > -Traceback= 60192B5C 60194EC0 60191AF4 60195054 6019845C 600F4E64 600F4ECC > 600E9 > 090 600E9298 600EA3B0 600EA39C > System Bootstrap, Version 5.3.2(3.2) [kmac 3.2], MAINTENANCE INTERIM > SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1994 by cisco Systems, Inc. > RSP processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory > > > Creading the file into memory... > Self decompressing the image : > # > > > ### [OK] > %CBUS-3-CCBPTIMEOUT: CCB handover timed out, CCB 0x5800FF50, slot 3 > -Traceback= 601A5348 601A398C 601A3E3C 6019D4F0 600EE70C 600F4EFC 600E9090 > 600E9 > 298 600EA3B0 600EA39C > %LINK-4-NOMAC: A random default MAC address of .0c9a.31e7 has > been chosen. Ensure that this address is unique, or specify MAC > addresses for commands (such as 'novell routing') that allow the > use of this address as a default. > %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly > under > stood.CC > > CC > %CBUS-3-MIPSTAT: Out of buffers--losing status information for the MIP > cardC > > > CC > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anil Yadav _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traceroute question
Do you get the same results when Trace with the ip address instead ? anil On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Rick Thompson wrote: > Do you have an internal DNS server? If so, then > something may be misconfigured. If not, then the > traceroute may be trying to resolve and that is what > is taking so long. > --- mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I would like to know, suppose when I traceroute to > > www.cisco.com. > > Each entry within my network displays very slow, > > once outside my > > network, the entry display very fast. Why this > > happen? > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards, > > mak > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anil Yadav _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Well Well Well CCIE #8757 [7:34951]
Congrats.. Good Show. --- "McCallum, Robert" wrote: > What can I say! 2nd and it really did turn out to be my > last attempt. > > Thanks to everyone concerned who know me or have indeed > spoke or emailed me. > > In the words of the most inspirational man WOHO!! > > > Robert McCallum CCIE #8757 [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34954&t=34951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]
Hi All! I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post to this list, so be kind. :p) In the access list below: ** conf t int ethernet0/0 no ip access-list extended secure2 ip access-list extended secure2 deny tcp any any eq deny tcp any any eq 139 permit ip any any int ethernet0/0 ip access-group secure2 out ip access-group secure2 in exit wr ** Why is it that you need to deny TCP and permit IP? Or did I not do this right? Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36164&t=36164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]
Actually my question was not clear, I think. My confusion is with the IP vs. TCP. In other words should it not be somthing like: deny ip any any eq 139 permit ip any any Why deny TCP and permit IP as opposed to deny IP and permit IP? Also, the purpose of these is that I am trying to block some suspicious activity on those ports (I think someone may be running an illegal IRC server on that port). Thanx for the reply (and the kid gloves). :-) Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Scott Nawalaniec" To: "'Anil Gupte'" ; Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:17 PM Subject: RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > Hi Anil, > > Sometimes its scaring posting to this group. =) > > To answer your question, > if you don't the permit IP any any command, there is an implicit deny rule > at the end of an access-list, which will drop all traffic that you have not > allowed through the access-list. > > The other two deny statements are dropping netbios port 139 and something > that uses port . > > Hope this helps. > > Scott > > -Original Message- > From: Anil Gupte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > Hi All! > > I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post > to this list, so be kind. :p) > > In the access list below: > ** > conf t > int ethernet0/0 > no ip access-list extended secure2 > ip access-list extended secure2 > deny tcp any any eq > deny tcp any any eq 139 > permit ip any any > > int ethernet0/0 > ip access-group secure2 out > ip access-group secure2 in > > exit > wr > ** > Why is it that you need to deny TCP and permit IP? Or did I not do this > right? > > Thanx, > Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36168&t=36164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New config maker [7:35386]
I have downloaded it with out much problems. if you try segmented download it may create problems. Anil Aravind ""William Pearch"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has anyone had difficulty with the new Config Maker (v2.6)? I tried > downloading it tonight and the executable reports as being corrupted. > Is it me? Do they hate me? :) > > TTFN, > Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36212&t=35386 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]
Yes, that does make sense. Thanx for the detailed reply. I did finally use the following: conf t int ethernet0/0 no ip access-list extended secure2 ip access-list extended secure2 deny tcp any any eq deny tcp any any eq 139 permit ip any any int ethernet0/0 ip access-group secure2 out ip access-group secure2 in exit wr Thanx again, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Tom Petzold" To: "Anil Gupte" ; Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > Remember the model OSI model. IP can have multiple higher level protocols > running over it. So IP uses protocol numbers to identify the higher level > protocol that it should send the data to. If you do a deny ? on a router > you will see all the different protocols (eigrp, gre, icmp, ospf, pim, tcp, > udp). Once the IP layer passes the packet up to the transport layer the > layer 4 protocol has to know which application to send the data to. So the > TCP protocol will send traffic on port 80 to the web server and traffic to > port 25 to the smtp server. > > Layer 7 - Application > Layer 6 - Presentation > Layer 5 - Session > Layer 4 - Transport Layer 3 - NetworkLayer 2 - Datalink Layer 1 - Physical > > The first line will not work. IP is the layer 3 protocol, tcp, udp, icmp, > etc are layer 4 protocols. So while tcp and udp have port numbers, ip > doesn't. If I want to deny http traffic I must deny tcp port 80 because > http uses TCP port 80. The same holds true for UDP. If I wanted to deny > snmp traffic I would deny UDP port 161. > > If you set the last line to "permit tcp any any" it would allow any tcp > based traffic but because there is a specific deny all at the end of all > access-lists, you would deny udp, icmp, eigrp, ospf, etc. The permit ip any > any says allow all layer 4 ip protocols. > > Does this make sense? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Anil Gupte > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > Actually my question was not clear, I think. My confusion is with the IP > vs. TCP. In other words should it not be somthing like: > > deny ip any any eq 139 > permit ip any any > > Why deny TCP and permit IP as opposed to deny IP and permit IP? > > Also, the purpose of these is that I am trying to block some suspicious > activity on those ports (I think someone may be running an illegal IRC > server on that port). > > Thanx for the reply (and the kid gloves). :-) > Anil Gupte > > - Original Message - > From: "Scott Nawalaniec" > To: "'Anil Gupte'" ; > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:17 PM > Subject: RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > > Hi Anil, > > > > Sometimes its scaring posting to this group. =) > > > > To answer your question, > > if you don't the permit IP any any command, there is an implicit deny rule > > at the end of an access-list, which will drop all traffic that you have > not > > allowed through the access-list. > > > > The other two deny statements are dropping netbios port 139 and something > > that uses port . > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Scott > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Anil Gupte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > > > > Hi All! > > > > I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post > > to this list, so be kind. :p) > > > > In the access list below: > > ** > > conf t > > int ethernet0/0 > > no ip access-list extended secure2 > > ip access-list extended secure2 > > deny tcp any any eq > > deny tcp any any eq 139 > > permit ip any any > > > > int ethernet0/0 > > ip access-group secure2 out > > ip access-group secure2 in > > > > exit > > wr > > ** > > Why is it that you need to deny TCP and permit IP? Or did I not do this > > right? > > > > Thanx, > > Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36397&t=36164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
Trying to apply what I am learning in the CCNA class, I am running into some confusion regarding some basic concepts. I am trying to apply what I learned to our network which has a few colocated customers to whom I want to assign ips with subnets. We have a /23 assigned to us, let us call it 63.142.136.0/23. We have broken it up into (assigned on our router's etherne port): Internet address is 63.142.136.1/24 Secondary address 63.142.137.1/24 Also, "show ip route static" shows (among other things): S 63.142.136.0/23 is directly connected, Null0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 66.100.223.193 Now here is where my confusion begins. I want to assign a subnet to a customer, let us say 63.142.136.32/27 which will be 32 - 63 with 32 being the network address and 63 being the broadcast. I will then add ip route 63.142.136.32 255.255.255.224 On his Windows server, do I assign 63.142.136.33 as the default gateway? and now do I need to add a route to route his subnet to 63.142.136.1? Am I confused about the Gateway vs. network address? If I could understand this, I think I would understand everything about routing. :-) Well maybe not, but I sure would feel better about it... Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36400&t=36400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
You said: "It is possible to have multiple logical subnets on one physical
network, although not recommended. " Why not? The purpose here is to keep
customers from stealing Ips that are not theirs and causing IP conflicts
(Windows Servers die when that happens). Also, it prevents at least for low
level crackers, the ability to crack into a domain/machine if they are on
different logical subnets. They are on the same wire in that they all come
off the same switch which in turn is connected to the Ethernet on the
router.
In your exmaple of the two router configuration, ("Then on R2-E0, assign
address 63.142.137.33/27. ..."), how would packets know how to get to
63.142.137.2/30 from the .33 gateway). Sorry for the dumb wuestions, but
that is how I learn.
Thanx for your detailed explanations.
Anil Gupte
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Charlebois"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
> OK, some terminology. We've got physical networks. They are bound by
> routers. Anytime a packet goes through a router, it is moving from one
> physical network to another. Then you have a logical subnet. This is what
> actually gets addressed. It is possible to have multiple logical subnets
on
> one physical network, although not recommended. Each device can only
> directly communicate with other members of the same logical subnet. A
> router would have to "translate" between the two logical subnets.
>
> Now, in the scenario you described, you have two logical subnets on one
> physical network (that's what the secondary address does). Also, the two
> logical subnets consume all your address space.
>
> You mentioned partitioning off subnets for customers. Does this mean each
> customer gets a seperate physical network? And do you need to provision
> networks for WAN links?
>
> Here would be one way to do it. Take the .137.X network off the main
router
> (Call it R1). Get a second router (R2) for this customer. Setup a
> point-to-point connection between the two. Now, R1-E0 has an address of
> 63.142.136.1/24. Assign R1-S0 to 63.142.137.1/30 and R2-S0 to
> 63.142.137.2/30. This is the WAN connection. Then on R2-E0, assign
address
> 63.142.137.33/27. The default gateway for the hosts on this network would
> be 63.142.137.33 and the broadcast would be 63.142.137.63. And on a
correct
> built network, the hosts (servers) never need to have route add commands.
>
> Now if you are doing this all on one router, you just need to add a
> secondary address of 63.142.137.33/27 (this would require you take off the
> 63.142.137.1/24 address first). This creates a logical subnet on your
> existing physical network.
>
> I hope this made some sense to you. If you have questions, I'll be
lurking
> around here somewhere.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36471&t=36400
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
book for CCNP ( Router Exam ) [7:14540]
hi all, can you recommend some good book for CCNP - Router Exam. also any free books are available on internet.if yes, please send me URL. thanks anil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14540&t=14540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
interested in buying pre-owned CCNP book [7:14568]
hello will anyone be interested in selling the following book to me Cisco CCNP Certification Library ISBN 1587200376 thanks anil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14568&t=14568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to ping [7:15095]
chk the subnet mask and default gateway setup on the PC you are unable to ping. also try pinging 127.0.0.1 & other PCs from the PC you are unable to reach. tks wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group , > I am facing a strange problem . I have 2 routers connected via ISDN > connectivity . I can ping all the pc's from one LAN to other LAN via WAN > except for one pc . But the same pc ping to all pc on local LAN > > WAN Link > 129.1.0.25 --->129.1.0.20 > 172.16.64.1 > > In above case router 129.1.0.20 and 172.16.64.1 (these are ethernet ip > addresses) are connected via ISDN .I am unable to connect pc 129.1.0.25 > from pc 172.16.64.15 but can ping any other pc 129.1.0.0 network . Also PC > 129.1.0.25 can ping all the pcs on LAN 129.1.0.0 . I have set ip address of > router (129.1.0.20) as th default gateway for pc (129.1.0.25). > Any help will be highly appreciated. > Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15107&t=15095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP telephony [7:27533]
Hi All, For a customer i have implemented an Voip and Ip telephony between two office with Cisco Call Manager 3.0. I need to intergrate the CCM with Normal PBX phones, so that users can dail to the normal telephone to Ip telephone. For the Voip i am using Cisco 3640 and 3660 Routers with NM-HDV cards and both the HDV cards are connected to Nortel PBX. Need help/sugesstion on this. Thanks in Advance. Regards.. Anil = Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27533&t=27533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP telephony [7:27533]
This is the Voice network i am implementing. Voip on this network is working. Analog PhoneAnalog Phone | | | | | | IPtelphone->CCM3.0->3660 Router-->3640 Router-->IPtelephone With NM-HDVWith NM-HDV (Main Office) (Remote Office) The problem which i am facing is the call routing between the IP telephone & the Analog phones to both locations. I am bit confused, and not sure to use which type of Gateway Types ( MGCP, or H.323) for the 3660 Routers. I read that MGCP is being used for mainly FXS/ FXO ports. I am using an R2 Digital Signalling for the NM-HDV card. I have enclosed the config of the main location, the same carries for the remote location too. Request your sugesstion / Comments on this. Regards.. Anil Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption service udp-small-servers max-servers no-limit ! ! enable secret 5 $1$QdNt$.YqZyaiFoHfFW.ZP1yHzG/ ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 10 voice-card 2 ! ip subnet-zero ip dhcp ping timeout 2000 ip dhcp relay information option ! ip dhcp-server 179.65.51.20 lane client flush isdn switch-type primary-net5 cns event-service server ! ! voice class permanent 10 signal pattern idle transmit 0001 signal pattern idle receive 0001 ! ! ! ! ! ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 clock source internal channel-group 1 timeslots 1-31 description connected to Branch ! controller E1 2/0 framing NO-CRC4 clock source internal ds0-group 0 timeslots 1-15,17-31 type r2-digital dtmf dnis description CONNECTED TO NORTEL EPABX ! ! ! interface Multilink1 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.252 ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast ip tcp header-compression iphc-format no ip mroute-cache fair-queue 2048 2048 1000 no cdp enable ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 20 ppp multilink interleave multilink-group 1 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp priority 16384 16383 1488 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 179.65.51.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache speed auto half-duplex no cdp enable ! interface Serial1/0:1 no ip address ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit no cdp advertise-v2 ! snmp-server engineID local 000902024B24BF30 snmp-server community public RO snmp-server packetsize 2048 ! voice-port 2/0:0 no modem passthrough cptone GB ! dial-peer voice 100 voip destination-pattern 125T session target ipv4:192.168.0.1 codec g711alaw ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 10 pots destination-pattern 116T port 2/0:0 forward-digits all ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 20 0 login ! end HO# __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27676&t=27533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP telephony [7:27533]
This is the Voice network i am implementing. Voip on this network is working. Analog PhoneAnalog Phone | | | | | | IPtelphone->CCM3.0->3660 Router-->3640 Router-->IPtelephone With NM-HDVWith NM-HDV (Main Office) (Remote Office) The problem which i am facing is the call routing between the IP telephone & the Analog phones to both locations. I am bit confused, and not sure to use which type of Gateway Types ( MGCP, or H.323) for the 3660 Routers. I read that MGCP is being used for mainly FXS/ FXO ports. I am using an R2 Digital Signalling for the NM-HDV card. I have enclosed the config of the main location, the same carries for the remote location too. Request your sugesstion / Comments on this. Regards.. Anil Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption service udp-small-servers max-servers no-limit ! ! enable secret 5 $1$QdNt$.YqZyaiFoHfFW.ZP1yHzG/ ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 10 voice-card 2 ! ip subnet-zero ip dhcp ping timeout 2000 ip dhcp relay information option ! ip dhcp-server 179.65.51.20 lane client flush isdn switch-type primary-net5 cns event-service server ! ! voice class permanent 10 signal pattern idle transmit 0001 signal pattern idle receive 0001 ! ! ! ! ! ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 clock source internal channel-group 1 timeslots 1-31 description connected to Branch ! controller E1 2/0 framing NO-CRC4 clock source internal ds0-group 0 timeslots 1-15,17-31 type r2-digital dtmf dnis description CONNECTED TO NORTEL EPABX ! ! ! interface Multilink1 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.252 ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast ip tcp header-compression iphc-format no ip mroute-cache fair-queue 2048 2048 1000 no cdp enable ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 20 ppp multilink interleave multilink-group 1 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp priority 16384 16383 1488 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 179.65.51.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache speed auto half-duplex no cdp enable ! interface Serial1/0:1 no ip address ip helper-address 179.65.51.20 ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit no cdp advertise-v2 ! snmp-server engineID local 000902024B24BF30 snmp-server community public RO snmp-server packetsize 2048 ! voice-port 2/0:0 no modem passthrough cptone GB ! dial-peer voice 100 voip destination-pattern 125T session target ipv4:192.168.0.1 codec g711alaw ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 10 pots destination-pattern 116T port 2/0:0 forward-digits all ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 20 0 login ! end HO# __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27677&t=27533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NM-16A [7:28057]
Hi All, I need to configure a 3660 Router with NM-16A for dialin users. Does the NM-16A Card needs the modem firmware loaded to the router, as what is done in AS5800. Suggestions and Comments are welcome. Thanks in Advance. Regards...Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28057&t=28057 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on CLID [7:30179]
For one customer I am implementing the dial solution. The customer has got a 3662 router with NM-16A card. For the authentication, the ACS for Windows NT/2000 has been configured. The username database for the ACS is obtanined through the Windows NT Domain. Inorder to have more security, apart for username / password authentication the customer wants the CLID facility to be enabled so that the users logs in through one telephone line only. How can the CLID be enabled on NM-16A for a 3660 router? Request for help. Thanks in Advance, Regards.. Anil Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30179&t=30179 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Half Successfull ping [7:30449]
Feel like you are having 2 routes pointing on the same destination, through two diffrent interfaces. Have a look on the routing. Regards --- McHugh Randy wrote: > Anyone have an ideas on this half successfull ping across > two directly > connect serial interfaces? Clock rate, encapsulation, > controllers and cables > look OK. Address on R4 is 172.16.1.4/24 and R2 is > 172.16.1.5/24 . Here is > the ping from R4 > R4#ping 172.16.1.5 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.5, timeout is > 2 seconds: > .!.!. > Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max > = 32/32/32 ms > > Same thing from R2 to R4 > R2#ping 172.16.1.4 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.4, timeout is > 2 seconds: > !.!.! > Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max > = 28/30/32 ms > Thanks > Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30464&t=30449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCSN book
Can any one tell me which book is good for BCSN ? Regds, Anil "Shahir Boshra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just passed BCRAN exam last Thursday, I used CIM, ISDN Access and Exam Cram "Remote Access", it's a compact book which maps directly with the course (and exam) outline. Very helpful. Regards Shahir Boshra Telecommunications Specialist USAID - Egypt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello group, > > I want to know that which book for BCRAN is good? Should I use BCRAN by > cisco press...author: Catherine Paquet > Or new BCRAN book by Thomasby osborne (i assume) ??? > > Please let me know that which book is easy to understand the material? > > Thanks > Sabeen > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing 2.0 (640-503) Exam Outline
hi all was just going thru exam outline of this new exam for CCNP 2.0 track http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf   the impression i get after reading this exam outline and prep guide is 1. this exam does not cover anything on access-list, QoS, Prioritising traffic etc 2. this exam does not cover anything on bridging non-routed protocols  while the above 2 parts were a substantial part of OLD ACRC exam for CCNP 1.0  has anyone written 640-503 exam and throw some light on this query?   Also the exam prep guide is silent on which routed protocols to cover? does one still need to study IPX, AppleTalk?  the impression prep guide gives is this that, if you are through with EIGRP,OSPF ( single / multi area ) & BGP for IP - you are done. seems to simple to beleive. ACRC was really tough putting lot of stress on topics other than these pure routing protocols for IP.  Thanks anil
Re: ACRC Vs. BSCN
hi that's the impression i get from exam outline. but cisco is notorious for putting up Qs which are remotely connected to exam outlines can anyone clarify if IPX, ISDN DDR, Bridges & access-lists are actually removed? thanks - Original Message - From: Trevor Corness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cisco Groupstudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; EEIEOL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 19, 2000 12:35 AM Subject: RE: ACRC Vs. BSCN > take a look at the objectives on Cisco's site. In class, our instructor > told us the major differences. This is from memory, so I might miss > something. > > More : BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, Redistribution > Removed : IPX, ISDN DDR, Bridging, Spanning-Tree (all covered in ICND) > > Basically, it's more indepth routing, with all the switching/bridging taken > out, and concentrating on IP. > > Regards, > Trevor Corness, CCNA > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > EEIEOL > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ACRC Vs. BSCN > > > A Chairde, >I have been studying for ACRC, but due to travel commitments > will not be able to complete exam by 31 July deadline.I will study BSCN > instead .I was wondering if anyone knows are these exams much different, > or basically on the same lines, OSPF,EIGRP,ISDN etc > > >Thanks in advance, > > >Slan / Ed > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP route to Null0? [7:66755]
I am trying to understand some IP route commands on our router. Several of them go to Null0 - what does that mean? For example, I have ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 200 What is this doing? I need to add another block of class Cs from the same provider. Do I need a similar statement to the above? Thanx for your help. Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66755&t=66755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP route to Null0? [7:66755]
You are right, it is using BGP. What does summarization do? Do I need an identical statement for my new Class C? Thanx, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Karsten" To: "Anil Gupte" ; Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: Re: IP route to Null0? [7:66755] Either a sloppy way to drop traffic for a /24, or bgp summarization using null routing. -Karsten On Thursday 03 April 2003 07:40 am, Anil Gupte wrote: > I am trying to understand some IP route commands on our router. Several of > them go to Null0 - what does that mean? > > For example, I have > ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 200 > > What is this doing? > > I need to add another block of class Cs from the same provider. Do I need > a similar statement to the above? > > Thanx for your help. > Anil Gupte > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66797&t=66755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simple config issues [7:70482]
I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in "sh run" However, when I do a "sh ip route", it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway of last resort is not set 2. I configured it for RIP using router rip network 63.x.x.0 and it shows as 63.0.0.0 in "sh run". Is this correct behavior? Until now I had only dealt with networks in the Class C range. This is a Class C assigned to us but by the first octet you can see that it is from a Class A range. Any help or pointers will be muchly appreciated. Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70482&t=70482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]
> Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? Is that not what I am doing with the statement ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x Or do I need to do something more? Incidentally, the router is not connected to anything - I want to have it fully pre-configured because we cannot afford to be down for more than a few minutes. Will it only establish the routes after it connects? To clarify (I cannot disclose the actual IPs of course), here is what I did: conf t router rip network 63.x.x.0 exit ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 63.x.x.193 int s0/0 ip address 63.x.x.194 255.255.255.248 So what did I miss? Thanx, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Brian Dennis" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: RE: Simple config issues [7:70482] > Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? If your router does not have a route to > x.x.x.x it will not install the static route in the routing table since the > next hop is unreachable. As far as RIP goes you are seeing the correct > behavior. Remember that RIP is classful. > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security) > > Anil Gupte wrote: > > > > I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: > > > > 1. I issued the default route command > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x > > > > I can see this under ip classless in "sh run" > > > > However, when I do a "sh ip route", it does not appear there > > and in fact > > says: > > > > Gateway of last resort is not set > > > > 2. I configured it for RIP using > > router rip > > network 63.x.x.0 > > > > and it shows as > > 63.0.0.0 > > > > in "sh run". Is this correct behavior? Until now I had only > > dealt with > > networks in the Class C range. This is a Class C assigned to > > us but by the > > first octet you can see that it is from a Class A range. > > > > Any help or pointers will be muchly appreciated. > > > > Thanx, > > Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70520&t=70482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Lag on Cisco? [7:70648]
Our network is running a 3640 as a core router and several other smaller routers plus an HP Procurve for the Servers and LAN. We run BGP across two upstream networks. Now, for a long time we have had a slight lag on our network. For example, whenever I am logged into our Linux servers, I will be typing something and I will lose the cursor, then suddenly a bunch of letters will appear at the cursor. There are other examples. We have hunted up and down and not found a problem/solution. Now comes the interesting part. A friend of mine who has been running Linux for years used a Linux machine as a router for the last 3.5 years. At my urging he decided to try a Cisco because his server was getting old and needed an overhaul. Yesterday he did and now has the same problem. His config is very simple - he has a 2640 router running IOS 12.1 - one T-1 and one Ethernet port to which he has connected his Dialup equipment (he is a Dialup ISP). What gives? He is now bad mouthing Cisco even more than he did before! Any ideas appreciated. Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70648&t=70648 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanning Tree Question [7:42806]
For spanning tree to work, do all the switches on a network (let us say a LAN) have to support or enable Spanning Tree? That is the general question. Specifically, I have an HP Procurve connected to a router, and then a Netgear Switch that hooks into one of the ports on the HP. On the Netgear are 3 or 4 more Netgear switches (all of there are simple unmanaged switches)and we are pretty sure there are some redundant loops in there - especially with two servers that dual NICs that are bound together using an Intel "teaming" driver. Do I need to turn Spanning Tree on? It is recommended? Is it even going to work? Thanx for any input. Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42806&t=42806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Question [7:42847]
If I look for BGP info on an IP using one of the Looking Glass sites (specifically Mae-East) does the number of entries returned mean anything? I have noticed that sometimes there are five or six entries and sometimes only one or two. The number of upstream connections is two. If only one entry exists, then is BGP broken? For example: BGP routing table entry for 216.91.141.0/24, version 7089796 Paths: (1 available, best #1) Advertised to peer-groups: rr-pop Advertised to non peer-group peers: 198.32.187.122 6347 20068 64.241.88.17 (metric 175301) from 165.117.1.110 (165.117.1.110) Origin IGP, metric 4294967294, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Community: 2548:196 2548:229 2548:666 3706:168 6347:1002 6347:3000 To me that implies that there are no alternate routes, and so no BGP on this route. Also, if there are more than two routes does that mean the routes are better connected? What is the best resource for learning more about BGP? Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42847&t=42847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question on VPN [7:43110]
Hi All, Need a small clarifcation on VPN. One of the customer is having a Lease Line connection to Internet at the head office and they are having branch offices at remote location.Since being a lease line they have obtained static IP address from ISP. The branch locations will be dialing into the local ISP and all the times the remote locations will be getting dynamic IP address. Since the customer want to have a secure connection through VPN is it possible to attain and establish a IPSEC VPN tunnel between a dialup connection and the lease line router. If so please let me know how the same can be attanied. Thanks in advance. Regards.. Anil Kumar. = Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43110&t=43110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dumb Access-List question [7:44588]
What is the difference between using either of the two syntax: access-list 5 permit etc and ip access-list extended AllNets permit ip 216.136.1.0 0.0.0.255 any Is this simply the difference between simple and extended access-lists? Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44588&t=44588 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing stuff from our router [7:44839]
To remove this: route-map MyISP-In permit 10 match as-path 6 set local-preference 200 Do I just do this?: no route-map MyISP-In permit 10 Also, to remove: ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^[0-9]* ip as-path access-list 2 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 3 permit ^1234$ ip as-path access-list 3 permit ^1234_[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ Do I just?: no ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^[0-9]* no ip as-path access-list 2 no ip as-path access-list 3 Also what is that "permit ^$" and "permit ^[0-9]*" for? What does it do? Thanx for the help. Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44839&t=44839 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing stuff from our router [7:44839]
No, this is a real implementation on our network. Since I am not even a CCNA yet (maybe in a couple of weeks), I wanted to make sure I would not break something. I just substituted names and AS numbers. I am hopefully going to take advanced routing and learn more about the BGP soon after my test. Thanx, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Scott H." To: Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: Re: Removing stuff from our router [7:44839] > Removing the route map and as-path filters will work the way you have it (if > you do "no route-map MyISP-In" it will remove the entire route-map), but you > should also remove the neighbor statements in your config. that reference > these things. By looking at the configs., I'm assuming this is in a lab > environment and not a real implementation. > > permit ^$ is simply permitting an empty as path. In other words, only > routes originating in the local AS will be permitted. It's a common way to > ensure that your AS does not become transit for somebody else's traffic. > > permit ^[0-9]* is a little more complicated. This statement is saying to > permit zero or more instances of a number between 0 and 9. Do a search on > CCO for AS path filters and you should find some good info. to help you on > your way. > > HTH, > Scott > CCIE #9340 > > ""Anil Gupte"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > To remove this: > > > > route-map MyISP-In permit 10 > > match as-path 6 > > set local-preference 200 > > > > Do I just do this?: > > no route-map MyISP-In permit 10 > > > > Also, to remove: > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^[0-9]* > > ip as-path access-list 2 permit ^$ > > ip as-path access-list 3 permit ^1234$ > > ip as-path access-list 3 permit ^1234_[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ > > > > Do I just?: > > no ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^[0-9]* > > no ip as-path access-list 2 > > no ip as-path access-list 3 > > > > > > Also what is that "permit ^$" and "permit ^[0-9]*" for? What does it do? > > > > Thanx for the help. > > > > Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44862&t=44839 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX question [7:45658]
Hi All, Does the PIX fw support secondary ip address option for the interface, as which is carried out on router ethernet interface? Thanks in Advance. Regards.. Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45658&t=45658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarification needed on PIX [7:45663]
Hi All, Does the PIX FW support secondary ip address option for the interface, as in Cisco router ethernet interface? Thanks in Advance for the reply. Regards.. Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45663&t=45663 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It's Official - CCNP 6xx series [7:45867]
Yes. Even Cisco Site tells the same http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/ Regards.. Anil --- "Kaminski, Shawn G" wrote: > Just called Prometric and VUE for information on when > they're switching to > the new CCNP 6xx series exams. As of this afternoon, > 6/5/02, the CCNP 5xx > series exams are no longer available. > > Shawn K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45926&t=45867 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarification On DDR with NAT [7:46149]
Hi All, Need clarfication on DDR with NAT. I have got a Lease Line to Internet connected through Cisco Router and PIX firewall. Internet Lease Line-->Router--> PIX outside--> PIX Inside. I have been provided a /30 subnet for WAN and /28 subnet for LAN by the local ISP. Now i need to provide a DDR for the lease line incase of lease line outages. I have configured the DDR, but each time i dial ISP i am being assigned a dynmic IP address and local ISP does not provide any staitc ip address. Due to this dynamic Ip address allocation i am not able to route the local lan traffic or to provide browsing faclity. I thought of configuring a NAT with /28 obtained from ISP, but is this a better solution? Another problem which i noticed Cisco Allows only one Overload command at a time either it should on the serial interface or it should be on the dialer interface. Is there any way i can provide both the overloads at the same time, like higher metric routes. Need your valuable inputs and sugesstion on this. Thanks in Advance, Regards.. Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46149&t=46149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DDR with NAT [7:46177]
Hi All, Need clarfication on DDR with NAT. I have got a Lease Line to Internet connected through Cisco Router and PIX firewall. Internet Lease Line-->Router--> PIX outside--> PIX Inside. I have been provided a /30 subnet for WAN and /28 subnet for LAN by the local ISP. Now i need to provide a DDR for the lease line incase of lease line outages. I have configured the DDR, but each time i dial ISP i am being assigned a dynmic IP address and local ISP does not provide any staitc ip address. Due to this dynamic Ip address allocation i am not able to route the local lan traffic or to provide browsing faclity. I thought of configuring a NAT with /28 obtained from ISP, but is this a better solution? Another problem which i noticed Cisco Allows only one Overload command at a time either it should on the serial interface or it should be on the dialer interface. Is there any way i can provide both the overloads at the same time, like higher metric routes. Need your valuable inputs and sugesstion on this. Thanks in Advance, Regards.. Anil Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar - Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46177&t=46177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Query on Site to Site VPN [7:46712]
Hi All, I have an office which is connected to internet through an ISDN line with a router.PIX firewall has been installed and connected in the same office. I have another office which is having a lease line to internet connected with PIX. The standard config has been followed on both the PIX firewalls. Now if i need to create a site-to-site VPN tunnel between these PIX, will it work, since once side i am getting a dynamic IP address from the ISP(ISDN Line). Other side since being a Lease Line, i have obtained static IP address. Is it nessasary that i need to have both the side static Ip address. Can some one help on this.. Thanks in Advance.. Regards..Anil - Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46712&t=46712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP-New Track [7:47178]
Hi, I am planning to take up the CCNP exams by next week. Can anyone tell what are passing score for 640-603, 604,605 and 606. Thanks in Advance. Regards...Anil - Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47178&t=47178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM T-1 cards for a 3640 [7:47348]
Someone sent me the following: > Here are the prices that I found (approx. prices): > > 4 port T1 ATM interfaces NEW=$3000 Refurb (no returns etc.)=$2100 > 8 port T1 ATM interfaces NEW=$5250 Refurb (no returns etc.)=$4100 > Is there not a less expensive card with a single ATM interface for a 3640? Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47348&t=47348 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless Exam [7:59035]
Hi, I am planning to take the Wireless LAN exam for field engineers next week. Anyone who has taken the test recently could please provide the last min tips about no of questions/ passing score/ areas to be concentrate. Thanks in Advance, Regards..Anil __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59035&t=59035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3640 ATM Support (NM-4T1-IMA) [7:48803]
We are running Cisco IOS 12.07 T-code as show below on our Cisco 3640 router. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-I-M), Version 12.0(7)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sat 09-Feb-02 14:32 by ccai Image text-base: 0x600088F0, data-base: 0x60858000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(19)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc 1) I just put in a ATM card, namely NM-4T1-IMA (two other slots are already occupied by NM1E2W cards) and it is not recognized. At bootup, the lights flash briefly and the EN light comes on for about 2 seconds, then goes out. Is something the matter with the card, or do I need to get a software upgrade? I understand that the card should work with any IOS greater than 12.05, and we have 12.07, but perhaps it needs some other feature set that has been removed? Thanx for any input. Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48803&t=48803 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1700 Flash Error [7:48809]
Hi All, I have got a 1750 Router. While switching on the router comes to rommon prompt and i am getting the following error message. rommon 3 > bus error while trying to access flash - addr = 0x6000 cannot read flash info getdevnum warning: device "flash" has size of zero bus error while trying to access flash - addr = 0x6000 cannot read flash info getdevnum warning: device "flash" has size of zero bus error while trying to access flash - addr = 0x6000 cannot read flash info getdevnum warning: device "flash" has size of zero bus error while trying to access flash - addr = 0x6000 cannot read flash info getdevnum warning: device "flash" has size of zero open: read error...requested 0x4 bytes, got 0x0 trouble reading device magic number dir: cannot open device "flash:" rommon 4 > Infact as per cisco site, i tried to load other flash image file, and after loading the same i applied the command bootsystem flash:. But inspite of doing this, i am getting the same above error message. Any sugesstion or help will be really appreciated. Thanks in Advance. Regards.. Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48809&t=48809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3640 ATM Support (NM-4T1-IMA) [7:48858]
I am reposting this because I got no replies. I hope someone can advise me, I am really stuck. - We are running Cisco IOS 12.07 T-code as show below on our Cisco 3640 router. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-I-M), Version 12.0(7)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sat 09-Feb-02 14:32 by ccai Image text-base: 0x600088F0, data-base: 0x60858000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(19)AA, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc 1) I just put in a ATM card, namely NM-4T1-IMA (two other slots are already occupied by NM1E2W cards) and it is not recognized. At bootup, the lights flash briefly and the EN light comes on for about 2 seconds, then goes out. Is something the matter with the card, or do I need to get a software upgrade? I understand that the card should work with any IOS greater than 12.05, and we have 12.07, but perhaps it needs some other feature set that has been removed? Thanx for any input. Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48858&t=48858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing Protocol PIX Firewall ? [7:50625]
Hi Friends, I am planning to deploy a network in the following manner. R1 ---> PIX INSIDEPIX OUTSIDE --> INTERNET ROUTER | PIX DMZ | | R2 R1 ( FOR LEASE LINE AND DDR FOR LEASE LINE) R2 ( FOR DIAL UP CUSTOMERS) For security reasons i am planning to have the dialup customers on one router(R2) and Lease line customers on other router (R1). Infact i wanted a routing protocol to be enabled on the network. Since one router is inside the DMZ zone and another router inside interface I am not sure will the routing updates will be passed through the PIX firwall. Another question , as per the above network if i use a RADIUS server for the dial in authentication and if i place the server in the inside segment (PIX) will the authentication/ accounting ports(1645 and 1646) will passed through the PIX firewall. Request your expert comments and sugesstion the above design. Thanks in Advance. Regards...Anil __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50625&t=50625 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubt on CLID [7:53370]
Hi Fayyaz, Thanks a lot for the info. As i was going through the Cisco Site and read across Cisco RPM, by configuring RPM will it help the modules to collect the digits? Other than ISDN any other alternative meathod is there? RegardsAnil --- Fayyaz Ahmed wrote: > Hi Anil, > > what you want to do is not possible with your current > hardware. Cisco > support caller ID on none of the analog modem products: > neither the WIC-AM > nor the NM-AM. The problem is that cisco analog modems, > (WIC-1AM, WIC-2AM, > NM-8AM, and NM-16AM) have no way to collect the caller ID > information and > pass it to IOS for processing. > You can screen by phone number using ISDN using the > 'dialer caller' command. > The reason it works with ISDN is that the call setup > message includes the > caller ID information. Unfortunatly the analog modems do > not support caller > ID, so we will be unable to collect the digits from the > switch. > I guess an alternate setup for caller ID authentication > would be to replace > the analog modem with a NM-6DM (6 Digital modems) and a > ISDN network module, > which would support CLID/ANI (if presented to us by the > switch.). This would > allow the ISDN switch to pass caller ID to the router. > > Kind Regards > > Fayyaz > > -Original Message- > From: Anil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 1:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Doubt on CLID [7:53370] > > > Hi All, > > I have got following network setup. Cisco 3660 router > with > NM-16AM card. I have got a Cisco ACS v2.6 server for the > aaa function. The router is configured for the aaa for > the > dail in users. > > In order to have more security on the dail in users, i > wanted to enable the CLID faclity for the authentication > apart from the username & password. The analog lines has > been enabled with the CLID faclity by the service > provider. > > In order to make the above work does the router needs to > configured so that to pass the dialled digits to the ACS > server? > If so, please let me know the sample configuration / URL > for the router and if any special IOS is also required > for > the router. > > The 3660 Router is having 12.1 IOS version. > > Requst your help on this. > > Thanks in Advance, > > Regards...Anil > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines > http://news.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53480&t=53370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubt on CLID [7:53370]
Hi Fayyaz, Thanks a lot for the information which u have given. While going through the Cisco Site, I was reading about Cisco RPM.Will Cisco RPM help or any one has tried the same? By upgrading the Cisco IOS will i be able to collect the digits on the Analog Modems with the help og Cisco RPM? Is there any other alternative meathod with the same setup. RegardsAnil --- Fayyaz Ahmed wrote: > Hi Anil, > > what you want to do is not possible with your current > hardware. Cisco > support caller ID on none of the analog modem products: > neither the WIC-AM > nor the NM-AM. The problem is that cisco analog modems, > (WIC-1AM, WIC-2AM, > NM-8AM, and NM-16AM) have no way to collect the caller ID > information and > pass it to IOS for processing. > You can screen by phone number using ISDN using the > 'dialer caller' command. > The reason it works with ISDN is that the call setup > message includes the > caller ID information. Unfortunatly the analog modems do > not support caller > ID, so we will be unable to collect the digits from the > switch. > I guess an alternate setup for caller ID authentication > would be to replace > the analog modem with a NM-6DM (6 Digital modems) and a > ISDN network module, > which would support CLID/ANI (if presented to us by the > switch.). This would > allow the ISDN switch to pass caller ID to the router. > > Kind Regards > > Fayyaz > > -Original Message- > From: Anil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 1:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Doubt on CLID [7:53370] > > > Hi All, > > I have got following network setup. Cisco 3660 router > with > NM-16AM card. I have got a Cisco ACS v2.6 server for the > aaa function. The router is configured for the aaa for > the > dail in users. > > In order to have more security on the dail in users, i > wanted to enable the CLID faclity for the authentication > apart from the username & password. The analog lines has > been enabled with the CLID faclity by the service > provider. > > In order to make the above work does the router needs to > configured so that to pass the dialled digits to the ACS > server? > If so, please let me know the sample configuration / URL > for the router and if any special IOS is also required > for > the router. > > The 3660 Router is having 12.1 IOS version. > > Requst your help on this. > > Thanks in Advance, > > Regards...Anil > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines > http://news.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53532&t=53370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password Breaking for 2511 [7:53848]
Hi All, I have got a doubt on password breaking for Cisco 2511 Router. As per the cisco document, if i break, will i loose the old configuration? Regards.. Anil __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53848&t=53848 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call Back on NM-16AM [7:54030]
Hi, I have a 3660 router with NM -16 AM card. For authentication I am using ACS2.6(3) .The ACS is mapped to the Windows NT domain server for user name and passwords. I need to configure the call back on the NM-16 card. I have done the following configuration but the dial back is not getting initiated. The users are able to login, but after dial-in, the call back is not getting initiated. Request you to go through the same and provide valuable suggestions. Thanks & RegardsAnil ! version 12.1 service exec-callback no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group radius aaa authentication login NO_AUTHEN none aaa authentication login no_radius enable aaa authentication ppp default if-needed group radius local aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius ! username test nocallback-verify callback-dialstring 789294 callback-line 97 password X memory-size iomem 15 ip subnet-zero ! no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! chat-script mod ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY "" "ATZ" OK "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT \c chat-script offhook "" "ATH1" OK modemcap entry default ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 no ip mroute-cache speed auto full-duplex interface Serial2/0 ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y no ip mroute-cache ! interface Async97 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 200 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 10 dialer map ip 10.5.1.1 modem-script mod 789294 dialer-group 1 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.1 ppp callback accept ppp authentication pap ! interface Async98 bandwidth 5600 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.2 no fair-queue ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async99 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.3 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async100 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 dialer-group 1 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.4 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async101 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.5 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async102 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.6 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async103 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.7 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async104 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.8 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async105 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.9 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async106 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache shutdown dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 5000 async mode interactive peer default ip address 10.5.1.10 ppp authentication pap chap ! interface Async107 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group 100 in ip helper-address 10.1.1.6 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cac
Wireless LAN Exam [7:54608]
Hi, Can any one suggest good books/ URL for the Wireless LAN exam, as the part of Partner Specialization program. Thanks in Advance. Regards... Anil __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54608&t=54608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless LAN-Book [7:54657]
Can any one suggest any book / url for the Wireless LAN Specialization for Cisco Partners. Regards.Anil - Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54657&t=54657 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP SoftPhone- Problem [7:62558]
Hi All, I have a problem facing with IP SoftPhone. Let me explain about the IP Telephone Network setup This is for one of the customer who has got an IP Telephone Setup. The network is having a CCM 3.1(4) Version. Around 4 numbers of IP Phones (7960 & 7910) has been installed on this network and all the phones are working perfectly. The customer has got one Cisco SoftPhone (v1.3). This SoftPhone is installed on the one of the client Machine which is having Windows XP as OS. Below is the problem which I am facing. After installing & opening the Soft Phone, I am not able to see any lines (extension) for the particular soft phone and its coming as blank. I have configured the CTI Port, and i have associated the device to the particular user. Inspite of the same i am not able get any lines for the SoftPhone. I have gone through the Cisco Documentation Cisco IP SoftPhone Administration v 1.3. As per the documentation I did the troubleshooting to find out what is the problem, but not able to get a breakthrough. On the call manager I checked the event viewer and provides follwoing error message. 2/4/20031:15:03 PM Cisco CTIManagerError None3 N/A CALLMGR Error: kCtiIncompatibleProtocolVersion - Incompatible protocol version. UNKNOWN_PARAMTYPE:Message Version: 196608 UNKNOWN_PARAMTYPE:Minimum Version: 131072 UNKNOWN_PARAMTYPE:Current Version: 131072 App ID: Cisco CTIManager Cluster ID: CALLMGR-Cluster Node ID: CALLMGR Application ID: Cisco Telephony Call Dispatcher Process ID: 0 Process Name: CtiHandler Provider Name: CTI Framework Explanation: The JTAPI/TAPI application version is not compatible with this version of CTIManager, so received message has been rejected. Recommended Action: Verify correct version of application is being used; otherwise, contact TAC.. I installed the same software on another machine, tested it and its working without any problem and I am able to place the calls from the softphone to other IP Phones. Has anyone faced this porblem before? Can any one give idea / solution for this? Regards...Anil __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62558&t=62558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PRI Module [7:65734]
Hi, I have a doubt. If I have a 2600 Router with ISDN PRI network module. The module will be terminated with and ISDN PRI line. Does this PRI modeul can accept normal Analog calls or do i need to have a analog modem pool to receive the calls. Can some one give an idea. = Thanks & Regards V Anil Kumar __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65734&t=65734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
