RE: Voice over IP [7:37298]
OK, I'll bite What's the drawbacks or gotcha's of choosing the 3810 over a 2600 or 3600 router?? In comparison, this is what I came up with so far: 1. No WIC modularity to speak of... you're stuck with DB-60 Serial interfaces. 2. Only one 10BT interface, so no VLAN routing :( Is this the ONLY reason why those units are much less expensive than the 1700s, 2600s, or 3600s?? Surely not! Can you do a "cross-over cable" between a couple of these units on their MFT T1 cards?? This would be great for VoATM simulations. As a side note, I didn't find an EOL listing for the MC3810, so I guess that is a positive. waiting patiently for reply input. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Voice over IP [7:37298] If you are ebay shopping, you can get a 3810 for cheaper than the 2600's or 3600's. Use this Ebay search (no quotes) "+cisco (3810,mc3810) -nokia -singer -att -at&t" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37520&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:37298]
If you are ebay shopping, you can get a 3810 for cheaper than the 2600's or 3600's. Use this Ebay search (no quotes) "+cisco (3810,mc3810) -nokia -singer -att -at&t" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37428&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP [7:37298]
You can go cheap and get a 1751. Takes the same card and can allow up to 4 voice calls at once. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Tim Medley"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. > > 2600's and 3600's are great for VoIP. You need an IP Plus feature set > and then appropriate voice modules based on your needs. An NM-1v or > NM-2v and some VIC's would get you started. > > If you tell us what exactly you are trying to do with VoIP we can > recommend a more specific hardware choice. > > tm > > Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP > Sr. Network Architect > VoIP Group > iReadyWorld > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] > > Greetings all, > > What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot > 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. > > ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37324&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:37298]
It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. 2600's and 3600's are great for VoIP. You need an IP Plus feature set and then appropriate voice modules based on your needs. An NM-1v or NM-2v and some VIC's would get you started. If you tell us what exactly you are trying to do with VoIP we can recommend a more specific hardware choice. tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37322&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:37298]
Fares- NM-1V with your choice of FXS, FXO, or E&M VICs. IOS Plus (12.x(xT) feature set. 32MB RAM/8MB Flash These are the absolute SW/HW minimums. Oh yeah, and a little reading time on CCO about configuring VoX. :) Have fun. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37311&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP [7:37298]
2600 is enough actualy Cisco's vg200 is a modified 2600... (that is what
is used as the voip gateway) That gateway can also function as the call
manager but you lose a lot fo functionallity (it is normaly used as a
back up call manager) Say your call mnager is across a wan link and the wan
link goes down...the 2600/vg200 will act as a temp call manager until the
wan link comes back up, allowing all local calls. And if you bring a
separate T into the 2600/vg200 then it can also route outbound calls if the
wan link is down.
If you plan on using a full featured call manager server, then you will need
to contact cisco for a demo.
-Patrick
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 03/05/02 01:07PM >>>
Greetings all,
What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot
26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great.
ThanksNabil
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37303&t=37298
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP [7:37298]
Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37298&t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accounting / Authentication for Voice over IP [7:30581]
Hi group I am new to VoIP. I have configured two voice gateways in my lab adn they are working fine. It's a very simple scenario and the calls are originated from one and terminated on the other one. Currently, everyone who dials the phone number of the voice ports can dial a number and the gateways establish a call. My question is that how can I provide a way of authentocation / accounting (something like asking for a PIN number)? Any inputs would be welcome Thanks is advance, Hamid __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30581&t=30581 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with Voice over IP over ATM [7:25163]
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:42:24PM -0500, William Lijewski wrote: > In the lab I am working on you are to do Voice over IP over ATM SVC's. They > want it so if no one is talking it still sends empty voice packets. Right > now if no one is talking you can hear it go dead silent until someone speeks > again. How do you get the empty voice packets to be transmitted so the line > is constantly active even if no one is talking? Sounds like you're looking for the 'no vad' command to disable Voice Activity Detection, which is enabled on ATM circuits by default. UniverCD link at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fvvfax_c/vvfport.htm. Hope this helps. David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25227&t=25163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with Voice over IP over ATM [7:25163]
You need to have VAD disabled in your dial-peers. ""William Lijewski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have been looking for what is probably a one line command for about 2 days > now. > > In the lab I am working on you are to do Voice over IP over ATM SVC's. They > want it so if no one is talking it still sends empty voice packets. Right > now if no one is talking you can hear it go dead silent until someone speeks > again. How do you get the empty voice packets to be transmitted so the line > is constantly active even if no one is talking? > > I have looked in the Caslow book, searched the Cisco documentation CD, and > I'm just having no luck. Any help would be great. > > Thanks, > Bill L. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25184&t=25163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with Voice over IP over ATM [7:25163]
I have been looking for what is probably a one line command for about 2 days now. In the lab I am working on you are to do Voice over IP over ATM SVC's. They want it so if no one is talking it still sends empty voice packets. Right now if no one is talking you can hear it go dead silent until someone speeks again. How do you get the empty voice packets to be transmitted so the line is constantly active even if no one is talking? I have looked in the Caslow book, searched the Cisco documentation CD, and I'm just having no luck. Any help would be great. Thanks, Bill L. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25163&t=25163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP specific [7:21031]
I have made the config with num-exp command and it worked. Thanks for the answers. ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > We have a customer that wants a implementation of voice over ip. Their dial > plan will be like this. > > A-clients --pbx--router--voip--router--pbx--Bclients >| >| > router > | >PBX > | > Cclients > > Normally if an A client want to reach a client from B, they dial 66 and from > PBX or FXS they get a line and dial 76 and reach the corresponding route > rfrom voip and dial 86 to reach PBX and the last step they dial the Bclients > expansion number 801. My question is this, Is it possible to only dial once > and reach the corresponding Bclient from A without PLar (cause A client will > Cclients too)? I want to appoint ony one number and make it dial all > 66,76,86,801 with commas ofcourse cause there is a waiting time over PBXs. > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21119&t=21031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP specific [7:21031]
Looking at what your doing you should be able to dial only once and reach the client on the other side. From my experience you would never have to dial an access code at each stage. I've got some sample config's with pots ports and lots of isdn configs, if you have any more specific questions let me know, regards ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > We have a customer that wants a implementation of voice over ip. Their dial > plan will be like this. > > A-clients --pbx--router--voip--router--pbx--Bclients >| >| > router > | >PBX > | > Cclients > > Normally if an A client want to reach a client from B, they dial 66 and from > PBX or FXS they get a line and dial 76 and reach the corresponding route > rfrom voip and dial 86 to reach PBX and the last step they dial the Bclients > expansion number 801. My question is this, Is it possible to only dial once > and reach the corresponding Bclient from A without PLar (cause A client will > Cclients too)? I want to appoint ony one number and make it dial all > 66,76,86,801 with commas ofcourse cause there is a waiting time over PBXs. > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21113&t=21031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP specific [7:21031]
Hi All, We have a customer that wants a implementation of voice over ip. Their dial plan will be like this. A-clients --pbx--router--voip--router--pbx--Bclients | | router | PBX | Cclients Normally if an A client want to reach a client from B, they dial 66 and from PBX or FXS they get a line and dial 76 and reach the corresponding route rfrom voip and dial 86 to reach PBX and the last step they dial the Bclients expansion number 801. My question is this, Is it possible to only dial once and reach the corresponding Bclient from A without PLar (cause A client will Cclients too)? I want to appoint ony one number and make it dial all 66,76,86,801 with commas ofcourse cause there is a waiting time over PBXs. Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21031&t=21031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP [7:20371]
Hi, I have a CDN on witch I want to route ip data traffic and ip voice traffic coming from an ip vioce gateway (a device attached to a PABX and to a LAN on witch reside the ethernet of the router). The voice need guaranteed bandwidth. Can someone suggest the best Cisco feature to implement? Schema: > Thanks in advance Francesco [demime removed a uuencoded section named schema.doc which was 435 lines] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20371&t=20371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Thomas I've had a look round CCO and I can't see very much to do with video apart from marketing spiel. I was thinking that this should work but then I had of a couple of thoughts, from my experience with voip normally a call to or from an isdn interface would be a voice call and not a data call. I'm thinking that the video conferencing equipment accepts only data calls, maybe it is possible just send the traffic out of the isdn interface as a data call. Just found some info have a look at this http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/mucvmn/prodlit/ipmcm_ds.htm this is just an example but it looks like it could be possible, maybe someone else has done video and can provide some input cheers ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yes, the camera is H323 supported. If the module is not the right one, > what module should I use in this case? > > > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Thomas does the camera use h323 across the network? if so it should be > > possible, I'd be interested to here if it works > > > > cheers > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hm... my topology messed up with the line swapping. Here it goes again: > > > > > > - > > > video conf. camera > > > | > > > Ethernet0 > > > | > > >Router > > > | > > > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > > > | > > >ISDN cloud > > > | > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Sorry I missed my topology: > > > > > > > > > > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > > > | > > > > Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN > > > > cloud---ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > > AT&T MCU > > > > > > > > > > > > Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using > > this > > > > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is > > connected > > > to > > > > > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > > > > module. > > > > > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the > ISP > > > > > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is > > possible > > > to > > > > > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU > with > > > > ISDN > > > > > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > > > > > > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19958&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Yes, the camera is H323 supported. If the module is not the right one, what module should I use in this case? ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thomas does the camera use h323 across the network? if so it should be > possible, I'd be interested to here if it works > > cheers > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hm... my topology messed up with the line swapping. Here it goes again: > > > > - > > video conf. camera > > | > > Ethernet0 > > | > >Router > > | > > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > > | > >ISDN cloud > > | > > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Sorry I missed my topology: > > > > > > > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > | > > > Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN > > > cloud---ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > | > > > > > > AT&T MCU > > > > > > > > > Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using > this > > > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is > connected > > to > > > > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > > > module. > > > > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > > > > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is > possible > > to > > > > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with > > > ISDN > > > > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > > > > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19928&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Thomas does the camera use h323 across the network? if so it should be possible, I'd be interested to here if it works cheers ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hm... my topology messed up with the line swapping. Here it goes again: > > - > video conf. camera > | > Ethernet0 > | >Router > | > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > | >ISDN cloud > | > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Sorry I missed my topology: > > > > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > > > | > > Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN > > cloud---ISDN video conf. camera > > > > | > > > > AT&T MCU > > > > > > Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using this > > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? > > > > > > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi All, > > > > > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected > to > > > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > > module. > > > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > > > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible > to > > > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with > > ISDN > > > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19916&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Hm... my topology messed up with the line swapping. Here it goes again: - video conf. camera | Ethernet0 | Router | VIC-2BRI-NT/TE | ISDN cloud | ISDN video conf. camera ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry I missed my topology: > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > | > Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN > cloud---ISDN video conf. camera > > | > > AT&T MCU > > > Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using this > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to > > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > module. > > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to > > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with > ISDN > > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19907&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Sorry I missed my topology: ISDN video conf. camera | Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN cloud---ISDN video conf. camera | AT&T MCU Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using this VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module. > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with ISDN > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19906&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Hi All, In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module. This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with ISDN lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19905&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP [7:19590]
clearly we will route them from eth to wan by frame relay ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In short yes, once you've packetised the voice you can just route it like > any other ip packets > > cheers Pat > > > ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi all, > > > > I have a question regarding to Voice over IP. Is it possible to make voice > > over IP connections on eth and distributing it by ip over frame relay by a > > different vendors router?. > > > > Let me explain this scenerio in detail. You have a wide area network > > connected by a frame relay cloud with Motorola routers. The main Motorola > > router is connected to PBX by 2 E&M ports. And it is the wide area > > connection by ip over frame relay to the frame relay cloud. We want to > > connect a cisco 1750 router to ethernet and its fxs port to PBX of the > > company. Is it possible to put another 1750 to the other side of the frame > > relay cloud and put its FXS to its PBX and make these to areas talk voice > > over ip like below figure. > > > > ETH > > --- > >| | > >| | > > Eth Eth > > Cisco 1750 Mot 6560 s0--FRAME RELAY and IP--s0 Cisco > > FXSE&M CLOUD > 1750 > > | | > > FXS > > | | ---P > > | > > |-B > > Telephone > > | X > > Telephone > > > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19602&t=19590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP [7:19590]
Hi all, I have a question regarding to Voice over IP. Is it possible to make voice over IP connections on eth and distributing it by ip over frame relay by a different vendors router?. Let me explain this scenerio in detail. You have a wide area network connected by a frame relay cloud with Motorola routers. The main Motorola router is connected to PBX by 2 E&M ports. And it is the wide area connection by ip over frame relay to the frame relay cloud. We want to connect a cisco 1750 router to ethernet and its fxs port to PBX of the company. Is it possible to put another 1750 to the other side of the frame relay cloud and put its FXS to its PBX and make these to areas talk voice over ip like below figure. ETH --- | | | | Eth Eth Cisco 1750 Mot 6560 s0--FRAME RELAY and IP--s0 Cisco FXSE&M CLOUD 1750 | | FXS | | ---P | |-B Telephone | X Telephone Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19590&t=19590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP [7:19590]
In short yes, once you've packetised the voice you can just route it like any other ip packets cheers Pat ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding to Voice over IP. Is it possible to make voice > over IP connections on eth and distributing it by ip over frame relay by a > different vendors router?. > > Let me explain this scenerio in detail. You have a wide area network > connected by a frame relay cloud with Motorola routers. The main Motorola > router is connected to PBX by 2 E&M ports. And it is the wide area > connection by ip over frame relay to the frame relay cloud. We want to > connect a cisco 1750 router to ethernet and its fxs port to PBX of the > company. Is it possible to put another 1750 to the other side of the frame > relay cloud and put its FXS to its PBX and make these to areas talk voice > over ip like below figure. > > ETH > --- >| | >| | > Eth Eth > Cisco 1750 Mot 6560 s0--FRAME RELAY and IP--s0 Cisco > FXSE&M CLOUD 1750 > | | > FXS > | | ---P > | > |-B > Telephone > | X > Telephone > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19591&t=19590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Wow! That helps out alot. Thanks Robert! Thomas N. ""Robert Hanley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thomas;Without knowing more about your actual network topology the best I > can do is offer a few pointers, but here goes.384k is generally considered > the lowest common denominator for acceptable quality professional > videoconferencing. This was originally based on a 3-Bri h.320 (ISDN) system. > If people are not moving around much it is not necessary to send screen > updates as often in order to maintain a subjectively acceptable experience. > It depends on whether your doing a talking head type of thing where someone > is sitting at a table as opposed to distance learning with a person moving > around alot. While Polycom is generally considered the professional's > choice, VCON http://www.vcon.commakes excellent h.320 and h.323 (IP) based > videoconferencing systems which include a rate adaptive algorithm which can > reduce the rate of updates sent out based upon network congestion. They also > have an interactive multicast capability which is unmatched by any other > vendor as far as I know. I would highly recommend their products.One of the > possible solutions to your bandwidth limitations would be to use an h.320 to > h.323 gateway such as the Accord MCU (for PRI...now owned by Polycom) which > will also give you a "Brady Bunch" group view of multiple participants or > Radvision L2W-323 (for BRI). These would allow you to do your > videoconferencing over IP within your campus(es) and use ISDN to extend the > calls to other sites without impacting your data network as well as adding > the capability of calling outside of your corporation to anyone else's h.320 > based system.Of course this is all assuming you were interested in > videoconferencing. If video streaming is part of your query, you had best > plan on at least 1.5Mb/sec for an acceptable MPEG1 stream. There are several > players, Minerva probably being the best of the breed for encoders, Optibase > being another. I get CNBC to the desktop at work via IP multicast. It's > pretty cool I must say, just make sure you have IGMP snooping, er excuse me > CGMP enabled on your switches.As mentioned by others QOS is also important > whenever you are running any latency sensitive traffic, but especially for > IP Telephony and Video.HTH> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf> Of> > > Thomas N.> > > Sent: > Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]> > >> > >> > > Hi All,> > >> > > My > company is concerning about running> voice/video over IP> > > network. Our > WAN> > > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth> limitation is a big > problem> to> us.> > > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement> for > voice and> > > video traffic?> > > 128k? Thanks!> > >> > > Thomas N.> > > and > subscription info:> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html> Report > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19383&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Thomas;Without knowing more about your actual network topology the best I can do is offer a few pointers, but here goes.384k is generally considered the lowest common denominator for acceptable quality professional videoconferencing. This was originally based on a 3-Bri h.320 (ISDN) system. If people are not moving around much it is not necessary to send screen updates as often in order to maintain a subjectively acceptable experience. It depends on whether your doing a talking head type of thing where someone is sitting at a table as opposed to distance learning with a person moving around alot. While Polycom is generally considered the professional's choice, VCON http://www.vcon.commakes excellent h.320 and h.323 (IP) based videoconferencing systems which include a rate adaptive algorithm which can reduce the rate of updates sent out based upon network congestion. They also have an interactive multicast capability which is unmatched by any other vendor as far as I know. I would highly recommend their products.One of the possible solutions to your bandwidth limitations would be to use an h.320 to h.323 gateway such as the Accord MCU (for PRI...now owned by Polycom) which will also give you a "Brady Bunch" group view of multiple participants or Radvision L2W-323 (for BRI). These would allow you to do your videoconferencing over IP within your campus(es) and use ISDN to extend the calls to other sites without impacting your data network as well as adding the capability of calling outside of your corporation to anyone else's h.320 based system.Of course this is all assuming you were interested in videoconferencing. If video streaming is part of your query, you had best plan on at least 1.5Mb/sec for an acceptable MPEG1 stream. There are several players, Minerva probably being the best of the breed for encoders, Optibase being another. I get CNBC to the desktop at work via IP multicast. It's pretty cool I must say, just make sure you have IGMP snooping, er excuse me CGMP enabled on your switches.As mentioned by others QOS is also important whenever you are running any latency sensitive traffic, but especially for IP Telephony and Video.HTH> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf> Of> > > Thomas N.> > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]> > >> > >> > > Hi All,> > >> > > My company is concerning about running> voice/video over IP> > > network. Our WAN> > > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth> limitation is a big problem> to> us.> > > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement> for voice and> > > video traffic?> > > 128k? Thanks!> > >> > > Thomas N.> > > > > Message Posted at:> http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19368&t=19351> --> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19379&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Actually we try to avoid netmeeting - our network carries our data traffic, voice (pbx to pbx and some remote ip hardphones) and video (polycom units - fx, mp and viavideo). Netmeeting works, and has its place in the organisation, but can cause headaches for everyday support, so we only roll out a limited number of systems for specific functions - remote training mostly. I should elaborate on the network a touch. Our hq in San Diego is connected into the MPLS network via a 3-t1 IMA connection, with a 3mbps CIR. Our other offices range from a full t1 into the MPLS cloud to 256cir/512port. The direct frame connections are 512cir/1024port, but we're slowing migrating them all over to MPLS (as the service becomes more and more available). Glad I could help out. Andras Bellak Director, WAN Engineering -Original Message- From: Thomas N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] Thanks much to Andras and others! Andras, when you said you had all units configured not to run at rate greater than 256k, and the quality is still OK or good; I assumed you had both video and voice traffice over those PVCs, such as NetMeeting application? Again, Thanks alot for all of the info! Thomas N. ""Andras Bellak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We are currently running a mix of polycom mp and fx units via h.323 on > our WAN. We have set all the units to not run at any speed greater than > 256k. The video quality is great on all of them, even those going into > questionaable frame networks such as Mexico. Our latency from our > headquarters in San Diego to the various video systems ranges from 40ms > to 210ms. Our WAN is composed of IP-enabled Frame links (AT&T's way of > saying MPLS VPN) with the occasionally frame pvc in place. If you are > going to depend on the video quality being good, you should look into > implementing some form of QOS on the network. Most people do this with > voice having a higher rating through the WAN, but we've found that > glitches are more easily recognized and complained about on the video > side. > > We are also running voice over the same network, but not the the same > degree. Our voice system is Lucent based, and simply ties into our LAN's > in each office that is connected with Lucent PBX systems. The voice > quality is decent over the links, at least good cell phone quality, and > the latency is minimal. One thing to be concerned about with voice is > it's high demands for bandwidth per call. The Lucent system uses 64K per > connection (which really doesn't measure out quite that high). Using > analog phones with FXS and FXO cards in cisco routers generates sound > quality that is at least as good, and lower overhead. But it is more > difficult to integrate into an existing homogenous network (if you have > disparate pbx systems, take a look at the cisco method). I haven't > worked with the cisco ip phone solutions on my network, but understand > from colleagues that they work extremely well. > > On the video side, try to test a few different systems that meet your > needs, even trying different systems from different manufacturers. There > is often a noticable difference in video quality depending on the > systems (ie - our polycom fx h.323 systems have far better video > performance than our polycom mp units with h.323 - but the fx doesn't > have built in isdn and cost quite a bit more). > > Have fun with this if you can - video and voice over ip are great ways > to wow upper management teams and are fun to play with. > > Good luck > > Andras Bellak > Director, WAN Engineering > > > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Whalen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > Many people agree with the below, that 384k is the minimum for > reasonable > live video.. > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: > > > As Manager, Voice/Data systems at the law firm I worked at, we demo'd > two > > different Videoconferencing technologies. I don't remember the first > > vendor, but the second we looked at was Polycom. For both, I had 3 > ISDN > > lines installed (3 x 128 kbps = 384 kbps). Use that as a ballpark > figure > > for video - if you're going to use specialized videoconferencing > equipment. > > > > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Re: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Thanks much to Andras and others! Andras, when you said you had all units configured not to run at rate greater than 256k, and the quality is still OK or good; I assumed you had both video and voice traffice over those PVCs, such as NetMeeting application? Again, Thanks alot for all of the info! Thomas N. ""Andras Bellak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We are currently running a mix of polycom mp and fx units via h.323 on > our WAN. We have set all the units to not run at any speed greater than > 256k. The video quality is great on all of them, even those going into > questionaable frame networks such as Mexico. Our latency from our > headquarters in San Diego to the various video systems ranges from 40ms > to 210ms. Our WAN is composed of IP-enabled Frame links (AT&T's way of > saying MPLS VPN) with the occasionally frame pvc in place. If you are > going to depend on the video quality being good, you should look into > implementing some form of QOS on the network. Most people do this with > voice having a higher rating through the WAN, but we've found that > glitches are more easily recognized and complained about on the video > side. > > We are also running voice over the same network, but not the the same > degree. Our voice system is Lucent based, and simply ties into our LAN's > in each office that is connected with Lucent PBX systems. The voice > quality is decent over the links, at least good cell phone quality, and > the latency is minimal. One thing to be concerned about with voice is > it's high demands for bandwidth per call. The Lucent system uses 64K per > connection (which really doesn't measure out quite that high). Using > analog phones with FXS and FXO cards in cisco routers generates sound > quality that is at least as good, and lower overhead. But it is more > difficult to integrate into an existing homogenous network (if you have > disparate pbx systems, take a look at the cisco method). I haven't > worked with the cisco ip phone solutions on my network, but understand > from colleagues that they work extremely well. > > On the video side, try to test a few different systems that meet your > needs, even trying different systems from different manufacturers. There > is often a noticable difference in video quality depending on the > systems (ie - our polycom fx h.323 systems have far better video > performance than our polycom mp units with h.323 - but the fx doesn't > have built in isdn and cost quite a bit more). > > Have fun with this if you can - video and voice over ip are great ways > to wow upper management teams and are fun to play with. > > Good luck > > Andras Bellak > Director, WAN Engineering > > > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Whalen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > Many people agree with the below, that 384k is the minimum for > reasonable > live video.. > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: > > > As Manager, Voice/Data systems at the law firm I worked at, we demo'd > two > > different Videoconferencing technologies. I don't remember the first > > vendor, but the second we looked at was Polycom. For both, I had 3 > ISDN > > lines installed (3 x 128 kbps = 384 kbps). Use that as a ballpark > figure > > for video - if you're going to use specialized videoconferencing > equipment. > > > > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of > > > Thomas N. > > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > My company is concerning about running voice/video over IP > > > network. Our WAN > > > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth limitation is a big problem > to > us. > > > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement for voice and > > > video traffic? > > > 128k? Thanks! > > > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19375&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
We are currently running a mix of polycom mp and fx units via h.323 on our WAN. We have set all the units to not run at any speed greater than 256k. The video quality is great on all of them, even those going into questionaable frame networks such as Mexico. Our latency from our headquarters in San Diego to the various video systems ranges from 40ms to 210ms. Our WAN is composed of IP-enabled Frame links (AT&T's way of saying MPLS VPN) with the occasionally frame pvc in place. If you are going to depend on the video quality being good, you should look into implementing some form of QOS on the network. Most people do this with voice having a higher rating through the WAN, but we've found that glitches are more easily recognized and complained about on the video side. We are also running voice over the same network, but not the the same degree. Our voice system is Lucent based, and simply ties into our LAN's in each office that is connected with Lucent PBX systems. The voice quality is decent over the links, at least good cell phone quality, and the latency is minimal. One thing to be concerned about with voice is it's high demands for bandwidth per call. The Lucent system uses 64K per connection (which really doesn't measure out quite that high). Using analog phones with FXS and FXO cards in cisco routers generates sound quality that is at least as good, and lower overhead. But it is more difficult to integrate into an existing homogenous network (if you have disparate pbx systems, take a look at the cisco method). I haven't worked with the cisco ip phone solutions on my network, but understand from colleagues that they work extremely well. On the video side, try to test a few different systems that meet your needs, even trying different systems from different manufacturers. There is often a noticable difference in video quality depending on the systems (ie - our polycom fx h.323 systems have far better video performance than our polycom mp units with h.323 - but the fx doesn't have built in isdn and cost quite a bit more). Have fun with this if you can - video and voice over ip are great ways to wow upper management teams and are fun to play with. Good luck Andras Bellak Director, WAN Engineering -Original Message- From: Brian Whalen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] Many people agree with the below, that 384k is the minimum for reasonable live video.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: > As Manager, Voice/Data systems at the law firm I worked at, we demo'd two > different Videoconferencing technologies. I don't remember the first > vendor, but the second we looked at was Polycom. For both, I had 3 ISDN > lines installed (3 x 128 kbps = 384 kbps). Use that as a ballpark figure > for video - if you're going to use specialized videoconferencing equipment. > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Thomas N. > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > My company is concerning about running voice/video over IP > > network. Our WAN > > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth limitation is a big problem to us. > > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement for voice and > > video traffic? > > 128k? Thanks! > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19368&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Many people agree with the below, that 384k is the minimum for reasonable live video.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: > As Manager, Voice/Data systems at the law firm I worked at, we demo'd two > different Videoconferencing technologies. I don't remember the first > vendor, but the second we looked at was Polycom. For both, I had 3 ISDN > lines installed (3 x 128 kbps = 384 kbps). Use that as a ballpark figure > for video - if you're going to use specialized videoconferencing equipment. > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Thomas N. > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > My company is concerning about running voice/video over IP > > network. Our WAN > > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth limitation is a big problem to us. > > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement for voice and > > video traffic? > > 128k? Thanks! > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19365&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
As Manager, Voice/Data systems at the law firm I worked at, we demo'd two different Videoconferencing technologies. I don't remember the first vendor, but the second we looked at was Polycom. For both, I had 3 ISDN lines installed (3 x 128 kbps = 384 kbps). Use that as a ballpark figure for video - if you're going to use specialized videoconferencing equipment. -- Leigh Anne > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Thomas N. > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Video/Voice over IP [7:19351] > > > Hi All, > > My company is concerning about running voice/video over IP > network. Our WAN > is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth limitation is a big problem to us. > What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement for voice and > video traffic? > 128k? Thanks! > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19364&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Video/Voice over IP [7:19351]
Hi All, My company is concerning about running voice/video over IP network. Our WAN is running on fractial T1, so bandwidth limitation is a big problem to us. What will be the mininum bandwidth requirement for voice and video traffic? 128k? Thanks! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19351&t=19351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5341]
Sorry group. I take it just web links are filtered out of the emails. Lets try this again http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000/voip.html. This info was provided to me by one of the Cisco TAC VOIP techs. Ken's Web Page(http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000) "There is more to life than increasing its speed." - Mahatma Gandhi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5341&t=5341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Ken's Web Page(http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000) "There is more to life than increasing its speed." - Mahatma Gandhi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5331&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Ken's Web Page(http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000) "There is more to life than increasing its speed." - Mahatma Gandhi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5332&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Link included this time :) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/voice _c/index.htm Cisco has some very good resources on their site. I recommend searching CCO. ""Hamid"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good > and complete document for it. > > Thanks > > Hamid > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5283&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
This is a good link : ""Hamid"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good > and complete document for it. > > Thanks > > Hamid > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5282&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Hi Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good and complete document for it. Thanks Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5221&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:4099]
Wayne, Try Cisco Voice over Frame Relay, ATM, and IP by Steve McQuerry. It is a very good reference book on how to configure routers to support voice over X. I would also definately recommend Integrating Voice and Data Networks by Scott Keagy. Eddie -- Edward J. Gomez, MCSE, CNE, CCNA Information Systems Manager ProxyMed, Inc 2555 Davie Road, Suite 110 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33317 (954) 473-1001 x315 http://www.proxymed.com -Original Message- From: Wayne Gum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:4099] Can anyone recomend a few good Voice over IP books. I have the Cisco CIM module on VO/IP but would also like a detailed book on setting a config. Thanks in Advance FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4173&t=4099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:4099]
You may want to consider: Integrating Voice and Data Networks by Scott Keagy ( Cisco Press ) Configuring Cisco Voice Over IP by Elliot Lewis ( Syngress ) Both are very readable. The latter contains a lot of conf information. I am not deeply into Keagy's book as yet. HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:4099] Can anyone recomend a few good Voice over IP books. I have the Cisco CIM module on VO/IP but would also like a detailed book on setting a config. Thanks in Advance FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4109&t=4099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP [7:4099]
Can anyone recomend a few good Voice over IP books. I have the Cisco CIM module on VO/IP but would also like a detailed book on setting a config. Thanks in Advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4099&t=4099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book on Voice over Ip and Voice over Frame Relay
Hi every body, Can anyone provide me some info on which books are better for Voip and VoFr. Thanks and regards Rajeev Bharadwaj _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP
12.0.7T at least, 12.1.2T even better. Steve "Amit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Over IP
Hi, In regard to the IOS versions, although it is not necessary for the routers to run the same IOS version I have encountered many time handshake problems in cases like yours and in VPN so it is something that worth checking. Gil -Original Message- From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ??? ? 28 ? 2000 07:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice Over IP Hi everybody, I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already existing data link between our local and remote office. Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was successful for the local site but a similar test at the remote site was unsuccessful. Could that be due to any signalling problems ? Thanks & Regards Amit __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! http://photos.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Over IP
Hi, until 12.0.5T the codec G729r8 was pre-IETF standard, from 12.0.5T the codec was standardized and the 2 codec are incompatible (different bit ordering) you must use the command "codec g729r8 pre-ietf" for interoperability but there are some negotiation problem (rink back tone for example). You must consider from 12.0.7T there are many new function very useful (codec, timing and debugging for example). My opinion check for 12.1.x because 12.0.7T reached the End of Engeneering so no more development are planned for this release. Check for memory. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 28 dicembre 2000 06.44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice Over IP > > > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Over IP
Hi, until 12.0.5T the codec G729r8 was pre-IETF standard, from 12.0.5T the codec was standardized and the 2 codec are incompatible (different bit ordering) you must use the command "codec g729r8 pre-ietf" for interoperability but there are some negotiation problem (rink back tone for example). You must consider from 12.0.7T there are many new function very useful (codec, timing and debugging for example). My opinion check for 12.1.x because 12.0.7T reached the End of Engeneering so no more development are planned for this release. Check for memory. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 28 dicembre 2000 06.44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice Over IP > > > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP
See my inlined comments ! Regards Elias Aggelidis CCNP, CVoice, Security - Original Message - From: "Amit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 7:44 AM Subject: Voice Over IP > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. Cisco is proposing to use the same IOS in every routers. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? FLASH, MEM > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? Check your config ! > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Over IP
Hi everybody, I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already existing data link between our local and remote office. Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was successful for the local site but a similar test at the remote site was unsuccessful. Could that be due to any signalling problems ? Thanks & Regards Amit __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! http://photos.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP using the IDAM line
Is there any one who have experience on configurating Voip in the AS5300 using the IDAM line IDAM line is some sort of old version of T1. thanks Sam Li _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP
I've got a fairly extensive collection of links to VoIP information at http://www.itprc.com/voice.htm. There is also a list of book recommendations on that page. Irwin > -Original Message- > From: Doug Guth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 8:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice over IP > > > Can anyone recommend a good reference for voice over IP? I > am now working > with VoIP and need to find a good book / document for a > "crash" course and > an ongoing reference. > > P.S. Before anyone gets started on it... where are there > instructions for > searching the archives since I am sure this has been > addressed before and > apologize for the repetition... > > Doug Guth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP
Doug: Be sure to get Caputo's book. It's does a good job of introducing items essential to field work with Cisco Voice. Put his name into the archives and I'm sure you'll see other comments. I find getting to the archives pretty easy from www.groupstudy.com. Search the "Professional/Technical" mail list. Good Luck. John >>> "Doug Guth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/11/00 05:18PM >>> Can anyone recommend a good reference for voice over IP? I am now working with VoIP and need to find a good book / document for a "crash" course and an ongoing reference. P.S. Before anyone gets started on it... where are there instructions for searching the archives since I am sure this has been addressed before and apologize for the repetition... Doug Guth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP
Can anyone recommend a good reference for voice over IP? I am now working with VoIP and need to find a good book / document for a "crash" course and an ongoing reference. P.S. Before anyone gets started on it... where are there instructions for searching the archives since I am sure this has been addressed before and apologize for the repetition... Doug Guth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP
Hi Keith, I'm not an expert on RSVP but I'll give this a shot... The reservation of bandwidth using RSVP simply prioritizes RSVP traffic of a given flow over all other incoming traffic (note that one RSVP flow can be prioritized over another RSVP flow). Thus, the RSVP traffic will always be routed before non-RSVP traffic. This has the effect of reserving bandwidth for RSVP traffic. Now, what happens if there isn't any incoming traffic on a given RSVP flow (i.e. your silence suppression example)? In the case of an extended gap between RSVP flow packets, non-RSVP packets could slip in and get routed due to the lack of priority traffic. Thus, the bandwidth is available to other traffic as along as there is no incoming RSVP traffic. That said, keep in mind that an RSVP session (flow) on a router will timeout if: 1) No RSVP packets in a flow have been received within a specified amount of time 2) No PATH or RESV message has been sent to periodically refresh the router's RSVP state machine When a timeout occurs (timeout intervals are specified in the PATH message), the router stops giving priority to RSVP traffic thereby releasing the bandwidth reservation. This is why it is unlikely that you would see a large number of non-RSVP packets being routed between two RSVP packets of the same flow (the session would probably timeout before this could occur). Hope this helps... -Marcus At 04:16 PM 07/26/2000 +0100, keith wood wrote: >I am currently reading throught the CVoice notes and have just passed the >section on RSVP. You can reserve bandwidth with this protocol to give to >active voice channels for the duration of the call - this much I understand, >no problem. > >What isn't clear in the notes is whether or not the bandwidth is available >to other traffic if the voice traffic is not using it all - ie: during >silence suppressed moments. > >Anybody know..? > >Thanks. > > > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Marcus A. Walton Lucent Technologies, Inc. NetworkCare Professional Services Division "The Knowledge Behind the Network" ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP
I am currently reading throught the CVoice notes and have just passed the section on RSVP. You can reserve bandwidth with this protocol to give to active voice channels for the duration of the call - this much I understand, no problem. What isn't clear in the notes is whether or not the bandwidth is available to other traffic if the voice traffic is not using it all - ie: during silence suppressed moments. Anybody know..? Thanks. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP configuration
Hi Erick,
I have worked with this kind of setup. I used EPABX connectivity. I
connected the cable from EPABX to the voice ports of the router and the
config which I made had worked fine. The config is attached herewith.
(See attached file: cis.txt)
Hope this would help...
Hitesh
Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 10:40:02 AM
Please respond to Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: harora)
Subject: Re: Voice Over IP configuration
Send me a copy of your configs. Sounds like you have a
port / dest-pattern mapping mismatch. Are you able to
dial the local phones fine connected to router (if you
have 2 phones plugged into the ports)?
--- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> I'm using 11.3(4)T software.
> The problem is when I tried to call extension at
> another side, it always
> busy.
> Do you have working config for this ?
>
> Thanks for help.
>
> Rgds-
> Anton
>
> Erick wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the problem and do you have configs?
> >
> > You will need a vofr dial-peer and a pots
> dial-peer
> > setup, then on the frame DLCI you're using you'll
> need
> > to configure it with traffic shaping. Lastly, what
> ver
> > of IOS?
> >
> > --- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have problem when configuring VoIP over Frame
> > > Relay.
> > > I have both 3640 Routers with 2 slot VoIP
> modules.
> > > Any body has working configuration about VoIP
> over
> > > Frame Relay ..?
> > >
> > > Thanks for help.
> > >
> > > Antonius Kurniadi
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(UUEncoded file named: cis.txt follows)
(Its format is: Text - character set unknown )
begin 644 cis.txt
M=F]I8V4M<&]R="`Q+S`O,`T*(&-P=&]N92!)3@T*('1I;65O=71S(&EN:71I
M86P@-0T*(&]P97)A=&EO;B`T+7=I7!E(#4-"B!S:6=N86P@:6UM
M961I871E#0HA#0IV;VEC92UP;W)T(#$O,"\Q#0H@8W!T;VYE($E.#0H@=&EM
M96]U=',@:6YI=&EA;"`U#0H@;W!Ehttp://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP configuration
Send me a copy of your configs. Sounds like you have a port / dest-pattern mapping mismatch. Are you able to dial the local phones fine connected to router (if you have 2 phones plugged into the ports)? --- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Erick, > > I'm using 11.3(4)T software. > The problem is when I tried to call extension at > another side, it always > busy. > Do you have working config for this ? > > Thanks for help. > > Rgds- > Anton > > Erick wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What is the problem and do you have configs? > > > > You will need a vofr dial-peer and a pots > dial-peer > > setup, then on the frame DLCI you're using you'll > need > > to configure it with traffic shaping. Lastly, what > ver > > of IOS? > > > > --- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have problem when configuring VoIP over Frame > > > Relay. > > > I have both 3640 Routers with 2 slot VoIP > modules. > > > Any body has working configuration about VoIP > over > > > Frame Relay ..? > > > > > > Thanks for help. > > > > > > Antonius Kurniadi __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP configuration
Hi Erick, I'm using 11.3(4)T software. The problem is when I tried to call extension at another side, it always busy. Do you have working config for this ? Thanks for help. Rgds- Anton Erick wrote: > Hi, > > What is the problem and do you have configs? > > You will need a vofr dial-peer and a pots dial-peer > setup, then on the frame DLCI you're using you'll need > to configure it with traffic shaping. Lastly, what ver > of IOS? > > --- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have problem when configuring VoIP over Frame > > Relay. > > I have both 3640 Routers with 2 slot VoIP modules. > > Any body has working configuration about VoIP over > > Frame Relay ..? > > > > Thanks for help. > > > > Antonius Kurniadi > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. > http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP configuration
Hi, What is the problem and do you have configs? You will need a vofr dial-peer and a pots dial-peer setup, then on the frame DLCI you're using you'll need to configure it with traffic shaping. Lastly, what ver of IOS? --- Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have problem when configuring VoIP over Frame > Relay. > I have both 3640 Routers with 2 slot VoIP modules. > Any body has working configuration about VoIP over > Frame Relay ..? > > Thanks for help. > > Antonius Kurniadi __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Over IP configuration
Hi all, I have problem when configuring VoIP over Frame Relay. I have both 3640 Routers with 2 slot VoIP modules. Any body has working configuration about VoIP over Frame Relay ..? Thanks for help. Antonius Kurniadi ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP books etc.
At 03:35 PM 5/20/00 -0700, Nathan Sharma wrote: >Hello, > >I wanted to take recommendations to prepare for Voice Over IP stuff for >CCIELAB test. I am scheduled to take lab next month. Is there anyone who >would like to trade official Cisco Training book for Voice over IP book ? >Thanks in advance . The commercially published info on Voice over IP, is a bit thin. Cisco Press has a couple of Multiservice books. By far, the best voice over material is on the Doc CD and CCO. Just do a search on "Configuring Voice over IP" = Dave Gingrich, K9DC Indianapolis, Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP books etc.
You dont need that much for the CCIE lab, just use CCO and check out the sample configs, Voice is only 3 points on the lab and only a few commands... -- Dave CCNP/CCDP/CCAI "Nathan Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 576792AC2314D411A3AF00508B6D2CA1094A42@SCL4MLBX03">news:576792AC2314D411A3AF00508B6D2CA1094A42@SCL4MLBX03... > Hello, > > I wanted to take recommendations to prepare for Voice Over IP stuff for > CCIELAB test. I am scheduled to take lab next month. Is there anyone who > would like to trade official Cisco Training book for Voice over IP book ? > Thanks in advance . > > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Over IP books etc.
Hello, I wanted to take recommendations to prepare for Voice Over IP stuff for CCIELAB test. I am scheduled to take lab next month. Is there anyone who would like to trade official Cisco Training book for Voice over IP book ? Thanks in advance . ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
