Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-14 Thread Raymond S. Swaim

On Thursday 14 December 2000 00:42, you wrote:

 Well... So far. I just decided to look into that by starting esd
 with a strace. My problem was that esd uses tcp (by default?!?!?),
 that is is wrapped by tcpd, that my hosts.deny says ALL: ALL and
 that my hosts.allow says nothing for esd... I added ALL: localhost
 and I now get the glorious sound!

 So. What should hosts.allow actually say for esd?

I don't have anything for ESD in hosts.allow.  Hmmm  Since you say it was 
working immediately after the install and then stopped, you may be right that 
installing the Helix updates might solve the problem.  Or, you might try 
installing only the updated esd packages.

RSwaim




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-14 Thread James Ray Kenney

On Monday 11 December 2000 23:40, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
 Tried, but it killed my gnome all together

 dave


If it just does not show in menu at bootup.
you must do this after logging in to any other window or desktop manager:

chmod +x /etc/X11/gdm/Sessions/Gnome

that got me going...
P.S. you would not believe how long it took me to find this out!

P.S. #2  All of the Gnome programs will disappear from your KDE menus after 
this but they WILL be in your GNOME menus!


 On Tuesday 12 December 2000 03:36, you wrote:
  Anyone has tried to install helix... With success?




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-14 Thread Raymond S. Swaim

On Thursday 14 December 2000 15:49, you wrote:
 snip

  (1)  Save a copy of /etc/X11/wmsession.d/02gnome
  (2)  Save a copy of /usr/bin/startgnome

 Could you send me a copy of your 02gnome and startgnome files?
 I found out too late :-(

You can use your editor to create them.  The contents of my 02gnome file are:

NAME=Gnome
ICON=gnome-logo-icon-transparent.xpm
DESC=Gnome Environment
EXEC=/usr/bin/startgnome
SCRIPT:
exec /usr/bin/startgnome

And the contents of startgnome are:

export HELP_BROWSER=gnome-help-browser
/usr/X11R6/bin/xsetroot -cursor_name left_ptr -solid "#99"
/usr/bin/createbackground.sh $HOME/.gnome png
exec /usr/bin/gnome-session

Place 02gnome in /etc/X11/wmsession.d, and place startgnome in /usr/bin.

RSwaim




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-14 Thread James Ray Kenney

snip

 (1)  Save a copy of /etc/X11/wmsession.d/02gnome
 (2)  Save a copy of /usr/bin/startgnome

Could you send me a copy of your 02gnome and startgnome files?
I found out too late :-(


 (3)  Run Helix installer
 (4)  When Helix installer finishes, it'll restart your X Server. Gnome will
 not be an option, so login to KDE.
 (5)  Copy the 02gnome and startgnome files back to their original
 directories (6)  Rename .gnome, .gnome-desktop, .gnome-private, and .mc
 directories in your /root directory and all user directories. (e.g. I
 renamed mine to ..gnome2, .gnome-desktop2, etc.).  The directories will be
 recreated when you login to Gnome.
 (7)  Reboot
 (8)  You should now be able to login to Gnome w/o (many) problems.




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread OS

I too tried it. H ! Now Sawfish produces windows without borders and 
title bars !!! Rats !

Oh yes, here they come, in the time it's taken to launch kmail, download some 
e-mails, find this one, draft a reply and almost press the send button !

Owen 

On Tuesday 12 December 2000  5:40 am, you wrote:
 Tried, but it killed my gnome all together

 dave

 On Tuesday 12 December 2000 03:36, you wrote:
  Anyone has tried to install helix... With success?




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread Raymond S. Swaim

On Tuesday 12 December 2000 15:51, you wrote:
 I too tried it. H ! Now Sawfish produces windows without borders and
 title bars !!! Rats !

Ack!  Hit the wrong button, sorry for that other reply. :-b

Before installing the Helix Gnome packages, save a copy of your 
/etc/X11/wmsession.d/02gnome and /usr/bin/startgnome files.  When the Helix 
installer finishes its installation, these files will be removed.  Because of 
this, the Gnome option will not be present in the gdm or kdm login screens 
(doesn't matter which one you choose, it'll be removed no matter which one 
you choose).  After completion, the Helix installer will restart your X 
server, so the next step is to login to KDE (since Gnome won't be an option) 
and copy the two files you saved back to their original directories.  
Secondly, rename the .gnome, .gnome-desktop, .gnome-private, and .mc 
directories in your /root and /home directories.  When you log back in to 
Gnome, these directories will be recreated.  If you don't recreate these 
directories, it'll be VERY unstable.

So, to sum up and repeat the steps in order:

(1)  Save a copy of /etc/X11/wmsession.d/02gnome
(2)  Save a copy of /usr/bin/startgnome
(3)  Run Helix installer
(4)  When Helix installer finishes, it'll restart your X Server. Gnome will 
not be an option, so login to KDE.
(5)  Copy the 02gnome and startgnome files back to their original directories
(6)  Rename .gnome, .gnome-desktop, .gnome-private, and .mc directories in 
your /root directory and all user directories. (e.g. I renamed mine to 
.gnome2, .gnome-desktop2, etc.).  The directories will be recreated when you 
login to Gnome.
(7)  Reboot
(8)  You should now be able to login to Gnome w/o (many) problems.

The Helix Gnome updates work pretty well on Mandrake 7.2 after following the 
above steps, but I still experience some very minor problems every now and 
then that I can't quite put my finger on (and I'm not even certain if the 
problems are caused by Helix Gnome, or something else).  I think that if I 
had it all to do over again, I'd probably just skip the Helix updates.  Most 
of the gnome packages in LM 7.2 are still current and I don't see any major 
differences.  Your system might be more stable if you just leave it the way 
it is.

RSwaim




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread Raymond S. Swaim

On Tuesday 12 December 2000 15:51, you wrote:
 I too tried it. H ! Now Sawfish produces windows without borders and
 title bars !!! Rats !





Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread Raymond S. Swaim

On Wednesday 13 December 2000 20:38, you wrote:
 Do you get sound? That's the main reason why I consider using helix.
 Since mandrake 7.2, I no longer have sound with gnome (except for the
 very first time I login after the install). Even root does not get
 sound with gnome, so it's not a permission problem.

Yes, I get sound, but then I was getting sound before installing Helix Gnome 
anyway (if I remember correctly).  However, my sound card does not show up in 
HardDrake, I had to use sndconfig to get it working.

Is it only Gnome that doesn't give you sound? In other words, do you get 
sound in KDE?  Although I do get sound, if I use any of the Gnome desktop 
sound effects, they tend to stutter quite a bit.  Instead of getting one bell 
ring, I'll get about 5 or 6.  I suspect the problem lies with ESD not liking 
my OPL3-SA card.

Btw, this stuttering problem has plagued me in every Linux distro that I've 
ever run, including Mandrake, Red Hat, SuSE, and Caldera.

RSwaim




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread Jean Meloche

On Wednesday 13 December 2000 16:21, you wrote:

 (1)  Save a copy of /etc/X11/wmsession.d/02gnome
 (2)  Save a copy of /usr/bin/startgnome
 (3)  Run Helix installer
 (4)  When Helix installer finishes, it'll restart your X Server. Gnome will
 not be an option, so login to KDE.
 (5)  Copy the 02gnome and startgnome files back to their original
 directories (6)  Rename .gnome, .gnome-desktop, .gnome-private, and .mc
 directories in your /root directory and all user directories. (e.g. I
 renamed mine to .gnome2, .gnome-desktop2, etc.).  The directories will be
 recreated when you login to Gnome.
 (7)  Reboot
 (8)  You should now be able to login to Gnome w/o (many) problems.

 The Helix Gnome updates work pretty well on Mandrake 7.2 after following
 the above steps, but I still experience some very minor problems every now
 and then that I can't quite put my finger on (and I'm not even certain if
 the problems are caused by Helix Gnome, or something else).  I think that
 if I had it all to do over again, I'd probably just skip the Helix updates.
  Most of the gnome packages in LM 7.2 are still current and I don't see any
 major differences.  Your system might be more stable if you just leave it
 the way it is.

 RSwaim

Thanks for the recipe... I'll try.

Do you get sound? That's the main reason why I consider using helix.
Since mandrake 7.2, I no longer have sound with gnome (except for the
very first time I login after the install). Even root does not get
sound with gnome, so it's not a permission problem.

-- 
Jean Meloche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e-gold # 133947




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-13 Thread Jean Meloche

On Wednesday 13 December 2000 21:14, you wrote:
 On Wednesday 13 December 2000 20:38, you wrote:
  Do you get sound? That's the main reason why I consider using helix.
  Since mandrake 7.2, I no longer have sound with gnome (except for the
  very first time I login after the install). Even root does not get
  sound with gnome, so it's not a permission problem.

 Yes, I get sound, but then I was getting sound before installing Helix
 Gnome anyway (if I remember correctly).  However, my sound card does not
 show up in HardDrake, I had to use sndconfig to get it working.

 Is it only Gnome that doesn't give you sound? In other words, do you get
 sound in KDE?  Although I do get sound, if I use any of the Gnome desktop
 sound effects, they tend to stutter quite a bit.  Instead of getting one
 bell ring, I'll get about 5 or 6.  I suspect the problem lies with ESD not
 liking my OPL3-SA card.

 Btw, this stuttering problem has plagued me in every Linux distro that I've
 ever run, including Mandrake, Red Hat, SuSE, and Caldera.

 RSwaim

My card was always detected automatically just fine. I always had sound
with kde and exactly once with gnome: the very first time I logged in
with gnome after the install. Since then, there was never any sound.
All applications that use esd said that "perhaps there is no sound
support in the kernel". Xmms, for example said that, but if I configure
it to use the oss driver, all was fine. So it's only through esd that
there is a problem.

Well... So far. I just decided to look into that by starting esd
with a strace. My problem was that esd uses tcp (by default?!?!?),
that is is wrapped by tcpd, that my hosts.deny says ALL: ALL and
that my hosts.allow says nothing for esd... I added ALL: localhost
and I now get the glorious sound!

So. What should hosts.allow actually say for esd?

-- 
Jean Meloche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e-gold # 133947




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-11 Thread Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]

On Tuesday 12 December 2000 04:36, you wrote:
 Anyone has tried to install helix... 

How nice.. Who is anyone btw?

-- 
\ Christian A Strømmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
   Live your life by your dreams,
 not by the limits of reality...




Re: [Cooker] helix

2000-12-11 Thread Armisis Aieoln

Tried, but it killed my gnome all together

dave

On Tuesday 12 December 2000 03:36, you wrote:
 Anyone has tried to install helix... With success?

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Linux - Cause I dont do windows 
or ovens!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Registered System: 83659





Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Frederic Crozat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:

 I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you 
 start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.

What version of gnome-core package do you have on your system ? There
was one buggy version which had a broken startgnome ..
 

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Ray

gnome-core-1.2.1-38
The big question is why isn't it in the login panel as a choice anymore?

On Mon, 09 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:
  I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
  start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.

 What version of gnome-core package do you have on your system ? There
 was one buggy version which had a broken startgnome ..




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Frederic Crozat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:

 gnome-core-1.2.1-38
 The big question is why isn't it in the login panel as a choice
 anymore?

That's a bug !! But I don't have it here.. What login manager are you
using ?
-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Ray

I believe it is kdm.. The standard Mandrake login.. This is a rc1 10-06-2000 
build. 

On Mon, 09 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:
  gnome-core-1.2.1-38
  The big question is why isn't it in the login panel as a choice
  anymore?

 That's a bug !! But I don't have it here.. What login manager are you
 using ?




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Ray

I added the following file to /etx/X11/wmsession.d/
and now it shows up and works.. So it is just missing drom the install


On Mon, 09 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:
  gnome-core-1.2.1-38
  The big question is why isn't it in the login panel as a choice
  anymore?

 That's a bug !! But I don't have it here.. What login manager are you
 using ?


NAME=Gnome
ICON=gnome.xpm
DESC=Gnome desktop
EXEC=/usr/bin/gnome-session
SCRIPT:
exec /usr/bin/gnome-session



Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-09 Thread Joshua Jackson

I installed Helix under 7.2 Beta 3 and it worked just fine.  Ugg...
I say it worked just fine, the installation worked just fine.  I never
actually logged into gnome or helix.  I just wanted all the updated
proggies.
JJ

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray) writes:
 
  I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
  start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-08 Thread OS

Hello,

You can access the Helix code from 195.92.249.252 and go to the directory
/pub/linux/helix/distributions/Mandrake-7

My success with 'raw' Helix code has diminished to such a point that I've
almost given up. The Mandrake Gnome seems to have everything anyway. About the
only thing I keep updated from Helix these days is the GIMP.

From the console try desktopcfg  (from desktopcfg-1.3.2-2mdk :-)  ). It does
not seem to give access to every window manager I have installed, but Gnome,
KDE, WindowMaker are all there plus some others. By going to say FVWM2
you can very often navigate to the window manager you want and lodge it
as the default. Failing that then switchdesk gives access to either Gnome or
KDE.

Owen


On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 hey,
 If u want to use gnome just select gnome from the drop down menu list when
 logging into linux. That is if u use graphical boot up.  I am not sure about
 how to change the desktop under the console though.
 
 --Khawar Zia
 - Original Message -
 From: "Ray" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 7:59 PM
 Subject: [Cooker] helix gnome
 
 
  I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
  start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.
 
 




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-08 Thread Ivan Kerekes

I just use different ~/.xinitrc for my different wm's. Here is my gnome:
[root@cs5884-a /root]# cat .xinitrc.gnome
#!/bin/sh
.. $HOME/.bashrc  
xsetroot -solid '#056'
imwheel
konsole 
exec /usr/bin/startgnome 


On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 well I would if it was there. There was a choice in 7.1 but not in 7.2.
 All that I have is kde anf the desktops like enlightenment, blackbox,
 and such... No gnome On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, you wrote:
  hey,
  If u want to use gnome just select gnome from the drop down menu list
  when logging into linux. That is if u use graphical boot up.  I am not
  sure about how to change the desktop under the console though.
 
  --Khawar Zia
  - Original Message -
  From: "Ray" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 7:59 PM
  Subject: [Cooker] helix gnome
 
   I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do
   you start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.






Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-07 Thread Khawar Zia

hey,
If u want to use gnome just select gnome from the drop down menu list when
logging into linux. That is if u use graphical boot up.  I am not sure about
how to change the desktop under the console though.

--Khawar Zia
- Original Message -
From: "Ray" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: [Cooker] helix gnome


 I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
 start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.






Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-07 Thread Ray

well I would if it was there. There was a choice in 7.1 but not in 7.2.
All that I have is kde anf the desktops like enlightenment, blackbox,
and such... No gnome

On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 hey,
 If u want to use gnome just select gnome from the drop down menu list when
 logging into linux. That is if u use graphical boot up.  I am not sure
 about how to change the desktop under the console though.

 --Khawar Zia
 - Original Message -
 From: "Ray" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 7:59 PM
 Subject: [Cooker] helix gnome

  I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
  start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.




Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-07 Thread root

Hi
I put helix over 7.2  and had reinstall 7.1  t get machine to run gnome
agian.

ROY



Ray wrote:

 I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
 start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.





Re: [Cooker] helix gnome

2000-10-07 Thread Gepper

Ray wrote:

 I want to try helix gnome under 7.2. Has anyone done this and how do you
 start it? I can't even find where to start gnome anymore.

Hello Ray.

You can start gnome by editing your .xinitrc file (located in your home
dir)
If it does exist, then comment out whatever is in there and put one single
line in there that says:
exec gnome-session
or if the file isn't there:
cd
echo "exec gnome-session"  .xinitrc
now startx

Hope this helped

/Björn





Re: [Cooker] Helix-gnome in cooker/mandrake

2000-09-12 Thread Mattias Eriksson

Well the goal is great, but if I got you right you are talking about 
harrasing the Helix people until they give up. I don't like that plan...

Instead we should contact them and offer our help in converting the packages 
to use the new menusystem. I assume that Helix are not refusing to do this 
just to piss us off, but for the lack of time and resources.

//Snaggen, don't know anything about RPM's but still willing to help

At 11 September, 2000 John Grange wrote:
 Dear list , after reading a post earlier today i have an idea! , we are
 a big group here now on this list, and i'm sure there are more than a
 few of us who would like the mandrake helix gnome packages to be
 compleetly compatible with mandrake 7.1+ menu system. I suggest that we
 campain to email the helix-gnome team to modify the mandrake packages to
 use our menu system ( wich is the same as debian no? ) Let's email them
 and get this problem fixed once and for all.
 
 -DarkWlf
 
 

-- 

 
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tvistevägen 26   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36  UMEA Tel:090-198800
SWEDEN   070-5636769
 
'I don't fight for a cause   Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen 
I fight for the fight'   PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc






Re: [Cooker] Helix-gnome in cooker/mandrake

2000-09-11 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 Dear list , after reading a post earlier today i have an idea! , we are
 a big group here now on this list, and i'm sure there are more than a
 few of us who would like the mandrake helix gnome packages to be
 compleetly compatible with mandrake 7.1+ menu system. I suggest that we
 campain to email the helix-gnome team to modify the mandrake packages to
 use our menu system ( wich is the same as debian no? ) Let's email them
 and get this problem fixed once and for all.

 -DarkWlf

I'm down for this, of course I'd like it the other way around and have mdk be 
compliant with helix-gnome package, but any compliance is good. 

-- 
Bryan Paxton
Public key can be found at http://speedbros.org/bryan.paxton.asc




Re: [Cooker] Helix-gnome in cooker/mandrake

2000-09-11 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, you wrote:

 I'm down for this, of course I'd like it the other way around and have mdk
 be compliant with helix-gnome package, but any compliance is good.

g I sent this before I finished. 

Have you laid out a plan about doing this ? 
At a glance this seems like an easy task, when in all actuality it's far from 
that. 

It's mostly the hacks that mdk does to gnome that breaks the compliance with 
vanilla helix-gnome. 

 menus , default pixmaps dir(which will fubar your desktop icons hence the 
need to remove your ~/.gnome/metadata.db) ,  the all in all default settings
, etc...

So, what to do. : )

-- 
Bryan Paxton
Public key can be found at http://speedbros.org/bryan.paxton.asc




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Yoann Vandoorselaere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  
  [...]
  
   Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I mean : )
  
  The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
  specific programs.
  
  The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
  wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
  
  Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's less
  cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that ship
  with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the apps in his
  menus.
 
 Ok, so if i follow you, you care about newbies, 
 but not about experienced user ?

Yes, you perfectly got me.

Experienced users most of the time bring their own config files and so on.
They are likely to tweak the system and they like it. They most of the
time use their own menus with 4 entries, or only command line..

 At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.

Okay, that's your position, let's not start an endless discussion about
this, we already know both our positions, it's no use trolling all over
:-).

(or in private..)



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

  At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.
 
 Yes, this is where I agree also.
 
 And it's not only what Yoann said but also if we dumb down the
 enviorment too much we're going to end up with stupid users.

The environment is already moving to simplify. That's the natural way to
do things. You can always tweak everything if you want!

 Now there's nothing wrong having a nice menu system, but I will say that the 
 current menu system is far from nice.

What people can not like is the way it looks. But it's the Mandrake look!
If you don't like it you can use another distrib or vanilla Helix. It's
purely normal to tweak the way things look, in order to get something
which looks "Mandrake".

 Take a look at this 
 http://speedbros.org/menukludge.jpg 
 
 Now ask yourself what the submenus probably look like : )

Okay, this is Gnome touch.

Now what?

You like it, install vanilla Helix! I don't care.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1) - other menu ideas

2000-08-10 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)


 Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 [...]

   At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.
 
  Yes, this is where I agree also.
 
  And it's not only what Yoann said but also if we dumb down the
  enviorment too much we're going to end up with stupid users.

 The environment is already moving to simplify. That's the natural way to
 do things. You can always tweak everything if you want!

  Now there's nothing wrong having a nice menu system, but I will say that
the
  current menu system is far from nice.

 What people can not like is the way it looks. But it's the Mandrake look!
 If you don't like it you can use another distrib or vanilla Helix. It's
 purely normal to tweak the way things look, in order to get something
 which looks "Mandrake".



This is interesting if only for the approach they take to structuring the
menus. I organize my bookmarks this way, why not my menus? Hmmm.
www.redmondlinux.org

It seems that some of their goals are compatible with Mandrake.

Hoyt





Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Yoann Vandoorselaere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

  Experienced users most of the time bring their own config files and so on.
  They are likely to tweak the system and they like it. They most of the
  time use their own menus with 4 entries, or only command line..
 
 Ok...
 
 /me take a deep breath.
 
 I urge you to stop being an integrist :
 You can't categorise people like you do...

Why? -- and why treating me of integrist?

Life is categorising people -- the problem is not to categorise, the
problem is to make abusive conclusions with your categories.

We know that some categories of people act mostly in one way. That does
not mean that some of them don't follow the masses! But we know things,
such as:

- an experienced user knows basics of vi and emacs
- a newbie is bored when he has to manually start kppp before starting his
  email client

You can't disagree with that simple statements! 

If we don't categorise things we can't move towards.


I know you don't like it, but let's face it Yoann: Linux-Mandrake is
mostly bought by newbies/ unexperienced users. We have to study what they
would like to have and react to that.

And that does *not* mean that the distribution is no more useable for
experienced users! Let's stop that debate which is wrong.

The point is that we have to adapt to the masses.


[...]

  Okay, that's your position, let's not start an endless discussion about
  this, we already know both our positions, it's no use trolling all over
  :-).
 
 That's not trolling.
 That's what free software is all about.

No, free software is not "all about" endless discussions.

We have to discuss, that's a very agreed point everywhere including inside
MandrakeSoft, and in the cooker mailing list.


 I want to have the choise and i want to give the choise to the user
 for him to be happy.

Yes, we all want. Mainly our position is that it's too much work and not
the way we want to move too. The present position of MandrakeSoft on the
menu problem is, if I guess right, to try to provide a tool so that the
users will have their menus filles with all the applications he has
installed.

You know that keeping the original Helix menus is not good because we will
lack all KDE and wm-independant applications. Ok, maybe you don't care,
but just consider our goal: to provide in the menus all the applications.

Ok, we all agree that the "look" of the Helix menus is much cleaner and
cute than the original Mandrake Gnome in the 7.1

But the way to go is not to revert to original Helix menus because we
would lack our goal which is to have cross-wm menus.


Your point, to leave the user the choice betweem mandrake menu and helix
menu, is very valid. The only problem is that here at MandrakeSoft you are
the guy who cares the more about this problem; the other ones don't want
to do it.

I know that you already have many things to do, but the way to go if you
want your point to become reality, is to study concretly the problem,
write down what would be necessary to do, patch the menu system to be able
to revert to the original menus, and show us all a prototype for that.


(I did not want that it becomes an endless discussion, but apparently..)
 

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1) - other menu ideas

2000-08-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

"Hoyt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  What people can not like is the way it looks. But it's the Mandrake look!
  If you don't like it you can use another distrib or vanilla Helix. It's
  purely normal to tweak the way things look, in order to get something
  which looks "Mandrake".
 
 This is interesting if only for the approach they take to structuring the
 menus. I organize my bookmarks this way, why not my menus? Hmmm.
 www.redmondlinux.org

Hey, we HAVE to choose ONE structure for the menus!

So, to you, also the grouping for the RPM is bad, and should follow your
bookmarks?

naahhh..

 It seems that some of their goals are compatible with Mandrake.

?


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-10 Thread Alexander Skwar

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 03:43:53PM -0700, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Yes, please delete all the text editors, mkXYfs, fdisk :-)
 
 you kidding do you understand there is a real difference between what
 you say and what i say ?

Sorry, not really.  You said that you don't include the Helix updater
because it messes up the configuration that's shipped with Mandrake. 
Doesn't a well placed rm -rf /usr/bin/* do the same?  So, where's the BIG
difference?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


[...]

 Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I mean : )

The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
specific programs.

The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.

Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's less
cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that ship
with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the apps in his
menus.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere

Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
 [...]
 
  Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I mean : )
 
 The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
 specific programs.
 
 The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
 wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
 
 Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's less
 cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that ship
 with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the apps in his
 menus.

Ok, so if i follow you, you care about newbies, 
but not about experienced user ?

At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.

-- 
-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
   An engineer from NVidia, while asking him to release cards specs said :
"Actually, we do write our drivers without documentation."




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
  [...]
 
   Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I
   mean : )
 
  The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
  specific programs.
 
  The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
  wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
 
  Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's
  less cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that
  ship with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the apps
  in his menus.

 Ok, so if i follow you, you care about newbies,
 but not about experienced user ?

 At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.

Yes, this is where I agree also.

And it's not only what Yoann said but also if we dumb down the enviorment too 
much we're going to end up with stupid users. 
Now there's nothing wrong having a nice menu system, but I will say that the 
current menu system is far from nice. 

Take a look at this 
http://speedbros.org/menukludge.jpg 

Now ask yourself what the submenus probably look like : )

-- 
Bryan Paxton

"Defacing the RIAA website would cause a major shitstorm for us good
guys." - someone

"Good point.
I still can't get over how Janet Reno's parents defaced her/it and they still
walk the streets free and clear." - someone else

Public key can be found at http://speedbros.org/Bryan_Paxton.asc




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere

Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
  Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  
   [...]
  
Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I
mean : )
  
   The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
   specific programs.
  
   The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
   wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
  
   Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's
   less cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that
   ship with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the apps
   in his menus.
 
  Ok, so if i follow you, you care about newbies,
  but not about experienced user ?
 
  At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.
 
 Yes, this is where I agree also.
 
 And it's not only what Yoann said but also if we dumb down the enviorment too 
 much we're going to end up with stupid users. 
 Now there's nothing wrong having a nice menu system, but I will say that the 
 current menu system is far from nice. 
 
 Take a look at this 
 http://speedbros.org/menukludge.jpg 

you're missing some icon, already availlable in development version
and gnome-icons tarball

-- 
-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
   An engineer from NVidia, while asking him to release cards specs said :
"Actually, we do write our drivers without documentation."




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
   Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
   
[...]
   
 Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what
 I mean : )
   
The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
specific programs.
   
The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde,
and wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
   
Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's
less cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps
that ship with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all
the apps in his menus.
  
   Ok, so if i follow you, you care about newbies,
   but not about experienced user ?
  
   At least, give them the opportunity to use standard menus, period.
 
  Yes, this is where I agree also.
 
  And it's not only what Yoann said but also if we dumb down the enviorment
  too much we're going to end up with stupid users.
  Now there's nothing wrong having a nice menu system, but I will say that
  the current menu system is far from nice.
 
  Take a look at this
  http://speedbros.org/menukludge.jpg

 you're missing some icon, already availlable in development version
 and gnome-icons tarball


Not missing them, the mdk packages simply don't have them(or do they ?). 

The was install mdk packages on in place of helix packages and well you can 
see the result : )

-- 
Bryan Paxton

"Defacing the RIAA website would cause a major shitstorm for us good
guys." - someone

"Good point.
I still can't get over how Janet Reno's parents defaced her/it and they still
walk the streets free and clear." - someone else

Public key can be found at http://speedbros.org/Bryan_Paxton.asc




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-09 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
   Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  
   [...]
  
Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I
mean
   
: )
  
   The problem is that with Helix Gnome you'll have only Gnome or Helix
   specific programs.
  
   The good thing of the menu system is that you have the gnome, kde, and
   wm-unaware programs in the menus of all your window managers.
  
   Okay, this costs a bit of the polished style of Helix Gnome, and it's
   less cute. It's good for people who know well Gnome, and the apps that
   ship with the distributions. But a newbie will like to have all the
   apps in his menus.
 
  *nod* this has been said : )

 what is the maning of "nod" ? .. "no" ?

no *nod* as in an action of nodding to agree with you : ) 

  And I think it goes from helix mdk problem to the menu system problem.

 i don't understand your position..

And you perfectly explained the problem. It's not particularly a helix mdk 
problem, it's the menu system that is current being used. 
It's horrible IMHO. 
This is what mostly takes away from that nice and polished look you 
mentioned. 

The menus after a post of installing a few rpms is awful. 
But I believe this is trying to be solved(other threads on the cooker ml).



-- 
Bryan Paxton

"Defacing the RIAA website would cause a major shitstorm for us good
guys." - someone

"Good point.
I still can't get over how Janet Reno's parents defaced her/it and they still
walk the streets free and clear." - someone else

Public key can be found at http://speedbros.org/Bryan_Paxton.asc




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Frederic Crozat

  From: Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  gnome icons on the desktop get chunked
  The reason for this is the gnome icons from helix aren't included
  (or is this the reason ?) so all the icons on the desktop get flipped to  
  gnome-application-x-gnome-app-info.png
  So I go to change them And they won't change : ( 
  there was an error about placement.
  So there seems to be a bug in one of two things.
  Your mc/gmc or there's just a compatibility problem between 
  the helix-gnome config files in ~/  and your helix-gnome packages. 
  This needs to be looked into futher though : )

This problem should not longer appear now. Could you try to
download last version of Gnome from cooker, and 
remove your .gnome-desktop directory as .gnome/metadata.db
to recreate icons database.

Be sure to update also Midnight Commander
-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




[Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah


Please Bryan comment on Cooker i'm not the Gnome Team.




On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Yeah, but mdk needs to keep the helix-gnome packages compliant with
  helix-gnome.

 and cooker ?, we design an Operating System we don't ship only a
 few desktop packages...

   I then exited gnome, and fired up X again and sorry but it's just
  friggin nasty IMHO.  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is,
  keeping helix-gnome raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks
  should be made.

 Suggestions are welcome, our Gnome team will be happy to discuss with
 you about the choice they did. What's wrong with the default
 configuration ?

It's not particulary that default config, but I will comment on a few things. 
But first stability with compatibility : )

gnome icons on the desktop get chunked
The reason for this is the gnome icons from helix aren't included(or is this 
the reason ?) so all the icons on the desktop get flipped to  
gnome-application-x-gnome-app-info.png
So I go to change them And they won't change : ( 
there was an error about placement.
So there seems to be a bug in one of two things.
Your mc/gmc or there's just a compatibility problem between the helix-gnome 
config files in ~/  and your helix-gnome packages. 
This needs to be looked into futher though : )



Ok now on to the minute problems of the default config a.k.a. pretty graphics.
This is IMHO, I'm sure a lot of people will disagree with me, but well for 
one thing the icons that come with helix aren't included, which are quite 
nice IMHO.

2). I understand trying to promote mdk, but those mdk folders in the gnome 
menu and the logo in the helix-gnome splash screen are just tacky IMHO. 

Also might want to consider going with the new default helix theme, the theme 
name is 5 over here, or at least that's how it shows up in gnomecc and 
/usr/share/themes. 

Keep the helix icons for the gnome menu, they're completely destroyed and 
makes the menu look funky. 

My 4 last statements we're just rants, but the first one is a problem. 

You need to look at this from an end-users point of view. 
Rather, a user that has installed helix from helixcode and not mdk and is 
switching to mdk's packages.  From my experience, people are gonna be highly 
pissed when a lot of they're pretty graphics(icon settings) are broke, as 
well desktop icons that don't seem to work at all.

Give it some thought : )

Bryan Paxton






-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Frederic Crozat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Simon) writes:

 Anton Graham wrote:
 
  You are correct that there are some striking differences between the two.
  One that comes to mind immediately is the mdk GNOME's inability to properly
  display GTK themes with light colored text.  They look fine in the preview
  window, but you end up with black text on your dark brown buttons after you
  apply the thing.
 
 BTW, a fix for this is to just delete /usr/share/gtkrc

Thanks, I'm correcting gnome-libs (which was providing /usr/share/gtkrc)
right now...


-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 03-Aug-00 by Bryan Paxton:
 So there seems to be a bug in one of two things.
 Your mc/gmc or there's just a compatibility problem between the helix-gnome 
 config files in ~/  and your helix-gnome packages. 
 This needs to be looked into futher though : )

I spent many hours on this problem myself during the testing of 7.1.  If you
kill your ~/.gnome directory you get those bland, unchangeable icons the
next time you start gmc.  But simply deleting the ~/.gnome/metadata.db fixes
it.  Why the regenerated metadata.db is different from the one generated
when the .gnome directory is created is beyond me.

-- 
   _
 _|_|_
  ( )   *Anton Graham
  /v\  / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/(   )X
 (m_m)   GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere

Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Please Bryan comment on Cooker i'm not the Gnome Team.
 
 From: Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)
 To: Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:22:47 -0500
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
  Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Yeah, but mdk needs to keep the helix-gnome packages compliant with
   helix-gnome.
 
  and cooker ?, we design an Operating System we don't ship only a
  few desktop packages...
 
I then exited gnome, and fired up X again and sorry but it's just
   friggin nasty IMHO.  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is,
   keeping helix-gnome raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks
   should be made.
 
  Suggestions are welcome, our Gnome team will be happy to discuss with
  you about the choice they did. What's wrong with the default
  configuration ?
 
 It's not particulary that default config, but I will comment on a few things. 
 But first stability with compatibility : )
 
 gnome icons on the desktop get chunked
 The reason for this is the gnome icons from helix aren't included(or is this 
 the reason ?) so all the icons on the desktop get flipped to  
 gnome-application-x-gnome-app-info.png
 So I go to change them And they won't change : ( 
 there was an error about placement.
 So there seems to be a bug in one of two things.
 Your mc/gmc or there's just a compatibility problem between the helix-gnome 
 config files in ~/  and your helix-gnome packages. 
 This needs to be looked into futher though : )
 
 
 
 Ok now on to the minute problems of the default config a.k.a. pretty graphics.
 This is IMHO, I'm sure a lot of people will disagree with me, but well for 
 one thing the icons that come with helix aren't included, which are quite 
 nice IMHO.
 
 2). I understand trying to promote mdk, but those mdk folders in the gnome 
 menu and the logo in the helix-gnome splash screen are just tacky IMHO. 
 
 Also might want to consider going with the new default helix theme, the theme 
 name is 5 over here, or at least that's how it shows up in gnomecc and 
 /usr/share/themes. 
 
 Keep the helix icons for the gnome menu, they're completely destroyed and 
 makes the menu look funky. 
 
 My 4 last statements we're just rants, but the first one is a problem. 
 
 You need to look at this from an end-users point of view. 
 Rather, a user that has installed helix from helixcode and not mdk and is 
 switching to mdk's packages.  From my experience, people are gonna be highly 
 pissed when a lot of they're pretty graphics(icon settings) are broke, as 
 well desktop icons that don't seem to work at all.
 
 Give it some thought : )
 
 Bryan Paxton
 
 --
 
 
 
 -- 
 MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
 San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel

-- 
-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/

I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, 
  even though she's too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. 
   I worry that 10 or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 
'Daddy, where were you when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?' 
-- Mike Godwin




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere


oops, wrong manip, sorry for the duplicate...

-- 
-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
   An engineer from NVidia, while asking him to release cards specs said :
"Actually, we do write our drivers without documentation."




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread David BAUDENS

Bryan Paxton écrivit :

 *nod* I understand, and I fully understand that it will be for the most part
 inexperienced users using mdk. See the follow up post I made to chmoel's
 response. I didn't even know about the below bug you mentioned : )
 
 But I don't mean taking out functionality of updating the menus(which is a
 whole 'nother situation :  p )
 but simply keeping everything more compliant and helix-like.
  ^^^

IMHO, you're wrong. It's not to Mandrake to keep compliant with
Helix-GNOME but to Helix-GNOME to keep compliant with Mandrake
distribution (and others Linux distributions). They ship different
packages for different distributions, they are not distributions makers
but they ship alternatives (Mandrake, SuSE, etc.) or complements
(Caldera) to Linux distributions. So, if they really want to be used by
users, they need to adapt their packages to each distributions. They do
it, a little, but don't respect each distributions specifications. It's
bad and sad.

-- 
MandrakeSofthttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
PARIS, FRANCE   --David

P.S.: please put question _before_ answer. It's easier to read your
messages.




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Alexander Skwar

 You need to look at this from an end-users point of view. 
 Rather, a user that has installed helix from helixcode and not mdk and is 
 switching to mdk's packages.  From my experience, people are gonna be highly 
 pissed when a lot of they're pretty graphics(icon settings) are broke, as 
 well desktop icons that don't seem to work at all.

I can only repeat, I don't have such problems with Mandrake and Helix.  No
broken graphics and the desktop also works all right.  

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191




Re: [Bryan Paxton evil7@bellsouth.net] Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

 Please Bryan comment on Cooker i'm not the Gnome Team.

irk I thought I did, I'll forward what I sent to cooker though.




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Bryan Paxton


This e-mail didn't get sent to cooker(oops)

 I spent many hours on this problem myself during the testing of 7.1.  If
 you kill your ~/.gnome directory you get those bland, unchangeable icons
 the next time you start gmc.  But simply deleting the ~/.gnome/metadata.db
 fixes it.  Why the regenerated metadata.db is different from the one
 generated when the .gnome directory is created is beyond me



It's not particulary that default config, but I will comment on a few things.
But first stability with compatibility : )

gnome icons on the desktop get chunked
The reason for this is the gnome icons from helix aren't included(or is this
the reason ?) so all the icons on the desktop get flipped to
gnome-application-x-gnome-app-info.png
So I go to change them And they won't change : (
there was an error about placement.
So there seems to be a bug in one of two things.
Your mc/gmc or there's just a compatibility problem between the helix-gnome
config files in ~/  and your helix-gnome packages.
This needs to be looked into futher though : )



Ok now on to the minute problems of the default config a.k.a. pretty
 graphics. This is IMHO, I'm sure a lot of people will disagree with me, but
 well for one thing the icons that come with helix aren't included, which are
 quite nice IMHO.

2). I understand trying to promote mdk, but those mdk folders in the gnome
menu and the logo in the helix-gnome splash screen are just tacky IMHO.

Also might want to consider going with the new default helix theme, the theme
name is 5 over here, or at least that's how it shows up in gnomecc and
/usr/share/themes.

Keep the helix icons for the gnome menu, they're completely destroyed and
makes the menu look funky.

My 4 last statements we're just rants, but the first one is a problem.

You need to look at this from an end-users point of view.
Rather, a user that has installed helix from helixcode and not mdk and is
switching to mdk's packages.  From my experience, people are gonna be highly
pissed when a lot of they're pretty graphics(icon settings) are broke, as
well desktop icons that don't seem to work at all.

Give it some thought : )

Bryan Paxton



 I spent many hours on this problem myself during the testing of 7.1.  If
 you kill your ~/.gnome directory you get those bland, unchangeable icons
 the next time you start gmc.  But simply deleting the ~/.gnome/metadata.db
 fixes it.  Why the regenerated metadata.db is different from the one
 generated when the .gnome directory is created is beyond me

-- 
   _
 _|_|_
  ( )   *Anton Graham
  /v\  / [EMAIL PROTECTED]


















Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-04 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 

 IMHO, you're wrong. It's not to Mandrake to keep compliant with
 Helix-GNOME but to Helix-GNOME to keep compliant with Mandrake
 distribution (and others Linux distributions). They ship different
 packages for different distributions, they are not distributions makers
 but they ship alternatives (Mandrake, SuSE, etc.) or complements
 (Caldera) to Linux distributions. So, if they really want to be used by
 users, they need to adapt their packages to each distributions. They do
 it, a little, but don't respect each distributions specifications. It's
 bad and sad.

heh I would think they're a little busy coding, I think it's great that they 
even try to keep the spec files indepenent to each distro as much as they do.
But then again, maybe they're right and they should do all the work and we 
simply reap all the benefits.

Bryan Paxton




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 A. Where is the "helix-updater" in Mandrake 7.1?

we don't ship that, MandrakeSoft != HelixCode

 B. How are the Mandrake menus built (the consistent menus between different WM)

/usr/bin/update-menus

and how do you change them?

/usr/doc/menu*/menu.txt

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Mattias Eriksson

At 03 August, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  A. Where is the "helix-updater" in Mandrake 7.1?
 
 we don't ship that, MandrakeSoft != HelixCode

Well, MandrakeSoft != GNU you still ship ALOT of gnu stuff. MandrakeSoft != SUN Still 
have staroffice on some CD aso. 

OK, you dont ship it. But would is be that stupid as you try to make it sound?

//Snaggen

-- 

 
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tvistevägen 26   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36  UMEA Tel:090-198800
SWEDEN   070-5636769
 
'I don't fight for a cause   Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen 
I fight for the fight'   PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc





Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Well, MandrakeSoft != GNU you still ship ALOT of gnu
 stuff. MandrakeSoft != SUN Still have staroffice on some CD aso.

GNU do a distribution of rpm packages ? Staroffice do a distribution
of rpm pacakges ? maybe yes but all package included in Mandrake are
shipped/configured by MandrakeSoft.

 OK, you dont ship it. But would is be that stupid as you try to make
 it sound?

Humm sorry about that, 03:AM here and i believe it has repercussion on
my posts :-\

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Mattias Eriksson

At 03 August, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Well, MandrakeSoft != GNU you still ship ALOT of gnu
  stuff. MandrakeSoft != SUN Still have staroffice on some CD aso.
 
 GNU do a distribution of rpm packages ? Staroffice do a distribution
 of rpm pacakges ? maybe yes but all package included in Mandrake are
 shipped/configured by MandrakeSoft.

Yes, I know. And ofcource that is the only way it should be. But if you ship
helix update you dont ship helix gnome, you just ship a tool to install
helixgnome if people would like to do that...

//Snaggen

-- 

 
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tvistevägen 26   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36  UMEA Tel:090-198800
SWEDEN   070-5636769
 
'I don't fight for a cause   Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen 
I fight for the fight'   PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc





Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Yes, I know. And ofcource that is the only way it should be. But if you ship
 helix update you dont ship helix gnome, you just ship a tool to install
 helixgnome if people would like to do that...

we can't ship a tools who can screwed a default mdk configuration,
maybe a tools for contrib but not for the main/ distrib

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The helix updater is not important as long as the helix updated
 packages appear in the Mandrake Updates, and fast...
 Mandrake DO really need a good updater, with unattended updates.

it's planned, but it's far far too be easy and can take several month
before it going to be implemented (it's not just developing one tools
it also to re-see a lot of packages)...

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Mattias Eriksson

At 03 August, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Yes, I know. And ofcource that is the only way it should be. But if you ship
  helix update you dont ship helix gnome, you just ship a tool to install
  helixgnome if people would like to do that...
 
 we can't ship a tools who can screwed a default mdk configuration,
 maybe a tools for contrib but not for the main/ distrib

OK, I must admit that you have a quite good point there 

//Snaggen

-- 

 
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tvistevägen 26   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36  UMEA Tel:090-198800
SWEDEN   070-5636769
 
'I don't fight for a cause   Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen 
I fight for the fight'   PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc





Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Franck Martin

Bonsoir,

Could you please at least have the mandrake-update read where to find
the mirror list from a file /etc/mandrake-update.conf. This should be
easy and make us, network administrator, happy...(save bandwidth as well
as work). That should be easy...

On the long long term, and very very difficult, I found a firm that
proposes something like SMS, but with the extra monitoring of system
files, which gets reinstalled if deleted by mistake, on a per machine
basis.

Merci
A+

Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

 Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  The helix updater is not important as long as the helix updated
  packages appear in the Mandrake Updates, and fast...
  Mandrake DO really need a good updater, with unattended updates.

 it's planned, but it's far far too be easy and can take several month
 before it going to be implemented (it's not just developing one tools
 it also to re-see a lot of packages)...

 --
 MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
 San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 At 03 August, 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
  Mattias Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Yes, I know. And ofcource that is the only way it should be. But if you
   ship helix update you dont ship helix gnome, you just ship a tool to
   install helixgnome if people would like to do that...
 
  we can't ship a tools who can screwed a default mdk configuration,
  maybe a tools for contrib but not for the main/ distrib

 OK, I must admit that you have a quite good point there

 //Snaggen

Yeah, but mdk needs to keep the helix-gnome packages compliant with 
helix-gnome. 

Up untill now I've been ignoring the mdk helix-gnome packages and sticking 
with helix-update to update my packages as new ones become available. So I 
saw this thread and decided to install the mdk packages. 
 I then exited gnome, and fired up X again and sorry but it's just friggin 
nasty IMHO.  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is, keeping 
helix-gnome raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks should be made.

Run helix-gnome raw and then mdk's helix-gnome and you'll see what I mean : )





Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Could you please at least have the mandrake-update read where to find
 the mirror list from a file /etc/mandrake-update.conf. This should be
 easy and make us, network administrator, happy...(save bandwidth as well
 as work). That should be easy...

all suggetion for Mandrake-update go to dindin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On the long long term, and very very difficult, I found a firm that
 proposes something like SMS, but with the extra monitoring of system
 files, which gets reinstalled if deleted by mistake, on a per machine
 basis.

how difference is from rpm ?

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread David Odin

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:24:57PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
 The helix updater is not important as long as the helix updated packages appear in 
the Mandrake Updates, and fast...
 
 Mandrake DO really need a good updater, with unattended updates.
 
 This is what I have found:
 
 In Mandrake-update.pm file which is installed with the mandrake-update executable, 
you find the line
 mirror=http://www.mandrake-soft.com/mirrors.lst.
 
 If you modify this line and point it to your corporate mirror, you control what gets 
updated.
 
 It would be nice to upgrade this line by checking in a /etc/mandrake-update.conf 
file where we should look for the list
 of mirror. A Network Administrator will remove the default to put his/her own list 
of mirrors...
 
 Now the extra, is to pass a switch to "mandrake-update -a" to automatically update 
all the packages listed without user
 intervention (a cron job).
 
 Problem: the kernels do not update automatically, despite beeing provided in 
update... So there must be a switch in the
 xml to stop the automatic update

  And glibc doesn't upgrade either, and, and...
  An automated updater would be _very_ dangerous.

  The new version of MandrakeUpdate (in Cooker) as some facilities to let
people update their system from a Cooker mirror or from any place on a disk.
Try it and tell me what you think.
 
 This is my 2 Fijian cents.
 
  Is that much? ;-)

 DindinX

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Yeah, but mdk needs to keep the helix-gnome packages compliant with
 helix-gnome.

and cooker ?, we design an Operating System we don't ship only a
few desktop packages...
   
  I then exited gnome, and fired up X again and sorry but it's just friggin 
 nasty IMHO.  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is, keeping 
 helix-gnome raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks should be made.

Suggestions are welcome, our Gnome team will be happy to discuss with
you about the choice they did. What's wrong with the default
configuration ?


-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread David Odin

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:03:45PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
 Bonsoir,
 
 Could you please at least have the mandrake-update read where to find
 the mirror list from a file /etc/mandrake-update.conf. This should be
 easy and make us, network administrator, happy...(save bandwidth as well
 as work). That should be easy...
 
 On the long long term, and very very difficult, I found a firm that
 proposes something like SMS, but with the extra monitoring of system
 files, which gets reinstalled if deleted by mistake, on a per machine
 basis.
 
   Please test the latest MandrakeUpdate from Cooker.

  DindinX

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 03-Aug-00 by Bryan Paxton:
 Basically what I'm trying to get through this is, keeping helix-gnome raw,
 the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks should be made.

Part of the problem (as I see it), Brian, is that a large portion of our
user base is rather inexperienced.  When you run straight helix, you not
only lose the continuity in menus between different managers, but your GNOME
menus won't be updated when you install a new package that is designed to
use the new menu system.

Inexperienced users are not likely to be comfortable with having to create
their own menu entries for every app.

You are correct that there are some striking differences between the two.
One that comes to mind immediately is the mdk GNOME's inability to properly
display GTK themes with light colored text.  They look fine in the preview
window, but you end up with black text on your dark brown buttons after you
apply the thing.

-- 
   _
 _|_|_
  ( )   *Anton Graham
  /v\  / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/(   )X
 (m_m)   GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Michael Irving

The new Mandrake Update rocks my socks.
- Original Message -
From: "David Odin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)


 On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:24:57PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
  The helix updater is not important as long as the helix updated packages
appear in the Mandrake Updates, and fast...
 
  Mandrake DO really need a good updater, with unattended updates.
 
  This is what I have found:
 
  In Mandrake-update.pm file which is installed with the mandrake-update
executable, you find the line
  mirror=http://www.mandrake-soft.com/mirrors.lst.
 
  If you modify this line and point it to your corporate mirror, you
control what gets updated.
 
  It would be nice to upgrade this line by checking in a
/etc/mandrake-update.conf file where we should look for the list
  of mirror. A Network Administrator will remove the default to put
his/her own list of mirrors...
 
  Now the extra, is to pass a switch to "mandrake-update -a" to
automatically update all the packages listed without user
  intervention (a cron job).
 
  Problem: the kernels do not update automatically, despite beeing
provided in update... So there must be a switch in the
  xml to stop the automatic update
 
   And glibc doesn't upgrade either, and, and...
   An automated updater would be _very_ dangerous.

   The new version of MandrakeUpdate (in Cooker) as some facilities to let
 people update their system from a Cooker mirror or from any place on a
disk.
 Try it and tell me what you think.

  This is my 2 Fijian cents.
 
   Is that much? ;-)

  DindinX

 --
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team






Latest MandrakeUpdate(Was Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1) )

2000-08-03 Thread Bryan Paxton

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:03:45PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
  Bonsoir,
 
  Could you please at least have the mandrake-update read where to find
  the mirror list from a file /etc/mandrake-update.conf. This should be
  easy and make us, network administrator, happy...(save bandwidth as well
  as work). That should be easy...
 
  On the long long term, and very very difficult, I found a firm that
  proposes something like SMS, but with the extra monitoring of system
  files, which gets reinstalled if deleted by mistake, on a per machine
  basis.

Please test the latest MandrakeUpdate from Cooker.

   DindinX

I was going to post about this, just been busy this morning...
This is quite a nice improvement IMHO.

A bug which I'm sure you know about is, it doesn't save the packages to 
ignore list, well after you exit and fire it up again you have to back in and 
add all the packages to ignore again. 

dep handling isn't as well though, in fact it's not really handled at all.
What should be implemented is the auto-dep from DrakX IMHO as well as asking 
the user to meet deps bla bla these packages are going to be installed 
[yes][no] ala urpmi style. 

But other than that, I think MandrakeUpdate is on the right path. 
Need a CLI version though : )
But keep up the good work on this, really great job IMHO.








Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Andreas Simon

Anton Graham wrote:

 You are correct that there are some striking differences between the two.
 One that comes to mind immediately is the mdk GNOME's inability to properly
 display GTK themes with light colored text.  They look fine in the preview
 window, but you end up with black text on your dark brown buttons after you
 apply the thing.

BTW, a fix for this is to just delete /usr/share/gtkrc

Cheers,
A.




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Bryan Paxton

*nod* I understand, and I fully understand that it will be for the most part 
inexperienced users using mdk. See the follow up post I made to chmoel's 
response. I didn't even know about the below bug you mentioned : )

But I don't mean taking out functionality of updating the menus(which is a 
whole 'nother situation :  p ) but simply keeping everything more compliant 
and helix-like.

Bryan Paxton

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Submitted 03-Aug-00 by Bryan Paxton:
  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is, keeping helix-gnome
  raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks should be made.

 Part of the problem (as I see it), Brian, is that a large portion of our
 user base is rather inexperienced.  When you run straight helix, you not
 only lose the continuity in menus between different managers, but your
 GNOME menus won't be updated when you install a new package that is
 designed to use the new menu system.

 Inexperienced users are not likely to be comfortable with having to create
 their own menu entries for every app.

 You are correct that there are some striking differences between the two.
 One that comes to mind immediately is the mdk GNOME's inability to properly
 display GTK themes with light colored text.  They look fine in the preview
 window, but you end up with black text on your dark brown buttons after you
 apply the thing.




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Alexander Skwar

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 03:34:01AM -0700, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 we can't ship a tools who can screwed a default mdk configuration,

Yes, please delete all the text editors, mkXYfs, fdisk :-)

Oh, it wsa 03:34 AM when you wrote that, then this is okay .-]

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Alexander Skwar

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:45:59AM -0500, Bryan Paxton wrote:
 Yeah, but mdk needs to keep the helix-gnome packages compliant with 
 helix-gnome. 

Why?  That's the task of Helixcode IMO.

  I then exited gnome, and fired up X again and sorry but it's just friggin 
 nasty IMHO.  Basically what I'm trying to get through this is, keeping 
 helix-gnome raw, the way it comes, and only lil minute tweaks should be made.

What do you mean?  Helix worked like a charm for me, ie. no problems here.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191




RE: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Franck Martin

I will talk to dindin about mandrake-update...


The difference with a RPM, is that:

1) oops a file libveryimportant.so is deleted.
2) The system cron, check from rpms and find out that rpm whatever.rpm is
the one installing libveryimportant.so
3) The system does not re-instal the rpm whatever.rpm (you loose your config
files), but simply extract libveryimportant.so and copy it where it should
be. Mail to admin is sent...

You system is kept maintained with all necessary files to run. Extra a
hacker trying to infiltrate your system will be defeated as his trojan
software will be replaced...

Cheers.

Franck Martin
Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ http://www.sopac.org/ 



-Original Message-
From: Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David odin
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)


Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Could you please at least have the mandrake-update read where to find
 the mirror list from a file /etc/mandrake-update.conf. This should be
 easy and make us, network administrator, happy...(save bandwidth as well
 as work). That should be easy...

all suggetion for Mandrake-update go to dindin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On the long long term, and very very difficult, I found a firm that
 proposes something like SMS, but with the extra monitoring of system
 files, which gets reinstalled if deleted by mistake, on a per machine
 basis.

how difference is from rpm ?

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




RE: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Franck Martin

Salut,

I agree an automatic update would be very dangerous, EXCEPT if it is in a
controlled environment. This would be an option, disabled by default...

Scenario:
I make a mirror(1) of the updates.
I look through it and decide that some rpm are not cool
I copy the cool packages on another place(2), and modify the xml file to
reflect the changes
My network machines gets updated from (2), without me moving.

Advantage: I can add non mdk packages in (2) and get the machines updated

Extra TODO: In (2) I place a file somemachine.update.xml. It adds the
selected rpms described in somemachine.update.xml to somemachine only.

Documentation: Important to understand the structure of the xml files
TODO: An editor that create xml files based on the Packages placed in(2).

Mandrake-update is then coming closer to the MS SMS job packaging that we
all know(??).

Problems: security - security. But we are smart enough to put some
safeguards (Machine signature, Kerebos system...)

RESULT: Mandrake the first Linux to grows alone Think about all the TCO
saved by having your support people stay in one place, when there is a
package to update due to a security alert.

Mandrake as to start to THINK BIG. With 1000's of machine to update on a
LAN.

Franck Martin
Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ http://www.sopac.org/ 



-Original Message-
From: David Odin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)


On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:24:57PM +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
 The helix updater is not important as long as the helix updated packages
appear in the Mandrake Updates, and fast...
 
 Mandrake DO really need a good updater, with unattended updates.
 
 This is what I have found:
 
 In Mandrake-update.pm file which is installed with the mandrake-update
executable, you find the line
 mirror=http://www.mandrake-soft.com/mirrors.lst.
 
 If you modify this line and point it to your corporate mirror, you control
what gets updated.
 
 It would be nice to upgrade this line by checking in a
/etc/mandrake-update.conf file where we should look for the list
 of mirror. A Network Administrator will remove the default to put his/her
own list of mirrors...
 
 Now the extra, is to pass a switch to "mandrake-update -a" to
automatically update all the packages listed without user
 intervention (a cron job).
 
 Problem: the kernels do not update automatically, despite beeing provided
in update... So there must be a switch in the
 xml to stop the automatic update

  And glibc doesn't upgrade either, and, and...
  An automated updater would be _very_ dangerous.

  The new version of MandrakeUpdate (in Cooker) as some facilities to let
people update their system from a Cooker mirror or from any place on a disk.
Try it and tell me what you think.
 
 This is my 2 Fijian cents.
 
  Is that much? ;-)

 DindinX

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Yes, please delete all the text editors, mkXYfs, fdisk :-)

you kidding do you understand there is a real difference between what
you say and what i say ?

 Oh, it wsa 03:34 AM when you wrote that, then this is okay .-]

i have to admit i am not really always clear at this time 

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome + Mandrake menus (mdk7.1)

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 1) oops a file libveryimportant.so is deleted.
 2) The system cron, check from rpms and find out that rpm whatever.rpm is
 the one installing libveryimportant.so
 3) The system does not re-instal the rpm whatever.rpm (you loose your config
 files), but simply extract libveryimportant.so and copy it where it should
 be. Mail to admin is sent...

so it's not a tools to replace rpm, but it's usefull only for big
network, i'll forward to our PS people.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Helix

2000-04-11 Thread ArMiSiS AiEoLn

Ive grabed it and was hopeing to see it in mandrake SOON! It ROCKS!!! and i
havent had ANY BUGS

dave


On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
 I am probably telling you all something that is very old news !
 
 Please bear with me, I live in the UK where we still pay for Internet access
 and I only have a 56K modem !!!
 
 Any way, has any one else grabbed the latest output from the Helix people. It's
 GOOD !
 
 Owen
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
LINUX - Why?
Cause I dont do windows
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




Re: [Cooker] Helix

2000-04-11 Thread Daouda LO

ArMiSiS AiEoLn a écrit :

 Ive grabed it and was hopeing to see it in mandrake SOON! It ROCKS!!! and i
 havent had ANY BUGS

We've packaging most of the packages from helix : Stuffs are in cooker .
Some packages (gnome-core 1.1.5) are not very stable to be included in the distro!



 dave

 On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
  I am probably telling you all something that is very old news !
 
  Please bear with me, I live in the UK where we still pay for Internet access
  and I only have a 56K modem !!!
 
  Any way, has any one else grabbed the latest output from the Helix people. It's
  GOOD !
 
  Owen
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 LINUX - Why?
 Cause I dont do windows
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

--
  /\
 --^^/°°\^^--
| Daouda LOemail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| MandrakeSoft SA|
| working on KDE-Gnome interoperability. |
 






RE: [Cooker] Helix

2000-04-11 Thread geoffrey lee




 ArMiSiS AiEoLn a écrit :

  Ive grabed it and was hopeing to see it in mandrake SOON! It
 ROCKS!!! and i
  havent had ANY BUGS

 We've packaging most of the packages from helix : Stuffs are in cooker .
 Some packages (gnome-core 1.1.5) are not very stable to be
 included in the distro!




hm, how about contribs?

 
 
  dave
 
  On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
   I am probably telling you all something that is very old news !
  
   Please bear with me, I live in the UK where we still pay for
 Internet access
   and I only have a 56K modem !!!
  
   Any way, has any one else grabbed the latest output from the
 Helix people. It's
   GOOD !
  
   Owen
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  LINUX - Why?
  Cause I dont do windows
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 --
   /\
  --^^/°°\^^--
 | Daouda LOemail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
 | MandrakeSoft SA|
 | working on KDE-Gnome interoperability. |
  







Re: [Cooker] Helix

2000-04-11 Thread Vandoorselaere Yoann

Daouda LO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ArMiSiS AiEoLn a écrit :
 
  Ive grabed it and was hopeing to see it in mandrake SOON! It ROCKS!!! and i
  havent had ANY BUGS
 
 We've packaging most of the packages from helix : Stuffs are in cooker .
 Some packages (gnome-core 1.1.5) are not very stable to be included in the distro!

gnome core 1.1.5 (cvs) is more stable than stable gnome-core

-- 
   -- Yoann,  http://prelude.sourceforge.net
 It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc().
 The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.




Re: [Cooker] Helix

2000-04-11 Thread Lord And Master;)

Daouda LO wrote:

 ArMiSiS AiEoLn a écrit :

  Ive grabed it and was hopeing to see it in mandrake SOON! It ROCKS!!! and i
  havent had ANY BUGS

 We've packaging most of the packages from helix : Stuffs are in cooker .
 Some packages (gnome-core 1.1.5) are not very stable to be included in the distro!

 
 
  dave
 
  On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
   I am probably telling you all something that is very old news !
  
   Please bear with me, I live in the UK where we still pay for Internet access
   and I only have a 56K modem !!!
  
   Any way, has any one else grabbed the latest output from the Helix people. It's
   GOOD !
  
   Owen
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  LINUX - Why?
  Cause I dont do windows
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 --
   /\
  --^^/°°\^^--
 | Daouda LOemail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
 | MandrakeSoft SA|
 | working on KDE-Gnome interoperability. |
  

Unmm the gnome-core 1.1.5 is not but the later versions are much more stable, and fyi
the gnome-core is the whole reason for using the new helix rpms!!

imho! though. but it is manly what has been changed except for a few minor bug fix
updates in the other stuff. We WANT the bleeding edge!

-DarkWlf





Re: [Cooker] Helix-Code Gnome

2000-03-19 Thread Patrick Poncet

Hey!

The dependency problems are no big deal... Things still work.  What's more painful is
the bugs relating to the desktop icons and launchers.  I found downgrading to the
original Mandrake 7.0 gmc fixes lots of problems with helix gnome.  In other words,
don't use helix code's gmc, use gnome's original...

cheers!

Patrick

Michael Gallagher wrote:

 Hi,
 Has anyone had any luck with installing Helix-Code Gnome on Madrake 7.0?  I
 gave it a try, downloading the packages and then installing, but had some
 problems.  A couple dependency problems and that I couldn't correct,
 libguile.so.4 and libbfd-2.91.0.24.so.  When I finished the install and
 tried Gnome I had a run of problems.  Most noticibly that the icons on the
 desktop were all screwed up.  I no longer had harddrive icons, just folder
 short cuts, as with all the Mandrake icons.  Is there anyway to keep the
 icons?  I figure that they're lost when upgrading Gnome, but is there anyway
 to prevent this?  I'm hoping that if I go through and solve the dependencies
 I'll be all set.  I also noticed that I couldn't add any clocks to the
 panel.  If I did, the panel would lock up.  Again I'm wondering if the
 dependencies are causing this.  I found the files that I think I needed
 afterwards when I was reinstalling Gnome from the orginal Mandrake files.  I
 was just curious if anyone else had given it a try.  Thanks.

 ~Mike



Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome RPMS

2000-03-13 Thread Patrick Poncet

Where are those RPMS???

Axalon Bloodstone wrote:

 On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Nitin Raja Bhatia wrote:

  Hello All,
 
  I will be producing Helix Gnome rpms optimized for Mandrake.
  They will be available shortly.
  Helix-Gnome is real slick...
 
  Raja

 Already done, just waiting on some files left out of the gnome-media
 SRPM. I'll put up the rest while i wait i guess.

 --
 MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Axalon



Re: [Cooker] Helix Gnome RPMS

2000-03-11 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Nitin Raja Bhatia wrote:

 Hello All,
 
 I will be producing Helix Gnome rpms optimized for Mandrake.
 They will be available shortly. 
 Helix-Gnome is real slick...
 
 Raja

Already done, just waiting on some files left out of the gnome-media
SRPM. I'll put up the rest while i wait i guess.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [Cooker] Helix-Code Gnome

2000-03-11 Thread OS

I installed Helix today, and it's brilliant. This may sway me away from KDE !
But that's not what you want to hear !

Having played with gnome for a couple of years I have been bitten by install
scripts before. I just downloaded everything and worked on the assumption that
RPM was correct for the 75%ish files it said were older than the mdk versions.

The only problem I had was running the gnome panel under Enlightenment, shame
'cos I like E ! but sawmill looks pretty smart too.

I also had the dependency problems, I guess Helix will post these as updates
sometime.

I think this is beta stuff, reading between the lines of publicity. It has a
few quirks, but all in all I think it makes major strides in usability. In
response to Ivan Kerekes, if the only good thing you found was the fact you got
sound working then you weren't looking very far !!!

I e-mailed Helix about my two favourite Linux bug bears. They confirmed that
they will look into non postscript printers and parallel port scanners - hooray !

Keep going, it's worth the effort.

Owen

On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, you wrote:
 Hi,
   Has anyone had any luck with installing Helix-Code Gnome on Madrake 7.0?  I
 gave it a try, downloading the packages and then installing, but had some
 problems.  A couple dependency problems and that I couldn't correct,
 libguile.so.4 and libbfd-2.91.0.24.so.  When I finished the install and
 tried Gnome I had a run of problems.  Most noticibly that the icons on the
 desktop were all screwed up.  I no longer had harddrive icons, just folder
 short cuts, as with all the Mandrake icons.  Is there anyway to keep the
 icons?  I figure that they're lost when upgrading Gnome, but is there anyway
 to prevent this?  I'm hoping that if I go through and solve the dependencies
 I'll be all set.  I also noticed that I couldn't add any clocks to the
 panel.  If I did, the panel would lock up.  Again I'm wondering if the
 dependencies are causing this.  I found the files that I think I needed
 afterwards when I was reinstalling Gnome from the orginal Mandrake files.  I
 was just curious if anyone else had given it a try.  Thanks.
 
 
 ~Mike



Re: [Cooker] Helix-Code Gnome

2000-03-09 Thread Steve Fox

I'm using it...I've also filed several bug reports with Helix for
Mandrake 7.0 dependency. I'd blame both teams really. Mandrake who
should become a Helix GNOME partner because it will improve the quality
of Mandrake's GNOME support. It's also the Helix team's fault because
they basically just copied the Redhat RPMs into a Mandrake directory.
There's no possible way they could have installed them on a Mandrake
system...way too many dependencys and wrong version libraries. You can
get things installed but you will have to --force some of the RPMs (many
just due to RPM alpha-numeric naming conflicts) and some such as guile
will need symbolic links created (eg, Helix GNOME wants libguile.so.4
and Mandrake only provides libguile.so.3 and libguile.so.5). It works
fine once they're installed.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.com