Re: [css-d] float-setup with mysterious top-margin...

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh

On 6 Feb 2006, at 3:49 pm, Jesper Brunholm wrote:

 I've reopened a page with the setup on
 http://www.triomio.dk/testsetup.html, and I am struggling to see how
 this can be collapsing margins. As far as I can gather, the  
 contributing
 factors are (all declared in
 http://www.triomio.dk/script/oldstyle.css, only relevant style is
 quoted below)

 [...]
 below that, the graphical element:

 #sgraf {
   border-top: 4px solid #c08e09;
   width: 300px;
   height: 400px;
   clear: left;
   float: left;
   margin-bottom: 2em;
 }
 []

 I think that it is the clear:left; of #sgraf that is still clearing
 when we get to the floated content. Actually, reconsidering, I think
 that it _should_ do so (considering the rules). I was fooled by
 Explorer's neat behaviour, and did not look far enough back into  
 my setup.

 Can you confirm this, or show me the margin-collapse :-) ?

No margin-collapsing issues to be seen there :-)
here is the same file as a minimal sample (probably won't work in IE).
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/trioMio.php
You are right when you isolate the 'clear:left' in #sgraf as the  
problem.

Better you are to float the whole left-hand column:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/trioMio2.php

If that is what you actually want...


Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://emps.l-c-n.com/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] float-setup with mysterious top-margin...

2006-02-06 Thread Jesper Brunholm

I've reopened a page with the setup on
http://www.triomio.dk/testsetup.html
[...]
I think that it is the clear:left; of #sgraf that is still clearing
when we get to the floated content. 
[...]
Can you confirm this, or show me the margin-collapse :-) ?

 No margin-collapsing issues to be seen there :-)

Thanks - then I probably haven't missed the collapsing-margins concept :-)

 Better you are to float the whole left-hand column:
 http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/trioMio2.php
 If that is what you actually want...

That's the solution I ended up using, see 
http://triomio.dk/index_e.html for an english version - do I interpret 
your anwer right, that you see a problem in this set up?

Thank you again

Best regards

Jesper Brunholm
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] IE7b2's Doctype switch comments

2006-02-06 Thread Alastair Campbell
I was just checking a few of the site's I look after in IE7's new beta,
and was a little worried that some appeared just as in IE6, which I
wasn't expecting.

The two odd ones out are on a 3rd party CMS that doesn't do the XML
declaration properly, and has a comment to kick IE6 into quirks mode.
I'm not sure if it's worth adding to the wiki, but I can see it causing
problems for people if this isn't general knowledge:

Although IE7 now accepts an XML declaration above the doctype, any
comment above the doctype will put it into quirks mode.

Personally, I'm quite happy with this behaviour, it means I can target a
group of browsers with predictable bugs  hacks (IE 5.0 - 7b2). I'll
leave this here if people want to check:
http://alastairc.ac/testing/IE7_Doctypes/

Cheers,

-Alastair
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] float-setup with mysterious top-margin...

2006-02-06 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Jesper Brunholm wrote:
 http://www.triomio.dk/testsetup.html

 I think that it is the clear:left; of #sgraf that is still
 clearing when we get to the floated content.

 Can you confirm this, or show me the margin-collapse :-) ?

You're quite right - no margin-collapse there. It's obvious when I see
the original case. Missed it the first time around :-)

Your solution in http://www.triomio.dk/index_e.html is the right one
for such a clearing-case.

regards
Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] width variation

2006-02-06 Thread Ulrich Wiederhold
Hello,
in a stylesheet I found:

width: 158px;
\width: 160px;
w\idth: 158px;

For which browsers are these different hacks?
and why?
Thanks.

Uli

-- 
Erst mal gar nichts unternehmen, alles andere ergibt sich dann von selbst.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] width variation

2006-02-06 Thread Els
Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
 Hello,

Hi :-)

 in a stylesheet I found:

 width: 158px;
 \width: 160px;
 w\idth: 158px;

 For which browsers are these different hacks?

The first line is setting the desired width for all browsers.
The second line sets a different width for WinIE and MacIE 
(although I've never seen that hack, I think it acts the same as 
the underscore hack: _property:value;)
The third line sets the desired width back for WinIE6 and MacIE5, 
but not WinIE5.

The result is that all browsers apply a width of 158px, while 
WinIE5 applies 160px.

 and why?

Because IE5 doesn't add the borders after applying the width, but 
includes them in the width.
IE6 wouldn't either if it's in quirks mode, so these stylerules 
only make sense in standards mode.
From the above mentioned style rules, I deduct that the element 
in question probably has a left and right border of 1px.

 Thanks.

You're welcome :-)


-- 
Els

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Photo Gallery's

2006-02-06 Thread trystano
Hi all,

I am soon going to implement a online Photo Gallery in CSS and was 
wondering if any of you knew of any good sites that I can use as a 
references. Basically, I'd like to make it crisp and clean, and 
obviously make use of Thumbnails.

Thanks

Tryst
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Photo Gallery's

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Heilmann
 Hi all,

 I am soon going to implement a online Photo Gallery in CSS and was
 wondering if any of you knew of any good sites that I can use as a
 references. Basically, I'd like to make it crisp and clean, and
 obviously make use of Thumbnails.

Floating them in a list worked for me, with some extra DOM you can
make them pretty slick, too:
http://www.icant.co.uk/sandbox/picasa-dom-view/
If you use picasa for your gallery, you can check my template to
generate the example:
http://www.wait-till-i.com/index.php?p=212

General info on how to do the CSS part is in the floatutorial:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/


--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] CSS Menu does not display in IE7beta2

2006-02-06 Thread T. R. Valentine
Although still in early stages, I am stumped as to why the left-side
menu is completely missing from the display in IE7beta2 (WinXPsp2).
The menu displays fine in FF 1.5 and Opera 8.

page: http://plano.lib.il.us/testing/new/test3.html

Any one run into this problem or have an answer?

--
T. R. Valentine
Use a decent browser: Safari, Firefox, Mozilla, Opera
(Avoid IE like the plague it is)
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE won't let static content move up to flow around

2006-02-06 Thread Pringle, Ron


snip

 So this innocent looking documentation attempt
 
   !-- This element fixes the isthereanameforit-bug --
   !--[if IE]
 div class=clear_solvent/div
   ![endif]--
 
 may cause problems that are difficult to debug. Authors are 
 baffled when 
 IE6 kicks one or two characters into the screen where they 
 don't belong to.
 
(
 Or, I haven't had time to test it, are we allowed to add a comment 
 phrase /inside/ the conditional comment?
 
 !--[if expression] comment_phrase  HTML ![endif]--
 or
 !--[if expression] HTML ![endif] comment_phrase --
 
 I don't know, and I did not find a mention of it in [1].
 
 Ingo

Ingo-

I don't know if you can place html comments within the conditional comments 
section, but you could certainly place css comments in there. That would avoid 
the problem entirely, right?

I think I'm one of the few people who've encountered a crashing version of the 
duplicate characters bug, which you helped me solve. I believe the problem in 
my case was an empty div that IE was attempting to duplicate, causing the crash.

Regards,
Ron
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Repost: tool tips + IE(6) = mess

2006-02-06 Thread Joelle Tegwen
I'm working on this demo http://ici1.umn.edu/beta/nceo/ If you click on
either Participation Policy Variables or Response and view the page
in IE it's a total mess. (Mozilla and Firefox are lovely)

I used John and Holly's tool tips
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=4E2C0 and I didn't
see any mention of this being a problem. I used to do a lot of css, but
since then I've gotten out of it so I'm pretty rusty on how to fix this. :)

I tried taking the position:relative off the a when in tables, but that
made the tooltips show up in the upper left hand corner of the content area.

Also, if you go to
http://ici1.umn.edu/beta/nceo/accommodations/state.asp?state=Alabama and
hover over the links you'll notice that the text of the link below shows
through.

Could someone help me figure this out?

Thanks
Joelle



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] IE unscrollable content bug

2006-02-06 Thread David Ross
I posted a question on Friday and was told I might be experiencing the ie
unscrollable content bug on this page:
http://www.lowandtritt.com/new/communicate.html

Now, I have made a #container { position: relative; top: 0; left: 0; height:
1%; }
and have put everything into this div. Still, the pc's I view this on here
are still showing no scrollbar.

This page says if I add height: 1% to the relative positioned container
everything should be fixed. Not working though.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/unscrollable.html

Any ideas? Thanks.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Edith Karnitsch @ Terranetwork
Dear list,

I usually can solve most issues by reading this list, but with this problem
I've reached a dead end.

I've created an HTML form and in IE the reset button appears towards the
middle of the page, rather than being floated left as I'd like it to (in FF
it all looks okay).

Form page here:
http://www.terranetwork.net/test/enquiry_form_060206.php
For test purposes I have included the CSS inline.

Any advice on how to position the button to the left in IE would be greatly
appreciated! 

PS: form not yet completed - pressing buttons will redirect to homepage. I'm
using IE6 on WinXP and FF 1.5.0.1 on WinXP. For some reasons, other forms
I've created float as expected ... so something is wrong, but as I said -
dead end, just can't find the error. 

many thanks!
Edith Karnitsch 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Pringle, Ron
Edith Karnitsch wrote:


 I've created an HTML form and in IE the reset button 
 appears towards the
 middle of the page, rather than being floated left as I'd 
 like it to (in FF
 it all looks okay).
 
 Form page here:
 http://www.terranetwork.net/test/enquiry_form_060206.php
 For test purposes I have included the CSS inline.
 
 Any advice on how to position the button to the left in IE 
 would be greatly
 appreciated!

Edith-

Did you fix this issue? It looks ok to me in IE6/Win2K. The Reset button
is left of the Request Quote button, but not so far left that it lines
up with the left border above it. It looks ok to me. Is this not where
its supposed to be?

Regards,
Ron
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's -( related question)

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Heilmann
  Floating them in a list worked for me, with some extra DOM you can
  make them pretty slick, too:
  http://www.icant.co.uk/sandbox/picasa-dom-view/
  If you use picasa for your gallery, you can check my template to
  generate the example:
  http://www.wait-till-i.com/index.php?p=212
 

 I have a question about this that I haven't seen answered:
 Is there a way to have thumbnails of varying sizes aligned along their
 bottom margins AND have captions that are top-aligned? (esp. noticeable
 when the captions are more than one line).
 Similar to this example using tables:
 http://66.117.159.181/products_buy_posters3.php

Probably, I think it'll need help of some of the CSS gods here
(Christian, Ingo...). Personally I would use the images as backgrounds
and cover them with a transparent GIF with the correct alternative
text the size of the whole cell, give the text content a top-padding
that is big enough and voila.

--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Edith Karnitsch @ Terranetwork
Ron - thanks for checking! No, it's not fixed (wish it were!). 

The button should line up with the left edge of the box above. I realize it
doesn't actually create an error but I just don't understand why it's not
over on the left as in FF. I'm still learning CSS so I guess every problem
is an opportunity :) Would just love to know why and what I can do to
rectify.

edith 

Pringle, Ron wrote:
Did you fix this issue? It looks ok to me in IE6/Win2K. The Reset button
is left of the Request Quote button, but not so far left that it lines
up with the left border above it. It looks ok to me. Is this not where
its supposed to be?


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Boxes breaking out of formation (floats)

2006-02-06 Thread Richard Brown
Hi Guys

Could someone take a look at this site please? (CSS Embedded)

http://www.theoldcoachworks.org.uk/

I am informed that the end box is breaking out of formation in IE 
(AOL). Is this correct and if so is there a reason please?

Many thanks.
-- 
Rich
http://www.cregy.co.uk
Embracing what God does for you is the best thing you can do for him. 
Romans 12 v 1

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's -( related question)

2006-02-06 Thread Susanne Jäger
Don Hinshaw wrote:

 I have a question about this that I haven't seen answered:
 Is there a way to have thumbnails of varying sizes aligned along their 
 bottom margins AND have captions that are top-aligned? (esp. noticeable 
 when the captions are more than one line).
 Similar to this example using tables: 
 http://66.117.159.181/products_buy_posters3.php

I don't think that it will work with completely unknown content, but if 
you just have to distinguish portrait and landscape images and none or 
some text, you can do a lot if you set min-width and min-height to the 
floated (list-)boxes ,give them position relative and play with 
position: absolute and margins for the caption.
Not a gallery, images top-aligned but multiple associated text-boxes 
http://casaaxarquia.com/forsale/plot.php might give you some ideas.

Susanne


-- 
http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lottumstr. 22, 10119 Berlin, Tel: 030 - 440 483 47
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Pringle, Ron

 Ron - thanks for checking! No, it's not fixed (wish it were!). 
 
 The button should line up with the left edge of the box 
 above. I realize it
 doesn't actually create an error but I just don't understand 
 why it's not
 over on the left as in FF. I'm still learning CSS so I guess 
 every problem
 is an opportunity :) Would just love to know why and what I can do to
 rectify.
 
 edith

Edith-

It appears that this is a bug in IE [0]. Your input#reset is inheriting
the 100px left margin from the #enquiry form container.

To solve it, you will need to feed IE a -100px margin-left on your
#reset. I added the following to fix it locally:

* html #reset {
margin-left:-100px;
}

You may wish to place this in a conditional comment instead.

Regards,
Ron

[0] after googling for IE css input bug, I came across this post:

http://jennifergrucza.com/blog/archives/2004/08/31/weird-ie-bug-inputs-i
ncorrectly-inherit-horizontal-margins-when-theyre-in-a-fieldset
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE unscrollable content bug

2006-02-06 Thread Bruno Fassino
David Ross wrote:

 I posted a question on Friday and was told I might be
 experiencing the ie
 unscrollable content bug on this page:
 http://www.lowandtritt.com/new/communicate.html

I believe you have a sligthly different bug here [1].
A solution could be to remove the top:205px on content-narrow, and get the
same result with padding-top:205px on the same element.
My first try was to use a margin-top:205px, but this seems to trigger yet
another bug in IE.  If I were you, I would try to use less positioning
relative/absolute in that page.

hth,
Bruno

[1] http://www.brunildo.org/test/IEWrelscroll.html

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's -( related question)

2006-02-06 Thread Al Sparber
From: Susanne Jäger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I don't think that it will work with completely unknown content, but 
 if
 you just have to distinguish portrait and landscape images and none 
 or
 some text, you can do a lot if you set min-width and min-height to 
 the
 floated (list-)boxes ,give them position relative and play with
 position: absolute and margins for the caption.
 Not a gallery, images top-aligned but multiple associated text-boxes
 http://casaaxarquia.com/forsale/plot.php might give you some 
 ideas.

Or you can save some energy, use a table for your thumbnails, and have 
lots of fun using CSS to, uh, style things :-)

-- 
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday.






__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's -( related question)

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Heilmann
  I don't think that it will work with completely unknown content, but
  if
  you just have to distinguish portrait and landscape images and none
  or
  some text, you can do a lot if you set min-width and min-height to
  the
  floated (list-)boxes ,give them position relative and play with
  position: absolute and margins for the caption.
  Not a gallery, images top-aligned but multiple associated text-boxes
  http://casaaxarquia.com/forsale/plot.php might give you some
  ideas.

 Or you can save some energy, use a table for your thumbnails, and have
 lots of fun using CSS to, uh, style things :-)

Well, the cool thing about floated thumbnails is that they fill up the
space that is available without causing horizontal scrolling, which
can be rather handy.

--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE unscrollable content bug

2006-02-06 Thread David Ross
Got it...thanks.



  I posted a question on Friday and was told I might be
  experiencing the ie
  unscrollable content bug on this page:
  http://www.lowandtritt.com/new/communicate.html

 A solution could be to remove the top:205px on content-narrow, and get the
 same result with padding-top:205px on the same element.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's

2006-02-06 Thread David Laakso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am soon going to implement a online Photo Gallery in CSS and was 
wondering if any of you knew of any good sites that I can use as a 
references. Basically, I'd like to make it crisp and clean, and 
obviously make use of Thumbnails.
Tryst

A simple question is becoming a complicated answer.
See image galleries on this page:
http://www.brunildo.org/test/index.html
And putting the caption on top:
http://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/figures.html
Regards,
~davidLaakso
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Ingo Chao
Pringle, Ron wrote:
 Ron - thanks for checking! No, it's not fixed (wish it were!). 

 The button should line up with the left edge of the box 
 above. I realize it
 doesn't actually create an error but I just don't understand 
 why it's not
 over on the left as in FF. I'm still learning CSS so I guess 
 every problem
 is an opportunity :) Would just love to know why and what I can do to
 rectify.

 edith
 
 Edith-
 
 It appears that this is a bug in IE [0]. Your input#reset is inheriting
 the 100px left margin from the #enquiry form container.
 
 To solve it, you will need to feed IE a -100px margin-left on your
 #reset. I added the following to fix it locally:
 
 * html #reset {
   margin-left:-100px;
 }
 
 You may wish to place this in a conditional comment instead.


As an alternative to Ron's Fix, you may try

   zoom:1; /*[1]*/
on
   form

as IE7b2 still shows this bug
(did not re-re-reinstall IE6 yet, so I can't test it)

The negative margin does work on IE7 too, but not the star html hack. So 
you have to put this into CC either way, since zoom does not validate.

Ingo

[1] http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html#hackmanagement

-- 
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Boxes breaking out of formation (floats)

2006-02-06 Thread Pringle, Ron
Rich wrote:

 Hi Guys
 
 Could someone take a look at this site please? (CSS Embedded)
 
 http://www.theoldcoachworks.org.uk/
 
 I am informed that the end box is breaking out of formation in IE 
 (AOL). Is this correct and if so is there a reason please?
 
 Many thanks.
 -- 
 Rich

Rich-

Hmm. The main problem in IE is that there is invalid html code in your
document. You need to enclose each photo caption within p tags.
Currently you have:

div class=in ltin tpin
a href=http://www.theoldcoachworks.org.uk/rooms.html;img
src=Old%20Coachworks_files/ocw-outside.jpg height=80
width=100OurbrRooms/a
/div

You need to have:

div class=in ltin tpin
a href=http://www.theoldcoachworks.org.uk/rooms.html;img
src=Old%20Coachworks_files/ocw-outside.jpg height=80
width=100/apOurbrRooms/p
/div

If you want the captions to be linked as well, simply surround them with
an a href tag identical to the one you're using on the image above it.

This will fix the problem of the text running up next to the images on
the right side, which is causing your box sizes to expand and some of
them to drop to the next line.

However... even after fixing this, one box drops. You simply don't have
enough room in the container for each of those boxes. You should revisit
the size of the container or margins/padding on the boxes. I fixed it by
expanding the size of the overall container by 10 pixels.

In the long run, since you've used ems for sizing the boxes, you will
get some boxes dropping if the person viewing the site changes their
text size settings. I'd recommend resetting the boxes in pixel units,
and simply allowing the captions to expand in size within the boxes.
This will end up fitting your needs better I think.

You also need to validate your HTML and CSS:

html:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http://www.theoldcoachworks.
org.uk/

Starting out with valid code will help you solve plenty of problems.

Hope this helps you.

Regards,
Ron
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Photo Gallery's -( related question)

2006-02-06 Thread Al Sparber
From: Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Or you can save some energy, use a table for your thumbnails, and 
 have
 lots of fun using CSS to, uh, style things :-)

Well, the cool thing about floated thumbnails is that they fill up the
space that is available without causing horizontal scrolling, which
can be rather handy.



Yes. I imagine a table can work depending on the presentation goals - 
floated elements in others. I like David Laasko's examples much 
better - though I still think a list is not necessary. There are lots 
of cool possiblities in using CSS to give the indivisual thumbs 
pizzazz, too.

-- 
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday.








__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Boxes breaking out of formation (floats)

2006-02-06 Thread David Laakso
Richard Brown wrote:

Hi Guys

Could someone take a look at this site please? (CSS Embedded)

http://www.theoldcoachworks.org.uk/

I am informed that the end box is breaking out of formation in IE 
(AOL). Is this correct and if so is there a reason please?

Many thanks.
  

Uncooperative little guys, arn't they?
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=226076
Best,
~davidLaakso
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Edith Karnitsch @ Terranetwork
Ron - big thank you! The problem is exactly as described in the links below
and that gave me an idea ...

Previously I had the input buttons outside a fieldset - I've now included
the input buttons in the fieldset and the buttons now float correctly! Looks
like it does have to do with the structure of form / fieldset / div / input
which triggers the incorrect inheritance of the left-margin from a
containing element and by positioning the button input element outside the
fieldset it all got wonky. 

To explain:
form/fieldset/div/input - all okay
form/div/input - wonky in IE (left-margin inherited from form)

many thanks for your help! edith 
(now I just got to write a PHP script to go with the form :) 

Pringle, Ron wrote:  

It appears that this is a bug in IE [0]. Your input#reset is inheriting
the 100px left margin from the #enquiry form container.

[0] after googling for IE css input bug, I came across this post:

http://jennifergrucza.com/blog/archives/2004/08/31/weird-ie-bug-inputs-incor
rectly-inherit-horizontal-margins-when-theyre-in-a-fieldset

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] HTML/PHP form - button problem in IE

2006-02-06 Thread Edith Karnitsch @ Terranetwork
Ingo - sorry, had solved issue locally and not posted onto server. To
confirm

problem:
http://www.terranetwork.net/test/enquiry_form_060206.php
solution:
http://www.terranetwork.net/test/enquiry_form_060206_solved.php

The grey border of the fieldset is only in the test code -my final design is
differently styled. But the buttons now behave as desired!

I'm actually not sure why I had the input buttons outside the fieldset in
the first place. For now I'm happy to place the input buttons inside the
fieldset - seems least worrying with regards to hacks / browsers but good to
know the other options for future reference - you'll never know with IE when
you need them :)

many thanks  to everybody!
Edith 


Ingo Chao wrote: 
as IE7b2 still shows this bug

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Can div be wider than viewport without horizontal scoll bar?

2006-02-06 Thread James Eaton
Is there a way to have a div wider than the viewport without causing the 
browser to display a horizontal scroll bar?

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can div be wider than viewport without horizontal scoll bar?

2006-02-06 Thread Rob Mientjes
On 06/02/06, James Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is there a way to have a div wider than the viewport without causing the
 browser to display a horizontal scroll bar?

position: absolute; will take it out of the flow. Any flow, so a
200%-wide absolutely positioned div will take that space, but not
physically. Only virtually, if you will.

HTH

-Rob.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can div be wider than viewport without horizontal scoll bar?

2006-02-06 Thread Jonathan Carter
James Eaton wrote:
 Is there a way to have a div wider than the viewport without causing the 
 browser to display a horizontal scroll bar?

 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

   
If you set the overflow of the div's container to hidden, that would 
allow the div to be as wide as you want without causing any scrollbars 
to display.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] positioning image to bottom of div, top of footer

2006-02-06 Thread Dann S. Washko
Roger Roelofs wrote:

 1: Validate.

Yeah, I should have been more diligent about this.

 2: Remove the image from the html
 3: Class or ID the container div around everything between .navbar and 
 .footer
 4: Style it with padding-left: 140px; background: #b4c2da 
 url(/images/montage_top.png) bottom left no-repeat; margin-bottom: 0;
 


I don't know why I did not think of that.  It works great.  I guess 
there is no way to put an image on the page like that but have any 
content that would appear above the image fill in the empty space as if 
the image were floated.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Using IE7b2 for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Jakob Persson
Hello everyone,

 

I recently downloaded IE7 Beta 2 in order to see how the new design of my
site is rendered using it and there are some serious issues, they are
rendering bugs even and they do not manifest in IE6 or any other browser. So
my question is, should I use IE7b2 as a reference browser and try and sort
these issues with it in mind or is it wiser to wait worrying about it until
IE7 is actually released when I can tell whether the issues are there to
stay or no?

 

Any advice welcome!

 

Sincerely,

 

Jakob Persson

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Line-height in drop-down not adjustable

2006-02-06 Thread dpgirago
Howdy,

I'm still getting my feet wet with CSS;  the waters are deep!

I've culled a horizontal navigation bar with a drop-down from a couple of
places, and I can't seem to alter the line height in the drop-down, which
is too high in IE.

I'm testing in IE6, Gecko 1.7.12, and FireFox 1.5.0. Can someone suggest
how to alter this?

A second issue is that I've used the  !important  hack for display in
IE, although I've paid attention today to the  conditional comments 
suggestions.  Can I jump in and out of these conditionals - as I might when
intermixing PHP code with HTML- or is this used in some different manner?
I've read  
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
 
and tried to implement but didn't get the expected results: it seemed to
invalidate the class where it was used.

CSS is embedded in the page:

http://home.capecod.net/~cape84/Start/navigate.html

Thanks very much,

David


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] WebKit and button/submit styling

2006-02-06 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon

On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:37, Jan Brasna wrote:

 Can anyone confirm this?

It was posted on the WebKit blog a while back, so yes, it is  
accepting the CSS styling.

- Geoffrey Sneddon
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Line-height in drop-down not adjustable

2006-02-06 Thread Adam Kuehn
At 02:06 PM 2/6/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I can't seem to alter the line height in the drop-down, which
is too high in IE.

I believe this is the white-space bug.  IE will render the white 
spaces between list items.  One good technique for defeating the bug 
is to put the white space inside the list item tags, like so:

ullistuff/li
   limore stuff/li
   liand so on/li/ul

Note that the line break is INSIDE the tags, so there is no white 
space BETWEEN the tags.  That's generally the easiest way to do it, 
although there are other methods, as well.

A second issue is that I've used the  !important  hack for display in
IE, although I've paid attention today to the  conditional comments 
suggestions.  Can I jump in and out of these conditionals - as I might when
intermixing PHP code with HTML- or is this used in some different manner?

You can't put conditional comments directly into a stylesheet at 
all.  Typically, they are used to serve up a link to an independent 
IE-only stylesheet, like this:

head
   link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=regularstyles.css /
   !--[if lte IE 6]
   link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=ieonlystyles.css /
   ![endif]--
/head

Note that the conditional comments do not appear inside a style 
block, but are used directly in the document head to serve a link to 
a stylesheet.

HTH,


-Adam Kuehn 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Line-height in drop-down not adjustable

2006-02-06 Thread Kim Finleyson
I've culled a horizontal navigation bar with a drop-down from a couple
of places, and I can't seem to alter the line height in the drop-down,
which is too high in IE.

David,

You can use conditional CSS to adjust the position in IE. Add this CSS
in the head, below your styles and just before you start the javascript:

!--[if ie]
style type=text/css media=all
#navGrp {   /* this is the
containing div for the horizontal nav group */
position: absolute;
top: 20%;
left: 13%;
width: auto;
}  
/style 

** Change the top to whatever percentage you want. As for mixing
important and conditional CSS, I am not exactly sure how to answer
that question. IE will just use all the styles that are defined in the
first block of CSS except for the ones that are overridden by
conditional CSS. 

You can of course import an entirely different style sheet for IE. You
create a new style sheet with just the changed styles for IE or just add
the styles to the head - both ways work. 

Hope this helps, 

Kim


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Line-height in drop-down not adjustable

2006-02-06 Thread dpgirago

 I can't seem to alter the line height in the drop-down, which
 is too high in IE.

 I believe this is the white-space bug.  IE will render the white
 spaces between list items.  One good technique for defeating the bug
 is to put the white space inside the list item tags, like so:

 ullistuff/li
   limore stuff/li
   liand so on/li/ul

 Note that the line break is INSIDE the tags, so there is no white
 space BETWEEN the tags.  That's generally the easiest way to do it,
 although there are other methods, as well.

Thanks for the suggestion, Adam.

As a test, I put the whole navigation group on a single line.

It shrunk the line-height of the top-level navigation but left the
sub-level untouched:
http://home.capecod.net/~cape84/Start/navigate2.html

Gives me some more stuff to think about, though.

David


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] css scrollable tables..again

2006-02-06 Thread Riccardo Lora
Hi paul,
i've looked at your demo too. I found it useful for understanding the
basis of  css
scrollable tables techniques, but, as i told, it is something lack.
For example: i see an horizontal scrollbar, while i expected to see
anyone (under Firefox).
Morevover: your examples use fixed columns width, and this is a limit
for my needs.
Howerver, thanks for the hint :)

 In 2004 I came up with a solution to this problem:
 http://novitskisoftware.com/demos/fixedtableheads/fixedtableheads.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Background Images Again

2006-02-06 Thread Zellie D . McClelland
Apologies for my neophyte status.

I now am having difficulty getting my background image to appear
in a content div.

http://www.zdsign.com/gwp/new2.html
http://www.zdsign.com/gwp/new2.css

Can anyone recommend the best CSS guide book?

Thank you ever so much. 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Using IE7b2 for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Tyson Tate
In short, it's a beta. In long:

http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/02/03/charting-ie7b2/

Regards,
Tyson

--
Tyson Tate
* Graphic Designer, CalPoly Library
* Assistant Librarian  Member, Mustang Band
* Team Member, CalPoly Triathlon Team
* Webmaster  Active, Kappa Kappa Psi
* Editor, Entropy Magazine
* Freelance Graphic Designer


On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Jakob Persson wrote:

 Hello everyone,

 I recently downloaded IE7 Beta 2 in order to see how the new design  
 of my
 site is rendered using it and there are some serious issues, they are
 rendering bugs even and they do not manifest in IE6 or any other  
 browser. So
 my question is, should I use IE7b2 as a reference browser and try  
 and sort
 these issues with it in mind or is it wiser to wait worrying about  
 it until
 IE7 is actually released when I can tell whether the issues are  
 there to
 stay or no?

 Any advice welcome!

 Sincerely,
 Jakob Persson
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Fluid design width problem

2006-02-06 Thread Jared Lyon
 Hi all, I seem to be having a bit of a problem getting a div to fill the
 width of the screen.  Here's the trouble page:
 http://www.rit.edu/upub/new/contact_us2.html
 
 Can anyone help me get the maincontent div to fill the remaining width of
 the screen?
 
 In order to get it to fill the width of the page, you have to leave a
 width off, and you can't float it. If you float it, it will expand to
 the width of its content -- and you have a bunch of blocks in there that
 want to be 100% of the window.  They successfully become 100% of the
 window and push #maincontent down in the process.
 
 So, remove the width and the float and apply margin-left: 180px to
 #maincontent.  Your new problem then becomes that the clearers you have
 within #maincontent are clearing the #sidebar too. This is because
 #sidebar and #maincontent are in the same block formatting context.
 You need to create a new block formatting context for #maincontent so
 that clearers within it pay no mind to #sidebar.  The float you had on
 there before was establishing a new context, but it was unusable with a
 fluid layout.  Luckily, you have several different ways:
 http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#q15
 
 I applied display: table-cell to #maincontent in Firefox and it worked
 great. If this doesn't work in other browsers, you can try display:
 inline-block on them.


Thanks for your reply, Zoe.  It's always encouraging when someone
compliments someone else's work. With this nagging clearer/float problem, I
needed a boost of encouragement.

That being said.  I am still having problems and was wondering if anyone
had any more ideas.

I've tried your suggestions of display:table-cell and
display:inline-block.  The table-cell works mostly in Firefox (but then
the maincontent div doesn't fill the whole screen at a large screen size),
in IE the table cell has a space between the contacts (because of the nav on
the left and clearer).  With the inline-block method Firefox does what IE
was doing with table-cell.

All I can say is UGH!  Add to this the fact that I need a sidebar on the
right, and I just can't win because then even if I get the left side working
correctly, the sidebar screws with those clearers. Is there some way to do
this thing without putting clearers in my div.items?

Anyway, I've reduced what I need down to a little diagram with just 6
block-level elements.  Here's a link to the diagram image, including the
requirements for each:
http://www.rit.edu/upub/new/whatineed.gif

So, to any kind soul that could help. Is the layout pictured in my diagram
even possible to do with CSS and get it working on the major browsers?  I
just can't seem to get it to work right.  The second div.item keeps
displaying vertically below where either the sitenav of the sidebar ends.

Again, thanks in advance for any more advice.
-o-
Jared Lyon
RIT University Publications

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Line-height in drop-down not adjustable

2006-02-06 Thread francky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I believe this is the white-space bug.  IE will render the white
spaces between list items.  One good technique for defeating the bug
is to put the white space inside the list item tags, like so:

ullistuff/li
  limore stuff/li
  liand so on/li/ul

Note that the line break is INSIDE the tags, so there is no white
space BETWEEN the tags.  That's generally the easiest way to do it,
although there are other methods, as well.



Thanks for the suggestion, Adam.

As a test, I put the whole navigation group on a single line.

It shrunk the line-height of the top-level navigation but left the
sub-level untouched:
http://home.capecod.net/~cape84/Start/navigate2.html

Gives me some more stuff to think about, though.

David

Hi David,
I've some more to think over: just IE-only adapting the padding of the 
li's, then the li
 li or single code line is not needed.
See testpage over here 
http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/test-navigate.html.
I placed the IE-code in a conditional comment; seems all the other 
IE-hacks can possibly be dangerous in IE7...
As long as there is no external style sheet needed, the CC can be placed 
directly in the head as well.
Decisions, decisions! ;-)

Greetings,
francky

ps: something in the DOCtype is not 100%, tells the html-validator.



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Using IE7b2 for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Cecil Ward
 is it wiser to wait worrying about it until IE7 is actually released when
I can tell whether the issues are there to stay or no?

See
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/02/03/charting-ie7b2/#comment-14367

Yes and no. There's no point doing any rework or expending much effort on a
release that is so early and so broken in certain areas.

But don't wait until the final release, keep an eye on the later, more
complete and more dependable 'real' betas.

Cecil Ward.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Using IE7b2 for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Jakob Persson

Cecil and Tyson: Thank you for your advice. Pretty much everything works
perfectly apart from this detail, no hacks applied, so I'll see how things
work once the RC versions start coming.

Thanks,

Jakob

-Original Message-
From: Cecil Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:37 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Using IE7b2 for testing

 is it wiser to wait worrying about it until IE7 is actually released when
I can tell whether the issues are there to stay or no?

See
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/02/03/charting-ie7b2/#comment-14367

Yes and no. There's no point doing any rework or expending much effort on a
release that is so early and so broken in certain areas.

But don't wait until the final release, keep an eye on the later, more
complete and more dependable 'real' betas.

Cecil Ward.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] z-index? content menu hiding behind header

2006-02-06 Thread cj
on a particular set of pages in my web site, i have a small, secondary
tab-like menu in addition to the main navigation.  on this set of
pages, i'd like to move the main content area (which includes the
sub-menu) up a little so that a big gap doesn't appear where the sub
menu is taking up vertical space.

the problem occurs in ff 1.5 (and opera 8.51) where the sub menu is
hidden behind a blank area that the menu div is occupying.  i tried
putting position: relative; on the menu and sub menu to get z-index
to work but i wasn't able to get the sub menu on top.  i'm not even
sure why it doesn't show up, as nothing in the menu area has a
background that should be filling that area in.  ie6 shows the menu
where i'd like it to be.

html and css validate except for a css line-height error that i don't
understand.

http://sltclan.com/images/cj/z-index-problem.html

==
other questions that are bugging me but not as bad as the menu:

- is there any way to get ie to show my includes area 100% height
like firefox?  notice how the grey area only goes as far down as the
content.  and dang ie6's we-don't-do-alpha-transparency...

- is there any way to get ff/ie to expand the whole red area to fill
in the browser window (minus header/footer)?  my ideal look is the
vertical red bar to extend to the footer regardless of browser height
so that i don't need that retarded red bar at the bottom to show an
end to the section (since the right hand side has a background tint
that cuts off).  i tried putting height: 100% in the parents but i'm
not getting something right as it never worked.

- how can i move my background globe picture up 1-2em so that it
clears the footer?  it needs to stay on the body element(?), though.


note: for anyone who wants to try a mouseover dom inspector, click the
modi link on the menu and choose mouseover dom inspector or
modiv2.  very, very handy tools.

thanks everyone.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] CSS Menu does not display in IE7beta2 // ALA Holy Grail fails in IE7b2

2006-02-06 Thread T. R. Valentine
On 06/02/06, Pringle, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 TR Valentine wrote:

  Although still in early stages, I am stumped as to why the left-side
  menu is completely missing from the display in IE7beta2 (WinXPsp2).
  The menu displays fine in FF 1.5 and Opera 8.
 
  page: http://plano.lib.il.us/testing/new/test3.html
 
  Any one run into this problem or have an answer?

 I see you're using the new holy grail layout from ALA.

Well, trying to! I've modified it to use ems instead of pixels for the
left column so the menu can grow with change of text size -- maybe
that modification creates an unsolvable problem.

 You forgot to include the fix for IE:

 * html #menu {
   left: 150px;   /* value equal to the right col width */
 }

According to http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail that is
supposed to be for IE6. I tried adding the fix, but it did not fix the
problem.

I went to http://www.alistapart.com/d/holygrail/example_1.html with
IE7b2 and found the left column is also missing. So at least there is
consistency in the problem.

I know there will be other problems (especially in IE sigh), but I'm
trying to win one battle at a time!
:-)


--
T. R. Valentine
Use a decent browser: Safari, Firefox, Mozilla, Opera
(Avoid IE like the plague it is)
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] z-index? content menu hiding behind header

2006-02-06 Thread francky
cj wrote:

[...]
html and css validate except for a css line-height error that i don't
understand.

http://sltclan.com/images/cj/z-index-problem.html

==
other questions that are bugging me but not as bad as the menu:

- [...]
- how can i move my background globe picture up 1-2em so that it
clears the footer?  it needs to stay on the body element(?), though.
[...]

Hi cj,
Two out of the bunch:
- The css-error means that you didn't give a unit for the amount of the 
line-height: Without units some browsers don't know what to measure: px 
or em or miles. ;-)
- body {background: transparent url(graphics/bg-service-1.png) no-repeat 
fixed right 80%; }

francky
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Peter Lindstrom
yes, I have tried both the faux columns approach that you use and the large
padding solution.. can't get either  to work very well.

maybe you can correct me if I am wrong but the faux column approach sets a
body background because the body tag will cover the whole page and therefore
extend the height of the column.

in my particular case (http://www.allanalog.com/aaw/) the column I am trying
to stretch is the center column in middle section of my page (with About Us
at the top) - so ideally I would like to have a wrapper only around column 2
and 3 (first column is generated by a CMS system and it is complex to wrap
that one as well) where I thought I could (as you do with body) put
repeating background image in the wrapper DIV... but, as I am guessing.. it
is not like adding it to body; as it does not repeat the same anywhere else.

I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can be
used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex -
but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).

seemed like a nice idea though.. maybe in a few years. 

Peter Lindstrom
All Analog - Technical Design Consulting
Ottawa, ON
Voice:  613-612-1419
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.allanalog.com  
 


::-Original Message-
::From: Ricky Zhou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:14 PM
::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it
::
::On 2/5/06, Peter Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:: I have managed to use this method to get what I was looking for.. but I
::had
:: sort of been hoping there was a real way of stretching columns without
:: that technique since there are limitations when doing this.. for example
::-
:: the side column must be fixed width (which isn't really that big a deal
::in
:: most cases)..
::The method described is used to get the container to stretch fully
::(the border is a completely different issue, which I solve with faux
::columns).  If you want to avoid this, I think some people use a huge
::paddings/negative margins to stretch the columns to theh container
::(padding-bottom: 32767px; margin-bottom: -32767px;).  Personally, I
::think that the image is a more flexible/clean solution, though.
::
::Hope this helps,
::Ricky

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Seona Bellamy
On 07/02/06, Peter Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 in my particular case (http://www.allanalog.com/aaw/) the column I am
 trying
 to stretch is the center column in middle section of my page (with About
 Us
 at the top) - so ideally I would like to have a wrapper only around column
 2
 and 3 (first column is generated by a CMS system and it is complex to wrap
 that one as well) where I thought I could (as you do with body) put
 repeating background image in the wrapper DIV... but, as I am guessing..
 it
 is not like adding it to body; as it does not repeat the same anywhere
 else.


There is a way to make a wrapper extend to the height of the body element. I
believe the trick is to set both the html and body elements to have a height
of 100%, and give your wrapper a height of 100% as well (although I've often
used min-height, which I find makes 'good' browsers play nicer and gets
treated as height by IE).

So you end up with something along the lines of:

html, body { min-height: 100% }
#wrapper { min-height: 100% }

Then it should just be a matter of what you put into the wrapper and what
you exclude.

Hope it helps,

Seona.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Rahul Gonsalves
Peter:

Peter Lindstrom wrote:
 yes, I have tried both the faux columns approach that you use and the large
 padding solution.. can't get either  to work very well.

 maybe you can correct me if I am wrong but the faux column approach sets a
 body background because the body tag will cover the whole page and therefore
 extend the height of the column.

 in my particular case (http://www.allanalog.com/aaw/) the column I am trying
 to stretch is the center column in middle section of my page (with About Us
 at the top) - so ideally I would like to have a wrapper only around column 2
 and 3 (first column is generated by a CMS system and it is complex to wrap
 that one as well) where I thought I could (as you do with body) put
 repeating background image in the wrapper DIV... but, as I am guessing.. it
 is not like adding it to body; as it does not repeat the same anywhere else.
   
?? - It does repeat the same everywhere. Simply enclose the middle 
portion of your page in a wrapper division and then add the faux-column 
to that. This is exactly what I am trying to do on this page, and have 
managed to do as well.

http://cfl.in/

Note the sidebar, and the main body - two column solution, with a 
faux-column.

You might have to do a google for a Sticky footer if you want a footer 
that stays at the bottom of the browser viewport if the content doesn't 
fill it. These two solutions are *not* exclusive to one another.
 I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can be
 used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex -
 but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).
   
Well - I don't know - CSS does have it's quirks. However, to say that it 
is not at a stage where it can be used for complex layouts...that is a 
different story, IMHO. This article might be of interest to you:

http://alistapart.com/articles/outsidethegrid

Oh - and if you really get stuck, why don't you post a mockup of what 
you're trying to achieve; one of the gurus on this site will 
*definitely* be able to help you.
 seemed like a nice idea though.. maybe in a few years.
Well - I'm going to start using it right now, if it's all the same to 
you. ;-).


Cheers,
Rahul.

-- 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rahul Gonsalves
Make PNG, not War.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] z-index? content menu hiding behind header

2006-02-06 Thread David Laakso
francky wrote:

cj wrote:

  

[...]
html and css validate except for a css line-height error that i don't
understand.

http://sltclan.com/images/cj/z-index-problem.html

==
other questions that are bugging me but not as bad as the menu:

- [...]
- how can i move my background globe picture up 1-2em so that it
clears the footer?  it needs to stay on the body element(?), though.
[...]



Hi cj,
Two out of the bunch:
- The css-error means that you didn't give a unit for the amount of the 
line-height: Without units some browsers don't know what to measure: px 
or em or miles. ;-)
  

Leading (line-height) is expressed as a raw number. There is no unit of 
measure(px, em, %) used with it. The validator is just being a little 
over-zealous, and complaining about a parse error open string.
line-height: 2; is correct.
To make the *validator* happy, close the string, like so:
line-height: 2.0;
~davidLaakso

- body {background: transparent url(graphics/bg-service-1.png) no-repeat 
fixed right 80%; }

francky
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/



  


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Background Images Again

2006-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Original Message:
-
From: Tyson Tate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:05:40 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Images Again


Please validate your XHTML and CSS before posting to the list. Many  
problems posted to this list can be solved by simply validating. That  
said, the CSS validator[1] points directly to your problem:

background: url(images/bg.gif) repeat x;

Should be:

background: url(images/bg.gif) repeat-x;

I apologize. I had validated -- I missed it. Thank you


Regards,
Tyson Tate

[1] http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/


--
Tyson Tate
* Graphic Designer, CalPoly Library
* Assistant Librarian  Member, Mustang Band
* Team Member, CalPoly Triathlon Team
* Webmaster  Active, Kappa Kappa Psi
* Editor, Entropy Magazine
* Freelance Graphic Designer


On Feb 6, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Zellie D. McClelland wrote:

 Apologies for my neophyte status.

 I now am having difficulty getting my background image to appear
 in a content div.

 http://www.zdsign.com/gwp/new2.html
 http://www.zdsign.com/gwp/new2.css

 Can anyone recommend the best CSS guide book?

 Thank you ever so much.

 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] IE6 Double-Clearing Problem

2006-02-06 Thread Ryan Cannon
Argh! I've been unable to figure this out.

http://comptonpappas.ryancannon.com/paintings

HTML:

div
aimg //a
-- 
Ryan Cannon

Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Heilmann
 I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can be
 used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex -
 but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).

You might be right, and I must say that by standing your ground and
using a hybrid CSS/Table layout with properly named IDs and classes
(my favourite is div class=block block-block id=block-block-1, I
like Ian Dury) you have created a layout that is sure to give me hours
of fun exploring the site:

http://onlinetools.org/tests/shot.png

That whole CSS Malarkey seems to be the same swindlle as being a
superstar. The other day I spent hours making my hair cool with a lot
of spray, taking some drugs and wearing my leather jacket and shades.
I still had to pay entrance to the club and was neither approached by
sponsors or jumped by love crazed groupies. Clearly it is not worth
the effort to learn an instrument, take singing lessons or write some
lyrics.

As all users are idiots who don't know what is good for them the only
good web design is creating GIFs of all the pages and covering them
with image maps. Good authoring tools do that automatically for you.
True, there is the search engine problem but I heard adding lots of
keywords in meta tags, titles and the file name works around that
little problem.

* may contain sarcasm to avoid expletives. No animals of were hurt in
the making of this email
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/6/06, Peter Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can be
 used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex -
 but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).

 seemed like a nice idea though.. maybe in a few years.

Let's not go making broad statements just because we can't get a bug
ironed out. Bottom line is you need to get your background to extend
the height of the page. You can keep trying or give up, but at the end
of the day thousands of developers have already implemented complex
layouts in CSS, so I can assure you that it can be done. I'm pretty
sure someone already solved your problem, but definitely let us know
if you are still stuck.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Peter Lindstrom
well YES.. certainly some frustration in my post - took me a weekend to
learn PHP and another one to learn JS.. but 2 years and still table or css
layouts drive me nuts.

but my frustration aside; you must admit that the idea of using CSS for
layout is a pretty cludgey art with present standards or lack thereof.
Everything I have seen to try to make layouts such as faux columns or
massively large paddings are simply tricks to get around the inherent lack
of layout capability in CSS - and, as tricks come issues.

why can't I just have:

div header - height fixed
div col1 - fixed width/div
div col2 - fixed width/div
div col3 - width to fill page/div
/div

div body - height to fill page or content
div col1 - fixed width/div
div col2 - width to fill page/div
/div

div footer - height fixed
div col1 - fixed width/div
div col2 - spacer width to fill page/div
div col3 - fixed width/div
/div


and define my width, background colors, images etc per div as I see fit.

pretty sure it doesn't really need to be this difficult.

And my point about a few years off was in reference to improvements in the
use of CSS for layouts that are coming to stds in the next year or so.. but
likely not to browsers for a couple yrs after that.


Peter...



::-Original Message-
::From: Christian Montoya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:18 AM
::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
::Subject: Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it
::
::On 2/6/06, Peter Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:: I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can
::be
:: used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex
::-
:: but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).
::
:: seemed like a nice idea though.. maybe in a few years.
::
::Let's not go making broad statements just because we can't get a bug
::ironed out. Bottom line is you need to get your background to extend
::the height of the page. You can keep trying or give up, but at the end
::of the day thousands of developers have already implemented complex
::layouts in CSS, so I can assure you that it can be done. I'm pretty
::sure someone already solved your problem, but definitely let us know
::if you are still stuck.
::
::--
::--
::Christian Montoya
::christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Michael Hulse

On Feb 6, 2006, at 10:37 PM, Peter Lindstrom wrote:
 why can't I just have:

 div header - height fixed
   div col1 - fixed width/div
   div col2 - fixed width/div
   div col3 - width to fill page/div
 /div

That would be nice, but then again, everyone and their dog would be 
web designers... no thanks.

Have you surfed these sites:

http://www.cssbeauty.com/
http://cssdrive.com/
http://www.nv30.com/mt/blogomania/index.php
http://cssvault.com/
http://www.stylegala.com/
http://www.unmatchedstyle.com/
http://www.weeklystandards.com/
http://www.webstandardsawards.com/
http://www.cssreboot.com/
http://txpmagazine.kbbu.de/all_sites/
http://cssdesign.se/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Heilmann
 well YES.. certainly some frustration in my post - took me a weekend to
 learn PHP and another one to learn JS.. but 2 years and still table or css
 layouts drive me nuts.

If you learnt PHP and JS in one weekend each then you are either a
certified genius or you learnt some syntax and think you mastered the
language and all that comes with it. Don't believe the hype of Teach
yourself quantum physics and changing the time continuum in 24 hours
books. That superficial knowledge will bite you where it hurts the
first time someone with malicious intent checks the safety of PHP
scripts developed on syntax alone.

It is the same problem here: half of CSS is realising what it is -
describing what the presentation should be like, not fixing it to make
it impossible to change.

 but my frustration aside; you must admit that the idea of using CSS for
 layout is a pretty cludgey art with present standards or lack thereof.
 Everything I have seen to try to make layouts such as faux columns or
 massively large paddings are simply tricks to get around the inherent lack
 of layout capability in CSS - and, as tricks come issues.

Maybe it is time to rethink layout for the web? We tried forcing print
design best practices onto the web and failed. Both with tables and
CSS as your example shows. Maybe it is time to open up a bit and let
the browser deal with display and layout instead of enforcing it. What
is the height you want to fill up? A web document is either a fixed
height or it is as high as its content. If you want to fill an
arbitary height like the browser window then you need to hack and
expect odd behaviour. CSS is not to blame there, the design expecting
this behaviour is.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Relative positioning/collapsing margins (?) and 100% height

2006-02-06 Thread Bruce MacKay
Hello all,

I'm seeking help on two problems: positioning of material within a 
wrapper and achieving 100% height in pages with short content.

The following pages (with embedded css) differ only in the presence 
of a sub-navigation element.  In both, I'm having problems in 
positioning the content to start 10-20 px below the navigation div.

http://temporarius.massey.ac.nz/menu1.htm
http://temporarius.massey.ac.nz/menu2.htm

In Firefox and Opera, the content starts hard up against the bottom 
of the navigation div.  It seems that the only way to achieve control 
of where the content starts is to place a 60-80px top margin in the 
content div - but this doesn't make sense to me as the top of the 
content div seems to be being measured from the bottom of the logo 
div, not the navigation div.  In IE, things seem better - the top of 
the content div (top margin = red) appears where I expect it to be 
relative to the bottom of the navigation div in menu2.htm, but not in 
menu1.htm.

I don't understand what's going on and consequently cannot work out 
the fix needed.  Any guidance please?


The second issue is how to I make the page fill the vertical space of 
the screen when the amount of material in the content div is short.

Thanks in advance,

Bruce


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/