RE: Exchange 2000 DR
I think you should plan on having a clone root domain controller. You could use VMWare or Microsoft Virtual Server and run it on the same box, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 DR All, We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where all objects live). The Exchange server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the DR exercise (Exchange 2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller (bakernet.com). I have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical hardware at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the forest root domain (bm.root) can not be contacted? Or do I need to also do a DR of a bm.root Domain controller at the DR site? I have done numerous IDR recoveries, but have all been on the production network where the bm.root domain could be contacted I hope this makes sense! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
Re: Exchange 2000 DR
That's a great question. I don't know the answer, though. It'd be nice to hear what happens - please report back when you complete your testing! - Original Message - From: "Miller, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:21 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 DR All, We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where all objects live). The Exchange server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the DR exercise (Exchange 2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller (bakernet.com). I have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical hardware at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the forest root domain (bm.root) can not be contacted? Or do I need to also do a DR of a bm.root Domain controller at the DR site? I have done numerous IDR recoveries, but have all been on the production network where the bm.root domain could be contacted I hope this makes sense! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange 2000 DR
You have valid Domain controller inplace at your test site or are you testing that part also. MS has a rather lenghty indepth white paper that spells out all of the steps and requirements. From: "Miller, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exchange 2000 DR Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:21:02 -0600 All, We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where all objects live). The Exchange server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the DR exercise (Exchange 2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller (bakernet.com). I have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical hardware at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the forest root domain (bm.root) can not be contacted? Or do I need to also do a DR of a bm.root Domain controller at the DR site? I have done numerous IDR recoveries, but have all been on the production network where the bm.root domain could be contacted I hope this makes sense! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access limited time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder.
There are several posts and replies in this forum about folders not replicating properly. I suggest you check the archives and try some of the suggestions posted. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder. Thanks for the reply! I forget to add that the E55 and E2k servers are in the same Admin Group/Site. I've try to replicate within the site, unsuccessfully. In Exchange Admin, I open the properties of the Schedule+ Free/Busy public folder, and under the Replica tab moved the E2k server to the "Replicate Folders to" column. The folder never replicated. Using the ADSI Edit util (per Q284200), I looked at the properties for the Admin Group, and it points to the E55 server (which holds the Schedule+ folder) as the SiteFolderServer. Can you think of anything else I may have missed. Thx again! > You must replicate the free-busy folder between the Exchange 5.5 and > 2000 public folder servers. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick > Stevenson > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy > System Folder. > > > I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55) > Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling. > An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but > can't see any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither > E55 nor E2k calendar info, but sees only its own calendar. E2k seems > not to recognize, or is unable to access the system/public folders on the E55 box. > > In the Active Directory Connector (ADC), the following CA's are running: > > . 2-way Recipient Agreement for Mailboxes (I changed the exchange > bridgehead from the E55 box to the E2k after E2k was installed for all > CA's) > . 1-way Recipient Agreement for Distribution Lists . Public Folder > Agreement . Configuration CA > > I've applied the recommendations from Knowledge Base Articles 275171 > and 284200 w/ no success. In case these issues are related, I've also > noticed that new mailboxes, created from AD Users and Computers for > either the E55 or E2k boxes, are not generating e-mail addresses - > X.400, SMTP or any proxies. > > Thoughts? > > Derrick > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder.
Thanks for the reply! I forget to add that the E55 and E2k servers are in the same Admin Group/Site. I've try to replicate within the site, unsuccessfully. In Exchange Admin, I open the properties of the Schedule+ Free/Busy public folder, and under the Replica tab moved the E2k server to the "Replicate Folders to" column. The folder never replicated. Using the ADSI Edit util (per Q284200), I looked at the properties for the Admin Group, and it points to the E55 server (which holds the Schedule+ folder) as the SiteFolderServer. Can you think of anything else I may have missed. Thx again! > You must replicate the free-busy folder between the Exchange 5.5 and 2000 > public folder servers. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System > Folder. > > > I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55) > Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling. > An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but can't see > any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither E55 nor E2k > calendar info, but sees only its own calendar. E2k seems not to recognize, > or is unable to access the system/public folders on the E55 box. > > In the Active Directory Connector (ADC), the following CA's are running: > > . 2-way Recipient Agreement for Mailboxes (I changed the exchange bridgehead > from the E55 box to the E2k after E2k was installed for all > CA's) > . 1-way Recipient Agreement for Distribution Lists . Public Folder Agreement > . Configuration CA > > I've applied the recommendations from Knowledge Base Articles 275171 and > 284200 w/ no success. In case these issues are related, I've also noticed > that new mailboxes, created from AD Users and Computers for either the E55 > or E2k boxes, are not generating e-mail addresses - X.400, SMTP or any > proxies. > > Thoughts? > > Derrick > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder.
You must replicate the free-busy folder between the Exchange 5.5 and 2000 public folder servers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder. I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55) Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling. An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but can't see any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither E55 nor E2k calendar info, but sees only its own calendar. E2k seems not to recognize, or is unable to access the system/public folders on the E55 box. In the Active Directory Connector (ADC), the following CA's are running: . 2-way Recipient Agreement for Mailboxes (I changed the exchange bridgehead from the E55 box to the E2k after E2k was installed for all CA's) . 1-way Recipient Agreement for Distribution Lists . Public Folder Agreement . Configuration CA I've applied the recommendations from Knowledge Base Articles 275171 and 284200 w/ no success. In case these issues are related, I've also noticed that new mailboxes, created from AD Users and Computers for either the E55 or E2k boxes, are not generating e-mail addresses - X.400, SMTP or any proxies. Thoughts? Derrick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Make sure to read this: XCCC: How Outlook 2000 Accesses Active Directory http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=302914 And this: XCLN: How MAPI Clients Access Active Directory http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;256976 Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error Any ideas? -Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to open their mailbox on the server: "Unable to display the selected folder or item. You do not have permission to log on" while no permissions have changed and their accounts are not locked out. Any ideas? Exchange 2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 and 2002 Win2k Domain Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Has something changed on the network? For example, something that would make domain controllers, expecially GCs invisible to the clients (like port 389 or port 3268 closure)? My thinking is that they can't correctly authenticate, or Outlook can't confirm that the user is a valid user because it can't see the Global Address List. Or maybe someone closed port 135 somewhere? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error Any ideas? -Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to open their mailbox on the server: "Unable to display the selected folder or item. You do not have permission to log on" while no permissions have changed and their accounts are not locked out. Any ideas? Exchange 2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 and 2002 Win2k Domain Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Any ideas? -Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to open their mailbox on the server: "Unable to display the selected folder or item. You do not have permission to log on" while no permissions have changed and their accounts are not locked out. Any ideas? Exchange 2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 and 2002 Win2k Domain Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
Thank you the Q article was exactly what I was looking for. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
A) Exchange 2000 doesn't have a service account. This would explain why you can't get your service account to access a mailbox. :) B) If you want an account to have the ability to open another users' mailbox, grant it Send As and Receive As rights. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions Hi All, I was wondering if you all have maybe heard of a resolution for the following problem: As of Exchange 2k SP2, MS has removed the ability for teh service account to view users email content. This means I cannot bind to a user mailbox with my service account for maintenance or programming realated features. I tried a work arround that basically took me to the properties of an exchange store, then to the permissions. I then made a copy of the inherited permissions and allowed my service account full access to mailboxes in that store. I figgured that would be enough. We ll interrestingly enough, I have an application that counts the email (read and unread items) in a users mailbox. I have created a custom VB.Net control that I have placed on our intranet pages that shows the user how much email is in their box and how many new items. I would usually just use the account the user logged in with, but teh intranet login is fed from a SQL database and not an NTLM login. SO I dont have the real credentials of the user, just the mailbox alias. I figgured if I used the service account I could work arround the permissions issue. It works from some users but not others. All of our users that use this APP are all besed on the same server, storage group, and store. Does anyone know why I would get a login error for some accounts but not all? Timothy H. Schilbach Alpha Omega Design Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] visit our NEW website at www.aodinc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054 Mike -Original Message- From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions Hi All, I was wondering if you all have maybe heard of a resolution for the following problem: As of Exchange 2k SP2, MS has removed the ability for teh service account to view users email content. This means I cannot bind to a user mailbox with my service account for maintenance or programming realated features. I tried a work arround that basically took me to the properties of an exchange store, then to the permissions. I then made a copy of the inherited permissions and allowed my service account full access to mailboxes in that store. I figgured that would be enough. We ll interrestingly enough, I have an application that counts the email (read and unread items) in a users mailbox. I have created a custom VB.Net control that I have placed on our intranet pages that shows the user how much email is in their box and how many new items. I would usually just use the account the user logged in with, but teh intranet login is fed from a SQL database and not an NTLM login. SO I dont have the real credentials of the user, just the mailbox alias. I figgured if I used the service account I could work arround the permissions issue. It works from some users but not others. All of our users that use this APP are all besed on the same server, storage group, and store. Does anyone know why I would get a login error for some accounts but not all? Timothy H. Schilbach Alpha Omega Design Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] visit our NEW website at www.aodinc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Did they recently change their passwords? -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to open their mailbox on the server: "Unable to display the selected folder or item. You do not have permission to log on" while no permissions have changed and their accounts are not locked out. Any ideas? Exchange 2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 and 2002 Win2k Domain Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
Or if you have separate routing groups that route SMTP mail through one another's connectors. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual server has everything that is necessary. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected "Allow relay to these domains" for the "* 1" address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual server has everything that is necessary. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected "Allow relay to these domains" for the "* 1" address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected "Allow relay to these domains" for the "* 1" address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected "Allow relay to these domains" for the "* 1" address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
No, it is not necessary. I do not have a connector (ok, actually I do, but it is ONLY routing mail to for a specific domain). All my normal e-mail flows out through the SMTP VS. What you have to realize is that SMTP connector properties override the Default SMTP VS properties. So, if your SMTP VS relay settings are wrong and allow relaying, if your SMTP Connector is not allowing relaying, it will not be allowed. If you can detail what your Relay settings are on both your SMTP VS and the Connector, or even better, detail what your friend's settings are, we can probably help with where the problem is. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
Did it here. Worked as the doctor prescribed. No side effects. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out there has done this procedure before? Can you give me some ideas what to expect? Have you run into any problems? How long does it take and what impact does it have on the server. I appreciate any input you can offer. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
No issues with the Std --> Enterprise upgrade. Put in CD Run setup Apply service packs. You'll want to have good OS and Exchange backups as well, but you probably won't need them. > -Original Message- > From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise > > > We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard > Edition to Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to > know if anyone out there has done this procedure before? Can > you give me some ideas what to expect? Have you run into any > problems? How long does it take and what impact does it have > on the server. > > I appreciate any input you can offer. > > > > Thanks... > > Ray Beckwith > Network Administrator > California Credit Union League > Information Technology > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.ccul.org > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
It's an incredibly uneventful procedure. 1. Take a backup. 2. Insert CD - run setup and choose to reinstall. 3. Apply service pack. Pretty boring stuff really. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Posted At: 12 November 2003 22:40 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out there has done this procedure before? Can you give me some ideas what to expect? Have you run into any problems? How long does it take and what impact does it have on the server. I appreciate any input you can offer. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
You can sort the queues themselves too. -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues So far it has not grown on me... :) I guess I am just accustomed to being able to sort all messages in the queue - regardless of destination domain (originator, sent time). > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues > > > I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to > give it time > to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management. > > If you want to see messages going to a particular remote > domain - right > click on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to > sort them as well. > > Sincerely, > > Andrey Fyodorov, MVP > Systems Engineer > Messaging and Collaboration > Spherion > > > -Original Message- > From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues > > All, > > First I would like to thank all who responded to my "secure e-mail" > thread > last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the > possible > solution... > > Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade > Project from > 5.5 > to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound IMC > servers with > 2000 > SMTP connectors. We did a pilot test yesterday - and although delivery > was > fine - the queues seem almost impossible to manage under 2000. It > creates a > "virtual" queue for each and every SMTP domain that it delivers too. > Within > 30 minutes I had 200 queues listed. Refreshes on the queues > were taking > 3 to > 4 minutes (whether from the console or remotely) - and the server was > not > under a heavy load performance wise. Also, I see no way to sort all > queued > messages by "date, originator, etc - as in 5.5... Are there any 3rd > party > tools that make queue management any easier? > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 OWA: Setting IE to open maximized
Ask him what kind of budget he has for developers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA: Setting IE to open maximized I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO. He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a maximized IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the KB or via a Google search. Has anybody tried this or know how I might be able to do this? Thanks, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
So far it has not grown on me... :) I guess I am just accustomed to being able to sort all messages in the queue - regardless of destination domain (originator, sent time). > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues > > > I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to > give it time > to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management. > > If you want to see messages going to a particular remote > domain - right > click on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to > sort them as well. > > Sincerely, > > Andrey Fyodorov, MVP > Systems Engineer > Messaging and Collaboration > Spherion > > > -Original Message- > From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues > > All, > > First I would like to thank all who responded to my "secure e-mail" > thread > last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the > possible > solution... > > Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade > Project from > 5.5 > to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound IMC > servers with > 2000 > SMTP connectors. We did a pilot test yesterday - and although delivery > was > fine - the queues seem almost impossible to manage under 2000. It > creates a > "virtual" queue for each and every SMTP domain that it delivers too. > Within > 30 minutes I had 200 queues listed. Refreshes on the queues > were taking > 3 to > 4 minutes (whether from the console or remotely) - and the server was > not > under a heavy load performance wise. Also, I see no way to sort all > queued > messages by "date, originator, etc - as in 5.5... Are there any 3rd > party > tools that make queue management any easier? > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to give it time to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management. If you want to see messages going to a particular remote domain - right click on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to sort them as well. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues All, First I would like to thank all who responded to my "secure e-mail" thread last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the possible solution... Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade Project from 5.5 to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound IMC servers with 2000 SMTP connectors. We did a pilot test yesterday - and although delivery was fine - the queues seem almost impossible to manage under 2000. It creates a "virtual" queue for each and every SMTP domain that it delivers too. Within 30 minutes I had 200 queues listed. Refreshes on the queues were taking 3 to 4 minutes (whether from the console or remotely) - and the server was not under a heavy load performance wise. Also, I see no way to sort all queued messages by "date, originator, etc - as in 5.5... Are there any 3rd party tools that make queue management any easier? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date?
It came out this month.. it is called Exchange 2003. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date? Has anyone heard when Exchange 2000 SP4 will be released? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
I will look into these options and see what the client wishes to do. Thanks for all your help. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization Avaliable options I'm aware of: 1. HP LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU) 2. Microsoft Identity Integration Server (MIIS) 3. SimpleSync 4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work) 5. Active Directory Connector (in interorganizational mode) 6. Your own code Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there was an InterOrg Synch tool. For Exchange 2000, I think I will have to use the Microsoft Metadirectory Services product (which is now called Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003). Can any confirm this or point me to another solution? I want something that will be fairly easy to setup and maintain if possible. Thanks in advance. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
Avaliable options I'm aware of: 1. HP LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU) 2. Microsoft Identity Integration Server (MIIS) 3. SimpleSync 4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work) 5. Active Directory Connector (in interorganizational mode) 6. Your own code Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there was an InterOrg Synch tool. For Exchange 2000, I think I will have to use the Microsoft Metadirectory Services product (which is now called Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003). Can any confirm this or point me to another solution? I want something that will be fairly easy to setup and maintain if possible. Thanks in advance. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
Is it possible to just use AD Connectors to do this? These companies are on a fairly tight budget and would rather have a "free" solution if possible. I know I could use the ADC for 5.5 to 2000, why not 2000 to 2000? Thanks. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization Hi Damian: The DIM Report is a great resources for Identity Management Solutions and alternatives to MIIS. Check out the following link. http://www.dimreport.com/dimreport/Reports/1403.htm#article1 Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there was an InterOrg Synch tool. For Exchange 2000, I think I will have to use the Microsoft Metadirectory Services product (which is now called Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003). Can any confirm this or point me to another solution? I want something that will be fairly easy to setup and maintain if possible. Thanks in advance. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
Hi Damian: The DIM Report is a great resources for Identity Management Solutions and alternatives to MIIS. Check out the following link. http://www.dimreport.com/dimreport/Reports/1403.htm#article1 Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there was an InterOrg Synch tool. For Exchange 2000, I think I will have to use the Microsoft Metadirectory Services product (which is now called Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003). Can any confirm this or point me to another solution? I want something that will be fairly easy to setup and maintain if possible. Thanks in advance. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
Unfortunately, I don't have a massive lab in which I can test this, but the last time I looked at it, losing the configuration DC wasn't serious; it switched over rather painlessly. However, when you lose all DCs in the site, it can indeed take 15 minutes or so before Exchange will query AD and redirect its scope to all DCs in the domain. During that 15 minutes, nothing much happens. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query H... only one DC can be designated as the Configuration DC. If it fails... Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query The obvious answer is to add another domain controller so your "AD" doesn't fail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query Hi All, How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff. Any suggestions? Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
H... only one DC can be designated as the Configuration DC. If it fails... Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query The obvious answer is to add another domain controller so your "AD" doesn't fail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query Hi All, How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff. Any suggestions? Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
Are all those domain controllers in the same site as the Exchange server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query Um, We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15 minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem. I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in the registry. This is an issue brought on by design of how dsquery works. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
Um, We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15 minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem. I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in the registry. This is an issue brought on by design of how dsquery works. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
The obvious answer is to add another domain controller so your "AD" doesn't fail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query Hi All, How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff. Any suggestions? Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Well, I don't necessarily disagree--65 is a lot more than 4. The routing should match your network. If all 65 offices go into the cloud, each could have 64 connectors. But it really only makes sense to have a couple of them to hub offices, especially since the bulk of the mail will end up going to those offices or the Internet anyway. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Putting all 65 Sites in a single Site Link was my initial plan - but when we had MS in for a "sign-off" on our AD design they suggested we make 4 Site Links - for replication management and efficiency (as our WAN links are not the most reliable). OK - Thanks. I will definitely give the Routing Group connector a shot. Any gotchas to watch out for when setting up Routing Group connectors? They seem straight forward. So you wouldn't see a problem with each of our 65 offices having 65 connectors - 1 to each and every office? It sure seems like the way to go, especially with or WAN - but wasn't sure how Exchange 2000 would react to having 4000+ connectors in the routing table Thanks again. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would think that > you'd make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. > > As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up standard > routing group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites > according to predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't > set up a full mesh, either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need > separate routing groups at all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what > really matters is available capacity, not raw capacity. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, > Robert > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links > (1 for all the > North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, > 1 for the Asia > Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link > bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. > > > -----Original Message- > > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > > > > How are your AD sites configured? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, > > Robert > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > > All, > > > > We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 > offices around > > the world. We are currently in the process of moving from > 5.5 to 2000. > > We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The > hubs have > > the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London > 2MB, Hong Kong > > 2MB). > > All other offices > > range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP > > connectors between the routing groups (each office, > including the hubs > > - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs > meshed with > > SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 > > connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then > the other 2 > > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would > > force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest > pipe and have > > London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. > > 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office > with 3 SMTP > > connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its > respective > > hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... > > and then 2 > > connectors with a higher cost to London and H
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Putting all 65 Sites in a single Site Link was my initial plan - but when we had MS in for a "sign-off" on our AD design they suggested we make 4 Site Links - for replication management and efficiency (as our WAN links are not the most reliable). OK - Thanks. I will definitely give the Routing Group connector a shot. Any gotchas to watch out for when setting up Routing Group connectors? They seem straight forward. So you wouldn't see a problem with each of our 65 offices having 65 connectors - 1 to each and every office? It sure seems like the way to go, especially with or WAN - but wasn't sure how Exchange 2000 would react to having 4000+ connectors in the routing table Thanks again. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would > think that you'd > make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. > > As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up > standard routing > group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites according to > predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't set up > a full mesh, > either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need separate > routing groups at > all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what really matters is > available > capacity, not raw capacity. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Miller, Robert > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links > (1 for all the > North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, > 1 for the Asia > Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link > bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > > > > How are your AD sites configured? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, > > Robert > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > > All, > > > > We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 > offices around > > the world. We are currently in the process of moving from > 5.5 to 2000. > > We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The > hubs have > > the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London > 2MB, Hong Kong > > 2MB). > > All other offices > > range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP > > connectors between the routing groups (each office, > including the hubs > > - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs > meshed with > > SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 > > connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then > the other 2 > > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would > > force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest > pipe and have > > London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. > > 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office > with 3 SMTP > > connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its > respective > > hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... > > and then 2 > > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. > > > > Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that > any office > > can send email directly to any other office - this would > require over > > 4000 connectors. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > TIA, > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailt
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
If you have a true cloud and no backup links, then I would think that you'd make one site link for all the sites connected to the cloud. As to Exchange routing group connectors, I would set up standard routing group connectors (not SMTP Connectors) between the sites according to predominant mail flow. There's no reason you couldn't set up a full mesh, either. In fact, I'm not so sure you really need separate routing groups at all given your WAN bandwidth, however, what really matters is available capacity, not raw capacity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > How are your AD sites configured? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, > Robert > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing > > All, > > We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around > the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. > We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have > the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong > 2MB). > All other offices > range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP > connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs > - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with > SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 > connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would > force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have > London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. > 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP > connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective > hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... > and then 2 > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. > > Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office > can send email directly to any other office - this would require over > 4000 connectors. > > Any thoughts? > > TIA, > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Each office/location is in it's own Site. I have 4 Site Links (1 for all the North and South America offices - 1 for the European offices, 1 for the Asia Pac offices, and then 1 that ties the other 3 together). The Site Link bridgeheads are the servers in the 3 Hubs. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing > > > How are your AD sites configured? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Miller, Robert > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing > > All, > > We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 > offices around the > world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to > 2000. We have 3 > main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have > the biggest pipes > into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). > All other offices > range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP > connectors between the routing groups (each office, including > the hubs - are > in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP > connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 > connector with > the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 > connectors with a > higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all > traffic through > Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for > redundant paths. > 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP > connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its > respective hub > site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... > and then 2 > connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. > > Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that > any office can > send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 > connectors. > > Any thoughts? > > TIA, > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
How are your AD sites configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing All, We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3 main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All other offices range from 65K to 512K. Looking for ideas on how to setup the SMTP connectors between the routing groups (each office, including the hubs - are in their own routing group. 2 ideas so far 1. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to Chicago, and then the other 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong (this would force all traffic through Chicago which has the biggest pipe and have London and Hong Kong for redundant paths. 2. 3 Hubs meshed with SMTP connectors - each remote office with 3 SMTP connectors - 1 connector with the lowest cost going to its respective hub site (example - Dallas office to Chicago, Paris to London)... and then 2 connectors with a higher cost to London and Hong Kong. Our WAN team wants us to create a routing topology so that any office can send email directly to any other office - this would require over 4000 connectors. Any thoughts? TIA, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
Hello, That reminds me a couple other things the FAQ didn't go into (e2K): -If you set the old server's mailbox stores to point to the new server's PF, then any remaining users in the old Mailbox store will be unable to see the PFs thru OWA. There are several Q articles on this. -Outlook users that are remote and in "off-line" mode don't automatically find their moved mailbox. If you can get them to just connect once "on-line" after the move everything works out. An issue if you've got a lot of remote users. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MSXLIST (MSX Discussions List) Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:43 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement If you're using public folders, make sure you set the Private Information Store setting to point to the PF server as well. The trick here, as well as the obvious job of setting the new server to point to itself as the PF server, is also to do the less obvious job of setting the old (now empty of mailboxes and PFs server) to also point to the new server as its PF server. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 04:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement So long as the server there were homed on is not removed before *all* client profiles on all machines have had outlook opened on them. It goes like this User logs in and runs up outlook (Outlook reads its configuration info Oulook connects to old home server and asks to connect to mailbox Old server says "clear off and talk to this new server" Outlook talks to new server and gets mailbox Outlook writes new mailbox location to outlook profile. If old mail server is removed and user has not logged in yet, When user goes to log on , outlook can't find the old server and has no idea about the new one. All it means is ya go into outlook/services and put the new server name in. cheers Dean If the old server is the "first exchange server" check the FAQ for Ed's move server method. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/10/2003 9:38:46 a.m. >>> No need to reconfigure clients. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
If you're using public folders, make sure you set the Private Information Store setting to point to the PF server as well. The trick here, as well as the obvious job of setting the new server to point to itself as the PF server, is also to do the less obvious job of setting the old (now empty of mailboxes and PFs server) to also point to the new server as its PF server. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 04:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement So long as the server there were homed on is not removed before *all* client profiles on all machines have had outlook opened on them. It goes like this User logs in and runs up outlook (Outlook reads its configuration info Oulook connects to old home server and asks to connect to mailbox Old server says "clear off and talk to this new server" Outlook talks to new server and gets mailbox Outlook writes new mailbox location to outlook profile. If old mail server is removed and user has not logged in yet, When user goes to log on , outlook can't find the old server and has no idea about the new one. All it means is ya go into outlook/services and put the new server name in. cheers Dean If the old server is the "first exchange server" check the FAQ for Ed's move server method. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/10/2003 9:38:46 a.m. >>> No need to reconfigure clients. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
So long as the server there were homed on is not removed before *all* client profiles on all machines have had outlook opened on them. It goes like this User logs in and runs up outlook (Outlook reads its configuration info Oulook connects to old home server and asks to connect to mailbox Old server says "clear off and talk to this new server" Outlook talks to new server and gets mailbox Outlook writes new mailbox location to outlook profile. If old mail server is removed and user has not logged in yet, When user goes to log on , outlook can't find the old server and has no idea about the new one. All it means is ya go into outlook/services and put the new server name in. cheers Dean If the old server is the "first exchange server" check the FAQ for Ed's move server method. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/10/2003 9:38:46 a.m. >>> No need to reconfigure clients. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
Hello, Some of the things I've encountered with the faq move, and received no help from the faq or list :-): -Some Public Folders not fully syncing. I THINK this was because of Trend Scanmail mucking things up. To resolve things I turned off PF Scanning on both source and target , and then dropped a message in every damn PF (source side) that wasn't synced up. You should allow a couple days for the initial sync. I waited over a week, etc... But, things synced up in a couple hours after dropping in messages. In ESM, Server, Store, PF, you can export the PF item count and bring into Excel. -Some mailboxes won't move. Less than 1%. Corrupt messages usually. ISINTEG doesn't fix things. Track down the messages and delete (get creative in how to delete: OWA, IMAP, Virus scanning turned off,...). -A lot of configuration to copy over (store limits, Maintenance times, SMTP, OWA, Monitors, Backups,...) -Blackberry users have been an annoyance. I've just started testing with those users. Not much written up, guess it's just suppose to work. Would be nice if they'd pay for maintenance! Rights at the Sever level for the Blackberry Admin account are very different between the new and old server... The faq, and it's links, covered the rest that I can recall. A DR server move would've been easier and quicker, but we've been doing that since Exchange 3.0, and we were just looking to leave some of the cruft behind. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Posted At: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T. Slater Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T. Slater Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
If this is the original exchange server in the group, there is some additional steps to perform, if memory serves me correct. Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T. Slater Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
No need to reconfigure clients. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
Nah, you won't need to point the clients. MAPI is smart Exchange should be able to find their mailboxes when you move them. This is discussed in the FAQ linked at: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Regards, Arlo -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/2003 coexistence
Your plan is fine. I did the same thing here. I built an Exchange 2003 server using the eval media, then moved all the executives mailboxes to it. That way they can get used to using the new OWA and RPC over HTTP. I'm hedging my bet that when the evaluation expires, there's no way they'll want to go back to Exchange 2000, so they'll approve the purchase of Exchange 2003. JC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rui Silva Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/2003 coexistence Hi all. I currently have 1 Exchange Server 2000 SP3, single site. I'm planning to upgrade to Exchange 2003. My plan is: - install a second server with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003 - Join this Exchange to the existing Organization - Move all the mailboxes (about 25) - Remove the old server I would like to hear some comments from you because all the documents I've read talk about first upgrading the existing Exchange 2000 Server. txs _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/2003 coexistence
Your plan sounds fine to me. The only suggestion I have is to install the latest post SP3 rollup fixes on the Exchange 2000 server. This will ensure that the Exchange 2003 ESM doesn't cause a problem if you make changes to the E2K server config. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rui Silva Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/2003 coexistence Hi all. I currently have 1 Exchange Server 2000 SP3, single site. I'm planning to upgrade to Exchange 2003. My plan is: - install a second server with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003 - Join this Exchange to the existing Organization - Move all the mailboxes (about 25) - Remove the old server I would like to hear some comments from you because all the documents I've read talk about first upgrading the existing Exchange 2000 Server. txs _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 high availability...
When you say "routed", do you mean physically routed, as in SMTP-routed? Or do you mean that you want user to hit OWA on the front-end server and get connected to his/her mailbox on the appropriate back-end server? If latter, then yes, this functionality is already built into the front-end/back-end design out of the box. Now, about server crashing... well a user's mailbox can only reside on one back-end server at any given time. So if that server crashes, that's it, the user won't see his/her mailbox until that server is up again. Way back there used to be a cluster product called Vinca CoStandby server that was supposed to work over long distance. It wasn't always as good as advertised. I am not sure if it is still around. Legato owns it now. Also there is GeoCluster... never tried it. And then Marathon. Again never tried it. Marathon used to allow a demo download. But now they must be paranoid or something because they only offer their product as a service. I.e. their engineers come out and set it up. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 high availability... We are looking into setting up High availability for exchange. We have two sites, and currently the exchange servers are at one site. I would like to setup a front-end and 4 backend servers at each site. And the ability to have all exchange servers running, wherever a user logs in there mail would be routed through that front-end server. But the most important thing is to have the ability to take any server down and work on it without effecting the users. Without out doing an ACTIVE PASSIVE CLUSTER. Has anyone had any experience with something like this? James Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 high availability...
This is too high for me. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 high availability... We are looking into setting up High availability for exchange. We have two sites, and currently the exchange servers are at one site. I would like to setup a front-end and 4 backend servers at each site. And the ability to have all exchange servers running, wherever a user logs in there mail would be routed through that front-end server. But the most important thing is to have the ability to take any server down and work on it without effecting the users. Without out doing an ACTIVE PASSIVE CLUSTER. Has anyone had any experience with something like this? James Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 NDR msg
I have a user who received the followiing error. I can not determine why. Any help? odd thing is the mailboxes are all located on mail02. So why was the msg directe dto mail03? Thanks, John Q Jr. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mail03.domain.ad ([10.10.220.27]) by mail02.domain.ad with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:02 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Return-Path: <> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2003 14:32:02.0153 (UTC) FILETIME=[771CF590:01C37871] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail02.domain.ad ([10.10.220.25]) by mail03.domain.ad with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:01 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C37871.5AF59A59" Subject: Important Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:31:14 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thread-Topic: Important Thread-Index: AcN4cVr1r9FT6r4mSXyHQFzdvTVJaA== From: "user0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "user1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "user2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "user3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Operations" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "recruiters" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2003 14:32:01.0189 (UTC) FILETIME=[7689DD50:01C37871] --_=_NextPart_001_01C37871.5AF59A59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports
Inbound mail: TCP 25 Access OWA: TCP 443 (configure to allow SSL only) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Lape Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Server I recently got a Cisco PIX and I need to know what ports are absolutely necessary to allow inbound traffic through the firewall for people to be able to send mail in, access OWA, etc. I am reading that port 135 needs to be allowed inbound but due to all the hype with RPC these days I was wondering if the port was necessary. Thanks in advance. Justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue
Those are the outbound queues. -Original Message- From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue I am looking at my default SMTP virtual server queue under protocols in the ex. 2000 system manager and I am seeing something that looks like this Radiologycorp.com - sprint.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) Radiologycorp.com - xxzz1.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) Radiologycorp.com - 123box.co.uk (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) And the list goes on... Does that mean some on the network is relaying spam to these domains or could it be that the server has been compromised (which I find harder to believe..but then again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue
And if you don't care then just go ahead and delete them. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue > > Most likely those are NDRs. Spammers were probably sending stuff to you, > caused NDRs to be generated back to them and now the NDRs are sitting in > the queues and can't be delivered because (surprise!) spammers used > bogus "From" addresses. > > You should be able to get an idea of what those messages are by finding > their files in the Queue directory and reading them with Notepad. > > Sincerely, > > Andrey Fyodorov > Systems Engineer > Messaging and Collaboration > Spherion > > > -Original Message- > From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue > > I am looking at my default SMTP virtual server queue under protocols in > the ex. 2000 system manager and I am seeing something that looks like > this > > Radiologycorp.com - sprint.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) > Radiologycorp.com - xxzz1.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) > Radiologycorp.com - 123box.co.uk (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) > And the list goes on... > > > Does that mean some on the network is relaying spam to these domains or > could it be that the server has been compromised (which I find harder to > believe..but then again) > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue
Most likely those are NDRs. Spammers were probably sending stuff to you, caused NDRs to be generated back to them and now the NDRs are sitting in the queues and can't be delivered because (surprise!) spammers used bogus "From" addresses. You should be able to get an idea of what those messages are by finding their files in the Queue directory and reading them with Notepad. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 server - smtp queue I am looking at my default SMTP virtual server queue under protocols in the ex. 2000 system manager and I am seeing something that looks like this Radiologycorp.com - sprint.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) Radiologycorp.com - xxzz1.com (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) Radiologycorp.com - 123box.co.uk (SMTP connector - Remote delivery) And the list goes on... Does that mean some on the network is relaying spam to these domains or could it be that the server has been compromised (which I find harder to believe..but then again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports
Hi, if you want to open ports for your users to be able to send mail you have to open the following ports: SMTP (inbound/outbound mail): 25 (optional POP3 / IMAP4) pop3: 110 (insecure, password sniffer possible) or use 995 if you prefer to use ssl Imap4: 143 (insecure) of use 993 foor imap4 ssl OWA uses port 80 (inbound) This is again insecure if you use basic authentication. Try using a SSL website (port 443). You don't have to open any rpc ports, these ports are only needed if you use a front/back end config. Hope this helps. J.P. de Jong _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports
TCP 25 - inbound SMTP mail delivery TCP 443 - inbound HTTPS for OWA TCP/UDP 53 - if you host your own DNS If you want Outlook, use a VPN. The PIX will do IPSEC based VPNs and you can use the Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 IAS (RADIUS) service to authenticate against the AD. Or you can just do PPTP VPNs to the RRAS service on Windows 2000. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Lape Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Server I recently got a Cisco PIX and I need to know what ports are absolutely necessary to allow inbound traffic through the firewall for people to be able to send mail in, access OWA, etc. I am reading that port 135 needs to be allowed inbound but due to all the hype with RPC these days I was wondering if the port was necessary. Thanks in advance. Justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports
Setup a VPN with the PIX. There is no reason to waste all the money on one if you are just going to turn it into swiss cheese to access Exchange. Yes, RDP is necessary if you are trying to allow users to use Outlook at home, but since a large number of consumer ISP's block it since MSBlast, it's a waste of time. As for other ports, SMPT: 25 OWA: 80 or 443 The rest should be firewalled. -Original Message- From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Firewall Ports Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Server I recently got a Cisco PIX and I need to know what ports are absolutely necessary to allow inbound traffic through the firewall for people to be able to send mail in, access OWA, etc. I am reading that port 135 needs to be allowed inbound but due to all the hype with RPC these days I was wondering if the port was necessary. Thanks in advance. Justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Knowledge Base Article Q298110 talks about a reg hack to fix this. Maybe that would work? From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:42:16 -0400 Good idea. That is definitely worth mentioning. If you come up with any other ideas, I would appreciate the input. I am really getting beat-up over this. Is it 4:30 yet Aaarrgg! Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere on the network and they could browse to it. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out to 250 machines and fix them because "I" was the one that upgraded Exchange and since "I" upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put it back in their court. I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept. Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoti
RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Good idea. That is definitely worth mentioning. If you come up with any other ideas, I would appreciate the input. I am really getting beat-up over this. Is it 4:30 yet Aaarrgg! Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere on the network and they could browse to it. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out to 250 machines and fix them because "I" was the one that upgraded Exchange and since "I" upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put it back in their court. I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept. Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere on the network and they could browse to it. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out to 250 machines and fix them because "I" was the one that upgraded Exchange and since "I" upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put it back in their court. I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept. Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out to 250 machines and fix them because "I" was the one that upgraded Exchange and since "I" upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put it back in their court. I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept. Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and Backup Exec 9.0
Wow. I like this forum because it is an information cornucopia. And I also liked it because I felt it was a step above the usual "I a bigger geek than you" flame wars that kick up all over the net. I am hoping that in the long run, we can avoid sophomoric commentary. I agree that one should look in books and research issues online, but at the same time, It is dificult wearing many hats. I guess what I am saying is this. Instead of throwing our inflammitory remarks, Just shake your head and ignore the post. People won't question your emotional intellect that way. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and Backup Exec 9.0
We haven't had any problem with BE9 on our Exch2k/SP3 Win2K/SP3 system, but we're not using the AFO option. Joe Pochedley Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. -Original Message- From: David Klindt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 and Backup Exec 9.0 Matt, Yes, we had a problem with BE 9.0 on our E2K SP3/W2K SP3 servers. After installing BE 9.0, some users could not access public folders and personal folders that they could access previous to the upgrade. We thought we had a bad install so we reinstalled BE 9.0. The result was the same, just different users were affected. Called Veritas and they had no clue. Searched Google and found another company with the same problem. Per their recommendation we installed BE 9.0 without the Advanced File option and everything seems to be OK now. I hope this helps. David Klindt AmerisourceBergen == > We have reached a point where we must upgrade from Backup Exec 8.6 to > Backup Exec 9.0 for the entire organization. Backup Exec 8.6 doesn't > support Windows 2003. We have 2 backup servers that perform backups. > The backup agent must be upgrade on all our servers. Sadly, this > requires the 8.6 version to be uninstalled, the server be rebooted, and > the 9.0 agent installed. Which bring me to my question (finally): Has > anybody had any issue upgrading their Exchange 2000 SP3/Windows 2K SP3 > machines to Backup Exec 9.0? > > Veritas's knowledge base didn't show anything but there is a lot of real > world experience on this list. > > Thanks, > > - Matt > > Matthew Bailey > LAN Engineer > CSK Auto, Inc. > Voice: 602.631.7486 > Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 and Backup Exec 9.0
Matt, Yes, we had a problem with BE 9.0 on our E2K SP3/W2K SP3 servers. After installing BE 9.0, some users could not access public folders and personal folders that they could access previous to the upgrade. We thought we had a bad install so we reinstalled BE 9.0. The result was the same, just different users were affected. Called Veritas and they had no clue. Searched Google and found another company with the same problem. Per their recommendation we installed BE 9.0 without the Advanced File option and everything seems to be OK now. I hope this helps. David Klindt AmerisourceBergen == > We have reached a point where we must upgrade from Backup Exec 8.6 to > Backup Exec 9.0 for the entire organization. Backup Exec 8.6 doesn't > support Windows 2003. We have 2 backup servers that perform backups. > The backup agent must be upgrade on all our servers. Sadly, this > requires the 8.6 version to be uninstalled, the server be rebooted, and > the 9.0 agent installed. Which bring me to my question (finally): Has > anybody had any issue upgrading their Exchange 2000 SP3/Windows 2K SP3 > machines to Backup Exec 9.0? > > Veritas's knowledge base didn't show anything but there is a lot of real > world experience on this list. > > Thanks, > > - Matt > > Matthew Bailey > LAN Engineer > CSK Auto, Inc. > Voice: 602.631.7486 > Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit
It's 16 gig. If you have hit that limit, you can contact PSS and they can send you an updated version of the store.exe that will temporarily extend the size to 17 gig. You then need to have users delete email, let online maintenance run and then defrag the database. Also, make sure your deleted item retention is turned off during this process or the stuff they delete will not disappear immediately. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:37 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit What is the limit on the information store in Exchange 2000? If it is 18 Gbyte, how can you bring the store back up once it has reached this size? Thanks! "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails
I am trying to run it on an AD domain. I am trying to extend the schema in perpetration for the first Exchange 2K server in the site. The Exchange 5.5 server is in a trusted NT 4 domain. I have checked the site and org names and they appear to be fine. I am now on the phone with MS tech support. Hopefully they will find what is causing the error. Thanks, Jamie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails Jamie, As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000 domain... I am happy to be wrong, however. themolk. > > -Original Message- > From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Greetings, > > I am encountering into a problem when I try to run ForestPrep > to add the first Exchange 2000 server to an existing Exchange > 5.5 site. At the time setup runs its checks I am getting an > Invalid Character error. I have checked the display names of > both the Organization and Sites and there is no problem > there. I have also looked at the XADM: Invalid Character > Error Occurs When You Upgrade or Join an Exchange Server 5.5 > Site KB article 289671. I am in the process of checking for > schema attributes that may have multiple descriptions though > I have not found any yet. > > Have any of you encountered this problem before? Are there > any recommendations on how to resolve this? > > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > Windows NT SP6 > CA Backup software > Mcafee Virus Scanning > > Thanks in advance, > > Jamie Domingue > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit
It is 16gb, and once you have reached the limit, you have 2 options. 1) run eseutil to perform an offline defrag of the database, removing any whitespace - cross your fingers and hope that you have enough whitespace to get below the limit. Requires roughly 1 1/2 times the size of the database to perform. If you choose this option, get the eseutil whitepaper. 2) upgrade to Exchange 2000 Enterprise. (best option). It is more expensive, yes. But you can peform the install right over the top of standard, and the store will start right up afterwards. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:37 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit What is the limit on the information store in Exchange 2000? If it is 18 Gbyte, how can you bring the store back up once it has reached this size? Thanks! "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails
What's the LDAP port set to on the exchange 5.5 server that you are pointing forestprep to? If it is anything other than 389, forestprep can get upset and return this error. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Domingue Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:28 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails Subject: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails Greetings, I am encountering into a problem when I try to run ForestPrep to add the first Exchange 2000 server to an existing Exchange 5.5 site. At the time setup runs its checks I am getting an Invalid Character error. I have checked the display names of both the Organization and Sites and there is no problem there. I have also looked at the XADM: Invalid Character Error Occurs When You Upgrade or Join an Exchange Server 5.5 Site KB article 289671. I am in the process of checking for schema attributes that may have multiple descriptions though I have not found any yet. Have any of you encountered this problem before? Are there any recommendations on how to resolve this? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows NT SP6 CA Backup software Mcafee Virus Scanning Thanks in advance, Jamie Domingue _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails
Jamie, As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000 domain... I am happy to be wrong, however. themolk. > > -Original Message- > From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Greetings, > > I am encountering into a problem when I try to run ForestPrep > to add the first Exchange 2000 server to an existing Exchange > 5.5 site. At the time setup runs its checks I am getting an > Invalid Character error. I have checked the display names of > both the Organization and Sites and there is no problem > there. I have also looked at the XADM: Invalid Character > Error Occurs When You Upgrade or Join an Exchange Server 5.5 > Site KB article 289671. I am in the process of checking for > schema attributes that may have multiple descriptions though > I have not found any yet. > > Have any of you encountered this problem before? Are there > any recommendations on how to resolve this? > > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > Windows NT SP6 > CA Backup software > Mcafee Virus Scanning > > Thanks in advance, > > Jamie Domingue > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000
Have you set the allow out of office responses in the global settings? -Original Message- From: D C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Can't seem to get Out of office auto:reply to work, have outlook 2000, exchange 2000, service pack 3- sends inside but not out to internet, I have all the settings for relaying / out of office to internet, but no luck.. anyone have any ideas?? Dan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Installation issues -- Help desperately needed! !!
Thanks for the help Ed. I considered calling MS, but since this is a dev environment I felt it could wait a bit more and I would explore the listserv avenue. I apologize for the possibly misleading subject line. Anyhow, I will try your suggestions and see what comes. Thanks again! -dan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions First, it is my experience that you will need a two-way trust. There may be a way to make a one-way trust work, but I haven't found it. Second, I don't recall having seen the error. Third, there are things that must replicate back, such as the mailbox location when you move mailboxes. So, I would quit overthinking this thing and just create the recommended two-way agreement. It won't cause you any problems as long as you manage mailboxes from their respective administrative tools. Finally, if you need immediate help, call PSS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel P. Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Installation issues -- Help desperately needed!!! Hey all, First off.. thanks for the help with the ADC issue I was having earlier this week. Using the SP3 ADC worked, also running the install as the same named-account as what Exchange 5.5 service acct. provided the appropriate work around. Now that I have gotten my ADC installed, a Recipient Connection Agreement, the ForestPrep and DomainPrep done I have run into issue with the E2K Server install. As the E2k server installed it eventually brought up an error indicating that a Exchange 2000 setup failed while installing a sub-component. The Site Replication Service which threw an error code of 0x0070534 . I apologize for not having the exact error in full detail, but that is as close as my scumming notes tell me. Anyhow, I am presented with Retry or Cancel.. I attempted Retry, but after retrieving the same reponsed 2 or 3 times, I hit cancel where the setup appeared to continue through and finished. Upon completion however, obviously the SRS doesn't operate I presume, but also the Information Store, the and the MTA (which is linked to the SRS) fail to start. I have gone through the Exchange 2000 Installation Log and found that the error code of 0x0070534 has an error as such in full: Error code 0XC0070534 (1332): No mapping between account names and security IDs was done. Now I ran the E2k install as an account named identical to the Exchange 5.5 Service Account (E5.5 exists in an NT4 member domain) .. i.e. E55 svc acct called Exchange-Admin in the XYZ NT4 domain is mimiced as Exchange-Admin in the ABC domain . Both accounts have identical passwords. The NT4 domain, XYZ, Trusts the Active Directory Domain, ABC through a 1 way trust. First off, is a 2-way trust required for this upgrade (via swing method). Second, Does anyone have some insight on this error, possibly created by the Exchange 5.5 existing in a separate domain than the E2k that I am trying to join to the E55 Org. Third, I have seen MS articles indicating that installation for a co-existence between E55 and E2k should have a 2-way RAC in the ADC. (for my needs, a 2-way RAC isn't necessary as we are moving everything away from E55 to E2K and we don't need anything the AD has to be replicated back to E55.) I have several other errors in my Event Logs revolving around the Exchange System Attendant, Service Control Manager, and the MSExchangeFBPublish .. however I believe these all are side-effects of the failed SRS. The last thing I tried before leaving the office on Friday was un-installing E2K from the server, but this uninstall appeared to have failed. I was about ready to re-install the server from the ground up since I have already gotten an ADC with my E55 and the Forest/Domain Prep done. Ideas are very much appreaciated as it will mean a shorter amount of time at work on a Sunday. Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/ly
RE: Exchange 2000 Installation issues -- Help desperately needed!!!
First, it is my experience that you will need a two-way trust. There may be a way to make a one-way trust work, but I haven't found it. Second, I don't recall having seen the error. Third, there are things that must replicate back, such as the mailbox location when you move mailboxes. So, I would quit overthinking this thing and just create the recommended two-way agreement. It won't cause you any problems as long as you manage mailboxes from their respective administrative tools. Finally, if you need immediate help, call PSS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel P. Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Installation issues -- Help desperately needed!!! Hey all, First off.. thanks for the help with the ADC issue I was having earlier this week. Using the SP3 ADC worked, also running the install as the same named-account as what Exchange 5.5 service acct. provided the appropriate work around. Now that I have gotten my ADC installed, a Recipient Connection Agreement, the ForestPrep and DomainPrep done I have run into issue with the E2K Server install. As the E2k server installed it eventually brought up an error indicating that a Exchange 2000 setup failed while installing a sub-component. The Site Replication Service which threw an error code of 0x0070534 . I apologize for not having the exact error in full detail, but that is as close as my scumming notes tell me. Anyhow, I am presented with Retry or Cancel.. I attempted Retry, but after retrieving the same reponsed 2 or 3 times, I hit cancel where the setup appeared to continue through and finished. Upon completion however, obviously the SRS doesn't operate I presume, but also the Information Store, the and the MTA (which is linked to the SRS) fail to start. I have gone through the Exchange 2000 Installation Log and found that the error code of 0x0070534 has an error as such in full: Error code 0XC0070534 (1332): No mapping between account names and security IDs was done. Now I ran the E2k install as an account named identical to the Exchange 5.5 Service Account (E5.5 exists in an NT4 member domain) .. i.e. E55 svc acct called Exchange-Admin in the XYZ NT4 domain is mimiced as Exchange-Admin in the ABC domain . Both accounts have identical passwords. The NT4 domain, XYZ, Trusts the Active Directory Domain, ABC through a 1 way trust. First off, is a 2-way trust required for this upgrade (via swing method). Second, Does anyone have some insight on this error, possibly created by the Exchange 5.5 existing in a separate domain than the E2k that I am trying to join to the E55 Org. Third, I have seen MS articles indicating that installation for a co-existence between E55 and E2k should have a 2-way RAC in the ADC. (for my needs, a 2-way RAC isn't necessary as we are moving everything away from E55 to E2K and we don't need anything the AD has to be replicated back to E55.) I have several other errors in my Event Logs revolving around the Exchange System Attendant, Service Control Manager, and the MSExchangeFBPublish .. however I believe these all are side-effects of the failed SRS. The last thing I tried before leaving the office on Friday was un-installing E2K from the server, but this uninstall appeared to have failed. I was about ready to re-install the server from the ground up since I have already gotten an ADC with my E55 and the Forest/Domain Prep done. Ideas are very much appreaciated as it will mean a shorter amount of time at work on a Sunday. Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles
I've seen this many times. The DC needs to be allowed to update the schema. Basically, you need to modify the NTDS to allow it modify the scema. Check this out: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326262 Let us know if it works k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 15 July 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles Have you tried running setup from the ADC provided with Exchange SP3 instead? - Original Message - From: "Foerst, Daniel P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles > Hey all, > > I am setting up a development environment to test our migration > scenario from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but ran into a snag. In my > development environment I have a Domain Controller that was built and > added to our production domain in order to have a recent list of user > accounts, groups, etc. This Domain Controller was then removed from > the production area and added to the Developement environment > where I needed to Seize the FSMO roles for the development domain. (The > production domain has all the appropriate roles). When I attempt > to install the ADC provided by our Exchange 2000 CD I eventually receive > an error stating that the account that I am running the ADC setup.exe > from does not have the sufficient rights to modify/upgrade the schema. > (I don't have the exact error in front of me). This doesn't make sense > because I am launching the ADC Setup from > the Domain Administrator account, which I verified is part of the Domain > Admins group, which is part of the builtin/Administrators group, it is > part of the Enterprise Admins group, and the Schema Admins group. I even > went as far to make another account with duplicte memberships thinking > that the ADC had issues with the Domain Administrator account, but even > that failed. I have verified that this DOmain Controller is indeed > running all 5 FSMO roles and is a Global Catalog (the only domain > controller in the development domain) . Can anyone point me in the right > direction? > > Windows 2000 Server > Service Pack 3 w/latest patches > 1.8GHz server (speed shouldn't be an issue) > 512MB memory > Exchange 2000 ADC > > > Thanks! > > -dan > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles
Have you tried running setup from the ADC provided with Exchange SP3 instead? - Original Message - From: "Foerst, Daniel P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles > Hey all, > > I am setting up a development environment to test our migration scenario > from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but ran into a snag. > In my development environment I have a Domain Controller that was built > and added to our production domain in order to have a recent > list of user accounts, groups, etc. This Domain Controller was then > removed from the production area and added to the Developement > environment > where I needed to Seize the FSMO roles for the development domain. (The > production domain has all the appropriate roles). When I attempt > to install the ADC provided by our Exchange 2000 CD I eventually receive > an error stating that the account that I am running the ADC setup.exe > from does not have the sufficient rights to modify/upgrade the schema. > (I don't have the exact error in front of me). This doesn't make sense > because I am launching the ADC Setup from > the Domain Administrator account, which I verified is part of the Domain > Admins group, which is part of the builtin/Administrators group, it is > part of the Enterprise Admins group, and the Schema Admins group. I even > went as far to make another account with duplicte memberships thinking > that the ADC had issues with the Domain Administrator account, but even > that failed. I have verified that this DOmain Controller is indeed > running all 5 FSMO roles and is a Global Catalog (the only domain > controller in the development domain) . Can anyone point me in the right > direction? > > Windows 2000 Server > Service Pack 3 w/latest patches > 1.8GHz server (speed shouldn't be an issue) > 512MB memory > Exchange 2000 ADC > > > Thanks! > > -dan > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Maybe he has something against slaying knights.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayer
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
I've no idea why he had a pop at me, anyway, what's in a name?
Harvey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: 03 July 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called "research". You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" /
"^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exch
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
I've no idea why he had a pop at me, anyway, what's in a name?
Harvey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: 03 July 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called "research". You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you
remembered it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" /
"/" / "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Harvey WallBanger...
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called "research". You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" /
"^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailt
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called "research". You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" /
"^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
====
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called "research". You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" /
"=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
========
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Nope - that's just Andy. Up there with Martin & Ed as far as I am
concerned when it comes to knowing their stuff.
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 8:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
>
>
> Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have
> you remembered it word for word?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
> Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
>
>
> "+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the
> specification in RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom
> of the local part of the address and then definition of atext
> in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" /
> "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" /
> "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
>
> The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special
> function, but only during local delivery, not routing.
>
> ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
> Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
>
> A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x
> should not even let you create that.
>
> William
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
> Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
>
>
> > Group,
> >
> > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
> method.
> > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation.
> Everything
> that
> > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
> name. We
> > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
> mailboxes,
> > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
> worried
> > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find
> anything on
> the
> > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > thanks
> > Josh Douglas
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you
remembered it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" /
"/" / "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
========
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
"+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" /
"/" / "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released
http://www.swinc.com/erm
========
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
> Group,
>
> we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
> I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
> I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
> have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
> dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is
worried
> about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
> web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Josh Douglas
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
You can have the alias a different name. But I was able to rename a distribution group with a + sign and can email it internally. So, it is possible. Just not proper form. William - Original Message - From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > we just put a plus in our dl's so that they are up at the top of the list. I > guess you would recommend changing that to something else. > > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > > A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let > you create that. > > William > > - Original Message - > From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM > Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > > > Group, > > > > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. > > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that > > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We > > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, > > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is worried > > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the > > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > thanks > > Josh Douglas > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
my fault, it's also just in the display name, not in smtp or anything else. so I'm guessing that should be ok since it's just a display name. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let you create that. William - Original Message - From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > Group, > > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is worried > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > thanks > Josh Douglas > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
we just put a plus in our dl's so that they are up at the top of the list. I guess you would recommend changing that to something else. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let you create that. William - Original Message - From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > Group, > > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is worried > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > thanks > Josh Douglas > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let you create that. William - Original Message - From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > Group, > > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is worried > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > thanks > Josh Douglas > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
You would use an SMTP Transport Event Sink Here are a couple of articles to point you to: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=317680 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;317327 Head to MSDN and check out the SMTP transport event sink stuff and go to the Exchange section and get the last SDK. http://snurl.com/1o88 The next SDK is due out any day now, and it may have a better example for you to follow, but still the March one is pretty good. The third party applications are not overly priced. www.exclaimer.com www.disclaimit.com Www.gfi.com That last one has a trial version of their full product, after which, I believe, the disclaimer component is free and continues to function. Almost like a reward for giving them a try. Or finally, deploy a corporate signature for everyone to use in Outlook. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
Yes, thanks. I even know how to read a FAQ and search with google. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
You can add a disclaimer/default signature with a lot of the Anti-virus products that are available. I use Trendmicro's IMSS. Other alternative is to add an SMTP event sync. Search the Microsoft KB for the article. Raj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5
Notes Connector. It's easy, robust, does dirsync, and will simplify your migration unless you were going for a big bang. We route SMTP into Exchange and then Exchange moves it into Notes if the target address is a Notes recipient. Works well and I can see some parts of the organisation being on Notes for ever. Paid for it, happy with it, supports lots of their business processes. -Original Message- From: Ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 21:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5
I had a customer who had Lotus Notes in-house and we hosted Exchange 2000 for them. They had 150 users on Exchange and a bunch more on LN. They also had an NT Mail server in-house (Gordano NT Mail). MX records were pointing to NT Mail server. NT Mail server had a routing table which defined the Exchange users, if a message came to an Exchange user - it was relayed to our Exchange environment. Otherwise it was given to LN. On Exchange side, we had a recipient policy for their domain name with the option UNselected "this Exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address". And we had an SMTP connector with their domain name in the Address Space and it pointed to their NT Mail server. The way all this worked - if Exchange finds an SMTP address locally, it keeps the message. If it does not - it shoots it to NT Mail. I think we also defined that NTMail server as a smart host in the properties of the Default SMTP Virtual Server. There was no GAL synchronization. They just sent mail to each other by typing their SMTP addresses. I guess for more $$$ we could have put together some kind of dir synch. -Original Message- From: Ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5
You need a lotus notes directory connector I guess. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/NotesConnector.asp k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk Sent: 23 June 2003 22:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 & Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 in a 2003 Server forest
No you don't. You ForestPrep and Domain when you are introducing W2K3 DC INTO a W2K Forest/Domain. With what you are intending to do, all you need is just dcpromo the "downlevel" Win2K. Win2K = "downlevel", can't resist that!!! Side note: IF you are already W2K3, why are you bringing a W2K DC into the MIX? Just curious. Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I www.akomolafe.com www.iyaburo.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 in a 2003 Server forest All I have a question about the installation of a windows 2000 server that will be my new exchange server in a Windows 2003 forest. Before I do a dcpromo on this box to join it to the 2003 forest and domain do I need to run any ADprep tools so that the schema and all is updated to the new 2003 schema ? Or can I just do a dcpromo and let the server take its course. I know I have to do forestprep when I install exchange but am not sure if I need to prepare the 2000 server before I bring it into AD. Any help is appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 in a 2003 Server forest
Ronk, I think you're confused. You MUST have AD in place and operational before you can install Exchange. The Exchange server does NOT need to be, nor should it be, installed on a domain controller. JC > > -Original Message- > From: Ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:11 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Thanks Ed you have confirmed my thoughts about this. I have > had another admin from another site tell me that you don't > want to install AD on the exchange server, but my anwser to > him was why do we have AD if you aren't going to use it. > Thanks Much > Ronk > > > You don't need to do anything until you want to install > Exchange 2000, > > = at which point you must run the usual setup /forestprep > and setup = > > /domainprep. > > Actually, I've seen it recommended that you run update > /forestprep and > > update /domainprep from the Exchange 2000 SP3 CD. I don't > believe you > > = need to run adprep unless you're installing Exchange 2003 in a > > Windows 2000 forest. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange 2000 in a 2003 Server forest > > > > > > All I have a question about the installation of a windows > 2000 server > > = that will be my new exchange server in a Windows 2003 > forest. Before > > I do a dcpromo on this box to join it to the 2003 forest > and domain do > > I need = to run any ADprep tools so that the schema and all > is updated > > to the new = > > 2003 > > schema ? Or can I just do a dcpromo and let the server take its > > course. = I know I have to do forestprep when I install > exchange but > > am not sure if = I need to prepare the 2000 server before I > bring it > > into AD. Any help is appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchange&text_mo > > de=3D= > > &lang > > =3Denglish > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
