RE: Any Ideas
What client are you running? We have seen many Dr Watson errors with Outlook 2000 (SR1) - although mainly when opening Word attachments with Office 2000 - again SR1. The same attachment opens fine if it's saved first. We have tried recreating the user's Outlook profile, recreating the user's NT profile (NT4 SP6a is the workstation OS) and reinstalling Office - but with no real clear pattern of what improves the problem and what doesn't: nor indeed consistency in about when the problem occurs. Karen -Original Message- From: Chhor, Manhao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 17:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Any Ideas Hi All, We run Exchange 5.5 with the latest sp. Once in a while a user will get an email and when they try to open it it comes up as a reference memory error and if we click to debug it it comes up with a Dr. Watson Access violation and the application shuts down. Now if we try to launch Outlook again the error constantly pops up. However, if I go in as the administrator and delete the email it will launch just fine. Now while it is in the deleted box the user cannot go to their deleted box or it shuts down again with the same error message. I have to delete it completely as the administrator. This time the e-mail was an auto-reply from the same server. Any ideas. It is very strange. Thanks, --hao List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
Two things come in mind: 1. Write code to change the default reply-to SMTP address in Exchange 5.5/Windows 2000 AD each time you need to submit a message with a different SMTP address. 2. Use an POP3/IMAP4 account to submit the message with a different sender address. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
I don't have an option to check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses in Outlook 2002 when I show the Form field. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
But if you type in your non-primary smtp address it automagically resolves to your display name, and therefore sends out with the primary address e.g. my display name is Lynn Karen; I have my new [EMAIL PROTECTED] address as my Set as Reply Address; but still have my old smtp address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, you see why we've changed!). If in the From field (Outlook 2000) I type [EMAIL PROTECTED], after a couple of seconds it changes to Lynn Karen (underlined) - and at the receiver's end the return address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you mean something different to this? Karen -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 11:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
You just type it in (or pull it from a contact). If it is legal, it lets you send. If not you will get an error message. Walt -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses I don't have an option to check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses in Outlook 2002 when I show the Form field. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
Sorry, you are correct. I had been using it with my Postmaster address. But, that is on another MBX. My BAD Walt -Original Message- From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses But if you type in your non-primary smtp address it automagically resolves to your display name, and therefore sends out with the primary address e.g. my display name is Lynn Karen; I have my new [EMAIL PROTECTED] address as my Set as Reply Address; but still have my old smtp address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, you see why we've changed!). If in the From field (Outlook 2000) I type [EMAIL PROTECTED], after a couple of seconds it changes to Lynn Karen (underlined) - and at the receiver's end the return address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you mean something different to this? Karen -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 11:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
message rulles
Hi, I have problem with forward message in Outlook 97/2000. I do modify message rulles for send on Exchange server O.K. if modify for any smtp don`t forward. I do make upgrade from Exchange 5.5 (no problem) to Exchange 2000. Any idea? Thanks. F. Nohejl List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
That's what I meant and the original poster was asking for. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Sorry, you are correct. I had been using it with my Postmaster address. But, that is on another MBX. My BAD Walt -Original Message- From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses But if you type in your non-primary smtp address it automagically resolves to your display name, and therefore sends out with the primary address e.g. my display name is Lynn Karen; I have my new [EMAIL PROTECTED] address as my Set as Reply Address; but still have my old smtp address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, you see why we've changed!). If in the From field (Outlook 2000) I type [EMAIL PROTECTED], after a couple of seconds it changes to Lynn Karen (underlined) - and at the receiver's end the return address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you mean something different to this? Karen -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 11:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses NO, NO, In OutlookViewcheck from field. In the from field check one of the legal-for-you smtp addresses. This can be secondary proxy addresses on a single mailbox, or other mailboxes that you have send as rights. No code writing or separate mailboxes is required. Walt -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Internet Mail Service--Stopped
Greetings All, Sometime yesterday the Internet Mail Service on my Exchange Server--NT4.0 SPa, MSExchange 5.5--SP4 shut itself off. I discovered this overnight and when I went to restart the service--thank God it did restart. Antigen is the mailserver antivirus we use. So, I am throwing this out to you for any comments, specifically has anyone on this list experienced a self shutdown by Exchange. My only thought that somehow the Antigen software shutdown the server to fend off some virus attack. Thanks, JRiley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Internet Mail Service--Stopped
Should not be Antigen, we used Scanmail and sometime IMS also shutdown by itself also. At first we used Scanmail 3.51 which used AVAPI, and this happened. Afterwards upgrade to 3.7 which follows Antigen uses ESE. Thought this may help IMS since the Virus engine scan the virus in the Database Engine level, still IMS will shutdown by itself occassionally. For me I suspect that some corrupted mails causing this on my site, may not be your case. Overhere there are some web services which make use of java mail servlet, basically the developers tried to compose their own mails complete with MIME attachments. Suspect some of the mails composed by these applications has the wrong format which IMS does not recognized and cause it to halt. I have asked the developers to relook into their servlets. Ong LB -Original Message- From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Internet Mail Service--Stopped Greetings All, Sometime yesterday the Internet Mail Service on my Exchange Server--NT4.0 SPa, MSExchange 5.5--SP4 shut itself off. I discovered this overnight and when I went to restart the service--thank God it did restart. Antigen is the mailserver antivirus we use. So, I am throwing this out to you for any comments, specifically has anyone on this list experienced a self shutdown by Exchange. My only thought that somehow the Antigen software shutdown the server to fend off some virus attack. Thanks, JRiley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MailboxManager - Purge procedure.
Good morning, If you do not use mailbox manager please delete this message. For those of you that use mailbox manager could you tell me if the Deleted Items folder is purged first then the messages over X number of days are moved from those folders to the deleted items folder? Also can the mailbox manager have two different run times as suggested in the letter below? They are worried that mailbox manager moves items first and then deletes, but I could not find anything in the documentation. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: McClernon Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:36 PM To: Mitchell Mike Subject: Purge procedure. Mike; To control the purge procedure, ensure that the deleted folder is purged first then the 90 day purge is run on the rest of the folders, could you stagger the times the purge is run. Mike Mescall suggested that you could purge the deleted items folder on Friday evening and then purge the other folders on Saturday evening.This may control the sequence of events and maintain the proper order of things. The implementation of the purge has not been determined yet. Thoughts Mike McClernon (317) 532-7800 x6365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol *
Disclaimers on *internal* mail? Good grief! :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 06 March 2002 13:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol * Subject: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol * Importance: High === This is a (rare) commercial message from your list sponsor: === * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol Policy Patrol add disclaimers to your internal and external emails. It includes advanced features that other products do not offer, such as merge fields and support for formatting (HTML and rich text formats). --- Product Features Policy Patrol is an add-on for Microsoft Exchange server and Lotus Notes that allows you to add user based disclaimers to your internal and external emails. The program includes some advanced features that are not yet available in other products. These advanced features, such as merge fields and formatting, are geared towards making the disclaimer notices more relevant and distinguishable and therefore improve their weight and effectiveness. Policy Patrol offers the following features: - Global user based disclaimers - Formatted disclaimers - In- and external disclaimers - Append Prepend notices - Merge Fields - Company slogans - Signatures - Sample disclaimers - Remote management - Integration with Windows 2000 - User licensing You can find it, and a 30-day eval here: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=590 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Internet Mail Service--Stopped
I guess the first question here is whether anything was thrown into the event log? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 06 March 2002 12:51 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Internet Mail Service--Stopped Subject: Internet Mail Service--Stopped Greetings All, Sometime yesterday the Internet Mail Service on my Exchange Server--NT4.0 SPa, MSExchange 5.5--SP4 shut itself off. I discovered this overnight and when I went to restart the service--thank God it did restart. Antigen is the mailserver antivirus we use. So, I am throwing this out to you for any comments, specifically has anyone on this list experienced a self shutdown by Exchange. My only thought that somehow the Antigen software shutdown the server to fend off some virus attack. Thanks, JRiley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Ex-Employees Emails
Could someone recommend to me what to do with emails from ex-employees we have taken off our Exchange Server? A while ago someone said there is a way of configuring an Distribution List and including all the ex-employees as members of this list and the emails just go into some sort of a black hole. Not sure about the details now. Thanks Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server
Are you talking about the netbios name of the NT server or the Exchange netbios name? Either way, you can programmatically update the registry to the new names using login scripts and .reg files. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Does anyone know how to perform a successful move of Exchange 5.5 SP4,to another server maintaining the same netbios name???with other sites in the Organisation??? Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ex-Employees Emails
Did you mean from your ex-employees or to them? -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ex-Employees Emails Could someone recommend to me what to do with emails from ex-employees we have taken off our Exchange Server? A while ago someone said there is a way of configuring an Distribution List and including all the ex-employees as members of this list and the emails just go into some sort of a black hole. Not sure about the details now. Thanks Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server
Title: Message Well I need to maintain the same name otherwise I will have to re-configure all the client's profiles and configurations Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server The DR whitepaper should be able to shed some light on this. But is there a specific reason you need to maintain the same name? -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Does anyone know how to perform a successful move of Exchange 5.5 SP4,to another server maintaining the same netbios name???with other sites in the Organisation??? Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server
Title: Message Not if you are using Outlook (MAPI Clients)...check out the Ed Crowley server move method: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message-From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Well I need to maintain the same name otherwise I will have to re-configure all the client's profiles and configurations Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server The DR whitepaper should be able to shed some light on this. But is there a specific reason you need to maintain the same name? -Original Message-From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:10 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Does anyone know how to perform a successful move of Exchange 5.5 SP4,to another server maintaining the same netbios name???with other sites in the Organisation??? Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking ofany action in reliance upon, this information by persons orentities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error, please contact thesender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
RE: Ex-Employees Emails
To them, from the internet mainly. -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 14:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ex-Employees Emails Did you mean from your ex-employees or to them? -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ex-Employees Emails Could someone recommend to me what to do with emails from ex-employees we have taken off our Exchange Server? A while ago someone said there is a way of configuring an Distribution List and including all the ex-employees as members of this list and the emails just go into some sort of a black hole. Not sure about the details now. Thanks Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs. ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ex-Employees Emails
Title: RE: Ex-Employees Emails Interesting. I never thought of doing that, but it sounds like it would work. Since I use a 3rd Party Filter, I simply add their username to the list of a Rule I have that dumps the mail. I never even see it, and thank the gods I never see those dammed NDRs anymore. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ex-Employees Emails For X amount of time, I have the e-mail forwarded to their ex-boss or replacement. Then I blackhole them, which means create a DL, and don't put anyone on the list. Just add their address to the list of SMTP addresses. -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ex-Employees Emails Could someone recommend to me what to do with emails from ex-employees we have taken off our Exchange Server? A while ago someone said there is a way of configuring an Distribution List and including all the ex-employees as members of this list and the emails just go into some sort of a black hole. Not sure about the details now. Thanks Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.330 / Virus Database: 184 - Release Date: 2/28/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server
Title: Message No, not true (unless you are POPing or IMAP). But if you are using MAPI (Outlook Clients), you can just follow this; http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm -Original Message-From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Well I need to maintain the same name otherwise I will have to re-configure all the client's profiles and configurations Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server The DR whitepaper should be able to shed some light on this. But is there a specific reason you need to maintain the same name? -Original Message-From: Sanjeev Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:10 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchaange server 5.5 move to another server Does anyone know how to perform a successful move of Exchange 5.5 SP4,to another server maintaining the same netbios name???with other sites in the Organisation??? Regards Sanjeev Singh Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shurlok International 28 Wiganthorpe Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Int.Tel +27 33 8454700 Int Fax +27 33 8454762 cell 0829289917 ' This message may contain information which is private,privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy /delete the message. You may not copy, distribute or disclose the contents to anyone nor take any action in reliance on the content.' 'Neither the sender nor Shurlok, a division of Electromatic (including it's subsidiaries and associated companies )shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.' List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
suggested that, but the message has to be seen to be coming from the other company, not our own, for business purposes. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses
But that if both addresses are associated with the same Exchange mailbox the typed in smtp address just gets resolved back to the Display Name of the mailbox, and when you hit reply the address is the chosen Set as Reply Address one, not the one originally typed in. Karen -Original Message- From: JENSEN, TIMOTHY C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses How about using the Have Replies Sent To field in the Options section of the mail msg? The from addy will still display their primary SMTP address on their mailbox, but when the user replies to the email, their mail client will use the other address specified. Tim Jensen Cingular Wireless, Chicago -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Thanks for the advice, but as one of you guys mentioned, the user would need a seperate mailbox for each SMTP address. I've already tried just giving them multiple SMTP addresses in Exch Administrator, but even if they type in the full SMTP address they wish to use, it defaults to sending the message from there Reply address as specified in Exch Administrator. Sending from a completely seperate mailbox address is fine (i.e the boss/secretary scenario), but I'd like to avoid having multiple mailboxes for each user. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message
In my last e-mail I said the only thing I did not try is to download them from the LAN. Well, I tried that and no hanging at all. I deleted all messages of the person who was complaining but now that there are more than 9 messages, she is having the same problem! Did not anybody have a similar problem ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message Thanks for suggestions. My first guess was that the 10th message was corrupted. So I checked the users who complained. They all had different 10th message. And deleting it did not change. I have deleted many e-mails and checked again but the same thing happened. Yes, I said some of the people are complaining but in fact I am not sure about the others. They may not have more than 10 e-mails waiting (that's the reply I got from one of them) and that may be why they do not seem to have problem. We do not have anything like PIX I would suspect to corrupt the attachments. All of the people are connecting from remote places. Some from US, some from Saudia Arabia and some of them are in Turkey. They all have dial-up connection but as I explained earlier I ruled out the connection problem. Connection is fine! They can check messages through OWA while they are not able to download more than 9 at a time. They can view all messages via IMAP too. I turned on every item on POP3 logging but There is nothing unusual. Clients connect, access their e-mail boxes and disconnects! No error message in App. Log or Security Log. The only thing I did not try is to use a POP3 connection on LAN. I am pretty sure this is due to a problem in Exchange actually. Because the same users were all fine and it started all of a sudden. But I just can't figure out what did change ?... Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message It does indeed work that way with POP3 boxes on exchange. If you have 10 messages waiting, and you download 9, and then get interrupted, then Exchange will not delete the first 9 ,and you will get them all over again the next time you log on. You say this is happening with some people so I am assuming that not everyone is having this problem. first thing I would do is check to see what the 10th message in each box is. If it is the same in each box then remove it from one box, and see if the problem goes away. If it does simply delete it out of all the boxes. Are all of these people in house, or are they getting the mail from remote locations? If they are remote then set up a computer to download from one of the POP accounts, but use it on the network. That way if you get all the mail, you can figure there is something between your server, and their box on the internet that is causing the problem. If the same error happens, then at least you have ruled out that option. We had a problem with our PIX firewall corrupting attachments, and when outlook got to that attachment, it would choke, and quit downloading. I would have to delete the message, and then they could get the resst of their mail. I finally figured out the PIX box had a Mail Fixup protocol installed, and it was corrupting the messages. Turned in off, and no more problem. John Majetic -Original Message- From: Neil Raggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message If the email client fails to get the messages correctly, it won't delete any messages off the server (I think). So next time you do a send and receive you get the same messages again. But why your getting the problem of not downloading all the messages - could be anything. -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Connection Terminated after 9nth message Hi All, We are having a strange problem. Some of our POP3 client users are reporting the same problem: We are receiving an error message after exactly 9 messages are downloaded and when we try again, it downloads the same 9 messages Error message is: Some messages couldn't be retrieved from the server Socket Error:10054 Error Number:0x800CCC0F Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. We're using E2K+SP2 Any comments please ? TIA Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at:
MTADATA
NT4 6a / Exch 5.5 SP4 We had a problem with a remote server that has since been fixed, but I noticed a bunch (6900+) items in the mtadata directory. The problem involved the MTA and IMS, there was a corrupted message in the queue. When I cleaned it out and the MTA/IMS was restarted, the MTA queue reflected the items and it eventually cleared. The items are still in the mtadata directory, which kind of caught me as strange. I looked at a couple local servers and there are a few items in the directory, but no where near the amount I see on the remote. What is the story with this directory? Is this something that needs to be manually cleaned? Thanks in advance, Tom Cross Viasystems Group List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message
A 10054 socket error in this context is not an indication of a problem, but is currently known and expected behavior. It happens any time a WinSock connection is closed down (TCP/IP or TP4, whether clean or dirty). Although this event by itself may be confusing, it is not harmful. Winsock Error code 10054 (WSAECONNRESET) indicates a Connection reset by peer. for a list of Winsock error codes, please see the following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: Q150537 Windows Sockets Error Codes, Values, and Meaning -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Connection Terminated after 9nth message Hi All, We are having a strange problem. Some of our POP3 client users are reporting the same problem: We are receiving an error message after exactly 9 messages are downloaded and when we try again, it downloads the same 9 messages Error message is: Some messages couldn't be retrieved from the server Socket Error:10054 Error Number:0x800CCC0F Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. We're using E2K+SP2 Any comments please ? TIA Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message
Is the modem set to shut down after only a few minutes operation? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message In my last e-mail I said the only thing I did not try is to download them from the LAN. Well, I tried that and no hanging at all. I deleted all messages of the person who was complaining but now that there are more than 9 messages, she is having the same problem! Did not anybody have a similar problem ? Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message Thanks for suggestions. My first guess was that the 10th message was corrupted. So I checked the users who complained. They all had different 10th message. And deleting it did not change. I have deleted many e-mails and checked again but the same thing happened. Yes, I said some of the people are complaining but in fact I am not sure about the others. They may not have more than 10 e-mails waiting (that's the reply I got from one of them) and that may be why they do not seem to have problem. We do not have anything like PIX I would suspect to corrupt the attachments. All of the people are connecting from remote places. Some from US, some from Saudia Arabia and some of them are in Turkey. They all have dial-up connection but as I explained earlier I ruled out the connection problem. Connection is fine! They can check messages through OWA while they are not able to download more than 9 at a time. They can view all messages via IMAP too. I turned on every item on POP3 logging but There is nothing unusual. Clients connect, access their e-mail boxes and disconnects! No error message in App. Log or Security Log. The only thing I did not try is to use a POP3 connection on LAN. I am pretty sure this is due to a problem in Exchange actually. Because the same users were all fine and it started all of a sudden. But I just can't figure out what did change ?... Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCP Yahoo: sc0ri0n ICQ: 26477783 -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message It does indeed work that way with POP3 boxes on exchange. If you have 10 messages waiting, and you download 9, and then get interrupted, then Exchange will not delete the first 9 ,and you will get them all over again the next time you log on. You say this is happening with some people so I am assuming that not everyone is having this problem. first thing I would do is check to see what the 10th message in each box is. If it is the same in each box then remove it from one box, and see if the problem goes away. If it does simply delete it out of all the boxes. Are all of these people in house, or are they getting the mail from remote locations? If they are remote then set up a computer to download from one of the POP accounts, but use it on the network. That way if you get all the mail, you can figure there is something between your server, and their box on the internet that is causing the problem. If the same error happens, then at least you have ruled out that option. We had a problem with our PIX firewall corrupting attachments, and when outlook got to that attachment, it would choke, and quit downloading. I would have to delete the message, and then they could get the resst of their mail. I finally figured out the PIX box had a Mail Fixup protocol installed, and it was corrupting the messages. Turned in off, and no more problem. John Majetic -Original Message- From: Neil Raggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connection Terminated after 9nth message If the email client fails to get the messages correctly, it won't delete any messages off the server (I think). So next time you do a send and receive you get the same messages again. But why your getting the problem of not downloading all the messages - could be anything. -Original Message- From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Connection Terminated after 9nth message Hi All, We are having a strange problem. Some of our POP3 client users are reporting the same problem: We are receiving an error message after exactly
SSL on OWA
Hi all, We currently have a cert from verisign to enable ssl for our OWA users. We are in the process of setting up Windows 2000 Certificate Authority on our test network and are stumped with the first option of what to install, enterprise or standalone CA. We don't want to issue certificates to users on the outside, we just want them to establish a secure connection with our OWA server like it is currently configured with the verisign cert. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks. Jonathan Crouthamel - MCSE/CNA Technical Services Supervisor Systems Administrator Datavision-Prologix, Inc. Phone: 215.442.7400 x1150 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Disabling RR functionality
Title: Disabling RR functionality My boss just asked me if there is a way to disable Read Receipts from going through the IMC on our Exchange 5.5 server. Specifically if an external e-mail comes in with a request for a Read Receipt, is there a way to suppress the automatic response to this in Outlook or at the Exchange server? I know how to do it client side if the client has the Internet Mail service installed. But none of our workstations need this, so the feature is disabled. I have also looked at the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet feature on the IMC, and ours is checked. I would think this would suppress the Read Receipt replies, but it doesn't. Any thoughts? TIA Chris Bodnar Network Engineer Essent Corporation 610-559- X:24 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
Title: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events I would be interested in your outline. Rick Gasper Manager of Network Services King's College Wilkes-Barre PA 18711 Phone: 570-208-5845 Fax: 570-208-5989 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Setup each piece of equipment as a separate mailbox on Exchange, determine who will be the owner of that mailbox resource and make them the owner. Open the resource mailbox that you have just created from Outlook, do not attach to it from another mailbox, the first time you open the mailbox it creates the calendar, while you're there you can setup the appropriate delegate permissions, and also in the Tools/Options/Calendar options, Resource Scheduling, there you can set it to auto accept meeting requests, and auto decline conflicting meeting requests. Then you can exit out of this mailbox and the owner can just attach to it from their mailbox. To use a resource mailbox have your users send a meeting request to that mailbox for the time needed and you should be good to go. I would recommend that you make a new Recipients Container in Exchange Admin for Resources. There is a Q article that explains all this, but I don't know where it is now, the above is what is says in a condensed version. I have about 35 Resource mailboxes on my Exchange server and once you've set it up, it's a piece of cake to manage once you get the users trained of course :) If you're interested, I have an outline for resource mailbox training. Good luck, Sherry -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events The documentation on resources in my exchange doc's is sketchy, but I am told you can make rooms or equipment a resource to eleviate double booking plsning for clean up retool etc. I just was wondering if anyone had a good set of docs about that not serve resources related to performace but the ability to track room manufacturing equipment etc. thanks Chris -- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Info on resources for what specifically? -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Does anyone have good info on resources in exchange I know this figures in, but I can't find good Documentation. Thanks Chris --- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, just make sure that anyone that needs to see it has reviewer perms -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Matthew, What kind of persmission are need? I was think only giving the person that is responsible for the room, Editor permissions, will this work? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Yes, that is exactly what we did. We made a folder to group them as Conference Rooms and then had a Calendar for each inside. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Matthew, How did you set yours up? I'm thinking about doing one calendar per room. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Sure it works. You mean just keep calendars as Public Folders. There is no unique set up that I know of -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the scheduling of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders with calendars, is anyone using Exchange for this. Will Exchange work for this? Is there any particular setup necessary for this? Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric Sabo NT
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain
We have a bunch of users homed in a trusted domain that access our servers. Exchange doesn't care where the users are. Steve -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain We would like to setup another Domain (NT 4.0) and move the Exchange 5.5 Store to a new Server while still allowing the users from the current NT 4.0 Domain access to their mailboxes via a trust. Can this be done? I have only been succesful moving an Information Store within the same Domain. Once I build a new Exchange Server into the new Domain, even if I import the individual mailboxes, how would the users access the mailboxes? Could you set the primary account to another Domain? JR _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MailboxManager - Purge procedure.
Mailbox manager removes items from the selected folders into deleted item retention if you have it enabled. Otherwise, it's a hard delete much the same as using shift-delete in Outlook. It does not move anything into your Deleted Items folder. Take caution when adding recipients because the previous policy will reset all date limits to 0. Any new recipients will automatically be given the MBX=n property once MBX Manager is enabled. John Allhiser CCNP MCSE Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MailboxManager - Purge procedure. Good morning, If you do not use mailbox manager please delete this message. For those of you that use mailbox manager could you tell me if the Deleted Items folder is purged first then the messages over X number of days are moved from those folders to the deleted items folder? Also can the mailbox manager have two different run times as suggested in the letter below? They are worried that mailbox manager moves items first and then deletes, but I could not find anything in the documentation. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: McClernon Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:36 PM To: Mitchell Mike Subject: Purge procedure. Mike; To control the purge procedure, ensure that the deleted folder is purged first then the 90 day purge is run on the rest of the folders, could you stagger the times the purge is run. Mike Mescall suggested that you could purge the deleted items folder on Friday evening and then purge the other folders on Saturday evening.This may control the sequence of events and maintain the proper order of things. The implementation of the purge has not been determined yet. Thoughts Mike McClernon (317) 532-7800 x6365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain
Thanks for the quick response. They have local mailboxes in your Store? What is the Primary NT Account pointing to? I'm sorry, I just cant picture this in my mind. My goal is to create a seperate NT 4.0 environmnent running parallel to the current with trusts but not bringing over the current users but still giving them access to the email server once that is moved into the other Domain until the new accounts have been setup. -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain We have a bunch of users homed in a trusted domain that access our servers. Exchange doesn't care where the users are. Steve -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain We would like to setup another Domain (NT 4.0) and move the Exchange 5.5 Store to a new Server while still allowing the users from the current NT 4.0 Domain access to their mailboxes via a trust. Can this be done? I have only been succesful moving an Information Store within the same Domain. Once I build a new Exchange Server into the new Domain, even if I import the individual mailboxes, how would the users access the mailboxes? Could you set the primary account to another Domain? JR _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: Recently Changed to Native Mode
LDAP is used to query Directories such as AD and MS Exchange 2000 when
connected to AD. Did you install the Exchange AD Connector? Is this
Service started? I would be concerned about this as it is a request for
some information. But of course it could just be another MS bug
Jeán Paul Reece
ARAE Networks Inc.\Advanced Research And Engineering
908-310-3074
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Businesses and People
-Original Message-
From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Recently Changed to Native Mode
This is probably a really easy one to answer, but I recently changed to
native mode on my Exchange 2000 Server. Since doing this I have started to
receive the following messages in my event logs:-
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSADC.
Event Category: LDAP Operations
Event ID: 8026
Date: 05/03/2002
Time: 15:11:52
User: N/A
Computer: {Servername}
Description:
LDAP Bind was unsuccessful on directory {Exchange Server} for distinguished
name 'Userid'. Directory returned error:[0x51] Server Down. (Connection
Agreement 'Mailboxes' #1992)
For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Do I have to delete my connection agreements in ADC to resolve this issue,
if not what can I do to stop it.
Many Thanks
Jez
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disabling RR functionality
Title: Disabling RR functionality Read receipts are a client function. They are email messages. Exchange just delievers them. Freeware to stop them: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm Commercial: www.grinningshark.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message-From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Disabling RR functionality My boss just asked me if there is a way to disable Read Receipts from going through the IMC on our Exchange 5.5 server. Specifically if an external e-mail comes in with a request for a Read Receipt, is there a way to suppress the automatic response to this in Outlook or at the Exchange server? I know how to do it client side if the client has the Internet Mail service installed. But none of our workstations need this, so the feature is disabled. I have also looked at the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet feature on the IMC, and ours is checked. I would think this would suppress the Read Receipt replies, but it doesn't. Any thoughts? TIA Chris Bodnar Network Engineer Essent Corporation 610-559- X:24List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Opening excel attachments (only excel)
Outlook 2k Exchange 5.5 2000 pro work station if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with can not find specified file if I open up word it works fine I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also. it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view. WHAT I HAVE DONE. I did a repair on office I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck. I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments. so looks like it is something with is profile. we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile. thanks in advanced for any help. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disabling RR functionality
Title: Disabling RR functionality Try this: IMC Properties - Internet Mail tab - Advanced Options - Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet. -Original Message-From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Disabling RR functionality My boss just asked me if there is a way to disable Read Receipts from going through the IMC on our Exchange 5.5 server. Specifically if an external e-mail comes in with a request for a Read Receipt, is there a way to suppress the automatic response to this in Outlook or at the Exchange server? I know how to do it client side if the client has the Internet Mail service installed. But none of our workstations need this, so the feature is disabled. I have also looked at the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet feature on the IMC, and ours is checked. I would think this would suppress the Read Receipt replies, but it doesn't. Any thoughts? TIA Chris Bodnar Network Engineer Essent Corporation 610-559- X:24List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
DUMB Question
Title: Message I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? Sheesh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DUMB Question
Title: Message YES! Absolutely yes. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? Sheesh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DUMB Question
Title: Message Yes -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? SheeshList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Performance counters
Greetings, Just wondering if there is a place I can go to get more info on decrypting the performance counters for exchange 2000 and what each means and possible estimates for values. David White List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: DUMB Question
Title: Message give this to your boss. As a Unit of MeasureWe use bytes, like bits, to measure capacities and speeds. To distinguish bytes from bits (lowercase "b"), we use an uppercase "B." For large numbers of bytes we add prefixes such as K, M, G, T. KB = Kilobyte (KIL-oh-biit) = Thousand bytes (actually 1,024). MB = Megabyte (MAAG-uh-biit) = Million bytes (technically 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576). GB = Gigabyte (GIG-uh-biit) = Billion bytes. BrainAid: Giga rhymes with bigga. Think bigga = billion. TB = Terabyte (TAIR-uh-biit) = Trillion bytes. Matt - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: DUMB Question YES! Absolutely yes. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? SheeshList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Disabling RR functionality
And to add to this: Read receipts are a client function which can be trapped and removed on the server. But it requires custom application development or a thoroughly configurable SMTP mailer daemon to accomplish that. I know that at least on the Windows 2000 SMTP it is possible with a few lines of code. I'm reading e-mail with OWA without generating read-receipts, which IMHO is a major gotcha on any client based implementations. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disabling RR functionality Read receipts are a client function. They are email messages. Exchange just delievers them. Freeware to stop them: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm Commercial: www.grinningshark.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [mailto:MS- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Disabling RR functionality My boss just asked me if there is a way to disable Read Receipts from going through the IMC on our Exchange 5.5 server. Specifically if an external e-mail comes in with a request for a Read Receipt, is there a way to suppress the automatic response to this in Outlook or at the Exchange server? I know how to do it client side if the client has the Internet Mail service installed. But none of our workstations need this, so the feature is disabled. I have also looked at the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet feature on the IMC, and ours is checked. I would think this would suppress the Read Receipt replies, but it doesn't. Any thoughts? TIA Chris Bodnar Network Engineer Essent Corporation 610-559- X:24 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
That is the theory. Of course this is useless if the shared storage fails. William -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DUMB Question
Title: Message Thank you everyone, at least I am crazy but not totally ignorant, -Original Message-From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: DUMB Question give this to your boss. As a Unit of MeasureWe use bytes, like bits, to measure capacities and speeds. To distinguish bytes from bits (lowercase "b"), we use an uppercase "B." For large numbers of bytes we add prefixes such as K, M, G, T. KB = Kilobyte (KIL-oh-biit) = Thousand bytes (actually 1,024). MB = Megabyte (MAAG-uh-biit) = Million bytes (technically 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576). GB = Gigabyte (GIG-uh-biit) = Billion bytes. BrainAid: Giga rhymes with bigga. Think bigga = billion. TB = Terabyte (TAIR-uh-biit) = Trillion bytes. Matt - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: DUMB Question YES! Absolutely yes. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? SheeshList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol *
It's not really bad to administer. The MMC is clean and functions very granular. www.disclaimit.com Would I use it? Not if my choice. Siegfried can write the equivalent with an hour and a good cup of coffee. Snookster in 62 minutes. William can too eventually. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol * Disclaimers on *internal* mail? Good grief! :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 06 March 2002 13:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol * Subject: * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol * Importance: High === This is a (rare) commercial message from your list sponsor: === * Sunbelt Adds New Exchange Tool: Policy Patrol Policy Patrol add disclaimers to your internal and external emails. It includes advanced features that other products do not offer, such as merge fields and support for formatting (HTML and rich text formats). --- Product Features Policy Patrol is an add-on for Microsoft Exchange server and Lotus Notes that allows you to add user based disclaimers to your internal and external emails. The program includes some advanced features that are not yet available in other products. These advanced features, such as merge fields and formatting, are geared towards making the disclaimer notices more relevant and distinguishable and therefore improve their weight and effectiveness. Policy Patrol offers the following features: - Global user based disclaimers - Formatted disclaimers - In- and external disclaimers - Append Prepend notices - Merge Fields - Company slogans - Signatures - Sample disclaimers - Remote management - Integration with Windows 2000 - User licensing You can find it, and a 30-day eval here: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=590 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: DUMB Question
Now ask him how many kilobits in a milligigabyte. His head will unscrew and fall on the floor... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DUMB Question Thank you everyone, at least I am crazy but not totally ignorant, -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DUMB Question give this to your boss. As a Unit of Measure We use bytes, like bits, to measure capacities and speeds. To distinguish bytes from bits (lowercase b), we use an uppercase B. For large numbers of bytes we add prefixes such as K, M, G, T. KB = Kilobyte (KIL-oh-biit) = Thousand bytes (actually 1,024). MB = Megabyte (MAAG-uh-biit) = Million bytes (technically 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576). GB = Gigabyte (GIG-uh-biit) = Billion bytes. BrainAid: Giga rhymes with bigga. Think bigga = billion. TB = Terabyte (TAIR-uh-biit) = Trillion bytes. Matt - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: DUMB Question YES! Absolutely yes. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? Sheesh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
I would probably deploy one of the third party tools to do this. For me, the migration is two-fold. Netware--Windows and Groupwise--Exchange. www.netiq.com www.aelita.com -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: DUMB Question
mine already did. AGG. Matt - Original Message - From: Dillon, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:56 AM Subject: FW: DUMB Question Now ask him how many kilobits in a milligigabyte. His head will unscrew and fall on the floor... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DUMB Question Thank you everyone, at least I am crazy but not totally ignorant, -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DUMB Question give this to your boss. As a Unit of Measure We use bytes, like bits, to measure capacities and speeds. To distinguish bytes from bits (lowercase b), we use an uppercase B. For large numbers of bytes we add prefixes such as K, M, G, T. KB = Kilobyte (KIL-oh-biit) = Thousand bytes (actually 1,024). MB = Megabyte (MAAG-uh-biit) = Million bytes (technically 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576). GB = Gigabyte (GIG-uh-biit) = Billion bytes. BrainAid: Giga rhymes with bigga. Think bigga = billion. TB = Terabyte (TAIR-uh-biit) = Trillion bytes. Matt - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: DUMB Question YES! Absolutely yes. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DUMB Question I am having a typical issue with a nontech manager. In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox resource size totals in K. That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself. For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? Sheesh List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel)
FWIW: I have the same exact problem. I tried the same steps as you. The only other thing to try which I hadn't is to clear Office totally off re-install from scratch (my user didn't want the downtime - so I havent tried that yet) Jeff -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 14:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening excel attachments (only excel) Outlook 2k Exchange 5.5 2000 pro work station if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with can not find specified file if I open up word it works fine I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also. it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view. WHAT I HAVE DONE. I did a repair on office I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck. I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments. so looks like it is something with is profile. we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile. thanks in advanced for any help. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
LOL! -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain
Thank you. This just saved me allot of work. Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain Resource Domain, then. IIRC, you should be able to get away with the following... 1) Create New NT 4 Domain 2) Setup ONE WAY trust to existing Domain, such that the new Domain trusts the old Domains users, but not vice versa unless there is a need to trust user accounts from the Resource Domain. 3) Create Exchange Server in New Domain, add to existing Organization. *This will necessitate using the Service account from the old Domain* 4) Move Mailboxes from old Exchange Server to new Exchange server (Export to PST and run a backup for safety). 5) Look up info in Knowledge Base re: removing the First Exchange Server in an Exchange 5.5 organization if that applies to you. The trust will take care of NT Account to Mailbox authentication. By _moving_ instead of exporting and importing mailboxes, you change the location of the box and update the directory pointers. This will help insure that there is no need to make client side modifications for MAPI clients. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain Thanks for the quick response. They have local mailboxes in your Store? What is the Primary NT Account pointing to? I'm sorry, I just cant picture this in my mind. My goal is to create a seperate NT 4.0 environmnent running parallel to the current with trusts but not bringing over the current users but still giving them access to the email server once that is moved into the other Domain until the new accounts have been setup. -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain We have a bunch of users homed in a trusted domain that access our servers. Exchange doesn't care where the users are. Steve -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain We would like to setup another Domain (NT 4.0) and move the Exchange 5.5 Store to a new Server while still allowing the users from the current NT 4.0 Domain access to their mailboxes via a trust. Can this be done? I have only been succesful moving an Information Store within the same Domain. Once I build a new Exchange Server into the new Domain, even if I import the individual mailboxes, how would the users access the mailboxes? Could you set the primary account to another Domain? JR List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
True. Point taken. -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Groupwise doesn't necessarily imply Netware. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/02 02:56PM I would probably deploy one of the third party tools to do this. For me, the migration is two-fold. Netware--Windows and Groupwise--Exchange. www.netiq.com www.aelita.com -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help
Thanks that did it, don't know how that got checked... I appreciate you taking your time to help. -Original Message- From: Steve Rosco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) OL2000: Unable to Double-click to Open an Excel Attachment see KB article: Q231342 -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening excel attachments (only excel) Outlook 2k Exchange 5.5 2000 pro work station if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with can not find specified file if I open up word it works fine I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also. it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view. WHAT I HAVE DONE. I did a repair on office I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck. I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments. so looks like it is something with is profile. we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile. thanks in advanced for any help. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MTADATA
Tom- This is be design...see technet article Q178021 for addtional information... The highlights from the article: When you look in the Microsoft Exchange Server Mtadata directory, you may find a large number of .dat files, for example, DB000123.DAT. Many of these files are only 1 byte in size. This is also true, even if the Exchange Server message transfer agent (MTA) does not have any messages in the queues held for delivery. CAUSE = This is by product design. In Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5, the MTA creates DAT files for all messages. After the messages have been delivered, instead of deleting the DAT files themselves, the data is deleted from the DAT files and the files are reset to 1 byte. The DAT files can be reused for future messages. (had the same question internally this morning!) -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MTADATA NT4 6a / Exch 5.5 SP4 We had a problem with a remote server that has since been fixed, but I noticed a bunch (6900+) items in the mtadata directory. The problem involved the MTA and IMS, there was a corrupted message in the queue. When I cleaned it out and the MTA/IMS was restarted, the MTA queue reflected the items and it eventually cleared. The items are still in the mtadata directory, which kind of caught me as strange. I looked at a couple local servers and there are a few items in the directory, but no where near the amount I see on the remote. What is the story with this directory? Is this something that needs to be manually cleaned? Thanks in advance, Tom Cross Viasystems Group List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MTADATA
Thanks Ken. I figured it was by design. I thought I had better CYA. Thanks for the highlights for the lazy. -Original Message- From: Brown, Ken F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: MTADATA Tom- This is be design...see technet article Q178021 for addtional information... The highlights from the article: When you look in the Microsoft Exchange Server Mtadata directory, you may find a large number of .dat files, for example, DB000123.DAT. Many of these files are only 1 byte in size. This is also true, even if the Exchange Server message transfer agent (MTA) does not have any messages in the queues held for delivery. CAUSE = This is by product design. In Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5, the MTA creates DAT files for all messages. After the messages have been delivered, instead of deleting the DAT files themselves, the data is deleted from the DAT files and the files are reset to 1 byte. The DAT files can be reused for future messages. (had the same question internally this morning!) -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MTADATA NT4 6a / Exch 5.5 SP4 We had a problem with a remote server that has since been fixed, but I noticed a bunch (6900+) items in the mtadata directory. The problem involved the MTA and IMS, there was a corrupted message in the queue. When I cleaned it out and the MTA/IMS was restarted, the MTA queue reflected the items and it eventually cleared. The items are still in the mtadata directory, which kind of caught me as strange. I looked at a couple local servers and there are a few items in the directory, but no where near the amount I see on the remote. What is the story with this directory? Is this something that needs to be manually cleaned? Thanks in advance, Tom Cross Viasystems Group List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Can't create file
FYI After some research and troubleshooting, I came across the following article(s) that pertains at least to the problem we were having (although we are not running Terminal Server). The Temporary Internet Files folder was missing from the end users local profile. PSS ID Number Q249793, Q268744 Thanks, Ken -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't create file Their temporary file locations are full. Clean out all (and I mean ALL) temporary file locations in their logon profile. - Original Message - From: Millar, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:06 AM Subject: Can't create file This may be somewhat off topic. I would like to know if anyone has seen this before. Microsoft gives an explanation in the following: Q181990 but I checked the permissions and it does not seem to apply here. Environment: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 running on NT4 Sp6a. Client: Outlook 2000 on NT Workstation 4.0 SP5 or SP6a (we have some of each) Client receives following error message while trying to open a WordPerfect attachment from email. Can't create file: file name Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the Shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder. Resolution: Blowing away the roaming(local) profile(s) clears up the problem temporarily. Thanks, Ken Millar Network Support Analyst Ottawa Police Service List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
Hug? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel)
Tools Options General Ignore Other Applications -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 11:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening excel attachments (only excel) Outlook 2k Exchange 5.5 2000 pro work station if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with can not find specified file if I open up word it works fine I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also. it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view. WHAT I HAVE DONE. I did a repair on office I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck. I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments. so looks like it is something with is profile. we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile. thanks in advanced for any help. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help
Title: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help Very nice. Good job all -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help Thanks that did it, don't know how that got checked... I appreciate you taking your time to help. -Original Message- From: Steve Rosco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) OL2000: Unable to Double-click to Open an Excel Attachment see KB article: Q231342 -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening excel attachments (only excel) Outlook 2k Exchange 5.5 2000 pro work station if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with can not find specified file if I open up word it works fine I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also. it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view. WHAT I HAVE DONE. I did a repair on office I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck. I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments. so looks like it is something with is profile. we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile. thanks in advanced for any help. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 5.5 IE?
My Exchange server still has IE 3.x on it. Is there any reason NOT to install 5.5 or 6.0? Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ That's one small step for a man; one giant leap for mankind. -NeilArmstrong ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
GW =/= NW is true. If you really want a clean migration however, you will have a Novell Client running, and that does imply NW. John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? True. Point taken. -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Groupwise doesn't necessarily imply Netware. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/02 02:56PM I would probably deploy one of the third party tools to do this. For me, the migration is two-fold. Netware--Windows and Groupwise--Exchange. www.netiq.com www.aelita.com -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
Several. Why? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 05:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing Settings on the external address in there contact list or Address Book is set wrong. They have set something in there Address book entry for the SMTP settings for encoding or format of the message/attachment. Check the settings between the 2 clients you speak of for the same address and I bet you find a difference. I'd be willing to put money that your client set them to RICH TEXT only and it's not an Exchange system and the gateway drops the encoded attachment because it doesn't know how RICH-TEXT works. On the other client they probably accepted all the default settings (best way usually) and it works just fine. You can also check your IMS to make sure you have it set correctly. I get around this problem (again, usually) by checking MIME and also Plain Text and HTML under the Message Content box on the Internet Mail tab. 99% of the time this corrects(read:override) any settings the client may have done. -Rick -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Attachments Disappearing
I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing No, we are using Outlook and it's set for rich text Murray -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments DisappearingI have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Huh? I use Word as the editor and send to many people who do not use Word and have no problems? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing and you are certain that this one user hasn't changed it? -Original Message-From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:58 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing No, we are using Outlook and it's set for rich text Murray -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Attachment blocking on the other end? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 IE?
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 IE? We forgot to mention Roger that silence on this alias means, YES, It's okay. wink -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 IE? My Exchange server still has IE 3.x on it. Is there any reason NOT to install 5.5 or 6.0? Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ That's one small step for a man; one giant leap for mankind. -NeilArmstrong ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Bend-Over Server
Not necessary thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Hug? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing You are absolutely correct, that was the problem. Thanks for the help! Murray -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Settings on the external address in there contact list or Address Book is set wrong. They have set something in there Address book entry for the SMTP settings for encoding or format of the message/attachment. Check the settings between the 2 clients you speak of for the same address and I bet you find a difference. I'd be willing to put money that your client set them to "RICH TEXT only" and it's not an Exchange system and the gateway drops the encoded attachment because it doesn't know how RICH-TEXT works. On the other client they probably accepted all the default settings (best way usually) and it works just fine. You can also check your IMS to make sure you have it set correctly. I get around this problem (again, usually) by checking "MIME" and also "Plain Text" and "HTML" under the "Message Content" box on the "Internet Mail" tab. 99% of the time this corrects(read:override) any settings the client may have done. -Rick -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
We did a migration recently. Things went fairly smooth using the GW Migration tool, however, the tasks didn't seem to come across correctly. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:50 PM Posted To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Conversation: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Several. Why? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 05:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: How to give managers rights to edit email aliases in AD
How many users are you trying to manage in these Distribution Lists? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Hug? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
I needed that after a day like today. Almost decided to hang it up and become a park ranger. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Hug? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
Title: Message whadda I win.. whadda I win... pantpant glad I was able to help.. -Original Message-From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing You are absolutely correct, that was the problem. Thanks for the help! Murray -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments Disappearing Settings on the external address in there contact list or Address Book is set wrong. They have set something in there Address book entry for the SMTP settings for encoding or format of the message/attachment. Check the settings between the 2 clients you speak of for the same address and I bet you find a difference. I'd be willing to put money that your client set them to "RICH TEXT only" and it's not an Exchange system and the gateway drops the encoded attachment because it doesn't know how RICH-TEXT works. On the other client they probably accepted all the default settings (best way usually) and it works just fine. You can also check your IMS to make sure you have it set correctly. I get around this problem (again, usually) by checking "MIME" and also "Plain Text" and "HTML" under the "Message Content" box on the "Internet Mail" tab. 99% of the time this corrects(read:override) any settings the client may have done. -Rick -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SSL on OWA
Not sure you need to set up a CA at all. Just use the cert and you will be fine. David -Original Message- From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SSL on OWA Hi all, We currently have a cert from verisign to enable ssl for our OWA users. We are in the process of setting up Windows 2000 Certificate Authority on our test network and are stumped with the first option of what to install, enterprise or standalone CA. We don't want to issue certificates to users on the outside, we just want them to establish a secure connection with our OWA server like it is currently configured with the verisign cert. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks. Jonathan Crouthamel - MCSE/CNA Technical Services Supervisor Systems Administrator Datavision-Prologix, Inc. Phone: 215.442.7400 x1150 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration?
a Novell Client running, and that does imply NW. Actually, no. I'm running Novell Client32 V4.81 on my laptop, in our Win2K/NT shop, simply because I have a NetWare 5 server in my home LAN. Works fine with our Microsoft-only office domain - I just check the little box for Workstation-only (a misnomer), and select the domain rather than my PC, to logon to. - Bob Peitzke -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? GW =/= NW is true. If you really want a clean migration however, you will have a Novell Client running, and that does imply NW. John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? True. Point taken. -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Groupwise doesn't necessarily imply Netware. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/02 02:56PM I would probably deploy one of the third party tools to do this. For me, the migration is two-fold. Netware--Windows and Groupwise--Exchange. www.netiq.com www.aelita.com -Original Message- From: Charles McNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Groupwise to Exchange Migration? Anybody here ever done a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration? or know anybody who has? Charles McNeill Novell System Administrator New Hanover Regional Medical Center email [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MAPI over T1
Title: Message I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway.Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Not that I know. dont mean sh_t though, he he You dont like OWA? I kinda really like it now Hell, member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway. Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments Disappearing
What OS ? What version/SP of email server? Client ? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 16:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments Disappearing I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain people outside our email system, the attachments do not reach the intended person. The email gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she sends the same attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in tact. If someone else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did NOT receive the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have any ideas where to start looking? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 IE?
Support (or lack there of) MS only supports n+1. So ie 5.5 or 6.0 -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 16:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 IE? My Exchange server still has IE 3.x on it. Is there any reason NOT to install 5.5 or 6.0? Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ That's one small step for a man; one giant leap for mankind. -NeilArmstrong ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 IE?
What service pack of 5.5 svr? -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 16:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 IE? My Exchange server still has IE 3.x on it. Is there any reason NOT to install 5.5 or 6.0? Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ That's one small step for a man; one giant leap for mankind. -NeilArmstrong ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 and 3905.017. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message I'm sure it will be fine. I was at a company with 8 remote offices of 50 to 100 people. Each had a 256K connection to the home office where the Exch servers were. It was a little slow, but it worked just fine. I would agree. Dont put a server in each locale. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. ThanksList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MAPI over T1
Title: Message Oh yah its MUCH better, and with integrated authentication over the vpn it probably wouldnt be too bad, but to use it all day every day for work must be kind of annoying.. -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Not that I know. dont mean sh_t though, he he You dont like OWA? I kinda really like it nowHell, member the 5.5 days, now that sucked. Its come a long ways jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Yah Im not sure either, is there any other way to populate the users global address book and public folders without using MAPI or webmail (ugh!). -Original Message-From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MAPI over T1 Ben, let us know how this works anyway.Mapi is such a freakin pig, I am curious if the performance is usable myself! jlc -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MAPI over T1 I have two offices running Exchange 2000/Windows 2000. Right now they are connected via a VPN over the T1 pipes. We are preparing to open two new offices each with a vpn to corporate via the T1. There are about 30 users at site A and site B each with exchange site connected. I was thinking the two new locations would have enough bandwidth to use MAPI instead of POP over the t1 vpn. Probably 15-20 users from remote to connect to either siteA or siteB. Overall users is about 75. Any suggestions on bandwidth requirements? I dont think I need an e2k server at each location for 15-20 users. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server This is also possible with Double Take. It maintains two copies of the server and automatically takes over if the primary fails. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I needed that after a day like today. Almost decided to hang it up and become a park ranger. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Hug? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I have 4 of them. :o( -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55 /help/default.htm We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Does MS have Whitepapers on this? Jeán Paul Reece -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server Yes. That is clustering. -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off? Jeán Paul Reece _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE : Multiple SMTP reply addresses
I just check but i missed the place in outlook where to get the from field Just give a tip thks -Message d'origine- De : AGUIAR John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : mardi 5 mars 2002 18:54 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses Well, one of the fields they can work with from within the client (Outlook) is the from field. Set that up and let them select which account the outbound message is from. We have that configured here for some users and it works well. John -Original Message- From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple SMTP reply addresses We have a some users who require two SMTP addersses with different domains. (i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]), thats fine and I can do this with within their mailbox settings. The problem is they also need to be able to reply to incoming message using either address, and this is where I've come un-stuck. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. (even if it's just to say it's not possible!) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
