RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

[Carol Fee]

This had to go to the escalation support team at Microsoft for a resolution.  
Here it is

ADSI Edit
CN=Configuration
CN=Services
CN=Organization Name
CN=Recipient Policies
CN=Default Policy

Attribute=msExchPurportedSearchUI
Attribute=purportedSearch

Both attributes must have a value. In this particular case that value needed to 
be
(mailNickname=*)

CFee
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 4:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

Also unable to mail enable any existing Public Folders that aren't already mail 
enabled using either the GUI or the EMS.
This is a single E2K7 server in a W2K8 domain functional level.  The process 
appears to complete, but when I check the properties of the folder and click on 
the Email addresses tab, I get the following
The Active Directory Proxy object for the public folder publicfolder name is 
being generated. Please try again later. It was running command 
'get-publicfolder -Server servername -Identity publicfolder name
Also, there is an entry in the Application log every 15 minutes for every 
Public Folder that is mail enabled
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder PublicFolderName in 
the Active Directory.
All public folders that were already mail enabled when they were moved over 
from a E2K3 server continue to work.
Exchange BPA isn't flagging anything, other than drivers.
Exchange System Attendant is running under the local System account.
I know this is some sort of a permissions issue with Exchange creating the 
DSProxy in AD, but I don't know how to fix it.



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\cfee\Application%20Data\Microsoft\Signatures\mbalogo-gold.gif]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

[Carol Fee]

Doesn't the SA also create the email address for mailboxes ?

CFee
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

Just an idea, but since the action on AD happens using the computer account of 
the Exchange server (local system), how is the health of that?  Have you 
verified the computer account is still working correctly in the domain 
(changing its password, etc), belongs to the correct domain groups, and hasn't 
had its security properties in AD modified to where the server can't read its 
own settings?

-Bonnie

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

The Microsoft Exchange System Objects container is at the root level of the 
domain.  All Public Folder objects are listed whether or not they are 
mail-enabled, and each one has an email address  in the form of pf 
name@massbar.org, whether or not it is mail enabled.  The modified dates are 
different (drastically) when you look at this container on a DC than when you 
look at it on the Exchange server.  The security on the container is
SelfSpecial Permissions
Authenticated Users  
Read/Special Permissions
Network Service  
Read/Special Permissions
Service-exchange
Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Service-backupexec   Full 
control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
My user acc't   
  Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Exchange servers 
Read/Special Permissions
Exchange Organization Administrators   Special permissions
Exchange Recipient Administrators  Read/Special 
Permissions(Inherited)
Exchange Public Folder Administrators   Special permissions 
(Inherited)
Administrator (domain)Full 
control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Enterprise Admins   
Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)  
  (Inherited)
Exchange AdminsFull 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Exchange Domain serversFull 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Exchange Enterprise Servers  Full 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Domain Admins
Read/Write/Create/Special permissions   (Inherited)


CFee
From: David L Christensen [mailto:david.christen...@northwestern.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

I ran into a similar problem a while back.  Have you looked at the Microsoft 
Exchange System Objects container yet? All of your mail-enabled PFs should be 
accounted for in that OU.   You can do an add/remove columns and choose 
modified date, then sort to see when your last PF was mail-enabled.  The funny 
thing is in my case this container (for whatever reason) was no longer located 
at the top level of the domain where Exchange has been installed.  It was 
within a sub-folder!!  Once I moved the container back to the root level, 
things were back to normal.

Hopefully that helps...


Dave Christensen
Sr. Sytems Analyst - Collaboration Services
Northwestern University
Phone: 847-491-2817
david.christen...@northwestern.edumailto:david.christen...@northwestern.edu
www.it.northwestern.eduhttp://www.it.northwestern.edu/




From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 3:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

Also unable to mail enable any existing Public Folders that aren't already mail 
enabled using either the GUI or the EMS.
This is a single E2K7 server in a W2K8 domain functional level.  The process 
appears to complete, but when I check the properties of the folder and click on 
the Email addresses tab, I get the following
The Active Directory Proxy object for the public folder publicfolder name

RE: Anti-spam choices in general?

[Carol Fee]

I agree.  We've been using the physical 300 for 5 years - no complaints.

CFee
-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-spam choices in general?

I had the physical 300 model for 5 years or so and have had the virtual 
appliance version of that model for 2+ years and can't say I've experience much 
of what you mention below.  Everyone's spam is going to be subjective though.  
I've always had it in global mode.  Just mark a few hundred spam/ham msg's and 
let it go.  Pay attention to it for a couple weeks to get thresholds set 
properly.  Then I have a narrow threshold for quarantine I send to an account 
to check every few weeks for false positives.  I've had false positives over 
the years but white listing those domains fixes that.  And even then most of 
the false positives are because of word filters in the message.  It maybe gets 
10 min a week of my attention, but you have 10 times the users I do so..

-Original Message-
From: Mike Benedict [mailto:benedic...@palmer.edu] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-spam choices in general?

I do like the Barracuda but...   there's just a bunch of nagging things.   A 
few that  immediately come to mind are:

Support says we have excessive filters (I don't think we do).
False positives due to an unexplained Barracuda custom rule.
They like to Barracuda whitelist sites we have no interest in.
Rate limiting has always been inconsistently applied and support has no idea 
why.
Inconsistent message log search results (which is really annoying when you're 
trying to help a user find their e-mail).
Seemingly simplistic (and obvious) spam is often not blocked (e.g. porn e-mails 
with an abundance of special characters).
Inconsistent blocking, same spam, different recipients, some blocked, some not, 
no known cause.
I dislike that I have to call support because the box is doing something it 
shouldn't that I can't control.  With that said, I have no complaints regarding 
the quality of their support reps.

All in all, given the cost, I think the Barracuda offers a good value but, I'd 
like something that allows more control and more consistent performance.

Thanks for the recommendations!


-Original Message-
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-spam choices in general?

We use Symantec's Brightstor gateway for inbound and outbound mail.  Easy to 
use and reliable.

In the past I've used Barracuda.  What don't you like about Barracuda?  I found 
the unit I used very flexible.  At my old shop we allowed users to have logons 
to create their own custom controls.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-spam choices in general?

I'm rather fond of Vircom's ModusGate solutions.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Benedict [mailto:benedic...@palmer.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anti-spam choices in general?

Just wondering if there's anti-spam recommendations for either appliances or 
standalone server based software (we need it to front-end a mail router ahead 
of Exchange)?

I currently use Barracuda and while I feel it represents a good value, I'm 
interested in a next-step solution that allows the customer a bit more 
flexibility to define custom rules.

Thanks,
Mike Benedict




---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

[Carol Fee]

The Microsoft Exchange System Objects container is at the root level of the 
domain.  All Public Folder objects are listed whether or not they are 
mail-enabled, and each one has an email address  in the form of pf 
name@massbar.org, whether or not it is mail enabled.  The modified dates are 
different (drastically) when you look at this container on a DC than when you 
look at it on the Exchange server.  The security on the container is
SelfSpecial Permissions
Authenticated Users  
Read/Special Permissions
Network Service  
Read/Special Permissions
Service-exchange
Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Service-backupexec   Full 
control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
My user acc't   
  Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Exchange servers 
Read/Special Permissions
Exchange Organization Administrators   Special permissions
Exchange Recipient Administrators  Read/Special 
Permissions(Inherited)
Exchange Public Folder Administrators   Special permissions 
(Inherited)
Administrator (domain)Full 
control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)
Enterprise Admins   
Full control (all permission boxes except Special permissions are checked)  
  (Inherited)
Exchange AdminsFull 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Exchange Domain serversFull 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Exchange Enterprise Servers  Full 
control/Special permissions (all permission boxes except Special permissions 
are checked)
Domain Admins
Read/Write/Create/Special permissions   (Inherited)


CFee
From: David L Christensen [mailto:david.christen...@northwestern.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

I ran into a similar problem a while back.  Have you looked at the Microsoft 
Exchange System Objects container yet? All of your mail-enabled PFs should be 
accounted for in that OU.   You can do an add/remove columns and choose 
modified date, then sort to see when your last PF was mail-enabled.  The funny 
thing is in my case this container (for whatever reason) was no longer located 
at the top level of the domain where Exchange has been installed.  It was 
within a sub-folder!!  Once I moved the container back to the root level, 
things were back to normal.

Hopefully that helps...


Dave Christensen
Sr. Sytems Analyst - Collaboration Services
Northwestern University
Phone: 847-491-2817
david.christen...@northwestern.edumailto:david.christen...@northwestern.edu
www.it.northwestern.eduhttp://www.it.northwestern.edu/




From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 3:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

Also unable to mail enable any existing Public Folders that aren't already mail 
enabled using either the GUI or the EMS.
This is a single E2K7 server in a W2K8 domain functional level.  The process 
appears to complete, but when I check the properties of the folder and click on 
the Email addresses tab, I get the following
The Active Directory Proxy object for the public folder publicfolder name is 
being generated. Please try again later. It was running command 
'get-publicfolder -Server servername -Identity publicfolder name
Also, there is an entry in the Application log every 15 minutes for every 
Public Folder that is mail enabled
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder PublicFolderName in 
the Active Directory.
All public folders that were already mail enabled when they were moved over 
from a E2K3 server continue to work.
Exchange BPA isn't flagging anything, other than drivers.
Exchange System Attendant is running under the local System account.
I know this is some sort of a permissions issue with Exchange creating the 
DSProxy in AD, but I don't know how to fix it.



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings

RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

[Carol Fee]

I am
Shocked
Disappointed
But ..
Feeling slightly better about the prospect of spending $$$ to call Microsoft.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

This is a new one on me :(

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 4:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to create mail enabled Public Folder in E2K7 SP3

Also unable to mail enable any existing Public Folders that aren't already mail 
enabled using either the GUI or the EMS.
This is a single E2K7 server in a W2K8 domain functional level.  The process 
appears to complete, but when I check the properties of the folder and click on 
the Email addresses tab, I get the following
The Active Directory Proxy object for the public folder publicfolder name is 
being generated. Please try again later. It was running command 
'get-publicfolder -Server servername -Identity publicfolder name
Also, there is an entry in the Application log every 15 minutes for every 
Public Folder that is mail enabled
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder PublicFolderName in 
the Active Directory.
All public folders that were already mail enabled when they were moved over 
from a E2K3 server continue to work.
Exchange BPA isn't flagging anything, other than drivers.
Exchange System Attendant is running under the local System account.
I know this is some sort of a permissions issue with Exchange creating the 
DSProxy in AD, but I don't know how to fix it.



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\cfee\Application%20Data\Microsoft\Signatures\mbalogo-gold.gif]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Moving to 2010 - Spam filter options?

[Carol Fee]

Second that !

CFee
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 4:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Moving to 2010 - Spam filter options?

I like my Barracuda very, very much.  It just flat works, and I only have to 
touch it to find something for someone, or figure out why a message didn't go 
through to an external recipient (we use it as our outbound gateway to take 
advantage of the backscatter prevention feature). I never have to touch it to 
fix anything.  I used to use Ninja, but only for A/V.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Eldridge, D K, 
d...@parkviewmc.commailto:d...@parkviewmc.com wrote:
We are finally gearing up to move to 2010 from 2003. We currently use 
Sunbelts/GFI/ninja/vipre spam filter. It has worked fine over the years but now 
that we are moving to 2010 I wanted to see what others are using.
Anyone move from Sunbelt ninja on 2003 to GFI/whatevertheycallit 2010?
Barracuda appliance?
Anything else?
Thanks for any input.
dave

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Outlook Credentials

[Carol Fee]

Have you tried rebooting your workstation ?  That usually does the trick.

CFee
From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Credentials

Does anyone know why all of a sudden Outlook is asking me for credentials every 
time I launch Outlook?

I am running Outlook 2010 and Exchange 2010.

Help


This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message in 
not the intended recipient or the employer or agent responsible for delivering 
the message to the recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by 
email or telephone, and delete this message and all of its attachments.

Thank You.


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

[Carol Fee]

No, that wasn't it.  But .. I have, finally, after many months of pulling 
my hair out over this, figured out the problem.  Our mail enabled Public 
Folders are hidden from the GAL.  There is never any reason to send internal 
emails to any of them.  In E2K3, this worked just fine .  Apparently, it 
doesn't in E2K7.  As soon as I unhid these folders from the GAL, I was able to 
Send-As from the folders.

CFee
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 6:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Hi Carol,

In EMC, Public Folder Management Console, properties of the public folder, 
select Mail Flow Settings and Delivery Options.  This is where users with Send 
on Behalf of are configured.  Clear all the users, select OK twice to exit out 
of the PF properties.  Select the public folder you want to set the Send As 
rights for but don't open it.  On the right pane of the EMC you should see 
Manage Send As Permission.  This is where you should add the users.

If I remember right, Outlook will check for send on behalf of rights before 
send as, and if it sees that it will use it regardless if the user has send as 
rights.

-matt

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Using Outlook 2007 or 2003, I'm simply entering the PF address in the From 
field.

CFee
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Sounds like you are trying to Send on Behalf of, which is different from 
Send As.

-matt

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Single W2K8 Forest and Domain and Exchange org
One Exchange 2003 SP2 server
One Exchange 2007 HT/CAS/Mailbox server
The example Public Folder below had even been deleted, and created from scratch.

We are unable to Send-As from any mail enabled Public Folder.  This worked just 
fine until the E2K7 server was introduced into the environment, and the Public 
Folders were replicated.  Then it stopped working.  The Outlook error message 
is 'You do not have permission to send the message on behalf of the specified 
user.

PFDavAdmin Property Editor produces the same results regardless of which server 
you connect to.  There are no DACL issues.
Public Folders\Community Services DOMAIN\User:Allowed:All-Extended-Rights 
DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As

Most user's mailboxes are on the E2K7 server, but I have also tested with a 
user who's mailbox is on the E2K3 server.

The results of the get-mailpublicfolder command using EMS on the E2K7 server 
are below.  I don't understand why it only list my account as having the 
permission, when there are actually 3, but I am no more able to do this than 
either of the other users.


[PS] C:\Windows\system32get-mailpublicfolder -Identity 'CN=Community Services,C
N=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=massbar,DC=org' |fl


Contacts   : {}
DeliverToMailboxAndForward : False
ExternalEmailAddress   : expf:COMMUNITY SERVICES856074B04EFF134BE6F
 610BDC8A6E02E9BFDFC
ForwardingAddress  :
PublicFolderType   : Mapi
PhoneticDisplayName:
RootUrl:
AcceptMessagesOnlyFrom : {}
AcceptMessagesOnlyFromDLMembers: {}
AddressListMembership  : {}
Alias  : CommunityServices
OrganizationalUnit : massbar.org/Microsoft Exchange System Obje
 cts
CustomAttribute1   :
CustomAttribute10  :
CustomAttribute11  :
CustomAttribute12  :
CustomAttribute13  :
CustomAttribute14  :
CustomAttribute15  :
CustomAttribute2   :
CustomAttribute3   :
CustomAttribute4   :
CustomAttribute5   :
CustomAttribute6   :
CustomAttribute7   :
CustomAttribute8   :
CustomAttribute9   :
DisplayName: Community Services
EmailAddresses : {SMTP:communityservi...@massbar.org, smtp:
 communityserv...@massbar.org}
GrantSendOnBehalfTo: {massbar.org/MBA/Users/Information Service
 s/Domain Admins/GPO Test Group/Carol Fee}
HiddenFromAddressListsEnabled  : True
LegacyExchangeDN   : /O=MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIATION/OU=MBA_EM
 AIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMMUNITY SERVICES856

RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

[Carol Fee]

Using Outlook 2007 or 2003, I'm simply entering the PF address in the From 
field.

CFee
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Sounds like you are trying to Send on Behalf of, which is different from 
Send As.

-matt

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

Single W2K8 Forest and Domain and Exchange org
One Exchange 2003 SP2 server
One Exchange 2007 HT/CAS/Mailbox server
The example Public Folder below had even been deleted, and created from scratch.

We are unable to Send-As from any mail enabled Public Folder.  This worked just 
fine until the E2K7 server was introduced into the environment, and the Public 
Folders were replicated.  Then it stopped working.  The Outlook error message 
is 'You do not have permission to send the message on behalf of the specified 
user.

PFDavAdmin Property Editor produces the same results regardless of which server 
you connect to.  There are no DACL issues.
Public Folders\Community Services DOMAIN\User:Allowed:All-Extended-Rights 
DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As

Most user's mailboxes are on the E2K7 server, but I have also tested with a 
user who's mailbox is on the E2K3 server.

The results of the get-mailpublicfolder command using EMS on the E2K7 server 
are below.  I don't understand why it only list my account as having the 
permission, when there are actually 3, but I am no more able to do this than 
either of the other users.


[PS] C:\Windows\system32get-mailpublicfolder -Identity 'CN=Community Services,C
N=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=massbar,DC=org' |fl


Contacts   : {}
DeliverToMailboxAndForward : False
ExternalEmailAddress   : expf:COMMUNITY SERVICES856074B04EFF134BE6F
 610BDC8A6E02E9BFDFC
ForwardingAddress  :
PublicFolderType   : Mapi
PhoneticDisplayName:
RootUrl:
AcceptMessagesOnlyFrom : {}
AcceptMessagesOnlyFromDLMembers: {}
AddressListMembership  : {}
Alias  : CommunityServices
OrganizationalUnit : massbar.org/Microsoft Exchange System Obje
 cts
CustomAttribute1   :
CustomAttribute10  :
CustomAttribute11  :
CustomAttribute12  :
CustomAttribute13  :
CustomAttribute14  :
CustomAttribute15  :
CustomAttribute2   :
CustomAttribute3   :
CustomAttribute4   :
CustomAttribute5   :
CustomAttribute6   :
CustomAttribute7   :
CustomAttribute8   :
CustomAttribute9   :
DisplayName: Community Services
EmailAddresses : {SMTP:communityservi...@massbar.org, smtp:
 communityserv...@massbar.org}
GrantSendOnBehalfTo: {massbar.org/MBA/Users/Information Service
 s/Domain Admins/GPO Test Group/Carol Fee}
HiddenFromAddressListsEnabled  : True
LegacyExchangeDN   : /O=MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIATION/OU=MBA_EM
 AIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMMUNITY SERVICES856
 074B04EFF134BE6F610BDC8A6E02E9BFDFC
MaxSendSize: unlimited
MaxReceiveSize : unlimited
PoliciesIncluded   : {}
PoliciesExcluded   : {}
EmailAddressPolicyEnabled  : False
PrimarySmtpAddress : communityservi...@massbar.org
RecipientType  : PublicFolder
RecipientTypeDetails   : PublicFolder
RejectMessagesFrom : {}
RejectMessagesFromDLMembers: {}
RequireSenderAuthenticationEnabled : False
SimpleDisplayName  :
UMDtmfMap  : {}
WindowsEmailAddress: communityservi...@massbar.org
IsValid: True
OriginatingServer  : MASSBARDC1.massbar.org
ExchangeVersion: 0.0 (6.5.6500.0)
Name   : Community Services
DistinguishedName  : CN=Community Services,CN=Microsoft Exchang
 e System Objects,DC=massbar,DC=org
Identity   : massbar.org/Microsoft Exchange System Obje
 cts/Community Services
Guid   : 2462f7ed-fa8f-4584-ba50-a348170a7a51
ObjectCategory : massbar.org/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-P

Unable to Send-As from Public Folders

[Carol Fee]

Single W2K8 Forest and Domain and Exchange org
One Exchange 2003 SP2 server
One Exchange 2007 HT/CAS/Mailbox server
The example Public Folder below had even been deleted, and created from scratch.

We are unable to Send-As from any mail enabled Public Folder.  This worked just 
fine until the E2K7 server was introduced into the environment, and the Public 
Folders were replicated.  Then it stopped working.  The Outlook error message 
is 'You do not have permission to send the message on behalf of the specified 
user.

PFDavAdmin Property Editor produces the same results regardless of which server 
you connect to.  There are no DACL issues.
Public Folders\Community Services DOMAIN\User:Allowed:All-Extended-Rights 
DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As DOMAIN\User::Allowed:Send-As

Most user's mailboxes are on the E2K7 server, but I have also tested with a 
user who's mailbox is on the E2K3 server.

The results of the get-mailpublicfolder command using EMS on the E2K7 server 
are below.  I don't understand why it only list my account as having the 
permission, when there are actually 3, but I am no more able to do this than 
either of the other users.


[PS] C:\Windows\system32get-mailpublicfolder -Identity 'CN=Community Services,C
N=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=massbar,DC=org' |fl


Contacts   : {}
DeliverToMailboxAndForward : False
ExternalEmailAddress   : expf:COMMUNITY SERVICES856074B04EFF134BE6F
 610BDC8A6E02E9BFDFC
ForwardingAddress  :
PublicFolderType   : Mapi
PhoneticDisplayName:
RootUrl:
AcceptMessagesOnlyFrom : {}
AcceptMessagesOnlyFromDLMembers: {}
AddressListMembership  : {}
Alias  : CommunityServices
OrganizationalUnit : massbar.org/Microsoft Exchange System Obje
 cts
CustomAttribute1   :
CustomAttribute10  :
CustomAttribute11  :
CustomAttribute12  :
CustomAttribute13  :
CustomAttribute14  :
CustomAttribute15  :
CustomAttribute2   :
CustomAttribute3   :
CustomAttribute4   :
CustomAttribute5   :
CustomAttribute6   :
CustomAttribute7   :
CustomAttribute8   :
CustomAttribute9   :
DisplayName: Community Services
EmailAddresses : {SMTP:communityservi...@massbar.org, smtp:
 communityserv...@massbar.org}
GrantSendOnBehalfTo: {massbar.org/MBA/Users/Information Service
 s/Domain Admins/GPO Test Group/Carol Fee}
HiddenFromAddressListsEnabled  : True
LegacyExchangeDN   : /O=MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIATION/OU=MBA_EM
 AIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMMUNITY SERVICES856
 074B04EFF134BE6F610BDC8A6E02E9BFDFC
MaxSendSize: unlimited
MaxReceiveSize : unlimited
PoliciesIncluded   : {}
PoliciesExcluded   : {}
EmailAddressPolicyEnabled  : False
PrimarySmtpAddress : communityservi...@massbar.org
RecipientType  : PublicFolder
RecipientTypeDetails   : PublicFolder
RejectMessagesFrom : {}
RejectMessagesFromDLMembers: {}
RequireSenderAuthenticationEnabled : False
SimpleDisplayName  :
UMDtmfMap  : {}
WindowsEmailAddress: communityservi...@massbar.org
IsValid: True
OriginatingServer  : MASSBARDC1.massbar.org
ExchangeVersion: 0.0 (6.5.6500.0)
Name   : Community Services
DistinguishedName  : CN=Community Services,CN=Microsoft Exchang
 e System Objects,DC=massbar,DC=org
Identity   : massbar.org/Microsoft Exchange System Obje
 cts/Community Services
Guid   : 2462f7ed-fa8f-4584-ba50-a348170a7a51
ObjectCategory : massbar.org/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-P
 ublic-Folder
ObjectClass: {top, publicFolder}
WhenChanged: 2/25/2011 11:41:03 AM
WhenCreated: 2/23/2011 5:19:16 PM


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St.
Boston, Ma  02110
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
[cid:image003.jpg@01CBD4FA.44B44B10]


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana

RE: PST files, be gone.

[Carol Fee]

Have you used this ?

CFee
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST files, be gone.

There is a tool called upstart that will combine PST files into one nice 
UNICODE PST.  (Forgoing the 2GB limit).
http://www.maclean.com/upstart.php



From: Roger Scudder [mailto:r...@scudderconsulting.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: PST files, be gone.

Her Exchange mailbox is up to 2.5GB and she has two PSTs at 2GB each, two at 
1GB each and a couple more that are under 500Mb each.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:27 AM, David Mazzaccaro 
david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.commailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com
 wrote:
How large is her current mailbox?
How large are the PST files?


From: Roger Scudder 
[mailto:r...@scudderconsulting.commailto:r...@scudderconsulting.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: PST files, be gone.

I have one user who has a very large mailbox, and in addition she has many pst 
files with archived mail from previous years.  I want to be rid of the pst 
files, but moving the folders to her mailbox is out of the question because it 
would be way to large.  I'm thinking that I could create an exchange store for 
the archived mail, but I'm not sure if that is really a good idea.  Any 
thoughts on this would be appreciated.  Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2003.

Roger Scudder


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exporting ALL mailbox content to PST?

[Carol Fee]

There's actually a link to that in Glenn's page, which he says is better :)

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exporting ALL mailbox content to PST?

Here is a better script, originally based on Glenn's work:

http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2009/10/16/exporting-mailboxes-larger-than-2-gb-on-an-exchange-server.aspx

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Troy Werelius [mailto:troy_werel...@lucid8.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exporting ALL mailbox content to PST?

You are correct on ExMerge and that is because it only supports ANSI PST's and 
they actually start to degrade at about 1.8GB so I would not go over that limit 
in order to ensure the data is recoverable

 1.  Here is an article on how to script the creation of overflow PST's if you 
reach the 2GB limit 
http://gsexdev.blogspot.com/2007/01/exporting-mailbox-larger-then-2-gb-and.html
 2.  Alternatively:
*   You can look at other tools like Kroll PC, Quest RM or Lucid8 DigiScope 
http://www.lucid8.com/product/digiscope.asp that will allow you to export 
data from any mailbox on a Production server or from an offline EDB to Unicode 
PSTs and also has some other cool features
*   Since you only a few mailboxes you should consider just using Outlook 
2003 or later to export each mailbox to a Unicode PST since it has a 20GB 
limit. (unless you are using Outlook 2010 and then you have a 50GB limit)
When you create a new PST i.e. select File/New/Outlook Data file you will 
have the option of selecting Office Outlook Personal Folders File (.PST) 
which is the default selection that will create a Unicode PST or you can select 
Outlook


Troy C. Werelius
Lucid8, LLC
troy_werel...@lucid8.commailto:troy_werel...@lucid8.com
425.456.8499
Monday-Friday 8AM to 6PM PST

[cid:image001.jpg@01CBADAB.542EFED0]http://www.lucid8.com/

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you 
are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the 
taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exporting ALL mailbox content to PST?

I need to export a couple of mailboxes to PST prior to deleting them, and they 
are larger than the 2gb limit on Exmerge.

I suspect I'm left with Outlook, so is there anything I need to do/know to 
ensure I get *everything* when trying to do a copy/archive at the mailbox level?

Thanks,
Paul

MIRA Ltd

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration  GB 114 5409 96

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the 
intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and 
notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.jpg

RE: Delayed messages

[Carol Fee]

Cached mode ?

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Dueck [mailto:wayne.l.du...@state.or.us] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delayed messages

We have a network device that sends PRTG email messages to an Exchange 
distribution list. I am in the DL and receive the emails on time. One of the 
recipients does not get all the emails. He will get a group of them all at once 
sometimes 12 days later. He does not use any rules to move email into folders. 
He has everything coming into his Inbox and takes care of each mail daily so 
that’s why he notices when he has a group of unread email dating over the last 
two weeks suddenly show up. I looked at the header for the message id and 
looked at the transport logs and it shows Exchange receiving it, expanding the 
DL and delivering the email all within seconds. 
This has happened several times with the client using Outlook 2007 and has now 
happened with Outlook 2010. 
Exchange 2007 SP2 RU2
What troubleshooting steps should I take next?
Thanks for your help.
Wayne
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Malicious Email - Your mailbox has been exceeded

[Carol Fee]

None yet, but thanks for the heads up.

CFee
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Malicious Email - Your mailbox has been exceeded
Importance: High

Starting seeing emails like this trying to come in.  Anyone else?
(Hyperlink sanitized).

-Paul



From: Siobhan OReilly [mailto:s.orei...@lboro.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:40 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Your Mailbox Has Exceeded

Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And 
You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To 
Re-Validate  -  Click Herehttp://no-no.com/: System Administrator

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: SMTP service causing massive outgoing bandwidth usage

[Carol Fee]

How are you handling NDR's ?  Do you send to non legitimate addresses ?

CFee
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 8:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP service causing massive outgoing bandwidth usage

Hi chaps,

We have an oddity, or perhaps not such an oddity, with an Exchange 2003 box 
using up all the outgoing bandwidth. The issue appears to be outgoing emails. 
If we stop the SMTP service then the bandwidth immediately drops. If we turn it 
back on then within about a minute the bandwidth is used up and the router 
graphs so that the Exchange servers IP is uploading stuff.

However, with the SMTP service started, the Exchange queues are nearly empty 
(currently 2 emails showing, both valid). The SMTP log itself doesn't show a 
massive number of connections to the smarthost (postini). Postini aren't 
reporting a large number of emails being sent to their server (at least no 
larger than normal). There aren't any current connections showing in the SMTP 
entry in Exchange Admin either. Relaying is limited to just Postinis IPs and, 
as no one uses the SMTP server to send emails as they all use OWA, no one is 
allowed to use the SMTP server at all.

I can't see why, given that the queues are empty and the logs show nothing 
major, why the SMTP service should be causing such an upload usage...unless 
it's sending out loads of emails, then why aren't these showing up in any 
queues/logs ?

Anyone knnow what we've missed or what might be going on?

Olly


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2007 Message tracking - find the source machine.

[Carol Fee]

Wouldn't it be in the header of the email when it was received ?

CFee
From: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Message tracking - find the source machine.

Hi,

We have a user who said that an email was sent from his account to another 
external user.
The email looks to be some sort of virus however it's only 1 email.
The user claims he never sent the email- however there is not nothing in his 
sent items.
Using message tracking I can see the email that was sent.

Is there a way to find out what PC this email was sent from?
I need to gather more information about how and why this email was sent from 
this account?

Exchange 2007 Sp1 relaying email through an Ironport device.


Regards
Fergal O'Connell



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Possible Email Virus

[Carol Fee]

Thank you.

CFee
From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Possible Email Virus

Reports of an email virus hitting some companies today. It has a link to a .scr 
file that looks like a PDF link. When users click it, it begins sending emails 
using the GAL or contacts. Not sure of the origin at this point but wanted to 
send a heads up. The email subject is Here you have.





---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email 
transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if 
addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the 
intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2010 CIGNA
==

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Delegated mailbox access and sent items

[Carol Fee]

Only if the Outlook profile is for the delegate mailbox, instead of the user's 
mailbox.

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delegated mailbox access and sent items

Outlook 2003 and 2007 with Exchange 2003
We have a number of users that have their own mailboxes and also
delegate access into a group email account.
They have send of behalf of permissions.
Is it possible that when a user replies to an email in the delegate
account the email will remain in the sent items of said delegate mailbox
instead of going into the main users sent items?

Thanks
John

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**

RE: Any SPF Wizzes Out There?

[Carol Fee]

Yeah, but then I had to add the E2K7 server :)

CFee
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Any SPF Wizzes Out There?

They should be - I created them! ;-)

--
ME2

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Carol Fee 
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org wrote:
Hmmm  I just tried sending a message to 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org and got the same result.  I 
know my spf records are good.

CFee
From: John Hornbuckle 
[mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:31 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Any SPF Wizzes Out There?

I've never had a problem with mail from us being rejected by a recipient using 
SPF until today. And naturally, it's the Florida Auditor General's office 
that's rejecting it-so it's kind of important to get it fixed.

We use Google/Postini, so all of our mail is routed through them. Below my sig 
are the results I got when I sent a message to 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org. The message passed the 
Mail-From test, but got none for the HELO result. I don't know much about 
this, but my understanding is that this result can be pass, fail, or none. I'm 
thinking that perhaps our lack of a pass here is what's causing our mail to 
be rejected by the AG's servers, but I have no idea how to fix it.

Any suggestions?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://www.taylor.k12.fl.us/



Generating server: 
Exchange-Edge.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://exchange-edge.taylor.k12.fl.us/

spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org
Postini #550 5.7.1 spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org: 
Recipient address rejected: SPF Tests: Mail-From Result=pass: Mail 
From=john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
 HELO name=na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.comhttp://na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com/ 
HELO Result=none Remote IP=74.125.149.209 ##

Original message headers:

Received: from 
Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.us/ 
(10.11.1.25) by
Exchange-Edge.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://exchange-edge.taylor.k12.fl.us/ 
(10.11.1.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:32 -0400
Received: from 
Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.us/ 
([2002:96b0:25ac::96b0:25ac]) by
Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.ushttp://exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.us/ 
([2002:96b0:25ac::96b0:25ac]) with mapi; Thu,
12 Aug 2010 14:46:32 -0400
From: John Hornbuckle 
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
To: spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:31 -0400
Subject:
Thread-Index: Acs6Tq32q3GCr+z8TcK9J2xj/mXdNA==
Message-ID: 
e4f47298c1dd67478772ed46f048b6be076ce00...@exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:e4f47298c1dd67478772ed46f048b6be076ce00...@exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.us
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=_000_E4F47298C1DD67478772ED46F048B6BE076CE001E0ExchangeCoret_
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: 
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us






NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.

RE: Any SPF Wizzes Out There?

[Carol Fee]

Hmmm  I just tried sending a message to 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org and got the same result.  I 
know my spf records are good.

CFee
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Any SPF Wizzes Out There?

I've never had a problem with mail from us being rejected by a recipient using 
SPF until today. And naturally, it's the Florida Auditor General's office 
that's rejecting it-so it's kind of important to get it fixed.

We use Google/Postini, so all of our mail is routed through them. Below my sig 
are the results I got when I sent a message to 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org. The message passed the 
Mail-From test, but got none for the HELO result. I don't know much about 
this, but my understanding is that this result can be pass, fail, or none. I'm 
thinking that perhaps our lack of a pass here is what's causing our mail to 
be rejected by the AG's servers, but I have no idea how to fix it.

Any suggestions?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us



Generating server: Exchange-Edge.taylor.k12.fl.us

spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org
Postini #550 5.7.1 spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org: 
Recipient address rejected: SPF Tests: Mail-From Result=pass: Mail 
From=john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
 HELO name=na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com HELO Result=none Remote 
IP=74.125.149.209 ##

Original message headers:

Received: from Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.us (10.11.1.25) by
Exchange-Edge.taylor.k12.fl.us (10.11.1.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:32 -0400
Received: from Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.us ([2002:96b0:25ac::96b0:25ac]) by
Exchange-Core.taylor.k12.fl.us ([2002:96b0:25ac::96b0:25ac]) with mapi; Thu,
12 Aug 2010 14:46:32 -0400
From: John Hornbuckle 
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
To: spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org 
spf-t...@openspf.orgmailto:spf-t...@openspf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:31 -0400
Subject:
Thread-Index: Acs6Tq32q3GCr+z8TcK9J2xj/mXdNA==
Message-ID: 
e4f47298c1dd67478772ed46f048b6be076ce00...@exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:e4f47298c1dd67478772ed46f048b6be076ce00...@exchange-core.taylor.k12.fl.us
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=_000_E4F47298C1DD67478772ED46F048B6BE076CE001E0ExchangeCoret_
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: 
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.usmailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us






NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.

RE: Barracuda Expertise

[Carol Fee]

They can't.  

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Barracuda Expertise

Our org has a Barracuda at the gateway.  We're having issues with too
much spam leaking through to some users' mailboxes.  The email admins
seem to think that enabling Outlook's anti-phishing option only (not
the junk mail filters) may be causing the Barracuda to filter
inadequately.  I'm confused... why/how/could Outlook settings impact a
gateway device?


Roger Wright
___

When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there
ain't nothin' like it!

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Carol Fee]

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.  I'd 
be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole 
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We have 
a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this person is 
going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any info, Legal or 
other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

RE: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

[Carol Fee]

Didn't someone post an issue earlier this week with this exact problem ?

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

FYI:  I have not seen or heard of this affecting anyone at our company but just 
in case any of you have been impacted check out the Apple article and fix 
mentioned in the original message.

-Original Message-
From: Susan Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Patch Management Mailing List
Subject: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

Forwarded courtesy of Bob Groger

Got this email from Intermedia, whose products I resell.

Bob G.


Apple recently released the iPhone4. It uses a new iPhone operating system ? 
iOS4 ? that is also available for download on older iPhone devices. The new 
iPhone operating system is adversely impacting Intermedia customers as well as 
customers of other email providers.

The following notification summarizes these issues and the critical actions we 
ask that your iPhone4 and iOS4 users immediately take in response.

The actions are in support of our commitment to providing the highest service 
quality for your organization and all Intermedia customers. We will continue to 
post updates as the situation evolves and Apple provides further details.

Summary of Issues
Exchange users who use an iPhone4 or upgraded an older iPhone to iOS4 are 
experiencing difficulties syncing their contacts, mail, and calendar via 
ActiveSync. Additionally, iOS4 is creating significant artificial load on 
Exchange servers, resulting in performance slowdowns for users on other devices 
and mail clients.

An Internet search for ?iOS4 Exchange? will provide further information related 
to these issues, which are affecting all email providers that use the 
ActiveSync protocol with iPhones.

Steps Your Organization Must Take
iPhone users who use the iPhone4 or upgraded to iOS4 must install a related 
Apple configuration patch on their iPhone. The patch, along with installation 
directions, can be found here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3398.

Failure to install this patch will result in incomplete sync of user items and 
may cause performance issues. If your users run an iPhone4 or other iOS4 device 
without the configuration patch, Intermedia may disable ActiveSync on their 
device to protect your organization?s overall service quality.

Further Technical Details on the Issue and Our Response
The iOS4 issues are driving random application pool instability on Exchange 
2007 CAS servers. Microsoft confirmed this instability is caused by iOS4 and 
classified this as a client side issue related to the Apple iOS4 update. 
Microsoft is not planning to release a patch or update. The instability will 
manifest itself as connection failures or slow performance when using Outlook 
and other clients. Outlook Web App (OWA) is not impacted and continues to 
function normally. If you are having connectivity issues we recommend using OWA 
to retrieve your mail.

Intermedia's engineering and operations teams are mitigating the impact to our 
customers via close monitoring and automated restarts of the impacted 
application pools.

Thank you for hosting with us,
Intermedia

This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

RE: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

[Carol Fee]

No, it was the Store Drive Avr. Disk Queue length  thread

CFee
From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

I think it was related to the iPad, not the iPhone.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Carol Fee 
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org wrote:
Didn't someone post an issue earlier this week with this exact problem ?

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.commailto:peter.d...@yum.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

FYI:  I have not seen or heard of this affecting anyone at our company but just 
in case any of you have been impacted check out the Apple article and fix 
mentioned in the original message.

-Original Message-
From: Susan Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Patch Management Mailing List
Subject: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI

Forwarded courtesy of Bob Groger

Got this email from Intermedia, whose products I resell.

Bob G.


Apple recently released the iPhone4. It uses a new iPhone operating system ? 
iOS4 ? that is also available for download on older iPhone devices. The new 
iPhone operating system is adversely impacting Intermedia customers as well as 
customers of other email providers.

The following notification summarizes these issues and the critical actions we 
ask that your iPhone4 and iOS4 users immediately take in response.

The actions are in support of our commitment to providing the highest service 
quality for your organization and all Intermedia customers. We will continue to 
post updates as the situation evolves and Apple provides further details.

Summary of Issues
Exchange users who use an iPhone4 or upgraded an older iPhone to iOS4 are 
experiencing difficulties syncing their contacts, mail, and calendar via 
ActiveSync. Additionally, iOS4 is creating significant artificial load on 
Exchange servers, resulting in performance slowdowns for users on other devices 
and mail clients.

An Internet search for ?iOS4 Exchange? will provide further information related 
to these issues, which are affecting all email providers that use the 
ActiveSync protocol with iPhones.

Steps Your Organization Must Take
iPhone users who use the iPhone4 or upgraded to iOS4 must install a related 
Apple configuration patch on their iPhone. The patch, along with installation 
directions, can be found here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3398.

Failure to install this patch will result in incomplete sync of user items and 
may cause performance issues. If your users run an iPhone4 or other iOS4 device 
without the configuration patch, Intermedia may disable ActiveSync on their 
device to protect your organization?s overall service quality.

Further Technical Details on the Issue and Our Response
The iOS4 issues are driving random application pool instability on Exchange 
2007 CAS servers. Microsoft confirmed this instability is caused by iOS4 and 
classified this as a client side issue related to the Apple iOS4 update. 
Microsoft is not planning to release a patch or update. The instability will 
manifest itself as connection failures or slow performance when using Outlook 
and other clients. Outlook Web App (OWA) is not impacted and continues to 
function normally. If you are having connectivity issues we recommend using OWA 
to retrieve your mail.

Intermedia's engineering and operations teams are mitigating the impact to our 
customers via close monitoring and automated restarts of the impacted 
application pools.

Thank you for hosting with us,
Intermedia

This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Yes, and when I look at the cert on the E2K3 server it says there is a private 
key.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 8:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

When you exported the cert on the e2k7 server, did you remember to export the 
private key?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Getting back to this
With the current certificate installed everything works, including Browsing to 
https://localhost/exchange
With the UCC installed, nothing works including Browsing to 
https://localhost/exchange - produces a page cannot be found
The UCC works perfectly on the E2K7 server, so it's not the cert

CFee
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 7:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

The quickest way to confirm that would be to test it on the server itself.
Browsing to https://localhost/exchange should work, even with a certificate 
error. If the error is bypassed then you can look at the certificate and see 
which one is being delivered. If it is the certificate that you hope for then 
you start to look outside of the server.

If, on the other hand, it doesn't work on the server itself, then a problem 
with the certificate is probably the issue.

Simon.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 June 2010 01:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It should work fine.

I'm convinced this is a DNS or firewall issue, not a certificate issue.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Well, there is no internal host record for mail.massbar.org, only a MX record.  
There is, however a host record for parcel.massbar.org, and that name works 
just fine in the browser when the old cert is installed, but not for the 
wildcard or UCC certs.
The working cert is for mail.massbar.org, but internally, you can use 
https://parcel.massbar.org, because that's what IIS thinks it is.  
Mail.massbar.org is only configured in Exchange so that the mail goes out from 
mail.massbar.org.
I guess maybe the UCC might not work because parcel.massbar.org is not listed 
on the cert, only mail.massbar.org.  What about the wildcard, though - 
*.massbar.org ?

CFee

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

See, telnet doesn't know ANYTHING about ssl certs. It just knows about tcp 
connections.

Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _

The above indicates clearly that they don't point to the same IP address.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Yes on the iisreset

On the telnet -
The internal host name is parcel.massbar.org
With the current SSL cert the URLs https://parcel.massbar.org etc work fine
The external host name is mail.massbar.org - the server responds to the telnet 
( 25 and 443 ) with this host name

With either of the other certs
Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _


CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

After you install the other certs, do you do an iisreset?

Can you still telnet server.domain.com 443 and get a response?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Getting back to this
With the current certificate installed everything works, including Browsing to 
https://localhost/exchange
With the UCC installed, nothing works including Browsing to 
https://localhost/exchange - produces a page cannot be found
The UCC works perfectly on the E2K7 server, so it's not the cert

CFee
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 7:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

The quickest way to confirm that would be to test it on the server itself.
Browsing to https://localhost/exchange should work, even with a certificate 
error. If the error is bypassed then you can look at the certificate and see 
which one is being delivered. If it is the certificate that you hope for then 
you start to look outside of the server.

If, on the other hand, it doesn't work on the server itself, then a problem 
with the certificate is probably the issue.

Simon.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 June 2010 01:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It should work fine.

I'm convinced this is a DNS or firewall issue, not a certificate issue.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Well, there is no internal host record for mail.massbar.org, only a MX record.  
There is, however a host record for parcel.massbar.org, and that name works 
just fine in the browser when the old cert is installed, but not for the 
wildcard or UCC certs.
The working cert is for mail.massbar.org, but internally, you can use 
https://parcel.massbar.org, because that's what IIS thinks it is.  
Mail.massbar.org is only configured in Exchange so that the mail goes out from 
mail.massbar.org.
I guess maybe the UCC might not work because parcel.massbar.org is not listed 
on the cert, only mail.massbar.org.  What about the wildcard, though - 
*.massbar.org ?

CFee

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

See, telnet doesn't know ANYTHING about ssl certs. It just knows about tcp 
connections.

Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _

The above indicates clearly that they don't point to the same IP address.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Yes on the iisreset

On the telnet -
The internal host name is parcel.massbar.org
With the current SSL cert the URLs https://parcel.massbar.org etc work fine
The external host name is mail.massbar.org - the server responds to the telnet 
( 25 and 443 ) with this host name

With either of the other certs
Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _


CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

After you install the other certs, do you do an iisreset?

Can you still telnet server.domain.com 443 and get a response?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime

Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB144C.AA1C4300]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime in with a correction, but 
I don't think Windows Mobile supported UCC/wildcart certs until WM 6. Other 
devices may have different support guidelines.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc182301.aspx

Windows Mobile 5.0 does not support the use of wildcard certificates for 
device-to-server authentication. This restriction applies to all 
communications, including Exchange ActiveSync.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB1454.A9893120]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime in with a correction, but 
I don't think Windows Mobile supported UCC/wildcart certs until WM 6. Other 
devices may have different support guidelines.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc182301.aspx

Windows Mobile 5.0 does not support the use of wildcard certificates for 
device-to-server authentication. This restriction applies to all 
communications, including Exchange ActiveSync.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB1458.3E3BDFE0]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Yes on the iisreset

On the telnet -
The internal host name is parcel.massbar.org
With the current SSL cert the URLs https://parcel.massbar.org etc work fine
The external host name is mail.massbar.org - the server responds to the telnet 
( 25 and 443 ) with this host name

With either of the other certs
Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _


CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

After you install the other certs, do you do an iisreset?

Can you still telnet server.domain.com 443 and get a response?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime in with a correction, but 
I don't think Windows Mobile supported UCC/wildcart certs until WM 6. Other 
devices may have different support guidelines.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc182301.aspx

Windows Mobile 5.0 does not support the use of wildcard certificates for 
device-to-server authentication. This restriction applies to all 
communications, including Exchange ActiveSync.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB145A.44135180]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

The UCC works fine on the Exchange 2007 server, and the wildcard works on our 
web server.

CFee
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

That sounds like a corrupt certificate.
The SSL channel cannot be established. I would ask the certificate provider if 
they can reissue the certificate.

On the point mentioned earlier in the thread about UCC support, Windows Mobile 
5 can work with a UCC certificate, but only by using the Common Name of the 
certificate. Therefore as long as the host name that you are putting in to the 
device for ActiveSync matches the common name (which is what I would usually 
recommend) it should work fine. If the name you are using for ActiveSync is one 
of the additional names, then you may have problems. Annoyingly, I think it 
changed with one of the minor builds of Windows Mobile 5, with full support at 
WM6.

Simon.


--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.

e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for 
certificates from just $23.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? 
http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/

Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/



From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: 25 June 2010 16:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime in with a correction, but 
I don't think Windows Mobile supported UCC/wildcart certs until WM 6. Other 
devices may have different support guidelines.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc182301.aspx

Windows Mobile 5.0 does not support the use of wildcard certificates for 
device-to-server authentication. This restriction applies to all 
communications, including Exchange ActiveSync.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB145C.641EFBD0]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

[Carol Fee]

Well, there is no internal host record for mail.massbar.org, only a MX record.  
There is, however a host record for parcel.massbar.org, and that name works 
just fine in the browser when the old cert is installed, but not for the 
wildcard or UCC certs.
The working cert is for mail.massbar.org, but internally, you can use 
https://parcel.massbar.org, because that's what IIS thinks it is.  
Mail.massbar.org is only configured in Exchange so that the mail goes out from 
mail.massbar.org.
I guess maybe the UCC might not work because parcel.massbar.org is not listed 
on the cert, only mail.massbar.org.  What about the wildcard, though - 
*.massbar.org ?

CFee

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

See, telnet doesn't know ANYTHING about ssl certs. It just knows about tcp 
connections.

Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _

The above indicates clearly that they don't point to the same IP address.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Yes on the iisreset

On the telnet -
The internal host name is parcel.massbar.org
With the current SSL cert the URLs https://parcel.massbar.org etc work fine
The external host name is mail.massbar.org - the server responds to the telnet 
( 25 and 443 ) with this host name

With either of the other certs
Z:\telnet mail.massbar.org 443
Connecting To mail.massbar.org...Could not open connection to the host, on port
443: Connect failed
Z:\telnet parcel.massbar.org 443 simply brings up a _


CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

After you install the other certs, do you do an iisreset?

Can you still telnet server.domain.com 443 and get a response?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

With the existing SSL cert everything works fine.
If I install either of the others the URLs  https://server.domain.com or 
https://server.domain.com/exchange produce an Internet Explorer cannot display 
the web page

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Help me help you. What does/doesn't it do? How does it not work? :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

Hmmm 
I can't for the life of me figure out why OWA works with the current SSL cert, 
but doesn't if I install either a wildcard cert for the domain or a UCC cert 
which includes the Exchange server host name.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA

It works just fine with OWA. With ActiveSync, Exchange is fine, but you need to 
ensure that your device supports it. Simon may chime in with a correction, but 
I don't think Windows Mobile supported UCC/wildcart certs until WM 6. Other 
devices may have different support guidelines.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc182301.aspx

Windows Mobile 5.0 does not support the use of wildcard certificates for 
device-to-server authentication. This restriction applies to all 
communications, including Exchange ActiveSync.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA

Will a UCC or wildcard cert work for OWA/ActiveSync ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CB146B.A6787740]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Corrupt Exchange Logs

[Carol Fee]

Was last night's backupexec job full or incremental ?

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Jim Slattery [mailto:jslatt...@medexassist.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Exchange Logs

Tried a second Windows Server Backup yesterday, which also failed, but last 
night my Backup Exec job completed successfully.

The only problem now is that the logs still didn't clear.  Working on that one 
now.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Slattery [mailto:jslatt...@medexassist.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Exchange Logs

Tried that... the Windows backup failed too, but seems to have removed a bad 
.log file, so I'm going to try it again and see what happens. *fingers crossed*

Thanks for the help!

Jim Slattery
Systems Administrator, MEDEX Global Group
410-308-7931

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Exchange Logs

Try running a full backup using Windows backup, then run the BackupExec

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Jim Slattery [mailto:jslatt...@medexassist.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Corrupt Exchange Logs

The last two nights, one of my Exchange 2010 backup jobs have failed (Backup 
Exec 2010) due to .log files that are corrupt.  Generally log files are cleared 
with a successful backup, but that's going to be difficult when they're the 
reason the backup is failing:

Backup- \\DAG1\Microsoft Information Store\Corporate Mailbox Database
WARNING: \\DAG1\Microsoft Information Store\Corporate Mailbox Database\Logs ( 
E008C20.log - E009BBE.log ) is a corrupt file. This file cannot verify.

My question is: How do I clear corrupt log files when I can't get a successful 
backup?

TIA for any help you can provide!

Jim Slattery
Systems Administrator, MEDEX Global Group

RE: Corrupt Exchange Logs

[Carol Fee]

Try running a full backup using Windows backup, then run the BackupExec

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Jim Slattery [mailto:jslatt...@medexassist.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Corrupt Exchange Logs

The last two nights, one of my Exchange 2010 backup jobs have failed (Backup 
Exec 2010) due to .log files that are corrupt.  Generally log files are cleared 
with a successful backup, but that's going to be difficult when they're the 
reason the backup is failing:

Backup- \\DAG1\Microsoft Information Store\Corporate Mailbox Database
WARNING: \\DAG1\Microsoft Information Store\Corporate Mailbox Database\Logs ( 
E008C20.log - E009BBE.log ) is a corrupt file. This file cannot verify.

My question is: How do I clear corrupt log files when I can't get a successful 
backup?

TIA for any help you can provide!

Jim Slattery
Systems Administrator, MEDEX Global Group

RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

[Carol Fee]

Try deleting the account and recreating.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

During account setup I am getting account verification failed.

-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address
to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com? So it matches the name on
the cert

John 

-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] 
Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

banging head on desk

I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the
internet using safari on the IPhone.
I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user
name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert
when it comes up.
Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail
the connection to the server failed message

continue banging head



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**

RE: IP Blocking calrification

[Carol Fee]

Do you have an Edge Server ?  

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IP Blocking calrification


Hi all ,
 
I'm a bit stumped here,
 
I have enalbed anti spam on my exchange 2010 server , since we re single server 
  I dont have the option to use it on the edge.
 
Where I am confused is trying to configure the the IP blocked list as per the 
instructions, i am to go to Porperties, but the only option I have is Disable 
or help  why am i not seeing the properties tab.
 
 
  Use the EMC to manage the IP Allow list 


You need to be assigned permissions before you can perform this procedure. To 
see what permissions you need, see the Anti-spam features entry in the 
Transport Permissions topic.

In the console tree, click Edge Transport.

In the result pane, click the Edge server you want to configure and then select 
the Anti-spam tab in the work pane.

Right click IP Allow List and then select Properties. 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
  
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2

RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

[Carol Fee]

yes

CFee
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

I accept the cert?
Is that the same as install?


From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Did you install the cert on the iPhone?

I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on 
my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier.  The last thing I 
did do was make sure that oma worked.  I may have had a few Exchange updates 
outstanding that I took care of, too.  It was a side project and only benefited 
me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden 
dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Nope.  Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA.



From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.commailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Are you accessing through ISA?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link 
jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29

You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse 
OMA Activesync.  This link came from Bing, Google was down for me.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden 
dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up.


From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden 
dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Came up asking for authentication creds.
Then failed with a system error.
OMA might be jacked?


From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

I may have been unclear.  I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get 
my iPhone talking to our Exchange server.  I do remember being unable to browse 
to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that 
problem.  have you verified that you can get to /oma?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link 
jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma?
If not you may not have everything setup correctly.  I had an issue, don't 
recall how I resolved it though.



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden 
dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com wrote:
I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari.


-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. 
[mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.ukmailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Can you browse the web on the phone?
Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data
connection
john

-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

During account setup I am getting account verification failed.

-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. 
[mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.ukmailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address
to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.comhttp://mobile-email.yourco.com/? 
So it matches the name on
the cert

John

-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.commailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange

banging head on desk

I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the
internet using safari on the IPhone.
I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user
name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert
when it comes up.
Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail
the connection to the server failed message

continue banging head



**
This email 

GoDaddy SSL Cert Exchange 2007

[Carol Fee]

E2K7 CAS/MB/HUB
I used the following in EMS to generate the cert request which I submitted to 
GoDaddy.
New-ExchangeCertificate -generaterequest -keysize 2048 -subjectname c=US, 
l=Boston, s=Massachusetts, o=Massachusetts Bar Association,cn=massbar.org 
-domainname 
MASSBAREX1,massbarex1.massbar.org,mail2.massbar.org,autodiscover.massbar.org 
-PrivateKeyExportable $true -path c:\certrequest.txt

After downloading the SSL cert, I did the following
[PS] C:\Import-ExchangeCertificate -Path c:\massbar.org.crt

ThumbprintServices   Subject
--   ---
ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701  .  CN=massbar.org, OU=Doma...

And then
[PS] C:\Enable-ExchangeCertificate -Thumbprint ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6
C48EC701 -Services SMTP,IIS

Confirm
Overwrite existing default SMTP certificate,
'BB40AC9127B72A0576E12D3E42AE3D55D6E89E4A' (expires 9/18/2010 3:02:29 PM), with
 certificate 'ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701' (expires 5/26/2012
11:47:19 AM)?
[Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help
(default is Y):y
[PS] C:\get-exchangecertificate

ThumbprintServices   Subject
--   ---
ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701  ...WS  CN=massbar.org, OU=Doma...
BB40AC9127B72A0576E12D3E42AE3D55D6E89E4A  IP..S  CN=MASSBAREX1
6D1A21BC512D35A86CDDADC354E32F8D1D5D50C3  .  CN=*.massbar.org, OU=Se...

My problem is that the cert seems to be for Massbar.org only, and not for any 
of the other identities.  So  Outlook 2007 clients get a SSL error which 
they have to click through twice, and ActiveSync devices do not see the 
mailserver host name on the cert.

What did I do wrong and how do I fix this ?


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CAFD8E.41846720]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: GoDaddy SSL Cert Exchange 2007

[Carol Fee]

How ?  I don't think you can use IIS for SSL with Exchange 2007.

CFee
From: mark tibbet [mailto:m.tib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoDaddy SSL Cert Exchange 2007

You can always look in IIS to see if the cert is binding correctly. Just my .02.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Carol Fee 
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org wrote:
E2K7 CAS/MB/HUB
I used the following in EMS to generate the cert request which I submitted to 
GoDaddy.
New-ExchangeCertificate -generaterequest -keysize 2048 -subjectname c=US, 
l=Boston, s=Massachusetts, o=Massachusetts Bar 
Association,cn=massbar.orghttp://massbar.org -domainname 
MASSBAREX1,massbarex1.massbar.orghttp://massbarex1.massbar.org,mail2.massbar.orghttp://mail2.massbar.org,autodiscover.massbar.orghttp://autodiscover.massbar.org
 -PrivateKeyExportable $true -path c:\certrequest.txt

After downloading the SSL cert, I did the following
[PS] C:\Import-ExchangeCertificate -Path c:\massbar.org.crt

ThumbprintServices   Subject
--   ---
ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701  .  
CN=massbar.orghttp://massbar.org, OU=Doma...

And then
[PS] C:\Enable-ExchangeCertificate -Thumbprint ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6
C48EC701 -Services SMTP,IIS

Confirm
Overwrite existing default SMTP certificate,
'BB40AC9127B72A0576E12D3E42AE3D55D6E89E4A' (expires 9/18/2010 3:02:29 PM), with
 certificate 'ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701' (expires 5/26/2012
11:47:19 AM)?
[Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help
(default is Y):y
[PS] C:\get-exchangecertificate

ThumbprintServices   Subject
--   ---
ED6AF463B9E33D99F564676610D486E6C48EC701  ...WS  
CN=massbar.orghttp://massbar.org, OU=Doma...
BB40AC9127B72A0576E12D3E42AE3D55D6E89E4A  IP..S  CN=MASSBAREX1
6D1A21BC512D35A86CDDADC354E32F8D1D5D50C3  .  
CN=*.massbar.orghttp://massbar.org, OU=Se...

My problem is that the cert seems to be for Massbar.org only, and not for any 
of the other identities.  So  Outlook 2007 clients get a SSL error which 
they have to click through twice, and ActiveSync devices do not see the 
mailserver host name on the cert.

What did I do wrong and how do I fix this ?


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CAFD94.2EC80CD0]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

inline: image001.gif

ESET Mail Security 4

[Carol Fee]

Any gotchas on E2K7 SP1 ?



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CAF8D8.E0CE6ED0]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: GAL not updating on cached clients

[Carol Fee]

What happens if after opening Outlook, they go to Tools/download address book ?

CFee
From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients

the ONLY thing coming up is event 9323, which is a warning that is supposed to 
come up and can be safely ignored as per this article
http://blogs.msdn.com/dgoldman/archive/2009/12/01/please-read-events-9320-and-9359-on-new-installation-of-exchange-2010.aspx

its seems to be pointing to the client becuase the server says that it has 
successfully generated the oab


OABGen successfully generated the changes.oab file that clients will download 
for a differential download of offline address book '\Global Address List'.
- \Default Offline Address List

could it be because they still get prompted for credentials when they launch 
outlook?
these are internal users on the network in the domain, they get prompted when 
they open outlook 2007 every morning


From: mich...@smithcons.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:49:51 +
Are you looking at it from PowerShell? I'd use event viewer or format-list to 
see the entire message.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients

everything *seems* to look ok , except that i cant see the complete messages


 559773 May 20 06:02  Warning MSExchangeSA   2147493007 OALGen 
truncated or dropped properties for entry 'WD' in address li...
  559772 May 20 06:02  Warning MSExchangeSA   2147493007 OALGen 
truncated or dropped properties for entry 'Virginia Taddoni'...
  559771 May 20 06:02  Warning MSExchangeSA   2147493007 OALGen 
truncated or dropped properties for entry 'Victor Kivuva' in...



 then there is this

559792 May 20 06:02  Information MSExchangeSA   1073750939 OABGen 
successfully generated the changes.oab file that clients wil...








Jean-Paul Natola






From: mich...@smithcons.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 19:48:21 +
Did you turn up logging on OABgen and see what it had to say?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients

still not working - its been connecting to server since yesterday








Turn up logging on OAB gen.

Try doing a get-exchangeserver |% {update-filedistributionservice $_.Name 
-type oab} and see if you can d/l the addr book after that.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients

2010 standard







From: mich...@smithcons.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: GAL not updating on cached clients
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:24:41 +
What exchange version?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: GAL not updating on cached clients

Hi all,

the GAL is not updating on my 2007 clients that are in cached mode, and if i 
try to download address book  it just hangs.

the only work around i have is to delete the OAB files from
\\pc1\c$\Documents and Settings\user_name\Local Settings\Application 
Data\Microsoft\Outlook

Exchange 2010
outlook 2007 (cached mode)
xp sp3









The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with 
Hotmail. Get 
busy.http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccountocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4


The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 
started.http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3


Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox. See 
how.http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2


Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. 
Learn 

RE: Non Email ?

[Carol Fee]

Only Ultimate/Pro

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:jallhi...@generaliusa.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 5:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Non Email ?

It would be nice if it was available for the Professional edition.  Can it be 
added separately, or is it only for Ultimate/Professional? 

-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Non Email ?

Used PointSec.  Piece of garbage.  Doing a PoC on Bitlocker for
Windows 7.  Seriously nicer performance.

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com wrote:
 Yep, using Credant Mobile Guardian - and yep, a bit slow at first.  I am a
 user, not implementer so have very few details.



 

 From: David.Ricci [mailto:david.ri...@hwinstitute.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:06 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Non Email ?



 Since this is the best forum.  I could not find a good encryption forum to
 ask.  Has anyone been doing hard drive and media encryption on their
 laptops?



 I was trying out GuardianEdge but it seem a little slow.  If anyone has any
 info please send it along









 David



 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in reliance on the
 information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received
 this e-mail in error, please immediately notify our e-mail administrator at
 supp...@hwinstitute.com.

RE: Is an internal open relay allowed?

[Carol Fee]

Wouldn't that cause you to be tagged on the Internet ?

CFee
From: Vandael Tim [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is an internal open relay allowed?

Hello all,

Any of you guys here that is familiar with the RFC rules for email?
Are we as a public school allowed to send mail from other domains?
The reason I'm asking it is an internal discussion we have here.
We are moving to exchange 2010 and the old open internal relay is going to be 
shut down in a few months.
So we have a lot of users complaining about the fact that they are not being be 
able to send mail from their home address through our exchange system.

Anyone that can point me to the right information about this issue?

Thnx!

Met vriendelijke groeten,

KHLim
Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg   Associatie 
KULeuven
http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/

Tim Vandael
ICT Systeembeheerder

Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek
T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36
tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be



inline: image001.gif

RE: Posting

[Carol Fee]

Those are very decent salaries

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Posting

Hopefully this doesn't go against list rules:

I'd like to call attention to positions that just went up on the city's
website:
http://www.norwichct.org/content/43/121/230.aspx  Look for IT Specialist
and Senior IT Specialist positions near the bottom.

If you are on or can relocate to the East Coast it's an opportunity with
great benefits.  We all wear many hats (writing reports, scripting,
programming, DBA, Exchange, AD, break/fix, network, etc...) but we each
have our areas of ownership; it would be great to have someone with
significant Exchange experience join our team of six.

~JasonG

RE: iPhone Issues in the NorthEast

[Carol Fee]

None in Boston, MA

CFee
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: iPhone Issues in the NorthEast

All,

Has anyone had any issues with Exchange connections within the 
last week or two in the NE USA? We've been having sporadic issues with our 
Exchange connection (such as when tapping on the e-mail to open it you receive 
a cannot connect to server error), but other accounts (such as Gmail and 
Hotmail) seem to be fine.

TIA!

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox  Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.commailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com

RE: Minor issue but nagging

[Carol Fee]

What Message Format is the Outlook 2007 client configured to use ?

CFee
From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Minor issue but nagging

Greetings,
So I have a user that has had some changes done to their computer and now 
Outlook does not act the same.
Outlook 2007, Exchange 2003, the issue? Well it is when they type a :) 'it used 
to make a smiley face'
Anyone know how or why this does not work anymore? I am guessing other symbols 
don't as well.
They can add it by doing an insert symbol

Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
i...@sonomatilemakers.commailto:i...@sonomatilemakers.com

Power Shell/Exchange Management Shell 2007 Book - Learn start to finish

[Carol Fee]

It seems to me this has been asked and answered, but I can't find anything in 
the archives.   TIA



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CADBC9.8788CF40]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Power Shell/Exchange Management Shell 2007 Book - Learn start to finish

[Carol Fee]

Thank you MSB and all.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Power Shell/Exchange Management Shell 2007 Book - Learn start to 
finish

I wouldn't say that there is one.

Ilse's book (which was otherwise recommended) is good - but it's not a basic 
PowerShell introduction. And while I recommend it too - it's got some holes in 
it (notably, it doesn't cover the *-ExchangeCertificate cmdlets). But it's a 
good book.

You should also look at Active Directory Cookbook, 3rd Edition by Laura 
Hunter and Active Directory, 4th Edition by Brian Desmond. They both have 
sections on PowerShell and Exchange (obligatory comment: I tech-reviewed them, 
so I'm a little biased).

For in-depth PowerShell, I'm recommending PowerShell in Action, 2nd Edition 
(Payette), but it isn't a basic text. For introductory stuff, probably 
PowerShell TFM (Jones/Hicks).

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Power Shell/Exchange Management Shell 2007 Book - Learn start to finish

It seems to me this has been asked and answered, but I can't find anything in 
the archives.   TIA



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CADBE1.1AEC51A0]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

[Carol Fee]

Can't you simply correct the path ?

CFee
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

It the website properties it shows an incomplete unc path instead of 
c:\prograetc...
I am screwed, aren't I?


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

They should be the same place you found exchweb. If they aren't there, you have 
larger problems.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

ExchWEb isAdmin Full authenicated user read only.
Still trying to find the Exchange site directories?


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
What are the permissions on the dierctories?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

Never gives the authentication window though
That's why I am confused.



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
401.2 is authentication failed and 404.0 is file not found.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA exchange 2003 Standard

I was getting an error so I began with adding a new Cert.
I am still getting the below errors??


2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange/davidm/ - 443 - 10.0.50.81 
Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E)
 401 2 2148074254
2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchweb/bin/auth/owalogon.asp 
url=https://10.0.50.4/exchange/davidm/reason=0 443 - 10.0.50.81 
Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E)
 404 0 2

RE: Trainsignal comes through again with WICKED cutting edge training

[Carol Fee]

Windows 3.1: The Future of Computing 
?

CFee
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Trainsignal comes through again with WICKED cutting edge training

I just bought this for my staff. I hope they can catch up

http://www.trainsignal.com/windowstraining.aspx?hq_e=elhq_m=372779hq_l=2hq_v=eaf12f48b0

RE: Hood Scholarship (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Carol Fee]

Done - best of luck.  She seems like a fine young lady.

CFee
From: Kent, Larry CTR US USA [mailto:larry.k...@us.army.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Hood Scholarship (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Folks:

This is way OT and I apologize to the list but if some of you can take the 
time


My daughter Courtney is competing for a $5000 scholarship for college.  If you 
can find the time, please vote for her at the following link.  It should come 
up as Courtney Kent with a voting button on the left side of the page.   Thanks.


This is the link to vote for Courtney.  You can vote once per day.  You can 
vote once per day, every day thru April 30th .   TIA

http://www.hood.com/promo/GoodSportVote0310/default.aspx?sid=CCA849F7-3E69-4CCB-B373-F4961D845BDB


Larry


From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?

Oh yeah one other thing that was a plus for Exchange 2010 UM:  We have 
journaling enabled so we can archive all inbound/outbound messages.  We did not 
want to archive user voice mail.  Exchange 2007/2010 has that bypass built-in.  
If we used Unity we were going to have to put in some rules on the mail archive 
product to look at the message form type, and if the unity form then delete.  
Sounds simple, but with our audit department that is a major pain to get 
approved and we have to prove that only those messages are being deleted.

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?

Just about, but we control the BES server.  Unity would be under the control of 
the telecom group and the Unity Console had the ability to add/modify/delete 
users; BES does not.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?

Do you have Blackberries? :-P

The Unity permissions are just about the same as the BES permissions. :)

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?

We actually did a POC of Exchange 2010 to Unity.  Currently we have Unity setup 
in a standalone forest so it is completely separate from our Exchange side.  
Management is wanting to integrate VM into the users mailbox so we have Unified 
Messaging.  Me as the AD/Exchange guy I did not like the idea of installing 
Unity in our primary domain because it requires a lot of elevated rights that 
would then be available to our telecom guys, via the Unity management console.  
So I opened my mouth and suggested looking at Exchange 2010.  We currently have 
Exchange 2007, but that lacks the MWI (message waiting indicator) interface 
unless you use a 3rd party.  So we setup a lab with Unity and Exchange 2010 and 
I configured the same options that we are using on Unity.  The only thing I 
could not get on the Exchange side was a voice mail box that had no greeting, 
Exchange requires some kind of recording.  We did the side by side comparison 
with management and they like the idea of going to Exch 2010.  The integration 
into Outlook, accessing contacts and calendar items, and the VM preview we key 
things they liked.  Going with Exch 2010 also allowed me to keep the telecom 
team from having elevated rights in the domain. We will UM enable a user in the 
same process as creating the user.

So now I am starting a project to upgrade our Exchange environment to 2010 from 
2007.  Still in the design phase.

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?

Curious if anyone has dropped Unity like a bad habit in favor of Exchange 
2007/2010 UM?  If so what was your experience like?  Happier now or wish you 
would have stuck with Unity?

Thanks,
JB

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

RE: Can't Open/Delete/Move an Email Message

[Carol Fee]

How about Outlook Safe Mode ?

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Can't Open/Delete/Move an Email Message

Exchange 2003 / Outlook 2007

I have a user who has a single message that can't be opened, moved, or
deleted.  She gets a message has already been moved or deleted, or
access denied error message.

We've tried via OWA and connecting to the mailbox as another user - same result.

Suggestions?


Die dulci fruere!

Roger Wright
___

RE: How to secure 2010

[Carol Fee]

I got the original

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to secure 2010


Resending with modifications since the list server bounced my initial response 
saying it appeared as an automated response...

I recommend that you look at the Exchange Technet Library for 2010.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558.aspx

The Planning and Deployment sections address securing your Exchange Environment:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998636.aspx

Hope that helps.

-Original Message-
From: jgarciaitl...@gmail.com [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to secure 2010

How to secure exchange 2010
Besides firewalls, what else needs to be done?

Also can exchange function well in a virtual environment?
Thanks
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

Sorry to be a pest - anything ?

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Quick set of questions from an Outlook MVP:

Are there PF databases on both servers?

When did the problem begin?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2003 server?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2007 server?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Sorry, I should have included that.  Online mode and yes they show up in a 
timely manner in OWA.  TIA

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

So...two things.

Are you in cached or online mode?

Do they show up immediately in OWA?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.

 

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 
  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org

[cid:image001.gif@01CAA66C.9BC1F960]
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
inline: image001.gif

RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

Sorry, I should have included that.  Online mode and yes they show up in a 
timely manner in OWA.  TIA

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

So...two things.

Are you in cached or online mode?

Do they show up immediately in OWA?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.

 

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 
  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

Cool, thx.  

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

This sounds really familiar, but my searches aren't finding anything. Don't we 
have an Outlook MVP on this list?

Anyway, I'll forward the question to an OL MVP and see if I get a response.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Sorry, I should have included that.  Online mode and yes they show up in a 
timely manner in OWA.  TIA

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

So...two things.

Are you in cached or online mode?

Do they show up immediately in OWA?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.

 

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 
  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

Yes.

Truthfully, I don't know.  I suspect it was a long time ago.

Yes

Yes

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Quick set of questions from an Outlook MVP:

Are there PF databases on both servers?

When did the problem begin?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2003 server?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2007 server?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Sorry, I should have included that.  Online mode and yes they show up in a 
timely manner in OWA.  TIA

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

So...two things.

Are you in cached or online mode?

Do they show up immediately in OWA?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.

 

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 
  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

[Carol Fee]

No FE Exchange.  The external gateway is a Juniper.  Exchange 2007 is single 
multi role server.

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St.
Boston, MA  02111
617-338-0623

From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 6:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Do you have a front-end server in the Exchange 2003 environment?

Is that a single-server in the Exchange 2007 environment (i.e., is there a 
CAS-only box too, or just the single multi-role server?)?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Yes.

Truthfully, I don't know.  I suspect it was a long time ago.

Yes

Yes

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Quick set of questions from an Outlook MVP:

Are there PF databases on both servers?

When did the problem begin?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2003 server?

Does the problem occur with a new profile for a user on the 2007 server?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

Sorry, I should have included that.  Online mode and yes they show up in a 
timely manner in OWA.  TIA

CFee
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

So...two things.

Are you in cached or online mode?

Do they show up immediately in OWA?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Issue

E2K3 Standard up to date on W2K3 SP2 also up to date.  Single domain native 
2003.  External emails to Public Folders are delivered to the folder promptly, 
and can be seen in ESM.  However, there is always a substantial delay ( 10-15 
min ) before they can be seen in any Outlook 2K3 or 7 client.  We do also have 
a W2K7 Mailbox/HT/CAS server, but this is not a replication issue.  Users 
connected to both mailbox stores will see the email in the Public Folder with 
the same delay.  The issue exists for all Public Folders that accept external 
email.  Internal email to the same folders can be viewed in the Outlook clients 
almost immediately.
I have no idea what could be causing this or how to find out.



Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org


   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500

RE: 2003 to 2010 planning

[Carol Fee]

Can you give us a reminder when it is out ?

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003 to 2010 planning

By the way...

self-promotion alert

I wrote the (planned, upcoming) May, 2010 cover article in WindowsITPro 
describing a step-by-step upgrade of a REAL CUSTOMER going from Exchange 2003 
to Exchange 2010.

/self-promotion-alert

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003 to 2010 planning

70% reduction from 2003 - 2007, another 70% reduction from 2007 - 2010. 
Totaling an over 90% overall reduction since 2003.

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2003 to 2010 planning

HI Greg,

Actually, in some of the reading I've done, the literature for Exchange 2010 
claims up to 90% less disk I/O than that experienced with Exchange 2003 (what 
we're running now).

My whole thinking about the necessity of archiving before moving to 2010 was 
based on the (quite possibly wrong) assumption that due to our high Single 
Instance Ratio I'd have a large increase in required storage right from the 
start.  I wasn't even considering 2010's archiving features since I've read 
multiple times that they're not quite up to snuff (yet).

I'll follow MBS's advice and total up mailbox usage as reported in System 
Manager and let everyone know just how far off target my assumption was.

Thanks,
RS

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Greg Olson gol...@markettools.com wrote:
+1
Exchange 2010's ability to use cheap(er) sata drives (it was re-engineered to 
use far less Disk IO than 2007 which was something like 70% less disk IO than 
2003) really make having to have email archiving for a shop your size a thing 
of the past. But if you really want it, 2010 has it as a built in feature, 
although I'd wait till it gets a little more mature in SP1 or above. You could 
easily have a few TB's of storage for cheap now, as you don't have to throw 
expensive fast drives at it anymore. 
-Greg
 
 
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:43 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003 to 2010 planning
 
In addition to Neil's comments, I ask WHY you think that storage is better 
served in an archiving system than in an Exchange mailbox?
 
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2003 to 2010 planning
 
Good afternoon one and all, and please forgive the long post.
 
I'm thinking about proposing the upgrade from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 
this year.  We're currently running a single monolithic server that has (knock 
on wood) been extremely reliable for going on 5 years.  We've got ~100 
mailboxes now, and I don't see us ever growing past 200.  The information store 
is currently 110GB, and the perfmon-reported Single Instance Ratio is pretty 
large at 22.  We have ~10 remote users who use Outlook Anywhere, ~10 PDA users, 
~10 Mac (Entourage) users, and OWA is available to most everyone.  AD is a 
single domain forest, is at 2003 Domain and Forest Functional Levels, and all 
DCs are 2003 SP2.  We have a single physical site, and only one site in AD.
 
Before rolling out 2010, I intend to deploy an e-mail archiving solution of 
some sort.  My hope is that, in addition to the obvious retention and search 
benefits this will provide, it will also take some of the pressure off of 
Exchange 2010's storage requirements by allowing me to finally enforce mailbox 
size restrictions without reducing the availability of older messages.
 
I've been poking around the interweb, looking for information that will help me 
determine how to design and deploy Exchange 2010 in a manner appropriate for 
our environment.  The most promising thing I've come up with is a simple 
statement on the Microsoft page that describes Exchange 2010 Mailbox Resiliency 
(http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/en/us/Mailbox-Resiliency.aspx).  It 
says,  For smaller sites, you can deploy a simple two-server configuration 
that provides full redundancy of mailbox data along with Client Access and Hub 
Transport roles. These changes put high availability within the reach of 
organizations that once considered it impractical.  That sounds like exactly 
like what I'm after - a simple-to-maintain, two server solution where all the 
inside roles are redundant.
 
Does this configuration sound appropriate for an organization of the size and 
characteristics described above?  Does anyone have any pointers to more 
in-depth discussion of this two server configuration?  (Is there a particular 
name for this configuration?)
 
Lastly, from what I can gather, this can be accomplished with Exchange Server 

RE: Symantec BEX 12.5 GRT backups good/bad

[Carol Fee]

Very brick level - down to individual items.  Takes up a lot of space.

CFee
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec BEX 12.5 GRT backups good/bad

Just upgraded to 12.5 today after being on 10d for years.
Looking for what this really is. Is this just another brick level backup 
routine?
Anyone using this? Good/Bad reviews.

Would Michael B. Smith approve of GRT? :)

Thanks

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token}

RE: Exchange Deployment Assistant Refresh

[Carol Fee]

I am getting the same error.  I am using an account in the Exchange 
Organization Administrator's group.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Deployment Assistant Refresh

I mentioned here (I think just yesterday) that the Exchange Deployment 
Assistant was going to be refreshed soon.

Well, it happened today. Lots of improved content.

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/01/13/453795.aspx

http://technet.microsoft.com/exdeploy2010

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Exchange MVP  Owner: The Essential Exchange
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Calendar

[Carol Fee]

What are the user's permissions on the PF ?

CFee
From: ExchList [mailto:exchl...@networkblade.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Calendar

I created a MASTER calendar in Public Folders section.

Issue:
A User creates an appointment and invites the public folder  the appointment 
appears in both calendars.
When the same user Cancels the appointment  it disappears from User calendar 
BUT the PF calendar then will have the Original appointment and a cancelation 
appointment (instead of disappearing).

This is also true if the user edits the appointment, the PF appointment will 
have the original and all individual edited versions.

Is there a way to configure the calendar to show just the most updated version 
of an appointment?

[cid:image001.jpg@01CA7FE9.229F8E70]


inline: image001.jpg

RE: testing

[Carol Fee]

Could the same thing have happened to ME2 ?  We haven't heard from him in 
several weeks at least.

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: testing

No response required. Just seeing if I can post again...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Exchange MVP  Owner: The Essential Exchange
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

RE: testing

[Carol Fee]

Ha ha ha
One in Spanish even !

CFee
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing

Wow, 22 OOFs later, I guess I can post.

Lyris seems to love to drop my posting capabilities for some reason. I've been 
posting all along, but I finally realized that no one was responding to my 
answers and people were responding to answers that just weren't accurate!

Oh well.

From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing

Guess I need to move the rules around a bit.  This is the first time your list 
posts have come into your personal folder.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: testing

No response required. Just seeing if I can post again...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Exchange MVP  Owner: The Essential Exchange
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

RE: Exchange 2007 Rules (automat1c rep1y/forward)

[Carol Fee]

What about a rule on the mailbox

[cid:image001.png@01CA5950.6D06FA30]



CFee



-Original Message-
From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Rules (automat1c rep1y/forward)





All righty, I've done some more research.  From the recommendations/best 
practices I've found, we should NOT check the box to Allow automatic replies 
or Allow automatic forward outside the company.  It can



1.  Cause mail loops

2.  Invite more spam

3.  Leak company data that may have not otherwise been forwarded if the user 
had to do it manually.



Is anybody else using a 3rd party tool or service to allow an automatic reply 
for ONE mailbox???  It appears the Exchange 2007 option is an all or nothing 
thing.  We would LIKE to just allow an auto reply from ONE particular mailbox 
that customers send issues into, without turning the option on for every 
mailbox in the company.



Thanks,



Rob



-Original Message-

From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]

Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:20 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Rules



you have to allow auto replies on the send connector.



Kevinm | WLKMMAS | This message is Certified Swine Flu Free | 
http://www.hedonists.ca



-Original Message-

From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]

Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:41 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Exchange 2007 Rules



I tried to setup a rule for one of our mailboxes that auto-replied to every 
email sent to it, something like



Thank you for contacting the complaint department, we really care, blah blah 
blah.



However, it appears to only work internally.



I think there's a setting somewhere on Exchange 2007 that says...Do not 
auto-forward outside the company.



Is it possible to turn this option off on an individual mailbox basis, or is it 
an all or nothing thing?



Thanks.



Rob












inline: image001.png

RE: Small Exchange on Vmware

[Carol Fee]

40 mailboxes - one server - Plenty

CFee

-Original Message-
From: Didtel, Larry [mailto:larry.did...@stemilt.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Small Exchange on Vmware

I am getting ready to upgrade Exchange at my church and am planning on doing 
that on Vmware.  There are only about 40 mailboxes, I was planning on just 
using one server but after reading about the changes you need to make, etc for 
that to work I was waffling about adding a second Exchange vm for the Hub 
Transport.  Am I better off just using one server for an organization that 
small?

Thanks,
Larry Didtel

RE: Auto-Discovery Service Not Working

[Carol Fee]

If you are in a workgroup, then you are not authenticated .

CFee
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto-Discovery Service Not Working

My laptop is currently in a workgroup setting.  When I try and setup my Outlook 
2007 client the auto discovery service seems to fail and I can only setup the 
profile manually.

Anyone have any idea as to what might be preventing the AD service from working 
properly?

Thank you,

John Bowles

RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues

[Carol Fee]

Ok, so, I removed the replicas of the two folders from the E2K7 server.
That allows me to see the entire hierarchy.  In the process of doing
something else, I figured out why I am seeing the E2K7 Public Folder
database ( which has no contents ) from my workstation using Outlook
2003, and accessing my real mailbox on the E2K3 server .  Somehow or
other, Exchange thinks I am the test user, not myself.  I know this
because I opened another user's mailbox along with my own in my Outlook
client.  When I look at the other user's mailbox in ESM, it is showing
it was last accessed by the test user, not myself.  How is this ?  I'm
logged on to my workstation as myself, not the test user, and my
workstation has been rebooted several times.  I have never logged on to
my workstation using the test user account.
 
CFee
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


what is the experience when you look at the public folders using OWA
2007?
 
if two folders are missing from the exchange 2007 replica set, remove
the exchange 2007 server from the replica set, wait a bit (i usually
define that as a couple of hours), then re-add the exchange 2007 server
to the replica set and see if replication happens then.
 


From: Carol Fee [c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


I was really hoping you would jump in here :-)  It's not a permissions
issue.  If I log in using OWA to my E2K3 mailbox, I can see all Public
Folders and their contents.  I am an owner of all.  When I access this
same mailbox from my workstation in the office using Outlook 2003, what
I see is the Public Folder hierarchy on the E2K7 server minus the two
folders which have been replicated.  I accessed this same mailbox this
morning from home over a Juniper VPN connection and using Outlook 2003
and was able to see the entire contents of the Public Folders including
the two folders which have been replicated and the contents of all
others.  So  when it works, I am obviously accessing the Public
Folder database on the E2K3 server.  When it doesn't work, I seem to be
accessing the database on the E2K7 server, however, I'm stumped as to
why the two replicated folders are missing.
I ran the PFDAVADMIN anyway, but nothing has changed.
 
CFee
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 5:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


I have seen, at multiple customers of mine, that administrators don't
have access to PF's. This is generally most often true (for my
customers) for those who have upgraded from Exchange 5.5. I haven't
tried to nail down the exact reason, but I've presumed it had something
to do with that migration.
 
I would get PFDavAdmin and add Domain Admins/Owner at the topic of the
tree and blow it down (assuming this meets your local security policies,
of course).
 


From: Carol Fee [c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


I'm in the process of setting up Exchange Server 2007 SP1 Enterprise on
Windows Server 2008 Standard.  Our single forest/domain is 2003 Native,
and we have one Server 2008 Domain Controller and three Server 2003
DC's.  All DC's are GC etc.  The single E2K7 server is Hub/CAS/Mailbox.
I can send and receive email to a test mailbox on the E2K7 server both
internally and from the Internet, through SMTP connector on the single
E2K3 server.  To begin the process of migrating the Public Folders, I
replicated two ( each with sub folders ) from the E2K3 to the E2K7
server.  Both the E2K3 and E2K7 mailbox databases point to the Public
Folder database on the E2K3 server.  I know the contents have replicated
by using EMS and get-publicfolderstatistics.My first problem is
 
I, personally can't see either of the two public folders which have been
replicated using Outlook 2003.  They don't even appear in the Public
Folder list.  This is true from multiple computers.  This is true for my
personal mailbox ( on E2K3 ) and my test mailbox on E2K7.  I can see the
folders using OWA to my E2K3 mailbox, but not to the E2K7 test mailbox.
 
The only other Domain Admin is unable to see one of the two replicated
folders using Outlook 2003 to his E2K3 mailbox.
 
All other users are able to see the entire Public Folder tree.
 
 


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 

 

  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
 
mbalogo-gold.gif

RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues

[Carol Fee]

I was really hoping you would jump in here :-)  It's not a permissions
issue.  If I log in using OWA to my E2K3 mailbox, I can see all Public
Folders and their contents.  I am an owner of all.  When I access this
same mailbox from my workstation in the office using Outlook 2003, what
I see is the Public Folder hierarchy on the E2K7 server minus the two
folders which have been replicated.  I accessed this same mailbox this
morning from home over a Juniper VPN connection and using Outlook 2003
and was able to see the entire contents of the Public Folders including
the two folders which have been replicated and the contents of all
others.  So  when it works, I am obviously accessing the Public
Folder database on the E2K3 server.  When it doesn't work, I seem to be
accessing the database on the E2K7 server, however, I'm stumped as to
why the two replicated folders are missing.
I ran the PFDAVADMIN anyway, but nothing has changed.
 
CFee
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 5:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


I have seen, at multiple customers of mine, that administrators don't
have access to PF's. This is generally most often true (for my
customers) for those who have upgraded from Exchange 5.5. I haven't
tried to nail down the exact reason, but I've presumed it had something
to do with that migration.
 
I would get PFDavAdmin and add Domain Admins/Owner at the topic of the
tree and blow it down (assuming this meets your local security policies,
of course).
 


From: Carol Fee [c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues


I'm in the process of setting up Exchange Server 2007 SP1 Enterprise on
Windows Server 2008 Standard.  Our single forest/domain is 2003 Native,
and we have one Server 2008 Domain Controller and three Server 2003
DC's.  All DC's are GC etc.  The single E2K7 server is Hub/CAS/Mailbox.
I can send and receive email to a test mailbox on the E2K7 server both
internally and from the Internet, through SMTP connector on the single
E2K3 server.  To begin the process of migrating the Public Folders, I
replicated two ( each with sub folders ) from the E2K3 to the E2K7
server.  Both the E2K3 and E2K7 mailbox databases point to the Public
Folder database on the E2K3 server.  I know the contents have replicated
by using EMS and get-publicfolderstatistics.My first problem is
 
I, personally can't see either of the two public folders which have been
replicated using Outlook 2003.  They don't even appear in the Public
Folder list.  This is true from multiple computers.  This is true for my
personal mailbox ( on E2K3 ) and my test mailbox on E2K7.  I can see the
folders using OWA to my E2K3 mailbox, but not to the E2K7 test mailbox.
 
The only other Domain Admin is unable to see one of the two replicated
folders using Outlook 2003 to his E2K3 mailbox.
 
All other users are able to see the entire Public Folder tree.
 
 


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 

 

  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
 
mbalogo-gold.gif

Exchange 2007 Public Folder Issues

[Carol Fee]

I'm in the process of setting up Exchange Server 2007 SP1 Enterprise on
Windows Server 2008 Standard.  Our single forest/domain is 2003 Native,
and we have one Server 2008 Domain Controller and three Server 2003
DC's.  All DC's are GC etc.  The single E2K7 server is Hub/CAS/Mailbox.
I can send and receive email to a test mailbox on the E2K7 server both
internally and from the Internet, through SMTP connector on the single
E2K3 server.  To begin the process of migrating the Public Folders, I
replicated two ( each with sub folders ) from the E2K3 to the E2K7
server.  Both the E2K3 and E2K7 mailbox databases point to the Public
Folder database on the E2K3 server.  I know the contents have replicated
by using EMS and get-publicfolderstatistics.My first problem is
 
I, personally can't see either of the two public folders which have been
replicated using Outlook 2003.  They don't even appear in the Public
Folder list.  This is true from multiple computers.  This is true for my
personal mailbox ( on E2K3 ) and my test mailbox on E2K7.  I can see the
folders using OWA to my E2K3 mailbox, but not to the E2K7 test mailbox.
 
The only other Domain Admin is unable to see one of the two replicated
folders using Outlook 2003 to his E2K3 mailbox.
 
All other users are able to see the entire Public Folder tree.
 
 


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 

 

  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
 
mbalogo-gold.gif

RE: ActiveSync Question

[Carol Fee]

Yes, it does.
 
CFee
 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ActiveSync Question


Does ActiveSync do bi-directional synchronization wirelessly?  

I'm looking on MS web-site and can't find anything about it states it
does or doesn't (yet, still looking).

Situation, have a user that went from a personal activesync device
(blackjack) to a corporately owned blackberry.  He wiped his personal
device and gave it to his daughter, now he's stating that he has
contacts that are missing.  These contacts would have been saved to the
blackjack from incoming calls he received, but I don't know if they ever
got to the Exchange server..



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. 
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Newark, TX, United States 

RE: exchangelist digest: September 16, 2009

[Carol Fee]

Anyone else get this three times ?  And why ? 


CFee

-Original Message-
From: O'Connor, Patrick (GPECS) [mailto:patrick.ocon...@goodrich.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchangelist digest: September 16, 2009

 

-Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues digest
[mailto:exchangel...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:00 AM
To: exchangelist digest recipients
Subject: exchangelist digest: September 16, 2009

EXCHANGELIST Digest for Wednesday, September 16, 2009.

1. Blocking Russian and Turkish emails.
2. Can't install 2007
3. Re: Can't install 2007-Solved
4. Messages awaiting directory lookup
5. Antigen
6. Re: Antigen
7. Re: Antigen
8. Exchange Database Restore via Asigra
9. Re: Antigen
10. BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE
11. RE: Antigen
12. RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

--

Subject: Blocking Russian and Turkish emails.
From: gro...@beachcomp.com
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:25 -0400
X-Message-Number: 1

Morning folks.

 

We seem to be getting lots of emails getting past brightmail and
non-spam.

Does anyone know if Exchange 2003 has the ability to block specific
languages?

I would do IPs but they are using Gmail and AOL at random.

 

Thanks for your input.

 

Dave


--

Subject: Can't install 2007
From: James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:19:54 -0400
X-Message-Number: 2

Trying to install Exchange 2007 on a domain member server and I'm not
getting very far at all. I want to do a migration from an existing
Exchnage 2007 server. When I run Step 4 from the DVD image to install
Exchange Server I immediately get an error popup stating exchange
server setup has encountered an error. The app event log has the
following noted in it, anyone have any ideas what's going on?

 

Event ID 4999
Source MSExchange Common

The description for Event ID 4999 from source MSExchange Common cannot
be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed
on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install
or repair the component on the local computer.

If the event originated on another computer, the display information had
to be saved with the event.

The following information was included with the event: 

3068

E12

False



The Exchange Setup Log only notes the following

[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Operating System version: Microsoft Windows
NT 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Setup version: 8.1.240.6.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Logged on user: domain.local\username.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='mode',
Value='Install'.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='sourcedir',
Value='E:\'.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='fromsetup',
Value=''.
[9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] ExSetupUI was started with the following
command: '-mode:install -sourcedir:E: /FromSetup'.








--

Subject: Re: Can't install 2007-Solved
From: James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:42:22 -0400
X-Message-Number: 3

I had to right click on the setup file and run select run as admin.
  - Original Message -
  From: James Kerr
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:19 AM
  Subject: Can't install 2007


  Trying to install Exchange 2007 on a domain member server and I'm not
getting very far at all. I want to do a migration from an existing
Exchnage 2007 server. When I run Step 4 from the DVD image to install
Exchange Server I immediately get an error popup stating exchange
server setup has encountered an error. The app event log has the
following noted in it, anyone have any ideas what's going on?

   

  Event ID 4999
  Source MSExchange Common

  The description for Event ID 4999 from source MSExchange Common cannot
be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed
on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install
or repair the component on the local computer.

  If the event originated on another computer, the display information
had to be saved with the event.

  The following information was included with the event: 

  3068

  E12

  False



  The Exchange Setup Log only notes the following

  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Operating System version: Microsoft
Windows NT 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Setup version: 8.1.240.6.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Logged on user: domain.local\username.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='mode',
Value='Install'.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='sourcedir',
Value='E:\'.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] [0] Command Line Parameter Name='fromsetup',
Value=''.
  [9/16/2009 11:13:02 AM] 

RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

[Carol Fee]

ugly
 
CFee
 



From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] 
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?



Anyone out there used ASSP for Anti-spams? I've been giving a budget of
Exchange should do this natively and the request Exchange is not
doing a good enough job at killing the right spam

http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/assp/index.php?title=Exchange_2007


 

Any other options for what I need?

 

From: Brad DeHart [mailto:br...@khs-net.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

+6 for IronPort.  They will let you try it for free for 30 days, too, so
you can see if it's a fit for you.

 

From: Kumar, Guhan [mailto:guhan.ku...@liberty-bank.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

+5 for Ironport.  Great product.  Mostly set it and forget it...

 



From: Tim Vandael [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be] 
Sent: September 18, 2009 03:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

+4 if you can effort a ironport. Go for it!

The reason for us to buy a PineApp instead of a Ironport was the price.

Ironport is better but much more expensive.

Although we are quite satisfied with our Pineapp.

 

Greetz

 

Tim

 

Van: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 18 september 2009 9:07
Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Onderwerp: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

+3

Installed Iron Port a few years and have not touched it since.

 

From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] 
Sent: 17 September 2009 23:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

I work for an Ironport reseller and we perform tons of these
installations.  We do not have one unsatisfied customer with this
appliance.  It is by far the Mercedes of SPAM/AV/SMTP Gateways.

 

+2 

 

From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerahs.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ironport or Proofpoint?

 

Any insights or preferences if you had to choose between Ironport or
Proofpoint?

 

They both look like good products, but the salesmen always say their
product is superior. I wonder which one does better job at filtering and
which provides the best support.

 

When it comes down to it, I'm looking for ease of manageability and
effectiveness of filtering.

 

Any thoughts or insights are appreciated (even a simple +1 vote for
either one would be helpful).

 

Thanks,

Andy

 

**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all
copies of this document. Thank you. 

Butler Animal Health Supply

**

 

 
 
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank
you.




** 
Deze email werd gescand op virussen en andere mogelijk schadelijke code.

Meer info : KHLim - dienst ICT 
tel : (011230)894 

**

 



Mail send by Exchange 2007 SP1



Mail send by Exchange 2007 SP1

**
Unless you have received this email through the Liberty Bank secure
email system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted
e-mail that is sent to us is not secure.  If you send regular e-mail to
Liberty Bank, please do not include any private or confidential
information such as social security numbers, unlisted telephone numbers,
bank account numbers, personal income information, user names,
passwords, etc.  If you need to provide us with such information, please
telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or write to us at
315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457.
 
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential 

RE: Unable to Sync iPhone 3Gs to Exchange 2003 SP2

[Carol Fee]

I use simply
https://servername.domain.com
The iPhone just takes care of the rest  Actually much easier than
the WM devices. 


CFee

-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to Sync iPhone 3Gs to Exchange 2003 SP2

I am trying to help a client setup their iPhone 3Gs to sync to an
Exchange 2003 SP2 server and am unable to get it to work.  I've tested
it with a Windows Mobile 6.1 phone and that works and so does OWA, but
no luck with the iPhone.
They are an extremely small (3 person) company and their email server
sits behind a firewall, and the firewall forwards the HTTP and SMTP
traffic to the exchange server, but they do not use SSL for the
connection. I'm entering the exact same address and credentials used to
get into OWA which as I said work fine with a Windows Mobile device.
The iPhone just says failed to verify credentials, but I don't see any
helpful error messages.
I know the iPhone 3Gs is suppose to work with Exchange, but it must
require something different as part of the server setup and I can't
figure out what that could be.  Does anyone have any ideas as to what
would prevent this from working?  The server address is in the format of
owa.domain.com/exchange which is a little different than I'm used to
seeing, but that doesn't cause an issue with Windows Mobile.  Is there
something in IIS that needs to be setup to make this work?

Thanks,
Paul

RE: Unable to Sync iPhone 3Gs to Exchange 2003 SP2

[Carol Fee]

You really should be using SSL.  We use a Juniper Netscreen as the Front
End, a single Exchange 2003 server as the Back end.  The iPhones deal
with the cert even better than the WM devices.  If your cert isn't from
a trusted root server, you have to install it on the WM devices.  On the
iPhone, you simply have to accept it the first time you connect, and
it's happy after that. 


CFee

-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Sync iPhone 3Gs to Exchange 2003 SP2

That is correct we are trying to use Activesync rather than IMAP.  OMA
seems to be setup correctly for Windows Mobile, but not for the iPhone
implementation.  I've also read some things saying it is more
problematic if you have a single Exchange server (no Front End and Back
End servers) without SSA and that is our situation.
I have found LOTS of conflicting information.  Some say you have to use
SSL, other say you don't, but you have to go into the settings on the
iPhone and disable SSL.  Everyone seems to have a different opinion on
what will make it work...what a pain.

RE: Auditing Exchange Public Folders

[Carol Fee]

Wasn't this posted already ?
 
CFee
 



From: Gavin Wilby [mailto:gavin.wi...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auditing Exchange Public Folders


Hello,

My GoogleFoo is failing me here.

I have an Exchange 2003 Standard setup with a few public folders in
it, one being a contacts folder with approx 5000 contacts in it.

I have been informed that a few contacts have disappeared, but of
course noone has deleted them, so the server must have done it!

Is there a way to audit the contacts folder for entry deletion easily,
so if it happens again I can at least show the boss that n user
deleted x entry?

Gavin.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




-- 
Gavin Wilby,
Twitter: http://twitter.com/gavin_wilby
GSXR Blog: http://www.stoof.co.uk

RE: Anybody Out There?

[Carol Fee]

Did you see that ? 


CFee

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anybody Out There?

  Just nod if you can hear me.

-- Ben

iPhone Bug

[Carol Fee]

http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/28/hackers-iphone-apple-technology-securit
y-hackers.html
 
 


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 

 

  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
 
mbalogo-gold.gif

RE: Opening up port 443 (SSL) on firewall for iPhone (2nd post)

[Carol Fee]

It posted as did a reply from someone.  Check the archives. 


CFee

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Opening up port 443 (SSL) on firewall for iPhone (2nd post)

Second post because I didn't see the first one come back, and I sent it
at 10:00am.  Odd...

Someone just dropped an iPhone off at my desk and wants it to be
configured to send and receive email just like our Blackberries (with a
BES server) so they can test it on Monday when they go out of town.

As I see it, the quick way to do this would be to open up port 443 (SSL)
on the firewall to our internal Exchange server.  What are the risks of
doing this, or does someone have a better suggestion?

Paul

Send As From Public Folder

[Carol Fee]

E2K3 SP2 fully patched
W2K3 Enterprise SP2 fully patched
Single domain/forest
All of a sudden, no one is able to Send As one and only one particular
Public Folder.  This includes users who have permissions and who were
previously able to do so.  Users are still able to do this from other
Public Folders according to the permissions for each.  There have been
no configuration changes to either the server or the Public Folder in
question.
Any ideas 
 
 


Carol Fee
Network Administrator
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
 

 

  
   Massachusetts Bar Association
   20 West Street
   Boston, MA 02111-1204
   (617) 338-0500
 
mbalogo-gold.gif

RE: RIM SUPPORT

[Carol Fee]

Download from their web site.
 
CFee
 



From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RIM SUPPORT



How do you keep your BES server up to date? Do you get the updates from
your carrier?

 

___

Stefan Jafs

 

From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RIM SUPPORT

 

+1 on that method.  The problem with it is that no carrier will even
begin to troubleshoot unless you have the device in question in your
hands.

 

CFee

 

 



From: Mike Sullivan [mailto:neog...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RIM SUPPORT

We've never paid for RIM support. Instead, we call our carrier (Verizon)
and have them help us and when they can't figure out the issue they
implement the call to RIM. We've only had to do this about 4 times in
2.5 years. We have 110 licenses (104 in use).  

 

Maybe you can take a similar route?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:

We had a round of lay-off's in November, and then some more in January.
Things are beginning to look up, maybe, but we are a LONG way from being
willing to shell out 6 large for that support.  We have a lead on a
contractor that is supposedly authorized by RIM who offers support
contracts.  Will let you know where that leads. 

 

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mousa Hamad mha...@zetron.com wrote:

You'll have to let us know how that works out.


We have 15 devices and just got the lowest support package... We are on
BPS, but interestingly they did price us based on the number of devices
we have as well... I found that odd, but just assumed that was how they
did it... I agree though, how many devices I have should be none of
their business...

Though RIM has already tried their best to alienate us with Verizon's
help by forcing Blackberry Storms down our throat, needless to say I'll
be completing the Curve for Storm switch out TODAY and my users are
already a LOT happier..


Mousa Hamad




-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: RIM SUPPORT

Anyone tried www.astrasync.com ?? I'm rolling it out to five users next
week as a test.


From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RIM SUPPORT

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Brown2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Again, all they REALLY support for me is ONE BES server.

 Yah, same here.  And really, I'm agreeing with you -- if RIM keeps
pissing off their customers, they'll eventually find they don't have
customers to piss off.

-- Ben

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

 

 




-- 
Mike Sullivan
neog...@gmail.com

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

RE: RIM SUPPORT

[Carol Fee]

+1 on that method.  The problem with it is that no carrier will even
begin to troubleshoot unless you have the device in question in your
hands.
 
CFee
 



From: Mike Sullivan [mailto:neog...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RIM SUPPORT


We've never paid for RIM support. Instead, we call our carrier (Verizon)
and have them help us and when they can't figure out the issue they
implement the call to RIM. We've only had to do this about 4 times in
2.5 years. We have 110 licenses (104 in use).  

Maybe you can take a similar route?


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:


We had a round of lay-off's in November, and then some more in
January.  Things are beginning to look up, maybe, but we are a LONG way
from being willing to shell out 6 large for that support.  We have a
lead on a contractor that is supposedly authorized by RIM who offers
support contracts.  Will let you know where that leads. 


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mousa Hamad
mha...@zetron.com wrote:


You'll have to let us know how that works out.


We have 15 devices and just got the lowest support
package... We are on
BPS, but interestingly they did price us based on the
number of devices
we have as well... I found that odd, but just assumed
that was how they
did it... I agree though, how many devices I have should
be none of
their business...

Though RIM has already tried their best to alienate us
with Verizon's
help by forcing Blackberry Storms down our throat,
needless to say I'll
be completing the Curve for Storm switch out TODAY and
my users are
already a LOT happier..


Mousa Hamad




-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith
[mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: RIM SUPPORT

Anyone tried www.astrasync.com ?? I'm rolling it out to
five users next
week as a test.


From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RIM SUPPORT

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Jeff
Brown2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Again, all they REALLY support for me is ONE BES
server.

 Yah, same here.  And really, I'm agreeing with you --
if RIM keeps
pissing off their customers, they'll eventually find
they don't have
customers to piss off.

-- Ben

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~




 




-- 
Mike Sullivan
neog...@gmail.com


 

RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

[Carol Fee]

Why don't you just set the size limit higher on her mailbox only ?
 
CFee
 



From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007



And being the non-technical buyer he is, he says, no problem, I'll just
stick with the methods and vendors I know.  We can't even get a foot in
the door because we asked him to do something a little different.

 

Don't get me wrong, I prefer not to use Exchange as a FTP server, and I
still have a 15 meg limit on incoming and a 10 meg limit on outgoing
messages.  My point is that sometimes what is best and easiest, and
makes the most sense to us, isn't always seen that way by people outside
the company that we have little ability to influence.  So each
organization has to make that call for themselves.

 

Another example of why message size restrictions can be a problem:  My
CEO gets several messages a week ranging from 10 to 13 megs from various
government agencies.  She needs to receive these messages, and the
senders are sending them out to numerous different agencies at once, so
there is zero chance of getting them to do anything differently.  So we
make adjustments on our rules, increasing the incoming limit from 10 15
MB.  I know at some point she is going to be vexed because she didn't
get a 16 or 17 MB message, and I'll be upping the limit again.

 

  

 



From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

We'd say, here, use this - it's easy and a better method of transferring
files.

 



From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

We had a situation where a salesperson was trying to get a new customer.
The potential customer wanted to send a 15 meg attachment with the
product specs to our salesperson so we could get a quote back to him.
His email was bounced because of the attachment size limit.  We asked
him to upload it to our FTP server, but he didn't want to do it.  Now
our rules are making it difficult for him, and he starts getting the
feeling we are hard to work with. So do we relax our message size limit,
or lose a sale?

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

Like I said, setup and used properly FTP is much easier for everyone.
We have our users trained on how to upload to our FTP site, note the url
for the file and send the url to the person that wants the file via
email.   You're not asking the VP of Advertising for Eaton Corp to use
FTP, they are just clicking on a link in an email.  

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:

We were never too keen on asking customers to deal with FTP. For example
the VP of Advertising for Eaton Corp or the CEO of Forest City
Enterprises is just not someone you would tell had to use FTP.

 

 

 

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:41 PM


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 

That's what FTP is for, File Transfer Protocol, Exchange is an
email/calendering application.  Setup and used properly, FTP is much
more secure than email.  

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote:

Do they need larger attachments to do their job? If yes, then either you
are being unreasonable or your company is being unreasonable by not
providing you the budget to support the needed size.

Attachment size is a business decision and then IT should have the
budget to provide that business need. I worked at an advertising agency
in the past. Big attachments flying around helped them work better and
faster and the company gave me the money to make it work, so I gave it
to them.

It was also real nice to know that every attachment bounce that came in
was the result of the outside sender/recipient rather than me. It made
answering that question nice and easy.




 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com]
 Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:24 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

 Subject: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007

 Was just curious if I was being unreasonable to my Sales department
 with my firm stand on 10 meg.

 Thanks,
 Dennis


 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark 

Problem Receiving Lyris Email

[Carol Fee]

I stopped receiving email from this list and the NTSysAdmin list on 5/28.  
Although I have had two reports that my Barracuda is rejecting list email, I do 
not believe that is true overall.  The two emails that I am aware of were not 
sent through the lyris.sunbelt-software email system.  They came from other 
ISP's. One of these was a reply from Michael Espinola, but it came from Google, 
not lyris.  Aside from one OOO reply to my post to the NTSysAdmin list on 
Wednesday, which I received, there are no entries in my Barracuda logs for 
email from either list since 5/28.  

Yesterday, I unsubscribed from the NTSysAdmin list, and then subscribed this 
morning.  I have not received the email from Sunbelt requiring me to confirm my 
subscription, and there is no trace of any email from Sunbelt in my Barracuda 
log.

I'm looking for some help from you folks in the way of a reply to this post 
which would also include cc:cfee1...@gmail.com.

I'm also looking for some help from someone at Sunbelt ?

Thanks in advance.

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St. 
Boston, MA  02111
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Problem Receiving Lyris Email

[Carol Fee]

I dind't receive your reply, but see it on the web page.  Thanks.  I'll let you 
know how I make out.

CFee
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Problem Receiving Lyris Email

[Carol Fee]

Thanks.  I don't think this is even a black listing issue.  If it was, I
would see the emails being rejected by the cuda.  It shows every email
that arrives at the gate, and it's disposition.  Since 5/28, one OOO has
appeared which came from exchange.lyris.sunbelt-software.com.  That was
a reply to my post on Wednesday.  The few others I've received have
come, like yours, from outside sunbelt.  A few people sent me an address
at Sunbelt which was posted to one of the other lists in response to
folks not receiving list email back in March.  I'll let everyone know
how this works out.
 
CFee
 



From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: Carol Fee
Subject: Re: Problem Receiving Lyris Email


I sent my email to you directly, to let you know that your messages were
at leasy reaching the lyris server.  Your issue appears to be with
receiving messages distributed by lyris back to you.
 
This is very commonly a mail/spam filtering issue.  In situations where
no changes were made on your end, its probably attributed to Sunbelt
being listed on an DNSBL again.

--
ME2



On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote:


I stopped receiving email from this list and the NTSysAdmin list
on 5/28.  Although I have had two reports that my Barracuda is rejecting
list email, I do not believe that is true overall.  The two emails that
I am aware of were not sent through the lyris.sunbelt-software email
system.  They came from other ISP's. One of these was a reply from
Michael Espinola, but it came from Google, not lyris.  Aside from one
OOO reply to my post to the NTSysAdmin list on Wednesday, which I
received, there are no entries in my Barracuda logs for email from
either list since 5/28.

Yesterday, I unsubscribed from the NTSysAdmin list, and then
subscribed this morning.  I have not received the email from Sunbelt
requiring me to confirm my subscription, and there is no trace of any
email from Sunbelt in my Barracuda log.

I'm looking for some help from you folks in the way of a reply
to this post which would also include cc:cfee1...@gmail.com
mailto:cc%3acfee1...@gmail.com .

I'm also looking for some help from someone at Sunbelt ?

Thanks in advance.

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St.
Boston, MA  02111
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image
Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Problem Receiving Lyris Email

[Carol Fee]

Actually, I did, and that didn't help.  Here is the explanation for what
happened ( from Sunbelt )
 
Hello Carol.

 

In Lyris 10.x and higher an unfortunate bug exists where if mail gets
rejected even once from any email address from a particular mailhost,
any domain and email address that MX host services gets permanently
blocked without a retry. I've been fighting Lyris for a fix but it's a
long way off.

 

I see this entry in our mailstream block:

 

208.252.57.233

IP Address Blacklisted by a Shared Blacklisting Service

 

When lyris tries to send it logs,

== MailStream is known to be blocked by server mail1.massbar.org
(208.252.57.233)

 

Usually if I catch this the moment it happens I can see the SMTP session
that caused this. However our logs stop at 5/31/2009. 

 

I have released your block from the mailstream, and hopefully now you
are getting emails again.

 
CFee
 



From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem Receiving Lyris Email



Yep. Always whitelist any list serves you are on. They often end up on
dnsbl's.

 

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: Carol Fee
Subject: Re: Problem Receiving Lyris Email

 

I sent my email to you directly, to let you know that your messages were
at leasy reaching the lyris server.  Your issue appears to be with
receiving messages distributed by lyris back to you.

 

This is very commonly a mail/spam filtering issue.  In situations where
no changes were made on your end, its probably attributed to Sunbelt
being listed on an DNSBL again.

--
ME2



On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote:

I stopped receiving email from this list and the NTSysAdmin list on
5/28.  Although I have had two reports that my Barracuda is rejecting
list email, I do not believe that is true overall.  The two emails that
I am aware of were not sent through the lyris.sunbelt-software email
system.  They came from other ISP's. One of these was a reply from
Michael Espinola, but it came from Google, not lyris.  Aside from one
OOO reply to my post to the NTSysAdmin list on Wednesday, which I
received, there are no entries in my Barracuda logs for email from
either list since 5/28.

Yesterday, I unsubscribed from the NTSysAdmin list, and then subscribed
this morning.  I have not received the email from Sunbelt requiring me
to confirm my subscription, and there is no trace of any email from
Sunbelt in my Barracuda log.

I'm looking for some help from you folks in the way of a reply to this
post which would also include cc:cfee1...@gmail.com
mailto:cc%3acfee1...@gmail.com .

I'm also looking for some help from someone at Sunbelt ?

Thanks in advance.

Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St.
Boston, MA  02111
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

SonicWall Email Security 300

[Carol Fee]

Any comments on these ?

CFee

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Online Spreadsheet

[Carol Fee]

What about Groove ?  Is that accessible by mac users ?
 

CFee

 



From: David Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Online Spreadsheet


Happy Monday!

We are currently looking for a collaborative online spreadsheet for both
mac and pc users.  I have seen google docs but are there any other
products that you all have used or recommend.  Does anyone want to
comment on the drawbacks of using google docs vs other products.   I
have also been looking at sharepoint services but some functionality is
missing when using a mac in particular the export to excel function.


Regards,

David




 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Carol Fee]

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
? 


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Dell laptop losing connectivity on network

[Carol Fee]

We have D630's and I've found the Intel network driver software to be
very problematic.
 

CFee

 



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 09:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dell laptop losing connectivity on network



I have a Latitude D620 that started having connectivity issues.  It will
work just after it's turned on for about 5 minutes and then no network
anything (local or Internet).  Sometimes it will spontaneously start
working again, but usually not.  Sometimes if I repair the local area
connection it will work, but usually that fails also.  If I
disable/re-enable the adapter it will always work, but only for a
short period of time.

When it is happening, I can ping the machine and get a mixture of
replys and timeouts.  The only error in the error logs is when the
repair the local area connection fails.  I get event id 1003 from dhcp
saying, unable to renew address from the network. The following
error occurred:  The semaphore timeout period has expired.  Your
computer will try to continue to try and obtain an address

The Dell tech thought it sounds like a software issue and we tried
everything.  Reinstalling the nic driver, stopping unnecessary services,
ruling out cabling issues, etc.  Finally he suggested, for no specific
reason, to try the laptop outside of our network.  So, I took it home
last night and low and behold it worked fine without having any
connectivity issues.  I was using the same Domain user account.

I would love to have some ideas on what may be going on or how to fix
this.  I have other laptops just like this and they are not having any
issues,... yet.

 

Thank you,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/  to learn more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: ActiveSync on WM driving me nuts

[Carol Fee]

If I remember correctly, this is a cert issue.  Specifically, you do not
have the root cert for the server which issued the cert for the Exchange
FE installed on the device.  You need to install this, not the FE cert. 


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Edward B. DREGER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ActiveSync on WM driving me nuts

A few days back, I posted about OMA not functioning.  Chalk up one to
being half-asleep; although OMA is grouchy, ActiveSync is the actual
problem with which I'm concerned.

The problem, in more detail:

* Phone fails to sync, giving error 0x85010014;
* Event viewer shows event ID 3005 (source: Server ActiveSync);
* IIS logs show error 500.

Problem occurs regardless of default domain and realm (empty, NetBIOS,
or Active Directory domain) settings on relevant IIS virtual
directories.  I've verified the allowed authentication methods.  I'm not
incorrectly forcing SSL on an internally-called-via-non-SSL-only virtual
directory.

OMA does not work; although it shows 200 in IIS logs, the page content
complains about an internal server error.  OWA works properly, as does
RPC-over-HTTPS.

Server is SBS 2003.  Exchange is SP2; said service pack has been
reinstalled.  I've followed several different KBs, and made a few
registry and metabase edits.  If it's on Microsoft.com or Petri.co.il,
there's a good chance I've already tried it.

SharePoint 2 had been installed, but never put into production.  I
confirmed that NTAuthenticationProviders is Negotiate,NTLM.

Rather than attempt to describe everything, I'll answer specific
questions if anyone wants...

Anything obvious that I might be overlooking?


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman 
Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting,
e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita

DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending
mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: meeting resource question

[Carol Fee]

Yes
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997184(EXCHG.65).aspx
 

CFee

 



From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 07:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: meeting resource question



E2K3-SP2 OL2K3/7,

 

When scheduling a meeting can a resource send the organizer an email
saying the event has been successful booked or declined?  Booking is
working as designed, however, users sigh want an email from the
resource stating same.  Is this doable using direct booking?

 

 

Thanks,

 

Shook

http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook  

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Carol Fee]

I have had this happen when during the Outlook or Office installation on
a computer, Run All from My Computer was not selected.
 

CFee

 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights



I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Attachment size limits

[Carol Fee]

Cool - see you there. 


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 14:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

Coming up - you'll get an email with a View Message icon which will
take you to a small registration page - fill that in and you'll get the
message and be a user.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

Don,

I'd like that please, thanks!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

We use Tumbleweed's Secure Messenger - basically a secure FTP like
product with email notification wrapped in an email like browser based
interface.

Be happy to send you sample off-list if you like.

Yousendit.com is a web based similar offering - free I believe for
individuals. 

-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

I've communicated that to his secretary.

I've looked at some solutions to this problem, but it would be nice to
hear what solutions the list members use to avoid sending documents
through email.

Any suggestions? Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

If the recipients are external it is highly likely that no one will be
able to receive it if the email is too large.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

Thanks Richard,

Our CEO's secretary is preparing the email for the CEO to send to
specific recipients and we're ran into this situation before so I'll
just set it globally for everyone to avoid any further calls to the
Pres. Complaining they are limited in doing their jobs. (long story)

Thanks for all the help ya'll!!


-Original Message-
From: Staley, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment size limits

Tom,

Although I agree with everyone else that the defaults are included in
the System Manger, if you have active directory running, you can modify
an individual's sizes. Go to active directory and select the user, right
click and select properties.  On the Exchange General tab click on the
Delivery Restrictions button and set the send limit to whatever the CEO
requires. This setting will override the defaults in System manager.

Richard Staley
Network Administrator
Martin Electronics, Inc.



-

This electronic message is intended for the exclusive use by the
person(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is
confidential or privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any
disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication, or the use of its contents, is prohibited.  If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify me of your
inadvertent receipt and delete this message from all data storage
systems.



-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:35 MEI AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Attachment size limits


CEO requested adjustment on Exchange 2003 to allow attachments larger
than 10MB. I've looked in Systems Manager, there are no limits set for
mailbox send and receive.

Is this setting located in another area and/or a registry key that needs
to be added?

TIA,
Tom



__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3012 (20080409) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3013 (20080409) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3013 (20080409) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets 

RE: Appointment not updating.

[Carol Fee]

I agree that activity on the list is drastically reduced this week.
Maybe just a coincidence. 


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 09:16
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Appointment not updating.

Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1:
bytes=32 time1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms
TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=128

Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate
round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

Yep... looks like it's working to me...

I haven't heard of anything like this from my users...

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Appointment not updating.

Testing 123  Is this thing on???

Email from this list seems to have dropped by 90% (for me anyway), and
one I sent yesterday never made it.  Interesting.

I have a user who updated an appointment, and 2 of the 4 people that
received the update did not have the original appointment removed from
the calendar.  Has anybody else ran into this?

They do all have Blackberry's, so I don't know if that is a factor or
not.



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2003 and Lyris Listserv

[Carol Fee]

Incoming mail to the Lyris Listserv comes in directly to that server.
Outgoing mail is routed through your Exchange Server, so you simply need
to give the Listserv machine permission to relay through the Exchange
Server.
 

CFee

 



From: Allen, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 13:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 and Lyris Listserv



Hi All,

 

I am looking for some help. I am in the process of setting up a Lyris
Listserv. How do I get my Exchange server to route the mail to the
listserv. We also use Messagelabs to scan all of our incoming and
outgoing mail for spam and viruses.

 

 I'm running Exchange 2003 Enterprise and Lyris ListManager 9.3.

 

Andrew

 

Andrew Allen

Network Engineer

William Mitchell College of Law

875 Summit Ave

St. Paul MN 55105

651.290.6463 (DID)

651.290.6414 (FAX)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.wmitchell.edu

 


___
This email has been scanned for all viruses.



 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: resource creation and scheduling question

[Carol Fee]

Did you send a test email to the mailbox first ?
 

CFee

 



From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 15:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: resource creation and scheduling question



E2K3 SP2+all patches OL 03/07 single server, single org.

 

OK, I just created six new resource accounts, logged in as the account
setup need calendar options in OL and gave all users author permissions
to said calendar.  When I go to schedule a test meeting and click the
scheduling tab, I get the wonderful \\ across the
resource slot with the message that no free\busy info could be read.
Google-fu points to permissions but all staff has 'author'.  

 

What did I miss?  

 

Shook

http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook  

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: recreating mailbox accounts

[Carol Fee]

Could this be a cached address book issue with the domain users ?
 

CFee

 



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 16:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: recreating mailbox accounts



Yes, the old address is listed as an SMTP address for the new account.

Everything looks as it should.

The problem is only when receiving email from Domain Users on our
network.  She gets email fine from outside the network.  

Hope Exchange will figure it out by tomorrow.

Btw, Exchange 2003 with 2003 AD.

 



From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: recreating mailbox accounts

 

Remember  account != email address

 

Look at email addresses not accounts.  Is the old address listed as an
SMTP address for the new account?  Then it should receive email for that
account.  In the future I would not create a new account for a name
change.  Change the name/login in AD, add an additional email address,
but why all this effort for a name change?

 

Can you clarify a little bit on which email address exist for which
accounts?

 

-troy

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: recreating mailbox accounts

 

I have a user who got married and changed her name.  We created a new=
AD User account with a new mailbox.  After realizing that we needed to
connect her old mailbox with the new User account we deleted both the
new mailbox and her original mailbox in AD using Exchange Tasks.  After
they showed the red x on the mailboxes in ESM we reconnected her old
mailbox with her new AD account and deleted (in ESM) the new mailbox
account that was created when we created her new AD User.  Then back in
AD we created a new email account for her original User account (since
the old mailbox for this User was reconnected to her new User account)
so we could forward any mail from her old name account to her new name
account.

 

Now, any email getting sent from inside our Domain to either of the
accounts don't get delivered.  We get a 5.4.6 error when sending to the
original email address and a 5.1.1 when sending to the new email
address.

 

She does seem to receive email to her new email address from my hotmail
account.

 

I hope this is clear.  I'm a little dizzy just typing it.

 

Is Exchange just working out the mailboxes because there are two
mailboxes with the same name but different SID's?

 

Is there a way to speed up this process? =20

 

Should I handle this situation differently?  I know I shouldn't have
created a mailbox for the new AD User if I was going to reconnect her
old account.

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/  to learn more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~