Re: Exchange SMTP Connector Issue
How exactly would I go by testing this on my end? Or would I have to test it through the app? Thanks On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: There are a couple of valid ways to specify the domain. That is not one of them. Do this instead: ** ** client.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential( username, password, “domain” ); ** ** *From:* MarvinC [mailto:marv...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, May 13, 2013 6:51 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Exchange SMTP Connector Issue ** ** I've got an Exchange 2003 SP2 environment where a developer is tying to create an smtp connection for a .NET4 application using the following syntax: System.Net.Mail.SmtpClient client = new System.Net.Mail.SmtpClient( mymailserver.mydomain.com); client.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential(my domain\\username, password); client.Send(message); I'm not 100% sure about the structure of statement and wanted to see if I could get some direction. Any responses appreciated. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
telnet to smtp mail server Q
Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Lots of carriers block port 25 from dynamic addresses with whitelists to allow servers they know about through Maybe depends on where you are connecting from Can you telnet to other MX servers okay? That would give you an idea of whether its a carrier issue (although the McAfee and perhaps local firewall rules could equally block port 25 outbound from anything other than a known server Also could be the server is actually down - is there a 2nd priority server MX record? On 10/04/2013, at 7:50 PM, Liby Philip Mathew lmat...@path-solutions.com wrote: Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.com image001.gif From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Try port 587. From: Duncan Turnbull [mailto:dun...@e-simple.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q Lots of carriers block port 25 from dynamic addresses with whitelists to allow servers they know about through Maybe depends on where you are connecting from Can you telnet to other MX servers okay? That would give you an idea of whether its a carrier issue (although the McAfee and perhaps local firewall rules could equally block port 25 outbound from anything other than a known server Also could be the server is actually down - is there a 2nd priority server MX record? On 10/04/2013, at 7:50 PM, Liby Philip Mathew lmat...@path-solutions.com wrote: Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 http://www.path-solutions.com/ www.path-solutions.com http://www.path-solutions.com/ image001.gif From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jimmy@ http://jt-solution.com/ jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go.. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Is this from inside the target network? I'm assuming that inbound email is flowing per normal. Sent on the run! On 10 Apr 2013, at 15:29, Orland, Kathleen korl...@rogers.com wrote: Try port 587. From: Duncan Turnbull [mailto:dun...@e-simple.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q Lots of carriers block port 25 from dynamic addresses with whitelists to allow servers they know about through Maybe depends on where you are connecting from Can you telnet to other MX servers okay? That would give you an idea of whether its a carrier issue (although the McAfee and perhaps local firewall rules could equally block port 25 outbound from anything other than a known server Also could be the server is actually down - is there a 2nd priority server MX record? On 10/04/2013, at 7:50 PM, Liby Philip Mathew lmat...@path-solutions.com wrote: Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.com image001.gif From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Not only that, I block outbound port 25 at our router for all IPs, except for the mail server. On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Duncan Turnbull dun...@e-simple.co.nzwrote: Lots of carriers block port 25 from dynamic addresses with whitelists to allow servers they know about through Maybe depends on where you are connecting from Can you telnet to other MX servers okay? That would give you an idea of whether its a carrier issue (although the McAfee and perhaps local firewall rules could equally block port 25 outbound from anything other than a known server Also could be the server is actually down - is there a 2nd priority server MX record? On 10/04/2013, at 7:50 PM, Liby Philip Mathew lmat...@path-solutions.com wrote: Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 *www.path-solutions.com* image001.gif http://www.path-solutions.com/ *From:* Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P *Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary.*** ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That's a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image001.gif@01CE35CE.0019D0B0]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don't use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven't configured yet which is why I'm trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still don't know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That's a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.comhttp://www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Can you Telnet to any other public MX servers? My guess would be that Comcast is blocking 25 out. I know I've had trouble with ATT doing that in the past and I'm pretty sure Comcast does it now too. Andrew Macbeth From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don't use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven't configured yet which is why I'm trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still don't know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That's a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.comhttp://www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image001.gif@01CE35E6.D5153490]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Someone mentioned earlier that many ISP's block port 25. Comcast certainly does. http://customer.comcast.com/help-and-support/internet/list-of-blocked-ports/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don't use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven't configured yet which is why I'm trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still don't know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That's a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.comhttp://www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Because Comcast blocks port 25... On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote: I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don’t use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven’t configured yet which is why I’m trying from home and other locations besides my office network. ** ** I still don’t know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. ** ** ** ** *From:* Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q ** ** There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That’s a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. ** ** Steve ** ** ** ** *Steve Hart* Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax -- *From:* Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com ji...@jt-solution.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q ** ** No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- *From:* Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] *Received:* Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *Subject:* RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 *www.path-solutions.com* [image: cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ *From:* Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com ji...@jt-solution.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P *Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary.** * --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistimage001.gif
RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Yep, that is the answer. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't going crazy. Thanks! From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q Because Comcast blocks port 25... On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.commailto:ji...@jt-solution.com wrote: I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don't use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven't configured yet which is why I'm trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still don't know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.commailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That's a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343tel:503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160tel:503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.comhttp://www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.commailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703tel:%2B965%2024824600%20Ext.%20703 Fax: +965 24824500tel:%2B965%2024824500 www.path-solutions.comhttp://www.path-solutions.com/ [cid:image007.gif@01CDC735.3B318E70]http://www.path-solutions.com/ From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I'm trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can't I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I'm making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.gif
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
Good to know!! Sent on the run! On 10 Apr 2013, at 19:53, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote: Yep, that is the answer. Just wanted to make sure I wasn’t going crazy. Thanks! From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q Because Comcast blocks port 25... On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote: I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I don’t use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I haven’t configured yet which is why I’m trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still don’t know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. That’s a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.com image001.gif From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: telnet to smtp mail server Q Im having a brain fart right now. I’m trying to telnet to a smtp server from outside of that network on port 25 but I get a connection refused. When I send an email from outside to that domain, the mail goes through to the recipient. Why can’t I telnet in on port 25? What am I missing? I’m making sure I telnet to the mx record on port 25 from outside and no go…. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Disclaimer [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.] P Protect our planet: Do not print this email unless necessary. --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q
FYI, you CAN get this unblocked if you talk to the right people. http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/taking-steps-to-prevent-unintentional-network-abuse http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/updated-management-of-smtp-port-25 On 4/10/2013 12:53 PM, Jimmy Tran wrote: Yep, that is the answer. Just wanted to make sure I wasnt going crazy. Thanks! From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: telnet to smtp mail server Q Because Comcast blocks port 25... On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote: I am testing this from my home network which is Comcast to my office. I dont use port 587, only 25. From inside my office I can telnet to my internal exchange ip fine. If I use the public ip it will fail due to some NAT polices I havent configured yet which is why Im trying from home and other locations besides my office network. I still dont know why email comes in on port 25 from other email servers but I cannot connect through a telnet session. McAfee or any other similar software is not installed on the machine. From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q There may be a firewall rule on your network preventing outbound port 25 connections from everything but your mail servers. Thats a common rule to stop spambots on internal networks from getting out. Steve Steve Hart Network Administrator 503.491.4343 -Direct|503.492.8160 - Fax From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q No Mcafee. Just Microsoft security essentials Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com] Received: Wednesday, 10 Apr 2013, 12:49am To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: telnet to smtp mail server Q Are you using McAfee on the PC? If so, probably it is blocking port 25. Just a thought. Regards Liby Philip Mathew | Principal Systems Administrator ICT Professional Services Path Solutions Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703 Fax: +965 24824500 www.path-solutions.com
RE: SMTP server stopped working
More than likely, you don't have an outgoing connector configured. Turn on SMTP logging in IIS and look at THOSE logs. The presence of a file in BadMail doesn't mean anything other than delivery failed. It doesn't tell you why. From: Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP server stopped working Hi all, Our first 2003 mailbox server has being used by printers, monitoring apps as a SMTP server to send notifications. I just removed Exchange 2003 from this server from the Add/Remove Programs panel and left just the IIS SMTP server thinking applications could still send emails. Now even though the SMTP server is up and running, we dont receive any more emails from applications that are set to use this host as SMTP. A telnet test does not produce any errors and i get : Mail queued for delivery. This is the logs on the SMTP server, the mail goes in the BAD mail folder: From: postmas...@acme.commailto:postmas...@acme.com To: w...@acme.commailto:w...@acme.com Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:32:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1160 - 0002 - Message-ID: x3cf3ednh0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.localmailto:x3cf3ednh0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. itt...@acme.commailto:itt...@acme.com --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local Received-From-MTA: dns;nlwussv01 Arrival-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 Final-Recipient: rfc822;itt...@acme.commailto:rfc822%3bitt...@acme.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from nlwussv01 ([10.1.1.2]) by remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: w...@acme.commailto:w...@acme.com Date: 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 Subject: =?utf-8?B?V1NVUzogVGVzdCBFLU1haWwgTm90aWZpY2F0aW9uIEZyb20gTkxXVVNTVjAx?= Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Bcc: Return-Path: w...@acme.commailto:w...@acme.com Message-ID: remcorpexch03mbyr2a0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.localmailto:remcorpexch03mbyr2a0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2013 13:31:51.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[8437C7C0:01CDEDA4] WW91IGFyZSBub3cgYWJsZSB0byByZWNlaXZlIGUtbWFpbCBub3RpZmljYXRpb25zIGZyb20g V2luZG93cyBTZXJ2ZXIgVXBkYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzLg== --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co-- --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP server stopped working
Hum, how can i create a SMTP connector now that exchange has been uninstalled. If i try from the EMC i receive: You must have at least one SMTP VSI in this routing group to create an SMTP connector SMTP logging is ON Here are the latest entries: 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 422 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 422 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 782 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 782 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1125 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 1125 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1485 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 1485 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1844 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 2641 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 2641 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 3000 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:25:42 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 88844 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 109 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:27:22 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 81922 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 16 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:29:52 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 64219 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 16 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:32:22 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 80750 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:33:20 10.135.136.4 jptoksv04.corp.acmegroup.local REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:33:20 10.135.136.4 jptoksv04.corp.acmegroup.local REMCORPEXCH03 240 282 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:36:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:36:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:41:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:41:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:46:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:46:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:51:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:51:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:56:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:56:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: More than likely, you don’t have an outgoing connector configured. Turn on SMTP logging in IIS and look at THOSE logs. The presence of a file in BadMail doesn’t mean anything other than delivery failed. It doesn’t tell you why. ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:37 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP server stopped working ** ** Hi all, ** ** Our first 2003 mailbox server has being used by printers, monitoring apps as a SMTP server to send notifications. I just removed Exchange 2003 from this server from the Add/Remove Programs panel and left
Re: SMTP server stopped working
Have you enabled the IP address of the SMTP server in the receive connector on the 2010 server? You might want to try creating a customer receive connector on the Hub transport server which will allow e-mail from this server to be delivered. Have you tried an telnet test from the console of the old E2K3 server?? Sent on the run! On 08 Jan 2013, at 17:36, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Our first 2003 mailbox server has being used by printers, monitoring apps as a SMTP server to send notifications. I just removed Exchange 2003 from this server from the Add/Remove Programs panel and left just the IIS SMTP server thinking applications could still send emails. Now even though the SMTP server is up and running, we dont receive any more emails from applications that are set to use this host as SMTP. A telnet test does not produce any errors and i get : Mail queued for delivery. This is the logs on the SMTP server, the mail goes in the BAD mail folder: From: postmas...@acme.com To: w...@acme.com Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:32:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1160 - 0002 - Message-ID: x3cf3ednh0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. itt...@acme.com --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local Received-From-MTA: dns;nlwussv01 Arrival-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 Final-Recipient: rfc822;itt...@acme.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from nlwussv01 ([10.1.1.2]) by remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: w...@acme.com Date: 8 Jan 2013 14:31:51 +0100 Subject: =?utf-8?B?V1NVUzogVGVzdCBFLU1haWwgTm90aWZpY2F0aW9uIEZyb20gTkxXVVNTVjAx?= Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Bcc: Return-Path: w...@acme.com Message-ID: remcorpexch03mbyr2a0...@remcorpexch03.corp.acme.local X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2013 13:31:51.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[8437C7C0:01CDEDA4] WW91IGFyZSBub3cgYWJsZSB0byByZWNlaXZlIGUtbWFpbCBub3RpZmljYXRpb25zIGZyb20g V2luZG93cyBTZXJ2ZXIgVXBkYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzLg== --9B095B5ADSN=_01CDEDA2E87F2738remcorpexch03.co-- --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
I use Ironport C-series boxes for outbound relays mainly because I need SRB, and Exchange Hub Transports really kind of suck at mail routing. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Who says it's not a good idea? :P People still on 5.5? :) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: *Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically * i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote: “Who says it’s not a good idea? :P” ** ** People still on 5.5? J ** ** ** ** *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Who says it’s not a good idea? :P ** ** I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. ** ** *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgkennedy...@elyriaschools.org] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don’t let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out…I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. ** ** Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. ** ** *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Hi, ** ** We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway ** ** We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future.** ** ** ** Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
ayup From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Who says it's not a good idea? :P People still on 5.5? :) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
But reading further technet, if i need to do TLS, the Microsoft Exchange EdgeSync service must be fully deployed for Domain Security. So i could setup an Edge Sync server and use it as a smarthost, that would make more sense now... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: *Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically * i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: “Who says it’s not a good idea? :P” ** ** People still on 5.5? J ** ** ** ** *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Who says it’s not a good idea? :P ** ** I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. ** ** *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgkennedy...@elyriaschools.org] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don’t let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out…I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. ** ** Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. ** ** *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** Hi, ** ** We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway ** ** We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future.* *** ** ** Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Yes, and on that connector check Address space for a type SMTP with an address of * I would think it is still there though. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Who says it's not a good idea? :P People still on 5.5? :) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
You don't need to do that. Just create a new send connector for the TLS domain. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails But reading further technet, if i need to do TLS, the Microsoft Exchange EdgeSync service must be fully deployed for Domain Security. So i could setup an Edge Sync server and use it as a smarthost, that would make more sense now... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.commailto:arose...@gmail.com wrote: No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Who says it's not a good idea? :P People still on 5.5? :) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Pretty sure you set it up the same way on a Hub transport. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/da/exchange2010/thread/a0d2c384-1810-4671-9722-96a20998db49 From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails But reading further technet, if i need to do TLS, the Microsoft Exchange EdgeSync service must be fully deployed for Domain Security. So i could setup an Edge Sync server and use it as a smarthost, that would make more sense now... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.commailto:arose...@gmail.com wrote: No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically i will be fine... On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Who says it's not a good idea? :P People still on 5.5? :) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it's not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future. Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
We'll see :) Thanks for the info On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote: Pretty sure you set it up the same way on a Hub transport. ** ** http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/da/exchange2010/thread/a0d2c384-1810-4671-9722-96a20998db49 ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 11:21 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails ** ** But reading further technet, if i need to do TLS, the Microsoft Exchange EdgeSync service must be fully deployed for Domain Security. So i could setup an Edge Sync server and use it as a smarthost, that would make more sense now... ** ** On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send Connector to: *Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail automatically * i will be fine... ** ** ** ** On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: “Who says it’s not a good idea? :P” People still on 5.5? J *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Who says it’s not a good idea? :P I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable. *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgkennedy...@elyriaschools.org] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don’t let exchange talk to the internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out…I have no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections. Not trying to stir up that debate, just tossing out the simple fix. *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 10:07 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails Hi, We currently run an old anti-spam gateway that we use as a smart host for outgoing emails. All anti-spam features have been disabled so it is just a SMTP server for now. In Exchange, this is setup at the Send Connector level where the * address space is configured to: route mail through the following smart host IP_of_our_antispam_gateway We would like to shutdown this device so we need to replace it with a server that would be used as a smart host by our Exchange 2010 Servers (only 2 members of a DAG). Would a single server with SMTP feature enabled be sufficient? Only 150 users. Our only requirement is to be capable of using TLS in the future.** ** Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** ** ** ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
OT - Windows XP SMTP server
Sorry for reaching out on a non-Exchange issue, but I'd appreciate any help from the email gurus on the list. I've got a RoboTask based monitoring system checking various systems every 5 minutes. If something has failed, it sends email alerts and text messages that start as emails. I've set up an XP SMTP server to handle these, since it's important that we get the alerts even if the Exchange server is down or unreachable. The system works, but changing the email addresses is tedious. I'd like to use email groups to do this, but I can't count on an Exchange server being available to expand the groups. Is there any group functionality implemented in the XP SMTP server? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OT - Windows XP SMTP server
Can't answer your question directly...but you could set up a Gmail account and have the XP SMTP send to that...and then use a filter/rule combo to have gmail send it to your list of people. -Original Message- From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT - Windows XP SMTP server Sorry for reaching out on a non-Exchange issue, but I'd appreciate any help from the email gurus on the list. I've got a RoboTask based monitoring system checking various systems every 5 minutes. If something has failed, it sends email alerts and text messages that start as emails. I've set up an XP SMTP server to handle these, since it's important that we get the alerts even if the Exchange server is down or unreachable. The system works, but changing the email addresses is tedious. I'd like to use email groups to do this, but I can't count on an Exchange server being available to expand the groups. Is there any group functionality implemented in the XP SMTP server? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: OT - Windows XP SMTP server
Even better, use blat to do a submit (port 587) to gmail with the credentials for the account embedded in the script (or use a profile which stores the credentials in the registry). http://www.blat.net/syntax/syntax.html On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Can't answer your question directly...but you could set up a Gmail account and have the XP SMTP send to that...and then use a filter/rule combo to have gmail send it to your list of people. -Original Message- From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT - Windows XP SMTP server Sorry for reaching out on a non-Exchange issue, but I'd appreciate any help from the email gurus on the list. I've got a RoboTask based monitoring system checking various systems every 5 minutes. If something has failed, it sends email alerts and text messages that start as emails. I've set up an XP SMTP server to handle these, since it's important that we get the alerts even if the Exchange server is down or unreachable. The system works, but changing the email addresses is tedious. I'd like to use email groups to do this, but I can't count on an Exchange server being available to expand the groups. Is there any group functionality implemented in the XP SMTP server? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: OT - Windows XP SMTP server
I would be inclined to do this as well. -- Espi On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Even better, use blat to do a submit (port 587) to gmail with the credentials for the account embedded in the script (or use a profile which stores the credentials in the registry). http://www.blat.net/syntax/syntax.html On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Can't answer your question directly...but you could set up a Gmail account and have the XP SMTP send to that...and then use a filter/rule combo to have gmail send it to your list of people. -Original Message- From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT - Windows XP SMTP server Sorry for reaching out on a non-Exchange issue, but I'd appreciate any help from the email gurus on the list. I've got a RoboTask based monitoring system checking various systems every 5 minutes. If something has failed, it sends email alerts and text messages that start as emails. I've set up an XP SMTP server to handle these, since it's important that we get the alerts even if the Exchange server is down or unreachable. The system works, but changing the email addresses is tedious. I'd like to use email groups to do this, but I can't count on an Exchange server being available to expand the groups. Is there any group functionality implemented in the XP SMTP server? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Set Secondary smtp Address as Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2003
The mail attribute also has to be changed to reflect the new primary SMTP address. From: Haritwal, Dhiraj [mailto:dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Set Secondary smtp Address as Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2003 Hi, due to some changes we got our primary SMTP Address changed for our majority users. now the original SMTP Address (a.domain.com) is showing as secondary due to primary smtp address change, default email address also changed. I have googled a vbs script modified it which will search SMTP smtp address under proxyaddress field reverse them ie. this will set the lower case smtp to Upper case SMTP so that this can set as primary SMTP. this is done but in default email address still showing changed emai address (b.domain.com) which should show as (a.domain.com). We are using Exchange 2003 SP2. Kindly let me know how can I do this without affecting existing email address. Dhiraj This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia Pacific Mail Gateway. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account
Below are the configs of a totally default Client Servername receive connector. Anyone with a mailbox is allowed to use the connector (that is the Permissions Group tab). On the Authentication tab, if you want to support plaintext authentication, then uncheck the box after Offer Basic authentication only after... Is that what you want? Or am I missing something? [cid:image001.png@01CCECA1.5E7F42B0] [cid:image002.png@01CCECA1.5E7F42B0] From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account Michael, Are you saying the default Client servername receive connector should allow already an authenticated user to use SMTP to relay to an external domain? I do notice the settings within that connector, are set to offer Basic Authentication only but only after starting TLS. Thanks again, Robert From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account That is the default behavior through the Client servername receive connector. From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account Google'ing still seems to come up short. I see the need but no answers. Now that were at Exchange 2010 SP2, I still cannot see how to allow a device or application to send SMTP mail through Exchange when destined for an external domain. I am able to allow by IP addresses within the Hub Transport Relay Connector, but I would really like to allow via an authenticated account. Any ideas? Thank you, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.pnginline: image002.png
RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account
That is the default behavior through the Client servername receive connector. From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account Google'ing still seems to come up short. I see the need but no answers. Now that were at Exchange 2010 SP2, I still cannot see how to allow a device or application to send SMTP mail through Exchange when destined for an external domain. I am able to allow by IP addresses within the Hub Transport Relay Connector, but I would really like to allow via an authenticated account. Any ideas? Thank you, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account
Michael, Are you saying the default Client servername receive connector should allow already an authenticated user to use SMTP to relay to an external domain? I do notice the settings within that connector, are set to offer Basic Authentication only but only after starting TLS. Thanks again, Robert From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account That is the default behavior through the Client servername receive connector. From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allow SMTP relay for authenticated account Google'ing still seems to come up short. I see the need but no answers. Now that were at Exchange 2010 SP2, I still cannot see how to allow a device or application to send SMTP mail through Exchange when destined for an external domain. I am able to allow by IP addresses within the Hub Transport Relay Connector, but I would really like to allow via an authenticated account. Any ideas? Thank you, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Set Secondary smtp Address as Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2003
Hi, due to some changes we got our primary SMTP Address changed for our majority users. now the original SMTP Address (a.domain.com) is showing as secondary due to primary smtp address change, default email address also changed. I have googled a vbs script modified it which will search SMTP smtp address under proxyaddress field reverse them ie. this will set the lower case smtp to Upper case SMTP so that this can set as primary SMTP. this is done but in default email address still showing changed emai address (b.domain.com) which should show as (a.domain.com). We are using Exchange 2003 SP2. Kindly let me know how can I do this without affecting existing email address. Dhiraj --- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia Pacific Mail Gateway. --- --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might be going on? I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according to the EMS or ECP. Best lead I've found so far is from someone on the Exchange Forums on Technet who says they've seen this a few times and always post-migration from 2003 to 2010 which is where we are. On the basis that we have a fairly small subset of Public Folders which should be mail-enabled, my (rough) plan was something like: Mail-Disable all public folders. See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to look out for and NOT delete in this folder) Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled. Thanks, Paul From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the “problem” address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
I think it's a serious mistake to delete them. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might be going on? I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according to the EMS or ECP. Best lead I've found so far is from someone on the Exchange Forums on Technet who says they've seen this a few times and always post-migration from 2003 to 2010 which is where we are. On the basis that we have a fairly small subset of Public Folders which should be mail-enabled, my (rough) plan was something like: Mail-Disable all public folders. See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to look out for and NOT delete in this folder) Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled. Thanks, Paul From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
OK, but then why on earth do I have them? I can't find a single command or anything that seems to apply, other than the ones related to mail-enabled/disabled public folders, which says these aren't mail-enabled. From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 03 October 2011 6:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I think it's a serious mistake to delete them. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might be going on? I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according to the EMS or ECP. Best lead I've found so far is from someone on the Exchange Forums on Technet who says they've seen this a few times and always post-migration from 2003 to 2010 which is where we are. On the basis that we have a fairly small subset of Public Folders which should be mail-enabled, my (rough) plan was something like: Mail-Disable all public folders. See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to look out for and NOT delete in this folder) Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled. Thanks, Paul From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
I don't know which addresses you have, so I can't make really good decisions about that; but Exchange does use email for PF replication and has quite a number of reserved SMTP addresses. That being said, someone made a really good suggestion (last week? Two weeks ago?) - mail-enable and then swap as necessary. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! OK, but then why on earth do I have them? I can't find a single command or anything that seems to apply, other than the ones related to mail-enabled/disabled public folders, which says these aren't mail-enabled. From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 03 October 2011 6:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I think it's a serious mistake to delete them. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might be going on? I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according to the EMS or ECP. Best lead I've found so far is from someone on the Exchange Forums on Technet who says they've seen this a few times and always post-migration from 2003 to 2010 which is where we are. On the basis that we have a fairly small subset of Public Folders which should be mail-enabled, my (rough) plan was something like: Mail-Disable all public folders. See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to look out for and NOT delete in this folder) Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled. Thanks, Paul From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Thanks Michael. Perhaps I'm not being too clear, these aren't in any way reserved/system smtp addresses, they are 110% names of department specific public folders with internal project names, and adfind.exe confirms they belong to specific public folders. If I mail-enable them it doesn't appear to solve the problem as it just assigns another smtp address i.e. if the folder shows up as proje...@domain.com right now, mail-enabling it assigns it proje...@domain.com, it's as if the smtp address showing in MESO is lost, there's just no reference to it anywhere. Paul From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 03 October 2011 6:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I don't know which addresses you have, so I can't make really good decisions about that; but Exchange does use email for PF replication and has quite a number of reserved SMTP addresses. That being said, someone made a really good suggestion (last week? Two weeks ago?) - mail-enable and then swap as necessary. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! OK, but then why on earth do I have them? I can't find a single command or anything that seems to apply, other than the ones related to mail-enabled/disabled public folders, which says these aren't mail-enabled. From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 03 October 2011 6:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I think it's a serious mistake to delete them. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might be going on? I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according to the EMS or ECP. Best lead I've found so far is from someone on the Exchange Forums on Technet who says they've seen this a few times and always post-migration from 2003 to 2010 which is where we are. On the basis that we have a fairly small subset of Public Folders which should be mail-enabled, my (rough) plan was something like: Mail-Disable all public folders. See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to look out for and NOT delete in this folder) Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled. Thanks, Paul From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 5:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage
Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
On 27/09/2011 21:17, Lists - Level Five wrote: Are you doing PF replication between servers? Is it possible that even though they aren't mail enabled , replication is using smtp transport to handle this , thus a random email is placed onto the folder? I haven't kept up with all the ins/outs of Exchange over the past couple of years, but thought I would toss it out. Replication does use SMTP, but the PF store itself has an email address. The store replicates chunks of updates via SMTP, the folders themselves may be Contacts, Calendar, Mail items, or mail-enabled folders - it makes no difference. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Try sending an email to it with a delivery receipt enabled. It *may* give some extra clues. YMMV as it has for me in the past ;-) Mike - Message from paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk - Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:13:03 + From: Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is /NOT/ mail enabled, so I have no idea how I?m supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
There are certain specific email addresses you can't use. Microsoft@adname.localmailto:Microsoft@adname.local comes to mind. Might you have a special name? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
A couple of things come to mind. You can try mail enabling it and see if that lets you remove the address, and then mail-disable it. Or take it straight to the source with ADSIEdit. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
This is just a country name at ourdomain.co.uk. It's already in use as adfind shows the public folder and its SMTP address as does browsing the Microsoft Exchange System Objects folder in AD, but when I look at the PF in the PF Management MMC it isn't mail-enabled Thanks, Paul From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 27 September 2011 16:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! There are certain specific email addresses you can't use. Microsoft@adname.localmailto:Microsoft@adname.local comes to mind. Might you have a special name? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Next :) Paul From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: 27 September 2011 16:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! A couple of things come to mind. You can try mail enabling it and see if that lets you remove the address, and then mail-disable it. Or take it straight to the source with ADSIEdit. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Quick follow-up, ADSIedit shows the offending address listed in the mail and proxyaddresses fields. Is it as simple as just changing them to something random to free up the address I want to use? I would like to understand why they're there if the folder isn't mail-enabled... Paul From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 16:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! This is just a country name at ourdomain.co.uk. It's already in use as adfind shows the public folder and its SMTP address as does browsing the Microsoft Exchange System Objects folder in AD, but when I look at the PF in the PF Management MMC it isn't mail-enabled Thanks, Paul From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 27 September 2011 16:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! There are certain specific email addresses you can't use. Microsoft@adname.localmailto:Microsoft@adname.local comes to mind. Might you have a special name? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the “problem” address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the “problem” address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
I have had to do this recently. Re-enable it. Wait for Replication. Munge it and wait for replication. Then you should be able to use the desired SMTP on the entity of your desire. J Nikki Peterson From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! A couple of things come to mind. You can try mail enabling it and see if that lets you remove the address, and then mail-disable it. Or take it straight to the source with ADSIEdit. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use. I ran adfind and found it. folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses. However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location, the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I'm supposed to remove the email address so that I can use it where I want to? This is on Exchange 2010 SP1 RU 3v3. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
Are you doing PF replication between servers? Is it possible that even though they aren't mail enabled , replication is using smtp transport to handle this , thus a random email is placed onto the folder? I haven't kept up with all the ins/outs of Exchange over the past couple of years, but thought I would toss it out. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! I am, but I'd like to understand it if possible - there seem to be a lot of folders with email addresses and whilst I've not yet reconciled them I suspect it's more than are mail-enabled. I should add no other public folder issues, everything is working fine, I only know of this issue with trying to add the email address. From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?! On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul Hutchings wrote: Thank you, I had tried that. If I mail-enable it it gives it a different email address entirely, with the problem address nowhere to be seen. Are you in a position to delete the folder and start again? Sometimes, nuking from orbit is the only way to be sure. Richard --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
SMTP Banner
Good morning all, Exchange 2010 I've just been told that I have a discrepancy between our webmail record and SMTP banner. It returns 220 servername.domain.ca Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at date/time. Can I just use the Set-ReceiveConnector cmdlet to set webmail.domain.ca ? I'm just concerned that if I do that, that I may be affecting something else. TIA Cameron --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Banner
That's exactly what I've done a few times and no one got hurt J From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 8:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Banner Good morning all, Exchange 2010 I've just been told that I have a discrepancy between our webmail record and SMTP banner. It returns 220 servername.domain.ca Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at date/time. Can I just use the Set-ReceiveConnector cmdlet to set webmail.domain.ca ? I'm just concerned that if I do that, that I may be affecting something else. TIA Cameron --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Auth
No. They are either/or not both/and. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Auth MS Exchange 2010 SP1 page http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395.aspx under Authentication Settings says for Basic Auth that: Basic authentication. Requires an authenticated logon. Does that actually mean that when set users *must* use basic auth to submit to the connector? What if Integrated is enabled on the same connector? Darren Young Systems Security Architect Computing Services University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 Voice 773.702.0331 | Fax 773.702.0233 --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Auth
If just basic is enabled on the connector does that really mean *must* auth to submit? Or is it *may* auth? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth No. They are either/or not both/and. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]mailto:[mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Auth MS Exchange 2010 SP1 page http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395.aspx under Authentication Settings says for Basic Auth that: Basic authentication. Requires an authenticated logon. Does that actually mean that when set users *must* use basic auth to submit to the connector? What if Integrated is enabled on the same connector? Darren Young Systems Security Architect Computing Services University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 Voice 773.702.0331 | Fax 773.702.0233 --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Auth
Depends on permission groups tab. If anonymous is checked, it means may. If not, it means must. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth If just basic is enabled on the connector does that really mean *must* auth to submit? Or is it *may* auth? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth No. They are either/or not both/and. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]mailto:[mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Auth MS Exchange 2010 SP1 page http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395.aspx under Authentication Settings says for Basic Auth that: Basic authentication. Requires an authenticated logon. Does that actually mean that when set users *must* use basic auth to submit to the connector? What if Integrated is enabled on the same connector? Darren Young Systems Security Architect Computing Services University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 Voice 773.702.0331 | Fax 773.702.0233 --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Auth
Thanks. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth Depends on permission groups tab. If anonymous is checked, it means may. If not, it means must. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]mailto:[mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth If just basic is enabled on the connector does that really mean *must* auth to submit? Or is it *may* auth? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP Auth No. They are either/or not both/and. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]mailto:[mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Auth MS Exchange 2010 SP1 page http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395.aspx under Authentication Settings says for Basic Auth that: Basic authentication. Requires an authenticated logon. Does that actually mean that when set users *must* use basic auth to submit to the connector? What if Integrated is enabled on the same connector? Darren Young Systems Security Architect Computing Services University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 Voice 773.702.0331 | Fax 773.702.0233 --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
If an address policy is set up correctly then changes to last name should
reflect in SMTP addresses automatically, possibly only requiring a refresh of a
policy.
Changes to Primary SMTP are done from within Exchange Management Console (or
shell). In the console it is done by selecting a mailbox from recipients;
selecting E-Mail Addresses tab and making appropriate changes. If you wish to
change a primary SMTP and this goes against policy; remember to uncheck box for
an automatic update on e-mail policy. From the shell it is necessary to turn
off policy make changes and turn policy back on (if desired)
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddresses Primary,
Secondary,Secondary
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FTrue
For EmailAddresses you will need to list all addresses that are required
separating each by a comma however if you decide to enable email policy it will
add/overwrite addresses as policy dictates.
Be cautioned if you decide to abandon email address policy for a user or set of
users; this may come back to haunt you later should you need to update the
policy for all users.
If you wish to you can get a list of names and aliases of all mailboxes that
don't have an email policy enabled.
Get-Mailbox -Filter {EmailAddressPolicyEnabled -eq $False} -ResultSize
Unlimited | Select-Object Name, Alias | Export-csv
MailboxesWithoutEmailPolicy.csv
These commands apply to Exchange 2007 and I am pretty sure will be the same in
2010
Steven Alfano
Sr. Systems Administrator
The Rockefeller University
1230 York Avenue
New York, NY 10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.edu
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Sometimes I need to change primary SMTP addresses when employees change their
names, or when my default Policies don't seem to be working quite rights. And
since we are still on both 2003 and 2010 I am not going to mess with policies
at the moment.
In 2003 ADUC I can simply set another SMTP address as Primary.
I have not been able to find out how or where to do this in either 2010 RSAT or
Exchange 2010. What do I need to do? For the one user today, I did change his
SMTP in the 2003 ADUC but I know that messing with 2010 objects in 2003 can be
a problem so I don't want to be doing that very often.
Thanks,
Alice
Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED AP
P 206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760 | F 206.658.1797
Sr. Exchange Administrator
McKINSTRY FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING
Consulting | Construction | Energy | Facility Services
www.mckinstry.comhttp://www.mckinstry.com/
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Great info on Policies but I am not doing something that requires policies, or
so I think..
For example: Sue Young gets married (or divorced) and changes her name to Sue
UsedtobeYoung. I have her original email of
s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and now I want to create a 2nd SMTP
of s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and make the new email her primary
SMTP address.
How do I make the new email her primary SMTP address?
Thanks,
Alice
From: Steven Alfano [mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
If an address policy is set up correctly then changes to last name should
reflect in SMTP addresses automatically, possibly only requiring a refresh of a
policy.
Changes to Primary SMTP are done from within Exchange Management Console (or
shell). In the console it is done by selecting a mailbox from recipients;
selecting E-Mail Addresses tab and making appropriate changes. If you wish to
change a primary SMTP and this goes against policy; remember to uncheck box for
an automatic update on e-mail policy. From the shell it is necessary to turn
off policy make changes and turn policy back on (if desired)
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddresses Primary,
Secondary,Secondary
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FTrue
For EmailAddresses you will need to list all addresses that are required
separating each by a comma however if you decide to enable email policy it will
add/overwrite addresses as policy dictates.
Be cautioned if you decide to abandon email address policy for a user or set of
users; this may come back to haunt you later should you need to update the
policy for all users.
If you wish to you can get a list of names and aliases of all mailboxes that
don't have an email policy enabled.
Get-Mailbox -Filter {EmailAddressPolicyEnabled -eq $False} -ResultSize
Unlimited | Select-Object Name, Alias | Export-csv
MailboxesWithoutEmailPolicy.csv
These commands apply to Exchange 2007 and I am pretty sure will be the same in
2010
Steven Alfano
Sr. Systems Administrator
The Rockefeller University
1230 York Avenue
New York, NY 10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edumailto:salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.eduhttp://www.rockefeller.edu
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Sometimes I need to change primary SMTP addresses when employees change their
names, or when my default Policies don't seem to be working quite rights. And
since we are still on both 2003 and 2010 I am not going to mess with policies
at the moment.
In 2003 ADUC I can simply set another SMTP address as Primary.
I have not been able to find out how or where to do this in either 2010 RSAT or
Exchange 2010. What do I need to do? For the one user today, I did change his
SMTP in the 2003 ADUC but I know that messing with 2010 objects in 2003 can be
a problem so I don't want to be doing that very often.
Thanks,
Alice
Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED AP
P 206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760 | F 206.658.1797
Sr. Exchange Administrator
McKINSTRY FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING
Consulting | Construction | Energy | Facility Services
www.mckinstry.comhttp://www.mckinstry.com/
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -PrimaryEmailAddresses
s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com
The current primaryemailaddress will automatically be retained as a secondary
address.
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Great info on Policies but I am not doing something that requires policies, or
so I think..
For example: Sue Young gets married (or divorced) and changes her name to Sue
UsedtobeYoung. I have her original email of
s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and now I want to create a 2nd SMTP
of s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and make the new email her primary
SMTP address.
How do I make the new email her primary SMTP address?
Thanks,
Alice
From: Steven Alfano [mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
If an address policy is set up correctly then changes to last name should
reflect in SMTP addresses automatically, possibly only requiring a refresh of a
policy.
Changes to Primary SMTP are done from within Exchange Management Console (or
shell). In the console it is done by selecting a mailbox from recipients;
selecting E-Mail Addresses tab and making appropriate changes. If you wish to
change a primary SMTP and this goes against policy; remember to uncheck box for
an automatic update on e-mail policy. From the shell it is necessary to turn
off policy make changes and turn policy back on (if desired)
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddresses Primary,
Secondary,Secondary
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FTrue
For EmailAddresses you will need to list all addresses that are required
separating each by a comma however if you decide to enable email policy it will
add/overwrite addresses as policy dictates.
Be cautioned if you decide to abandon email address policy for a user or set of
users; this may come back to haunt you later should you need to update the
policy for all users.
If you wish to you can get a list of names and aliases of all mailboxes that
don't have an email policy enabled.
Get-Mailbox -Filter {EmailAddressPolicyEnabled -eq $False} -ResultSize
Unlimited | Select-Object Name, Alias | Export-csv
MailboxesWithoutEmailPolicy.csv
These commands apply to Exchange 2007 and I am pretty sure will be the same in
2010
Steven Alfano
Sr. Systems Administrator
The Rockefeller University
1230 York Avenue
New York, NY 10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edumailto:salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.eduhttp://www.rockefeller.edu
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Sometimes I need to change primary SMTP addresses when employees change their
names, or when my default Policies don't seem to be working quite rights. And
since we are still on both 2003 and 2010 I am not going to mess with policies
at the moment.
In 2003 ADUC I can simply set another SMTP address as Primary.
I have not been able to find out how or where to do this in either 2010 RSAT or
Exchange 2010. What do I need to do? For the one user today, I did change his
SMTP in the 2003 ADUC but I know that messing with 2010 objects in 2003 can be
a problem so I don't want to be doing that very often.
Thanks,
Alice
Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED AP
P 206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760 | F 206.658.1797
Sr. Exchange Administrator
McKINSTRY FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING
Consulting | Construction | Energy | Facility Services
www.mckinstry.comhttp://www.mckinstry.com/
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering
Re: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Exchange 2010
EMC
Recipient Configuration
Mailbox
Select the mailbox
Properties
Email Addresses
Add
and you can also turn off the Automatically update email addresses based on
email address policy for that user as well as Set as reply until you want
to delete the old one.
Or am I missing something? (it feels like a Monday today!)
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Campbell, Rob
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote:
Set-Mailbox –Identity *Alias_Name* -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False**
**
Set-Mailbox –Identity *Alias_Name* -PrimaryEmailAddresses “
s...@company.com”
** **
The current primaryemailaddress will automatically be retained as a
secondary address.
** **
** **
** **
** **
*From:* Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:27 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
** **
Great info on Policies but I am not doing something that requires policies,
or so I think..
** **
For example: Sue Young gets married (or divorced) and changes her name to
Sue UsedtobeYoung. I have her original email of s...@company.com and now
I want to create a 2nd SMTP of s...@company.com and make the new email her
primary SMTP address.
** **
How do I make the new email her primary SMTP address?
** **
Thanks,
Alice
** **
*From:* Steven Alfano [mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:42 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
** **
If an address policy is set up correctly then changes to last name should
reflect in SMTP addresses automatically, possibly only requiring a refresh
of a policy.
** **
Changes to Primary SMTP are done from within Exchange Management Console
(or shell). In the console it is done by selecting a mailbox from
recipients; selecting E-Mail Addresses tab and making appropriate changes.
If you wish to change a primary SMTP and this goes against policy; remember
to uncheck box for an automatic update on e-mail policy. From the shell it
is necessary to turn off policy make changes and turn policy back on (if
desired)
** **
Set-Mailbox –Identity *Alias_Name* -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox –Identity *Alias_Name*-EmailAddresses *Primary*, *
Secondary*,*Secondary*
Set-Mailbox –Identity *Alias_Name*-EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FTrue
** **
For EmailAddresses you will need to list all addresses that are required
separating each by a comma however if you decide to enable email policy it
will add/overwrite addresses as policy dictates.
** **
Be cautioned if you decide to abandon email address policy for a user or
set of users; this may come back to haunt you later should you need to
update the policy for all users.
** **
If you wish to you can get a list of names and aliases of all mailboxes
that don’t have an email policy enabled.
** **
Get-Mailbox –Filter {EmailAddressPolicyEnabled –eq $False} –ResultSize
Unlimited | Select-Object Name, Alias | Export-csv
MailboxesWithoutEmailPolicy.csv
** **
These commands apply to Exchange 2007 and I am pretty sure will be the same
in 2010
** **
*Steven Alfano*
*Sr. Systems Administrator*
*The Rockefeller University*
1230 York Avenue
New York, NY 10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.edu
** **
*From:* Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
*Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2011 8:43 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
** **
Sometimes I need to change primary SMTP addresses when employees change
their names, or when my default Policies don’t seem to be working quite
rights. And since we are still on both 2003 and 2010 I am not going to mess
with policies at the moment.
In 2003 ADUC I can simply set another SMTP address as Primary.
I have not been able to find out how or where to do this in either 2010
RSAT or Exchange 2010. What do I need to do? For the one user today, I did
change his SMTP in the 2003 ADUC but I know that messing with 2010 objects
in 2003 can be a problem so I don’t want to be doing that very often.
Thanks,
Alice
Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED AP
P 206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760 | F 206.658.1797
Sr. Exchange Administrator
*McKINSTRY** FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING*
Consulting | Construction | Energy | Facility Services
www.mckinstry.com
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions
OT: Fwd: : Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
ROFL!! Love this OOO!! -- Forwarded message -- From: Greg Sweers gswe...@acts360.com Date: Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:45 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010 To: Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com While it is my sincere desire to respond to you, I leave behind my awesome staff and our newest employee Kale to assist you in any questions or issues that you may have. I would love to tell you that I will be close to my phone and will respond to your email or phone call in short order, but lets be honest. I rarely take vacation and I am going to spend much needed time with my family. This truly benefits you as I will recharge my batteries and will be much less likely to desire to destroy any technology I come in contact with. If there is an emergency that I must be made aware of, please contact my staff at 813-657-0849 and they have the highly classified, will be terminated if they gave it out access to reach my family during our sabatical. I look forward to serving you when I return on August 1st at 8am EST. ** ** Thank you and have a blessed day! ** ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Ah. So Set as Reply is the same as Set Primary SMTP Address.
That is what I was missing. By unchecking the checkbox next to Automatically
update email addresses based on email address policy, I can now change the
Set as reply.
As usual, semantics.. and not the AV vendor.. :)
Thanks!
Alice
From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Exchange 2010
EMC
Recipient Configuration
Mailbox
Select the mailbox
Properties
Email Addresses
Add
and you can also turn off the Automatically update email addresses based on
email address policy for that user as well as Set as reply until you want to
delete the old one.
Or am I missing something? (it feels like a Monday today!)
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Campbell, Rob
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.netmailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net
wrote:
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -PrimaryEmailAddresses
s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com
The current primaryemailaddress will automatically be retained as a secondary
address.
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.commailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Great info on Policies but I am not doing something that requires policies, or
so I think..
For example: Sue Young gets married (or divorced) and changes her name to Sue
UsedtobeYoung. I have her original email of
s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and now I want to create a 2nd SMTP
of s...@company.commailto:s...@company.com and make the new email her primary
SMTP address.
How do I make the new email her primary SMTP address?
Thanks,
Alice
From: Steven Alfano
[mailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edumailto:salf...@mail.rockefeller.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
If an address policy is set up correctly then changes to last name should
reflect in SMTP addresses automatically, possibly only requiring a refresh of a
policy.
Changes to Primary SMTP are done from within Exchange Management Console (or
shell). In the console it is done by selecting a mailbox from recipients;
selecting E-Mail Addresses tab and making appropriate changes. If you wish to
change a primary SMTP and this goes against policy; remember to uncheck box for
an automatic update on e-mail policy. From the shell it is necessary to turn
off policy make changes and turn policy back on (if desired)
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$False
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddresses Primary,
Secondary,Secondary
Set-Mailbox -Identity Alias_Name-EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FTrue
For EmailAddresses you will need to list all addresses that are required
separating each by a comma however if you decide to enable email policy it will
add/overwrite addresses as policy dictates.
Be cautioned if you decide to abandon email address policy for a user or set of
users; this may come back to haunt you later should you need to update the
policy for all users.
If you wish to you can get a list of names and aliases of all mailboxes that
don't have an email policy enabled.
Get-Mailbox -Filter {EmailAddressPolicyEnabled -eq $False} -ResultSize
Unlimited | Select-Object Name, Alias | Export-csv
MailboxesWithoutEmailPolicy.csv
These commands apply to Exchange 2007 and I am pretty sure will be the same in
2010
Steven Alfano
Sr. Systems Administrator
The Rockefeller University
1230 York Avenue
New York, NY 10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937tel:212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160tel:646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712tel:212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edumailto:salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.eduhttp://www.rockefeller.edu/
From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.commailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Primary SMTP Address in Exchange 2010
Sometimes I need to change primary SMTP addresses when employees change their
names, or when my default Policies don't seem to be working quite rights. And
since we are still on both 2003 and 2010 I am not going to mess with policies
at the moment.
In 2003 ADUC I can simply set another SMTP address as Primary.
I have not been able to find out how or where to do this in either 2010 RSAT or
Exchange 2010. What do I need to do? For the one user today, I did change his
SMTP in the 2003 ADUC but I know that messing with 2010 objects in 2003 can be
a problem so I don't want to be doing that very often.
Thanks,
Alice
Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED AP
P 206.832.8295tel:206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760tel:206.427.7760 | F
206.658.1797tel:206.658.1797
Sr. Exchange Administrator
McKINSTRY FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING
Consulting
RE: Unable to change default SMTP address?
Create a new EMAP. Just don't delete/change the default. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Unable to change default SMTP address? Created a new user/mailbox on 2010 and at the moment it defaults to firstl...@domain.commailto:firstl...@domain.com for the SMTP address. I tried to change it to first.l...@domain.commailto:first.l...@domain.com it and got the error that The command will clear the PrimarySMTPAddress property because the EmailAddressPolicyEnabled parameter is set to true. This action isn't allowed. I've not yet played with Email Address Policies, and before I do so I'd like to understand whether I run the risk of inadvertently changing the email addresses of all of my users? I was never entirely comfortable with recipient policies on Exchange 2003 so I'd like to be sure what I'm doing before I change things on the 2010 box. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Unable to change default SMTP address?
The ones I have all show applied as false and are the 2003 Recipient Policies. Creating a new one seems simple enough, but I am paranoid about screwing some/all of my existing accounts email addresses - that's definitely not going to happen? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 20 June 2011 15:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Unable to change default SMTP address? Create a new EMAP. Just don't delete/change the default. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Unable to change default SMTP address? Created a new user/mailbox on 2010 and at the moment it defaults to firstl...@domain.commailto:firstl...@domain.com for the SMTP address. I tried to change it to first.l...@domain.commailto:first.l...@domain.com it and got the error that The command will clear the PrimarySMTPAddress property because the EmailAddressPolicyEnabled parameter is set to true. This action isn't allowed. I've not yet played with Email Address Policies, and before I do so I'd like to understand whether I run the risk of inadvertently changing the email addresses of all of my users? I was never entirely comfortable with recipient policies on Exchange 2003 so I'd like to be sure what I'm doing before I change things on the 2010 box. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
The server generating our NDRs is either one of the three Front-End looking at message tracking the NDRs is sent just after the categorizer process emails. I have enabled SMTP logging and received the following error: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: SMTP Protocol Event ID: 7010 Date: 6/7/2011 Time: 8:45:15 AM User: N/A Computer: B1 Description: This is an SMTP protocol log for virtual server ID 1, connection #3583. The client at 150.7.5.65 sent a xexch50 command, and the SMTP server responded with 504 Need to authenticate first . The full command sent was xexch50 1020 2. This will probably cause the connection to fail. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. In ESM Access Control is configured to accept Anonymous Access for authentication on the SMTP Virtual Server (Resolve anonymous email is checked too) plus Integrated Authentication. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Orland, Kathleen korl...@rogers.com wrote: From the NDR you gets back obviously there’s a server that is generating the NDR. Is it your server issuing the SMTP unable to relay response or is it an external server that is causing your server to generate the NDR? Message tracking / protocol logging can help you track down what IP address is issuing the SMTP response and why. *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 06 June 2011 10:34 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u...@acme.com Havent touched config in Exchange, but tried to restart SMTP service on all front end servers and do the following fix: select your virtual smtp server and right click then options. if you have 2 virtual servers choose the one that connects to the outside. go to access tab and click on relay. choose only that list make sure you untick the autorize relay to autenticated computers check box. click on the users button and check both check boxes for authenticated users. Any ideas? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
Turned out to be a smarthost issue. We use a DNS name as smart host, the DNS record points to four servers. Only one of the three is working correctly so we pointed to the ip address as a temp fix. Thanks everyone for feedback and support, much appreciated. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: The server generating our NDRs is either one of the three Front-End looking at message tracking the NDRs is sent just after the categorizer process emails. I have enabled SMTP logging and received the following error: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: SMTP Protocol Event ID: 7010 Date: 6/7/2011 Time: 8:45:15 AM User: N/A Computer: B1 Description: This is an SMTP protocol log for virtual server ID 1, connection #3583. The client at 150.7.5.65 sent a xexch50 command, and the SMTP server responded with 504 Need to authenticate first . The full command sent was xexch50 1020 2. This will probably cause the connection to fail. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. In ESM Access Control is configured to accept Anonymous Access for authentication on the SMTP Virtual Server (Resolve anonymous email is checked too) plus Integrated Authentication. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Orland, Kathleen korl...@rogers.comwrote: From the NDR you gets back obviously there’s a server that is generating the NDR. Is it your server issuing the SMTP unable to relay response or is it an external server that is causing your server to generate the NDR? Message tracking / protocol logging can help you track down what IP address is issuing the SMTP response and why. *From:* Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 06 June 2011 10:34 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u...@acme.com Havent touched config in Exchange, but tried to restart SMTP service on all front end servers and do the following fix: select your virtual smtp server and right click then options. if you have 2 virtual servers choose the one that connects to the outside. go to access tab and click on relay. choose only that list make sure you untick the autorize relay to autenticated computers check box. click on the users button and check both check boxes for authenticated users. Any ideas? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
You don't have to touch relay settings at all if the client machines are all Outlook MAPI clients (instead of POP3/IMAP/SMTP). What server is generating the NDR? Are you using a smart host? If so, have you checked it is still able to relay email for your server? Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://exchange.sembee.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 15:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u...@acme.commailto:u...@acme.com Havent touched config in Exchange, but tried to restart SMTP service on all front end servers and do the following fix: select your virtual smtp server and right click then options. if you have 2 virtual servers choose the one that connects to the outside. go to access tab and click on relay. choose only that list make sure you untick the autorize relay to autenticated computers check box. click on the users button and check both check boxes for authenticated users. Any ideas? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
Exchange 2003? Do these errors include internal e-mails? Have you changed the recipient policy and perhaps inadvertently removed your internal domain? I've had this happen to a customer before in a past life :) Is the exchange system perhaps no longer authoritative for the internal domain name? Regards [cid:image001.jpg@01CC2482.7AA5B3D0] Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 2442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com www.peterstow.comhttp://www.peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. [cid:image002.jpg@01CC2482.7AA5B3D0] From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 07:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for We are indeed using a smart host, i contacted the admin for this one and they said everything is OK... I reverted back the relay settings to what they were. Relay Restrictions: Only the list below (empty list) Box checked Allow all computers which succesfully authenticate to relay Still NDRs To see i have disabled Antigen SMTP scan but no luck On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: You don't have to touch relay settings at all if the client machines are all Outlook MAPI clients (instead of POP3/IMAP/SMTP). What server is generating the NDR? Are you using a smart host? If so, have you checked it is still able to relay email for your server? Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://exchange.sembee.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.commailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 15:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u...@acme.commailto:u...@acme.com Havent touched config in Exchange, but tried to restart SMTP service on all front end servers and do the following fix: select your virtual smtp server and right click then options. if you have 2 virtual servers choose the one that connects to the outside. go to access tab and click on relay. choose only that list make sure you untick the autorize relay to autenticated computers check box. click on the users button and check both check boxes for authenticated users. Any ideas? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe
RE: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
Have you tried restarting the routing engine? Maybe the routing tables are hosed. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 1:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for These errors include internal emails indeed. I have checked the recipient policies and nothing changed, i can still see the domain name listed. Thank you On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Peter Johnson peter.john...@peterstow.commailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com wrote: Exchange 2003? Do these errors include internal e-mails? Have you changed the recipient policy and perhaps inadvertently removed your internal domain? I've had this happen to a customer before in a past life :) Is the exchange system perhaps no longer authoritative for the internal domain name? Regards [Description: C:\Users\ptjohnson\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\peterstow logo2.jpg] Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 2442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.commailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com www.peterstow.comhttp://www.peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. [Description: C:\Users\ptjohnson\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\environment2.jpg] From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.commailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 07:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for We are indeed using a smart host, i contacted the admin for this one and they said everything is OK... I reverted back the relay settings to what they were. Relay Restrictions: Only the list below (empty list) Box checked Allow all computers which succesfully authenticate to relay Still NDRs To see i have disabled Antigen SMTP scan but no luck On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk wrote: You don't have to touch relay settings at all if the client machines are all Outlook MAPI clients (instead of POP3/IMAP/SMTP). What server is generating the NDR? Are you using a smart host? If so, have you checked it is still able to relay email for your server? Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.ukmailto:si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://exchange.sembee.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.commailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 15:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u
RE: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
From the NDR you gets back obviously there's a server that is generating the NDR. Is it your server issuing the SMTP unable to relay response or is it an external server that is causing your server to generate the NDR? Message tracking / protocol logging can help you track down what IP address is issuing the SMTP response and why. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2011 10:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: URGENT: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Hi, Exchange 2003 SP2, clients Outlook 2003 All of a sudden all emails in our ORG generate NDRs: You do not have permission to send to this recipient smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for u...@acme.com Havent touched config in Exchange, but tried to restart SMTP service on all front end servers and do the following fix: select your virtual smtp server and right click then options. if you have 2 virtual servers choose the one that connects to the outside. go to access tab and click on relay. choose only that list make sure you untick the autorize relay to autenticated computers check box. click on the users button and check both check boxes for authenticated users. Any ideas? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: RE: Allow SMTP relay by Group membership?
Ooo, please tell me more. I'm facing the same scenario, (only we're under 2007 for the moment - migration to 2010 is in the works). We have a team of recruiters who use a hosted app called Sendouts. There is a client for the app that is installed locally and needs to be able to send smtp mail from the workstations where it is installed. I'd rather not have to manage static IP Addresses and associated transport rules if I don't have to. Thanks, Jonathan A+, MCSA, MCSE Thumb-typed from my HTC Droid Incredible (and yes, it really is) on the Verizon network. Please excuse brevity and any misspellings. On May 23, 2011 8:31 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: I haven't tried this, so don't hold me to it - but I think you could manage this with a transport rule. It might take two working together, but I think you could make it happen. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 6:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allow SMTP relay by Group membership? Currently within Exchange 2010, we do not allow anonymous relaying of mail to the outside except from specific internal IPs via the Relay Connector. The problem I have is a network application being used that attempts to send mail from the local workstation via an SMTP tool from within the fat client of this application. The mail is attempting to send from the local workstation. If I add the IP of the workstation to the allowed IP list, I am sure Exchange will relay the mail just fine. But I don't relish the idea of managing static IPs for these multiple machines, across various subnets. Is there a way to allow relaying via an AD group membership, either for the machine or user? Thanks for any ideas, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto: listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Allow SMTP relay by Group membership?
Currently within Exchange 2010, we do not allow anonymous relaying of mail to the outside except from specific internal IPs via the Relay Connector. The problem I have is a network application being used that attempts to send mail from the local workstation via an SMTP tool from within the fat client of this application. The mail is attempting to send from the local workstation. If I add the IP of the workstation to the allowed IP list, I am sure Exchange will relay the mail just fine. But I don't relish the idea of managing static IPs for these multiple machines, across various subnets. Is there a way to allow relaying via an AD group membership, either for the machine or user? Thanks for any ideas, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Allow SMTP relay by Group membership?
I haven't tried this, so don't hold me to it - but I think you could manage this with a transport rule. It might take two working together, but I think you could make it happen. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 6:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allow SMTP relay by Group membership? Currently within Exchange 2010, we do not allow anonymous relaying of mail to the outside except from specific internal IPs via the Relay Connector. The problem I have is a network application being used that attempts to send mail from the local workstation via an SMTP tool from within the fat client of this application. The mail is attempting to send from the local workstation. If I add the IP of the workstation to the allowed IP list, I am sure Exchange will relay the mail just fine. But I don't relish the idea of managing static IPs for these multiple machines, across various subnets. Is there a way to allow relaying via an AD group membership, either for the machine or user? Thanks for any ideas, Robert --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
OTish Manual SMTP
I used to do this manually all the time via telnet on 25 to see the responses and get better detai, but in recent years it fails 99 percent of the time. What changed that I didn’t notice? telnet mx01.windstream.net 25 220 ** HELO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command EHLO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command MAIL FROM: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OTish Manual SMTP
Looks like a PIX/ASA with smtp protocol fixup enabled. DAMIEN SOLODOW Systems Engineer 317.447.6033 (office) 317.217.6851 (fax) HARRISON COLLEGE From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OTish Manual SMTP I used to do this manually all the time via telnet on 25 to see the responses and get better detai, but in recent years it fails 99 percent of the time. What changed that I didn’t notice? telnet mx01.windstream.net 25 220 ** HELO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command EHLO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command MAIL FROM: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OTish Manual SMTP
I think you are right. Our ‘ISP’ put in a new ASA a few months back….I will contact them and let you know. However, all our email flows just fine…… From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OTish Manual SMTP Looks like a PIX/ASA with smtp protocol fixup enabled. DAMIEN SOLODOW Systems Engineer 317.447.6033 (office) 317.217.6851 (fax) HARRISON COLLEGE From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OTish Manual SMTP I used to do this manually all the time via telnet on 25 to see the responses and get better detai, but in recent years it fails 99 percent of the time. What changed that I didn’t notice? telnet mx01.windstream.net 25 220 ** HELO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command EHLO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command MAIL FROM: kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OTish Manual SMTP
Here is what I get: 220 pacmmta02 ESMTP ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r() Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:48:26 -0400 ehlo test 250-pacmmta02 says EHLO to 10.0.0.3:49760 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 PIPELINING mail from: mich...@smithcons.com 250 MAIL FROM accepted rcpt to: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 550 Relayed denied quit 221 pacmmta02 closing connection I would suggest that based on the PIX-ish appearance, that your outgoing IP doesn’t match to the name (mailout.elyriaschools.org) you provided. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OTish Manual SMTP I used to do this manually all the time via telnet on 25 to see the responses and get better detai, but in recent years it fails 99 percent of the time. What changed that I didn’t notice? telnet mx01.windstream.net 25 220 ** HELO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command EHLO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command MAIL FROM: kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OTish Manual SMTP
I am clean on the dns. I am fully circular and I just double checked it. DNS on mailout.elyriaschools.org resolves to an IP and the rDNS on that IP is mailout.elyriaschools.org. That setup has always been high on my list for email servers. Still waiting on a response back on the smtp fixup from the ISP. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OTish Manual SMTP Here is what I get: 220 pacmmta02 ESMTP ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r() Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:48:26 -0400 ehlo test 250-pacmmta02 says EHLO to 10.0.0.3:49760 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 PIPELINING mail from: mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com 250 MAIL FROM accepted rcpt to: kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 550 Relayed denied quit 221 pacmmta02 closing connection I would suggest that based on the PIX-ish appearance, that your outgoing IP doesn’t match to the name (mailout.elyriaschools.org) you provided. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OTish Manual SMTP I used to do this manually all the time via telnet on 25 to see the responses and get better detai, but in recent years it fails 99 percent of the time. What changed that I didn’t notice? telnet mx01.windstream.net 25 220 ** HELO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command EHLO mailout.elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command MAIL FROM: kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 500 5.5.2 unrecognized command --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
Thanks Jim, I guess I'll give them a call. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: You will need contact their support on that. They will tunnel in and adjust it for you. However ask them if this will reset each time you update the firmware, I suspect it will that is how any special settings I have had them make behave. There is a downside to what you are doing…..turning down the dns cache will probably turn down all the dns cache’s….so you will be doing far more lookups with it. JK That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that behaivor. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Cuda’s caching the dns lookup? *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
The A records are named the same because I'm only referencing a single MX record. I'm using the second method described in this document: http://www.barracudanetworks.com/ns/downloads/White_Papers/BarracudaNetworks_WP_Load_Balancing_Email_Using_DNS_MX_Records.pdf - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.comwrote: I don’t think you should have to (or want to) name the A records the same – that’s what the equally weighted MX is for – but I also don’t think that is necessarily your problem if you are getting the expected results when running nslookup from the Barracuda. -- *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:43 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
I don't think that's true Bill. I think you simply leave the smarthost field blank. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote: So, I don't even think it is possible to have the barracuda send mail directly and not use a smart host. That annoyed me. Bill Sean Martin wrote: Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com http://testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com http://test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto: listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
Cuda's caching the dns lookup? From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.comhttp://testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.comhttp://test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that behaivor. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote: Cuda’s caching the dns lookup? *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
Are the devices overworked with outgoing email? If not, I would not worry about that. From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that behaivor. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Cuda's caching the dns lookup? From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.comhttp://testmx.domain.com/ and two A records both named test.domain.comhttp://test.domain.com/, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
No not at all. Just trying to balance mail flow across our two sites. It's a documented feature, it's setup correctly (as far as I can tell), so I'm just frustrated that it is not working as intended. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Missy Koslosky mi...@notsoclever.comwrote: Are the devices overworked with outgoing email? If not, I would not worry about that. *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:05 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that behaivor. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Cuda’s caching the dns lookup? *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
You will need contact their support on that. They will tunnel in and adjust it for you. However ask them if this will reset each time you update the firmware, I suspect it will that is how any special settings I have had them make behave. There is a downside to what you are doing.turning down the dns cache will probably turn down all the dns cache'sso you will be doing far more lookups with it. JK That sounds likely, I just don't see anywhere within the GUI to control that behaivor. - Sean On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Cuda's caching the dns lookup? From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.commailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.comhttp://testmx.domain.com/ and two A records both named test.domain.comhttp://test.domain.com/, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
I don't think you should have to (or want to) name the A records the same - that's what the equally weighted MX is for - but I also don't think that is necessarily your problem if you are getting the expected results when running nslookup from the Barracuda. From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.comhttp://testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.comhttp://test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
On 2011-01-20 19.42, Sean Martin wrote: I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com http://testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com http://test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. I think that could mess up the cache logic in the barracudas. You should create two differently named A records, and two MX records with equal priorities. Like this: $ORIGIN domain.com. smarthost IN MX 1 smarthost1 IN MX 1 smarthost2 smarthost1 A ipaddress1 smarthost2 A ipaddress2 -- Eino Tuominen --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Load Balancing - Barracuda
So, I don't even think it is possible to have the barracuda send mail directly and not use a smart host. That annoyed me. Bill Sean Martin wrote: Good morning all, I've got two Barracuda SPAM/Virus Firewalls that I'm trying to setup for load balancing outgoing mail. The Barracuda's forward mail to a smarthost, and since they're clustered, I can't specify separate smart hosts per device. Barracuda documentation indicates this is accomplished using MX records. I created an MX record named testmx.domain.com http://testmx.domain.com and two A records both named test.domain.com http://test.domain.com, one for each of the downstream smart hosts. However, both of the barracuda's appear to favor only one of the smart hosts when delivering outgoing mail. Repeated NSLookups against the MX record seem to alternate between the A records as expected. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Single or Multiple SMTP Connectors?
Exchange 2003 SP2 I had a small issue with one of my Barracuda Virus Firewalls this morning that got me thinking about my current configuration. I currently have a single SMTP connector configured with multiple smarthosts. I was wondering if it would be preferable to configurable multiple SMTP connectors of equal cost, each with a unique smarthost? The only benefit I can think of is being able to immediately identify which smarthost may be having problems accepting mail. Thoughts? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Single or Multiple SMTP Connectors?
I think I may have found the answer to my question... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997032(EXCHG.65).aspx Load Balance with Multiple Bridgehead Servers When you have a single connector that is hosted by multiple bridgehead servers, the servers using the connector randomly select the bridgehead server that they use, thereby load balancing requests across the bridgehead servers. *The situation is different if you have multiple connectors with the same address space, each with a single bridgehead server. The servers that use these connectors use a method based on the server GUID to determine which of the available connectors they will use. The algorithm may not evenly distribute the server selections across the available connectors. So, to achieve load balancing, it is recommended that you use a single connector sourced to multiple bridgehead servers. * On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Exchange 2003 SP2 I had a small issue with one of my Barracuda Virus Firewalls this morning that got me thinking about my current configuration. I currently have a single SMTP connector configured with multiple smarthosts. I was wondering if it would be preferable to configurable multiple SMTP connectors of equal cost, each with a unique smarthost? The only benefit I can think of is being able to immediately identify which smarthost may be having problems accepting mail. Thoughts? - Sean --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP Log
Follow up. I finally figured out what's going on with some messages being accepted but not delivered. RoadRunner, Comcast, Network Solutions, and possibly some other e-mail providers, have started silently deleting all messages with our toll free 800 number anywhere in the body. Delete the number (or even, just for testing, change it by one digit) and the messages are delivered without issue. Has anyone else seen anything like this, or have any insight into why it's happening? We don't have any telemarketing dialing out on the 800 number. Google searches for it only show hits from our website and various reverse number lookup sites. It's quite strange. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, RS rich...@gmail.com wrote: It's the old story. The recipient _swears_ that there's nothing there... On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.comwrote: There's always the spam folder option too... ~JasonG -Original Message- From: RS [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Log I think you're right. But seriously, that's pretty much what I was thinking - that it left here OK, but for whatever reason Road Runner didn't deliver it to the recipient's inbox. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com wrote: You are right, but they may also be right. But, if they are right, they need to talk to Road Runner. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: RS [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 13:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Log Is there anything odd with the SMTP log excerpt below? It is from Exchange 2003. The recipient swears that the message was never received, but it looks like to me it was accepted just fine. Any thoughts or analysis are appreciated. Thanks, RS 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2031, 0, 67, 0, 0, -, -, 220 Welcome to Road Runner. NO UCE *** FOR AUTHORIZED USE ONLY! ***, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2031, 0, 4, 0, 0, EHLO, -, mail.redacted.com, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2046, 0, 61, 0, 0, -, -, 250-hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com says EHLO to IPredacted:55954, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2046, 0, 4, 0, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:redac...@redacted.com, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2078, 0, 22, 0, 0, -, -, 250 MAIL FROM accepted, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2078, 0, 4, 0, 0, RCPT, -, TO:redac...@wi.rr.com, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2093, 0, 20, 0, 0, -, -, 250 RCPT TO accepted, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2093, 0, 4, 0, 0, DATA, -, -, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2109, 0, 40, 0, 0, -, -, 354 continue. finished with \r\n.\r\n, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2140, 0, 27, 0, 0, -, -, 250 OK 8D/5D-06614-6A86EFC4, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2156, 0, 4, 0, 0, QUIT, -, -, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2171, 0, 46, 0, 0, -, -, 221 hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com closing connection, --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe
RE: SMTP Log
How long have you had the number? If you acquired it fairly recently it’s possible it was used in a spam campaign by someone else, and you’ve inherited its reputation. From: RS [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Log Follow up. I finally figured out what's going on with some messages being accepted but not delivered. RoadRunner, Comcast, Network Solutions, and possibly some other e-mail providers, have started silently deleting all messages with our toll free 800 number anywhere in the body. Delete the number (or even, just for testing, change it by one digit) and the messages are delivered without issue. Has anyone else seen anything like this, or have any insight into why it's happening? We don't have any telemarketing dialing out on the 800 number. Google searches for it only show hits from our website and various reverse number lookup sites. It's quite strange. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, RS rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote: It's the old story. The recipient _swears_ that there's nothing there... On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.commailto:jasongu...@npumail.com wrote: There's always the spam folder option too... ~JasonG -Original Message- From: RS [mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 13:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMTP Log I think you're right. But seriously, that's pretty much what I was thinking - that it left here OK, but for whatever reason Road Runner didn't deliver it to the recipient's inbox. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.commailto:jasongu...@npumail.com wrote: You are right, but they may also be right. But, if they are right, they need to talk to Road Runner. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: RS [mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 13:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Log Is there anything odd with the SMTP log excerpt below? It is from Exchange 2003. The recipient swears that the message was never received, but it looks like to me it was accepted just fine. Any thoughts or analysis are appreciated. Thanks, RS 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2031, 0, 67, 0, 0, -, -, 220 Welcome to Road Runner. NO UCE *** FOR AUTHORIZED USE ONLY! ***, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2031, 0, 4, 0, 0, EHLO, -, mail.redacted.comhttp://mail.redacted.com/, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2046, 0, 61, 0, 0, -, -, 250-hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.comhttp://250-hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com/ says EHLO to IPredacted:55954, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2046, 0, 4, 0, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:redac...@redacted.commailto:redac...@redacted.com, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2078, 0, 22, 0, 0, -, -, 250 MAIL FROM accepted, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2078, 0, 4, 0, 0, RCPT, -, TO:redac...@wi.rr.commailto:redac...@wi.rr.com, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2093, 0, 20, 0, 0, -, -, 250 RCPT TO accepted, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2093, 0, 4, 0, 0, DATA, -, -, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2109, 0, 40, 0, 0, -, -, 354 continue. finished with \r\n.\r\n, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2140, 0, 27, 0, 0, -, -, 250 OK 8D/5D-06614-6A86EFC4, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionCommand, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2156, 0, 4, 0, 0, QUIT, -, -, 71.74.56.243, OutboundConnectionResponse, 12/7/2010, 12:02:29, SMTPSVC1, MAIL, -, 2171, 0, 46, 0, 0, -, -, 221 hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.comhttp://hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com/ closing connection, --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-http://lyris.sunbelt-/ software.com/read/my_forums/http://software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage
