Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-25 Thread engage
On Sunday 24 August 2003 12:42 pm, you wrote:
engage wrote:
On Sunday 17 August 2003 11:11 am, Larry Sword wrote:
Helge Hielscher wrote:
Hello,

what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW
 disks (if there is any)?

Try cdrecord. If you are using KDE then open a Komqueror window and type
man:/cdrecord.
Using cli a plain man cdrecord. Since most of the frontends use
cdrecord they will probable work for burning a dvd as well. (I don't
have a dvd burner connected so can't verify this will work)

I changed my preferences in gcombust from cdrecord to cdrecord-dvdhack but
 it didn't work. Sony DRU-510A.

/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Found DVD media: using cdr_mdvd
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Drive does not support TAO recording
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Illegal write mode for this drive

I see that DVD-R media support was added at the Version 0.1.54. Mandrake
9.1 ships with version 0.1.53. Look in: http://www.abo.fi/~jmunsin/gcombust/

Larry

Thanks. I'll give it a try after my butt heals.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-24 Thread engage
On Sunday 17 August 2003 11:11 am, Larry Sword wrote:
Helge Hielscher wrote:
Hello,

what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
(if there is any)?

Try cdrecord. If you are using KDE then open a Komqueror window and type
man:/cdrecord.
Using cli a plain man cdrecord. Since most of the frontends use
cdrecord they will probable work for burning a dvd as well. (I don't
have a dvd burner connected so can't verify this will work)

I changed my preferences in gcombust from cdrecord to cdrecord-dvdhack but it 
didn't work. Sony DRU-510A.

/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Found DVD media: using cdr_mdvd
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Drive does not support TAO recording
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Illegal write mode for this drive


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-24 Thread engage
On Sunday 17 August 2003 10:59 am, Byron Poland wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 13:13, Helge Hielscher wrote:
 Hello,

 what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
 (if there is any)?

 TIA and Regards,
 Helge

You need to install cdrecord-dvdhack this is what Mandrake has in it's
distribution for burning dvd's.  I use it with a pioneer 104 drive in an
external firewire enclosure and it works great.  It is all command line
though, same options as cdrecord I think.

Does it interface well with gcombust or do I need a different frontend?

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-24 Thread Larry Sword
engage wrote:

On Sunday 17 August 2003 11:11 am, Larry Sword wrote:
 

Helge Hielscher wrote:
   

Hello,

what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
(if there is any)?
 

Try cdrecord. If you are using KDE then open a Komqueror window and type
man:/cdrecord.
Using cli a plain man cdrecord. Since most of the frontends use
cdrecord they will probable work for burning a dvd as well. (I don't
have a dvd burner connected so can't verify this will work)
   

I changed my preferences in gcombust from cdrecord to cdrecord-dvdhack but it 
didn't work. Sony DRU-510A.

/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Found DVD media: using cdr_mdvd
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Drive does not support TAO recording
/usr/bin/cdrecord-dvdhack: Illegal write mode for this drive
 

I see that DVD-R media support was added at the Version 0.1.54. Mandrake 
9.1 ships with version 0.1.53. Look in: http://www.abo.fi/~jmunsin/gcombust/

Larry

--
Abit VP-6 Dual Pentium III 1GHz
Mandrake 9.1
Kernel 2.4.21-0.25mdksmp


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread Helge Hielscher
Hello,

what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
(if there is any)?

TIA and Regards,
Helge



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread Byron Poland
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 13:13, Helge Hielscher wrote:
 Hello,
 
 what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
 (if there is any)?
 
 TIA and Regards,
 Helge

You need to install cdrecord-dvdhack this is what Mandrake has in it's
distribution for burning dvd's.  I use it with a pioneer 104 drive in an
external firewire enclosure and it works great.  It is all command line
though, same options as cdrecord I think.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread Larry Sword
Helge Hielscher wrote:

Hello,

what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
(if there is any)?
 

Try cdrecord. If you are using KDE then open a Komqueror window and type 
man:/cdrecord.
Using cli a plain man cdrecord. Since most of the frontends use 
cdrecord they will probable work for burning a dvd as well. (I don't 
have a dvd burner connected so can't verify this will work)

--
Abit VP-6 Dual Pentium III 1GHz
Mandrake 9.1
Kernel 2.4.21-0.25mdksmp


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread stefmit
I have embarked myself in a search for such things (with the only drawback - 
so far - consisting of incompatibilities between the DVDs I create, and older 
DVD readers (I can read them fine on my DVD burner)) ... mainly for the 
purpose of archiving stuff in Linux. I know you have asked for -R and -RW, 
and I am pretty sure you'll get plenty of info about cdrecord, but here are 
some links for + ones ... just in case ... as I collected them while 
looking for DVD burning solutions ...

http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/
http://www.dvdplusrw.org/
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gazette/issue83/stoddard.html
http://www.dvdrhelp.com/

HTH,
Stef


On Saturday 16 August 2003 12:13 pm, Helge Hielscher wrote:
 Hello,

 what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
 (if there is any)?

 TIA and Regards,
 Helge


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Sonntag, 17. August 2003 19:11 schrieb Larry Sword:
 Helge Hielscher wrote:
 Hello,
 
 what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
 (if there is any)?

 Try cdrecord. If you are using KDE then open a Komqueror window and type
 man:/cdrecord.
 Using cli a plain man cdrecord. Since most of the frontends use
 cdrecord they will probable work for burning a dvd as well. (I don't
 have a dvd burner connected so can't verify this will work)

k3b in CVS has dvd support. Alltough I must admit that I can't get it to 
compile (autoconf stuff :-/). Further there was a thread on cooker not long 
ago, that might give pointers.

Steffen

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software to record DVD-R/RW?

2003-08-17 Thread Mark Williamson
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 02:59, Byron Poland wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 13:13, Helge Hielscher wrote:
  Hello,
  
  what software (in 9.1 or cooker) may I use to record DVD-R or DVD-RW disks
  (if there is any)?
  
  TIA and Regards,
  Helge
 
 You need to install cdrecord-dvdhack this is what Mandrake has in it's
 distribution for burning dvd's.  I use it with a pioneer 104 drive in an
 external firewire enclosure and it works great.  It is all command line
 though, same options as cdrecord I think.
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

I tried using the cdrecord-dvdhack on a late very late model Sony
DVD-RW  device, but all it did was failed, it just couldn't recognise
the media..  later i switched to growiosfs, and used that with Mondo
backup, with full success and excellent results.

Cheers
Mark
 

-- 
Mark Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cyber Essentials


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software RAID (IDE) - Setup On Existing Install?

2003-08-15 Thread Greg Meyer
On Thursday 14 August 2003 06:27 pm, Sevatio wrote:
 I am running LM9.0 .   Is it possible to add another IDE harddrive of
 the same size and make that a mirror of the first drive using software
 RAID without having to do a full re-install?

The Boot + Root + Raid + Lilo : Software Raid mini-HOWTO has a section on 
this that will walk you through it.  Section 4 I believe.

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/Boot+Root+Raid+LILO.html
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Software RAID (IDE) - Setup On Existing Install?

2003-08-14 Thread Sevatio
I am running LM9.0 .   Is it possible to add another IDE harddrive of 
the same size and make that a mirror of the first drive using software 
RAID without having to do a full re-install?

Thanks,
Sevatio

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Software suggestion request.

2002-12-27 Thread Joerg Mertin
*lol*

Ok - I admit - I don't know your programming skills.
I was in the intention of making a Voting interface - dynamically 
driven, with binary inclusion (Picture) for the UT2003 Server I have 
haning around on the Net - with answer inclusion, votes, and player 
preferences (what they play). It shouldn't be then difficult to use that 
code for your requirement. I already wrote such a beast for the Media-DB 
module (phpWebsite), but there only the movies get rated, (Not comments 
etc.) and no dynamic questioning.
I can't tell when I'll start it as I'm actually coding on a House-Hold 
Income/Expenses planification interface which is quite more complicated 
;) But I'll keep your request in mind. When I'm that far - I'll let you 
know.

Cheers

	Joerg

James Sparenberg wrote:
You've obviously never seen me program... *grin* you're time
estimate is very optimistic, considering the coder *me*. *grin.

James



--

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Work)|
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software suggestion request.

2002-12-25 Thread James Sparenberg
You've obviously never seen me program... *grin* you're time
estimate is very optimistic, considering the coder *me*. *grin.

James


On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 04:19, Joerg Mertin wrote:
 Hi James,
 
 I don't think I know such a Software yet - but it shouldn't take more 
 than 3 days to write a phpWebsite module for that.
 
 Cheers
 
   Joerg
 
 James Sparenberg wrote:
  All,
  
 Looking to set up a simple online user survey.  The requirements are.
  
  1.  able to gather and colate data into mysql.
  
  2.  Easy to manage (Marketing types will be controling it.)
  
  3.  Able to output results as an e-mail 
  
  4.  I don't have to write the php pages *grin*
  
  5.  Person being surveyed needs to only know how to type and click
  buttons.
  
  6.  browser based admin / setup.
  
  
 We are looking to ask a set of maybe 10-15 questions of our customers
  on their experience in using the product as well as gather info on what
  they did / didn't like. The questions may/will change often enough that
  it should be totally browser based.  
  
  
Any suggestions?
  
  James
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software suggestion request.

2002-12-24 Thread James Sparenberg
All,

   Looking to set up a simple online user survey.  The requirements are.

1.  able to gather and colate data into mysql.

2.  Easy to manage (Marketing types will be controling it.)

3.  Able to output results as an e-mail 

4.  I don't have to write the php pages *grin*

5.  Person being surveyed needs to only know how to type and click
buttons.

6.  browser based admin / setup.


   We are looking to ask a set of maybe 10-15 questions of our customers
on their experience in using the product as well as gather info on what
they did / didn't like. The questions may/will change often enough that
it should be totally browser based.  


  Any suggestions?

James




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-24 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 16:50, Mark Weaver wrote:
 Jack Coates wrote:
  On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 22:57, James Sparenberg wrote:
  
 I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
 running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
 stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
 funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
 or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
 a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
 version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
 Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
 problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
 drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
 Blue blows.
 
 James
  
  
  Heck, I haven't even touched the new distro or the new GUI -- but I do
  have to work on a number of RH 7.x servers, and man do I miss urpmi. I
  also think Mandrake RPMs are generally better put together. That is,
  less likely to be broken and more likely to have the configure options I
  wanted.
 
 In response to James...I've noticed the exact opposite. I'm so fed up 
 with trying to do server with 9.0 I've vowed it will never see any more 
 of the servers I administrate. Whether at home or at the office. 8.2, on 
 the other hand works exceptionally as either a workstation or a server. 
 9.0 does just dandy as a workstation, but there appears to be a lot 
 needing attention when it comes to the server end. Networking is at the 
 top of the list right now.
 
 Mark

Well I will admit that Desktops are more of a concern for me than plain
servers... And that with MDK it wants a heavy footprint.  But I just
de-commissioned (by force the hardware died) a 7.2 Mandrake box that had
run without a hiccup or a breakin for over 2 years.  24-7-52 ... MDK RH
or Slack... each has it's fun points.  (slack is very unforgiving )
Biggest problem with RH is that it installs to many problem rpms
(telnet r services finger etc) by default.  With Mandrake the hassle is
for me getting it installed sans gui.(again fewer services  fewer
holes.) For Laptops... MDK all the way... 2 identical dell boxes the
other week... MDK ... installed and running in 30 minutes... RH ... 3
days and only limping.  RH and MDK run neck n neck on one point ... I've
got updates set up on a cron job... if it comes out I get it and an
e-mail to boot. One thing though... MDK does have more options.

James

 
 
 
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software suggestion request.

2002-12-24 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hi James,

I don't think I know such a Software yet - but it shouldn't take more 
than 3 days to write a phpWebsite module for that.

Cheers

	Joerg

James Sparenberg wrote:
All,

   Looking to set up a simple online user survey.  The requirements are.

1.  able to gather and colate data into mysql.

2.  Easy to manage (Marketing types will be controling it.)

3.  Able to output results as an e-mail 

4.  I don't have to write the php pages *grin*

5.  Person being surveyed needs to only know how to type and click
buttons.

6.  browser based admin / setup.


   We are looking to ask a set of maybe 10-15 questions of our customers
on their experience in using the product as well as gather info on what
they did / didn't like. The questions may/will change often enough that
it should be totally browser based.  


  Any suggestions?

James







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


--

| Joerg Mertin  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)|
| in Neuchâtel/Schweiz  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED](Work)|
| Stardust's LiNUX System   :  |
| PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice  Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54   |

Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-24 Thread Mark Weaver
James Sparenberg wrote:

On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 16:50, Mark Weaver wrote:


Jack Coates wrote:


On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 22:57, James Sparenberg wrote:



I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
Blue blows.

James



Heck, I haven't even touched the new distro or the new GUI -- but I do
have to work on a number of RH 7.x servers, and man do I miss urpmi. I
also think Mandrake RPMs are generally better put together. That is,
less likely to be broken and more likely to have the configure options I
wanted.


In response to James...I've noticed the exact opposite. I'm so fed up 
with trying to do server with 9.0 I've vowed it will never see any more 
of the servers I administrate. Whether at home or at the office. 8.2, on 
the other hand works exceptionally as either a workstation or a server. 
9.0 does just dandy as a workstation, but there appears to be a lot 
needing attention when it comes to the server end. Networking is at the 
top of the list right now.

Mark


Well I will admit that Desktops are more of a concern for me than plain
servers... And that with MDK it wants a heavy footprint.  But I just
de-commissioned (by force the hardware died) a 7.2 Mandrake box that had
run without a hiccup or a breakin for over 2 years.  24-7-52 ... MDK RH
or Slack... each has it's fun points.  (slack is very unforgiving )
Biggest problem with RH is that it installs to many problem rpms
(telnet r services finger etc) by default.  With Mandrake the hassle is
for me getting it installed sans gui.(again fewer services  fewer
holes.) For Laptops... MDK all the way... 2 identical dell boxes the
other week... MDK ... installed and running in 30 minutes... RH ... 3
days and only limping.  RH and MDK run neck n neck on one point ... I've
got updates set up on a cron job... if it comes out I get it and an
e-mail to boot. One thing though... MDK does have more options.

James


O I agree 1000%...MDK all the way. While I really like MDK9.0, I'm still 
quite frustrated over the networking troubles that seem to exist on the 
system when it comes to setting it up, getting it running, *correctly*. 
There don't appear to be these same problems with MDK 8.2. That goes in 
without a hassle and I've been known to get a server functional with 2 
hours.

RedHat 8.0 on the other hand is, without a doubt, a workstation ONLY 
distro. That poor bugger has been so severely crippled when it comes to 
administrating it as a server I can't even begin to tell ya.

More and more...Mandrake is the one and only.

Mark



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-23 Thread Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
James,

I wholetotally agree with you!

On 22 Dec 2002, James Sparenberg wrote:

 I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
 running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
 stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
 funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
 or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
 a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
 version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
 Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
 problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
 drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
 Blue blows.

-- 
---
Alan Wilter S. da Silva
---
 Laboratório de Física Biológica
  Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho
   Universidade do Brasil/UFRJ
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-23 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 22:57, James Sparenberg wrote:
 I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
 running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
 stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
 funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
 or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
 a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
 version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
 Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
 problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
 drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
 Blue blows.
 
 James

Heck, I haven't even touched the new distro or the new GUI -- but I do
have to work on a number of RH 7.x servers, and man do I miss urpmi. I
also think Mandrake RPMs are generally better put together. That is,
less likely to be broken and more likely to have the configure options I
wanted.

   
 
 On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 12:57, Philip Webb wrote:
  021222 Praedor Atrebates wrote:
   Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.
  -- details snipped --
  
  i've been happily running an upgrade 8.2 - 9.0rc1 since September.
  certainly, 8.0 was awful (very bad KDE)  8.2 quite good,
  but there's no reason to avoid 9.0 ,
  tho' you might want to try a few things from Cooker.
 
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-23 Thread Mark Weaver
Jack Coates wrote:

On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 22:57, James Sparenberg wrote:


I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
Blue blows.

James



Heck, I haven't even touched the new distro or the new GUI -- but I do
have to work on a number of RH 7.x servers, and man do I miss urpmi. I
also think Mandrake RPMs are generally better put together. That is,
less likely to be broken and more likely to have the configure options I
wanted.


In response to James...I've noticed the exact opposite. I'm so fed up 
with trying to do server with 9.0 I've vowed it will never see any more 
of the servers I administrate. Whether at home or at the office. 8.2, on 
the other hand works exceptionally as either a workstation or a server. 
9.0 does just dandy as a workstation, but there appears to be a lot 
needing attention when it comes to the server end. Networking is at the 
top of the list right now.

Mark


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-22 Thread David Robertson
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 23:15, Philip Webb wrote:
 021221 John Wilson wrote:

  The installation manager keeps telling me
  that uninstalled packages are already installed.
 
 you have to do something like 'urpmi-update' or '-rebuild'.

That never worked for me, nor did rebuilding the rpm database, which was
another suggestion. Having had a bit of a mental breakdown the other
day, out of sheer frustration, following which I posted a bit of a rant
(apologies for that, everyone) I solved the problem by doing a really
minimal reinstall, removing the CD installation sources from Software
Manager, and then replacing them with a variety of sources configured
from http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php ( a great utility, in my
opinion). I then installed the latest versions of everything I wanted.
Things have been fine since - and I've even now got mplayer installed,
which started this whole thing off for me.

David




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-22 Thread Praedor Atrebates
Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.  I bought 
it when it was first released but quickly cancelled the order when the list 
of problems began quickly stacking up.  Then with some of the difficulties I 
was having with a few items (mainly kde 3.0.x) on 8.2, I was convinced to go 
ahead and go to 9.0 but to upgrade immediately to a Cooker kernel to avoid 
the 2.3.19 problems (supermount, usb).  I have since learned that the Cooker 
kernels have new problems of their (particularly, it seems, with regards to 
usb and the atmel wireless driver).  Then there are these problems with the 
software manager.

So much to look forward to (not).  I get saddled with 9.0 on Monday (when the 
package will arrive).  Has anyone looked into the possibility of 
forward-porting 8.2 stuff into 9.0?  That is, eliminating the 9.0 software 
manager and compiling/installing the 8.2 software manager in its stead?  As 
it is, with the Cooker kernel problems I am looking at having to build/use 
the 8.2 kernel to ensure my wireless device works as well as supermount.

praedor

On Sunday 22 December 2002 06:39 am, David Robertson wrote:
 On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 23:15, Philip Webb wrote:
  021221 John Wilson wrote:
   The installation manager keeps telling me
   that uninstalled packages are already installed.
 
  you have to do something like 'urpmi-update' or '-rebuild'.

 That never worked for me, nor did rebuilding the rpm database, which was
 another suggestion. Having had a bit of a mental breakdown the other
 day, out of sheer frustration, following which I posted a bit of a rant
 (apologies for that, everyone) I solved the problem by doing a really
 minimal reinstall, removing the CD installation sources from Software
 Manager, and then replacing them with a variety of sources configured
 from http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php ( a great utility, in my
 opinion). I then installed the latest versions of everything I wanted.
 Things have been fine since - and I've even now got mplayer installed,
 which started this whole thing off for me.

 David


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 22 December 2002 17:53, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.  I
 bought it when it was first released but quickly cancelled the order when
 the list of problems began quickly stacking up.  Then with some of the
 difficulties I was having with a few items (mainly kde 3.0.x) on 8.2, I was
 convinced to go ahead and go to 9.0 but to upgrade immediately to a Cooker
 kernel to avoid the 2.3.19 problems (supermount, usb).  I have since
 learned that the Cooker kernels have new problems of their (particularly,
 it seems, with regards to usb and the atmel wireless driver).  Then there
 are these problems with the software manager.

 So much to look forward to (not).  I get saddled with 9.0 on Monday (when
 the package will arrive).  Has anyone looked into the possibility of
 forward-porting 8.2 stuff into 9.0?  That is, eliminating the 9.0 software
 manager and compiling/installing the 8.2 software manager in its stead?  As
 it is, with the Cooker kernel problems I am looking at having to build/use
 the 8.2 kernel to ensure my wireless device works as well as supermount.

 praedor


7.2 and 8.2 were excellent distributions I can only agree. The x.0 versions 
are the ones to be wary of.
Considering the troubles I personally had with 7.0 and 8.0 and the ease of 9.0 
(the first x.0 version that didn't leave me pining for the previous version) 
I just can't wait to see what 9.2 will be like. Should be sheer heaven!;o)

So maybe you should just wait for x.2 versions (i.e if you can't take the 
heat.!) if you don't want to take any chances.

Good luck,
HarM



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-22 Thread Philip Webb
021222 Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.
-- details snipped --

i've been happily running an upgrade 8.2 - 9.0rc1 since September.
certainly, 8.0 was awful (very bad KDE)  8.2 quite good,
but there's no reason to avoid 9.0 ,
tho' you might want to try a few things from Cooker.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks But V9.0 otherwise working fine (so far).

2002-12-22 Thread John Wilson
On Sunday 22 December 2002 08:53 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.  I
 bought it when it was first released but quickly cancelled the order when
 the list of problems began quickly stacking up.  Then with some of the
 difficulties I was having with a few items (mainly kde 3.0.x) on 8.2, I was
 convinced to go ahead and go to 9.0 but to upgrade immediately to a Cooker
 kernel to avoid the 2.3.19 problems (supermount, usb).  I have since
 learned that the Cooker kernels have new problems of their (particularly,
 it seems, with regards to usb and the atmel wireless driver).  Then there
 are these problems with the software manager.

 So much to look forward to (not).  I get saddled with 9.0 on Monday (when
 the package will arrive).  Has anyone looked into the possibility of
 forward-porting 8.2 stuff into 9.0?  That is, eliminating the 9.0 software
 manager and compiling/installing the 8.2 software manager in its stead?  As
 it is, with the Cooker kernel problems I am looking at having to build/use
 the 8.2 kernel to ensure my wireless device works as well as supermount.

 praedor

Goodness, I hope not. :)

The only problem so far has been with urpmi and Software Manager, important 
though that is. 

This distro is the first that flawlessly installed my sound card properly (I 
didn't have to spend half the day getting noise from the speakers), found the 
right printer instead of the printer family (HP Deskjet 695C instead of HP 
Deskject 690 family) and actually set up the ISP without a whole lot of 
bother.

I agree that 8.2 and 7.2 were virtually flawless and I expect that 9.2 will be 
wonderful too.  But for most of my uses so far it's a dream.

Now if I could only figure out what a M$ security patch did that has blown 
that machine out of the water so that it won't connect to Samba or the 
Internet.  But I'll save that for another thread.

Thaniks everyone. :)

ttfn

John


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-22 Thread James Sparenberg
I've got to put in my 2 cents here.  For me... 8.2 bit bad.  Why, I was
running i810 and i815 chipset motherboards and having all kinds of
stability problems with 9.0 these boxes have all been rock solid.  any
funky hassles I've had have been either due to pushing the box too hard
or trying to do something I shouldn't have been trying to do. Not due to
a weakness in 9.0.  Actually I've found it to be the most solidly tested
version since 7.0.  Yes there are problems with programs that run ON
Linux.  KDE - Gnome - etc etc.  Many of these aren't so much MDK
problems as just... problems.  If you ever want something that will
drive you nuts trying to get it to do what you want... try RH 8.0...
Blue blows.

James
  

On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 12:57, Philip Webb wrote:
 021222 Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  Ah, with it now too late ya'll have made me regret buying MDK 9.0.
 -- details snipped --
 
 i've been happily running an upgrade 8.2 - 9.0rc1 since September.
 certainly, 8.0 was awful (very bad KDE)  8.2 quite good,
 but there's no reason to avoid 9.0 ,
 tho' you might want to try a few things from Cooker.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-21 Thread John Wilson
I've just browsed the list to see if anyone is experienceing the same issues 
with urpmi and Software Manager as I am and I spotted David Robertson's 
comments.  I'm so glad I'm not the only one.

I finally upgraded to 9.0 because I figured most of the bugs would be out and, 
for the most part, they are.  But

Who the heck decided to break Software Manager?  Up to 8.2 it worked like a 
charm...slowly and it wanted to take over the whole machine..but it worked.  
It even showed things like where files were installed and so on.  Now it's 
three or four peices none of which are anywhere near as good as 8.2.  The 
installation manager keeps telling me that uninstalled packages are already 
installed.  KPackage at least reports that properly about installed packages 
and installs them correctly.  But...and it's a big but...the Install Packages 
keeps blithely insisting I installed everything from all the CDs, which I 
haven't.

As David said one of the joys of Mandrake up to 9.0 was ease of use and ease 
of setup.  This does seem to be gone..right out the window!

What I could do on one screen before with software manager now takes 4 and if 
I'm lucky, which I haven't been so far, it will work.

Anyway, I'm back to essentially manually installing packages either from 
KPackage or the command line.  Software Manager is worse than uselsess.

ttfn

John


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-21 Thread XI
John Wilson wrote:

I've just browsed the list to see if anyone is experienceing the same issues 
with urpmi and Software Manager as I am and I spotted David Robertson's 
comments.  I'm so glad I'm not the only one.

I finally upgraded to 9.0 because I figured most of the bugs would be out and, 
for the most part, they are.  But

Who the heck decided to break Software Manager?  Up to 8.2 it worked like a 
charm...slowly and it wanted to take over the whole machine..but it worked.  
It even showed things like where files were installed and so on.  Now it's 
three or four peices none of which are anywhere near as good as 8.2.  The 
installation manager keeps telling me that uninstalled packages are already 
installed.  KPackage at least reports that properly about installed packages 
and installs them correctly.  But...and it's a big but...the Install Packages 
keeps blithely insisting I installed everything from all the CDs, which I 
haven't.

As David said one of the joys of Mandrake up to 9.0 was ease of use and ease 
of setup.  This does seem to be gone..right out the window!

What I could do on one screen before with software manager now takes 4 and if 
I'm lucky, which I haven't been so far, it will work.

Anyway, I'm back to essentially manually installing packages either from 
KPackage or the command line.  Software Manager is worse than uselsess.

ttfn

John


I am totally agree with you. Does anyone know if it is possible to use 
rpmdrake from mandrake 8.2 ? I have tried to use rpmdrake package from 
it, but I can't get it working.

Xavier


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager Sucks

2002-12-21 Thread Philip Webb
021221 John Wilson wrote:
 Who the heck decided to break Software Manager?

one of the Mandrake staff persons fixed it.

 Up to 8.2 it worked like a charm ...
 It even showed things like where files were installed and so on.

you can still do that: R-click on the R-hand window.

 Now it's 3 - 4 pieces none of which are anywhere near as good as 8.2.

you can have them all open at once to make comparisons.

 The installation manager keeps telling me
 that uninstalled packages are already installed.

you have to do something like 'urpmi-update' or '-rebuild'.

there has been a lot of discussion re these problems since last summer
both here on Expert  on the Cooker list: check the archive.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software for small newsgroup archive

2002-11-20 Thread Wolfgang Bornath

Hi,

subject tells it all. I have a small local newsgroup stored away in my
leafnode spool.

As the ISP is too lazy to maintain an archive I thought about
providing that on my Website. As I said, it's small.

Is there any software for that or a howto or something how I can go
about that?

wobo
-- 
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID using scsi controller bussed boxes.

2002-08-11 Thread g

civileme wrote:

 Mark Lucas wrote:

I've set up a software RAID 0 on my 8.2 system and it works very well.
Until, that is, I need to restart at which point the system won't mount
/dev/md0 and complains of 'invalid file type'. I don't have to restart very
often (thankfully) but when I do I need to make a backup forst then reset
the RAID when the system comes up. This is a real pain! Anybody had a
similar problem?

 Mark

 Check http://www.civileme.net/Softwaredoc/RAIDdoc.html

 Your question should be answered there... basically you need a non-RAID
 /boot partition with an initrd that loads the RAID modules.

 Civileme

heading that way shortly. thanks for 'hot link'.

interesting to see how it works with scsi bussed raid boxes.

spend any time with scsi as a box buss?

would you happen to know of some good sources for info
for sharing scsi buss between 2 or more controllers.

ria, i am looking to set up a 'full scsi linked system'.


_raid ide on lan_ + _raid scsi hd internal system + _raid scsi external_

aka,  _ril+sin+sex_ ...


you may be giving up your position, but never, give up your posts.

i have learned from them all. look forward to next.


peace out, rocky.

tc,hago.

g
.


Subject: Re: [expert] Software RAID





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-11 Thread Mark Lucas

Thanks for this help but:

 ... basically you need a non-RAID 
 /boot partition with an initrd that loads the RAID modules.

how do I do this?

I have /boot on my non-RAID disk. My RAID is mounted at /home.
How do I set up the initrd to load RAID modules?

Mark




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-11 Thread civileme

Mark Lucas wrote:

Thanks for this help but:

... basically you need a non-RAID 
/boot partition with an initrd that loads the RAID modules.


how do I do this?

I have /boot on my non-RAID disk. My RAID is mounted at /home.
How do I set up the initrd to load RAID modules?

Mark





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Now I really don't understand...  I need to see your disk configuration. 
 Softwarte RAID, at least linux software RAID does not go by the disk, 
but rather by the partition.

You set up the initrd to load RAID by putting the RAID drivers names 
into /etc/modules.conf and running mkinitrd...  Read the URL I gave you 
and you can do this all at install.  If you have an IDE RAID controller 
working  on this system you are very lucky to have gotten as far as you 
did.  

http://www.civileme.net/Softwaredoc/RAIDdoc.html



Civileme








Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-11 Thread Mark Lucas

Thanks for this, I'll have another go.

To save confusion my system is as follows:

17Gb IDE drive with partition 1 mounted as root
40Gb IDE drive, single ext3 partition mounted on /data
4Gb SCSI drive with various ext2 partitions
2x9.1Gb SCSI drives with RAID 0 partitions to give /dev/md0 mounted on /home

raidtab as follows:
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level  0
persistent-superblock   1
chunk-size  4
nr-raid-disks   2
device  /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target2/lun0/part1
raid-disk   0
device  /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/part1
raid-disk   1

fstab as follows:
/dev/hdc1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/ide/host1/bus1/target0/lun0/part1  /data  ext3  defaults  0  2
none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 ro,nosuid,noauto,exec,user,nodev 0 0
/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy vfat sync,nosuid,noauto,user,nodev,unhide 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid0
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target2/lun0/part5  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid1
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/part5  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid2
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3  swap  swap  defaults  0  0
/dev/md0  /home  ext2  noauto  0  0

Sorry for any confusion.

Mark

- Original Message -
From: civileme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Software RAID


 Mark Lucas wrote:

 Thanks for this help but:
 
 ... basically you need a non-RAID
 /boot partition with an initrd that loads the RAID modules.
 
 
 how do I do this?
 
 I have /boot on my non-RAID disk. My RAID is mounted at /home.
 How do I set up the initrd to load RAID modules?
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 Now I really don't understand...  I need to see your disk configuration.
  Softwarte RAID, at least linux software RAID does not go by the disk,
 but rather by the partition.

 You set up the initrd to load RAID by putting the RAID drivers names
 into /etc/modules.conf and running mkinitrd...  Read the URL I gave you
 and you can do this all at install.  If you have an IDE RAID controller
 working  on this system you are very lucky to have gotten as far as you
 did.

 http://www.civileme.net/Softwaredoc/RAIDdoc.html



 Civileme













 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-11 Thread civileme

Mark Lucas wrote:

Thanks for this, I'll have another go.

To save confusion my system is as follows:

17Gb IDE drive with partition 1 mounted as root
40Gb IDE drive, single ext3 partition mounted on /data
4Gb SCSI drive with various ext2 partitions
2x9.1Gb SCSI drives with RAID 0 partitions to give /dev/md0 mounted on /home

raidtab as follows:
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level  0
persistent-superblock   1
chunk-size  4
nr-raid-disks   2
device  /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target2/lun0/part1
raid-disk   0
device  /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/part1
raid-disk   1

fstab as follows:
/dev/hdc1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/ide/host1/bus1/target0/lun0/part1  /data  ext3  defaults  0  2
none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 ro,nosuid,noauto,exec,user,nodev 0 0
/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy vfat sync,nosuid,noauto,user,nodev,unhide 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid0
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target2/lun0/part5  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid1
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/part5  /usr/local/squid/cache/squid2
ext2  defaults  0  0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3  swap  swap  defaults  0  0
/dev/md0  /home  ext2  noauto  0  0

Sorry for any confusion.

Mark


OK I had a little more complex situation with one IDE and two SCSI 
drives for my example.  I used diskdrake during install to set 
everything up and I have no problem even though / is on a RAID5.  That 
was on a Compaq Professional Workstation 5000 with dual PPro 200/512s.

I think we need to discover how your system is different.  I never had 
trouble with a reboot.

Check your /etc/modules.conf  Make sure that the scsi driver is the 
FIRST thing loaded.  If the raid is loaded first, it may have nothing to 
reference and get autocleaned though that would be quirky in my POV.

Civileme





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software RAID

2002-08-10 Thread Mark Lucas

I've set up a software RAID 0 on my 8.2 system and it works very well.
Until, that is, I need to restart at which point the system won't mount
/dev/md0 and complains of 'invalid file type'. I don't have to restart very
often (thankfully) but when I do I need to make a backup forst then reset
the RAID when the system comes up. This is a real pain! Anybody had a
similar problem?

Mark




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-10 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:00:36 +0100, Mark Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've set up a software RAID 0 on my 8.2 system and it works very well.
 Until, that is, I need to restart at which point the system won't mount
 /dev/md0 and complains of 'invalid file type'. I don't have to restart very
 often (thankfully) but when I do I need to make a backup forst then reset
 the RAID when the system comes up. This is a real pain! Anybody had a
 similar problem?

Is / on a RAID0? If so, you need to enable autodetection support in the kernel,
which isn't available in the Mandrake kernel. Firstly, write the superblock to
the partitions in the RAID, then compile a kernel with RAID0 compiled into it
(not as a module). Info on this can be found in the Software RAID HOWTO
(http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html).

Or better yet, take a look at EVMS (http://evms.sourceforge.net/), which not
only replaces both software RAID and LVM, it also does them better.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan

 We like to think of ourselves as the Microsoft of the energy world
-- Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software RAID

2002-08-10 Thread civileme

Mark Lucas wrote:

I've set up a software RAID 0 on my 8.2 system and it works very well.
Until, that is, I need to restart at which point the system won't mount
/dev/md0 and complains of 'invalid file type'. I don't have to restart very
often (thankfully) but when I do I need to make a backup forst then reset
the RAID when the system comes up. This is a real pain! Anybody had a
similar problem?

Mark





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Check http://www.civileme.net/Softwaredoc/RAIDdoc.html

Your question should be answered there... basically you need a non-RAID 
/boot partition with an initrd that loads the RAID modules.

Civileme






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] software manager problems

2002-02-10 Thread Eugene C. Zesch

I'm having a problem with Software Manager with Mandrake 8.1 on my new
computer, which I dont have on the old computer.

When I try to install a package not on the loaded disk, a prompt asks
for a different disk. It must still be mounted though, because I cant
eject and change the disk. I can only do so if I su to root and umount.

The old computer is a PII 266 on some generic MB, using ext2.
The new one is a 1.13 Athalon on an ECS K7S5A, using ext2 on /, and ext3
on the other partitions. (I had problems booting using ext3 on the /
partition).

Any help would be welcome.

Thanks,

Gene



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software Manager

2002-02-01 Thread James Francis

Somehow my 3 source cds were no longer available in the Software Manager's  
source list so I made new ones using the New option under Define sources.  
Now when I try to do an update it no longer prompts for the correct cd 
although it shows in the list which one it wants. If I put the correct cd in 
it will no longer mount it automatically. Anyone know how to configure this 
or where to look for information regarding it?

Thanks 

Jim



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] software manager

2001-12-08 Thread Marek


Hi Guys

When i run software manager or mandrake update it gets to analysing the
3rd disk part and then hangs at 97%. I had to kill it the other day as
it was taking too long to get to the ftp site and maybe i messed things
up with kill -9. any ideas pse ?

Cheers

Marek





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] software RAID (was Promise Fastrak 100 lite - anyone?)

2001-12-04 Thread jason-snyder

Is the installer for mdk 8.2 going to make it easier to set up a software RAID
under Linux?  The main thing that steered me away from pure Linux software RAID
after I got past all of the other snags was that I realized maintaining a
bootable software RAID would be too much of a pain in the long run for me.  The
reason for this is that at the time that I decided to go with a 3ware controller
I had to go through a long and complicated process to install Mandrake on my
system.  Doing it once isn't so bad, but when you guys release a new version of
your OS I like to upgrade to it and going through the process of upgrading
on a bootable software RAID just takes too long.  (Now if I just had time to
hack and try to optimize the 3ware drivers. :-))

civileme wrote:


 Not supported unless you are an expert...

 These RAID controllers are like unto WinModems--really software does the job,
 which is not a bad thing because it does increase performance, but the
 drivers just aren't there for linux.

 Here is an article I wrote for a LUG about the devices.

 OK if you want a hardware IDE RAID, there is one, and it is OS transparent.

 http://www.arcoide.com/productspages/products.html

 There is nothing else that is a pure hardware IDE RAID.

 Now we have controllers from CMD, Promise, Highpoint, and at least one other
 plus 3ware.  The 3ware controller, while it existed, had GPL drivers.  Those
 are all to some extent Software RAID.  Here's how tey do it:

 Assume this line is your disk space:

 M-

 where M is te master boot record.
 After the controller does its thing,

 MR--R

 where the R are date and timestamp info.  Also your drive has been destroked
 in the BIOS to protect those areas.  There is also a little info there to
 toggle which lie the controller will tell the system about wat is real and
 what is not.

 The result is that you have precisely one RAID extent, because of this
 design.  The R at the front of the disk is useless because LILO stomps all
 over it, but the one at the other end is the one used (originally, only the
 beginning was used so very early controllers are rotally incompatible with
 linux and in fact their RAIDs are destroyed by an attempted install.)

 OK let's look at the software RAIDs

 Hardware  Cards   Linux Software RAID

 Extents 1   16
 RAID Types  0, 1 0+10,1,4,5
 Identical drivesYes Irrelevant
 Volume mgr  No  Volumes can be pieces of
  up to 16 drives
 Setup at installNo, requires kernel modsYes
 Cost$30-100 extra   Your time

 Journaling filesystems will work with both.

 If you really want to use the RAID controller in RAID mode, even after all of
 this, there is some _experimental_ software to do so here:

 http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/pdcraid/

 Of course, this is not for the faint of heart.  The one advantage of having
 this software probably is with Promise FastTrak controllers which do not
 fully work as IDE controllers in linux.  The most useful feature is
 compatibility with Windows RAID for file exchange on a stand-alone dual-boot
 system.  (A small network has better alternatives).

 RAID0 does perform better for two drives as far as access time goes.  It
 performs even better if the drives are on different IDE channels, which is
 achievable with linux Software RAID, but not with the controllers I have
 tested.

 Finally, all of the IDE-RAID controllers are closed-source at this time.
 They may all admit that linux software RAID is better in implementation than
 theirs, but they are sorely afraid of giving their competitiors advantage in
 the Windows market.

 WinRAIDs, anyone?

 Civileme

   
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager

2001-10-19 Thread Ralph Forsythe

At 10:37 PM 10/18/2001 -0500, you wrote:
you have to update your sources first, and even this doesn't always work
correctly.  A freature needs to be added where it looks for the file name,
and if it finds a different version (hopefully newer) it will download that
one instead.  Any chance someone could add that?

mark

Did that ... which is how I've tried multiple servers. :)  I agree, it 
needs some sort of aut-search feature, or a master list of packages and 
their corresponding locations (with some kind of intelligent auto-update 
feature to prevent dead links) in the world that the software can grab as 
part of it's list.

- Ralph




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager

2001-10-18 Thread Mark D'voo

you have to update your sources first, and even this doesn't always work 
correctly.  A freature needs to be added where it looks for the file name, 
and if it finds a different version (hopefully newer) it will download that 
one instead.  Any chance someone could add that?

mark

On Wednesday 17 October 2001 06:28 pm, you wrote:
 So, does anyone else have problems using software manager?  Frequently the
 majority of packages I select to upgrade or install (usually the first)
 fail to fetch from the server I select.  I have tried quite a few servers,
 same results.  Are the files just not there even though SM thinks they
 are?  I have tried this on two different systems as well.

 Any insight would be appreciated. :)

 Thanks,
 Ralph Forsythe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Software Manager

2001-10-18 Thread David E. Fox

 you have to update your sources first, and even this doesn't always work 
 correctly.  A freature needs to be added where it looks for the file name, 

apt (from debian) and apt-get is supposed to be the Right Way to do these
sorts of upgrades. Personally I have little experience with these particular
tools, not having run Debian. But I think that porting it would not be that
major a problem. I've tried a rpm of apt, but it was not usable because the
source path files did not include any decent places to search -- which is 
probably more important than the software itself, is to have a decent sample
paths file to start from. 

It's been suggested numerous times that the debian file format (.deb) is
better suited to these types of problems than the rpm file format -- chiefly
because of dependency issues. Supposedly, one should be able to type 'apt-get
update' and get all files that have changed since the last apt-get, along
with all dependencies - so that if package X gets a new version, it'll get
X and new versions of packages that depend on X, and if those packages have
dependencies of their own, those get downloaded too.

I have yet to try this, and have yet to try urpmi, which is Mandrake's an-
swer to apt-get (I guess). Even with that, you need a good source path
file for it to follow. I have tried rpmfind (with --latest) which 
can occasionally do a good job at getting new versions, but it sometimes
will get bogged down when dependencies (especially complicated ones)
enter the picture.


 

David E. Fox  Thanks for letting me
[EMAIL PROTECTED]change magnetic patterns
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   on your hard disk.
---



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-21 Thread Ken Thompson

On Friday 21 September 2001 05:51 am, you wrote:
 On 21 Sep, Gregor Maier wrote:
  1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs)
 
  then i should be vi / gvim ;-)
  but i'm not sure if gvim requires gtk

 Nope. For something very lightweight, there's always pico...

Jed is very good also


  2. An FTP client
 
  ncftp is a really good tip

 Yep.

  3. CD player

 tcd is the console app for gtcd, the gnome CD player -- oops, requires
 glib. There is also a cd tool called cdplay, which comes with MDK. cdp is
 the console version, cdplay is the non-interactive version.

  4. MP3/Media Player
 
  mpg123.

 Da best!

  5. mpeg/avi player

 mtvp: http://www.mpegtv.com
 xanim: http://xanim.va.pubnix.com/home.html

 L

-- 
Ken Thompson
Payette, Idaho
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ww.nwaa.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-21 Thread Laurent Duperval

On 21 Sep, Gregor Maier wrote:
 1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs) 
 then i should be vi / gvim ;-)
 but i'm not sure if gvim requires gtk
 

Nope. For something very lightweight, there's always pico...

 2. An FTP client 
 ncftp is a really good tip
 

Yep.

 3. CD player 
 

tcd is the console app for gtcd, the gnome CD player -- oops, requires glib.
There is also a cd tool called cdplay, which comes with MDK. cdp is the
console version, cdplay is the non-interactive version. 

 4. MP3/Media Player 
 mpg123.
 

Da best!

 5. mpeg/avi player 
 

mtvp: http://www.mpegtv.com
xanim: http://xanim.va.pubnix.com/home.html

L

-- 
Laurent Duperval mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Il ne sera pas dit qu'un Léonard de mon calibre baisse les bras au pied
levé!
  -Léonard le génie




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread George Jones (IT)
Title: software recommendations





I'm pulling together a list of gui apps for my own little mandrake based installation (P75, 64MB, 540MB HD). I'm looking for apps that do not use QT or GTK+ (I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible, and I probably wouldn't be installing the libraries anyways). I need:

1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs)
2. An FTP client
3. CD player
4. MP3/Media Player
5. mpeg/avi player


I've been playing around with everything that's included with MDK 7.2, but most of the included apps use the aforementioned libraries. Any thoughts?




Re: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread Jaime Herazo B .

Hi. If you accept console tools there are lots of ncurses-based
programs that are very good that fill most of your needs:

* George Jones (IT) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs)
Personally i like vim, but there are lots to choose from.

 2. An FTP client
For a not-so-common choice try mc, you can enter ftp servers with it
doing a cd ftp://some.ftp.server/somedir;

 3. CD player
There are several, don't remember which ones right now (long time i
haven't listened to audio CDs :) )

 4. MP3/Media Player
There are good frontends to mpg123, and you can always use mc :)

 5. mpeg/avi player
I don't really know about those, but as there are commandlinetools for
those there must be some frontends


To sum it up, go to freshmeat.net and start browsing :)


---
Microsoft: Writing viruses has never been easier!
Microsoft: The company that made email dangerous
Microsoft: Having a false sense of security was never so expensive
-
Jaime Herazo Barrios/\
jherazo at geocities dot com\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
ICQ number: 14721935 X  Against HTML Mail,
Yahoo! id: jherazo_1999 / \ and News Too





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread Richard Kuryk
Title: software recommendations



1. 
Jedit - A great java programmers editor

2. 
ncftp - great command line ftp program



  -Original Message-From: George Jones (IT) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 20, 
  2001 11:44 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: 
  [expert] software recommendations
  I'm pulling together a list of gui apps for my own little 
  mandrake based installation (P75, 64MB, 540MB HD). I'm looking for apps that 
  do not use QT or GTK+ (I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible, and I 
  probably wouldn't be installing the libraries anyways). I need:
  1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs) 
  2. An FTP client 3. CD player 
  4. MP3/Media Player 5. mpeg/avi 
  player 
  I've been playing around with everything that's included with 
  MDK 7.2, but most of the included apps use the aforementioned libraries. Any 
  thoughts?


RE: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread George Jones (IT)
Title: RE: [expert] software recommendations





1 2. An FTP client
For a not-so-common choice try mc, you can enter ftp servers with it
doing a cd ftp://some.ftp.server/somedir


HA! Now there's something to try. I use MC quite a bit for quick browsing and configuring. Always thought it would be nice to do more from there. 

George E. Jones IV
Store Systems Support
Borders Group Inc. 





RE: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread Gregor Maier


On 20-Sep-2001 Richard Kuryk wrote:
 1. Jedit - A great java programmers editor
  
 2. ncftp - great command line ftp program
  
 I'm pulling together a list of gui apps for my own little mandrake based
 installation (P75, 64MB, 540MB HD). I'm looking for apps that do not use QT
 or GTK+ (I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible, and I probably
 wouldn't be installing the libraries anyways). I need:
 
 1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs) 
then i should be vi / gvim ;-)
but i'm not sure if gvim requires gtk

 2. An FTP client 
ncftp is a really good tip

 3. CD player 

 4. MP3/Media Player 
mpg123.

 5. mpeg/avi player 

 I've been playing around with everything that's included with MDK 7.2, but
 most of the included apps use the aforementioned libraries. Any thoughts?
 

And have a look a freshmeat.net
--
E-Mail: Gregor Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21-Sep-2001
Time: 07:48:31
--



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] software recommendations

2001-09-20 Thread Seak, Teng-Fong

George Jones (IT) wrote:

 I'm pulling together a list of gui apps for my own little mandrake 
 based installation (P75, 64MB, 540MB HD). I'm looking for apps that do 
 not use QT or GTK+ (I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible, 
 and I probably wouldn't be installing the libraries anyways). I need:

 Do you accept Motif?  If yes, NEdit (included in Mdk 7.2) and xdir 
are answers to 1. and 2.

 1. A decent text editor (Not XEmacs... I hate Emacs)
 2. An FTP client
 3. CD player

 There used to be a simple one, but I forgot its name.  Something 
like cdplayer?

 4. MP3/Media Player

 Don't know

 5. mpeg/avi player

 xanim






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] software manager

2001-08-15 Thread Jerry Sternesky

I did some updates from cooker and now when I run the software manager to try 
and install a package I get bad rpm message.  However, when I drop to the 
cl and do an rpm -Uvh it installs just fine.  Has anyone else encountered 
this?  Any suggestions of what I might need to update to get it working again?

Thanks,

Jerry



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Software Manager Problem

2001-07-11 Thread Nathan Callahan

Hi All,

I just got LM 8.0 Powerpack.  I've been trying to add the CDs as extra 
sources in Software Manager, but it always seems to fail to read the 
second disk that I put in, and the drive becomes unusable until I reboot 
(i/o error is the message that I seem to remember) .

I'm running a Pioneer 16x DVD ROM drive, of an ASUS Mobo (Can't remember 
the model at the moment) with a Slot A 700Mhz Athlon.

Any help greatfully accepted.






[expert] software manager upgrading?

2001-05-28 Thread Dan Swartzendruber


I finally gave up on cooker (for now).  Did a clean install of 8.0
and it seems to work pretty well.  I was going through uninstalling
packages I don't use (using Software Manager), and I noticed something
kind of odd.  I had done an upgrade of a dozen or so packages that were
newer than what was installed on my system.  So now, I'm scrolling through
a list of installed packages, and I notice that, for example, samba
now has a 2.0.7 *and* a 2.0.9 showing up.  Is this deliberate?







[expert] Software and Hardware Inventory

2001-04-30 Thread Alfredo Cole

Hello:

There are several software packages for MSWindows which can assist the 
network administrator to keep track of software and hardware installed at 
each of the clients, but I have not been able to find a similar product for 
Linux. Anybody knows of any who can point the way? Thank you.

-- 
Alfredo J. Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tegucigalpa, Honduras




[expert] Software Manager

2001-04-23 Thread Digital Wokan

Okay, I've got Mandrake 8.0 installed, and now there's this Samba update
out.  Since MandrakeSoft seemed to think MandrakeUpdate was such a bad
thing, I'm trying to figure out this Software Manager they include.  I
got it set for security updates and picked a mirror, but I can't for the
life of me figure out how to install the Samba update without resorting
to ftp and the command line.
This is not a new problem to me.  I tried figuring this out before beta2
even hit the streets.  I had to resort to rpm -Fvh and rpm -Uvh more
often than not.
-- 
Digital Wokan, Tribal Mage of the Electronics Age
Guerilla Linux Warrior




Re: [expert] Software Manager

2001-04-23 Thread Haim Ashkenazi

Hi

well, the new software manager has a lot of problems. where is the search in 
description or file list? but I think the most important problem is the fact that some 
of the packages only appear in flat mode view. some of the most important ones are:
fvwm - my favorite window manager
bind-utils - how come this is not installed by default (even in workstation mode)? 
have you ever heard of a unix without nslookup?
knsplugin - konqueror doesn't accepts netscape plugins without it.
many others that I can't think of now.

I hope they'll fix that soon.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:00:42PM -0700, Digital Wokan wrote:
 Okay, I've got Mandrake 8.0 installed, and now there's this Samba update
 out.  Since MandrakeSoft seemed to think MandrakeUpdate was such a bad
 thing, I'm trying to figure out this Software Manager they include.  I
 got it set for security updates and picked a mirror, but I can't for the
 life of me figure out how to install the Samba update without resorting
 to ftp and the command line.
 This is not a new problem to me.  I tried figuring this out before beta2
 even hit the streets.  I had to resort to rpm -Fvh and rpm -Uvh more
 often than not.
 -- 
 Digital Wokan, Tribal Mage of the Electronics Age
 Guerilla Linux Warrior
 

Bye
-- 
Haim




Re: [expert] Software RAID 5 and data curruption

2001-01-30 Thread jason-snyder

I have done some more experimenting with a 2.4.0 kernel that I hacked together a
little while back a couple of days after 2.4.0 was released.  (I have all of the
drives set to autotune with this 2.4.0 kernel.)  I found that when I ran
'badblocks -wv /dev/md0' on a three disk IDE raid device it report 0 bad blocks
out of 90 million total.  When I tried to build a four disk array with the fourth
disk failed and copy files over, bad stuff happened once again.  Here is an
excerpt out of my /var/log/messages log when I tried to copy files over:

Jan 28 17:21:50 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114184
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_free_blocks:
Freeing blocks in system zones - Block = 1114190, count = 2
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114190
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114191
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114199
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114220
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114222
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114227
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114242
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114243
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114251
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114258
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114267
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114271
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114274
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114279
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114284
Jan 28 17:21:51 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114291
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114117
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114121
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114126
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114137
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114142
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114144
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_free_blocks:
Freeing blocks in system zones - Block = 1114146, count = 1
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114146
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114149
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114153
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114155
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114159
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114166
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114171
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114176
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone - block = 1114178
Jan 28 17:22:47 tick kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_new_block:
Allocating block in system zone 

Re: [expert] Software RAID 5 and data curruption

2001-01-26 Thread Rusty Carruth

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am sending this again seeing that my last post never showed up on the
 list.
 
 My efforts to set up a software raid in my "spare" time has progressed a
 little from last time around, but it seems that I have run into a rather
 significant snag.

That's weird.  Civileme, is this indicatave of a problem with the hard
drive tuning?  (I know that Jason tried -u0, but what do I know, I 
try to stick with scsi most of the time ;-)

I'm not TOO surprised that things worked unusually when running with
one of the drives off, but it would feel much better if it had worked
perfectly, eh? ;-)

The only other thing I could guess is maybe some kind of collision on the
ide bus?  I'm grasping at straws here...  I've done sw raid with scsi
(2 controllers, 3 drives, raid 5 - I said a bit about it a day or so ago)
and it worked fine, but then all I did was set it up, try some performance
tests, then fill the drive up ;-)

Are there any clues in /var/log/messages or friends?

rc


Rusty Carruth  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621  SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX:   (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825
ICBM: 33 20' 44"N   111 53' 47"W




[expert] Software RAID 5 and data curruption

2001-01-25 Thread jason-snyder

I am sending this again seeing that my last post never showed up on the
list.

My efforts to set up a software raid in my "spare" time has progressed a
little from last time around, but it seems that I have run into a rather
significant snag.

I am basing my attempt to build a root software raid 5 on the software
raid HOWTO (http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html).

Here is a list of relevent configurations:
I. Harware
1. Asus K7V m/b with BIOS version 1.007.
2. In-Win Q500 case w/ 300W p/s and 3 1/2 fan rigged to the front of

the chassis blowing over the internel 3 1/2 disk cage.
3. 4 IBM DLTA-307045
4. Promise Ultra100 controller acting as ide[23].
5. Promise Ultra66 controller acting as ide[45].
6. 256 MB of ECC PC133 RAM w/ ECC enabled.
II. Software configuration
1. ide2 is the drive that I live off of for the moment.
2. ide[345] are the test drives.
3. software RAID 5 is what I am shooting for, so if I don't mention
what RAID level I am using assume that.
4. default disk tunning goes as follows unless otherwise specified:
hdparm -u1 -c1 -d1 -X69 /dev/hde
hdparm -u1 -c1 -d1 -X69 /dev/hdg
hdparm -u1 -c1 -d1 -X68 /dev/hdi
hdparm -u1 -c1 -d1 -X68 /dev/hdk
5. Stock mdk 7.2 kernel.

Here is how I first noticed a problem.  I was experimenting with a four
disk RAID 5 with one failed disk.  (Add it in once everything else is
moving smoothly because last disk to add is the disk that I am currently
running off of.)  I got through all of the initial stuff of building a
software raid and I made a copy of my machine to the raid devices using
cp -a.  When I went to boot off of a boot disk I noticed that there
where errors initializing /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 (/dev/md0 is the /
directory and /dev/md1 is the /home directory) and the machine would
kernel panick on boot.  When I booted the normal way I saw that in the
first round /dev/md[01]  got errors on the first round of initialization
while /dev/md[234] didn't and then all devices would get started in a
second round after the / file system was mounted.  When I mounted
/dev/md[01] (mount /dev/md0 test or mount /dev/md1 test) I would get
errors while mounting, but it would mount.  /dev/md[24] (/dev/md3 was
set up as swap) would not give me errors.

This section concerns the stage of confirming a real problem.  The
errors that I got seemed to demand further testing so I umounted all
raid devices and ran e2fsck on /dev/md[0124] and came across hundreds or
maybe even thousands of errors of many types including duplicate
blocks.  (I lost count of how many errors.)  After a little playing
around I went back and typed in hdparm -u0 for all of the disk drives
and tried to recopy the / directory.  When I recopied, umounted the
device and reran e2fsck I got a whole bunch errors like I did before.  I
then went and tried running 'badblocks -wv /dev/md0'.  After a little
while this reported back approximately 1400 bad blocks out of a 6 GB
RAID device.

This section concerns the more thurough testing that I conducted to try
to isolate the problem as best as possible.  After seeing all of those
bad blocks show up on a software RAID device with one disk intentionally
failed, I decided to see what would happen if I distroyed the RAID
devices and test each disk with one standard linux partition per disk
taking up the whole 45 GB disk.  In my first aborted attempt I noticed
that after I started checking the first disk, the other two would
stalled.  This was fixed by re-unmasking the IRQ's for each device
(hdparm -u1 /dev/hd[2345]).  I went and typed in badblocks -wv
/dev/hd[gik]1 for each of the disks again on different virtual terminals
and let them run simaltaniously.  (I noticed that when all disks where
being written to a second or so would go by where nothing was being
flushed to disk and everything else would go and then a flurry of disk
activity that would last a couple of seconds causing everything except
for the blinking curser to pause.  I also noticed when I opened top that
my 800 MHz Athlon was tacked out.)  To my surprise the first disk
(/dev/hdg1) finished a few minutes after the other two, but non of them
incurred any errors.  I then decided to see what would happen if I built
a software RAID five using three disks w/ no failed disks, using the
entire disk for one RAID device.  When I did this and ran 'badblocks -wv
/dev/md0' I came up with a final of 233,604 bad blocks out of 90,069,632
blocks total.  I looked over some of the output and it looked like
series of blocks would be marked bad of seemingly random lengths at
seemingly random intervals.  Plus on sequental passes it looks like
there is no consistancy between where the blocks are marked bad.  When I
checked for blocks in read-only mode I came up with no bad blocks.  When
I checked for bad blocks using the non destructive write mode the first
time around the machine locked up about 15 hours and 50 minutes into the
test.  

[expert] software RAID - disk mirroring restore

2000-11-17 Thread Andy Judge

Does anyone know where I can find an article in RAID 1 restoration when hda
fails?  I can't seem to find anything current.  Thanks

Andy



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Software RAID on root fs

2000-10-24 Thread Marcus

Hello,

I am planning on Trying to configure my linux box as a (Software) RAID 1 box. 
 The only problem I saw was that you cannot just make your root filesystem 
("/")  as a RAID.  Why is that (what's the point of having RAID if your root 
filesystem is not redundant).

I noticed that there are several work arounds on the internet.  Has anyone 
ever tried this?  Please let me know.  Any information on (software) RAID is 
welcome because I never did this before.  

Marcus




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Software

2000-09-28 Thread Richard Humphrey
Title: Software





Does anyone know of a software that runs on Linux that will record keystrokes of another machine on the network?






Re: [expert] Software

2000-09-28 Thread Ron Johnson, Jr.

 Richard Humphrey wrote:
 
 Does anyone know of a software that runs on Linux that will record
 keystrokes of another machine on the network?

Boy, couldn't *that* be used as a great cracking tool...

Wouldn't you need a "keystroke server" (possibly a module in the
kernel, to trap keystrokes), and an open port on the "other machine" 
to capture the strokes and then send them to the collecting machine?

Ron
-- 
+--+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
| Jefferson, LA  USA  WWW : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://ronandheather.dhs.org |
+--+



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Software

2000-09-28 Thread Michael

How would that differ from keystroke logging of users on a given machine
and forwarding that data to a remote machine? If you find such a program
let me know because it's on my list of things to do to make sure users
can't be logged by any trojans etc on our network. :)

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Ken Wahl wrote:

 On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Richard Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Does anyone know of a software that runs on Linux that will record
  keystrokes of another machine on the network?
  
  
  
 
 Don't know of any in particular but a good first place to look might be
 packetstorm   http://packetstorm.securify.com
 
 -- 
 #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-#
 | Ken Wahl, CCNA   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  PGP Key ID:  3CF9AB36 |
 | PGP Public Key:  http://www.ipass.net/~kenwahl/pgpkey.txt |
 #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Powered by Linux Mandrake --=-=-=-=-=-=-#
 
 Linux up 3 days, 14:03, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.04, 0.01
 
 
 
 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Software

2000-09-28 Thread Mwinold

man you just complicat things, a server first of all the program would be 
installed on the system its recording, which works a lot better, sure you 
could try and record a keystroke across the net but the error rate would be a 
little high, if its on the system it can record it then if you modify this 
program it would send a transcript of this to your terminal like in a text 
file, 
but most key loggers are used to record the keystrokes of another user on the 
same computer, or in corperate management where it does what i stated up 
above, to manage their employees use of the system this works on  networks 
but in the internet i wouldnt recomend it

In a message dated 28-Sep-00 14:30:11 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Boy, couldn't *that* be used as a great cracking tool...
 
 Wouldn't you need a "keystroke server" (possibly a module in the
 kernel, to trap keystrokes), and an open port on the "other machine" 
 to capture the strokes and then send them to the collecting machine?
 
 Ron 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Software

2000-09-28 Thread Mwinold

well you may deplore me for suggesting such a thing but check a site called 
hackers.com they have files that can record keystrokes along with other files 
you probably shouldnt use except in certain circumstances, however im not 
sure how many of them will work in linux, but if they have one it will say 
(linux) right next to it


In a message dated 28-Sep-00 11:16:52 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Does anyone know of a software that runs on Linux that will record
 keystrokes of another machine on the network? 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Software RAID

2000-09-26 Thread Russell P. Sutherland

Which versions of Mandrake (if any) have the "new"
software RAID patches (i.e. 0.90 RAID support) compiled
into the distributed kernels?



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Software RAID install

1999-11-25 Thread Scott Patten

I just did a search of the archives and didn't see this.  Sorry if this
has been covered already - I'm new to the list.

I want to install to a software raid device (/dev/md0)  I can create the
device prior to install.  I have a 2.2.13ac kernel with software raid
support that I can place on the install disk.  This will autodetect and
autostart the raid.  So it will be available for the install.  I guess my
question is whether the install system will allow me to use /dev/md0, for
example, instead of /dev/hdx?

I'm trying to avoid using a small install partition and doing the copy
thing.  This system has more drives in it than the box can already handle
and I can't afford to waste the space for an install.

BTW, I'll be booting from a diskette and/or CD after the install.  This is
done bye using root=900.  For those thinking about using software
raid get 2.2.13ac and ignore all the initrd stuff from the How-To.  The
kernel will start the raid if the partition types are set to raid - very
nice.

Thanks,

Scott

---
 Scott Patten  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Wasatch Communications Group   http://www.wasatch.com



[expert] Software RAID on Helios!

1999-09-19 Thread Kit Ngan

Hi,

I found that the Software RAID still problem on Helios...
2.2.13-7mdk!
When I use mkstart /dev/md0, its results error: invaild argument...

Its happen on 2.2.9-19/27, 2.2.11-1, 2.2.13-4/5/7... kernel
But work fine on 2.2.11-2 (but always out of memory)
The final version I can use still 2.2.10-34!

--
Rgds Kit
KB Computer Technology Co.
ICQ: 28280598
http://www.knb.com.hk




Re: [expert] software raid level 1

1999-07-29 Thread drew Roberts

What I was asking, is if it works as supplied in Mandrake 6.0, or if I need to
go further. Can I assume from your post that it does work out of the "box"?

Basically, mkraid aborts with no helpful info. I have read lots of howtos and
other info on the web, but am having problems determining what goes with what,
and a search on the mandrake site for raid turns up nothing.

Using an older version of raidtools, I was able to get md0 greated and added
(mkraid, mdadd?) but  the docs with that version said I needed to then mdrun
and there was no mdrun supplied, nor could I find one.

Basically, what should work? I don't mind poking around some more if I know it
should work.

Thanks for the offer.

drew


On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, you wrote:
 What is not working? I can help if you give me more information with
 your exact problem! Carl
 
 - Original Message -
 From: drew Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 3:40 PM
 Subject: [expert] software raid level 1
 
 
  Has anyone got software raid level 1 to work under mandrake 6.0? It has
 been
  giving me grief for about a week now.
 
  If, so, can you point me in the right direction?
 
  drew
 
 



[expert] software raid level 1

1999-07-28 Thread drew Roberts

Has anyone got software raid level 1 to work under mandrake 6.0? It has been
giving me grief for about a week now.

If, so, can you point me in the right direction?

drew



Re: [expert] software raid level 1

1999-07-28 Thread Carl St-Jacques

What is not working? I can help if you give me more information with
your exact problem! Carl

- Original Message -
From: drew Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 3:40 PM
Subject: [expert] software raid level 1


 Has anyone got software raid level 1 to work under mandrake 6.0? It has
been
 giving me grief for about a week now.

 If, so, can you point me in the right direction?

 drew