[FairfieldLife] RE: O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Emptybill,
 

 I've listened to several singers after Judy made her comment on this thread.  
IMO, Charlotte Church sang it with passion, even though she was still very 
young when she sang this aria.
 

 But Sissel's version made it more understandable because of the subtitles.


[FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
According to a recent OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the
planet's wealth* could all fit onto this bus:

  [Double Decker Bus]

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.ht\
ml
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.h\
tml




[FairfieldLife] RE: O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Judy,
 

 The us refers to the forum members, but I also meant it to mean me, myself 
and I.


[FairfieldLife] Re: O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

  The us refers to the forum members, but I also meant it to mean me,
myself and I.

The good thing about multiple personality disorder is that you've always
got someone to talk to. Also, masturbation is less lonely because you
can always get one of the others to do it for you.   :-)










[FairfieldLife] Ringo Starr recognized for 'Lifetime of Peace Love'

2014-01-21 Thread nablusoss1008

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2014/01/20/ringo-starr-recognized-for-lifetime-of-peace-and-love/4666879/
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2014/01/20/ringo-starr-recognized-for-lifetime-of-peace-and-love/4666879/

[FairfieldLife] HFCS: Japan's retaliation?

2014-01-21 Thread cardemaister
Japan's unintentional retaliation for H-shima and N-sagi?

Wikipedia:

HFCS was first introduced by Richard O. Marshall 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_O._Marshallaction=editredlink=1
 and Earl R. Kooi 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earl_R._Kooiaction=editredlink=1 in 
1957. They were, however, unsuccessful in making it viable for mass production, 
primarily because the glucose-isomerizing activity they discovered required 
arsenate, which was highly toxic to human.[21] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_fructose_corn_syrup#cite_note-21 The glucose 
(xylose) isomerase that did not require arsenate ion for its catalytic activity 
and thus was industrially feasible was first discovered by Dr. Kei Yamanaka 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kei_Yamanakaaction=editredlink=1, 
Kagawa University, Japan, in 1961.[22] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_fructose_corn_syrup#cite_note-22[23] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_fructose_corn_syrup#cite_note-23 The 
industrial production process and creation was made by Dr. Yoshiyuki Takasaki 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoshiyuki_Takasakiaction=editredlink=1
 at the Agency of Industrial Science and Technology of Ministry of 
International Trade and Industry of Japan in 1965–1970. HFCS was rapidly 
introduced to many processed foods and soft drinks 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drink in the U.S. from about 1975 to 1985.



Re: [FairfieldLife] O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
John, it is a beautiful melody and her voice is extraordinarily lovely. But the 
words! For me, they were quite mundane and did not at all match the deeply 
moving quality of the melody. Maybe I'll write new ones!




On Monday, January 20, 2014 8:21 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
Sissel sings this classical song with English subtitles.  The translation gives 
an extra dimension to this song.  Let us know what you think?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1YKBrUqwIU



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and beards?

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
And you put the fate of the world in those people's hands?

On Tue, 1/21/14, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and 
beards?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 3:21 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
First time ever I
was kicked out of the Domes was for facial hair.
They changed the guideline on facial hair after some
 while.
(So much for administrative 'purity of the
 teaching').
  Second or Third time out was for seeing saints.
They subsequently granted me (only) an exemption.
Jai Gurus Dev,
-Buck in the Dome
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 cardemaister@... wrote:
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and beards?

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
I have a buddy who is a long time TM'er - years ago he went to see Muktananda, 
some kind of retreat - the first time he saw the swami, he was lecturing, Bill 
got to sit pretty close, it was a morning lecture. Bill said he really didn't 
feel any energy or anything during the event, But afterwards, one of the female 
disciples went to where one of Muktananda's number one or two men had been 
sitting drinking coffee, and she took the coffee cup and went around offering 
everyone a little of the coffee  - the theory was this male disciple was so 
steeped in the energy of Swami Muktananda, if you put some drops of his coffee 
in your mouth, you would git some real good vibes and blessings. Bil declined 
the offer. I reckon that gal thought the male coffee drinker was some kind-a 
saint.

On Tue, 1/21/14, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and 
beards?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 3:35 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
 
 
First time ever I
was kicked out of the Domes was for facial hair.
They changed the guideline on facial hair after some
 while.
(So much for administrative 'purity of the
 teaching').
  Second or Third time out was for seeing saints.
They subsequently granted me (only) an exemption.
Jai Gurus Dev,
-Buck in the DomeHow many times do I have to
 tell you Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS SAINTS. Get over
 it. Go stare your horse in the face, look in his eyes and
 tell me this is not the most sublime, the deepest thing you
 will ever see. Collecting the ashy crap emanating from some
 fake's toes or feet or whatever it was you said you saw
 is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer, you need to
 get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the
 cornfields to somewhere imaginary and strange.
 
  ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@...
 wrote:
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off 
the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
 
 
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:

 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we managed
to get all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened them with
driving the bus off a cliff with them on it unless they signed over all
of their money to the poor people they fucked over to get it. After they
signed, then we'd take the signed papers, get off the bus and push it
over the edge anyway, and then redistribute the funds.

But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to sit
through The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with
everything said in the open letter
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2013/12/26/an-open-letter-to-the-maker\
s-of-the-wolf-of-wall-street-and-the-wolf-himself   written by
Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life scumbags who worked
with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that Martin Scorcese,
Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers who glorified greed
and immorality in this film should be sentenced to spend the rest of
their lives doing community service by making movies about the little
people these real-life scumbags ripped off, and whose lives they
ruined.

Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even
*seen* misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman in
the film who isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more
rube to be fucked and fucked over. I literally had to take a shower
after watching it.

The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole. Yes,
he has made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed,
corruption, and misogyny (although the only ones I can think of right
now are Hugo, The Last Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but
those subjects have been the focus of and the preoccupation of almost
*all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a director out of 55 *not*
about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be about Frank Sinatra.
What a fuckin' waste of creative talents.

 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:

  Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus
or off the bus?
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM

According to a recent
  OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
  wealth* could all fit onto this bus:

 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.ht\
ml
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.h\
tml




[FairfieldLife] Ringo Starr Honored With David Lynch Foundation's 'Lifetime Of Peace Love Award'

2014-01-21 Thread nablusoss1008

 With David Lynch, Jim Carrey
 
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video/9751038-ringo-starr-honored-with-david-lynch-foundations-lifetime-of-peace-love-award/
 
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video/9751038-ringo-starr-honored-with-david-lynch-foundations-lifetime-of-peace-love-award/


Re: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.
 

 Smart man.
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off 
the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
 
 
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 



[FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

 Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we managed to get 
all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened them with driving the 
bus off a cliff with them on it unless they signed over all of their money to 
the poor people they fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take 
the signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then 
redistribute the funds. 
 

 I love the we part. As if the average human being wouldn't pocket the 
ransacked money and make off with it themselves. Rich or poor, the basic 
instinct is to survive and to survive in style. Those who claim they wouldn't 
love an extra $1,000,000 in the bank are fooling themselves. Granted, many are 
loathe to cheat and steal their way to accessing this and many would consider a 
billion dollars a little unnecessary but greed, avarice and the love of the 
good life is, to some extent, in all of us. Take a guy like Leonardo in his 
role as the Wolf, take away his gazillions and he'd still be the loan shark, 
the pimp or the drug dealer clawing his way toward his idea of fame and 
fortune. You don't have to be rich to embody all sorts of loathsome traits.

But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to sit through 
The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with everything said in the 
open letter 
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2013/12/26/an-open-letter-to-the-makers-of-the-wolf-of-wall-street-and-the-wolf-himself
  written by Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life scumbags who 
worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that Martin Scorcese, 
Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers who glorified greed and 
immorality in this film should be sentenced to spend the rest of their lives 
doing community service by making movies about the little people these 
real-life scumbags ripped off, and whose lives they ruined.

Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even *seen* 
misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman in the film who 
isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more rube to be fucked and 
fucked over. I literally had to take a shower after watching it. 

The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole. Yes, he has 
made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed, corruption, and 
misogyny (although the only ones I can think of right now are Hugo, The Last 
Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but those subjects have been the focus of 
and the preoccupation of almost *all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a 
director out of 55 *not* about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be 
about Frank Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents. 
 

 I could tell this film was worth a big miss by watching 2 minutes of the 
trailer. It looked like an indulgent mess on everyone's part.
  
  
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off 
 the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
 According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
I like this part the best:

After they signed, then we'd take the signed papers, get off the bus and push 
it over the edge anyway, and then redistribute the funds.

Hee hee! And I didn't know he was doing a film about Frankie - I wonder what 
kind of portrayal he'll give? I once read something about him that said he 
loved and admired mobsters - he once told friends that he'd rather be a bag man 
for the mafia than a big shot entertainer. And these are the people our society 
glorifies.

On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or 
off the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 1:58 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson 
 wrote:
 
  I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin
 rich folk.
 
 Personally, I suspect that the
 planet would be better off if we managed to get all 85 of
 these people on one bus, and then threatened them with
 driving the bus off a cliff with them on it unless they
 signed over all of their money to the poor people they
 fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take
 the signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge
 anyway, and then redistribute the funds. 
 
 But that may just be how I feel today, after having been
 forced to sit through The Wolf Of Wall Street. I
 now completely agree with everything said in the open
 letter  written by Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the
 real-life scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan
 Belfort. I think that Martin Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio,
 and all of the other producers who glorified greed and
 immorality in this film should be sentenced to spend the
 rest of their lives doing community service by
 making movies about the little people these
 real-life scumbags ripped off, and whose lives they ruined.
 
 Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really
 haven't even *seen* misogyny until you've seen this
 movie. There is not a woman in the film who isn't
 portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more rube to be
 fucked and fucked over. I literally had to take a shower
 after watching it. 
 
 The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as
 a whole. Yes, he has made the occasional film that
 *doesn't* celebrate greed, corruption, and misogyny
 (although the only ones I can think of right now are
 Hugo, The Last Temptation of Christ,
 and Kundun), but those subjects have been the
 focus of and the preoccupation of almost *all* of his other
 films. Only 3 films as a director out of 55 *not* about
 slimeballs. And his next film is going to be about Frank
 Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents. 
   
  
  On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
  
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's
 Are you on the bus or off the bus?
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
   
 According to a recent
   OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the
 planet's
   wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
   
   http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
Ann, I agree that there's an instinct to survive. But I don't think there's an 
instinct to survive in style, as you say. I think anything beyond basic 
survival needs is conditioned into us by the people and circumstances of our 
childhood. Remember the significance of Rosebud in Citizen Kane? Of course 
we're also hugely conditioned by our culture and this conditioning, from what 
I've read, spreads to the remotest corners of the earth via TV, etc. Supposedly 
Dallas was one of the most popular shows in Saudia Arabia! 

I think it's a matter of degree. I would wish for everyone on earth to have 
their basic needs met and even be comfortable. But I've seen pictures of solid 
gold doors in Dubai. Does someone really need a solid gold door to their house 
in order to be comfortable?! 

I admit I don't understand how such an imbalance continues decade after decade. 
There are people who collect very expensive cars for a hobby. And there are 
babies starving to death every day. I don't understand how this continues.





On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:22 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:


 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we managed to get 
all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened them with driving the 
bus off a cliff with them on it unless they signed over all of their money to 
the poor people they fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take 
the signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then 
redistribute the funds. 

I love the we part. As if the average human being wouldn't pocket the 
ransacked money and make off with it themselves. Rich or poor, the basic 
instinct is to survive and to survive in style. Those who claim they wouldn't 
love an extra $1,000,000 in the bank are fooling themselves. Granted, many are 
loathe to cheat and steal their way to accessing this and many would consider a 
billion dollars a little unnecessary but greed, avarice and the love of the 
good life is, to some extent, in all of us. Take a guy like Leonardo in his 
role as the Wolf, take away his gazillions and he'd still be the loan shark, 
the pimp or the drug dealer clawing his way toward his idea of fame and 
fortune. You don't have to be rich to embody all sorts of loathsome traits.

But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to sit through 
The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with everything said in the 
open letter  written by Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life 
scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that Martin 
Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers who glorified greed 
and immorality in this film should be sentenced to spend the rest of their 
lives doing community service by making movies about the little people 
these real-life scumbags ripped off, and whose lives they ruined.

Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even *seen* 
misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman in the film who 
isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more rube to be fucked and 
fucked over. I literally had to take a shower after watching it. 

The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole. Yes, he has 
made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed, corruption, and 
misogyny (although the only ones I can think of right now are Hugo, The Last 
Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but those subjects have been the focus of 
and the preoccupation of almost *all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a 
director out of 55 *not* about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be 
about Frank Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents. 

I could tell this film was worth a big miss by watching 2 minutes of the 
trailer. It looked like an indulgent mess on everyone's part.
  

 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off 
 the bus?
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
According to a recent
  OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
  wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Well, obviously there is virtue and there is vice and there are our spiritual 
practices of discipline to free the soul of the indentations of the subtle 
system created of vice. Some people are brought up badly. Fortunate though are 
those whom have good teachers who know better and can give spiritual help to 
others. Service to others is the great virtue as it undoes vice. Seek good 
company. Do good. Come to a group transcending meditation near you. So says the 
science. The whole purpose of life is to gain enlightenment. Nothing else is
significant compared to that completely natural, exalted state of consciousness.
So always strive for that. Set your life around that goal. Don't get caught up
in small things, and then it will be yours. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi 
 
 


[FairfieldLife] RE: Girish Varma's judicial remand extended

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
  Girish, our partner in India: 
http://globalpeaceproject.net/about-us/our-partner-in-india/ 
http://globalpeaceproject.net/about-us/our-partner-in-india/ 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:

 Reading now, 1978 World Government News noticable then the World Government at 
the top included Indians: Rt. Hon. Kirti Shrivastava Rt. Hon. Praveen 
Shrivastava and Rt. Hon. Brahmachari Nandkishore 
 “After the maharishi’s death in 2008, his vast empire of educational and other 
institutions in India and abroad was shared among various members of the 
family.” See: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/370423 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/370423 
 
 
 Nandkishore evidently was not family and apparently is out. 
 Do these other families have controlling interests in estates there like 
Girish Varma that are also extra-territorial to the SBS Trust and SBS 
Foundation? The Shankaracharya? How much got away and is out of control of the 
SBS enclosures that were created at the end stage of Maharishi's life?  
 There do NOT seem to be names of Indian families now with the SBS Boards. Are 
there villas in the names of these families in India like Girish's? Is there an 
Indian who can be trusted in TM? Evidently needs a little more transparency on 
the part of SBS Foundation and Trusts. 
 
http://globalpeaceproject.net/about-us/the-foundation/brahmananda-saraswati-foundatio-board-of-directors/
 
http://globalpeaceproject.net/about-us/the-foundation/brahmananda-saraswati-foundatio-board-of-directors/
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Spiritual Warfare Begins Within,
 

 In Field Effect of consciousness.
 
 As much as for just purely Selfish reasons, Being good communitarians and good 
citizens we all should be going to nearby group meditations to join with others 
in group transcending meditation, so the science says. Numbers and proximity do 
matter to everyone's spiritual well-being, so the science says.  
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck. wrote:

 Well, obviously there is virtue and there is vice and there are our spiritual 
practices of discipline to free the soul of the indentations of the subtle 
system created of vice. Some people are brought up badly. Fortunate though are 
those whom have good teachers who know better and can give spiritual help to 
others. Service to others is the great virtue as it undoes vice. Seek good 
company. Do good. Come to a group transcending meditation near you. So says the 
science. The whole purpose of life is to gain enlightenment. Nothing else is
significant compared to that completely natural, exalted state of consciousness.
So always strive for that. Set your life around that goal. Don't get caught up
in small things, and then it will be yours. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
Si, John, Italian is a beautiful sounding language. Thanks for the detailed 
explanation of how the words of the song fit into the plot.

Today we're experiencing Polar Vortex II! But the sun is shining so that helps 
a little.





On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:11 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
Share,

Yes, it's a very emotional song but I didn't understand the words until 
Sissel's video version came along.  As we can see, the story is fairly simple:  
the girl asks her father for permission to get married.  If not, she'll jump 
off a bridge to the waters below.  You probably can write the English lyrics to 
fit the melody.  But I still like the Italian lyrics to give it the opera 
flavor.  Si?


Re: [FairfieldLife] O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Share,
 

 Yes, it's a very emotional song but I didn't understand the words until 
Sissel's video version came along.  As we can see, the story is fairly simple:  
the girl asks her father for permission to get married.  If not, she'll jump 
off a bridge to the waters below.  You probably can write the English lyrics to 
fit the melody.  But I still like the Italian lyrics to give it the opera 
flavor.  Si?


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and beards?

2014-01-21 Thread doctordumbass
lol- I think I'll try that, over at the local Starbucks this morning, and see 
how long it takes, before the cops show up.
No, really, I meditated over it...
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

 I have a buddy who is a long time TM'er - years ago he went to see Muktananda, 
some kind of retreat - the first time he saw the swami, he was lecturing, Bill 
got to sit pretty close, it was a morning lecture. Bill said he really didn't 
feel any energy or anything during the event, But afterwards, one of the female 
disciples went to where one of Muktananda's number one or two men had been 
sitting drinking coffee, and she took the coffee cup and went around offering 
everyone a little of the coffee - the theory was this male disciple was so 
steeped in the energy of Swami Muktananda, if you put some drops of his coffee 
in your mouth, you would git some real good vibes and blessings. Bil declined 
the offer. I reckon that gal thought the male coffee drinker was some kind-a 
saint.
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... 
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and 
beards?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 3:35 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
 
 
 First time ever I
 was kicked out of the Domes was for facial hair.
 They changed the guideline on facial hair after some
 while.
 (So much for administrative 'purity of the
 teaching').
 Second or Third time out was for seeing saints.
 They subsequently granted me (only) an exemption.
 Jai Gurus Dev,
 -Buck in the DomeHow many times do I have to
 tell you Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS SAINTS. Get over
 it. Go stare your horse in the face, look in his eyes and
 tell me this is not the most sublime, the deepest thing you
 will ever see. Collecting the ashy crap emanating from some
 fake's toes or feet or whatever it was you said you saw
 is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer, you need to
 get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the
 cornfields to somewhere imaginary and strange.
 
 ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
cardemaister@...
 wrote:
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/ 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/ 



[FairfieldLife] RE: O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
You know,  you can find English translations of the lyrics of most famous opera 
arias on the Web. Just do a search for English lyrics [title of aria].
 

 

 Emptybill,

 

 I've listened to several singers after Judy made her comment on this thread.  
IMO, Charlotte Church sang it with passion, even though she was still very 
young when she sang this aria.
 

 But Sissel's version made it more understandable because of the subtitles.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, I agree that there's an instinct to survive. But I don't think there's an 
instinct to survive in style, as you say. I think anything beyond basic 
survival needs is conditioned into us by the people and circumstances of our 
childhood. Remember the significance of Rosebud in Citizen Kane? Of course 
we're also hugely conditioned by our culture and this conditioning, from what 
I've read, spreads to the remotest corners of the earth via TV, etc. Supposedly 
Dallas was one of the most popular shows in Saudia Arabia! 
 

 I am not sure about the conditioning aspect with regard to wanting that 
little bit of style. I have lived in converted (barely) garages, I have lived 
in basement suites with no natural light, I have lived in mouse-infested and 
rat-infested temporary hovels and virtual shacks for one reason or another at 
various times (one of those times was when we were building our current house 
and we lived in the small 1935 hut/house for 16 months). Believe me, I have 
experienced some pretty basic living conditions in the US and in Canada 
(including the most cockroach-infested apartment on the second floor of the one 
of the buildings around the square in FF during the late 70's.) And while I 
don't require solid gold doors, hardwood instead of old lino floors is nice, 
glass instead of plastic cups is preferable and a toilet that is not stained 
brown and flushes properly is my choice, in a pinch. We are talking about 
relative degrees here, not so much absurd levels where someone feels anything 
less than four houses and three yachts is unthinkable. Style can simply mean 
aesthetic over bare minimum.

I think it's a matter of degree. I would wish for everyone on earth to have 
their basic needs met and even be comfortable. But I've seen pictures of solid 
gold doors in Dubai. Does someone really need a solid gold door to their house 
in order to be comfortable?! 
 

 You are actually reinforcing my point with your examples: people tend to 
spiral toward absurdity, toward more and toward better and a level of 
consumption that can begin to border on obscene. And we are not simply talking 
about the rich, we are talking about the guy in Dubai (your example) or the 
kid on the streets of some tough city whose idea of heaven is owning a big car 
and wearing lots of gold jewelry and might do just about anything to obtain 
those things. 

I admit I don't understand how such an imbalance continues decade after decade. 
There are people who collect very expensive cars for a hobby. And there are 
babies starving to death every day. I don't understand how this continues.
 

 Because it appears to be human nature, or at least the nature of a fairly 
large percentage of humans. MMY talked about this, we tend to move in the 
direction of greater and greater happiness and bliss, like little monkeys. It's 
just that for many, this idea of bliss is in the form of collecting and 
surrounding themselves with more and more stuff. And we haven't even touched on 
the subject of the power hungry. 
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:22 AM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... 
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

 Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we managed to get 
all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened them with driving the 
bus off a cliff with them on it unless they signed over all of their money to 
the poor people they fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take 
the signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then 
redistribute the funds. 
 

 I love the we part. As if the average human being wouldn't pocket the 
ransacked money and make off with it themselves. Rich or poor, the basic 
instinct is to survive and to survive in style. Those who claim they wouldn't 
love an extra $1,000,000 in the bank are fooling themselves. Granted, many are 
loathe to cheat and steal their way to accessing this and many would consider a 
billion dollars a little unnecessary but greed, avarice and the love of the 
good life is, to some extent, in all of us. Take a guy like Leonardo in his 
role as the Wolf, take away his gazillions and he'd still be the loan shark, 
the pimp or the drug dealer clawing his way toward his idea of fame and 
fortune. You don't have to be rich to embody all sorts of loathsome traits.

But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to sit through 
The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with everything said in the 
open letter 
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2013/12/26/an-open-letter-to-the-makers-of-the-wolf-of-wall-street-and-the-wolf-himself
  written by Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life scumbags who 
worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. 

Re: [FairfieldLife] O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
That was a literal translation, Share. And not even a singable translation. Of 
course it isn't going to be as poetic as the original Italian.
 

 But if you have a literal translation to compare with the Italian lyrics, it's 
not hard to follow the Italian, and then you get the poetry and the drama.
 

  John, it is a beautiful melody and her voice is extraordinarily lovely. But 
the words! For me, they were quite mundane and did not at all match the deeply 
moving quality of the melody. Maybe I'll write new ones! 

 
 
 On Monday, January 20, 2014 8:21 PM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Sissel sings this classical song with English subtitles.  The translation 
gives an extra dimension to this song.  Let us know what you think?
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1YKBrUqwIU 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1YKBrUqwIU

 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Jim Carrey: The Power of Consciousness

2014-01-21 Thread nablusoss1008

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P779XJEq6vg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P779XJEq6vg
 

 RUSSELL BRAND ADDICTED TO CONSCIOUSNESS:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hp6Og18OYTM 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hp6Og18OYTM
 

 Stern Interviews Russell Brand :
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U
 



[FairfieldLife] many good reasons to return to...eating bugs!

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
http://www.upworthy.com/watch-the-food-youre-probably-not-eating-for-all-the-wrong-reasons-8?c=upw1


[FairfieldLife] RE: O Mio Babbino Caro

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
Much better, thank you.
 
 Since it is opera why not listen to it sung by some of the best mezzos?
 

 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow1niq0mOwE 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow1niq0mOwE
  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU3bJ5JJhlw 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU3bJ5JJhlw




Re: [FairfieldLife] Advaita is about inherent freedom

2014-01-21 Thread Richard Williams
To reiterate - the term maya in Advaita Vedanta is not real, yet not
unreal; it is neither both nor neither. Maya in Advaita Vedanta is real in
the sense that it is presented to us, but not real in the absolute sense.
According to Shankara, maya is a superimposition on the real.

Apparently there are no Vedanta scholars posting to this list, so lets just
break it down and make it simple for people to understand: TM practice is
yoga - based on the tantras and not on the Advaita Vedanta. MMY did not
emphasize the notion that maya is illusion - that notion would be totally
counter-productive for ordinary householders.

Shankara's Advaita Vedanta is based on Sri Vidya and Kashmere Trika. It is
a restatement of Buddhist Vijnanvada, which takes the ultimate reality to
be pure consciousness, vijnana in Sanskrit. Liberation or moksha is
release by aquiring vidya - knowledge. The term advaita in Sansrit
means not-two - nondual idealism. Advaita Vedanta is the identity of the
true Self, Atman, which is pure consciousness.

Excerpt from vijnApti matratA siddhi by vasAabAndhu:

Reality is Pure Conciousness; external objects
do not exist outside thought. Reality can be
directly realized by transcending the
subject-object duality. (vimshAtika-Vrtti on kArikA 1 - Sharma).

So, let's review what we  know:

The first historical proponent of Advaita Vedanta was the Adi Guru, Shri
Gaudapadacharya, the teacher of Shankara and his teacher, Shri
Govindacharya. Gaudapadacharya composed the Mandukya-Karika, the first
treatise on non-dual consciousness, in which three states of consciousness
are enumerated, and a transcendental state, turiya, which in Sanskrit
means fourth.

Excerpt from Mandukya Karia by Gaudapada:

Duality is only an appearance; non-duality is
the real truth. The object exists as an object
for the knowing subject; but it does not exist
outside of consciousness because the distinction
of subject and object is within consciousness
(IV 25-27 - Sharma).

Shankaracharya founded ten sannyasin orders including the Saraswati;
Shankara founded four seats of learning including the monestery at
Sringeri. The guru of Swami Brahmananda Saraswati was Swami Krishnananda
Saraswati, both highly accomplished siddha yogis who followed the Sri Vidya
tradition. SBS's student was Swami Hariharananda Saraswati (Karpatri Swami)
a proponent of the non-dual Sri Vidya. MMY studied and learned yoga
meditation under SBS for thirteen years and then founded the TMO.

In 1968 MMY visited Srinagar with his students on TTC, and meditated in a
group with Swami Lakmanjoo, the last guru of the Kasmere tantric system.
Kashmere Shaivism is a form of transcendental, realistic idealism; a form
of absolute monism. According to Kashmere Shaivism, 'Cit' is pure
consciousness - the One Reality. The term trika in Sanskrit means three,
refering to the three states of consciousness, called in Sri Vidya the
three cities.

Works cited:

'A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy'
by Chandrahar Sharma, M.A., D. Phil., D. Litt., LL.B.,
Shastri, Dept. of Phil., Benares Hindu U.
Rider, 1960
p. 245-246.

'A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy'
by Chandrahar Sharma, M.A., D. Phil., D. Litt.,
LL.B., Shastri
Dept. of Phil., Benares Hindu University
Rider, 1960.
p. 114.

'The Secret of the Three Cities'
An Introduction to Hindu Sakta Tantrism
by Douglas Renfrew Brooks
University Of Chicago Press, 1990

Hariharananda Saraswati:

He was also the great expert of Shree Vidya and probably all the present
day experts in Varanasi have somehow or the other obtained Shree vidya from
him or his pupils.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Karpatri


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:05 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:



 This reply demonstrates that you are either unable to understand the post
 or you didn't read it. It also shows that you are probably unqualified to
 study advaita.

 The post was about Advaita - not Kashmiri Trika or Shri Vidya.Your reply
 is merely inane. Don't sully this one with your quasimoto,
 pseudo-professorial bullshit.
  



[FairfieldLife] Russel Brand on Kathy Perry, sex and Transcendental Meditation

2014-01-21 Thread nablusoss1008

 Stern Interviews Russell Brand:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U
 

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: many good reasons to return to...eating bugs!

2014-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:


http://www.upworthy.com/watch-the-food-youre-probably-not-eating-for-all\
-the-wrong-reasons-8?c=upw1
http://www.upworthy.com/watch-the-food-youre-probably-not-eating-for-al\
l-the-wrong-reasons-8?c=upw1

Growing up in Morocco, I had a number of Arab friends, who would
occasionally invite me to dinner at one of their houses (and
occasionally even in tents in the Sahara). I had been briefed before
attending by mutual friends who made it clear to me that refusing to eat
what was served to me was an insult of the highest order, so I managed
to fairly gracefully expand my food horizons by doing what I'd been told
to do. Suffice it to say that camels are not only for riding. :-)

Thus I got to experience the delicacy of chocolate-covered ants. Does
anyone remember the candy you used to be able to get in movie theaters
called Raisinets? Well, they were sorta like that, but crunchy. And,
to be perfectly honest, they were a bit of a high, probably because of
the large amounts of protein and formic acid. Go figure.

They ranked way down on the list of Weirdest Things I Was Ever Served,
however. The top of the list, to this day, was a tasty soup served to me
in a large ceramic Moroccan bowl that gave me the eye -- literally --
when it was placed in front of me. Floating on top of the tasty broth
were several sheep's eyeballs. Given the gusto with which the other
guests were busy devouring this delicacy, I kinda figured that this was
one of those where the rubber meets the road culinary moments in which
I kinda had to go there or risk offending my fairly wealthy and
influential hosts. So I did. I will spare everyone the details of what
it's really like to bite into a boiled eyeball, except to say that I
survived. :-)





[FairfieldLife] Games People Play

2014-01-21 Thread Richard Williams
[image: Inline image 1]

We used to play video games on a TV set. Then we got an Atari game console.
Then, there's the XBox, SONY Play Station and the Nintendo Wi game console.
But these days kids and adults want to play games on their smartphone or
tablet. Go figure.

Pong (marketed as PONG) is one of the earliest arcade video games; it is a
tennis sports game featuring simple two-dimensional graphics. While other
arcade video games such as Computer Space came before it, Pong was one of
the first video games to reach mainstream popularity.

Pong:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pong

'Nintendo’s Iwata Under Fire After Missing Wii U Forecast'
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-21/nintendo-s-iwata-under-fire-after-failing-to-meet-wii-u-pledge.html?cmpid=yhoo


Re: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu

They won't let you on their bus.

On 01/21/2014 04:12 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:


I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:

Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus 
or off the bus?

To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM


























According to a recent
OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
wealth* could all fit onto this bus:



http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html































[FairfieldLife] Russel Brand on Sex with 2 girls with rubber, the lovely mother of Kathy Perry and Transcendental Meditation

2014-01-21 Thread nablusoss1008


 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U
 

 I knew you would finally click this link :-)


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
And this is why some folks didn't get what I meant by using the term 
scam the other day with reference to people in Silicon Valley.  It's 
been very interesting to watch (as well as be part of) the excesses of 
wealth in the area where VC's (also known as Vulture Capitalists by 
the old timers) throw money at startups.


One con game that is popular here is 1) putting together some wild idea 
and then 2) getting the VC's to invest in it, 3) folding the company 
when the VC funding runs out and then go back to step 1 again and repeat 
the process.  Occasionally one of the wild ideas does take off at which 
point a really big company will come along and buy it out.


Regarding the rich, I did know a couple of children of an old money 
family.  Before they were allowed access to their trusts they had to go 
out and prove that they knew the value of money by supporting 
themselves.  True, this was a very liberal family line and pro the 
people.  I suspect the conservative rich raise their kids to be pirates 
and to rape and plunder.


On 01/21/2014 08:30 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

Ann, I agree that there's an instinct to survive. But I don't think 
there's an instinct to survive in style, as you say. I think 
anything beyond basic survival needs is conditioned into us by the 
people and circumstances of our childhood. Remember the significance 
of Rosebud in Citizen Kane? Of course we're also hugely conditioned 
by our culture and this conditioning, from what I've read, spreads to 
the remotest corners of the earth via TV, etc. Supposedly Dallas was 
one of the most popular shows in Saudia Arabia!


I am not sure about the conditioning aspect with regard to wanting 
that little bit of style. I have lived in converted (barely) 
garages, I have lived in basement suites with no natural light, I have 
lived in mouse-infested and rat-infested temporary hovels and virtual 
shacks for one reason or another at various times (one of those times 
was when we were building our current house and we lived in the small 
1935 hut/house for 16 months). Believe me, I have experienced some 
pretty basic living conditions in the US and in Canada (including the 
most cockroach-infested apartment on the second floor of the one of 
the buildings around the square in FF during the late 70's.) And while 
I don't require solid gold doors, hardwood instead of old lino floors 
is nice, glass instead of plastic cups is preferable and a toilet that 
is not stained brown and flushes properly is my choice, in a pinch. We 
are talking about relative degrees here, not so much absurd levels 
where someone feels anything less than four houses and three yachts is 
unthinkable. Style can simply mean aesthetic over bare minimum.


I think it's a matter of degree. I would wish for everyone on earth to 
have their basic needs met and even be comfortable. But I've seen 
pictures of solid gold doors in Dubai. Does someone really need a 
solid gold door to their house in order to be comfortable?!


You are actually reinforcing my point with your examples: people tend 
to spiral toward absurdity, toward more and toward better and a 
level of consumption that can begin to border on obscene. And we are 
not simply talking about the rich, we are talking about the guy in 
Dubai (your example) or the kid on the streets of some tough city 
whose idea of heaven is owning a big car and wearing lots of gold 
jewelry and might do just about anything to obtain those things.


I admit I don't understand how such an imbalance continues decade 
after decade. There are people who collect very expensive cars for a 
hobby. And there are babies starving to death every day. I don't 
understand how this continues.


Because it appears to be human nature, or at least the nature of a 
fairly large percentage of humans. MMY talked about this, we tend to 
move in the direction of greater and greater happiness and bliss, like 
little monkeys. It's just that for many, this idea of bliss is in 
the form of collecting and surrounding themselves with more and more 
stuff. And we haven't even touched on the subject of the power hungry.




On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:22 AM, awoelflebater@... 
awoelflebater@... wrote:




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:


 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

*/Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we
managed to get all 85 of these people on one bus, and then
threatened them with driving the bus off a cliff with them on it
unless they signed over all of their money to the poor people they
fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take the
signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge anyway,
and then redistribute the funds. /*

*/
/*
*I love the we part. As if the average human 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
Oh, but that would be taking other people's money  which we all know 
they worked so hard for.:-D


Actually I suspect Scorsese probably would say he got his desired effect 
with you.  I haven't seen the film yet as I relegated it to the BD 
rental phase.


You are not alone in your reaction to the Oxfram study (which I posted 
here yesterday) as I heard several radio commentators say the same 
thing.  Just take their money and redistribute it.  As I see it the the 
rich, like dogs, have so soiled their capitalist beds that the penalty 
should be global socialism for the next 400 years.  Doesn't have to be 
mean, authoritarian or totalitarian. Could be very transcendental and 
pleasant.


But looking at the weather, the coming drought and famine there might 
not be anyone around in 40 years let alone 400.



On 01/21/2014 05:58 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:

 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

*/Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we 
managed to get all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened 
them with driving the bus off a cliff with them on it unless they 
signed over all of their money to the poor people they fucked over to 
get it. After they signed, then we'd take the signed papers, get off 
the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then redistribute the 
funds.


But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to sit 
through The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with 
everything said in the open letter 
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2013/12/26/an-open-letter-to-the-makers-of-the-wolf-of-wall-street-and-the-wolf-himself  
written by /**/Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life 
scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that 
Martin Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers who 
glorified greed and immorality in this film should be sentenced to 
spend the rest of their lives doing community service by making 
movies about the little people these real-life scumbags ripped off, 
and whose lives they ruined.


Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even 
*seen* misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman in 
the film who isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more 
rube to be fucked and fucked over. I literally had to take a shower 
after watching it.


The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole. Yes, 
he has made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed, 
corruption, and misogyny (although the only ones I can think of right 
now are Hugo, The Last Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but 
those subjects have been the focus of and the preoccupation of almost 
*all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a director out of 55 *not* 
about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be about Frank 
Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents.

/*
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus 
or off the bus?

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM

 According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:

 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 









[FairfieldLife] RE: HFCS: Japan's retaliation?

2014-01-21 Thread cardemaister

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ1XBVpOS28 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ1XBVpOS28

[FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:

 Oh, but that would be taking other people's money  which we all know
 they worked so hard for.:-D

 Actually I suspect Scorsese probably would say he got his desired
effect
 with you.  I haven't seen the film yet as I relegated it to the BD
 rental phase.

I'm not convinced of this. As the daughter of one of the real-life
protagonists in this scandal pointed out in her open letter, *most* of
the film consists of glorifying their actions and their lifestyle. It is
not surprising, therefore, that one of the business editors of a large
Wall Street publication reported going to see the movie a few blocks
from where he worked, finding the theater full of traders, and hearing
them laughing and applauding at all the wrong moments. That is,
whenever the people onscreen got away with something illegal, whenever
they screwed somebody over for money, and whenever someone made a sale
to some retiree and managed to steal their life savings.

I honestly think that although Scorcese says *now* that he was trying to
be satirical, he was really still kinda impressed by all the macho,
misogynist buddy-buddy shit, just as he has been in the past by similar
behavior on the part of gangsters. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been
so much of it in the film. And there might have been one -- even one --
scene or bit of dialog dealing with the *effect* these narcissistic
assholes had on the people they stole from. I think Scorcese and
DiCaprio got carried away with the buddy-buddy shit and lost sight of
the true nature of the people they were trying to portray onscreen.

 You are not alone in your reaction to the Oxfram study (which I posted
 here yesterday) as I heard several radio commentators say the same
 thing.  Just take their money and redistribute it.  As I see it the
the
 rich, like dogs, have so soiled their capitalist beds that the penalty
 should be global socialism for the next 400 years.  Doesn't have to be
 mean, authoritarian or totalitarian. Could be very transcendental and
 pleasant.

I still like the bus off the cliff approach.

 But looking at the weather, the coming drought and famine there might
 not be anyone around in 40 years let alone 400.

With Share's post in mind, let them eat ants.


 On 01/21/2014 05:58 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
  
   I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.
 
  */Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we
  managed to get all 85 of these people on one bus, and then
threatened
  them with driving the bus off a cliff with them on it unless they
  signed over all of their money to the poor people they fucked over
to
  get it. After they signed, then we'd take the signed papers, get off
  the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then redistribute the
  funds.
 
  But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to
sit
  through The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with
  everything said in the open letter
 
  written by /**/Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life
  scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that
  Martin Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers
who
  glorified greed and immorality in this film should be sentenced to
  spend the rest of their lives doing community service by making
  movies about the little people these real-life scumbags ripped
off,
  and whose lives they ruined.
 
  Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even
  *seen* misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman
in
  the film who isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more
  rube to be fucked and fucked over. I literally had to take a shower
  after watching it.
 
  The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole.
Yes,
  he has made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed,
  corruption, and misogyny (although the only ones I can think of
right
  now are Hugo, The Last Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but
  those subjects have been the focus of and the preoccupation of
almost
  *all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a director out of 55 *not*
  about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be about Frank
  Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents.
  /*
   
   On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
  
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the
bus
  or off the bus?
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
  
   According to a recent
   OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
   wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.ht\
ml
 
  
 
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Russel Brand on Sex with 2 girls with rubber, the lovely mother of Kathy Perry and Transcendental Meditation

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
I am more impressed by the first 30 seconds or so where Brand talks about the 
possibility of sticking the banana up his own ass - truly a fine example of the 
virtues of TM and TMSP - and truly a wonderful spokesperson for TM and David 
Lynch.

On Tue, 1/21/14, nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Russel Brand on Sex with 2 girls with rubber, the 
lovely mother of Kathy Perry and Transcendental Meditation
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 5:10 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Z6d5lQd3U
 I knew you would finally click this link :-)
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: many good reasons to return to...eating bugs!

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
turq, you have me LOLing with this eyeball story. Reminds me of a Star Wars 
moment whose details now escape me. Except for a floating in soup eyeball!

 PS Yes, I remember Raisinets though my favorite was the chocolate covered 
caramel thingies whose name I can't remember.

I think I better have some ginko bilobia for lunch!




On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:05 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 http://www.upworthy.com/watch-the-food-youre-probably-not-eating-for-all-the-wrong-reasons-8?c=upw1
  

Growing up in Morocco, I had a number of Arab friends, who would occasionally 
invite me to dinner at one of their houses (and occasionally even in tents in 
the Sahara). I had been briefed before attending by mutual friends who made 
it clear to me that refusing to eat what was served to me was an insult of the 
highest order, so I managed to fairly gracefully expand my food horizons by 
doing what I'd been told to do. Suffice it to say that camels are not only for 
riding. :-)

Thus I got to experience the delicacy of chocolate-covered ants. Does anyone 
remember the candy you used to be able to get in movie theaters called 
Raisinets? Well, they were sorta like that, but crunchy. And, to be perfectly 
honest, they were a bit of a high, probably because of the large amounts of 
protein and formic acid. Go figure. 

They ranked way down on the list of Weirdest Things I Was Ever Served, however. 
The top of the list, to this day, was a tasty soup served to me in a large 
ceramic Moroccan bowl that gave me the eye -- literally -- when it was placed 
in front of me. Floating on top of the tasty broth were several sheep's 
eyeballs. Given the gusto with which the other guests were busy devouring this 
delicacy, I kinda figured that this was one of those where the rubber meets 
the road culinary moments in which I kinda had to go there or risk offending 
my fairly wealthy and influential hosts. So I did. I will spare everyone the 
details of what it's really like to bite into a boiled eyeball, except to say 
that I survived. :-)





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
noozguru, not to be too persnickity but I just saw on the weather report this 
morning that there is already drought in California. And no rain in the long 
range forecast! 

I'm beginning to suspect that *the powers that be* are using Super Bowls and 
Golden Globe Awards, etc. to distract the masses from the reality that we're 
schtooked!





On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:19 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 
  
Oh, but that would be taking other people's money  which we all know they 
worked so hard for.:-D 

Actually I suspect Scorsese probably would say he got his desired
  effect with you.  I haven't seen the film yet as I relegated it to
  the BD rental phase.

You are not alone in your reaction to the Oxfram study (which I
  posted here yesterday) as I heard several radio commentators say
  the same thing.  Just take their money and redistribute it.  As I
  see it the the rich, like dogs, have so soiled their capitalist
  beds that the penalty should be global socialism for the next 400
  years.  Doesn't have to be mean, authoritarian or totalitarian. 
  Could be very transcendental and pleasant. 

But looking at the weather, the coming drought and famine there
  might not be anyone around in 40 years let alone 400.


On 01/21/2014 05:58 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:

 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we managed to get 
all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened them with driving the 
bus off a cliff with them on it unless they signed over all of their money to 
the poor people they fucked over to get it. After they signed, then we'd take 
the signed papers, get off the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then 
redistribute the funds. 

But that may just be how I feel today, after having
been forced to sit through The Wolf Of Wall
Street. I now completely agree with everything said
in the open letter  written by Christina McDowell, daughter 
of one of the real-life scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. 
I think that Martin Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers 
who glorified greed and immorality in this film should be sentenced to spend 
the rest of their lives doing community service by making movies about the 
little people these real-life scumbags ripped off, and whose lives they 
ruined.

Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you
really haven't even *seen* misogyny until you've
seen this movie. There is not a woman in the film
who isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just
one more rube to be fucked and fucked over. I
literally had to take a shower after watching it. 

The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's
work as a whole. Yes, he has made the occasional
film that *doesn't* celebrate greed, corruption, and
misogyny (although the only ones I can think of
right now are Hugo, The Last Temptation of
Christ, and Kundun), but those subjects have been
the focus of and the preoccupation of almost *all*
of his other films. Only 3 films as a director out
of 55 *not* about slimeballs. And his next film is
going to be about Frank Sinatra. What a fuckin'
waste of creative talents. 
  
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are
  you on the bus or off the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM
 
 According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the
  planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
The drought is a big topic in California.  Just listened to a SF talk 
show where it was the topic.  Again this is being called climate 
disruption now by the climate scientists.  And we have been getting 
delayed rain in years past.  Someone even mentioned on the talk show 
that the almanac says Feb and Mar will wet.


Problems with a drought compared to last big one in the late 1970s is 
that back then people might have been able to afford to do plumbing and 
things to help. Now many are squeaking by and won't be able to do things 
like that this round.


So it goes.

On 01/21/2014 09:52 AM, Share Long wrote:
noozguru, not to be too persnickity but I just saw on the weather 
report this morning that there is already drought in California. And 
no rain in the long range forecast!


I'm beginning to suspect that *the powers that be* are using Super 
Bowls and Golden Globe Awards, etc. to distract the masses from the 
reality that we're schtooked!




On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:19 AM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Oh, but that would be taking other people's money  which we all know 
they worked so hard for.:-D


Actually I suspect Scorsese probably would say he got his desired 
effect with you.  I haven't seen the film yet as I relegated it to the 
BD rental phase.


You are not alone in your reaction to the Oxfram study (which I posted 
here yesterday) as I heard several radio commentators say the same 
thing.  Just take their money and redistribute it. As I see it the the 
rich, like dogs, have so soiled their capitalist beds that the penalty 
should be global socialism for the next 400 years. Doesn't have to be 
mean, authoritarian or totalitarian.  Could be very transcendental and 
pleasant.


But looking at the weather, the coming drought and famine there might 
not be anyone around in 40 years let alone 400.



On 01/21/2014 05:58 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:


 I'd ride with 'em, I ain't prejudiced agin rich folk.

*/Personally, I suspect that the planet would be better off if we 
managed to get all 85 of these people on one bus, and then threatened 
them with driving the bus off a cliff with them on it unless they 
signed over all of their money to the poor people they fucked over to 
get it. After they signed, then we'd take the signed papers, get off 
the bus and push it over the edge anyway, and then redistribute the 
funds.


But that may just be how I feel today, after having been forced to 
sit through The Wolf Of Wall Street. I now completely agree with 
everything said in the open letter 
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2013/12/26/an-open-letter-to-the-makers-of-the-wolf-of-wall-street-and-the-wolf-himself  
written by /**/Christina McDowell, daughter of one of the real-life 
scumbags who worked with the real-life Jordan Belfort. I think that 
Martin Scorcese, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of the other producers 
who glorified greed and immorality in this film should be sentenced 
to spend the rest of their lives doing community service by making 
movies about the little people these real-life scumbags ripped off, 
and whose lives they ruined.


Those of you who mouth off about misogyny, you really haven't even 
*seen* misogyny until you've seen this movie. There is not a woman in 
the film who isn't portrayed as a bimbo, a hooker, and just one more 
rube to be fucked and fucked over. I literally had to take a shower 
after watching it.


The experience made me rethink Martin Scorcese's work as a whole. 
Yes, he has made the occasional film that *doesn't* celebrate greed, 
corruption, and misogyny (although the only ones I can think of right 
now are Hugo, The Last Temptation of Christ, and Kundun), but 
those subjects have been the focus of and the preoccupation of almost 
*all* of his other films. Only 3 films as a director out of 55 *not* 
about slimeballs. And his next film is going to be about Frank 
Sinatra. What a fuckin' waste of creative talents.

/*
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the 
bus or off the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 8:19 AM

 According to a recent
 OXFAM report the 85 people who own *half of the planet's
 wealth* could all fit onto this bus:

 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/oxfam-bus-wealth_n_4616103.html 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Bollywood Movies

2014-01-21 Thread Richard Williams
Outsourced TV Series

[image: Inline image 1]

Outsourced is set in a call center in Bombay, India, where an American
novelties company has recently outsourced its order processing. A lone
American manages the call center and must explain American popular culture
to his employees as he tries to understand Indian culture. All about India
- funny, entertaining.

Ben Rappaport
Anisha Nagarajan
Diedrich Bader
Parvesh Cheena
Pippa Black
Rebecca Hazlewood
Rizwan Manji
Sacha Dhawan

Theme Song
http://youtu.be/LkI84JXoy3k

TV Series Trailer
http://youtu.be/_wR3LhFlgGo

Gupta
http://youtu.be/Q5frCo8mywE

Mama Sutra
https://www.youtube.com/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgyo5vH5N6Ylist=TLNo8tEG_a0TAuZk29IVTUpp3KFBrciRu6

Madhuri
http://youtu.be/nI6zPynTlrg

Bachna aye hase
http://youtu.be/wuedRBE9sq8


On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Bend It Like Beckham is one of my favorite movies of all time. I've also
 seen Monsoon Wedding and enjoyed it too, suspect it is more true Bollywood.
 If you want to have even more fun, watch Bend It all the way through the
 end credits. Very fun!




   On Monday, January 6, 2014 11:08 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
 wrote:

   Dancing around trees adds little to a Bollywood movie unless you are
 into dance.  Those scenes are in lieu of people kissing.  On a real DVD,
 not the ripped ones some Indian stores will rent you, you can use the
 chapter to skip over those and turn it into a 90 minute movie.  The dance
 scenes add nothing to the story.

 Hulu has a larger selection of Bollywood movies than Netflix.  There are
 some classics there as well as a bit of kitsch junk.

 On 01/05/2014 06:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:


 Rita and I are really into Bollywood movies - Rita knows a lot more than I
 do,and we love all the singing and dancing. The Director of IT where I
 worked at the community college, Usha, is from India and she is teaching us
 a lot about Indian actors.The movies I listed are just a good place to
 start, if anyone is interested.


 On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:


   The Guru is not a Bollywood movie though Jimi Mistry is a Bollywood
 star but doing some US films.

 Deepa Mehta is Canadian and does some of her movies in India but not
 necessarily with Bollywood. Her ex-husband was on the Rishikesh course with
 the Beatles and published a book of the photos he took while there.  Mehta
 got thrown out of India after upsetting them with her film Fire which
 mocks Indian spiritual practices.

 Gurinder Chada is from London though she was in San Francisco for a while
 and made a few other films here in the US.  One of my favorites was her
 early film Bhaji at the Beach which takes place in London (as does Bend
 It With Beckham).

 Mira Nair was US trained in film making at USC (or UCLA, it's not on IMDB
 but she mentioned it in an extra on one of her films).  Her films are also
 done outside the Bollywood system.  I'm a fan of many of her films.

 You need to watch some purely Bollywood movies including some of the
 classics.  Netfilx does have some of those.  I have a few award winners and
 some just curiosities I purchased used at the local Indian grocer.



 On 01/05/2014 04:12 PM, Richard Williams wrote:


  [image: Inline image 1]

  There are several Bollywood movies that we enjoy. Here's a list of good
 Indian-themed movies to get started and then a list detailing the major
 stars of Bollywood.

  *'The Guru'*
 Starring Heather Graham, Marisa Tomei and Jimi Mistry
 Director: Daisy von Scherler Mayer
 Universal Studios, 2003
 Trailer:
 Movie Trailer:
 http://youtu.be/lEIEb5jPhhA

  Heather Graham does a great job as a warm-hearted woman of debatable
 morals. Marisa Tomei also does a great job as a warm-hearted woman of
 debatable judgement. Jim Mistry has some really funny lines. A superb
 indie-like studio picture that benefits from bright dialogue and the
 impressive cast.

  *'Bollywood Hollywood'*
 Staring Lisa Ray, Rahul Khanna, Moushumi Chatterjee, Dina Pathak
 Director: Deepa Mehta
 Lionsgate, 2005
 Movie Trailer:
 http://youtu.be/js3N8e8InnY

  This is by far the best satirical movie on Indians in the west. If you
 live in Canada, you will appreciate the humor of the Indian Bollywood movie
 audience and family parody. - Amazon review

  *'Bend it Like Beckham'*
 Staring Parminder Nagra, Keira Knightley, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers
 Director: Gurinder Chadha
 20th Century Fox, 2002
 Movie Trailer:
 http://youtu.be/J2Dv9f6bCwg

  [image: Inline image 2]

  Despite it's soccer-themed title, Bend It Like Beckham is a fabulous
 and heart-warming story about family, traditions, friendship, love,
 fulfilling your dreams, and - yes - soccer (or football to non-US
 audiences). - Amazon review

  *'Marigold'*
 Staring Ali Larter, Salman Khan, Ian Bohen and Gulshan Grover
 Director: Willard Carroll
 Echo Bridge, 2008
 Movie Trailer:
 http://youtu.be/34j9ChkjK6w

  The film has Bollywood 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on Buddha at the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014

2014-01-21 Thread Share Long
noozguru, well I would speculate that Shiva is sattvic and so might help 
alleviate the tamasic quality of kapha imbalance.





On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:15 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 
  
Yes from an ayurvedic standpoint.  One of the last questions I asked my late 
tantra guru was about why would Shiva mantras be pacifying  for kapha?  But he 
didn't know ayurveda and if he did would have probably been able to sidestep 
his heart problem.

On 01/18/2014 11:28 AM, Share Long wrote:

  
noozguru, you have said a few times that TM mantras are good for pitta types. 
Maybe not so good for kapha or vata...






On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:19 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
wrote:
 
  
I'm sure he did many times.  TM doesn't work for everybody.  He was into 
enough other things to try anyway.

On 01/18/2014 09:03 AM, Share Long
  wrote:

  
noozguru, did your friend ever consider having his TM checked?!






On Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:33 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
wrote:
 
  
Not only that the people having these experiences are probably wondering why 
others aren't.  I have a friend who has been doing TM for years but claims to 
have only transcended twice.  Huh?

On 01/15/2014
  04:08 PM, Rick
  Archer wrote:

  
 
From:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of jr_...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:50 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on Buddha at 
the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014
 
  
Bhairitu,
 
IMO, these experiences of celestial beings may be due to hynogogia, a 
state of consciousness in between sleep and waking.  It would appear that 
meditation, for some people, may enhance or extend hynogogia into the waking 
state.  Thus, they appear to see or hallucinate visions in conjunction with 
ordinary activities during the day.
The folks I referred to in the interview see them all the time, very 
clearly, in the waking state. Although since they’re in an enlightened 
state, or whatever you’d like to call it, it’s not really the waking state. 
It’s what Maharishi predicted in his 7-states model: refined, “celestial” 
perception. Subtle or “celestial” beings are all around us, or in a parallel 
dimension. Most people just can’t see them because their perception is not 
sufficiently refined.









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus or off the bus?

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
wouldn't the rains come in time if all the yogic frawg hoppers went to Cali and 
did their sleeping - er, I mean their program out there in the dry spots?

On Tue, 1/21/14, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: New meaning for Kesey's Are you on the bus 
or off the bus?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 7:07 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
 The drought is
 a big topic in
   California.  Just listened to a SF talk show where it
 was the
   topic.  Again this is being called climate
 disruption now by the
   climate scientists.  And we have been getting delayed
 rain in
   years past.  Someone even mentioned on the talk show
 that the
   almanac says Feb and Mar will wet.
 
   
 
   Problems with a drought compared to last big one in
 the late 1970s
   is that back then people might have been able to
 afford to do
   plumbing and things to help. Now many are squeaking by
 and won't
   be able to do things like that this round.
 
   
 
   So it goes.
 
   
 
   On 01/21/2014 09:52 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
 
 
    
   
   
 noozguru,
   not to be too persnickity but I just saw on
 the weather
   report this morning that there is already
 drought in
   California. And no rain in the long range
 forecast! 
 
   
 
   I'm beginning to suspect that *the powers
 that be* are
   using Super Bowls and Golden Globe Awards,
 etc. to
   distract the masses from the reality that
 we're schtooked!
 
   
 
 

 
 
 
 
   
   On
 Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:19 AM,
 Bhairitu
 noozg...@sbcglobal.net
 wrote:
 

 
   
 
    
   
 
   
  
 Oh,
   but that would be taking
 other
   people's money 
 which we all know
   they worked so hard
 for.
   :-D 
 
   
 
   Actually I suspect
 Scorsese probably
   would say he got his
 desired effect
   with you.  I haven't
 seen the film yet
   as I relegated it to the
 BD rental
   phase.
 
   
 
   You are not alone in your
 reaction to
   the Oxfram study (which I
 posted here
   yesterday) as I heard
 several radio
   commentators say the same
 thing.  Just
   take their money and
 redistribute it. 
   As I see it the the rich,
 like dogs,
   have so soiled their
 capitalist beds
   that the penalty should be
 global
   socialism for the next 400
 years. 
   Doesn't have to be
 mean, authoritarian
   or totalitarian.  Could
 be very
   transcendental and
 pleasant. 
 
   
 
   But looking at the
 weather, the coming
   drought and famine there
 might not be
   anyone around in 40 years
 let alone
   400.
 
   
 
   
 
   On 01/21/2014 05:58 AM,
 TurquoiseB
   wrote:
 
 
 
   
  
 
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 Michael Jackson
 wrote:
 
 
 
  I'd ride
 with 'em, I ain't
 prejudiced agin rich
 folk.
 
 
 
 Personally,
   I suspect that
 the planet
   

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on Buddha at the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
I look at mantras scientifically as resonance patterns which have a 
certain influence on the nervous system and hence the rest of the body.  
They can particularly have an influence on the autonomic nervous 
system.  The spiritual explanations are pretty much to make things 
understandable to simple non educated people.  The whole Hindu pantheon 
was invented for that.  It's really just physics.


On 01/21/2014 11:17 AM, Share Long wrote:
noozguru, well I would speculate that Shiva is sattvic and so might 
help alleviate the tamasic quality of kapha imbalance.




On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:15 PM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Yes from an ayurvedic standpoint.  One of the last questions I asked 
my late tantra guru was about why would Shiva mantras be pacifying  
for kapha?  But he didn't know ayurveda and if he did would have 
probably been able to sidestep his heart problem.


On 01/18/2014 11:28 AM, Share Long wrote:
noozguru, you have said a few times that TM mantras are good for 
pitta types. Maybe not so good for kapha or vata...




On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:19 AM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net mailto:noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I'm sure he did many times. TM doesn't work for everybody.  He was 
into enough other things to try anyway.


On 01/18/2014 09:03 AM, Share Long wrote:

noozguru, did your friend ever consider having his TM checked?!



On Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:33 AM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net mailto:noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Not only that the people having these experiences are probably 
wondering why others aren't.  I have a friend who has been doing TM 
for years but claims to have only transcended twice.  Huh?


On 01/15/2014 04:08 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
*From:*FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of 
*jr_...@yahoo.com mailto:jr_...@yahoo.com

*Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:50 PM
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on 
Buddha at the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014

Bhairitu,
IMO, these experiences of celestial beings may be due to 
hynogogia, a state of consciousness in between sleep and waking. 
 It would appear that meditation, for some people, may enhance or 
extend hynogogia into the waking state.  Thus, they appear to see 
or hallucinate visions in conjunction with ordinary activities 
during the day.
The folks I referred to in the interview see them all the time, 
very clearly, in the waking state. Although since they’re in an 
enlightened state, or whatever you’d like to call it, it’s not 
really the waking state. It’s what Maharishi predicted in his 
7-states model: refined, “celestial” perception. Subtle or 
“celestial” beings are all around us, or in a parallel dimension. 
Most people just can’t see them because their perception is not 
sufficiently refined.

















Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Sherlock: His Last Vow

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
Just a reminder to those in the US that the first episode played Sunday 
night and if you've cut the cable or don't have TV then you can watch 
on PBS.com.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/

Or wait for Hulu to get as they said they don't have Season 3 yet.  
So maybe after all three episodes air there.


On 01/17/2014 09:42 AM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


There's a link at the end of the Wholock video to another clip showing 
how he (?) combined the elements and masked out unwanted material. The 
possibilities are endless. We're used to sampling in music but given 
all the film footage now available at a mouse click you could combine 
clips from assorted classic films noir (say) to produce your very own 
all-star thriller.







[FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on Buddha at the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014

2014-01-21 Thread cardemaister
FWIW, Wikipedia:

Tamas is also a Guna http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guna or Quality that is much 
needed to counter Evil, as an example Bhairava 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhairava Incarnation of Lord Shiva 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Shiva is a Tamasic Avatar, and Lord Shiva 
Himself out of the Trinity represents Tamas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamas, 
where Shiva drinks the poison of his devotees to get rid of their sin, hence 
absorbing the Tamo-Guna of devotees, in Devi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devi 
worship, there are many goddesses which incarnate within the Shakta 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakta sect of Hindusim where goddess are offered 
animal sacrifice.

[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Emily,
 

 To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He
 

 -- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
 -- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
 -- is blue or dark skinned; 
 -- strikes fear to people when he speaks.
 

 During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.
 

 During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to 
a 49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.
 

 The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.
 

 

 



[FairfieldLife] Post Count Wed 22-Jan-14 00:15:03 UTC

2014-01-21 Thread FFL PostCount
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 01/18/14 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 01/25/14 00:00:00
318 messages as of (UTC) 01/22/14 00:13:48

 44 Share Long 
 34 authfriend
 29 Richard Williams 
 28 dhamiltony2k5
 28 awoelflebater
 25 Bhairitu 
 21 jr_esq
 17 TurquoiseB 
 16 emptybill
 16 Michael Jackson 
 13 s3raphita
 12 nablusoss1008 
  8 cardemaister
  7 emilymaenot
  5 doctordumbass
  4 j_alexander_stanley
  3 anartaxius
  3 Mike Dixon 
  2 steve.sundur
  2 Jason 
  1 ultrarishi 
Posters: 21
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 




[FairfieldLife] The Naked Rambler

2014-01-21 Thread s3raphita
Stephen Gough - the Naked Rambler - is an activist, and a former Royal 
Marine. In 2003-2004, he walked the length of Great Britain naked. He did it 
again in 2005-2006, but was arrested in England and in Scotland. He has been 
repeatedly rearrested for public nudity within a short period, each time he was 
released. 
 
 On his walks he wear nothing but boots, socks, rucksack and sometimes a hat, 
after having quit his job as a lorry driver. He has been arrested and 
imprisoned numerous times during the course of his rambles. In UK law it is not 
actually illegal to be naked in public but if a  member of the public complains 
you can be arrested for a breach of the the peace. He has spent six years in 
prison - most of it in solitary confinement (as he refuses to wear clothes).
 My initial impression of the guy is that he was probably an exhibitionist and 
mentally disturbed. It does strike me though that he has an illustrious 
forbear: the Cynic philosopher Diogenes who despised possessions; openly 
masturbated in public; taught a back-to-nature approach to life; and was one of 
the first to warn of the dangers of civilization. 
 Maybe Stephen Gough is just the latest in a long line of English eccentrics. 
But maybe we need more naked ramblers - more people who can wake us up from our 
slumber and our obsession with conspicuous consumption.
 Here he is  . . .
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b039086d/The_Naked_Rambler/ 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b039086d/The_Naked_Rambler/




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and beards?

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Dear MJ, sometimes you just have to go to war along with the people you got. 
These may be our last best hope. MahaRaja Nader Raam however is rising now in 
his place. I am feeling quite good about him recently. Things are marching 
again a foot and on the move for meditation and the numbers meditating. The 
science all says that 1 percent meditating is an important goal for everyone. I 
would hope you would join once again with us in group meditation, -Buck
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

 And you put the fate of the world in those people's hands?
 
 On Tue, 1/21/14 Buck wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Why yogii's and svaamii's have long hair and 
beards?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 3:21 AM
 

 First time ever I
 was kicked out of the Domes was for facial hair.
 They changed the guideline on facial hair after some
 while.
 (So much for administrative 'purity of the
 teaching').
 Second or Third time out was for seeing saints.
 They subsequently granted me (only) an exemption.
 Jai Gurus Dev,
 -Buck in the Dome
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 cardemaister@... wrote:
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/ 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/8579163893/ 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John Hagelin: New Interview on Buddha at the Gas Pump - 01/14/2014

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Dear Bhairitu; I absolutely agree. For instance, I find the vibratory affect of 
the maha saraswati mantra brings transcendental consciousness forward 
throughout the energy fields of the human form. The Gayatri maha mantra 
polishes marma points and chakras brightening them up and gets them spinning 
right, and the Mrtyunjaya mantra facilitates the embodiment on earth of the 
Purusha of the Unified Field in the architecture of the human subtle system, 
and I don't even know what any of these mantras mean. I'm just a guy from Iowa. 
It is just my experience. Each employed like we meditate with the sidhis for 
periods of time makes a fabulous meditation.  
 That in fact was the point of Maharishi's vedic science as modern science, 
employing recitation of the sound value of slokas and mantras as his third 
technique behind TM and the Patanjali yoga sutras. Either vocal intonation or 
with just moving tongue and lips or mentally silent, creating the vibration of 
healing spirituality in the whole central nervous system towards creating 
Heaven on Earth within the heart of the human nervous system makes a fabulous 
spiritual meditation.  Is time well spent. -Buck

[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
John, I think dreadlocks are the hair, they aren't worn on the hair.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Emily,
 

 To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He
 

 -- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
 -- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
 -- is blue or dark skinned; 
 -- strikes fear to people when he speaks.
 

 During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.
 

 During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to 
a 49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.
 

 The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.
 

 

 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread Mike Dixon
Just wondering why they are called *dreadlocks*. Maybe because one dreads 
running a comb through them?
From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:59 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

  
John, I think dreadlocks are the hair, they aren't worn on the hair.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote: 
Emily,

To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He

-- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
-- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
-- is blue or dark skinned; 
-- strikes fear to people when he speaks.

During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.

During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to a 
49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.

The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.





[FairfieldLife] You're not as dumb as you think

2014-01-21 Thread s3raphita
Scientists at Tübingen University, Germany say, older brains aren't weaker than 
younger brains.  Instead they believe they are just slower due to years of 
stored up information.  They say many tests used to determine brain power of 
elderly favour the young.
 http://tinyurl.com/k64ccvn http://tinyurl.com/k64ccvn




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
LOL. I didn't know, so I looked it up. The name apparently comes from the 
Rastafarians, for whom dreadlocks are a sign of devotion, i.e., fear of the 
Lord--hence dread.
 

Just wondering why they are called *dreadlocks*. Maybe because one dreads 
running a comb through them? 
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:59 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

   John, I think dreadlocks are the hair, they aren't worn on the hair.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote: Emily,
 

 To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He
 

 -- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
 -- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
 -- is blue or dark skinned; 
 -- strikes fear to people when he speaks.
 

 During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.
 

 During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to 
a 49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.
 

 The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.
 

 

 





 


 











[FairfieldLife] Re: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements.

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Awoelflebater writes: 
 How many times do I have to tell you Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS 
SAINTS. Get over it. Go stare your horse in the face, look in his eyes and tell 
me this is not the most sublime, the deepest thing you will ever see. 
Collecting the ashy crap emanating from some fake's toes or feet or whatever it 
was you said you saw is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer, you need to 
get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the cornfields to somewhere 
imaginary and strange.

 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/370722
 
 
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:

 Weber's definition of charismatic is good for purpose of discussion generally 
and also for extending out to include the uncomfortable person who is 
skeptically asking in unknowing disbelief, “what exactly's a saint?” I feel 
that granting the spiritual consideration of charisma makes the whole 
consideration of spirituality and charismatic leadership much more interesting 
and also makes for a more interesting sense of history too if people will grant 
for sake of discussion that charismatic saints do happen. Weber's definition 
then begins to allow for further scholarly consideration of spirituality and of 
even the saintly, if people will grant it rather than just being in a position 
of contending and denying it.
 
 -Buck
 

 

 Turq, separating the NP-Disordered as a consideration is just a scale with a 
range and distribution of consideration around the real spiritual charismatic. 
The Dis-ordered may just indicate bad nurture of upbringing or some bad nature 
of dis-ease of genetic material otherwise and both may be independent of a 
charismatic life of saintly-hood as a trans-formative affective energy field in 
time.  Bad nurture or bad nature may travel with charisma evidently as part of 
the story.  That is only human?  The OEM of the human form does come with ego 
included as part of the factory package on earth.  That evidently can give us 
all a lot to talk about and I appreciate your journalistic pursuit of the 
subject here.   
 
 -Buck in the Dome   
 
 
 Weber, in an oft quoted passage, defined charisma as a certain quality of an 
 individual personality, by virtue of which [s/]he is set apart from ordinary 
 [people] and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least 
 specifically exceptional powers or qualities. These are such as are not 
 accessible to the ordinary person, but are regarded as of divine origin or as 
 exemplary, and on the basis of them the individual concerned is treated as a 
 leader. 1 

 Turq writes: I would suggest -- and in fact have, many times -- that a synonym 
for charisma in many cases is Narcissistic Personality Disorder. 

There is a weakness in many people and their basic *lack* of self confidence 
and self awareness that makes them easy prey for those who have a surfeit of 
it. They encounter someone who is so taken with themselves that they can 
literally think of nothing and no one else and they project a bunch of 
admirable qualities onto a disorder that is largely devoid of them. 

Think about the arrival on FFL of someone who is as classic an example of NPD 
as has ever existed. Some people saw the endless But enough talking about 
me...let's talk about me drivel as what it was and lost interest, and some 
looked at the same drivel and somehow projected greatness onto it.  

To this day, the most dismaying thing about my entire experience at FFL has 
been the fact that many people here were completely *unable* to recognize two 
classic psychopaths -- Ravi and Robin -- when they encountered them. Instead 
they admired them, became their groupies, and in one case actually created a 
small cult following around them. That is worrisome, especially in a group of 
people who claim to be sophisticated spiritual seekers who've been on the 
path for 20-30 years. To have spent that much time theoretically studying the 
psychology of enlightenment without being able to tell it from the psychology 
of psychopathology is shocking. 
 

 

 
O
 








[FairfieldLife] Re: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements.

2014-01-21 Thread dhamiltony2k5
In Graphing data-pairs of Saints and spiritual groups; along the path we all 
long-timers had experience to some degree with ranges and distribution of 
personality narcissism in spiritual people, from ordered to disordered and with 
continuum of relatively saintly charismatic affect and the less than saintly 
spiritual behaviors. In looking at spiritual leaders or looking at spiritual 
groups historically I tend to draw back and place them on Cartesian paired-data 
graphs working two types of relative scales to get a fix on the spirituality. I 
find this works good as framework for placing any group or saint relatively. 
  Weber's definition of Charismatic can be one scale. There also comes a 
calculus that can be seen through time with charismatics or their groups 
(life-cycle) for instance if you plot transformative spiritual affective-ness 
on one axis against the altruistic evolution of group organizational 
development on another. Graphing like thus one can parse variously using 
data-pairs of scale to sort them out relatively. 
 
 For instance, 
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
 
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
 
 
 Awoelflebater writes: 
 
 How many times do I have to tell you Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS 
SAINTS. Get over it. Go stare your horse in the face, look in his eyes and tell 
me this is not the most sublime, the deepest thing you will ever see. 
Collecting the ashy crap emanating from some fake's toes or feet or whatever it 
was you said you saw is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer, you need to 
get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the cornfields to somewhere 
imaginary and strange.

 
 
 Weber's definition of charismatic is good for purpose of discussion generally 
and also for extending out to include the uncomfortable person who is 
skeptically asking in unknowing disbelief, “what exactly's a saint?” I feel 
that granting the spiritual consideration of charisma makes the whole 
consideration of spirituality and charismatic leadership much more interesting 
and also makes for a more interesting sense of history too if people will grant 
for sake of discussion that charismatic saints do happen. Weber's definition 
then begins to allow for further scholarly consideration of spirituality and of 
even the saintly, if people will grant it rather than just being in a position 
of contending and denying it.
 
 -Buck
 

 

 Turq, separating the NP-Disordered as a consideration is just a scale with a 
range and distribution of consideration around the real spiritual charismatic. 
The Dis-ordered may just indicate bad nurture of upbringing or some bad nature 
of dis-ease of genetic material otherwise and both may be independent of a 
charismatic life of saintly-hood as a trans-formative affective energy field in 
time.  Bad nurture or bad nature may travel with charisma evidently as part of 
the story.  That is only human?  The OEM of the human form does come with ego 
included as part of the factory package on earth.  That evidently can give us 
all a lot to talk about and I appreciate your journalistic pursuit of the 
subject here.   
 
 -Buck in the Dome   
 
 
 Weber, in an oft quoted passage, defined charisma as a certain quality of an 
 individual personality, by virtue of which [s/]he is set apart from ordinary 
 [people] and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least 
 specifically exceptional powers or qualities. These are such as are not 
 accessible to the ordinary person, but are regarded as of divine origin or as 
 exemplary, and on the basis of them the individual concerned is treated as a 
 leader. 1 

 Turq writes: I would suggest -- and in fact have, many times -- that a synonym 
for charisma in many cases is Narcissistic Personality Disorder. 

There is a weakness in many people and their basic *lack* of self confidence 
and self awareness that makes them easy prey for those who have a surfeit of 
it. They encounter someone who is so taken with themselves that they can 
literally think of nothing and no one else and they project a bunch of 
admirable qualities onto a disorder that is largely devoid of them. 

Think about the arrival on FFL of someone who is as classic an example of NPD 
as has ever existed. Some people saw the endless But enough talking about 
me...let's talk about me drivel as what it was and lost interest, and some 
looked at the same drivel and somehow projected greatness onto it.  

To this day, the most dismaying thing about my entire experience at FFL has 
been the fact that many people here were completely *unable* to recognize two 
classic psychopaths -- Ravi and Robin -- when they encountered them. Instead 
they admired them, became their groupies, and in 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements.

2014-01-21 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 In Graphing data-pairs of Saints and spiritual groups; along the path we all 
long-timers had experience to some degree with ranges and distribution of 
personality narcissism in spiritual people, from ordered to disordered and with 
continuum of relatively saintly charismatic affect and the less than saintly 
spiritual behaviors. In looking at spiritual leaders or looking at spiritual 
groups historically I tend to draw back and place them on Cartesian paired-data 
graphs working two types of relative scales to get a fix on the spirituality. I 
find this works good as framework for placing any group or saint relatively. 
  Weber's definition of Charismatic can be one scale. There also comes a 
calculus that can be seen through time with charismatics or their groups 
(life-cycle) for instance if you plot transformative spiritual affective-ness 
on one axis against the altruistic evolution of group organizational 
development on another. Graphing like thus one can parse variously using 
data-pairs of scale to sort them out relatively. 
 
 For instance, 
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
 
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
 
 
 Awoelflebater writes: 
 
 How many times do I have to tell you Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS 
SAINTS. Get over it. Go stare your horse in the face, look in his eyes and tell 
me this is not the most sublime, the deepest thing you will ever see. 
Collecting the ashy crap emanating from some fake's toes or feet or whatever it 
was you said you saw is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer, you need to 
get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the cornfields to somewhere 
imaginary and strange.

 
 
 Weber's definition of charismatic is good for purpose of discussion generally 
and also for extending out to include the uncomfortable person who is 
skeptically asking in unknowing disbelief, “what exactly's a saint?” I feel 
that granting the spiritual consideration of charisma makes the whole 
consideration of spirituality and charismatic leadership much more interesting 
and also makes for a more interesting sense of history too if people will grant 
for sake of discussion that charismatic saints do happen. Weber's definition 
then begins to allow for further scholarly consideration of spirituality and of 
even the saintly, if people will grant it rather than just being in a position 
of contending and denying it.
 
 -Buck
 

 Thanks Buck but did you go out and look into your horse's eyes today? If you 
did, can you tell me what a saint can relay to you that those eyes can't? Did 
you feel anything? Learn anything? Did you realize that saintliness, depth and 
wisdom is everywhere to be found in the things around you? Did you know that 
the powers that be can't kick you out of the Dome for transcending into your 
horse's eyes? Sounds like a win win to me.
 

 I am not uncomfortable with the possibility that what you think of as 
saints exist, indeed, I surely hope they do. I believe all things are 
possible, including all manner of beings. Unknowing disbelief does not 
describe the nature of my incredulity about the existence of saints. I just 
don't think they are what you and others think they are. I think they are way 
more than that.
 

 Turq, separating the NP-Disordered as a consideration is just a scale with a 
range and distribution of consideration around the real spiritual charismatic. 
The Dis-ordered may just indicate bad nurture of upbringing or some bad nature 
of dis-ease of genetic material otherwise and both may be independent of a 
charismatic life of saintly-hood as a trans-formative affective energy field in 
time.  Bad nurture or bad nature may travel with charisma evidently as part of 
the story.  That is only human?  The OEM of the human form does come with ego 
included as part of the factory package on earth.  That evidently can give us 
all a lot to talk about and I appreciate your journalistic pursuit of the 
subject here.   
 
 -Buck in the Dome   
 
 
 Weber, in an oft quoted passage, defined charisma as a certain quality of an 
 individual personality, by virtue of which [s/]he is set apart from ordinary 
 [people] and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least 
 specifically exceptional powers or qualities. These are such as are not 
 accessible to the ordinary person, but are regarded as of divine origin or as 
 exemplary, and on the basis of them the individual concerned is treated as a 
 leader. 1 

 Turq writes: I would suggest -- and in fact have, many times -- that a synonym 
for charisma in many cases is Narcissistic Personality Disorder. 

There is a weakness in many people and their basic *lack* 

[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Judy,
 

 In retrospect, I could have written that phrase better.  I had difficulty in 
describing a person with such a hair arrangement.  But that's how it was 
written.  C'est la vie!  O mio babbino caro!


[FairfieldLife] RE: Advaita is about inherent freedom

2014-01-21 Thread emptybill
All of these absurd assertions have long ago been refuted by excellent 
scholars. You simply don't know what you are talking about - to put it quite 
plainly.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread jr_esq
Judy,
 

 Aside from their dreadlocks, consider the odd connection of the Rastafarians 
to Shiva.  From what I understand, they believe in smoking marijuana as part of 
their religion, which is similar what the sadhus are doing to worship Shiva.


Re: [FairfieldLife] The Naked Rambler

2014-01-21 Thread Bhairitu
Back in the late 1990s on a Saturday afternoon I was driving on Channing 
just west of Telegraph in Berkeley when this guy came walking down the 
street carrying his shopping bag and wearing a baseball cap, sandals and 
nothing else.  Back then there was no law against public nudity there.


On 01/21/2014 04:22 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


Stephen Gough - the Naked Rambler - is an activist, and a former 
Royal Marine. In 2003-2004, he walked the length of Great Britain 
naked. He did it again in 2005-2006, but was arrested in England and 
in Scotland. He has been repeatedly rearrested for public nudity 
within a short period, each time he was released.


On his walks he wear nothing but boots, socks, rucksack and sometimes 
a hat, after having quit his job as a lorry driver. He has been 
arrested and imprisoned numerous times during the course of his 
rambles. In UK law it is not actually illegal to be naked in public 
but if a  member of the public complains you can be arrested for a 
breach of the the peace. He has spent six years in prison - most of it 
in solitary confinement (as he refuses to wear clothes).


My initial impression of the guy is that he was probably an 
exhibitionist and mentally disturbed. It does strike me though that he 
has an illustrious forbear: the Cynic philosopher Diogenes who 
despised possessions; openly masturbated in public; taught a 
back-to-nature approach to life; and was one of the first to warn of 
the dangers of civilization.


Maybe Stephen Gough is just the latest in a long line of English 
eccentrics. But maybe we need more naked ramblers - more people who 
can wake us up from our slumber and our obsession with conspicuous 
consumption.


Here he is  . . .

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b039086d/The_Naked_Rambler/






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements.

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Jackson
all the saints I ever communed with were cats, and they all loved to kill mice

On Wed, 1/22/14, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious 
Movements.
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:25 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
 
 In
 Graphing data-pairs of Saints and spiritual groups; along
 the path we all long-timers had experience to some
 degree with ranges and distribution of  personality
 narcissism in
 spiritual people, from ordered to disordered and with
 continuum of
 relatively saintly charismatic affect and the less than
 saintly
 spiritual behaviors.  In looking at spiritual leaders or
 looking at
 spiritual groups historically I tend to draw back and place
 them on
 Cartesian paired-data graphs working two types of relative
 scales to
 get a fix on the spirituality.  I find this works good as
 framework
 for placing any group or saint relatively.  Weber's
 definition of
 Charismatic can be one scale.   There also comes a calculus
 that can
 be seen through time with charismatics or their groups
 (life-cycle)
 for instance if you plot transformative spiritual
 affective-ness on
 one axis against the altruistic evolution of group
 organizational
 development on another.  Graphing like thus one can parse
 variously
 using data-pairs of scale to sort them out relatively.   
 
   
 For instance, 
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
 
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/BVT5Okg_nfc
 
  
 Awoelflebater writes: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 How many times do I have to tell you
 Bucko, there are NO SUCH THINGS AS SAINTS. Get over it. Go
 stare your
 horse in the face, look in his eyes and tell me this is not
 the most
 sublime, the deepest thing you will ever see. Collecting the
 ashy
 crap emanating from some fake's toes or feet or whatever
 it was you
 said you saw is downright creepy. Get a grip. For a farmer,
 you need
 to get grounded again. I think you've flown off in the
 cornfields to
 somewhere imaginary and strange.
 
 
 
 Weber's
 definition of charismatic is
 good for purpose of discussion generally and also for
 extending out
 to include the uncomfortable person who is skeptically asking
 in
 unknowing
 disbelief, “what exactly's a saint?”   I feel
 that granting the
 spiritual consideration of charisma makes the whole
 consideration of
 spirituality and charismatic leadership much more
 interesting and also makes for a more interesting sense of
 history too if people will grant for
 sake of discussion that charismatic saints do happen. 
 Weber's
 definition then begins to allow for further scholarly
 consideration
 of spirituality and of even the saintly, if people will
 grant it rather
 than just being in a position of contending and denying
 it.
 -Buck
 Thanks Buck but did you go
 out and look into your horse's eyes today? If you did,
 can you tell me what a saint can relay to you
 that those eyes can't? Did you feel anything? Learn
 anything? Did you realize that saintliness, depth and wisdom
 is everywhere to be found in the things around you? Did you
 know that the powers that be can't kick you out of the
 Dome for transcending into your horse's eyes? Sounds
 like a win win to me.
 I am not
 uncomfortable with the possibility that what you
 think of as saints exist, indeed, I surely hope
 they do. I believe all things are possible, including all
 manner of beings. Unknowing disbelief does not
 describe the nature of my incredulity about the existence of
 saints. I just don't think they are what you and others
 think they are. I think they are way more than
 that.
 Turq,
 separating the NP-Disordered as a
 consideration is just a scale with a range and distribution
 of
 consideration around the real spiritual charismatic.  The
 Dis-ordered may just indicate bad nurture of upbringing or
 some bad
 nature of dis-ease of genetic material otherwise and both
 may be independent of
 a charismatic life of saintly-hood as a trans-formative
 affective
 energy field in time.  Bad nurture or bad nature may
 travel with charisma evidently as part of the story.
  That is only human?  The OEM of the human form
 does come with ego included as part of the factory package
 on earth.  That evidently can give us all a lot to talk
 about and I appreciate your journalistic pursuit of the
 subject here.   
 -Buck in the Dome   
   
  Weber, in an oft quoted passage, defined charisma
 as a certain quality of an individual personality, by virtue
 of which [s/]he is set apart from ordinary [people] and
 treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at
 least specifically exceptional powers or qualities. These
 are such as are not accessible to the ordinary 

[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread authfriend
You'd say it the same way you'd describe a man with a ponytail: He wore his 
hair in a ponytail, and He wore his hair in dreadlocks. No big deal; it's 
just that He wore dreadlocks on his hair sounds as if dreadlocks are in 
addition to the hair, but they're all just hair.
 

 

 Judy,

 

 In retrospect, I could have written that phrase better.  I had difficulty in 
describing a person with such a hair arrangement.  But that's how it was 
written.  C'est la vie!  O mio babbino caro!




[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread emilymaenot
John, I hate to tell you, but now I think you might be takin' a few tokes.  
Richard Sherman's behavior was painful to watch, but then again, they don't pay 
football players for their self-awareness, except maybe their ability to be 
aware of where their self is on the field relative to their team, the ball, and 
the other team. The guy is a trash-talker and acted like a self-absorbed jerk 
- right?  I doubt very much he was channeling Shiva, dreads or no dreads, etc.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Emily,
 

 To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He
 

 -- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
 -- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
 -- is blue or dark skinned; 
 -- strikes fear to people when he speaks.
 

 During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.
 

 During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to 
a 49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.
 

 The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.
 

 

 





[FairfieldLife] RE: It's All About Football

2014-01-21 Thread emilymaenot
John, I hate to tell you, but now I think you might be takin' a few tokes.  
Richard Sherman's behavior was painful to watch, but then again, they don't pay 
football players for their self-awareness, except maybe their ability to be 
aware of where their self is on the field relative to their team, the ball, and 
the other team. The guy is a trash-talker and acted like a self-absorbed jerk 
- right?  I doubt very much he was channeling Shiva, dreads or no dreads, etc. 
and he and he alone did not win the game, despite what he might be telling 
himself and anyone else who will listen.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Emily,
 

 To understand the event that happened last Sunday, consider the known 
characteristics of Shiva.  He
 

 -- keeps company with boisterous and rowdy friends;
 -- wears dreadlocks on his hair;
 -- is blue or dark skinned; 
 -- strikes fear to people when he speaks.
 

 During the game, weren't the Seahawks fans loud and rowdy?  These fans also 
consider themselves as the 12th man of the home team.  In jyotish, the number 
12 represents meditation, which is a known characteristic of Shiva.
 

 During the last play of the game, the Seahawk player, who blocked the pass to 
a 49er player, wears long dreadlocks on his hair, and is a black man.  When he 
spoke to a television reporter after the game, the reporter and the station 
managers were scared to death at what he was saying or about to say.  He was 
shouting that he was the greatest player that ever lived and was angry about 
the perceived insults that he endured from a 49er player.  As such, the 
reporter cut the interview short for fear of hearing any expletives that may be 
said by the player.
 

 The player we're talking about is Richard Sherman, who unknowingly may have 
channeled the spirit of Shiva during the game.  So, given the various omens, it 
would appear that Shiva got involved in the game and blessed the city of 
Seattle with a championship victory for the Seahawks.