Re: [Finale] tambourine sound

2014-01-23 Thread A . S . Weinstangel
Thank you very much! Will do as you suggested.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Jan Angermüller j...@angermueller.com wrote:
 
 Open the Score Manager and select your tambourine staff.
 Set Notation Style to Percussion and select Maracas, Tambourine  
 Shakers
 in the Percussion layout selection dialog, then click on Select.
 Back in Score Manager set the Perc. MIDI Map of the tambourine staff
 to General MIDI and assign SmartMusicSynth as Device.
 When using MIDI playback (and not VST Playback), assign
 MIDI channel 10 to the tambourine staff in the Score Manager.
 
 When you now enter into the staff with speedy note entry,
 you should be able to enter and to hear maracas, tambourine and shakers 
 notes.
 If you want to have tambourine only, you can edit the Maracas, Tambourine
  Shaker settings above and delete everything except Tambourine.
 Better make a duplicate of the original notation style before deleting.
 
 If you are not using SmartMusicSynth or any General MIDI playback engine,
 you may need a different Perc.MIDI Map and a different notation style.
 
 Best regards,
 Jan
 
 Am 21.01.2014 18:37, schrieb dr.a.s. weinstangel:
 Fin2012, Win 8.1.
 
 I am trying to assign one staff to tambourine sound. It is delightful to 
 find that, say, in the Brush drum kit that would be MIDI note number 83, and 
 in the Electronic drum kit it would be number 54, but I have no idea how to 
 assign that globally to the whole staff.
 
 Sliding the note with the mouse gives me all possible sounds, except what I 
 need here.
 
 Please help!
 
 Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
 
 sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
 NEW!  cel.647-292-4605
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] tambourine sound

2014-01-22 Thread dr.a.s. weinstangel
One more try with this question, as there was no response.

Any suggestions, my friends?

Dr.A.S.Weinstangel

sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
NEW!  cel.647-292-4605


 From: dr...@hotmail.com
 To: finale@shsu.edu
 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:37:29 -0500
 Subject: [Finale] tambourine sound
 
 Fin2012, Win 8.1.
 
 I am trying to assign one staff to tambourine sound. It is delightful to find 
 that, say, in the Brush drum kit that would be MIDI note number 83, and in 
 the Electronic drum kit it would be number 54, but I have no idea how to 
 assign that globally to the whole staff. 
 
 Sliding the note with the mouse gives me all possible sounds, except what I 
 need here.
 
 Please help!
 
 Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
 
 sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
 NEW!  cel.647-292-4605
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
  
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] tambourine sound

2014-01-22 Thread Jan Angermüller
Open the Score Manager and select your tambourine staff.
Set Notation Style to Percussion and select Maracas, Tambourine  
Shakers
in the Percussion layout selection dialog, then click on Select.
Back in Score Manager set the Perc. MIDI Map of the tambourine staff
to General MIDI and assign SmartMusicSynth as Device.
When using MIDI playback (and not VST Playback), assign
MIDI channel 10 to the tambourine staff in the Score Manager.

When you now enter into the staff with speedy note entry,
you should be able to enter and to hear maracas, tambourine and shakers 
notes.
If you want to have tambourine only, you can edit the Maracas, Tambourine
 Shaker settings above and delete everything except Tambourine.
Better make a duplicate of the original notation style before deleting.

If you are not using SmartMusicSynth or any General MIDI playback engine,
you may need a different Perc.MIDI Map and a different notation style.

Best regards,
Jan

Am 21.01.2014 18:37, schrieb dr.a.s. weinstangel:
 Fin2012, Win 8.1.

 I am trying to assign one staff to tambourine sound. It is delightful to find 
 that, say, in the Brush drum kit that would be MIDI note number 83, and in 
 the Electronic drum kit it would be number 54, but I have no idea how to 
 assign that globally to the whole staff.

 Sliding the note with the mouse gives me all possible sounds, except what I 
 need here.

 Please help!

 Dr.A.S.Weinstangel

 sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
 NEW!  cel.647-292-4605
   
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] Garritan sound libraries

2013-02-22 Thread Phil Buglass
Thank you for the input.  Most people didn't seem 
to understand the question, I don't think.  Here's another question...

I am going to get GPO, I think.   But will 
loading that remover the 'Garritan for Finale' 
library?   I ask because I probably will do some 
wind band stuff, and I can't afford the Concert 
band library for a while just yet, and the GPO 
does not include saxophones.  Or euphoniums for 
that matter, although they can pretend to be trombones!

Having asked this, I realise that I am not at all 
sure if the freeby library includes saxes either!

Phil.

At 12:45 PM 2/20/2013, you wrote:
Hi, Phil...
The two libraries GPO and IO are entirely different.

If you are using Finale, you will likely prefer GPO.

It consists of traditional orchestra sections 
and solo instruments, so you can set up a total 
virtual full orchestra, chamber ensemble, etc.

It's more usable with Finale in terms of What you write is what you hear.

IO consists of sections, pre-defined chords, 
preset moods, etc, and takes more work to use 
with Finale if you want the score to match the 
sound. It is really designed for quick-sketching 
a movie scene or some programmatic music.

I would suggest that you go to YouTube and look for the IO demo series.

If you are doing traditional orchestral music 
or chamber ensembles, then Finale + GPO is the way to go.

The Garritan Instruments for Finale is a small 
sampling of sounds from the jazz collection, the 
orchestra collection, and the wind band set, 
etc. GPO is a full orchestra and then 
some--section strings, solo strings, brass, 
woodwinds, percussion, keyboards, etc.

Also of interest, depending on what type of 
music you do, would be the jazz band set and the concert  marching band set.

Jim

Sent from my iPad, so pardon the typos.

On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Phil Buglass bloke...@comcast.net wrote:

  I have been looking at the orchestral sound
  libraries they have on offer, but I need a bit
  more infor before plonking down that kind of money...
 
  Can anyone tell me what the difference is between
  Instant Orchestra and Personal Orchestra.  I
  cannot imagine anyone wanting 2 sets of 
 orchestral sounds, so what is the deal?
 
  Is one significantly better than the other?
  Also, what is the advantage over the Garritan sounds included with Finale?
 
  Thanks in advance...
 
  Phil.
 
 
 
  Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
  Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. ­ Groucho Marx
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


“Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. 
Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read.” ­ Groucho Marx
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] Garritan sound libraries

2013-02-22 Thread TXSTNR POP account
The Garritan for Finale library does contain saxes, and no, installing GPO will 
not erase anything.  You'll then have your choice of which library to draw from 
for each individual instrument in your score.

On Feb 22, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Phil Buglass wrote:

 Thank you for the input.  Most people didn't seem 
 to understand the question, I don't think.  Here's another question...
 
 I am going to get GPO, I think.   But will 
 loading that remover the 'Garritan for Finale' 
 library?   I ask because I probably will do some 
 wind band stuff, and I can't afford the Concert 
 band library for a while just yet, and the GPO 
 does not include saxophones.  Or euphoniums for 
 that matter, although they can pretend to be trombones!
 
 Having asked this, I realise that I am not at all 
 sure if the freeby library includes saxes either!
 
 Phil.
 
 At 12:45 PM 2/20/2013, you wrote:
 Hi, Phil...
 The two libraries GPO and IO are entirely different.
 
 If you are using Finale, you will likely prefer GPO.
 
 It consists of traditional orchestra sections 
 and solo instruments, so you can set up a total 
 virtual full orchestra, chamber ensemble, etc.
 
 It's more usable with Finale in terms of What you write is what you hear.
 
 IO consists of sections, pre-defined chords, 
 preset moods, etc, and takes more work to use 
 with Finale if you want the score to match the 
 sound. It is really designed for quick-sketching 
 a movie scene or some programmatic music.
 
 I would suggest that you go to YouTube and look for the IO demo series.
 
 If you are doing traditional orchestral music 
 or chamber ensembles, then Finale + GPO is the way to go.
 
 The Garritan Instruments for Finale is a small 
 sampling of sounds from the jazz collection, the 
 orchestra collection, and the wind band set, 
 etc. GPO is a full orchestra and then 
 some--section strings, solo strings, brass, 
 woodwinds, percussion, keyboards, etc.
 
 Also of interest, depending on what type of 
 music you do, would be the jazz band set and the concert  marching band set.
 
 Jim
 
 Sent from my iPad, so pardon the typos.
 
 On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Phil Buglass bloke...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 I have been looking at the orchestral sound
 libraries they have on offer, but I need a bit
 more infor before plonking down that kind of money...
 
 Can anyone tell me what the difference is between
 Instant Orchestra and Personal Orchestra.  I
 cannot imagine anyone wanting 2 sets of 
 orchestral sounds, so what is the deal?
 
 Is one significantly better than the other?
 Also, what is the advantage over the Garritan sounds included with Finale?
 
 Thanks in advance...
 
 Phil.
 
 
 
 Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
 Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. ­ Groucho Marx
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 “Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. 
 Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read.” ­ Groucho Marx
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 

Lon Price
lonpr...@txstnr.com
http://www.txstnr.com/





___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] Garritan sound libraries

2013-02-22 Thread Phil Buglass
Thanks, that will keep me going till the funds allow the next step!

Phil.

At 08:14 PM 2/22/2013, you wrote:
The Garritan for Finale library does contain 
saxes, and no, installing GPO will not erase 
anything.  You'll then have your choice of which 
library to draw from for each individual instrument in your score.

On Feb 22, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Phil Buglass wrote:

  Thank you for the input.  Most people didn't seem
  to understand the question, I don't think.  Here's another question...
 
  I am going to get GPO, I think.   But will
  loading that remover the 'Garritan for Finale'
  library?   I ask because I probably will do some
  wind band stuff, and I can't afford the Concert
  band library for a while just yet, and the GPO
  does not include saxophones.  Or euphoniums for
  that matter, although they can pretend to be trombones!
 
  Having asked this, I realise that I am not at all
  sure if the freeby library includes saxes either!
 
  Phil.
 
  At 12:45 PM 2/20/2013, you wrote:
  Hi, Phil...
  The two libraries GPO and IO are entirely different.
 
  If you are using Finale, you will likely prefer GPO.
 
  It consists of traditional orchestra sections
  and solo instruments, so you can set up a total
  virtual full orchestra, chamber ensemble, etc.
 
  It's more usable with Finale in terms of 
 What you write is what you hear.
 
  IO consists of sections, pre-defined chords,
  preset moods, etc, and takes more work to use
  with Finale if you want the score to match the
  sound. It is really designed for quick-sketching
  a movie scene or some programmatic music.
 
  I would suggest that you go to YouTube and look for the IO demo series.
 
  If you are doing traditional orchestral music
  or chamber ensembles, then Finale + GPO is the way to go.
 
  The Garritan Instruments for Finale is a small
  sampling of sounds from the jazz collection, the
  orchestra collection, and the wind band set,
  etc. GPO is a full orchestra and then
  some--section strings, solo strings, brass,
  woodwinds, percussion, keyboards, etc.
 
  Also of interest, depending on what type of
  music you do, would be the jazz band set and 
 the concert  marching band set.
 
  Jim
 
  Sent from my iPad, so pardon the typos.
 
  On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Phil Buglass bloke...@comcast.net wrote:
 
  I have been looking at the orchestral sound
  libraries they have on offer, but I need a bit
  more infor before plonking down that kind of money...
 
  Can anyone tell me what the difference is between
  Instant Orchestra and Personal Orchestra.  I
  cannot imagine anyone wanting 2 sets of
  orchestral sounds, so what is the deal?
 
  Is one significantly better than the other?
  Also, what is the advantage over the 
 Garritan sounds included with Finale?
 
  Thanks in advance...
 
  Phil.
 
 
 
  Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
  Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. ­ Groucho Marx
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
  “Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend.
  Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read.” ­ Groucho Marx
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 

Lon Price
lonpr...@txstnr.com
http://www.txstnr.com/





___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


“Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. 
Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read.” ­ Groucho Marx
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] Garritan sound libraries

2013-02-20 Thread Williams, Jim
Hi, Phil...
The two libraries GPO and IO are entirely different.

If you are using Finale, you will likely prefer GPO.

It consists of traditional orchestra sections and solo instruments, so you can 
set up a total virtual full orchestra, chamber ensemble, etc.

It's more usable with Finale in terms of What you write is what you hear.

IO consists of sections, pre-defined chords, preset moods, etc, and takes more 
work to use with Finale if you want the score to match the sound. It is really 
designed for quick-sketching a movie scene or some programmatic music.

I would suggest that you go to YouTube and look for the IO demo series.

If you are doing traditional orchestral music or chamber ensembles, then 
Finale + GPO is the way to go.

The Garritan Instruments for Finale is a small sampling of sounds from the 
jazz collection, the orchestra collection, and the wind band set, etc. GPO is a 
full orchestra and then some--section strings, solo strings, brass, woodwinds, 
percussion, keyboards, etc. 

Also of interest, depending on what type of music you do, would be the jazz 
band set and the concert  marching band set.

Jim

Sent from my iPad, so pardon the typos.

On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Phil Buglass bloke...@comcast.net wrote:

 I have been looking at the orchestral sound 
 libraries they have on offer, but I need a bit 
 more infor before plonking down that kind of money...
 
 Can anyone tell me what the difference is between 
 Instant Orchestra and Personal Orchestra.  I 
 cannot imagine anyone wanting 2 sets of orchestral sounds, so what is the 
 deal?
 
 Is one significantly better than the other?
 Also, what is the advantage over the Garritan sounds included with Finale?
 
 Thanks in advance...
 
 Phil.
 
 
 
 Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. 
 Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. ­ Groucho Marx
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] no sound

2013-02-15 Thread Ian Harris


--
From: Linda Worsley li...@ganymuse.com
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:26 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] no sound

 I just made a new file for String Quartet, and began writing... but there
 is no sound. ..
 Where do I go to make this file play

 Thanks,
 Linda

Linda, look in the Score Manager, and make sure that the assigned channels 
(at the right) agree with the ARIA player settings.

It has happened for me, too.
Ian 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] no sound

2013-02-14 Thread Linda Worsley
Duh!  I should have said.  It's finale mac 2012.

All my other finale files play, but many of those were created in Fin mac
2010.  I imported them into 2012 and they play just fine.  Only this new
one that I created from the template will not play.  I finally did get it
to play--sort of.  But unless I pump up the basic volume to ridiculously
high number, I can barely hear it.

Very puzzling, as all those old files play beautifully.

Thanks for taking time to answer.
Linda
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-14 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Wed, July 14, 2010 12:09 am, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
 More details, please, about your play Finale through MIDI settings.
 What are you using as a playback device, softsynth (whose), or some
 other method? For example, I've got Finale 2010 on WIN XP SP3 set up to
 playback through MIDI, but the MIDI playback is through a USB audio
 device. If through a USB audio device, is the device plugged directly
 into the machine, or is it through a hub?

Overlapping messages, I see. :)

Yes, USB audio (Saffire Pro-40), directly into the machine. Other devices go
through the hub.

The problem occurs in either device I set up (Finale's softsynth or
Instruments for Finale...). It appears to be associated with how Finale is
initiating the sound output.

 Does the same behavior occur with all documents, or only specific
 one(s)?

I haven't tried. This is my first document (other than some I've tried to
diagnose for other folks) that I've been doing in 2010.

 If you have any earlier version of Finale installed, what
 happens if you save one of the offending files as a MIDI file, load it
 into the earlier version, and try to play it back? What happens if you
 load a document into an earlier version, save it as a MIDI file, load
 the MIDI file into 2010, and try to play it back?

I have Finale 97, 2003, 2005, 2006 and 2007 also installed, but what will that
reveal? This problem occurs in Speedy note entry as well, where the playback
of the input note will occur with an increasing delay until either I can't
stand it anymore, it just stops playing the entered note, or I re-open the
document. (It is correctly saving audio files, but they aren't in real time.)

 At some point recently, MakeMusic changed the MIDI engine, and I have
 problems with MIDI files which play correctly in earlier versions, and
 do not play correctly in 2010. In my case, the issue is not a playback
 lag; if multiple voices are assigned to the same MIDI channel, not all
 MIDI off signals get processed correctly, so I wind up with tone
 clusters which do not terminate when the piece ends. The only option is
 to turn off the (external, USB connected) device, and turn it back on.

Ouch. I wonder if that will do it ... I will check the next time I get to the
can't-stand-it level.

Thanks again,
Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:



Yes, USB audio (Saffire Pro-40), directly into the machine. Other devices go
through the hub.


What happens if you playback through an external device through the 
Saffire pro-40, like a digital keyboard, or ...?




If you have any earlier version of Finale installed, what
happens if you save one of the offending files as a MIDI file, load it
into the earlier version, and try to play it back? What happens if you
load a document into an earlier version, save it as a MIDI file, load
the MIDI file into 2010, and try to play it back?


I have Finale 97, 2003, 2005, 2006 and 2007 also installed, but what will that
reveal?


If you save the file which is giving problem with the playback as a MIDI 
file, and load the MIDI into an earlier version, if playback is the same 
there as it is in 2010, then there is likely something in the file 
itself. If, on the other hand, the MIDI plays back without the time lag 
issues in 2005 (just to pick one from the list), then you know that the 
problem is likely not in the file. Saving a MIDI in an earlier version, 
loading that MIDI into 2010, and playing back is another way to 
determine that it is something in the software (or your settings), and 
not in a specific file. And since




This problem occurs in Speedy note entry as well, where the playback
of the input note will occur with an increasing delay until either I can't
stand it anymore, it just stops playing the entered note, or I re-open the
document. (It is correctly saving audio files, but they aren't in real time.)


I suspect it is the settings, somewhere, but that is about the limit of 
my skillset with respect to MIDI. FWIW, on my system, where I am as yet 
unaware of the problems you are having with MIDI (I've not yet had 
problems with latency on speedy entry, for example), under the 
MIDI/Audio menu, in the device setup menu, the MIDI through menu item 
is checked, and the smart radio button is selected in the MIDI 
throught menu.


I'd be curious to know if you get the same problems with simple entry.


I know what causes the MIDI problems I have with 2010 are entirely 
regarding the MIDI playback subsystem not properly processing note off 
messages; I have no problem with either simple or speedy entry.


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-14 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Wed, July 14, 2010 9:57 am, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
 What happens if you playback through an external device through the
 Saffire pro-40, like a digital keyboard, or ...?

That's all I have. I got rid of all my hardware except my Behringer Midi pedal
(that's on the traveling laptop), and I don't use a keyboard other than the
computer one.

 under the
 MIDI/Audio menu, in the device setup menu, the MIDI through menu item
 is checked, and the smart radio button is selected in the MIDI
 through menu.

Yes, selected.

 I'd be curious to know if you get the same problems with simple entry.

I've never used it, and don't even know how. I'm one of those who started with
Speedy and never tried any other method.

When playing back, Finale appears to be a CPU hog, pretty much at 45-55%.
Maybe the programming with respect to a Core Duo processor is the issue. I've
heard of other programs that have problems with multiple-core processors. No
way Finale should be taking half the power of a 3GHz CPU just to play eight
parts.

Ah, well. For now I'll just close  re-open the document when it gets annoying!

D


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-14 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:


Ah, well. For now I'll just close  re-open the document when it gets annoying!


Actually, given the problems I have with MIDI playback, I'd like to see 
you open a support desk ticket


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-13 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:

Hi all,

First time actually working Finale 2010 (Windows XP Pro SP3)

I'm having a problem with increasing sound lag. The more I use the program,
the more the sound lags behind the note entry or playback. After about 15
minutes, the sound lags 5+ seconds.

I'm just using the basic play Finale through Midi setting.

If I exit and restart Finale, the problem goes away, but slowly recurs.

Any clues?


Without details of your system, I can't be of too much help. Based upon 
what you describe, though, first question, is how much installed memory, 
and what else is going on in the background when you try to play back?


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-13 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Tue, July 13, 2010 4:28 pm, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
 Without details of your system, I can't be of too much help. Based upon
 what you describe, though, first question, is how much installed memory,
 and what else is going on in the background when you try to play back?

That's the thing. Nothing but the usual background tasks.

This is WinXP Pro SP3, Intel Core Duo 3GHz, 2GB Ram, Nvidia GeForce 9400
driving two 22-inch displays (one landscape, one portrait), Saffire Pro-40
8-channel outboard audio. The system was custom-built for me less than a year
ago for audio. Finale 2007 works fine, no lags even with Garritan stuff
running. No other audio or video application shows the slightest problem.

But Finale consistently begins to lag, sometimes playing a whole crunch of
notes 10-15 seconds later as it catches up. I just tested it on Garritan stuff
and same problem. The display shows the cursor moving for playback normally.

I've had to restart Finale about every 20 minutes.

Thanks for any insights!

Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-13 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Tue, July 13, 2010 4:28 pm, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
 Without details of your system, I can't be of too much help. Based upon what
you describe, though, first question, is how much installed memory, and what
else is going on in the background when you try to play back?


Two more bits of info.

If the document is closed and re-opened, it will play again. Finale itself
doesn't have to be restarted.

If I have Finale play a few measures and then just leave it alone for 10
minutes, the next time I come back, there is a long lag. If I close and
re-open the file, let it play once, and come back quite a while (about 20+
minutes), it no longer plays at all, and I have to re-open the document.

So whatever is happening starts with the first play and just keeps going.

Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinWin2010 sound lag?

2010-07-13 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:


I'm just using the basic play Finale through Midi setting.


More details, please, about your play Finale through MIDI settings. 
What are you using as a playback device, softsynth (whose), or some 
other method? For example, I've got Finale 2010 on WIN XP SP3 set up to 
playback through MIDI, but the MIDI playback is through a USB audio 
device. If through a USB audio device, is the device plugged directly 
into the machine, or is it through a hub?



If the document is closed and re-opened, it will play again.


Does the same behavior occur with all documents, or only specific 
one(s)? If you have any earlier version of Finale installed, what 
happens if you save one of the offending files as a MIDI file, load it 
into the earlier version, and try to play it back? What happens if you 
load a document into an earlier version, save it as a MIDI file, load 
the MIDI file into 2010, and try to play it back?


At some point recently, MakeMusic changed the MIDI engine, and I have 
problems with MIDI files which play correctly in earlier versions, and 
do not play correctly in 2010. In my case, the issue is not a playback 
lag; if multiple voices are assigned to the same MIDI channel, not all 
MIDI off signals get processed correctly, so I wind up with tone 
clusters which do not terminate when the piece ends. The only option is 
to turn off the (external, USB connected) device, and turn it back on.


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-04 Thread mmathew1942
Thanks! I'll try working with it and see if that helps the problem. 


Michael Mathew 
mmathew_musicp...@comcast.net 
mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com 
http://www.musicengravers.com/cgi-bin/engravers.pl 
Phone and Fax: 503 641 6127 

- Original Message - 
From: Michael Greensill m...@mikegreensill.com 
To: finale@shsu.edu 
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2010 9:20:39 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry 

I think I've found it! Uncheck playback in the speedy menu. 

Who'd have thoughtdefinitely not intuitive. 

Mike G. 

www.mikegreensill.com 


___ 
Finale mailing list 
Finale@shsu.edu 
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread Ryan
This happens to me too. Can't explain it. Looking forward to some insight.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michael Greensill m...@mikegreensill.comwrote:

 This happens in some files and not others. I can't seem to find any
 difference in settings that might cause this..

 But sometimes I can only get sounds out of my keyboard when in the speedy
 entry tool. As soon as I exit to another tool, silence.

 I have midi thru set to fixed channel 1, in order to get the piano sound.

 Mike G.

 www.mikegreensill.com




 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread mmathew1942
I have had the same thing happen to me, also. I have no explanation, either, 
though it is probably something basic? 


Thanks ahead, also, 
Michael Mathew 
mmathew_musicp...@comcast.net 
mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com 
http://www.musicengravers.com/cgi-bin/engravers.pl 
Phone and Fax: 503 641 6127 



- Original Message - 
From: Ryan ry.squa...@gmail.com 
To: finale@shsu.edu 
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2010 2:37:44 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry 

This happens to me too. Can't explain it. Looking forward to some insight. 

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michael Greensill 
m...@mikegreensill.comwrote: 

 This happens in some files and not others. I can't seem to find any 
 difference in settings that might cause this.. 
 
 But sometimes I can only get sounds out of my keyboard when in the speedy 
 entry tool. As soon as I exit to another tool, silence. 
 
 I have midi thru set to fixed channel 1, in order to get the piano sound. 
 
 Mike G. 
 
 www.mikegreensill.com 
 
 
 
 
 ___ 
 Finale mailing list 
 Finale@shsu.edu 
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
 
___ 
Finale mailing list 
Finale@shsu.edu 
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
I think I have been able to recreate your problem.

If the instrument list is set to mute all, there will be no playback, but the 
notes entered in speedy will still sound to the chosen instrument sound for the 
given staff.

So take a look at your instrument list from the Windows menu.

Klaus

Finale 2010b for Mac



--- On Mon, 1/4/10, mmathew1...@comcast.net mmathew1...@comcast.net wrote:

 From: mmathew1...@comcast.net mmathew1...@comcast.net
 Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry
 To: finale@shsu.edu
 Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:34 AM
 I have had the same thing happen to
 me, also. I have no explanation, either, though it is
 probably something basic? 
 
 
 Thanks ahead, also, 
 Michael Mathew 
 mmathew_musicp...@comcast.net
 
 mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com
 
 http://www.musicengravers.com/cgi-bin/engravers.pl 
 Phone and Fax: 503 641 6127 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ryan ry.squa...@gmail.com
 
 To: finale@shsu.edu 
 Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2010 2:37:44 PM GMT -08:00
 US/Canada Pacific 
 Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in
 Speedy Entry 
 
 This happens to me too. Can't explain it. Looking forward
 to some insight. 
 
 On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michael Greensill 
 m...@mikegreensill.comwrote:
 
 
  This happens in some files and not others. I can't
 seem to find any 
  difference in settings that might cause this.. 
  
  But sometimes I can only get sounds out of my keyboard
 when in the speedy 
  entry tool. As soon as I exit to another tool,
 silence. 
  
  I have midi thru set to fixed channel 1, in order to
 get the piano sound. 
  
  Mike G. 
  
  www.mikegreensill.com 
  
  
  
  
  ___ 
  Finale mailing list 
  Finale@shsu.edu 
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
  
 ___ 
 Finale mailing list 
 Finale@shsu.edu 
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 


  
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread mmathew1942
My instrument list is set for all instruments. I rummaged around in the 
MIDI/Audio menu item MIDI setup until I examined the output source for 
softsynth settings which listed two sources: Default Output, and Built-in 
Output. 


I tried the input both ways and discovered the following to be true for my 
setup: 



Toggling latter allows us to hear the keyboard; whereas, the default output 
leaves us with sound only in speedy edit? 


Michael Mathew 
Finale 2010b for Mac, also 



- Original Message - 
From: Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre yorkmaster...@yahoo.com 
To: finale@shsu.edu 
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2010 5:16:47 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry 

I think I have been able to recreate your problem. 

If the instrument list is set to mute all, there will be no playback, but the 
notes entered in speedy will still sound to the chosen instrument sound for the 
given staff. 

So take a look at your instrument list from the Windows menu. 

Klaus 

Finale 2010b for Mac 



--- On Mon, 1/4/10, mmathew1...@comcast.net mmathew1...@comcast.net wrote: 

 From: mmathew1...@comcast.net mmathew1...@comcast.net 
 Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry 
 To: finale@shsu.edu 
 Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:34 AM 
 I have had the same thing happen to 
 me, also. I have no explanation, either, though it is 
 probably something basic? 
 
 
 Thanks ahead, also, 
 Michael Mathew 
 mmathew_musicp...@comcast.net 
 
 mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com 
 
 http://www.musicengravers.com/cgi-bin/engravers.pl 
 Phone and Fax: 503 641 6127 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ryan ry.squa...@gmail.com 
 
 To: finale@shsu.edu 
 Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2010 2:37:44 PM GMT -08:00 
 US/Canada Pacific 
 Subject: Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in 
 Speedy Entry 
 
 This happens to me too. Can't explain it. Looking forward 
 to some insight. 
 
 On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michael Greensill 
 m...@mikegreensill.comwrote: 
 
 
  This happens in some files and not others. I can't 
 seem to find any 
  difference in settings that might cause this.. 
  
  But sometimes I can only get sounds out of my keyboard 
 when in the speedy 
  entry tool. As soon as I exit to another tool, 
 silence. 
  
  I have midi thru set to fixed channel 1, in order to 
 get the piano sound. 
  
  Mike G. 
  
  www.mikegreensill.com 
  
  
  
  
  ___ 
  Finale mailing list 
  Finale@shsu.edu 
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
  
 ___ 
 Finale mailing list 
 Finale@shsu.edu 
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
 ___ 
 Finale mailing list 
 Finale@shsu.edu 
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
 



___ 
Finale mailing list 
Finale@shsu.edu 
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread Michael Greensill
softsynth settings which listed two sources: Default Output, and  
Built-in Output.Michael Mathew


At first I thought you'd hit on it, because when I opened a new  
document and the piano sound worked fine. But then as soon as I went  
to the speedy entry tool and then left itit stopped.


Mike G.

www.mikegreensill.com
Finale 2010b iMac

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Midi Sound disappears when not in Speedy Entry

2010-01-03 Thread Michael Greensill

I think I've found it! Uncheck playback in the speedy menu.

Who'd have thoughtdefinitely not intuitive.

Mike G.

www.mikegreensill.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-10 Thread dhbailey

Raymond Horton wrote:
[snip]
Once, many years ago, a rock sound guy (perhaps not the tightest cable 
tie in the bunch, if you get my drift) was setting up mics for a pops 
concert of ours.  I mentioned to him how we had a problem at the 
rehearsal getting a solo heard.  He said to me, missing the point of 
what I had just said:


That's the great thing about a symphony job.  You just put up a bunch 
of mics, turn 'em on, and it sounds like a symphony!


How can you argue with logic like that?



He didn't grow up to be president, did he?

--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-09 Thread Darcy James Argue

When did I say you were?

Cheers,

- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



On 09 May 2007, at 7:56 PM, John Howell wrote:
  So I'm sorry Darcy:  while I insist that there are good uses for  
sound reinforcement, and even for amplification, I also insist that  
there are times when only a good acoustic sound will do.  That does  
NOT make me an anti-amplification fundamentalist, whatever you  
think that means.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-09 Thread Raymond Horton

Darcy James Argue wrote:
I wlll never understand the anti-amplification fundamentalists. 


John Howell wrote:
  That does NOT make me an anti-amplification fundamentalist, whatever 
you think that means.


John





It seems to me that Darcy's comment came after my lament, so I will 
willingly take on the label of anti-amplification fundamentalist, but 
only 100% when it comes to symphony orchestras.  Economics force 
symphony orchestras to play pops concerts in locations and musical 
situations where they must be amplified, and it never works well.  



I agree that in other areas that have been discussed by John and others, 
over-amplification is too often the first solution.Certainly sound 
re-enforcement can be done well, but too often it isn't.That's all I 
am saying on the general subject.



Once, many years ago, a rock sound guy (perhaps not the tightest cable 
tie in the bunch, if you get my drift) was setting up mics for a pops 
concert of ours.  I mentioned to him how we had a problem at the 
rehearsal getting a solo heard.  He said to me, missing the point of 
what I had just said:


That's the great thing about a symphony job.  You just put up a bunch 
of mics, turn 'em on, and it sounds like a symphony! 



How can you argue with logic like that?


Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist
Louisville Orchestra





___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-09 Thread Carl Dershem

Raymond Horton wrote:

That's the great thing about a symphony job.  You just put up a bunch 
of mics, turn 'em on, and it sounds like a symphony!


How can you argue with logic like that?


Slap 'em upside the head with a rubber chicken?  (It always seemed to 
work for Monty Python).


cd
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/#
http://members.cox.net/dershem

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-09 Thread Christopher Smith


On May 9, 2007, at 10:02 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:



Once, many years ago, a rock sound guy (perhaps not the tightest  
cable tie in the bunch, if you get my drift) was setting up mics  
for a pops concert of ours.  I mentioned to him how we had a  
problem at the rehearsal getting a solo heard.  He said to me,  
missing the point of what I had just said:


That's the great thing about a symphony job.  You just put up a  
bunch of mics, turn 'em on, and it sounds like a symphony!


How can you argue with logic like that?



Well, I'm not sure he's so far off.

I give a lot of... well, let's say constructive... comments to sound  
engineers, especially if I am in the audience and paying good prices.  
I went up and spoke to the sound guy at a Joe Lovano concert here in  
Montreal at the Jazz Festival because of the bad sound quality, and  
darned if the sound didn't get better in the second half. All I said  
was, Do you think the bass drum is that loud on stage? Amazing the  
difference that made.


On the flip side, I also make it a point to mention when the sound  
has been good, and every time I do, I get variants of the same  
answer: I didn't do much, just set a basic position and balance and  
let them play. So if the band already played with a good sound and  
balance, the sound guy didn't stick his fingers where they weren't  
needed, to the benefit of everyone.


Phil Nimmons (I consider him to be the Canadian Duke Ellington,  
because of the quality of his output, but I also have a special  
fondness for him because he got me started writing) always used the  
same sound man, Jake, and introduced him so he could take a bow at  
the end of every concert of his band. Jake said that he got the gig  
when Phil came up to him before a concert and said, You know, my  
band plays pretty soft sometimes. When they do, don't turn them up.  
and Jake's response was, Of course not! Phil hugged him after the  
show, and a beautiful relationship was born.


Christopher


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Sound reinforcement (was Can you spot the fake?)

2007-05-09 Thread Raymond Horton

Christopher Smith wrote:


On May 9, 2007, at 10:02 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:



Once, many years ago, a rock sound guy (perhaps not the tightest 
cable tie in the bunch, if you get my drift) was setting up mics for 
a pops concert of ours.  I mentioned to him how we had a problem at 
the rehearsal getting a solo heard.  He said to me, missing the point 
of what I had just said:


That's the great thing about a symphony job.  You just put up a 
bunch of mics, turn 'em on, and it sounds like a symphony!


How can you argue with logic like that?



Well, I'm not sure he's so far off.

I give a lot of... well, let's say constructive... comments to sound 
engineers, especially if I am in the audience and paying good prices. 
I went up and spoke to the sound guy at a Joe Lovano concert here in 
Montreal at the Jazz Festival because of the bad sound quality, and 
darned if the sound didn't get better in the second half. All I said 
was, Do you think the bass drum is that loud on stage? Amazing the 
difference that made.


On the flip side, I also make it a point to mention when the sound has 
been good, and every time I do, I get variants of the same answer: I 
didn't do much, just set a basic position and balance and let them 
play. ...

Christopher
Difference was - it sounds like your guys had some idea what they where 
doing.


RBH
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-12 Thread dhbailey

A-NO-NE Music wrote:

Kim Patrick Clow / 2006/12/11 / 08:19 PM wrote:


Could you fathom a guess then what type of computer set-ups are being
used to generate the full symphonic demos I have heard on Garritan's
webpage? My hunch is that the people that are creating these files
have some really big systems  I guess I can toss the notion that my
laptop is going to recreate the Ancient Academy of Music or St Martin
in the Fields ;)



My orchestra demo here:
http://a-no-ne.com/music/music/
was done by G5 Dual 2.5Hz/3.5GB RAM.




Can anyone answer the question then about how Garritan can claim that 
you can load a full orchestra with only 1GB of ram?  That certainly 
sounds like a downright lie based on all the experiences mentioned here. 
Or is the Garritan concept of a full orchestra one with strings only?


Or was it possibly on a computer where the only things loaded were the 
OS and GPO?


I am sick of software marketers lying about the technical specs required 
for their software in order to get customers.


Or is it in the finer details where the Garritan web-site says that you 
need 1GB to load a full orchestra, but it really doesn't make a claim 
that you can actually play any music with that loaded.


Either way, based on these real world experiences, that claim is 
certainly false and should be changed to be more realistic.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-12 Thread dhbailey

Daniel Wolf wrote:

Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

Could you fathom a guess then what type of computer set-ups are being
used to generate the full symphonic demos I have heard on Garritan's
webpage?


There are two issues here, using Garritan samples in a live player (i.e. 
while working in Finale), and using them to generate a sound file. The 
first usage is RAM intensive, and even with a gb of RAM you are going to 
be limited to 6-8 instruments at once.  The second usage, in which the 
rendering is not done in real time and can take samples from the 
harddisk as well as from the RAM should be able to handle orchestral 
textures without a problem (aside from phasing unison samples, which can 
be tweaked with small time, pitch, or spatial adjustments).


In any case, this is not a Garritan problem, this is a problem with 
sound samples. To get adequate quality, samples have to be large, and to 
play them in realtime, they have to sit in RAM.





Well it is a Garritan problem when their web-site claims that you only 
need 1GB of ram, when in reality to actually USE the samples it's 
obvious that far more than that is required.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-12 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 08:43 AM 12/12/06 +0100, Daniel Wolf wrote:
In any case, this is not a Garritan problem, this is a problem with 
sound samples. To get adequate quality, samples have to be large, and to 
play them in realtime, they have to sit in RAM.

Doesn't it depend on the implementation? I have used large arrangements
(more than 32 tracks) with dozens of massive soundfonts and patch changes
(including a 500MB piano font for a Yamaha grand) running with 512MB RAM
and a 1.6GHz processor (AMD, not Intel). Fast disks can load/unload or
stream these large samples in real time; I use 7200RPM disks with very low
access times. The only slowdown is processor demand for effects. The CPU
can't keep up with those. (But I also understand disk streaming of samples
from disk is patented by the Gigasampler folks.)

What is different about the Garritan arrangement that it can't load/unload?
Are the samples that large? Or don't they use (or not license) disk streaming?

Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-12 Thread Williams, Jim
Streaming is discouraged due to the CPU load it causes. 



From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
Sent: Tue 12-Dec-06 12:37
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?


At 08:43 AM 12/12/06 +0100, Daniel Wolf wrote:
In any case, this is not a Garritan problem, this is a problem with 
sound samples. To get adequate quality, samples have to be large, and to 
play them in realtime, they have to sit in RAM.

Doesn't it depend on the implementation? I have used large arrangements
(more than 32 tracks) with dozens of massive soundfonts and patch changes
(including a 500MB piano font for a Yamaha grand) running with 512MB RAM
and a 1.6GHz processor (AMD, not Intel). Fast disks can load/unload or
stream these large samples in real time; I use 7200RPM disks with very low
access times. The only slowdown is processor demand for effects. The CPU
can't keep up with those. (But I also understand disk streaming of samples
from disk is patented by the Gigasampler folks.)

What is different about the Garritan arrangement that it can't load/unload?
Are the samples that large? Or don't they use (or not license) disk streaming?

Dennis



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
Actually, the Garritan samples are much smaller than the instruments  
in most sampled libraries. They compensate for the small sample size  
by using sophisticated programming. The library was designed from the  
ground up to be loaded into RAM.


Cheers,

- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



On 12 Dec 2006, at 12:37 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:

What is different about the Garritan arrangement that it can't load/ 
unload?
Are the samples that large? Or don't they use (or not license) disk  
streaming?

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread Randolph Peters

Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I have a good laptop with a gig of RAM and it's a recent vintage, so 
the CPU can

handle what Garritan requires.


I'm sorry to disillusion you, but 1GB RAM with any speed processor 
will NOT give you the ability to do full orchestral mockups. It will 
give you about 5 or 6 tracks with Keyswitching (others might get 
more), but not the whole enchilada.


GPO and Finale GPO load the samples into RAM and 1 GB can get used up 
very quickly. Kontakt 2 (not Kontakt Player 2) can play samples from 
the disk, but with a lot of voices or polyphony, that often yields 
poor results.


Is anyone on this list doing full orchestral mockups using only GPO? 
And if so, what kind of computer and technical specs do you have?


-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I have two computers to do it. I run Kontkat on my PC (2.3 Gigahertz), 
and run some instruments on my Dual 1.8 Ghz G4. I can do about 8 or so 
complex GPO sounds on the PC. Depends on the patch. On the Mac, I 
generally can get a full saxophone section using Garritan Jazz. 
Generally though, I have to record about 3 audio tracks to get a full 
mockup rendered.


Randolph Peters wrote:

Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I have a good laptop with a gig of RAM and it's a recent vintage, so 
the CPU can

handle what Garritan requires.


I'm sorry to disillusion you, but 1GB RAM with any speed processor 
will NOT give you the ability to do full orchestral mockups. It will 
give you about 5 or 6 tracks with Keyswitching (others might get 
more), but not the whole enchilada.


GPO and Finale GPO load the samples into RAM and 1 GB can get used up 
very quickly. Kontakt 2 (not Kontakt Player 2) can play samples from 
the disk, but with a lot of voices or polyphony, that often yields 
poor results.


Is anyone on this list doing full orchestral mockups using only GPO? 
And if so, what kind of computer and technical specs do you have?


-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread dhbailey

 - To play an entire orchestra, we recommend 1 GB of RAM.

This is a direct copy-and-paste quote from the Garritan web site.  Don't 
you just love it when a manufacturer gives specs on their web-site which 
just don't work out in real life. Or maybe they know something we don't?


David H. Bailey


Randolph Peters wrote:

Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I have a good laptop with a gig of RAM and it's a recent vintage, so 
the CPU can

handle what Garritan requires.


I'm sorry to disillusion you, but 1GB RAM with any speed processor will 
NOT give you the ability to do full orchestral mockups. It will give you 
about 5 or 6 tracks with Keyswitching (others might get more), but not 
the whole enchilada.


GPO and Finale GPO load the samples into RAM and 1 GB can get used up 
very quickly. Kontakt 2 (not Kontakt Player 2) can play samples from the 
disk, but with a lot of voices or polyphony, that often yields poor 
results.


Is anyone on this list doing full orchestral mockups using only GPO? And 
if so, what kind of computer and technical specs do you have?


-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread Williams, Jim

Yes, traditional orch, wind ensemble, and jazz band--all Garritan. Actually, Jazz Band 
eats the most RAM because of the programming. A full jazz band with the 
non-lite versions of inst. eats a goodly chunk of my 2 gB and, with reverb, 
maxes my processor .

Wind ens. has 2fl/picc, 2ob, Eb cl., 6Bb cl., BsCl, 2 Bsns, AATBBs Sax (JABB 
bass sax is cool), 4 hrns, 4tpt, 3trb, 2 euph (using horns), 2 tubas, 
percussion. I combine GPO, Finale GPO, and JABB

2gB RAM, Centrino @ 2 gHz, Echo Indigo Sound Card, ASIO4ALL.

NOTE TO KIM: GPO instruments will be bland  unexpressive out of the box. 
Human Playback will help to a large extent. If you decide to get GPO, read Darcy's tutorial 
for GPO and Finale.

There is a currently GROUP BUY for GPO at garritan.com  GPO is selling for a 
measly $139, I think. Even at the full price, it's a great value.

Wind ensemble demos at 
http://www.esnips.com/doc/4e925e9d-a874-4f6d-9342-a036dac131de
and http://www.esnips.com/doc/3f011827-45bc-43ea-aa59-49fd36c64fae  ...first 2 
movements of Holst 2nd Suite in F.

Jim



From: Randolph Peters
Sent: Mon 11-Dec-06 19:24
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?


Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I have a good laptop with a gig of RAM and it's a recent vintage, so 
the CPU can

handle what Garritan requires.


I'm sorry to disillusion you, but 1GB RAM with any speed processor 
will NOT give you the ability to do full orchestral mockups. It will 
give you about 5 or 6 tracks with Keyswitching (others might get 
more), but not the whole enchilada.


GPO and Finale GPO load the samples into RAM and 1 GB can get used up 
very quickly. Kontakt 2 (not Kontakt Player 2) can play samples from 
the disk, but with a lot of voices or polyphony, that often yields 
poor results.


Is anyone on this list doing full orchestral mockups using only GPO? 
And if so, what kind of computer and technical specs do you have?


-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread Kim Patrick Clow

On 12/11/06, Williams, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yes, traditional orch, wind ensemble, and jazz band--all Garritan. Actually, Jazz  NOTE TO 
KIM: GPO instruments will be bland  unexpressive out of the box. Human Playback 
will help to a large extent. If you decide to get GPO, read Darcy's tutorial for GPO and Finale.



Could you fathom a guess then what type of computer set-ups are being
used to generate the full symphonic demos I have heard on Garritan's
webpage? My hunch is that the people that are creating these files
have some really big systems  I guess I can toss the notion that my
laptop is going to recreate the Ancient Academy of Music or St Martin
in the Fields ;)

Thanks much!

Kim
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Kim Patrick Clow / 2006/12/11 / 08:19 PM wrote:

Could you fathom a guess then what type of computer set-ups are being
used to generate the full symphonic demos I have heard on Garritan's
webpage? My hunch is that the people that are creating these files
have some really big systems  I guess I can toss the notion that my
laptop is going to recreate the Ancient Academy of Music or St Martin
in the Fields ;)


My orchestra demo here:
http://a-no-ne.com/music/music/
was done by G5 Dual 2.5Hz/3.5GB RAM.


-- 

- Hiro

Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Garritan Sound Libraries and Finale?

2006-12-11 Thread Daniel Wolf

Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

Could you fathom a guess then what type of computer set-ups are being
used to generate the full symphonic demos I have heard on Garritan's
webpage?


There are two issues here, using Garritan samples in a live player (i.e. 
while working in Finale), and using them to generate a sound file. The 
first usage is RAM intensive, and even with a gb of RAM you are going to 
be limited to 6-8 instruments at once.  The second usage, in which the 
rendering is not done in real time and can take samples from the 
harddisk as well as from the RAM should be able to handle orchestral 
textures without a problem (aside from phasing unison samples, which can 
be tweaked with small time, pitch, or spatial adjustments).


In any case, this is not a Garritan problem, this is a problem with 
sound samples. To get adequate quality, samples have to be large, and to 
play them in realtime, they have to sit in RAM.


DJW


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] No Sound

2005-01-31 Thread Patricia Spedden
It works!  Apparently the channels settings weren't compatible.  We
changed Send MIDI Values from Only Channel 1 to All MIDI channels,
and it works.  Such a relief.  Thank you again for taking your time to
help us (novices) put together these disparate pieces of equipment.

Patricia Spedden

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenneth Kuhlmann
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 9:21 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] No Sound

Patricia,

My immediate reaction to your problem description is that the MIDI setup
of
the
Proformance module at college differs from the setup on the tone
generator
which you use at home in some way related to either MIDI channel numbers
or
program numbers.  Simply put, the equipment at home responds to the note
on
/ off messages etc on the MIDI channels generated by Finale playback
whereas
the Proformance module at college ignores messages on the same
channel(s).

I assume that the Finale setup remains the same in each situation.  You
do
not give enough detail about equipmet connections and setups to enable a
good diagnosis and I am not familiar with any of the equipment you might
be
using other than Finale, but I would look at the following matters to
ensure
that both tone generators are setup compatibly:

1)Does the Proformance respond to the program numbers generated by
Finale playback?  I understand it is limited to 16 piano sounds; what
program
numbers does it respond to?  I.e. is the instrument assignment (=program
number
assignment) in your Finale file compatible with the Proformance's
capabilites?
Therefore make sure that the MIDI program numbers generated by Finale
are
suitable.

2)Make sure that Finale Playback is generating messages on MIDI
channels
accessible by the Proformance module.  Because it is a piano module, I
assume that it is necessary for Finale to generate messages on a single
channel only.  If Finale is generating on several channels then the
situation can be very problematical.  Your home equipment might be set
up to
respond on all channels generated in your Finale setup, whereas the
Proformance may not respond to the same channels.

3)So, is the Proformance responding to the to the same MIDI channels
as
your home sound module?  Check the MIDI mode in which each generator is
operating, considering in particular Mode 1 (Omni Mode = Omni On/Poly)
vs
Mode 3 (Poly Mode = Omni Off/Poly).  In a studio situation with other
synthesizers available, it is quite likely that a module like the
Proformance would be setup to operate in Poly Mode; whereas a single
synthesizer at home might default to Omni Mode for convenience.

4)If the Proformance is in Poly Mode and set to channel X, make sure
that Finale playback generates on channel X also.  If your home
generator is
also in Poly Mode you will need to change its channel  number to X to
match,
but you need not change it if it is in Omni Mode.

5)If the Proformance is in Omni Mode and the program numbers are
compatible then I can only suggest that the Proformance is not receiving
any
note messages and you should look at what might be happening at other
points
on the signal path between your laptop and the Proformance module.

Kenneth Kuhlmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: Patricia Spedden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 7:48 PM
Subject: [Finale] No Sound


 I teach at a college where we have purchased a number of Fastlane MIDI
interfaces.  They are used mainly with Macs.



 However, I have WinXP laptop that I'm trying to use at the college for
a
lengthy, urgent project with the following equipment:

 * Fastlane interface
 * Fatar Studio 90 master controller with no internal sounds
 * Proformance/1 16-bit piano module
 * Amplified speakers
 * Finale 2005

 This all works fine at home with a Roland MPU64 USB interface which
I've
updated with an XP driver.



 I'd prefer to be able to use the MOTU with Finale at the college (so I
don't have to disconnect everything daily), but can get no sound through
the
Proformance module using the MOTU.  The MOTU in/out lights come on
appropriately, but there's no sound.  We have tried every possible
configuration with no luck.



 Could anyone tell us how to make this work as soon as possible?



 (Dr.) Patricia Spedden




 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] No Sound

2005-01-31 Thread Kenneth Kuhlmann
Patricia,
It is a pleasure to contribute to this wonderful List.

Kenneth Kuhlmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: Patricia Spedden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Finale] No Sound


 It works!  Apparently the channels settings weren't compatible.  We
 changed Send MIDI Values from Only Channel 1 to All MIDI channels,
 and it works.  Such a relief.  Thank you again for taking your time to
 help us (novices) put together these disparate pieces of equipment.
 
 Patricia Spedden
 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] No Sound

2005-01-31 Thread Keith Helgesen
Hi Ken- good to see you on the list! When are you back in band? 
Cheers K

Keith Helgesen.
Director of Music, Canberra City Band.
Ph: (02) 62910787. Band Mob. 0436-620587
Private Mob 0417-042171

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Kuhlmann
Sent: Tuesday, 1 February 2005 12:29 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] No Sound

Patricia,
It is a pleasure to contribute to this wonderful List.

Kenneth Kuhlmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: Patricia Spedden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Finale] No Sound


 It works!  Apparently the channels settings weren't compatible.  We
 changed Send MIDI Values from Only Channel 1 to All MIDI channels,
 and it works.  Such a relief.  Thank you again for taking your time to
 help us (novices) put together these disparate pieces of equipment.
 
 Patricia Spedden
 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005
 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] No Sound

2005-01-29 Thread Kenneth Kuhlmann
Patricia,

My immediate reaction to your problem description is that the MIDI setup of
the
Proformance module at college differs from the setup on the tone generator
which you use at home in some way related to either MIDI channel numbers or
program numbers.  Simply put, the equipment at home responds to the note on
/ off messages etc on the MIDI channels generated by Finale playback whereas
the Proformance module at college ignores messages on the same channel(s).

I assume that the Finale setup remains the same in each situation.  You do
not give enough detail about equipmet connections and setups to enable a
good diagnosis and I am not familiar with any of the equipment you might be
using other than Finale, but I would look at the following matters to ensure
that both tone generators are setup compatibly:

1)Does the Proformance respond to the program numbers generated by
Finale playback?  I understand it is limited to 16 piano sounds; what
program
numbers does it respond to?  I.e. is the instrument assignment (=program
number
assignment) in your Finale file compatible with the Proformance's
capabilites?
Therefore make sure that the MIDI program numbers generated by Finale are
suitable.

2)Make sure that Finale Playback is generating messages on MIDI channels
accessible by the Proformance module.  Because it is a piano module, I
assume that it is necessary for Finale to generate messages on a single
channel only.  If Finale is generating on several channels then the
situation can be very problematical.  Your home equipment might be set up to
respond on all channels generated in your Finale setup, whereas the
Proformance may not respond to the same channels.

3)So, is the Proformance responding to the to the same MIDI channels as
your home sound module?  Check the MIDI mode in which each generator is
operating, considering in particular Mode 1 (Omni Mode = Omni On/Poly) vs
Mode 3 (Poly Mode = Omni Off/Poly).  In a studio situation with other
synthesizers available, it is quite likely that a module like the
Proformance would be setup to operate in Poly Mode; whereas a single
synthesizer at home might default to Omni Mode for convenience.

4)If the Proformance is in Poly Mode and set to channel X, make sure
that Finale playback generates on channel X also.  If your home generator is
also in Poly Mode you will need to change its channel  number to X to match,
but you need not change it if it is in Omni Mode.

5)If the Proformance is in Omni Mode and the program numbers are
compatible then I can only suggest that the Proformance is not receiving any
note messages and you should look at what might be happening at other points
on the signal path between your laptop and the Proformance module.

Kenneth Kuhlmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: Patricia Spedden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 7:48 PM
Subject: [Finale] No Sound


 I teach at a college where we have purchased a number of Fastlane MIDI
interfaces.  They are used mainly with Macs.



 However, I have WinXP laptop that I'm trying to use at the college for a
lengthy, urgent project with the following equipment:

 * Fastlane interface
 * Fatar Studio 90 master controller with no internal sounds
 * Proformance/1 16-bit piano module
 * Amplified speakers
 * Finale 2005

 This all works fine at home with a Roland MPU64 USB interface which I've
updated with an XP driver.



 I'd prefer to be able to use the MOTU with Finale at the college (so I
don't have to disconnect everything daily), but can get no sound through the
Proformance module using the MOTU.  The MOTU in/out lights come on
appropriately, but there's no sound.  We have tried every possible
configuration with no luck.



 Could anyone tell us how to make this work as soon as possible?



 (Dr.) Patricia Spedden




 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] No Sound

2005-01-29 Thread Patricia Spedden
Thank you so much for your speedy response.  When I go to the college on Monday 
(it's some distance away), I'll check out every one of your suggestions.  Thus 
far, It's been such a waste of time  very frustrating. 
 
Hopefully, one of your suggestions will solve this.
 
Patricia Spedden 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kenneth Kuhlmann
Sent: Sat 1/29/2005 9:21 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] No Sound



Patricia,

My immediate reaction to your problem description is that the MIDI setup of
the
Proformance module at college differs from the setup on the tone generator
which you use at home in some way related to either MIDI channel numbers or
program numbers.  Simply put, the equipment at home responds to the note on
/ off messages etc on the MIDI channels generated by Finale playback whereas
the Proformance module at college ignores messages on the same channel(s).

I assume that the Finale setup remains the same in each situation.  You do
not give enough detail about equipmet connections and setups to enable a
good diagnosis and I am not familiar with any of the equipment you might be
using other than Finale, but I would look at the following matters to ensure
that both tone generators are setup compatibly:

1)Does the Proformance respond to the program numbers generated by
Finale playback?  I understand it is limited to 16 piano sounds; what
program
numbers does it respond to?  I.e. is the instrument assignment (=program
number
assignment) in your Finale file compatible with the Proformance's
capabilites?
Therefore make sure that the MIDI program numbers generated by Finale are
suitable.

2)Make sure that Finale Playback is generating messages on MIDI channels
accessible by the Proformance module.  Because it is a piano module, I
assume that it is necessary for Finale to generate messages on a single
channel only.  If Finale is generating on several channels then the
situation can be very problematical.  Your home equipment might be set up to
respond on all channels generated in your Finale setup, whereas the
Proformance may not respond to the same channels.

3)So, is the Proformance responding to the to the same MIDI channels as
your home sound module?  Check the MIDI mode in which each generator is
operating, considering in particular Mode 1 (Omni Mode = Omni On/Poly) vs
Mode 3 (Poly Mode = Omni Off/Poly).  In a studio situation with other
synthesizers available, it is quite likely that a module like the
Proformance would be setup to operate in Poly Mode; whereas a single
synthesizer at home might default to Omni Mode for convenience.

4)If the Proformance is in Poly Mode and set to channel X, make sure
that Finale playback generates on channel X also.  If your home generator is
also in Poly Mode you will need to change its channel  number to X to match,
but you need not change it if it is in Omni Mode.

5)If the Proformance is in Omni Mode and the program numbers are
compatible then I can only suggest that the Proformance is not receiving any
note messages and you should look at what might be happening at other points
on the signal path between your laptop and the Proformance module.

Kenneth Kuhlmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Patricia Spedden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 7:48 PM
Subject: [Finale] No Sound


 I teach at a college where we have purchased a number of Fastlane MIDI
interfaces.  They are used mainly with Macs.



 However, I have WinXP laptop that I'm trying to use at the college for a
lengthy, urgent project with the following equipment:

 * Fastlane interface
 * Fatar Studio 90 master controller with no internal sounds
 * Proformance/1 16-bit piano module
 * Amplified speakers
 * Finale 2005

 This all works fine at home with a Roland MPU64 USB interface which I've
updated with an XP driver.



 I'd prefer to be able to use the MOTU with Finale at the college (so I
don't have to disconnect everything daily), but can get no sound through the
Proformance module using the MOTU.  The MOTU in/out lights come on
appropriately, but there's no sound.  We have tried every possible
configuration with no luck.



 Could anyone tell us how to make this work as soon as possible?



 (Dr.) Patricia Spedden




 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


winmail.dat___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] MIDI Sound card problem

2004-09-15 Thread Ben Michelle Farley
Have you rebooted windows... tends to fix a lot of problems

-Original Message-
From: Giz Bowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2004 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Finale] MIDI  Sound card problem

I've just tried using WinFin2005  my transcribing software, only to get an 
error from Transcribe! that the sound card is already in use. It seems I 
had the same conflict in WinFin2004, only I've forgotten how I fixed it. 
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Giz

___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale