RE: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ...
What's the easiest way to clear out all of the /compat/linux stuff and start all over again? -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands > -Original Message- > From: Adi Pircalabu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:42 > To: Kiffin Gish > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ... > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:54:04 +0100 > "Kiffin Gish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32: error while loading shared > > libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object > file: No such > > file or directory *** Error code 127 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. > > > > --end--- > > > > Something to do with the xorg stuff for linux perhaps? > > Something went bad during your updates. Some ports were not > updated. Do you have an up-to-date x11/linux-XFree86-libs > port installed? Update all your dependencies and the problem > will dissapear. > > -- > Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) > > > -- > This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. > For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ...
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:54:04 +0100 "Kiffin Gish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32: error while loading shared > libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such > file or directory *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. > > --end--- > > Something to do with the xorg stuff for linux perhaps? Something went bad during your updates. Some ports were not updated. Do you have an up-to-date x11/linux-XFree86-libs port installed? Update all your dependencies and the problem will dissapear. -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Crispy Beef wrote: When the install CD boots, you normally get presented with a menu (same on an installed FreeBSD system) which allows you to choose to boot the system with; 1) ACPI Disabled 2) ACPI Enabled...a safe mode etc. etc. If you are not getting to that then it sound like you might be at the loader console . Ok, I think so, but it seems I can't load anything! Try typing 'autoload' and then hitting return to see what that does, it should start to load a kernel. Tried this yesterday an get a message such "cannot find kernel" Get the meny by typing "beastie-start"=> each entry fails. I 'll try with NetBSD this evening... if it fails go back to slack ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ...
Alright, I updated my ports and things seem to go better. However, here's the next error: --start--- # cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 # make install clean ===> Installing for linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/redhat-release - found ===> linux-gtk2-2.4.14_3 depends on file: /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 already installed gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.3.i386.rpm /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32: error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. --end--- Something to do with the xorg stuff for linux perhaps? -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands > -Original Message- > From: Adi Pircalabu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 13:25 > To: Kiffin Gish > Subject: Re: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ... > > > On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:06:16 +0100 > Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > fetch: > > > ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3. > > i386.rpm: > > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) ... > > > > Any ideas what's going wrong? > > Update your ports tree and try again. > > -- > Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) > > > -- > This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. > For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Can someone please repost the fix for installing OpenOffice on FreeBSD 6.0
A. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 14:36, Tim Greening-Jackson wrote: > Hello there. I am trying to install Open Office on my new FreeBSD > workstation, and have downloaded the appropriate BZ2 file from > OpenOffice.org and unzipped it. > > Now when I ask pkg_add to add it I get the following: > > tordella# pkg_add OOo_SRC680_m146_FreeBSD60Intel_install_en-GB.tar > pkg_add: could not find package openssl-beta-0.9.8a ! > > I recall exactly this topic being discussed on this list a few weeks > ago, but have long-since deleted the solution (IIRC, it involved some > way of forcing pkg_add to use a version of openssl other than beta > 0.9.8a. Please can someone forward the original reply or otherwise > enlighten me. > > Many thanks. > > Tim. > Tim, Searching the mail archives often helps: Try this: http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-questions_2005/msg36901.html Rob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
When the install CD boots, you normally get presented with a menu (same on an installed FreeBSD system) which allows you to choose to boot the system with; 1) ACPI Disabled 2) ACPI Enabled...a safe mode etc. etc. If you are not getting to that then it sound like you might be at the loader console . Ok, I think so, but it seems I can't load anything! Try typing 'autoload' and then hitting return to see what that does, it should start to load a kernel. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Crispy Beef wrote: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: Crispy Beef wrote: Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. Have you tried it with ACPI enabled? I think it's option 2 on the menu. You'll be needing that enabled for the system anyway. Do you talk about the BIOS menu? because I have no menu in the installer (if fact I think I'm not in the installer but in a mini-shell for loading a kernel) When the install CD boots, you normally get presented with a menu (same on an installed FreeBSD system) which allows you to choose to boot the system with; 1) ACPI Disabled 2) ACPI Enabled...a safe mode etc. etc. If you are not getting to that then it sound like you might be at the loader console . Ok, I think so, but it seems I can't load anything! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: Crispy Beef wrote: Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. Have you tried it with ACPI enabled? I think it's option 2 on the menu. You'll be needing that enabled for the system anyway. Do you talk about the BIOS menu? because I have no menu in the installer (if fact I think I'm not in the installer but in a mini-shell for loading a kernel) When the install CD boots, you normally get presented with a menu (same on an installed FreeBSD system) which allows you to choose to boot the system with; 1) ACPI Disabled 2) ACPI Enabled...a safe mode etc. etc. If you are not getting to that then it sound like you might be at the loader console. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. Have you tried it with ACPI enabled? I think it's option 2 on the menu. You'll be needing that enabled for the system anyway. -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[Fwd: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64]
Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. Have you tried it with ACPI enabled? I think it's option 2 on the menu. You'll be needing that enabled for the system anyway. -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Crispy Beef wrote: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: / I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to />/ switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. />/ I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # />/ 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. />/ I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command />/ to load a kernel but it didn't work. />/ />/ I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. / I would think you'll need to download the AMD64 ISO from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ -- Paul I Tried with these iso. Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. -- Paul Thank's a lot. I precise that I've tried with ACPI disabled, just in case. I don't know how the installer decides that no kernel can be loaded, but I suppose that some hardware is not supported. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: / I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to />/ switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. />/ I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # />/ 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. />/ I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command />/ to load a kernel but it didn't work. />/ />/ I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. / I would think you'll need to download the AMD64 ISO from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ -- Paul I Tried with these iso. Just booted my AMD64 system with the install CD from the link above and got into sysinstall no problem, booted the kernel (with ACPI) and could see all hardware being detected nicely. I remember when I first had the system that I had to flash the BIOS as the USB 2.0 stuff was causing issues with both Windows and Linux, maybe it's worth updating the BIOS, outside of that I don't really know what to suggest and will have to leave it for somebody with more FreeBSD experience to answer. -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: / I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to />/ switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. />/ I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # />/ 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. />/ I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command />/ to load a kernel but it didn't work. />/ />/ I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. / I would think you'll need to download the AMD64 ISO from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ -- Paul I Tried with these iso. I have the SN85G4 Shuttle as my main system here, it's currently running Linux , but I have the AMD64 CD here sonmewhere, will see if it can boot at all. -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: / I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to />/ switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. />/ I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # />/ 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. />/ I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command />/ to load a kernel but it didn't work. />/ />/ I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. / I would think you'll need to download the AMD64 ISO from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ -- Paul I Tried with these iso. -- JB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can someone please repost the fix for installing OpenOffice on FreeBSD 6.0
Hello there. I am trying to install Open Office on my new FreeBSD workstation, and have downloaded the appropriate BZ2 file from OpenOffice.org and unzipped it. Now when I ask pkg_add to add it I get the following: tordella# pkg_add OOo_SRC680_m146_FreeBSD60Intel_install_en-GB.tar pkg_add: could not find package openssl-beta-0.9.8a ! I recall exactly this topic being discussed on this list a few weeks ago, but have long-since deleted the solution (IIRC, it involved some way of forcing pkg_add to use a version of openssl other than beta 0.9.8a. Please can someone forward the original reply or otherwise enlighten me. Many thanks. Tim. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
Jean-Baptiste Potonnier wrote: I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command to load a kernel but it didn't work. I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. I would think you'll need to download the AMD64 ISO from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64
I'm a new FreeBSD user, just tested it on an old i386, and want to switch from Slackware linux to FreeBSD or NetBSD. I wanted to install FreeBSD on my new Shuttle SN95G5: the AMD64 cdrom # 1 boots, but a message tells me that no kernel can be loaded. I get a command line wit "boot", "ls", 'load', etc. I tried some command to load a kernel but it didn't work. I don't know if can install FreeBSD on this hardware with this CDROM. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ...
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:06:16PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > => Attempting to fetch from > ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/fedora/updates/3/i386/. > fetch: > ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/fedora/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Attempting to fetch from > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/. > fetch: > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: > Not Found > => Attempting to fetch from > ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/. > fetch: > ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) Having a quick glance over those links, there seems to be no such file, only gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.3.i386.rpm (note the 3, afaik that's indeed the way Fedora name their RPMs). I'm not sure if there used to be such a file named as above, or this is just a type or oversight from the port maintainer... As a quick fix, try downloading the available gtk2, rename it and put it in /usr/ports/distfiles (you may even have to disable CHECKSUM as it might not match). -- Riemer PalstraAmsterdam, The Netherlands [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.palstra.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cannot build linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 ...
I am trying to build the latest linux-gtk2 for FreeBSD 6.0 but it fails for some reason: # pkg_add -r linux-gtk2 Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.0-release/Latest/linux-gtk2.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.0-release/Latest/linux-gtk2.tbz' by URL # cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 # make install clean ===> Extracting for linux-gtk2-2.4.14_2 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for rpm/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for rpm/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: rpm/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm rpm/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm => gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm. => Attempting to fetch from ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/fedora/updates/3/i386/. fetch: ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/fedora/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/. fetch: ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/3/i386/gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) ... Any ideas what's going wrong? -- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Printing from FreeBSD 6.0 client to Fedora Core 4 server via CUPS/LPD
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 06:05 am, Tim Greening-Jackson wrote:
> Hello there. I hope someone can help me with what I am sure is
> an elementary problem. I am currently investigating FreeBSD
> with a view to using it on my server in place of Fedora Core
> 4. Before I move the server from Fedora to FreeBSD, I want to
> "play" with FreeBSD to make sure it can do everything I want
> and there will be no surprises when I move my server (and
> hence my business) across.
>
> I seem to be beating my head against a brick wall attempting
> to get network-based printing operating. The setup I have is
> as follows. I have a internet gateway/firewall and
> smb/nfs/print/DHCP server called "bifrost". It is connected
> via Ethernet to a workstation called "tordella".
>
> Details of the two nodes are:
>
> Linux bifrost.shellike.com 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1
> Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
>
> FreeBSD tordella 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
> Wed Dec 14 13:04:41 GMT 2005
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TORSNDKRNL i386
>
> (Note that the TORSNDKRNL kernel is the 6.0 generic one with
> support for my sound-card compiled in).
>
> Connected to bifrost is an HPLJ1200 printer (lp0). If tordella
> runs Windows 2000 it can use the printer via SMB, as can other
> Microsoft systems (e.g. my laptop)
>
> So:
>
> +-+ +-++-+
>
> | tordella| | bifrost || HPLP 1200 |
> | FreeBSD 6.0 | | Fedora 4++ (lp0) |
> | 10.0.0.10 | | 10.0.0.1|| |
>
> +--+--+ +--+--++-+
>
>
> +==+=+==+
>100BaseT
>
> Bifrost runs CUPS as its Unix printing service. Both the
> FreeBSd handbook and 'The Complete FreeBSD' suggest that LPD
> will be used on tordella. As far as I can tell the two should
> be compatible. But... when I attempt to print I get this on
> tordella:
>
> tordella# ls -l | lpr
> tordella# lpq
> tordella: Warning: lp is down: waiting for bifrost to come
> up tordella: Warning: no daemon present
> Rank Owner Job Files
> Total Size
> 1stroot 7(standard input)
> 1279 bytes
>
> and on bifrost I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lpq
> HPLJ1200 is ready
> no entries
>
> bifrost's /etc/printcap is:
>
> HPLJ1200|HPLJ1200:rm=bifrost:rp=HPLJ1200:
>
> (with comments removed) and tordella's is:
>
> lp|HPLJ1200|LaserJet 1200 on bifrost:\
>
> :sh:\
> :rm=bifrost:\
Possibly need
:rp=HPLJ1200: \
in here
> :sd=/var/spool/output/bifrost:\
> :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\
> :if=/usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/texttops:
>
and of course you have the lpd daemon started?
> On bifrost, the relevant lines of /etc/cups/cupsd.conf are:
>
>
> Order Allow,Deny
> Allow From All
> Allow from tordella
> Allow From 127.0.0.1
> AuthType None
> Allow from All
> Allow from tordella
>
> # Lines below are automatically generated - DO NOT EDIT
> Browsing On
> BrowseProtocols all
> BrowseOrder Allow,Deny
> BrowseAllow from tordella
> BrowseAllow from @LOCAL
> Listen 127.0.0.1:631
> Listen tordella
>
> Having done a man cups-lpd, I have also added the following
> to /etc/xinet.d on bifrost
xinetd.conf on BSD but might be xinet.d on FC4
>
> service printer
> {
> socket_type = stream
> protocol = tcp
> wait = no
> user = lp
> group = sys
> passenv =
> server = /usr/lib/cups/daemon/cups-lpd
> server_args = -o
> document-format=application/octet-stream }
>
Of course you have the xinetd daemon started?
Malcolm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Printing from FreeBSD 6.0 client to Fedora Core 4 server via CUPS/LPD
Hello there. I hope someone can help me with what I am sure is an
elementary problem. I am currently investigating FreeBSD with a view to
using it on my server in place of Fedora Core 4. Before I move the
server from Fedora to FreeBSD, I want to "play" with FreeBSD to make
sure it can do everything I want and there will be no surprises when I
move my server (and hence my business) across.
I seem to be beating my head against a brick wall attempting to get
network-based printing operating. The setup I have is as follows. I have
a internet gateway/firewall and smb/nfs/print/DHCP server called
"bifrost". It is connected via Ethernet to a workstation called
"tordella".
Details of the two nodes are:
Linux bifrost.shellike.com 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1
Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
FreeBSD tordella 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Wed Dec 14 13:04:41 GMT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TORSNDKRNL i386
(Note that the TORSNDKRNL kernel is the 6.0 generic one with support for
my sound-card compiled in).
Connected to bifrost is an HPLJ1200 printer (lp0). If tordella runs
Windows 2000 it can use the printer via SMB, as can other Microsoft
systems (e.g. my laptop)
So:
+-+ +-++-+
| tordella| | bifrost | | HPLP 1200 |
| FreeBSD 6.0 | | Fedora 4++ (lp0) |
| 10.0.0.10 | | 10.0.0.1|| |
+--+--+ +--+--++-+
| |
| |
+==+=+==+
100BaseT
Bifrost runs CUPS as its Unix printing service. Both the FreeBSd
handbook and 'The Complete FreeBSD' suggest that LPD will be used on
tordella. As far as I can tell the two should be compatible. But... when
I attempt to print I get this on tordella:
tordella# ls -l | lpr
tordella# lpq
tordella: Warning: lp is down: waiting for bifrost to come up
tordella: Warning: no daemon present
Rank Owner Job Files Total
Size
1stroot 7(standard input) 1279
bytes
and on bifrost I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lpq
HPLJ1200 is ready
no entries
bifrost's /etc/printcap is:
HPLJ1200|HPLJ1200:rm=bifrost:rp=HPLJ1200:
(with comments removed) and tordella's is:
lp|HPLJ1200|LaserJet 1200 on bifrost:\
:sh:\
:rm=bifrost:\
:sd=/var/spool/output/bifrost:\
:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\
:if=/usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/texttops:
On bifrost, the relevant lines of /etc/cups/cupsd.conf are:
Order Allow,Deny
Allow From All
Allow from tordella
Allow From 127.0.0.1
AuthType None
Allow from All
Allow from tordella
# Lines below are automatically generated - DO NOT EDIT
Browsing On
BrowseProtocols all
BrowseOrder Allow,Deny
BrowseAllow from tordella
BrowseAllow from @LOCAL
Listen 127.0.0.1:631
Listen tordella
Having done a man cups-lpd, I have also added the following
to /etc/xinet.d on bifrost
service printer
{
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = lp
group = sys
passenv =
server = /usr/lib/cups/daemon/cups-lpd
server_args = -o document-format=application/octet-stream
}
I'd be grateful for any advice anyone has. Many thanks in advance.
Tim Greening-Jackson
Manchester, UK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0: Problem with network, doesn't use default
Glenn Dawson wrote: At 07:18 AM 1/3/2006, Christer Folkesson wrote: Hi, this is my first message to the mailing-list. I hope that I have included enough information about the problem. The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release) won't use the default route (gateway). So I can't access anything on the internet. Hardware and network equipment: Dell latitude D810 (Pentium M 2.0 GHz, 1.5 GB of primary memory, broadcom gigabit/fast/"normal" ethernet controller). The broadcom chip uses the bge driver. I have looked in the man page for that and no troubles or something like that is mentioned. IPv4 address: 192.168.0.228 /25 The gateway is a netgear RP614 broadband router. IPv4: 192.168.0.199 /25 Also a windows 2003 server is acting as DNS-server for my network. FreeBSD shares the computer with windows XP pro SP2 using dual boot. In windows it works fine so this convince me that it's a software problem in FreeBSD. As said, it works perfectly fine inside the LAN, but not outside. I include a dmesg output (at the bottom) if that is of any importance and also output from ifconfig, netstat -nr, ping and traceroute. I was logged in as root while testing this. Notice that because I'm using an internal DNS-server I can do lookups. Obviously that wouldn't have been possible with the DNS-server provided by my ISP. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the configuration info you sent below. The problem you are having is more likely in the router you are using, but without that configuration info, it's impossible to tell. Are you using dhcp to assign IP addresses? If so, is the router doing that job or something else? Since you mentioned that it works when you boot into windows, are the network settings the same? (IP, netmask, default route ,etc) or is windows configured to use something different? How is NAT configured in the router? Does it's configuration cover the 192.168.0.228 address? -Glenn Problem is solved! Sometimes oneself must be told to re-think what you think you already have though of ;-) (I'm not using DHCP for the record) The network settings for the broadcom controller wasn't the same in windows, but the same as the intel p/w 2915 wireless controller in windows. IP for broadcom in windows was 192.168.0.225 /25 and .228 for the wireless. My conclusion is that the netgear RP614 played along fine in the LAN. For example I had no problem accessing it's web-interface. BUT when it comes to do NAT:ing it must have remembered the MAC of .228 (since I had used windows right before freebsd) and the NAT function of it refuse to understand that it has to use another MAC for sending back information. After changing the broadcom controller's IP in freebsd to 192.168.0.225 /25 it works perfectly. Thanks to you all for your replys. I have still some endeavors left before freebsd is like a hand in the glove on my laptop, but hopefully I won't run in to "unresolvable" problems =) / Christer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0: Problem with network, doesn't use default gateway
At 07:18 AM 1/3/2006, Christer Folkesson wrote: Hi, this is my first message to the mailing-list. I hope that I have included enough information about the problem. The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release) won't use the default route (gateway). So I can't access anything on the internet. Hardware and network equipment: Dell latitude D810 (Pentium M 2.0 GHz, 1.5 GB of primary memory, broadcom gigabit/fast/"normal" ethernet controller). The broadcom chip uses the bge driver. I have looked in the man page for that and no troubles or something like that is mentioned. IPv4 address: 192.168.0.228 /25 The gateway is a netgear RP614 broadband router. IPv4: 192.168.0.199 /25 Also a windows 2003 server is acting as DNS-server for my network. FreeBSD shares the computer with windows XP pro SP2 using dual boot. In windows it works fine so this convince me that it's a software problem in FreeBSD. As said, it works perfectly fine inside the LAN, but not outside. I include a dmesg output (at the bottom) if that is of any importance and also output from ifconfig, netstat -nr, ping and traceroute. I was logged in as root while testing this. Notice that because I'm using an internal DNS-server I can do lookups. Obviously that wouldn't have been possible with the DNS-server provided by my ISP. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the configuration info you sent below. The problem you are having is more likely in the router you are using, but without that configuration info, it's impossible to tell. Are you using dhcp to assign IP addresses? If so, is the router doing that job or something else? Since you mentioned that it works when you boot into windows, are the network settings the same? (IP, netmask, default route ,etc) or is windows configured to use something different? How is NAT configured in the router? Does it's configuration cover the 192.168.0.228 address? -Glenn alcoy# ifconfig bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.228 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:14:22:e1:41:be media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 alcoy# netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.0.199 UGS 0 52 bge0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 52lo0 192.168.0.128/25 link#1 UC 00 bge0 192.168.0.199 00:09:5b:10:de:14 UHLW2 190 bge0 1182 192.168.0.210 00:05:5d:0c:f8:23 UHLW1 29 bge0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%bge0/64link#1 UC bge0 fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 00:14:22:e1:41:be UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHL lo0 ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 ff02::%bge0/32link#1 UC bge0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 alcoy# traceroute ping.sunet.se traceroute to ping.sunet.se (130.242.80.31), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 sentinel (192.168.0.199) 0.524 ms 0.518 ms 0.515 ms 2 * * * ^C alcoy# ping sentinel PING router.aqualize.tk (192.168.0.199): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 time=0.669 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=0.679 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=0.673 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=0.673 ms ^C --- router.aqualize.tk ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.669/0.673/0.679/0.004 ms alcoy# Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz (1995.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6d8 Stepping = 8 Features=0xafe9fbff Features2=0x180 AMD Features=0x10 real memory = 1610448896 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1569087488 (1496 MB) ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 9 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 7 on acpi0 pci_
Re: FreeBSD 6.0: Problem with network, doesn't use default gateway
Christer Folkesson wrote: Hi, this is my first message to the mailing-list. I hope that I have included enough information about the problem. The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release) won't use the default route (gateway). So I can't access anything on the internet. [snip] I may have snipped some clue to what's actually wrong, but don't let that discourage you from trying to file complete problem reports. I'm a snipper. What I found to be most relevant follows. Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.0.199 UGS 0 52 bge0 [snip] This shows generally that the router IP is being properly used by FreeBSD as a gateway (Use = 52). Suggests that your assumption that FreeBSD isn't using the gateway properly is not correct. alcoy# traceroute ping.sunet.se traceroute to ping.sunet.se (130.242.80.31), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 sentinel (192.168.0.199) 0.524 ms 0.518 ms 0.515 ms [snip] This shows the gateway IP is being properly used by FreeBSD as the appropriate route to ping.sunet.se. Indicates that the problem really is not FreeBSD's default route configuration or functionality. The route is clearly being used. alcoy# ping sentinel PING router.aqualize.tk (192.168.0.199): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 time=0.669 ms [snip] This shows you communicating with the gateway directly (confirms the assertion that local LAN operations are doing just fine). Since your packets are being routed and NATed by the gateway correctly when the box is in Windows mode, packets should be getting routed and NATed correctly for FreeBSD as well. That is, if the box in Windows mode is using the same IP number and mask as the FreeBSD settings (you should double check that it is). If the gateway is running fine (seems to be) and FreeBSD is properly using the gateway (seems to be), then the most likely suspect seems to be firewall configuration -- after your connection is properly routed, reply packets from the Internet could be getting dropped on the floor by your gateway or by FreeBSD. Have you configured any kind of packet filter (ipf, ipfw, other) for FreeBSD? Try disabling that and see if your results change. If so, tune your filtering rules accordingly. Use of tcpdump -i bge0 may also be informative (see man tcpdump). -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0: Problem with network, doesn't use default gateway
--- Christer Folkesson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, this is my first message to the > mailing-list. I hope that I have > included > enough information about the problem. > > The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release) > won't use the default route > (gateway). So I can't access anything on the > internet. > > Hardware and network equipment: > Dell latitude D810 (Pentium M 2.0 GHz, 1.5 GB > of primary memory, broadcom > gigabit/fast/"normal" ethernet controller). > The broadcom chip uses the bge driver. I have > looked in the man page for > that > and no troubles or something like that is > mentioned. > IPv4 address: 192.168.0.228 /25 > > The gateway is a netgear RP614 broadband > router. IPv4: 192.168.0.199 /25 > > Also a windows 2003 server is acting as > DNS-server for my network. > > FreeBSD shares the computer with windows XP pro > SP2 using dual boot. > In windows it works fine so this convince me > that it's a software > problem in > FreeBSD. > > As said, it works perfectly fine inside the > LAN, but not outside. > > > I include a dmesg output (at the bottom) if > that is of any importance > and also > output from ifconfig, netstat -nr, ping and > traceroute. > I was logged in as root while testing this. > Notice that because I'm using an internal > DNS-server I can do lookups. > Obviously that wouldn't have been possible with > the DNS-server provided > by my > ISP. > > > > alcoy# ifconfig > bge0: > flags=8843 > mtu 1500 > > options=1a >inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 > prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >inet 192.168.0.228 netmask 0xff80 > broadcast 192.168.0.255 >ether 00:14:22:e1:41:be >media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > ) >status: active > lo0: flags=8049 > mtu 16384 >inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x2 >inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 > alcoy# netstat -nr > Routing tables > > Internet: > DestinationGatewayFlags > Refs Use Netif Expire > default192.168.0.199 UGS > 0 52 bge0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH > 0 52lo0 > 192.168.0.128/25 link#1 UC > 00 bge0 > 192.168.0.199 00:09:5b:10:de:14 UHLW > 2 190 bge0 1182 > 192.168.0.210 00:05:5d:0c:f8:23 UHLW > 1 29 bge0 > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway > > Flags Netif Expire > ::1 ::1 > > UH lo0 > fe80::%bge0/64link#1 > > UC bge0 > fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 > 00:14:22:e1:41:be > UHL lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 > > U lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#2 > > UHL lo0 > ff01::/32 ::1 > > U lo0 > ff02::%bge0/32link#1 > > UC bge0 > ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 > > UC lo0 > alcoy# traceroute ping.sunet.se > traceroute to ping.sunet.se (130.242.80.31), 64 > hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 sentinel (192.168.0.199) 0.524 ms 0.518 ms > 0.515 ms > 2 * * * > ^C > alcoy# ping sentinel > PING router.aqualize.tk (192.168.0.199): 56 > data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 > time=0.669 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 > time=0.679 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 > time=0.673 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 > time=0.673 ms > ^C > --- router.aqualize.tk ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% > packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = > 0.669/0.673/0.679/0.004 ms > alcoy# It seems obvious from the traceroute that its going to the gateway. Since the address of the system is not a legal internet address, its likely a NAT problem. I'd look closely at the windows setup to see what might be different. DT __ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0: Problem with network, doesn't use default gateway
Hi, this is my first message to the mailing-list. I hope that I have included enough information about the problem. The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release) won't use the default route (gateway). So I can't access anything on the internet. Hardware and network equipment: Dell latitude D810 (Pentium M 2.0 GHz, 1.5 GB of primary memory, broadcom gigabit/fast/"normal" ethernet controller). The broadcom chip uses the bge driver. I have looked in the man page for that and no troubles or something like that is mentioned. IPv4 address: 192.168.0.228 /25 The gateway is a netgear RP614 broadband router. IPv4: 192.168.0.199 /25 Also a windows 2003 server is acting as DNS-server for my network. FreeBSD shares the computer with windows XP pro SP2 using dual boot. In windows it works fine so this convince me that it's a software problem in FreeBSD. As said, it works perfectly fine inside the LAN, but not outside. I include a dmesg output (at the bottom) if that is of any importance and also output from ifconfig, netstat -nr, ping and traceroute. I was logged in as root while testing this. Notice that because I'm using an internal DNS-server I can do lookups. Obviously that wouldn't have been possible with the DNS-server provided by my ISP. alcoy# ifconfig bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.228 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:14:22:e1:41:be media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 alcoy# netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.0.199 UGS 0 52 bge0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 52lo0 192.168.0.128/25 link#1 UC 00 bge0 192.168.0.199 00:09:5b:10:de:14 UHLW2 190 bge0 1182 192.168.0.210 00:05:5d:0c:f8:23 UHLW1 29 bge0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%bge0/64link#1 UC bge0 fe80::214:22ff:fee1:41be%bge0 00:14:22:e1:41:be UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHL lo0 ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 ff02::%bge0/32link#1 UC bge0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 alcoy# traceroute ping.sunet.se traceroute to ping.sunet.se (130.242.80.31), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 sentinel (192.168.0.199) 0.524 ms 0.518 ms 0.515 ms 2 * * * ^C alcoy# ping sentinel PING router.aqualize.tk (192.168.0.199): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 time=0.669 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=0.679 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=0.673 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=0.673 ms ^C --- router.aqualize.tk ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.669/0.673/0.679/0.004 ms alcoy# Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz (1995.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6d8 Stepping = 8 Features=0xafe9fbff Features2=0x180 AMD Features=0x10 real memory = 1610448896 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1569087488 (1496 MB) ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 9 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 7 on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: on acpi0 pci_link6: on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 battery1: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 Dont Detect My PCIExpress Card...? Radeon X300.
perikillo schrieb: Hi people. I have this motherboard: http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=652 K8N Neo4 AMD64 I install freebsd 6.0 AMD64, the installation was easy. The problema is my VGA card is one PCIExpress ATI Radeon X300, i install suse 10 on the same computer and suse detect the card, i say if suse can bsd can, but no :-( There is no reason for this conclusion. , on the BIOS i dont have the option PnP OS = YES or NO, i have 2 options for the VGA card: PCIE or PCI, and IRQ Auto and Manual, i test both Auto and Manual, but still didnt detect my card. What do you mean with detection of the card? How do you determine whether the card has been detected or not? I read the NOTES file and found two options: drm radeondrm These are for 3D support, but "man radeon" says that your card isn't supported in this regard by this driver. [...] If iam correct pci5 is my the PCIE card...? But dont see nothing that say PCIExpress Card...? This is not a problem because PCI express devices appear as regular PCI devices. I have 2 options, find another VGA card compatible with freebsd or continue locking for help and maybe the results would not be good ? Buy an Nvidia card if you need 3D support necessarily, because Nvidia offers drivers for FreeBSD. ATI does not; they support Linux only. The third option would be to do it without 3D support. This should work always. If you have problems with configuring the X Window Server then /var/log/Xorg.0.log might be helpful. :-) Another thing is that, if i compile the GENERIC kernel deleting some fields but let the 3 options for Firewire support, make send me errors and dosent finish...? [...] Most likely you deleted some options that are necessary for firewire support. I can't say more unless you tell the error message and your kernel configuration file. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 Dont Detect My PCIExpress Card...? Radeon X300.
Hi people. I have this motherboard: http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=652 K8N Neo4 AMD64 I install freebsd 6.0 AMD64, the installation was easy. The problema is my VGA card is one PCIExpress ATI Radeon X300, i install suse 10 on the same computer and suse detect the card, i say if suse can bsd can, but no :-(, on the BIOS i dont have the option PnP OS = YES or NO, i have 2 options for the VGA card: PCIE or PCI, and IRQ Auto and Manual, i test both Auto and Manual, but still didnt detect my card. I read the NOTES file and found two options: drm radeondrm I enable both options on the kernel file, install the kernel but still didnt detect my ATI card, this is my dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Mon Jan 2 17:05:34 PST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64 Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0x8065e000. ACPI APIC Table: Calibrating clock(s) ... i8254 clock: 1193191 Hz CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Calibrating TSC clock ... TSC clock: 1809280663 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (1809.28-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20ff0 Stepping = 0 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800,LM,3DNow+,3DNow> L1 2MB data TLB: 8 entries, fully associative L1 2MB instruction TLB: 8 entries, fully associative L1 4KB data TLB: 32 entries, fully associative L1 4KB instruction TLB: 32 entries, fully associative L1 data cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative L1 instruction cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative L2 2MB unified TLB: 0 entries, disabled/not present L2 4KB data TLB: 512 entries, 4-way associative L2 4KB instruction TLB: 512 entries, 4-way associative L2 unified cache: 512 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 16-way associative real memory = 1073676288 (1023 MB) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x1000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x0075b000 - 0x3e1a, 1034244096 bytes (252501 pages) avail memory = 1029566464 (981 MB) APIC: CPU 0 has ACPI ID 0 MADT: Found IO APIC ID 2, Interrupt 0 at 0xfec0 ioapic0: Routing external 8259A's -> intpin 0 ioapic0: intpin 0 -> ExtINT (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 1 -> ISA IRQ 1 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 2 -> ISA IRQ 2 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 3 -> ISA IRQ 3 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 4 -> ISA IRQ 4 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 5 -> ISA IRQ 5 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 6 -> ISA IRQ 6 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 7 -> ISA IRQ 7 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 8 -> ISA IRQ 8 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 9 -> ISA IRQ 9 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 10 -> ISA IRQ 10 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 11 -> ISA IRQ 11 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 12 -> ISA IRQ 12 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 13 -> ISA IRQ 13 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 14 -> ISA IRQ 14 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 15 -> ISA IRQ 15 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 16 -> PCI IRQ 16 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 17 -> PCI IRQ 17 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 18 -> PCI IRQ 18 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 19 -> PCI IRQ 19 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 20 -> PCI IRQ 20 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 21 -> PCI IRQ 21 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 22 -> PCI IRQ 22 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 23 -> PCI IRQ 23 (level, low) MADT: Interrupt override: source 9, irq 9 ioapic0: intpin 9 trigger: level ioapic0: intpin 9 polarity: high MADT: Interrupt override: source 14, irq 14 ioapic0: intpin 14 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 14 polarity: high MADT: Interrupt override: source 15, irq 15 ioapic0: intpin 15 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 15 polarity: high lapic0: Routing NMI -> LINT1 lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high MADT: Ignoring local NMI routed to ACPI CPU 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard cpu0 BSP: ID: 0x VER: 0x00050010 LDR: 0x0100 DFR: 0x0fff lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x0400 TPR: 0x SVR: 0x01ff timer: 0x000100ef therm: 0x0001 err: 0x0001 pcm: 0x0001 wlan: <802.11 Link Layer> mem: netsmb_dev: loaded null: random: io: acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [MPSAFE] pci_open(1):mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80003804 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x8000 (0x8000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=058000] [hdr=00] is there (id=005e10de) acpi_bus_number: root bus has no _BBN, assuming 0 acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR AcpiOsDerivePciId: bus 0 dev 1 func 0 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: root bus has no _BBN, assuming 0 acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number
FreeBSD 6.0 Release: XMMS causes kernel panic if HTT is enabled
Hello,
If HTT is disabled in BIOS configurator, XMMS works fine (It played about a
week continiously ). If HTT is enabled XMMS causes kernel panic after few
hours of playing. Any ideas?
StackTrace:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0x18
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc04c2497
stack pointer = 0x28:0xeb32e9dc
frame pointer = 0x28:0xeb32ea18
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 2990 (xmms)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 1
Uptime: 1h50m30s
Dumping 2559 MB (2 chunks)
chunk 0: 1MB (159 pages)
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0x1c
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc052c178
stack pointer = 0x28:0xe7ac1c8c
frame pointer = 0x28:0xe7ac1ccc
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 36 (swi4: clock sio)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 1
... ok
chunk 1: 2559MB (655024 pages) 2543 2527 2511 2495 2479 2463 2447 2431 2415
2399 2383 2367 2351 2335 2319 2303 2287 2271 2255 2239 2223 2207 2191 2175
2159 2143 2127 2111 2095 2079 2063 2047 2031 2015 1999 1983 1967 1951 1935
1919 1903 1887 1871 1855 1839 1823 1807 1791 1775 1759 1743 1727 1711 1695
1679 1663 1647 1631 1615 1599 1583 1567 1551 1535 1519 1503 1487 1471 1455
1439 1423 1407 1391 1375 1359 1343 1327 1311 1295 1279 1263 1247 1231 1215
1199 1183 1167 1151 1135 1119 1103 1087 1071 1055 1039 1023 1007 991 975 959
943 927 911 895 879 863 847 831 815 799 783 767 751 735 719 703 687 671 655
639 623 607 591 575 559 543 527 511 495 479 463 447 431 415 399 383 367 351
335 319 303 287 271 255 239 223 207 191 175 159 143 127 111 95 79 63 47 31 15
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc051d5d3 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:399
#2 0xc051d984 in panic (fmt=0xc06b29f9 "%s")
at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:555
#3 0xc0698b28 in trap_fatal (frame=0xeb32e99c, eva=0)
at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:831
#4 0xc0698821 in trap_pfault (frame=0xeb32e99c, usermode=0, eva=24)
at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:742
#5 0xc0698407 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = -349044728, tf_es = -1066532824, tf_ds = -996474840, tf_edi =
0, tf_esi = -348984384, tf_ebp = -348984808, tf_isp = -348984888, tf_ebx = 0,
tf_edx = 18, tf_ecx = -348984752, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2,
tf_eip = -1068751721, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66054, tf_esp = -1002219520,
tf_ss = 4098}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:432
#6 0xc0683e7a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139
#7 0xc04c2497 in devfs_open (ap=0xeb32ea50)
at ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:703
#8 0xc06a3328 in VOP_OPEN_APV (vop=0x0, a=0x12) at vnode_if.c:372
#9 0xc0591a5c in vn_open_cred (ndp=0xeb32ebc0, flagp=0xeb32ecc0, cmode=0,
cred=0xc5421880, fdidx=18) at vnode_if.h:198
#10 0xc05915bf in vn_open (ndp=0xeb32ea50, flagp=0x0, cmode=0, fdidx=0)
at ../../../kern/vfs_vnops.c:91
#11 0xc0589068 in kern_open (td=0xc55e3600, path=0x0, pathseg=UIO_USERSPACE,
flags=1, mode=0) at ../../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:979
#12 0xc0588f66 in open (td=0x0, uap=0xeb32ed04)
at ../../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:945
#13 0xc0698f0f in syscall (frame=
{tf_fs = 137232443, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = -1090584517, tf_edi = 135516160,
tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1077942680, tf_isp = -348983964, tf_ebx = 675767476,
tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 135935024, tf_eax = 5, tf_trapno = 22, tf_err = 2,
tf_eip = 676095987, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 582, tf_esp = -1077942724, tf_ss
= 59}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:976
#14 0xc0683ecf in Xint0x80_syscall () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:200
#15 0x0033 in ?? ()
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(kgdb) up 7
#7 0xc04c2497 in devfs_open (ap=0xeb32ea50)
at ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:703
703 fp = ap->a_td->td_proc->p_fd->fd_ofiles[ap->a_fdidx];
(kgdb) p ap->a_fdidx
$1 = 18
(kgdb) p ap->a_td->td_proc->p_fd->fd_ofiles[18]
$2 = (struct file *) 0x0
(kgdb) p ap->a_td->td_proc->p_fd->fd_ofiles[17]
$3 = (struct file *) 0xc4c39d38
(kgdb)
dmesg output and kernel configuration file are attached.
--
Oleg S. Sidorkin
#
# GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386
#
# For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on
# Kernel Configuration Files:
#
#
http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html
#
# The handbook is also available locally
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:54, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Yuan Jue wrote:
> >>It appears you can set some default values:
> >>
> >> default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] }
> >> If for some set of options the client should use the value sup-
> >> plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no
> >> value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined
> >> in the default statement.
> >>
> >>I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also
> >>take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very
> >>usefull. Something like this I guess:
> >>
> >> interface bge0 {
> >> default {
> >> fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here;
> >> subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here;
> >> ...
> >> }
> >> }
> >
> > sorry, I still don't quite get what you mean. it seems my default setting
> > is this though it is not written in dhclient.conf.
> >
> > how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf?
> > like as follows?
>
> The dhclient.conf does not contain any interface configuration values
> unless you write it. dhcp automatically reads dhclient.conf on startup,
> so you just need to enable dhcp for the interfaces you want configured.
>
> In rc.conf insert
>
>interface_ath0="DHCP"
>interface_bge0="DHCP"
>
> Create dhclient.conf like this
>
>interface ath0 {
>default {
> ... the default configuration for your wireless nic ...
>}
>}
>interface bge0 {
>default {
> ... the default configuration for your wired nic ...
>}
>}
>
> No need to mention any scripts in dhclient.conf. In the default
> configuration you need to specify at least: ip address, netmask, router
> and nameserver, see dhclient.conf(5) for the names of those variables.
>
> You only need to create an interface specific section if you need to
> configure the nic with values other than those provided by the dhcp
> server. If your ath0 is always configured with dhcp (as I understood)
> and you are happy with that, no need to make that section in the
> dhclient.conf - or keep it empty.
>
> Then run
>
> # /etc/rc.d/netif restart
thanks for your kind suggestions :) it is very useful.
but, in my situation, there are two things needed to mention:
1. normally the wireless NIC is not in the kernel when system boots, so
no need to "if_ath0="DHCP" every time
2. usually I use my laptop in dormitory with a static IP address. so no
need to "if_bge0="DHCP" every time
finally, I figure out that "ifconfig bge0 delete" before I wanna use the
wireless NIC would sound better for me :)
--
Best Regards.
Yuan Jue
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Romeo Theriault wrote: Hi, I'm interested in how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date without having to follow the stable branch. All of the security advisories have instructions on how to patch systems up to 5.4, even though 6.0 is listed as affected also. I've read that 'freebsd-update' will do this, is this correct? But if I don't want to use 'freebsd-update' is there a security branch I can follow with CVSup. Yes. In your supfile for system updates, put *default tag=RELENG_6_0 Then, when you cvsup, you will get 6.0-RELEASE with the latest security updates. -- Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date
Hi, I'm interested in how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date without having to follow the stable branch. All of the security advisories have instructions on how to patch systems up to 5.4, even though 6.0 is listed as affected also. I've read that 'freebsd- update' will do this, is this correct? But if I don't want to use 'freebsd-update' is there a security branch I can follow with CVSup. Thanks, Romeo Theriault ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 Installed on Adaptec 2100S RAID 5 But Won't Boot
Solved. Something in the BIOS. I reset to defaults, then re-configured. Only thing that's different is that it boots now. Derek Derek Flenniken wrote: I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for slice creation, partition. Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable FreeBSD Boot Manager Default Partition Scheme If I install again I see my slice and partitions from the previous install. I've gone through the configurations with the 2100S and can't find anything wrong with the settings. System POSTs, 2100S POSTs, then blinking cursor for a while and finally a No OS message. Any ideas? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0 Installed on Adaptec 2100S RAID 5 But Won't Boot
I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for slice creation, partition. Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable FreeBSD Boot Manager Default Partition Scheme If I install again I see my slice and partitions from the previous install. I've gone through the configurations with the 2100S and can't find anything wrong with the settings. System POSTs, 2100S POSTs, then blinking cursor for a while and finally a No OS message. Any ideas? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On 2005-12-28 21:32, Yuan Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf?
> like as follows?
>
> interface ath0 {
> default {
> script "/etc/dhclient-script";
> }
> }
You don't. An interface is not configured to use DHCP by
modifying "dhclient.conf". The dhclient.conf file is used by
dhclient to find out *options* for interfaces that are configured
to use "DHCP" in the "/etc/rc.conf" file. The rc.conf file is
the one you have to edit & make sure that it contains something
like:
ifconfig_ath0="DHCP"
Then, when dhclient *is* started for 'ath0' it will read the file
/etc/dhclient.conf looking for a matching set of options.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue wrote:
It appears you can set some default values:
default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] }
If for some set of options the client should use the value sup-
plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no
value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined
in the default statement.
I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also
take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very
usefull. Something like this I guess:
interface bge0 {
default {
fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here;
subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here;
...
}
}
sorry, I still don't quite get what you mean. it seems my default setting
is this though it is not written in dhclient.conf.
how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf?
like as follows?
The dhclient.conf does not contain any interface configuration values
unless you write it. dhcp automatically reads dhclient.conf on startup,
so you just need to enable dhcp for the interfaces you want configured.
In rc.conf insert
interface_ath0="DHCP"
interface_bge0="DHCP"
Create dhclient.conf like this
interface ath0 {
default {
... the default configuration for your wireless nic ...
}
}
interface bge0 {
default {
... the default configuration for your wired nic ...
}
}
No need to mention any scripts in dhclient.conf. In the default
configuration you need to specify at least: ip address, netmask, router
and nameserver, see dhclient.conf(5) for the names of those variables.
You only need to create an interface specific section if you need to
configure the nic with values other than those provided by the dhcp
server. If your ath0 is always configured with dhcp (as I understood)
and you are happy with that, no need to make that section in the
dhclient.conf - or keep it empty.
Then run
# /etc/rc.d/netif restart
Cheers, Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org
S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt
Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72
Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Monday 26 December 2005 16:56, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Yuan Jue wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> >>Yuan Jue wrote:
> >>>one more question
> >>>since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address
> >>>in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure
> >>> from time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default
> >>> setting, which is as follows:
> >>>
> >>>what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my
> >>>situation?
> >>
> >>Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all
> >>interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to
> >>configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a
> >>lease is not obtained.
> >>
> >>Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take
> >>down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp
> >>configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because
> >>usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/
> >>networks.
> >
> > thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I
> > still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :)
>
> Of course I guess you read the man-page, but maybe you didn't see this:
>
yes, i do
>The dhclient.conf file can be used to configure the behaviour of the
>client in a wide variety of ways: protocol timing, information
>requested from the server, information required of the server,
>defaults to use if the server does not provide certain information,
>values with which to override information provided by the server, or
>values to prepend or append to information provided by the server.
>The configuration file can also be preinitialized with addresses to
>use on networks that do not have DHCP servers.
>
> It appears you can set some default values:
>
>default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] }
> If for some set of options the client should use the value sup-
> plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no
> value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined
> in the default statement.
>
> I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also
> take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very
> usefull. Something like this I guess:
>
>interface bge0 {
>default {
>fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here;
>subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here;
>...
>}
>}
>
sorry, I still don't quite get what you mean. it seems my default setting
is this though it is not written in dhclient.conf.
> You might want to toggle timeout so defaults take effect faster.
>
> If both interfaces are configured with dhcp then dhclient will
> unconfigure the interface if there is no connection be it wired or
> wireless and the configuration of the working interface should take effect.
how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf?
like as follows?
interface ath0 {
default {
script "/etc/dhclient-script";
}
}
looking forward more explanations
thanks
--
Best Regards.
Yuan Jue
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2005-12-26 11:07, Yuan Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > instead, I figure out another way to work around.
> >
> > 1.ifconfig bge0 delete
> > % this would shut my local NIC down totally
> >
> > 2.kldload if_ath
> >dhclient ath0
> >
> > then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :)
> >
> > antway, thank you again!
>
> FWIW,
>
> On my laptop, which has to switch between a couple of wireless networks and
> my local LAN at home, I use custom shell scripts called ``/root/net/*.sh''
> to encapsulate the changes I'd have to manually make.
>
> I have prepared working sets of files, like:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf_home
> /etc/resolv.conf_work
>
> and then run /root/net/home.sh which contains:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> if test -n "$1" && test -f "/root/netstart-home-$1.sh" ; then
> mode="$1"
> else
> mode=wlan
> fi
>
> echo "## Stopping local services"
> /etc/rc.d/named stop
> /etc/rc.d/sendmail stop
>
> echo "## Setting up /etc and /usr/local/etc files"
> (
> cd /etc;
> cp resolv.conf_home resolv.conf;
> cp dhclient.conf_home dhclient.conf;
> cp namedb/named.conf_home namedb/named.conf;
>
> cd /usr/local/etc/postfix;
> cp main.cf_home main.cf;
> )
>
> echo "## Bringing up the network connection"
> "/root/net/netstart-home-${mode}.sh"
>
> echo "## Refreshing the firewall rules"
> /etc/rc.d/pf reload
>
> echo "## Starting local services again"
> /etc/rc.d/named start
> /etc/rc.d/sendmail start
>
> The real work is done by netstart-home-wlan.sh or netstart-home-wlan.sh.
> The wlan script is the one that sets up a wireless connection, and
> contains:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> # Default setup for my bge0 interface.
> export ifconfig_ath0="DHCP ssid 'gker' \
>wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey
> '1:0xXX'" export defaultrouter="192.168.1.2"
>
> /etc/rc.d/netif stop bge0
> /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0
>
> echo -n "Waiting for ath0 to associate "
> _timeout=0
> _associated=NO
> while [ "$_timeout" -lt 30 ]; do
> status=$( ifconfig ath0 2>&1 | grep status: |\
> awk '{print $2}' )
> if [ X"${status}" = X"associated" ]; then
> _associated=YES
> break
> fi
> echo -n '.'
> sleep 1
> _timeout=$(( $_timeout + 1 ))
> done
> if [ X"${_associated}" = X"YES" ]; then
> echo " ok"
> else
> echo ''
> echo "Failed to bring up ath0. Aborting."
> /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0
> exit 1
> fi
>
> #
> # The default route may be pointing to another interface. Find out
> # the IP address of the default gateway, delete it and point to the
> # default gateway of my home network.
> #
> if [ -n "${defaultrouter}" ]; then
> _oldrouter=`netstat -rn | grep default | awk '{print $2}'`
> if [ -n "${_oldrouter}" ]; then
> route delete default "${_oldrouter}"
> unset _oldrouter
> fi
> route add default "$defaultrouter"
> fi
>
> This seems to work remarkably well so far. All I need to do once the
> laptop boots is to log in as root and run the proper /root/net/*.sh script
> :)
thanks for your shell scripts. it is very appreciated.
thanks again :)
--
Best Regards.
Yuan Jue
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On 2005-12-26 11:07, Yuan Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> instead, I figure out another way to work around.
>
> 1.ifconfig bge0 delete
> % this would shut my local NIC down totally
>
> 2.kldload if_ath
>dhclient ath0
>
> then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :)
>
> antway, thank you again!
FWIW,
On my laptop, which has to switch between a couple of wireless networks and
my local LAN at home, I use custom shell scripts called ``/root/net/*.sh''
to encapsulate the changes I'd have to manually make.
I have prepared working sets of files, like:
/etc/resolv.conf_home
/etc/resolv.conf_work
and then run /root/net/home.sh which contains:
#!/bin/sh
if test -n "$1" && test -f "/root/netstart-home-$1.sh" ; then
mode="$1"
else
mode=wlan
fi
echo "## Stopping local services"
/etc/rc.d/named stop
/etc/rc.d/sendmail stop
echo "## Setting up /etc and /usr/local/etc files"
(
cd /etc;
cp resolv.conf_home resolv.conf;
cp dhclient.conf_home dhclient.conf;
cp namedb/named.conf_home namedb/named.conf;
cd /usr/local/etc/postfix;
cp main.cf_home main.cf;
)
echo "## Bringing up the network connection"
"/root/net/netstart-home-${mode}.sh"
echo "## Refreshing the firewall rules"
/etc/rc.d/pf reload
echo "## Starting local services again"
/etc/rc.d/named start
/etc/rc.d/sendmail start
The real work is done by netstart-home-wlan.sh or netstart-home-wlan.sh.
The wlan script is the one that sets up a wireless connection, and
contains:
#!/bin/sh
# Default setup for my bge0 interface.
export ifconfig_ath0="DHCP ssid 'gker' \
wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey '1:0xXX'"
export defaultrouter="192.168.1.2"
/etc/rc.d/netif stop bge0
/etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0
echo -n "Waiting for ath0 to associate "
_timeout=0
_associated=NO
while [ "$_timeout" -lt 30 ]; do
status=$( ifconfig ath0 2>&1 | grep status: |\
awk '{print $2}' )
if [ X"${status}" = X"associated" ]; then
_associated=YES
break
fi
echo -n '.'
sleep 1
_timeout=$(( $_timeout + 1 ))
done
if [ X"${_associated}" = X"YES" ]; then
echo " ok"
else
echo ''
echo "Failed to bring up ath0. Aborting."
/etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0
exit 1
fi
#
# The default route may be pointing to another interface. Find out
# the IP address of the default gateway, delete it and point to the
# default gateway of my home network.
#
if [ -n "${defaultrouter}" ]; then
_oldrouter=`netstat -rn | grep default | awk '{print $2}'`
if [ -n "${_oldrouter}" ]; then
route delete default "${_oldrouter}"
unset _oldrouter
fi
route add default "$defaultrouter"
fi
This seems to work remarkably well so far. All I need to do once the
laptop boots is to log in as root and run the proper /root/net/*.sh script :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue wrote:
On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Yuan Jue wrote:
one more question
since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address
in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from
time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting,
which is as follows:
what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my
situation?
Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all
interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to
configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a
lease is not obtained.
Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take
down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp
configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because
usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/
networks.
thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I
still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :)
Of course I guess you read the man-page, but maybe you didn't see this:
The dhclient.conf file can be used to configure the behaviour of the
client in a wide variety of ways: protocol timing, information
requested from the server, information required of the server,
defaults to use if the server does not provide certain information,
values with which to override information provided by the server, or
values to prepend or append to information provided by the server.
The configuration file can also be preinitialized with addresses to
use on networks that do not have DHCP servers.
It appears you can set some default values:
default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] }
If for some set of options the client should use the value sup-
plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no
value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined
in the default statement.
I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also
take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very
usefull. Something like this I guess:
interface bge0 {
default {
fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here;
subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here;
...
}
}
You might want to toggle timeout so defaults take effect faster.
If both interfaces are configured with dhcp then dhclient will
unconfigure the interface if there is no connection be it wired or
wireless and the configuration of the working interface should take effect.
However, in any case you should expect wierd things if both interfaces
are up, and in particular for the same network. I don't know how
dhclient handles that.
Let me know if the above works, it's always good to have this kind of
examples in the archive.
Cheers, Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org
S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt
Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72
Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > one more question > > since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address > > in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from > > time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, > > which is as follows: > > > > what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my > > situation? > > Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all > interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to > configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a > lease is not obtained. > > Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take > down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp > configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because > usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ > networks. thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :) instead, I figure out another way to work around. 1.ifconfig bge0 delete % this would shut my local NIC down totally 2.kldload if_ath dhclient ath0 then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :) antway, thank you again! -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue wrote: one more question since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, which is as follows: what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my situation? Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a lease is not obtained. Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ networks. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Sunday 25 December 2005 20:51, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > > yes. they are not on the same LAN. > > but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. > > the following is how my local NIC works: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ping 166.111.8.28 > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms > > > > why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address > > as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > > OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get > wierd. Try > > # ifconfig bge0 down > > And, check that default route is set correctly. > > I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the > interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured > both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you > disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you > might think but on bge0. > > To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually > leaving your interface. one more question since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, which is as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig bge0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 59.66.138.109 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 59.66.138.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier as you can see, it is totally different from the dynamic IP address I can get. and when I go to a classroom, I use DHCP to change my bge0 settings. now the question is: since I wanna use my wireless NIC, it seems that it is not enough that just close bge0 down at this time. using command "route -n get default" i get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] route -n get default route to: default destination: default mask: default gateway: 59.66.138.1 interface: bge0 flags: recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] so even I have shutted bge0 down, the ping still cannot work correctly. how can I get things right here? I think maybe i can change the interface using by route but "route -q change interface ath0" doesn't work. it says: YuanJue# route -q change interface ath0 route: bad address: interface YuanJue# what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my situation? thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Sunday 25 December 2005 20:51, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > > yes. they are not on the same LAN. > > but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. > > the following is how my local NIC works: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ping 166.111.8.28 > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms > > > > why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address > > as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > > OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get > wierd. Try > > # ifconfig bge0 down > > And, check that default route is set correctly. thank you very much. it does work now. :) you know, back to FreeBSD 5.4, things like this never happened. so I even never think about close the local NIC down to get the wireless one works. Maybe this is the FreeBSD 6.0's improvement on wireless access, right? > > I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the > interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured > both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you > disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you > might think but on bge0. thanks for your explanations. It is very appreciated. > > To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually > leaving your interface. > > Cheers, Erik -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue wrote: On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: yes. they are not on the same LAN. but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. the following is how my local NIC works: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ping 166.111.8.28 PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get wierd. Try # ifconfig bge0 down And, check that default route is set correctly. I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you might think but on bge0. To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually leaving your interface. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > > status: associated > > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > ping: send to: No route to host > > it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the > > wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? > > > > can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. > > Take a close look at the ip/broadcast of your nic and the ip of the host > you're trying to ping. > > Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 > Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 > yes. they are not on the same LAN. but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. the following is how my local NIC works: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ping 166.111.8.28 PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=1 ttl=251 time=0.665 ms 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=2 ttl=251 time=0.521 ms ^C --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.521/0.570/0.665/0.067 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED] why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > They are not on the same network as far as I can see. > > Now, check that you have the default route set, > > # route -n get default thanks for your reply. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Erik Nørgaard wrote: Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 Just now when I think of it, maybe you meant to ping 166.111.208.28? Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue wrote: ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) status: associated ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes ping: send to: No route to host it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. Take a close look at the ip/broadcast of your nic and the ip of the host you're trying to ping. Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 They are not on the same network as far as I can see. Now, check that you have the default route set, # route -n get default Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
On Sunday 25 December 2005 18:10, you wrote: > Yuan Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? > > Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD > > 6.0. > > > > I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: > > 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" > > after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: > > Id Refs AddressSize Name > > 19 0xc040 328db0 kernel > > 21 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko > > 3 16 0xc0735000 5683cacpi.ko > > 61 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko > > 71 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko > > 81 0xc297b000 24000ath_hal.ko > > and use "ifconfig" to see this: > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast > > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 > > ath0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect > > status: no carrier > > ssid "" channel 1 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS > > > > 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" > > the response is this: > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 > > bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. > > and use "ifconfig" can see: > > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast > > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > > status: associated > > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > > > it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? > > but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected > > from the IP address I have got, like : > > ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) > > the result is this: > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ^C > > --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- > > 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > What does netstat -r say? YuanJue# netstat -r Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire ^C YuanJue# thanks for the reply. what should I do now? -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Yuan Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? > Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD > 6.0. > > I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: > 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" > after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: > Id Refs AddressSize Name > 19 0xc040 328db0 kernel > 21 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko > 3 16 0xc0735000 5683cacpi.ko > 61 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko > 71 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko > 81 0xc297b000 24000ath_hal.ko > and use "ifconfig" to see this: > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=1a > inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 > ath0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > ssid "" channel 1 > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS > > 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" > the response is this: > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 > bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. > and use "ifconfig" can see: > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > status: associated > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? > but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected > from the IP address I have got, like : > ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) > the result is this: > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ^C > --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- > 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > What does netstat -r say? Fabian -- http://www.fabiankeil.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ?
Hello, all Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD 6.0. I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: Id Refs AddressSize Name 19 0xc040 328db0 kernel 21 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko 3 16 0xc0735000 5683cacpi.ko 61 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko 71 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko 81 0xc297b000 24000ath_hal.ko and use "ifconfig" to see this: bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 ath0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel 1 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" the response is this: DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. and use "ifconfig" can see: ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) status: associated ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected from the IP address I have got, like : ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) the result is this: PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ^C --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
racoon on FreeBSD 6.0?
Hi, all I have a VPN connection between FreeBSD 4.7 and Mandriva linux 2006, which works fine for quite a while. Now, I upgrade FreeBSD 4.7 to 6.0 but found only racoon2 available in package collection. After trying to build racoon from port, I got 'port broken' message or something like that. I really don't like racoon2, several startup scripts and different configuration. Is it possible that I can get racoon running on 6.0, so I don't have to worry about new configuration? Thanks, Vincent Chen ___ 最新版 Yahoo!奇摩即時通訊 7.0，免費網路電話任你打！ http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Dual-core processors and FreeBSD 6.0
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 18:57 -0800, Justin Franks wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know if FreeBSD 6.0 supports dual-core CPU chips. Yes > Note, dual-core is different from dual CPU. > On Jun. 13, 2005 PT Wired magazine explained a dual-core CPU as the following > in a article titled "The New Chips on the Block" > "A dual-core processor differs from a single-core chip in that it has two > physical computer processing unit, or CPU, cores on a > single die." > Link here: > http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,67795,00.html > > That googling energy should have been saved by visiting freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html > > -Justin Franks > Ph: 415.261.0706 > Fx: 925-935-6096 > http://www.inetassociation.com > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Dev Tugnait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dual-core processors and FreeBSD 6.0
Hello, I would like to know if FreeBSD 6.0 supports dual-core CPU chips. Note, dual-core is different from dual CPU. On Jun. 13, 2005 PT Wired magazine explained a dual-core CPU as the following in a article titled "The New Chips on the Block" "A dual-core processor differs from a single-core chip in that it has two physical computer processing unit, or CPU, cores on a single die." Link here: http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,67795,00.html -Justin Franks Ph: 415.261.0706 Fx: 925-935-6096 http://www.inetassociation.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Unable to connect to FreeBSD 6.0 machine using serial port (COM-1)
Hello, I just installed FreeBSD 6.0 from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org. When I try to access the system by connected a serial console. I do not see any output. (It just hangs). 1. I have created a file /boot/boot.conf with line -h in it. 2. Edited the /etc/ttys to change the /dev/ttyd0 line to read ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure. Instead of ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure. 3. The /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC file has an entry device sio 4. The /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints has hint.sio.0.flags="0x10" The /var/log/messages has the following lines. sio0: configured irq 0 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled. sio0: <16550A-Compatible Com Port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flag 0x10 on acpio0 sio0: type 16550A. sio1: configured irq 0 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled. gettty repeating too quickly on port /dev/ttyd0, sleeping for 30s. Am I missing something. Please advise. Thanks, Sowmya ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE - panic: page fault
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 11:35 +, Miguel Saturnino wrote:
> My server reboots sporadically (once a day, maximum) and I hope someone
> can shed some light on why this is happening.
>
> I've upgraded to 6.0-RELEASE yesterday but the symptoms remain...
> Attached is the backtrace of the crash dump and the relevant portion
> of /var/log/messages.
>
> My custom kernel is the generic kernel plus support for quotas.
>
> Also, during last buildworld I got a "segmentation fault" (only thing I
> have in /etc/make.conf is "CFLAGS= -O -pipe" and "NO_PROFILE= true"). I
> then tried it again (in the exact same conditions), and it worked. Don't
> know if that might indicate bad RAM (the only memory test I'm able to
> run is memtest but it can only lock (to test) about 15% of the total
> system memory...).
>
Since I got no answers, I'll reply to myself ;)
I have now replaced the memory, but the problem persists. So I guess
it's highly unlikely that the problem is with the RAM. I started saving
the output of top, vmstat and iostat at each minute, and this is from
the last records I got before the last crash (the machine is a web
server but has only a few low traffic sites):
top:
last pid: 29978; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 0+16:10:46
19:41:00
123 processes: 1 running, 122 sleeping
Mem: 186M Active, 115M Inact, 64M Wired, 14M Cache, 60M Buf, 114M Free
Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
vmstat:
===
procs memory page disk faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 in sy cs us sy id
0 2 0 517256 130988 84 0 0 0 90 4 0 214 42726 495 7 4
90
iostat:
===
tty ad0 cpu
tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id
0 12 13.06 6 0.07 7 0 3 0 90
latest backtrace:
=
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0657a48
stack pointer = 0x28:0xd565eafc
frame pointer = 0x28:0xd565eb10
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 37 (swi1: net)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
Uptime: 16h11m16s
Dumping 510 MB (2 chunks)
chunk 0: 1MB (159 pages) ... ok
chunk 1: 510MB (130544 pages) 494 478 462 446 430 414 398 382 366 350
334 318 302 286 270 254 238 222 206 190 174 158 142 126 110 94 78 62 46
30 14
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
165 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td));
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc0638202 in boot (howto=260)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:399
#2 0xc0638498 in panic (fmt=0xc084ece2 "%s")
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:555
#3 0xc0808370 in trap_fatal (frame=0xd565eabc, eva=36)
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:831
#4 0xc0807b12 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = -1065418744, tf_es = -1046544344, tf_ds = -714801112,
tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = -1032972416, tf_ebp = -714740976, tf_isp =
-714741016, tf_ebx = -1046540928, tf_edx = -1032972416, tf_ecx =
-1064083040, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip =
-1067091384, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 589954, tf_esp = 40, tf_ss = 0})
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:267
#5 0xc07f750a in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
#6 0xc0657a48 in propagate_priority (td=0xc26e1780)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:233
#7 0xc06581f6 in turnstile_wait (lock=0xc09361a0, owner=0xc26e1780)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:628
#8 0xc062fa6c in _mtx_lock_sleep (m=0xc09361a0, tid=3248426368, opts=0,
file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:553
#9 0xc06772bd in sf_buf_mext (addr=0xd4623000, args=0x0)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1690
#10 0xc066d6bd in mb_free_ext (m=0xc2162b00)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:258
#11 0xc06748a4 in sbdrop_locked (sb=0xc1deb0c8, len=0) at mbuf.h:427
#12 0xc06d7938 in tcp_input (m=0xc1be3d00, off0=20)
at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:2121
#13 0xc06cf1c1 in ip_input (m=0xc1be3d00)
at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:778
#14 0xc06ac483 in netisr_processqueue (ni=0xc09292d8)
at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:236
#15 0xc06ac67e in swi_net (dummy=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:349
#16 0xc0623df9 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc19e4180)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:547
#17 0xc0623080 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0623ca0 ,
arg=0xc19e4180, frame=0xd565ed38)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:789
#18 0xc07f756c in fork_trampoline ()
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208
(kgdb) f 5
#5 0xc07f750a in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
139 calltrap
Current language: auto; currently asm
Hope someone can help me debug this...
Thanks,
Miguel
_
FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE - panic: page fault
Hi! My server reboots sporadically (once a day, maximum) and I hope someone can shed some light on why this is happening. I've upgraded to 6.0-RELEASE yesterday but the symptoms remain... Attached is the backtrace of the crash dump and the relevant portion of /var/log/messages. My custom kernel is the generic kernel plus support for quotas. Also, during last buildworld I got a "segmentation fault" (only thing I have in /etc/make.conf is "CFLAGS= -O -pipe" and "NO_PROFILE= true"). I then tried it again (in the exact same conditions), and it worked. Don't know if that might indicate bad RAM (the only memory test I'm able to run is memtest but it can only lock (to test) about 15% of the total system memory...). Thanks for your help. Regards, Miguel /var/log/messages: == Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 11 14:52:49 WET 2005 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: ACPI APIC Table: Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2393.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf33 Stepping = 3 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Features=0xbfebfbff Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Features2=0x41d Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: real memory = 535756800 (510 MB) Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: avail memory = 514928640 (491 MB) Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: npx0: [FAST] Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: npx0: on motherboard Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link0: irq 7 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link1: irq 3 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link3: irq 10 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link4: irq 0 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link5: irq 0 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link6: irq 0 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci_link7: irq 5 on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: acpi_button0: on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: acpi_button1: on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: pci0: on pcib0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: agp0: port 0xb000-0xb007 mem 0xf000-0xf7ff,0xf810-0xf817 irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: agp0: detected 892k stolen memory Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: agp0: aperture size is 128M Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci0: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb0: on uhci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci1: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb1: on uhci1 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/ Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci1: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb1: on uhci1 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci2: port 0xa800-0xa81f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb2: on uhci2 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: usb2: USB revision 1.0 Dec 12 01:32:48 tiger kernel: uhub2: In
Re: ipmon syslog facility in FreeBSD 6.0
Toomas Aas wrote: What syslog facility is ipmon using on FreeBSD 6.0? From the documentation I don't see that anything is supposed to be changed from 5.4, where it was 'security'. I found the pr bin/88780. Seems that unintentionally the syslog facility has changed to local0. I modified my syslog.conf accordingly and it does work now. -- Toomas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Can't Mount Windows NT From FreeBSD 6.0 Stable
On 12/8/05, RdBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kernel Error : > > WARNING: userland calling deprecated sysctl, please rebuild world Do as the waning tells you: Rebuild your world. Seems your userland and kernel is out of sync. The process is described here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ipmon syslog facility in FreeBSD 6.0
Hello! What syslog facility is ipmon using on FreeBSD 6.0? From the documentation I don't see that anything is supposed to be changed from 5.4, where it was 'security'. So on my freshly-installed FreeBSD 6.0 I made modifications to /etc/syslog.conf similar to those that work on 5.4. Basically I added this as the first uncommented line to /etc/syslog.conf security.* /var/log/ipfilter However, nothing is logged to /var/log/ipfilter. I'm using the default value for ipmon_flags in /etc/rc.conf and ps output shows that '/sbin/ipmon -Ds' is running. At the same time, ipfstat -ih shows increasing number of hits on rules which have 'log' keyword in them. The logfile /var/log/ipfilter exists and is mode 0600, owner root:wheel. When I enable all.log in syslog.conf, ipmon messages are logged to all.log. So it seems like I'm not using the correct facility for /var/log/ipfilter. How can I find out what the correct facility is? I tried reading the source, but it's beyond my comprehension (except contrib/ipfilter/Makefile, which seems to imply that it's still 'security'). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can't Mount Windows NT From FreeBSD 6.0 Stable
Dear All, This is my third email to freebsd-questions with the same question. Why i can't mount my nt share from my freebsd 6.0 stable. it was stabilized to 6.0 about 2 weeks ago. when i have 5.4 stable there's no such error and all fine and worked. Would you allhelp me please ? Error : [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mount_smbfs -I 192.168.0.3 //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/misc$ /mnt/workgroup/1/ Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection reset by peer Kernel Error : WARNING: userland calling deprecated sysctl, please rebuild world Thanks for the answers. RdBSD ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40
Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: after alot of time spent in this problem, I still have no solution to this and no help yet, is there nobody using IBM Blade and FreeBSD? I've used FreeBSD since 1994 and never had a problem like this. but, I tried to boot from Gentoo Linux, and it detects everything fine with all lun's useable without any apparent problem is FreeBSD not going to support IBM Blade? it seems that I'm forced to stop using FreeBSD for Linux I'm not happy. kveðja/regards Gestur From: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Sent: 6. desember 2005 12:18 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40 hi I have an update to my problem with booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade H40 I set the execution throttle to 256 from 255 and set Hard id to 5 from 125 by doing this, I get the ISP driver working and no delay when the driver boots => but when the system comes into sysinstall menu, I get no disks, it seems that the system doesn't see any drives or lun's ,,, what is causing this?? please help me with this anyone! kveðja/ best regards Gestur From: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Sent: 6. desember 2005 10:57 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40 Hi I have this new IBM Blade Center, which I would like to run FreeBSD on with boot from SAN, when trying to boot I get problems and can't see any disks from the SAN. the configuration I have is a IBM Blade Center H40 DS400 diskbox with dual controller but only single connection Qlogic 2312 dual FC controller I have problem with the ISP driver: I tried to boot from the FreeBSD 6.0-Release cd but it always fails with the error can't load kernel and I can't see the cdrom to boot from after the boot loader has started. So I downloaded the boot floppies and tried to boot the blade using the floppies but it won't show me any drivers after a long waiting period while the isp driver hangs for awile in the boot process. I compiled a custom kernel and made new boot kern floppies to boot from, and now I'm stuck with this error in the boot process: isp0: bad execution throttle of 0- using 16 isp0: bad hard address 125- resetting to zero after reading all i've gathered on this subject and googl'd on it, I put ispfw_load="YES" line in the loader.conf ,, but without result Can anyone point me out on how to solve this problem, I really need this to work !?!? please help! kveðja/regards Gestur ___ FYI, I've had an issue where I can install from the ISO disk in 4.10 and 4.11, but hang when it boots from the Hard Drive. From 5.x on, I can't even get through the installation from the CD. In both cases, it hangs at the end of the detection process. 4.9 worked fine, but I'm getting further and further behind with software updates. I tried submitting it as a bug, but nobody seems interested in working on it. Clearly something changed in the detection process at that time. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40
after alot of time spent in this problem, I still have no solution to this and no help yet, is there nobody using IBM Blade and FreeBSD? I've used FreeBSD since 1994 and never had a problem like this. but, I tried to boot from Gentoo Linux, and it detects everything fine with all lun's useable without any apparent problem is FreeBSD not going to support IBM Blade? it seems that I'm forced to stop using FreeBSD for Linux I'm not happy. kveðja/regards Gestur From: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Sent: 6. desember 2005 12:18 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40 hi I have an update to my problem with booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade H40 I set the execution throttle to 256 from 255 and set Hard id to 5 from 125 by doing this, I get the ISP driver working and no delay when the driver boots => but when the system comes into sysinstall menu, I get no disks, it seems that the system doesn't see any drives or lun's ,,, what is causing this?? please help me with this anyone! kveðja/ best regards Gestur From: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Sent: 6. desember 2005 10:57 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40 Hi I have this new IBM Blade Center, which I would like to run FreeBSD on with boot from SAN, when trying to boot I get problems and can't see any disks from the SAN. the configuration I have is a IBM Blade Center H40 DS400 diskbox with dual controller but only single connection Qlogic 2312 dual FC controller I have problem with the ISP driver: I tried to boot from the FreeBSD 6.0-Release cd but it always fails with the error can't load kernel and I can't see the cdrom to boot from after the boot loader has started. So I downloaded the boot floppies and tried to boot the blade using the floppies but it won't show me any drivers after a long waiting period while the isp driver hangs for awile in the boot process. I compiled a custom kernel and made new boot kern floppies to boot from, and now I'm stuck with this error in the boot process: isp0: bad execution throttle of 0- using 16 isp0: bad hard address 125- resetting to zero after reading all i've gathered on this subject and googl'd on it, I put ispfw_load="YES" line in the loader.conf ,, but without result Can anyone point me out on how to solve this problem, I really need this to work !?!? please help! kveðja/regards Gestur ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40
hi I have an update to my problem with booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade H40 I set the execution throttle to 256 from 255 and set Hard id to 5 from 125 by doing this, I get the ISP driver working and no delay when the driver boots => but when the system comes into sysinstall menu, I get no disks, it seems that the system doesn't see any drives or lun's ,,, what is causing this?? please help me with this anyone! kveðja/ best regards Gestur From: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Sent: 6. desember 2005 10:57 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40 Hi I have this new IBM Blade Center, which I would like to run FreeBSD on with boot from SAN, when trying to boot I get problems and can't see any disks from the SAN. the configuration I have is a IBM Blade Center H40 DS400 diskbox with dual controller but only single connection Qlogic 2312 dual FC controller I have problem with the ISP driver: I tried to boot from the FreeBSD 6.0-Release cd but it always fails with the error can't load kernel and I can't see the cdrom to boot from after the boot loader has started. So I downloaded the boot floppies and tried to boot the blade using the floppies but it won't show me any drivers after a long waiting period while the isp driver hangs for awile in the boot process. I compiled a custom kernel and made new boot kern floppies to boot from, and now I'm stuck with this error in the boot process: isp0: bad execution throttle of 0- using 16 isp0: bad hard address 125- resetting to zero after reading all i've gathered on this subject and googl'd on it, I put ispfw_load="YES" line in the loader.conf ,, but without result Can anyone point me out on how to solve this problem, I really need this to work !?!? please help! kveðja/regards Gestur ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problems booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade Center H40
Hi I have this new IBM Blade Center, which I would like to run FreeBSD on with boot from SAN, when trying to boot I get problems and can't see any disks from the SAN. the configuration I have is a IBM Blade Center H40 DS400 diskbox with dual controller but only single connection Qlogic 2312 dual FC controller I tried to boot from the FreeBSD 6.0-Release cd but it always fails with the error can't load kernel and I can't see the cdrom to boot from after the boot loader has started. So I downloaded the boot floppies and tried to boot the blade using the floppies but it won't show me any drivers after a long waiting period while the isp driver hangs for awile in the boot process. I compiled a custom kernel and made new boot kern floppies to boot from, and now I'm stuck with this error in the boot process: isp0: bad execution throttle of 0- using 16 isp0: bad hard address 125- resetting to zero after reading all i've gathered on this subject and googl'd on it, I put ispfw_load="YES" line in the loader.conf ,, but without result Can anyone point me out on how to solve this problem, I really need this to work !?!? please help! kveðja/regards Gestur ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problems with 170MB HD (FreeBSD 6.0)
> install as without swap on 10GB drive withour touching this 170MB at all. > > > then (after booting installed system) > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=512k count=1 of=/dev/your_170MB_whole_disk (like > /dev/ad1) > > and > > swapon -a /dev/ad1 > > > if it works - put > > /dev/ad1 none swap sw 0 0 > > in /etc/fstab Thanks for the reply. I did as you described above: # dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 count=1 of=/dev/ad1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.01 secs ... which looks good I'd say. But the swapon command returned a warning message: WARNING: reducing size to maximum of 67108864 blocks per swap unit I wasn't sure if that is ok. As a simple test I unpacked a rather big tarball and hoped the system would swap. Eventually it did try to swap it seems, because I got a lot of the following error messages from ad1: ad1: TIMEOUT - WRITE retrying (0 retries left) LBA=2152 ad1: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE status=51 error=5 These messages are repeated a number of times with different values for LBA, finally it stops with swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 292, size 28627, error 5 Could this be because I didn't tell the system the correct geometry settings and it still thinks I have a 18863/255/63-disk? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problems with 170MB HD (FreeBSD 6.0)
On 04 Dec Christian Wurst wrote: > I booted up from CD and started creating slices on the HDs, which > worked perfectly for the primary master HD (the 10GB one). But > sysinstall complained about an incorrect geometry setting for the > 170MB drive and asked me to enter them manually. I didn't want to > reboot to get the BIOS values and tried to finish the install without > swap at all - which worked. > Both drives worked well under Linux, so I think > it's no hardware-problem. > > Any hints would be greatly appreciated. FreeBSD not only suggested to give the values manually; it also assumed the right values itself! You say both drives work well under linux. I can tell you from own experience that the drive values linux uses are 99.9% the _same_ as the guessed values by freebsd. So, my advice would be: dont use the bios values; leave the guessed values alone. (freebsd not linux are stupid ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problems with 170MB HD (FreeBSD 6.0)
I've been trying to install FreeBSD 6.0 on an old Pentium MMX 200MHz this weekend. The box has two HDs, a ~10GB one, which I wanted to use for / and a really old ~170MB one, which I wanted to use for swap. (Of couse there would be enough space on the first disk for swap, but I had this old disk lying around here and thought why not use it.) install as without swap on 10GB drive withour touching this 170MB at all. then (after booting installed system) dd if=/dev/zero bs=512k count=1 of=/dev/your_170MB_whole_disk (like /dev/ad1) and swapon -a /dev/ad1 if it works - put /dev/ad1 none swap sw 0 0 in /etc/fstab ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cannot run FreeBSD 6.0-R in Mac Virtual PC 7
I have not been able to get any version of FreeBSD (5.x or 6.x), PC-BSD, or DesktopBSD to run inside Virtual PC 7 on my Mac Mini. The installs hang on the message: Extracting base into / directory 2% Supposedly FreeBSD did run in older versions of Virtual PC (I guess before Microsoft bought Connectix). Inside the VM, I tried selecting the types "UNIX", "Linux", and "Unspecified". None work. I wonder which "UNIX" does work. Any suggestions? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problems with 170MB HD (FreeBSD 6.0)
Hello, I've been trying to install FreeBSD 6.0 on an old Pentium MMX 200MHz this weekend. The box has two HDs, a ~10GB one, which I wanted to use for / and a really old ~170MB one, which I wanted to use for swap. (Of couse there would be enough space on the first disk for swap, but I had this old disk lying around here and thought why not use it.) I booted up from CD and started creating slices on the HDs, which worked perfectly for the primary master HD (the 10GB one). But sysinstall complained about an incorrect geometry setting for the 170MB drive and asked me to enter them manually. I didn't want to reboot to get the BIOS values and tried to finish the install without swap at all - which worked. I rebooted, got the geometry settings for the disk from the BIOS, started sysinstall and enterered them in fdisk using the (g)eometry command. The detected geometry is 18863 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors, which adds up to a 144GB disk according to fdisk. After I enter the correct values (903 cyls/8 heads/46 sectors), it tells me, the disk has 162MB, but still shows me 144GB unused space. If I now use the a-command to use the whole disk, it assignes the 144GB to ad1s1. That seems really odd to me, I'd expect it to create a 162MB slice only. If I (w)rite the changes, it tells me the partition was created sucessfully and ad1s1 shows up in the label editor too. When trying to create swap space in the disklabel editor, I get the error message: "Unable to add /dev/ad1s1b as a swap device: No such file or directory". As far as I can tell I did exactly as described in the FAQ at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/formatting-media/index.html. >From a search with Google I learned that some other people had the "problem" with the wrong drive geometry too, but it seems to me that they all have *much* larger drives and are trying to set up multiboot-systems. Both drives worked well under Linux, so I think it's no hardware-problem. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD-6.0 Install slows to a crawl
I am attempting an install of FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE with the CD1 ISO image. Everything runs at a normal speed until it mounts /dev/md0 and runs /stand/sysinstall. At that point the whole process slows to a crawl. It does not freeze, but it is really slow. I suffered through the Standard install, which has been installing bin to / for the last 12 hours at about 0.3 KB per second. I have a dual celeron 433 setup using an Abit BP6 motherboard. I saw that its ACPI setup is blacklisted, so I disabled it in the BIOS. I have disabled ACPI at the boot loader prompt as well. I did not see anything about this in the INSTALL, RELNOTES or README docs. Am I missing something? Are there any other kernel hints that would be useful? Thanks for the help! Wes ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem sourcing a file while configuring OpenVPN 2.0 on FreeBSD 6.0
Just as I thought, I'm a dullard. Switched to sh, and all is working find. Thanks. On 12/1/05, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Singerman wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Perhaps I am missing something incredibly stupid here, but I can't > >source the vars file that is part of the OpeVPN configuration process: > > > ># source ./vars > >export: Command not found. > >D: Undefined variable. > > > > > You are running csh and this script is for sh and derivatives. > > --Alex > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem sourcing a file while configuring OpenVPN 2.0 on FreeBSD 6.0
Matt Singerman wrote: Hi all, Perhaps I am missing something incredibly stupid here, but I can't source the vars file that is part of the OpeVPN configuration process: # source ./vars export: Command not found. D: Undefined variable. You are running csh and this script is for sh and derivatives. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problem sourcing a file while configuring OpenVPN 2.0 on FreeBSD 6.0
Hi all, Perhaps I am missing something incredibly stupid here, but I can't source the vars file that is part of the OpeVPN configuration process: # source ./vars export: Command not found. D: Undefined variable. Here is the contents of vars (with the comments removed for the sake of brevity): # easy-rsa parameter settings export D=`pwd` export KEY_CONFIG=$D/openssl.cnf export KEY_DIR=$D/keys echo NOTE: when you run ./clean-all, I will be doing a rm -rf on $KEY_DIR export KEY_SIZE=1024 export KEY_COUNTRY=KG export KEY_PROVINCE=NA export KEY_CITY=BISHKEK export KEY_ORG="OpenVPN-TEST" export KEY_EMAIL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Please note, the info in that last section has been changed to be my correct info, I just didn't want to include it :) Thanks for any and all help on this! --Matt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade
Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: Hi I'm having a problem installing freebsd on an ibm blade the problem I face is that during boot, it always stops in OK prompt with the message "can't load 'kernel'" [...] can anyone point me out... it seems that when I try type in load /boot/kernel/kernel I get ? instead of / Hi there - I don't think I know the answer , but I've managed to figure things out in the past by issuing 'lsdev' (no quotes) from that point and see what it says/ what devices it can see. Then you can usually change where it tries to find the kernel (passing the right path from the hardware/BIOs point of view). (and again, maybe not ;) ) hope it helps. Beto ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problem booting FreeBSD 6.0 on IBM Blade
Hi I'm having a problem installing freebsd on an ibm blade the problem I face is that during boot, it always stops in OK prompt with the message "can't load 'kernel'" CD Loder 1.2 Building the boot loader arguments Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found Relocating the loader and the BTX Starting the BTX loader BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS 630kB/2620340kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader , Revision 1.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED], Thu Nov 3 07:33:10 UTC 2005) \ can't load 'kernel' Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed.. can anyone point me out... it seems that when I try type in load /boot/kernel/kernel I get ? instead of / kveðja Gestur ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/30/05, Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Miao schrieb: > > On 11/29/05, 赵铭 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >>the reason of the error ,i think it's the vmware and you real machine check > >>the processor *MHZ is not the same number. > >>i start my vmware ,the vmware can tall me the message. > >> > >> > >>On 11/29/05, Konrad Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>>On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > >>>>message of "calcu runtime error"? > >>> > >>>I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware > >>>GSX server and encountered no problems. > >>> > >>>Regards > >>> > >>>Konrad Heuer > >>>GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>___ > >>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> > >> > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> > >>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> > >>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>== > >>姓 名：赵铭 > >>电 话：13001067593 > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>== > > > > > > 赵铭， > > > > 谢谢，我禁用了ACPI，现在似乎好了。 > > > > > > > > > > _______ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Hi, > > I have 6.0 running even on VMWARE 3.2.1. No Problems. Ah, no, I can't > install the VMWARE-Tools, but that happend to be under FreeBSD 5.4, too. > > Regards, > Ben > Benjamin, This is the vmware tools installation guide on official website. According to this guide, I installed vmware-tools in vm5.5 with a guest os freebsd 6.0, encounter no problems. Hope this helps. http://www.vmware.com/support/ws4/doc/new_guest_tools_ws.html#1008244 Regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
David Miao schrieb: On 11/29/05, 赵铭 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the reason of the error ,i think it's the vmware and you real machine check the processor *MHZ is not the same number. i start my vmware ,the vmware can tall me the message. On 11/29/05, Konrad Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error message of "calcu runtime error"? I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware GSX server and encountered no problems. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- == 姓 名：赵铭 电 话：13001067593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] == 赵铭， 谢谢，我禁用了ACPI，现在似乎好了。 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hi, I have 6.0 running even on VMWARE 3.2.1. No Problems. Ah, no, I can't install the VMWARE-Tools, but that happend to be under FreeBSD 5.4, too. Regards, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/29/05, 赵铭 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the reason of the error ,i think it's the vmware and you real machine check > the processor *MHZ is not the same number. > i start my vmware ,the vmware can tall me the message. > > > On 11/29/05, Konrad Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: > > > > > I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > > > message of "calcu runtime error"? > > > > I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware > > GSX server and encountered no problems. > > > > Regards > > > > Konrad Heuer > > GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > -- > == > 姓 名：赵铭 > 电 话：13001067593 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > == 赵铭， 谢谢，我禁用了ACPI，现在似乎好了。 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/29/05, Konrad Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: > > > I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > > message of "calcu runtime error"? > > I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware > GSX server and encountered no problems. > > Regards > > Konrad Heuer > GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Konrad, Thanks to your experience which shared with me. Regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/30/05, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, David Miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > > message of "calcu runtime error"? > > Quoting Ed (again): > > Disable your APIC device, provided you're not trying to run an SMP > kernel in a virtual SMP machine. Disabling the APIC forces FreeBSD to > fall back on the old-fashioned IRQ timers. I think. Anyway, it works. > Or works around. Whatever: > > In /boot/loader.conf , add: > > hint.apic.0.disabled=1 > > > Note: This had already been answered on this list. > > -- > Joao Barros > Dear Joao, I think I ought to google freebsd mailling archive beforehand. Anyway, thank you very much for your solution. Regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/29/05, Vampire D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boot without ACPI > > -- > "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look > just like the criminal they are playing?" > > Christopher > Hi Christopher, Thank you very much. Regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/29/05, Mathieu CHATEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tuesday, November 29, 2005, 7:57:00 AM, you wrote: > > > Are you running vmware on a notebook ? > I have warning fromm vmware since my processor frequency is changing ( > to keep battery) > > This may slow of boost cpu/clock throttle inside the VM. > > cheers, > Mathieu CHATEAU > > Hi Mathieu, Yes, I'm running vmware in a Dell laptop. I disabled ACPI function (according to Joao Barros & Vampire's advice), it seems fine so far. Thank you. Regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
Tuesday, November 29, 2005, 7:57:00 AM, you wrote: DM> Hi list, DM> I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error DM> message of "calcu runtime error"? DM> Below is my freebsd configuration DM> === DM> Kernel: GENERIC DM> df -h: DM> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on DM> /dev/ad0s1a484M 72M373M16%/ DM> devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev DM> /dev/ad0s1g476M622K437M 0%/home DM> /dev/ad0s1f771M 24K709M 0%/tmp DM> /dev/ad0s1d4.8G1.4G3.0G33%/usr DM> /dev/ad0s1e989M2.9M907M 0%/var DM> rc.conf: DM> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Nov 28 19:45:27 2005 DM> # Created: Mon Nov 28 19:45:27 2005 DM> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. DM> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. DM> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. DM> gateway_enable="YES" DM> hostname="uat.mydomain.com" DM> ifconfig_lnc0="DHCP" DM> inetd_enable="YES" DM> linux_enable="YES" DM> moused_enable="YES" DM> moused_type="auto" DM> sshd_enable="YES" DM> usbd_enable="YES" DM> === DM> Any ideas about my freebsd box? Appreciate your advice. DM> Regards, DM> David DM> /* my dmesg.boot in /var/run directory */ DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1882244 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1249633 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1882244 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1249633 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1882106 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1248719 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1882106 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1248719 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1881969 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1248289 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1881969 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1248289 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1880194 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247839 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1880194 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247839 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1878989 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247389 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1878989 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247389 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1878471 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247291 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1878471 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247291 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1877728 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247185 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for DM> pid 559 (sshd) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1877728 usec for pid 3 (g_up) DM> calcru: negative runtime of -1247185 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) DM> calcru: runtime went backwards from 179
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On 11/29/05, David Miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > message of "calcu runtime error"? Quoting Ed (again): Disable your APIC device, provided you're not trying to run an SMP kernel in a virtual SMP machine. Disabling the APIC forces FreeBSD to fall back on the old-fashioned IRQ timers. I think. Anyway, it works. Or works around. Whatever: In /boot/loader.conf , add: hint.apic.0.disabled=1 Note: This had already been answered on this list. -- Joao Barros ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: > I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error > message of "calcu runtime error"? I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware GSX server and encountered no problems. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
Hi list, I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error message of "calcu runtime error"? Below is my freebsd configuration === Kernel: GENERIC df -h: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a484M 72M373M16%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad0s1g476M622K437M 0%/home /dev/ad0s1f771M 24K709M 0%/tmp /dev/ad0s1d4.8G1.4G3.0G33%/usr /dev/ad0s1e989M2.9M907M 0%/var rc.conf: # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Nov 28 19:45:27 2005 # Created: Mon Nov 28 19:45:27 2005 # Enable network daemons for user convenience. # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. gateway_enable="YES" hostname="uat.mydomain.com" ifconfig_lnc0="DHCP" inetd_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" moused_type="auto" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" === Any ideas about my freebsd box? Appreciate your advice. Regards, David /* my dmesg.boot in /var/run directory */ calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1882244 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1249633 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1882244 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1249633 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1882106 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1248719 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1882106 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1248719 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1881969 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1248289 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1881969 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1248289 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1880194 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247839 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1880194 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247839 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1878989 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247389 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1878989 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247389 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1878471 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247291 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1878471 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247291 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1877728 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247185 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1877728 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1247185 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1877592 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1246875 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1877592 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1246875 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: negative runtime of -1877462 usec for pid 3 (g_up) calcru: negative runtime of -1246285 usec for pid 29 (irq18: lnc0) calcru: runtime went backwards from 17922702 usec to 17792085 usec for pid 559 (sshd) calcru: neg
RE: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express?
>-Original Message- >From: Micah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 8:11 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Hans Nieser; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express? > > >> >> Micah, if this has changed, please cite where. I myself also >happen to >> have a system with an onboard nvidia card so I really am interested, >> not just trying to flame-bait. > >I think I understand your claim. Source code with an open source >license is not Open Source unless it is actively maintained by someone >and has freely available specs. No, not exactly. This is a special case with device drivers. A simple standalone program that does not interface with hardware, if it's source is open with an open source license, it's open source, even if it is not actively maintained, and even if nobody has published a flowchart or logic diagram that indicates how the code works. Such a program can be modified or maintained by anyone, if they are competent enough. But device drivers are different cases, because even if the source is open, and licensed as open, unless you are able to determine how the hardware works from looking at the source code, it really isn't open source because nobody can modify it. Nobody that is, except someone who has the hardware technical documentation. And that documentation is not something Nvidia gives out, even under NDA. The author of NV, Mark, is an Nvidia employee, so he has access to this data and can modify the driver. But nobody else can modify the driver who doesen't work for Nvidia. Thus it's immaterial - for a device driver - if source is open or not or source is licensed as open source or not, because other people are prevented from working on the driver. It would be like if I patented a software algorithim and released "open source" for it, then started suing everyone for patent violations who simply used that source. (NOT copyright violations) Kind of like Unisys and the .gif file format. >Under that criteria, I guess NV isn't >open source. > There's an open source organization which is trying to establish branding on the name "open source" who has a bunch of criterian that they claim a program license must meet to be termed "open source" I don't hold with that, but if you do I do not think that the source for the nv driver meets their criterian either. I view a program as being open source based on what the copyright holder intends with it. For example, I don't have a problem with a copyright holder claiming copyright on a program then writing a license that only permits people to download the source and compile it and use it in their own projects, or for custom projects they are doing for other people, but prohibits people from compiling binaries of the program then selling those binaries as standalone programs, or using the source in software that they are selling standalone binaries of. To me, that is "open source" but to a lot of people it isn't. To GNU it isn't, but rather than writing a license that bars selling software, they wrote a license that requires source to be provided if you do sell the software, in the hopes that this would kill enthusiasm among people for selling open source. Goals of GNU and the hypothetical copyright holder are the same, but approach to that goal is different - thus GNU claims it's own stuff is open source and the hypothetical copyright holders stuff isn't. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
Dmytro, Instructions for updating the ports tree are in the handbook on freebsd.org Please understand that the ports directory tree distributed with the RELEASE cd's is always out of date. I never install it when I install a RELEASE. I always use cvsup to download the current ports tree after installation. I just setup a P4 3.2Ghz system with a gig of ram and mirrored SATA drives, and I ran the mysql benchmarks on it, and they are quite a bit faster than any other systems I have. Please post mysql benchmarks on your system, or post any other benchmarks that you think are indicative of kernel slowness? I will run the same and we can compare to see if there's a difference. Ted >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dmytro >Surovtsev >Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 3:31 AM >To: Kris Kennaway; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance > > >Kris, > >thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for >performance, I >catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. >Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to >FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X. >About the port set: what do you mean under "> upgrading your ports >properly"? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred it >to /usr/ports. what else? > >Dmytro > >Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much >>>slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. >> >> >> It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements >> that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than >> FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem >> performance. >> >> >>>And, as well, 6.0 works >>>right with the set of ports come with it in distribution inly. Nearly >>>any new port can not assemble with differnent errors, mostly >like: "The >>>version of library XXX is installed, it's conflict with >XXX-1, please do >>>pkg_delete, and pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. >> >> >> This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't >> upgrading your ports properly. >> >> Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with >> using it, then post specific questions. >> >> Kris >___ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.7/181 - Release Date: >11/24/2005 > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express?
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Micah, Would you please list a cite that the nv driver is open source? > There is also another site here: http://news.com.com/2061-10795_3-5762319.html > although I will admit this is 5 months old - please cite a more recent article where nvidia has reversed their policy? As Mike Harris eloquently said a couple years ago: Nvidia doesn't release their technical specifications for their hardware to *anyone*, not even under NDA (non-disclosure agreements). One might be tempted to think "well you have the source code though right?", however the source code isn't enough. None of the video hardware registers are documented, instead they are programmed as a series of random "magic" numbers, so you have absolutely no idea what the purpose of a given register is, that is getting written seemingly random information into it in the driver. The driver is for all intents and purposes obfuscated unless you have the hardware documentation which turns numbers like 0x3432 into a useful name like NVIDIA_SUCH_AND_SUCH_REGISTER with documentation of WTH that register actually does. That's the long story, the short story is, that even though the "nv" driver is open source, it is more or less supplied as-is and the only way it gets updated is if Nvidia updates it, because nobody outside Nvidia has the foggiest clue how their hardware works. So if a card isn't supported, that's unfortunate. If 2D doesn't work, that's also unfortunate. By reporting bugs that occur in the "nv" driver to http://bugs.xfree86.org, the bug report will get assigned to Mark Vojkovich, who is the official driver maintainer, working at Nvidia, who has access to pretty much every Nvidia card ever made, and the technical specifications to go along with them. If he can't fix the bug, then more or less, nobody can. Not without getting hired by Nvidia to work on the 'nv' driver. ;o) Micah, if this has changed, please cite where. I myself also happen to have a system with an onboard nvidia card so I really am interested, not just trying to flame-bait. I think I understand your claim. Source code with an open source license is not Open Source unless it is actively maintained by someone and has freely available specs. Under that criteria, I guess NV isn't open source. Later, Micah ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Using ifconfig to change channels using FreeBSD 6.0 on a Netgear WG311v3 wireless NIC
Hi, I have compiled the FreeBSD driver from the Windows 2000 files by running: ndisgen WG311v3.INF WG311v3.sys After working through the simple wizard and selecting the defaults, I ended up with a kernel module called: WG311v3_sys.ko Then I loaded it by running: kldload ndis kldload WG311v3_sys.ko I could then run: wicontrol -i ndis0 to see the following: NIC serial number: [ ] Station name: [ asc1 ] SSID for IBSS creation: [ my_net ] Current netname (SSID): [ ] Desired netname (SSID): [ my_net ] Current BSSID: [ 00:00:00:00:00:00 ] Channel list: [ 3fff ] IBSS channel: [ 3 ] Current channel:[ 1 ] Comms quality/signal/noise: [ 0 0 0 ] Promiscuous mode: [ Off ] Intersil-Prism2 based card: [ 1 ] Port type (1=BSS, 3=ad-hoc):[ 1 ] MAC address:[ 00:0f:b5:85:87:f0 ] TX rate (selection):[ 0 ] TX rate (actual speed): [ 1 ] RTS/CTS handshake threshold:[ 2346 ] Create IBSS:[ Off ] Access point density: [ 1 ] Power Mgmt (1=on, 0=off): [ 0 ] Max sleep time: [ 100 ] WEP encryption: [ Off ] TX encryption key: [ 0 ] Encryption keys:[ ][ ][ ][ ] Now, if I try changing the current channel by using this command: ifconfig ndis0 channel 11 All this does is change the IBSS channel to 11, not the current channel. What am I missing here? Cheers, Paul Hamilton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express?
Micah, Would you please list a cite that the nv driver is open source? There is also another site here: http://news.com.com/2061-10795_3-5762319.html although I will admit this is 5 months old - please cite a more recent article where nvidia has reversed their policy? As Mike Harris eloquently said a couple years ago: Nvidia doesn't release their technical specifications for their hardware to *anyone*, not even under NDA (non-disclosure agreements). One might be tempted to think "well you have the source code though right?", however the source code isn't enough. None of the video hardware registers are documented, instead they are programmed as a series of random "magic" numbers, so you have absolutely no idea what the purpose of a given register is, that is getting written seemingly random information into it in the driver. The driver is for all intents and purposes obfuscated unless you have the hardware documentation which turns numbers like 0x3432 into a useful name like NVIDIA_SUCH_AND_SUCH_REGISTER with documentation of WTH that register actually does. That's the long story, the short story is, that even though the "nv" driver is open source, it is more or less supplied as-is and the only way it gets updated is if Nvidia updates it, because nobody outside Nvidia has the foggiest clue how their hardware works. So if a card isn't supported, that's unfortunate. If 2D doesn't work, that's also unfortunate. By reporting bugs that occur in the "nv" driver to http://bugs.xfree86.org, the bug report will get assigned to Mark Vojkovich, who is the official driver maintainer, working at Nvidia, who has access to pretty much every Nvidia card ever made, and the technical specifications to go along with them. If he can't fix the bug, then more or less, nobody can. Not without getting hired by Nvidia to work on the 'nv' driver. ;o) Micah, if this has changed, please cite where. I myself also happen to have a system with an onboard nvidia card so I really am interested, not just trying to flame-bait. Ted >-Original Message- >From: Micah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:02 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Hans Nieser; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express? > > >Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> As far as I know Nvidia hasn't allowed Xorg to write drivers >> for their cards, all the nvidia drivers out there are >> binaries from Nvidia. This for me would cross that card >> off my list. > >Just to correct this bit of mis-information, there are two drivers >available for nvidia. The nv driver is an open source driver provided >by xorg, and the nvidia driver is a closed source driver >provided by nvidia. > >Later, >Micah > >-- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express?
>-Original Message- >From: Hans Nieser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 4:48 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 6.0 fully support PCI-Express? > > >Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> This is correct. The various driver authors who have been >> affected by the PCI Express issue have implemented logic in >> their probe code that activates the devices on pci express busses, >> so for most devices it's a non-issue. But this is kludgy and >> there's been discussion in the core as to try to get someone >> to write a PCI Express driver that would talk to the bus >> and would handle the devices the way the buss is intended. >> >> You still get weirdness though - for example on several Intel >> motherboards that have PCI Express that I've run FBSD on, >> the BSD kernel complains about no interrupt being available >> for the serial port. But the serial port works anyway. >> >> I'm surprised you didn't find this with Google, it's in >> there. Perhaps look through the mailing list archives? >> >> As far as I know Nvidia hasn't allowed Xorg to write drivers >> for their cards, all the nvidia drivers out there are >> binaries from Nvidia. This for me would cross that card >> off my list. >> >> In any case, this really isn't a FreeBSD issue, it's an Xorg >> issue and you should ask on those mailing lists. Others have >> had Nvidia troubles for other reasons and should be able to >> better advise you. > >Many thanks for your clarification Ted. I did post to >freebsd-x11 but the >list seems relatively low-traffic and unfortunately got no responses. I was meaning post to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:23:34PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > > >Kris, > > > >thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, > >I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. > >Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched > >to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X. > >About the port set: what do you mean under "> upgrading your ports > >properly"? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred > >it to /usr/ports. what else? > > > >Dmytro > > > >Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > >>On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > >> > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is > >>>much slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. > >> > >> > >> > >>It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements > >>that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than > >>FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem > >>performance. > >> > >> > >>>And, as well, 6.0 works right with the set of ports come with it in > >>>distribution inly. Nearly any new port can not assemble with > >>>differnent errors, mostly like: "The version of library XXX is > >>>installed, it's conflict with XXX-1, please do pkg_delete, and > >>>pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. > >> > >> > >> > >>This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't > >>upgrading your ports properly. > >> > >>Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with > >>using it, then post specific questions. > >> > >>Kris > > > >___ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Dmytro, > > Sorry the debug -g option did not help. > > I have only noticed increased speed with 6 vs 5.4, but then again I am > not using X, I use FreeBSD only for servers. > > I noticed a slight lag at first and was not using the SCHED_ULE > scheduler, but the 4BSD. > > Removing debug -g and recompiling my kernel pretty much solved that. Again, -g does not have any runtime performance effect. The symbols it adds are stripped out when the kernel is loaded. Kris pgpnDS3ei7SRi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: Kris, thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X. About the port set: what do you mean under "> upgrading your ports properly"? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred it to /usr/ports. what else? Dmytro Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: Hello, Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem performance. And, as well, 6.0 works right with the set of ports come with it in distribution inly. Nearly any new port can not assemble with differnent errors, mostly like: "The version of library XXX is installed, it's conflict with XXX-1, please do pkg_delete, and pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't upgrading your ports properly. Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with using it, then post specific questions. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Dmytro, Sorry the debug -g option did not help. I have only noticed increased speed with 6 vs 5.4, but then again I am not using X, I use FreeBSD only for servers. I noticed a slight lag at first and was not using the SCHED_ULE scheduler, but the 4BSD. Removing debug -g and recompiling my kernel pretty much solved that. Thanks, Russell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:23:26AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option. > Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile > without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like > many years. I do not think that racing for issuing the new RELEASE (so > called in this case) in proper time costs the reliability and robustness > we all appreciated all theese years. I find this comment very disrespectful to the many people who worked for the past year on 6.0-RELEASE, and who spent nearly 6 months during the release cycle to polish it and fix bugs. Kris pgpHHGyMUeI53.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:30:39AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: > Kris, > > thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I > catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. > Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to > FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X. OK, if it's all in your head and you haven't actually measured anything then there's not much we can say to you, is there? > About the port set: what do you mean under "> upgrading your ports > properly"? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred it > to /usr/ports. what else? I already told you: > >Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with > >using it, then post specific questions. Kris pgpuTQRKodg52.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
Kris, thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X. About the port set: what do you mean under "> upgrading your ports properly"? I've downloaded the ports.tar.gz (about 30M) and untarred it to /usr/ports. what else? Dmytro Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: Hello, Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem performance. And, as well, 6.0 works right with the set of ports come with it in distribution inly. Nearly any new port can not assemble with differnent errors, mostly like: "The version of library XXX is installed, it's conflict with XXX-1, please do pkg_delete, and pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't upgrading your ports properly. Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with using it, then post specific questions. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option. Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like many years. I do not think that racing for issuing the new RELEASE (so called in this case) in proper time costs the reliability and robustness we all appreciated all theese years. SD Kris Kennaway wrote: >>On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: >> >> > >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much >>>>slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. >>>> >>>> > >> >>It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements >>that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than >>FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem >>performance. >> >> >> > >>>>And, as well, 6.0 works >>>>right with the set of ports come with it in distribution inly. Nearly >>>>any new port can not assemble with differnent errors, mostly like: "The >>>>version of library XXX is installed, it's conflict with XXX-1, please do >>>>pkg_delete, and pkg_add then". But after than nearly nothing works. >>>> >>>> > >> >>This is not a FreeBSD 6.0 problem, it indicates that you aren't >>upgrading your ports properly. >> >>Look into the portupgrade tool, and if you have specific problems with >>using it, then post specific questions. >> >>Kris >> >> Dmytro, The stock Generic Kernel for 6.0-Release has debugging features which according to the kernel developement team where left in during release. Try to recompile the Generic Kernel with the option debug -g commented out and see if that helps with the speed issues you have encountered. Thanks, Russell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and VmWare 5
On 11/15/05, Mário Gamito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Has any one around here tried to run FreeBSD 6.0 in VmWare 5 (Windows) > with success ? > > FreeBSD's install reboots when it comes to package installation. I haven't upgraded 6.0 from BETA something on my laptop but it's been working back from 5.x days so I didn't really install 6 on it. What kind of disk are you using on the VM, ide, scsi? What about the installation media, iso mounted on virtual cdrom, using real cdrom? off topic: são raros os portugueses por estas paragens ;) -- Joao Barros ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
