[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547455 ] Log messages. Customize

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #547455, was opened at 2002-04-23 01:09
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Log messages. Customize

Initial Comment:
Hi

I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic 
from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to 
modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to 
messages, cause it only floods that log?
Please I've tried to gather that information but not 
successed.



--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Syslogd delay

2002-04-23 Thread Rissone Ruggero

Hi.
I'm a newbie in LRP world and I have a question on Bering distro.
During the boot, syslogd waits for more than 3 minutes prior to continue
the boot sequence.
I've disabled all the logging functions without any changes in the delay
time.
Is it possible to use another (maybe better) syslogger in my Bering
system ??

Thanks in advance for the answers.

Best Regards

Ruggero Rissone
Italy




___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??

2002-04-23 Thread Rissone Ruggero

I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD.

Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard Disk
??

Thanks in advance

Ruggero

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??

2002-04-23 Thread Przemyslaw Rudy

That seems to be the simplest since all data (modules/packages and boot 
files) are then in the same media. Reading 
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/howto/LRPHardDiskHOWTO.txt should help.
But anyway, the idea of the Bering and other distributons is to use low 
cost pc with small size systems.
Maybe I'm wrong :)


Rissone Ruggero wrote:
 I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD.
 
 Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard Disk
 ??
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Ruggero
 
 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 
 



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547477 ] Log messages. Customize

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #547477, was opened at 2002-04-23 02:30
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Log messages. Customize

Initial Comment:
Hi

I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic 
from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to 
modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to 
messages, cause it only floods that log?
Please I've tried to gather that information but not 
successed.



--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547477group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-547455 ] Log messages. Customize

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #547455, was opened at 2002-04-23 01:09
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Deleted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Log messages. Customize

Initial Comment:
Hi

I am using Bering firewall and I've blocked traffic 
from my routers port 520. I'm asking what do I have to 
modify that that 520 port deny's are not logged to 
messages, cause it only floods that log?
Please I've tried to gather that information but not 
successed.



--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 05:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

Duplicate SR:
[ 547477 ] Log messages. Customize
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=547477group_id=13751atid=213751

--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=547455group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Compact Flash

2002-04-23 Thread brooksp5

Hello,
I have been using both Dachstein and Bering for the last few months,
I now want to start working with compact flash cards, can anyone point me in
the right direction to start off.
I am just looking for some general links to recomended cards and where to
look for How-To's etc.
I will probably be back looking for lots more information once I get started
:}
Thanks

Paul



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help

2002-04-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 Thank you very Charles, I will modify the RSA key in the config when I
 get home.

 In the network.conf I have

 EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0
 EXTERN_PROTO1=51 0/0

 and

 EXTERN_UDP_PORTS=0/0_500

 on both sides

 so I think I do not have to set firewall=yes, right?

You are correct.  With the above entries in network.conf, you do not need
FreeS/WAN to generate firewall holes for the IPSec packets.  An additional
side benifit of using network.conf to create the firewall rules is you can
modify your firewall rules while running (ie edit network.conf and run net
ipfilter reload) without bringing down any VPN tunnels.  If you use the
FreeS/WAN [left|right]firewall=yes to do this, you have to shut down IPSec,
reload your firewall rules, the re-start ipsec.

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] Compact Flash

2002-04-23 Thread Andy McLeod

I'll leave the experts to comment on the software how-tos. Suffice to say if
you follow the instructions for setting up an IDE drive it is essentially
the same.

I would like to recommend an excellent source of supply for CF to IDE cards.
See

http://www.pcengines.com/cflash.htm

The cards are cheap, reliable and usually shipped the next day. I have
ordered several and have always had good service. (I am not connected with
the company.)

rgds/andy


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of brooksp5
 Sent: 23 April 2002 13:26
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Leaf-user] Compact Flash


 Hello,
 I have been using both Dachstein and Bering for the last few months,
 I now want to start working with compact flash cards, can
 anyone point me in
 the right direction to start off.
 I am just looking for some general links to recomended cards
 and where to
 look for How-To's etc.
 I will probably be back looking for lots more information
 once I get started
 :}
 Thanks

 Paul



 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Compact Flash

2002-04-23 Thread Phillip . Watts



Sandisk for cards and adapters.  Pricewatch has good deals
on the cards.

Plug in to IDE primary master.

They come preformatted as bootable Fat16 so a Leaf Router
will just copy after you use syslinux to load the loader.
Same procedure as hard disk.

If you want to go ext2, I can probably advise.

Remember, these devices are only writable about a million times,
so no logging.





brooksp5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/23/2002 07:26:26 AM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx)

Subject:  [Leaf-user] Compact Flash



Hello,
I have been using both Dachstein and Bering for the last few months,
I now want to start working with compact flash cards, can anyone point me in
the right direction to start off.
I am just looking for some general links to recomended cards and where to
look for How-To's etc.
I will probably be back looking for lots more information once I get started
:}
Thanks

Paul



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user





___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-512515 ] Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 15:01
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server

Initial Comment:
Hello,

I'm trying to get my dachstein router working in 
combination with my Alcatel Speedtouch ADSL modem.
It has an option for DHCP spoofing, so theorethically
al I need to do is setup DHCP on my external interface 
and that's it. 
Sadly, alcatel has made a buggy DHCP server-
implementation on their modems which has the feature
of only giving the last 3 bytes of the ip-adress 
instead of the subnet mask.
The current dhclient doesn't really like this...
Could anyone provide a patched dhclient package which 
resolves this issue or a modified dhcpclient-script 
that hardcodes the subnetmask to 255.255.255.255 (i 
think that should also do the trick).

I already found a patched version of client.c which 
someone else wrote for pathing his RedHat install, 
maybe it's useful for adressing this problem under LRP

Thanks in advance,

Thijs

*** client.c.orig Sun Aug 5 12:14:21 2001
--- client.c Sun Aug 5 12:22:12 2001
***
*** 469,476 
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /* 
setting netmask */
{
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /* 
setting broadcast address */
--- 469,480 
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 ) /* 
setting netmask */
{
! p-sin_addr.s_addr = 0x; /* try 
255.255.255.255 */
! if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,ifr) == -1 )
! {
! syslog(LOG_ERR,dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m );
! return -1;
! }
}
memcpy(p-sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,ifr) == -1 ) /* 
setting broadcast address */





--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

No reply in over one month, so I'm closing this support request.

If you still have problems, please open a new support request.

--

Comment By: Lynn Avants (guitarlynn)
Date: 2002-03-18 17:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=176069

Well, the source won't help much since it is in C and we 
shell-script the dhcp scripts with LEAF. You could change
the netmask in all instances of ip addr, ip 
route...,and ip link ., but this would involve 
going through roughly 300+ lines of code. 

If you have a static option with the modem, it would be 
consideably easier. LEAF firewalls all do ip spoofing by 
default, so you are not gaining anything by using this 
option with your modem.

Is this possible???


--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=512515group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] VPN tunnel up, but can't reach other subnet

2002-04-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

CS Forgot to include LEAF list in previous reply...

- Original Message -
From: Rein Inge Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN tunnel up, but can't reach other subnet


Hi Charles,

I am still not able to operate with this setup. I have tried all the things
you and others have suggested but with no luck. Below the latest email I
received from you is the output from ipsec barf. Do you see any errors or
misconfigurations here?

Thanks alot for the help so far.

CS I don't really see anything wrong.  At first, I thought you were missing
the [left|right]nexthop settings, but then I noticed that's because you're
running both endpoints on the same subnet.  About the only thing I can
suggest to try is removing the default and opportunistic connection entries,
so you have a single connection entry for the tunnel you're trying to build.
If that doesn't help, you'll probably have to post your barf to the
FreeS/WAN list, where there are hopefully more knowledgable folks...I'm not
exactly an IPSec guru, I just got the code running on LEAF, and managed to
get a few tunnels up  running.

CS I also notice you're setting auto=add.  You realize this means you'll
have to manually start the connection (using ipsec auto --up connection)
from one end or the other, right?  If you want the connection to start
automatically, use auto=start.

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-536605 ] Oxygen installation: howto location

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #536605, was opened at 2002-03-28 20:22
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Oxygen
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Oxygen installation: howto location

Initial Comment:
I have downloaded the three version 1.8 Oxygen .bin 
files from LEAF. As I am new to Linux, and cannot 
locate the necessary HOWTO, can someone please help 
with the instruction on how to install Oxygen?.

The three Oxygen files have been downloaded to a 
Windows system, and are to be installed to a seperate 
PC (that meets the minimum specified requirements).

My hope is to create a bootable CD.

I would appreciate any help.

Many Thanks

Greg G

--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

This page may help you get started.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=90001page_id=16

--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=536605group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] VPN tunnel up, but can't reach other subnet

2002-04-23 Thread Joey Officer

Make sure that you've done the ipsec auto -route name

that was the problem I had before, also the -up command

Joey


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Rein Inge Hoff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN tunnel up, but can't reach other subnet

CS Forgot to include LEAF list in previous reply...

- Original Message -
From: Rein Inge Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN tunnel up, but can't reach other subnet


Hi Charles,

I am still not able to operate with this setup. I have tried all the things
you and others have suggested but with no luck. Below the latest email I
received from you is the output from ipsec barf. Do you see any errors or
misconfigurations here?

Thanks alot for the help so far.

CS I don't really see anything wrong.  At first, I thought you were missing
the [left|right]nexthop settings, but then I noticed that's because you're
running both endpoints on the same subnet.  About the only thing I can
suggest to try is removing the default and opportunistic connection entries,
so you have a single connection entry for the tunnel you're trying to build.
If that doesn't help, you'll probably have to post your barf to the
FreeS/WAN list, where there are hopefully more knowledgable folks...I'm not
exactly an IPSec guru, I just got the code running on LEAF, and managed to
get a few tunnels up  running.

CS I also notice you're setting auto=add.  You realize this means you'll
have to manually start the connection (using ipsec auto --up connection)
from one end or the other, right?  If you want the connection to start
automatically, use auto=start.

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Syslogd delay

2002-04-23 Thread kimoppalfens

Aanhalen Rissone Ruggero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had the same issue,
probably has something to do with name resolution.

Check you /etc/hosts  /etc/resolv.conf for incorrect settings.

Kim

 Hi.
 I'm a newbie in LRP world and I have a question on Bering distro.
 During the boot, syslogd waits for more than 3 minutes prior to
 continue
 the boot sequence.
 I've disabled all the logging functions without any changes in the
 delay
 time.
 Is it possible to use another (maybe better) syslogger in my Bering
 system ??
 
 Thanks in advance for the answers.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Ruggero Rissone
 Italy
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 
 


-
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??

2002-04-23 Thread kimoppalfens

Aanhalen Przemyslaw Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I don't think bering has builtin support for ide so booting might be a
problem. Unless /boot/lib/modules can help. But if I am not mistaken that 
won't allow you to put lrp packages on that disk since those modules are 
loaded after unpacking the lrp packages. Could be just mumbling here though.

Jacques any insight here? Could we use modules to boot from HDD?

Kim

 That seems to be the simplest since all data (modules/packages and boot
 
 files) are then in the same media. Reading 
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/howto/LRPHardDiskHOWTO.txt should
 help.
 But anyway, the idea of the Bering and other distributons is to use low
 
 cost pc with small size systems.
 Maybe I'm wrong :)
 
 
 Rissone Ruggero wrote:
  I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD.
  
  Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard
 Disk
  ??
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  Ruggero
  
  ___
  Leaf-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
  
  
 
 
 
 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 
 


-
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Syslogd delay

2002-04-23 Thread Ray Olszewski

I don't know exactly what your problem is, but 3 minutes is a big hint.
This length of delay is usually associated with a reverse-lookup failure.
Your DNS resolver is trying to get the name associated with some IP address
and failing to do so; it waits for 3 minutes before timing out.

How to fix it? That depends on the details of your setup, which will tell
you what address the router is trying to look up (probably at the behest of
syslogd, based on your report). You might add an appropriate entry to your
DNS server, or you might put an entry in the router's /etc/hosts file ... or
maybe something else I'm not thinking of this early in the morning.

Without knowing the details of your setup, I cannot offer more specific
advice. Except that this is, almost surely, not a problem with syslogd
itself, so switching to a better one won't fix it.

At 10:38 AM 4/23/02 +0200, Rissone Ruggero wrote:
Hi.
I'm a newbie in LRP world and I have a question on Bering distro.
During the boot, syslogd waits for more than 3 minutes prior to continue
the boot sequence.
I've disabled all the logging functions without any changes in the delay
time.
Is it possible to use another (maybe better) syslogger in my Bering
system ??


--
Never tell me the odds!---
Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo
Palo Alto, CA[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Bering development: kernel compression?

Initial Comment:
i am working with the bering distro and building a 
custom kernel.  i started with the bering.config that 
is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know 
but i have to prove it).  The compiled kernel that i 
got was 597k.  i doubt that the ntfs write is 
responsible for all of that difference in size 
(124k).  Did you do anything to compress the kernel 
that ships on the diskette image?

thanks,
dean

--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

Dean,
Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/

--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Bering development: kernel compression?

Initial Comment:
i am working with the bering distro and building a 
custom kernel.  i started with the bering.config that 
is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know 
but i have to prove it).  The compiled kernel that i 
got was 597k.  i doubt that the ntfs write is 
responsible for all of that difference in size 
(124k).  Did you do anything to compress the kernel 
that ships on the diskette image?

thanks,
dean

--

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:49

Message:
Logged In: NO 

that's what i thought.

thanks,
dean

--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

Dean,
Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/

--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] [ leaf-Support Requests-542543 ] Bering development: kernel compression?

2002-04-23 Thread noreply

Support Requests item #542543, was opened at 2002-04-11 08:39
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Summary: Bering development: kernel compression?

Initial Comment:
i am working with the bering distro and building a 
custom kernel.  i started with the bering.config that 
is on the ftp server and added ntfs write (yes, i know 
but i have to prove it).  The compiled kernel that i 
got was 597k.  i doubt that the ntfs write is 
responsible for all of that difference in size 
(124k).  Did you do anything to compress the kernel 
that ships on the diskette image?

thanks,
dean

--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 07:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

Based on the most recent comment on this support request, it
is our understanding that this matter has been addressed.
Should you require further assistance from the LEAF project
members, please submit a new support request.

Thank you,

leaf-project.org support

--

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:49

Message:
Logged In: NO 

that's what i thought.

thanks,
dean

--

Comment By: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes)
Date: 2002-04-23 06:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=39521

Dean,
Bering uses UPX to compress the kernel.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/upx/

--

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=213751aid=542543group_id=13751

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??

2002-04-23 Thread Etienne Charlier

Hi,


 Aanhalen Przemyslaw Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I don't think bering has builtin support for ide so booting might be a
 problem. Unless /boot/lib/modules can help. But if I am not mistaken that

/boot/lib/modules is stored in initrd.lrp so the modules there are loaded
from the
boot device by syslinux.
So when linuxrc is run, the modules are loaded and the packages located on
the
HD can be loaded if the parameters on the syslinux.cfg are correctly set.

you need

ide-mod.o
ide-disk.o
ide-probe-mod.o

and for cd
ide-cd.o
isofs.o
in /boot/lib/modules

and
boot=/dev/hda1,msdos PKGPATH=/dev/hda1
in syslinux.cfg (hda1 to be changed according to your setup)

the easiest is to prepare a standard bering floppy (bad summary from the
lrpharddisk howtp...)

- boot it
- copy the modules in /boot/lib/modules
- backup initrd

- boot with a dos floppy
- fdsik/format your partition
- use syslinux to install the boot loader ( don't forget the lock command
before syslinux)
copy all files from your bering floppy to the hd
edit syslinux.cfg ( see above)

remove the floppy...
reboot

 won't allow you to put lrp packages on that disk since those modules are
 loaded after unpacking the lrp packages. Could be just mumbling here
though.

 Jacques any insight here? Could we use modules to boot from HDD?

 Kim

  That seems to be the simplest since all data (modules/packages and boot
 
  files) are then in the same media. Reading
  http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/howto/LRPHardDiskHOWTO.txt should
  help.
  But anyway, the idea of the Bering and other distributons is to use low
 
  cost pc with small size systems.
  Maybe I'm wrong :)
 
 
  Rissone Ruggero wrote:
   I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD.
  
   Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard
  Disk
   ??
  
   Thanks in advance
  
   Ruggero
  
   ___
   Leaf-user mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
  
  
 
 
 
  ___
  Leaf-user mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 
 


 -
 This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

 ___
 Leaf-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Nagasaki Disk On Module Update

2002-04-23 Thread Steve Fink

Group,

Here is the latest in the Nagasaki saga...

All communications left in tact intentionally...

Steve

-

Dear Steve,

Our newest design DOM's protected function is hardware mode. We will send
our utility to you , you can install this utility on your linux major
program. That will become hardware protected function .

Please let me know how many capacity that you need?

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: Andy Chen
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:51 AM
Subject: RE: Disk On Module Password


Andy,

How does the write protect version work?  Is it write protect version
software or hardware protected?

Thanks,

Steve



-Original Message-
From: Andy Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:23 AM
To: Steve Fink
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk On Module Password


Dear Steve,

We can offer our protect version of DOM on April 26~27. The first version is
40 pin vertical type DOM. The price will be increase 15~20%. Please confirm.

We can offer the follows capacity of protect DOM:

4MB
16MB
32MB
64MB

We will not offer write protect's program to any customer, please confirm,
thanks.

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: andy
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: Disk On Module Password


Andy,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

I am currently using three Nagasaki DOM's in my firewalls.  They work
great!  The firewall boots in about 14 seconds, extremely fast!

I want to set a password on the DOM itself so if the firewall is
penetrated by an outside source, they cannot write to the DOM.

The scenario is this

I create my software and put it onto the DOM then set the password, so
it cannot be written to without entering the password.  The utility could
work much the same way, the first time the password is set the utility
assumes the person running the utility is the owner and sets the password.
Then every subsequent time it needs to be written to the same utility has to
be used to unlock the DOM.  The utility can check the DOM and verify that
the user has authorization to modify the DOM based on the password and then
unlock the DOM for writing.  Then files are written to the DOM and then the
utility is re-run and the DOM locked again.

Any assistance would be much appreciated,

Thanks in advance,

Steve


-Original Message-
From: andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:44 AM
To: Steve Fink
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk On Module Password


Dear Steve,

Please enter into BIOS setting, there have a User password that you can
setting.

If you ask our if our DOM can setting password or security function , I have
some questions are as follows:

1. What kinds of password or security function that you want to use?? More
detail is great.
2. Do you ever use another company's DOM have this function ? What is the
brand?
3. We can do a easy security for you, but you need to send it back to us.
4. We can not offer this utility to our customer, because if we offer this
utility to customer , the security is do not make a sence.

If you need anything else, please contact with me, thanks.

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Disk On Module Password


Dear Sales,

I attempted to fill out the form on your website for support,
unfortunately it does not complete the process.

Could you please forward this message to support?  Thank you.


Dear Support,

I own three Disk On Modules.  I was reading the technical pdf for the
product and can see where it is possible to set a password on the DOM.  Is
there a utility to set this password?  Or how would one go about setting the
password?

Thanks in advance,

Steve Fink




___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help

2002-04-23 Thread MLU

Thank you Charles.

After making the RSA right, I restarted the ipsec service on both 
side and then I try to ping a machine on 192.168.1.x from 192.168.9.x subnet but the 
ping times out and there is nothing in auth.log or syslog suggesting a reason.

Could you please suggest what I should look at now? I am including 
the log messages and the config files.

BTW, both ends have dynamic IPs but they do not change for long time.
The left, leftnexthop, right and rightnexthop are extracted from the
file /var/state/dhcp/dhclient.leases


Here is the auth.log after restarting the ipsec service:

   on 192.168.1.x  3
Apr 23 12:07:17 router Pluto[18965]: Starting Pluto (FreeS/WAN Version 1.91)
Apr 23 12:07:18 router Pluto[18965]: added connection description Binh
Apr 23 12:07:18 router Pluto[18965]: listening for IKE messages
Apr 23 12:07:18 router Pluto[18965]: adding interface ipsec0/eth0 24.76.93.9
Apr 23 12:07:18 router Pluto[18965]: loading secrets from /etc/ipsec.secrets
Apr 23 12:07:19 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #1: initiating Main Mode
Apr 23 12:07:19 router Pluto[18965]: some IKE message we sent has been rejected with 
ECONNREFUSED (kernel supplied no details)
 ^^^ probably because I started this before the 
other end 
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #2: responding to Main Mode
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #2: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA 
established
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #3: responding to Quick Mode
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #3: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA established
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #1: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #4: initiating Quick Mode 
RSASIG+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[18965]: Binh #4: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA 
established

# On 192.168.9.x
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: Starting Pluto (FreeS/WAN Version 1.91)
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: added connection description CuHoi
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: listening for IKE messages
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: adding interface ipsec0/eth0 24.83.28.213
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: loading secrets from /etc/ipsec.secrets
Apr 23 12:07:58 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #1: initiating Main Mode
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #1: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #2: initiating Quick Mode 
RSASIG+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS
Apr 23 12:07:59 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #2: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA 
established
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #3: responding to Main Mode
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #3: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA 
established
Apr 23 12:08:29 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #4: responding to Quick Mode
Apr 23 12:08:30 router Pluto[11171]: CuHoi #4: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA established

I also try ipsec look on both sides and saw the following:
##  On 192.168.1.x   side 
router Tue Apr 23 12:41:00 PDT 2002
192.168.1.0/24 - 192.168.9.0/24 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (0)
ipsec0-eth0 mtu=16260(1500)-1500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESP_3DES_HMAC_MD5: dir=out src=24.76.93.9 iv_bits=64bits 
iv=0xc6c1541a7d8b3da7 ooowin=64 alen=128 aklen=128 eklen=192 life(c,s,h)=add(14,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESP_3DES_HMAC_MD5: dir=in  src=24.83.28.213 iv_bits=64bits 
iv=0xe22a68599253e1dc ooowin=64 alen=128 aklen=128 eklen=192 life(c,s,h)=add(14,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IPIP: dir=in  src=24.83.28.213 life(c,s,h)=add(14,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IPIP: dir=out src=24.76.93.9 life(c,s,h)=add(14,0,0)
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 24.76.92.1  0.0.0.0 UG0 0  0 eth0
192.168.9.0 24.76.92.1  255.255.255.0   UG0 0  0 ipsec0
24.76.92.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0   U 0 0  0 eth0
24.76.92.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0   U 0 0  0 ipsec0

### On 192.168.9.x side
router Tue Apr 23 12:40:24 PDT 2002
192.168.9.0/24 - 192.168.1.0/24 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (0)
ipsec0-eth0 mtu=16260(1500)-1500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESP_3DES_HMAC_MD5: dir=in  src=24.76.93.9 iv_bits=64bits 
iv=0x5d9e98819d25068d ooowin=64 alen=128 aklen=128 eklen=192 life(c,s,h)=add(106,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESP_3DES_HMAC_MD5: dir=out src=24.83.28.213 iv_bits=64bits 
iv=0x603513885b325daf ooowin=64 alen=128 aklen=128 eklen=192 life(c,s,h)=add(106,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IPIP: dir=in  src=24.76.93.9 life(c,s,h)=add(106,0,0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IPIP: dir=out src=24.83.28.213 life(c,s,h)=add(106,0,0)
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 24.83.28.1  0.0.0.0 UG0 0  0 eth0
192.168.1.0 24.83.28.1  255.255.255.0   UG0 0  0 ipsec0
24.83.28.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0   U 0 0  

RE: [Leaf-user] Nagasaki Disk On Module Update

2002-04-23 Thread Joey Officer

Hmm.. it sounds  like to me that the utility is a software solution.
That'll work as long as it is backwards compatible with the older designs.
Surely it is.. otherwise I'll be disappointed in myself for not waiting...

Keep us informed when you get the utility to see if we can incorporate it
into the LRP distro...

Joey


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Fink
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:25 PM
To: LEAF-List
Subject: [Leaf-user] Nagasaki Disk On Module Update

Group,

Here is the latest in the Nagasaki saga...

All communications left in tact intentionally...

Steve

-

Dear Steve,

Our newest design DOM's protected function is hardware mode. We will send
our utility to you , you can install this utility on your linux major
program. That will become hardware protected function .

Please let me know how many capacity that you need?

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: Andy Chen
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:51 AM
Subject: RE: Disk On Module Password


Andy,

How does the write protect version work?  Is it write protect version
software or hardware protected?

Thanks,

Steve



-Original Message-
From: Andy Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:23 AM
To: Steve Fink
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk On Module Password


Dear Steve,

We can offer our protect version of DOM on April 26~27. The first version is
40 pin vertical type DOM. The price will be increase 15~20%. Please confirm.

We can offer the follows capacity of protect DOM:

4MB
16MB
32MB
64MB

We will not offer write protect's program to any customer, please confirm,
thanks.

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: andy
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: Disk On Module Password


Andy,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

I am currently using three Nagasaki DOM's in my firewalls.  They work
great!  The firewall boots in about 14 seconds, extremely fast!

I want to set a password on the DOM itself so if the firewall is
penetrated by an outside source, they cannot write to the DOM.

The scenario is this

I create my software and put it onto the DOM then set the password, so
it cannot be written to without entering the password.  The utility could
work much the same way, the first time the password is set the utility
assumes the person running the utility is the owner and sets the password.
Then every subsequent time it needs to be written to the same utility has to
be used to unlock the DOM.  The utility can check the DOM and verify that
the user has authorization to modify the DOM based on the password and then
unlock the DOM for writing.  Then files are written to the DOM and then the
utility is re-run and the DOM locked again.

Any assistance would be much appreciated,

Thanks in advance,

Steve


-Original Message-
From: andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:44 AM
To: Steve Fink
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk On Module Password


Dear Steve,

Please enter into BIOS setting, there have a User password that you can
setting.

If you ask our if our DOM can setting password or security function , I have
some questions are as follows:

1. What kinds of password or security function that you want to use?? More
detail is great.
2. Do you ever use another company's DOM have this function ? What is the
brand?
3. We can do a easy security for you, but you need to send it back to us.
4. We can not offer this utility to our customer, because if we offer this
utility to customer , the security is do not make a sence.

If you need anything else, please contact with me, thanks.

Regards

Andy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fink
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Disk On Module Password


Dear Sales,

I attempted to fill out the form on your website for support,
unfortunately it does not complete the process.

Could you please forward this message to support?  Thank you.


Dear Support,

I own three Disk On Modules.  I was reading the technical pdf for the
product and can see where it is possible to set a password on the DOM.  Is
there a utility to set this password?  Or how would one go about setting the
password?

Thanks in advance,

Steve Fink




___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread Eric B Kiser

Hello All,

I need to be able to make an IPSec connection through my Bering 1.0-rc1
firewall. If I understand correctly I will need the ip_masq_ipsec.o module
to be able to do this. I have been unable to find the ip_masq_ipsec.o for
Bering. I have already searched through all of the files in the modules
section online and did not come across it. Is it already compiled in to the
kernel or is it somewhere else or have I just missed it?

Thanks in advance,

Eric


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] Compact Flash

2002-04-23 Thread Eric B Kiser

Here are some more links that might help you out...

_Flash Memory_
www.pcengines.com/cflash.htm
--Compact Flash to IDE converter (Internal Interface)
www.abiatech.com/fb4617.htm
--Compact Flash to IDE converter (External Interface)
www.sandisk.com/main.htm
--I found their prices to be surprisingly reasonable.
www.flashmemory.com.au
--Memory and more
www.psism.com/psiiia.htm
--CF to IDE converter that mounts in an external drive bay for 
easy
access.
Good Luck,
Eric


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread Joey Officer

Are you sure that you need the ip_masq_ipsec.o file.  I think that this is
only needed if you have an internal ipsec server.  In my case I run the
ipsec server (I'm sure as does everyone else) on the actual gateway server /
leaf server...

Joey


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric B Kiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Hello All,

I need to be able to make an IPSec connection through my Bering 1.0-rc1
firewall. If I understand correctly I will need the ip_masq_ipsec.o module
to be able to do this. I have been unable to find the ip_masq_ipsec.o for
Bering. I have already searched through all of the files in the modules
section online and did not come across it. Is it already compiled in to the
kernel or is it somewhere else or have I just missed it?

Thanks in advance,

Eric


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread Tom Eastep

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Joey Officer wrote:

 Are you sure that you need the ip_masq_ipsec.o file.  I think that this is
 only needed if you have an internal ipsec server.  In my case I run the
 ipsec server (I'm sure as does everyone else) on the actual gateway server /
 leaf server...
 

And in any case, the modules for a 2.4 kernel are most likely named 
ip_conntrack_ipsec.o and ip_nat_ipsec.o.

I think that Harald Welte recently made those modules available -- check
the Netfilter site.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep  \ http://www.shorewall.net
ICQ: #60745924  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread Eric B Kiser

Joey,

Thanks for the quick reply. Here is what I am looking at...

[1] I have to use IPSec client software on an NT4.0 machine from inside my
network to make a connection to the company firewall/IPSec server to be able
to gain remote access into my company. Since we are unable to do both
pass-through and termination I am forced to set this box up to do
pass-through only.

[2] I am planning on setting up a second box inside my network to act as an
IPSec server so that I can connect to my lab while on the road.

I hope this helped to explain it a little better.

Regards,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: Joey Officer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering


Are you sure that you need the ip_masq_ipsec.o file.  I think that this is
only needed if you have an internal ipsec server.  In my case I run the
ipsec server (I'm sure as does everyone else) on the actual gateway server /
leaf server...

Joey


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric B Kiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Hello All,

I need to be able to make an IPSec connection through my Bering 1.0-rc1
firewall. If I understand correctly I will need the ip_masq_ipsec.o module
to be able to do this. I have been unable to find the ip_masq_ipsec.o for
Bering. I have already searched through all of the files in the modules
section online and did not come across it. Is it already compiled in to the
kernel or is it somewhere else or have I just missed it?

Thanks in advance,

Eric


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help

2002-04-23 Thread guitarlynn

On Tuesday 23 April 2002 14:57, MLU  wrote:
 Thank you Charles.

 After making the RSA right, I restarted the ipsec service on both
 side and then I try to ping a machine on 192.168.1.x from 192.168.9.x
 subnet but the ping times out and there is nothing in auth.log or
 syslog suggesting a reason.

Funny, it appears that the tunnel has come up even though your
left  right sides are not the same on both gateways that normally
doesn't happen (might be a problem). But more likely, the route to
the correct local subnet on each machine is missing (I assume eth1).

Using a Subnet-to-Subnet connection you cannot get the gateways
to use the tunnel, they only route the local subnet traffic to the
remote subnet... so any machine on the local subnet should be
able to ping any machine on the remote subnet except the gateways
themselves. 

I hope this helps!  :-)
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread joey officer

ahh.. I think I understand know.. so you need to have the packets 
passed through on the home machine so that you can make the connection 
to work.  I understand now.  

There was another post earlier that mentioned the nameing difference 
for the Bering ipsec.o files.  You might look there.  I'm not familiar 
at all w/ Bering, but I'll be glad to assist you by looking as well,
and if necessary, maybe I or someone else can compile this for you.


joey

At Tuesday, 23 April 2002, Eric B Kiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Joey,

Thanks for the quick reply. Here is what I am looking at...

[1] I have to use IPSec client software on an NT4.0 machine from 
inside my
network to make a connection to the company firewall/IPSec server 
to be able
to gain remote access into my company. Since we are unable to do both
pass-through and termination I am forced to set this box up to do
pass-through only.

[2] I am planning on setting up a second box inside my network to 
act as an
IPSec server so that I can connect to my lab while on the road.

I hope this helped to explain it a little better.

Regards,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: Joey Officer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Are you sure that you need the ip_masq_ipsec.o file.  I think that 
this is
only needed if you have an internal ipsec server.  In my case I run the
ipsec server (I'm sure as does everyone else) on the actual gateway 
server /
leaf server...

Joey

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric B Kiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Hello All,

I need to be able to make an IPSec connection through my Bering 1.0-rc1
firewall. If I understand correctly I will need the ip_masq_ipsec.
o module
to be able to do this. I have been unable to find the ip_masq_ipsec.
o for
Bering. I have already searched through all of the files in the modules
section online and did not come across it. Is it already compiled 
in to the
kernel or is it somewhere else or have I just missed it?

Thanks in advance,

Eric

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user









___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??

2002-04-23 Thread Chad Carr

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:04:14 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Aanhalen Przemyslaw Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 I don't think bering has builtin support for ide so booting might be a
 problem. Unless /boot/lib/modules can help. But if I am not mistaken
 that won't allow you to put lrp packages on that disk since those
 modules are loaded after unpacking the lrp packages. Could be just
 mumbling here though.

This is the Makefile I use for making a Bering floppy img bootable on
compact flash (ignore the steps for serial boot messages if you don't need
them):

* Makefile inline *

#
# Makefile to build new soekris image from bering floppy image
#   *THIS WILL DESTROY WHATEVER IS ON YOUR CF CARD*
#   Instructions:  put this Makefile and a bering floppy image in a scratch
#   directory.  Get the modules you want to load before packagesChange the following 
vars to reflect your system:
#   BERING_IMAGE - the name of the floppy image
#   CF_DEV - the device name or your compact flash drive
#   BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR - relative path to modules needed for package load
#   (for soekris, serial, ide-mod, ide-probe-mod, ide-disk)
#   BERING_OTHER_MOD_DIR - relative path to other modules you want to load 
#   (for soekris, natsemi)
#


BERING_IMAGE=Bering_1.0-rc2_img_bering_1680_last.bin
CF_DEV=/dev/hde1
BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR=bootmods
BERING_OTHER_MOD_DIR=othermods

.DUMMY:
bering

bering:
# make mountpoint and mount floppy image
mkdir -p mnt
mount -t msdos $(BERING_IMAGE) mnt -o loop

# make mountpoint, format fs and mount cf
mkdir -p cf
mkdosfs $(CF_DEV)
mount -t msdos $(CF_DEV) cf

# copy all the files from the floppy image to the cf
cp mnt/* cf/

# umount the filesystems
umount mnt
umount cf

# run syslinux to make them bootable
syslinux $(CF_DEV)

# remount the cf so me can muck with it
mount -t msdos $(CF_DEV) cf

# get packages from hda1 and send messages to serial console
# remove syslinux.dpy banner; it messes up serial console
sed -e 's/fd0u1680/hda1/g' cf/syslinux.cfg  cf/syslinux.tmp
grep -v syslinux.dpy cf/syslinux.tmp  cf/syslinux.cfg
echo append console=ttyS0,19200  cf/syslinux.cfg
rm cf/syslinux.dpy

# modify etc.lrp to allow serial console login from root
mkdir -p scratch
tar xzf cf/etc.lrp -C scratch
sed -e 's/^\([12]:\)/#\1/g' \
-e 's/^#T1\(.*\)ttyS1/T0\1ttyS0/' scratch/etc/inittab \
 scratch/etc/inittab.tmp
mv scratch/etc/inittab.tmp scratch/etc/inittab
sed -e '/^tty[0-9]/d' scratch/etc/securetty  scratch/etc/securetty.tmp
echo ttyS0  scratch/etc/securetty.tmp
mv scratch/etc/securetty.tmp scratch/etc/securetty
tar czf cf/etc.lrp -C scratch `ls scratch`

# get boot modules into initrd.lrp
gunzip -S .lrp cf/initrd.lrp
mount -t minix cf/initrd mnt -o loop
#   cp $(BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR)/serial.omnt/boot/lib/modules
cp $(BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR)/ide-mod.o   mnt/boot/lib/modules
cp $(BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR)/ide-disk.o  mnt/boot/lib/modules
cp $(BERING_BOOT_MOD_DIR)/ide-probe-mod.o mnt/boot/lib/modules
#   echo serial mnt/boot/etc/modules
echo ide-modmnt/boot/etc/modules
echo ide-disk   mnt/boot/etc/modules
echo ide-probe-mod  mnt/boot/etc/modules
umount mnt
gzip -S .lrp cf/initrd


# unmount cf
umount cf


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

2002-04-23 Thread Eric B Kiser

damn... I have just been sitting here staring at my monitor while the
reality of what I am trying to do has dawned on me. When Tom pointed me in
the direction of the files ip_conntrack_ipsec.o and ip_nat_ipsec.o I began
searching for them under the assumption that I would just load them like any
other module. After reading your reply things suddenly came more into focus.
If I understand this correctly, then what I am actually looking for is a
patch that will make these options available for when I have to recompile
the kernel. At which time, I can then select to either compile them as
modules or to compile them directly into the kernel.

Thanks Joey, for the offer of assistance. Any and all help would be
graciously received. I am still a newbie here so if someone would be kind
enough to either confirm or deny my assumptions about how to go about this I
would appreciate it.

Respectfully,
Eric


-Original Message-
From: joey officer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:05 PM
To: Eric B Kiser
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering


ahh.. I think I understand know.. so you need to have the packets
passed through on the home machine so that you can make the connection
to work.  I understand now.

There was another post earlier that mentioned the nameing difference
for the Bering ipsec.o files.  You might look there.  I'm not familiar
at all w/ Bering, but I'll be glad to assist you by looking as well,
and if necessary, maybe I or someone else can compile this for you.


joey

At Tuesday, 23 April 2002, Eric B Kiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Joey,

Thanks for the quick reply. Here is what I am looking at...

[1] I have to use IPSec client software on an NT4.0 machine from
inside my
network to make a connection to the company firewall/IPSec server
to be able
to gain remote access into my company. Since we are unable to do both
pass-through and termination I am forced to set this box up to do
pass-through only.

[2] I am planning on setting up a second box inside my network to
act as an
IPSec server so that I can connect to my lab while on the road.

I hope this helped to explain it a little better.

Regards,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: Joey Officer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Are you sure that you need the ip_masq_ipsec.o file.  I think that
this is
only needed if you have an internal ipsec server.  In my case I run the
ipsec server (I'm sure as does everyone else) on the actual gateway
server /
leaf server...

Joey

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric B Kiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] ip_masq_ipsec.o for bering

Hello All,

I need to be able to make an IPSec connection through my Bering 1.0-rc1
firewall. If I understand correctly I will need the ip_masq_ipsec.
o module
to be able to do this. I have been unable to find the ip_masq_ipsec.
o for
Bering. I have already searched through all of the files in the modules
section online and did not come across it. Is it already compiled
in to the
kernel or is it somewhere else or have I just missed it?

Thanks in advance,

Eric

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user










___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user