Looking for packet shaping/viewer appliance/sotware

2008-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

At one of my clients we have the need to try and determine how the internet
is being utilized.  The 10mb is constantly swamped and I have a hard time
believing it's for work-related reasons.

I'm looking at putting in some kind of software/device that analyzes the
internet traffic and can tell me how much is being used for basic web
surfing, streaming video, webcam usage, p2p programs, internet radio, or
whatever else might be happening.

I know packeteer has a product that does this, but we are NOT looking to
shape the bandwidth at this time, merely view it so we can make a
determination of what to do from there.  They used to have a viewer
product in the past long ago called PacketPup but I'm not sure if they do
anymore...

Any recommendations on how I can determine what the internet is being used
for as it relates to Applications?

Thanks
JR



myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


tape/disk speed

2008-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I've been doing backup to disk backups and backup to tape backups for a
long time.  I've always liked backup to disk because restores can occur so
much quicker when restoring a single file or two.  However, the other day I
was doing some testing and found that my backup to tape backups are a LOT
faster than disk.  Backing up 25GB of data to tape (LTO3) takes me about 25
minutes at 2,855MB/min.  Backing up the same 25GB of data to disk takes
about 2 hours at 460MB/min.  

Is this what most others are seeing, or is my disk backups just performing
slow?




mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: tape/disk speed

2008-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the B2D folders are residing on the BackupExec server itself.  The server
is a ML310 with RAID5 array made up of 4 sata disks.

Original Message:
-
From: Dallas Burnworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:31:39 -0800
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: tape/disk speed


Is your disk VTL or just a RAID array? 

Dallas 
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: tape/disk speed


I've been doing backup to disk backups and backup to tape backups for a
long time.  I've always liked backup to disk because restores can occur
so
much quicker when restoring a single file or two.  However, the other
day I
was doing some testing and found that my backup to tape backups are a
LOT
faster than disk.  Backing up 25GB of data to tape (LTO3) takes me about
25
minutes at 2,855MB/min.  Backing up the same 25GB of data to disk takes
about 2 hours at 460MB/min.  

Is this what most others are seeing, or is my disk backups just
performing
slow?




mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on
Microsoft(r)
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: IT Departmental Meetings

2008-11-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately I see many companies which have dysfunctional inter and
intradepartmental communication. For some meetings = donuts.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:51:14 -0800
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: IT Departmental Meetings


+1

 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT Departmental Meetings

 

I gotta tell you guys - I go into lots of companies where one of their major
issues is a lack of interdepartmental communications (and in some case,
intradepartmental communications).

 

I often encourage them to have healthy meetings.

 

Once the meetings go away - people claim to know NOTHING about whatever else
is going on, leading to information silos. That's a bad thing.

 

Just IMHO. YMMV.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange

 

From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT Departmental Meetings

 

Interesting.  im taking some notes.  thanks..

 

  _  

From: Andy Crellin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT Departmental Meetings

 

We have just changed the way we do things because of exactly this same
problem. We normally have full team meetings every 2 or 3 months (20 odd
people) and do something interesting like an away day somewhere or get a
departmental director/head/etc to come in a talk about what the business is
doing in different areas. We then have 2 or 3 groups working for an hour or
two on ideas to help that particular department make better use of IT. If
the ideas we come up with are worth running with then they'll be turned into
projects and done. It's mainly a social gathering though as large meetings
like that are pretty much ineffective.

 

I also meet with my opposite numbers (3 other areas of IT) and boss (Head of
MIS) every month/6 weeks and we discuss general strategic stuff, major
issues, problems etc etc. These meetings are generally very useful as
information filters down from our boss to us and from us to our staff (and,
of course, upwards as well). The 4 of us then meet with our teams once a
week where possible to manage the tactical side of things.

 

HTH.

 

Andy Crellin 
Technical Services Manager
Leonard Cheshire Disability
Telephone: 01904 479200
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 November 2008 13:30
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: IT Departmental Meetings

 

Hi Everyone,

 

Right now we have the most boring meetings for our IT Dept.  We have weekly
meetings with 15 members of our staff in them from the CIO to lower level
techs and everyone in between.  We fill out an agenda with what we are
working on etc.  The meeting lasts forever and the DBAs don't want to hear
what the Network guys are doing and the techs don't want to hear what the
systems guys are doing etc. etc.  just awful meetings and nothing gets
accomplished.  We were told since we don't like the meetings and they are
highly ineffective to come up with a better way to hold them.  I was
thinking about every 2 weeks have the CIO meet with the management in each
division together so we still know what is going on with the team.  Every
week is way too often and doesn't give enough time to report on completed
projects etc.

 

I was wondering how dept. meetings are held at your places of employment for
the IT dept.

 

Thanks..BC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have
received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it
immediately.

Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in
England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England  Wales)
and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South
Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL.

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: ESX backup solutions?

2008-11-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also using esXpress for a year or so now at several different clients of
mine.  Very happy with the results.  We also do data backups via BackupExec
as well.  The hot-backups of the VMs with esXpress are done for extra piece
of mind but we don't rely on them.  Still, so far, they have proven to be a
good tool.

Using the Professional version at 3 different places now.  The free one is
okay, but limited by speed, no auto-delete of old backups, etc.

JR

Original Message:
-
From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:30:20 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ESX backup solutions?


2nd Vote for EsXpress. We've been using it for the past year and I have
to say it rocks, As noted you can download a free copy of their basic
product and a 30 eval. The basic free copy only allows you to do Full's
which is not bad if you have the space / speed. Their Enterprise version
comes with everything and it's $1999 List , which is not bad at all

 

The setup we have is Site one back's up all the VM's on Three hosts to
Site two by FTP every night, we do Delta's nightly and Full's on the
weekends, The Host's on Site Two scans the FTP backup Dir and restores
the VMDK's from the night before every morning, so to us it's pretty
much BCP on Site two.

 

While the program doesn't have a lot of bells and whistles it's does one
thing and does it well. Their next version comes with Dedup, block level
stuff and central management coming in Dec. For the price it's very hard
to beat

 

 

 

From: Jeff Frantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESX backup solutions?

 

Damien,

 

I've used esXpress for about 1.5 years and I highly recommend it.  All
in all, it's a fast, inexpensive, and easy to use product.  I back up to
an 8TB NAS box via FTP then copy full backups to external USB drives
weekly for off-site storage.  You can backup to a VMFS volume, or use
FTP, NFS, or SMB.  esXpress has always worked flawlessly, it's easy to
configure, and you don't need the program to restore a backup.  The
delta backups are executable with code to restore themselves.  I
purchased their file level backup (FLB) option about 7 months ago which
allows you to zip up files and/or directories within a Windows VM
client.  I use it for keeping archives of files such.  The FLB isn't
sophisticated but it works well.

 

They also have great support forums.  Usually questions are answered by
the esXpress staff within minutes of being posted.  You may want to read
through some of the forum questions.  It's a good resource and it may
give you a better idea of what others are doing with the product.

 

I highly suggest you try it out.  You can download a free copy of
esXpress from their website.  It will take you about 10 minutes to set
up and it won't pollute your ESX host should you decide not to use it.

 

-Jeff

 



From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ESX backup solutions?

 

We are looking at some packages for backups and the like of ESX guests.

 

Most things I've seen say that VCB comes up a bit short, and the two
products I've seen much about are vRanger, and esXpress. 

 

Any experiences, anecdotes, etc on either of these? Other options worth
looking into?

 

Damien Solodow, MCSE

Senior System Administrator

Infrastructure Services Group

Information Services

Indiana Business College

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Direct - (317) 217-6881

 

We are the Foundation of how Business Gets Done!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges.
This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not
an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete
the original message and any attachments from your system.
_

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


CA 2003 Enteprise

2008-11-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This has me baffled.

I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise server running as a CA.  I need to find a
way to setup computer based certificates on non-XP machine (Mac OS 10.5).  

I cannot seem to figure out how to create machine certificates properly or
even request them.

I've been able to get XP machines (that are part of the domain) a computer
certificate through group policy and auto enrollment.  However, I'm not
sure how to manually request a computer based certificate.  Going through
the web interface (http://ip-addr/certsrv) does not allow you to request a
computer based cert.

Does anyone know how to (or has anyone successfully done this) setup a
computer based certificate on a computer on a non-XP box to a Win 2k3
Enterprise CA?  

Reading the MS whitepages on CA makes my head spin.

JR


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: $700B?

2008-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think they need to make accommodations for those on Wall Street that are
responsible for this... at Leavenworth Prison!

-Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Vue, Za [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:33:01 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: $700B?


This sounds more like a ransom from the master of evil for wanting to take
over Earth or a Lewis Farrakhan lawsuit.

-Z.V.




This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: $700B?

2008-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not for bail out. I am for Bail in or no Bail. Show them to nearest
prison.

Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:23:49 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: $700B?


(First off, I appreciate Stu and Sunbelt not forcing this topic off-list, I
for one, appreciate this thread).

+1  times 10! We have met the enemy, and he is us. Years ago I used to have
the mentality If I can afford the payment, then I can afford it. Luckily
15 years ago I decided that wasn't such a good plan.

Here's a test that I came across rather accidentally - ask someone how much
of a raise it would take for them to be able to buy cash for a car, or have
to finance it for only six months. The answer should hopefully be none,
because $1500 - $2000 (no missing zeroes there) will buy you a reliable
car...some people have a hard time giving up their keep up w/ Joneses
mentality to buy things they can actually afford :-). I make $100K/yr, I
DESERVE better than my parents and their paid-for 1995-whatever  Many
people when asked that Q will think you mean new car - which tells me
they aren't thinking outside Jonses box IMO.

I have a friend who bought a modest house about 15 years ago, he called it
his Taco Bell house, because if he lost his job, he could make the
payments if he was stuck working at Taco Bell...if most people thought that
way, we wouldn't have this mess, regardless of banks actions.

I'd rather spend $700B on our education system, it would pay better
long-term dividends than bailing out flawed financial thinking...teach
these kids how to handle money, and they will make fewer of these mistakes
I'd bet. Too late for that option...

Dave

-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: $700B?

I would argue that the rascals include not only greedy lenders, but also
greedy borrowers. These folks just couldn't stand to live in a modest home,
so they bought more than they could afford in an effort to keep up with the
Joneses.

Shame on me, but I feel a little good that it has come back to bite them in
the butt. My wife and I bought a modest home. When we were in the market,
we calculated our payment ability based on just one of our incomes--not
both. This was so we could afford to make the payments if one of us ended
up out of work. We also stayed far away from ARMs and interest-only loans.

All the while, I watched people in our age and income brackets building
nice, big new houses. And yes, I'll admit to a bit of envy. Now, though,
I'm mostly just relaxing. The economy sucks, but I can still make my
mortgage payment every month. And if my wife or I lose our job, I'll
*still* be able to make the payment every month.






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: $700B?

Track down as many loan officers as possible and play grab ass-et with
them!  (Hundred million $ bonuses/salaries for screwing up???)  Then
disappear 'em to Gitmo...

rantHere's the thing.  Let's suppose I'm super wealthy.  (If I were, I'd
not be a sysadmin!)  I pay cash for a new house and car.  I still have a
substantial sum in mutual funds, money market accounts, and CDs...

Now, some hucksters come up with creative financing and convince $30k/yr
folks they can take out a $350k loan.  It will be at, say, 1% interest,
and their payment (wild guess here) is $350/month.  They're told it's an
ARM, and the rate will go up a point.  Not to worry - houses are going up
in value; they can re-finance against the increased value.

Well, the buyer thinks, a 1% increase in my $350 payment is only $3.50.
WRONG!  The 1% increase means that 1% interest now becomes 2% - his
payment doubles!

Meanwhile, other hucksters keep paving over the world's greatest farmland
for more McMansions.

Other hucksters buy up all these sub-prime 1% loans, package them, and put
them on the world market.  They're sold to dang near every major financial
institution in the world because what actually happened was never
considered...

SO, with all those McMansions, the population ran out of people who would
buy them, so they sit empty.  Someone does want to buy a house, and these
new empty structures have had their prices slashed - supply far excedes
demand.

Meanwhile, this drags down the value of any and all houses.  Those
sub-primers find that, at the time their $350 payment becomes $700, their
$350,000 McMansion is now worth only, say, $175,000 (but they owe
$350,000).  They walk away (literally), so the house is now vacant.  Folks
default on mortgages, so there is no more money to be lent (for not only
mortgages but for business loans as well.)

Meanwhile, the house for which I paid cash has also gone way down in
value.  If my neigbors are all moving out, leaving their houses vacant

ntfs perms

2008-09-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I was asked to create a folder on the server where students are:

ALLOWED TO:
Create files and edit their own files

NOT ALLOWED TO:
Open/edit files that were NOT created by them.

This was achieved by basically giving them list permission to the folder
and the create files/folders perimission.  Then giving creator/owner
permission to write data and append data. 

This works great...  Students can create files in the folder, and edit
their own files, but can't see the data in other files of other students. 
BUT.  Now i'm also being asked to set up that same folder so that students
can't see the contents of the folder, except their OWN files.  I cannot
figure out how to do this -- I don't think it can be done.  If I remove
List access to the folder, they can't even get into the folder. 

Any ideas?  or is this just not possible...  Rather not have to create
subfolders for each student and manually assign permissions to each folder
-- too many students to do this for...




mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: ntfs perms

2008-09-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This worked great.  Thanks for the tip!

Original Message:
-
From: Kennedy, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:13:45 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ntfs perms


Access-based Enumeration should fix you up.

Download:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=04A563D9-78D9-4342-
A485-B030AC442084displaylang=en

Docs:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/abe.mspx


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:07 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: ntfs perms


 I was asked to create a folder on the server where students are:

 ALLOWED TO:
 Create files and edit their own files

 NOT ALLOWED TO:
 Open/edit files that were NOT created by them.

 This was achieved by basically giving them list permission to the
 folder
 and the create files/folders perimission.  Then giving creator/owner
 permission to write data and append data.

 This works great...  Students can create files in the folder, and edit
 their own files, but can't see the data in other files of other
 students.
 BUT.  Now i'm also being asked to set up that same folder so that
 students
 can't see the contents of the folder, except their OWN files.  I cannot
 figure out how to do this -- I don't think it can be done.  If I remove
 List access to the folder, they can't even get into the folder.

 Any ideas?  or is this just not possible...  Rather not have to create
 subfolders for each student and manually assign permissions to each
 folder
 -- too many students to do this for...



 
 mail2web.com - What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
 http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Printer Login Script Help

2008-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you running R2?  It has the ability to push out printers via GPOs.


Original Message:
-
From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:05:11 -0600
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Printer Login Script Help


I need some help guys,
While I am deploying everything, I am thinking that the *last* thing I had
planned to fix was the way the previous guy setup printers.

I have one print server with a handful of queues I need to add to every
profile. I need to do this via group membership.

Anyone have anything canned they can spare me? Its gonna be a late one :P

Thanks!
jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: AD maintenance?

2008-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I've used Hyena many times in the past to purge old computer accounts.  You
can run querys on it very easily that will tell you the last time the
machine pswd was changed.

JR

Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:44:08 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: AD maintenance?


How do you guys with larger org's handle keeping AD tidy and not having a
bunch on non-existent system, user and group accounts? I work for a
mid-size org and am almost certainly the only Systems Engineer here who is
willing to take the time to try and maintain AD. If I do an AD query of
systems with description has a value I come up with 191 objects. A search
of computers with description has a no value comes up with 811, and since
NWEA has ~250 employees and 140-ish servers I'm pretty sure there is a  ton
of clutter in there. Ferreting out the invalid desktops/laptops is the
bigger issue of the two.

Suggestions?
David Lum
SYSTEMS ENGINEER // NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // 971.222.1025





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Citrix issue

2008-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This article may help you locate where Pass-thru Authentiation is failing.

http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX368624

Original Message:
-
From: James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:18:04 +0100
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Citrix issue


Yes, but a) it doesn't work, and b) when I reboot the server, it defaults
back to Prompt again

2008/8/29 Mike Semon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Have you enabled pass thru authentication on the Citrix Web Interface and
 under properties of PNAgent?



 Mike


  --

 *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2008 5:17 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Citrix issue














~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: AV on *all* servers...or no?

2008-08-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO, it isn't needed on all servers, or even the majority of them, *IF*
your clients are up to date with AV software.  I sometimes don't want the
extra overhead on my servers of having AV installed, management of the
software, patching of software, the all-too-often conflict of AV with other
software, etc. 

But, OTOH, I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing to have AV installed
on all servers in certain circumstances when done right.  Just not
NEEDED (IMHO).

JR


Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:53:12 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: AV on *all* servers...or no?


[Cross posted here and on the Vipre Enterprise list]

There is some debate among my fellow IS staff here weather AV should be on
all 200+ of our servers. From my standpoint my question would be Why not?
- put it on all servers and exclude what's necessary We are SQL heavy and
I'm sure performance is the primary concern , but is there any compelling
reason to completely leave it off of some servers?

Dave Lum - Systems Engineer
971-222-1025
Northwest Evaluation Association - www.nwea.org


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: ESX and NetApp best practice question

2008-08-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i think what you are getting at is the swapfile policy for virtual
machines. The default is in the same directory as the virtual machines. The
second option is to store the 
swapfile in a datstore specified by host. A big black warning tells you
that a host specified datastore may degrade vmotion performance for the
affected virtual machines.

-Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:29:36 -0600
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ESX and NetApp best practice question


Netapp didn't mean OS swap :)
They aren't aware of what OS is inside of your vm's or if it has a swap.
BTW, if the swap disappears under windows it will BSOD for sure.

They were referring to the host swap, heh...

jlc

From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ESX and NetApp best practice question

List,
Friend of mine is implementing ESX 3.5 on a filer and he is asking me if he
should follow NetApp's advice on separating out the swap files on a
different LUN to better manage snapshots.  Now, I'm not a NetApp dude but
I don't by this for the following reasons:

1.   Another layer of complexity

2.   Properly sized VMs (RAM) shouldn't be tapping the page file that
much

3.   Something happens to that swap LUN and performance tanks and/or OS
blue screens

4.   Recovery issues.  (This maybe a stretch)


I say keep the swap\temp directory on the same volume unless some
non-standard requirements come into play


Any of you NetApp\ESX admins have any feedback?

Shook







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Backup Exec 12 VMs

2008-08-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What this boils down to is a image vs file level backup. Products such as
Vizioncore ESX vRanger do Image level and file level backups. Installing
agent inside each VM does not guarantee recovery. This is not the preferred
method because if you try to back up a bunch of VM's with agents installed
you could have problems with CPU and memory on ESX host. The preferred
method is setting up a backup proxy with VCB and the backup software of
your choice that works with ESX. This allows for snapshots and fixes the
open file problem. Also, this a LAN free backup wheras with an agent
installed in each VM your are backing up over the network. Installing agent
in host not recommeded either unless you have small number of VM's. Can
adversely affect ESX host performance. Also have to maintain scripts with
that method.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:29:45 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12  VMs


I understand and good advice.  I'm just thinking about using this on
basic application servers without active databases, and even then, only
as an secondary alternative to using the agent on each VM.

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12  VMs

 

That's a pretty 'harsh' way to copy a server.  If there are databases or
anything running on the guest, I would expect some corruption on a
restore.  It's the equivalent of unplugging a live server, and powering
it back on again.

 

I wouldn't do backup the virtual machines that way unless they are
suspended.

 



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12  VMs

Yep, version 12 agents include the ability to capture open files.  So
then I should be good to go, right?

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: mqcarp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup Exec 12  VMs

 

Do you have the open file option for your BE? If so, then I see no
reason why that would not work.

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I just did a test.  Last night I backed up the Virtual Machines folder
on the host box as part of my normal backup routine.  The single VM was
running at the time.

 

This morning I deleted that entire folder and restored it from the
backup.  I was able to restart the VM without a problem.

 

So it appears that recovery of VMs will be relatively easy as long as I
don't require recovery of individual files within the VM.

 

Am I missing something here?

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: mqcarp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:03 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup Exec 12  VMs

 

To back up the VMDK files, you will need a different tool. I think BE
has an option now for that, but we use RangerPro, which, as you said,
basically encapsulates the VM and can spot restore the entire VM to any
host. It is made by Vizioncore. They also make a vReplicator product to
do live replication of VMs. 

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

So the agent on the host will not backup the .vm* files?  It would seem
that backing up these would allow for easier DR.

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:02 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Backup Exec 12  VMs

 

if only 1 Guest, and if you have spare BE agent license, I would just
throw the agent on the guest and back it up directly.  Don't really ever
need to backup the host. (Assuming all the host does is VMware Server).

 

BE agents on the host can't backup guests out of the box.  But they can,
if you get creative and start sceduling/scripting snapshots/suspends.
Worth investigating once you start getting more Guests running on one
hosts.

 



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:46 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup Exec 12  VMs

Okay, I've just deployed my first VM using VMware Server - a
non-essential server so I could get a feel for the process - and it's
running well. 

Now... what do I need to do to back up this and any future machines with
Backup Exec?  

Does the host BE agent cover the guests or do I need to place an agent
on each?  

Or is that only necessary if I wish to restore files/folders within the
VM?

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

RE: iSCSI SAN for esx and general use

2008-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Th HP MSA 1510 is a relatively inexpensive iSCSI SAN. I think you can add
either 2 or 4 shelves to it. Configuration is not that difficult.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:53:51 -0600
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: iSCSI SAN for esx and general use


I need some more IO and don't have time to roll my own solution as I cant
afford the testing interval.

Looking at some cheap Netapp S550's right now. Anyone got any
experiences/reco's they can share?

Thanks!
jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: After-hours work

2008-08-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it all depends. I am well compensated and don't mind doing on call
rotation. Fortunately we don't get to many calls in the evenings and
weekends. When I worked for a consulting company after 5 and weekends was
time and half.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:04:55 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: After-hours work


For my full-time day gig, we (err, they) get compensated ~$200 for the week
they carry the pager. It's not quite #2 because you do get more pay if your
on-call time includes a holiday, for example. It is a very fair system IMO.

As a consultant I include monitoring as part of my support, but there's no
additional fee unless I need to go onsite at which time I charge 150% of my
normal onsite rate - in my contracts it's Emergency onsite support. None
of my clients require 24x7 so I am never woke up by the monitoring systems.
Alerting consists of text messages going to my phone which does not beep
when a message comes in.

At my last day job it was #1.

Dave

From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 8:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: After-hours work

Hey all,

Taking a little informal poll about compensation for after hours / weekend
works.  This is mostly geared at consultants, so if you're an onsite IT
guy, please indicate.


If you work after-hours on-call, or are expected to carry the beeper, how
are you compensated?

1. None, just man up and be an IT cowboy and glad you have a job.
2. Flat fee for being on-call.
3. Overtime or time-and-a-half bonus for hours actually worked.
4. Straight hourly at my normal rate
5. Flex time - no extra compentation, but I come in late the next day /
take a day off later in the week.

Thanks all.   Yes, I'm on the beeper this weekend (OK, there's no actual
beeper) so it's on my mind. :)

-- Durf

--
--
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day.
Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks!





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.

2008-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are synchronizing our guests with ESX hosts. ESX hosts are synchornizing
with NTP server. Exception are domain controllers.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:27:56 -0300
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.


Only if yours guests are synchronising time with your esx hosts. not sure
why you would want to do that?


From: Tim Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 12:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.

If you are running a DC virtualized, setting the clock back could have
an impact.

...Tim

 -Original Message-
 From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:16 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.

 Dang... vmware makes one little small mistake and the world unleashes
 an arse kicking on them.

 MS makes many big mistakes all the time and we don't even flinch?
Maybe
 vmware should drop the ball daily and we would be happier?

 Man, that's life! Software has bugs, all I know is my history w/ esx
 has always been extremely positive, and even this bug was trivial! Set
 clock back, turn on vm's, set clock forward, **NO** harm done.

 Wow...

 -Original Message-
 From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:16 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.

 Hopefully they unbugged it with the new update accordingly, so you
 don't
 reapply faulty SP...

 Z

 Edward E. Ziots
 Network Engineer
 Lifespan Organization
 MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
 Phone: 401-639-3505
 -Original Message-
 From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:55 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Looks like Vmware Update 2 is available again.

 http://www.vmware.com/download/vi/

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Any ESX guru's out there

2008-08-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does VMotion and DRS work? What's your switch configuration like?

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:20:29 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Any ESX guru's out there


Latest VC 2.5x and 3.5i, 

 

Getting HA Agent on (ESX HOST NAME) in Cluster (NAMEOFCLUSTER) in
SITE(NAME OF SITE) has an error. 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA

Phone: 401-639-3505



From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Any ESX guru's out there

 

What's the error? Version of ESX and VC?

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Any ESX guru's out there

 

Hey Gang, 

 

I am trying to figure out why one of my ESX hosts has a HA  Agent error
on it, and I have tried to Reconfigure for HA still no luck. I have
restarted Service Mgmt and vpxa services no no dice. 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA

Phone: 401-639-3505

 

 

_
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other
privileges.
This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are
not
an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized
use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and
delete
the original message and any attachments from your system.
_

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


MX record confirmation

2008-08-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're going to be switching from a hosted email service to hosting email
internally with Exchange on SBS.  Our MX record obviously points to the
hosted service IP right now.  When Exchange is setup and running, I want
email to come there instead.  However, I still want to leave the old MX
record in there just incase theres problems with the new server, but at a
lesser MX priority.  So, do I basically just have the ISP change the DNS
host table and create a new MX record for Exchange server with a HIGHER
priority number than the current MX record?

example... 

If my current dns table shows:
IN MX 10 mail.outsourced-email.com.

I should have the ISP change it to:
IN MX 20 mail.myinternalmail.com.
IN MX 10 mail.outsourced-email.com.

Is that correct?
Thanks.


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: VMWare and Exchange

2008-07-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2007 is more friendly for virtualization since in runs primarily
in memory where Exchange 2003 did more writing to disk. I/O issues have
been reported by some where others it has not been a problem. Part of that
mostly likely is due to your network and SAN setup. Are you going to be
clustering Exchange in your VMware environment?

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Fogarty Richard MR - CONTR - Team EITC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:15:51 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: VMWare and Exchange


Has anyone virtualized their whole Exchange environment?  Any issues?

Has anyone had issue particularly with a backend box being virtualized?
What about if it is clustered with MS Clustering services.

 

Rick Fogarty
Team EITC, Senior Systems Engineer
Planning  Systems Engineering Coordinator
US Army Special Operations Command
(910) 396-0501
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Copying VHD Files

2008-07-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ESXi is just the embedded version of ESX. A lot of this is hype. Still need
to purchase Enterprise to get VMotion, DRS, HA an all of the goodies.
Basically it is just a scaled down version of ESX with a 32 MG footprint.
Suppose to be more secure and does away with the service console.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:37:22 +1000
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Copying VHD Files


Well, VMWare has just announced that ESXi will be free, so that cuts some
of the price differential. SCVMM 2008 -vs- Vi is another debate.

Certainly for larger shops, there is no competition for VMotion, DRS,
StorageMotion etc.

Cheers
Ken

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2008 8:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Copying VHD Files

Yes but the cost is so much better as is the administration of the base
hardware.  By the end of the year I am suppose to be down to 3 physical
boxes from 5 and no new boxes scheduled for purchase before I retire.  One
of the physicals will be an external Web server.

Jon
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:45 AM, John Hornbuckle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

That's what I ended up doing, and it seems to have worked fine. Hyper-V
assigned  a new MAC address to the new server, and sysprep took care of the
SID.



I'm absolutely loving Hyper-V. I don't have any experience with VMWare, so
I can't compare them, but as a server virtualization noob I have to say
this is just the coolest.



Of course, if my physical server that's hosting multiple virtual servers
konks out, I'll probably end up cussing the technology and longing for the
days when one server being down only meant that one server was down rather
than many...









From: Ken Schaefer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 7:17 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Copying VHD Files



You don't need to do any of that (the export/import stuff)



Just create your base machine, and shut it down (e.g. after sysprep)



Then copy/rename the VHD file. Create a new machine in Hyper-V, and say to
use an existing hard disk. Point it to the VHD you copied. Run NewSID if
you didn't sysprep your base image.



Cheers

Ken



From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2008 1:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Copying VHD Files



Simple answer yes but you do have some loops to go through to use the
machine as separate machines.  You will have to export them base machine
and then re-import the machine.



Done right is not too bad.



Jon





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: terminal server

2008-07-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That depends if you downloaded per user or per device cals from the
Microsoft clearing house. What does it say in your agreement from
Microsoft? Just changing it on the server will not fix this if you
downloaded and installed per device cals from Microsoft and your Terminal
Server License Server.

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:53:36 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Isn't the reason I've been issued temporary CALs because my TS is per
device and I don't have any 2003 per device CALs?  I've already got
25 per user CALs, plus like you said, they are not tracked in the
Licensing Server.
Seems like if I convert this last Server to per user like the rest of
them, the issue with my temporary CALs expiring will go away.
Is that right?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

You have to match what you dowonloaded from Microsoft. If you downloaded
per device Cals then you need to set per device cal on your Terminal
Server. Same goes for per user. If you want to change from per device to
per user cals you need to have the TS Cals reallocated from Microsoft
clearing house and reinstalled on license server. 

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:35:15 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


I don't think I wanted the fourth TS to be Per Device.  
Do I just change that one from Per Device to Per User and I'm good?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

A license server can support both per user and per device, however, I
would
choose one or the other to save your sanity and keep things consistant.
Also a license server can support both Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 TS
cals. You can change your license one time to per user or device. The TS
license server on the DC is the preferred method. Why would you want to
change to per device instead of using per user?

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:25:16 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Here is what's confusing to me (amongst other things); 

1. I have 4 Terminal Servers, 2 are load balancing and the other two are
supporting different applications each.
2. 3 are configured Per User and the fourth (the one in question) is
Per Device.
3. My Licensing Server shows
TypeTotal
AvaiIssued  
Existing Windows 2000 License   built-inunlim   unlim   19
Temp Lic. Serv 2003 Per Device CAL  Temp-   -
15
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 TS Client Access License   Open1   1
0
2003 TS Per User CALOpen25  25
N/A

Can a Licensing Server only support one type of CAL, per user or per
device?  Is that why it shows N/A for number of per user cals issued?
Do I just need to change from per device to per user on the fourth
TS?  If so are my per user CALs useless?
I haven't confirmed yet if the 25 CALs are actually User CALs or not,
but if so and I wanted Device CALs can they be exchanged?
My Licensing Server is my DC, not one of the TS's.
Most of my users have XP, but a few 2000 and Thin Clients. 
I have closer to 60 users who access these TS's.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

I believe you are allowed a one time change to per user. The advantage
of
per user is that the cals are not tracked and you don't have to deal
with
all the nonsense of licenses being stored in the users registry and
having
to return licenses to the pool after 90 days.

Original Message:
-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:14:33 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Sounds like your TS server is in per-device mode but your owned licenses
are per-user.  OR, you purchased per-device licenses and when the TS
licenses were installed, the wrong type was picked.  You really need to
know what kind of licenses you're supposed to have first and get that
sorted.

On your TS, launch Terminal services configuration, look in the Server
Settings node at Licensing to see what mode the server is set to.  I
seem
to remember there might be an issue with switching this one way (as in,
you
change

RE: terminal server

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How many TS cals did you purchase? Did you purchase per user or per device
Cals? Check to make sure it is set correctly on your Terminal Servers under
Terminal Services  Server settings  Licensing. The 25 licenses that are
per user should be fine, however, the 15 temp licenses that are expiring
are the issue. Check your agreement to see what you purchased and what
Tscal licensing packs you downloaded. You can contact the TS licensing
group without charge if you need to reissue your TScals without charge.
Just go through the wizard like your are installing cals and the phone
number is there.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:02:44 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


My understanding is the temp licenses are issued for approximately
120-day period or until you activate your installed licenses.   You
terminal server will need to connect to a license server (could be
itself) in order to activate the installed license pack.

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

_

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: terminal server

 

On my Licensing Server it shows that I have 25 2003 per user cals
available, and it's showing 15 temporary 2003 per device cals.  The
temporary cals expire next week.

I'm so confused with this, I think I screwed something up.

Can I get some advice?

 

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/  to learn more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: terminal server

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe you are allowed a one time change to per user. The advantage of
per user is that the cals are not tracked and you don't have to deal with
all the nonsense of licenses being stored in the users registry and having
to return licenses to the pool after 90 days.

Original Message:
-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:14:33 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Sounds like your TS server is in per-device mode but your owned licenses
are per-user.  OR, you purchased per-device licenses and when the TS
licenses were installed, the wrong type was picked.  You really need to
know what kind of licenses you're supposed to have first and get that
sorted.

On your TS, launch Terminal services configuration, look in the Server
Settings node at Licensing to see what mode the server is set to.  I seem
to remember there might be an issue with switching this one way (as in, you
change it and it can't be changed back), so be careful and google it
first-maybe someone else can jump in if they know the answer on that.

-Bonnie

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: terminal server

On my Licensing Server it shows that I have 25 2003 per user cals
available, and it's showing 15 temporary 2003 per device cals.  The
temporary cals expire next week.
I'm so confused with this, I think I screwed something up.
Can I get some advice?


Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. 
Visit our website at
www.leementalhealth.orgblocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn
more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message, including attachments.








~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: So I have this app called Great Plains....

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's why they call it Great Pains! We had issues with Great Plains
installation and removal and had trouble getting support through Microsoft.
Had to call one the Great Pains partners to get help.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:01:37 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: So I have this app called Great Plains


The uninstaller tells me it requires Microsoft Dexterity Shared Components
10.0 to be INSTALLED in order to proceed. Wellthat is installed but the
GP uninstaller refuses to play nice. Does anyone know how to trick Great
Plains into uninstalling? The other option is manually hacking it out of
the registry, but there are probably HUNDREDS of entries based on a cursory
search.

Ideas?

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
..remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding
the back of the tiger ended up inside  - JFK




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Copying VHD Files

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is correct. The nice part of ESX and virtual center is that you
install sysprep once
to c:\documents and settings\Allusers\Application Data\VMware\Virtual
Center\Windows\Resources\sysprep. Customize using the guest customization
wizard will be grayed out in Virtual Center if not installed. Be careful
when moving a VM to another host because of UUID issue.

mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:47:21 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Copying VHD Files


I didn't and have seen no problems yet but then I am not activating it prior
to the export import process either.

Jon

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, John Hornbuckle 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  In Googling this, I'm finding recommendations to run sysprep on the
 machine I'm cloning prior to cloning it…











 *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:52 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Copying VHD Files



 Simple answer yes but you do have some loops to go through to use the
 machine as separate machines.  You will have to export them base machine
and
 then re-import the machine.



 Done right is not too bad.



 Jon

 On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:37 AM, John Hornbuckle 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As I've mentioned before, I'm a noob when it comes to server
 virtualization. Forgive me if this is a dumb question.

 I need to create a couple of virtual servers in Hyper-V with the same
 OS. Can I create a VHD, install the OS to it and patch it up, then just
 make copies of that VHD to use in multiple virtual servers? Obviously in
 each virtual server I'd rename the machine. Are there any problems with
 doing this? Like the kinds of things you'd see with cloning hard drives
 with Windows client OS's (e.g., duplicate SIDs)?




 John Hornbuckle
 MIS Department
 Taylor County School District
 318 North Clark Street
 Perry, FL 32347

 www.taylor.k12.fl.us


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Windows - No Disk

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows - No Disk
Exception processing message c013 Parameters
75a851d8fef8e6dc75a851d875a851d8
Cancel, Try Again, Continue

This pop up box routinely occurs on my SBS2003 box.  I've done quite a bit
of research on this and can't see to shake the issue.  Doesn't seem to be a
USB drive issue either.

To try and track this down, I've also waited for the msg to appear, then
run filemon.exe, then hit try again and the error reappears.  However, I
don't see anyhting in filemon.exe that clues me in except this:

188 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  OPENC:\WINNT\TEMP\  SUCCESS 
Options: Open
Directory  Access: 0011 
189 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  OPENC:\WINNT\TEMP\  SUCCESS 
Options: Open
Directory  Access: 0011 
190 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  DIRECTORY   C:\WINNT\TEMP\  NO SUCH
FILEFileBothDirectoryInformation:
{42D2756E-8650-4053-A1BA-143D0DDAA926}WIN32READ.dat 
191 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  DIRECTORY   C:\WINNT\TEMP\  NO SUCH
FILEFileBothDirectoryInformation:
{0B856260-DD89-43C4-BC95-1225259A}WIN32READ.dat
192 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  CLOSE   C:\WINNT\TEMP\  SUCCESS 
193 10:05:35 AM store.exe:1584  CLOSE   C:\WINNT\TEMP\  SUCCESS 

I'm not sure if this is the 'issue' or not.  Anyone have any ideas?

The error pops up every couple days or so it seems... for as long as I can
remember.



mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: terminal server

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A license server can support both per user and per device, however, I would
choose one or the other to save your sanity and keep things consistant.
Also a license server can support both Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 TS
cals. You can change your license one time to per user or device. The TS
license server on the DC is the preferred method. Why would you want to
change to per device instead of using per user?

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:25:16 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Here is what's confusing to me (amongst other things); 

1. I have 4 Terminal Servers, 2 are load balancing and the other two are
supporting different applications each.
2. 3 are configured Per User and the fourth (the one in question) is
Per Device.
3. My Licensing Server shows
TypeTotal
Available   Issued  
Existing Windows 2000 License   built-inunlim   unlim
19
Temp Lic. Serv 2003 Per Device CAL  Temp-   -
15
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 TS Client Access License   Open1   1
0
2003 TS Per User CALOpen25  25
N/A

Can a Licensing Server only support one type of CAL, per user or per
device?  Is that why it shows N/A for number of per user cals issued?
Do I just need to change from per device to per user on the fourth
TS?  If so are my per user CALs useless?
I haven't confirmed yet if the 25 CALs are actually User CALs or not,
but if so and I wanted Device CALs can they be exchanged?
My Licensing Server is my DC, not one of the TS's.
Most of my users have XP, but a few 2000 and Thin Clients. 
I have closer to 60 users who access these TS's.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

I believe you are allowed a one time change to per user. The advantage
of
per user is that the cals are not tracked and you don't have to deal
with
all the nonsense of licenses being stored in the users registry and
having
to return licenses to the pool after 90 days.

Original Message:
-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:14:33 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Sounds like your TS server is in per-device mode but your owned licenses
are per-user.  OR, you purchased per-device licenses and when the TS
licenses were installed, the wrong type was picked.  You really need to
know what kind of licenses you're supposed to have first and get that
sorted.

On your TS, launch Terminal services configuration, look in the Server
Settings node at Licensing to see what mode the server is set to.  I
seem
to remember there might be an issue with switching this one way (as in,
you
change it and it can't be changed back), so be careful and google it
first-maybe someone else can jump in if they know the answer on that.

-Bonnie

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: terminal server

On my Licensing Server it shows that I have 25 2003 per user cals
available, and it's showing 15 temporary 2003 per device cals.  The
temporary cals expire next week.
I'm so confused with this, I think I screwed something up.
Can I get some advice?


Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. 
Visit our website at
www.leementalhealth.orgblocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to
learn
more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
or
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient,
please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original
message, including attachments.








~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE - Free email based on Microsoft(r) Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm

RE: terminal server

2008-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to match what you dowonloaded from Microsoft. If you downloaded
per device Cals then you need to set per device cal on your Terminal
Server. Same goes for per user. If you want to change from per device to
per user cals you need to have the TS Cals reallocated from Microsoft
clearing house and reinstalled on license server. 

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:35:15 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


I don't think I wanted the fourth TS to be Per Device.  
Do I just change that one from Per Device to Per User and I'm good?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

A license server can support both per user and per device, however, I
would
choose one or the other to save your sanity and keep things consistant.
Also a license server can support both Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 TS
cals. You can change your license one time to per user or device. The TS
license server on the DC is the preferred method. Why would you want to
change to per device instead of using per user?

Original Message:
-
From: Paul Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:25:16 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Here is what's confusing to me (amongst other things); 

1. I have 4 Terminal Servers, 2 are load balancing and the other two are
supporting different applications each.
2. 3 are configured Per User and the fourth (the one in question) is
Per Device.
3. My Licensing Server shows
TypeTotal
Available   Issued  
Existing Windows 2000 License   built-inunlim   unlim
19
Temp Lic. Serv 2003 Per Device CAL  Temp-   -
15
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 Server CAL Per Device  Open3   3
0
2000 TS Client Access License   Open1   1
0
2003 TS Per User CALOpen25  25
N/A

Can a Licensing Server only support one type of CAL, per user or per
device?  Is that why it shows N/A for number of per user cals issued?
Do I just need to change from per device to per user on the fourth
TS?  If so are my per user CALs useless?
I haven't confirmed yet if the 25 CALs are actually User CALs or not,
but if so and I wanted Device CALs can they be exchanged?
My Licensing Server is my DC, not one of the TS's.
Most of my users have XP, but a few 2000 and Thin Clients. 
I have closer to 60 users who access these TS's.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: terminal server

I believe you are allowed a one time change to per user. The advantage
of
per user is that the cals are not tracked and you don't have to deal
with
all the nonsense of licenses being stored in the users registry and
having
to return licenses to the pool after 90 days.

Original Message:
-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:14:33 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: terminal server


Sounds like your TS server is in per-device mode but your owned licenses
are per-user.  OR, you purchased per-device licenses and when the TS
licenses were installed, the wrong type was picked.  You really need to
know what kind of licenses you're supposed to have first and get that
sorted.

On your TS, launch Terminal services configuration, look in the Server
Settings node at Licensing to see what mode the server is set to.  I
seem
to remember there might be an issue with switching this one way (as in,
you
change it and it can't be changed back), so be careful and google it
first-maybe someone else can jump in if they know the answer on that.

-Bonnie

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: terminal server

On my Licensing Server it shows that I have 25 2003 per user cals
available, and it's showing 15 temporary 2003 per device cals.  The
temporary cals expire next week.
I'm so confused with this, I think I screwed something up.
Can I get some advice?


Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. 
Visit our website at
www.leementalhealth.orgblocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to
learn
more.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized

RE: Fax Server that integrates with Exchange

2008-07-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GFI Faxmaker is good. Captaris (formerly Right Fax) is fine also.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Phil Guevara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:49:10 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Fax Server that integrates with Exchange


Anyone know of or use a fax server that integrates with exchange?
 
So that we can have email to fax ability?

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Excahnge Setup

2008-07-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are running ESX 3.5. It sounds like you are recommending using the raw
device mapping
which makes sense for clustered servers in VMware. Do you see a big
performance difference
between physical and virtual?

Original Message:
-
From: Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:26:22 +1000
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Excahnge Setup


SCR generally gives you a bit more flexibility than CCR. See:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/06/28/445538.aspx
for a list of differences

You can certainly run Exchange in a VM. Just be aware that virtualisation
always adds overhead of some level, so if you are currently I/O constrained
(i.e. I/O is bottlenecking your systems) then virtualising will just make
the situation worse.

Now, the higher end virtualisation products all allow direct disk access
(i.e. you can add a LUN as a disk to the VM), and the overhead is
reasonably low (around 10%). If you can provide enough spindles and LUNs,
then you can get Exchange working in VMs with respect to the performance
issues.

Cheers
Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 12 July 2008 2:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Excahnge Setup

Can any of you Exchange guys comment on your preference for using Stanby
Continuous Replication or Cluster continuous replication? Also, running
Exchange as VM's. some prefer not to run Exchange as VM's because of the
I/O contention problems. That is why we are running Notes on physical boxes.

Mike

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Excahnge Setup

2008-07-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No SBS in our environment. We have 150+ servers. For storage we have EMC FC.

Original Message:
-
From: Jim Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:42:14 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Excahnge Setup


I've been sent in to clean up a couple installations where they put SBS on
a VM, including the data store volumes.
 
In both of these cases, ended up with 474 errors in ESE... which according
to MS is generally caused by a hardware (disk subsystem) problem. There
being no physical disk subsystem that the VM sees, I'm thinking it's a
problem with I/O delay that causes store database corruption.
 
So, don't do that.  Use external storage of some sort. (iSCSI has been very
good to me).
 
Sorry if this seems like a simple no-brainer, but I know someone out there
is doing it wrong, at least twice that I've seen and had to fix. 


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:26:22 +1000 Subject: RE: Excahnge Setup  SCR
generally gives you a bit more flexibility than CCR. See:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/06/28/445538.aspx for a list of
differences  You can certainly run Exchange in a VM. Just be aware that
virtualisation always adds overhead of some level, so if you are currently
I/O constrained (i.e. I/O is bottlenecking your systems) then virtualising
will just make the situation worse.  Now, the higher end virtualisation
products all allow direct disk access (i.e. you can add a LUN as a disk to
the VM), and the overhead is reasonably low (around 10%). If you can
provide enough spindles and LUNs, then you can get Exchange working in VMs
with respect to the performance issues.  Cheers Ken  -Original
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday,
12 July 2008 2:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Excahnge Setup
 Can any of you Exchange guys comment on your preference for using Stanby
Continuous Replication or Cluster continuous replication? Also, running
Exchange as VM's. some prefer not to run Exchange as VM's because of the
I/O contention problems. That is why we are running Notes on physical
boxes.  Mike  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with
Ninja! ~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Blade systems

2008-07-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have the HP c7000 Bladesystem which holds 8 fullheight or 16 half-height
blades. You could look at the c3000 Bladesystem if you are interested in HP
Blades. It holds 4 full height or 8 half-height blades. VMware ESX server
is running on all 16 blades. We have Terminal Server /Citrix servers,
Domain controllers , file servers, and lots of other servers running as
VM's. Terminal Server /Citrix servers will run fine, however, they will not
scale like physical servers. If you are getting 80 on a physical box, you
are probably going to get around 40 on a Citrix VM.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Tom Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:15:40 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Blade systems


Hi Folks:
 
I'm in the market for a new blade chassis and eventually blades to fill up
the chassis.  I am not partial to any particular vendor although most of
our equipment is Dell.  We currently have a Dell blade chassis that is full
and holds nine blades.
 
When I contacted Dell the newest version is a chassis that holds up to 16
blades.  That's great except the chassis is now three times more costly
than what I paid for a chassis two years ago.  At $15,000 for a basic
chassis configuration, that's a lot to spend for a mid-sized non-profit
agency.  Acknowledging the redundency and power efficiency, I could instead
purchase several servers for that amount.  
 
Recommendations?  I'd like to get a new blade system but I need to afford
it.  These blades will be file and print, application.  No attached storage
or SAN/clustering (at least now).
 
Tom

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Excahnge Setup

2008-07-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can any of you Exchange guys comment on your preference for using Stanby
Continuous Replication or Cluster continuous replication? Also, running
Exchange as VM's. some prefer not to run Exchange as VM's because of the
I/O contention problems. That is why we are running Notes on physical boxes.

Mike


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

2008-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone recommend a good Notes to Exchange conversion Tool?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

2008-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have over 1000+ users and need not just to convert nsf files to pst. We
need a product robust enough to convert things like contacts, calandars,
databases, etc. 

Original Message:
-
From: Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:57:46 +1000
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion


Depends what you're migrating (Mail, Apps)

Depends on the complexity of what you're migrating

Depends on how much you want OOB and how much elbow grease you want to put
in yourself.

Microsoft has free tool (dunno if it's only available for partners, but
it's free to sign up as a partner). Quest has a good paid-for tool. We
(Avanade) have a much more sophisticated multi-threaded tool that runs
alongside the Quest tool. And so on.

All depends on what you want to do, and how quickly you want to do it. :-)

Cheers
Ken

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2008 11:52 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

 Can anyone recommend a good Notes to Exchange conversion Tool?

 Thanks,

 Mike


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

2008-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have over 1000+ and we do have Sharepoint developers. We are using
iNotes templates.
Have 6 Notes /Domino servers. We will be migrating to Clustered Exchange
2007 and be moving databases to SAN environment. Would like to look at an
email archive solution too.
Any suggestions?

Thx,

Mike
Original Message:
-
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:06:41 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion


Why Shookie, that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me! :-)

To the OP: Ken gave you a great answer. If I were going in as a consultant
for this type of engagement, the first thing I would do would be to survey
the existing Notes environment - how many servers, what capabilities of
Notes are being used, how much workflow is being used, whether iNotes is in
use, etc. etc.

Then, you crunch the numbers and decide what pain level you are willing to
absorb. ;-)

In this case, pain includes the dollars to spend on automation, the dollars
to spend on SharePoint development, user training, etc. etc.

Now, if your company has 10 people, that's a really different discussion
than if your company has 1,000 people or 10,000 people.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

Yeah, Michael B. Smith, but he's not a tool. :) 

Shook


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

Can anyone recommend a good Notes to Exchange conversion Tool?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web.com - Microsoft(r) Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

2008-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks interesting. Says it has the features of Symantec enterprise Vault.

Original Message:
-
From: Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:19:59 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion


Take a look at SEA from our list host.  

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Business/Sunbelt-Exchange-Archiver/ 

 
Andy Shook
Decision Support LLC
Direct:704.844.1848
Fax:704.847.4875
www.decisionsupport.com 



This message with attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential
or proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify
the sender, do not use or share it, and delete it. Unless specifically
indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any
product or service.  Subject to applicable law, Decision Support LLC may
monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its
networks/systems. The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may
impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and
produced in countries other than the country in which you are located.
This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 10:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

We have over 1000+ and we do have Sharepoint developers. We are using
iNotes templates.
Have 6 Notes /Domino servers. We will be migrating to Clustered Exchange
2007 and be moving databases to SAN environment. Would like to look at
an
email archive solution too.
Any suggestions?

Thx,

Mike
Original Message:
-
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:06:41 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion


Why Shookie, that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me! :-)

To the OP: Ken gave you a great answer. If I were going in as a
consultant
for this type of engagement, the first thing I would do would be to
survey
the existing Notes environment - how many servers, what capabilities of
Notes are being used, how much workflow is being used, whether iNotes is
in
use, etc. etc.

Then, you crunch the numbers and decide what pain level you are willing
to
absorb. ;-)

In this case, pain includes the dollars to spend on automation, the
dollars
to spend on SharePoint development, user training, etc. etc.

Now, if your company has 10 people, that's a really different discussion
than if your company has 1,000 people or 10,000 people.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

Yeah, Michael B. Smith, but he's not a tool. :) 

Shook


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Lotus Notes to Exchange conversion

Can anyone recommend a good Notes to Exchange conversion Tool?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web.com - Microsoft(r) Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on
Microsoft(r)
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printers in TS

2008-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Typically in the Terminal Server /Citrix world this is caused by the user
having admin or power user rights on the box. Check your permissions.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:59:41 -0400 
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Printers in TS


Good afternoon,

 

When connected to my TS, if I open printers, I see a ton of printer listed.
It looks like every printer installed on every workstation is displayed. 
The users printers look like this:

 

Pcl5c on SCHEDULECOPY (from DEK04) in session 1,20

 

Is there any way to filter this so I, and my other users, only see relevant
printers?  I only want to see printers installed on the server, and my
local machine.

 

I'm prolly just not googling the right terms, but I'm coming up empty.

 

Thanks,


Eric


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printers in TS

2008-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check local groups on TS box or use a tool like filemon or Regmon ot see
where elevated permissions are coming from.

Original Message:
-
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:36:02 -0400 
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Printers in TS


The users in question are only members of the TS group to give them the
right to logon and the Domain User group.

You're right though.  They certainly have elevated rights when logged into
the TS box, and I can't figure out why.  Any suggestions tracking down
where they are being inherited from?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 1:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Printers in TS

Typically in the Terminal Server /Citrix world this is caused by the user
having admin or power user rights on the box. Check your permissions.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:59:41 -0400 
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Printers in TS


Good afternoon,

 

When connected to my TS, if I open printers, I see a ton of printer listed.
It looks like every printer installed on every workstation is displayed. 
The users printers look like this:

 

Pcl5c on SCHEDULECOPY (from DEK04) in session 1,20

 

Is there any way to filter this so I, and my other users, only see relevant
printers?  I only want to see printers installed on the server, and my
local machine.

 

I'm prolly just not googling the right terms, but I'm coming up empty.

 

Thanks,


Eric


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft(r) Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


WMI Query

2008-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for help with WMI query for an application (TSM). 

On Error Resume Next
strComputer = Server1
   Server2
   Server3 
Set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts:\\  strComputer  \root\cimv2)
Set colItems = objWMIService.ExecQuery(Select * from
Win32_ProgramGroup,,48)
For Each objItem in colItems
Wscript.Echo Caption:   objItem.Caption
Wscript.Echo Description:   objItem.Description
Wscript.Echo GroupName:   objItem.GroupName
Wscript.Echo Name: TSM  objItem.Name
Wscript.Echo SettingID:   objItem.SettingID
Wscript.Echo UserName:   objItem.UserName
Next

Can anyone help?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: WMI Query

2008-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's closer.  Trying to query to see if TSM is installed. Can I just add

Wscript.Echo GroupName:  Tivoli Storage Manager

To see if TSM is installed?


Original Message:
-
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:18:19 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: WMI Query


Eh, you probably mean something like this:

On Error Resume Next
strComputers = Array (Server1, Server2, Server3)
For i = LBound (strComputers) To UBound(strComputers)
strcomputer = strcomputers[i]
Set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts:\\  strComputer 
\root\cimv2)
Set colItems = objWMIService.ExecQuery(Select * from
Win32_ProgramGroup,,48)
For Each objItem in colItems
Wscript.Echo Caption:   objItem.Caption
Wscript.Echo Description:   objItem.Description
Wscript.Echo GroupName:   objItem.GroupName
Wscript.Echo Name: TSM  objItem.Name
Wscript.Echo SettingID:   objItem.SettingID
Wscript.Echo UserName:   objItem.UserName
Next
set colItems = Nothing
set objWMIService = Nothing
Next

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WMI Query

Looking for help with WMI query for an application (TSM). 

On Error Resume Next
strComputer = Server1
   Server2
   Server3 
Set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts:\\  strComputer  \root\cimv2)
Set colItems = objWMIService.ExecQuery(Select * from
Win32_ProgramGroup,,48)
For Each objItem in colItems
Wscript.Echo Caption:   objItem.Caption
Wscript.Echo Description:   objItem.Description
Wscript.Echo GroupName:   objItem.GroupName
Wscript.Echo Name: TSM  objItem.Name
Wscript.Echo SettingID:   objItem.SettingID
Wscript.Echo UserName:   objItem.UserName
Next

Can anyone help?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web LIVE - Free email based on MicrosoftR Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: WMI Query

2008-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If strComputer can't be a muti-valued property, how would you query mutiple
servers?

Original Message:
-
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:26:59 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: WMI Query


Well, it won't work. strComputer can't be a multi-valued property in WMI.

Also, this particular line has obvious problems:

Wscript.Echo Name: TSM  objItem.Name

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WMI Query

What info are you looking to retrieve?

Are you saying this does or doesn't work?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WMI Query

Looking for help with WMI query for an application (TSM). 

On Error Resume Next
strComputer = Server1
   Server2
   Server3 
Set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts:\\  strComputer  \root\cimv2)
Set colItems = objWMIService.ExecQuery(Select * from
Win32_ProgramGroup,,48)
For Each objItem in colItems
Wscript.Echo Caption:   objItem.Caption
Wscript.Echo Description:   objItem.Description
Wscript.Echo GroupName:   objItem.GroupName
Wscript.Echo Name: TSM  objItem.Name
Wscript.Echo SettingID:   objItem.SettingID
Wscript.Echo UserName:   objItem.UserName
Next

Can anyone help?

Thanks,

Mike


mail2web LIVE - Free email based on MicrosoftR Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: WYSE Terminal thin clients

2008-07-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have worked with the S90 which has the embedded XP. It is fine for that
right environment. Places like manufacturing or Kiosk are a great place.
The drawbacks in the
corporate environment are that they have to be managed like any other
device so you need another tool which for Wyse is WDM. Also if you need to
install small programs on the device there is not alot of room to work. I
think it is like 512-1MB local storage. You can have them customize a build
for you. Test printing before you make your decision.  Installing local
print drivers can cause problems.  The thing to look at is buying thin
clients going to save money in the long run if they cost about the same as
PC's? A desktop locked down with group policy offers the same functionality
and more flexibility.

Mike 

Original Message:
-
From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:51:02 -0600
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: WYSE Terminal thin clients


Shawn,
If its ok to you, keep it on list :P
I may be buying some too...
jlc


From: Shawn Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 5:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WYSE Terminal thin clients

Hi All,

Is there anyone on the list with experience with XP on Wyse thin clients?

Could someone drop me a note off list?  Aside from some general concept
knowledge I don't know much about them and would like to understand them
better.

Shawn


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


ghost and drivers

2008-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I could have sworn that there was a software program (which might have even
been discussed on this list?) that works with Symantec Ghost for the
purpose of providing a driver database for imaging machines across
different hardware models.  

I know this can be done with sysprep, but I thougth I read something about
a new program (not made by Symantec I think) that eases ghost imaging
across multiple hardware... Does this ring a bell by anyone?  Discussed on
the list perhaps 3-8 months ago?   I did a search by couldn't find anything.

Thanks.

Jesse



mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ghost and drivers

2008-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I found what I was thinking of...
http://www.binaryresearch.net/products/the_universal_imaging_utility



Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:16:54 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: ghost and drivers


I could have sworn that there was a software program (which might have even
been discussed on this list?) that works with Symantec Ghost for the
purpose of providing a driver database for imaging machines across
different hardware models.  

I know this can be done with sysprep, but I thougth I read something about
a new program (not made by Symantec I think) that eases ghost imaging
across multiple hardware... Does this ring a bell by anyone?  Discussed on
the list perhaps 3-8 months ago?   I did a search by couldn't find anything.

Thanks.

Jesse



mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: VMWare / Virtualization

2008-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lots of varied opinions on this subject...

I (personally) will virtualize almost anything (SQL, Exchange, File/Print,
etc.).  The only things I shy away from virtualizing are the FMSO role DC,
Oracle (because of their cpu pricing model), or other servers that are very
cpu intense.  Aside from that, I'm willing to virtualize most any box.  I
really like the added DR it provides me (we backup data/files on each
server via Backup Exec (VM or physical) but in addition, we also backup the
entire VM flat-file every night (basically an image backup of the server). 
Restoring the entire VM flat-file can be done in 20 minutes flat, whereas
rebuilding a crashed server and restoring the data can take hours or more.

Low overhead boxes are typically the best candidate to virtualize (IMO) but
if you have a very robust virtual host, you can get away with virtualizing
database servers, etc. as well.

JR

Original Message:
-
From: Fogarty Richard MR - CONTR - Team EITC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:47:32 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: VMWare / Virtualization


When virtualizing a datacenter is there a stand fast rule on what one
can/cannot virtualize?  For example, we're not scheduled to upgrade to
E2k7 for some time, so I'd like to virtualize our E2k3 boxes.  We've
used the capacity planner and very little of our existing infrastructure
is being taxed.  Our SQL boxes run with all of our DBs on a SAN with
fiber channel (as do all of our Exchange stores) - so I'm assuming that
most should be fine.

 

I know I've heard some of you say that you'd never virtualize
everything, so are DCs the only systems you'd leave on a physical box?
(Mind you, this is outside the obvious systems where you'd get no ROI)


Comments?

Thanks in advance,

Rick

 

 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: (0T) Ports needed for MetaFrame Presentation Server Web Client

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you are using Web Interface and Presentation server you can utilize port
443,
however, you must have Web Interface setup to use port 443 and have a
certificate.
You would have to have a cert with the FQDN setup to resolve to the
external IP
address on the firewall. If you are NAT'ing a public to private address on
your 
firewall without SSL then you will need 1494 or 2598 depending if you are
using session reliability.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:19:26 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: (0T) Ports needed for MetaFrame Presentation Server Web Client


1494/2598 if memory serves along with 80.

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: (0T) Ports needed for MetaFrame Presentation Server Web Client

 

A user would like to be able to use some Citrix client to help manage
his Church.  I would like to allow him to do so, but I can't seem to get
it to connect on our network.

It connects fine on our Sprint EVDO Data cards, so it must be our
firewall.  I have talked with the software provider for the church, and
they keep telling me that all I need is port 443 open.  Well, we
obviously have that open...  I can't find any docs outlying the
requirements to run this software.  

 

Do you guys that might actually know something about Citrix be able to
clue us in?

 

Thanks,

 

Sam

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Support fee

2008-05-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can sell them a block of time at x dollars per hour or maybe a managed
services contract. Managed services is the way to go because you have a
guaranteed revenue stream. You can charge them based on level of service or
SLA. Base your cost on the number of workstations and servers. 

Mike

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Liu, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:53:20 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Support fee


Average 8-12 calls.   

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:21 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Support fee
 
 I would want to know how many calls.
 
 Depending on the userbase, 40 people can either consume almost-none of
 my
 time or 100% of my time.
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 MCSE/Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Liu, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:04 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Support fee
 
 A question for the consultants/support for-hire folks out there:
 
 What's the ballpark monthly fee you wd charge for a userbase of 40 in
 California (30 PC/10 Macs) , 90% desktop support + level one call
 fielding, 10% light maintenance on 3 Windows File Server, 1 DC, 1
Print
 Server  (e..g powercycling boxes if they cannot be brought up after a
 remote reboot, basic AD user administration of locking/unlocking
accts,
 tape rotations given most AD administration/maintenance/support is
done
 centrally at the headquarters) ?
 
 Do you charge per head or per machine?
 
 I'm asking as we are currently faced with having to renew a contract
 with an outside vendor  I want to see what's considered reasonable
 market price for CA.
 
 Thanks in advance for your input,
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Support fee

2008-05-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8-12 calls per day for a 40 person staff is a lot. I would do a network
assessment because if their network is always on fire or their users are
exceptionally needy you will be spending a lot of time there.

Original Message:
-
From: Liu, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:08:41 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Support fee


A day, 

I wish it were per month :)
David Liu
Answering from my blackberry. I'm on the move

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed May 28 09:06:43 2008
Subject: RE: Support fee

A day? A week? A month?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Liu, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Support fee

Average 8-12 calls.   

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:21 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Support fee
 
 I would want to know how many calls.
 
 Depending on the userbase, 40 people can either consume almost-none of
 my
 time or 100% of my time.
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael B. Smith
 MCSE/Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Liu, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:04 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Support fee
 
 A question for the consultants/support for-hire folks out there:
 
 What's the ballpark monthly fee you wd charge for a userbase of 40 in
 California (30 PC/10 Macs) , 90% desktop support + level one call
 fielding, 10% light maintenance on 3 Windows File Server, 1 DC, 1
Print
 Server  (e..g powercycling boxes if they cannot be brought up after a
 remote reboot, basic AD user administration of locking/unlocking
accts,
 tape rotations given most AD administration/maintenance/support is
done
 centrally at the headquarters) ?
 
 Do you charge per head or per machine?
 
 I'm asking as we are currently faced with having to renew a contract
 with an outside vendor  I want to see what's considered reasonable
 market price for CA.
 
 Thanks in advance for your input,
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Citrix question

2008-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Same applies for published desktop. Create an AD group and that group of
users only access to that published desktop.

Original Message:
-
From: James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:55:17 +0100
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Citrix question


I already have the application published, but because they are accessing via
a published desktop, I need them to log on to the published desktop on the
same server that the Excel plugin is installed on. The application doesn't
play nicely via a published desktop unless it is the same server. I was just
wondering if there was some sort of preferred server flag that could be
set, but it doesn't look too hopeful.

2008/5/27 David Mazzaccaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Create a new published app, called something like Execel - Server2.

 Publish it on only server2, and only give permission to that group of
 people.




  --

 *From:* Mike Semon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:28 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Citrix question



 You could create AD groups and publish the application to that particular
 group of users, however, that may be a lot of trouble if you

 are going to change things back once you have plug-in fixed.



 Mike


  --

 *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:49 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Citrix question












~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Citrix and redirected My Documents

2008-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what I was thinking. Here is a good link that suggests how to do
this.

http://www.dabcc.com/miab/miab30/Implementation-Phase-11.-5.-How-to-Publish-
Windows-Explorer-MIAB-3.aspx


Original Message:
-
From: Tom Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:44:32 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Citrix and redirected My Documents


Can you just publish  Explorer?  I do that here.  You might need to
modify your login script to accommodate it, though.  

 David Mazzaccaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/27/2008 11:52
AM 

Since we on the subject of Citrix….

I have a 2003 domain, with“My Documents”redirecting
to\\server\share\username ( file://server/share/username )for
everyone.
Each user’s“My Documents”is a different location (ie.
\\server\share\SmithJ ( file://server/share/SmithJ
),\\server\share\DoeJ ( file://server/share/DoeJ ))

For Citrix, we use Web Interface as our client.  Users simply open a
browser and goto:“citrix”.
Is there a way to havethe users’“My Documents”appear along with
theirotherpublishedapplications?

Right now, usershaveto launch Excel, then goto FILEOPEN to get
their“My Documents”to open an Excel file.
Then they have to open Word, then goto FILEOPEN to get totheir“My
Documents”to open aWordfile.

If they could go straight to“My Documents”that would be great!
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dave





Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


preventing users from hiding files

2008-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there an easy way (group policy perhaps?) to prevent people from hiding
files?  I beleive it can be done from NTFS permissions and setting a folder
so that the Write Attributes permission is denied, but this seems a bit
time consuming to setup on every single folder I want this done for...

We have 1500+ user accounts that have home directories we do NOT want them
to be able to hide anything in those home directories.  There's also some
network shares we don't want these users to be able to hide files/folders
inside them as well.  I'm hoping or a GPO alternative to settings the NTFS
perms all all these folders/drives/files, etc.

I'm going to see if maybe disabling the context windows (the menu that
appears from right clicking on a file or folder) does the trick -- the
users do not have access to CMD.exe so they cannot use the .exe command on
a file/folder.  

Thanks.
JR



myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: preventing users from hiding files

2008-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... going with this option.  I created a ADM file for GP that will make all
hidden files/folders viewable.  Now there shouldn't be any point in hiding
files since everyone will be able to see them anyways.  Good idea.

JR


Original Message:
-
From: Eric Woodford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:24:07 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: preventing users from hiding files


How about turning on the permission that says show hidden files for
everyone?.. That way its pointless to do so.


On 5/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is there an easy way (group policy perhaps?) to prevent people from hiding
 files?  I beleive it can be done from NTFS permissions and setting a
folder
 so that the Write Attributes permission is denied, but this seems a bit
 time consuming to setup on every single folder I want this done for...

 We have 1500+ user accounts that have home directories we do NOT want them
 to be able to hide anything in those home directories.  There's also some
 network shares we don't want these users to be able to hide files/folders
 inside them as well.  I'm hoping or a GPO alternative to settings the NTFS
 perms all all these folders/drives/files, etc.

 I'm going to see if maybe disabling the context windows (the menu that
 appears from right clicking on a file or folder) does the trick -- the
 users do not have access to CMD.exe so they cannot use the .exe command on
 a file/folder.

 Thanks.
 JR


 
 myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft(R) Windows(R) and Linux web and
application
 hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix question

2008-05-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have worked on numerous server farms and have seen both. PNAgent works
great on locked down published desktops. Users see only applications
published that they have permission to access. Remote users almost
exclusivley web client.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:00:40 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix question


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Citrix question
 
 The UPD works for about 80-90 percent of printing issues.

It is actually designed for 95% functionality.  I have yet to find anyone
who uses the UPD who has problems with it.  BUT - there are thousands of
printing devices and I obviously haven't worked with them all.

 You
 can use PnAgent, Web Client or Full PN client for both PS 4 and PS 4.5.
 Citrix is discouraging using the full PN client and moving people to
 PNAgent or Web Client.

According to my dealing with Citrix tech Support, fewer than 5% of installs
do not use the Web Interface exclusively.  I have worked on well over 100
Citrix farms and have never met anyone using PNAgent in production.  Some
will test it or play around with it, but no one that I have worked with uses
it in production.


Webster


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix problem with install

2008-05-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What kind of problem are you having with .Net 2.0? This was a problem with
PS 4.0 and Web Interface, however, this was fixed in version 4.5 or 4.6.
Version 4.5 and 4.6 should be able to work with .Net 2.0?

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:07:18 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install


I actually fixed this one too... The CD I was using was scratched, lol.
I burned a new one, and got everything installed.  The wall I'm working
around now is an issue with Web Interface and .Net 2.0.  Is it possible
to uninstall .Net 2.0?  I went into Add/Remove, see .Net 2.0 Service
Pack 1, try to uninstall it and it tells me it can't because it would
affect other applications.   I did find a CTX doc showing a possible
work-around, I'll let everyone know if that works.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install



What error or errors are you getting installing PS?

 

 

Webster

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install

 

Licensing is resolved.

 

I uninstalled Licensing and IIS, re-installed, and I can now access the
LMC.  Now, I'm hitting my next wall, which is errors trying to install
the actual Presentation Server.

 

I'll be back! (In best Governator voice)

 

Joe Heaton






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix problem with install

2008-05-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you reinstall IIS then Citrix license Manager? I have seen issues where
I had to reinstall IIS and LMC to fix problem.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 07:27:22 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install


I looked at the httperr.log.  It is showing the following:
 
2008-05-14 22:17:42 127.0.0.1 1215 127.0.0.1 80 HTTP/1.1 GET
/lmc/index.jsp 400 - Hostname -
2008-05-14 22:18:19 127.0.0.1 1238 127.0.0.1 80 HTTP/1.1 GET
/lmc/index.jsp 400 - Hostname -
2008-05-14 22:58:50 127.0.0.1 1356 127.0.0.1 80 HTTP/1.1 GET
/lmc/index.jsp 400 - Hostname -
 
So the reason is Hostname?  Which would point to what you were saying
about not accepting localhost.  I'm poking around in IIS Manager,
trying to find where to tell it to accept localhost.  Time to break out
my google-fu.  Thanks Ken.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install



a)  400 = Bad Request. Probably occurring because you aren't sending
the correct Host HTTP header to the IIS server (it's configured to
listen for the servername, and not localhost as a header. You can
change the IIS config to accept localhost as well as the servername.
Look in the httperr.log error log file to find out why you are getting
Bad Request

b)  If you want to view something over HTTPS you need a certificate.
Did you install a cert into the website or configure IIS to use an
existing server authentication certificate? You can use SelfSSL.exe
(part of the Res Kit tools) to generate a self-signed certificate to
test.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 15 May 2008 8:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install

 

Nope, only 80 is shown.  I did find that I had 2 NICs, both set to DHCP.
I disabled one, and put a static address on the other, reinstalled LMC,
and now I'm getting a 400 error, when using localhost.  If I change that
to the server name, then I get the message saying it needs to be viewed
over https.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Mike Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Citrix problem with install

Does your default web site in IIS have the SSL port on it? I know mine
is blank. 

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That's what I thought.  So I'm right where I started.  Install seems to
go fine, but the web app won't open.  Is there anything I need to change
in the security settings for IE?


Joe Heaton


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install

No, you can add license file anytime. Default location is Program
Files\Citrix\Licensing\MyFiles directory.

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:38:25 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install


Yep, that's how I'm trying to access it.  Does the license file have to
be in place before running the install?  I thought I remembered
installing LMC first with 4.5 in class, then loading in the actual
license file.

Joe Heaton






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Citrix problem with install

2008-05-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you have IIS installed before you installed license server? Have seen
some different issues with license server. If you have problem with it just
uninstall since you can run license server installation separate from PS
4.5 installation. It only takes about 5-10 minutes and make sure license
file is in correct location.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Tom Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:21:13 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Citrix problem with install


I have PS 4.5 running and the license console points to
http://localhost/lmc/index.jsp - not sure if it's the same on 4 but you
could give it a try.   I don't think this is a web site - just web app.  In
IIS I only see my Web and PN Agent sites.

 Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/14/2008 1:52 PM 
Hoping there's a few Citrix guys out there that can tell me where to look. 
I am trying to install Licensing Management Console for PS 4.  The install
seems to go well, but I can't connect to the webpage.  Also, when I look in
IIS, there's no lmc folder under the default website.  Any ideas where to
look, or what I can do to fix this?  I really need to get this new Citrix
server going, and I can't even get past the licensing install...Oy vey!
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 




Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix problem with install

2008-05-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, you can add license file anytime. Default location is Program
Files\Citrix\Licensing\MyFiles directory.

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:38:25 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install


Yep, that's how I'm trying to access it.  Does the license file have to
be in place before running the install?  I thought I remembered
installing LMC first with 4.5 in class, then loading in the actual
license file.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install



 

 

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix problem with install

 

Yep, that's the same as the link created in 4.0.  But when I try it, my
IE tells me I have to use https, then when I do that, it says it can't
display the page, because I'm not on the internet...

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Citrix problem with install

I have PS 4.5 running and the license console points to 
http://localhost/lmc/index.jsp - not sure if it's the same on 4 but you
could give it a try.   I don't think this is a web site - just web app.
In IIS I only see my Web and PN Agent sites.

 Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/14/2008 1:52 PM 

Hoping there's a few Citrix guys out there that can tell me where to
look.  I am trying to install Licensing Management Console for PS 4.
The install seems to go well, but I can't connect to the webpage.  Also,
when I look in IIS, there's no lmc folder under the default website.
Any ideas where to look, or what I can do to fix this?  I really need to
get this new Citrix server going, and I can't even get past the
licensing install...Oy vey!

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 

 






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Why XP is doomed

2008-05-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has just become ridiculous how much memory you need for a workstation. I
remember upgrading workstations to 32MB of memory and then 64MB and we
thought that was a lot.
Servers back then only had 1-2GB of memory. I remember the old Novell
servers running with 512MB of memory.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:29:37 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Why XP is doomed


Amen.

Jon

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Michael B. Smith 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You could run Windows 2000 Pro in 64 MB. It really liked 128 MB, but 64 MB
 worked fine.

 Couldn't do that with XP.

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 MCSE/Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:16 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 Funny,

 I have to disagree with XP needing 2X the memory Windows 2000 does, I
 ran both Windows 2000 and XP with 1GB RAM on same machine with no
 issues. ( Win2k SP4 Pro, then wiped and rebuilt with XP SP2, still fine
 performance)

 Its when you short-change the system with like 512MB and through a ton
 of applications on the system that are memory intensive is when you run
 into issues.

 If that is one favor you can do with any Microsoft OS, DON'T skimp on
 the RAM, your computer will be happy you did, and you will too.

 Z

 Edward E. Ziots
 Network Engineer
 Lifespan Organization
 MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
 Phone: 401-639-3505

 -Original Message-
 From: David Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:59 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 But ever new OS needs drivers.
 Every new os has always had greater requirements than the last.
 Vista has had issues, oems providing quality drivers being one. Vista
 compatable being another.
 XP neeed double the memory of Windows 2000. XP sp2 needed double again
 over XP sp0, and broke hardware if the bios was not up to date.
 It has its good points and its bad points. I use it and would not go
 back.

 Regards,
 David Houston
 Dame Computers Ltd.
 Office: +35312873159
 Mobile: +353876810844
 Suppprt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew W. Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Sent: 11/05/08 08:44
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 Hold on there... If an OS requires new drivers and more horsepower... we
 can't blame the new OS?

 Oh yes we can.

 --Matt ross
  _

 From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Vista wasn't perfect out of the gate, but it's not the piece of junk
  people think it is, either. A huge reason Vista has a negative image
 is
  that the hardware OEMs have been releasing buggy drivers for it--if
 they
  released drivers for it at all--and have been shipping Vista computers
  that either don't have enough horsepower or are bloated with crapware
 or
  bad drivers (or all three). It all adds up to a bad experience for
  users, and the OS gets the blame.




 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Why XP is doomed

2008-05-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think price is the point. I have 4GB on my workstation so I can run
VMware workstation. Is the reason for needing so much memory just code
bloat or crappy coding?

Original Message:
-
From: Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:42:01 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed


Hell Memory these days is cheap. I got 4GB in my XP machine, and will be
running Vmworkstation and a few hacking tools from home on 2k8 and Nix
Os's in VM's, and still runs like a champ. 

Z

Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why XP is doomed

It has just become ridiculous how much memory you need for a
workstation. I
remember upgrading workstations to 32MB of memory and then 64MB and we
thought that was a lot.
Servers back then only had 1-2GB of memory. I remember the old Novell
servers running with 512MB of memory.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:29:37 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Why XP is doomed


Amen.

Jon

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Michael B. Smith 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You could run Windows 2000 Pro in 64 MB. It really liked 128 MB, but
64 MB
 worked fine.

 Couldn't do that with XP.

 Regards,

 Michael B. Smith
 MCSE/Exchange MVP
 http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:16 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 Funny,

 I have to disagree with XP needing 2X the memory Windows 2000 does, I
 ran both Windows 2000 and XP with 1GB RAM on same machine with no
 issues. ( Win2k SP4 Pro, then wiped and rebuilt with XP SP2, still
fine
 performance)

 Its when you short-change the system with like 512MB and through a ton
 of applications on the system that are memory intensive is when you
run
 into issues.

 If that is one favor you can do with any Microsoft OS, DON'T skimp on
 the RAM, your computer will be happy you did, and you will too.

 Z

 Edward E. Ziots
 Network Engineer
 Lifespan Organization
 MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
 Phone: 401-639-3505

 -Original Message-
 From: David Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:59 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 But ever new OS needs drivers.
 Every new os has always had greater requirements than the last.
 Vista has had issues, oems providing quality drivers being one. Vista
 compatable being another.
 XP neeed double the memory of Windows 2000. XP sp2 needed double again
 over XP sp0, and broke hardware if the bios was not up to date.
 It has its good points and its bad points. I use it and would not go
 back.

 Regards,
 David Houston
 Dame Computers Ltd.
 Office: +35312873159
 Mobile: +353876810844
 Suppprt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew W. Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Sent: 11/05/08 08:44
 Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed

 Hold on there... If an OS requires new drivers and more horsepower...
we
 can't blame the new OS?

 Oh yes we can.

 --Matt ross
  _

 From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Vista wasn't perfect out of the gate, but it's not the piece of junk
  people think it is, either. A huge reason Vista has a negative image
 is
  that the hardware OEMs have been releasing buggy drivers for it--if
 they
  released drivers for it at all--and have been shipping Vista
computers
  that either don't have enough horsepower or are bloated with crapware
 or
  bad drivers (or all three). It all adds up to a bad experience for
  users, and the OS gets the blame.




 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft(r) Windows(r) and Linux web and
application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm

RE: Me so stupid..

2008-05-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you should have a domain controller that hosts your FSMO roles and DNS
on physical hardware, however, you can have other domain controllers which
are virtual. Also, you can cluster domain controller and make other server
virtual. This makes since because if you reboot your Virtual Server and the
domain controller is on virtual server then that will cause issues.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:51:46 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Me so stupid..


I'm reading up on virtualizing domain controllers and found this:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888794

It says, in part:
We recommend that you locate critical server roles on domain
controllers that are installed directly on physical hardware. Critical
server roles include the following: 
* Global catalog servers 
* Domain Name System (DNS) servers 
* Operations master roles, also known as flexible single master
operations (FSMO)

How do you have a domain controller that doesn't have a FSMO role
associated with it?

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix question

2008-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The printing engine was completely redesigned for Presentation Server 4.0.
So Presentation Server 4 and 4.5 use the same printing engine and can take
advantage of the same printing polices and Universal Printer driver
technology. The UPD works for about 80-90 percent of printing issues. You
can use PnAgent, Web Client or Full PN client for both PS 4 and PS 4.5.
Citrix is discouraging using the full PN client and moving people to
PNAgent or Web Client.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:49:42 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Citrix question


Don't know if anyone here can answer this for me but here goes:
 
Does anyone know what version of Presentation Server finally fixed the
printing issues?  I know 4.5 is ok, but is 4.0?  Meaning that in 4.5 you
are not supposed to install any print drivers on the Citrix server.
Printing is done completely from the client machine.  Is that also true
in 4.0?  
 
Also, what client access options are there for 4.0?  Is PN Agent
available, or is it still plain old PN?
 
Thanks for any help, off to try my Google-Fu, while I wait for an answer
here.
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Citrix question

2008-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are not the only one. Still see plenty of Metaframe 1.8/XP out in the
field. Look at the positive way. You got your money's worth:)

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:15:31 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Citrix question


Thanks Tom and Mike.  I just finished a 4.5 class a few weeks ago, and
didn't remember if the issues were resolved with 4.0.  Really appreciate
the info.  I did know about moving away from PN, but currently we're
using, get this, MetaFrame 1.8.  Yep, I'm not kidding...  Just did a PC
upgrade last week at one of our remote offices, and now they are having
major printing issues, with the existing Citrix server not releasing the
temporary Client printer session.

So, my top priority has been shifted to getting the 4.0 version that the
agency bought back in '06 up and running. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix question

The printing engine was completely redesigned for Presentation Server
4.0.
So Presentation Server 4 and 4.5 use the same printing engine and can
take advantage of the same printing polices and Universal Printer driver
technology. The UPD works for about 80-90 percent of printing issues.
You can use PnAgent, Web Client or Full PN client for both PS 4 and PS
4.5.
Citrix is discouraging using the full PN client and moving people to
PNAgent or Web Client.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:49:42 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Citrix question


Don't know if anyone here can answer this for me but here goes:
 
Does anyone know what version of Presentation Server finally fixed the
printing issues?  I know 4.5 is ok, but is 4.0?  Meaning that in 4.5 you
are not supposed to install any print drivers on the Citrix server.
Printing is done completely from the client machine.  Is that also true
in 4.0?  
 
Also, what client access options are there for 4.0?  Is PN Agent
available, or is it still plain old PN?
 
Thanks for any help, off to try my Google-Fu, while I wait for an answer
here.
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on
Microsoft(r) Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: R: R: Why XP is doomed

2008-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it is two years, that's fine. I have no urgency to upgrade to Vista.
Basically for a an OS I just want a stable platform for my applications,
drivers, tools, etc. In the workplace I don't need all of the extra bells
and whistle's. Windows XP is just a jumping off point for me to manage the
rest of the network(RDP, VI client, etc) For my clients, if they could
convince me that Vista is easier to deploy, more stable, increases
productivity, more secure, etc,. then it would justify the ROI. Vista does
have some nice new features, however, I don't see anything compeling other
then Microsoft is going to stop selling and supporting XP. Lot's of costs
associated with new OS's deployment's;
hardware, images, training, IT resources etc,.

Original Message:
-
From: Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:30:28 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: R: R: Why XP is doomed


Personally I doubt that Windows 7 will be released when the pundits
think/say it will be.  If Microsoft is true to form and I see that they will
be so far then you will be waiting about 2+ years beyond the current
scheduled release date.

YMMV and that is very strictly a personal observation.

Jon

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Mike Semon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I am going to stay with XP as long as I can. Vista does not bring
 anything new to the party to justify the upgrade. Five years between
 operating systems

 is not too long. Big companies typically refresh workstations after 36
 months and laptops 24 months. So a minimum of 36 months between new
 operating

 systems is acceptable. I think everyone expected more after waiting 5 yrs
 for a new operating system. Vista does not justify the additional expense
 and

 training required. I like many large companies are waiting on the side
 lines for Windows 7. Hopefully this one will be ready for prime time.



 Mike


  --

 *From:* Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:40 PM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* FW: R: R: Why XP is doomed





 XP isn't doomed, WE ARE I've been in this racket for nearly 44
 years, and I've seen a lot. I go back to hand wiring boards to program
 something. When the personal computer appeared, it was wonderful. Over the
 years we went from DOS to Windows thru 9X and finally to NT (win2K) and
 finally to XP. I have no intention of EVER going to Vista, when it really
 adds nothing to the way I use a computer. And as Micheal says, we keep
 having to buy newer faster hardware to just keep up with our
productivity.
 LONG LIVE XP!!!



 Murray












~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Job title - Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator, Network Administrator

2008-04-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference is about 10-15K :) I have seen these terms used
interchangeably, however, System Engineer usually implies a higher level of
responsibility such as design whereas Administrator is more of a
maintenance role.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:22:49 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Job title - Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator, Network
Administrator


I'm searching the internet and can't find a distinction between
Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator, and Network
Administrator.
Is there a definite difference between these job titles? Or are they
simply 3 names for the same job?





Thanks,
Jon












.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Job title - Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator, Network Administrator

2008-04-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't care what they call me as long as they pay my bill rate! They can
address me as hey you for all I care.

Original Message:
-
From: Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:47:23 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Job title - Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator,
Network Administrator


I'd be on your team any day Sherry, I don't give a dang WHAT you call
me!!

 

  _  

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Job title - Systems Engineer, Systems Administrator,
Network Administrator

 

 
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3007 (20080407) __ The message was checked by
ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array

2008-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes.  Smart start 7.60.  I did not see anything in there to expand the
logical drive.  Only expand the array itself to add more physical disks.  ??

Original Message:
-
From: Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:20:35 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array


Are you using SmartStart for this operation?  I think there's a step in
there that does what you're wanting to do...
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 6:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array



I have an ML350 G3 server with 5 internal drives (array #1 is (2) drives
with RAID1, array #2 is (3) drives with RAID5).   I have just added a
6th drive to the server and gone into the HP ACU to extend array #2 from
3 physical drives to 4 physical drives.  The array #2 was extended,
however, it didn't extend the logical drive IN the array.  Instead, it
just shows the old logical drive (144GB), and (72GB) of free space in
the array.  I want to take that 72GB of free space in the array and
extend the current (144GB) logical drive in that array to 216GB.

 

Can this be done?  Or do I have to just delete the 144GB logical drive
in the array and recreate a new one that uses the maximum space (216GB)?
I would think there's a way to extend the logical drive IN the array.

 

JR

 






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array

2008-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
532 controller.  I did not see anything in the ACU about extending the
logical drive...  Smart Start 7.60.



Original Message:
-
From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:21:38 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array


I've done what you are asking about many times.  Just extend the logical
drive in the ACU - should be an on-line event.  I did this last month on
a 370 G3 so I would expect it work on a 350 G3.  Which array controller
do you have? 
 
-Brian

 



From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: expanding RAID array and logical drive IN the array



I have an ML350 G3 server with 5 internal drives (array #1 is (2) drives
with RAID1, array #2 is (3) drives with RAID5).   I have just added a
6th drive to the server and gone into the HP ACU to extend array #2 from
3 physical drives to 4 physical drives.  The array #2 was extended,
however, it didn't extend the logical drive IN the array.  Instead, it
just shows the old logical drive (144GB), and (72GB) of free space in
the array.  I want to take that 72GB of free space in the array and
extend the current (144GB) logical drive in that array to 216GB.

 

Can this be done?  Or do I have to just delete the 144GB logical drive
in the array and recreate a new one that uses the maximum space (216GB)?
I would think there's a way to extend the logical drive IN the array.

 

JR

 






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Secure Web access to AD Home Folder for students...

2008-03-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've implemented this over SSL using WebDev in IIS.  Works great!
JR


Original Message:
-
From: Matthew W. Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:41:42 -0800
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Secure Web access to AD Home Folder for students...


Hey list,

Students and Staff at my school are wanting to have access to their files
from home. I'm looking for a good solution to allow this, while maintaining
security. One thing that had come to mind would be some kind of application
or web-based access to the user's AD home folder. Doing a bit of googling,
I first came up with FileWay from Everywhere Networks. Has anybody had
experience with this program? Or are there others which I should consider?

If we were to implement this, I would like to have the following features:

1. Robust security
2. Adheres to MS Filesystem quotas.
3. Good logging. I want to know who's account downloaded which file at what
time using which IP.
4. Protection from Brute Force attacks. If a brute force is detected, I
would like to be informed, and the attempts to be automatically blocked.

I'm hoping somebody on this list knows of some software which does this and
is proven to be effective. Or, if some alternative can be suggested, I'd be
interested in those as well.

Thanks all.

--Matt Ross
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


swapping HDs in servers

2008-02-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Been awhile since I done this... any reason this shouldn't work?

I have an HP ML350 G3 server (about 3-4 years ago) that is acting up.  I
think it's hardware related.  I have an unused (retired) HP ML350 G3 server
laying around.  I'd like to take the (2) physical hard drives from the
problematic server (configured as RAID1) and install them in the unused
retired server.  

I'm thinking the second server should recongnize a RAID1 configuration on
the drive and boot up without a problem.  

Any problems with this theory?

J


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


On Access AV scanning of servers

2008-02-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just curious as to people's thoughts about installing AV software on
servers.  I've sorta been against this in the past, ASSUMING that our
clients have up-to-date AV software on them.  

I don't care for the idea of AV software on a server being setup for On
Access so that everytime someone accesses/reads a file, AV checks it. 
Especially on ANY server that has a DB such as Exchange, SQL, MSDE, etc.  

Any reason I should change my mind about that?  Do you typically install
On Access AV scanning on all your servers?

JR


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Determining duplex of cisco router interface?

2008-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about show running-config or sh run?

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:42:06 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Determining duplex of cisco router interface?


I've got a router that is running at 10mb half duplex.
I'm planning on trying to force it to full duplex, but I'm wondering
if there's a way to tell what duplex it is before I try to force it to
full?
I would ASSUME that no card sold in the last 10 years would be only half
duplex?



Thanks,
Jon







.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Determining duplex of cisco router interface?

2008-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think sh run or sh ip interfaces will get this for you.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Jon D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:42:06 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Determining duplex of cisco router interface?


I've got a router that is running at 10mb half duplex.
I'm planning on trying to force it to full duplex, but I'm wondering
if there's a way to tell what duplex it is before I try to force it to
full?
I would ASSUME that no card sold in the last 10 years would be only half
duplex?



Thanks,
Jon







.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Deploy/Push Registry Permission Changes

2008-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've deployed permission changes on registry and files/folders via a GPO. 
Works pretty good.
JR

Original Message:
-
From: Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:05:57 -0600
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Deploy/Push Registry Permission Changes


I need to change the permissions of a reg key on a bunch of PCs.
Anyone know of an easy way?GPO, Script?
 
 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


exchange db/restore Q

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I vaguely recall a 'best practice' theory of making sure whatever drive
(volume) your exchange databases are installed on that it's a good idea the
drive space of that volume is at least 2x the size of your databases --
this is because of space needed for doing restores or something like that.

For example.  If my exchange dbs are on my e: drive and the exchange dbs
are approximately 20gb, then i should make sure i have at least a 50gb e:
drive to accommodate for space neccessary if I performed a complete
exchange restore.

Does this ring a bell or am I thinking of something else?
J


mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: exchange db/restore Q

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
excellent.  when i read that, the light bulb went off in my head... it's
definitely the defrag i was thinking about as i have gone down that route a
couple times in the past.  thanks for the response.


Original Message:
-
From: Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:09:01 -0700
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: exchange db/restore Q


it is needed if you want to do a manual defrag of the database and/or 
mount a recovery store.

For a simple backup and restore it is not necessary.

Klint

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I vaguely recall a 'best practice' theory of making sure whatever drive
 (volume) your exchange databases are installed on that it's a good idea
the
 drive space of that volume is at least 2x the size of your databases --
 this is because of space needed for doing restores or something like that.

 For example.  If my exchange dbs are on my e: drive and the exchange dbs
 are approximately 20gb, then i should make sure i have at least a 50gb e:
 drive to accommodate for space neccessary if I performed a complete
 exchange restore.

 Does this ring a bell or am I thinking of something else?
 J

 
 mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
 http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange



 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
   


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Installing a Terminal Server

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I second the motion. Unless you know all drivers and apps work with x64.

Mike

Original Message:
-
From: Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:28:46 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Installing a Terminal Server


I would stay with x32 Jim.
 
My 2 cents,
Tom



From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Installing a Terminal Server




I'm installing a new Terminal Server for a client and I'm wondering if
it would be better to install x32 or the x64 version of 2003 R2 as the
base operating system.  It will be hosting Office 2007 Pro and an
Accounting Ap. That is currently only 32 bit.  (The database is still on
an SQL 2000 server, and won't be upgraded to SQL 2003 until June.

 

 










~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


DFS Root

2008-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple months ago we started using DFS in our Windows 2003 domain
environment.  When DFS was intially setup last year, it was setup from
Server A at Site C.  We did this because Server A at Site C was the first
Windows 2003 DC in the domain.  Since then, all over the other DCs at the
other 9 sites are now running Windows 2003 as well.

I want to move the DFS Root Target from Server A at Site C to Server A at
Site A.  Can this be done easily?  Any idea how?  I find the MS
documentation for DFS to be very wordy and sometimes difficult to
understand.
JR


myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Can I maintain data drives after virus reinstall?

2001-09-26 Thread Zona.Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Concerning this 
nimda beast: My head is hurting from chasing it for the past eight 
days.

I need some thoughts 
on areinstall ofMS NT4 and 2000on my 
clusters.

I would have to 
rebuild all the shares, reinstall the SQL, andrestore the databases, to 
say the least. However, my databases all point to gigabytes of source files. 
Will l have to reformat the data drives and restore data also, or will I be able 
to maintain my data drives?

Tony 
Zona
Erie, 
PA.
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/