Re: [OTlist] Blurring the lines

2008-08-21 Thread Neal Luther
 This is my first time responding and I am encouraged by the lively
discussion.  It's interesting to me the subject matter as I have
wondered and even lost jobs over these very things (e.g., not accepting
productivity standards based on everything but pt. care).  

It is in fact a "pay for performance" world we live in and for better or
worse not likely to change any time soon.  It is my opinion, that we
play a crucial role in defining the positives of this model.  For
example, if I were to take any tx./tx. plan I have ever offered to a pt.
and try to "sell" it to that same pt. outside of the "system" would
anyone "buy" it?  I know this sounds very commercial and consumer driven
and yet in the end none of us want to work for free.  But we have
assumed for years that the 
"system" would pay if we just jumped through the right documentation
hoops.  
Again, it is my opinion that this is were the rub is.  We've fought for
and won, to varying degrees, at the legislative level but, forgotten the
consumer.  Look no further than No Child Left Behind or IDEA as an
example.  And in the end we create legions of dependants on the "system"
to give them what they want not necessarily what they need.  We have to
go to the consumer with a "product" that is valuable and stands on its
own merits and is made available through insurances.  Again, I offer
"alternative medicine" as an example.  Not that long ago it was unheard
of that insurance would consider paying for massage therapy or
chiropractic intervention.  Now, it is becoming commonplace. This is in
part because these practice groups have "sold" their product to the
consumer and at the same time focused on legislative advocacy where
appropriate. 
I agree with the professor from TSU to some degree in that one day we
will be one discipline if we do not do a better a job of explaining the
"overlap" and selling the differences.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lehman, David
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:47 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Blurring the lines

I feel the OT profession and its association failed to promote what the
true meaning of Occupational Science is and they (as well as PT) let the
modern medical money making machine split the body in half.  In
addition, now OT is left fighting for its life in trying to get
reimbursement for occupational innervation versus upper body impairment
and function treatment. OT must join the evidence based wagon and show
the insurance companies that true occupational therapy/science improves
outcomes in daily life skills (not just focus on the general ADLs that
we all work on (i.e. bed mobility, transfers, bathing, walking, etc).
OT has so much to offer outside the basic ADLs and I feel for people
that cannot get true OT for their lives would be so much more fulling

The PT is not limited to impairment improvment and never really has
been.  PTs that were and some that still are caught in  the mindset that
treating impairments is what we do are poor clinical thinkers in that we
must take impairments to the functional level or it makes no sense.
What I have a big problem with is the jump PTs make from thinking that
improving an impairment is actually improving a function.  For example,
there is no scientifc evidence that a 3/5 or 4/5 manual muscle test
leads to improved sit to stand.

I have to make my students think about the theory behind why they choose
to improve an impairment and that theory must be related to improving
function.

I am going out on a limb here, but, I feel one day professions such as
PT, OT, activity therapists, etc.  will all be one (i.e a rehabilitation
specialist) and this overlap/turf war will be gone.

Does this make any sense?


David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
Associate Professor
Tennessee State University
Department of Physical Therapy
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
Nashville, TN 37209
615-963-5946
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my website:  http://www.tnstate.edu/interior.asp?mid=2410&ptid=1


This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential
information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it
is addressed. If you receive this correspondence in error, please notify
the sender and

Re: [OTlist] Blurring the lines

2008-08-22 Thread Neal Luther
 If PT is the tire then OT is the road.  You've gotta put the rubber on
the road at some point.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 9:32 AM
To: Pat
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Blurring the lines

I  certainly  don't  subscribe  to  the  whole  UE/LE  concept,  and I
constantly find myself explaining myself to other providers, employers
and patients.

So, how do you describe the difference?

Generally, I visualize and articulate the following:

When the focus of treatment is on a body part (leg, arm, hand,
foot,  etc),  then  it's PT. When the focus of treatment is on
occupation, then it's OT.

Obviously  overlap  exists between body parts and occupation, but it's
the  FOCUS of treatment (i.e. the goals) separating PT and OT.

In  home  health,  a  GREAT  place  for  OT,  I  really find that this
treatment approach integrates well with PT and patient outcomes.

Ron

- Original Message -
From: Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Blurring the lines

P> "What is the difference between OT and PT?"


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] bioness

2008-08-25 Thread Neal Luther
 I agree with the statement about TENS in general upper quad use for the
neuro population.  I have used it adjunctively to other tx.
(Saeboflex)that is more active for the CVA population not MS.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 7:34 AM
To: Bill Maloney
Subject: Re: [OTlist] bioness

I am skeptical of e-stim devices for the hand. In my experience, there
is  little  a  therapist  or  device  can  do to restore permanent and
meaning  ability  to  a  hand  affected by a CVA. Of course, I've seen
patient's  recover  hand  function s/p CVA, but this normally occurred
spontaneously and rather quickly after the CVA.

When  someone  is  1  year  or  more  out  from their stroke, and hand
function  is  not  meaningful,  I do not feel that meaningful use will
return.

Others' opinion??

- Original Message -
From: Bill Maloney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] bioness

BM> I am relieved to see the OTlist responding to the recent "CPR" it
received.
BM> I hope it never dies.

BM> Does anyone out there have any specific experience with the Bioness
device
BM> for treatment of the hands for patients diagnosed with multiple
sclerosis?
BM> (FYI http://www.bioness.com/bioness_hand_main.php).  I appreciate
any
BM> feedback.

BM> Bill Maloney, OTR
BM> www.embracelifewell.com


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Do You Agree with This Statement?

2008-08-25 Thread Neal Luther
As it relates to occupation--sure.  The obvious application is industry.
However, I have used ergonomic/overuse principals in homecare with 80 yo
women who have never heard of any of this stuff.   All they want to be
able to do is go out to the garden again without fear of falling and all
that pain in back/shoulders/hips/knees.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 3:24 PM
To: Chuck Willmarth
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Do You Agree with This Statement?

Chuck, stop busting my bubble 

As  usual,  Chuck  is  correct. The quote IS from AOTA's Grip and Grin
brochure. And as Paul Harvey say's, "Here's the rest of the story."

I  recently received an AOTA e-mail announcing that an OT was going to
be  on "The Early Show", discussing preventing hand and wrist injuries
on  the  campaign trail. The source of the message was Heather Huhman,
AOTA Media Relations Manager.

Because  I  am  so  against OT being affiliated with UE/hand issues, I
promptly replied to Ms. Huhman's message with the following:

Great,  National exposure about OT's being hand/UE therapists.
That's the LAST thing our profession needs.

Let's  get some media relations about OT helping people engage
in  occupations,  especially  those  that  don't  focus on the
hand/UE!

Apparently,  my  message  was forwarded to Chritine Metzler (who works
for  AOTA  but  I'm  not sure in what capacity) and she replied to me.
Part of her reply was directing me to AOTA's "Grip and Grin" brochure.
The quote in the brochure, which I included in the original message of
this thread, stood out. I posted it because I'm curious to know if any
OT's on this list agree with statement.

I'm  still  curious  to know if any OT's see themselves as: "expert in
preventing   and   treating   conditions   such  as  repetitive-motion
injuries".

I know for a fact, that is NOT how I see OT.

Thanks.

Ron

- Original Message -
From: Chuck Willmarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Do You Agree with This Statement?

CW> Ron,

CW> Looks like that quote was pulled from AOTA's Grip and Grin brochure
CW> which is a promotional item rather than an official document.

CW> See:
CW>
http://www.aota.org/Practitioners/Advocacy/Tools/PromotionalItems/39726.
CW> aspx


CW> Grip and Grin: AOTPAC Chair Amy Lamb Appears on CBS to Talk About
CW> Preventing Injuries on the Campaign Trail

CW> On Wednesday, August 13, 2008, Cindy McCain, the wife of Senator
John
CW> McCain, sustained a wrist injury after shaking hands with an
CW> enthusiastic supporter. AOTPAC Chair Amy Lamb, OTD, OTR/L, spoke
with
CW> the CBS Early Show about AOTA's Grip and Grin campaign and how
CW> candidates across the country can prevent similar injuries.

CW> See the video online at:
CW> http://www.aota.org/News/Announcements/GripandGrin.aspx

CW> Chuck

CW> -Original Message-
CW> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
CW> Behalf Of Ron Carson
CW> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:05 AM
CW> To: OTlist
CW> Subject: [OTlist] Do You Agree with This Statement?

>> Occupational   therapy   practitioners  are  health,  wellness,  and
>> rehabilitation  professionals  who  are  expert  in  preventing  and 
>> treating  conditions  such  as  repetitive-motion injuries resulting 
>> from excessive handshaking.

CW> The  above  statement is from an official AOTA document.

CW> If  you are an OT/COTA, do you see yourself as an expert in
preventing
CW> and  treating  conditions such as repetitive-motion injuries
resulting
CW> from hand shaking?

CW> Ron

CW> --
CW> Ron Carson MHS, OT
CW> www.OTnow.com



CW> --
CW> Options?
CW> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

CW> Archive?
CW> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] OT/PT perspective

2008-08-26 Thread Neal Luther
Mary, 
Your comments are well spoken.  They actually lead me to ask you and any
others willing to chime in a question.  How would you suggest starting a
program to train home health PT's or OT's to perform power
mobility/seating assessments?  Our company is a large, not-for-profit
company with ~ 160 therapists across three states.  We currently have an
underdeveloped power w-c/specialty seating service line.  They are
however, distinctly separate from the home health side of our business.
I want them to work together.  Any thoughts.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Alice Cafiero
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:19 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] OT/PT perspective

I first must start my comment by saying that many of my dear friends  
are Physical Therapists. I love them and learn from the constantly. I  
also continually learn the differences in our approaches to  
situations. The example coming to mind is when I am doing a wheelchair  
clinic at a teaching hospital with a PM&R doctor, patient and patient  
family, and wheelchair supplier. My role was previously done by a PT  
who is now doing research full time. I have not met her directly but  
have heard wonderful things about her. I do know that her approach to  
a seating assessment and my approach to the same assessment are very  
different.

For instance, she measured every joint angle upper and lower extremity  
with a goniometer. I want to know what is limited and what that  
limitation hinders. I also want to know the mechanism for why it is  
limited, and if it is fixed or flexible. I want a lot more information  
in question and answer format or in patient giving me a narrative  
format about how they use their chair, what they can and cannot do in  
their chair, and what needs to be different next time around. I think  
much of the most valuable information I get comes from that type of  
conversation. BUT I don't get a goniometer out of my briefcase. I'll  
tell the supplier that we need to have a specific type of footplate  
because their knees can't come to 90 degrees, but I'm not going to  
measure it.

So, is that a huge difference? Not in and of itself. My focus is on  
getting the client the best equipment possible so that mobility is  
easy and they can go do what they want to do. I wish it was simple to  
do that. It's very complex and is what consumes my life these days.  
The above comments are not a knock on PT. I work with some amazing PTs  
who do wonderful seating and mobility evaluations. Conversely, I work  
with some OTs who totally miss the point and should not be doing a  
mobility evaluation.

PTs and OTs alike need to be willing to admit that Seating and  
Mobility is another specialty area. Not every new graduate from every  
program has the skills to walk in and start doing evaluations for  
complex rehab equipment. Until our national organizations agree with  
this, we are fighting a seriously uphill battle!

That was a little rantish. And a bit oddball and tangential because I  
am very tired. If it doesn't make sense, just ask me!
Mary Alice


Mary Alice Cafiero
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.

>
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Expertise

2008-09-04 Thread Neal Luther
Occupational task analysis.  The rest is down hill from there. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Audra Ray
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 4:09 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Expertise

Anything that the person does or thinks is important, hence occupation.

--- On Mon, 9/1/08, Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Expertise
To: "Ron Carson" 
Date: Monday, September 1, 2008, 4:33 PM

Anyone???

- Original Message -
From: Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008
To:   OTlist 
Subj: [OTlist] Expertise

RC> What do you think is OT's expertise?

RC> Ron
RC> -- 
RC> Ron Carson MHS, OT





-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



  
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

2008-09-05 Thread Neal Luther
Arley 
I could not agree more!  You are making some of the same points that I believe 
Dr. Sorenesen has made recently with regard to EI (quite a broohaha).  We 
simply don't know how/when to D/C I believe in part because we have not 
established plans of care based on sound clinical reasoning.  We confuse 
altruism with therapeutic intervention (give a man a fish vs. teach a man to 
fish).  This results in treating everyone and everything and if done so long 
enough even the smallest changes/improvements are claimed to be as result of 
treatment.  My two cents.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnson, Arley
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:19 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

I would like to start by asking this question: If an OT is treating a stroke 
patient and uses neurofacilitation strategies in their treatment or a peds 
therapist performs prepping techniques prior to her play activities, is there a 
difference when an OT uses PAMs and strengthening exercises with the ortho 
population en route to addressing occupation based deficits?
I think we need to address the root of the problem by appropriate means and 
then bring it home to the patient during and after every session to a 
functional, meaningful implication/connection. 

The thought pattern posed in the original query should prohibit us from being 
on burn units. There is a lot of biomechanical activity going on in this field 
prior to addressing the functional deficits directly. But the therapists are 
aware that without proper splinting, constant ROM and strengthening, the 
ability to regain any true function in any capacity would be limited by skin 
contractures.

I admit, when I did ortho rehab, my supervisors thought I pulled the discharge 
trigger too early, but I wasn't comfortable treating them when they didn't have 
any functional deficits. If pain was present, but didn't limit their engagement 
in their roles successfully, then I recommended the physician to address the 
issue, not therapy.

Just my humble opinion...

Arley Johnson MS, OTR/L

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:28 AM
To: OTlist
Subject: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

=
SOURCE:

   Advance for OT, Sep 1, 2008, P. 46

Article Title:

   "Injuries  to  the  Wrist: Beneath the Surface of Ulnar
   Wrist Pain."


"[OT] treatment generally involved  rest by splinting and activity
modification; reduction of pain and inflammation by cryotherapy and
.. ROM and strengthening..."

Again, recognizing that this article is about treating an injury, is
the above description accurate for OT?  What is different about the
above compared to what PT might do?

IF OT's expertise is occupation, where's the occupation in the above
description?

Thanks,

Ron
-- 
Ron Carson MHS, OT


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, 
and delete the original message.

-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

2008-09-08 Thread Neal Luther
Hello Ron,
I'm not sure I completely follow.  
If you are saying the point is occupational goal setting--I could not
agree more.  The exception I take is that many times we are reduced to
glorified "shower attendants" in the name of occupation.  More
specifically, I have never had a pt. that had xfers as a goal.  I may
have influenced their opinion to that end but, they have never initially
volunteered BADL type goals.  As has been discussed before, most people
"just want be a able to walk again".  The problem, as we know, is we
stand on the other side of the "river bank" with our pt's and we are
trying to help them "build a bridge" to the other side.  In my best
moments of task analysis there are many types of "bridges"...some more
precarious than others.  Sometimes you "walk" over and sometimes you
build in rest breaks.
What's my point?  Yes, functional I with the "necessities" of life are a
part of occupational performance (BADL), but it is not the "end" for our
pt's.   
For example, the xfers you mentioned before, they should be viewed in my
opinion as the bridge to the greater goal/question of "what does the pt.
want/need to be able to do once they are in?".
The same is true at the other end of the spectrum of performance
(modalities--->decreased pain/increased AROM--->increased functional I).

Rambling?Yeah...but look at the metaphors!


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 8:23 AM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

Hello Neal:

If OT's would adopt occupational goals then patients would be d/c when
those  goals  are  achieved.  For  example,  if  the goal is:

 "By  d/c,  patient  will  safely  and  independently transfer
 to/from car"

Once  the  goal is best achieved the patient is discharged. Of course,
patients have multiple goals but the concept is the same.

Just  last week, I evaluated a patient with total hip replacement. The
evaluation resulted in 5 goals (in abbreviated format):

1. In/out shower
2. In/out of car
3. On/off toilet
4. Simple meal prep
5. Lower body dressing

Using  the  above  approach,  it's  easy  to tell when the goal(s) are
achieved.  If  additional  goals  are  not established, the patient is
discharged.  Also,  this  approach  empowers  the patient because they
generate their own goals.

I  strongly  believe that my job is NOT making goals, but facilitating
the patient to achieve them. Of course, there are exceptions.

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Advance for OT Article: Point #3

NL> Arley 
NL> I could not agree more!  You are making some of the same points
NL> that I believe Dr. Sorenesen has made recently with regard to EI
NL> (quite a broohaha).  We simply don't know how/when to D/C I
NL> believe in part because we have not established plans of care
NL> based on sound clinical reasoning.  We confuse altruism with
NL> therapeutic intervention (give a man a fish vs. teach a man to
NL> fish).  This results in treating everyone and everything and if
NL> done so long enough even the smallest changes/improvements are
NL> claimed to be as result of treatment.  My two cents.


NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Rehab Program Coordinator
NL> Advanced Home Care
NL> 1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
NL> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty






-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] expertise

2008-09-08 Thread Neal Luther
Great Quote!
Global Warming, anyone? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Cheyne
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 6:44 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] expertise

Ron and all, 
While I love OT as a profession,  I remain open-minded to doing what is proven 
to work, If Occupation is all that we believe it to be, it will become evident 
when studied...a good idea it won't die. We owe it to our clients to confirm 
objectively what gets results and meet their goals and discard what doesn't.
Food for thought
 "Men who have excessive faith in their theories or ideas are not 
only
   ill prepared for making discoveries: they also make very poor 
   observations. Of necessity, they observe with a preconceived 
idea,
   and when they devise an experiment, they can see, in its 
   results,only a confirmation of their theory. In this way they 
distort
observation and often neglect very impotant facts because they 
do not further  
their aim. But it happens further quite naturally that men who 
believe 
   too firmly in their theories, do not believe enough in the 
theories of others. 
   So the dominant idea of these despisers of their fellows is to 
find
  others' theories  faulty and try to contradict them. The 
difficulty 
 for science is still the same."
   Claude Bernard, "An Introduction to the Study of Experimental 
Medicine,1865
 
Sincerely Brent Cheyne OTR/L


  
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] expertise

2008-09-08 Thread Neal Luther
I would suggest the COPM as you mentioned, Ron. And the study done at USC with 
the geriatric population...can't remember the name.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 7:14 PM
To: Brent Cheyne
Subject: Re: [OTlist] expertise

Brent,  the  issue  of  research  supporting practice is very valid. I
don't  have  a good reply other than to follow up with your sentiments
that OT is NOT alone in the lack of evidence supporting practice.

At  this point, I must confess a small secret. I do not like research;
I  don't  like  doing it or reading it. I KNOW it's important but I am
just  NOT  a  research  man.  As  such,  I  tend to never focus on the
research question(s) that you mention, but maybe I should.

Maybe  someone  else  on  the list has a better answer. None the less,
thanks for taking time to write.

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -
From: Brent Cheyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] expertise

BC> Ron and all,
BC>  While defining expertise for OTs as being "Occupation" seems
BC> to fill the void of a professional identitity crisis. To be an
BC> "expert" as a profession should be more than just about what we
BC> "believe in" or what we "hold dear". These beliefs, values, and
BC> assumptions are a philosophical ideology (Theory) which has great
BC> usefulness in forming a professional identity but what about the
BC> role facts and evidence in refining our practices? What if facts
BC> and evidence refute our belief about the use of Occupation in
BC> certain situations?...will we refine our beliefs and practices?
BC> Currently it seems as though practices can neither be fully confirmed or 
refuted
BC>  When we make these judgements about what is good OT and
BC> not-good OT shouldn't we also have an scientific method of
BC> establishing what does work and refine our practice from that
BC> data. Shouldn't all theories be tested and questioned and
BC> proven?...or at least a tendency or trend be established?
BC>Granted it is very hard work to find information that
BC> supports and validates completely certain practices, please steer
BC> me in the direction of some good research and outcomes that shows
BC> that Occupation is a powerful tool, process, method, to achieve
BC> functional outcomesI know that we all believe in Occupation
BC> but is that enough?  This kind of information would validate our
BC> practices and confirm us as experts. We are not alone in this
BC> disconnection between theory and objective evidence. The lack of
BC> evidence and science in practice is a problem for not only OT, but
BC> PT, MDs, pharmacology and countless other health-related professions.
BC> It feels good to believe but I want more specifics for my work in Geriatric 
Rehab.
BC> Sincerely,
BC> Brent Cheyne OTR/L
BC>   


BC>   



-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] expertise, goals, and my 2 cents

2008-09-09 Thread Neal Luther
I could not agree more!! 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sue O
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 10:12 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] expertise, goals, and my 2 cents

Hi all - very interesting discussion. If, by expertise, you mean what
differentiates us from other rehab professions, I would say that our
expertise is (or should be) facilitating occupational performance. We
may
include preparatory interventions to accomplish occupational performance
goals, but if we stop at the preparatory step, or write our goals to
reflect preparatory skills (like strength, ROM, etc.) then we are not
doing
OCCUPATIONal therapy. 

I don't write ROM or strength goals, nor do I teach my students to do so
either. Once you shift your thinking, it's not that difficult to write
goals that reflect occupational performance. I would never start a goal
with the performance skill or client factor (increase ROM to do
something).
That, to me is like describing OT by how it's not like PT. I always
start
(and end) with occupational performance. Why not simply state as a goal
that the client will don pullover clothing (if that is what they
identify
as the problem), or even something more general like complete self-care
tasks requiring overhead reaching (and maybe give a couple of examples),
if
the physical problem is shoulder ROM? The intervention plan itself will
spell out that I might work on ROM or teach the client some
self-stretching, but that should not be the goal.

I respectfully disagree with those who say that just because something
is
done by an OT, then it's OT. That mentality has, in my opinion, caused
some
of the identity problem we now wrestle with. That's like saying I'm a
dentist, so if I happen to be good at giving massages, and I choose to
give
you a massage while you're in the chair, then it is dentistry (I realize
my
analogy is a bit absurd, but in a way some of what we do isn't that
different). We have tried to be all things to all people, and it's taken
us
away from our roots, which is the power of occupation to promote mental
and
physical health. Therapists trained during the heavy "medical model"
years
were taught a more reductionistic perspective. But in the past 10-15
years
there has been a decided shift back to a more holistic foundation based
on
the power of occupation. 

I really like the language that the Canadian model uses, which is
exemplified in the COPM, which asks the client "what things do you need
to
do, want to do, or are expected to do, that you can't do, don't do, or
aren't satisfied with how you do them, due to your (fill in the blank
diagnosis, health condition, situation)"? Starting with an assessment
like
the COPM, it's almost impossible not to be both client centered and
occupational based. Once the occupational performance deficits are
identified and goals developed, then we can address the "why" and add in
the necessary assessment and interventions to address the appropriate
performance skills in pursuit of the occupational performance goals.

The bottom line, to me, is if there are no occupational performance
goals
(i.e. the client's condition is not affecting their occupational
performance in any meaningful way, as perceived by the client), then OT
is
not indicated. I know by reading the posts on this topic that some of
you
will disagree with me - no problem. But as someone who has been teaching
OT
for the last 11 years and has experienced the shift first hand, I see
the
handwriting (no pun intended) on the wall.

I have tremendously enjoyed the debate and look forward to more!

Sue Ordinetz

Assistant Professor of Occupational Therapy
American International College
Springfield MA 01109


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] expertise

2008-09-09 Thread Neal Luther
Hey Brent, Just curious...what brought you to USA? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Cheyne
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:09 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] expertise

To Ron and the OTList>
I was glad to see the COPM mentioned more than once in rhe recent discussion as 
I was born raised and edcuated in Canada and have been taught by some of the 
designers of the COPM. I need to go back and get a copy of that material and 
start using it in practice. The OT profession in Canada is strong and dynamic, 
at least it was when I left 15 years ago. I wonder if some of the problems in 
practice related to occupation-based treatments are related to the different 
healthcare system(?)  being a single payer system vs our US system which has a 
lot of big business influences. I have written earlier about what the Medicare 
PPS system and RUGS classification and Rehab companies  have done to OT 
practice in SNFs..productivity, staffing, etc.. have made it hard to practice 
in a more ideal OT way. And it has created bad habits for the profession in 
terms of good occupation-based interentions.
Good to hear about some EBP going on our there too...but I know that a great 
majority of therapist don't really use it at this time including me. But 
objective validation of practices through science would clarifiy a body of 
knowledge and level of expertise.
 If OT is a powerful idea  it will be shown through the evidence.
\Good Discussion
Brent Cheyne OTR/L
 


  
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] OT role in ADL

2008-09-09 Thread Neal Luther
You're right Brent.  It's analogous to OT orders for splinting...its 
reductionist thinking.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Cheyne
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:47 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] OT role in ADL

Linda, Ron and all,
I work in SNF and the issue of ADL and showers comes up a lot. My thought is 
that ideed there are some patients that it is too soon to work on showersso 
there should be no goal in the treatment plan for showering at that time. 
 
Sometimes basic grooming and washing and dressing are challenging and engaging 
enough to match the patients capability. Goals should be set for this type of 
activity. This is a clinical judgement.  It is a matter of activity analysis 
and grading of activity which takes some critical thinking and logical 
progression. Eventually the goal of completing a shower with assistance would 
come as a progression and be an appropriate challange.
 
 If you take a patient and hose them down and scub them up and dry them off 
such that they are a passive receiver of the shower, it would be unethical to 
bill for therapy for that type of treatment and we couldn't  call it 
occupation-based either.  People don't improve function by being in the 
presence of occupation but by engaging in it.  There is sucha a thing as too 
much too soon which is a big waste of therapy time. On the other hand just 
taking patients to the gym and randomly doing puzzles and playing cards isn't 
right either.
 
 WIth all due respect, I don't think blanket rule about "OT must bathe the 
patient once a week makes a lot of sense...a bit of rigid overkill" which 
implicates that there is no thought, or decision-making skills required to 
plan, analyze and progress the patient in logical and effective manner. In that 
case the therapist is not needed . But, believe me  I do understand and relate 
to the frustration managers have with who don't seem to "get it" about 
occupation. Staff education, inservicing, skill building, mentoring, and team 
building are oftern required to keep a team fresh and dynamic and out of bad 
habits. Besides...its important to look at outcomes, if patients are 
progressing to the point where they can shower independently and go 
homesomebody must be doing something right..who are they and what are they 
doing? Eliminate those thiings that don't need doing.
"There's a time for everything under the sun"  It's a gradual and logiccal 
process.
SIncerely, submitted wtih respect
Brent Cheyne OTR/L


  
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

2008-10-09 Thread Neal Luther
Simple.  If we don't know that our interventions are successful we dare
not make claims on occupational performance.  It's akin to performing
PROM on someone in a coma (which can be a good thing) and when they come
out of the coma claiming our intervention as the reason they are able
feed themselves now.  Another example would be in orthopedics.  Why do
we do higher level IADL tasks.  In my experience, it is usually to work
on the dynamics of balance (especially with TKR's).  If I do not know
the effects of single leg stance on the joint and whether that pt. Is
ready (usually in consult with PT) then I can't plan occupational tasks
accordingly. And if this is not addressed then I have not done my job to
prepare that pt. For return to meaningful activity.



Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:13 PM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

Why?

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -----
From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> Also,  I  think  we  have  to measure success at both levels --the
NL> treated area and occupational performance.


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

2008-10-10 Thread Neal Luther
Ron, 
Your splitting hairs.
I put IADL/balance in the context of treating an ortho pt. (TKR). 
Respectfully,



Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

Neal, it seems that we look at things differently:

You say:

"we  do  higher  level  IADL  tasks ... usually to work on the
dynamics of balance"

I look at it this way:

I  do  higher level tasks so the patient can learn to do these
tasks independently 

I work on the dynamics of balance so the patient can do higher
level tasks

Also,  for  me,  I know if interventions are successful if the patient
has  improved  occupational  performance.  Lastly, In my opinion, OT's
role  is  not  PREPARING  the  patient  for  return  to activity, it's
RETURNING them to activity.

Does any of this make sense or is it just "rubbish" 

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> Simple.  If we don't know that our interventions are successful we
dare
NL> not make claims on occupational performance.  It's akin to
performing
NL> PROM on someone in a coma (which can be a good thing) and when they
come
NL> out of the coma claiming our intervention as the reason they are
able
NL> feed themselves now.  Another example would be in orthopedics.  Why
do
NL> we do higher level IADL tasks.  In my experience, it is usually to
work
NL> on the dynamics of balance (especially with TKR's).  If I do not
know
NL> the effects of single leg stance on the joint and whether that pt.
Is
NL> ready (usually in consult with PT) then I can't plan occupational
tasks
NL> accordingly. And if this is not addressed then I have not done my
job to
NL> prepare that pt. For return to meaningful activity.



NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Rehab Program Coordinator
NL> Advanced Home Care
NL> 1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
NL> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



NL> The information contained in this electronic document from
NL> Advanced Home Care is privileged and confidential information
NL> intended for the sole use of [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If the reader of
NL> this communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee
NL> or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,
NL> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
NL> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
NL> received this communication in error, please immediately notify
NL> the person listed above and discard the original.-Original
Message-
NL> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
NL> Behalf Of Ron Carson
NL> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:13 PM
NL> To: Neal Luther
NL> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> Why?

NL> Ron
NL> --
NL> Ron Carson MHS, OT

NL> - Original Message -
NL> From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NL> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008
NL> To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
NL> Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL>> Also,  I  think  we  have  to measure success at both levels --the
NL>> treated area and occupational performance.





--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

2008-10-13 Thread Neal Luther
 Ron, 
I disagree.  We are not at different ends of the spectrum.  I think we
have different ways of expressing the same desire to keep occupation the
central tenet of OT.  However, I still think you are trying to "burn
both ends of the candle" by not admitting in order to establish baseline
occupational performance one must establish baseline "human" deficit.
We are limited creatures, who depend on these bodies that are decaying
(some more rapidly than others) to successfully engage in the things
(occupations) that are meaningful to us.  Your own case history reveals
this.  You do a great job of establishing in a snap shot where the
deficits are:
Martha: A Case Study

History:
90 y/o female
s/p CVA (approximately 10 years) with mild residual affects
Generalized weakness
Decreased endurance
Diffuse pattern of extremity pain
HTTN
Severe anxiety
Evaluation:
Decreased strength in bi-lateral LE
Pain in right LE, secondary to "injury" while standing from
toilet
Decreased endurance
Dependent for most ADL's.
Requires mod - max assist with transfers
Non-ambulatory
Prior Level of Function:
Previously ambulated with RW, short distances
Transferred independently
The only occupation mentioned (toileting)is in relation to pain.  Your
goals reflect occupational performance areas but your eval does not.
Why?


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:49 AM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

Hello Neal:

I  do  not  feel  that  I'm splitting hairs at all. What you and I are
saying  are  at  two  ends  of the spectrum. We are describing totally
different   theoretical  approaches  to  treatment.  Using  IADL's  to
remediate  balance  is  nothing unique to our profession. And, I think
this  type  of  approach leads some OT's to do pretty silly stuff like
cones, shoulder arc, pegs, balloons, laundry, washing windows, etc.

What  I'm  arguing  is  that  OT's  role  should  not  be  remediating
underlying  issues,  other  profession's do that. Instead, our primary
role, and distinction is remediating occupational issues.

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> Ron, 
NL> Your splitting hairs.
NL> I put IADL/balance in the context of treating an ortho pt. (TKR). 
NL> Respectfully,



NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Rehab Program Coordinator
NL> Advanced Home Care
NL> 1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
NL> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

NL> -Original Message-
NL> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
NL> Behalf Of Ron Carson
NL> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:36 PM
NL> To: Neal Luther
NL> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> Neal, it seems that we look at things differently:

NL> You say:

NL> "we  do  higher  level  IADL  tasks ... usually to work on
the
NL> dynamics of balance"

NL> I look at it this way:

NL> I  do  higher level tasks so the patient can learn to do
these
NL> tasks independently 

NL> I work on the dynamics of balance so the patient can do
higher
NL> level tasks

NL> Also,  for  me,  I know if interventions are successful if the
patient
NL> has  improved  occupational  performance.  Lastly, In my opinion,
OT's
NL> role  is  not  PREPARING  the  patient  for  return  to activity,
it's
NL> RETURNING them to activity.

NL> Does any of this make sense or is it just "rubbish" 

NL> Ron
NL> --
NL> Ron Carson MHS, OT

NL> - Original Message -
NL> From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NL> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008
NL> To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
NL> Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL>> Simple.  If we don't know that our interventions are successful we
NL> dare
NL>> not make claims on occupational performance.  It's akin to
NL> performing
NL>> PROM on someone in a coma (which can be a good thing) and when they
NL> come
NL>> out of the coma claiming our intervention as the reason they are
NL> able
NL>> feed themselves now.  Another example would be in orthopedics.  Why
NL> do
NL>> we do higher level IADL tasks.  In my experience, it is usually to
NL> work
NL>> on the dynamics of balance (especially with TKR's).  If I do not
NL> know
NL>> the effects of single leg stance on 

Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

2008-10-15 Thread Neal Luther
Fair enough. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:27 PM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

Neal,  I've  been  pondering  the  below  question  for some time. The
question  really  had  me thinking about my evaluation process. Then I
remembered  that the eval form that I use (provided by the home health
agency)  includes a check box section regarding daily living skills. I
did  NOT  include  this  section  in my on-line evaluation, but should
have.

Thanks for pointing out my error.

I  still  think  we are on different ends of the spectrum, but I guess
that's a well-beaten horse, right? 

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

- Original Message -----
From: Neal Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Best Practice

NL> The only occupation mentioned (toileting)is in relation to pain.
Your
NL> goals reflect occupational performance areas but your eval does not.
NL> Why?


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Clearly DelineatingOT and PT?

2008-10-22 Thread Neal Luther
I think your research is incredibly valuable  both to us as a profession
and ultimately to the communities we serve.  Here's why. 
I'll use one of the areas your research is focused--interpersonal
expressions of caring.  Often the aged/elderly population have lost so
many meaningful expressions of "life and love" that bathing themselves
is completely irrelevant.  But holding that grand baby in their arms and
rocking them to sleep... now, suddenly that same person is alive with
meaningful occupation.  The problem is (as always) third party payers
could care less.  And I believe they could not care less because we
(OT's) have not demonstrated to them the value of this occupation and
how it impacts this persons ability to stay engaged...maybe even stay
home longer...maybe even have carry effect to other areas of personal
self care.
Keep it up! 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sue Doyle
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:02 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Clearly DelineatingOT and PT?


Just another idea from my OT researcher mind. I have been observing
stroke patients for many years. Many patients can function well to
complete their basic self care tasks one handed. The meaning of having
both arms able to function well goes beyond the basic self care tasks we
tend to focus on. The concepts of communication (how many of us talk
with our hands), self esteem and sense of social acceptance (not being
seen as disfigured or disabled), and interpersonal expressions of caring
(eg hugs etc) are ones that I am currently observing as strong
dissatisfiers for clients post stroke who have otherwise mastered basic
self care but are still unhappy with their current performance levels or
the upper extremity function.
 
I am currently designing a research study to further investigate these
concepts. But where does that take us as OTs with treatment?
 
Just to spin the record at a slightly different speed.
 
Sue> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:26:59 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: OTlist@OTnow.com> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Clearly DelineatingOT and
PT?> > If I evaluated a CVA patient (new or old) and they were unable
to> identify occupation goals, they I would d/c them. Recommending PT>
might or might not be indicated.> > No, I do not think we should use
"common sense" to coerce goals.> Occupational goals are not about your
or me, they are about a> patient's perceived needs and values. Just
because we think something> is important, that is no indication that a
patient will agree.> Especially were patients face catastrophic loss of
occupation. What we> value may be meaningless to our patients. Thus,
using a "common sense"> approach can create more harm than good and
leave patient's feeling> utterly frustrated.> > On the other hand, a
skilled OT may need to enlighten a patient as to> the realities of life
with a CVA. Often this is done during the eval,> either through
questioning or actual performance. After a> comprehensive
occupation-based evaluation, it's is my opinion and> experience that an
OT has a very good understanding of a patient's> concerns and thus their
motives.> > I think a LOT of OT success lies in the timing of our
services. If> patients are not willing or able to focus on occupation
then our> success in improving occupation may be greatly diminished.
However,> when patients are focused on lost occupation, and in the hands
of a> skilled occupation-based OT, improvement in occupation performance
is> almost guaranteed.> > Ron> --> Ron Carson MHS, OT> > - Original
Message -> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Sent:
Tuesday, October 21, 2008> To: OTlist@OTnow.com >
Subj: [OTlist] Clearly DelineatingOT and PT?> > cac> What should an OT
do if the patient identifies that they want to> cac> be able to look to
the left (attention?=body?function)?because of> cac> a right CVA?to
their parietal lobe (body structure)?? They> cac> unfortunately do no
personally state any occupations that they> cac> want to address in
particular.? Should we pass the patient to> cac> physical therapy or
should we "coerce" a few occupational goals?through common sense?> >
cac> Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR> > > cac> -Original Message-> cac>

Re: [OTlist] Best Practice

2008-10-28 Thread Neal Luther
Precisely! 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carmen Aguirre
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 8:03 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice


I think the message here limits the power of task analysis and task
equivalency. There a MANY times when a client will need physical agent
modalities/ neuromuscular re-education, lymphedema treatment , etc to
prepare a body segment to perform then or later, a desired occupation.
The role of OT is important to id. those components that would
facilitate the occupational outcome. I would not ID those physical agent
modalities, refer my patient to PT, wait until I'm told "they are ready"
and then work with my patient on the occupation. It is a segmented
approach and unnecessary in my opinion. We are competent to see the
process from beginning to end. 
Carmen





> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:17:43 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> Subject: [OTlist] Best Practice
> 
> I just posted the following on AOTA's Phy-Dys list serve and wanted to
> get OTnow.com readers' opinion. As usual, it's lengthy:
> 
>  ## START ##
> 
> I  have  always  believe  that  OT  intervention  and  goals must be a
> straight  and  direct  line.  In other words, what OT does MUST have a
> DIRECT  effect  on  the patient's occupational deficits. To accomplish
> this  intervention,  I've  sort  of  developed  an  "outline" which is
> primarily  based  on  the  Canadian Model of Occupational Performance.
> What  follows  is  a simplified model which helps establish the DIRECT
> LINE between goals and treatment:
> 
> 1.  Help  the  patient figure out what they want or need to do
> (i.e. occupation)
> 
> 2.  Figure  out  what  is keeping the patient from doing their
> identified occupations:
> 
> a. Environmental
> b. Cognition
> c. Physical
> d. Social
> e. Emotional
> 1. Fear
> 2. Motivation
> 
> 3.  Prioritize the above into those things that can be changed
> and  THEN  GET  BUSY  CHANGING  THEM! Don't waste therapist or
> patient time addressing those issues which can not be changed.
> 
> Now  this  is simple and incomplete, but it works because outcomes and
> treatment  focus on occupation. Recently, it's been suggested, both on
> this  list  and in print, that quality OT must include occupation into
> treatment sessions. I do not feel that such an approach is mandated by
> AOTA's Framework, not is it always appropriate.
> 
> Here  are  several passages from the OT Framework, Rev 2 collaborating
> this concept:
> 
> {EVALUATION}
> 
> Occupation-based  activity analysis places the person [client]
> in  the  foreground.  It  takes  into  account  the particular
> person's [client's] interests, goals, abilities, and contexts,
> as   well  as  the  demands  of  the  activity  itself.  These
> considerations   shape  the  practitioner's  efforts  to  help
> the...person  [client]  reach  his/her  goals  through
carefully
> designed  evaluation and intervention. (Crepeau, 2003, p. 193)
> (P. 651)
> 
> Analyzing  occupational  performance requires an understanding
> of  the  complex  and  dynamic  interaction  among performance
> skills,   performance  patterns,  contexts  and  environments,
> activity demands, and client factors. (P. 651)
> 
> {INTERVENTION}
> 
> The intervention process consists of the skilled actions taken
> by  occupational  therapy  practitioners in collaboration with
> the  client  to facilitate engagement in occupation related to
> health and participation. (P. 652)
> 
> The intervention focusisonmodifyingthe
> environment/contexts   and   activity   demands  or  patterns,
> promoting  health,  establishing  or restoring and maintaining
> occupational  performance,  and  preventing further disability
> and occupa

Re: [OTlist] Client without goals

2008-10-31 Thread Neal Luther
 I would have done the same thing with one exception.  
I have always found a way to discuss faith issues.  I find that lack of
hope is related to lack of faith which is a great place to begin.  When
I say "faith" I do mean faith in God.  It is an amazing thing to realize
that the God of the universe who created all things created me/us with a
purpose.  In this one simple fact is meaning and hope and it is in Him
that our faith should be placed.  
When we as therapists realize this it is a great gift we give to our
patients to discuss these things and in fact build into the occupational
framework of living.  The more we look into ourselves for answers the
emptier life is.  When we turn our eyes/faith to Him and start everyday
with that practice the world (no matter what our circumstances) is a
better place.



Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Alice Cafiero
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 8:23 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Client without goals

I recently had this discussion with a good friend here who does home  
health. She had a patient that was very similar as far as not being  
able to identify goals. Her pt had a very flat affect and didn't do  
anything other than move from her bed to her couch during the day and  
occasionally get up to go to the kitchen for some snack food or  
similar that she just had to grab and eat.

The referral actually got to home health because the lady had a  
shoulder arthroplasty done. However, when my friend did the  
evaluation, this lady was able to do all of her basic ADLs and even  
some IADLS in her home. PT was also on the case and was addressing the  
specifics of range and exercise for the shoulder. The first thought  
was that there were not really OT goals. My friend wasn't totally  
comfortable with this, and I'm sure that was, at least in part,  
because my friend does have some background working in mental health.

She talked with the pt who agreed to have her come back to "check" on  
her. On the next visit, they talked about depression and how having a  
schedule of doing things during the day can help alleviate symptoms.  
They made a very simple plan/schedule for the pt to begin following  
each day with just 3-5 activities scheduled throughout the day. Simple  
things like getting dressed instead of staying in pajamas, brushing  
her hair and teeth, making a sandwich or microwave meal for lunch,  
stepping out into the front or backyard once or twice a day, etc.

On just 1-2 follow-up visits, the pt was actually doing the things  
they scheduled and said she was feeling better and even smiled. The  
smile was huge because during the evaluation, the pt had an absolutely  
flat affect and showed no emotion the whole time. She was able to  
verbalize that she could understand why getting up for activities  
during the day made a difference in how she feels.

Now, of course, we don't know if she will continue to do those things  
when no one is "checking", but I think the OT intervention was valid  
and meaningful even though the pt could not initially verbalize goals.  
Certainly, a recommendation was given to the HH agency and physician  
that a pscyh referral would be a good idea. My friend did a lot of  
education regarding depression and basic things that the pt can do  
around her home to combat the depression.

What do y'all think? Was this appropriate US medical model home health  
OT intervention?
Sorry for being long-winded,
Mary Alice

Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.





On Oct 31, 2008, at 12:59 AM, FAY, Felicity wrote:

>
> Hi there, I'm a Mental Health OT from Australia and work with clients
> who find it difficult to engage and identify their goals daily.
> Sometimes just engaging with the person and building rapport for a
> coupl

Re: [OTlist] Client without goals

2008-11-03 Thread Neal Luther
Why? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Alice Cafiero
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:55 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Client without goals

I have two comments/questions.
Ron, I think the other thing that I thought of with your patient is  
about when she said she wanted to be normal. Could she tell you in any  
way what normal was to her? I think I would have tried to use that as  
a starting point to find out what she thought she was lacking.

Neal and Ron, I think hope/faith/whatever term you want to use like  
this is very important. I am always careful not to share my specific  
beliefs, especially when I don't know the patient's background or  
belief system. I think talking about hope, personal satisfaction/ 
stability (can't actually think of the word I'm looking for here) is  
fine but that recognizing the validity of other people's belief  
systems is also very important. I don't see my role as an OT including  
testifying to someone about my personal beliefs. It's just dangerous  
ground in my mind.

Respectfully,
Mary Alice

Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.





--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab

2008-11-07 Thread Neal Luther
A couple of quick thoughts and observations.
First, Wikipedia has good info on basic definitions of ethics and morality.
Second, ultimately after one reads these definitions or others one comes to the 
question: Says who?
On what authority does any "man" or system of "man" e.g. government, religion, 
etc. make their claim? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Cheyne
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 6:52 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab

To Ron, Chris and the List,
For the sake of continuing the doubling/dovetailing conversation, I'd like to  
talk about ethics...the  labels of "ethical and unethical" situations get  
freely tossed around a lot in talk about the OT world. To say that something is 
"unethical" because it is against the rules means if you follow the rules your 
are  supposedly"ethical".
 However, truly ethical conduct goes beyond the mere act of following the 
'rules', and is far more complicated. As we have already observed one clinical 
setting (acute rehab) may have different "rules" than another (SNF, Peds etc.). 
 And often the rules are hard to find, pin down,  verify,  or subject to 
multiple interpretations. Rules change frequently...does that mean our ethics 
are also constantly in flux based on corporate,medicare, or insurance provider 
policies?
 
The AOTA has a Code of Ethics (2005) with 7 principles as components:
Principle 1.demonstrate a concern for the safety and well-being of the 
recipients of their services. (BENEFICENCE) 
Principle 2. take measures to ensure a recipient’s safety and avoid imposing or 
inflicting harm. (NONMALEFICENCE) 
Principle 3 respect recipients to assure their rights. (AUTONOMY, 
CONFIDENTIALITY) 
Principle 4. achieve and continually maintain high standards of competence. 
(DUTY). 
Principle 5.comply with laws and Association policies guiding the profession of 
occupational therapy. (PROCEDURAL JUSTICE) 
Principle 6. provide accurate information when representing the profession. 
(VERACITY) 
Principle 7. treat colleagues and other professionals with respect, fairness, 
discretion, and integrity. (FIDELITY) 
 
 According to the AOTA these are the ethical principles we follow to determine 
if a situation or even a rule is ethical. Additionally these ethical principles 
are held in conjuction with the  OT Core Values (AOTA 1993): Altruism, 
Equality, Freedom, Justice, Truth and Prudence. 
 
So...Based on AOTA  Ethical Principles and Core Values, we take a look back at 
doubling/dovetailing patients for treatment and we know there are certain rules 
to follow in a variety of contexts of clinical practice,  Questions Come Up: 
Should doubling/dovetailing (DB/DT) always be considered "unethical"  
regardless of the clinical setting ?  If   DBDT is allowed by rule is it still 
unethical? If it is generally unethical by what  ethical principle?   Is DBDT 
only unethical because it is harder (or easier) work for the therapist, or can 
it be proven to be less (or more) efficient in providing the most effective 
treatment to the most people for the least cost?
 
I think all these questions should have good answers before we go to our 
colleagues,  managers, and administrators to talk about the ethics of practices 
and policies such as DBDTing.
Any other thoughts or responses?
Brent, an OT


--- On Thu, 11/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OTlist Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7
To: otlist@otnow.com
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 3:00 PM

Send OTlist mailing list submissions to
otlist@otnow.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OTlist digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: doubling patient in acute rehab ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:05:30

Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab

2008-11-10 Thread Neal Luther
 Bill,
I think I hear what you are saying.  If I may be so bold as to add a few
thoughts.
First, I do think healthcare should be viewed as a business.  However, I
think we look at it as a national commodity when in fact it is a
service...a vital service, none the less a service.  To further
complicate matters we have taken this "commodity" and made it a "right"
to "have access" in our conversations around how to regulate.  So,
strictly speaking from a business model, or more specifically an
economic model we do not have true "free market" economic principals in
play.  Namely, supply and demand.
Here is another way to look at it.  If you or I had to take what we do
as therapist and "package" it in a way that the consumer would buy it, I
fear that most consumers would not buy.  When I say consumer I do mean
the end user not the "fiscal intermediator" or any other entity that
holds the purse strings.
So what is the answer?  I think in part is lies (at least in the US)
with "cleaning up" the insurance industry.  This includes Medicare and
all private insurances.  It would involve new innovative ways of
thinking that are actually not new.  Give the consumer control.  One of
the "products" that I think could be useful in changing the paradigm is
HSA's (healthcare savings accounts).  You can find plenty of info
on-line (try HSA.com) that speak to particulars.  In a nutshell, these
are insurance products that are a high deductible policy matched with a
savings account that is interesting bearing and is yours.  It is not
dependant upon your employer.  Something like this would have to be
phased in gradually starting with 18 year olds.  The power in a product
like this is the same as any interest bearing accounts--compounded
interest over time and it rolls over from year to year.  This is so
unlike any of the so called FSA's that do not encourage saving but
spending.
Anyway, at the end of the day we would be "selling" our services to the
consumer and not to congress.  I do see a place for congress to be
involved, but on a limited basis and simply to provide oversight and
safeguards where necessary (like making sure it is portable from state
to state).
Hope this makes sense.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Maloney
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:28 PM
To: OTlist
Subject: Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab

On the subject of DB/DT:  ethics, rules, varying standards of individual
clinical practices, etc. notwithstanding, the bottom line is PROFIT.  If
you
look very closely at ALL clinical settings, the bottom line has to be
"healthy" (seemingly at whatever cost) or the business fails.  With the
US
economy faltering, business owners, board members and trustees are more
than
likely interested in the path of least resistance when it comes to
ethics,
i.e. as long as you're not doing anything harmful enough to hurt
business,
rock on.  I am absolutely and certainly not implying, in any way, that
the
"suits" don't hold themselves to high standards of ethical business
behavior
(perhaps some do, perhaps some don't).  I am just jaded, I guess, by all
the
improprieties that are regularly surfacing from behind the scenes in the
corporate world.  Healthcare is no different, it is a business.  The
questions I would have are two:

1.  The cart before the horse: does the business side of healthcare
exist
and do what it does to keep the wheels spinning in order for us to
provide
excellent care to our recipients; or do we provide our service to the
recipients as a means of generating revenue for the business (is the dog
wagging the tail, or vice-versa)?  and

2.  When you've applied ethical framework guidelines to how you're
practicing, and asked all the appropriate questions, and answered them
to
the best of your interpretation, do you stay put or move on to something
that better aligns with your personal practice philosophy?

Thanks, Ron and others for allowing freedom of expression on this site.

Bill Maloney, OTR





--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

2008-11-12 Thread Neal Luther
Thank-you , David. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lehman, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:54 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

Neal...what I think you did was not a professional act but a human
actyou can call it PT or OT.this is how I address my patients in
the SNF I work at. Most times the OT is on top of the pt's life goals
but, together we both address the life situation via our treatment
(whether improvment in function or impairments).  We have the ole'
division of the body (if OT is seeing pt, I cannot address UE
impairments/function, so, I relate it to LE impairments and overall
function based on what the pt will be doing at discharge, whether
staying in SNF or going home).  I think we can all play the modern
medical game to appease administration and insurance companies, but,
knowing we are all actually looking our for the life improvement
outcomes.

Peace,

David
David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
Associate Professor
Tennessee State University
Department of Physical Therapy
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
Nashville, TN 37209
615-963-5946
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my website:  http://www.tnstate.edu/interior.asp?mid=2410&ptid=1


This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential
information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it
is addressed. If you receive this correspondence in error, please notify
the sender and delete the email from your system. Do not disclose its
contents with others.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neal Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:51 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

I have one for you, Ron.  I do some PRN work at a small community
hospital that also has it's own SNF.  Routinely, they will "eval" pt's
who are being transferred to the SNF in the hospital before they leave.
In addition, they are in the habit of telling pt's/families the pt. has
to stay a minimum of 21 days for the insurance to pay.  Under this
working model I saw a pt. last weekend who was admitted with respiratory
failure thru their ED--went to the floor for a few days--xfered to the
SNF.  When I saw her she had been in the SNF for three days.  She was
completely I with all BADL albeit she needed to tale rest breaks.  Tx.
plan involved IADL home mgmt. tasks.  As is my habit when I do weekend
work I asked the pt. what she does for fun (I usually get some very
strange looks, but have found it to be a great way to build quick
repoire).  As it turns out the pt. had no interest at all in "meal
planning/prep".  What was important to her was relationships and
socializing with friends/family.  So, I re-directed her tx. that day to
simply walking through the entire SNF looking for people she had played
bingo with and talking/socializing.  She even pushed another pt. to the
dining room in their w/c.
Was I right in my choice?  Was what I did really PT?


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home
Care is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole
use of [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the person listed above and discard the
original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:07 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

I've  been  an  OT  for  a  long  time  and I still can NOT explain my
profession in a way that is:

* Concise
* CLEARLY differentiates OT from other professions
* Makes sense to other people (i.e. patients, MD's, nurses, etc)
* Consistent:
- With others
- Across patient populations
- Supported by practice
- Supported by documentation
* Satisfies me

Yesterday, I evaled a patient s/p shoulder replacement. PT was already
on the case. I struggled understanding my OT role with this patient
and how it might be different if PT wasn't already seeing the patient.
I wondered how other OT's would approach the patient.

The patient is a retired nurse and her daughter is a retired "special
needs" kids. Bot

Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

2008-11-12 Thread Neal Luther
I have one for you, Ron.  I do some PRN work at a small community
hospital that also has it's own SNF.  Routinely, they will "eval" pt's
who are being transferred to the SNF in the hospital before they leave.
In addition, they are in the habit of telling pt's/families the pt. has
to stay a minimum of 21 days for the insurance to pay.  Under this
working model I saw a pt. last weekend who was admitted with respiratory
failure thru their ED--went to the floor for a few days--xfered to the
SNF.  When I saw her she had been in the SNF for three days.  She was
completely I with all BADL albeit she needed to tale rest breaks.  Tx.
plan involved IADL home mgmt. tasks.  As is my habit when I do weekend
work I asked the pt. what she does for fun (I usually get some very
strange looks, but have found it to be a great way to build quick
repoire).  As it turns out the pt. had no interest at all in "meal
planning/prep".  What was important to her was relationships and
socializing with friends/family.  So, I re-directed her tx. that day to
simply walking through the entire SNF looking for people she had played
bingo with and talking/socializing.  She even pushed another pt. to the
dining room in their w/c.
Was I right in my choice?  Was what I did really PT?


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:07 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

I've  been  an  OT  for  a  long  time  and I still can NOT explain my
profession in a way that is:

* Concise
* CLEARLY differentiates OT from other professions
* Makes sense to other people (i.e. patients, MD's, nurses, etc)
* Consistent:
- With others
- Across patient populations
- Supported by practice
- Supported by documentation
* Satisfies me

Yesterday, I evaled a patient s/p shoulder replacement. PT was already
on the case. I struggled understanding my OT role with this patient
and how it might be different if PT wasn't already seeing the patient.
I wondered how other OT's would approach the patient.

The patient is a retired nurse and her daughter is a retired "special
needs" kids. Both of them had knowledge of OT, which sometimes is a
bad thing.  The patient was recently d/c'd from rehab for her shoulder
surgery.  The shoulder became dislocated while in rehab and when I
asked the daughter if OT or PT worked on the shoulder, she said OT.
When I asked her what they did once the shoulder was dislocated, she
said they had her mom sitting at a table doing pegs, cards, etc with
her unaffected arm to "keep it strong".

I love being an OT but it is such a confusing profession. When I
evaluate people, the only thing that really makes sense is occupation.
But, that often leads to mobility issues, and if PT is on the case,
they already address this, so there's nothing for me to do.  I'll
never understand how OT has become so pigeonholed into UE treatment.
I can find no good logic or reason why OT as a profession focuses on
the UE but it seems to be the predominate pattern.



Ron
-- 
Ron Carson MHS, OT


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

2008-11-13 Thread Neal Luther
So are you saying it was a good choice or not? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:29 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

Nope - what you did was Recreational Therapy - but since OTs have a
monster  
leisure component to Occupation - then that is what occurred.  In order
to  
socialize with peers/family - you have to walk - you also have to obtain
items  
and network - which is again - occupation.  You did endurance activities
and 
not PT - you took what she was vested in and ran with it.
 
 
 

Connie S. Boggess, MS, CTRS, OTR/L
Certified Therapeutic  Recreation Specialist
Occupational Therapist Registered/Licensed

Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any  attachments, is for
the 
sole use of the individual or entity named above. This  message may
contain 
confidential health information that is legally protected by  the Health

Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Family
Education Rights 
Privacy Act (FERPA) and/or the Individuals with Disabilities  Act
(IDEA). It 
is intended solely for the recipient named above. If you are not  the
intended 
recipient and/or have received this information and its contents in
error, 
you are herby notified that any review, use, disclosure and/or
distribution of 
this information is strictly prohibited. Please notify sender
immediately and 
destroy the information. Thank you.


**Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news
& 
more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/10075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?
redir=htt
p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0001)
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Still Can't Explain OT

2008-11-13 Thread Neal Luther
Thanks, Bill, and all who have responded.  I must confess I was
"baiting" to a degree with my questions.  I am absolutely convinced that
the tools we have as OT's are underutilized.  That is why I chose the
intervention as I did.  Incidentally, the patient was thrilled!
Best regards,


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Maloney
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:38 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Still Can't Explain OT

I like David's explanation, a lot.  It rings true with my thoughts and
philosophy as well.  And, for what it's worth, Neal, your socialization
treatment for that SNF patient was OT.

Not to add fuel to the fire, Ron, but you'll love this one:  I arrived
at a
patient's home yesterday at the agreed time to find the PT already
beginning
her treatment.  The PT has been on the case (s/p right THR secondary to
hardware failure of previous ORIF) for about 2 weeks already.  The best
I
could tell from observing her treatment "in the background" as I
interviewd
the caregivers and began to assess the living spaces, I deduced that she
was
working on "functional mobility" which I absolutely address as part of
my
plan, i.e. how can I not address that if we're loooking at safe,
independent
toileting as a goal?  But, when I arrived for my initial OT evaluation,
the
patient was understandably confused.  The PT jumped in and offered the
following explanation:  "Oh, he's the arm guy."

Have a nice day,
feelin' your pain.Bill Maloney, OTR





--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

2008-11-14 Thread Neal Luther
BrentFUNNY 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Rehab Program Coordinator
Advanced Home Care
1-336-878-8824 xt 3205
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, 
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above 
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Cheyne
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:33 PM
To: Ron Carson
Subject: Re: [OTlist] I still can't explain OT

"I've  been  an  OT  for  a  long  time  and I still can NOT explain my
profession in a way that is:

* Concise
* CLEARLY differentiates OT from other professions
* Makes sense to other people (i.e. patients, MD's, nurses, etc)
* Consistent:
- With others
- Across patient populations
- Supported by practice
- Supported by documentation
* Satisfies me"

 
Other professions with identity crisis, (job the club)
 
 Physical Therapist vs athletic trainer vs massage therapist vs chiropractor, 
vs exercise physiologist,vs kinesiologist, vs personal trainer vs body worker, 
yoga instructor vs pilates instructor vs "fitness personality"
 
 Chiropractor vs Osteopath vs Naturopath vs Homeopath vs Acupuncturist vs 
Oriental Medicine Specialist vs Natural Healer
 
Psychiatrist vs Psychologist vs Mental Health Counsellor vs Psychotherapist vs 
addiction cousellors vs Personal Coach vs Personal Shopper vs Personal 
Assistant :)
 
Physicians assistant vs Nurse Practitioner, Nurse Anasthestatists, Nurse 
Midwives, 
 
Nutritionist vs Dietitian vs Sports Nutrition Counsellor vs Dietary services 
manager
 
Nurse Case Manager vs Social Worker vs Geriatric Care Manager vs Life Care 
Managers vs Disablilty Managers
 
Speech Language Pathologist vs Audiologists vs Special Education Teachers vs 
Learning Disabled Specialist vs Educaitonal Psychologist
 
 
Computer Engineer vs Software Engineer vs Network Management specialist vs 
information technology manager, vs systems analyst vs data base manager vs 
website developer.
 
Engineers: Civil vs Mechanical vs Electrical vs Structural vs Chemical vs 
Biomedical vs Architects vs Urban Planners 
 
Optometrists vs Opthamologists
 
Lawyers: Corporate Lawyers vs Environmental Lawyers vs Estate Lawyers vs 
Criminal Lawyers vs Constitutional Lawyers vs Personal Injury Lawyers vs 
Entertainment and Intellectual Property Lawyers
 
Business: CEO, COO, CFO, CIO, Chairman, President, Owner, Majority Holder
 
CIA vs FBI vs Department of Homeland Security vs Sheriffs Department vs City 
Police Department vs NSA,vs FEMA
 
Publicist vs Public Relations Specialist vs Advisor/handler vs Agent
 
Journalist vs Columnist vs Pundit vs Blogger vs Poparrattzzi vs TV/Radio Talk 
Show Host
 
Rabbi vs Priest vs Pastor vs Guru vs  Eman vs Shaman vs Minister vs Spiritual 
Advisor
 
Compassionate Social Conservative Republican vs Fiscally Responsible 
Progressive Liberal Democrat vs...dare I go on?
 
Sorry, this was just a fun mental exercise for me, there are a lot of 
professions that overlap in areas of expertise and infuence and turf...the 
boundries can be social, legal, or cultural, and even political. 
OT is not alone in the search for a universally understood definition. Stay 
relevant by being useful and effective with your clients. I try to remain 
content in my career and enjoy my work despite  a lack of concrete and defined 
professional boundries.
 
Brent 
 
 
 
 
 
 


  
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread Neal Luther
Could not agree more.  In addition, this just simply sounds
juvenile...pediatric. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:50 AM
To: Barbara H. Hale
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

I  don't  want  to  sound  negative,  but  I  can't  help wondering what
patient's think about using what should be medically necessary equipment
to  play  "games".  What  "message"  might  this send to patients, other
professionals  and  payers?  Finally,  should social interaction only be
considered as therapeutic if it's an actual goal?

Just some random questions.

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com

- Original Message -
From: Barbara H. Hale 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Game using reacher

BHH> I have a bean bag tic tac toe game that I use for a reacher
training 
BHH> activity. The grid for the game is painted on a fabric square that
I  place
BHH> within reach on the floor. Each bean bag has an X or an O painted
on it. All
BHH> the items fit into a tote bag and I usually hold the bag for the
patient to
BHH> clean up our game at the end by placing the bean bags in the tote
bag.
BHH>  It is engaging for the patient and I can use it for social
interaction 
BHH> also. 


BHH> --
BHH> Options?
BHH> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BHH> Archive?
BHH> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT

2009-02-25 Thread Neal Luther
It would be helpful to me for those with experience to talk about the
differences in "vestibular" disorders and how you use this in an
occupational model.  Example,  BPPV vs Meniere's disease vs sensory
processing deficits. Thanks


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of ehthiers
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:46 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT

Ot's have been doing vestibular work since Jean Ayers (much of the basis
for
Sensory integration treatment starts at the vestibular system).
However,
with fall prevention becoming a big thing with Medicare everyone and
their
brother is becoming a vestibular specialist.  I have vertigo and went
through many local providers before I finally went to the one
recommended by
me in a course I took.  Less physcial depends on if you have aides to
help
you out.  It is a fascinating field and you would be mistaken for  PT if
you
don't know how to bring an OT perspective to the program.  Vestibular
disorders association (VEDA) has lots of great information, here on the
east
coast an OT from the Ear Clinic in Atlanta does some great trainings.
It
all depends on what age group you want to work with.

Elizabeth Thiers, OTR/L
FECTS
ehthiersfe...@earthlink.net
 

> -Original Message-
> From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com 
> [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of d. chang
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:10 AM
> To: OTlist@otnow.com
> Subject: [OTlist] vestibular OT
> 
> Hello !!
> 
> I've been on this list for a while, but just as an owl.  I 
> love reading
> everything here.   Im learning new things from each and every 
> one of you.
> Education is just totally endless.  There are so much stuff 
> to learn.  Oh, before I go on, my name is Diana and Im in my 
> last year of OT program !!
> 
> I'm very interested in vestibular field.  A friend of mine 
> told me that the vestibular is an up and coming field for OT 
> AND its less physical demanding, which is perfect for me 
> because I have a meniere's disease and a low back pain.
> 
> Does anyone know about this particular field?
> 
> diana.
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> 
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT

2009-02-26 Thread Neal Luther
Thanks, Jamie.
Here is an attempt to make even further distinction.  I think what the group 
has been talking about (vestibular rehab) and what appears in a lot of journals 
these days is related to falls in the adult population.  Dr. Epley 
(neurologist) first pioneered/discovered that otolith crystals in the 
semicircular canals could be repositioned and "cure" issues with positional 
vertigo.  The diagnosis is referred to as BPPV (benign paroxysmal positional 
vertigo).  So, through a series of head, neck, trunk positioning maneuvers the 
pt. Can first be diagnosed in regards to which canal is causing the problem and 
this is observed thru nystagmus patterns in the eyes.  The most common 
repositioning maneuvers are the Epley and the Dix-Hallpike.  I think someone 
else already mentioned VEDA and their website.  They are really the best source 
of info.  Hope I got all that right... off the top of my head.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of 
jamie thomas
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:34 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT

Hi,
This "vestibular" stuff is interesting to me.  It seems I've gotten lots of 
continuing ed. brochures concerning "Vestibular Rehabilitation" that are put on 
by PTs.  I do use sensory integration in my practice as a school OT, but from 
what I've done and seen in practice, the vestibular activities we do under this 
frame of reference look different than what people who practice "Vestibular 
Rehab", as it is termed, do.  I was looking at a site (looks like it's written 
by a neurologist) that claims that mostly PTs do this sort of rehab, but that 
some OTs do it as well.  "Vestibular Rehab", according to this site, seems to 
involve different techniques, maneuvers and tests that I'm not familiar with, 
and seems to be directed toward definite conditions that involve balance 
issues.  For reference, here's the site 
(http://www.dizziness-and-balance.com/treatment/rehab.html#definition)
 
There seem to be slight differences in terminology that may determine what 
field the majority of practitioners come from.  There is a course put on by 
OTs, Sheila Frick & Mary Kawar called "Vestibular Habilitation >From the Core", 
and I do also use this in practice via the "Astronaut Training" protocol.
 
Just my two cents...perhaps this will clarify (or confuse more ;-)) the 
question from the person who initially began this thread.
 
~Jamie 

--- On Wed, 2/25/09, Neal Luther  wrote:

From: Neal Luther 
Subject: Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 6:20 AM

It would be helpful to me for those with experience to talk about the
differences in "vestibular" disorders and how you use this in an
occupational model.  Example,  BPPV vs Meniere's disease vs sensory
processing deficits. Thanks


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above
and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of ehthiers
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:46 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] vestibular OT

Ot's have been doing vestibular work since Jean Ayers (much of the basis
for
Sensory integration treatment starts at the vestibular system).
However,
with fall prevention becoming a big thing with Medicare everyone and
their
brother is becoming a vestibular specialist.  I have vertigo and went
through many local providers before I finally went to the one
recommended by
me in a course I took.  Less physcial depends on if you have aides to
help
you out.  It is a fascinating field and you would be mistaken for  PT if
you
don't know how to bring an OT perspective to the program.  Vestibular
disorders association (VEDA) has lots of great information, here on the
east
coast an OT from the Ear Clinic in Atlanta does some great trainings.
It
all depends on what age group you want to work with.

Elizabeth Thiers, OTR/L
FECTS
ehthiersfe...@earthlink.net
 


Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?

2009-02-27 Thread Neal Luther
Absolutely.  It's called the Modified Borg Scale.  Respiratory
therapists use it all the time.  Good tool for OT to help with anxiety
related to certain tasks that require more energy. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:14 PM
To: Carmen Aguirre
Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?

Interesting  that  you  mention  pulse  ox.  My  clinical  director  has
repeatedly  told  that staff that pulse oximetry can only be taken under
an MD's order.

Regarding  the baseline, could you use a patient's self-reported fatigue
level during the desired activity of ambulating to the dining room? Then
use this as the measurable outcome.

Ron

- Original Message -
From: Carmen Aguirre 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?


CA> I  would  start  with breathing exercises, 6-min activity testing to
CA> meassure  fatigue  and  shortness  of  breath  to  get a meassurable
CA> baseline.  Take  pulse  oxymetry and BP to help educate when rest is
CA> needed if not aware of it and to manage energy levels. Work on basic
CA> routines  he  wants  to improve performance and quality; besides the
CA> actual  tasks/activities  teach maint. pulmonary exercises to manage
CA> his  disease.  Medication  management  to  assess how he manages his
CA> disease  as  well. Community resources and overall health management
CA> skill.  Balance  retraining,  strengthening  would  be  part  of  my
CA> treatment plan.

CA> Carmen


CA>  

>> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:15:25 -0500
>> From: rdcar...@otnow.com
>> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
>> Subject: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
>> 
>> Evaluated a man today, recently discharged from rehab. His primary
>> diagnosis is congestive heart failure.
>> 
>> He's presents with decreased fine motor control from an unknown
>> etiology. He has decreased lower extremity strength and decreased
>> balance. He is also short of breath during exertion.
>> 
>> He is unable to do dishes, zip and button his clothes. He is unable
to
>> independently sit/stand and has difficulty getting into his shower
Also,
>> he is unable to consistently and safely walk to the dining room of
the
>> ALF. He desire to NOT use a wheelchair. His primary concern is
>> mobility-related daily living activity.
>> 
>> What treatment MIGHT you provide this patient and why?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ron
>> 
>> --
>> Ron Carson MHS, OT
>> www.OTnow.com
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Options?
>> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>> 
>> Archive?
>> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

CA> _
CA> Windows Live(tm): Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live.  
CA>
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cn
s!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009
CA> --
CA> Options?
CA> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

CA> Archive?
CA> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?

2009-03-02 Thread Neal Luther
It simply requires the order as a "modality".  It is not for whatever
reason considered a vital sign. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Carmen Aguirre
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:23 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?


 

I wonder why



Carmen


 

> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:14:29 -0500
> From: rdcar...@otnow.com
> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> 
> Interesting that you mention pulse ox. My clinical director has
> repeatedly told that staff that pulse oximetry can only be taken under
> an MD's order.
> 
> Regarding the baseline, could you use a patient's self-reported
fatigue
> level during the desired activity of ambulating to the dining room?
Then
> use this as the measurable outcome.
> 
> Ron
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Carmen Aguirre 
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009
> To: otlist@otnow.com 
> Subj: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> 
> 
> CA> I would start with breathing exercises, 6-min activity testing to
> CA> meassure fatigue and shortness of breath to get a meassurable
> CA> baseline. Take pulse oxymetry and BP to help educate when rest is
> CA> needed if not aware of it and to manage energy levels. Work on
basic
> CA> routines he wants to improve performance and quality; besides the
> CA> actual tasks/activities teach maint. pulmonary exercises to manage
> CA> his disease. Medication management to assess how he manages his
> CA> disease as well. Community resources and overall health management
> CA> skill. Balance retraining, strengthening would be part of my
> CA> treatment plan.
> 
> CA> Carmen
> 
> 
> CA> 
> 
> >> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:15:25 -0500
> >> From: rdcar...@otnow.com
> >> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> >> Subject: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> >> 
> >> Evaluated a man today, recently discharged from rehab. His primary
> >> diagnosis is congestive heart failure.
> >> 
> >> He's presents with decreased fine motor control from an unknown
> >> etiology. He has decreased lower extremity strength and decreased
> >> balance. He is also short of breath during exertion.
> >> 
> >> He is unable to do dishes, zip and button his clothes. He is unable
to
> >> independently sit/stand and has difficulty getting into his shower
Also,
> >> he is unable to consistently and safely walk to the dining room of
the
> >> ALF. He desire to NOT use a wheelchair. His primary concern is
> >> mobility-related daily living activity.
> >> 
> >> What treatment MIGHT you provide this patient and why?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> 
> >> Ron
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Ron Carson MHS, OT
> >> www.OTnow.com
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Options?
> >> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> >> 
> >> Archive?
> >> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
> 
> CA> _
> CA> Windows Live(tm): Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live. 
> CA>
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cn
s!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009
> CA> --
> CA> Options?
> CA> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> 
> CA> Archive?
> CA> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
> 
> 
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> 
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

_
Access your email online and on the go with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Access_022
009
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?

2009-03-03 Thread Neal Luther
Probably a state intermediary mandate. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Carmen Aguirre
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:50 PM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?


I work in SNF. Never heard such restriction. I hope I'm not alone!!


Carmen


 

> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:44:14 -0500
> From: neal.lut...@advhomecare.org
> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> 
> It simply requires the order as a "modality". It is not for whatever
> reason considered a vital sign. 
> 
> 
> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org
> 
> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for the
sole use of otl...@otnow.com. If the reader of this communication is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify the person listed above and discard the
original.-Original Message-
> From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
> Behalf Of Carmen Aguirre
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:23 PM
> To: otlist@otnow.com
> Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I wonder why
> 
> 
> 
> Carmen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:14:29 -0500
> > From: rdcar...@otnow.com
> > To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> > Subject: Re: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> > 
> > Interesting that you mention pulse ox. My clinical director has
> > repeatedly told that staff that pulse oximetry can only be taken
under
> > an MD's order.
> > 
> > Regarding the baseline, could you use a patient's self-reported
> fatigue
> > level during the desired activity of ambulating to the dining room?
> Then
> > use this as the measurable outcome.
> > 
> > Ron
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Carmen Aguirre 
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009
> > To: otlist@otnow.com 
> > Subj: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> > 
> > 
> > CA> I would start with breathing exercises, 6-min activity testing
to
> > CA> meassure fatigue and shortness of breath to get a meassurable
> > CA> baseline. Take pulse oxymetry and BP to help educate when rest
is
> > CA> needed if not aware of it and to manage energy levels. Work on
> basic
> > CA> routines he wants to improve performance and quality; besides
the
> > CA> actual tasks/activities teach maint. pulmonary exercises to
manage
> > CA> his disease. Medication management to assess how he manages his
> > CA> disease as well. Community resources and overall health
management
> > CA> skill. Balance retraining, strengthening would be part of my
> > CA> treatment plan.
> > 
> > CA> Carmen
> > 
> > 
> > CA> 
> > 
> > >> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:15:25 -0500
> > >> From: rdcar...@otnow.com
> > >> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
> > >> Subject: [OTlist] What Would YOU Do?
> > >> 
> > >> Evaluated a man today, recently discharged from rehab. His
primary
> > >> diagnosis is congestive heart failure.
> > >> 
> > >> He's presents with decreased fine motor control from an unknown
> > >> etiology. He has decreased lower extremity strength and decreased
> > >> balance. He is also short of breath during exertion.
> > >> 
> > >> He is unable to do dishes, zip and button his clothes. He is
unable
> to
> > >> independently sit/stand and has difficulty getting into his
shower
> Also,
> > >> he is unable to consistently and safely walk to the dining room
of
> the
> > >> ALF. He desire to NOT use a wheelchair. His primary concern is
> > >> mobility-related daily living activity.
> > >> 
> > >> What treatment MIGHT you provide this patient and why?
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> 
> > >> Ron
> > >> 
> > >> --
> > >> Ron Carson MHS, OT
> > >> www.OTnow.com
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> --
> > >> Options?
> > >> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> > >> 
> > >> Archive?
> > >> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
> > 
> > CA>
_
> > CA> Windows Live(tm): Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows
Live. 
> > CA>
>
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cn
> s!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009
> > CA> --
> > CA> Options?
> > CA> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> > 
> > CA> Archive?
> > CA> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Options?
> > www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> > 
> > Archive?
> > www.mail-a

Re: [OTlist] Modified Borg Scale?

2009-03-23 Thread Neal Luther
Patient.  It is perceived (subjective) exertion. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 8:46 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] Modified Borg Scale?

Is the Modified Borg Scale scored by the patient or the therapist?

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] "Occupation"

2009-03-27 Thread Neal Luther
Absolutely, and I include some broader language referring to
occupational performance. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:50 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] "Occupation"

Does  anyone  use  the  word  "occupation"  in  their documentation? For
example, I write: "Pt will complete daily occupations including bathing,
dressing, and toileting"

Ron


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

2009-04-10 Thread Neal Luther
Are you serious? It actually appears you have been censured?


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:18 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

Hello All:

On  two  different  and  recent  occasions,  my  comments  on  the  AOTA
president's  blog  concerning  the  recent  branding  campaign  were not
posted.  While  I  have  no  way  of  knowing  who or even if someone is
censoring my comments, it certainly appears to be the case.

Given  that  AOTA  is member supported organization is it acceptable for
AOTA  to  censor  members'  messages, even if they are negative and
non-supporting?

You can read the AOTA President's blog here: http://tinyurl.com/dka9fm

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] We Better Wake Up...

2009-04-10 Thread Neal Luther
Hey Ron, 
I've been taking a temporary break from responding but I could not agree
with you more.
It's what Deborah Aminni (sp?) (and I'm sure others) who writes a column
for OT Advance calls a reductionist mentality.  I think she's right.
If, for example, we become the "go to" discipline for ue splinting this
has the appearance of being a good thing simply from a "keeping the
caseload full" perspective.  In the end, however, we are reduced to
becoming a vendor for all things regarding splinting.
Case in point is a referral I received the other day who was clearly
documented as having no further skilled OT need by the OT a couple of
months ago.  She did have some swallowing issues the SLP has been
addressing.  Here comes the kicker...the pt. Kept complaining to the
staff and SLP about wanting another splint for her LUE.  The CVA was
some twenty years ago.  The splint however, was deemed appropriate on
the last referral.  This time when I arrived and began my interview with
the pt. All she wanted was the cover to be taken off and washed.  The
ALF facility claims they had no idea it came off.  In the end I did not
make any further recommendations.  I did review appropriate care of
splint with all parties.  To me this was a complete waste of time.  It
kept me busy.  But what a waste of time and resources.


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:17 AM
To: Mary Alice Cafiero
Subject: Re: [OTlist] We Better Wake Up...

Hey Mary Alice, thanks for posting.

I  tend to be guilty of talking out of both sides of my mouth but I'm OK
with  that.  Normally, being "double minded" is a bad thing, but in this
case,  I think it's OK. Like it or not, health care is a business and OT
is  part  of  this business model. And like most businesses, it's a "dog
eat  dog"  world.  As  a  business, OT must work VERY hard to expand its
presence  while  at the same time, restricting the efforts of others who
are  doing the same. And while many OT's see this as a "bad" thing, it's
what  other  professions  do  and  it's  what  OT  MUST  also  do. EVERY
profession is literally in a war to protect itself from absorption.

As  it stands now, OT is a very small "player" in the health care world.
We  are  not  well  known, even by professions who should know us. In my
opinion,  we are not well respected, even by profession who know what we
do. And we do not do a good job of practicing what we preach.

Lastly,  OT  has  always  had  a  large cadre of cheerleaders within the
profession.  In  fact,  it  seems to me that in general OT does not do a
good  job of receiving self-critical analysis. As a profession, it seems
that  what  we  want  is the sweet without the bitter. We want the cream
without  the  fat.  And while that may make us feel good, it really is a
"head  in  the  cloud"  approach  to  the  harsh realities of the highly
competitive  American healthcare model. I think many OT's are happy just
sitting  on  their duff's taking whatever hand outs come their way. This
"welfare"  model  may  allow  us to survive, but it will NOT allow us to
thrive.  As  a  play against our new brand, our profession is NOT living
its life to the fullest.

Thanks for the dialogue, I hope others join in

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com

- Original Message -
From: Mary Alice Cafiero 
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] We Better Wake Up...

MAC> Susanne,
MAC> I have to agree with you. I don't think OTs have a lock on the
market  
MAC> of making an activity functional. Certainly I find plenty of OTs
that  
MAC> are threatened by PTs use of functional activity and functional
goals.  
MAC> Interestingly, the first time I heard that PT was trying to take
over  
MAC> OT because they dared to say they were doing functional tasks was  
MAC> about 15 years ago. So far, it seems that there is plenty of room
for  
MAC> all of us to help our patients in a variety of ways with varying  
MAC> approaches/frames of reference.

MAC> It is hard to avoid feeling that many OTs who are upset by this are

MAC> "talking out of bo

Re: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

2009-04-10 Thread Neal Luther
Wow!! 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 9:17 AM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

Unfortunately,  I  am  dead  serious.  I've  posted  two messages to Dr.
Moyers'  blog,  but  neither have appeared. I assume the blog is working
because  at  least  two  other  messages from different members appeared
between my messages.

The question for me, is what should I do about this situation?

Thanks,

Ron

- Original Message -----
From: Neal Luther 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

NL> Are you serious? It actually appears you have been censured?


NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
NL> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
NL> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



NL> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

NL> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
NL> Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for
NL> the sole use of otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this
NL> communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
NL> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
NL> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
NL> of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
NL> this communication in error, please immediately notify the person
NL> listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
NL> From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
NL> Behalf Of Ron Carson
NL> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:18 PM
NL> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
NL> Subject: [OTlist] AOTA Screening Bloggers Comments?

NL> Hello All:

NL> On  two  different  and  recent  occasions,  my  comments  on  the
AOTA
NL> president's  blog  concerning  the  recent  branding  campaign  were
not
NL> posted.  While  I  have  no  way  of  knowing  who or even if
someone is
NL> censoring my comments, it certainly appears to be the case.

NL> Given  that  AOTA  is member supported organization is it acceptable
for
NL> AOTA  to  censor  members'  messages, even if they are negative and
NL> non-supporting?

NL> You can read the AOTA President's blog here:
http://tinyurl.com/dka9fm

NL> Thanks,

NL> Ron

NL> ~~~
NL> Ron Carson MHS, OT
NL> www.OTnow.com


NL> --
NL> Options?
NL> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

NL> Archive?
NL> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Empowering Your Patients...

2009-04-13 Thread Neal Luther
I essentially do the same with proviso that I have sent communication
notes to other team members and asking for their assist as to progress
and if/when it may be appropriate to re-eval. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:20 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] Empowering Your Patients...

Hello All:

I  frequently,  in fact almost always, let patients make decisions about
therapy and I wonder if other therapists do the same. For example, today
I  explained  to  a  patient  that  I could continue seeing her 5x/week,
3x/week or whatever else she wanted. To my surprise, the patient elected
to  decrease  OT  to  3x/week. Also, a couple weeks ago I left a patient
with  the statement that OT could only continue if the patient generated
goals  for himself. On the next visit, the patient told me his only goal
was  to  "walk like a man". I explained that "walking" was a PT goal but
that if he had any daily living goals, I could continue. He again stated
that  his  only  goal  was walking. So, again to my surprise, I was left
with  no alternative but discharge. Also during evals, I leave the start
of  therapy  up  to the patient. I explain that I can see the patient or
not,  and  it's  up  to them. I explain what I will do as far as general
treatment but leave the decision to the patient.

Do  others do this same thing? One thing I can say is that this approach
does  not  make  my  supervisor very happy. I tend to have more than the
normal amount of "eval only".

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] A Typical Day, Is this Normal?

2009-04-15 Thread Neal Luther
Sounds to me like you're facility is RUGG'ing everyone at high/very high.  Is 
that appropriate for your averagae 91 yo? 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of 
Brent Cheyne
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:53 AM
To: Ron Carson
Subject: [OTlist] A Typical Day, Is this Normal?

There have been some very excellent and insightful posts recently and I need to 
go back and read them a second time before I respond..very thought provoking
Over the past "busy season" at my place of work I've been having a very 
challenging caseload. Please review the circumstances and decide if it is a 
normal/comfortable work condition
 
 
In an 8 hour day I have to treat and do daily notes, 1 weekly note, attend  1 
weekly staff meeting and attend 1-2 care plan meetings.
 
1. 91 yo female, femur fx nwb-max assist ADL, wants to go home alone-60min
2 91 yo female, sternal fx max assist ADL, want to go home alone-60 min (Eval 
today)
3 85 yo female, total knee replacement  ADL with supervision but encouragement 
45min
4 82 yo female, distal radial fracture-ADL with minimal assit-home alone-60 min
5 81 yo male, total hip revision-ADL with minimal assist and encourge- to live 
alone 60 min
6 77 you female, CVA Aphasic right hemi- max assist self care- to live with 
spouse -60 min
7 63 yo female, Multiple sclerosis, max assist ADL, home with spouse, 60 min
8 74 yo femal, CVA right hemi-max assist ADL, r/oSNF placement , 60 minutes
9 65 yo male, Parkinson  stand by assist ADL, home with spouse who works, 60 min
 
So I'm scheduled to see these people today... about 465 minutes of 
treatment,5/9 patiens are maximal assist,   all this week, did this all last 
week
Does this sound like a reasonable and appropriate schedule?
Am I going to be able to get through it and still provide that meaningful and 
effective, individualized treatment that will create a great public relations 
image?
Give me some feedback
Brent
 
 


  
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

2009-04-15 Thread Neal Luther
Not only that I dare say 1/100 OT's ever have a thought about
cost/benefit to pt. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:33 AM
To: cmnahrw...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

In  my  opinion,  the  AOTA's  president's  own quote clearly shows that
branding will not work for OT. She says:

Branding   actually   starts   with   the  occupational  therapy
practitioner   in  that  all  practitioners  must  ensure  their
servicesare   efficient,   effective,   result   in   client
satisfaction, and have value in terms of the cost-benefit.

Right  off  the  bat,  we  KNOW  that  ALL  practitioners do NOT provide
effective  occupational  therapy  resulting in patient satisfaction. The
"coners" and "peggers" ensure this doesn't happen!

In  my honest opinion of OT, our single biggest problem is INTERNAL, not
external.  As  a  profession, we do NOT do what we say. And NOTHING will
kill  a  product  or  profession  more  quickly and efficiently than not
delivering  what  is  promised  and/or  promoted!  The more the branding
process  proceeds  the  more  we are shooting ourselves in the foot. The
more we promote "living life to it fullest" while delivering "crappy PT"
the  more  disenchanted our patients and referral sources become and the
practice of phsy-dys OT will become even more disenfranchised!

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



- Original Message -
From: cmnahrw...@aol.com 
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

cac> Here is a quote from the AOTA president that supports my statements

cac> "As a profession, we seem to understand marketing more than we 
cac> understand a branding process. Branding is about building the
emotional 
cac> reaction to a product or service over time. Branding actually
starts 
cac> with the occupational therapy practitioner in that all
practitioners 
cac> must ensure their services are efficient, effective, result in
client 
cac> satisfaction, and have value in terms of the cost-benefit. Branding

cac> starts with ensuring a basic level of competence, as well as making

cac> sure that every practitioner can deliver the message of what we do.
We 
cac> all know that this is difficult given all the different types of 
cac> services we provide and the client problems that we solve.

cac> Therefore, branding is not about a single tag line, poster, etc. It
is 
cac> really about capturing the essence of our impact. Marketing we have

cac> done before with the posters about skills for the job of living. It

cac> described occupational therapy as a discipline where practitioners 
cac> worked with people with a disabling condition to do things like
brush 
cac> their hair, etc. This was a great one-time marketing campaign, it
was 
cac> not a branding process. Granted occupational therapy is about
getting 
cac> people back to doing; but, when we did the marketing research some
8 
cac> years later with our consumers and potential consumers, the good
news 
cac> was that we did not have a bad image. The bad news was that we did
not 
cac> have an image. Perhaps likening living to a job did not emotionally

cac> resonate with our consumers."-Moyers





--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

2009-04-24 Thread Neal Luther
Hey Ron and group,
Here is a case I had this week in home health.  Brief history includes a
significant emotional trauma about 4 years ago.  Apparently the pt. got
mixed up in a multi-level/pyramid scheme of some sort and lost lots of
money.  According to her husband, shortly after she had an emotional
break down and has never recovered. 
 Fast forward to the referral... now she has fallen at home with a
displaced femoral neck fx. and surgical repair.  She is only 68 yo and
now has a dx. Of Alzheimer's type dementia for which she is taking
Aricept and depression (taking Zoloft). The husband reports the med's
have not helped.  She is very impulsive, has the "lithium/trazadone
stare", is not able to talk and will only occassionally follow
directions/cues of any kind.
The husband is the primary caregiver and is providing excellent care.
What would you do to serve her occupational needs?



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:25 PM
To: ocil...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it
even

Hello Ilene:

I appreciate your message!

In  this  case,  the  pain  was  caused  by  probably joint misalignment
resulting  from paralysis of the shoulder girdle. I believe I did assist
this  patient  by  providing  him  my  opinion on his shoulder pain, and
referred him to an ortho MD.

I  am  pretty  confident that this patient understood occupation and OT.
Well,  at  least  it  was  explained  to him. In fact, he was discharged
because his only stated goal was, "walking like a man".

Thanks again!

Ron

- Original Message -
From: ocil...@comcast.net 
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it even

ocn> Ron, IMO there were many things an OT could have done to assist
ocn> that patient even without directly treating his arm. Pain disrupts
ocn> occupational function in all areas. We can work with chronic pain
ocn> patients to learn relaxation techniques. We can educate them and
ocn> their caregivers on how to prevent further pain and deformity (many
ocn> times CVA patients do make things worse because of dysfunctional
ocn> strageties they develop to perfom self-care, poor arm placement
ocn> during transfer, etc) We can help them learn how to find a chronic
ocn> pain support group or how to find assistive devices on the
ocn> internet. I think patients really have no idea all that OT offers,
ocn> nor often what "occupation" really is. The best way to get OT's out
ocn> of the "UE" box, is to show them what we CAN do for them, rather
ocn> than say "there is nothing we can do, refer to PT" for a patient
like that.

ocn> ~Ilene Rosenthal, OTR/L 


ocn> From: Ron Carson < rdcar...@otnow.com > 
ocn> Subject: [OTlist] Breaking the Bonds of Upper Extremity OT; Is it
even 
ocn> Possible? 
ocn> To: OTlist@OTnow.com 
ocn> Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 4:06 PM 


ocn> Hello All: 

ocn> A couple weeks ago, I worked with a CVA patient who despite having 
ocn> multiple occupational deficits, he was unwilling to verbalize any 
ocn> OT-related goals. And after a couple of weeks, the patient was
d/c'd. 

ocn> The patient's UE and LE were compromised by the CVA. He had almost
no 
ocn> active movement in his affected arm. His shoulder was extremely
painful 
ocn> during any AROM. 

ocn> I initially told the patient that as an OT, I would address his
most 
ocn> important occupations but that I could do nothing about his arm.
Over 
ocn> the? course of? treatment, his wife reported having difficulty
bathing 
ocn> under the patients arm. After doing some gentle PROM, I concluded
that 
ocn> there was a possible impingement. I believed an orthopedic
appointment 
ocn> was necessary. I conferred? with the PT and? she concurred. I 
ocn> also 
ocn> confirmed that the treating PTA would address 
ocn> the shoulder 
ocn> ROM/Pain. 


ocn> --
ocn> Options?
ocn> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

ocn> Archive?
ocn> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Marketing Flyers

2009-05-13 Thread Neal Luther
I strongly agree with whole concept.  
I believe marketing types call it "push/pull" marketing.  In other words
get your message to both the consumer and the referral source.  This way
when the consumer goes to the MD the MD has already heard the same
message.
As far specific suggestions try: 1)ageing successfully in place (which
could include home safety/modifications,etc.), 2)marketing directly to
caregivers of ageing parents (how to cope, strategies for keeping
occupationally engaged), 3) general wellness and occupational
performance.
Hope this helps.
Neal



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Juan Turcios
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:17 AM
To: OTlist@otnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] Marketing Flyers

Hello everyone. I have a question for all OTs involved in OTPP. I have
been
trying to get referrals from MD's in my area, but i am having a
difficult
time. Ron, I know you told me so. I have been thinking lately to market
the
program to the client themselves, like the drug companies do now a days.
Does anyone have any ideas on what I can say to the client themselves? I
was
thinking of reasons why they would benefit from OT (e.g. decrease in fxl
status). Also once the client reaches out to me, will the MD be willing
to
be involved in the plan? Any comments and ideas are greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot, Juan
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

2009-06-15 Thread Neal Luther
Well said, Chris. 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 12:08 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

I see the horse is not dead yet

This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the 
bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or an 
end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to treat 
occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the 
treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction 
either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the underlying 
impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing the 
occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest in hand 
therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do this 
too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing hand 
therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy 
because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes an 
interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) because of 
their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they utilize this 
training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes with 
gait and balance, would they state that they are doing occupational 
therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training 
(IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers training?

What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of occupatonal 
therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school, by 
erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain extent, 
but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher therapist.  
A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain image 
of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT 
without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain RUG 
level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is Ron's 
intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to guide 
phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in order 
to clean up the public perception of what we do.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..

-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: Kristin 
Sent: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:04 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

Kristin, I don't really know where to start, so let me just jump in.

In  my  opinion, the BIGGEST problem facing OT is that we do not do what
we  say  we do. Comparing AOTA's rhetoric and practice patterns of adult
phys  dys  OT's  does  not  paint  a congruent picture. On paper, the OT
profession  is  all about occupation. In practice, adult phys dys is all
about UE rehab. For me, this inconsistency is killing our profession!

I'm going to disagree with some of what you've written:

 1) A broken finger may or may not cause occupational deficits. And even
 if  it does, these deficits may not require the skill of an OT.

  2) I don't care if the hygienist had a good or bad experience. I do 
care
 if the experience revolved around occupation.

 3)  Occupation  should  NOT be things talked about during rote therapy.
 Occupation should be the FOCUS and outcome of treatment.

 4) The profession needs therapists who are experts in occupation. Leave
 the UE specialization to PT.

Disclaimer:

My  comments  are  not  directed towards YOU. They are just
general comments about how I feel towards OT.

Everyone  is  welcome  to  join  this conversation. Only through
honest  and  logical  dialogue  will  we  better  understand and
appreciate everyone's viewpoints.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



- Original Message -
From: Kristin 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...


K> I guess I dont understand why it's such a horrible thing for OT's to
K> be knowledgeable and profiecient in treating UE ailments. I agree
K> that shouldn't be the only area for the profession to focus on, but
K> having a broken finger causes dysfunctional occupational performance!
K> At least the dental hygenist had a good

Re: [OTlist] Even PT's Think OT's Do Too Much ThereEx...

2009-08-14 Thread Neal Luther
I love it. 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:55 PM
To: Ron Carson
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Even PT's Think OT's Do Too Much ThereEx... 

This is the response I sent to the PT. It didn't get posted. I thought
it  was  kind  of  clever,  but  I'm sure not everyone appreciates the
humor.

RC> Tell  the  OT's to stop doing therex. That's the realm of PT.
Instead,
RC> the  OT  SHOULD  be  working on daily occupation and specific
barriers
RC> inhibiting the patient's goal(s).
RC>
RC> Therex  and  OT  go  together  like Obama and healthcare reform -
they
RC> don't
RC>
RC>
RC> Ron Carson MHS, OT
RC> Hope Therapy Services, LLC
RC> www.HopeTherapyServices.com

- Original Message -
From: Ron Carson 
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009
To:   OTlist 
Subj: [OTlist] Even PT's Think OT's Do Too Much ThereEx... 

RC> Once  again,  this is taken from another listserve and is written by
a
RC> PT:

>> In  the  IRF  setting, what percentage of your patients' OT services
>> are  ADL  training each day? What are typical staffing schedules for
>> your OTs? What do you see happening regularly as functional training
>> tasks  other  than  basic dressing/bathing tasks? I have a couple of
>> staff  that  seem to be in a rut. I see my OTs doing what I percieve
>> to be too much basic ther ex and too few ADL tasks. I am looking for
>> data/statistics from other IRF settings to give them an idea of what
>> is  typical  and  expected from an ADL perspective. How much of your
>> OTs'  time  is  spent in patient rooms with ADLs vs. in the gym with
>> ther ex?


RC> Now  we  have a PT questioning that OT is spending too much time
doing
RC> EXERCISES. too funny!!!

RC> Not funny at all. Just plain sad!


RC> --
RC> Options?
RC> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

RC> Archive?
RC> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Backpack Unawareness

2009-08-20 Thread Neal Luther
Chris,
Thanks for going the extra mile to actually confirm supposed best
practice.  This is in my opinion one of, if not the biggest, problems we
have in healthcare. 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 4:02 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Backpack Unawareness

The whole backpack awareness day in my opinion is a little on the shady 
side.  OTs are educating students and teachers that there should be a 
10% body weight limit placed in back packs and often have students  use 
a scale to weigh themselves and then their backpacks.  The problem is 
 from my understanding and from completing a quick literature review on 
OTseeker.com and Pubmed, that there is insefficient data for such 
recommendations.  In fact the most recent publication in Work (2009) 
demonstrates that the body weight limit did not factor in much at all, 
but instead it was shown that a possible psychological component 
involved that caused this adolescent back pain that spans into 
adulthood.  It did show that both straps of the backpack should be worn 
versus unilateral and the most troublesome spot for injuries to occur 
would be in the unstable shoulder and not the back.  So perhaps we need 
to complete psychological profiles versus  weighing the backpacks?

You cannot tell me that AOTA is not aware of this research.  Do they 
ignore it because of the free publicity that OTs receive?  Creating a 
solution that does not really help in hopes to promote the profession 
is odd in my opinion.  I am not an expert in this area, so I would love 
to learn what the experts have to say about this topic.  Perhaps I am 
missing the important data that AOTA is reading.
Chris Nahrwold MS,OTR

-Original Message-
From: Diane Randall 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Backpack Unawareness

I am not familiar with what the controversy is surrounding this issue. 
What
research about this is lacking? What kind of money is being spent on the
issue and why is it not relevant to OT?  Diane COTA/L Peds

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com]on
Behalf Of cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 21:13
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Backpack Unawareness


Yes, especially since there is little research to back it up.

-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: OTlist 
Sent: Tue, Aug 18, 2009 7:17 pm
Subject: [OTlist] Backpack Unawareness

Does  anyone else think that AOTA's dribble on Backpack Awareness is a
total
waste  of  time  and  money?  Well, maybe not for school/ped
therapists, but
certainly for the rest of the OT world.

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Renew AOTA or NOT??????

2009-08-20 Thread Neal Luther
I would also like to chime in here.  My concern about any professional
group, be they healthcare or not, that depends so heavily on lobbying
efforts to be relevant to the general public is practicing on shifting
sand. 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:54 AM
To: Carmen Aguirre
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Renew AOTA or NOT??

It's  not  only  (+)  commentary  that  grows  a  profession.  In  fact,
our
profession is sorely lacking in (-) commentary.

- Original Message -
From: Carmen Aguirre 
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009
To:   otlist@otnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Renew AOTA or NOT??

CA> Again, I said it long time ago in this listserve: What are you
CA> complainers doing to make the difference AOTA is not doing in your
CA> opinion? Where is the useful commentary that helps outr profession
grow
CA> and serve the community even better?


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


[OTlist] New subject

2009-08-28 Thread Neal Luther
Any thoughts on how this should figure into the health care reform
debate?
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy
out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another
person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to
anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody
else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work
because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other
half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is
going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning
of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."

- Adrian Rogers, 1931 




Neal Luther, OTR/L
Advanced Home Care
Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt. 6672 Office
1-336-538-9948 Fax



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] New subject

2009-08-31 Thread Neal Luther
Thanks for your response Ron.  I agree. 
More specifically, I think the comments by Rogers are  appropriate with
regard to the angst that is expressed about OT awareness.  So many
people I see in home care and in other settings I have worked do not
have "ownership" of their healthcare because: 1- They don't have to if
the government (M'care and M'caid)is going to pay the bill, and 2- We
don't explain ourselves at each and every contact with a pt. So why
would they do their homework to figure out who we are?

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 5:59 AM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] New subject

It's  such  a difficult situation. I'm all for taking care of people who
are
truly unable to take care of themselves. I'm believe that individuals
have a
moral  obligation  to  take  care  of themselves AND those around them.
If a
person  is  in  need  and  I  have  the  ability  to  help,  then  I
should.

I do NOT believe that healthcare is a RIGHT. And even if it is a right,
with
every  right comes a responsibility. And responsibility is one thing
that is
sorely lacking in this country. So many people WANT what's "theirs" but
they
don't want to take responsibility for what they get.

Great topic, I was hoping someone would bring it up.

Ron

PS, I'm a big fan of Adrian Rogers' teachings.

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] New subject

NL> Any thoughts on how this should figure into the health care reform
NL> debate?
NL> You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the
wealthy
NL> out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for,
another
NL> person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give
to
NL> anybody anything that the government does not first take from
somebody
NL> else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to
work
NL> because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the
other
NL> half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody
else is
NL> going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the
beginning
NL> of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing
it."

NL> - Adrian Rogers, 1931 




NL> Neal Luther, OTR/L
NL> Advanced Home Care
NL> Burlington Office
NL> 1-336-538-1194, xt. 6672 Office
NL> 1-336-538-9948 Fax



NL> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

NL> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
NL> Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for
the
NL> sole use of otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication
is
NL> not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
NL> delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that
NL> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
NL> strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in
error,
NL> please immediately notify the person listed above and discard the
original.
NL> --
NL> Options?
NL> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

NL> Archive?
NL> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Help please

2009-10-06 Thread Neal Luther
Survey Monkey works really well.  If Ron allows it it could be very
helpful. 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Sue Doyle
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:45 AM
To: otlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Help please


I have a couple of questions.
Could I post a link on here for survey monkey for some research for my
PhD? How many of you would respond? (it is on sensory retraining after
stroke)
Has any one had experience with survey monkey and what are you thoughts?

Thanks

Sue D 




> From: o...@nvhospital.org
> To: otl...@otnow.com.
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:43:20 -0700
> Subject: [OTlist] Speaker
> 
> Just came from the Washington OT conference and our keynote speaker
was
> Patch Adams. What a great speaker he was. If anyone ever gets a chance
to
> hear him speak it is certainly worth it.
> 
>  
> 
> Michael A. Holmes MSOTR/L
> 
>  
> 
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
> 
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
  
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


[OTlist] Bed Mobility

2010-01-04 Thread Neal Luther
Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be able to
independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great bicep
and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.

Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
 <> 


P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

2010-01-05 Thread Neal Luther
Yes he has an electric head/foot hospital bed.  He reports to me he had
another therapist attempt this with him 4-5 yrs. ago, but was
unsuccessful at that time. They apparently tried a graduated hand loop
rope.  The problem is once he gets into sidelying how does he stay put?
He currently has a stage II/III decub. On the sacrum. 

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:45 AM
To: Neal Luther
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

Neal, does the patient have a hospital bed with rails?

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

NL> Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
NL> Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be
able to
NL> independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great
bicep
NL> and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.

NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
NL> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
NL> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
NL>  <> 


NL> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

NL> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
NL> Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for
NL> the sole use of otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this
NL> communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
NL> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
NL> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
NL> of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
NL> this communication in error, please immediately notify the person
NL> listed above and discard the original.
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

2010-01-05 Thread Neal Luther
Yes, see my response to Ron. 
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandra Lejeune
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:27 AM
To: OTlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

Perhaps try a pull down bed rail or bed rope ladder so he has something
to
pull himself over with?

Alex
London UK

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Neal Luther
wrote:

> Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
> Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be able
to
> independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great
bicep
> and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.
>
> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org
>
> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
>  <>
>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
Home
> Care is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole
use of
> otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the
intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to
the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If
> you have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify the
> person listed above and discard the original.
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
>



-- 
Alexandra Lejeune
Occupational Therapist

www.hpccheck.org
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Fw: Bed Mobility

2010-01-07 Thread Neal Luther
I could not agree more.  This was a referral from a nurse and I am
trying everything I can.



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of susanne
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:42 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: [OTlist] Fw: Bed Mobility

(Sorry - I sent this a while ago - only now realized it did not arrive -
as I sent it from the wrong email address)-:

I see now that you wrote:
>The problem is once he gets into sidelying how does he stay put?
>He currently has a stage II/III decub. On the sacrum.

In that case I'd say he needs help turning - to make sure it's
sufficient - a wound like that needs not only pressure relief but also
air, no traction etc. - once it's fully healed you can start
experimenting..

cybs wrote:
> Hi Neal!
> 
> I don't personally have experience with this - although I lived with
> my quad boyfriend for more than 10 years - sadly, he died this
> summer. He was not able to turn himself - in part because he needed a
> pillow firmly pressed against his back to maintain a side lying
> position that would keep his sitting area free of the mattress - his
> skin needed air at night. But I know some quads do, also at the level
> you describe, which would be c5/6 with a trace of c7 - maybe not the
> same in both sides, that is very usual. A message board we often used
> for peer advice was the care/cure forums - I just went there and
> found this thread for you: 
> 
> 
>
http://sci.rutgers.edu/forum/showthread.php?t=126367&highlight=quad+turn
ing+bed
> 
> Sure there is more threads about this - or simply ask them - true
> experts in my opinion! 
> 
> Warmly
> susanne, denmark
> 
> 
> Neal Luther wrote:
>> Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
>> Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be able
>> to
>> independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great
>> bicep
>> and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.
>> 
>> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
>> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
>> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
>> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org
>> 
>> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
>>  <>

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

2010-01-07 Thread Neal Luther
Thanks, Chris. 

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:55 PM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

Difficult situation.  I assume that he has not grip strength because 
his triceps won't work.  I think I would first recommend a bed rail and 
then I would come up with a  lasso/belt like system that I would 
harness to the bed rail and then practice use his deltoid and biceps 
for your advantage by practicing moving his arms into the lasso using 
shoulder movements and then using his biceps, flex his elbows firmly on 
the lasso, and finally attempting to roll himself over.  Long shot, but 
worth a try.

Chris Nahrwold
Anderson Indiana

-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: Neal Luther 
Sent: Tue, Jan 5, 2010 7:44 am
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

Neal, does the patient have a hospital bed with rails?

- Original Message -
From: Neal Luther 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

NL> Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
NL> Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be 
able to
NL> independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great 
bicep
NL> and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.

NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
NL> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
NL> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
NL> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
NL>  <>


NL> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

NL> The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced
NL> Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for
NL> the sole use of otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this
NL> communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
NL> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
NL> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
NL> of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
NL> this communication in error, please immediately notify the person
NL> listed above and discard the original.
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

2010-01-07 Thread Neal Luther
Yeah, I intentionally left the details vague so as to "stoke the
synapses".  Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandra Lejeune
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 2:52 PM
To: OTlist@otnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility

Ah, you didnt tell us that!

Sounds like you should discuss with a specialist nurse whether he can
have
some sort of special mattress so he doesnt "have to turn" i.e the
pressure
is taken care of...he might still need rails so he can figet as he sees
fits.

Alex

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Neal Luther
wrote:

> Yes he has an electric head/foot hospital bed.  He reports to me he
had
> another therapist attempt this with him 4-5 yrs. ago, but was
> unsuccessful at that time. They apparently tried a graduated hand loop
> rope.  The problem is once he gets into sidelying how does he stay
put?
> He currently has a stage II/III decub. On the sacrum.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
> Behalf Of Ron Carson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:45 AM
> To: Neal Luther
> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Bed Mobility
>
> Neal, does the patient have a hospital bed with rails?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Neal Luther 
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010
> To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
> Subj: [OTlist] Bed Mobility
>
> NL> Hello everyone and Happy New Year!
> NL> Has anyone ever had success in teaching a quadriplegic pt. to be
> able to
> NL> independently reposition into sidelying in bed?  My pt. has great
> bicep
> NL> and deltoid strength.  Little to no triceps.  Thanks for any help.
>
> NL> Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
> NL> Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
> NL> 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
> NL> neal.lut...@advhomecare.org
>
> NL> Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty
> NL>  <>
>
>
> NL> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> NL> The information contained in this electronic document from
Advanced
> NL> Home Care is privileged and confidential information intended for
> NL> the sole use of otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this
> NL> communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
> NL> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
> NL> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying
> NL> of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received
> NL> this communication in error, please immediately notify the person
> NL> listed above and discard the original.
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
>
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
>



-- 
Alexandra Lejeune
Occupational Therapist

www.hpccheck.org
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com