Re: White Balance on K-7
On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote: Boris, This is the issue: http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax trying to outsmart us, but they're going to have to try harder! Hmmm... /Scratches his head/ Oh well, I will verify what kind of value I assigned to this option when I was passing over the menus once I got the camera... I may be up to a surprise... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT Lightroom 3
Dave, LR 3.2 (even if you get 3.0 from Fedex, you can immediately download upgrade 3.2 from Adobe web site) offers a number of very useful improvements over previous generations of LR. And they introduced totally new demosaicing engine that will likely make you think that it was worth your while. Boris On 12/2/2010 12:49 AM, David J Brooks wrote: I have not done the computer up grade just yet, but decided to get Version 3 anyway. Ordered it today, with a projected Dec 8th arrival via Fedex. Free shipping.:-) At least it gives me incentive to upgrade.;-) Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: My book is up on blurb
One of the things I did last night was add notes to some of the photos. For page 38, cormorants in love (page 16 is lawyers in love) I mention: Cormorants are the official bird of the PDML, the Pentax Discuss Mailing List, a profligate source of good advice and bad puns. I may have exaggerated the quality of advice available on the list. But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Cashel Ruins
On 12/1/2010 10:09 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Dan, Makes me want to go for a visit. Regards, Bob S. I concur. And the deep shadows seem to be in place here no matter how much I like to open shadows in my shots... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:09 +0100, Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com wrote: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) cc welcome That's a really wonderful set of images. Without captions, its difficult to comment on specific images but I'll try anyway I love the juxtaposition of the cross and the industrial complex on the lower image of the first pair. Probably my favourite is the top image of the fourth pair - the person in the street wearing the long, black cloak - very mysterious and beautiful colour. The lower image of the seventh pair - the man on the roof. Not sure what he's doing but it's an excellent composition Both images of the 13th pair - nothing specific to comment on but they just attracted my attention. The lower image of the 15th pair - the sleeping dogs and graffiti. Well seen and well captured. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My PESO at Jalopnik.com
Suddenly the way you sign your messages makes additional sense, mister BMW :-). Boris On 12/2/2010 4:37 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: Just noticed that an old PESO of mine, that was also reproduced in the 1st PDML book, was included in a gallery of hood ornaments as part of a front-page article published today at car enthusiast site Jalopnik.com ... http://jalopnik.com/5702901/ten-awesome-hood-ornaments/gallery/ -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Guarding the Goods
Judging from the direction of the dog's sight, we may be speaking of a rather poor guard ;-). And that would be a picture by Frank we all know and appreciate for the very long time! Thumbs up! BOris On 12/1/2010 11:46 PM, frank theriault wrote: This little fellow, spotted in a store window a few nights ago, seems to take his job very seriously: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/12/guarding-goods.html Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome. cheers, frank -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Outta here for a while . . .
2010/12/2 Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info: Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta. My operation Monday turned into a bit of a saga. The procedure before mine was delayed for 4 hours as they worked to bring temperature/humidity within specs in the OR. And the one before mine took 5 hours. So it was 4:30 p.m. or so before they got started on me. I was then in the hospital for another 40+ hours of discomfort before being released today. Am now at my brother's where I will stay for another week or so, with the first (only?) follow-up visit scheduled for next Monday. This is really all quite miraculous considering the recovery time required prior to laprascopic robo-surgery, but that doesn't make me feel all that much more comfortable. I won't know more about the cancer until I get the biopsy results next week, but the surgeon says everything went smoothly, no issues, no surprises. First good news today, just powered on my puter =) Wait a while and you'll smile about all the collaterals - for now, just keep your confidence that the biopsy will go well; a good mindstate helps enormously. Also, be sure to inquire in advance if that robodog thingamajig comes in K-mount!!! Best of luck for the follow-up and a speedy recovery Ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
I may have exaggerated the quality of advice available on the list. But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. That's a good tip. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: What's the going rate?
On 1/12/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: In all seriousness: never. I've had editors tell me everything from I don't know to supplying a highly detailed rate chart, and I've had editors tell me they couldn't afford the price I set when they didn't have a rate chart, etc etc, but none have ever indicated they were uncomfortable with the question. How could they be? They're in business ... arranging a business transaction .. just like I am. Are you uncomfortable or put off if a provider whose services you need asks you what the budget for a shoot might be? Must be the British. When I get asked for a quote, I take into account my daily rate in balance with the nature of the work and the client's history with me (including non at all). I have to make a living and so if I asked each client what his/her budget was for the job, and indeed if they even answered, then I'd either laugh them off the phone or adjust my rate upwards accordingly! Seriously - my rate varies by only a little. There are plenty of companies offering my services and we all charge very similar amounts - where I can undercut is that I can not only organise the job, but I also undertake the writing, shooting and editing myself. Others may have to sub-contract where necessary. I think maybe the nature of the work has a lot to do with it - selling individual photos may promote the questioning about budgets, but on projects that I typically work on, we're talking about several days' work or an entire job. The client is likely getting in quotes from other sources also, so while trying to be competitive, I also have a living to make and my rates are set accordingly. If I work for less than my determined minimum, I'd go bust fairly quickly. Targeting the upper- middle to top-end of my market is tough, but that's the background I have and the choice I made. Are you uncomfortable or put off if a provider whose services you need asks you what the budget for a shoot might be? Not at all - it's never happened though. If it did, I'd probably ask them to hold on while I checked my pockets. Really. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
- Original Message - From: Bob W p...@web-options.com To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:20 AM Subject: RE: My book is up on blurb One of the things I did last night was add notes to some of the photos. For page 38, cormorants in love (page 16 is lawyers in love) I mention: Cormorants are the official bird of the PDML, the Pentax Discuss Mailing List, a profligate source of good advice and bad puns. I may have exaggerated the quality of advice available on the list. But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. Well, that's a Bob W. wheatie for sure! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Happy Hanukkah
What Ken said Dave said about what Bob said with regard to what Frank said to all Hanukkah celebrators. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:57 PM Subject: Re: Happy Hanukkah What Dave said. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Happy Hanukkah What Bob said Dave On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Frank, You beat me to it! Happy Hanukah to all. Bob Lynn On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:44 AM, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: In about 10 hours it will be Hanukkah here. Somewhere in the world it's already started. Tonight we're trying potato and broccoli latkes, vegan cholent and home made macaroons for dessert. Should be yummy! Whatever you're having, enjoy this first night of lighting the Menorah. Happy Hannukah, Judy and Frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
Outstanding... It almost feels like reading a book... Boris On 12/2/2010 4:09 AM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) cc welcome -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Outta here for a while . . .
Very glad surgery went well, Stan. Rest up and spoil yourself! Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:08 PM Subject: Re: Outta here for a while . . . Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta. My operation Monday turned into a bit of a saga. The procedure before mine was delayed for 4 hours as they worked to bring temperature/humidity within specs in the OR. And the one before mine took 5 hours. So it was 4:30 p.m. or so before they got started on me. I was then in the hospital for another 40+ hours of discomfort before being released today. Am now at my brother's where I will stay for another week or so, with the first (only?) follow-up visit scheduled for next Monday. This is really all quite miraculous considering the recovery time required prior to laprascopic robo-surgery, but that doesn't make me feel all that much more comfortable. I won't know more about the cancer until I get the biopsy results next week, but the surgeon says everything went smoothly, no issues, no surprises. stan On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Miserere wrote: Say hi to Danny Devito, and get back soon, Stan. Here's the good wishes I took back the other week: GOOD WISHES! On 27/11/2010, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: Leaving for Cleveland tomorrow (Sunday) a.m., my rescheduled surgery will be Monday morning. The Clinic has extensive wifi, but I don't think I'll take my laptop in with me. Try to be good while I am gone! stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Question about flash photography
You might find the metz 40 a bit of a pain with some of these accessories. A great design in some ways, it suffers from the fact that all accessories are designed for more normal shaped flashes. Metz themselves make (made?) a bounce card for it, the Bounce Diffuser 40-73, which I picked up cheap with one of my used 40 series flashes. Dunno how easy these are to find, but I wouldn't pay too much for one, considering you could make one easy enough. Diffusers like stofen, fong, et al, work pretty well where you can get some bounce. They throw light ut in all directions, and it comes back from all directions. This is great in normal rooms, etc, but if you're in a huge hall/theatre the benefit may be minimal. If you're in close enough, some benefit can be had from a larger unit like a fong, but not so much as a softbox/large reflector. The lumiquest SB-III or style softbox diffusers simply work by increasing the area of the flash, so you'll get softer shadows. Even still, you have to be reasonably close for these to have a huge effect, but they do work well at close range. - Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Outta here for a while . . .
From: Stan Halpin Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta. My operation Monday turned into a bit of a saga. The procedure before mine was delayed for 4 hours as they worked to bring temperature/humidity within specs in the OR. And the one before mine took 5 hours. So it was 4:30 p.m. or so before they got started on me. I was then in the hospital for another 40+ hours of discomfort before being released today. Am now at my brother's where I will stay for another week or so, with the first (only?) follow-up visit scheduled for next Monday. This is really all quite miraculous considering the recovery time required prior to laprascopic robo-surgery, but that doesn't make me feel all that much more comfortable. I won't know more about the cancer until I get the biopsy results next week, but the surgeon says everything went smoothly, no issues, no surprises. stan Good to hear that you came through Ok. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Happy Hanukkah
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:13 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: What Ken said =) Have a great day, all who celebrate! Ecke Great day? The Jews know how to do it right. Eight days, my friend! Hanukkah is an eight day (or more accurately, eight night) celebration. ;-) cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com wrote: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) cc welcome Some wonderful images in there, and some of the pairs really work well together. I agree with Brian, the person wearing the cloak against the yellow wall is particularly striking! cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Metro Colosseo
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=27 Comments, Suggestions, Criticisms and Abuse Welcome Dan http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola Tilted, nice motion blur, soft. What's not to like? ;-) Seriously, I do like this one, Dan. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
Very nice! And a happy holiday season to you and your family, Boris. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:34 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Hi! http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
More mushrooms
I was trying to get some shots of my cthuloid stump tonight, but never quite nailed the lighting. these might be the best two of the stump: This one has the strobe slightly above ground level: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226313346/ And this one has it down below ground level where I've dug out around the roots: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225715967/ I ended up shooting a lot more of mushrooms than of the stump: You may recognize these clumps from last week, they've grown up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226308582/ Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
The triffids have arrived :-). Cool photos though. I have a feeling that you're approaching your 'shrooms a bit like a researcher, though you mostly research light and shadows. I suppose you still have sufficiently warm weather over there so that they can grow, these fungi. Gosh, it is +27C outside and it is Dec 2nd... Boris On 12/2/2010 2:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote: I was trying to get some shots of my cthuloid stump tonight, but never quite nailed the lighting. these might be the best two of the stump: This one has the strobe slightly above ground level: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226313346/ And this one has it down below ground level where I've dug out around the roots: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225715967/ I ended up shooting a lot more of mushrooms than of the stump: You may recognize these clumps from last week, they've grown up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226308582/ Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Outta here for a while . . .
Glad you're back Stan. Sounds like good news so far. Hope you are fairly comfortable and things heal up quickly. By the way, Diane is doing well and undergoing her radiation therapy daily. Her biggest problem is the tape they have applied to all the targets and lines they have drawn on her. Our grandaughter thinks she has gotten tattoos. She told Diane that she wants some too. Hoping for good news with your follow up visit. Ted The eye of the viewer becomes the eye of the Photographer. Albert Maysles -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
I see you got one shot of the rarely seen pencillus eberhardii http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ :-) ann The fungi close-ups are more visually intersting than the twisted roots, me thinks Larry Colen wrote: I was trying to get some shots of my cthuloid stump tonight, but never quite nailed the lighting. these might be the best two of the stump: This one has the strobe slightly above ground level: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226313346/ And this one has it down below ground level where I've dug out around the roots: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225715967/ I ended up shooting a lot more of mushrooms than of the stump: You may recognize these clumps from last week, they've grown up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226308582/ Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
Larry, I think you're developing an unhealthy obsession with these much rooms. ;-) The shots are wonderfully sharp. I find the first few here a bit too dark but I really liked the last two and especially the last one. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: I was trying to get some shots of my cthuloid stump tonight, but never quite nailed the lighting. these might be the best two of the stump: This one has the strobe slightly above ground level: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226313346/ And this one has it down below ground level where I've dug out around the roots: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225715967/ I ended up shooting a lot more of mushrooms than of the stump: You may recognize these clumps from last week, they've grown up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226308582/ Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribi?: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos Luka, I always look forward to you posting shots. I enjoy the view into your life that you share with us when you post. This photo essay is no different. If I were to pick a favorite image from this set, I would have to pick either the man on the street with a cape or the 4 dogs sleeping on the sidewalk. Thank you for posting this set and incidently all your previous posts. I value the peeks into your part of the world. Ted The eye of the viewer becomes the eye of the Photographer. Albert Maysles -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Teleconverters?
I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On 12/2/2010 4:26 PM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, Eric, I had a couple non-Pentax tele-converters. One I used as such another was purely macro converter. Both were only so-so though macro converter wasn't all that bad. They eat light so that if you mount 200/2.8 on 2x tele converter, you get equivalent of 400/5.6. If you mount one more 2x converter you'd be at 800/11.0. One of the reasons I decided to cease using tele lenses was that it was an either-either choice - either mediocre results with cheap gear or gear beyond my financial reach. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
You may want to shop for the Kenko MC7 Pz-Af teleconverter - it is optically fairly good with 7 elements and couples all mount contacts including SDM and/or power soom. It also comes branded as Bower and Soligor. On eBay Germany they typically sell between 50 and 125 €, dunno about US price levels Hope this helps Ecke 2010/12/2 Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Eric, I had a couple non-Pentax tele-converters. One I used as such another was purely macro converter. Both were only so-so though macro converter wasn't all that bad. They eat light so that if you mount 200/2.8 on 2x tele converter, you get equivalent of 400/5.6. If you mount one more 2x converter you'd be at 800/11.0. One of the reasons I decided to cease using tele lenses was that it was an either-either choice - either mediocre results with cheap gear or gear beyond my financial reach. Thanks, Boris. That's helpful. I hear on NPR this morning you've got pretty serious drought there. Sincerely, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Peso: Screamin'
Another vacation pic: http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/?action=viewcurrent=coaster.jpg My friends were actually on this sets of cars. They wondered how I managed to see them and get the shot. They had never considered that I would take one of every car I saw, check out the people on zoom, and delete all but one. I told them patient but intense concentration. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:34 AM, eckinator wrote: You may want to shop for the Kenko MC7 Pz-Af teleconverter - it is optically fairly good with 7 elements and couples all mount contacts including SDM and/or power soom. It also comes branded as Bower and Soligor. On eBay Germany they typically sell between 50 and 125 €, dunno about US price levels Thanks, Ecke. For the moment, at least, I'm avoiding AF. Sincerely, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
Luka - Carlos is a quite harsh -- but I agree with him to the extent that you should have pruned a bit more - because your best work is so very strong... and you know I'm a fan. But there are certainly more than 1 or 2 keepers, Carlos! I had a bit of problem viewing the slideshow - because of the wide white borders and I have a strong preference for seeing a stream of images that read left to right instead of up and down. I also wanted to be able to look at each photo alone... as I often liked one of a pair much better than the other... if for no other reason than I could say I really liked one of them and could do so by grabbing a link to show you. Like the second photo on the page where the guy on top is guzzling a beer. The shot below it is terrific... also the one where there are all those chairs on a roof top - ann Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT Lightroom 3
Thanks Boris. btw This is not the first time i bought the cart before buying the horse, so to speak.:-) Dave On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, LR 3.2 (even if you get 3.0 from Fedex, you can immediately download upgrade 3.2 from Adobe web site) offers a number of very useful improvements over previous generations of LR. And they introduced totally new demosaicing engine that will likely make you think that it was worth your while. Boris On 12/2/2010 12:49 AM, David J Brooks wrote: I have not done the computer up grade just yet, but decided to get Version 3 anyway. Ordered it today, with a projected Dec 8th arrival via Fedex. Free shipping.:-) At least it gives me incentive to upgrade.;-) Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My PESO at Jalopnik.com
Thanks folks. :) -bmw On 10-12-01 9:41 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I remember that one! Good for you Bruce. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Just noticed that an old PESO of mine, that was also reproduced in the 1st PDML book, was included in a gallery of hood ornaments as part of a front-page article published today at car enthusiast site Jalopnik.com ... http://jalopnik.com/5702901/ten-awesome-hood-ornaments/gallery/ -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
I found this to be a fascinating set – not at all typical of travel pics and certainly not narcissistic. There is something profound about the pairings. I found myself looking for the linkage, and I was disappointed when the slide show concluded. The only two that I would eliminate are the forest and the lake. They just don't fit. Love the shot of the crowd, where only one man in the rear is in focus. My eye immediately searched for the point of focus, and its discovery was rewarding and interesting in that the subject was looking back at me. Well done. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Luka - Carlos is a quite harsh -- but I agree with him to the extent that you should have pruned a bit more - because your best work is so very strong... and you know I'm a fan. But there are certainly more than 1 or 2 keepers, Carlos! I had a bit of problem viewing the slideshow - because of the wide white borders and I have a strong preference for seeing a stream of images that read left to right instead of up and down. I also wanted to be able to look at each photo alone... as I often liked one of a pair much better than the other... if for no other reason than I could say I really liked one of them and could do so by grabbing a link to show you. Like the second photo on the page where the guy on top is guzzling a beer. The shot below it is terrific... also the one where there are all those chairs on a roof top - ann Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Now this is why I wanted my own scanner
On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Nick David Wright wrote: Scanning film is a good deal different than digital photography. I got an Epson V500 back when I started working my way back to photography -- about a year ago. At the time I didn't want to hear about digital, and have lots of slides and film of my own, and some from a deceased brother, that I envisioned myself sorting through, prioritizing, and then scanning. Everything I've read about the process since getting the scanner has been so intimidating that I haven't ventured beyond scanning a few family photos -- 15 or so -- just to make them available to other family members. This thread has been somewhat intimidating, too. Nevertheless, I do want to get to my brother's stuff. It's all film, there's not that much of it, and most of it's black and white. -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:23 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Thanks, Paul. It's the 2X-S.Looks like the price is going to turn out to be reasonable. And *my* camera is a *ist DS. Can you use a teleconvertor with a zoom? -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
The first two have a 1950's B movie feel to them. Dave On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: I was trying to get some shots of my cthuloid stump tonight, but never quite nailed the lighting. these might be the best two of the stump: This one has the strobe slightly above ground level: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226313346/ And this one has it down below ground level where I've dug out around the roots: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225715967/ I ended up shooting a lot more of mushrooms than of the stump: You may recognize these clumps from last week, they've grown up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226308582/ Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Now this is why I wanted my own scanner
Oh wow. By different I didn't mean hard. I just meant you have to go at it a little differently than you do for digital camera images. Because I think that's where most folks have their problems. They expect scanning film to be just like a digital camera, and it isn't. It can be very very easy though. The V500 is an exceptional scanner (especially for the price), and I'm finding it very easy to use. Black and white particularly so. Don't let what anyone else has to say about it stop you. If you have a problem, ask; someone here is sure to know the solution. ~nick On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote: On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Nick David Wright wrote: Scanning film is a good deal different than digital photography. I got an Epson V500 back when I started working my way back to photography -- about a year ago. At the time I didn't want to hear about digital, and have lots of slides and film of my own, and some from a deceased brother, that I envisioned myself sorting through, prioritizing, and then scanning. Everything I've read about the process since getting the scanner has been so intimidating that I haven't ventured beyond scanning a few family photos -- 15 or so -- just to make them available to other family members. This thread has been somewhat intimidating, too. Nevertheless, I do want to get to my brother's stuff. It's all film, there's not that much of it, and most of it's black and white. -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
K-5 at lower price
For the K-5 droolers: I just noticed that Best Price Electronics (aka US1 Camera) has the K-5 for $1500, which appears to be $100 below its price at BH and Amazon http://bestpriceelectronics.com/bp/product_info.php/pentax-k5-163-megapixel-digital-slr-camera-body-k5-p-20007 http://tinyurl.com/k5-1500 I've never purchased anything from that store. Judge it yourself: http://www.resellerratings.com/store/Best_Price_Electronics Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Eric Weir wrote: On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:23 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Thanks, Paul. It's the 2X-S.Looks like the price is going to turn out to be reasonable. And *my* camera is a *ist DS. Can you use a teleconvertor with a zoom? Sure. I haven't done use it with a zoom, but I don't see why not. Now that you mention it, I'll have to give it a try with my DA* 60-250. Might be a good combo for wildlife. Of course, it would be manual focus only. Paul -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
Good call Paul, I did eliminate that slide! About the length, I find it great when people end it wishing for more. I've found that with longer edits, i.e. 30 slides with 2 or more pictures, many people don't go through. it has to do with the web attention span, it's really rare that people are ready to go for a long time just clicking next-next :) I also found that very few people focused on the pairings, and the way it works or doesn't and on the overall flow of the slideshow. somehow, most of the comments are about individual images. This partly has to mean that the whole thing doesn't work well enough, but i think it also has to do with the way people are used to looking at photos online, which is mostly singled out photos or sometimes straight slideshows. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:15 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I found this to be a fascinating set – not at all typical of travel pics and certainly not narcissistic. There is something profound about the pairings. I found myself looking for the linkage, and I was disappointed when the slide show concluded. The only two that I would eliminate are the forest and the lake. They just don't fit. Love the shot of the crowd, where only one man in the rear is in focus. My eye immediately searched for the point of focus, and its discovery was rewarding and interesting in that the subject was looking back at me. Well done. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Luka - Carlos is a quite harsh -- but I agree with him to the extent that you should have pruned a bit more - because your best work is so very strong... and you know I'm a fan. But there are certainly more than 1 or 2 keepers, Carlos! I had a bit of problem viewing the slideshow - because of the wide white borders and I have a strong preference for seeing a stream of images that read left to right instead of up and down. I also wanted to be able to look at each photo alone... as I often liked one of a pair much better than the other... if for no other reason than I could say I really liked one of them and could do so by grabbing a link to show you. Like the second photo on the page where the guy on top is guzzling a beer. The shot below it is terrific... also the one where there are all those chairs on a roof top - ann Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Teleconverters
Eric, I've used two TC's: A2X-S and F 1.7X AF, both mostly for macro (or close-distance) shots. Here is an example of my first use of the A2x-S (with a zoom - since you asked): http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/WildAnimalPark/IMGP5086w2.jpg It was shot with *istDS. For detail, see this old post of mine: http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg387319.html (The link to the photo is updated here.) I like both TC's. However, since I got my hands on the 1.7X AF, I prefer it. The AF adds some convenience. (E.g. I tried it recently in Sydney with Rob's 300/2.8, while shooting surfers and it was nice! - I hope to use the upcoming break to work on the photo backlog.) Igor On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
Just to add a quick thought to Paul's solid advice, the Pentax A2L is considerably better glass, but the price goes UP accordingly. This converter, however, is made to be used with Pentax * lenses with recessed rear lens element. You've doubtless considered it, but the lesser powered converters (1.7, 1.4) tend to produce somewhat better IQ at the obvious loss of power. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 7:23 AM The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
I've used my Promaster 7-element 2X teleconverter with my 50-200mm kit lens to shoot birds and gotten *decent* results as long as the birds cooperated and as long as I stayed away from the farthest reaches of the lens. Of course, the maximum aperture on the 50-200 is f/4, so I couldn't reasonably expect anything more than just decent. I'm sure the Pentax has better optics, so you may have better luck than I have -- most assuredly if you have a wider-aperture zoom. -- Walt On 12/2/2010 10:12 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Eric Weir wrote: On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:23 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Thanks, Paul. It's the 2X-S.Looks like the price is going to turn out to be reasonable. And *my* camera is a *ist DS. Can you use a teleconvertor with a zoom? Sure. I haven't done use it with a zoom, but I don't see why not. Now that you mention it, I'll have to give it a try with my DA* 60-250. Might be a good combo for wildlife. Of course, it would be manual focus only. Paul -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
I've now made a few more changes. It's horizontally laid out and few more slides removed. feel free to check it out luka On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com wrote: Good call Paul, I did eliminate that slide! About the length, I find it great when people end it wishing for more. I've found that with longer edits, i.e. 30 slides with 2 or more pictures, many people don't go through. it has to do with the web attention span, it's really rare that people are ready to go for a long time just clicking next-next :) I also found that very few people focused on the pairings, and the way it works or doesn't and on the overall flow of the slideshow. somehow, most of the comments are about individual images. This partly has to mean that the whole thing doesn't work well enough, but i think it also has to do with the way people are used to looking at photos online, which is mostly singled out photos or sometimes straight slideshows. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:15 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I found this to be a fascinating set – not at all typical of travel pics and certainly not narcissistic. There is something profound about the pairings. I found myself looking for the linkage, and I was disappointed when the slide show concluded. The only two that I would eliminate are the forest and the lake. They just don't fit. Love the shot of the crowd, where only one man in the rear is in focus. My eye immediately searched for the point of focus, and its discovery was rewarding and interesting in that the subject was looking back at me. Well done. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Luka - Carlos is a quite harsh -- but I agree with him to the extent that you should have pruned a bit more - because your best work is so very strong... and you know I'm a fan. But there are certainly more than 1 or 2 keepers, Carlos! I had a bit of problem viewing the slideshow - because of the wide white borders and I have a strong preference for seeing a stream of images that read left to right instead of up and down. I also wanted to be able to look at each photo alone... as I often liked one of a pair much better than the other... if for no other reason than I could say I really liked one of them and could do so by grabbing a link to show you. Like the second photo on the page where the guy on top is guzzling a beer. The shot below it is terrific... also the one where there are all those chairs on a roof top - ann Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: Thanks guys. @carlos: i appreciate your opinion, although my goal here was not really to post the best photos necessarily, but to try and create a short essay/narrative. i mainly focused on the pairings and the flow of the slide show. i can accept that i've failed at that too, if that's your opinion. thank you, anyway, of course! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Carlos R carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote: El 02/12/2010 3:09, Luka Knezevic-Strika escribió: A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania: http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the first slideshow - austria romania) I am an admirer of your work, but this time I think there are only a few keepers in your trip photos, perhaps 1 or 2. Many of them look like the usual narcissistic, dispensable pics you can see by miriads looking at Flickr pages. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, that's not my intention, I try hard to be constructive and friendly but I think a frank opinion is the best possible thing amongst friends. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
Neat pix, Boris. I send you a message off list re: this image. -p On 12/2/2010 1:34 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Hi! http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
On 12/2/2010 7:24 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote: Neat pix, Boris. I send you a message off list re: this image. Off list message replied. Thanks, Paul! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
The A2X-S and A2X-L were originally the same price if I recall. I don't think the L is better glass, just different. It has the long snout to optimize its use with lenses that have the recessed rear element. That group includes more than just the *** lenses, and not all of the latter. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Just to add a quick thought to Paul's solid advice, the Pentax A2L is considerably better glass, but the price goes UP accordingly. This converter, however, is made to be used with Pentax * lenses with recessed rear lens element. You've doubtless considered it, but the lesser powered converters (1.7, 1.4) tend to produce somewhat better IQ at the obvious loss of power. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 7:23 AM The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO: Romania/Austrika
On 12/2/2010 7:09 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: I've now made a few more changes. It's horizontally laid out and few more slides removed. feel free to check it out luka Horizontal lay out is good, but I think you took away a bit of a story by removing some slides. I kind of liked the initial version... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Boris Peso #58 - Rokach House
Hi! http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-58-rokach-house.html As usual - brutal and honest comments are sought after. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
[Fwd: tech support question] Had to share....
Christine, tanya, wendy - substitute HUSBAND and BOYFRIEND in appropriate places -- although none of them will run on current equipment :-) ann Original Message Subject: tech support question Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:57:24 -0500 From: Jacobsmike807 jacobsmike...@aol.com To: ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Tech Support VERY HELPFUL FOR MARRIED PERSONNEL Dear Tech Support: Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0. I soon noticed that the new program began unexpected child processing that took up a lot of space and valuable resources. In addition, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now monitors all other system activity. Applications such as Poker Night 10.3,, Football 5.0 , Hunting and Fishing 7.5, , and Golfing 3.6. I can't seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while attempting to run my favorite applications. I'm thinking about going back to Girlfriend 7.0 , but the uninstall doesn't work on Wife 1.0 . Please help! Thanks, Troubled User. _ REPLY: Dear Troubled User: This is a very common problem that men complain about. Many people upgrade from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0, thinking that it is just a Utilities and Entertainment program. Wife 1.0 is an OPERATING SYSTEM and is designed by its Creator to run EVERYTHING !!! It is also impossible to delete Wife 1.0 and to return to Girlfriend 7.0 . It is impossible to uninstall, or purge the program files from the system once installed. You cannot go back to Girlfriend 7.0 because Wife 1.0 is designed to not allow this. Look in your Wife 1.0 manual under Warnings-Alimony/Child Support . I recommend that you keep Wife 1.0 and work on improving the situation. I suggest installing the background application Yes Dear to alleviate software augmentation. The best course of action is to enter the command C:\APOLOGIZE! because ultimately you will have to give the APOLOGIZE command before the system will return to normal anyway. Wife 1.0 is a great program, but it tends to be very high maintenance . Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs, such as Clean and Sweep 3.0 , Cook It 1.5 and Do Bills 4.2 . However, be very careful how you use these programs. Improper use will cause the system to launch the program Nag Nag 9.5 . Once this happens, the only way to improve the performance of Wife 1.0 is to purchase additional software. I recommend Flowers 2.1 and Diamonds 5.0 ! WARNING!!! DO NOT, under any circumstances, install Secretary With Short Skirt 3.3 . This application is not supported by Wife 1.0 and will cause irreversible damage to the operating system! Best of luck, Tech Support -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
The AX and AL converters were never the same price when I was shopping them in the late 1990's. At that time the Pentax L's improved quality and configuration are provided to accommodate the 300mm and up telephoto lenses. The exact wording notwithstanding in the absence of any further research. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 9:47 AM The A2X-S and A2X-L were originally the same price if I recall. I don't think the L is better glass, just different. It has the long snout to optimize its use with lenses that have the recessed rear element. That group includes more than just the *** lenses, and not all of the latter. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Just to add a quick thought to Paul's solid advice, the Pentax A2L is considerably better glass, but the price goes UP accordingly. This converter, however, is made to be used with Pentax * lenses with recessed rear lens element. You've doubtless considered it, but the lesser powered converters (1.7, 1.4) tend to produce somewhat better IQ at the obvious loss of power. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 7:23 AM The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Dragon Boats
Thanks, Brian. The colors caught my eye, but I was also drawn by the contrast with the USS Constellation, see in the background, together with its museum. Perhaps you were expecting a dragon boat like the one in this old can from a 1966 Spotmatic image: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12034632 One of these day I need to clean up the slide and try to get a better scan of this old boat. Dan On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote: On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:43 -0500, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=25 Comments, Suggestions, Criticisms and Abuse are all Welcome. Colourful and I like the close crop. But I was expecting real dragon boats: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_boat :-) Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software or over the web -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Cashel Ruins
Thanks for commenting, Boris. Dan On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/1/2010 10:09 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Dan, Makes me want to go for a visit. Regards, Bob S. I concur. And the deep shadows seem to be in place here no matter how much I like to open shadows in my shots... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
They were the A2X-S and A2X-L. They were priced the same when first introduced. The L versions were less common and sold for more used. The Ls couldn't be used with every lens that was over 300mm. For example, the rear baffle on the A400/5.6 precludes their use. Both are excellent optics. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Jack Davis wrote: The AX and AL converters were never the same price when I was shopping them in the late 1990's. At that time the Pentax L's improved quality and configuration are provided to accommodate the 300mm and up telephoto lenses. The exact wording notwithstanding in the absence of any further research. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 9:47 AM The A2X-S and A2X-L were originally the same price if I recall. I don't think the L is better glass, just different. It has the long snout to optimize its use with lenses that have the recessed rear element. That group includes more than just the *** lenses, and not all of the latter. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Just to add a quick thought to Paul's solid advice, the Pentax A2L is considerably better glass, but the price goes UP accordingly. This converter, however, is made to be used with Pentax * lenses with recessed rear lens element. You've doubtless considered it, but the lesser powered converters (1.7, 1.4) tend to produce somewhat better IQ at the obvious loss of power. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 7:23 AM The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-5 at lower price
On 2010-12-02 09:03 , Igor Roshchin wrote: For the K-5 droolers: I just noticed that Best Price Electronics (aka US1 Camera) has the K-5 for $1500, which appears to be $100 below its price at BH and Amazon http://bestpriceelectronics.com/bp/product_info.php/pentax-k5-163-megapixel-digital-slr-camera-body-k5-p-20007 http://tinyurl.com/k5-1500 I've never purchased anything from that store. Judge it yourself: http://www.resellerratings.com/store/Best_Price_Electronics and judge resellerratings.com for yourself too ;? (personally, i would wait until it comes down at a more mainstream seller) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
The L version sold for more when I bought my new 1.4. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 10:51 AM They were the A2X-S and A2X-L. They were priced the same when first introduced. The L versions were less common and sold for more used. The Ls couldn't be used with every lens that was over 300mm. For example, the rear baffle on the A400/5.6 precludes their use. Both are excellent optics. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Jack Davis wrote: The AX and AL converters were never the same price when I was shopping them in the late 1990's. At that time the Pentax L's improved quality and configuration are provided to accommodate the 300mm and up telephoto lenses. The exact wording notwithstanding in the absence of any further research. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 9:47 AM The A2X-S and A2X-L were originally the same price if I recall. I don't think the L is better glass, just different. It has the long snout to optimize its use with lenses that have the recessed rear element. That group includes more than just the *** lenses, and not all of the latter. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Just to add a quick thought to Paul's solid advice, the Pentax A2L is considerably better glass, but the price goes UP accordingly. This converter, however, is made to be used with Pentax * lenses with recessed rear lens element. You've doubtless considered it, but the lesser powered converters (1.7, 1.4) tend to produce somewhat better IQ at the obvious loss of power. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 7:23 AM The A 2X teleconverters are very good optically. Of course because you're adding glass, a lens plus converter can never match the performance of the lens alone, but the A 2X converters are among the best I've seen. Note that I said converters, because there are two. The A2X-L can only be used with certain long telephoto lenses. It has a long snout and can't be attached to other Pentax lenses. The A2X-S fits all Pentax lenses. I use the A2X-S once in a while with an A400/5.6. It yields good results. My photo of a dragonfly that's on the opening page of the Pentax Gallery and in their Premier Collection was shot with this combination on an *istD. Paul On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Eric Weir wrote: I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Re: PESO: Metro Colosseo
Thanks, Frank. I know it's tilted; I liked the way the lines of the station and the lines of the track converged toward the left. Somehow, it seemed to enhance the feeling of motion. I did a different crop, which is more level with the station structure: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12034691 I'm not at all sure which I prefer. I shall cogitate on it. G Dan http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:18 AM, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=27 Comments, Suggestions, Criticisms and Abuse Welcome Dan http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola Tilted, nice motion blur, soft. What's not to like? ;-) Seriously, I do like this one, Dan. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My PESO at Jalopnik.com
Congratulations! Dan On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Just noticed that an old PESO of mine, that was also reproduced in the 1st PDML book, was included in a gallery of hood ornaments as part of a front-page article published today at car enthusiast site Jalopnik.com ... http://jalopnik.com/5702901/ten-awesome-hood-ornaments/gallery/ -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Outta here for a while . . .
Good to have you back. We wish you a complete and speedy recovery. Dan On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta. My operation Monday turned into a bit of a saga. The procedure before mine was delayed for 4 hours as they worked to bring temperature/humidity within specs in the OR. And the one before mine took 5 hours. So it was 4:30 p.m. or so before they got started on me. I was then in the hospital for another 40+ hours of discomfort before being released today. Am now at my brother's where I will stay for another week or so, with the first (only?) follow-up visit scheduled for next Monday. This is really all quite miraculous considering the recovery time required prior to laprascopic robo-surgery, but that doesn't make me feel all that much more comfortable. I won't know more about the cancer until I get the biopsy results next week, but the surgeon says everything went smoothly, no issues, no surprises. stan On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Miserere wrote: Say hi to Danny Devito, and get back soon, Stan. Here's the good wishes I took back the other week: GOOD WISHES! On 27/11/2010, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: Leaving for Cleveland tomorrow (Sunday) a.m., my rescheduled surgery will be Monday morning. The Clinic has extensive wifi, but I don't think I'll take my laptop in with me. Try to be good while I am gone! stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
On 2010-12-02 11:45 , Rick Womer wrote: I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. i don't have one (i have its DVI predecessor, with which i'm quite happy), but i infer from your message that you have an older laptop -- if so, and its video output is DVI, you will need a somewhat expensive converter to use the Mini DisplayPort on this display, something like this Geffen product (an example, not a recommendation): http://www.amazon.com/Gefen-DVI-Mini-DisplayPort-Converter/dp/B002QPWBEK the only other caution is that it's glossy, so you will have to control your environment carefully; my 13 laptop is glossy, and at this time of day my desk is sunny -- the reflection of the sun on my face makes the display hard to see in parts (i'm wearing a dark shirt thankfully), but causes no problem with the matte surface of my 23 Cinema HD -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
Well seen captured Boris. Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Same to you fella ;+} Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com Subject: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah Hi! http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-5 at lower price
Igor Roshchin wrote: I just noticed that Best Price Electronics (aka US1 Camera) has the K-5 for $1500, which appears to be $100 below its price at BH and Amazon http://bestpriceelectronics.com/bp/product_info.php/pentax-k5-163-megapixel-digital-slr-camera-body-k5-p-20007 http://tinyurl.com/k5-1500 I've never purchased anything from that store. Judge it yourself: http://www.resellerratings.com/store/Best_Price_Electronics http://thoughts-of-dave.blogspot.com/2010/02/best-price-electronics-aka.html Best Price Electronics aka bestpriceelectronics.com: BAIT AND SWITCH ALERT Per resellerratings, Best Price Electronics is the latest incarnation of US1Photo, an infamous bait and switch operation. http://consumerist.com/2009/02/us1photo-pulls-the-buy-accessories-or-well-cancel-your-order-scam.html US1Photo Pulls The 'Buy Accessories Or We'll Cancel Your Order' Scam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Ken Waller wrote: From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. You must be a loonie. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
More SD card deals
Or rather deal, singular. BH has a Cyber Thursday (whatever that is) deal on Transcend 16GB Class 6 SDHC Cards for $26.95 + free shipping: http://tinyurl.com/2f5xyvt Full disclosure: the URL includes EtL's affiliate BH code, so if enough of you buy this card today through the above link I might be able to buy some gum next week :-) Cheers, —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Ken Waller wrote: From: Mark Robertsm...@robertstech.com Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. You must be a loonie. (Deutsch) Mark! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More SD card deals
Even better deal from Amazon, Transcend 16GB Class **10** SDHC Cards for $24.49: http://tinyurl.com/34y2c5o Purchase something else for $0.51 and you get free shipping (within the US). Same URL caveat as before applies to the above. Cheers, —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 2 December 2010 14:31, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: Or rather deal, singular. BH has a Cyber Thursday (whatever that is) deal on Transcend 16GB Class 6 SDHC Cards for $26.95 + free shipping: http://tinyurl.com/2f5xyvt Full disclosure: the URL includes EtL's affiliate BH code, so if enough of you buy this card today through the above link I might be able to buy some gum next week :-) Cheers, —M. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: What's the going rate?
One thing to note is that you're not a photo editor or publisher, Cotty. They're buying services if they're booking me for an assignment. They're buying goods if they're buying a usage license for an existing photograph. Yes, booking an assignment is quite different from selling licensing for a photograph (or photographs). When I'm booking an assignment, the license terms is just a part of the total fees ... I establish the rates for the shoot, equipment fees, etc. But when selling the use license for photographs, I am a bit more flexible ... the goods are in the can and the negotiation is to get as good a price for the goods as possible while not losing the sale. The response I've gotten to the budget question is in the context of if you have this much to spend, I can enable you with a package that includes x and y and z ... where if you only have a smaller amount to spend, I'll have to exclude z ... etc. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: On 1/12/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: In all seriousness: never. I've had editors tell me everything from I don't know to supplying a highly detailed rate chart, and I've had editors tell me they couldn't afford the price I set when they didn't have a rate chart, etc etc, but none have ever indicated they were uncomfortable with the question. How could they be? They're in business ... arranging a business transaction .. just like I am. Are you uncomfortable or put off if a provider whose services you need asks you what the budget for a shoot might be? Must be the British. When I get asked for a quote, I take into account my daily rate in balance with the nature of the work and the client's history with me (including non at all). I have to make a living and so if I asked each client what his/her budget was for the job, and indeed if they even answered, then I'd either laugh them off the phone or adjust my rate upwards accordingly! Seriously - my rate varies by only a little. There are plenty of companies offering my services and we all charge very similar amounts - where I can undercut is that I can not only organise the job, but I also undertake the writing, shooting and editing myself. Others may have to sub-contract where necessary. I think maybe the nature of the work has a lot to do with it - selling individual photos may promote the questioning about budgets, but on projects that I typically work on, we're talking about several days' work or an entire job. The client is likely getting in quotes from other sources also, so while trying to be competitive, I also have a living to make and my rates are set accordingly. If I work for less than my determined minimum, I'd go bust fairly quickly. Targeting the upper- middle to top-end of my market is tough, but that's the background I have and the choice I made. Are you uncomfortable or put off if a provider whose services you need asks you what the budget for a shoot might be? Not at all - it's never happened though. If it did, I'd probably ask them to hold on while I checked my pockets. Really. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. I have the circa 2006 version Apple Cinema Display 23 model (DVI input, with both FireWire and USB 2 ports). It's great. The current model is a 27, not 24, and its cable connects to a Mini Display Port, which requires a converter box if your laptop doesn't have a Mini Display Port connection. I don't know much about the 24 models which preceded them. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
On 2010-12-02 13:03 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: The current model is a 27, not 24, and its cable connects to a Mini Display Port, which requires a converter box if your laptop doesn't have a Mini Display Port connection. I don't know much about the 24 models which preceded them. the 24 inch is (well, was, but still available refurb from Apple sometimes, an new old stock elsewhere) much the same configuration as the 27 -- both are LED backlit, glossy, Mini DisplayPort units which are also able to serve as power supplies for Apple laptops; the 27 however requires a dual-link DVI to Mini DisplayPort converter, which is more expensive than the unit i mentioned needed for the 24; only example i could find was an Altona unit (again, not a recommendation): http://www.jr.com/atlona/pe/AAO_DP400/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Walter Gilbert wrote: On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Ken Waller wrote: From: Mark Robertsm...@robertstech.com Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. You must be a loonie. (Deutsch) Mark! I'm glad you're being franc with us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
I've always been of the mindset to use converters from the same maker as the lens, tho I have never evaluated brand X convertors on brand Y lenses. I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L have used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0X-L is the least used for me. They're a great way to extend your 'photo reach' relatively cheaply compared to the cost of an equivalent lens. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net Subject: Teleconverters? I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Larry, I think you're developing an unhealthy obsession with these much rooms. ;-) The stump is about five feet in front of my front door. It's hard not to notice things to photograph on it. I really was trying to photograph the stump, preferably getting a shot of the stump and the mushrooms. When I started digging it out, I noticed how wonderfully tentacular the root system is. Last night was my first attempt at photographing it. My goal is to use light to isolate the roots from the background, but I'm having a tough time trying to figure out how to do that. I hope to get back to physically isolating the roots more in the near future. With more space between them and the dirt, visual isolation may be easier. I'm very interested in suggestions on how to do this. The shots are wonderfully sharp. I find the first few here a bit too dark but I really liked the last two and especially the last one. Thank you. By the last two do you mean: Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ Or the last two in the set? The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ Boris, last night it only got down to about 5C, most of the last week it was down to about 1C and was feeling really chilly. And, yes, I realize how spoiled I am to complain that the temperature got almost down to freezing in November. Dave, yes, I was going specifically for that B-movie tentacular monster effect. Larry -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. I have the circa 2006 version Apple Cinema Display 23 model (DVI input, with both FireWire and USB 2 ports). It's great. The current model is a 27, not 24, and its cable connects to a Mini Display Port, which requires a converter box if your laptop doesn't have a Mini Display Port connection. I don't know much about the 24 models which preceded them. Thanks, Godfrey. The mini-display port isn't a problem. Unfortunately the current models (24 or 27-in) don't have a FireWire port anymore, though they now have 3 USB ports. Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
A very engaging image, Boris. Have a wonderful holiday season. Dan On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: Well seen captured Boris. Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Same to you fella ;+} Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com Subject: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah Hi! http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html Have a great year end holiday season, everyone! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Teleconverters?
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because of the simple fact there is a slight loss in resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on. -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions : http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ken Waller Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Teleconverters? I've always been of the mindset to use converters from the same maker as the lens, tho I have never evaluated brand X convertors on brand Y lenses. I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L have used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0X-L is the least used for me. They're a great way to extend your 'photo reach' relatively cheaply compared to the cost of an equivalent lens. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net Subject: Teleconverters? I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: excellent online print experience
Just wanted to share an excellent experience/result with an online service that I used recently. I was looking for a unique presentation for a print I wanted to give as a gift decided not to go my usual route (home print on an Epson printers then mounted/matted/framed by a local framer). I saw an add in a photo mag for bayphoto (www.bayphoto.com/metalprints) their 'metal prints'(you image printed on aluminum sheets). I liked what I saw downloaded one version of their ordering software, placed the order waited for the prints to arrive. They arrived today, a little over 1 week I'm totally satisfied with the results. They image quality is first rate and agrees with what I expected given the image on my monitor. They have several options I chose the 'float hanger' where they add a half inch thick spacer to the back that floats the image a half inch off the wall. Their pricing is reasonable if you compare it to the normal costs of mounting, matting and framing. I paid $19.50 for an 8X12 print ! (normally $26.00 - but a 25 % discount is given to first time customers) If you're looking for something a little different that the usual framed print - check them out Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer wrote: I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. How expensive is it in comparison to a refurbbed 24 iMac? Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb Walter Gilbert wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Ken Waller wrote: Mark Roberts wrote Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. You must be a loonie. (Deutsch) Mark! I'm glad you're being franc with us. Frankly, I'm a little Lira that -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net Subject: RE: Teleconverters? FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because of the simple fact there is a slight loss in resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on. When using them is the difference of getting/not getting the image I want - I use them. I can't say the loss of resolution and contrast has been an issue for me in their usage. -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions : http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ken Waller Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Teleconverters? I've always been of the mindset to use converters from the same maker as the lens, tho I have never evaluated brand X convertors on brand Y lenses. I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L have used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0X-L is the least used for me. They're a great way to extend your 'photo reach' relatively cheaply compared to the cost of an equivalent lens. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net Subject: Teleconverters? I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On 2010-12-02 16:14, Ken Waller wrote: When using them is the difference of getting/not getting the image I want - I use them. I can't say the loss of resolution and contrast has been an issue for me in their usage. Ditto. When I use one, I'm typically adding it to a long lens to get more reach, anyway, so the image quality is already suffering. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: More mushrooms
Yes, those two. -Original Message- From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:51:19 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: More mushrooms On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Larry, I think you're developing an unhealthy obsession with these much rooms. ;-) The stump is about five feet in front of my front door. It's hard not to notice things to photograph on it. I really was trying to photograph the stump, preferably getting a shot of the stump and the mushrooms. When I started digging it out, I noticed how wonderfully tentacular the root system is. Last night was my first attempt at photographing it. My goal is to use light to isolate the roots from the background, but I'm having a tough time trying to figure out how to do that. I hope to get back to physically isolating the roots more in the near future. With more space between them and the dirt, visual isolation may be easier. I'm very interested in suggestions on how to do this. The shots are wonderfully sharp. I find the first few here a bit too dark but I really liked the last two and especially the last one. Thank you. By the last two do you mean: Things are looking up http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5225717773/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5226309776/ Or the last two in the set? The whole set is at: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ or if you prefer the flickr interface http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625385123895/ Boris, last night it only got down to about 5C, most of the last week it was down to about 1C and was feeling really chilly. And, yes, I realize how spoiled I am to complain that the temperature got almost down to freezing in November. Dave, yes, I was going specifically for that B-movie tentacular monster effect. Larry -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: My book is up on blurb
Ken Waller wrote: Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb Walter Gilbert wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Ken Waller wrote: Mark Roberts wrote Cotty wrote: But you're right on the money with regards to the puns. he's shilling... Bob said pensively. When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm not one to buck the trend. that makes cents. Euronly likely to upset people if you're too franc, and that gets on people's thrupennies. You just have to pound it home don't you. Nothing could be farthing from the truth. I guess the list will just have to PESO we can move on to another pun. You must be a loonie. (Deutsch) Mark! I'm glad you're being franc with us. Frankly, I'm a little Lira that They're a dime a dozen here -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Experience with 24 in Apple Cinema Display?
http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Thu, 12/2/10, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: How expensive is it in comparison to a refurbbed 24 iMac? I'm tired of trying to keep photos and Lightroom catalogs synced between my laptop and our desktop; so I'm planning to stick with the laptop, a FireWire drive, and a monitor. Rick On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer wrote: I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these days. So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time I buy a docking station (which will be obsolete when I update my laptop in a couple of years) it's cheaper than alternatives. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT - We are not alone?
Strange finding. They discovered a bacterium that uses arsenic in place of phosphorus in its DNA. That is somewhat earth-shaking in the biology field, as no other organism on earth has been able to substitute other elements in DNA. Jeffery On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/nov/HQ_M10-167_Astrobiology.html Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: excellent online print experience
Ken - bay photo is who does the work for smugmug sales ... I'm using them exclusively now and offering buyers luster, glossy or metalic - but I haven't looked at any of my stuff printed on the metal yet didn't realize they were really printed on aluminum. I know one smugmugger who shows his things and doesn't care for it... not sure why. I've really become a smugmug booster... for a pro site the annual fee is only $150 and is well worth it... I may not be taking as much advantage of everything that I should - but it gets better all the time - the help staff is great. And if you can write code you really can control your site. There is no limit to the amount of photos you upload... anyway... Glad, Ken, to get a good review of the metalic prints from you , in addition to the already glowing praise I got from my friend Gary Ricketts and Godders. ann annsan.smugmug.com kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: Just wanted to share an excellent experience/result with an online service that I used recently. I was looking for a unique presentation for a print I wanted to give as a gift decided not to go my usual route (home print on an Epson printers then mounted/matted/framed by a local framer). I saw an add in a photo mag for bayphoto (www.bayphoto.com/metalprints) their 'metal prints'(you image printed on aluminum sheets). I liked what I saw downloaded one version of their ordering software, placed the order waited for the prints to arrive. They arrived today, a little over 1 week I'm totally satisfied with the results. They image quality is first rate and agrees with what I expected given the image on my monitor. They have several options I chose the 'float hanger' where they add a half inch thick spacer to the back that floats the image a half inch off the wall. Their pricing is reasonable if you compare it to the normal costs of mounting, matting and framing. I paid $19.50 for an 8X12 print ! (normally $26.00 - but a 25 % discount is given to first time customers) If you're looking for something a little different that the usual framed print - check them out Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
Same has been true for me, Ken. I've never used anything beyond a 1.4, so have been conservative and thus conditionally pleased with the results. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: From: Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com Subject: Re: Teleconverters? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 1:14 PM Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net Subject: RE: Teleconverters? FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because of the simple fact there is a slight loss in resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on. When using them is the difference of getting/not getting the image I want - I use them. I can't say the loss of resolution and contrast has been an issue for me in their usage. -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions : http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ken Waller Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Teleconverters? I've always been of the mindset to use converters from the same maker as the lens, tho I have never evaluated brand X convertors on brand Y lenses. I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L have used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0X-L is the least used for me. They're a great way to extend your 'photo reach' relatively cheaply compared to the cost of an equivalent lens. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net Subject: Teleconverters? I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as comments specifically about this one. I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on my agenda, and I imagine it could be put to use in that connection. Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net P.S. I got a Weston Master II exposure meter and manual of eBay. Both look in good condition. It's been suggested that even it didn't work one of these, or something like it, would help me understand exposure better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT - We are not alone?
Some people will feel let down because of the blogsphere hype that preceded the announcement, but I think it's frickin cool what they've discovered. See guys? It's not just the upcoming full-frame and mirrorless cameras from Pentax that get people excited: http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/close_encounters_of_the_media.php Cheers, —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 2 December 2010 16:59, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote: Strange finding. They discovered a bacterium that uses arsenic in place of phosphorus in its DNA. That is somewhat earth-shaking in the biology field, as no other organism on earth has been able to substitute other elements in DNA. Jeffery On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/nov/HQ_M10-167_Astrobiology.html Cheers Brian -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: excellent online print experience
I've seen the add and am going to archive this as it answers some questions. Thanks for posting. Jack --- On Thu, 12/2/10, kwal...@peoplepc.com kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote: From: kwal...@peoplepc.com kwal...@peoplepc.com Subject: OT: excellent online print experience To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 1:02 PM Just wanted to share an excellent experience/result with an online service that I used recently. I was looking for a unique presentation for a print I wanted to give as a gift decided not to go my usual route (home print on an Epson printers then mounted/matted/framed by a local framer). I saw an add in a photo mag for bayphoto (www.bayphoto.com/metalprints) their 'metal prints'(you image printed on aluminum sheets). I liked what I saw downloaded one version of their ordering software, placed the order waited for the prints to arrive. They arrived today, a little over 1 week I'm totally satisfied with the results. They image quality is first rate and agrees with what I expected given the image on my monitor. They have several options I chose the 'float hanger' where they add a half inch thick spacer to the back that floats the image a half inch off the wall. Their pricing is reasonable if you compare it to the normal costs of mounting, matting and framing. I paid $19.50 for an 8X12 print ! (normally $26.00 - but a 25 % discount is given to first time customers) If you're looking for something a little different that the usual framed print - check them out Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Teleconverters?
On 2 December 2010 15:53, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote: FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because of the simple fact there is a slight loss in resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on. I stopped using TCs because they're obsolete in the digital world of today's high-pixel-count cameras. It's true, Pentax said so. —M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: What's the going rate?
You don't join professional organizations to impress clients and customers. The ASMP isn't going to throw prospective leads your way, that's not what they do. They provide information and organize events for members. Either it's worth it to you or not. It has nothing to do with getting business. If you want that, you join a marketing association. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:47 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:19 PM, John Sessoms wrote: From: Walter Gilbert Hmm ... $335 a year. At the moment, it's a bit beyond my range. I think I'd be better off putting that money toward a car for the time being. But, now I know what happened to Annie Leibovitz. -- Walt I spend more than $335 a year just on coffee, and I don't even drink Starbucks. I'm talking McDonalds/Dunkin Donuts/Quickie Mart prices here. You can join the first year as an Emerging Associate at $140/year. After the first year you can be an Associate as a Professional with less than 3 years publication experience, part-time professional or non-professional at $225/year. Best deal is as a Student Associate. You can join at $45/year and can remain a Student Associate for one year after graduation before moving up to the Emerging Associate level for the next year, and then on to Associate member for the next three years. And you may never get to the General Membership level where the dues are $335/year. I think Annie has other money management issues beyond the cost of ASMP dues. And any of those memberships will get youwellnothing. Those who hire photographers couldn't care less if their ASMP members. They just want to see a portfolio. Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
