Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-17 Thread vgs399

I see your point Jon, but I think you give Shania too much credit for her
early career as some people slam her too much for singing cabaret-style
"pop" tunes.  Before Lange got involved, you have a woman who wanted a music
career; was influenced equally by country and pop and who tinkered around
writing songs.
She sang whatever gave her a paycheck and the Nashville invite was just
"luck".  She says now that she fought to get things her own way - well,
interesting point is that she really didn't have a style at that point.  She
pretty much sang as a pop songstress,  wore ordinary and sometimes frumpy
looking clothes and had that wedge cut of a hairdo.  She got a job as a
house singer for Crook  Chase.  I think it was Wilson who did say that he
looked over the songs she had written and didn't think much of them, adding
that "they" didn't think they were good.  Exit Norro Wilson, enter Lange.
Her vocal style changes, her music changes, her "look" changes and she
adopts male rock star stage mannerisms.  She didn't do this all by herself.
The songs which she did write were altered by Lange and we'll probably never
know exactly who wrote what or was responsible for what as it's all part of
the myth those two want us to "buy" into.  Her future was thought-out
beforehand and planned step-by-step.  Absolutely brilliant "take" on the
Eliza Doolittle story.  While I'm on the subject - often I think that people
look at her rock influence and cite her videos and some of her television
appearances as a threat to country music and sometimes to women in general.
Her videos express a more perfunctory sensuality than her actual stage
presence.  In concert, she is not the sassy little belly-button waving sex
kitten or the freewheelin'  liberated woman, but rather a happy cheerleader
of country/pop who literally bounces about the stage, invites members of the
audience to sing with her, including children and who often shows a video of
herself strumming guitar and singing a country song at age 9 or 10.  She
tries very hard to entertain and she is quite likeable in a little sister
sort of way.  After seeing one of her concerts, my impression was that she
was a "nice girl" who just wants to be liked.  Her music and her "style"
belies the fact that she is a 33 year old woman.  I have concluded that she
is an interesting phenomenon whose time will pass also as the bouncy
cheerleader pose won't work much longer as she gets older.
Actually, I'm a bit suprised it has worked thus far. Those videos obviously
work to her advantage.
Anyway, Jennings, Nelson, Glaser and Colter had a cause to support, were
already  in the business and knew exactly how they wanted to approach and
stand up for their beliefs  whereas Twain just wanted to be in the music
business and sing with the likes of Elton John and Stevie Wonder.
Tera
-Original Message-
From: Jon Weisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: passenger side [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: Clip: The state of country radio


  Looking at the matter in terms of the country music industry and the
way
  that it works, Twain's career, at least through The Woman In Me, bears
a
  considerable resemblance to that of some of the 70s Outlaws - that is
to
  say, a struggle with "conservative" producers and label execs over her
  desire to pursue a new sound that could appeal beyond the
 "normal" country audience by bringing in pop/rock elements.
 
  Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/
 
 
 Jon, you keep making this point, but I'd argue that you're overstating
the
 resemblance between Twain's career (and, by necessity, her music, since
 that's her career) and that of the 70s outlaws.

Let's see.  Artist A has essentially mediocre success using
producer-determined/arranged material, fights with his label in order to
record the stuff that *he* wants to, rather than what the label has stuck
him with in the past, wins fight, hits it big with crossover appeal.
Artist B has essentially mediocre success using
producer-determined/arranged
material, fights with her label in order to record the stuff that *she*
wants to, rather than what the label has stuck her with in the past, wins
fight, hits it big with crossover appeal.

Looks like a pretty close resemblance to me on a pretty important level.

As I said before, there's rock influences and then there's rock
influences, and they're not all floating around on the same, precise
relativist plain.

So you say, but I think it depends a lot on your degree of interest in
rock.
If you're not interested in classical music, and you think that
incorporating classical music influences into rock makes the result less
enjoyable, are you really going to care whether it's Beethoven's influence
or Holst's?  Are you going to find a Beethoven-influenced rock song better
than a Holst-influenced one?

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/






Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread vgs399


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: passenger side [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, March 15, 1999 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Clip: The state of country radio


In a message dated 3/15/99 9:40:41 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 Just happened to be station-surfing Sunday morning on the way back from
the
 gig in Knoxville and came across Elton John's "Hold Me Closer, Tiny
Dancer"
 rock/pop operretta -- it features, in addition to overblown strings and an
 overall baroque-rock arrangement, a pedal steel! I seemed to have
forgotten
 about EJ using steel in a lot of his 70's stuff. 

"Tumbleweed Connection" was an amazing album. I still listen to it every
once
in a while. Was it alt. country?

Slim

Maybe alt.country/pop given some of the embellishment in arrangement g.
Some beautiful stuff on that album.  I also play it every now and then, btw.
"Come Down In Time" with the moody oboe and harp backing is still one of my
favorite ballads.
I've read that John was very enamoured of the American Old West when he was
a kid.
He enjoyed reading cowboy and indian epics and always dreamed of visiting.
It was said he was further
inspired to write the songs on TC due to his promo trip to the states for
"Your Song".
Encouraged by that lp, I also bought "Madman Across The Water" with that
"Tiny Dancer" song some have mentioned here.  Not a bad album, but
definitely lost interest in John, except for a few random singles every now
and then heard on the radio. Perhaps if he had taken the concept of
Tumbleweed Connection further...
Tera






Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Mike Hays

This is pretty evident by the fact that instead of folding to the whims of
Nashville and becoming another music publisher's puppet, she fond Mutt
Lange
(or should I say he found her), who in return allowed her to do things her
own way.

Not aware of what her lounge singing consisted of in Canada, but before she
met Mutt she did a pretty decent straight ahead country CD which if I
remember correctly, received critical acclaim but little commercial
acceptance as it came out just as the POP boom in country was exploding.
Mike Hays
http://www.TwangCast.com  TM  RealCountry  24 X 7
Please Visit Then let us know what you think!

Mike Hays www.MikeHays.RealCountry.net
For the best country artist web hosting, www.RealCountry.net





RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

 Correct me if I'm wrong here (and I've been meaning to bring this up about
 Shania), but since when was Shania ever really "Country."  From what I've
 read about her, she was singing pop songs in a Vegas format in
 some vacation lodges in Canada.  It just so happens that the one person
 that "discovered" her was from Nashville.  Her musical background before
 that time was pretty much "Pop" bands playing in Ontario.

As Mike Hays pointed out, Twain's first album, produced by Norro Wilson and
Harold Shedd (he's the guy who signed her), was pretty much straightahead
country.  More to the point, though, the CMF's new Encyclopedia of Country
Music says that 1) she came to Nashville with a tape and hooked up with
Shedd there, and 2) "by her teens she was a veteran of Canadian country TV
shows," which suggests that her background wasn't solely pop.

Looking at the matter in terms of the country music industry and the way
that it works, Twain's career, at least through The Woman In Me, bears a
considerable resemblance to that of some of the 70s Outlaws - that is to
say, a struggle with "conservative" producers and label execs over her
desire to pursue a new sound that could appeal beyond the "normal" country
audience by bringing in pop/rock elements.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Derek Sampson

From: Mike Hays
Not aware of what her lounge singing consisted of in Canada, but before she
met Mutt she did a pretty decent straight ahead country CD which if I
remember correctly, received critical acclaim but little commercial
acceptance as it came out just as the POP boom in country was exploding.

Yes, but was this the pre-Mutt Lange Shania, or post?  If it was pre, then
she was only allowed to contribute one or maybe two songs of her own.
Her lounge singing BTW, consisted of Gloria Gainer etc. type songs.

Derek



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

Terry says:

 As for rock influences on country, Jon's made this point before, and it's
 well documented, but I'd argue that there's rock influences and then
 there's rock influences. The sort of rock influences that's "corrupting"
 commercial country music these days is, for the most part, banal,
 done-a-million-times bar-band type junk that was cliched when the
 Doobies were hacking away at it in the Seventies. Take Shania [and] Garth
 Brooks. Viewed from a rock perspective, these folks are
 living and breathing cliches.

Could be, but I'll bet there are plenty of rock fans who would disagree from
their rock perspectives, eh?  I mean, about what qualifies as rock junk and
what doesn't.  Not that those are arguments I'm especially invested in g.

In any event, I don't know that the idea of "cliche" has the same content
across different musical styles or listeners' backgrounds.  A huge number of
country shuffles start off with the same two-note fiddle pickup, and a huge
number of mid- and up-tempo bluegrass tunes start with the same 3-note banjo
pickup.  Are those cliches?  By most stabs at an objective definition of the
term, I'd guess so, but I, at least, not only don't get tired of and bored
with them, I'm usually disappointed if they're not there.  Maybe this kind
of stuff is only cliched if you don't like it g.  I don't know a lot about
rock/pop, but even I can recognize that the passage in, say, "Bye Bye Baby"
that follows the bridge, where Messina is singing the first part of the
chorus over a stripped-down backing that comes crashing back in for the
second part of the chorus is a technique that's been used in a gazillion
pop/rock songs; even so, it doesn't bother me.  To my ears, it works, it
sounds good, it fits the song (in a pop/rock kind of way g), and so the
question of whether it's a cliche or not is just plain irrelevant.  YMMV,
etc., but I wonder if it can't be said that, at least in one sense, country
listeners have a higher tolerance in general for recycling musical material
(not meaning songs, but licks, riffs, arrangements, etc.).

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Derek Sampson

From: Jon Weisberger

More to the point, though, the CMF's new Encyclopedia of Country
Music says that 1) she came to Nashville with a tape and hooked up with
Shedd there,

Well shame on me then for watching and believing what I see on VH1, but
according to their report, she was singing away doing her lounge act while
Mr Shedd just happened to be in the audience.  As reported by Mr. Shedd in
the segment, he approached Shania and asked her to please come back to
Nashville with him.

2) "by her teens she was a veteran of Canadian country TV
shows," which suggests that her background wasn't solely pop.

I never meant to suggest that her background was "solely" pop (which I know
it kinda came off sounding like), but according to Terry's post (which got
me started), he was dissapointed in Shania for her desertion of "real
country."  I just don't see it that way.  It's not as if she had some long
struggle as an unknown country artist, then only to make it to the top and
totally do a 180, thus leaving her throngs of long devoted country fans in
the dust.  
Now if Terry was simply saying that he liked Shania better as a "real
country" performer, than the pop diva she's now becoming, then I can
understand that.

Derek




RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Matt Benz



[Matt Benz]  Shania sez in the VH1 special that she sang whatever was in
demand: she sang in rock bands, top 40 cover bands, country bands. She
was a typical lounge-type performer: simply doing whatever styles were
wanted at the time. As far as I can tell, she was not pre-disposed to
country music, which is clear from her pop thrusts lately. She just
wanted to succeed in a musical career. Which is fine.

She did have at least one good country song, I think, based on that
special: a clip from an early video (her playing guitar in a rustic
porch setting) was kinda good.




RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

 [Matt Benz]  Shania sez in the VH1 special...

Hmm, first Derek, now Matt confesses to having tuned in.  I think it's
pretty clear just who the real Shania fans are here.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Matt Benz

I was at my in-laws, lying on the couch, watching lots of satellite tv.
Lots of VH1 music specials. I didn't see all of Shania's, tuned out
before the "fake Native American backround" scandal. I admit I was
curious. And she is good looking, no denying that. But then I also
watched the Grand Funk one. So yeh, I'm shameless.

M

 -Original Message-
 From: Jon Weisberger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 10:26 AM
 To:   passenger side
 Subject:  RE: Clip:  The state of country radio
 
  [Matt Benz]  Shania sez in the VH1 special...
 
 Hmm, first Derek, now Matt confesses to having tuned in.  I think it's
 pretty clear just who the real Shania fans are here.
 
 Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Terry A. Smith

 
 Looking at the matter in terms of the country music industry and the way
 that it works, Twain's career, at least through The Woman In Me, bears a
 considerable resemblance to that of some of the 70s Outlaws - that is to
 say, a struggle with "conservative" producers and label execs over her
 desire to pursue a new sound that could appeal beyond the "normal" country
 audience by bringing in pop/rock elements.
 
 Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/
 
 
Jon, you keep making this point, but I'd argue that you're overstating the
resemblance between Twain's career (and, by necessity, her music, since
that's her career) and that of the 70s outlaws. They actually could write
songs, or had the good judgment to pick songs, with some staying power and
grit. I'm not a soothsayer, so I can't say this for sure, but I'll bet my
bottom dollar that the tunes of Kris Kristofferson and Outlaw era Willie
will be around when Shania's been long forgotten.

As I said before, there's rock influences and then there's rock
influences, and they're not all floating around on the same, precise
relativist plain. -- Terry Smith



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

  Looking at the matter in terms of the country music industry and the way
  that it works, Twain's career, at least through The Woman In Me, bears a
  considerable resemblance to that of some of the 70s Outlaws - that is to
  say, a struggle with "conservative" producers and label execs over her
  desire to pursue a new sound that could appeal beyond the
 "normal" country audience by bringing in pop/rock elements.
 
  Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/
 
 
 Jon, you keep making this point, but I'd argue that you're overstating the
 resemblance between Twain's career (and, by necessity, her music, since
 that's her career) and that of the 70s outlaws.

Let's see.  Artist A has essentially mediocre success using
producer-determined/arranged material, fights with his label in order to
record the stuff that *he* wants to, rather than what the label has stuck
him with in the past, wins fight, hits it big with crossover appeal.
Artist B has essentially mediocre success using producer-determined/arranged
material, fights with her label in order to record the stuff that *she*
wants to, rather than what the label has stuck her with in the past, wins
fight, hits it big with crossover appeal.

Looks like a pretty close resemblance to me on a pretty important level.

As I said before, there's rock influences and then there's rock
influences, and they're not all floating around on the same, precise
relativist plain.

So you say, but I think it depends a lot on your degree of interest in rock.
If you're not interested in classical music, and you think that
incorporating classical music influences into rock makes the result less
enjoyable, are you really going to care whether it's Beethoven's influence
or Holst's?  Are you going to find a Beethoven-influenced rock song better
than a Holst-influenced one?

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Carl Abraham Zimring

Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 16-Mar-99 RE: Clip:  The
state of cou.. by "Jon Weisberger"@fuse.ne 
 So you say, but I think it depends a lot on your degree of interest in rock.
 If you're not interested in classical music, and you think that
 incorporating classical music influences into rock makes the result less
 enjoyable, are you really going to care whether it's Beethoven's influence
 or Holst's?  Are you going to find a Beethoven-influenced rock song better
 than a Holst-influenced one?

Perhaps.  I'd rather hear Debussy than Wagner in my rock.  The latter
leads to things like Meat Loaf.

Carl Z.



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

  So you say, but I think it depends a lot on your degree of
 interest in rock.
  If you're not interested in classical music, and you think that
  incorporating classical music influences into rock makes the result less
  enjoyable, are you really going to care whether it's
 Beethoven's influence
  or Holst's?  Are you going to find a Beethoven-influenced rock
 song better
  than a Holst-influenced one?

 Perhaps.  I'd rather hear Debussy than Wagner in my rock.  The latter
 leads to things like Meat Loaf.

Hmm, Carl, does this mean you're not interested in classical music?

Besides, the former leads to things like BST.

g

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/




Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Todd Larson


Often in these P2 discussions of radio, I'm surprised at the notion
that people could actually make a change in it.  I'm much more of the
opinion that the music industry *manufactures* mass taste and the
need for its products.  Very pessimistic on that point.  I know it's
not a simple equation, but the music and radio companies have all the
cards.  Popular taste is not formed before industry dreck gets heard,
it's formed *in and by* industry dreck.


When did T.W. Adorno sneak on to the list?

Anyway, right on Junior.  Unfortunately, it's hard not to be pessimistic in
this cultural climate, and to wonder whether anything meaningful can even
get through to people when their tastes, as you suggest, are so thoroughly
mediated by commercial interests and industry drecksometimes I wonder
whether all you can hope for as a musician is to try to give people a few
moments of pleasure and count your blessings if you're able to achieve at
least that, however illusory it might be (as opposed to actually believing
that you can encourage real "change" of any kind).

Todd




Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Carl Abraham Zimring

Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 16-Mar-99 RE: Clip: The state
of coun.. by "Jon Weisberger"@fuse.ne 
 Hmm, Carl, does this mean you're not interested in classical music?

Relative to several other types of music, that would be a fair
statement.  I'm a casual listener at best.

Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 16-Mar-99 RE: Clip: The state
of coun.. by "Jon Weisberger"@fuse.ne 
 Besides, the former leads to things like BST.  g

Ew.  You have a point, though I'd take at least pre-David Clayton Thomas
BST over Meat Loaf or Styx, or any number of arena-rock bands that took
cues from Wagner any day of the week.  There are traces of Debussy in
some of Richard Thompson's work, btw.

Would a discussion of the merits of Kenny G's and Sonny Rollins's
influence on rock by non-jazz fans be fair?  I'll bet there's a lurker
or two who's not big on jazz but digs the Stones' "Waiting For a Friend"
 runs screaming from Michael Bolton's work

Carl Z. 



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

Carl says:

 Would a discussion of the merits of Kenny G's and Sonny Rollins's
 influence on rock by non-jazz fans be fair?  I'll bet there's a lurker
 or two who's not big on jazz but digs the Stones' "Waiting For a Friend"
  runs screaming from Michael Bolton's work

Fair, sure, why not? g  But consider that, as best I can tell, anyhow, one
of the raps on Kenny G is that his work is influenced by the wrong kinds of
rock and pop, so a certain degree of circularity starts to creep into the
discussion.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Ph. Barnard

So:
  Perhaps.  I'd rather hear Debussy than Wagner in my rock.  The latter
  leads to things like Meat Loaf.
 
 Hmm, Carl, does this mean you're not interested in classical music?
 Besides, the former leads to things like BST.

People!!  Wagner and Debussy are yucky  *romantic* music.  They are 
NOT *classical*  music.  All European music isn't the same.  Don't 
mix great composers like Mozart and Cimarosa in with trash like 
Wagner, sheesh g  What would you think if somebody 
characterized Buck as Bluegrass?!?!?

Boy o boy, whatta listg,
--junior



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Carl Abraham Zimring

Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 16-Mar-99 RE: Clip: The state
of coun.. by "Jon Weisberger"@fuse.ne 
 But consider that, as best I can tell, anyhow, one
 of the raps on Kenny G is that his work is influenced by the wrong kinds of
 rock and pop, so a certain degree of circularity starts to creep into the
 discussion.

True, but you could substitute Chuck Mangione or Russ Freeman or even
Dave Brubeck for Kenny G and wind up with jazz with far different
sensibilities  than much of Rollins or Sun Ra or Coltrane, and (to
continue using fans of rock music) a lite-rock fan would be a lot more
likely to prefer the former, while a heavy-rock fan might tend toward
the latter, regardless of their knowledge of or affinity to jazz.

Carl Z. 



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Carl Abraham Zimring

Excerpts from internet.listserv.postcard2: 16-Mar-99 RE: Clip: The state
of coun.. by "Ph. Barnard"@eagle.cc.u 
 People!!  Wagner and Debussy are yucky  *romantic* music.  They are 
 NOT *classical*  music.  All European music isn't the same.  Don't 
 mix great composers like Mozart and Cimarosa in with trash like 
 Wagner, sheesh g  What would you think if somebody 
 characterized Buck as Bluegrass?!?!?

Damned purists.g  Told ya I was a casual listener at best!  Though
what I know of Debussy I like...

Carl Z.



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

  People!!  Wagner and Debussy are yucky  *romantic* music.  They are
  NOT *classical*  music.  All European music isn't the same.  Don't
  mix great composers like Mozart and Cimarosa in with trash like
  Wagner, sheesh g  What would you think if somebody
  characterized Buck as Bluegrass?!?!?

 Damned purists.g  Told ya I was a casual listener at best!

Well, now, if I were you, Carl, I'd tell Junior that we're using "classical"
here the same way we're using "jazz" and "rock" g.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Ph. Barnard

I love this.  Only on P2 does a discussion of the state of country 
radio devolve into questions about the differential effects of 
radically diverse sax players like Brubeck, Kenny G, Sun Ra, or 
Coltrane on a non-informed rock audience.  Not to mention this 
business about Wagner  

--junior



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread cwilson

Jr. goes:
Popular taste is not formed before industry dreck gets heard, it's 
formed *in and by* industry dreck.

 
And then Todd goes:
 When did T.W. Adorno sneak on to the list?
 
And so I goes:

Like, too long ago? Jr. is using a real overpure Frankfurt-school reading 
of popular culture? And if not superceded totally the likes of Adorno need 
to be modified (sez me) by more recent cultural thinking on response, 
interpretation and appropriation? Adorno was an utter snob? He would think 
every bit of the music we're talking about was dreck, including, say, 
George Jones? (Tho that seems fitting to Jr.'s mood today considering his 
later "romantic music isn't classical music" nitpickery? Like, take a chill 
pill?)

Plus, y'know, I'd like to, kinda, stand up for myself as more pessimistic 
than Junior? Because while thinking that people are to some degree, like, 
sheep herded and counted in the pens of the purveyors of dreck, I also 
think people can wallow dreck all on their own? Which is why the purveyors 
got to be the big muscular purveyors in the first place? 'Cuz no one ever 
went broke underestimating the taste of the [fill in nation-state here] 
public? Along with the logic of late capitalism, I'll grant you?

But, well, shit, remember even among the dreck there are pearls? Pearls of 
parody at least? Y'what I mean?

 like, Carl W?



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread cwilson

 No, no, I know that, Mr.Junior. (I mean, really, with a name like 
 "Junior", you'd have been drummed out of the Teddy-and-Walt Noble 
 Frankfurters Clubhouse at the first meeting...) But I was somewhat, 
 somehow serious that the management-and-creation-of-taste line, while 
 valid, can turn into monolithic cultural conspiracy theory (a la 
 Adorno) if not used with caution and parental warning stickers. PLEASE 
 STEP AWAY FROM THE YELLOW LINE. Etc.
 
 (The above in reference to the statement from the 
 plaintiff-turned-defendant, Philip aka "Junior" Barnard, aka "the 
 twangy professor":
 Like, dude g, I would never look at pop culture from Adorno's 
 perspective, so I take this as facetiousness.)
 
 In other news, went to an Epitaph preview party for Tom Waits's new 
 album The Mule Variations last night. Hard to hear over the 
 beer-fuelled chatter (including mine) but sounded, in a word, 
 extraordinary.
 
 Carl W.



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

Terry says:

 What I'm trying to say -- the relative merit
 of the music (which is all a matter of taste) isn't addressed on any
 levels in your comparisons about how each of these artists, or group of
 artists, dealt with the "industry." If Shania was a duck quacking, and
 she'd gone through some of those fights for freedom with the Nashville
 establishment, that wouldn't say a damn thing about quacker's merit vis a
 vis Waylon, Willy, Jerry Jeff, etc.

Well, sure, but the relative merit of the music isn't the only, or even
necessarily the most important point at issue here.  Plus which, as you say,
that's all a matter of taste g.

 I think your comparative points are
 instructive, but of limited utility, when we're trying to gauge to what
 extent rock influences have eroded or heightened the quality of country
 music. It depends on the influence. Quality is subjective, but to deny the
 lack of differences in quality is lunacy.

I'm sorry, but I just can't buy the unqualified line you're selling here.
There are passionate arguments here all the time about the relative merits
of one rock group or another that I couldn't care less about, and if I
couldn't care less about their relative merits on their own terms, why would
I care about their relative merits as influences on country music?  Between
you and me, I never liked a lot of that Outlaw stuff much anyhow - a song
here, a song there, sure, but I never found it nearly as exciting or
interesting as some other, less rock-influenced (at least to my ear) stuff
that was coming out at the same time; the only Waylon Jennings album I ever
bought until that Essential comp came out was the cassette version of Waylon
Live, and that's because I really liked "Rainy Day Woman."  So an argument
that hinges on the superiority of the Outlaw kind of rock-influenced music
over Twain's kind just doesn't go very far with me.  As far as I'm
concerned, the differences in quality (or, better, enjoyment) have to do
with the less obviously rock-influenced aspects of their music.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Terry A. Smith

Jon quotes me  here (and is kind of enough not to point out that I tangled
up that last sentence and said the opposite of what I meant):

I think your comparative points are
  instructive, but of limited utility, when we're trying to gauge to what
  extent rock influences have eroded or heightened the quality of country
  music. It depends on the influence. Quality is subjective, but to deny the
  lack of differences in quality is lunacy.
 
Then he addresses that statement with this:

 I'm sorry, but I just can't buy the
unqualified line you're selling here. There are passionate arguments here
all the time about the relative merits
 of one rock group or another that I couldn't care less about, and if I
 couldn't care less about their relative merits on their own terms, why would
 I care about their relative merits as influences on country music?  Between
 you and me, I never liked a lot of 

But isn't the history of country music more or less the history of its
influences? And  that being the case, doesn't that make the influences,
and genres within the influences, very valid -- even crucial -- factors in
assessing the music? It seems as if you're throwing all rock music into
the same bag. And rock is a lot more diverse than country. 

Jon says he didn't like a  lot of "that Outlaw stuff
much anyhow - a song
 here, a song there, sure, but I never found it nearly as exciting or
 interesting as some other, less rock-influenced (at least to my ear) stuff
 that was coming out at the same time; the only Waylon Jennings album I ever
 bought until that Essential comp came out was the cassette version of Waylon
 Live, and that's because I really liked "Rainy Day Woman."  So an argument
 that hinges on the superiority of the Outlaw kind of rock-influenced music
 over Twain's kind just doesn't go very far with me.  As far as I'm
 concerned, the differences in quality (or, better, enjoyment) have to do
 with the less obviously rock-influenced aspects of their music.
 
I agree with regard to Waylon. I liked that tune, and Ralph Mooney's
memorable steel solo, better than anything else Waylon did. I was bored by
a lot of the pacing and oomph, pha, pha, type bass stuff, and was always
wishing he'd do more material along the lines of Rainy Day Woman. But
there was a lot of Outlaw and Austin stuff at that period with great merit,
including Waylon, Willie, Doug Sahm, Kris K., Asleep at the Wheel, Rusty
Weir, Alvin Crow and the Pleasant Valley Boys, etc. Now that I think of
it, the stuff from that time that I enjoyed the most, however, was the
material that borrowed heavily from the country side. Well, maybe I should
be making this argument, using punk country as my example of good rock
influences I'll let my tag-team partners take over for that. -- Terry
Smith 



RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-16 Thread Jon Weisberger

 But isn't the history of country music more or less the history of its
 influences? And  that being the case, doesn't that make the influences,
 and genres within the influences, very valid -- even crucial -- factors in
 assessing the music? It seems as if you're throwing all rock music into
 the same bag. And rock is a lot more diverse than country.

Well, yeah, I am, but I'm also throwing pop, blues, rb and everything else
into that same bag g.  No, really, as far as the history of country music
goes, I think it would be more accurate to say that it's the history of how
those influences were incorporated, not the history of the influences
themselves.  Plus which, the biggest influence, so to speak, is the past
practice of country music itself.  Or at least it used to be g.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread KATIEJOM

Well, well, wellmaybe if they started playing folks like Dale Watson, The
Derailers, Duane Jarvis, Joe Ely, Jimmie Dale Gilmore, Rosie Flores, Kelly
Willis, Jann Browne, Heather Myles, Mike Ireland, Lucinda, Lauderdale, Cisco,
The Hollisters, Buddy Miller and Steve Earle they'd get those listeners back.

.just a thought!
Kate

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Listeners are deserting country music radio
  stations because they're bored with the music being played, according to
  two teams of researchers who spoke at a convention of radio industry
  workers. 



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread jon_erik

Kate writes:

Well, well, wellmaybe if they started playing folks like Dale 
Watson, The Derailers, Duane Jarvis, Joe Ely, Jimmie Dale 
Gilmore, Rosie Flores, Kelly Willis, Jann Browne, Heather 
Myles, Mike Ireland, Lucinda, Lauderdale, Cisco, The Hollisters, 
Buddy Miller and Steve Earle they'd get those 
listeners back.

.just a thought!

 I don't think that big changes are in the works, personally.  Radio
has been taking its lumps on this subject for years and they inevitably
chalk it up to "a vocal minority of malcontents," or words to that
effect.  In addition, most of these artists are on small labels and don't
have the dough to duke it out toe-to-toe with the majors in terms of
pushing their stuff at radio.  
 Finally, my most cynical belief is that collective change is
unlikely simply because it sounds too much like the consultants admitting
that they've been wrong.  
 I recall a Dale Watson interview a couple of years back where he
said that he would gladly accept a country music industry that was half
its current size if it meant that the music got back to its roots as a
result.  If radio continues its current approach, he might just get his
wish!
--Jon Johnson
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Wollaston, Massachusetts




RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread Jon Weisberger

 Well, well, wellmaybe if they started playing folks like Dale
 Watson, The
 Derailers, Duane Jarvis, Joe Ely, Jimmie Dale Gilmore, Rosie Flores, Kelly
 Willis, Jann Browne, Heather Myles, Mike Ireland, Lucinda,
 Lauderdale, Cisco,
 The Hollisters, Buddy Miller and Steve Earle they'd get those
 listeners back.

 .just a thought!


And a nice one, too, but also a questionable one.  These folks are already
on the air in many major markets, and they have albums out, too, yet they
don't, with the occasional exception, seem to be drawing listeners and
buyers in the kind of numbers that mainstream country radio is looking for,
and it was getting away from, not moving toward, the twangier stuff that
brought a lot of listeners in in the first place; why would moving toward it
bring those people back now?

I frankly think that what's happening is that the novelty factor is wearing
off for a lot of the newer country listeners, and they're off to look for
the Next Big Thing without much concern for whether it's labeled rock or pop
or something else again.  I haven't seen even a whisper of a desire for
twangier, more hardcore country stuff in the coverage of the CRS that's been
posted here - and in fact, the positive references to "outlaws" merely
underlines the point, as the musical content of The Outlaws boom of the 70s
consisted in large part of "breaking the rules" and "taking risks" by
bringing more rock influences into the country mainstream.

The best thing that can happen to country music right now is for the
audience to shrink.

Jon Weisberger  Kenton County, KY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.fuse.net/jonweisberger/



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread Terry A. Smith

 or something else again.  I haven't seen even a whisper of a desire for
 twangier, more hardcore country stuff in the coverage of the CRS that's been
 posted here - and in fact, the positive references to "outlaws" merely
 underlines the point, as the musical content of The Outlaws boom of the 70s
 consisted in large part of "breaking the rules" and "taking risks" by
 bringing more rock influences into the country mainstream.
 
Jon's probably correct when he expresses doubts that there's some great
untapped audience out here for hardcore country stuff. Maybe if John
Travolta makes a movie with a Pentium-powered electronic bull, in a Texas
dance hall, while occasionally battering a younger version of Debra
Winger, that'll spark some renewed interest in hard country, but I
wouldn't hold your breath. (Wait a minute, "Urban Cowboy" sparked an
interest in soft country. Oh well.)

As for rock influences on country, Jon's made this point before, and it's
well documented, but I'd argue that there's rock influences and then
there's rock influences. The sort of rock influences that's "corrupting"
commercial country music these days is, for the most part, banal,
done-a-million-times bar-band type junk that was cliched when the Doobies were
hacking away at it in the Seventies. Take Shania. The other day I was
reacting as I usually do when I see or hear  her, gagging, and then it
came to me. I don't have a problem with her because of what she's doing to
country music; the problem involves what she's doing to rock. The same
applies to Garth Brooks. Viewed from a rock perspective, these folks are
living and breathing cliches. And they're popular as hell. So, my point?
It's easier for me to explain why this stuff turns me off, if I
do it from the perspective of a rock fan. Coming from the country side,
the main reason to have a problem with Shania (and her increasing progeny)
is her desertion of "real country," and as Jon and others have so well
argued, the notion of pure or real country music isn't unlike a
toddler's idea of Camelot.

Also, I know that Jon's rhetorical chops, with regard to rock, aren't
nearly as sharp as they are with country. g --
Terry Smith

np a review copy of Steve Wynn's new one. I'll report back.



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread Derek

From: Terry A. Smith

Coming from the country side,
the main reason to have a problem with Shania (and her increasing progeny)
is her desertion of "real country," and as Jon and others have so well
argued, the notion of pure or real country music isn't unlike a
toddler's idea of Camelot.


Correct me if I'm wrong here (and I've been meaning to bring this up about
Shania), but since when was Shania ever really "Country."  From what I've
read about her, she was singing pop songs in a Vegas format in some vacation
lodges in Canada.  It just so happens that the one person that "discovered"
her was from Nashville.  Her musical background before that time was pretty
much "Pop" bands playing in Ontario.
It seems to me that Shania had a dream of one day making it big in the music
industry, and when she got her chance, she took it.  Had it been some guy
from LA vacationing in Canada who asked her to come back with him so that
she could be Sony's new star recording artist, we would be listening to her
as the latest Pop Diva, and all these questions about her allegiance to
"Real Country" music would be completely irrelevant.
This is pretty evident by the fact that instead of folding to the whims of
Nashville and becoming another music publisher's puppet, she fond Mutt Lange
(or should I say he found her), who in return allowed her to do things her
own way.  It is simply guilt by association that it was someone from
Nashville that opened the doors for her to do what she has always wanted to
do from the start.
If you're going to blame anyone, blame Nashville for still holding onto her.

Derek

ducking and hiding





RE: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread Amy Haugesag


I frankly think that what's happening is that the novelty factor is wearing
off for a lot of the newer country listeners, and they're off to look for
the Next Big Thing without much concern for whether it's labeled rock or pop
or something else again.  I haven't seen even a whisper of a desire for
twangier, more hardcore country stuff in the coverage of the CRS that's been
posted here - and in fact, the positive references to "outlaws" merely
underlines the point, as the musical content of The Outlaws boom of the 70s
consisted in large part of "breaking the rules" and "taking risks" by
bringing more rock influences into the country mainstream.

The best thing that can happen to country music right now is for the
audience to shrink.

Using up my "me too" quotient for the month, I'll say that I think Jon has
this exactly right. The line- dancing-for-yuppies era is pretty well dead
and buried, the suburbanites who embraced HNC in the late 1980s and early
1990s have moved on, as Jon notes, to whatever--Hootie or Lilith Fair or
God knows what--and pop acts like Shania Twain and, er, Shania Twain have
begun to give up any vague association with country music. That's the most
convincing explanation for why the balance seems to be shifting, on country
radio and on CMT, back toward a preponderance of music that we may or may
not like, but that we can all agree, I think, is indisputably what we think
of as country music, unlike some of the more pop-oriented HNC stuff. That's
why Junior and other folks, me among them, are finding it so much easier to
listen to mainstream country radio lately.

--Amy




Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread JKellySC1

In a message dated 3/15/99 9:40:41 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 Just happened to be station-surfing Sunday morning on the way back from the
 gig in Knoxville and came across Elton John's "Hold Me Closer, Tiny Dancer"
 rock/pop operretta -- it features, in addition to overblown strings and an
 overall baroque-rock arrangement, a pedal steel! I seemed to have forgotten
 about EJ using steel in a lot of his 70's stuff. 

"Tumbleweed Connection" was an amazing album. I still listen to it every once
in a while. Was it alt. country? 

Slim



Re: Clip: The state of country radio

1999-03-15 Thread Terry A. Smith

 
 Using up my "me too" quotient for the month, I'll say that I think Jon has
 this exactly right. The line- dancing-for-yuppies era is pretty well dead
 and buried, the suburbanites who embraced HNC in the late 1980s and early
 1990s have moved on, as Jon notes, to whatever--Hootie or Lilith Fair or
 God knows what--and pop acts like Shania Twain and, er, Shania Twain have
 begun to give up any vague association with country music. That's the most
 convincing explanation for why the balance seems to be shifting, on country
 radio and on CMT, back toward a preponderance of music that we may or may
 not like, but that we can all agree, I think, is indisputably what we think
 of as country music, unlike some of the more pop-oriented HNC stuff. That's
 why Junior and other folks, me among them, are finding it so much easier to
 listen to mainstream country radio lately.
 
 --Amy
 
I'm still not sure "the balance is shifting." Believe me, listening to
country music radio these days is 50 percent luck. And it has been for
years. If you tune in one day, you just might hit on Gill's shuffle duet
that's getting play, and then maybe Sara Evans or Dwight. But you're just
as likely to pick a day when three or four nice-sounding lounge singers 
with cowboy hats begin sappy ballad time. You're more likely to hear it,
unless you're lucky enough to strike paydirt and find a station
that's pickier, or grants the freedom to be pickier. Like Mike's. The thing
is, I've been tuning in to this stuff for a long time, and the minutes
when there's actually something interesting getting play haven't
increased, at least from what I can notice. Of course, there's always the
possibility that the ornery cuss who owns our local country station is
deliberately sabotaging the playlist just to piss me off. - Terry Smith