Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Paul Hill wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Hill wrote: On 11/5/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Could you imagine how bad this country would be if the White Christian Males left the country? I always get disoriented with these color references. What does White mean to you? Is it only anglo-saxon, or do latins (e.g. French) qualify. If latins don't qualify then, what do you do with the fact that there is a lot of latin blood in anglo-saxons? I mean, the Romans conquered the little island, and later the French did the same. I think you will find it was the Normans rather than the French! I don't recall that country... Oh, yes! It's a part of France, La Normandie, where the Normans come from, just like Alsace, Lorraine, and so many other regions of La France. Allons Garcons de la Patre le jour de gloire est'arrivé... Now it's part of France but it wasn't back then. From the page Jean helpfully linked to: The name of Normandy is derived from the settlement and conquest of the territory by Vikings (Northmen) from the 9th century, and confirmed by treaty in the 10th century. For a century and a half following the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, Normandy and England were linked by Norman rulers, but following 1204 the continental territory was ultimately held by France. Are we speaking the same language? If they are French now, then they would be considered Latin, wouldn't they? If you would not then please let me know the line from where Latin begins. ... .. . So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Y'all are all getting bent out of shape about the wrong part of the phrase 'white Christian males', totally missing the point. The color is only important as it lets people have someone to criticize and get away with it. The last two words are the keys... when we have males acting like men rather than whiney little boys or spoiled self centered brats, we have the strength that makes society run smoothly. This is not to downplay the value of women, however when we have males who have been Oprafied to the point of inefectiveness, we have nothing. Then the last word, whether you believe the same way or not, shows a sense of knowing ones self and the value of others that is not subject to the results of political correctness or the latest Gallop poll... or Cosmo poll for that matter... thus they can be scary people by those who want to run society. You see Larry, your choice of words denotes your thought process, your image of the world. You can say the same thing in mny many ways, yet this one was chosen, it is meaningful. Then we have the strength that makes society run smoothly, or knowing one's self and the VALUE of others (I added the apostrophe and the caps) that, to me, have a very particular Nazi scent. But don't mind me, I'm just a cocky latin who thinks himself superior to the chosen ones, poor fool. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Paul Hill wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. Only part of them, I have Galician, Spanish, French, German. But I also have injun (true American?) genes. But really, who cares? Everyone who splashes his speech with phrases such as White Christian men? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On 11/6/07, Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. Make that Afrika... http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. But really, who cares? -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Jean Laeremans wrote: On 11/6/07, Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. Make that Afrika... http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html So I'm also Black? Cool! Hey Paul! Add African to my gene pool. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FP2.6 dos not going full screen
Andrew Stirling wrote: John, Peter The other machines are 3+ years old. This one is 4months old. Probably a much better quality than the others, not a dual core I believe. This is been happening since they bought it. The user is getting annoyed they can't go full screen. Could it be a Video Driver? I've seen other issues with the video driver. For some unknown reason certain browse windows would display the columns in the wrong order. Can't remember whether the solution was to turn down the video resolution or turn it up and make the card work harder. Another option would be to put in a cheap video card to test if that was the problem. Disable the on board one if necessary. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: FoxSpell v3.0h - Fixed
Hello Dave, Thanks for the info and link. Craigs class looks real nice ... wish I had seen it before I got FoxSpell. I found and fixed the problem by adding trim() to 2 lines of code. Around line 636... aTextshow[nLine_load] = trim(MLINE(cText2check, 1, _MLINE)) Around line 1075 ... cString = trim(MLINE(cText2check, 1, _MLINE)) Thanks, Kent Kent, If you still have problems and can't solve them, then take a look at Craig's free 100% VFP Spell checker http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/SPSBlog/PermaLink,guid,8800bdb9-a9c2-484f -942f-6a08947d903a.aspx or http://tinyurl.com/p93jy Excellent piece of software Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kent Belan Sent: 05 November 2007 18:58 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: FoxSpell v3.0h Hello, I am using FoxSpell in my applications and it works fine except when the user replaces a word and saves to exit it puts extra spaces in the text. Has anyone noticed this bug and fixed it before I dig into the code? I have tried to find the developer with no luck, Thanks, Kent ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Hill wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. Only part of them, I have Galician, Spanish, French, German. But I also have injun (true American?) genes. But really, who cares? Everyone who splashes his speech with phrases such as White Christian men? Who me? I think you're confused.. -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FP2.6 dos not going full screen
Hi all, On a related note I noticed on this Vista box I get the message: This system does not support fullscreen mode. It's a newish Dell. -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
That is so ridiculous it doesn't even deserve redress... Although it was kind of funny. He is a good well balance site: http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics.asp v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 12:33 PM To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: [OT] Yeah, that's about right... http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/pundits.gif -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: He is a good well balance site: How does the phrase media elite strike you as well-balanced? Do you call doctors the medical elite? Or farmers the agricultural elite? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On 11/6/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: He is a good well balance site: Is this a well balanced sentence ? A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
snip On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: He is a good well balance site: How does the phrase media elite strike you as well-balanced? Do you call doctors the medical elite? Or farmers the agricultural elite? Yeah, that's about right...ggg v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:04 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right... On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: He is a good well balance site: How does the phrase media elite strike you as well-balanced? Do you call doctors the medical elite? Or farmers the agricultural elite? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
loader
Hi foxgang Im trying to get a loader running that checks for an update on the internet, downloads and runs. I have all running except one problem. Once the exe runs and closes it has an error that the loader (formname) cannot be cleared (object loader cannot be cleared because it is in use) Anyone have an idea how to overcome this. I did do it a while bach with a loader but lost the source. If not can anyone refox my exe for that. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
The color is only important as it lets people have someone to criticize and get away with it. I guess my friend did not catch this line of my posting. As far as knowing who you are... it's not a sense of superiority, it's a sense of 'I know who I am and these bozos who are criticizing me can take a flying leap!' -- Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html message/rfc822 --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Jeff Johnson wrote: Michael: I have done this on everything since day 1. Well maybe I got in trouble a couple of times and started it somewhere early on. I don't have them sign anything because nowadays I have been working with my core customers for over 15 years. What I do is get the bulk of the application working and distribute it. I have the customer put it through it's paces and ask them if it is what they expected and does it meet their needs. If they say yes, I bill them and move on to the next phase. I do this with hourly and bid. When I add a feature or a report, I handle it the same way. The big difference between your scenario and mine is that I'm not working with long-time customers but in fact NEW customers, and those folks may be of the mindset why do I have to test this...isn't that your job? I certainly run my own testing, but many times, especially in a scenario where I'm a very small company (1!), the end-user may do something that I didn't consider. You know the kind of customer I'm talking about--the ones who want the off-the-shelf product that is flawlessand we all know that with custom written software, that flawless idea is simply not realistic. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Whil Hentzen wrote: MB Software Solutions wrote: Curious as to how many of you independents handle UAT (User Acceptance Testing), whereby you are getting them to sign off on delivery of the goods (software) and their acceptance of said software. Chapter 28 of DevGuide covers this, including a sample Customer Visit form. Sometimes it's difficult to remember that this info is already on the bookshelf among the thousands of pages there. :) Very true...and I own this book. I recall reading (some of) it back in 2004, and I liked the arguments you made for how to answer those questions of why companies should go with you (the small shop) instead of the big corporate dog. It doesn't always work, but your ideas/tips/suggestions were good ones that actually helped me land a client a couple years ago. That, and the fact that PeopleSoft got bought out and some other big name companies tanked. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
snip On 11/6/07, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: He is a good well balance site: Is this a well balanced sentence? Can't a guy have a near mid-week hangover in peace? ggg v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
sent to your email address Thanks Dave Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, I can Refox it for you if you want. Dave Crozier No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Ed Leafe wrote: On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:54 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote: The big difference between your scenario and mine is that I'm not working with long-time customers but in fact NEW customers, and those folks may be of the mindset why do I have to test this...isn't that your job? I *always* show the app to the actual employees who will be using it whenever possible. It's one thing to get the department head to sign off on the spec, but without exception the day-to-day users find one or more things that annoy them because they make their work harder. Let's say you're showing it to a couple of users, and they comment on how the current app is a pain because it makes them do x, y and z in order to accomplish what should be a simple task. You then modify the app to accommodate this request, and show them the new version. They will think that you are the greatest guy in the world, because you listened to them and made their life easier. You now have some 'fans' in the company who will champion your app and be glad to show others why this new app is much better. This kind of support is invaluable in overcoming the inevitable bumps that happen when a new app is introduced into a busy office. I whole-heartedly agree...the folks I'm asking to sign off are indeed the end-users in this case. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oprafied lol!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:54 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote: The big difference between your scenario and mine is that I'm not working with long-time customers but in fact NEW customers, and those folks may be of the mindset why do I have to test this...isn't that your job? I *always* show the app to the actual employees who will be using it whenever possible. It's one thing to get the department head to sign off on the spec, but without exception the day-to-day users find one or more things that annoy them because they make their work harder. Let's say you're showing it to a couple of users, and they comment on how the current app is a pain because it makes them do x, y and z in order to accomplish what should be a simple task. You then modify the app to accommodate this request, and show them the new version. They will think that you are the greatest guy in the world, because you listened to them and made their life easier. You now have some 'fans' in the company who will champion your app and be glad to show others why this new app is much better. This kind of support is invaluable in overcoming the inevitable bumps that happen when a new app is introduced into a busy office. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Al, I can Refox it for you if you want. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Sent: 06 November 2007 13:03 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: loader Hi foxgang Im trying to get a loader running that checks for an update on the internet, downloads and runs. I have all running except one problem. Once the exe runs and closes it has an error that the loader (formname) cannot be cleared (object loader cannot be cleared because it is in use) Anyone have an idea how to overcome this. I did do it a while bach with a loader but lost the source. If not can anyone refox my exe for that. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP7: Source Not Available
Rick Schummer wrote: The source will need to be available from the current directory, iirc. The source needs to be in the path, not the current directory. This is the part I have been burned on before. available FROM (notice I didn't say IN) the current directory ...kinda means... in the current path;-) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zip it and then attach to a message with some standard text in it Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 14:05 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: loader sent to your email address Thanks Dave Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, I can Refox it for you if you want. Dave Crozier No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
ok tried again. It was the exe so probably got stuffed changed subject to ladies of the night for you :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zi No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FP2.6 dos not going full screen
On 11/6/07, Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note I noticed on this Vista box I get the message: This system does not support fullscreen mode. It's a newish Dell. Vista and Dell. That's two strikes. You ought to review http://badvista.fsf.org/ Googling yields: http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/06/27/workaround-to-this-system-does-not-support-full-screen-mode-in-windows-vista/ or: http://preview.tinyurl.com/3928s8 -- Ted Friends Don't Let Friends Run Vista Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Al, Still nothing here. Send it to DaveC at Replacement-Software.co.uk and I'll pick it up off my webmail. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 14:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: loader ok tried again. It was the exe so probably got stuffed changed subject to ladies of the night for you :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zi No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:27 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: How does the phrase media elite strike you as well-balanced? Do you call doctors the medical elite? Or farmers the agricultural elite? The ones who are very successful.yes. But calling someone elite in this context is not a compliment; it implies out-of-touch and, especially here, biased based on being out-of-touch. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Michael: I do a lot small apps for mom pops and small businesses, too. I have them look over the software, I show them how to use it and after a couple of days I ask them for feedback. I also tell the small guys and it is written in my contract that the accuracy of the software is the customer responsibility. If they don't test the software and tell me about something that doesn't work right; I can't be held responsible. Others may disagree with this, but it has worked great for me. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] SanDC, Inc. 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 MB Software Solutions wrote: Jeff Johnson wrote: Michael: I have done this on everything since day 1. Well maybe I got in trouble a couple of times and started it somewhere early on. I don't have them sign anything because nowadays I have been working with my core customers for over 15 years. What I do is get the bulk of the application working and distribute it. I have the customer put it through it's paces and ask them if it is what they expected and does it meet their needs. If they say yes, I bill them and move on to the next phase. I do this with hourly and bid. When I add a feature or a report, I handle it the same way. The big difference between your scenario and mine is that I'm not working with long-time customers but in fact NEW customers, and those folks may be of the mindset why do I have to test this...isn't that your job? I certainly run my own testing, but many times, especially in a scenario where I'm a very small company (1!), the end-user may do something that I didn't consider. You know the kind of customer I'm talking about--the ones who want the off-the-shelf product that is flawlessand we all know that with custom written software, that flawless idea is simply not realistic. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Ed Leafe wrote: How does the phrase media elite strike you as well-balanced? Do you call doctors the medical elite? Or farmers the agricultural elite? The ones who are very successful.yes. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Al, Nothing here still. Did you try the replacement-software.co.uk address as well as there is nothing there either? It may be your end as all the profox messages are coming through on both Flexipol and replacement-software Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 14:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: loader ok tried again. It was the exe so probably got stuffed changed subject to ladies of the night for you :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zi No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Signing off
Profox: Hello. Just over 5 years ago, I subscribed to this list. It helped see me through the dark days of working with VFP at my day job and mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Now the time has come, and my boss has finally seen the light that VFP isn't forever, and we're making conversions to .NET. First our web product, but more to follow. I'm glad to see this for the company and my career as well. I'm amazed at how well .NET is just working-- I don't spend more than half my day trying to work around stupid limitations and bugs(C0.05's, graphics glitches, etc.) as I've often done with VFP. Anyways, seeing as how this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. Thank you, and if anyone wishes to contact me off list, you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Derek Kalweit wrote: Profox: Hello. Just over 5 years ago, I subscribed to this list. It helped see me through the dark days of working with VFP at my day job and mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Now the time has come, and my boss has finally seen the light that VFP isn't forever, and we're making conversions to .NET. First our web product, but more to follow. I'm glad to see this for the company and my career as well. I'm amazed at how well .NET is just working-- I don't spend more than half my day trying to work around stupid limitations and bugs(C0.05's, graphics glitches, etc.) as I've often done with VFP. Anyways, seeing as how this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. Thank you, and if anyone wishes to contact me off list, you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. and now the end is near, and so I face the final shutdown Au revoir. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Signing off
Another one falls to the dark side!!! Hope it all continues to go well Derek. Dave Crozier ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Juniper SSL and VFP
Good Morning All: We just moved into out new $400 arena in Newark, NJ and it's time to get scouting back up and running. In the past we used Checkpoint VPN-1 for scouting communications and I abandoned it with all the IPSEC and NAT issues I have experienced for the last 7 years for Juniper's SSL VPN. There was no sense trying to get the old system working in the new building when I wanted to change to SSL last year. I have figured out how to automate the login in VFP6 passing the userid and password to the URL in IE7 and map drives and send and receive data. But I can't get the tunnel to drop within the VFP app without user intervention. I don't want to add another step to the process. Does anyone use VFP and Juniper's SSL dsNetworkConnect.exe or the web browser launch to automate the process? I have looked everywhere and Juniper doesn't mention automation... Thanks! Regards, Jack Skelley Dave Crozier wrote: Al, Nothing here still. Did you try the replacement-software.co.uk address as well as there is nothing there either? It may be your end as all the profox messages are coming through on both Flexipol and replacement-software Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 14:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: loader ok tried again. It was the exe so probably got stuffed changed subject to ladies of the night for you :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zi No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Derek Kalweit wrote: I think it's time for me to go. Thank you, and if anyone wishes to contact me off list, you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Good luck, and best of success to you! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Jeff Johnson wrote: Michael: I do a lot small apps for mom pops and small businesses, too. I have them look over the software, I show them how to use it and after a couple of days I ask them for feedback. I also tell the small guys and it is written in my contract that the accuracy of the software is the customer responsibility. If they don't test the software and tell me about something that doesn't work right; I can't be held responsible. Others may disagree with this, but it has worked great for me. I've got a good contract clause in place whereby any bugs in the software of which I am notified and can replicate on my end--I've got something like 30-90 days to fix them. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
On Nov 6, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Another one falls to the dark side!!! Hope it all continues to go well Derek. This seems like a good time to remind everyone on this list about Derek's contribution to making this list possible. As many of you know, I run my server from the RoadRunner account for my home, which means that I have an IP address in the range reserved for dynamic addresses. Many ISPs block spam from these know dynamic ranges, on the assumption that such addresses should be sending mail through their ISP's server and not directly. However, RoadRunner limits outgoing messages from any address to about a thousand a day, which is more than enough for most, but would be about 3 postings a day for ProFox! The solution that I've used for the past few years has been to route mail to addresses whose ISPs block dynamic ranges through a server with a fixed IP address. Derek has been generous enough to provide his server at sensiblesoftware.com for this purpose; without this, most of you could not receive ProFox. So take a second to look at your email headers, and if you see an entry for 'suggs.sensiblesoftware.com' in there, be sure to thank Derek for contributing to the community! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: loader
I can help you with that. what I have have done in the past is to build a loader ext that finds the highest file with the .app extension and runs it. in side the app i check for newer version and if one is noted then all I do is download the new app file, extract it and drop back to my loader.exe. the exe will pick up the newer app file and run it. simple Dave Crozier wrote: Al, I can Refox it for you if you want. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Sent: 06 November 2007 13:03 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: loader Hi foxgang Im trying to get a loader running that checks for an update on the internet, downloads and runs. I have all running except one problem. Once the exe runs and closes it has an error that the loader (formname) cannot be cleared (object loader cannot be cleared because it is in use) Anyone have an idea how to overcome this. I did do it a while bach with a loader but lost the source. If not can anyone refox my exe for that. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
ok have sent to that ad. Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Still nothing here. Send it to DaveC at Replacement-Software.co.uk and I'll pick it up off my webmail. Dave No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Signing off
No, PLEASE DON'T GO!G Good luck with dot net. I'm dabbling, but I'll be doing Fox for a while still. JH ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
I dont use apps. only exe's I found my problem was a clear all in the exit of the prog. It didnt like the loader being already there. Its because the loader runs the exe and wont go away untill the exe closes. I may have to look at a delphi loader. The version part is fine, I have been using the same method for some time now. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Erickson Sent: 06 November 2007 16:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: loader I can help you with that. what I have have done in the past is to build a loader ext that finds the highest file with the .app extension and runs it. in side the app i check for newer version and if one is noted then all I do is download the new app file, extract it and drop back to my loader.exe. the exe will pick up the newer app file and run it. simple No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Derek Kalweit wrote: Profox: Hello. Just over 5 years ago, I subscribed to this list. It helped see me through the dark days of working with VFP at my day job and mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Now the time has come, and my boss has finally seen the light that VFP isn't forever, and we're making conversions to .NET. First our web product, but more to follow. I'm glad to see this for the company and my career as well. I'm amazed at how well .NET is just working-- I don't spend more than half my day trying to work around stupid limitations and bugs(C0.05's, graphics glitches, etc.) as I've often done with VFP. Anyways, seeing as how this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. Thank you, and if anyone wishes to contact me off list, you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. I'm glad I don't have the issues that seemed to plague you with VFP. It just works well for me! ;-) Good luck! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Ed Leafe wrote: But calling someone elite in this context is not a compliment; it implies out-of-touch and, especially here, biased based on being out-of-touch. ...reminds me of the time when George HW Bush didn't know the cost of a loaf of bread...and that really dinged him iirc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] The actual surge
Recent Troop Deaths Make 2007 Deadliest Year of Iraq War for U.S. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119435614156283877.html? mod=googlenews_wsj ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/39kslo ) So we know that the surge is working. We just aren't sure for whom it's working yet. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Juniper SSL and VFP
On 11/6/07, Jack Skelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just moved into out new $400 arena in Newark, NJ and it's time to get scouting back up and running. Boy, I knew housing prices were down, but that's a bargain. I mean, even in New Jersey! Or is this one of those deals with the devil? -- Ted g,dr Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Al, Refoxed Proj just sent back to you. Dave ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Juniper SSL and VFP
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Ted Roche wrote: Boy, I knew housing prices were down, but that's a bargain. I mean, even in New Jersey! Or is this one of those deals with the devil? You mean deals for the Devils, right? ;-) -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] WinWord (2000) problem
Hi all I have one copy of Word 2K installed in the usual place on C - it was installed to this location from Win98, Win2K and WinXP which are in three different partitions. Word runs fine from Win98 and Win2K but resfuses to start when run from XP - the splash screen comes up and never disappears. The main word screen appears but completely blank and all I can do is use task manager to shut it down. I have tried (i) repairing the office installation (ii) reinstalling office and (iii) completely unistalling and then reinstalling office. I have made sure that it is not a template problem (Normal.DOT) and that there are no COM add-ins. I have also checked various registry entries and these also seem to be OK. I have tried to make sure that it is not a printer (driver) problem I am completely stuck so any suggestions would be highly appreciated Paul Newton ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
SMTP error
I recently asked for advice on Automating Emails and, as a result, decided to use Essmtp.ocx. It works like a charm on my development machine but when I take it to my client I get an error 213 when I try to send mail. I can't find any trace of what that error message means. My development system is very similar to my client's, they are both four machines on a peer-to-peer network sharing internet access through a Netgear router. The main difference is the ISP, I am with PlusNet and my client is with BT. Any suggestions gratefully received. (I really don't want to have to go back to MAPI g). TIA John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Juniper SSL and VFP
Ted: I'm not sure if this is a Freudian Slip or a typo bg Actually it should read '$400 million' Regards, Jack Ted Roche wrote: On 11/6/07, Jack Skelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just moved into out new $400 arena in Newark, NJ and it's time to get scouting back up and running. Boy, I knew housing prices were down, but that's a bargain. I mean, even in New Jersey! Or is this one of those deals with the devil? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: loader
Can you do the same thing with 2 different exe's??? is that an option??? Allen wrote: I dont use apps. only exe's I found my problem was a clear all in the exit of the prog. It didnt like the loader being already there. Its because the loader runs the exe and wont go away untill the exe closes. I may have to look at a delphi loader. The version part is fine, I have been using the same method for some time now. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Erickson Sent: 06 November 2007 16:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: loader I can help you with that. what I have have done in the past is to build a loader ext that finds the highest file with the .app extension and runs it. in side the app i check for newer version and if one is noted then all I do is download the new app file, extract it and drop back to my loader.exe. the exe will pick up the newer app file and run it. simple No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem
Paul, There is an unistaller on the Microsoft site especially for this. Can't remember off hand what it is called - something on the lines of forced installer. I can find out when I get home this evening though. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 06 November 2007 16:11 To: profox Subject: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem Hi all I have one copy of Word 2K installed in the usual place on C - it was installed to this location from Win98, Win2K and WinXP which are in three different partitions. Word runs fine from Win98 and Win2K but resfuses to start when run from XP - the splash screen comes up and never disappears. The main word screen appears but completely blank and all I can do is use task manager to shut it down. I have tried (i) repairing the office installation (ii) reinstalling office and (iii) completely unistalling and then reinstalling office. I have made sure that it is not a template problem (Normal.DOT) and that there are no COM add-ins. I have also checked various registry entries and these also seem to be OK. I have tried to make sure that it is not a printer (driver) problem I am completely stuck so any suggestions would be highly appreciated Paul Newton [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SMTP error
John Weller wrote: I recently asked for advice on Automating Emails and, as a result, decided to use Essmtp.ocx. It works like a charm on my development machine but when I take it to my client I get an error 213 when I try to send mail. I can't find any trace of what that error message means. My development system is very similar to my client's, they are both four machines on a peer-to-peer network sharing internet access through a Netgear router. The main difference is the ISP, I am with PlusNet and my client is with BT. Any suggestions gratefully received. (I really don't want to have to go back to MAPI g). I'm not sure how this OCX is set up or what it uses for parameters etc. Maybe you could show some code. Is the ocx trying to send using an account that does not exist at the client? Maybe the mail server details are wrong? What mail server are they using? Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SMTP error
is the ISP blocking port 25 to the smtp server. I know that comcast does that. John Weller wrote: I recently asked for advice on Automating Emails and, as a result, decided to use Essmtp.ocx. It works like a charm on my development machine but when I take it to my client I get an error 213 when I try to send mail. I can't find any trace of what that error message means. My development system is very similar to my client's, they are both four machines on a peer-to-peer network sharing internet access through a Netgear router. The main difference is the ISP, I am with PlusNet and my client is with BT. Any suggestions gratefully received. (I really don't want to have to go back to MAPI g). TIA John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
SQL to add a Totals line
Has anyone ever come up with a way to have a SQL statement add a line at the end that consists of totals of all the previous lines? Is something like that even possible? For example, if this would be the result of my SQL code: ID NameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 It would be convenient to have it come out like this: ID NameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 Total 11 .30 Or something like that -- Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - Performance that Packs. www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SMTP error
On 11/6/07, John Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On your next visit to the client, bring along a copy of BLAT.exe and the docs. Set up BLAT on one of the machines in accordance with the docs. Try running BLAT from the command intepreter and see what error messages results. Use the debugging tools (-debug -log) it gives you to capture all of the interactions for a session. I usually find that there is a password authentication scheme that requires a particular sequence of logging in, and many ISP's mail servers are set up uniquely in this respect. And sometimes the clients have just given me the wrong username and password! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Yeah, that's about right...
Paul Hill wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Hill wrote: On 11/6/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, back to the matter. What in hell does White stand for? Haven't heard an explanation from the original users of the word (Paul, Mikey). Your genes originate from Europe I guess. Only part of them, I have Galician, Spanish, French, German. But I also have injun (true American?) genes. But really, who cares? Everyone who splashes his speech with phrases such as White Christian men? Who me? I think you're confused.. No, I'm not. I didn't say you, you just assumed it. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
Matthew Jarvis wrote: Has anyone ever come up with a way to have a SQL statement add a line at the end that consists of totals of all the previous lines? Is something like that even possible? For example, if this would be the result of my SQL code: IDNameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 It would be convenient to have it come out like this: IDNameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 Total 11 .30 AFAIK that is not possible. The reason being that Select SQL queries are either summary OR detailed. So you can have the detail lines OR the summary line but not both. You could do it if you selected into a cursor readwrite, then added the summary line afterwards. It could get awkward for summary totals as well as a grand total. The report writer does this sort of thing very easily. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
On 11/6/07, Matthew Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be convenient to have it come out like this: ID NameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 Total 11 .30 Select cast(ID, char(5)) as ID, Name, Amount, Tax from mytable UNION SELECT Total as ID, as Name, SUM(Amount) as Amount, SUM(Tax) as Tax) from mytable group by ID ORDER BY ID ... but it's a very bad idea. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Derek Kalweit wrote: Profox: Hello. Just over 5 years ago, I subscribed to this list. It helped see me through the dark days of working with VFP at my day job and mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Now the time has come, and my boss has finally seen the light that VFP isn't forever, and we're making conversions to .NET. First our web product, but more to follow. I'm glad to see this for the company and my career as well. I'm amazed at how well .NET is just working-- I don't spend more than half my day trying to work around stupid limitations and bugs(C0.05's, graphics glitches, etc.) as I've often done with VFP. Anyways, seeing as how this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. Thank you, and if anyone wishes to contact me off list, you can do so at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Well, shucks. Seriously, you've had great contributions over the years, both Fox and unFox... Cantcha just hang around for the [NF] stuff? It's not ALL open source nonsense, ya know? s We'll miss you! Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
As Whil suggested, you never know, there might still be some useful conversations that happen here that isn't necessarily propoganda... In any case, good luck to you, Derek. Derek Kalweit wrote: Profox: snip this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
Ted Roche wrote: Select cast(ID, char(5)) as ID, Name, Amount, Tax from mytable UNION SELECT Total as ID, as Name, SUM(Amount) as Amount, SUM(Tax) as Tax) from mytable group by ID ORDER BY ID ... but it's a very bad idea. I knew it wasn't possible! Well that's actually two queries rolled into one. Peter :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FP2.6 dos not going full screen
On 11/6/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/6/07, Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note I noticed on this Vista box I get the message: This system does not support fullscreen mode. It's a newish Dell. Vista and Dell. That's two strikes. You ought to review http://badvista.fsf.org/ Hey, I didn't choose it! And I only installed Vista because some customers were reporting problems. Googling yields: http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/06/27/workaround-to-this-system-does-not-support-full-screen-mode-in-windows-vista/ or: http://preview.tinyurl.com/3928s8 To be honest I'm really not that bothered... -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Juniper SSL and VFP
Good Afternoon All: After much reading and the trail and error approach I have the login and logout automated. Regards, Jack Skelley Jack Skelley wrote: Good Morning All: We just moved into out new $400 arena in Newark, NJ and it's time to get scouting back up and running. In the past we used Checkpoint VPN-1 for scouting communications and I abandoned it with all the IPSEC and NAT issues I have experienced for the last 7 years for Juniper's SSL VPN. There was no sense trying to get the old system working in the new building when I wanted to change to SSL last year. I have figured out how to automate the login in VFP6 passing the userid and password to the URL in IE7 and map drives and send and receive data. But I can't get the tunnel to drop within the VFP app without user intervention. I don't want to add another step to the process. Does anyone use VFP and Juniper's SSL dsNetworkConnect.exe or the web browser launch to automate the process? I have looked everywhere and Juniper doesn't mention automation... Thanks! Regards, Jack Skelley Dave Crozier wrote: Al, Nothing here still. Did you try the replacement-software.co.uk address as well as there is nothing there either? It may be your end as all the profox messages are coming through on both Flexipol and replacement-software Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 14:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: loader ok tried again. It was the exe so probably got stuffed changed subject to ladies of the night for you :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Not arrived here DaveC at Flexipol.co.uk. If you used loader as the subject then it may have been junked by our email filter as loader is the subject name of messages that are sent out by a number of viruses. I suggest .zi No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem
Paul, Think this is the link: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/orkXP/HA011362891033.aspx Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 16:33 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem Paul, There is an unistaller on the Microsoft site especially for this. Can't remember off hand what it is called - something on the lines of forced installer. I can find out when I get home this evening though. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 06 November 2007 16:11 To: profox Subject: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem Hi all I have one copy of Word 2K installed in the usual place on C - it was installed to this location from Win98, Win2K and WinXP which are in three different partitions. Word runs fine from Win98 and Win2K but resfuses to start when run from XP - the splash screen comes up and never disappears. The main word screen appears but completely blank and all I can do is use task manager to shut it down. I have tried (i) repairing the office installation (ii) reinstalling office and (iii) completely unistalling and then reinstalling office. I have made sure that it is not a template problem (Normal.DOT) and that there are no COM add-ins. I have also checked various registry entries and these also seem to be OK. I have tried to make sure that it is not a printer (driver) problem I am completely stuck so any suggestions would be highly appreciated Paul Newton [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SMTP error
John Weller wrote: I recently asked for advice on Automating Emails and, as a result, decided to use Essmtp.ocx. It works like a charm on my development machine but when I take it to my client I get an error 213 when I try to send mail. I can't find any trace of what that error message means. My development system is very similar to my client's, they are both four machines on a peer-to-peer network sharing internet access through a Netgear router. The main difference is the ISP, I am with PlusNet and my client is with BT. Any suggestions gratefully received. (I really don't want to have to go back to MAPI g). And BLAT isn't an option for you? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
Sure. It's called a Union to bring in the separate query with 'Total' as Name, and dummy values for ID and elsewhere as needed. I have even added an extra col for the grouping and or sorting as needed. I have been faking output like this for years with that trick. Say how is the brewing? __Stephen On 11/6/07, Matthew Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone ever come up with a way to have a SQL statement add a line at the end that consists of totals of all the previous lines? Is something like that even possible? For example, if this would be the result of my SQL code: ID NameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 It would be convenient to have it come out like this: ID NameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 Total 11 .30 Or something like that -- Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - Performance that Packs. www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Signing off
Derek, My feelings are the same; you should hand around and socialize every now and then. However, if not, I wish you the best in the .Net world. v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:33 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: Signing off As Whil suggested, you never know, there might still be some useful conversations that happen here that isn't necessarily propoganda... In any case, good luck to you, Derek. Derek Kalweit wrote: Profox: snip this list is just VFP and Daboo/open source propoganda, I think it's time for me to go. -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
Matthew This should do it: CREATE CURSOR 'curinfo' ; ( ; id i ,; namec(20),; Amount n(10,2),; tax n(9,2); ) INSERT INTO 'curinfo' values(4,'Matt',3,.1) INSERT INTO 'curinfo' values(2,'Joe',2,.1) INSERT INTO 'curinfo' values(5,'Tim',6,.1) SELECT * ; FROM curinfo ; UNION ; select 999 as id, 'Total' as name, ; SUM(curinfo.amount) as amount, ; SUM(curinfo.tax) as tax ; FROM curinfo ; into cursor curtemp Andrew Stirling 01250 874580 http://www.calcpay.co.uk HMRC Accredited UK payroll program Matthew Jarvis wrote: Has anyone ever come up with a way to have a SQL statement add a line at the end that consists of totals of all the previous lines? Is something like that even possible? For example, if this would be the result of my SQL code: IDNameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 It would be convenient to have it come out like this: IDNameAmount Tax 4 Matt3 .10 2 Joe 2 .10 5 Tim 6 .10 Total 11 .30 Or something like that ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
re: SMTP error
Another troubleshooting option is to simply use telnet to connect to port 25 on the mail server. I like this approach because telnet is universally available, gives the user complete control, and requires no configuration. Joe Yoder On Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:03 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:03:37 -0500 From: Ted Roche To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMTP error On 11/6/07, John Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On your next visit to the client, bring along a copy of BLAT.exe and the docs. Set up BLAT on one of the machines in accordance with the docs. Try running BLAT from the command intepreter and see what error messages results. Use the debugging tools (-debug -log) it gives you to capture all of the interactions for a session. I usually find that there is a password authentication scheme that requires a particular sequence of logging in, and many ISP's mail servers are set up uniquely in this respect. And sometimes the clients have just given me the wrong username and password! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SQL to add a Totals line
On 11/6/07, Matthew Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone ever come up with a way to have a SQL statement add a line at the end that consists of totals of all the previous lines? Is something like that even possible? It's not terribly useful for this case, but I wanted to point out the ROLLUP clause in Transact-SQL, in case the situation comes up later: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189305.aspx ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues
Hi all: I have to work with a WSDL server to send medical claim files, elegibility requests, etc. Started with the easiest thing send a file. The documentation is in WSDL and eventhough I can open the link in the browser and see the WSDL code in the server side, the registration process always returns an error with the WSDL file either invalid, in use or not found. So far I have the following code: IF !USED(commdata) SELECT 0 USE commdata ALIAS commdata ELSE SELECT commdata ENDIF LOCAL lcFile AS STRING ,; lcUsuario AS String ,; lcPassword AS STRING lcUsuario = '' + ALLTRIM(commdata.usuario) + '' lcPassword = '' + ALLTRIM(commdata.clave) + '' lcFile = FILETOSTR(c:\temp\claimtest.snd) oSoap = CREATEOBJECT(mssoap.soapclient) oSoap.MSSoapInit(https://209.91.228.166:9443/wshippa/services/ProcessHippaM essage?wsdl) lcXML = oSoap.processClaim(lcFile,lcUsuario,lcPassword) lcstringxml = oSoap.processClaimresponse DO FORM frmmensaje I'm also getting an error on the MSSoapInit line that the loading of the WSDL file failed. Can some Soap Guru please help me ...somehow this sounds strange ; ) AiR Aida I. Rivera-Benítez, MSMIS AiR Information Systems, Inc. San Juan, Puerto Rico www.airispro.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apples OSX upgrade troubles worsten
I'm no big Microsoft fan Ed, and I also don't have a blanket unquestioning hatred of everything they do either. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
It would be two exe's in the end anyway so yes and I have done it before. My problem was I had a clear all in the exit program and it didnt like it because it could not clear the loader screen. Being that VFP is not capable, so it seems, of running something else VFP without waiting for it to finish. For some reason also you cant run a VFP exe as an EXe (as in run/n other.exe) Dont know why but it does not work. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Erickson Can you do the same thing with 2 different exe's??? is that an option??? Allen wrote: I dont use apps. only exe's I found my problem was a clear all in the exit of the prog. It didnt like the loader being already there. Its because the loader runs the exe and wont go away untill the exe closes. I may have to look at a delphi loader. The version part is fine, I have been using the same method for some time now. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:21:56 -0600, Whil Hentzen mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Er, compared to what? Java? .Net before version 2? VB6? -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apples OSX upgrade troubles worsten
Alan Bourke wrote: I'm no big Microsoft fan Ed, and I also don't have a blanket unquestioning hatred of everything they do either. Are you implying that Ed does? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SMTP error
Blat is pop3 only isnt it ? Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche On your next visit to the client, bring along a copy of BLAT.exe and the docs. Set up BLAT on one of the machines in accordance with the docs. Try running BLAT from the command intepreter and see what error messages results. Use the debugging tools (-debug -log) it gives you to capture all of the interactions for a session. I usually find that there is a password authentication scheme that requires a particular sequence of logging in, and many ISP's mail servers are set up uniquely in this respect. And sometimes the clients have just given me the wrong username and password! No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SMTP error
silly me of course its not :) Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 06 November 2007 19:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SMTP error Blat is pop3 only isnt it ? Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues
how are you generating the wsdl. did you change the names in the setup. rights issue ? as you will probably be logged in as inetuser. Have you changed the location of the dll ? Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aida I. Rivera-Benítez, MSMIS Sent: 06 November 2007 19:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues Hi all: I have to work with a WSDL server to send medical claim files, elegibility requests, etc. Started with the easiest thing send a file. The documentation is in WSDL and eventhough I can open the link in the browser and see the WSDL code in the server side, the registration process always returns an error with the WSDL file either invalid, in use or not found. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] User Acceptance Testing
Jeff Johnson wrote: Michael: I do a lot small apps for mom pops and small businesses, too. I have them look over the software, I show them how to use it and after a couple of days I ask them for feedback. I also tell the small guys and it is written in my contract that the accuracy of the software is the customer responsibility. If they don't test the software and tell me about something that doesn't work right; I can't be held responsible. Others may disagree with this, but it has worked great for me. But you've got a built-in advantage when working with mom and pops. If the software doesn't work, mom can (and WILL) blame pop. Then when mom's gone, pop will lean over and whisper to you that SHE was the one with the fumble fingers. Kind of a variation on 'good cop - bad cop'. Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Signing off
yeah its horrible to keep losing people like this. .net poo all over the place. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whil Hentzen Well, shucks. Seriously, you've had great contributions over the years, both Fox and unFox... Cantcha just hang around for the [NF] stuff? It's not ALL open source nonsense, ya know? s We'll miss you! No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
thanks Dave. extra beer in Prague next year :) Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 06 November 2007 17:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader Al, Refoxed Proj just sent back to you. Dave No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FP2.6 dos not going full screen
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:50:25 -0500, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/06/27/workaround-to-this-system-does-not-support-full-screen-mode-in-windows-vista/ Blimey, I didn't realise this was the case with Vista. I suppose you could change font etc the shortcut properties of the DOS app so that it starts as near to a full-screen sized windows as possible. I have used DosBOX for games, and it certainly runs FoxPro for DOS if memory serves. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SMTP error
I have had some issues using a pocketpc with SMTP. What was wrong there was it is an authorised SMTP and sometimes it just allows you to use the same as pop3 for logging on and other times it may require the username and password to be put in. Try combinations of no password / normal password and setting the password. Just a thought Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Erickson Sent: 06 November 2007 17:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMTP error is the ISP blocking port 25 to the smtp server. I know that comcast does that. John Weller wrote: I recently asked for advice on Automating Emails and, as a result, decided to use Essmtp.ocx. It works like a charm on my development machine but when I take it to my client I get an error 213 when I try to send mail. I can't find any trace of what that error message means. My development system is very similar to my client's, they are both four machines on a peer-to-peer network sharing internet access through a Netgear router. The main difference is the ISP, I am with PlusNet and my client is with BT. Any suggestions gratefully received. (I really don't want to have to go back to MAPI g). No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] The actual surge
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:59, Ed Leafe wrote: Recent Troop Deaths Make 2007 Deadliest Year of Iraq War for U.S. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119435614156283877.html? mod=googlenews_wsj ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/39kslo ) So we know that the surge is working. We just aren't sure for whom it's working yet. Hi Ed! What happened to the profox profox login? Overall the surge is working. In the earlier part of the year deaths were up but the last few days and weeks they are down. Is the glass half empty or half full? http://tinyurl.com/22dg8w -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apples OSX upgrade troubles worsten
On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: I'm no big Microsoft fan Ed, and I also don't have a blanket unquestioning hatred of everything they do either. So you're saying that in these respects you're no different than I am. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:09 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote: I wasn't even going to bother going there---you're not going to change his mind. Especially when he has been trying to get his company to change their mind for years! Regardless, we all thank him for his offerings here over the years. Editing in VFP is painful without VariSense. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Allen wrote: yeah its horrible to keep losing people like this. .net poo all over the place. Allen This shouldn't surprise anyone. Reality check. One of these statements is NOT true: * DotNet will continue to grow * VFP will continue to shrink * One day, that asteroid WILL hit the earth and kill all/most life as we know it * That hot blonde WILL be interested in me when she's sober and her friend will get together with us for an incredible time Are you smart enough to know the answer? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Apples OSX upgrade troubles worsten
Ed Leafe wrote: On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: I'm no big Microsoft fan Ed, and I also don't have a blanket unquestioning hatred of everything they do either. So you're saying that in these respects you're no different than I am. ...but does he look hot in that dress??? g -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Signing off
Alan Bourke wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:21:56 -0600, Whil Hentzen mastering it as best as a person can master as buggy/incomplete a development environment/runtime as VFP. Er, compared to what? Java? .Net before version 2? VB6? I wasn't even going to bother going there---you're not going to change his mind. Regardless, we all thank him for his offerings here over the years. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues
Hi Allen: Don't have any say on the server side, have to deal with whatever the insurance company does, so don't have control over the dlls nor generate the wsdl. What I'm trying to do for now is just send them a file. AiR how are you generating the wsdl. did you change the names in the setup. rights issue ? as you will probably be logged in as inetuser. Have you changed the location of the dll ? Allen ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues
On 11/6/07, Aida I. Rivera-Benítez, MSMIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can some Soap Guru please help me ...somehow this sounds strange ; ) Hello, Aida: Yes, SOAP guru sounds very strange. It's been a while since I read WSDLs, but I think the WDDL declares that all three parameters are sent as one complex type. I don't recall what the trick is to merge your three strings together so that you can send them all as one. You might try something as simple as comma-separating all three parameters in one string parameter instead. Or, I could be out to lunch... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: loader
Really? I have been doing this for years. 3 foxpro exes. 1. Start.exe, which is a smart xcopy feature and runs the destination exe. 2. Swap.exe, which is used if start.exe is updated. 3. Application.exe, which is my application that is called from Start.exe with a line of ! /n path\application.exe As the application is running I look at task manager and Start.exe is NOT in the list. Thanks, Dan Neuman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loader It would be two exe's in the end anyway so yes and I have done it before. My problem was I had a clear all in the exit program and it didnt like it because it could not clear the loader screen. Being that VFP is not capable, so it seems, of running something else VFP without waiting for it to finish. For some reason also you cant run a VFP exe as an EXe (as in run/n other.exe) Dont know why but it does not work. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Erickson Can you do the same thing with 2 different exe's??? is that an option??? Allen wrote: I dont use apps. only exe's I found my problem was a clear all in the exit of the prog. It didnt like the loader being already there. Its because the loader runs the exe and wont go away untill the exe closes. I may have to look at a delphi loader. The version part is fine, I have been using the same method for some time now. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SMTP error
Thanks - I'll check with the ISP in the morning. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Erickson Sent: 06 November 2007 16:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMTP error is the ISP blocking port 25 to the smtp server. I know that comcast does that. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SMTP error
John Weller wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Erickson Sent: 06 November 2007 16:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMTP error is the ISP blocking port 25 to the smtp server. I know that comcast does that. Thanks - I'll check with the ISP in the morning. Don't bother calling the isp and wasting your time until you've found out if the isp is indeed blocking port 25. Find out by opening a command window and issuing: c:\telnet mail.paulmcnett.com 25 Connecting to mail.paulmcnett.com...Could not open connection to the host, on port 25: Connect failed Okay, so my ISP (ATT DSL) is blocking port 25. Actually, it could be one of my firewalls but I happen to know that isn't the case.[1] Point being, I can't get out onto the internet on port 25 (smtp). If I had gotten out, I'd have seen: c:\telnet mail.paulmcnett.com 25 Connecting to mail.paulmcnett.com... 220 mail.paulmcnett.com ESMTP Postfix If you find that your isp does block port 25, your options include setting up a relay smtp server. I've set one up for my use, that listens on port 8025 (try telnetting to mail.paulmcnett.com 8025). This allows certain clients of mine behind restrictive isp's to still have mailservers in-house that relay over 8025 to my server that actually sends the mail. [1] If I didn't know that was the case, I'd bring my laptop over to the dsl router, and plug it in directly, and then I'd go to my OS's firewall and temporarily disable it, and try the telnet test again. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem
Many thanks (again), Dave ! Dave Crozier wrote: Paul, There is an unistaller on the Microsoft site especially for this. Can't remember off hand what it is called - something on the lines of forced installer. I can find out when I get home this evening though. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 06 November 2007 16:11 To: profox Subject: [NF] WinWord (2000) problem Hi all I have one copy of Word 2K installed in the usual place on C - it was installed to this location from Win98, Win2K and WinXP which are in three different partitions. Word runs fine from Win98 and Win2K but resfuses to start when run from XP - the splash screen comes up and never disappears. The main word screen appears but completely blank and all I can do is use task manager to shut it down. I have tried (i) repairing the office installation (ii) reinstalling office and (iii) completely unistalling and then reinstalling office. I have made sure that it is not a template problem (Normal.DOT) and that there are no COM add-ins. I have also checked various registry entries and these also seem to be OK. I have tried to make sure that it is not a printer (driver) problem I am completely stuck so any suggestions would be highly appreciated Paul Newton [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Signing off
well it may be the case when people fall in line with the guiants telling you what to do. But I have not given up VFP yet. yet And I dont know about .net either. Just because M$ say its getting there does not mean it is. And dont believe all you hear about hot blonds either. Red heads are much better :) Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions This shouldn't surprise anyone. Reality check. One of these statements is NOT true: * DotNet will continue to grow * VFP will continue to shrink * One day, that asteroid WILL hit the earth and kill all/most life as we know it * That hot blonde WILL be interested in me when she's sober and her friend will get together with us for an incredible time Are you smart enough to know the answer? No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 05/11/2007 19:11 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
