Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-30 Thread faith gagne

Thakn you thank you.

Faith


- Original Message - 
From: "Simon Jester" 

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06



On 10/29/2007 faith gagne wrote:

Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty


Wendell Phillips

http://freedomkeys.com/vigil.htm


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  





Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-29 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/29/2007 faith gagne wrote:

Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty


Wendell Phillips

http://freedomkeys.com/vigil.htm


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-29 Thread faith gagne

'Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty'.  (Brigham Young?)

Faith


- Original Message - 
From: "James McCourt, Ph.D." 

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06



THE FOUNDATION: CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION by Thomas Jefferson:
"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general 
welfare,
but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not 
as

describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and
independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the 
Union,

would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power
completely useless." -Thomas Jefferson

GOVERNMENT
"In each new Congress since 1995, Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ) has introduced
the Enumerated Powers Act (HR 1359)... Simply put, if enacted, the
Enumerated Powers Act would require Congress to specify the basis of
authority in the U.S. Constitution for the enactment of laws and other
congressional actions. HR 1359 has 28 co-sponsors in the House of
Representatives. When Shadegg introduced the Enumerated Powers Act, he
explained that the Constitution gives the federal government great, but
limited, powers. Its framers granted Congress, as the central mechanism 
for

protecting liberty, specific rather than general powers. The Constitution
gives Congress 18 specific enumerated powers, spelled out mostly in 
Article
1, Section 8. The framers reinforced that enumeration by the 10th 
Amendment,

which reads: 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the
States respectively, or to the people.' Just a few of the numerous
statements by our founders demonstrate that their vision and the vision of
Shadegg's Enumerated Powers Act are one and the same... I salute the 
bravery

of Rep. Shadegg and the 28 co-sponsors of the Enumerated Powers Act. They
have a monumental struggle. Congress is not alone in its constitutional
contempt, but is joined by the White House and particularly the
constitutionally derelict U.S. Supreme Court." -Walter Williams

- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Nave" 

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06




-Original Message-
From: Simon Jester [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:23 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:

It was created because no one was doing *any* job.


That was the *excuse* provided... but it was a MANUFACTURED one.

It isn't the Federal Governments JOB to police the food supply. If you
disagree, please point to the Article:Section:Clause in the Constitution
that delegates this authority.

And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general welfare'
clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no meaning, except
for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...


Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 





Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-29 Thread James McCourt, Ph.D.
THE FOUNDATION: CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION by Thomas Jefferson:
"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare,
but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as
describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and
independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union,
would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power
completely useless." -Thomas Jefferson

GOVERNMENT
"In each new Congress since 1995, Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ) has introduced
the Enumerated Powers Act (HR 1359)... Simply put, if enacted, the
Enumerated Powers Act would require Congress to specify the basis of
authority in the U.S. Constitution for the enactment of laws and other
congressional actions. HR 1359 has 28 co-sponsors in the House of
Representatives. When Shadegg introduced the Enumerated Powers Act, he
explained that the Constitution gives the federal government great, but
limited, powers. Its framers granted Congress, as the central mechanism for
protecting liberty, specific rather than general powers. The Constitution
gives Congress 18 specific enumerated powers, spelled out mostly in Article
1, Section 8. The framers reinforced that enumeration by the 10th Amendment,
which reads: 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the
States respectively, or to the people.' Just a few of the numerous
statements by our founders demonstrate that their vision and the vision of
Shadegg's Enumerated Powers Act are one and the same... I salute the bravery
of Rep. Shadegg and the 28 co-sponsors of the Enumerated Powers Act. They
have a monumental struggle. Congress is not alone in its constitutional
contempt, but is joined by the White House and particularly the
constitutionally derelict U.S. Supreme Court." -Walter Williams

- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Nave" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06




-Original Message-
From: Simon Jester [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:23 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
> It was created because no one was doing *any* job.

That was the *excuse* provided... but it was a MANUFACTURED one.

It isn't the Federal Governments JOB to police the food supply. If you
disagree, please point to the Article:Section:Clause in the Constitution
that delegates this authority.

And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general welfare'
clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no meaning, except
for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...


Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 



Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-29 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/29/2007, Dan Nave (dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com) wrote:

And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general
welfare' clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no
meaning, except for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...



Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, 
Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common

Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties,
Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


Like I said... this is NOT a specific delegation of authority...

Read the debates (Federalist, Anti-federalist, Elliots) on the 
Constitution... this mention of 'general Welfare' doesn't mean ANYTHING 
like what you seem to think it means... otherwise, what would be the 
point of all of the specific delegations that follow?



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


RE: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-29 Thread Dan Nave
 

-Original Message-
From: Simon Jester [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org] 
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:23 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
> It was created because no one was doing *any* job.

That was the *excuse* provided... but it was a MANUFACTURED one.

It isn't the Federal Governments JOB to police the food supply. If you
disagree, please point to the Article:Section:Clause in the Constitution
that delegates this authority.

And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general welfare'
clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no meaning, except
for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...


Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 



Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-28 Thread Ode Coyote



  If overt is blocked, go subvert.
It can be long quiet haul, but a better idea trumps a bad one.
Subversion sneaks it into the back door, into common use and "traditional" 
before the guards know to look away from the gates.


 The LAW outlines minimal expectations of civility.
It does have glitches to go around and not get caught at.
 Calm and quiet makes that fairly easy as they focus on noise and dissent.

Self control means to exceed those minimal expectations.
Not above the law, but beyond it.

Ode


At 04:37 PM 10/27/2007 +0005, you wrote:


Cross-posting to the OT list so we can start migrating things there...

Ken writes:
> We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves,
> then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.

"Some people," Ken, do not whine when they don't control us. We're
surprised and relieved. We don't *want* them to control us. We *can*
control ourselves.

> If you have a better idea, implement it. If it IS a better idea, it
> will catch on.

And those currently in power don't put any insurmountable barriers in
the way of *that*, of course!

Mike D.

[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[mdev...@eskimo.com]
[Speaking only for myself...   ]


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 
10/27/2007 11:02 AM





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 
10/27/2007 11:02 AM




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007 11:02 AM




Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-28 Thread Paula Perry

- Original Message - 
From: "Ode Coyote" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

I didn't object to the fact that you have a different view or opinion.  What
I objected to was several of your statements of facts that were not credible
to me. You make broad assumptions about things that may in fact have no
basis other than your own opinion.

Below, I have made comments.

> > > >We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.

The fact is that last year Congress authorized millions more dollars for FDA
testing. What happened to the money? (Reported on Lou Dobb's last week)
Rather than an increase of testing,-the money was given out in the form of
bonus's to top appointed official (Puppets) at the FDA.

> > >
> > > Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules
to
> > > be followed.

You offer no proof of this being true.


> > > All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
> > > It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
> > > No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
> > > Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
> > > Who pays for that overhaul? HOW, should it be changed?

The first, best change would be to get rid of the appointed puppets that
have been put in place to thwart oversight and prevent all the good
employees from doing their jobs.


> > >   We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and
> > > being in charge.

If you want to change a corrupt and broken system maybe some folks do need
to speak up and inform others.  This sounds to me like you are suggesting,-
shut-up and put-up. Your a whinner if you don't.

> > >   If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we
> > > demandwe'd all starve.
> > > Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.

A better suggestion is to stop subsidizing factory farm food. When the mad
cow situation came to light what happened to inspections? They decreased
down to nothing. Was this a money problem or a political move to protect big
beef industry? We can support local, family farms if we want good product.
And, by the way, most of us do. Most of us if given the choice would prefer
locally produced goods. We do it with our dollars already. It is our elected
officials who represent the corporate interests that have favored corporate
farming with their subsidies.
> > >
> > > GE:
> > > Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history
> > > strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic
> > > animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are,
and
> > > they are, of course, "perfect".
> > >   No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or
..
> > >   How many versions of human just plain "failed"?

This is your opinion and if you want to think that it is okay with me.
However, if that were true, we somehow adjusted to particular foods during
all those years since. It doesn't mean that now we can adjust to inserted
pestisides and other genes in our food. What about suicide seeds? You think
those are designed to feed the starving masses too? Get a grip. You are much
too smart for that BS.
> > >
> > > Any changes present problems to some people.
> > >   Every endeavor includes a possibility of error.

What we are talking about is deliberate.


> > > Nothing happens without cost and benefit considerations.
> > >   Every human is motivated by self interest.  Call that greed?  OK,
Call
> >it
> > > greed.
> > >   And everything starts with not knowing what you're doing.
> > >   Nothing, is what needs to be done?
> > > OK, do nothing.
> > > Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
> > > Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable intelligence
and
> > > effort on nothing ]

Your opinion only. I could say the same.
> > >
> > > So here we have a system by default that, if even a very small
percentage
> > > of people have a problem, whole fields of endeavor grind to a halt,
> > > regardless of any over all benefit.
> > >   We have Governments to control us because we don't control
ourselves,
> > > then whine when they do...and whine when they
don't

Anyone out there whining for more government intrusion and control? Nope not
me.

> > >   Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative
> > > government.
> > >   They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.

We no longer have a democratic government

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-28 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:

It was created because no one was doing *any* job.


That was the *excuse* provided... but it was a MANUFACTURED one.

It isn't the Federal Governments JOB to police the food supply. If you
disagree, please point to the Article:Section:Clause in the Constitution
that delegates this authority.

And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general welfare'
clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no meaning, except
for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...


No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.


It isn't that the FDA system is imperfect... it works in the exact
OPPOSITE role that it was sold to the gullible American public.


Yes, the system does need an overhaul.


No, it needs to be scrapped, and we need to return to a system where
people are responsible for their own actions, decisions and choices.


Who pays for that overhaul?


The only cost would be for the investigations and criminal
prosecutions... negligible, when compared to what the system is costing
us today, and this would only be for a year or two until the
prosecutions and executions were carried out.

? HOW, should it be changed?

1. Abolish the Agency and all related offices and functions,

2. Initiate UNBIASED investigations into the criminal collusion and
conspiracy between FDA principals and the Pharmaceutical/Medical Industry,

3. File appropriate criminal charges once the criminal relationships and
acts have been well defined.

4. Execute the guilty. If you supported the execution of Saddam Hussein,
you should support the execution of those responsible for the suffering
and sometimes lingering deaths of millions of people.

The evidence is in plain sight, so this really wouldn't be hard to do.

We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and 
being in charge.


YOU may piss and moan... I certainly don't. All I want is for these
bastards to get the hell out of my life and allow me to live it the way
I want to. If I want to buy raw milk from a farmer, who the hell are
THEY - or YOU - to tell me I can't?

If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we 
demandwe'd all starve.

Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.


I agree... and their 'rules' (like pasteurization of milk) in reality
accomplish the very OPPOSITE of what they intended - they allow milk
producers to be as lax as they want when it comes to cleanliness of
their equipment and methods, because all they have to do is pasteurize
the milk, and they think that is good enough. It is a JOKE.


GE:
Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history 
strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic 
animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are, 
and they are, of course, "perfect".


Do you really want to bring Zacharia Sitchin and his writings into this
argument?


No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or ..
How many versions of human just plain "failed"?


Strawman from a strawman.


Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable 
intelligence and effort on nothing ]


Only if you ass-u-me that I want to 'replace' it with something. I do
not. As I have repeatedly stated - I WANT THEM - AND YOU - TO LEAVE ME
THE F**K ALONE AND LET ME BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MY OWN LIFE.

We have Governments to control us because we don't control 
ourselves,


True for many, but certainly not applicable to me or my friends (I'm
not friends with people who are part of the problem). And no, I don't
'respect the viewpoints' of those who would see everyone in chains, just
because they are deathly afraid of a germ so tiny they cannot see it.

I do not respect the opinions and viewpoints of criminals, when those
opinions and viewpoints include concepts that they own my life or any
part of it.


then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.


Speak for yourself, Ode-to-big-brother. I DO control myself - though
sometimes I tend to lose it when someone tries to tell me that they have
a Right to my life, or even a small part of it...

Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative 
government. They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.


Sorry, you must have me confused with someone who believes your rants.

Even Monsanto can't survive without the buyers consent and 
participation.


Consent and participation based on lies, deceit, fraud and extortion.

If they were not allowed to get away with all of the marketing LIES, and
then protected by their servants (government thugs) when people like me
try to point this out - and then defended by people like YOU who are too
smart for their own good and think they know what they are talking
about, then most people would NOT buy their garbage.

But I do agree that, to an extent, 'the majority' are responsible for
this problem. One of the things that

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-28 Thread Ode Coyote

  Taking in a broader view never stifles intelligent discussions.
 It does make them more complicated, which takes more intelligence to 
discuss intelligently.
Dismissing facts in favor of other facts that skew conclusions is the 
dis-information.
It's exactly what "silver listers" say Stephen Barrett does on Quackwatch 
concerning CS.


Pat Condemnation seeking agreement isn't a discussion at all.
..it's commiseration.

 Fact is, the facts ARE muddled. [SNAFU ]
It's is not "this OR that" it's "this AND that " ...with all the conflicts 
of not all bad and not all good.

Sort of like "reality".

OK Hang em all.and then what?
The FDA isn't the only self conflicted mixed intent and application entity 
there is.

It could be better, and so could everyone.

Ode

At 10:47 AM 10/27/2007 -0400, you wrote:


This disinformation and muddling of facts is not at all helpful and appears
to attempt to stifle intelligent discussion.
Paula

- Original Message -
From: "Ode Coyote" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06


>
> >We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.
>
> Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules to
> be followed.
> All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
> It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
> No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
> Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
> Who pays for that overhaul? HOW, should it be changed?
>   We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and
> being in charge.
>   If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we
> demandwe'd all starve.
> Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.
>
> GE:
> Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history
> strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic
> animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are, and
> they are, of course, "perfect".
>   No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or ..
>   How many versions of human just plain "failed"?
>
> Any changes present problems to some people.
>   Every endeavor includes a possibility of error.
> Nothing happens without cost and benefit considerations.
>   Every human is motivated by self interest.  Call that greed?  OK, Call
it
> greed.
>   And everything starts with not knowing what you're doing.
>   Nothing, is what needs to be done?
> OK, do nothing.
> Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
> Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable intelligence and
> effort on nothing ]
>
> So here we have a system by default that, if even a very small percentage
> of people have a problem, whole fields of endeavor grind to a halt,
> regardless of any over all benefit.
>   We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves,
> then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.
>   Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative
> government.
>   They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.
>
> Even Monsanto can't survive without the buyers consent and participation.
>   Monsanto is "people" who eat the unlabeled foods they engineer.  Those
> are not "different" people.
>   They have children and relatives too.
>   They are self interested like everyone else.
>   They see and suffer the cost just like everyone else, but also have a
> birds eye view of benefit that no one wants to look at.
> Every change has it's risk.   No attempt in the face of  inevitable
change,
> is even riskier.
>   Problems and imperfections?  OF COURSE!  [If anyone knew what they were
> doing, it would already be done. ]
>
> If you have a better idea, implement it.
> If it IS a better idea, it will catch on.
>   A real winner doesn't have to make everything else out to be a loser.
> That's what losers do to make themselves out to *look like* winners.
> I can't, because "they" won't?  Loser!!
>
> There are just no absolutes on planet Earth.
> It's ALL process, and all process includes errors.
> ..and all errors include resistance to acknowledgement.
>
> A better idea that really IS better, makes errors AND  resistance a moot
> and forgotten point.
>   Beating your brains out against obstacles, gets you beaten brains. "GO
> AROUND"
>
> Only an idiot believes he can make idiots smarter by yelling "stupid" at
them.
>   [ And only an idiot would listen to them yell. ]
>
>   Help me, help me!  ...No, not like that!
&g

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread M. G. Devour
Cross-posting to the OT list so we can start migrating things there...

Ken writes:
> We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves,
> then whine when they do...and whine when they don't. 

"Some people," Ken, do not whine when they don't control us. We're 
surprised and relieved. We don't *want* them to control us. We *can* 
control ourselves.  

> If you have a better idea, implement it. If it IS a better idea, it
> will catch on. 

And those currently in power don't put any insurmountable barriers in 
the way of *that*, of course!

Mike D.

[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[mdev...@eskimo.com]
[Speaking only for myself...   ]


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
   


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/27/2007, Clayton Family (clay...@skypoint.com) wrote:
It has been designed to do so. And the chem companies have even gone 
to the extremes to defeat all efforts to have any labels at all. 
There are alot of people that want labeling, at the least, but they 
have lost the fight because of the disinformation campaigns run by 
these huge companies. 


And their voluntary apologists/defenders like Ode - who actually do far 
more damage in my opinion because of the obvious sincerity... is he a 
paid schill? Probably not, most paid schills would not do as good of a 
job...



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/27/2007, David  (dr...@montrose.net) wrote:

One of the best posts I've seem...
Thanks


Rotflmaoayii...


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Clayton Family
It has been designed to do so. And the chem companies have even gone to 
the extremes to defeat all efforts to have any labels at all. There are 
alot of people that want labeling, at the least, but they have lost the 
fight because of the disinformation campaigns run by these huge 
companies.



On Oct 27, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Paula Perry wrote:

This disinformation and muddling of facts is not at all helpful and 
appears

to attempt to stifle intelligent discussion.
Paula

- Original Message -
From: "Ode Coyote" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06





We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.


Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague 
rules to

be followed.
All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
Who pays for that overhaul? HOW,



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Paula Perry
This disinformation and muddling of facts is not at all helpful and appears
to attempt to stifle intelligent discussion.
Paula

- Original Message - 
From: "Ode Coyote" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06


>
> >We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.
>
> Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules to
> be followed.
> All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
> It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
> No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
> Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
> Who pays for that overhaul? HOW, should it be changed?
>   We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and
> being in charge.
>   If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we
> demandwe'd all starve.
> Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.
>
> GE:
> Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history
> strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic
> animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are, and
> they are, of course, "perfect".
>   No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or ..
>   How many versions of human just plain "failed"?
>
> Any changes present problems to some people.
>   Every endeavor includes a possibility of error.
> Nothing happens without cost and benefit considerations.
>   Every human is motivated by self interest.  Call that greed?  OK, Call
it
> greed.
>   And everything starts with not knowing what you're doing.
>   Nothing, is what needs to be done?
> OK, do nothing.
> Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
> Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable intelligence and
> effort on nothing ]
>
> So here we have a system by default that, if even a very small percentage
> of people have a problem, whole fields of endeavor grind to a halt,
> regardless of any over all benefit.
>   We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves,
> then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.
>   Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative
> government.
>   They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.
>
> Even Monsanto can't survive without the buyers consent and participation.
>   Monsanto is "people" who eat the unlabeled foods they engineer.  Those
> are not "different" people.
>   They have children and relatives too.
>   They are self interested like everyone else.
>   They see and suffer the cost just like everyone else, but also have a
> birds eye view of benefit that no one wants to look at.
> Every change has it's risk.   No attempt in the face of  inevitable
change,
> is even riskier.
>   Problems and imperfections?  OF COURSE!  [If anyone knew what they were
> doing, it would already be done. ]
>
> If you have a better idea, implement it.
> If it IS a better idea, it will catch on.
>   A real winner doesn't have to make everything else out to be a loser.
> That's what losers do to make themselves out to *look like* winners.
> I can't, because "they" won't?  Loser!!
>
> There are just no absolutes on planet Earth.
> It's ALL process, and all process includes errors.
> ..and all errors include resistance to acknowledgement.
>
> A better idea that really IS better, makes errors AND  resistance a moot
> and forgotten point.
>   Beating your brains out against obstacles, gets you beaten brains. "GO
> AROUND"
>
> Only an idiot believes he can make idiots smarter by yelling "stupid" at
them.
>   [ And only an idiot would listen to them yell. ]
>
>   Help me, help me!  ...No, not like that!
> How then?
>   If I knew that, I wouldn't have hired you to tell me.
>   That makes me the expert and you the fool?
>   Noise is knowledge in action?
> Yup.
>
> The clinking sound a coin makes when thrown away, buys one nothing.
> [Discount today, 3 nothings for a single clink. ]
> ...always a highly successful sale day, drawing crowds of buyers.
>
>   Law of demand and supply:  [It's NOT the other way around.]
> Where-so-ever there be buyers, so shall there be sellers.
>
>   Buy into your helplessness??  So shall it be sold to you.
>
>   I've met a lot of people with a "saviour complex".
>   All they know is how to put others down and any "plan" they may have is
> so full of holes, it won't even hold boulders.
> Never mind "my"  plan that CAN'T work in any version o

RE: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread David
One of the best posts I've seem...
Thanks


-Original Message-
From: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com [mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com]
On Behalf Of Ode Coyote
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:20 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06


>We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.

Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules to 
be followed.
All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
Who pays for that overhaul? HOW, should it be changed?
  We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and 
being in charge.
  If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we 
demandwe'd all starve.
Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.

GE:
Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history 
strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic 
animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are, and 
they are, of course, "perfect".
  No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or ..
  How many versions of human just plain "failed"?

Any changes present problems to some people.
  Every endeavor includes a possibility of error.
Nothing happens without cost and benefit considerations.
  Every human is motivated by self interest.  Call that greed?  OK, Call it 
greed.
  And everything starts with not knowing what you're doing.
  Nothing, is what needs to be done?
OK, do nothing.
Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable intelligence and 
effort on nothing ]

So here we have a system by default that, if even a very small percentage 
of people have a problem, whole fields of endeavor grind to a halt, 
regardless of any over all benefit.
  We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves, 
then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.
  Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative 
government.
  They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.

Even Monsanto can't survive without the buyers consent and participation.
  Monsanto is "people" who eat the unlabeled foods they engineer.  Those 
are not "different" people.
  They have children and relatives too.
  They are self interested like everyone else.
  They see and suffer the cost just like everyone else, but also have a 
birds eye view of benefit that no one wants to look at.
Every change has it's risk.   No attempt in the face of  inevitable change, 
is even riskier.
  Problems and imperfections?  OF COURSE!  [If anyone knew what they were 
doing, it would already be done. ]

If you have a better idea, implement it.
If it IS a better idea, it will catch on.
  A real winner doesn't have to make everything else out to be a loser.
That's what losers do to make themselves out to *look like* winners.
I can't, because "they" won't?  Loser!!

There are just no absolutes on planet Earth.
It's ALL process, and all process includes errors.
..and all errors include resistance to acknowledgement.

A better idea that really IS better, makes errors AND  resistance a moot 
and forgotten point.
  Beating your brains out against obstacles, gets you beaten brains. "GO 
AROUND"

Only an idiot believes he can make idiots smarter by yelling "stupid" at
them.
  [ And only an idiot would listen to them yell. ]

  Help me, help me!  ...No, not like that!
How then?
  If I knew that, I wouldn't have hired you to tell me.
  That makes me the expert and you the fool?
  Noise is knowledge in action?
Yup.

The clinking sound a coin makes when thrown away, buys one nothing. 
[Discount today, 3 nothings for a single clink. ]
...always a highly successful sale day, drawing crowds of buyers.

  Law of demand and supply:  [It's NOT the other way around.]
Where-so-ever there be buyers, so shall there be sellers.

  Buy into your helplessness??  So shall it be sold to you.

  I've met a lot of people with a "saviour complex".
  All they know is how to put others down and any "plan" they may have is 
so full of holes, it won't even hold boulders.
Never mind "my"  plan that CAN'T work in any version of a real world 
look at theirs that isn't doing very well!!
Idi Amin was one of those "saviours"
  He truly believed he could and the people of Uganda bought 
it...believing, like Amin, that "they" were the problem, so eliminating 
"them" was a solution.

  It was found out the hard way,
  There is no "they" and "them" is, us, denying our own identity.
and the res

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Ode Coyote

At 03:09 PM 10/26/2007 -0500, you wrote:

Yes, I had heard that too. I knew one who took tryptophan for a long time 
prior to that batch with good results. I read that that was a bad batch, 
and then the FDA decided to ban it, which seemed pretty extreme to me at 
the time.


The genetic engineering in food *really* compromises the value of it- it 
becomes harmful instead of healthful. I have felt SO MUCH better since 
getting very strict about the organic food, doing cs, and stopping all 
medicines.



##  You have taken responsibility and put your beliefs into considered 
action.  Good for you.
If everyone did that, it would be a whole different situation. But, it is 
risky, so almost no one does... even *if*  it's actually less risky.



It is no coincidence that there is such a huge rise in anaphylactic 
allergy- that is just what you should expect when giving everyone GMO 
foods. All allergies are on the rise, and it is my belief that the gmo 
products are causing it.  The companies that produce it are extremely 
careful to ensure that none of their foods can be traced back to them, as 
they could lose their shirts legally.  I wonder how much it has cost them 
to pay off the right people to keep us from having labeled GMO products 
that can be traced back to the source..


##  Which could just as well be that children are no longer allowed to eat 
mud pies...or [GASP] that going to extremes to save every child no matter 
how defective, is bleeding the strength of the Gene pool.
 What happened to natural birth...and the infant mortality rate that goes 
with it?

How does protecting anyone make them smarter or stronger?

 Going organic may be a viable alternative, so, go organic.  "Do it"
 Even if it isn't, there are other good reasons to and doing so, takes 
sales power away from GMO by "application" of a better power, making GMO a 
non enemy, gone around.
 "Your" label makes their lack of labeling irrelevant.  Buy "your" story 
and theirs is history unsold.

If it really IS better and worth the effort, that's where it will all wind up.
If you know a good horse, feed it and ride itand all the donkeys will 
bray into the breeze, unused and unfed.

 But, if you fall offit's your horse.
 Can't bray at donkeys, any more.
"Not doing" falls short of any ride that has reins, no way around that.
 And no one that won't pick up his own reins, can legitimately complain 
about where donkeys take them.


The "people" have ALL the power.
Using it is always scary...so, most just give it away. [to others who may 
not care how scared you are..and/or..sell you your own fear. ]


 That's right.  Even the "Pharm" cannot survive without your fear and faith.
It has no power of its own.
 None, at all.
It relies entirely on dependence for its existence.
So, how can it be an "enemy" if those willing to walk, can walk right 
around it ?


Ode




On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Simon Jester wrote:


On 10/26/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:

Yes, "flooded" is the correct term. [maybe not "inundated" ]
That Japanese outfit was HUGE and made tryptofan a lot cheaper than 
anyone else using their new [faulty] process.


It was due to using GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA... they had been 
producing tryptophan for many years prior to that.


Had the FDA kept that crap out of our food supply (read: BEEN DOING THEIR 
SUPPOSED JOB), it never would have happened.


But no, your (apparently beloved) FDA approves of this junk wholeheartedly.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 
269.15.12/1095 - Release Date: 10/26/2007 7:54 PM





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 
269.15.12/1095 - Release Date: 10/26/2007 7:54 PM




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1095 - Release Date: 10/26/2007 7:54 PM




Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-27 Thread Ode Coyote



We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job.  Fact.


Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules to 
be followed.

All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
Yes, the system does need an overhaul.
Who pays for that overhaul? HOW, should it be changed?
 We piss and moan, but don't want the responsibility of paying up and 
being in charge.
 If we DID fund them enough to protect us absolutely, as we 
demandwe'd all starve.

Inspect every leaf, every hunk of meat?  Nothing left to eat.

GE:
Mitochondria DNA tracing along with some interpretations of history 
strongly suggests that virtually all of our farm crops and domestic 
animals...and we ourselves, were genetically engineered...and we are, and 
they are, of course, "perfect".

 No one is allergic to sheep, or peanuts, or corn, or wheat, or ..
 How many versions of human just plain "failed"?

Any changes present problems to some people.
 Every endeavor includes a possibility of error.
Nothing happens without cost and benefit considerations.
 Every human is motivated by self interest.  Call that greed?  OK, Call it 
greed.

 And everything starts with not knowing what you're doing.
 Nothing, is what needs to be done?
OK, do nothing.
Telling everyone else they are wrong, is, doing nothing.
Congratulations, you have succeeded. [in wasting valuable intelligence and 
effort on nothing ]


So here we have a system by default that, if even a very small percentage 
of people have a problem, whole fields of endeavor grind to a halt, 
regardless of any over all benefit.
 We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves, 
then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.
 Yes, it is a bit more than a touch ignorant.  It's a representative 
government.

 They all are.  Even the totalitarian ones.

Even Monsanto can't survive without the buyers consent and participation.
 Monsanto is "people" who eat the unlabeled foods they engineer.  Those 
are not "different" people.

 They have children and relatives too.
 They are self interested like everyone else.
 They see and suffer the cost just like everyone else, but also have a 
birds eye view of benefit that no one wants to look at.
Every change has it's risk.   No attempt in the face of  inevitable change, 
is even riskier.
 Problems and imperfections?  OF COURSE!  [If anyone knew what they were 
doing, it would already be done. ]


If you have a better idea, implement it.
If it IS a better idea, it will catch on.
 A real winner doesn't have to make everything else out to be a loser.
That's what losers do to make themselves out to *look like* winners.
I can't, because "they" won't?  Loser!!

There are just no absolutes on planet Earth.
It's ALL process, and all process includes errors.
..and all errors include resistance to acknowledgement.

A better idea that really IS better, makes errors AND  resistance a moot 
and forgotten point.
 Beating your brains out against obstacles, gets you beaten brains. "GO 
AROUND"


Only an idiot believes he can make idiots smarter by yelling "stupid" at them.
 [ And only an idiot would listen to them yell. ]

 Help me, help me!  ...No, not like that!
How then?
 If I knew that, I wouldn't have hired you to tell me.
 That makes me the expert and you the fool?
 Noise is knowledge in action?
Yup.

The clinking sound a coin makes when thrown away, buys one nothing. 
[Discount today, 3 nothings for a single clink. ]

...always a highly successful sale day, drawing crowds of buyers.

 Law of demand and supply:  [It's NOT the other way around.]
Where-so-ever there be buyers, so shall there be sellers.

 Buy into your helplessness??  So shall it be sold to you.

 I've met a lot of people with a "saviour complex".
 All they know is how to put others down and any "plan" they may have is 
so full of holes, it won't even hold boulders.
Never mind "my"  plan that CAN'T work in any version of a real world 
look at theirs that isn't doing very well!!

Idi Amin was one of those "saviours"
 He truly believed he could and the people of Uganda bought 
it...believing, like Amin, that "they" were the problem, so eliminating 
"them" was a solution.


 It was found out the hard way,
 There is no "they" and "them" is, us, denying our own identity.
and the responsibility that having an identity entails, along with the 
"true" power it gives.


Ode



Had the FDA kept that crap out of our food supply (read: BEEN DOING THEIR 
SUPPOSED JOB), it never would have happened.


But no, your (apparently beloved) FDA approves of this junk wholeheartedly.

If I recall, they did get their buttocks sued off, but none of the small 
guys re-packaging and re-selling it did.


Why should they? Its the FDA that should have gotten sued.


[balance snipped as meaningless sniping ]


Meaning you have no answer to it...

no, not everyone is evil

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-26 Thread Clayton Family
Yes, I had heard that too. I knew one who took tryptophan for a long 
time prior to that batch with good results. I read that that was a bad 
batch, and then the FDA decided to ban it, which seemed pretty extreme 
to me at the time.


The genetic engineering in food *really* compromises the value of it- 
it becomes harmful instead of healthful. I have felt SO MUCH better 
since getting very strict about the organic food, doing cs, and 
stopping all medicines.


It is no coincidence that there is such a huge rise in anaphylactic 
allergy- that is just what you should expect when giving everyone GMO 
foods. All allergies are on the rise, and it is my belief that the gmo 
products are causing it.  The companies that produce it are extremely 
careful to ensure that none of their foods can be traced back to them, 
as they could lose their shirts legally.  I wonder how much it has cost 
them to pay off the right people to keep us from having labeled GMO 
products that can be traced back to the source..



On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Simon Jester wrote:


On 10/26/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:

Yes, "flooded" is the correct term. [maybe not "inundated" ]
That Japanese outfit was HUGE and made tryptofan a lot cheaper than 
anyone else using their new [faulty] process.


It was due to using GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA... they had been 
producing tryptophan for many years prior to that.


Had the FDA kept that crap out of our food supply (read: BEEN DOING 
THEIR SUPPOSED JOB), it never would have happened.


But no, your (apparently beloved) FDA approves of this junk 
wholeheartedly.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-26 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/26/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:

Yes, "flooded" is the correct term. [maybe not "inundated" ]
That Japanese outfit was HUGE and made tryptofan a lot cheaper than 
anyone else using their new [faulty] process.


It was due to using GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA... they had been 
producing tryptophan for many years prior to that.


Had the FDA kept that crap out of our food supply (read: BEEN DOING 
THEIR SUPPOSED JOB), it never would have happened.


But no, your (apparently beloved) FDA approves of this junk wholeheartedly.

If I recall, they did get their buttocks sued off, but none of the 
small guys re-packaging and re-selling it did.


Why should they? Its the FDA that should have gotten sued.


[balance snipped as meaningless sniping ]


Meaning you have no answer to it...

no, not everyone is evil no matter who they work for, nor is the 
alt health industry a pack of benevolent angels.


Never said either one, so fail to see your point.


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-26 Thread Ode Coyote

At 05:32 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:


On 10/25/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company tried 
a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic, 
resulting in a few deaths.

They had flooded the market


'Flooded the market'? They were selling a product... lets not make it into 
something it wasn't...


 ## Yes, "flooded" is the correct term. [maybe not "inundated" ]
 That Japanese outfit was HUGE and made tryptofan a lot cheaper than 
anyone else using their new [faulty] process.
 If I recall, they did get their buttocks sued off, but none of the small 
guys re-packaging and re-selling it did.


[balance snipped as meaningless sniping ]
no, not everyone is evil no matter who they work for, nor is the alt 
health industry a pack of benevolent angels.  Both sides as a whole are 
"BIG business", the alt health side has more opportunity for the small 
guy...and the  fraudulent / ignorant , less opportunity for committing high 
tech error and causing deaths, but not none.
 It's two sides of the same consumer fear based profit margins coin. BIG 
$$$, all around ...with intermixed stock and company ownerships playing 
both sides at once.


Ode




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.11/1093 - Release Date: 10/25/2007 5:38 PM




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-26 Thread Ode Coyote

At 12:46 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:


Ode Coyote wrote:



  L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company 
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic, 
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan was in 
what bottle, so it was ALL recalled and banned from sale till it was all 
made safe again.


How would they not know what was in each bottle? That is like one dairy 
getting some poison in their milk, and them outlawing all milk from all 
dairies for almost 20 years.  Makes no sense.  Companies who are packaging 
and shipping a product know where they bought it from. They track every 
ingredient, and if they bought some from a specific company, they can use 
the date code or product code they stamp on each bottle to figure out 
where every single ingredient in that bottle came from.


That is the way it is done. When I made colloidal silver, I recorded the 
date code of every bottle of distilled water that went into a batch.  So 
if they announced that one of the bottles had toxic chemicals in it, I 
could easily recall those bottles of CS made with it.  This is industry 
wide practice, and a legal requirement for ISO 9000 products.


Marshall

##  The "Herbal" market is not regulated quite like the drug 
market.  Anyone can buy bulk from many sources and fill a bottle from a 
hopperand do so quite often when packaging colloidal silver they 
didn't make.

 They don't even know how it was made in most cases.

You can only label according to your best of knowledge and if the bulk 
label reads L Tryptophan and a batch number, that's all you know about 
it.  Did they record that and follow it to every serialized 
bottle?  Probably not.

 How many had bought large bulk and resold smaller bulk?
If you only use one source, only straight from the factory, maybe then you 
can keep track, but in the case of deadly contamination possible and 
somewhat lax source tracking and mixing practices, they weren't taking any 
chances.


ode


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 
269.15.11/1093 - Release Date: 10/25/2007 5:38 PM





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 
269.15.11/1093 - Release Date: 10/25/2007 5:38 PM




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.11/1093 - Release Date: 10/25/2007 5:38 PM




Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-25 Thread Jonathan B. Britten
That essay by Marshall Smith was interesting, but after reading BROJON 
for many months, I came to have nagging doubts about the author, who 
seems to be an authority on anything and everything, and, in his own 
mind, consistently finds brilliant insights and solutions where 
everyone else has failed.Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to follow 
up on very much.


The article he wrote, if it is true, has information that could win 
someone a Nobel Prize in medicine.   Suppose it's true that half of all 
Americans have sub-clinical trichinosis from factory-farmed pork, as 
the essay claimed?   Verification of that would change a great many 
things in the USA, that's for sure.   But where's the evidence and the 
follow up?   Big claims require big evidence.


Unfortunately, I've never heard anything more about it.That doesn't 
mean it isn't true, but it it raises a few red flags.


Anyway, at least tryptophan is back on the market, and Marshall Smith's 
essay is definitely still worth a read, especially if tryptophan could 
serve as a safe prozac substitute.   The stories about prozac 
side-effects are hair-raising.


Thanks for reminding us about that article.   I no longer subscribe to 
BROJON -- I got fed up with it -- but I'd be deeply impressed if it 
turns out he's right about trichinosis.


BTW -- I read just today that scientists are speculating that abnormal 
prions may NOT be the cause of BSE or CJD, the human version.  Check 
New Scientist.  If not, EIS could turn out to be of some use to 
sufferers, or as prophylaxis.








On Thursday, Oct 25, 2007, at 05:30 Asia/Tokyo, julie martin wrote:


for those who may be interested.

--- "Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:

List,

Many members know about big Pharm fraud, but few
examples are as
compelling at the L-Tryptophan scam, which I recall
very, very well.
BROJON, although being rather uneven in my opinion,
has a great piece
which I am pasting below.
THE INSIDER'S STORY OF AN  L-TRYPTOPHAN
RESEARCHER
  A Response To
Reader's Requests



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-25 Thread Jonathan B. Britten
Ah.   Yes, that was interesting, though after reading BROJON for many 
months, I came to have nagging doubts about the author, who seems to be 
an authority on anything and everything, and, in his own mind, 
consistently finds brilliant insights and solutions where everyone else 
has failed.Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to follow up on very much.


The sited article, if it is true, could win someone a Nobel Prize in 
medicine.   Suppose it's true that half of all Americans have 
sub-clinical trichinosis from factory-farmed pork, as the essay 
claimed?   Verification of that would change a great many things in the 
USA, that's for sure.   But where's the evidence and the follow up?   
Big claims require big evidence.


Unfortunately, I've never heard anything more about it.That doesn't 
mean it isn't true, but it it raises a few red flags.


Anyway, at least tryptophan is back on the market, and Marshall Smith's 
essay is definitely still worth a read, especially if tryptophan could 
serve as a safe prozac substitute.   The stories about prozac 
side-effects are hair-raising.


Thanks for reminding us about that article.   I no longer subscribe to 
BROJON -- I got fed up with it -- but I'd be deeply impressed if it 
turns out he's right about trichinosis.


BTW -- I read just today that scientists are speculating that abnormal 
prions may NOT be the cause of BSE or CJD, the human version.  Check 
New Scientist.  If not, EIS could turn out to be of some use to 
sufferers, or as prophylaxis.








On Thursday, Oct 25, 2007, at 05:30 Asia/Tokyo, julie martin wrote:


for those who may be interested.

--- "Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:

List,

Many members know about big Pharm fraud, but few
examples are as
compelling at the L-Tryptophan scam, which I recall
very, very well.
BROJON, although being rather uneven in my opinion,
has a great piece
which I am pasting below.
THE INSIDER'S STORY OF AN  L-TRYPTOPHAN
RESEARCHER
  A Response To
Reader's Requests



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-25 Thread Simon Jester

On 10/25/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company 
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being 
toxic, resulting in a few deaths.

They had flooded the market


'Flooded the market'? They were selling a product... lets not make it 
into something it wasn't...


Now, if you want to talk about how pharmaceutical companies - with the 
help and blessings of the FDA - are 'flooding the market' with dangerous 
and COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY 'cholesterol lowering drugs' (among hundreds 
of other things) - then yes, you would have a valid point.



so it was ALL recalled and banned from sale till it was all made safe
again.


Yep - a few deaths = total ban at gunpoint.

Let's see - how many deaths a year are there from prescription drugs 
(overdoses, wrongly prescribed, or interactions)? Over a HUNDRED THOUSAND...



The "Alt Health" industry is almost as big a business as the "Pharm",


Poppycock... it is certainly way more commercialized than I would like - 
but saying they are "almost as big as the 'Pharm'" is like saying I'm 
"almost as famous as 'Elvis'"



but with fewer regulations and less accountability.


Because fewer are needed. Most natural health products are not toxic 
chemical poisons, like pharmaceutical drugs are. Lots of crap that 
doesn't do you any GOOD being sold, sure - but at least it doesn't KILL 
you 99.99% of the time.


When the "Pharm" screws up, they get sued big time. Too big to hide, 
big enough to make a hard fight.


Pharmaceutical companies enjoy varying degrees of liability protection, 
and have virtually unlimited resources to fight these lawsuits - but 
yes, they still get sued, and in most cases, RIGHTLY SO.


Not to mention the fact most of their INDIVIDUAL 'products' have killed 
FAR more people than ALL of the natural health products COMBINED.



When "alt health" screws up, most just fade out of sight.


?? More like, people go to JAIL... or are driven out of business by 
armed thugs (FDA goon squads) like Dr Schulze's clinic.



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-25 Thread Marshall Dudley

Ode Coyote wrote:



  L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company 
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic, 
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan was in 
what bottle, so it was ALL recalled and banned from sale till it was 
all made safe again.


How would they not know what was in each bottle? That is like one dairy 
getting some poison in their milk, and them outlawing all milk from all 
dairies for almost 20 years.  Makes no sense.  Companies who are 
packaging and shipping a product know where they bought it from. They 
track every ingredient, and if they bought some from a specific company, 
they can use the date code or product code they stamp on each bottle to 
figure out where every single ingredient in that bottle came from.


That is the way it is done. When I made colloidal silver, I recorded the 
date code of every bottle of distilled water that went into a batch.  So 
if they announced that one of the bottles had toxic chemicals in it, I 
could easily recall those bottles of CS made with it.  This is industry 
wide practice, and a legal requirement for ISO 9000 products.


Marshall


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
  


Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-25 Thread Ode Coyote



  L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company 
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic, 
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan was in what 
bottle, so it was ALL recalled and banned from sale till it was all made 
safe again.
The "Alt Health" industry is almost as big a business as the "Pharm", but 
with fewer regulations and less accountability.
 When the "Pharm" screws up, they get sued big time. Too big to hide, big 
enough to make a hard fight.
 When "alt health" screws up, most just fade out of sight. Many too 
fragmented to be found, some big enough to take on a fight.

Both operate with huge profit margins.

EVERYONE screws up, now and then.

Ode

At 01:30 PM 10/24/2007 -0700, you wrote:


for those who may be interested.

--- "Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:
> List,
>
> Many members know about big Pharm fraud, but few
> examples are as
> compelling at the L-Tryptophan scam, which I recall
> very, very well.
> BROJON, although being rather uneven in my opinion,
> has a great piece
> which I am pasting below.
> THE INSIDER'S STORY OF AN  L-TRYPTOPHAN
> RESEARCHER
>   A Response To
> Reader's Requests
>
> I have received a number of letters to the editor
> asking about which
> L-tryptophan is the best and where to buy it.  Many
> readers want to
> start using it each morning to maintain their
> circadian rhythms.  For
> almost 20 years it has been impossible to purchase
> L-tryptophan.  So
> where did I buy my tryptophan for my research for
> the last 20 years?
>
> During the 1980's when I started my circadian rhythm
> experiments, I
> used the common L-tryptophan found in stores.  I
> soon found there were
> two types --one with B6 and one without any B6.  I
> tried several brands
> of each and found that the ones with B6 did not work
> at all in my
> experiments for shifting or controlling the
> circadian rhythms.  Thus
> proving that B6 prevents tryptophan from getting
> into the brain.  Using
> B6 will definitely disrupt your normal circadian
> rhythms.
>
> I later found that almost all the L-tryptophan in
> all brands was made
> from the same bulk raw product from Japan.  The
> Showa Denko company had
> developed a method of using genetically modified
> bacteria to extract
> copious amounts of L-tryptophan from milk.  Since
> the bacteria was
> removed and reused, what remained was pure, cheap
> L-tryptophan.  It is
> now the same method used for making all the other
> amino acid products.
>
> In November 1989, the CDC made the false claim that
> L-tryptophan was
> causing a new disease or disorder called
> Eosinophilia Myagia Syndrome
> (EMS).   The symptoms of EMS were exactly the same
> as trichinosis.
> Trichinosis is a parasite which comes from eating
> improperly cooked
> pork.  My research found that about half of all
> American's have
> contracted the trichinosis parasite.  But for most
> people it is
> sub-clinical, meaning most people don't even know
> that they have
> trichinosis.  This sub-clinical form of the disease
> is the primary
> reason for most autoimmune disorders such as
> fibromyagia and chronic
> fatique syndrome.  The body immune system attacks
> itself in an attempt
> to get rid of the parasite.  The disease is caused
> by microscopic worms
> embedding by the millions into your muscles.  Then
> they form a tiny
> impenetrable cyst which protects them from
> medication and from your own
> immune system.  No effective medication has been
> found for ridding the
> body of trichinosis.
>
> For most people the original symptoms were a slight
> fever like the flu,
> and achy muscles as the trichinella enter the
> muscles and become
> encysted.   It takes about a week and later those
> early symptoms go
> away and are forgotten.  Those were exactly the same
> symptoms which
> were identified as EMS by the CDC.   In the first
> week after the CDC
> alert for EMS, the doctors before reporting EMS
> needed to perform a
> trichinosis test.   In the second week after the CDC
> alert, the
> trichinosis test requirement was strangely dropped,
> so all the usual
> hundreds of thousands of cases of trichinosis were
> then falsely
> reported to the CDC as the new tryptophan disorder,
> EMS.
>
> The CDC also changed the reporting requirement to
> include: observe the
> symptoms and also, secondly interview the patient
> for having previously
> or still using L-tryptophan.   Thus, suddenly this
> became an
> L-tryptophan disease.  But it wasn't at all.  It was
> just the common
> trichinosis.  I was using L-tryptophan in my
> research studies but I
> never had any symptoms.  Something was very wrong
> with the CDC story
> about EMS and the ban on sales of L-tryptophan.
>
> I suspected then that this was a fraudulent story
> and I have kept in my
> files, several years worth of all the CDC reports
> and university
> research reports into the s

Re: CS> tryptophan repost from june'06

2007-10-24 Thread julie martin
for those who may be interested.  

--- "Jonathan B. Britten" wrote:
> List,
> 
> Many members know about big Pharm fraud, but few
> examples are as 
> compelling at the L-Tryptophan scam, which I recall
> very, very well.   
> BROJON, although being rather uneven in my opinion,
> has a great piece 
> which I am pasting below.
> THE INSIDER'S STORY OF AN  L-TRYPTOPHAN
> RESEARCHER
>   A Response To
> Reader's Requests
> 
> I have received a number of letters to the editor
> asking about which 
> L-tryptophan is the best and where to buy it.  Many
> readers want to 
> start using it each morning to maintain their
> circadian rhythms.  For 
> almost 20 years it has been impossible to purchase
> L-tryptophan.  So 
> where did I buy my tryptophan for my research for
> the last 20 years?
> 
> During the 1980's when I started my circadian rhythm
> experiments, I 
> used the common L-tryptophan found in stores.  I
> soon found there were 
> two types --one with B6 and one without any B6.  I
> tried several brands 
> of each and found that the ones with B6 did not work
> at all in my 
> experiments for shifting or controlling the
> circadian rhythms.  Thus 
> proving that B6 prevents tryptophan from getting
> into the brain.  Using 
> B6 will definitely disrupt your normal circadian
> rhythms.
> 
> I later found that almost all the L-tryptophan in
> all brands was made 
> from the same bulk raw product from Japan.  The
> Showa Denko company had 
> developed a method of using genetically modified
> bacteria to extract 
> copious amounts of L-tryptophan from milk.  Since
> the bacteria was 
> removed and reused, what remained was pure, cheap
> L-tryptophan.  It is 
> now the same method used for making all the other
> amino acid products.
> 
> In November 1989, the CDC made the false claim that
> L-tryptophan was 
> causing a new disease or disorder called
> Eosinophilia Myagia Syndrome 
> (EMS).   The symptoms of EMS were exactly the same
> as trichinosis.  
> Trichinosis is a parasite which comes from eating
> improperly cooked 
> pork.  My research found that about half of all
> American's have 
> contracted the trichinosis parasite.  But for most
> people it is 
> sub-clinical, meaning most people don't even know
> that they have 
> trichinosis.  This sub-clinical form of the disease
> is the primary 
> reason for most autoimmune disorders such as
> fibromyagia and chronic 
> fatique syndrome.  The body immune system attacks
> itself in an attempt 
> to get rid of the parasite.  The disease is caused
> by microscopic worms 
> embedding by the millions into your muscles.  Then
> they form a tiny 
> impenetrable cyst which protects them from
> medication and from your own 
> immune system.  No effective medication has been
> found for ridding the 
> body of trichinosis.
> 
> For most people the original symptoms were a slight
> fever like the flu, 
> and achy muscles as the trichinella enter the
> muscles and become 
> encysted.   It takes about a week and later those
> early symptoms go 
> away and are forgotten.  Those were exactly the same
> symptoms which 
> were identified as EMS by the CDC.   In the first
> week after the CDC 
> alert for EMS, the doctors before reporting EMS
> needed to perform a 
> trichinosis test.   In the second week after the CDC
> alert, the 
> trichinosis test requirement was strangely dropped,
> so all the usual 
> hundreds of thousands of cases of trichinosis were
> then falsely 
> reported to the CDC as the new tryptophan disorder,
> EMS.
> 
> The CDC also changed the reporting requirement to
> include: observe the 
> symptoms and also, secondly interview the patient
> for having previously 
> or still using L-tryptophan.   Thus, suddenly this
> became an 
> L-tryptophan disease.  But it wasn't at all.  It was
> just the common 
> trichinosis.  I was using L-tryptophan in my
> research studies but I 
> never had any symptoms.  Something was very wrong
> with the CDC story 
> about EMS and the ban on sales of L-tryptophan.
> 
> I suspected then that this was a fraudulent story
> and I have kept in my 
> files, several years worth of all the CDC reports
> and university 
> research reports into the suspected causes for EMS. 
> The CDC even 
> blamed Showa Denko for making a contaminated product
> and forced them 
> out of business.  But NO cause of EMS was ever found
> and the story was 
> quietly dropped, but the ban for local drug stores
> to sell L-tryptophan 
> has remained.  Mysteriously and quietly the ban on
> sales has been 
> dropped in the last year and now many small sellers
> are using the 
> Internet to push L-tryptophan.  Why?  What has
> suddenly changed?
> 
> The original reason for banning the sale of
> L-tryptophan is still a 
> mystery.  I suspected the illegal ban was bought and
> paid for by Eli 
> Lilly which made nearly a trillion dollars by
> selling Prozac, which was 
> designed to replace L-tryptophan as a means t