Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
NoOp wrote: On 02/02/2015 11:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote: Only the beta versions of Lightning are compatible with SeaMonkey releases. SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta ... SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta ... http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1419526652/ ... Beta version application.ini: ... SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta ... SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta So technically they are both betas, but I think the tinderbox* builds don't advertise themselves as such. *Huh, shouldn't they call these something else these days? -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Hi, EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 : Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. Does it help to update ABP to the latest version 2.6.7? No, in fact, I was unable to update Adblock Plus at all. I had to revert to SM 2.31 in order to do that. You can use Adblock Edge : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ http://adstomper.bitbucket.org/Differences.html -- Sorry for possible mistakes in English! http://pasdenom.info/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Yamo' wrote: Hi, EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 : Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. Does it help to update ABP to the latest version 2.6.7? No, in fact, I was unable to update Adblock Plus at all. I had to revert to SM 2.31 in order to do that. You can use Adblock Edge : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ http://adstomper.bitbucket.org/Differences.html The problem with Adblock Plus was fixed. It involved changing this setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled - true ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote: The problem with Adblock Plus was fixed. It involved changing this setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled - true Which is the default anyway. Only a user knowledgeable enough and interested enough to change that setting would experience the problem. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Perhaps consider adblock edge, which I started using a while back, its a fork. https://bitbucket.org/adstomper/adblockedge been using it fine here with the latest seamonkey for the past week. Yamo' wrote: Hi, EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 : Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. Does it help to update ABP to the latest version 2.6.7? No, in fact, I was unable to update Adblock Plus at all. I had to revert to SM 2.31 in order to do that. You can use Adblock Edge : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ http://adstomper.bitbucket.org/Differences.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 02/02/2015 11:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 03/02/2015 14:20, NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/
Yes openSUSE released the update today. Finally.
When SeaMonkey started, it even found and installed Lightning 3.7b1.
Try updating your addons:
Lightning3.7 true{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32
Build identifier: 20150116134703
Only the beta versions of Lightning are compatible with SeaMonkey releases.
Phil
Well... this replaced my 3.7b1:
(from application.ini)
[App]
Vendor=Mozilla
Name=Lightning
Version=3.7
BuildID=20141225091732
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta
SourceStamp=bd79ffe48b24
Copyright=Copyright (c) 1998 - 2010 mozilla.org
ID={e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}
[Build]
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta
SourceStamp=91050fafc8b6
[Gecko]
MinVersion=35.0
MaxVersion=35.0
Can't recall exactly, but I'm pretty sure that I got my version from here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1419526652/
(SourcesStamp matches)
And it's working just fine (so far as I can tell).
Beta version application.ini:
[App]
Vendor=Mozilla
Name=Lightning
Version=3.7b1
BuildID=20141225091732
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta
SourceStamp=bd79ffe48b24
Copyright=Copyright (c) 1998 - 2010 mozilla.org
ID={e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}
[Build]
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta
SourceStamp=91050fafc8b6
[Gecko]
MinVersion=35.0
MaxVersion=35.0
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 03/02/2015 14:20, NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/
Yes openSUSE released the update today. Finally.
When SeaMonkey started, it even found and installed Lightning 3.7b1.
Try updating your addons:
Lightning 3.7 true{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32
Build identifier: 20150116134703
Only the beta versions of Lightning are compatible with SeaMonkey releases.
Phil
--
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.
Links:
[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32
[2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/
Yes openSUSE released the update today. Finally.
When SeaMonkey started, it even found and installed Lightning 3.7b1.
Try updating your addons:
Lightning 3.7 true{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32
Build identifier: 20150116134703
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Yes openSUSE released the update today. Finally. When SeaMonkey started, it even found and installed Lightning 3.7b1. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Philip Chee wrote on 01/15/2015 05:08 AM: On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote: Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J It looks like SeaMonkey users won't have a Lightning because Thunderbird didn't build a 35.0 beta. You may be able to figure out something to get it to work, or switch to Thunderbird. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J Quote: You could try an untested and unreleased build from the build server, for example: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1419527852/ contains a build from 25-Dec-2014 that might work with SeaMonkey 2.32 on x64 Linux platform. UnQuote. Phil thanks Phil, Lightning is working for me once again... ;~) -- What we must decide is perhaps how we are valuable... rather than how valuable we are. ~ F. Scott Fitzgerald taglines courtesy of Tagzilla 0.7a2 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
On 1/23/2015 8:47 AM, Neil wrote: Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it? As far as I know, there are no end-user controls for the behaviour, sorry. Thanks. Too bad it can't be done with about:config too. :( -- I'm not a worker ant. I'm like a queen. Or maybe a king. But you never hear of king ants. --Sean Bentley /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
Ant wrote: Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it? As far as I know, there are no end-user controls for the behaviour, sorry. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
On 1/22/2015 1:27 AM, Neil wrote: Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to autocomplete? Thunderbird is still tweaking autocomplete, but you'd have to try a trunk nightly to see whether it works better for you. The long answer is that the autocomplete search backend is a component, so if you know what you're doing, you can replace or overridde it. I even have an example somewhere of how to override an autocomplete component in an extension although my example is for the LDAP autocomplete rather than the address book autocomplete. Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it? I only use local *.mab files. -- Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways and be wise: which having no guide, overseer or ruler, provideth her meat in the summer and gathereth her food in the harvest. --Proverbs 6:6-8 (Bible) /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
Ant wrote: Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to autocomplete? Thunderbird is still tweaking autocomplete, but you'd have to try a trunk nightly to see whether it works better for you. The long answer is that the autocomplete search backend is a component, so if you know what you're doing, you can replace or overridde it. I even have an example somewhere of how to override an autocomplete component in an extension although my example is for the LDAP autocomplete rather than the address book autocomplete. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to autocomplete? I have nicknames for them. Thank you in advance. :) On 1/15/2015 12:33 AM, Ant wrote: It looks like they went to old address book autocompletion method? On 1/14/2015 5:05 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ -- This worker ant will be unemployed after Friday, the 23rd, as of 1/15/2015 @ 11 AM PST. :( /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
NoOp wrote on 18/01/2015 03:22: On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... Your point? ... drum roll please: From: Ray_Net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1 Do you say that uninstalling 2.29.1 and installing 2.32 (this is my method for upgrading) will modify my profile in such a way that dom.indexedDB.enabled will pass from true to false ??? I don't believe that. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
In news:9cgdntt7kvbnmchjnz2dnuu7-kgdn...@mozilla.org, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote: Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... But I had set it to false, and nobody told me until the other day that I had to change it back again. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079355 We should be able to set it back to false once that work gets released, two cycles away. In the meantime, we get to choose between blocking ads and having so-called super cookie technology enabled. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Ray_Net wrote on 18/01/2015 09:25: NoOp wrote on 18/01/2015 03:22: On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... Your point? ... drum roll please: From: Ray_Net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1 Do you say that uninstalling 2.29.1 and installing 2.32 (this is my method for upgrading) will modify my profile in such a way that dom.indexedDB.enabled will pass from true to false ??? I don't believe that. I just upgraded to 2.32 and dom.indexedDB.enabled is still true. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 18/01/15 17:43, NoOp wrote: On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you Here, this will make it easy for you :-) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) @Philip: You can easily use VMWare or VirtualBox to run various linux distro's, within Windows - but hey, I appreciate all that you do if it's only Windows that you work with, then that's A-OK with me, thanks and keep up the good work. A couple of years ago, when you guys were having so troubles with producing releases (particularly GNU/Linux) (back when KaiRo was more heavily involved with SM), I was a bit flush with funds I was considering donating $1000 to the SM Consortium but I was a bit worried about the funds getting lost with-in Mozilla, so did nothing. Now, after over three years later, with me, basically, having been unemployed for most of that time, funds are tighter so I'm, sort of, glad that I did nothing!! :-( Cross-posted to and Follow-up set to m.gen. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20150101220549 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... But I had set it to false, and nobody told me until the other day that I had to change it back again. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) If you buy a new Mac It comes with the latest system out for that machine at the time its shipped. IF you have your own Keyboard and Monitor you can get a Mac Mini for as low as $499.00 for low end Model. As long as key board is a USB 2 or 3 Keyboard will do just fine. Would be nice to use a Mac formatted Keyboard but can use a PC keyboard. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
NoOp wrote: On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you Here, this will make it easy for you :-) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) @Philip: You can easily use VMWare or VirtualBox to run various linux distro's, within Windows - but hey, I appreciate all that you do if it's only Windows that you work with, then that's A-OK with me, thanks and keep up the good work. You can get a Mac mini for for as Little as $499.00 If you want to work on SeaMonkey for Mac need to supply your own Keyboard and Monitor. Note: this is a Suggestion for Phil Chee who asked about someone buying him a Mac to work on SeaMonkey Mac. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: platforms [was: SeaMonkey 2.32 released]
Miles Fidelman wrote: PhillipJones wrote: ...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes. Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop releasing a Mac version. Sure. Instead of trying to recruit some people that know Mac. Continue on with the treating Mac's as play toys and Mac users as second class citizens, since they came on the, air and Macs came on Market, over 20 years ago. As a long-time Mac user, I can relate to the sentiment. [Note that I also use Windows (current employer), Linux (server farm that I manage, used to be Solaris, and Android (cell phone), and support my wife and kids' iPads and iPhones - so not coming from a fanboy perspective.] Mac, iPhone, iPads are the fast growing Market in computer industry today. I could swear that it's Android. Apple is making the Most money of any Computer Tech company in existence today. Right up there, but don't count out Samsung, Foxconn, HP, IBM, Google, etc. Not sure if I completely trust Wikipedia as a source, but it's listing samsung as no. 1 right now. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_information_technology_companies) Its seems the majority of people have rebelled against being treated as 5 year old children with Shinny buttons and want the experience of actually using a computer. Laid out like a computer. For PC people System 7 was the best and 10 will apparently back track some what, to System 7 at least in look and feel, If not operation. MS is even planing to Retire IE, and come out with a Shinny new replacement that works like Safari and Chrome. At least some of us still swear by XP - to the extent that corporations are paying 3rd parties for post-end-of-life support. Miles Fidelman Where I work we have tools that still require XP, and need that support...end of life for XP is a real problem, and I can sympathize with that! I don't really care about who has what share of what - I'm all for freedom of choice and what someone uses depends on what they want to *do* IMO, and doesn't bother me a whit. But I do care about truth in advertizing, quality control, and the *whole* job getting done, when and if it's supposedly being done. By it's very nature, if someone is going to sign on to do multi-platform releases of a product they have taken on a *huge* task...I would think - and hope - that people that do this actually understand that and tool up to support each platform equally in the interests of their own integrity and quality control from the *start*. If they can't or aren't willing to do this then I'd rather they just plain stay out of the multi-platform arena and do the best with and for what they choose, rather than to have them releasing sub-quality or non-equivalent quality versions for non-primary platforms just for show. And then *whining* about how whomever they've slighted isn't worth the trouble anyway because they don't amount to much...that's just *really* poor form, and destroys any respect that should be due volunteerism. I mean, SERIOUSLY? Just be clear and concise about limitations and intent so clear choices can be made, and cut the whining. Be professional. That's all I really want. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote: Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows. I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: PhillipJones wrote: and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite). No, that is not correct. Microsoft had to skip Windows *9* because, in programming code where the version is searched, the Windows 95 and 98 versions would report positive. if string found Windows 9 do [something] else ... They didn't discover this glitch until there was an alpha release of 9, which was promptly dropped in favor of 10. (One wonders if this will have a problem with Windows 1) Windows versions are not called using the word System. Probably Didn't think that far ahead although Windows 1 and 2 didn't last that long It was only when 3.1.1 came out did Windows take off. Then you had windows: 95, 98 then one or two in between which I have forgotten their code names that were less stellar, quickly replaced and forgotten about. (One I believe was called Windows ME). Then NT Then from NT to XP Then 7 the 8, 8.8.1, now 10. On Mac Side of Thing OS 1 and 2 were but experiments. Mac OS 3 was first serious system designed to work on Motorola 680X0 chips, 68000, 68010, 68020, 68030 (By far the longest lasting series), then 68040 was the last these were CISC Chips. Then they switched to using a RISC Processor from Motorola That was originally used in a Work station that had computer, keyboard and monitor built into a Desk. I believe it was 650xxx series. And you Started OSX.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.9,10 at OSX.4 point they switched to Intel Chips Up until OS8 they used an emulator called Rosetta that would all PowerPC coded applications work on Intel Machines. With OSX.7 they did not renew license for Rosetta and all apps had to work using Intel code. RISC - Reduced Instruction Set Computing Very little Code just barely enough to get computer to boot burned into the code. System Code has to tell it practically everything Therefor size is large and Clunky and slow to load even with tons of system Ram But advantage is if you want add features without changing processors, you can. CISC - Complex Instruction Set Computing Most code to do everything is built into chip. System is small Compact and loads very fast even on slow systems. Disadvantage where so much operation code is burned in It is difficult and or impossible add new features without creating a New Chip with new code burned in. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Philip Chee wrote: On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote: Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows. I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? Phil ...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes. Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop releasing a Mac version. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
*PhillipJones* schrieb: Mac, iPhone, iPads are the fast growing Market in computer industry today. Apple is making the Most money of any Computer Tech company in existence today. Microsoft keeps sputtering and sputtering even more Window 8/8.1 Has not been the hit it should have been, and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite). Were it not for Microsoft Office (which by the way started of the components started of as Mac only products) MS would be fondly remember along with such names a Westinghouse, RCA, Sylvania, Philco, DuMont, Macromedia, Netscape, Eudora, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems -- best regards ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
platforms [was: SeaMonkey 2.32 released]
PhillipJones wrote: ...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes. Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop releasing a Mac version. Sure. Instead of trying to recruit some people that know Mac. Continue on with the treating Mac's as play toys and Mac users as second class citizens, since they came on the, air and Macs came on Market, over 20 years ago. As a long-time Mac user, I can relate to the sentiment. [Note that I also use Windows (current employer), Linux (server farm that I manage, used to be Solaris, and Android (cell phone), and support my wife and kids' iPads and iPhones - so not coming from a fanboy perspective.] Mac, iPhone, iPads are the fast growing Market in computer industry today. I could swear that it's Android. Apple is making the Most money of any Computer Tech company in existence today. Right up there, but don't count out Samsung, Foxconn, HP, IBM, Google, etc. Not sure if I completely trust Wikipedia as a source, but it's listing samsung as no. 1 right now. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_information_technology_companies) Its seems the majority of people have rebelled against being treated as 5 year old children with Shinny buttons and want the experience of actually using a computer. Laid out like a computer. For PC people System 7 was the best and 10 will apparently back track some what, to System 7 at least in look and feel, If not operation. MS is even planing to Retire IE, and come out with a Shinny new replacement that works like Safari and Chrome. At least some of us still swear by XP - to the extent that corporations are paying 3rd parties for post-end-of-life support. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
OT: RISC vs. CISC [was: SeaMonkey 2.32 released]
PhillipJones wrote: RISC - Reduced Instruction Set Computing Very little Code just barely enough to get computer to boot burned into the code. System Code has to tell it practically everything Therefor size is large and Clunky and slow to load even with tons of system Ram But advantage is if you want add features without changing processors, you can. CISC - Complex Instruction Set Computing Most code to do everything is built into chip. System is small Compact and loads very fast even on slow systems. Disadvantage where so much operation code is burned in It is difficult and or impossible add new features without creating a New Chip with new code burned in. Ahh, the topic of many long battles. The argument for RISC is: - if you analyze compiled code, most of it uses a small subset of a CISC instruction set, so why waste the silicon - optimize for blinding fast speed on the reduced instruction set and you come out ahead - I expect it's easier to do things like preemptive look ahead and pre-fetch with a simpler instruction set The argument for CISC is: - do it faster in hardware - write compilers that take advantage of the breadth of the instruction set There are certainly examples of very successful CPUs in both families - e.g. SPARC for RISC, Intel's entire line for CISC. I can also recall a couple of cases where very specific CISC instruction sets made a lot of difference: - the old DG Nova's macro-instructions looked very much like micro-instructions, with the ability to do multiple instructions in parallel (e.g., rotate, shift, and compare in one macro-instruction cycle) -- very useful for things like optical character recognition - at one firm, I personally helped develop a set of instructions specialized to high-speed bit twiddling in a radar processing system (back in the days when 4MIPS was blindingly fast, it was pretty much impossible to manipulate nanosecond pulse trains without specialized hardware) But I digress Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote: Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows. I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? Phil ...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes. Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop releasing a Mac version. Sure. Instead of trying to recruit some people that know Mac. Continue on with the treating Mac's as play toys and Mac users as second class citizens, since they came on the, air and Macs came on Market, over 20 years ago. Mac, iPhone, iPads are the fast growing Market in computer industry today. Apple is making the Most money of any Computer Tech company in existence today. Microsoft keeps sputtering and sputtering even more Window 8/8.1 Has not been the hit it should have been, and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite). Were it not for Microsoft Office (which by the way started of the components started of as Mac only products) MS would be fondly remember along with such names a Westinghouse, RCA, Sylvania, Philco, DuMont, Macromedia, Netscape, Eudora, etc. Its seems the majority of people have rebelled against being treated as 5 year old children with Shinny buttons and want the experience of actually using a computer. Laid out like a computer. For PC people System 7 was the best and 10 will apparently back track some what, to System 7 at least in look and feel, If not operation. MS is even planing to Retire IE, and come out with a Shinny new replacement that works like Safari and Chrome. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
PhillipJones wrote: and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite). No, that is not correct. Microsoft had to skip Windows *9* because, in programming code where the version is searched, the Windows 95 and 98 versions would report positive. if string found Windows 9 do [something] else ... They didn't discover this glitch until there was an alpha release of 9, which was promptly dropped in favor of 10. (One wonders if this will have a problem with Windows 1) Windows versions are not called using the word System. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05: NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. It's true by default in my SM ... Your point? ... drum roll please: From: Ray_Net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/17/2015 06:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) I build my own. :) But your link is about Linux desktops, not Linux operating systems. How many desktop choices do you have for that Windows PC you buy? Best user for KDE: Windows users who want the easiest transition from XP or 7 but prefer the traditional desktop metaphor over the modern look and feel. Must be why I chose KDE when I built my first Linux PC using Red Hat, then Fedora, now openSUSE operating system. I have also used Gnome and XFCE, but I like KDE the best. -- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0a1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
In news:ayadnbzu1fbkosfjnz2dnuu7-igdn...@mozilla.org, EE nu...@bees.wax wrote: EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Somebody finally gave me the solution (on a web forum). The setting: dom.indexedDB.enabled has to be set to true now in order for Adblock Plus to work with SeaMonkey. Written up in some detail (for Fx, but it's the same issue) at http://www.ghacks.net/2015/01/16/fix-add-ons-not-working-in-firefox-35/. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: OT: RISC vs. CISC [was: SeaMonkey 2.32 released]
On 18/01/2015 05:47, Miles Fidelman wrote: PhillipJones wrote: RISC - Reduced Instruction Set Computing Very little Code just barely enough to get computer to boot burned into the code. System Code has to tell it practically everything Therefor size is large and Clunky and slow to load even with tons of system Ram But advantage is if you want add features without changing processors, you can. CISC - Complex Instruction Set Computing Most code to do everything is built into chip. System is small Compact and loads very fast even on slow systems. Disadvantage where so much operation code is burned in It is difficult and or impossible add new features without creating a New Chip with new code burned in. Ahh, the topic of many long battles. The argument for RISC is: - if you analyze compiled code, most of it uses a small subset of a CISC instruction set, so why waste the silicon - optimize for blinding fast speed on the reduced instruction set and you come out ahead - I expect it's easier to do things like preemptive look ahead and pre-fetch with a simpler instruction set The argument for CISC is: - do it faster in hardware - write compilers that take advantage of the breadth of the instruction set There are certainly examples of very successful CPUs in both families - e.g. SPARC for RISC, Intel's entire line for CISC. I can also recall a couple of cases where very specific CISC instruction sets made a lot of difference: - the old DG Nova's macro-instructions looked very much like micro-instructions, with the ability to do multiple instructions in parallel (e.g., rotate, shift, and compare in one macro-instruction cycle) -- very useful for things I think most modern CPU architectures these days support SIMD in one form or other. like optical character recognition - at one firm, I personally helped develop a set of instructions specialized to high-speed bit twiddling in a radar processing system (back in the days when 4MIPS was blindingly fast, it was pretty much impossible to manipulate nanosecond pulse trains without specialized hardware) All major CISC cpu families these days are internally RISC (e.g. x64-AMD from Intel and AMD) with a translation layer for CISC to RISC conversion. So in a sense RISC has won. Normally you can't access the underlying RISC core but at least one manufacturer (I think Taiwan or China based) made a x86 CPU chip where you could switch to the internal (and very different) RISC instruction set). Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50: Mason83 wrote: On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote: I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac? I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^ Regards. ...I'll chip in too! What distribution would you give him ? I get crazy reading this page: http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/783109-how-to-choose-the-best-linux-desktop-for-you Here, this will make it easy for you :-) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg I dont have problem choosing which Windows i will use, because, it's bundled in a pc you buy. :-) @Philip: You can easily use VMWare or VirtualBox to run various linux distro's, within Windows - but hey, I appreciate all that you do if it's only Windows that you work with, then that's A-OK with me, thanks and keep up the good work. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/15/2015 07:08 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote: Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J It looks like SeaMonkey users won't have a Lightning because Thunderbird didn't build a 35.0 beta. You may be able to figure out something to get it to work, or switch to Thunderbird. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J Quote: You could try an untested and unreleased build from the build server, for example: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1419527852/ contains a build from 25-Dec-2014 that might work with SeaMonkey 2.32 on x64 Linux platform. UnQuote. Phil That would work for Linux as has been reported elsewhere. I have to wait until openSUSE provides SeaMonkey and by then I think a 3.7b1 will be out from what I have read. If not I may try that build. I don't know what build Windows or Mac users would need. Maybe there is one in the tinderbox-builds folder for them. -- Strip District Music Fest 2015-01-17 http://www.stripdistrictmusicfest.com/ Je Suis Charlie ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Yamo' wrote: Hi, Cecil Bankston a écrit le 15/01/2015 16:52 : Could you please explain how you edited the installation file? I need the Windows version. Does your edited version install and function normally? Open the xpi file with a tool like 7zip and edit the install.rdf file. After that, you can use the xpi file. After I edited and installed the xpi from the link you posted, Lightning worked normally. When I tried the same edit on the latest Lightning version from the 2015 nightly versions page, it installed but didn't work properly. It showed only a Today view, and most of the buttons didn't work. -- C. Bankston ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and installed the version converted using Add-on Converter for Seamonkey. Ghostery 5.4.1 works with SM2.32 (Xubuntu 14.04). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Pololo wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: snip Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and installed the version converted using Add-on Converter for Seamonkey. Ghostery 5.4.1 works with SM2.32 (Xubuntu 14.04). Firstly, why are you *emailing* me instead of just *posting* to the news group? Hint: click the first Reply button in SeaMonkey not the 2nd. Yes it will install, but can you configure it? That is where it will fail. When you go into options, or right-click the ghost the setting windows will be blank! This is this Australis issue. -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
NFN Smith wrote: EE wrote: If only that version had not broken Adblock Plus! What do you mean by break -- what are the symptoms? And what version of ABP are you running? I updated my Windows installation to SM 2.32 yesterday, and I see that I'm running ABP 2.6.7, and not seeing any problems with that combination. I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. Does it help to update ABP to the latest version 2.6.7? No, in fact, I was unable to update Adblock Plus at all. I had to revert to SM 2.31 in order to do that. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote: I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM 2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button for Adblock Plus disappears, and it is impossible to get to the interface for the filter lists. Have you tried restarting in Safe Mode? There may be something else in your user profile that's disrupting Adblock Plus. I've occasionally found that that simply going to Safe Mode, and then reenabling my extensions one by one is enough to clear odd things in my user profile. Also, you might try an ininstall/reinstall of just Adblock Plus. Just to double-check, you could try adding an additional user profile, and seeing how ABP behaves in a fresh profile. As mentioned previously, I'm not having any problems with ABP 2.6.7 in SM 2.32, in either Windows or Ubuntu Linux. I guessing your problems are specific to your user profile, and not a more general problem with the combination of ABP and SM 2.32. Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It's not fix because the problem is with Ghostery. They no longer support the pre-Australis interface. Search in Add-ins within SeaMonkey and you will NOT find Ghostery. Either they will have to add in support, or SeaMonkey will have to adopt Australis. Choose your poison. I when to Bluhell Firewall. Works just as good and lighter... Again I'm going to ask the question - why does it show up in the release notes as fixed? I *know* it's not fixed, and at his point I don't care *why* it's not fixed, or who's fault it is...but I *would* like to be able to trust what is in the Release Notes, and what is being said in the bug thread. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It is NOT fixed on Windows either. I have SM on Windows 8.0 Pro and I cannot install Ghostery on SM 2.32. I had to remove the older partially working version I had on SM 2.31 as it was completely broken on 2.32. Then the Release Note and the bug thread declaring it fixed need some revision. But I think the results are actually mixed... -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil Ghostery will not install on SeaMonkey 2.32 from either Mozilla Addons site or Ghostery site. I had to uninstall the older version I had sort of working on SM 2.31. I started a thread at Ghostery forum about it (no replies yet). https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32 I was going to try this just to see if the problem was that it wouldn't install over the older version, and/or that it didn't like the advertize Firefox compatibility implementation. I'll try this later today and see what happens. I seem to recall that the first time I installed Ghostery in SM that I had to do it manually, and now I can't find a way to get the actual file in order to do that - I was going to try that too. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 5:33 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It's not fix because the problem is with Ghostery. They no longer support the pre-Australis interface. Search in Add-ins within SeaMonkey and you will NOT find Ghostery. Either they will have to add in support, or SeaMonkey will have to adopt Australis. Choose your poison. I when to Bluhell Firewall. Works just as good and lighter... Did you read the Bugzilla bug on this issue? It was fixed for SM 2.32 and is MARKED AS FIXED. I've asked Ghostery if we need to reopen the bug. Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Pololo wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and installed the version converted using Add-on Converter for Seamonkey. Ghostery 5.4.1 works with SM2.32 (Xubuntu 14.04). I wanted to try grabbing the .xpi and manually installing it, but I couldn't find a way to get the .xpi for Mac. But I think I have something else to try - uninstalling the old version first. I didn't try that. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
WaltS48 wrote: On 01/16/2015 03:57 PM, Rufus wrote: Pololo wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and installed the version converted using Add-on Converter for Seamonkey. Ghostery 5.4.1 works with SM2.32 (Xubuntu 14.04). I wanted to try grabbing the .xpi and manually installing it, but I couldn't find a way to get the .xpi for Mac. But I think I have something else to try - uninstalling the old version first. I didn't try that. [Ghostery fixed on Seamonkey 2.32?](https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32) Progress in progress...thanks for the info! -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It's not fix because the problem is with Ghostery. They no longer support the pre-Australis interface. Search in Add-ins within SeaMonkey and you will NOT find Ghostery. Either they will have to add in support, or SeaMonkey will have to adopt Australis. Choose your poison. I when to Bluhell Firewall. Works just as good and lighter... I hope SeaMonkey doesn't. Big mistake if they do. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Desiree wrote: On 1/16/2015 10:53 AM, Rufus wrote: Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It is NOT fixed on Windows either. I have SM on Windows 8.0 Pro and I cannot install Ghostery on SM 2.32. I had to remove the older partially working version I had on SM 2.31 as it was completely broken on 2.32. Then the Release Note and the bug thread declaring it fixed need some revision. But I think the results are actually mixed... Ghostery Communications Manager says that it IS fixed on Windows for SeaMonkey 2.32 but in the NEXT version of Ghostery for Fx. He says he doesn't yet have a release date for the next version. So, apparently, the bug thread is correct assuming Ghostery manages to put out a new version before SeaMonkey, Fx update again. I didn't ask about Mac or Linux because I only have Windows and just didn't think about it. Sorry. I can ask or you can in my thread at Ghostery (or start a new one there). https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32 Thanks for the followup. It sounds like some Linux users may have been able to get it working as well. I still need to try a clean Ghostery install on my laptop - that's where I do my experimenting! I think the thing now is to insure that folks on the SM side look at *all* platforms in doing their homework. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 1/16/2015 10:51 AM, Rufus wrote: Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil Ghostery will not install on SeaMonkey 2.32 from either Mozilla Addons site or Ghostery site. I had to uninstall the older version I had sort of working on SM 2.31. I started a thread at Ghostery forum about it (no replies yet). https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32 I was going to try this just to see if the problem was that it wouldn't install over the older version, and/or that it didn't like the advertize Firefox compatibility implementation. I'll try this later today and see what happens. I seem to recall that the first time I installed Ghostery in SM that I had to do it manually, and now I can't find a way to get the actual file in order to do that - I was going to try that too. I don't know if this will work on a Mac but on a PC I just used Lemonjuice's SeaMonkey Extension Converter and Ghostery installed and works fine on SM. http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/ Lemonjuice comments in a Mozillazine thread that his converter does basically what Ghostery itself will do in its next version in order to support SM. I did have all tabs showing busy if I hovered the mouse over any of them after I installed Ghostery. A restart of SM fixed that. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 1/16/2015 5:50 AM, Pololo wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and installed the version converted using Add-on Converter for Seamonkey. Ghostery 5.4.1 works with SM2.32 (Xubuntu 14.04). That's good to know that the Addon Converter works for Linux as well as PC's. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Desiree wrote: On 1/16/2015 10:51 AM, Rufus wrote: Desiree wrote: On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil Ghostery will not install on SeaMonkey 2.32 from either Mozilla Addons site or Ghostery site. I had to uninstall the older version I had sort of working on SM 2.31. I started a thread at Ghostery forum about it (no replies yet). https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32 I was going to try this just to see if the problem was that it wouldn't install over the older version, and/or that it didn't like the advertize Firefox compatibility implementation. I'll try this later today and see what happens. I seem to recall that the first time I installed Ghostery in SM that I had to do it manually, and now I can't find a way to get the actual file in order to do that - I was going to try that too. I don't know if this will work on a Mac but on a PC I just used Lemonjuice's SeaMonkey Extension Converter and Ghostery installed and works fine on SM. http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/ Lemonjuice comments in a Mozillazine thread that his converter does basically what Ghostery itself will do in its next version in order to support SM. I did have all tabs showing busy if I hovered the mouse over any of them after I installed Ghostery. A restart of SM fixed that. ...funny...I have that one bookmarked, but hadn't thought to try it - one more to add to my experiments if doing a remove/reinstall fails. Thanks for the reminder. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
X-No-Archive :yes X-OS :Debian Jessie Archive:no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: gzqdnt_4mf-xnyxjnz2dnuu7-k2dn...@mozilla.org Lines: 14 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.233.201.43 X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-s2HHoWlO8SkJsCPziU31Wn/234oQkkDpLu4QZ/APWyolntp/OFt2Gipr6VuAQxwFSxB/fyNHYKPHO1t!u/Ac/YzxoZbQNKg8V9fi4n9yoj+tFSjQxE28njoHSuo0ZNxVIBSOu0RRgjYFKc5HdRESgipvQ31u!FNyoUFs4BxnJ X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1971 X-Original-Bytes: 1909 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:91241 Hi, Cecil Bankston a écrit le 15/01/2015 16:52 : Could you please explain how you edited the installation file? I need the Windows version. Does your edited version install and function normally? Open the xpi file with a tool like 7zip and edit the install.rdf file. After that, you can use the xpi file. -- Sorry for possible mistakes in English! http://pasdenom.info/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I had two major gripes with 2.31. The first one shows up with the page http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/jan/15/youtube-best-sport-videos-star-wars-chelsea-serena-willimas (yep, her name is wrong in the link). 2.31 hung instead of displaying the comments. I suspect this is related to the Chase bug, and 2.32 fixes it. YES!! The second one has to do with a plugin I only use under Linux so I'll have to wait until opensuse provide the new level. Still, fixing that Comments bug is going to reduce my Firefox usage a lot. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released - password problem still present
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I have upgraded to 2.32 from 2.30 as the Chase problem is solved and had hoped that the password problem would be among the fixes. I regret to inform you that this has NOT been solved in 2.32 either. PLEASE correct this problem, it is extremely annoying. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Yamo' wrote: Hi, Le 14/01/2015 16:12, Cecil Bankston a écrit : Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I've edited the version 3.7a2 (didn't found the 3.7b1) : https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/2014/11/2014-11-09-00-40-06-comm-aurora/ Could you please explain how you edited the installation file? I need the Windows version. Does your edited version install and function normally? -- C. Bankston ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... If only that version had not broken Adblock Plus! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
PhillipJones schrieb: Thanks. I've turned back on SSL3. Next time I have to do this will see if this happens again. Note that this means you are making your computer intentionally insecure, for more information read https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/10/14/the-poodle-attack-and-the-end-of-ssl-3-0/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE KaiRo ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released - password problem still present
On 15-Jan-15 15:05, Larry S. wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I have upgraded to 2.32 from 2.30 as the Chase problem is solved and had hoped that the password problem would be among the fixes. I regret to inform you that this has NOT been solved in 2.32 either. PLEASE correct this problem, it is extremely annoying. Dave What password problem are you describing? I seem to see several different versions as I read this topic over recent weeks. In one, SM won't save new logins or passwords at all. In another, when they are saved in Password Manger SM won't autofill either one where needed. In another, SM will fill the userid but not the p/w. In another, SM will fill both if on the same page, but not the p/w if on a second page. I've been sticking with 2.26.1 until this sorts out (a biggie for me), but I'm coming to realize that I don't even really know if the problem affects me. Yes, I know about the problem extension to save passwords. Thank you for any insights or advice you might give me. Larry S. I wish to inform you that by 14 Feb 15, I will make another donation (after three (3) years) to the foundation for all my griping and your patience and input with my challenges and issues. I Am grateful! Thank you all, again, bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. I know it is not going to help you, but just for reference, I use NoScript and Request Policy. They are security addons, but they also kill adds as a nice side effect. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote: There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. Does it help to update ABP to the latest version 2.6.7? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil Ghostery will not install on SeaMonkey 2.32 from either Mozilla Addons site or Ghostery site. I had to uninstall the older version I had sort of working on SM 2.31. I started a thread at Ghostery forum about it (no replies yet). https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery-fixed-on-seamonkey-2-32 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It is NOT fixed on Windows either. I have SM on Windows 8.0 Pro and I cannot install Ghostery on SM 2.32. I had to remove the older partially working version I had on SM 2.31 as it was completely broken on 2.32. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 1/15/2015 5:33 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It's not fix because the problem is with Ghostery. They no longer support the pre-Australis interface. Search in Add-ins within SeaMonkey and you will NOT find Ghostery. Either they will have to add in support, or SeaMonkey will have to adopt Australis. Choose your poison. I when to Bluhell Firewall. Works just as good and lighter... Did you read the Bugzilla bug on this issue? It was fixed for SM 2.32 and is MARKED AS FIXED. I've asked Ghostery if we need to reopen the bug. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
EE wrote: If only that version had not broken Adblock Plus! What do you mean by break -- what are the symptoms? And what version of ABP are you running? I updated my Windows installation to SM 2.32 yesterday, and I see that I'm running ABP 2.6.7, and not seeing any problems with that combination. Something that I noticed is that this particular Mozilla release cycle, the updates for Seamonkey were remarkably fast. Windows versions of Seamonkey lagged Firefox by only about 24 hours, and Ubuntuzilla pushed out their updates within about 48 hours. Normally, if Firefox releases on Tuesday, I generally don't expect to see Seamonkey for Windows until about Friday, and then Ubuntuzilla not until Monday or Tuesday of the following week. It may be that this particular timing was enough that it caught some extension developers unexpectedly. I know that as I write this, the beta version of Lightning (which is necessary for running Seamonkey) has not yet updated from 3.6b1 (Windows) and 3.6b3 (Linux), and I presume that SM 2.32 is waiting for Lightning 3.7b1. Although I have Lightning installed, I don't really use it, and can afford to wait for the 3.7 beta. However, if I depended on Lightning, I would be downgrading back to SM 2.31, until Lightning is updated. Smith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released - password problem still present
Larry S. wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I have upgraded to 2.32 from 2.30 as the Chase problem is solved and had hoped that the password problem would be among the fixes. I regret to inform you that this has NOT been solved in 2.32 either. PLEASE correct this problem, it is extremely annoying. Dave What password problem are you describing? I seem to see several different versions as I read this topic over recent weeks. In one, SM won't save new logins or passwords at all. In another, when they are saved in Password Manger SM won't autofill either one where needed. In another, SM will fill the userid but not the p/w. In another, SM will fill both if on the same page, but not the p/w if on a second page. I've been sticking with 2.26.1 until this sorts out (a biggie for me), but I'm coming to realize that I don't even really know if the problem affects me. Yes, I know about the problem extension to save passwords. Thank you for any insights or advice you might give me. Larry S. ...and then there's the random requests for Master Password...which I didn't stick with 2.23 long enough to observe, but I'm sure is still there. Ditto on sticking with 2.26.1, even with that bug. Other than that the Password Manager is working for me. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Philip Chee wrote: On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released (address books)
It looks like they went to old address book autocompletion method? On 1/14/2015 5:05 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ -- Only two great groups of animals, men and ants, indulge in highly organized mass warfare. --Charles H. Maskins /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote: Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J It looks like SeaMonkey users won't have a Lightning because Thunderbird didn't build a 35.0 beta. You may be able to figure out something to get it to work, or switch to Thunderbird. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J Quote: You could try an untested and unreleased build from the build server, for example: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1419527852/ contains a build from 25-Dec-2014 that might work with SeaMonkey 2.32 on x64 Linux platform. UnQuote. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. Ghostery uses it's own custom button registration code so their blue pacman like button should appear on the extreme right of the navigation toolbar. You might need to restart SeaMonkey. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Hi, Le 14/01/2015 16:12, Cecil Bankston a écrit : Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I've edited the version 3.7a2 (didn't found the 3.7b1) : https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/2014/11/2014-11-09-00-40-06-comm-aurora/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released - password problem still present
David H. Durgee wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I have upgraded to 2.32 from 2.30 as the Chase problem is solved and had hoped that the password problem would be among the fixes. I regret to inform you that this has NOT been solved in 2.32 either. PLEASE correct this problem, it is extremely annoying. Dave What password problem are you describing? I seem to see several different versions as I read this topic over recent weeks. In one, SM won't save new logins or passwords at all. In another, when they are saved in Password Manger SM won't autofill either one where needed. In another, SM will fill the userid but not the p/w. In another, SM will fill both if on the same page, but not the p/w if on a second page. I've been sticking with 2.26.1 until this sorts out (a biggie for me), but I'm coming to realize that I don't even really know if the problem affects me. Yes, I know about the problem extension to save passwords. Thank you for any insights or advice you might give me. Larry S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Jonathan N. Little wrote: josephus wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I have a problem the udate does not fix. apparently 7 has an update that has broken the connection I cannot set my seamonkey as the system browser. I was trying to update flashplayer and it kept installing in IE. I looked and the buttons in seamonkey are grayed out. Maybe because SeaMonkey is already your default browser. NOTE: the flash updater does update your flash plugin in SeaMonkey (you can check from Tools Addon Manager Plugins) but the after-install check to see if install was successful is hard coded to launch IE! Bad-bad Adobe! But they are not the only ones that do it. There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even tried making a new profile to see if that would help. It did not help. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released - password problem still present
SamuelS wrote: On 15-Jan-15 15:05, Larry S. wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ I have upgraded to 2.32 from 2.30 as the Chase problem is solved and had hoped that the password problem would be among the fixes. I regret to inform you that this has NOT been solved in 2.32 either. PLEASE correct this problem, it is extremely annoying. Dave What password problem are you describing? I seem to see several different versions as I read this topic over recent weeks. In one, SM won't save new logins or passwords at all. In another, when they are saved in Password Manger SM won't autofill either one where needed. In another, SM will fill the userid but not the p/w. In another, SM will fill both if on the same page, but not the p/w if on a second page. I've been sticking with 2.26.1 until this sorts out (a biggie for me), but I'm coming to realize that I don't even really know if the problem affects me. Yes, I know about the problem extension to save passwords. Thank you for any insights or advice you might give me. Larry S. I wish to inform you that by 14 Feb 15, I will make another donation (after three (3) years) to the foundation for all my griping and your patience and input with my challenges and issues. I Am grateful! Thank you all, again, bo1953 Not as informative an answer as I might have hoped! Larry S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Daniel wrote: On 15/01/15 07:12, Jonathan N. Little wrote: josephus wrote: snip Maybe because SeaMonkey is already your default browser. NOTE: the flash updater does update your flash plugin in SeaMonkey (you can check from Tools Addon Manager Plugins) but the after-install check to see if install was successful is hard coded to launch IE! Bad-bad Adobe! But they are not the only ones that do it. Wasn't there, at sometime in the past, two different versions of Flash, one for MSIE and one for everything else?? Actually now 3; Mozillas, MSIE, and Opera Chromium Maybe, Win7 is choosing to only install the MSIE version of Flash and a separate installation of the non-MSIE is required. Nope. I bet if he goes to the plugin page Tools Add-ons Manager Plugins he will find his flash is up to date. It is the Flash plugin *installer* that is hard-coded on Windows to launch MSIE and not your *default* browser when it does its finalization part of the install. Adobe is not the only one to hard-code MSIE in their installers when the process goes to an online resource. Instead of just launching a URL which would use the user's default browser they call MSIE with the URL specifically. Bad practice in my opinion. If I wanted IE I would use and make it default, it is not like you can easily *remove* it! -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Rufus wrote: So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the PC version, and then victory was advertized. But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations as to why - I certainly *believe* it's broke...I've watched it break. But why do the developers think it's fixed, and why didn't they point out that it's only fixed for one case? If it is... It's not fix because the problem is with Ghostery. They no longer support the pre-Australis interface. Search in Add-ins within SeaMonkey and you will NOT find Ghostery. Either they will have to add in support, or SeaMonkey will have to adopt Australis. Choose your poison. I when to Bluhell Firewall. Works just as good and lighter... -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
josephus wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I have a problem the udate does not fix. apparently 7 has an update that has broken the connection I cannot set my seamonkey as the system browser. I was trying to update flashplayer and it kept installing in IE. I looked and the buttons in seamonkey are grayed out. Maybe because SeaMonkey is already your default browser. NOTE: the flash updater does update your flash plugin in SeaMonkey (you can check from Tools Addon Manager Plugins) but the after-install check to see if install was successful is hard coded to launch IE! Bad-bad Adobe! But they are not the only ones that do it. -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Cecil Bankston wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I have a problem the udate does not fix. apparently 7 has an update that has broken the connection I cannot set my seamonkey as the system browser. I was trying to update flashplayer and it kept installing in IE. I looked and the buttons in seamonkey are grayed out. josephus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J It looks like SeaMonkey users won't have a Lightning because Thunderbird didn't build a 35.0 beta. You may be able to figure out something to get it to work, or switch to Thunderbird. -- Strip District Music Fest 2015-01-17 http://www.stripdistrictmusicfest.com/ Je Suis Charlie ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... Still waiting for it to show up in either the update or mozilla repository for openSUSE. No hurry, no Lightning for it. -- Strip District Music Fest 2015-01-17 http://www.stripdistrictmusicfest.com/ Je Suis Charlie ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... -- Jaime A. Cruz Secretary Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34 http://www.AMADistrict34.com/ Pop's Run http://www.popsrun.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 09:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... Still waiting for it to show up in either the update or mozilla repository for openSUSE. No hurry, no Lightning for it. Notice an issue with the latest release. I use a special program to make Backup PDFs of receipts of Browser pages (Yojimbo) I noticed even though when I go to Print PDF Save to: Yojimbo. The preview doesn't show it but a new item I never seen before. http://goo.gl/jWHBrM I deliberately Blurred out any possible sensitive information. Supposedly SeaMonkey is being advertised as FireFox. What do I need to fix to correct this the previous version doesn't exhibit this. Problem. That is probably The SSL 3.0 encryption protocol is disabled by default due to security concerns (bug 1076983). Legacy websites may still rely on it and will not work with the newer TLS 1.x protocols. SSL 3.0 support can be re-enabled in Preferences under Privacy Security, SSL. [SeaMonkey 2.32 Release Notes](http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/#issues) Thanks. I've turned back on SSL3. Next time I have to do this will see if this happens again. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... Still waiting for it to show up in either the update or mozilla repository for openSUSE. No hurry, no Lightning for it. Notice an issue with the latest release. I use a special program to make Backup PDFs of receipts of Browser pages (Yojimbo) I noticed even though when I go to Print PDF Save to: Yojimbo. The preview doesn't show it but a new item I never seen before. http://goo.gl/jWHBrM I deliberately Blurred out any possible sensitive information. Supposedly SeaMonkey is being advertised as FireFox. What do I need to fix to correct this the previous version doesn't exhibit this. Problem. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ...ok...the Bugs Fixed list indicated SM 2.32 fixed Ghostery (bug 1060858)...but I installed SM 2.32 (Mac), and Ghostery 5.2.1 does not work. I tried updating Ghostery to the latest version, and it would not install. Back to SM 2.26.1...Ghostery 5.2.1 works again. Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api ...I'd like to know why they claim it's fixed, and what platform it's supposedly fixed on. It doesn't look like they checked anything but Windoze... -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 01/14/2015 09:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ And it was in the Ubuntuzilla repository immediately too! Life is good. Now, to see if the Usenet Binary Attachment bug has been fixed... Still waiting for it to show up in either the update or mozilla repository for openSUSE. No hurry, no Lightning for it. Notice an issue with the latest release. I use a special program to make Backup PDFs of receipts of Browser pages (Yojimbo) I noticed even though when I go to Print PDF Save to: Yojimbo. The preview doesn't show it but a new item I never seen before. http://goo.gl/jWHBrM I deliberately Blurred out any possible sensitive information. Supposedly SeaMonkey is being advertised as FireFox. What do I need to fix to correct this the previous version doesn't exhibit this. Problem. That is probably The SSL 3.0 encryption protocol is disabled by default due to security concerns (bug 1076983). Legacy websites may still rely on it and will not work with the newer TLS 1.x protocols. SSL 3.0 support can be re-enabled in Preferences under Privacy Security, SSL. [SeaMonkey 2.32 Release Notes](http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/#issues) -- Strip District Music Fest 2015-01-17 http://www.stripdistrictmusicfest.com/ Je Suis Charlie ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
On 15/01/15 07:12, Jonathan N. Little wrote: josephus wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? I have a problem the udate does not fix. apparently 7 has an update that has broken the connection I cannot set my seamonkey as the system browser. I was trying to update flashplayer and it kept installing in IE. I looked and the buttons in seamonkey are grayed out. Maybe because SeaMonkey is already your default browser. NOTE: the flash updater does update your flash plugin in SeaMonkey (you can check from Tools Addon Manager Plugins) but the after-install check to see if install was successful is hard coded to launch IE! Bad-bad Adobe! But they are not the only ones that do it. Wasn't there, at sometime in the past, two different versions of Flash, one for MSIE and one for everything else?? Maybe, Win7 is choosing to only install the MSIE version of Flash and a separate installation of the non-MSIE is required. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20150101220549 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Woot!2.32 fixes the weird null shortcutCache ICO files I posted about. -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility with this version? -- C. Bankston ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.32 released
Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.32 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.32/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
