Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.19 Return is now available
Henk, On 26-04-2005 07:04, you [HMdB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: HMdB> I missed a space, should be ok now, thanks. HMdB> -- HMdB> Henk M. de Bruijn Nope. :-) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.19 Return Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.19 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Wrong Body Loaded, and "Browse Deleted Messages"
Martin, On 24-04-2005 23:21, you [MWot] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MWot> Wouldn't it be nice if TB! followed the same naming convention MWot> used with POP3 accounts, e.g. tbbeta.TBB? Yup! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.17 Return Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.18 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 3.0.9.17: bugs (mainly IMAP)
Manuel, On 20-04-2005 14:52, you [MB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> # I still cannot delete parked messages in local Outbox for IMAP >> accounts - they _are_ moved to IMAP remote Trash but aren't removed >> from local Outbox. MB> Not confirmed. MB> I've a local Outbox, moved a message to it, parked it, deleted it MB> after the confirmation-dialog. Very strange since it is reproducible here. Did you move to another folder and back again? The message is removed from view here, but when I switch back to the folder, it is still there. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.17 Return Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 3.0.9.17: bugs (mainly IMAP)
9Val, On 20-04-2005 14:09, you [9] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 9> Hello Peter, PF>> # IMAP mailboxes are connected to/refreshed on startup although this PF>> has been "unticked". 9> Sorry, don't get you here OK, I'll try to be more specific: For 2 of my 3 IMAP accounts I check here from work, I have set TB! _not_ to connect to them at startup. However, when I start TB! they are bolded, indicating new mail. Strangely enough, after some time, they unbold themselves. And one of them shows 2 <*> for unread mail - it does has 2 unread messages in it but the other one that bolded has no unread messages at all. It did however, have a message in the Outbox (remote). Is this clearer now? PF>> # Parked messages/drafts in Outboxes bold them. Icon wrong (old PF>> "parked" icon and not "draft" icon). 9> Was fixed yesterday Good. PF>> # Account Options: IMAP fine-tune "Allow N concurrent connections..." PF>> text is wrapped and under other text strings. 9> Was fixed some days ago Good. PF>> # This is almost certainly known: Old keyboard shortcuts are not PF>> migrated. 9> And perhaps never be Ouch! And I cannot print out the ones from the old keyboard shortcut editor, can I? This will mean I will have to write down the ones I want to use by hand. Not what I had hoped for but there you go. PF>> # Does anybody have any idea what the new IMAP option "Auto PF>> filtering" does? 9> New? ;-) OK, new since 3.0.1.33 as I have been using that version for a long time due to problems. 9> Refreshing folder will re-filter not processed messages in 9> background, so you don't need manually select folder with new 9> messages. Nice. What about this? # I still cannot delete parked messages in local Outbox for IMAP accounts - they _are_ moved to IMAP remote Trash but aren't removed from local Outbox. Some more: # Every time I start TB!, it seems to freeze for a couple of seconds - maybe 10 secs the first time and 2 secs the second time. The third time not problem: related to IMAP filtering (as all messages had be filtered the third time)? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.17 Return Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Beta 3.0.9.17: bugs (mainly IMAP)
Hello beta testers. I have found the following issues with the latest beta (after testing for 10 mins) - confirmations would be nice: # IMAP mailboxes are connected to/refreshed on startup although this has been "unticked". # Parked messages/drafts in Outboxes bold them. Icon wrong (old "parked" icon and not "draft" icon). # I still cannot delete parked messages in local Outbox for IMAP accounts - they _are_ moved to IMAP remote Trash but aren't removed from local Outbox. # Account Options: IMAP fine-tune "Allow N concurrent connections..." text is wrapped and under other text strings. # This is almost certainly known: Old keyboard shortcuts are not migrated. What I like: # IMAP mailboxes seem to be bolded immediately when new mail arrives. But I need more testing to be sure. Questions: # I suppose the "sort by thread" will be split up in "sort by reference only" and "sort by reference and subject" - this would be nice as I correspond with a lot of users of the broken e-mailer, Outlook and for them, I need the combined mode. However, would it be possible to show combined modes more cleverly, i.e. with more levels? I get: Original message | +--- Reply | +--- My reply to the reply above Would it not be possible to devise something that looks like this: Original message | +--- Reply | +--- My reply to the reply above Based on "Correspondence with same person and looking at time stamp" and maybe even using the Outlook Thread-Topic and Thread-Index headers if available? # Does anybody have any idea what the new IMAP option "Auto filtering" does? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.17 Return Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: My reasons to revert to 3.0.2.10
MAU, On 19-04-2005 13:04, you [M] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: M> But it does "force" me to use 3.0.2.10 during my works hours and I am M> sorry about it. Agreed. For me this is also so annoying that I cannot test betas to any significant degree before this is fixed. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Close / save button on Customise
Graham, On 19-04-2005 10:49, you [FG] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: FG> Am I the only person who feel uncomfortable at the lack of SAVE, FG> Exit / Cancel buttons on the Customise dialogue? No. Poor UI design... -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: An error occurred while reading the message base (IMAP)
moment. AM> Otherwise, I will continue to feel like I'm testing for just AM> testing, rather than testing towards a final product that I'll end AM> up really continuing to use in the end. I understand you completely. I hope what I have written above will show why I will continue to help with testing IMAP. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.15 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: An error occurred while reading the message base (IMAP)
Keith, On 14-04-2005 03:39, you [KR] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: KR> Can anyone help me with this, or are there any IMAP users left here? KR> Has everyone, including Allie, abandoned ship? I have not jumped ship but I am using 3.0.1.33 which seems to work OK for me. It does not work perfectly but with minor issues. When some of the other bugs have been ironed out of this beta series, I will start beta testing again. When (if?) TB! grows better with IMAP, I want to move all my accounts to IMAP but I dare not at the moment. But for me TB! is more important than IMAP - for me Mulberry and Thunderbird are not an option due to missing functionalities: macros, RegExp, etc. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.15 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.9.12 new-/non-/fixed issues
Peter, How have you compiled this list? As I gather it, this is not a complete list of issues reported for the pre-betas, right? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.12 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.9.11 issues
Marck, On 01-04-2005 16:21, you [MDP] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MDP> 3) Scroll bar MDP>All scroll bars everywhere seem to be out-of-whack. They all show MDP>slack scroll areas - the ScrollRange is set beyond the bounds of MDP>the list / view. If you drag any scroll bar to the bottom of the MDP>track, the list / window scrolls well beyond the end of data. And when you've had a very long account tree and you collapse it (so it would fit in the account tree height), you are not automatically "scrolled up". You are in 3.0.1.33. Hope it is clear what I mean. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.11 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Themes only "half" sticking
Jonathan, On 28-03-2005 22:35, you [JA] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JA> If I then click on "New Message" for example, the colours are off on JA> some of the bars, for example: Reported at least here <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.10 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.9.9 issues (already found?)
Peter, On 23-03-2005 21:57, you [PF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF> After having used this latest beta for a day or so, I have found PF> the following issues which I _think_ have not been reported before: (...) PF> Issues that I _think_ have been reported: If I select theme Office 2003, the menu bar (with Message, Specials, etc.) has the same colour the whole width of the window. If I restart TB!, the part of the menu that has text on it is decidedly lighter than the rest of the menu (to the right of the text). If I switch to another theme and back all is well again. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.9.9 issues (already found?)
Peter, On 23-03-2005 21:57, you [PF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF> After having used this latest beta for a day or so, I have found PF> the following issues which I _think_ have not been reported before: I also get a get bolded outboxes with a count of (1) although no messages are shown when selecting it. Yes, there _is_ a message there as reported by 3.0.1.33! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
3.0.9.9 issues (already found?)
Hello beta testers. After having used this latest beta for a day or so, I have found the following issues which I _think_ have not been reported before: I have new thread sorting enabled but threads with new messages are not moved to the bottom of the message list (I have it set so that newest messages go at the bottom). In my QT for the beta list, I have %language="br", but it does not work. It does not change the language although all other aspects of the mail are changed as according to the template. If you remove duplicates from folder while the contents are visible, sometimes the message list goes almost empty. I need to change folder and back to get the refreshed list. If you scroll to the bottom of the message list, sometimes you can scroll 5-10 "message lines" beyond the last message seeing only whitespace. Issues that I _think_ have been reported: That IMAP filtering does not work as "well" as it did in 3.0.1.33 (actually, it does not work at all here)? I have previously reported that saved, not queued, mail bolds outboxes which is annoying. I cannot set font size separately for quotation lines in MicroEd. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
Marek, On 22-03-2005 20:02, you [MM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> [-] UI : message list uses correct font size MM> confirmed. Not confirmed. See <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
MAU, On 22-03-2005 21:57, you [M] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: M> In 3.0.9.9 this options has been changed to: "Limit expansion of M> first column to NN levels". If you select 1 for NN your first column M> width will not change, I have just verified this. Ah, I had missed this. Thanks! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
Richard, On 22-03-2005 21:28, you [RW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> * In thread by reference view the subject field grows bigger and PF>> bigger as I navigate though messages. RW> Hooray, the first column expands all the way again as it did before this RW> version came out. In the old release version, you had the choice whether this should happen or not. I want it to _not_ happen! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
Stefan, Don't know if this has been reported yet: * Each time I start, I need to go to Colour Groups and Font and reset the font size (I have it at 8 pt). When TB! first opens, the font is smaller than this. I just need to open the dialog and click OK, then all is OK again. * I cannot set different font sizes for MicroEd's text and quotations. * The menu/shortcut editor really needs some Save/Cancel buttons! * Draft messages bold the Outbox. Not good. Only queued mail should. * In thread by reference view the subject field grows bigger and bigger as I navigate though messages. How do I avoid that. In old days there was an "automatic subject field width" setting but I cannot find that now. Here TB! uses 90-94% CPU on checking news via MyGate - way more then before. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
MAU, On 22-03-2005 19:59, you [M] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: M> You can change shortcuts, at least many of them, by editing the M> 'mainform.def' file (in your TB directory) with a text editor. You M> can always go back to defaults by copying this file from the *.rar. I am trying right now. Thanks. If this works, I'll try the new version, although .8 did not work with IMAP filtering here... -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.9 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) is now available
Stefan, On 22-03-2005 19:13, you [ST] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ST> Here is a short list of changes: Could you give us any sort of time frame on when you expect the keyboard shortcuts will be fixed? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.8 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.9.7: My most annoying bugs!
MAU, On 19-03-2005 20:18, you [M] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: M> Have you done any reading at all of what's been written and reported M> on this list since this 3.0.9.x started? Maybe you should. I have done some but apparently not enough. M> It is not a bug, this is due to the new UI which is still under M> development. IMO it is a bug that previous settings are not migrated, n'est-ce pas? >> The sorting on date is somehow reversed as compared to before. M> yes, it is. And don't take my word for it but I think it will stay that M> way. OK. I will change mine. It's all in the meaning of "descending" - compared to what - dates or age? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
3.0.9.7: My most annoying bugs!
Hello beta testers. I hate the fact that none of my keyboard shortcuts work: please fix this one immediately. TB! is mainly for power users (whatever that is) and we probably use the keyboard a lot. The sorting on date is somehow reversed as compared to before. Is this by design (and should I fix my View Modes) or a bug? If the latter, please fix ASAP as it is highly annoying. Lesser stuff: The Colour Group and Fonts does not seem to like my previous setting where the font was specified at 11 pt. Can be fixed, though. I have not messed with any of the new stuff yet, as it is hard for me to use TB! when the two bugs mentioned above are present. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Install beta from new series - what do I need?
Hello beta testers. As can be seen from my sig, I am running the latest release version, but I would like to try out the current (pre-)betas. I suppose it is not enough just to download tbb30907.rar and install it? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
David, On 22-02-2005 23:52, you [DE] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: DE>>> I am sorry but it was released a alpha release. DE> Yea and ?? I did not write what you answering. You cut out my reply to that message. >> That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general >> public (although it as per BS standards would be a Beta :-) ) as long as >> it is clearly marked as such. DE> But they follow the correct protocols. DE> They announced it as an an alpha. Yes they did. But again, according to BS 7925-1 (AFAIR), alpha tests take place in-house. Anyway this is off-topic and not that interesting. >> People (including myself) have anxiously been waiting for news from >> Ritlabs and I suppose that they have released this version to give people >> something to "work with". DE> < ... > DE> Then wait for a beta. Which I also wrote I would. I don't know why you are suggesting I should do what I already have said I would do? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP and Mail Fetching Quirks
Jonathan, On 23-02-2005 06:18, you [JA] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JA> This email is concerning IMAP and message fetching quirks. It'd JA> appear randomly TB wants to "hang" on fetching emails. I have sat JA> here for an hour with 2 emails (yes only 2 emails) sitting in the JA> queue to be processed with the "Status" of "In Queue". I get this problem with all versions past 3.0.1.33 (I have not tried the alpha). -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
David, On 22-02-2005 23:24, you [DE] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to >> this list. DE> I don't agree here. It was advertised as an Alpha release. OK as per BS standards (yes, I have recently been ISEB certified software tester), alpha tests/releases per definition take place in-house. >> Only after a program has been thoroughly tested by the developers and >> a very selective group of volunteers and the program has shown to be >> stable (not saying bug free!!), it should be made available to a >> wider audience, i.e. this TBBETA list. DE> I am sorry but it was released a alpha release. Yes. See above. That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general public (although it as per BS standards would be a Beta :-) ) as long as it is clearly marked as such. People (including myself) have anxiously been waiting for news from Ritlabs and I suppose that they have released this version to give people something to "work with". Personally, I'll wait for the Beta. And then I will wait to hear if IMAP is better than the one I am using now. Any version after 3.0.1.33 breaks in my Exchange server environment. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Quiet?
Tony, On 22-02-2005 23:28, you [TB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: TB> Well I've got bored waiting so I'm playing with Poco. TB> TB> -- TB> Tony. TB> TB> :gentoo: TB> www.gentoo.org Which apparently has a problem with sig delimiters... :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: the bat! wishes
Goncalo, On 18-02-2005 08:33, you [GF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: GF> That's not true! Even TB! already uses the Document and Settings GF> directory ( ie, C:\Documents and Settings\USER\Application GF> Data\TheBat!) to store the mailboxes among other things. Yes. In its default setup. The user can change this at the time of installation. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filtering VFs by received date
Marcus, On 10-02-2005 20:48, you [MO] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MO> Well, are there any BT items, or should I add two (I'll do the work MO> for you Peter)? I don't know, but please add the wish - it'll will save me some typing... :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filtering VFs by received date
Roger, On 10-02-2005 19:13, you [RP] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: RP> If you use two filters, one for 'AGE' greater than, 'AND' and a RP> second one for 'AGE' less than, should give you only mail a RP> particular day. Am I the only one who would also like to be able to select hours for "age"? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter not updated when account name changes
Thorvald, On 10-02-2005 08:22, you [TN] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: TN> I changed the account to xyz.xyz.de, but the accountname in the move TN> filters is not adjusted. Confirmed! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: How to exit The Bat! immediately?
Alexey, On 27-01-2005 19:50, you [ANV] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ANV> It seems to be the strange "feature": This worked for some time ago*, but the ability to exit _now_ is most often broken. ___ * I do not remember when but it has worked, I am quite sure. However it only worked for a short time. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Update on the Status of Software
Goncalo, On 21-01-2005 09:23, you [GF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: GF> Really, I have better things to do so I just cut the signature and GF> move on. Who else votes for a ban? GF> If this was a list that didn't have to do with TB! beta tests, you GF> could be sure that I would go elsewhere. You do not need to be here to be informed of new betas. Not do you need to be here for reporting bugs. What's keeping you? Good bye. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mod: Top posting
Stuart, On 10-01-2005 16:49, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that PF>> version has a number of bugs. SH> So what do you want, a rushed version that may still have big holes in SH> it or to wait a while for one which, we /all/ hope, has these major SH> problems fixed? This was not the issue: the rush is that currently it does not work (properly, for me, at least). Hence I would prefer a quick fix to these problems and then Ritlabs could continue doing what they're doing. Of course, if they're rewriting IMAP completely, the wait for me is warranted. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mod: Top posting
Stuart, On 10-01-2005 09:55, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> So what? I'd happily wait as long again for a full release that was SH> - relatively - bug free and functional. Why the rush? Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that version has a number of bugs. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?
Dierk, On 06-01-2005 14:26, you [DH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage DNSBL. >> Ursache: dnsbl.sorbs.net list.dsbl.org And again. >> Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage And again. So it is due to the fact that DNSBL finally works. DH> Curiously my own message was scored high due to a blacklist server DH> (not that I am aware of being BL'ed, or why I should be). You can see your result here <http://moensted.dk/spam/?addr=write4u.de&Submit=Submit> and make a query yourself here <http://openrbl.org/> as well (fewer results). I does not look like you are on lists (to any greater extent). -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?
Dierk, On 06-01-2005 09:17, you [DH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: DH> Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I DH> very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors), DH> all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily DH> explainable. DH> This morning I polled my mail and four out of six messages from this DH> list were suddenly deemed Junk. I didn't change any of my settings. Before it did not seem to work well here. Hopefully now that the public blacklists are to be working again, that may be the course of the increased "aggression"? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 17-12-2004 12:36, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> Should it be just a case of enabling the P2Pplugin to get it to SH> work? Yes. In plugin options you can set a number of how many other people have received the mail in order for it to be spam. SH> If I do that then my TB! connections hang and the SpamPal Status SH> shows that it's trying to connect to something. Sounds like a firewall issue. Naturally, checking mail is slower with both bayesian, publick blacklists and P2P - in the case of the latter because they contact external servers. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 17-12-2004 11:14, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> What was wrong? SH> I truth? I have no idea. :) SH> I know it's working 'cos I can see loads of messages that really are SH> spam that BayesIt missed but which have been marked **SPAM** You would probably prefer that SpamPal adds a header field "X-Spampal: spam" instead of having it in the subject line. It can still be filtered and you do not need to make a subject cleaning filter. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 17-12-2004 10:56, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> Hope this helps a little more. SH> I've got it working, thanks. What was wrong? SH> It seems to have taken a bit of an exception to Tony Broom though; SH> all of his messages are marked as spam! Probably his provider is on a public blacklist. You can use auto-whitelists. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 17-12-2004 10:17, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> I don't know about Exchange servers - but have you tried to fill in a PF>> DNS address type thing or IP? SH> I don't know what you mean by this. I mean for the address of the Exchange server, you fill in something like exchange.example.com (DNS) or 111.111.111.111 (IP address) instead of the windows (?) name. Can you ping your Exchange server over the network? What IP address does it return? PF>> It seems like you need to change the port (due to some other proxy) and PF>> SpamPal cannot understand the address of the exchange server. SH> I'm using rss2pop3 and MyGate but on different accounts; I've got no SH> proxies running on the account I'm trying to run SpamPal against. No but I think these will influence, no matter whether they are on another account. Ports are "global" for your machine. PF>> Have you tried looking at the SpamPal forums for help? SH> Not yet; I was hoping it was a nice quick, simple setup like the other SH> proxies I'm using. I'll have to try and have a proper play later. Hope this helps a little more. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 16-12-2004 15:14, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> And I've changed it to SH> Server: 127.0.0.1 SH> Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SH> password: SH> Port: 110 SH> SpamPal complains about the port (110) being in use. I've tried I don't know about Exchange servers - but have you tried to fill in a DNS address type thing or IP? SH> changing the port number in TB to 1110 and changing the local port SH> number in SpamPal to the same but then when I try and collect my mail, SH> the TB! log reports that the server rejected the request 'cos of a bad SH> username/passowrd. It seems like you need to change the port (due to some other proxy) and SpamPal cannot understand the address of the exchange server. Have you tried looking at the SpamPal forums for help? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:43, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> Thanks, I'll try and follow that up between Christmas and New Year SH> whilst it's quiet in the office. I might have been unclear: * BayesIt has Bayesian * Bayes Filter has Bayesian and public blacklists * SpamPal (with plugins) has Bayesian, regexp, URL in body, peer-to-peer, public blacklists and much more. All have personal white/blacklists. For me the by far most effective is SpamPal - due to the combination of Bayesian, peer-to-peer and public blacklists. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:46, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> (SpamPal plugin home PF>> <http://www.agentintelligent.com/P2Pplugin.html>). SH> The site seems to be down. Not from here. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Spam on the increase
Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:24, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder SH> that BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain SH> nothing that I might not expect to find in a regular message, little SH> jokes, quotations from literature, etc; no keywords that point to SH> the real nature of the message at all. The real 'message' is hidden SH> in an attached image file. That is the inherent failure of Bayesian filtering. Effective spam filtering needs more strings to play on - which is why I use Bayes Filer (with public blacklists) and SpamPal at home which to me has _the_ most useful additional anti-spam mechanism: peer-to-peers spam fighting using DCC servers (SpamPal plugin home <http://www.agentintelligent.com/P2Pplugin.html>). More about DCC here <http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/>. For me this approach has been really helpful. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP on current beta
Marcus, On 15-12-2004 16:12, you [MW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MW> Anyone got any tips for working imap (I dont do anything complicated, MW> no filters or anything) on the current beta? This is the first beta MW> thats been unusable for me on imap. See the sub-thread beginning with <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat
AC, On 15-12-2004 15:48, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I hope you will fix the hanging IMAP tasks before that... AM> Yep. I've been trying for the last couple days but it's an intolerable AM> problem at present. I agree. AM> Problems with beta 10 and IMAP: AM> - as was said before; frequently hanging connections. This has actually AM> followed me after rolling back to pre-multiple connection support AM> builds. The hangs and glitches are numerous. Yes. For me it makes any thing later than 3.0.1.33 useless. Strangely enough the problems seems to have "spilled over" to this previously good version. AM> - wrong message bodies being displayed for messages actually selected. I haven't seen this (I think). AM> - Duplication of messages in the message list. Leaving the folder AM> and going back fixes the message list glitch. Quite unnerving that. Get this too. AM> - Message list not displaying on selecting a folder. Haven't seen this either. AM> - The attachment limit feature doesn't work well. Have not tried this. AM> - I just can't get an SSL connection to be stably working for any AM> meaningful period. Have not tried this. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat
Maxim, On 15-12-2004 14:00, you [MM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MM> We've decided to release a stable version with new major additions MM> at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most likely to MM> release the new version in 2005. I hope you will fix the hanging IMAP tasks before that... -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie
AC, On 02-12-2004 22:50, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I confirm that. 3.0.2.10 continuous loses connection to all of my >> four imap-accounts - one after one... ping, ping, ping, ping. Even a >> reconnect doesn't work - have to close TB and restart it. AM> Confirmed here. :( I know I indicated the contrary but I now confirm. AM> -- AM> Cheers, AM> Allie Martin Ouch :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.10 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie
Matt, On 02-12-2004 19:36, you [MT] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MT> Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. No problem here. In order for Ritlabs to fix the problem, you really should post your IMAP settings and your IMAP server. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Minimilization
Tony, On 02-12-2004 16:56, you [TB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: TB> Could we have the option to Minimise to the tray if we click the X TB> please. I use a number of programs that have this option and it's TB> become habit. So much so that I keep closing The Bat every 5 TB> minutes when what I really want is to just minimise it. <http://powerpro.webeddie.com/> does this and a bunch of other stuff. _The_ utility for Windows. I know a lot of people here use it and I do too. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch
Chris, On 02-12-2004 08:46, you [CW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: CW> On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch CW> (see attached). CW> Can anyone else confirm? Yup. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP Issues
Chris, On 29-11-2004 22:27, you [CW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: CW> 3. Incorrect marked messages. I get this, too. A messages was not marked with attachment (I have set TB! to fetch message structures with headers, set the folder to full sync - _and_ I had fetched the message) although it had three. BTW the multiple connections seem to work - but it still takes forever to fetch mail on my LAN, since TB! "freezes" on "Fetch Flags" on several of the connections. Exchange via IMAP. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.10 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Lost all mail on Exchange account
Peter, On 19-11-2004 16:58, you [PG] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Is it really gone from the Exchange mailbox? Have you looked at it >> with Outlook? PG> No, it is only gone from the TB!, but all mail is still on the PG> Exchange server. The folder was truncated. As far as I know, there is PG> no way to re-synchronize it with the TB!. I use the IMAP connection method to out Exchange server at work as TB! doesn't handle to Exchange protocol too well: * The dates are messed up * Messages sometimes seem to be deleted from server on fetch -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter
Paul, Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens. On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PVN> I did not realize it takes 15 swats with a sledge hammer by several PVN> people to pound a single carpet tack. Because you made several "errors" that needed pointing out. Also, someone might not be aware that the roles have been broken. This is the reason for the several moderator messages. PVN> Why wasn't there a welcoming message explaining the rules? You didn't? OK, this sounds like a mistake. You should have. The moderators can send you the list rules I am sure. PVN> What I don't appreciate is sifting the info for something of value PVN> past the first message. I don't understand what you mean by this? PVN> I am very busy. I am self-employed so I don't have deep pockets PVN> available to pay me for lost time. It is always voluntary participating here... :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter
Paul, On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PVN> I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be PVN> amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant. With this attitude I doubt anyone will give you something of substance. The list rules are not insignificant. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP performance no longer what it used to be.
Allie, On 11-11-2004 22:03, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> Now, it's not so. TB! is now bogged down with a tremendous queue of AM> what I really don't know. A lot of server count requests, something AM> I used to do without problems. I'm now back to using ThunderBird. I also seem to get quite a number of these: !12-11-2004, 09:47:32: IMAP - Could not download messages due to processing error In the account log. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.6 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP performance no longer what it used to be.
Allie, On 11-11-2004 22:53, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Worst thing is that gong back to 3.0.1.33 (my reference version) >> does not really help. AM> I've discovered *that* as well. Which is strange, isn't it? One would think that a new *.exe was all that was needed to get back the performance of yore? Since nothing else is installed, I don't get it. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP performance no longer what it used to be.
Allie, On 11-11-2004 22:03, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> Now, it's not so. TB! is now bogged down with a tremendous queue of AM> what I really don't know. A lot of server count requests, something AM> I used to do without problems. I have this as well for the last 3-4 betas. TB! locks up for no reason executing a task. At work I have found that unticking "retrieve message structure with message headers" lessens the problems somewhat but TB! is definitely worse. Worst thing is that gong back to 3.0.1.33 (my reference version) does not really help. AM> -- AM> Allie Martin Ouch! :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.7 beta
Allie, On 11-11-2004 20:25, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> Unfortunately, there isn't a way to make that option stick between AM> restarts. AM> Another way to view only unread messages is through the ticker virtual AM> folder. Configure the ticker to display messages only for those folders AM> you wish to and then open the ticker folder. A third way is to assign a view mode that has the filter condition "Message attributes message is unread"? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Currupted mail/repair (now also IMAP)
Peter, On 10-11-2004 22:38, you [PF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF> I just got a "your message base is corrupted - do you want to PF> repair it now" message. Here at work I experienced the same for an IMAP folder. I "repaired" and suddenly several messages were marked unread, some were duplicated. I cleared the local cache and did a full re-sync. That helped. I believe the "repair" function is iffy. Re-sync found some old messages - although I have set TB! to compress automatically on folder change - does compress not do its job properly? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.6 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Currupted mail/repair
Tony, On 11-11-2004 09:22, you [TB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: TB> PSpad, it 100% free and quite phenomenal. Wow! -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.6 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Currupted mail/repair
Alexander, On 11-11-2004 08:47, you [ASK] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ASK> Any self-healing capabilities of about anyhing in the world (except ASK> those of my own physical body) usually make me go to red alert... ASK> :) I know. It is also very un-likely of me to trust this... :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.6 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Currupted mail/repair
MAU, On 11-11-2004 01:38, you [M] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: M> From what you say it looks like you didn't back up your massage base M> in 15 months, and you can't blame "repair" for that. No, true, but I _can_ blame TB! for corrupting my message base and the lulling me into a false sense of security be claiming the ability to repair it. Had you exported the whole base as an MBX file and fixed it by hand, you would have more chance of avoiding such a great message loss, I'd say. M> Those files may contain parts of damaged messages, so you can | view M> them with any binary file viewer (you can find plenty of them by | M> searching the Internet, even the standard Notepad can be used) and M> save | any relevant information you can find. `- In UltraEdit most of that file is [] (squares) AFAIR. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.6 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Currupted mail/repair
Hello beta testers. I just got a "your message base is corrupted - do you want to repair it now" message. I was stupid enough not to back up the TBB file before I let TB! "repair" the message base. The result: One part0001.bin of 43 MB and _15_ months of mail lost! I think the "repair" sucks big time. Has anyone else experienced something similar? What can I do to the bin file to retrieve the messages? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Bug 3.0.x.x: moving to next unread message across folders
Marcus, On 08-11-2004 20:30, you [MO] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MO> Strange. I remember this being discussed more then once but I never MO> heard of someone having it work as you describe. I guess I should MO> have congratulated you when it still did work :-) I have added a note. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Bug 3.0.x.x: moving to next unread message across folders
Marcus, On 08-11-2004 19:16, you [MO] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MO> It's not the later betas, it's been like this since "Allow search MO> for unread messages across accounts" were introduced. No, it has not (for me). For me it's only been over the last week or two. Before that it worked as described here. MO> Not confirmed, it has not been like you described since introducing MO> "Allow search for unread messages across accounts" It has here. MO> and before that, TB! would never jump across accounts no matter if MO> there were unread left in the current account or not. True. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Bug 3.0.x.x: moving to next unread message across folders
Hello beta testers. In the later betas (I am not sure when this first popped up) whenever I am at a "bottom" folder and use my keyboard shortcut for "move to next unread message", TB! does not move to the next unread message in the the currently selected account, but to the next unread in the next "lower" account. In the old days, _all_ unread messages in an account were the target of "next unread message" before another account was selected. Now__ Account A | +- Folder a (Has unread) | +- Folder b Start placement Account B | +- Folder c (Has unread) Jumps to this Before__ Account A | +- Folder a (Has unread) Jumps to this | +- Folder b Start placement Account B | +- Folder c (Has unread) Could we _please_ get the old behaviour back? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Martin, On 07-11-2004 18:14, you [MW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MW> Here's a summary in Excel (18kB). I've not done any analysis but MW> will start experimenting with my set-up as a result of this MW> exercise. Thanks for your contributions. Maybe you should add my second setup since this is an Exchange server with some more messages. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Allie, On 05-11-2004 14:02, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> - this must mean that the folders are not actually sync'ed until >> they're selected. AM> This is true if you have the folders set not to sync or the periodic AM> checking is disabled. Or, that I am faster moving to another older than the server setting flags... :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Allie, On 05-11-2004 13:21, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> You now go to another location, start TB! there and the local cache AM> for the folder still contains those messages you deleted. As a AM> result, the local cache contains more messages than are actually on AM> the server. With the next sync operation, the old messages are AM> deleted from the list and the cache. Yes, I know - but this one account I only access from one location (company account not accessible from outside the company network). Folder 1 10 Folder 2 10 If I move a message from Folder 1 to Folder 2 it now looks like this: Folder 1 10 <9> Folder 2 10 <11> - this must mean that the folders are not actually sync'ed until they're selected. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Allie, On 05-11-2004 13:04, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> The more information you retrieve about a message, the more AM> bandwidth is being used. So for slow connections, you should AM> minimize what you retrieve in order to see what's on the server for AM> reading. That makes sense. Maybe I'm just spoilt for bandwidth, so I've never noticed any big difference when I set stuff. >> It means that the server holds 10 messages for that folder but the >> local cache only holds 9. AM> Actually, it's the other way around. is the number of messages on AM> the server and which hasn't yet been fully sync'd with what's local. I believe you - I just find it strange that there would be less e-mail on the server than locally before sync'ing. >> After sync it only says 10. I forget what <*> means. AM> That just means that there are messages on the server but the amount is AM> yet to be determined. OK. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Keith, On 05-11-2004 09:29, you [KR] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: KR>>> 2.[X] Retrieve message structures together with message KR>>> headers >> 9Val explained this to me yesterday: "It retrieves information about all >> message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about has >> message attachments or not" KR> Why would one not want this? Idunno - as Homer would say :) KR> [ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message text KR> [ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes KR> if I check only the first box, no attachments will be downloaded, KR> and if I check the first two and put a number in the third, KR> attachments will be downloaded only if the message is smaller KR> than nK bytes? Yes. Or this is how I understand it. There seems to be a distinct lack of documentation of (also) the daily builds. >> This will show the message count on the server and not the difference >> between server and cached count - doing away with <*> and KR> I'm confused by this one. What does the <*> mean, anyway, and KR> what is "the difference between server and cached count"? If a folder looks like this: Folder10 <9> It means that the server holds 10 messages for that folder but the local cache only holds 9. After sync it only says 10. I forget what <*> means. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Keith, On 05-11-2004 08:53, you [KR] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: KR> Michael Acklin wrote: >> These I->[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message KR> text >> Could ->[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes >> Not Find ->[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast connection) KR> Like Michael and Bernd, I wasn't able to find these, either. I KR> had a little trouble tracking down some of the others, as well, KR> since some are out of sequence. These are only available in the daily build from yesterday. KR> 2.[X] Retrieve message structures together with message headers 9Val explained this to me yesterday: "It retrieves information about all message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about has message attachments or not" KR> 3.[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message text In newer builds - so that if a message is greater than "n", TB! will not download attachments - a bit like the POP3 setting. KR> 4.[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast connection) This will show the message count on the server and not the difference between server and cached count - doing away with <*> and -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration
Martin, I have two: Home, which I also access from work... IMAP Server: Mailmax 5.5 Server OS: Windows Network: Internet (2 MBit connection) TB! version: 3.0.2.4 build 04/11/2004 (at work this is 3.0.1.33) Automatically connect to server: At startup [X] When account is selected [x] For managing folders [x] With any command [x] [X] Compress emptied folders automatically [ ] When inactive, disconnect after [ ] seconds [X] Retrieve message structures together with message headers [X] Compress folders when switching to another folder [ ] Automatically disconnect after synchronisation [x] When on-line, refresh folders every [1] minutes [ ] Courier IMAP compatibility mode [X] Auto filtering [ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message text [ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes [X] Use precise counters (needs fast connection) [x] Check mailbox at start-up -> I don't think these [x] Periodical checking each [5] minutes -> actually do anything? [X] Remote Outbox All 5 folders set to full sync. Total messages ~45 (largest folder 38 messages) - this is a test account 9Val has access to. Work... IMAP Server: Exchange 6.5 Server OS: Windows Network: LAN (100 MBit connection) TB! version: 3.0.1.33 (to prevent IMAP lockups) Automatically connect to server: At startup [X] When account is selected [x] For managing folders [x] With any command [x] [X] Compress emptied folders automatically [ ] When inactive, disconnect after [ ] seconds [X] Retrieve message structures together with message headers [X] Compress folders when switching to another folder [ ] Automatically disconnect after synchronisation [x] When on-line, refresh folders every [1] minutes [ ] Courier IMAP compatibility mode [x] Check mailbox at start-up -> I don't think these [x] Periodical checking each [2] minutes -> actually do anything? [X] Local Outbox All 14 folders set to full sync. Total messages ~1812 (largest folder 457 messages) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Exchange issues (follow-up)
Just to follow up: On 20-10-2004 14:35, you [PF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF> Issues with the new Exchange server: PF> 1) IMAP: I cannot move messages to another folder. Yes, I can dump the PF> messages there but they're not re-fetched on accessing the folder. PF> If I open LookOut 2003, they are clearly visible. All folders are PF> set to Full synchronize in TB! The counts are correct, but not all PF> messages are shown! This problem was fixed clearing the local cache. I find it very puzzling that this should become corrupted just in the exact moment the server was upgraded. TB! works just as well with Exchange 6.5 as Exchange 5.5. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
Allie, On 03-11-2004 12:12, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> IMO, the thing to do would be for TB! to support the message AM> labelling as is supported by so many other IMAP clients. This colour AM> labelling can be stored server side. Yes. I agree. TB! should store this info server side. I don't know if anything can be done about memos. >> No but my suggestion is to make the current functionality more solid so >> that clearing the local cache does not remove colour groups and memos. AM> Those POP3 features are nice aren't they? :) Yup! AM> What I wish not to see is colour groups being enhanced the way you AM> describe and then colour labelling storable server side, and usable AM> by other IMAP clients is never supported. I agree. The optimal solution is the one you describe. However, I am afraid that this might mean a reduction in current functionality of CGs and memos. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
Allie, On 03-11-2004 03:22, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> So what happens when you wish to view those colours at another AM> location with another TB! client? You can't. But you cannot do that now either. They are stored with the local cache now. AM> What's the point of developing further support for an attribute that AM> cannot be stored centrally for at least another TB! installation to AM> make use of. This isn't what IMAP is about. No but my suggestion is to make the current functionality more solid so that clearing the local cache does not remove colour groups and memos. Naturally making this information available from all locations would be nice but I don't think this is possible as per the IMAP protocol? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
Hello beta testers. Please support my wish, if you agree... ,- [ https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4013 ] | Colour groups and Memos are saved in the local cache of IMAP folders. | For functionality not possible with IMAP, I'd like to TB! to save local | settings in a _separate_ file, not in the local cache of IMAP folders, | as they might be deleted to in order to fix IMAP issues. The separate | file could just be a list of message IDs and tag: "colour group X" and | "memo Y" which would then be shown when the message is selected. This | could work for POP3, too. PS. Outlook 2003 uses different coloured | "flags" - is this non-standard, too? `- -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Bug 3.0.2.4 Rush: Very slow IMAP
Peter, On 01-11-2004 09:33, you [PF] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF> This version runs well at home (mainly POP3) but very slow here at PF> work (mainly IMAP/Exchange). TB! uses 93-97% CPU (Pentium 4 with HT PF> and 512 RAM) - even doing nothing (no mail checking). As the signature shows I am back to 3.0.1.33 - speed/CPU use is OK again. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Bug 3.0.2.2 (Rush): Virtual folders not updating
Matt, On 31-10-2004 00:41, you [MT] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MT> Using 3.0.2.4 and the VF's are updating fine on my system. Not here. Still the same problem (IMAP folders as basis for the VFs). -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Bug 3.0.2.4 Rush: Very slow IMAP
Hello beta testers. This version runs well at home (mainly POP3) but very slow here at work (mainly IMAP/Exchange). TB! uses 93-97% CPU (Pentium 4 with HT and 512 RAM) - even doing nothing (no mail checking). Does anyone have the same experience? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: new revision
Allie, On 30-10-2004 14:25, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> I dislike the CC as a separate Window. It's one of those aspects of AM> TB! that I've never taken to. Me too. I liked it the way it was in Eudora 4 (the last version I used). I have CTRL+SHIFT+1 to show and CTRL+SHIFT+2 to hide it. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: new revision
Allie, On 30-10-2004 01:08, you [AM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AM> Can anyone else confirm these pauses in smooth browsing of messages? Yes. There is an entry in the BT for this <https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3985> -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Weird LCD monitor bug
Peter, On 28-10-2004 17:22, you [PG] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PG> Look at those screenshots. When the email is created on the computer PG> with the LCD monitor TB! starts to screw up part of the status bar. I also get this sometimes in the Log panel - and I am on a 22'' CRT running 2048*1536, large fonts on a Matrox G550. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Bug 3.0.2.2 (Rush): Virtual folders not updating
Hello beta testers. In this and in at least one previous version, TB! does not update read/unread status for VFs. They have been set as Auto Update - but they still show as bolded after the messages they contain have been read in their original/real folders. On Esc all is OK. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.2 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.2 is now available
Michael, On 27-10-2004 23:12, you [MLW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MLW> Take off, eh? ? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.2 Rush Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.2 is now available
Peter, On 27-10-2004 19:51, you [PM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PM> BTW, why do you call it Rush? A tribute to Canada's finest? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP - Message not moving to sent items
Jonathan, On 20-10-2004 22:24, you [JA] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JA> Server in question is an exchange server, but have since disabled JA> the account, and gone back to using Outlook for that account due to JA> slowness in TB. I use TB! with Exchange all day and the speed is very good. Local Outbox, still. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.1 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP - Message not moving to sent items
Chris, On 20-10-2004 13:19, you [CW] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: CW> Right now, when I send a message, the message is showing in the CW> status bar as sent and people are receiving the messages, but the CW> message is not then being moved into the 'Sent' folder. I get sort of the same thing - but mainly with messages with attachments: actually, my problem is more general with moving messages around. Moving a message from one IMAP folder to another, locks TB! (possible sending a SetFlags command) for some seconds and then - suddenly - all is OK again. I have no specific problems with moving from local outbox to remote sent folder. CW> FYI - For the account in question, I'm using a local Outbox as the CW> server side Outbox previously caused more problems (unless this has CW> now been rectified?). On my MailMax account: yes (for me) On my Exchange account: no (for me) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.1 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Exchange issues
Hello beta testers.
Today our exchange server was upgraded from 5.5 to 6.5. Telnet-ing to it
on port 143 gives the following response: Microsoft Exchange Server 2003
IMAP4rev1 server version 6.5.7226.0.
Before this upgrade, the DNS was exchange.stibo.com but now it's called
MAILA.graphic.stibo.int.
I accessed it via IMAP before (I think the TB! Exchange functionality is
_very_ limited - e.g. I cannot decide which folders I want to have
displayed - and seems more POP3-like than IMAP-like ("Messages
management > Delete messages from server").
Issues with the new Exchange server:
1) IMAP: I cannot move messages to another folder. Yes, I can dump the
messages there but they're not re-fetched on accessing the folder.
If I open LookOut 2003, they are clearly visible. All folders are
set to Full synchronize in TB! The counts are correct, but not all
messages are shown!
2) Accessing via Exchange protocol will set the Date of all messages
to the date they are fetched - so now I have 3.104 messages with
the same time stamp!
As of now I am forced to use Outlook because of 1, so please somebody
help me!
--
Best regards,
Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1)
IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported:
No Drafts folder (0002080) 328
Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
3.0.2.1 Folders lost - cannot be retrieved
Hello beta testers. Due to the "renaming bug" (https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3848), things got really messed up here. Anyway, restored the account name and all filters (a lot of work). One issue persists: I cannot find my folders again. They are on disk but Ctrl+Alt+Shift+L does nothing. If I make new folders with the old names, the folders appear - but only until I close TB! and restart. Then they are gone again. It seems as if some file has a list of folders in it and it doesn't get updated by TB! Any ideas? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.1 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 5.5), 150K msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: "Empty" features -- an explanation
Raymund, On 19-10-2004 08:49, you [RT] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: RT> But the TB core files will be changed. There is a new exe in it, and RT> it is that large. RT> The disk cost say how much data gets installed. OK. I understood it as the "delta" size. -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 327 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: "Empty" features -- an explanation
Maxim, On 19-10-2004 07:45, you [MM] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MM> If during the installation you see that a particular feature MM> occupies 0 KB or an amount of space smaller than it actually MM> occupies, than it means that this feature already resides on the MM> disk installed by a previous version of The Bat! Setup, and the new MM> installation won’t modify it. But that is not the case in reality. When I installed over a previous installation, TB core files were said to take up 8,5 MB. How can that be? -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 327 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Usability enhancement: Read/ Unread Tabs
Munango-Keewati, On 16-10-2004 22:46, you [MK] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MK> It would also be nice to be able to create our own tabs and hide any MK> we don't want to see. Any colour group you assign to a _folder_ will make it turn up as a tab showing only the messages in that folder (think VFs for populating that folder with a selection of messages). -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 326 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.1 (Beta/1)
9Val, On 15-10-2004 11:48, you [9] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 9> Yesterday we had Chishinau Birthday (568 years) so after a 9> little holiday it is enough mail to read and reply :) Excuse me - but what is "Chishinau"? OK. I have experienced the same problem with lockup without the 'Auto-filter' in the build Maxim posted the link to. Regarding: 9> There is no way to determine why folder has new messages - have they 9> been delivered by server or have they moved from other folder by 9> filter. Ouch! This means that IMAP sounds will only make sense when a perfect filtering system has been made (so messages are delivered immediately in their correct folder - no sound for a message coming into the Inbox and then a new sound when a message arrives in its filtered folder). -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 323 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.1 (Beta/1)
9Val, On 15-10-2004 11:11, you [9] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 9> And additionaly: 9> [+] IMAP: sound on new mail arrival (for non-selected folders yet) You never got back to me on this, 9Val: In the daily build you sent me, each time a mail is being filtered (manual filters, read/unread status) it triggers the sound: of course it should only trigger once - when the new mail arrives for the first time. Good this is that the sound does go off also when the message first arrives! :) 9> [+] IMAP: new tune-up option 'Auto-filter' which allows filter 9> folders after new message arrival I did not get an example of use for this either. However, having enabled this, I have had a couple of IMAP lock-ups, where a message (with attachment) was frozen in the CC. After some time it eventually downloaded. -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 323 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Has the Sort Columns/View Mode Bug Been Fixed?
Stuart, On 15-10-2004 10:07, you [SH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: SH> I disagree, if I want the viewmode to change I should edit the SH> viewmode. Exactly. Agree completely. It annoys me too that if I sort one folder by sender, then all folders (with a variety of view modes) are suddenly sorted by sender, too. I'd prefer a menu entry for _system_wide_ changes: Global view mode (which can be set back to Undefined to "return" to all the view modes set for individual folders), global sorting. Set from the View menu, they would apply to all. Clicking on a column header should be local and transient. -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Exchange issues: Days since reported: No Drafts folder (0002080) 323 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
High CPU use
Hello beta testers. I did a manual re-filtering of 500 of messages in my Inbox - it took 7 mins! I have been running TB! for 6 hours today until now: CPU time is 2:17, current Memory usage 67 MB, VM is 84 MB. I am now running a host of other programs and the PC seems slow. OK, so my system is old (I need to buy some new hardware): AMD Athlon 700 MHz, 256 MB Ram. At home (where I am now), I run only POP3 (almost), 3 VFs, MyGate, Kaspersky plug-in, load of other plug-ins. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
