but they aren't there yet
;-)
MadR
btw nice car !!
- Original Message -
From: "Minto George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: [313] every dog vol. 3
>
> This is my fav vol. of this series by jeff...v
further in the dataphysics sound.
I think i'm gonna power up my arpeggiator :)
- Original Message -
From: "Minto George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: 25 March, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: [313] every dog vol. 3
>
> This is my fav vol. of this seri
This is my fav vol. of this series by jeff...very deep
and damn good...wish he would put out more of this
kinda stuff. Classic Detroit techno and highly
recommended! I got my copy through groovetech and I
think it was worth the $16 I paid for it. :)
also gotta say I dug Tom's new one on Nordic Tr
henrique casanova:
and i dont know if you guys will agree, but this 3° vol. is much
closer to techno then the other two(thank god!!). at least in the
drums..
i don't know that i feel quite right saying one record is more techno than
another. to me, techno is *so* much more than just the "rig
> ...and on the subject of Detroit techno, my copy of "Every Dog Has
It's Day"
> Vol 3 arrived today. i've only played it the once, but i've gotta
say it's
> the best thing i've heard from Mills on Axis in feckin ages...
and i dont know if you guys will agree, but this 3° vol. is much
closer to
...and on the subject of Detroit techno, my copy of "Every Dog Has It's Day"
Vol 3 arrived today. i've only played it the once, but i've gotta say it's
the best thing i've heard from Mills on Axis in feckin ages... perhaps since
Humana. if you're into Mills' more subtle and less pounding momen
come to leeds it's
between £7.25 - £7.95 and attitude free.
paul, innercity.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
now available at bent crayon:
MILLSA
for imports in manchester? come to leeds it's
> between £7.25 - £7.95 and attitude free.
>
> paul, innercity.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Monday,
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 11 March 2002 16:38
|
| I just can't see a reason for it, can anyone else?
Well, the only reason I can think of is that a limited run results in a
larger overhead per copy pressed - especially if there's anyt
To:
cc:313@hyperreal.org
Subject:RE: [313] every dog vol 3
as far as i remember the other 2 were about 20 quid - i think they were
limited run and more albums than double packs hence the more expensive than
usual price tag. when you consider cds in chain stores are now above 15quid
a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
:Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
:
:
:
:Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers
:
: Start of message text
:
:£23 for this double-pack in Manchester.
:That's an outrage in my opinion.
:
:I mean, some o
soles.
Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/03/2002 15:55:17
To:313@hyperreal.org
cc:
Subject:[313] every dog vol 3
now available at bent crayon:
MILLSART: Every Dog Has Its Day Vol. 3 2x12" (AXIS). "In time, all
wrongdoings are eligible for correction. Even in the eye
I paid £22
It's top notch though.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
> now available at bent crayon:
>
> MILLSART: Every Dog Has Its Da
ahhh words that speak sense..
finally the 313 gets back to basics..
well done Jason!
-Original Message-
From: Jason Donnelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2002 15:55
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
now available at bent crayon:
MILLSART: Every Dog
now available at bent crayon:
MILLSART: Every Dog Has Its Day Vol. 3 2x12" (AXIS). "In time, all
wrongdoings are eligible for correction. Even in the eye of a storm, we
must endure the invalid as a objective fragment in the existence of
mankind. Effortlessly, time passes over and onto, without
Look what landed in me box today... [voice of Homer] , new
Mills...[drool]...
Millsart: Every Dog Has Its Day Vol 3 (Axis)
2x12", AX-026, released 15 April 2002
No tracklisting, unfortunately, but it does come with a prime slice of
'Mills-speak'.
> btw, imho it seems like Mills writes his sleevenotes in German or perhaps
> French and then uses Babelfish to translate them into English. anyone
else
> think this is likely?
>
Maybe that´s the reason why I do understand it :D
but more serious also to Stephen -
(with most respect 4 your
Otto:
Most likely due to the fact that it isn't out yet...
(the original post started with a quote from the Bent Crayon mailout, where
you could only pre-order it since it isn't released yet)
yeah, i realise that. so, for arguments sake, has anyone actually heard it,
or are we stuck with dis
Ken Odeluga:
ok - can I just ask about the cd of the same name (on Music Man): "Every
Dog
..." ... Is that anything to do with vol 3 or am I hopelessly behind the
times? ...
i think the cd includes tracks from Vol1 and Vol2 (both of which are limited
vinyl doublepacks on Axis).
rob
___
;To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>At 08:04 AM 1/10/02 +, you wrote:
> >no, i think you're right Steve - a bunch of posts about the sleeve notes
>on Every Dog Vol 3, and (unless i've missed something) there's
>been nothing
>abou
At 08:04 AM 1/10/02 +, you wrote:
>no, i think you're right Steve - a bunch of posts about the sleeve notes
on Every Dog Vol 3, and (unless i've missed something) there's been nothing
about the music on that particular record just yet...
Most likely due to the fact that it isn't out yet...
Original Message-
From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [313] every dog vol 3
Wrong. The music gets mentioned almost in every posting; the general
consensus is that the music could stand tall, footnotes or not
-Original Message-
From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:37 AM
To: Lester Kenyatta Spence
Subject: RE: [313] every dog vol 3
That could be interesting ... and I'm not being ironic.
>-Original Message-
>From: Lester Keny
-Original Message-
From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [313] every dog vol 3
Wrong. The music gets mentioned almost in every posting; the general
consensus is that the music could stand tall, footnotes
fuck.. what's going on with this list these days?...
is anybody going to comment on how the record sounds - or are you all happy
debating how good/bad the sleeve notes are?.. two digests full of this shit
about the sleeve notes and nobody has said anything about the record..
i'm right here a
tand however that not everyone who likes this spectrum of music,
is a dreamer ... :o)
>-Original Message-
>From: james boylan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:57 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [
I haven't really looked at this topic as it looked a bit too active but,
would this be a good time to ask whether anybody liked Mills' Mono?
That was his piece of art; I saw it at Sonar 2001.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
That Mills stuff sounds like classic jive-nonsense talk. I think
it's actually supposed to be funny; if you read it aloud it has
that kind of swing rhythm...
I don't think he is going for the Serious Jazz mode, or else he
*should* hire you to do the liner notes!
Just think, you could be the Ralp
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
> > The grammar is not the point at all ... (but it is just as bad in the
> > origianl note
It's usually sincerely meant. Why dhouldn't they? You don't have to read it,
right?
:)
--
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:43 PM
>
>
>Yes, I think that we have been here
"Lester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
> I don't think that musicians need writers to transform their work into
> something that is more meaningful. Most
> The grammar is not the point at all ... (but it is just as bad in the
> origianl notes as in the transcript, I'm afraid) The point is whether we
> really think Jeff is adding a great deal to the history of Western
> philosophy with all this? Of course the validity of temporality (or not),
> the
But if you're going to add another layer to it...why not use a WRITER?
I don't know that we're supposed to take it that seriously. I think
it's just supposed to come off as whimsical stoned nonsense.
hire a copywriter, and then you just get *insincere* whimsical stoned
nonsense. (please se
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Odeluga, Ken wrote:
>
> Great music, but I wish someone would deal with his grammar before
> publishing his notes. It's embarrassing. Might be due to the fact that
> they're usually put out by companies in countries where English is language
> II ...
>
Mills isn't stupid or ill
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, james boylan wrote:
> I think some people are slightly embarrassed by the futurist
> philosophy/mythology that sometimes informs techno and look upon it with the
> same disdain as punks did on some of the excesses of progressive rock,
> musical or otherwise.
You're right.
> P
heartfelt,
insightful, tongue-in-cheek or just plain pretentious rubbish.
Its always intriguing at the very least.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Lester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:30:30 -08
ester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/01/2002 04:26:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't think that musicians need writers to transform their work in
what´s the problem ?
interesting thoughts - written in a simple understandable way -
don´t know if someone else would write down those thoughts -
language will be moving along and the advanced definitions of how people
should communicate - seperating the classes will be gone tommorow
so
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't think that musicians need writers to transform their work into
> something that is more meaningful. Most music is equivocal, and it is this
> that has imbued it with so much power and meaning throughout history. If an
> artist wants some sort
that they
would be able to string a few sentences together themselves.
"Lester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/01/2002 04:03:44 PM
To: "Jason Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
I've actua
So what can we expect? Another 2 slabs of old, dusty tracks?
W
-Original Message-
From: Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at INET-1
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:26 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org at INET-1
Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
on the most recent Bent Crayon m
time exists to organise the universe's knowlege
> -- Mensagem original ---
>
> De : Jason Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: 313@hyperreal.org
> Cc :
> Data: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:26:30 +0000
> Assunto : [313] every dog vol 3
&g
I've actually been thinking about offering my services as a liner notes
writer to detroit influenced artists. Taking the liner notes from EVERY
DOG HAS ITS DAY away from the context of the album makes it even more
apparent that techno artists need "real" writers if they are serious about
taking th
> hmm, does that matter? the text JM provides is surely just setting the
> stage for the music to follow. to get you in the right frame of mind to
> get (grok) what JM wants you to take from the music.
>
> robin...
I agree whole-heartedly! The text is there to try to get the listener into the
On Tue, 08 January 2002, "Odeluga, Ken" wrote:
... but at the end of the day (upon
> which a dog will have his) facile, primary school sentiments are easily
> recognisable as just that.
Whoops! Recognizable. ;)
So the point is, that whoever recognizes Jeff's discussion topics are smarter
tha
> The grammar is not the point at all ... (but it is just as bad in the
> origianl notes as in the transcript, I'm afraid) The point is whether we
> really think Jeff is adding a great deal to the history of Western
> philosophy with all this?
hmm, does that matter? the text JM provides is surel
... The Everydog Has It's Day CD edition out on Musicman last year was a
different item?
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Donnelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:42 PM
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>me
cognisable as just that.
>-Original Message-
>From: T.J.Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:17 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>The grammar isn't to the point where it bo
meant to say before everyone on the list hits the bent crayon site for a
copy, 'every dog vol 3' was listed in the 'forth coming titles' section, so
you might want to pre-order with John C to avoid the rush when its
eventually released.
also worth a mention, and ready to ship is:
MR FINGERS:
The grammar isn't to the point where it bothers me.I'd have to read it
directly from the record and not Jason's retyping it to actually analyze it
though. Maybe Jeff should hire an editor to fend off grammatical analysts! ;)
On Tue, 08 January 2002, robin pinning wrote:
>
>
> >> Well, s
Well, since others are throwing around their opinions about this, I guess I'll
toss mine out there. I enjoy writings like this. The concept of time and its
existence have perplexed intelligent minds for forever (if forever exists).
Without time there is no forever and with forever there is no
06 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
> Yes, I think that we have been here before.
> Am I the only one who gets slightly irritated by people thanking God for
> their musical abilities? It's completely unnecessary.
Very good.
>-Original Message-
>From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:58 AM
>To: Odeluga, Ken
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
>Subject: RE: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>
>> Here's one I'll never forge
> Here's one I'll never forget: Blake Baxter presents '313' (Tresor, '96)
> "Detroit as a city is a forgotten place but it can develop a new urban
> role..." (or very close).
>That's Detroit as a city mind, not as a pumpkin.
not as a state of mind? :)
robin...
---
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:33 AM
>To: Jason Donnelly
>Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>
>Makes no sense whatsoever.
>Unfortunately Mills influenced a whole generation of pr
2 11:45:11 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: "Jason Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] every dog vol 3
>
> Makes no sense whatsoever.
i thought that, but then i thought maybe it was a zen trick
>
> Makes no sense whatsoever.
i thought that, but then i thought maybe it was a zen trick to empty your
mind.
> Unfortunately Mills influenced a whole generation of producers to put this
> sort of gibberish on the back of their album sleeves.
what would you rather be written?
hmm i think we
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:27 AM
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: [313] every dog vol 3
>
>
>on the most recent Bent Crayon mailout:
>
>> > MILLSART: Every Dog Has Its Day Vol. 3 2x12" (AXIS). "In time, all
>> > wrongd
Makes no sense whatsoever.
Unfortunately Mills influenced a whole generation of producers to put this
sort of gibberish on the back of their album sleeves.
"Jason Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/01/2002 11:26:30 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
cc:
Subject: [313] every do
on the most recent Bent Crayon mailout:
> MILLSART: Every Dog Has Its Day Vol. 3 2x12" (AXIS). "In time, all
> wrongdoings are eligible for correction. Even in the eye of a storm, we
> must endure the invalid as a objective fragment in the existence of
> mankind. Effortlessly, time passes over
60 matches
Mail list logo
