Alexis wrote:
> Repeal rule 2603 or provide a manner for determining the office's holder,
> as there's currently no way for that office to be held.
R1006, last para. It's meant to be a penalty for proposal authors who
define switches without specifying who, if anybody, should track them.
> Amend
On 1/19/20 10:39 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> and SHALL before the end
> of the next Agoran week, grant the associated set of assets to the
> player.
I don't think this is an actual requirement. According to Rule 2141, "a
rule [...] is always taking effect", which
On 1/19/2020 1:36 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> I sent my notice of intent to the players of Agora in two steps:
> first, through myself, and then, through agora-business in this
> message. So, I have sent it via both myself and a public forum. Since
> it was sent via a public forum,
On 1/19/2020 1:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> Sigh. My message stated the wrong method (with notice rather than
> without objection). I withdraw the CFJ I just called.
Drat - it would have been a good one!!
I was about to send the following gratuitous:
As part of my Arbitor work
On 1/18/20 11:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ah, I see where we were thinking differently. Yes, I think your idea works
> then, so long as it happens earlier in the week before the officer
> publishes the report and the obligation is live. Once the report is
> published, the oblig
What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
spelled out in the relevant rule (probably something we should fix).
I'm working on a thesis, on and off, and I want to make sure I'm doing
it right.
-Aris
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:16, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/18/20 11:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ah, I see where we were thinking differently. Yes, I think your idea
> works
> > then, so long as it happens earlier in the wee
The best way is to look at past examples.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:43, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
> spelled out in the relevant rule (probably something we should fix).
> I'm work
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> intent," after "past judgements,".
>
Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
int
Alexis wrote:
> > Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> > intent," after "past judgements,".
>
> Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
> intent.
Fair enough! Like I said, mostly there to provoke discussion. Would you
feel differen
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
> model of law:
>
Any opinions? Buehler?
Agora
My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
The generally platonic model has served Agora well the vast majority
of the time. I don't have extended reasoning here, those are just my
initial reactions.
-Ar
Here's a draft. The actual report will be about a day late; I
sincerely apologize for my tardiness, and I hope the extra day won't
cause significant trouble. Given how big this distribution has turned
out to be, I don't feel comfortable sending this out without a draft
to catch errors.
-Aris
---
I
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
> The generally platonic model has served Agora w
On 1/19/2020 2:57 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> The best way is to look at past examples.
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:43, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
>> spe
On 1/19/2020 3:04 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
>> intent," after "past judgements,".
>>
>
> Qu
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> > many categories. Additionally, I di
On 1/19/2020 3:29 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Twg, can we have the same warranty (in public, to be clear) from you?
> I phrased it so that it works the same way even with your whole zombie
> thing; so you don't need to change any words at all. :) If you don't,
> I intend to vote
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/2020 3:29 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > Twg, can we have the same warranty (in public, to be clear) from you?
> > I phrased it so that it works the same way even with your whole zombie
> > thing
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 19:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/19/2020 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On 1/19/2020 1:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> +7 G. <= SHOGUN
> >> +6 Aris
> >
> > I pledge to equalize these next week, if no one doe
On 1/19/2020 4:38 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 19:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>> [I'm gonna generally retire from attempting to keep things equal after
>> this,
>> others can if they like.]
>>
>
> Well, I wa
Okay, that was astonishingly convincing. I’m not going to change my
personal approach to scams (at the very least ones that use my official
position; I don’t think I’ve ever stated on record that I’ll never write a
scam proposal, though I’ve also scrupulously avoided doing so). However,
you have co
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 6:21 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 20:42, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > What I will not do, barring sufficiently persuasive arguments to the
> > contr
On 1/19/2020 6:40 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> I create the following proposal: {
> Title: Deregistration
> AI: 3
> Author: Gaelan
>
> Flip the Citizenship of the following players to Unregistered:
> - D. Margaux
> - Baron von Vaderham
> }
>
> [They’re both inactive, but active
The vast majority of thesis publications I’ve seen are either legal or
historical. If anything, this is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn’t
qualify for a J.N. IMO, it’s about public policy, not rule interpretation.
-Aris
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:05 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-
On 1/19/2020 7:05 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> Ahh, in this case I'll withdraw the intent for now so it can be further
> discussed. But the thinking I had was that the degree is analagous to the
> Juris Doctor conferred to law school graduates who can subsequently go into
> practic
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 22:13, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I was about to re-reply to say, I don't mind expanding the scope of J.D. at
> all! just that it might warrant some discussion first and it was worth
> mentioning the original intent.
>
I wo
On 1/19/2020 7:09 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> The vast majority of thesis publications I’ve seen are either legal or
> historical. If anything, this is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn’t
> qualify for a J.N. IMO, it’s about public policy, not rule interpretation.
To me
28 matches
Mail list logo