Mischief wrote:
On 9/29/2024 1:12 PM, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
On 9/22/24 9:11 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
Well I guess I better get to work, then!
Indeed.
I deputise as Prime Minister to appoint snail as Speaker
All the timestamps on this message are past 29
[I had these sitting around from an old RtRW but never got around to
fleshing them out.]
Proto-Proposal: Track quorum
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) to read:
Each Agoran decision has a quorum, a number set when the decision
is created and fixed thereafter. When a person initiates
Janet wrote:
This doesn't seem to actually address the issue of perverse incentives?
It creates *different* incentives (by creating but not transferring) but
doesn't change the fact that people are incentivized to vote against
proposals they didn't author in order to prevent them from gaining
ec
Mischief wrote:
On 9/1/24 11:49 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
CoE: The ownership of the Recursion Stone is disputed, and depends on
the outcome of CFJ 4093. (I know you know this, but as far as I can
tell snail would self-ratify as the owner if I didn't CoE, because the
report doesn't m
Kate wrote:
When a judgement is issued that has major implications for the
interpretation of a rule, and it is highly unlikely that the rule
will be changed to alter the interpretation or the case reopened
in the near future, the Arbitor SHALL in an officially timely
Kate wrote:
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 13:58 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I CFJ: { Rule 1023 contains the text "Any anniversary." }
This is CFJ 4087.
I CFJ: { Rule 1023 contains a list with exactly 5 list items. }
This is CFJ 4088.
I assign CFJs 4087 and 4088 to Murphy.
Origin
juan wrote:
4st nomic via agora-discussion [2024-08-14 10:13]:
Do we technically need to state "All unlisted persons are Unregistered",
since they are tracked also?
I think so. They are tracked only in the monthly report. So the weeklies
could ratify, given some ambiguity, to keeping previous
Proto-Proposal: No double harvest redux
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 2124 (Performing Tabled Actions) by replacing this text:
An intent is ripe if was tabled within the past 14 days, the
Speaker hasn't objected to it in the past 48 hours, and its
conditions, if any, are each clearly and
Aris wrote:
Hi!
I hope everyone is doing well.
TTYL!
Turkey's a bit dry.
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
Janet wrote:
On 7/28/24 20:04, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Janet wrote:
On 7/24/24 19:14, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the office of Prime Minister to
become vacant.
I support and do so.
Ineffective, snail already did
Janet wrote:
On 7/24/24 19:14, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the office of Prime Minister to
become vacant.
I support and do so.
Ineffective, snail already did.
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 16:25 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Gratuitous:
* Jaff has been Speaker since April.
* On or about June 4, ais523 won (Paradox, Zen, High Score).
* On or about June 22, Janet won (Zen).
* On or about June 27, snail won
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 11:25 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I believe I am Prime Minister.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) to the office of
Speaker.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) to the office of
Speaker.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) t
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 18:59 -0500, secretsnail wrote:
ID: 9145
Title: Pragmatic quarters
Adoption Index: 2.0
Author: Murphy
Co-authors: Mischief
Amend Rule 2555 (Blots) by replacing this text:
At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each
fugitiv
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 14:09 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
snail wrote:
Do the awards, bozos
Wins in 2023, based on comparing the Herald's reports of 2023-01-02 vs
2024-01-27 (the latter of which mentions that there were no new patent
titles since Nov 2023):
I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet):
9125~ 4st 1.0 (n/a)
AGAINST
9126~ Mischief2.0 More Stone Cleanup
endorse Stonemason
9127~ Mischief2.0 There Aren't Many Stone Idioms in
English
FOR
9128~ Janet
Juniper wrote:
Query: This report lists my lateness as !!! - but Simplifior was only
enacted in the past 24 hrs, right? Am I misinterpreting something in
this report?
Yeah, the 'offices' table in the database doesn't track how recently an
office was created (it's available in the event history
Janet wrote:
On 6/22/24 22:45, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
//
ID: 9123
Title: Anniversaries
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: Mischief
Co-authors:
Amend rule 1023 (Agoran Time) by appending:
5. Any anniversary, mo
I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet):
9120~ juniper 1.0 Labour Payment
AGAINST
9121~ juniper, mqyhlkahu 1.1 More Rules, Less Complex
PRESENT
I wrote:
=Metareport=
You can find an up-to-date version of this report at
http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php
Date of last report: 2024-05-19
Date of this report: 2024-05-21
Whoops, actually 2024-05-25. (The report-generating script uses the date
of the most recent event re
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2024-05-19 at 15:09 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
particular, if a contract would be given a Rest (the equivalent of a
Blot), every member of the contract would be given a Rest instead.
the Insulator (equivalent of today's Re
ais523 wrote:
particular, if a contract would be given a Rest (the equivalent of a
Blot), every member of the contract would be given a Rest instead.
the Insulator (equivalent of today's Referee) was required to report
the Fugitive status.
For those wondering how "Rest" and "Insulator" fit
wunst wrote:
Am 13.05.24 um 01:00 schrieb ais523 via agora-discussion:
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 15:32 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
Proposal: No apathetic apathy
Amend Rule 2465 (Victory by Apathy) by appending this text:
A player SHALL NOT announce intent to Declare Ap
Janet wrote:
When a document is to be ratified, the publication time is the instant
at which the document to be ratified was published. The truth time of
the document is the instant at which the document specifies that it was
true, if any, or the publication time otherwise. Ratification of a
doc
Janet wrote:
I previously wrote:
PROPOSALS
=
PROPOSAL 9068 (Agora of Empires)
AUTHOR: Yachay Wayllukuq
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (2): Murphy%, Yachay Wayllukuq%
AGAINST (2): Aris%, Janet+
PRESENT (2): juan$, snail^
BALLOTS: 6
AI (F/A): 10/14 (AI=1.0)
POPULARITY: 0.000
OUTCOME: REJECTED
CoE
4st wrote:
CoE: I destroyed the crystals in L&FD
NttPF. (If you already TTttPF'd then ignore this, I'm just catching up
on a-d first as usual.)
Gaelan wrote:
I proto-submit the following proposal: {
Title: Officially Official (and Backuply Backup)
Authors: Gaelan
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled “Forum Purposes”, with the following
text: {
Purpose is a public forum switch, with values Business (default),
Offi
Janet wrote:
... Okay, so it turns out I can't read and "denial" isn't by
announcement (I could have sworn it was at some point, but I can't find
that). So the above probably did not discharge my duty.
Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification), in part (according to the latest SLR,
modulo all existential
nix wrote:
On 3/14/24 15:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:53 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 3/11/24 17:41, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: There exists a rule 105.
I number this CFJ 4069. I assign CFJ 406
te:
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
If so, and if Kate indeed gained five Ribbons on 2023-08-31, and no
one else gained as many, then:
* Only Kate's vote counted on any proposal resolved after 230.
* Only Kate's support counted on any
nix wrote:
I assign CFJ 4059 to Murphy.
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg45651.html
("As a result of the 2023 Agoran't Birthday Tournament, Murphy won the
game.")
Draft judgement:
Without performing an exhaustive analysis of the Agoran't archives, I'm
assuming th
Aris wrote:
Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be
statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is
different from interpreting it in context.
At one point we did legislate that, for CFJs asking yes/no questions, a
judgement of TRUE/FALSE
Janet wrote:
On 3/4/24 13:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote:
𐑣𐑧𐑤𐑴 𐑩𐑜𐑹𐑩,
𐑲 𐑛𐑧𐑒𐑤𐑺 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑹𐑰 𐑚𐑲 𐑨𐑐𐑩𐑔𐑰 𐑓 ·𐑚𐑧𐑯 𐑯 ·𐑜𐑹𐑧𐑯
𐑑 𐑳𐑚𐑡𐑧𐑒𐑑, 𐑮𐑲𐑑 "𐑲 𐑳𐑚𐑡𐑧𐑒𐑑 𐑑 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑹𐑰 𐑚𐑲 𐑨𐑐𐑩𐑔𐑰"
𐑜𐑫𐑛𐑚𐑲 𐑩𐑜𐑹𐑩
Transliterated from the Shavian alphabet to standard English:
{
Hello Agora,
I declare victory by apathy for Ben and
Janet wrote:
On 3/3/24 16:24, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
9068~ Yachay 1.0 Agora of Empires
FOR (without 2 objections is a reasonable guard against trivial
wins, other issues can be ironed out later)
That's not the only method to amend. There's also a "by announc
Yachay wrote:
An Imperial can, by announcement, win the game without 2 objections if the
Empireworld shows that ey have accomplished at least 3 extraordinary feats
in the fictional world that the Empireworld describes since ey last won the
game in this way. This rule does not describe what quali
4st wrote:
Right, but I'm not happy to accept the gamestate we're currently playing in.
Right, I agree with the platonists that the gamestate is wrong and that
ratification is wrong, just... definitely not in the same sense of wrong.
Wrong as in it feels wrong, whether or not anything is actu
nix wrote:
On 2/15/24 19:07, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
So, we've discovered on Discord a potential issue that could have
wide-ranging effects. Consider the four-day rule as stated in the
(purported) Rule 105/23:
{
A rule change is wholly prevented from taking effect unless it
Janet wrote:
So, I don't think basing quorum on Activity is a good idea at all, and
there's no obvious change (to me) that would avoid these problems.
Whereas quorum is currently based on a specific type of activity (voting
on other recent decisions), which seems a lot more appropriate.
juan wrote:
The 27th of October of 2023
is
Murphy's 16th Agoran Birthday!
Actually that was my third registration; I confirm that the following
registrations were also me:
(v) Murphy (< 1996-01-23--2
Janet wrote:
I also initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prime
Minister election.
* The Vote Collector is the ADoP (me).
* The valid options are the candidates (Janet, nix, and any others
who become candidates by end of voting).
* The voting method is insta
ais523 wrote:
9048* nix, 4st, snail 3.0 It's been 4+ years, Agora. 4+
YEARS.
AGAINST. Proposal result ratification appears to be broken in the
ruleset being ratified (and thus probably the current ruleset) – this
is one of the things I check for when it comes to doing ruleset
ratifi
4st wrote:
Here are the crystals and their owners (geologist required monthly report)
Weekly, actually. (R2162 section 3, and R2685 doesn't specify otherwise)
Ben wrote:
I agree that 1 would need to be clarified, building off what nix said, since
you could declare yourself inactive and active again to flip a switch.
I think that was intended to count; the idea wasn't "find the one
super-obscure thing that counts", it was "find literally anything
th
Gaelan wrote:
9038~ Murphy 1.0 Ratify the Ruleset Week
PRESENT - not sure how I feel about this. I worry an explicit SHALL to
propose ruleset ratification at a given time runs the risk of rushing us
into ratification without proper due diligence first? It seems like, at
min
Janet wrote:
To address some of the holes that befell Agoran't:
{
Add (somewhere? enact a new rule? at power 2 or 3?):
{
A Rule that purports to designate an action as "unforceable" thereby
designates that a player NEED NOT comply with any provision of any Rule
that requires or forbids em fr
4st wrote:
I couldn't find these three players (so far, maybe I can't find more):
Douglas Hofstadter, General Chaos, Troublemaker At Large
and Ørjan is listed differently.
General Chaos, Kelly (1996), and Kelly (1997-1999) are a single person.
Ørjan / Oerjan (1995, 1996, 1996-2000) are a sing
4st wrote:
Operating solely off the registrar's report, then, there could probably be
some notations to players that are c/o or otherwise proxies: so the
registrar could have some corrections on their report that have gone
unnoticed for quite some time, and I have taken those to be fact due to
t
4st wrote:
CoE: the proposal pool lacks my proposals submitted October 9th.
NttPF
juan wrote:
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-26 13:08]:
"Why should this be in the rules?" is a valid question. Putting
something in the rules means that everybody has to pay attention to it,
lest it change out from under them to actually do something, and that
people (like me) have rul
snail wrote:
I vote as follows in the prime minister election: [snail]
This vote was ineffective, as voting was not yet open.
4st wrote:
I deputise as Prime Minister to appoint G to the office of Speaker.
I believe this actually was effective even if not overdue, as Prime
Minister was vacant. (If for some reason it was ineffective, then
please let me know; that would also mean that snail remains Speaker.)
juan wrote:
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2023-06-18 13:38]:
But, based on this proto alone, the Equality switch doesn't do anything
either (e.g. grant radiance). And there's a strong implication that
Policies /should/ do something more, but no context for what that
somethin
4st wrote:
Left and Right are player switches that can have a value of any player,
defaulting to emself. Once each week, each player CAN, by announcement,
either set eir Left to any player, or set eir Right to any player.
Left and Right are tracked by the Lorax.
A player CAN reach a player on
4st wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:41 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
I would really love some feedback.
--
EQUALITY (Power 1.0)
For the purposes of this rule, a Player Property is de
nix wrote:
On 5/17/23 16:45, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
My radiance is 100 or more (specifically 100). The announcement in the
previous sentence causes me to win the game.
If I can do so (based on the current moot, which is leaning towards
yes), I award ais623 the title of Champion.
I
ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
th
nix wrote:
On 5/19/23 11:50, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
I'd much rather take the route of trying to get the Radiance/Stamps
system functional again, than of trying to repeal it. (Stamps in
particular are one of the most powerful "new player perks" we've seen,
and I suspect that that's a
snail wrote:
I wield the radiance stone. (Woah! So cool!)
(Wait! Oh my gosh! it's)
I reach for the Recursion stone.
(with a steel chair)
As $DEITY is my witness, that rule is broken in half!
Proto-Proposal: More Factors
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by replacing this text:
When interpreting and applying the rules, the text of the rules
takes precedence. Where the text is silent, inconsistent, or
unclear, it is to be augmented by game custom, comm
nix wrote:
On 4/23/23 18:45, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Assessor
election.
* The Vote Collector is the ADoP.
* The valid options are the candidates (currently 4st, Janet).
* The voting method is instant runoff.
*
nix wrote:
On 5/1/23 15:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
When you do a job manually for a while, you start to use shortcuts, get
faster, streamline, then maybe join a couple of steps using a bit of code…
there’s really no sharp line between “automation” and plain old
“experience” - t
nix wrote:
But it's also worth noting that the very original Agora doesn't seem to
have played as platonically as we currently do; ie, an accepted mistake
would be treated as the reality of the game often-times, without need
for some ratification process. There's another thesis, Vanyel's
*Pra
4st wrote:
Not sure if this is intended, but for festivity, we can't set it to the
maximum ever, so any player who is 1 away from laudable is going to be
festive.
(given the standard definition of "exclusive" and "greater than or equal"
in that rule.)
This is adequately covered by R2480:
nix wrote:
Honestly just kinda curious what people use, but I figured it might also
just be helpful to have more clarity. I'll compile the results in a week.
{
2023 Agora Nomic Technology and Accessibility Poll
--
For each question please first
juan wrote:
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-03-09 15:12]:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 5:05 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
On thing your recent Fingerprints proposal got me wanting to try is
pre-planned moves with cards - that is, you have to commit to "these
are my next three card play
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00075 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2327
("Read the Ruleset Week"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send sugge
juan wrote:
Here's the new version:
{
A Fingerprint for a document (the Plaintext) is a document that could
not have been reasonably created without knowledge of the Plaintext, and
which is related to the Plaintext in such a way that one could not
reasonably produce another document related to
ais523 wrote:
(Also, nkep feels like it fits into this sort of framework somehow, but
I'm not sure how.)
For those unfamiliar, "nkep" was basically the "I floop" concept
combined with private-agreement shenanigans. A search of the CFJ
archive turns up the following, there were probably some ot
Proto-Proposal: Schrodinger's Dice
(co-author = ais523)
Amend Rule 2505 (Random Choices) by replacing this text:
The selecting person SHOULD make the selection method
public, and SHOULD use a method for which the final probability
distribution can be readily confirm
Janet wrote:
On 2/5/23 19:18, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Limited tracking
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by replacing "other instances are at their
default value" with "other tracked instances are at their default
value".
Amend Rule 26
Proto-Proposal: Limited tracking
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by replacing "other instances are at their
default value" with "other tracked instances are at their default
value".
Amend Rule 2606 (Proposal Classes) by replacing this text:
Proposals created since the enactment of thi
Proto-Proposal: Yes, Prime Minister
(AI = 3)
Amend Rule 2139 (The Registrar) by replacing "The Registrar is an
office;" with "The Registrar (syn. Minister of Domestic Affairs) is an
office;".
Amend Rule 1607 (Distribution) by replacing "The Promotor is an office;"
with "The Promotor (syn. Minist
Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora): What would count as "duly
harassment"?
Rule 2679 (Restrictions on Participation): Either change the definition
of "unwelcome" to "if and only if", or change the securing of
"designations of unwelcomeness" to "other designations". Also, maybe be
more exp
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00071 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2575
("The Distributor"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions
nix wrote:
I added a new page to the website, intended to give people an idea of
what to do after they join. Any feedback appreciated:
https://agoranomic.org/play.html
Vote on Proposals: May want to explain PRESENT as "you just count toward
the minimum number of voters", and endorse as "you vo
Janet wrote:
On 1/22/2023 1:55 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 1/22/23 12:42, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Janet wrote:
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I atte
I wrote:
=Metareport=
You can find an up-to-date version of this report at
http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php
Date of last report: 2023-01-15
Date of this report: 2023-01-20
Unofficial CoE, accepted: "Date of this report" should have been
2023-01-22.
(The script that gener
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00070 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2630
("The Administrative State"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send su
Janet wrote:
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00069 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2641
("Wielding Stones"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00068 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2556
("Penalties"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if yo
Janet wrote:
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation
a
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00067 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2201
("Self-Ratification"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestio
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00066 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2478
("Justice"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if you
snail wrote:
The Horsened's Final Standings Report! Winning calculations and state
immediately before the race began anew.
Here's a quick and dirty Javascript animation of the full race:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/horse_race1.html
Displaying additional events is left as an exercise for som
I wrote:
Coins were converted to score bonuses, roughly 25 per boatload,
I thought that sounded unusually high. Looks like I somehow botched my
arithmetic, and it was instead roughly 1 point per 25 boatloads.
Coin and stamp balances were reverted to mid-November values.
Coins were converted to score bonuses, roughly 25 per boatload, then
repealed, along with coin awards:
* Monthly base income
* Adopted proposals / ratio of votes in favor
* Judging CFJ on time (replaced with +2 score)
* Publish
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00064 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 1607
("Distribution"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00063 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2415
("Badges"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if you h
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00062 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2677
("Etiquette"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if yo
Jason wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00061 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2585
("Birthday Gifts"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions
Jason wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00060 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 1023
("Agoran Time"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if
Jason wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00059 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2632
("Complexity"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if y
G. wrote:
[A nice historical question for the occasion!]
The below CFJ is CFJ FOUR THOUSAND (4000). I assign it to Murphy.
status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#4000
=== CFJ 4000 ===
It is round 2,098.
===
ziproot wrote:
FALSE: One section of "Performing Tabled Actions" says "A rule
purporting to allow a person to perform a tabled action allows em to do
so by announcement, if, considering only intents for that action/method
combination." Purporting is not defined anywhere, so a common sense
defin
Regarding the recent troubles, and in particular Anti-Cleisthenes's
Cantus Cygneus:
In one sense, nothing new has happened. Rules whose effects clearly
include "Players can be deregistered via proposal" have been on the
books for a long time. The reasons could be anything from "repeal
corporate p
Proto-Proposal: Lucid dreaming
(AI = 2, co-author = ziproot)
[Converts " Dreamer" to a switch, adds whitespace to the list
of Mindsets and their effects, and generally cleans up wording.
Includes changes based on ziproot's recent proto.]
Change the title of Rule 2675 (Dream of Wandering) to "
juan wrote:
On 9/1/2022 6:40 AM, juan via agora-business wrote:
secretsnail9 via agora-official [2022-08-31 18:57]:
DREAMOR'S MONTHLY REPORT
All active players have a mindset of Dream of Wandering.
All active players are Sleeping Dreamers.
--
secretsnail
CoE: My mindset is Dream of Victory.
Jason wrote:
On 8/31/22 20:13, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal
Title: Extermination
Author: Jason
Coauthors:
Adoption index: 1.0
{
Each of the following rules is repealed, in ascending numerical order by ID:
* Rule 2660 (Birds)
* Rule 2661 (Permits)
juan wrote:
Jason Cobb via agora-discussion [2022-08-29 13:23]:
We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
Title: Unfortunately
Author: Jason
Coauthors:
Adoption index: 3.0
{
Amend Rule 869 by a
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
