On 6/24/2020 8:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> Bump. Here's an updated text; all I did was remove the once-per-month
> restriction. G., what do you think about submitting this before nch's
> and R. Lee's possible victory? I'm happy to pend it (assuming
> DracoLotto worked as inten
On 6/24/2020 7:51 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>>
>> I object to any and all intents to declare apathy.
>
> But does this adequately identify the intents being objected to?
>
> (I think there might have been a CFJ a
On 6/25/2020 9:41 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> The Registrar wouldn't need to write any regulations, e would just need
> to pick a method that the Treasuror has defined in the auction regulations.
>
I think the auctioneer is free to point to any method that follows the
guideline
On 6/25/2020 9:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/24/2020 8:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Bump. Here's an updated text; all I did was remove the once-pe
On 6/25/2020 11:16 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-06-25 10:41, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/20 12:39 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 6/25/20 12:37 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
This also mean
On 6/25/2020 11:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 17:03, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/25/2020 9:33 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>
oh, crud. I copy and pasted and forgot to change "grok" to "ATMunn".
There's actually a couple precedents that the assignment in the message
worked, not the subject line. So I guess these are "linked" with grok as
judge (unless e recuses emself from one). Sorry about that!
On 6/25/2020 3:24
On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Auction regulations are regulations defined by this rule, all of which
> comprise a single body of law, and for which the Treasuror is the
> promulgator. The scope of auction regulations is wholly restricted to
> defining specific auc
On 6/25/2020 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/25/20 7:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Auction regulations are regulations defined by this rule, all of which
>>> co
On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3851. I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3851
>>
>> ==
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Yah knowing this was coming up is one reason I grabbed the green ribbon
when I did :)
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
>
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL?
On 6/26/2020 6:14 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/26/20 9:11 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>&g
On 6/26/2020 11:11 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:29 PM nch wrote:
>> On 6/25/20 6:40 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>>> Title: Regulatory Instruments v2
>>> Author: Jason
>>> Coauthors: Aris
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>
>> Reading this it seems mechanically sound. However I kind of ag
On 6/27/2020 2:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/27/20 12:10 AM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:12 PM James Cook wrote:
>>> I've thought it would be interesting to play a Nomic that starts with
>>> just one simple rule with text like "This is a Nom
On 6/27/2020 2:37 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/23/20 12:01 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I intend, with 2 Agoran consent, to award G. the Patent Title of
>> Tapecutter for Proposal 8407, "no stinking auction definitions".
>>
>
> Seeing 3 support and no objections
On 6/27/2020 6:06 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> I point a finger at jason for uncertain certification. Reasonable players
> may not disagree about the operation of the current wording.
Which means it's an ambiguity which is covered by CP?
-G.
On 6/28/2020 7:22 AM, Ed Strange via agora-official wrote:
> Success! Resending to OFF, for those who prefer it.
Yay!
On 6/28/2020 7:16 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> https://leeonlaw.blogspot.com/2020/06/adop-metareport.html
Bookmarked and thanks. That black on dark brown is s
On 6/28/2020 12:14 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/28/20 3:11 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
>> [Pending fees are fine and all, but only three new Legislative Cards
>> per month seems a bit low. This would at least raise that to four.]
>
>
> Officers can actually
On 6/28/2020 12:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 6/28/2020 12:14 PM, Jason
Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:>> On 6/28/20 3:11 PM, Edward Murphy via
agora-business wrote:>>> [Pending fees are fine and all, but only three
new Legislative Cards>>> per month seems a bit low. This would at least
raise th
On 6/28/2020 8:35 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:29 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/20 11:06 PM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
>>> So, as it currently stands, the Referee can impose 6 bl
On 6/29/2020 6:23 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> Why don't we just have "A player cannot receive a welcome package if eir
> most recent deregistration was as a Fugitive". It means you aren't forever
> barred, but you have to wait the 30 days like everyone else.
Yeah, I think the is
On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> the pool also contains my most recent proposal, the one about repealing
> summary judgement
Aris,
You just asked why we should change the rule to actually state that
proposal pool report is accurate to the beginning of the week inst
On 6/29/2020 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Strange
via agora-discussion wrote:>> the pool also contains my most recent
proposal, the one about repealing>> summary judgement> > Aris,> > You just
asked why we should change the rule to actually state that> proposal pool
repor
On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes
>> back in the game sooner than a voluntary deregistrant is silly. Crime
>> deregistration should be a
not so.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:05 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6/29/2020 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Strange
>> via agora-discussion wrote:>> the pool also
On 6/29/2020 9:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Oh nice, quick turnaround!
>
> I assign CFJ 3857 to R. Lee.
>
Note: to be clear to everyone I just followed straight-up favoring policy
here no bribes were solicited from my end or accepted :).
-G.
On 6/29/2020 10:13 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/29/20 12:11 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the Participation Award, given to the people who are members to the
>> most contracts:
> I would restrict this to people who are members of contracts with at
> least two member
On 6/29/2020 10:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> If I no longer possess any doubloons, I consent to the above Parley.
>
well *that* defeats the purpose somewhat...
[I wrote the below, but am purposefully sending it to Discussion for
commentary rather than pointing atm]
On 6/29/2020 11:08 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> I find Aris guily of Tardiness as Promotor and levy the Cold Hand of
> Justice, imposing a forgivable fine of 1 blot, speci
erk I think I need to say for the second part "this will probably fail
(unless there's a retroactive currency reset)" Wasn't trying to mislead
anyone...
On 6/30/2020 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I earn a Legislative card for P8446.
>
> I pay a set of 4 Legislative Cards to earn 10 Pendants
On 7/1/2020 8:21 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> - How long do theses tend to be on average? I remember trying to read
> through G.'s thesis e published recently and realizing just how long it
> is. Is that an average length, or do they tend to be shorter?
That one is Master or PhD
tl;dr What do people think about a separate method for arts degrees that's
more akin to applause and somehow brings in Bard? (just in general).
longer:
I didn't think about this when voting last month, but the new art degrees
are kind of how we used to award Bard. A person produces Good Art,
On 7/1/2020 9:08 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/1/20 11:05 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> FWIW I will probably vote AGAINST both of these as I have a black ribbon
>> already, and the way this is worded, I'm not sure I could even get black
>> glitter from it. Correc
On 7/1/2020 9:17 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> they've been comprehensively fixed by now.
The Agoran equivalent of "what could possibly go wrong"
On 7/1/2020 11:51 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:59 AM omd wrote:
>> I haven’t looked at the wording in detail yet, but “by notice” is
>> confusingly similar to “with notice” (i.e. dependent actions).
>>
> Other suggestions? It doesn't seem confusing to
On 7/1/2020 4:59 PM, James Cook wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 16:17, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> tl;dr What do people think about a separate method for arts degrees that's
>> more akin to applause and somehow brings in Bard? (just in general).
>&
On 7/1/2020 8:24 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>>> CoE: This resolution is invalid because the decision was already resolved
>>> the previous time, because G.’s vote was invalid, because it did not
>>> “clearly set[] forth the voter’s inten
On 7/2/2020 8:18 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/2/20 10:14 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> One strange thing here is that Bard is mixed in with a long list of
>> other titles in R2581, but (from this point of view) is arguably more
>> similar to degrees than those other
On 7/2/2020 10:40 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have put together my judgement for CFJ 3860 [assuming that is the
> number it will be assigned by the CotC]. I am mainly publishing this as
> a draft and not an official judgement because I want to wait for
> confirmation that it is act
On 7/2/2020 11:21 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I was looking at Rule 2472, and I'm confused by the incompatibility of
> the Assessor and the Associate Director of Personnel. At no place in the
> ruleset can I find a conflict of interest between the two offices. Did
> one previousl
On 7/3/2020 8:14 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> Maybe I'm misreading it, but I dug up the judgements for both of these
> CFJs and it seems to me that neither attempt actually worked.
>
> On 7/2/2020 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> 3667 found
On 7/3/2020 10:41 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> What's the Annabel Crisis?
- A person registered under the name Annabel, did not much for a month or
so, then deregistered.
- ~6 months later, a long-time player (Maud) confessed that e had been
Annabel.
- It was decided that Anna
On 7/3/2020 10:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/3/2020 10:41 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
>> What's the Annabel Crisis?
>
> - A person registered under the name Annabel, did not much for a month or
> so, then deregistered.
>
> - ~6 months later, a long-time player (Maud) confesse
On 7/1/2020 8:24 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a
> locked
> filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying
> ‘Beware of the Leopard.”
[Just entering the case now].
Funnily enough, in
On 7/3/2020 12:24 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> Maybe worth also mentioning: back in February I tried to patch over
> this problem with Proposal 8328, The Eternal Sprit [sic... didn't
> notice the typo until now]
>
> Proposal text was 'Amend Rule 869 by replacing the text "is a per
On 7/3/2020 1:22 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have looked at all the CFJs involved and your gratuitous arguments and
> am ready to deliver my judgement. Am I good to do so?
no reason why not from here
On 7/3/2020 1:45 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> Even if it turns out
> my arguments are terrible and it gets reconsidered, I'm glad I put the
> effort into it.
At a first read, this looks comprehensive and well-done. Thanks for
putting in the substantial effort when you could have just
Signalling question: I've been interpreting [Treasusor] subject lines as
things that are strictly *from* the treasuror (as opposed to [attn.
Treasuror]). Is that the best way to distinguish - in particular are
officers searching for [Officer] but not [attn. Officer]?
-G.
On 7/3/2020 2:18 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/3/20 5:15 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> Signalling question: I've been interpreting [Treasusor] subject lines as
>> things that are strictly *from* the treasuror (as opposed to [attn
On 7/3/2020 1:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-07-03 7:56 p.m., Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/3/2020 12:24 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Maybe worth also mentioning: back in February I tried to patch over
>>>
On 7/3/2020 2:55 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticuswrote:
> On 7/3/20 5:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 7/2/20 6:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote:
CFJ, submitted to Referee: The above-quoted attempt to pay cards on
nch’s behalf was unsuc
On 7/3/2020 3:19 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:09 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>> On 7/3/20 6:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-official
>> wrote:
>>> I resolve the below intent, enacting and promulgating the below
>> regulations.
>>
>>
>> I enter t
On 7/3/2020 2:45 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I was scrolling through the CFJ archives and found this:
>
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3722
>
> And this message's subject line was basically my reaction.
>
> Apparently I "was indisputably Prime Minister" at one
On 7/3/2020 4:32 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> Proposal: Upvotes (AI=1)
> {
>
> Multiply all positive Karma values by 3 (to compensate existing Karma holders
> for expected inflation). Replace all negative Karma values with 0 (because
> Karma will become a currency).
>
> Amend Rule 2510
On 7/3/2020 5:48 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> at 5:19 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>> An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announcement
>>> by its owner to another entity, subject to modification by its
>>> backing document. A fixed a
On 7/3/2020 4:32 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> - The ability to take away others' karma is removed. I didn't want to do
> this,
>since I think the 'balanced karma' system is a quite interesting mechanic.
>But for karma transfers to feel cheap, I think you have to be able to
> pe
Proto: Agora the karma bank
Amend Rule 2510 (Such is Karma) by deleting:
4. Not result in Agora's karma moving farther away from 0.
and by replacing its last paragraph with:
At the beginning of each quarter,
On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
> Unless
> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
> SHALL NOT make use of loopholes in the underlying game of
> Diplomacy in order to gain a competitive advantage.
I'm a little puzzled/conc
On 7/4/2020 1:00 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 12:56 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>> Unless
>>> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, all Contestants
>>> SHALL NOT make use of loopholes in
On 7/4/2020 2:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/4/20 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> On 7/4/2020 12:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>> Unless
>>> explicitly permitted by the Diplonomic 2020 rules, al
On 7/5/2020 9:32 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> On 2020-07-05 4:25 p.m., Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>>> I object to the above announcement of intent. This may do nothing.
>>>
>>>
>>> I CFJ: Regardless of other supporters/objectors, Agora will not be
>>> satisfied with the ab
On 7/5/2020 10:17 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>> ... what? It doesn't matter if it's "antithetical". The rule clearly
>> says "sole function". This is an ulterior function and therefore
>> violates the rule. This interpretation means 'patches' dont't have to
>> be primarily patches w
On 7/5/2020 12:40 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> Now, the above arguments make it seem like there's absolutely no such
> thing as a "bug" wherever text was voted on by the legislature. In that
> respect, it is quite reasonable to apply the "bug" designation to clearly
> malfunctionin
On 7/5/2020 4:44 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> at 12:40 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>
>> So it does NOT meet the test in Rule 2626(1) on legislative intent (nor do
>> any of the other tests apply). It would be presumptuous, in this case, for
>> any judge or referee to
On 7/5/2020 5:22 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> at 4:51 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>>> In short, you’re saying that a rule does not “operate in a way that is
>>> clearly contrary to legislative intent or common sense” if it only does so
>&
On 7/6/2020 8:44 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
> |G. |1066| 1| 1| 0| 1| 0| 0| 10| 0|
Sorry to be the first to spoil your shiny new report - I paid to pend a
proposal yesterday:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-July/
On 7/6/2020 11:00 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/6/20 12:54 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>> [This came from a discussion on Discord in which nch mentioned that the
>> current 10 coin welcome packages really don't help that much. 25 may
>> still be on the low side, but I think
On 7/7/2020 9:12 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 10:08, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/7/20 12:06 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-07 10:01, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
I bid 35.00
On 7/7/2020 9:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 7/7/2020 9:12 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2020-07-07 10:08, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 7/7/20 12:06 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2020-07-07 10:01, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wr
On 7/7/2020 9:28 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 10:23, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/7/2020 9:12 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-07 10:08, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On
On 7/7/2020 12:28 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> ADoP: 2
> Arbitor: 1
If we got this route I might see about formalizing the CotC? The strict
Arbitor's duties (which can just be assignment on the fly and few records
kept) is probably a 1, but keeping it organized/archived is where
On 7/7/2020 1:09 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 13:59, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/7/2020 3:54 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/7/2020 12:28 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>>
On 7/8/2020 7:33 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/8/2020 2:26 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>> As fun as this is, contracts cannot perform actions automatically. I
>> guess you could amend it so that you CAN do so, but at that point,
>> there's no real reason for th
Diplonomic Proto: anonymous, turn-based proposals
[I will submit some version of this before the next turn; technical
comments very welcome]
Replace Rule 8 with the following:
During the negotiation or order-submission periods, any Contestant CAN
submit a proposal to change these rules private
On 7/12/2020 1:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
>> ID Author(s)AITitle
>> ---
>> 8473p Jason, G.1.0 Plain Old Bribery
> FOR. Consider this a p
On 7/12/2020 2:10 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:32 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> That presumes that I think bribery proposals are legitimate. I don't,
>> but if the rules explicitly make it so there's no legitimate way to
>> do something one is clearly intende
On 7/12/2020 5:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I entirely understood that conditionals were even a thing.
> Could you give some sort of example of a conditional?
>
It's only for builds and retreats. In normal diplomacy, there's a brief
"retreats and builds" phase af
On 7/12/2020 6:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/12/2020 5:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I entirely understood that conditionals were even a thing.
>> Could you give some sort of example of a conditional?
>>
>
> It's only for builds and retreats. In normal diplomac
On 7/12/2020 7:40 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the most part, this has turned into "when there's enough player
>> turnover that a majority don't have black ribbons, pass an AI-1 proposal".
>> So most defense for such proposals has been token at best (e.g. in the
>> current r
On 7/12/2020 9:02 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> Scam, dunno details, nch is listed as conspirator, it involved Rule 2492?
>> 2017-06-28 Qua
On 7/12/2020 10:13 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 21:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Here are the votes withdrawals, 2 seconds before the voting period
>> ended:
>
> Did I really cut it that close? My usual a
On 7/14/2020 3:03 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/14/2020 5:58 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 23:54 +0200, Cuddle Beam via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> Seeing how many active players were against this and this needs a
>>> high amount of people to wor
On 7/16/2020 2:41 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 14:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>> Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
>> Thu 16 Jul 2020 UTC
>
> COE: This omits the case I called about Diplonomic proposals being
> misinterpreted as
On 7/18/2020 11:30 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I motion to reconsider, I don't believe it to be overly hypothetical when
> it refers to how Agora itself works. It's a question about Agora's
> fundamental way of working.
First, I found this tidbit in CFJ 1895:
> R2160(d) allows us
PSS wrote:
> All proposals submitted before this sentence took effect, that have not
> yet been resolved in some manner, CAN and SHALL be resolved as described
> above, before the next turn (after this sentence takes effect) begins;
> after doing so, the Judge CAN remove this sentence by announce
On 7/19/2020 10:35 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> There was only one remaining proposal, which I resolved in the same email:
>
totally missed that (and somehow thought there were more), thanks! -G.
On 7/19/2020 4:50 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I Raise a Banner.
>
Congratulations At just over a year that's a really fast Renaissance!
Dunno if it's fastest ever, but it's up there.
On 7/19/2020 5:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 7/19/2020 4:49 PM, Jason Cobb
via agora-business wrote:>> For the avoidance of doubt, I award myself a
Black Ribbon if I do not>> already have one. [This should do nothing.]
I award myself a white ribbon, as I have never owned one before.>>> > I
th
On 7/21/2020 1:04 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via agora-discussion wrote:
> I see that it is still possible to tell the difference between a
> difference
> from a difference in language, but I'm not sure how
> that works.
If this email address is a bot (and not the human behind the bot), the
address s
On 7/21/2020 1:21 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 13:13 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:11 PM ais523 wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>>> wrote:
On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via ago
On 7/24/2020 8:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 7/24/2020 2:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>> So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
>> actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
>> those actions by writing them out.
>>
>> The
On 7/24/2020 5:08 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> -Tiger
>
Didn't process your signature at first then did a double-take. Hi!!
-G.
On 7/24/2020 1:38 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 08:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/2020 8:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2020 2:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>>>> So there's prec
On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3819
Just to add that in the Caller's Arguments for this case, Gaelan provides
a decent summary of several relevant cases (though not the 'large but
finite' one I don't think).
On 7/24/2020 2:09 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/24/20 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3819
>> Just to add that in the Caller's Ar
On 7/24/2020 2:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 7/24/2020 2:09 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/24/20 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2020 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic
On 7/25/2020 6:33 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> As France has been eliminated, it is with great sadness that I cause R.
> Lee to cease to be a Contestant in the 2020 Birthday Tournament,
> pursuant to Regulation BT2.
>
H. Judge Publius,
I'd like to ask for a clarification here t
On 7/25/2020 9:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 7/25/20 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 7/25/2020 6:33 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> As France has been eliminated, it is with great sadness that I cause R.
>&g
H. Publius,
Another diplonomic rules question!
The original Diplomacy Rules say:
> A unit may not retreat to the province from where the dislodging unit
> came or to an "embattled" province, meaning one left vacant by a
> bounce/standoff that turn.
(https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Diplomacy/Rules
501 - 600 of 1014 matches
Mail list logo
