I have a tinyurl.com clone written using AOLserver and
Postgres (shouldn't be very hard to port to use about
any DB) which does make nice urls
Spiffy, I did the same at http://oneweek.org a while back. Never
advertised it though, just gave it friends and people here on the
list.
Daniel P.
Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?
- Original Message -
From: Tim Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
a long way towards wider
adoption of AS
- Original Message -
From: Mat Kovach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:01PM -0700, Patrick Spence wrote
] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?
- Original Message -
From: Tim Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
2
Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
towards wider adoption of AS
Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
body of SIGNOFF
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Funny that your putting this out :)
Some years (1, 2?) ago, I was tinkering with the idea of how
to bring DAV (faster) to AS and one of the considerations
was to snap-in Apache-layer and use mod_dav as-is.
Musea Technologies
Peter M. Jansson said:
Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
towards wider adoption of AS
Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.
I don't see how it would speed the migration.. in fact it would have kept
me from moving my stuff away...by adding
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we could still get on the chat
every week or every other week without him.
Of course, it helps to have something to talk about and something worth
talking about ... so why don't I throw
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you
could haveone thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
I discovered this in the last few days. If I instant message
someone a URL pointing to an image, it never gets logged in the
access log. Perhaps it's something to do with
- Original Message -
From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we could still get on the chat
every week or every other week without him.
Indeed!
Of course, it helps to have something to
I am glad to hear someone is working on Debian packages, as I am getting
ready to install Aolserver on a Debian server.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:53:36PM -0600, Roberto Mello wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate program that puts readline on top of a TCP
connection, you can
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Rob Mayoff wrote:
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate
On 2003.07.31, Roberto Mello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
- Readline support for nscp.
Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as my login shell (yes,
I'm a nut) and
Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as
my login shell (yes,
I'm a nut) and I've heard from other folks that
they'd like readline
support in nscp ... so, I wonder ... what might it
take for something
like package require readline to work. So, if you
really want
readline
On 2003.07.31, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
There ya go, limiting it to ONE thing.. :) but I am difficult, and never
listen
On 2003.07.31, Brett Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is already a tclreadline binding.
http://tclreadline.sourceforge.net
It'd be great except TclReadlineCmd calls Tcl_CreateFileHandler(0, ...)
for stdin. If you could pass it the input and output fd's, that'd be
perfect ...
Maybe I'll
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
then run Apache. :-)
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a
Dossy said:
1: A better solution for virtual hosting
a: I don't have to run multiple instances of aolserver
b: the Pageroot variable is updated correctly so scripting
in languages like php can handle virtual hosting
c: logging to seperate files for each virtual server
Peter M. Jansson said:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
then run Apache. :-)
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with mod_rewrite
and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
makes it easier to work with...
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:28:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I don't think we really need full readline/ncurses in nscp. I
think just line editing capabilities (cursor forward, backwards, start
of line, end of line) would be a big win at this point.
Considering how "standard" VT100
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:30:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a .htaccess file, for example -- that
just won't work with AOLserver as it stands, and the changes would go a
long way
Peter M. Jansson said:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with
mod_rewrite
and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
makes
Roberto Mello wrote:
- Readline support for nscp.
That would be quite hard, since readline also has to guess the terminal
type and so on.
Wouldn't it be much better to write nscp client in Tcl+readline or even
Tk. I have a pretty generic ztelnet module, which I use to connect.
It's pretty old and
26 matches
Mail list logo
