Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-29 Thread Praveen Kumar
Hi Listers, I believe this is defect in SRM 7.6.04 SP2 and fixed in SP4. Scenario : Attachment added from fulfillment request in not accessible from Request Entry console (SRS:ServiceRequestConsole), where as the same can be opened from Request Details tab(SRS:RequestDetails form). When we

Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-15 Thread vaibhav wadekar
Hello Raj, What Patch level you are on for SRM 7.6.04, We have seen such issue with unpatch version of 7.6.04 and all of them got corrected in 7.6.04 sp4. Also when you adding an attachment, do you select the internal or Public? when you select public (radio button), it will be display within

Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-15 Thread Parekar, Rahul
to the work order then the requester is not able to open the attachment from the Request entry console. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of vaibhav wadekar Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 4:35 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: SRM Issue

Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-13 Thread Raj
Hi Tauf , We have SRM with version 7.6.04 and here external means the clients using SRM through internet and when they tried to open attachments of their own requests it is not visible to them. I have tried your suggestion every thing looks fine. I am not getting what is the problem.

Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-13 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
So can you go into more detail on not visible to them? Do they see the activity log entry and then the attachment table? Do they then click on it and then nothing happens? Or a window opens and nothing is displayed? What browser are you using and did you try a different browser? Sent from my

SRM Issue

2013-04-12 Thread Raj
Hi, I am facing the following issue, In SRM external customer users are unable to view attachments in the activity log. Thanks in advance. Regards, Rajkumar ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at

Re: SRM Issue

2013-04-12 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
Raj, More info needed. Start with version. Then, what does external mean? Are these people who have access to remedy and SRM? Are they coming in through the internet? Are they looking at their own requests? Here's a few things that cause attachment issues sometimes: 1: Make sure pop up blockers

Re: SRM - Issue with Draft Records (ARERR-150)

2012-11-01 Thread itsm.support
|| http://www.linkedin.com/company/vyom-labs From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mohamed Abdelaziz Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:24 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: SRM - Issue with Draft Records (ARERR-150) ** Hello

Re: SRM - Issue with Draft Records (ARERR-150)

2012-11-01 Thread John
Hello, This looks like an edited version of BMC KA360782. Cheers, John ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are

Re: SRM - Issue with Draft Records (ARERR-150)

2012-11-01 Thread John
Correction KA331904 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are

SRM - Issue with Draft Records (ARERR-150)

2012-10-31 Thread Mohamed Abdelaziz
Hello, As part of SRDs migration, I migrated all records we have in CFG Configuration AIF form from Dev to QA using arx format. Then, migrated all SRDs and related workflow. Now, everything seems to be working fine except when attempting to open an SR in Draft, I receive ARERR 150 A server

Re: SRM Issue

2011-12-10 Thread Mahesh
what is displayed on Request Entry Console) and if needed, you can add more fields and a simple set fields filter action to populate the information. Thanks Mahesh On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Veeral Oza veer...@gmail.com wrote: ** Hi All, Need some help to figure out an SRM issue. ARS

Re: SRM Issue

2011-12-09 Thread John Sundberg
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Veeral Oza veer...@gmail.com wrote: ** Hi All, Need some help to figure out an SRM issue. ARS 7604 SP2 ITSM 7604 SP2 SRM 7604 SP2 As seen in the attached screen shot, the marked red section is the requester details, getting populated from

Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-27 Thread Maria Calabrese
I though about doing it that way, but the Incident type is not a field available in the AOT for me to map and set. Do you recall if you were on SRM 7.6.4? this is the version that we're on. Thanks for any addiitonal help you can provide. Maria Calabrese Bose Corporation

Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-27 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
are not available out of the box. (Don't ask why) :) -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Maria Calabrese Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:38 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs I

Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-27 Thread Gmail
: Chowdhury, Tauf [mailto:tauf.chowdh...@frx.com] Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:30 PM Subject: Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs Maria, I've seen this issue and what I've had to do is hard code the mapping for that field within your AOT after you relate the template to it. So when you define

Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-27 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs I just ran into this today. This is by design since the incident was created from a Service Request. You shouldn't hard code anything. A true incident User Service Restoration should be created directly from the Incident Management

SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-26 Thread Maria Calabrese
Currently working on the implementation of SRM 7.6.4 (within the ITSM suite) I am setting up Service Request Definitions for Incidents. So far I have done the following: Created an Incident template, which sets the Incident type to User Service Restoration Created an AOT and registered the

Re: SRM issue with Incident SRDs

2011-09-26 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Maria Calabrese Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 2:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: SRM issue with Incident SRDs Currently working on the implementation of SRM 7.6.4 (within the ITSM suite) I am setting up Service Request Definitions

Re: SRM issue

2010-07-23 Thread Prasanth Prabhakaran (UST, IND)
-Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Christine Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:50 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: SRM issue Prasanth, I've had this happen in the past and it took me a bit to find the fix for our

SRM issue

2010-07-22 Thread Prasanth Prabhakaran (UST, IND)
Hi, We are facing a strange issue with SRM, sometimes INC and WO are not creating and sometime WO is creating but INC is not. Anybody know what is the reason ? Thanks and Regards, Prasanth.p ___

Re: SRM issue

2010-07-22 Thread Chowdhury, Tauf
(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Prasanth Prabhakaran (UST, IND) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:27 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: SRM issue Hi, We are facing a strange issue with SRM, sometimes INC and WO are not creating and sometime WO is creating but INC

Re: SRM issue

2010-07-22 Thread Christine
Prasanth, I've had this happen in the past and it took me a bit to find the fix for our environment. Below is how I have our environment working. I should say I have this working without official training or much Remedy experience. There may be a better way to do this. The SRD has Nav Cats 1, 2

Re: SRM issue

2010-07-22 Thread Joe DeSouza
@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 12:26:36 PM Subject: SRM issue ** Hi,      We are facing a strange issue with SRM, sometimes INC and WO are not creating and sometime WO is creating but INC is not. Anybody know what is the reason ?     Thanks and Regards,   Prasanth.p

Re: SRM issue

2010-07-22 Thread Mahesh
Look into the records in CAI:Events and see the value for Return Code and Return Message. Thanks Mahesh On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Prasanth Prabhakaran (UST, IND) prasanth.prabhaka...@ust-global.com wrote: ** Hi, We are facing a strange issue with SRM, sometimes INC and WO are