I happened to have the Sbooster PSU included when I purchased a
Lindemann DAC. I mailed the manufacturer and they were kind enough to
send me an interchangeable DC tip that fits my Squeezebox Touch. However
I noticed that the official power source for the Touch is 5VDC-3A, while
the PSU is only
vinhattieu wrote:
I happened to have the Sbooster PSU included when I purchased a
Lindemann DAC. I mailed the manufacturer and they were kind enough to
send me an interchangeable DC tip that fits my Squeezebox Touch. However
I noticed that the official power source for the Touch is 5VDC-3A,
Sometimes 'digital-sounding' is used as a shorthand for 'bright, edgy,
etched, fatiguing'. As has been pointed out, this is often describing
jitter and rail noise - the former partly being a function of the
latter.
'Analog-sounding' is sometimes used to convey a certain 'soft-knee'
distortion
@ Thomas: very much enjoyed your post, and curious about your
comparisons between your best SB and the Mac . . .
--
item_audio
item_audio's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=51315
View this thread:
magiccarpetride;664726 Wrote:
You're right, analog comes with more pronounced distortion.
However, analog distortion is of a different category. It is what sound
engineers refer to as a 'soft knee' distortion, meaning it is
mathematically elegant. Digital distortion, despite being much
But the sad fact is that many audiophiles try to cover up for bad
recordings, believing that the digital harshness comes from thier
inferior dac,cdp or whatever ?
If we remove the obviusly loudness war and digitally clipped modern
records from the equation
Imho audiable digital artifacts
Last week i tested at home one S-booster. I have DIY PS with Teddy
Superreg build according to Teddy Pardo instructions and SBT with
Soundcheck Toolbox 2.0 and priority tweaks from
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359
SPDIF with a good cable from Blue Jeans cable is feeding
Phil Leigh;663821 Wrote:
This thread has become tainted with an analogue=better mantra/line of
thinking. The reality - shocking though it may be - is that analogue is
not better (in any objective sense) than correctly engineered digital.
In fact the opposite is true. Some people might prefer
Stratmangler;663941 Wrote:
...So what I really meant to say when I said more analogue, was that I
felt that the sound took me closer to the recording event, to the
original analogue.
...
Ah, I see... more transparent... a cleaner window into the recording...
increased verisimilitude... (oops
More noise can result in sharper treble, if it offsets feedback loops in
amp stages.
in that case a reduction of noise then can well be perceived as 'more
analogue and natural'.
--
Dura
Dura's Profile:
This thread has become tainted with an analogue=better mantra/line of
thinking. The reality - shocking though it may be - is that analogue is
not better (in any objective sense) than correctly engineered digital.
In fact the opposite is true. Some people might prefer certain
peculiarities of
Phil Leigh;663821 Wrote:
This thread has become tainted with an analogue=better mantra/line of
thinking. The reality - shocking though it may be - is that analogue is
not better (in any objective sense) than correctly engineered digital.
In fact the opposite is true. Some people might prefer
Amauta;663211 Wrote:
What differences did you hear?
Things just sound more analogue and natural.
--
Stratmangler
There is no element of personal attack in my response.
Stratmangler's Profile:
Stratmangler;663656 Wrote:
Things just sound more analogue and natural.
Sounds like it's actually injecting more noise. I might be wrong but a
cleaner power supply will lower the noise floor, reduce jitter, which
translates to clearing up some mud on sound.
But if you like it go for it,
Jeff Flowerday;663670 Wrote:
Sounds like it's actually injecting more noise. I might be wrong but a
cleaner power supply will lower the noise floor, reduce jitter, which
translates to clearing up some mud on sound.
But if you like it go for it, ultimately it's your ears and money.
Notice
Stratmangler;663672 Wrote:
Notice I did *not* say it sounds more like an analogue -recording- of
-*any*- sort.
Don't read things into what I have not said ;)
Chris :)
Oh, I noticed, nor was my comment in regards to a analogue recording...
--
Jeff Flowerday
Jeff Flowerday;663681 Wrote:
Oh, I noticed, nor was my comment in regards to a analogue recording...
In that case it's curious that jitter should even enter the
conversation
--
Stratmangler
There is no element of personal attack in my response.
Stratmangler;663656 Wrote:
Things just sound more analogue and natural.
And what, exactly, does more analogue mean? If it's not like an
analogue recording, does it have any meaning at all? That can
actually be defined? That's not an artifact of expectation?
R.
--
RonM
pski;663177 Wrote:
Technical? Was it free?
The effects are quite audible.
I like what I hear, so in my subjective opinion it's an improvement.
I might at some point pop round to a friend's place and have him put it
on the 'scope. Be interesting to see what's being removed, noise wise,
from the
Stratmangler;663207 Wrote:
The effects are quite audible.
What differences did you hear?
--
Amauta
SqueezeboxServer 7.5.1 on Qnap TS-119.
3x Squeezebox2, 1 Squeezebox Classic, 2x BOOM - excellent sound!, One
little RED Radio
'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/Squeezebox_II/)
I've had an SBooster delivered today on a sale or return basis, plugged
it in between the stock SMPS and Touch, and it's not going to be
returned.
Chris :)
--
Stratmangler
There is no element of personal attack in my response.
Stratmangler;663141 Wrote:
I've had an SBooster delivered today on a sale or return basis, plugged
it in between the stock SMPS and Touch, and it's not going to be
returned.
Chris :)
Technical? Was it free?
--
pski
real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. It is
Sitting between stock SPSU and Squeezebox, the SBooster does deliver as
promised - just. Sort of. It dials down the background hash. At
least, I think it does. With such marginal improvements, it's easy to
doubt oneself. To what degree the SBooster will work for you will
likely depend on
I bought an SBooster on a sale or return basis from a UK dealer-I
returned it.It did nothing in my system however I use a decent linear
supply.
--
Covenant
Covenant's Profile:
Hello guys. Please be kind to each others opinions..:)
As an engineer, I tune everything I own..:) Well I build my own
linear PSU, based actually in a battery charger, using only linear
technology, charging 2 LiIon Cells. From there, an other PSU is
regulating the power down to the 5v the
panosm;656246 Wrote:
Well back to the question. There is a huge difference in the sound
quality. If you can hear the difference between the standard PSU and a
good linear PSU, you have to find what is wrong with your other
equimpent.
kind regards
Panos
do you mean if you CAN'T hear the
panosm;656246 Wrote:
Hello guys. Please be kind to each others opinions..:)
As an engineer, I tune everything I own..:) Well I build my own
linear PSU, based actually in a battery charger, using only linear
technology, charging 2 LiIon Cells. From there, an other PSU is
regulating the
Phil Leigh;656293 Wrote:
This is your opinion... To which you are entitled... However, It is not
a fact.
Perhaps if you mod a benchmark dac til it doesn't work properly.
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile:
Since it was possible to return the sBooster combination if not
satisfactory I ordered one. Always room and open for improvements
right?
Sound is definitly different than with the standard PSU. Bass is indeed
more extended and the highs are smoother. Some may define this easier
(less analytic)
Hi everybody,
here comes my (I guess final) word on my series of comparisons. The
Teddy Pardo PSU has in fact changed over the last 10 days, it appears
that the sound has become somewhat fuller and richer and possibly
clearer. Not a big change, but anyway, it was important to not evaluate
this
Tom186;626598 Wrote:
Hi everybody,
here comes my (I guess final) word on my series of comparisons. The
Teddy Pardo PSU has in fact changed over the last 10 days, it appears
that the sound has become somewhat fuller and richer and possibly
clearer. Not a big change, but anyway, it was
michael123;626600 Wrote:
Listening few times myself and my friends to Squeezebox/Touch
(plain/moded) with TeddyPardo PSU.. Transporter beats them all :)
FYI
You're wasting too much energy IMHO
That's a good point, I never tried a Transporter, just marveled at the
raging debates around this
Tom186;624342 Wrote:
the Teddy Pardo PSU for my squeezebox is here, currently breaking in, so
I do not want to say too much.
The PSU is breaking in, really?
What is supposed to happen with it during that time?
--
johann
Whether it does anything or not, I can only tell you after a week or so
...
(The manufacturer claims that the sound becomes more liquid/less edgy
during this time. Could be ... I have had this with other equipment
that contains caps, so let's see. Nothing like trying).
--
Tom186
Tom186, I'm greatly appreciating your findings. Keep the info coming.
--
HumanMedia
HumanMedia's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44865
View this thread:
Just received sbooster, made only one listening session through speakers
(analog out from touch). First impression very positive, to my ears the
sound is warmer, cant tell about any detail loss at the moment. I don't
trust in A/B blind test, i will make some more listening of well know
flac24
Hi everybody,
I have been playing around with various power supplies for my SBT in
recent weeks, and thought I'd share my experiences here.
(My setup is a pretty revealing one, bordering on the analytical, but
still musical enough: SBT fed via Ethernet from a WLAN bridge. All
Soundcheck mods
Hi,
Thanks again for your very useful advices.
I have ordered the Belden/Canare cables + recomended analog RCA from
Blue Jeans and will try to improve the digital out of SBT following
your recommendations.
About the analog instability, what's annoying for me is that I am using
the analog as
sorry for the delay, been house decorating.
It is generally agreed that the digital output of the Touch is superior
to the Analog output. It has been measured that improving the power
supply has a effect on the Analog output but not the Digital. It has
also been measured by Phil Leigh that
c3p0;605474 Wrote:
sorry for the delay, been house decorating.
So basically you should hear a difference between the DAC of the Touch
via analog and the Output of the Vdac via Touch digital ( I am using
SPDIF cable) and its just a case of finding out whats blocking you from
hearing the
Hi,
If your supply to the V-dac is a stable, low ripple supply it will
definetly be better than the V-dac supplied power supply.
The Vovox was quite expensive (£135 for 1m with Eichmann bullets).
Your experience with the Analog outputs being variable is what some
people have noticed with their
c3p0;602945 Wrote:
Hi,
My Vdac ran very warm (hot) with the supplied wall wart, i measured
output at 19 volts (not good). I changed to a Strontronics low ripple
higher current SMPS, Vdac now cool and sounds better; cost about £10.
Hi c3p0,
To come back to your setup, are you using the
As this thread is about improved SB power supplies I thought this might
be of interest to some...I've also added a new thread on the Duet forum
so sorry for the duplication :)
This will only be of use to receiver users in the UK...
Maplins have got a deal on till this coming Tuesday, a 20W
c3p0;603263 Wrote:
Hi,
So my advice to improve your system, buy a cheaper low ripple Smps for
the Vdac, (12v is way better than 19v). Keep your amp and save up for
some new speakers. The new speakers around now are fantastic (speaker
technology and cabinet design have improved and got
Hi,
This is where the fun begins and the reading of reviews and
selecting ones that you can hear locally.
I cant recommend a particular brand but i can say i have heard quite a
few speakers in the last two years (HiEnd Dealer around the corner from
house) and have been impressed by the sound.
evdplancke;602902 Wrote:
I have experienced the sbooster on my SBT and after a few days, I don't
notice any difference anymore between my analog an digital outputs. My
first impression is that the improvement is higher on the analog than
on the digital. But, to be honnest, the supply of my
Thanks for the advice, but I am not sure to understand your logic: on
one hand, you are using a low cost SMPS for your V-DAC allthough I
would expect this type of PSU being in every aspects worse than a
linear PSU. On the other hand, you are using a power plant premier of
about 2k... for sure I
Hi,
at the low cost end a Smps can out perform a linear Psu. Linear isn't
always better, the Smps with the Touch is very good. A lot of Hi end
Hifi manufacturers are using Smps Inc Linn. So don't write Smps off, a
bit of specification Research will find you one at low cost.
I agree with you that
I have experienced the sbooster on my SBT and after a few days, I don't
notice any difference anymore between my analog an digital outputs. My
first impression is that the improvement is higher on the analog than
on the digital. But, to be honnest, the supply of my DAC (V-DAC with
standard PSU)
Hi there, I am pretty sure that Soundcheck is the writer of one of the
reviews of that device in the german magazine eins null...
http://www.squeeze-upgrade.com/images/Squeeze_upgrade%20Eins%20Null.pdf
--
MCG555
MCG555;597806 Wrote:
Hi there, fyi, I am pretty sure that Soundcheck is the writer of one
of the reviews of that device in the german magazine eins null...
http://www.squeeze-upgrade.com/images/Squeeze_upgrade%20Eins%20Null.pdf
At least I'm 100% in line with them.
I'm still using the
@Soundcheck: how did you use the sbooster, did you hook it up with the
stock SMPS or with your own LPS. I mean is the described improvement
the combination of the latter?
If you also want to test the squeeze-upgrade linear PS it will
automatically be with the sbooster attached, it is one product.
michael123;584138 Wrote:
Guys
Audiophiles _listen_ to music. And this is what matters in the end.
The little I learn in this field is that there are no rules.
--Michael
Absolutely correct.
However, we can use some science to help us try and understand and
improve the unreliable rules...
soundcheck;584112 Wrote:
...
You might guess that I expected such an answer. Phil will be the next
chiming in. ...
No I won't (oh - rats...)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X
soundcheck;584137 Wrote:
You hearing an improvement or even a difference is not a hard
fact unless the difference can be measured, now that would be a hard
fact.
Wrong!
People who buy 200$ devices usually have to trust their ears.
Those ears are known to be better on many aspects
Hi guys.
Great to read about the joint SqueezeBox forum gang wisdom.
Looks not pretty nice to me that you shot Smooveg as a first time
poster who came up with a serious opinion about that device.
What kind of attitude is that supposed to be!?!
Even if that guy would have been part of that
soundcheck;584070 Wrote:
I'm running my Touch off batteries, Teddy-regs and a pretty solid EPCOS
Sikorel buffer.
Why just Teddy-regs?
My friend is using Teddy touch external power supply and said that the
difference is huge..
[ yet, he is not using Touch for critical listening, for that he
michael123;584071 Wrote:
Why just Teddy-regs?
My friend is using Teddy touch external power supply and said that the
difference is huge..
[ yet, he is not using Touch for critical listening, for that he has
NorthStar Transport + DAC ;) ]
Because a single DIY SuperTeddyReg (to be exact)
soundcheck;584070 Wrote:
Looks not pretty nice to me that you shot Smooveg as a first time poster
who came up with a serious opinion about that device.
What kind of attitude is that supposed to be!?!
I havn't tested the entire SBooster supply yet, just the booster.
There's more to
Dear iPhone.
You might guess that I expected such an answer. Phil will be the next
chiming in. Perhaps Mynb last.
I know 5V are 5V, bits are bits. And a buffer is just a buffer.
I heard that before.
There'll always be a group of people like you. And there'll be other
people
like me who just
soundcheck;584112 Wrote:
Dear iPhone.
You might guess that I expected such an answer. Phil will be the next
chiming in. Perhaps Mynb last.
I know 5V are 5V, bits are bits. And a buffer is just a buffer.
I heard that before.
There'll always be a group of people like you. And there'll
On 20/10/10 18:18, soundcheck wrote:
Dear iPhone.
You might guess that I expected such an answer. Phil will be the next
chiming in. Perhaps Mynb last.
I know 5V are 5V, bits are bits. And a buffer is just a buffer.
I heard that before.
There'll always be a group of people like you.
Dear ralphpny.
!!!Fairness
People who never tried a device or tweak, judge about people who have
that device right in front of them -- listening to it at the very
moment.
That you call fair.
--
soundcheck
'soundcheck's au...@vise - Squeezebox Touch Modification
Robin Bowes;584119 Wrote:
On 20/10/10 18:18, soundcheck wrote:
Dear iPhone.
You might guess that I expected such an answer. Phil will be the
next
chiming in. Perhaps Mynb last.
I know 5V are 5V, bits are bits. And a buffer is just a buffer.
I heard that before.
On 20/10/10 19:23, soundcheck wrote:
Dear ralphpny.
!!!Fairness
People who never tried a device or tweak, judge about people who have
that device right in front of them -- listening to it at the very
moment.
That you call fair.
I have *never* listened to my
On 20/10/10 19:44, soundcheck wrote:
This discussion is not about opinions.
This discussion is about respect and attitude!
Some people experienced and reporting something - hard facts.
Some others have and express a more then questionable opinion about
that. (This is not the first time
Robin Bowes;584132 Wrote:
On 20/10/10 19:44, soundcheck wrote:
This discussion is not about opinions.
This discussion is about respect and attitude!
Some people experienced and reporting something - hard facts.
Some others have and express a more then questionable opinion
soundcheck;584123 Wrote:
Dear ralphpny.
!!!Fairness
People who never tried a device or tweak, judge about people who have
that device right in front of them -- listening to it at the very
moment.
That you call fair.
What you seem to be failing to understand
On 20/10/10 20:03, soundcheck wrote:
Robin Bowes;584132 Wrote:
You are *not* reporting hard facts, you are reporting your opinions.
The only disrespect and poor attitude that I'm seeing is from you
because not everyone has the same opinion as you, or accepts your
opinion as hard fact.
You hearing an improvement or even a difference is not a hard
fact unless the difference can be measured, now that would be a hard
fact.
Wrong!
People who buy 200$ devices usually have to trust their ears.
Those ears are known to be better on many aspects then most of the
measurement gear
Guys
Audiophiles _listen_ to music. And this is what matters in the end.
The little I learn in this field is that there are no rules.
--Michael
--
michael123
michael123's Profile:
soundcheck;584137 Wrote:
I wouldn't state anything over here or anywhere else, what I couldn't
prove in a listening session.
Fair enough. Now just get ready for the coming flame war regarding what
constitutes a proper listening session :)
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -
soundcheck;584137 Wrote:
If several people independently experience the same result. I call it
hard facts.
Fantastic! So, in fact, Elvis is still alive and the Earth has lots of
visitors from other planets, and they are all mingling with the
numerous ghosts haunting houses.
--
garym
ralphpnj;584135 Wrote:
... but I can tell you that shorts and chocolate pudding (slightly
warm without whipped cream) make absolutely no difference or
improvement in the sound :)
But it does make for a more pleasurable listening experience ;=}
--
iPhone
*iPhone*
Media Room:
iPhone;582687 Wrote:
And you call yourself an Audiophile ;=} No Pets, No Smoking, No dust, no
drinks, and no humans in the room! Well I guess we need that last one.
PS Don't buy any Vandersteen model below the Quatro Woods, cats love
those full length speaker socks!
I've actually only
Nonreality;582704 Wrote:
I've actually only called myself a wanna be audiophile. Very lacking at
that too. For some reason I need my damn cat. He likes my music when
no one else does.
Hey Non, I like your music. I listen to a lot of Tom Waits too. Besides
being allergic to cats, I
When I changed my SB Classic for a Touch, I first kep my (far too
expensive) Russ Andrews Sqeeuzepak PS. That thing made an audible
difference for the better on the Classic, basically giving clearer
sound. Recently I compared the Squeezepak to the standaard Touch PS and
could not detect any
Phil Leigh;582323 Wrote:
Interesting conclusion - you preferred the Stock PSU.
Wonder what the Sbooster things actually does...
That is a very easy question to answer Phil, what it actually does is
lower ones checking account balance without any return for said
lowering!
IE it separates
iPhone;582536 Wrote:
That is a very easy question to answer Phil, what it actually does is
lower ones checking account balance without any return for said
lowering!
IE it separates those looking for Audio Nirvana from their hard earned
money giving nothing in return. Common Sense should
Aha, so we're back to the 2nd post in this thread after all. ;-)
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=571566postcount=2
--
garym
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this
garym;582576 Wrote:
Aha, so we're back to the 2nd post in this thread after all. ;-)
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=571566postcount=2
That may be true but at least now we have actual proof of the wisdom of
your earlier post.
Years ago at the beginning of the upgraded power
ralphpnj;582583 Wrote:
That may be true but at least now we have actual proof of the wisdom of
your earlier post.
good point! Actually, I could spend money that would clearly improve my
listening situation, but it would cost more than 1/2 of my net worth.
I'd have to divorce my wife (as the
garym;582589 Wrote:
good point! Actually, I could spend money that would clearly improve my
listening situation, but it would cost more than 1/2 of my net worth.
I'd have to divorce my wife (as the wife acceptance factor has placed
many more limitations on my setup than either money or
Phil Leigh;582566 Wrote:
Hey iPhone, old chap, it's me! - I know the PSU won't make a blind bit
of difference. I was just wondering what particular piece of voodoo
they had in there that was SUPPOSED to make a difference... :-)
Should have put a Smiley on that one, sorry. Wasn't really
Nonreality;582685 Wrote:
I do know that having the spikes on my speakers have upgraded my
listening experience. My damn cat has a much harder time knocking them
over so I can listen to them in the right position. The bi-amping also
makes life a bit more of a problem for him knocking them
I do know that having the spikes on my speakers have upgraded my
listening experience. My damn cat has a much harder time knocking them
over so I can listen to them in the right position. The bi-amping also
makes life a bit more of a problem for him knocking them over, the
leverage thing.
--
I am new here, but have already examined a lot on this forum. I
recognize the returning names like e.g. Phil Leigh, JohnSwenson and
Soundcheck by now. Very educative and I am grateful for the efforts
they and others put in helping and teaching.
I want to share some subjectives. I bought the
JKlein;582307 Wrote:
I am new here, but have already examined a lot on this forum. I
recognize the returning names like e.g. Phil Leigh, JohnSwenson and
Soundcheck by now. Very educative and I am grateful for the efforts
they and others put in helping and teaching.
I want to share some
Mnyb;578635 Wrote:
Yea that could be an application, is it not very popular with thick
carpeting that covers the whole floor in the US ?
It seems to work with our shorter Berber type carper.
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-
iPhone;578327 Wrote:
One can only hope. Do we really need more? Once they use Magic and
Night and Day Difference its time to hide your wallet!
Maybe I'm not an Audiophool after all because anybody that believes
that adding X (insert the accessory or after market product here) to
what they
Mnyb;578440 Wrote:
Sometimes you get your wishes fullfilled ;)
Passive Biwiring terminals and spikes on every speaker cus the
audiophools want it.
Even if it is pure BS science .
The benefits of bi-wiring are still the subject of debate but there are
very clear and audible reasons for
ralphpnj;578486 Wrote:
The benefits of bi-wiring are still the subject of debate but there are
very clear and audible reasons for using spikes - they do provide
improve the performance of a given speaker.
Some audiophile tweaks are just bad or questionable science but many
others are good
Mnyb;578495 Wrote:
It a very clear difference in using spike you tune in a resonance in the
midrange/lower bass it's very different indeed. I'm all for soft springy
feets tuned to the speakers weight.
like these:
http://www.sonicdesign.se/sdfeet.html
You can not make the speaker
Passive x-over is so 1950 , but i have them myself speakers are so much
an acoustic thing the selection of home active speakers is tiny.
So there you are, and even fewer have a working concept for active home
theater.
Prices extreme to say the least even if in principle it does not have
to be.
Foolish me, I thought those spikes were just to keep the speaker in
place on my carpet.
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
Nonreality;578633 Wrote:
Foolish me, I thought those spikes were just to keep the speaker in
place on my carpet.
Yea that could be an application, is it not very popular with thick
carpeting that covers the whole floor in the US ?
--
Mnyb
Phil Leigh;576254 Wrote:
+1, Hmmm... I smell a rat
I think you guys killed it. I was waiting for more great claims. Now
we will never know.
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
Nonreality;578202 Wrote:
I think you guys killed it. I was waiting for more great claims. Now
we will never know.
One can only hope. Do we really need more? Once they use Magic and
Night and Day Difference its time to hide your wallet!
Maybe I'm not an Audiophool after all because anybody
A veil has indeed lifted... a veil of BS :-)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system
Hi All,
I bought the S-booster (Squeeze-upgrade - Linear power supply for the
Squeezebox Classic 5V) for the Squeeze-box classic.
The sound quality is way better than the original adapter.
the sound is more spacial, there is more rest in the sound.
instrument that I couldn't hear before i can
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
