I'm running some tests, and as such, I'm not restoring to the system on which
the files were originally backed up. But when I get the report e-mails, in
the subject they say:
Bacula: Restore OK of machine-to-which-I'm-restoring Full
Granted, I'm restoring that the second machine's client, but
I'm just beginning to use it this week, it appears to work out of the box
with 1.38 though.
Some details though, I'm using Xen, base os RHEL5 (32bit), domU where the
director and sd are is debian etch (stable). The machine is a new Dell 6850,
this is an LTO4 version connected with to a LSI logic
Hello,
Is anyone using tls with the latest bacula? I upgraded from 2.03 to
2.2.4 and the director now does not start. Both the file and storage daemons
do start, so i do not believe it's a tls issue. I've installed the latest
server on both FreeBSD via ports, and a CentOS 5 box, and i'm getti
I'm using Bacula 2.2.3 and have a schedule that writes a full backup to
DVD on monday night followed by incrementals for the rest of the week.
The full backup runs OK and the next four incrementals run OK, but the
fifth incremental fails with the following error:
12-Oct 23:10 server-sd: Upfront
Today while restoring, I got this:
12-Oct 14:38 adelie-sd: Ready to read from volume "File-0037" on
device "FileStorage" (/backup/bacula).
12-Oct 14:38 adelie-sd: Forward spacing Volume "File-0037" to file:block
0:970478039.
12-Oct 14:39 adelie-fd: RestoreFiles.2007-10-12_13.56.09 Error: attribs
> My understanding so far is that your configuration (no Autochanger) is
> effectively very similar to mine (with Autochanger). Autochanger resource is
> apparently just a virtual place to keep things like Changer Command and
> Changer Device so that multiple Device resources in SD (describing actu
Hi John,
On Friday 12 October 2007 04:13:40 pm John Drescher wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Ivan Adzhubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
> > autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape
> > test
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Doh ! I knew it was simple ! I looked at the original package startup
scripts and they don't start the file daemon as user bacula. So my
single file restore seems to have worked just fine when the file daemon
runs as root.
I agree that sqlite is probabl
Hi,
12.10.2007 22:03,, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote::
> My apologies if this has a simple solution, but I couldn't find anything
> with a (quick) search:
>
> I've been running bacula 1.38.x for quite awhile and it's been
> very nice, except for the massive amount of time the database
> attr spooling
My apologies if this has a simple solution, but I couldn't find anything
with a (quick) search:
I've been running bacula 1.38.x for quite awhile and it's been
very nice, except for the massive amount of time the database
attr spooling takes - mine is huge due to the tremendous number of
files my u
On 10/12/07, Ivan Adzhubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
> autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape tests
> on the new drive completed with flying colors. Now I need advice on how to
> co
Hi,
12.10.2007 14:48,, Andy Brown wrote::
> Hi there,
> Firstly, thank you for getting back to me, and with such speed.
You were lucky :-)
>
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>>MaximumPartSize = 5000M;
>>
>> That directive takes no effect, it's only used for DVD writing.
> Ah!
>
>
>>
>>
Hi,
Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape tests
on the new drive completed with flying colors. Now I need advice on how to
configure Bacula for two drives which use different (and incomp
i have never used this feature, but now i need it.
i can confirm that bacula 2.2.5 (compiled from source on debian 4.0) has the
same problem with postgresql
> catalog = all, !skipped, !saved
but i don't know if this is only a configuration problem
(the dird starts fine with that message-resour
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:03 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 12.10.2007 09:47,, Silver Salonen wrote::
> > On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> ...
> >>> But Bacula is the best written Software I have ever had the pleasure
>
> (I leave this in to keep the mail on topic :-)
>
Andy Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which shows the volume as purged but yet its still consuming disk space,
> is this normal? Is there a way of telling it to null/zero the file?
To my experience volumes on a file storage will never be deleted by
bacula, only overwritten. If the volumestatu
> Please mount Volume "Tape-0008" on Storage Device "Drive-1"
> (/dev/nst0) for Job
> BackupMailSrv01.2007-10-11_22.00.00"
>
If you want to use only 7 tapes and the 7 tapes you have in the
changer are all marked as Full you must allow bacula to automatically
recycle
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:18, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > And I did as I said "I will increase this limit,".
>
> OK, I missed that bit/
>
> > Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K,
> > and there is even a certain amount of evi
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> And I did as I said "I will increase this limit,".
OK, I missed that bit/
> Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K, and
> there is even a certain amount of evidence from my own tests and from several
> other users that in
Hi there,
Firstly, thank you for getting back to me, and with such speed.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>MaximumPartSize = 5000M;
>
> That directive takes no effect, it's only used for DVD writing.
Ah!
>
> The above looks good, provided the retention times and set volume
> sizes fit, i
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:15, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
> > - It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
> > 964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
> > 957, 908
Hello.
First of all, I use Bacula 2.2.4 on FreeBSD-6.1.
I've configured all the jobs with "Max Wait Time = 12h" - the idea of this was
that if a job has been waiting for storage or smth too long, it will be
cancelled, so that jobs that may have a longer wait time, may start running.
I've now h
Hello,
12.10.2007 11:58,, Andy Brown wrote::
> Hi All,
> I'm having a hard time getting this right on our install here, so
> wondered if anyone can advise what I'm doing wrong here.
> Scenario is a dozen servers backing up to this server. I have a 333Gb
> array for backing up to on /backups/bacu
Hi,
12.10.2007 09:47,, Silver Salonen wrote::
> On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
>>> But Bacula is the best written Software I have ever had the pleasure
(I leave this in to keep the mail on topic :-)
> of
>>> working with!!
>> You know what they (in p
Hi,
12.10.2007 10:32,, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote::
> Hi,
>
> since a few days I'm trying to migrate an existing backup
> infrastructure to Bacula 2.2.4. I have the pleasure of a fairly
> uniform OS landscape (mainly CentOS 5 with a few Fedora 7 and the odd
> Windows XP box thrown in) and ge
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
> - It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
> 964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
> 957, 908, 958, and 955.
Looking at this, it appears you simply clos
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:55:12 +0200, Janco van der Merwe said:
>
> I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
> SD and FD binaries, reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
> installed I had to compile the entire Bacula which meant installing a
> DB,
On 12 Oct 2007 at 10:54, GDS.Marshall wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this is a bug or part of the design hence raising it
> here first.
>
> I have two jobs which start on day x, y and z
> 0300 job name1 priority a (high)
> 0605 job name2 priority b (low)
>
> Job name1 overruns onto day
Hi All,
I'm having a hard time getting this right on our install here, so
wondered if anyone can advise what I'm doing wrong here.
Scenario is a dozen servers backing up to this server. I have a 333Gb
array for backing up to on /backups/bacula/
The problem is that I keep using up all of the disk
Hello,
I am not sure if this is a bug or part of the design hence raising it here
first.
I have two jobs which start on day x, y and z
0300 job name1 priority a (high)
0605 job name2 priority b (low)
Job name1 overruns onto day y. Job name2 is still waiting for the higher
priority job name1 to
Hi,
12.10.2007 11:13,, luyigui loholhlki wrote::
>
>
> *//*
>
> > i've defined an hp-tape (8volumes) with auto changer but i've
> plugged
> > just 7 volumes
> > the problem is that when the backup proccess arrives to the 8th
> volume
> > (which doesnt exists) sends m
On 12 Oct 2007 at 12:19, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I
> > > start upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
> > upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's
> > Makefile and it builds and work
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:35 +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> Hi - I'm trying to determine a reasonable base before moving onto Bacula
> itself... have a look at this, does it make sense?
HP /did/ sneak out a firmware update days before I wrote the original
mail. I upgraded, and also changed to 'random
> i've defined an hp-tape (8volumes) with auto changer but i've plugged
> just 7 volumes
> the problem is that when the backup proccess arrives to the 8th volume
> (which doesnt exists) sends me msg with a problem
>
> My question is : can u please tell how to declare an hp tape with just 7
On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
> upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's
> Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling
> it with 2.6 and there wasn
Hello,
> Hi,
>
> 11.10.2007 17:05,, Michel Meyers wrote::
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 11.10.2007 12:14,, GDS.Marshall wrote::
Is anyone using a Quantum Superloader 3 with Bacula? If so, do you
know
how to get bacula
Hi group,
I'm using Bacula 2.2.4. Lately i've implemented Verify Jobs for my
tapes. I've noticed that a *Verify* changed the 'LastWritten'-time of the
tape (which seems very incorrect to me- a verify doesn't write on the
tape at all!).
The LastWritten-time also influences the expiretime of the
i have also a second machine thats act as storage-daemon, to build only fd and
sd i do something like:
./configure --enable-client-only
make
make install
and now the sd:
cd src/cats
make
cd ../lib
make
cd ../stored
make
cp src/stored/bacula-sd /sbin
thats all.
second way:
search for these
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 12.10.2007 08:55,, Janco van der Merwe wrote::
> > I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
> > SD and FD binaries,
>
> That's not really incredible...
>
> > reason why I'm asking is that in order to g
Hi,
12.10.2007 08:55,, Janco van der Merwe wrote::
> I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
> SD and FD binaries,
That's not really incredible...
> reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
> installed I had to compile the entire Bacula which meant in
41 matches
Mail list logo
