Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-08-2013 18:05, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: 1. lfs72 tags: one left - xsane I almost always have time for BLFS, but since yesterday, I could not yet do it. Two things more than just tagging lfs73 for sane: 1. I did not use sane-frontend before, but xsane. Have installed sane-frontend,

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-08-2013 19:45, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 02-08-2013 18:05, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: I almost always have time for BLFS, but since yesterday, I could not yet do it. This is wrong. I mean I can give almost all my time to BLFS but have been busy about the last 24 hours temporarily

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-08-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 02-08-2013 18:05, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: 1. lfs72 tags: one left - xsane I almost always have time for BLFS, but since yesterday, I could not yet do it. Two things more than just tagging lfs73 for sane: 1. I did

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-08-2013 20:05, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 02-08-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Just update the page with the correct URLs. -- Bruce Just did it. Hope I did it correctly. Do I need to create, take and close a ticket? Enviando introduction/welcome/changelog.xml

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-08-2013 23:58, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 02-08-2013 20:05, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 02-08-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Just update the page with the correct URLs. -- Bruce Just did it. Hope I did it correctly. ... So far so good. I

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11568

2013-08-02 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 03-08-2013 00:47, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: About the segfault, it was *not* random, stopped occurring in one machine, after a reboot and a change in the preferences from lineart to color. have to see in another machine. Checked in the other machine

Re: [blfs-dev] Status Report

2013-08-01 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-07-2013 23:32, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Looking really good. Packages left that are marked lfs72: pst/scanning/xsane.xml: This can be tagged working lfs73 icedtea-web 1.3 - 1.4 This, I have already uploaded a patch, and any other help I can do, please just ask. -- []s, Fernando

Re: [blfs-dev] faad2-2.7: autoreconf neede some help, for me

2013-07-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Thank you very much for replying, Igor. Em 31-07-2013 04:19, Igor Živković escreveu: On 07/31/2013 05:35 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Igor, I do not know what I did wrong, perhaps nothing, in doubt, sent here, instead of -support. $ autoreconf --version autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40/IcedTea-2.4.1 - typo?

2013-07-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-07-2013 05:01, David B. escreveu: The mandb command should be: mandb -c /opt/jdk/man rather than: mandb -c /opt/OpenJDK/man This is my mistake. I had noticed before, but forgot to include in the discussions with Bruce. -- []s, Fernando --

Re: [blfs-dev] faad2-2.7: autoreconf neede some help, for me

2013-07-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-07-2013 09:26, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: ... It seems mine is doing this. Should have been: It seems mine is *not* doing this. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: [blfs-dev] gnome deprecated packages

2013-07-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-07-2013 19:16, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:41:55PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin K. wrote: I'd rather archive Gnucash then keep all the old libraries. Your call. I'm leaning that way too. We can put it back when the package gets caught up. Ken? -- Bruce

[blfs-dev] faad2-2.7: autoreconf neede some help, for me

2013-07-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Igor, I do not know what I did wrong, perhaps nothing, in doubt, sent here, instead of -support. $ autoreconf --version autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 Problem and solution: patch -Np1 -i ../faad2-2.7-mp4ff-1.patch #aclocal: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac',

Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314

2013-07-29 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 29-07-2013 03:30, Matt Burgess escreveu: On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 20:43 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: But I have to say that I like vim/gvim, only dislike the way it is maintained, displaying a *new version with x.y.z* in the site, but only providing an original version x.y tar ball

Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314

2013-07-28 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 26-07-2013 10:54, Igor Živković escreveu: On 07/26/2013 03:13 PM, akhiezer wrote: Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:39:55 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314 On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11501 - trunk/BOOK/multimedia/videoutils

2013-07-28 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 26-07-2013 03:43, Igor Živković escreveu: On 07/25/2013 11:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote: On 07/25/2013 10:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:33 PM, i...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: igor Date:

[blfs-dev] VLC, MPlayer, FFmpeg, Audacity

2013-07-28 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
$ paco VLC MPlayer FFmpeg Audacity audacity-2.0.3 ffmpeg-0.8.7 ffmpeg-1.2.1 mplayer-1.1.1 vlc-2.0.7 I have three questions. Audacity needs ffmpeg version 0.9, as I learned after trying many times to build it. So, I installed ffmpeg-0.8.7 at /usr/local/ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local I

Re: [blfs-dev] VLC, MPlayer, FFmpeg, Audacity

2013-07-28 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 28-07-2013 21:45, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: ... Sorry, it was supposed to go for -support. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11499 - in trunk: BOOK bootscripts bootscripts/blfs/init.d

2013-07-25 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 25-07-2013 07:50, xinglp escreveu: 2013/7/25 i...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org: Author: igor Date: Thu Jul 25 02:50:36 2013 New Revision: 11499 Log: ALSA restore state in the bootscript The udev's alsa restore script not work for you guys either ? No. I had already changed the

Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314

2013-07-25 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 25-07-2013 12:37, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hi, Bruce, (I am addressing you, because last update was your work, after we discussed a little.) Vim 7.4a BETA is out, thus, 7.3 is not being patched any more, last

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I needed to be off-line. Apologies for the delay. Em 20-07-2013 15:30, DJ Lucas escreveu: Good catch. One request though, since this will not likely get upstreamed, why not just install mkcacerts.sh in the jre bin directory and add a blurb about it in the cacerts page? Could even add a

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I had written replies to Bruce (twice) and Ken, but Thunderbird failed to send them and they disappeared from the drafts folder. I will rewrite them and in case of new failure, will dsend from the web mail. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 20-07-2013 16:44, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: I created anew patch, icedtea-2.4.1-add_cacerts-2.patch OK, I saw it and the other modifications. Thanks. rebuilt the x86_64 version. The certs seems to be generated fine Good to know. Lets just leave the binaries as they exist right now, OK.

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-21 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 20-07-2013 11:45, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:25PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: In the logs, I find the error: Fingerprints do certificado: ... Extensões: #1: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 Criticality=true ... Confiar neste certificado? [não]: Resposta errada

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-20 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 20-07-2013 10:54, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Fernando de Oliveira Problem: no root certificates generated for some non-english locales. In this message, first, I describe the problem, then the solution. Many users may have the bug, so a test is necessary

[blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-19 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Problem: no root certificates generated for some non-english locales. In this message, first, I describe the problem, then the solution. Many users may have the bug, so a test is necessary. This test is described below. I am most greatful to Ken Moffat for reading a first draft and giving

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11452 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-07-2013 10:09, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 17-07-2013 23:35, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... Bruce, thanks for taking the time explaining all those points. ... there is no possibility of vulnerabilities or bugs with two different

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 16-07-2013 21:06, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 16-07-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: This mail was written earlier. Lost again internet connection (after ... $ tail OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-re-run-tests-2013.07.16-12h03m32s.log Passed: java/awt/Frame

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 12:08, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: ... ... disabled 8 tests at java/awt/FullScreen: java/awt/FullScreen/SetFSWindow/FSFrame.java java/awt/FullScreen/TranslucentWindow/TranslucentWindow.java java/awt/FullScreen/FullScreenInsets/FullScreenInsets.java java/awt/FullScreen

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11448 - in trunk/BOOK: general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 16:45, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: Author: bdubbs Date: Wed Jul 17 12:45:57 2013 New Revision: 11448 Log: Update to JUnit-4.11 Modified: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/junit.xml trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml ... Modified:

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 14:57, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 17-07-2013 12:08, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: ... And the winner is ...: java/awt/FullScreen/SetFSWindow/FSFrame.java Disabling just this, tests are already ahead of the hung point. Now, have to add that line

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11448 - in trunk/BOOK: general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Bruce, Message with the files attached is over just 50KB. Should I send compressed files? -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 20:09, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... All three patches and the diff attached. One paths patch has only changed its own filename (for new icedtea version). Thanks. I'll try to get that in tonight. I just finished a build (37.6 SBU, 8282 MB!) 8.1G

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11452 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Bruce, I know that you are in a hurry because of the trip. I am worried. I believe you forgot we combined a couple of days ago to name OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.1. That is why in the diff I sent, I changed everything that way, for the About Java page, too. The directories for the tarballs are named

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11452 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 23:22, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.1 OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.2 Actually, it has happened just now: two icedtea 1.4.0 and 1.4.1 and both 1.7.0.40. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11452 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-07-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 17-07-2013 23:35, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.1 OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.2 Did you render the book? The title of the section is OpenJDK-1.7.0.40/IcedTea-2.4.1. Actually, the IcedTea part is actually not that critical as it is just a build

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
This mail was written earlier. Lost again internet connection (after several months, it has started again: twice in a day). I will send it as is. Bruce, have just seen [blfs-book] r11441. Liked it very much. Em 16-07-2013 13:10, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Thanks for the work on that. It's my

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 16-07-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... See what the test is after FullScreenInsets.java. That's where the problem is. Also check the load with top. If the system is idle, there is probably a hang. I have been trying to find where the sequence

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 16-07-2013 19:56, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: This mail was written earlier. Lost again internet connection (after ... $ tail OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-re-run-tests-2013.07.16-12h03m32s.log Passed: java/awt/Frame/FrameSetSizeStressTest/FrameSetSizeStressTest.java

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 16-07-2013 21:06, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: ... understand what you also recommended: where can I find the sequence in which the tests are made, so I could disable that test. Perhaps I found it. Starting the test. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11441 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog general/sysutils introduction/welcome

2013-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Just written my first java program: $ java HelloWorld Hello, World $ ls HelloWorld.* HelloWorld.class HelloWorld.java Thanks. $ du -sh OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-i686-bin 499MOpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-i686-bin $ du -sh OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-x86_64-bin 421MOpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-x86_64-bin

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #3866: IcedTea 2.4.1

2013-07-15 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 15-07-2013 15:04, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... ... to save your time and keep this package up to date in the future, I could try to produce a diff, send it here, and you could correct me. That would be great. ... I have already the image for x86_64. For i686

[blfs-dev] SOLVED: IcedTea-Web-2.4 broken (Was: OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1)

2013-07-12 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 12-07-2013 00:36, DJ Lucas escreveu: DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken touched it. Problem

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-12 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 11-07-2013 20:14, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken touched it. Not me - I've never used

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-12 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 11-07-2013 22:15, DJ Lucas escreveu: Run Firefox from a terminal and see if this is the save writ as this one: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1495 --DJ Of course. I was so impacted by the problem, I forgot the most basic procedures. Thanks, DJ. -- []s,

Re: [blfs-dev] SOLVED: IcedTea-Web-2.4 broken (Was: OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1)

2013-07-12 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 12-07-2013 15:39, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 12-07-2013 00:36, DJ Lucas escreveu: DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: ... First, the icedtea-2.4.0-add_cacerts-1.patch was first to finally fail This seems not to be related

[blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken touched it. Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started. For all versions, I have been using book's patches, just renaming according to the icedtea's

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-11 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 11-07-2013 18:04, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... For all versions, I have been using book's patches, just renaming according to the icedtea's version. icedtea-2.4.0-add_cacerts-1.patch was first to finally fail a chunk (hope this sentence is written

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11362

2013-07-07 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 07-07-2013 00:15, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 05:01:03PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: k...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: ken Date: Sat Jul 6 14:51:39 2013 New Revision: 11362 Log: firefox-22.0. Using a sourceforge variant for http download, What's the

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency

2013-07-05 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 05-07-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: akhiezer wrote: Just for the avoidance of doubt: I think (fwiw) that a rolling-'release' is overall not a good(-enough) idea per se, whether based on upstream 'stable' or upstream 'unstable'; Perhaps, but I think it is as good as possible with

[blfs-dev] Firefox-21/Xulrunner-21: search box not working (Was: [blfs-support] Firefox-21: search box not working)

2013-06-06 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Moved here, after testing book's instruction for xulrunner/firefox, with copy/paste, just changing in firefox's mozconfig the lines for linking to xulrunner. Still, no working search box. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox-21/Xulrunner-21: search box not working (Was: [blfs-support] Firefox-21: search box not working)

2013-06-06 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Problem solved. Details in the support list. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] Enc: Re: [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2

2013-05-09 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Armin, Ken sent the patches in this email I am forwarding. []s, Fernando --- Em dom, 10/3/13, Ken Moffat k...@linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: De: Ken Moffat k...@linuxfromscratch.org Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2 Para:

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-09 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 9/5/13, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 9 de Maio de 2013, 10:50 Hi, Someone mentioned he had a patch for LibreOffice to use system installed version of Boost. I am in process

[blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.0.2.2 (Was: #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2)

2013-04-05 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em seg, 11/3/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Segunda-feira, 11 de Março de 2013, 9:38 --- Em dom, 10/3/13, Ken Moffat escreveu: De: Ken Moffat

[blfs-dev] NSS

2013-04-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I never noticed it, before. In make, there seems to be switches for system zlib to be used and linked. Is zlib a Required Dependency? []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

2013-04-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Randy McMurchy ra...@linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: De: Randy McMurchy ra...@linuxfromscratch.org Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS Para: BLFS Development blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:33 On 4/4/2013 9:29 AM, Fernando de Oliveira

Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

2013-04-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:38 Forgot it and gorgot to look for it there. :- Sorry, s/gorgot/gorgot/ :- []s, Fernando -- http

Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

2013-04-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS Para: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:43 --- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2

2013-03-11 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em dom, 10/3/13, Ken Moffat escreveu: De: Ken Moffat Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2 Para: blfs-dev Data: Domingo, 10 de Março de 2013, 16:12 On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:57:45PM -, BLFS Trac wrote: #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

2013-01-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 22/1/13, Matt Burgess escreveu: De: Matt Burgess Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2013, 12:49 On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 07:27 -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: But I noticed

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

2013-01-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 22/1/13, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2013, 13:31 On 01/22/2013 04:27 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Hi, Armin, I reinstalled Xulrunner

[blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

2013-01-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Hi, Armin, I reinstalled Xulrunner/Firefox to comply with the new page you modified (only difference, I did not install system libevent), and again, it is even smaller (disk space) than my previous install script/mozconfig, thank you for the good work! As written in

[blfs-dev] Update: icedtea-2.3.4, but openjdk-1.7.0.9?

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Hi, The updated source: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/icedtea-2.3.4.tar.gz There are security fixes: http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/01/15/security-icedtea-2-1-4-2-2-4-2-3-4-released/ I have found that Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu and Arch Linux have updated it. However,

[blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Re: Message in Debian (reproduced below). See also: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-5519 where there is this: Name CVE-2012-5519 Description CUPS 1.4.4, when running in certain Linux distributions such as Debian GNU/Linux, stores the web interface administrator key

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
[]s, Fernando --- Em qui, 17/1/13, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 12:17 On 01/17/2013 03:36 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Re: Message

Re: [blfs-dev] firefox fails with cairo w/o patch

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 17/1/13, Tobias Gasser escreveu: De: Tobias Gasser Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] firefox fails with cairo w/o patch Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 14:15 Am 17.01.2013 13:28, schrieb Armin K.: I'm pretty sure that I removed

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Have to stop now. Later or tomorrow will go back to this again. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

2013-01-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 17/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 14:22 --- Em qui, 17/1/13, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem

2013-01-12 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em sáb, 12/1/13, DJ Lucas escreveu: De: DJ Lucas Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem Para: BLFS Development List Data: Sábado, 12 de Janeiro de 2013, 3:30 On 01/11/2013 11:39 PM, JZB2 wrote: On Friday, January 11, 2013 04:38:10 PM Fernando de Oliveira wrote

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem

2013-01-11 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em sex, 11/1/13, JZB2 escreveu: De: JZB2 Assunto: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem Para: blfs-dev Data: Sexta-feira, 11 de Janeiro de 2013, 19:25 ... icedtea-2.3.3 (openjdk-1.7.0_09, built from source, after binary, per BLFS) seamonkey-2.13.2 icedtea-web-1.3 I my case, $

Re: [blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1

2012-11-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 15/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: [blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 15 de Novembro de 2012, 20:27 Worked out of the box. Has panel, widgets, apparently all I need. For transparency (pseudo), I

Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

2012-11-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em seg, 29/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved Para: BLFS Development List Data: Segunda-feira, 29 de Outubro de 2012, 13:08 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Yesterday, one 500MB HD became undetectable. As I

Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

2012-11-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Where I wrote 500MB, please, read as 500GB. []s, Fernando --- Em sex, 16/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved Para: BLFS Development List Data: Sexta-feira, 16 de Novembro de 2012, 18:15

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-15 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I am more satisfied now. Downloaded and installed faenza-icon-theme_1.3.zip, and the stausbar icons are much better now, yet small. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-15 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I intended to send the messages for this thread to the support list, only now noticed that I sent to dev. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1

2012-11-15 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Worked out of the box. Has panel, widgets, apparently all I need. For transparency (pseudo), I had installed already feh. Very good, if no problems appears, it will be kept as default. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-14 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
I needed to upgrade midori, it was showing some instability. So I did upgrade the system to the following: ruby-1.9.3-p286 glib-2.34.1 libsoup-2.40.1 webkitgtk-1.10.1 midori-0.4.7 Unfortunately, no icons are displayed in the status bar, as previous 0.4.6 correctly did. Have changed themes, icon

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-14 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qua, 14/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012, 13:37 I needed to upgrade midori, it was showing some instability

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-14 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qua, 14/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: De: Ken Moffat Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012, 15:11 Sorry, all I can say is here be dragons. Some months ago, when Andy was still

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

2012-11-14 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Not important, but I hate inaccuracies. Time in the filename attached in previous mail is not accurate, screen capture was saved by clicking over the wrong and adding good. Correct name is something like MidoriCaptura-de-tela-de-2012-11-14-22.25.00-NovoGamerLFS71-good.png to which I have

[blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1... no *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly installed. configure: error: GLIB 2.33.1 or later is

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 13:51 On 11/13/2012 05:49 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1... no *** Could not run GLIB

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 14:01 --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. kre...@email.com Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33 On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. kre...@email.com escreveu: De: Armin K. kre...@email.com Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01 Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:26 --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:20 Dana 13.11.2012 22:26, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao: ... We tend to use dependency chains. On libsoup page

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:27 Guys, please trim your responses. Ok. (I did trim the latest, at least.) I'd like to add that we should only

[blfs-dev] Two cents on Sawfish x Openbox

2012-11-13 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Just installed sawfish-1.9.1. Not very nice, getting a black screen without anything on it. On the contrary, openbox comes, at least, with a menu. Including a line with xterm in .xinitrc, one can at least run sawfish-config, links graphical (links -g) or other software. A panel will add much

Re: [blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24

2012-11-10 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em sex, 9/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Sexta-feira, 9 de Novembro de 2012, 12:31 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Every reinstall fails, then I have definitely added the line      rm -v /usr

[blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24

2012-11-09 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Every reinstall fails, then I have definitely added the line rm -v /usr/share/cups/charsets/pdf.utf-8 to the script. Error log: ... make install-data-hook make[2]: Entrando no diretório `/media/Dados1T/NovoGamer/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2012.11.09/cups-filters-1.0.24' ln -s

[blfs-dev] Questions on contributions (RE: seamonkey-2.13.2)

2012-11-09 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Bruce, Thank you for the comments in the ticket. One thing I do not understand. * general.ent needs a date change at the top Also, I did not want to use svn to send, as once you told me, because being the first attempt, I was expecting (many) corrections. []s, Fernando --

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

2012-11-05 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em seg, 5/11/12, DJ Lucas escreveu: De: DJ Lucas Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths Para: BLFS Development List Data: Segunda-feira, 5 de Novembro de 2012, 2:40 On 11/03/2012 11:28 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I have noticed some modifications in the Introduction

[blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

2012-11-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
This is in the make log: /bin/sh: line 1: 24093 Falha de segmentação [segmentation fault] GEGL_DEBUG_TIME=yes GEGL_SWAP=RAM GEGL_PATH=../../operations ../../bin/gegl clones.xml -o `echo clones.png | sed s?./??` `echo clones.png | sed s?./?? | sed -e s/png/txt/` make[5]: ** [clones.png] Erro

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

2012-11-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qua, 31/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2012, 12:24 Fernando de Oliveira wrote:      pst/scanning/sane.xml:             Update to 1.0.23

Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

2012-11-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
-0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I purposely have not installed GTK-Doc up to now, and it seems to be assumed there by some packages. Yes, many packages assume gtk-doc.  I take the view that it is easier to just install it. Agree. Wish the book would agree too, as it is only

Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

2012-11-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Resending with proper line format. --- Em dom, 4/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: De: Ken Moffat Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 21:10 On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:29:39PM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote

[blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

2012-11-03 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Probably for Armin, but I am thankful to any replies. I have noticed some modifications in the Introduction to Xorg-7.7 page, particularly: sed 's@/usr/X11R6@PREFIX@g' -i /etc/man_db.conf In my host LFS7.1, I have not done that, there is the symlink /usr/X11R6 - /usr and just in case, I have

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

2012-11-03 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
It took a very long time for this message to appear in the list. This delay has been happening since some days ago. Thus, I am building Xorg without the modifications I am asking about below, still replies would be much appreciated. []s, Fernando --- Em sáb, 3/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

2012-10-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em ter, 30/10/12, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 Para: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Terça-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2012, 17:58 Armin K. wrote: On

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >