Hi Guys,
If anyone wants some google+ invites email me, or if you are on add me
my email for google is alex.go...@gmail.com have couple hundred here
Regards
Alex
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Ok sent out a few invites and have a few more left, what you need if you
want one is a google account which you can get free from www.gmail.com
Email me back here and can then set up a nice channel on google+ which
is brilliant.
Regards
Alex
me too...~)
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
First off I abjectly apologize for replying with everything in tact from the
whole list. Sigh. I thought I was done making those mistakes.
So, OK, Yeah, if there's invitations available, I'd like to join Google+.
My Gogglemail is evenstar5...@gmail.com . Remember to speak slowly an
what is google+, exactly and why is it any better than yahoo, alex?
i use facebook despite how it violates peoples' privacy; the benefits outweigh
the trolls, etc... i rec'd the invitation from david and signed up some time
ago, but it wasn't until people i had lost touch
All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that
reads in part:
<
Your computer is running software that doesnt allow you to use Google.
Youre seeing this page because your computer is trying to send you to a
website that is pretending to be Google. Over the past few we
"Google Inc. is bankrolling a $30 million out-of-this-world prize to
the first private company that can safely land a robotic rover on the
moon and beam back a gigabyte of images and video to Earth, the
Internet search leader said Thursday."
<http://www.cnn.com/2007/TEC
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
joining a discussion about the future?
Regards,
Wayne Eddy
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo
Hi all,
Nick & Lance have both turned up in my Wave contacts list, so I guess that
means they both got their invitations OK. Can't see Dave there yet though.
I have started a discussion here & added Nick & Lance to it.
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252B06VwwaASC
I
So??? I tried signing up via their website but haven't heard
anything. What's the scoop?
Doug
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
So... Google Buzz introduced itself to me this morning, just as I was
reading an article on privacy concerns about it. The biggest one is that it
automatically imports contacts and shows them as friends. Sure enough, when
I looked at Buzz, it said that it had automatically followed a dozen or so
> You guys are lucky, I just got the Palm Pre...
> love it .. sort of and set up
> my gmail account and a few others and it then
> imported ALL my facebook, gmail etc
> contacts and there are thousands of "contacts"
> now in the palm pre...
> http://www.gogan.com/blog/
> Sent from Alex Gogan Bal
Yes, please invite me!
Thanks,
DANNY
On 13 July 2011 18:21, Alex Gogan wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> If anyone wants some google+ invites email me, or if you are on add me my
> email for google is alex.go...@gmail.com have couple hundred here
>
>
Hi Danny
Done
On 18/07/2011 16:46, Danny O'Dare wrote:
Yes, please invite me!
Thanks,
DANNY
On 13 July 2011 18:21, Alex Gogan wrote:
Hi Guys,
If anyone wants some google+ invites email me, or if you are on add me my
email for google is alex.go...@gmail.com have couple hundred
Hi Jon,
No probs but you need to get a gmail email account which are free
www.gmail.com and can send out the invite. If there are any others have
some invites left.
Also if any of you guys are interested in joining my circle just look
out for me, alex.go...@gmail.com
Regards
On 21/07/201
On 7/22/2011 3:07 AM, Alex Gogan wrote:
Hi Jon,
No probs but you need to get a gmail email account which are free
www.gmail.com and can send out the invite. If there are any others
have some invites left.
Also if any of you guys are interested in joining my circle just look
out for me, alex
If you still have an invite left, I would like one for matzeb...@gmail.com
Thanks,
-- Matt
From: Alex Gogan
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: Google+
Hi Danny
Done
On 18/07/2011 16:46, Danny
On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Jo Anne wrote:
> evenstar5...@gmail.com
Has been invited to Google+
Dave
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
:* Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:05 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Google+
>
> Hi Danny
>
> Done
>
>
> On 18/07/2011 16:46, Danny O'Dare wrote:
>
> Yes, please invite me!
>
> Thanks,
> DANNY
>
> On 13 July 20
PM, Jo Anne wrote:
>
>> evenstar5...@gmail.com
>
> Has been invited to Google+
>
> Dave
>
>
> ___
> http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
>
>
___
've got one too) and type in G+
DB just friended me (or whatever you call it on +). I'm glad _he's_
got a short memory.
Doug
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Dave Land wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Jo Anne wrote:
evenstar5...@gmail.com
Has been invite
Could be interesting if it works.
http://labs1.google.com/gvs.html
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world,
it is God's gift to
From: Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that reads
in part:
I'm not as expert as some on this list are, but I'm up at 3AM, so I'll add
my 2 cents...
<
Your computer is running software that doesnt allow y
--- Bryon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The advice it gives seems very reasonable to me. It does seem odd that the
>
> fake google you're getting redirected to would be warning you about it,
> though.
> Also, AdAware, and Spybot Search and Destroy are both go
On 24 Sep 2003 at 21:36, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that
> reads in part:
Okay, do the hosts thing.
Then, immediately head over and get Spybot Search and Destroy:
http://security.kolla.de/news.php?lang=en
It is basically #THE
On 25 Sep 2003 at 0:42, Jan Coffey wrote:
>
> --- Bryon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The advice it gives seems very reasonable to me. It does seem odd
> > that the
> >
> > fake google you're getting redirected to would be warning you about
&g
Bryon Daly wrote:
> Also, AdAware, and Spybot Search and Destroy are both good
> programs. I've used both and prefer spybot, but both are
> reputable.
Me too!
But seriously, it's a good idea for everybody to run one or
both of those programs every now and then, whether they fix
this problem or no
At 02:19 PM 9/25/03 +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 24 Sep 2003 at 21:36, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that
> reads in part:
Okay, do the hosts thing.
Then, immediately head over and get Spybot Search and Destroy
On 25 Sep 2003 at 20:09, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 02:19 PM 9/25/03 +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> >On 24 Sep 2003 at 21:36, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> >
> > > All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page
> > > that reads in part:
> &
Thanks all for the help. Google's back and Spy Bot loaded. I'm not
sure how or where I got whatever it was as I'm very cautious about
attachments and downloading, but others - my wife and son - have been on
my machine, so I'll blame them. 8^) In any case, all's well that ends
well, thanks a
http://www.googlefight.com/
Brin (245,000 results)
versus
Tolkien (1,520,000 results)
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Silence. I am watching television." - Spider Jerusalem
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
"Google Inc. is bankrolling a $30 million out-of-this-world prize to
the first private company that can safely land a robotic rover on the
moon and beam back a gigabyte of images and video to Earth, the
Internet search leader said Thursday."
<http://www.cnn.com/2007/TEC
One-page parody site...
http://fury.com/images/weblog/google_circa_1960.jpg
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
>From http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/08/technology/google_chrome/index.htm
or
http://tinyurl.com/m2vf2p
Google launches OS - calls out Microsoft
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Google Inc. is planning to
hit Microsoft Corp. where it hurts by challenging the software
gian
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy wrote:
> Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
> anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
> joining a discussion about the future?
Can you invite others to the beta? I
, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by joining
a discussion about the future
Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 6:07 PM:
> Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there
> was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out
> by joining a discussion about the future?
>
> Regards,
>
> Wayne Edd
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Wayne Eddy wrote:
> No Problem, Nick.
> I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to process
> though.
> I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?
>
That's the one.
Thanks!
Nick
___
ds,
Wayne.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if
there was anyone o
ards, Wayne.
P.S.
Google says:
"Google Wave is more fun when you have others to wave with, so please nominate
people you would like to add. Keep in mind that this is a preview so it could
be a bit rocky at times.
Invitations will not be sent immediately. We have a lot of stamps to li
Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 11:28 PM:
> Hi Lance, have you got a gmail address you want to use?
> I have sent Nick & Dave invites, and I am happy to you one too, but I
> want to invite a few others from elsewhere so three invites for the Brin
> List will have to do for now.
>
Looks cool, count me in please. Use brig...@zo.com
Thanks,
Doug
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Wayne Eddy wrote:
> Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
> anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
> joining a discuss
On 15/10/2009, at 8:11 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if
there was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my
try it out by joining a discussion about the future?
Wayne, I
user has received the invite, they can use it with any e-mail address
they wish. And yes, they do take a few days to process.
Regards,
Wayne.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? "Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please".
Amities,
Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com
___
http://mc
Jo Anne wrote:
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? "Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please".
It depends on who you ask and how much hype they've ingested, digested,
and
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
Jo Anne wrote:
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do
with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? "Speak
slowly and
directly into the microphone, please".
It depends on who you ask an
t are generally related
to the same question of how valid the underlying assumptions are, as
well as the overall reliability of the servers the storage lives on.
In terms of specific to Google Wave: for now early adopters should trust
Google's storage policies (and considering the vast number o
a questionable argument), but my misgivings about it are generally
related to the same question of how valid the underlying
assumptions are, as well as the overall reliability of the servers
the storage lives on.
In terms of specific to Google Wave: for now early adopters should
trust G
Thanks, Max and Bruce. But I have one more question. What's FUD? Is it
printable?
Amities,
Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
FUD usually appears as an acronym for the usual resistance to change:
Fear
Uncertainty
Doubt
-- Matt
- Original Message
From: Jo Anne
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Fri, October 16, 2009 12:45:22 PM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
Thanks, Max and Bruce. But I have one more
> From: Matt Grimaldi
> FUD usually appears as an acronym for
> the usual resistance to change:
>
> Fear
> Uncertainty
> Doubt
Oh, dear. I'm hosed. I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use
for anything other than talking...
Debbi
I Am NOT A Fuddy-Duddy!!! Maru
...am
> From: Matt Grimaldi
> FUD usually appears as an acronym for
> the usual resistance to change:
>
> Fear
> Uncertainty
> Doubt
From: Deborah Harrell
]Oh, dear. I'm hosed. I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use
for anything other than talking...
]
]Debbi
]I Am NOT A
Google? Bing? I don't care.
Not long ago if I was given an MSN or Yahoo search tool I went out of my
way to get to a Google search. Not any more. The competition has come
a long way.
That's BAD news for Google. I like Google as a corporate citizen, but
they are still a one trick
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
> So... Google Buzz introduced itself to me this morning, just as I was
> reading an article on privacy concerns about it. The biggest one is that it
> automatically imports contacts and shows them as friends.
When buzz popped up its
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 AM, John Williams wrote:
>
> Why do you think it imported something from your contacts? Did you
> click on "setup" or whatever when the buzz screen popped up?
It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The list
it showed me sure didn't look lik
photos, videos and more, and start
conversations about the things you find interesting. You're already set up
to follow the people you email and chat with the most.*
Then a list of people, followed by two people who are already following me.
And then this:
*Your Google Reader shared items,
ost.
>
> Then a list of people, followed by two people who are already following me.
>
> And then this:
>
> Your Google Reader shared items, Picasa Web public albums, and Google Chat
> status messages will automatically appear as posts in Buzz. To edit your
> connected site
; Then a list of people, followed by two people who are already following me.
>
> And then this:
>
> *Your Google Reader shared items, Picasa Web public albums, and Google
> Chat status messages will automatically appear as posts i
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
> It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The list
> it showed me sure didn't look like that, however.
It was probably the people with gmail accounts that you talk to the most.
--
Mauro Diotallevi
"The number you hav
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nick Arnett
> wrote:
>
> > It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The
> list
> > it showed me sure didn't look like that, however.
>
> It was probably the people with gmail accou
But you should have used "David Brin," since there are lots of Brins who
aren't, such as the founder of Google!
And then the results for DB drop by an order of magnitude...
--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMA
> From: Adam C. Lipscomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://www.googlefight.com/
>
> Brin (245,000 results)
> versus
> Tolkien (1,520,000 results)
Love vs Sex
Lord of the rings Vs Wheel of time
lord of the rings vs star wars
love vs hate
darth vader vs sauron
__
Adam posted:
http://www.googlefight.com/
The Fool replied:
darth vader vs sauron
Darth Vader vs Sauron, Darth Vader wins.
"Darth Vader" vs Sauron, Sauron wins.
Very interesting...
Reggie Bautista
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus pro
Folks,
So you go to Google Maps, and you type "idiot, washington, DC", and you
wonder what comes up...
A: John Kerry for President
B: National Association of Realtors
C: United States Government: Tour Information
D: Elected Officials - Federal & State: President George W Bush
Mauro wrote:
>
>
> So, any early adopters planning on switching over when it ships? I'm
> willing to at least give it a hard drive partition.
>
Me too. I refuse to use Explorer and would jump on a new OS from Google
especiall
On 7/8/2009 8:06:20 PM, Doug Pensinger (brig...@zo.com) wrote:
> Mauro wrote:
>
>
> So, any early adopters planning on switching over when it ships? I'm
> willing to at least give it a hard drive partition.
>
>
> Me too. I refuse to use Explorer and would
you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably "OS lite"
would be a better term. It will be able to run programs on your own
CPU, provided they conform to whatever API google is coding, and it
will be able to store files locally on your computer.
I believe you are thinking of the
On Jul 8, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
My prediction is that Chrome OS will never gain significant market
share for high-powered computers, but it may make some inroads in
"netbooks" (which are in between a notebook and a smart phone in terms
of power). Of course, the g
S" will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably "OS lite"
would be a better term.
...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS
which Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces
and BS
Charlie Wrote
...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS which
> Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and BSDs to
> try, up to and including Darwin/OSX. So I'm with Will (you can pick
> yourselves up at your leisure)
John Williams wrote:
>
> My impression is that the "Chrome OS" will allow you to avoid just
> what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably "OS lite"
> would be a better term. It will be able to run programs on your own
> CPU, provided they confo
le of
different versions of Windows, depending on whether I'm at work (and
if so, at which computer), or at home, or out and about with my wife's
laptop, and depending on exactly what I'm doing at the time (I have
some old games that only run error-free on Windows ME, if you can
b
at home, or out and about with my wife's
laptop, and depending on exactly what I'm doing at the time (I have
some old games that only run error-free on Windows ME, if you can
believe it). I like what Google did to e-mail with GMail, and expect
that they might have some new bright ideas
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2009, at 1:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
>> My impression is that the "Chrome OS" will allow you to avoid just
>> what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably "OS lite"
>> would
y "OS lite"
would be a better term.
...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's
gOS which
Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and
BSDs to
try, up to and including Darwin/OSX. So I'm with Will (you can pick
yourselves up at
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Bruce Bostwick wrote:
(As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
something that can displace Windows
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
>
> (As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
> that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
> shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
> something that can displace Windows a
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Dave Land wrote:
I am not like our friend Mario with his "57 Varieties" approach to
operating systems. I use Mac OS X almost exclusively because
operating system fit and finish matter to me. (This is not a
statement of superiority to Mario, merely noting a diffe
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
(As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
something tha
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
>
>> Not to mention that changing Windows virtual monopoly to *Nix
>> monopoly is _very bad_ for the development of new techs.
>
> How would migrating to a larger user base for *nix be bad for the
> development of new techs?
>
Because Monopoly is Evil.
> Other than by bre
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Who says M$ won't have users pay to play M$-Linux? It's possible
that the worse nightmare of the free-software jihad community
happens: M$ may embrace, extend and then extinguish Linux.
The way they "embraced and extended" the Web with Inter
On 8 Jul 2009 at 23:43, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> Charlie Wrote
>
> ...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS which
> > Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and BSDs to
> > try, up to and including Darwin/OSX.
;Chrome OS" will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably "OS lite"
would be a better term. It will be able to run programs on your own
CPU, provided they conform to whatever API google is coding, and it
will be able to store files locally on y
On 7/9/2009 11:15:40 AM, Bruce Bostwick (lihan161...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
>"At the risk of being flamed, I might also point out that NASA has long
>since forbidden any primary functionality on ISS from running on
>Windows platforms because of stability concerns -- if it's onboard and
>actua
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
On 7/9/2009 11:15:40 AM, Bruce Bostwick (lihan161...@sbcglobal.net)
wrote:
"At the risk of being flamed, I might also point out that NASA has
long
since forbidden any primary functionality on ISS from running on
Windows platforms because of stabi
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Bostwick"
To: "Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
>
> Sounds like you might know the right people to ask for a tour*. ;)
>
> (*one no
Andrew wrote:
>
> The spam filter on Pegaus Mail works fine for me, and it's mine
> rather then being in the control of a company which is going to scan
> my emails. I've yet to find (and this includes gmail) another filter
> which is more than 90% accurate for me.
>
I'd estimate the efficiency o
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of false
positives ( number of real marked as spam / number of real), a
At 11:48 PM Thursday 7/9/2009, John Williams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
> I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of false
positive
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:48 PM, John Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
>
> > I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
>
> That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
>
> Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of fal
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
>> Other than by breaking the M$ "pay to play" licensing paradigm and
>> leveling the playing field for open source developers?
>>
> Who says M$ won't have users pay to play M$-Linux? It's possible
> that the worse nightmare of the free-software jihad community
> happens:
-Original Message-
From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com [mailto:brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com] On
Behalf Of John Williams
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:48 PM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensinger
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:
> I get no more than 1 in 500 false positives.
>
> I get no more than 1 in 1000 false negatives.
That is interesting. I am much more worried about false positives
(missing a real email) than I am about false negatives (seeing a few
spam emails
Julia wrote:
>
> Reply:
>
> I get no more than 1 in 500 false positives.
>
> I get no more than 1 in 1000 false negatives.
>
> It was more than that early on in my use of Gmail, I got one account in
> 2004, IIRC, and another in 2007. The more recent one, most of the false
> positives were from on
_
From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com [mailto:brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com] On
Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
Julia wrote:
Reply:
I get no more than 1 in 500 false
On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
>
> It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
> made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
There is. I did.
Except for gaming. So I use a MacBook for day-to-day shite, email, letters,
browsing, whatever, and
cing Microsoft would require a
competitor that can beat Microsoft in the market over the long haul
(maybe Google Linux based OSes) and that wants to (Apple is very happy
as a boutique brand. Apple doesn't *want* to unseat Microsoft.) Google
search is a transient service. In literally a
is that for Microsoft market domination translates into a
> tactical margin of error since their products are critical and well nigh
> universal infrastructure. Replacing Microsoft would require a
> competitor that can beat Microsoft in the market over the long haul
> (maybe Google L
http://bingle.nu/
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
