Jeff,
What are you trying to install exactly?
I used The Cisco OS (cisco iptelephony server os2003.1.4) which I used to
install UCCX.
I know that all the versions below 1.4 are not Vmware aware and you need a
special .reg patch for this.
This can be found here:
http://tannerezell.com/cisco/?p=1
I heard that Cisco is planning to open more ccie exam centres around the world
and one will be open in Dubai at the beginning of 2010. Is that true? Anybody
heard the same news recently ?
___
Ben gave this info during networkers but so far no news.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, A A wrote:
> I heard that Cisco is planning to open more ccie exam centres around the
> world and one will be open in Dubai at the beginning of 2010. Is that true?
> Anybody heard the same news recently ?
No special reg patch needed but you do need some reg entries which are as
follows:
KEY - Hkey_local_machine/software/Cisco Systems/Model
String Value - Hardware 7835H04
String Value - Memory 2048
String Value - Speed 3400
1) install windows 2003 server (any ver, not MCS disk)
2) put above entrie
Gotta love when people link to me :)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Iwan wrote:
> Jeff,
>
>
>
> What are you trying to install exactly?
>
> I used The Cisco OS (cisco iptelephony server os2003.1.4) which I used to
> install UCCX.
>
> I know that all the versions below 1.4 are not Vmware aware
You sure are sir!
On 10/30/09, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Wait...
>
> If this is accurate (and no Voice IEs decertified) that means less
> than 43 people (assuming some number passed between Jun 26th and July
> 15th) passed the V3 Voice Lab...
>
> OK, now I feel like I am in a small group...
>
>
>
Wait...
If this is accurate (and no Voice IEs decertified) that means less
than 43 people (assuming some number passed between Jun 26th and July
15th) passed the V3 Voice Lab...
OK, now I feel like I am in a small group...
Jonathan
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Mark Holloway wrote:
> Loo
Interesting stuff. Thanks fellas
On 10/30/09, Pulos, Greg wrote:
> No special reg patch needed but you do need some reg entries which are as
> follows:
>
> KEY - Hkey_local_machine/software/Cisco Systems/Model
> String Value - Hardware 7835H04
> String Value - Memory 2048
> String Value - Speed 3
Tanner,
Link to you? I was looking for you in gmail chat last night. Your website
was down :)I knew your resource was out there but I didn't have a w2k3
disk other than the telephony OS but I'm going to try to find one at hte
office today. Eventually found your video on Vimeo, but it sorta
Jeff
Yeah, I pissed last night, and my hotel had no wifi so I was fairly
unavailable to say the least :) If you'd like, send me a list of things
you'd like to see and I'll see what I can do.
Cheers,
Tanner Ezell
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jeff Garvas wrote:
> Tanner,
>
> Link to you? I
Folks:
Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with some of my questions
over the past few weeks... and a huge thanks to IPExpert for the very helpful
bootcamp and practice lab material.
- Dan
___
For more information regarding industry
Cong
please share you exp and material used. thanks.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Rodriguez wrote:
> Folks:
>
>
>
> Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with some of my
> questions over the past few weeks… and a huge thanks to IPExpert for the
> very helpful boot
In theory it is all just regular CCIE written content.
So, if you crushed the written it won't be a problem...
>From what I saw on my two attempts at v3 voice the questions were
based on relatively common show and debug commands you should have run
a hundred times. If you know what the output me
Congrats Daniel! Def need to educate the list on your experience, how long
did you prep for? How many attempts etc? That will be helpful to all the new
folks :)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Rodriguez
wrote:
> Folks:
>
>
>
> Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with s
Congratulations Dan...
Quoting Daniel Rodriguez :
> Folks:
>
> Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with some of
> my questions over the past few weeks... and a huge thanks to
> IPExpert for the very helpful bootcamp and practice lab material.
>
> - Dan
>
___
Great! Thanks Jonathan!
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> In theory it is all just regular CCIE written content.
>
> So, if you crushed the written it won't be a problem...
>
> From what I saw on my two attempts at v3 voice the questions were
> based on relatively common
Excellent news, many congrats mate
Please share what material have you used and do you have any advices for ppl
who have just strated the preparation for the exam.
Thanks,
Ahmad Azeem
From: drodrig...@fidelus.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:
The reg patch contains the additions you are adding manually so it
does not matter if you do it manually or use the .reg patch (file)
Bericht verzonden vanaf iPhone.
Message sent from iPhone.
Met vriendelijke groet,
ing. Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE# 13084 (R&S / SP / Security)
On 30 okt 2009, at 1
Thanks.
To prep I spent a good 160-180hrs doing practice labs, read the CUCM SRND, went
through many Cisco docs on SIP call flows, voice translation rules, gatekeeper
signaling, etc. I brushed up on my CME with the Cisco Press book Cisco IP
Communications Express: CME w/ CUE. The SRNDs were grea
Dan,
Congratulations!! Awesome. Thank you very much for sharing with us
your strategy! Are you still going to visit us here from time to time to help
us pass? :)
Wilson
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Thanks :)
As for sharing strategy that worked for me, definitely.
People here helped me when I had questions. I'll be more than happy to return
the favor.
- Dan
From: Wilson Bolanos [mailto:wbola...@pvt.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 11:44 AM
To: Daniel Rodriguez; A A; ccie_voice@onlinestudy
Congrats
Nice work..
Thomas J. Koch
Owner/Consultant
CCNA, CCVP
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net
_
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Rodriguez
Sent: Friday, October 30,
Any recommended strategy for the much feared Open Ended Questions? Like what
you would recommend to read etc.?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Rodriguez
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:35 AM
To: A A; ccie_voice@on
I know this question was asked once before (I looked back through the
archives) but I cant seem to find any answers.
Does anyone know of a what to prolong/stop the CUCM web page from timing
out/logging you off?
After work each day, I go home and try to put in 4 - 5 hours of study
time. Its frust
I honestly don't think I can say much without breaking the NDA. All I can
really say is study for them like you would for the written exam. It's known
that the questions can be on any topic covered in the lab and the written. With
that being said, before my took my written in May, I went over th
Congrats Man :) , was the time enough to finish all the tasks ?
how many tasks , did u get any troubleshooting question ? in what section ?
please share you success story .
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, Daniel Rodriguez wrote:
From: Daniel Rodriguez
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #25689
To: "OSL Grou
Thanks everyone. I had a copy that loaded without a hitch.
-Jeff
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
y, October 30, 2009 10:03 AM
> To: OSL Group
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #25689
>
>
>
> Folks:
>
>
>
> Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with some of my
> questions over the past few weeks. and a huge thanks to IPExpert for the
> very he
Now you have no excuse to not pass the lab :)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Garvas wrote:
> Thanks everyone. I had a copy that loaded without a hitch.
>
> -Jeff
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, pl
Thanks a lot mate, thats informative and helpful. Wish you a good luck in other
ccie track if any :)
Best regards,
Ahmad Azeem
From: drodrig...@fidelus.com
To: f...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:34:49 -0400
Subject: RE: [NEWSENDER] - RE: [OSL |
Hello,
working on the messaging question, the 3600 cti route point registered
the 5000 and 3000 CTI route point are not registering.
Any idea as to what i might be missing
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please vis
3000 CUE route point make sure it is associated with cue jtapi users and
then reload the cue
5000 unity connection would work without registration as long as you
specify voicemail profile and call forward all to voicemail on it
.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:c
Hi,
i have reloaded the cue and its still not registering
Thanks
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:
> 3000 CUE route point make sure it is associated with cue jtapi users and
> then reload the cue
>
>
>
> 5000 unity connection would work with
Hello,
Sorry i mean it is registered now
Regards
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Omotayo wrote:
> Hi,
> i have reloaded the cue and its still not registering
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Aamir Panjwani <
> aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:
>
>> 3000 CUE route point mak
Still on Vol2 lab 3
when you can in from the pstn to 3100, you can only dial the br2 extension.
when you dial branch 1 or hq extension you get you have entered an invalid
entry
also when you call the UC auto attendant and you dial hq and br1 phones. you
get the message that they are unavailable ev
Have completed the config and calls and transformations occur as they should.
To test the failover from HQ SIP GW to MGCP, I follow the instructions in the
PG and do a shut on the voice port on HQ GW. I retry the call and get reorder
tone. If a no shut the voice port and then go and reverse the
Does "stop routing on unallocated number" help?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL
USA [jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:06 PM
To: ccie_voice@online
Hey Jeff - It sounds like you're failing over from a SIP trunk to an MGCP
gateway, but I read that you're shutting a voice-port. Did you mean H323
gateway instead of SIP Trunk? Sorry but I don't have the lab manual in front of
me. If you meant H323 gateway to MGCP, make sure your service paramet
Part 1. (CUE AA) Look around the menus some more.
Part 2. Look around the subscriber edit menus some more. Download and read the
Audiotext applications docuemnt from the Ciscounitytools.com web site.
Part2B (4-digit to BR2) Unity Connection by default only allows you to dial
extensions it kn
It's easy to set calling/called party number type for calls going out
local gateway, however , I just wanted to confirm how it actually works
in case of backup gateway and teho
Backup GW: Local call goes out HQ gateway calling/called number type set
to "subscriber", if HQ GW goes down, the loc
You're correct - its from the perspective of the egress gateway. For example,
using IPExpert labs as a point of reference, calls from HQ Gw to Spain would be
international. That is, you pass the international access code and country code
to the PSTN with the called number type as international.
Thanks Dan, totally make sense..
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drodrig...@fidelus.com]
Sent: Saturday, 31 October 2009 12:52 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; 'ciscod...@live.com'; 'mciarfe...@iplogic.com';
'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callin
Daniel -
SIP to MGCP
PG indicated to do a shut on the voice port - created as a result of the T1.
However this does not appear to work correctly as the CUCM still sees the SIP
trunk up.
My solution was to go in and point the SIP trunk to a bad IP address and
then reset the trunk. I
Jeff - not really sure how the voice-port up/down status would affect the SIP
trunk from CUCMs perspective though. It should be purely IP end to end unless
you're hairpinning to TDM. Sorry I don't have the lab in front of me, maybe
there's something I'm missing in terms of configs or task requir
I have notice in same of the ip expert labs they have configured
"ccm-manager switchback immediate" command and in other case cases it is
left at default which is "ccm-manager switchback graceful".
If I just tested both scenarios
1) Graceful mode: when there is active call and primar
I would say it depends on what I'm being asked to do. If nothing is specified
in terms of MGCP failover/switchback behavior, nothing - I would leave it at
default. If I'm being asked to configure MGCP failover behavior so that my MGCP
gateways don't switchback until I'm confident my server or co
I think that I have shown that the up/down status of the voice port does not
effect the SIP trunk status from the CUM point of view. CUCM still sees it as
up and still tries to route across it
Believe that I have found an error in the PG
For those that have not goteen to 5.8 yet - I added a sol
Thanks Dan...what about h323 call preservation? When there is a active call
through h323 gateway and the primary UCM goes down call drops as expected,
unless I configure following call preservation command.
voice class h323 1
h225 timeout tcp establish 3
call preserve limit-media-detection
I would say the same really. If you're in the habit of configuring it,
definitely keep doing it (unless specifically told not to). I'd say one of the
most important things to remember is not to break strategy. Hope that helps.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Aamir Panjwani
To: Daniel Ro
OK - moved on from 5.8 to a pretty simple question. Block 900 calls w/variable
length digits and set a specific error message.
RP set to 91900!# with do not route and exceeded precedence message set.
Then it got interesting. HQ Phone 2 is a 7961 with a SIP load. Dialing
919004522138 gets bloc
I did it with a translation pattern:
91900? with urgent priority will give reorder or the precedence message in your
case after you dial 91900
91900XXX with or without urgent priority will give reorder or precedence
message after you dial the full 919004522138 number.
91900? without urgent
Is this a sip trunk from HQ to BR2 or are we talking about SIP Gateway? I
don't have the lab book with me, but wonder if there is anything of BR1 to
be configured as a sip gateway??
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA <
jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil> wrote:
> I think that
This one is easy if you know how to utilize route-lists. I totally love the
option of having setups like this at both routelist and routepattern level.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:
> Thanks Dan, totally make sense..
>
>
> -Original Me
53 matches
Mail list logo
