> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:20 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: "Return of the King" Extended Edition
>
> I think everyone who wants to see the movie has seen it.
>
> I supp
scene on the river bank?
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:12:28 -0500, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:43 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:43 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: "Return of the King" Extended Edition
[I tried to reply to this with the web interface, but it bombed out... so
here
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: "Return of the King" Extended Edition
>
> with ribbons in her hair :)
>
> what's this about the mouth of S
I think it would have been a better end than the extended tearjerker
at the Gray Havens. Even I was squirming by the end of that, and I'm
one of those people that read all the supporting materials
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:00:58 -0800, Ian Skinner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both of those
Both of those were excellent story - Bombadil and the Scouring of the Shire.
However Bombadil was an add on - Tolkein's Tree and Leaf has some interesting
commentaries about that. As for the scouring of the shire, it was really there
to bring closure, and essentially was a minimal reprise of th
; addition.
> 2) The end of Return Of The King was missing a good 30-60 minutes of story
> about Saruman and the shire.
>
> What bits do you wish had been included?
>
> --
> Jay
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16
?
--
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 11:58
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: "Return of the King" Extended Edition
Same here. On another note, I can think of no other 4 hours + movie that is
such a pleasure to sit th
Same here. On another note, I can think of no other 4 hours + movie
that is such a pleasure to sit through. The entire series has just
been I don't know - a whole level about most films.
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:46:23 -, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "You bow to no one" bit g
The "You bow to no one" bit got me too.
--
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 06:38
To: CF-Community
Subject: "Return of the King" Extended Edition
Just watched it through.
I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says "...Rosie Cotton danc
with ribbons in her hair :)
what's this about the mouth of Sauron though?
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:38:06 -0500, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just watched it through.
>
> I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says "...Rosie Cotton dancing" I tear up.
> And then when Aragorn says "You
just saw it for the 2nd time last night with my wife.
when the head of ministirith sends his son off to near certain death
there is a scene with gandolf staring at some empty baskets.
what's up with that?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
; - Original Message -
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
>
> Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
>
> larry
>
> At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you wro
PM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
larry
At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
>Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
>
>...
> - Original Message -
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Co
Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
larry
At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
>Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
>
>...
> - Original Message -
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:45 AM
> Subject
ElfQuest - the comic.
Do rabid EverQuest fans ever actually leave their homes? ;^)
Jim Davis
_
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
...
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Glad I'm not the only one with that impression. Some of the EQ fans
I'
e upstate shows were great - just a high-school gym or
>auditorium, but SO MANY great people lived in that area. Jim Shooter, Berni
>Wrightson, the Pinis, and lots of others that I can't remember. The Hudson
>Valley was a gold mine for comic pros.
>
>
>Jim Davis
>
>
was largely incoherent and completely unfunny.
>
>
>Jim Davis
>
>
> _
>
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:53 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
>
>
>Wizards came before B
ers that I can't remember. The Hudson
Valley was a gold mine for comic pros.
Jim Davis
_
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Given that he filmed it first then animated on
etely unfunny.
Jim Davis
_
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Wizards came before Bakshi's LOTR, and it was merely coloured scenes
from the movie Zulu. Fire and
rsion.
>
>
>Jim Davis
>
>
> _
>
>From: William H Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:55 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
>
>
>The rotoscoping was better in Wizards, too.
>
>will
&
Wizards came before Bakshi's LOTR, and it was merely coloured scenes
from the movie Zulu. Fire and Ice used a much more involved rotoscopy
technique. I was at a conference years ago and had a few minutes to
talk to Bakshi about the technique. He's really gone downhill over
the years. I think C
).
But still, I wish Bakshi had been able to do the second installment of his
version.
Jim Davis
_
From: William H Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
The rotoscoping was better i
The rotoscoping was better in Wizards, too.
will
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> I have the movies on DVD, the Rankin and Bass The Hobbit and Return
> of the King, and Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings. The Rankin and
> Bass stuff are garbage, the Bakshi film was an interesting
> experiment. The rotosco
I have the movies on DVD, the Rankin and Bass The Hobbit and Return
of the King, and Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings. The Rankin and
Bass stuff are garbage, the Bakshi film was an interesting
experiment. The rotoscopy technique he used was much better developed
in film Fire and Ice he did wi
I have an even vaguer memory of the animated movies. :-)
I think I'm going to have to read the books again.
At 04:05 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
>Subject: Return of the King - SPOILER -
>From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:40:01 -0600
>Thread:
>http://www.houseof
> Not explicitly. In the book they go on to have families and become
> important Hobbits of the Shire. I would say that the male love that is
> being descibed as homoerotic and/or gay in this list, is supposed to be
> Chivileric and/or Esperit de Corps type feelings that are not very much
used
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
> I seem to remember the spider being able to talk (?) and Sam wea
ffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
> I was pretty unimpressed. The movie started off slow and ended
> slow. But, the middle was very good. I
I was pretty unimpressed. The movie started off slow and ended
slow. But, the middle was very good. I'll agree that a few of the scenes
look pretty bluescreen-ish, as someone else said on this list. I thought
the same about a few scenes in The Two Towers.
The flow of this one felt more "j
Well at least I was having fun while watching the movies!
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Me thinks you have given this _WAY_ too much thought.
=)
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/03 10:43AM >>>
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
MAJOR SPOILER
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SOME MORE WHITE SPACE FOR THOSE WITH LARGE MONITORS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I felt the same way about the end of the movie. Not exactly disapointed, after 3 1/2 hours my bottom was getting sore, but I would have liked to see the Battle o
l keep your secret. But I miss you."
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
> I must admit
Oh, that was too deep for me.
-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:10 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
The vagina was bad. Duh!!
--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security
Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:02 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
>
>
> Caution. Do not read if you hold LoTR sacred.
> ..
> ..
> ..
> ..
> ..
> ..
> ..
&g
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:11 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER
ontext.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Caution. Do not read if you hold LoTR sacred.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Are you kidding!?! That's what I thought throughou
I must admit when Frodo woke up and they were all prancing on that bed it
was all very homo-erotic. All it needed was a pot of elf jelly :)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 December 2003 13:43
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the
---
From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
> That comment is just inappropriate. This is the LOTR, for goodness sake.
> Something must be
That comment is just inappropriate. This is the LOTR, for goodness sake.
Something must be sacred.
M
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:43 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
space
space...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
> Also the only reason Frodo was leaving the shire was because the blade
shard
> stuck in his chest was slowly moving towards his heart. The elves could
> prevent this so he had to go with them.
>
I thought Frodo left because his gay lover Samwise spur
I was good with it, I feel that different mediums have different ways of handling things, and also creative license comes into play.
Basically, the most important thing to me was that the spirit of Tolkien's work was preserved, not necessarily the exact events.
Peter Jackson did an incredible job
11:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King
> Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
> from discussions of the actual story. What did everyone think of the CGI
> in that movie? There were some parts that were rather cludgy (esp.
> during
Hmm. Maybe we should thaw Iggy.
--benD
Jim Campbell wrote:
> Iggy Pop.
>
> Howie Hamlin wrote:
>
> >Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Haggerty, Mike
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
> > Subj
> Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
> from discussions of the actual story. What did everyone think of the CGI
> in that movie? There were some parts that were rather cludgy (esp.
> during the calvary scenes) but Gollum was done spectacularly well.
Something
That explains it.
M
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:41 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King
Iggy Pop.
Howie Hamlin wrote:
>Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
>
>
> -
Iggy Pop.
Howie Hamlin wrote:
>Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Haggerty, Mike
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
> Subject: Return of the King
>
>
> Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I wil
Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
- Original Message -
From: Haggerty, Mike
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Return of the King
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from discussions of the actual
sfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: RE: open relays Re: return of the king game...
| LOL well
954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.ediets.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: open relays Re: return of the king game...
I really hope that is not the case as I accept ALL mail sent to my
se
I really hope that is not the case as I accept ALL mail sent to my server. I
bounce nothing.
> OHHH another fun thing. You know how aol does its check of OPEN RELAYS??
> its complete freaking crap. They don't really check they simply email
> your server with something that should bounce and if it
022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.ediets.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:04 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: return of the king game...
Last week an email from another list member was blocke
inal Message -----
> From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:56 AM
> Subject: RE: return of the king game...
>
>
> | I just got prince of persia man the memories of
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: RE: return of the king g
th my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: RE: return of the king game...
| I just got prince of persia man the m
I just got prince of persia man the memories of the old school game ;)
PoP is really quite well done i have some compliants about the cam views
but still alot of fun so far.
--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 3344
58 matches
Mail list logo
