so, getting back to your original request -- your tag cloud on the
seach page is good. However, if there is a way to search for something
that is not in that cloud, I am not seeing it.
Ah, now I do. presumably you can do a simple search by ignoring some
option in advanced search. But I person
::cough:: I have some availabilty for content-writing recent
samples at fusionauthority.com
/me smiles
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Good point.
>
> Could you look at the site again? I think I got most of your
> suggestions, except for the highlight on the selected ri
Good point.
Could you look at the site again? I think I got most of your
suggestions, except for the highlight on the selected right nav items.
http://thepluginstore.com
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> If you ever find one, don't let any other coder know.
>
> That is
If you ever find one, don't let any other coder know.
That is the holy grail for all of us.
You'd think with all the english, communications and marketing majors
out there, that slot would not be so impossible to fill.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Maureen wrote:
> What I really need is a
I understand that. Just got off the phone with a client that I've
been working with for more than 10 years who thinks every web page is
supposed to be a squeeze page that convinces the viewer to "BUY
SOMETHING RIGHT NOW".
Just when I think I have him convinced to let me build a professional
look
Yeah, well, don't take all of mine, they often conflict. I throw them
out stream-of-consciousness - not all make sense. (just a warning.
lol. which my designer has learned after many years of pain)
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I made them bold. Trying to incorporate al
Maureen wrote:
> Re: the feature div - thanks for catching that. I copied it to make
> the three blocks instead of one and forgot to change the id to class.
> I really do know better.
>
Yeah I'm hearing you there. I know you're not finished yet but I had an
idea the ID/class thing was a sim
I made them bold. Trying to incorporate all the suggestions.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> Either I have better lighting this late at night, or the color of the
> page headers changed a little?
>
> Because they are working for me now.
>
> =)
>
> Might be the lack of
Either I have better lighting this late at night, or the color of the
page headers changed a little?
Because they are working for me now.
=)
Might be the lack of sleep.
I like the change to the home page, with the grid. Very common setup,
but common is often common because it works.
Thank you, Mark.
I changed the shop page to a grid with displays of product images, and
I'll be putting feature products on the main page as well, so perhaps
it will look more like a store.
I haven't run the validation yet, so thanks for that. I'll fix all
the stuff that it found.
Re: the fea
Site Link: http://thepluginstore.com
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> so maybe something like
>
> You make sound, we make it sound good.
> It's your sound, play with it.
> Change your sound
> Toys for noise
Followed by:
> Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have
> add-ons? what oth
Condiments for your creative tools
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have
> add-ons? what other products let you extend their functions?
>
> Aftermarket addons for your creative toolbox
> Extend your tools
> Pimp y
Good plan. Stick with it. Basic structure always needs to come first.
Not sure if that fancy font is better, but the size and weight is much
more to my liking.
As for the page titles, I want my eye to be drawn there first on each
page load. Pull my eye in. So either bold that text there (which m
Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have
add-ons? what other products let you extend their functions?
Aftermarket addons for your creative toolbox
Extend your tools
Pimp your stack
The sweet editing suite
~~
Not really sure of the "group" this is targeted for, but I am
picturing my brother-in-law, who has a rack of sound devices, lots of
add ons for his edrums and midi boxes, and a dozen pedals for his
guitars and basses.
he plays with the sound.
so maybe something like
You make sound, we make it s
> Thanks. I changed the text color for the inputs back to black. Tag
> Cloud links aren't ready yet. I'm not much of an artist so the
> graphics will have to wait until I can afford to hire someone. A
> store logo is "coming soon". I'm not a big fan of sites with wild or
> multiple fonts, so I
I have no idea what to use for a tagline, although I know I need one.
Any thoughts?
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> a tagline is needed. that alone could do it.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I'm giving some serious thought to having a section of the site for
analog plugs, stomp boxes and cables - just for fun.
The header that is currently the analog knobs will change with the
type of plugs - I just need to get the graphics for the alternate
versions.
a tagline is needed. that alone could do it.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>> Well, yes, more info to come. Products to display, and content for
>> all the areas. Probably a featured image of a product on each page.
>
The main article with the plugs on the home page does not scream "buy
things". I admit it took a second to find the "shop" button.
Was unclear at first what the site was selling. I thought it was
selling connectors and cables (which sadly excited me. I spent 4
months once building a database of a
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Maureen wrote:
> Well, yes, more info to come. Products to display, and content for
> all the areas. Probably a featured image of a product on each page.
>
> Not sure what else I could do to make a store
>
Yeah, I'm thinking about that one.
Initially I would
Well, yes, more info to come. Products to display, and content for
all the areas. Probably a featured image of a product on each page.
Not sure what else I could do to make a store look like a store - open
to suggestions.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
> Right... No blin
Thanks. I changed the text color for the inputs back to black. Tag
Cloud links aren't ready yet. I'm not much of an artist so the
graphics will have to wait until I can afford to hire someone. A
store logo is "coming soon". I'm not a big fan of sites with wild or
multiple fonts, so I'll probab
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "also really seems like a blog not a
> place to buy sell plugs."
>
> It's not a blog, it's a store. It has a blog so customers can discuss
> the plugs.
>
Right... No bling as Hatton said. hehehe
It looks like a
> If any of you are around today, could you look at this site:
> thepluginstore.com and give me any comments, kudos, criticisms, etc?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Background does not extend to the bottom of the page on Sell and Learn pages.
Links in tag cloud do not work (not sure if they were supposed
I'm not sure what you mean by "also really seems like a blog not a
place to buy sell plugs."
It's not a blog, it's a store. It has a blog so customers can discuss
the plugs.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> If any
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If any of you are around today, could you look at this site:
> thepluginstore.com and give me any comments, kudos, criticisms, etc?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Looking good. I'm not a big fan of colors, still a bit plain and also really
seems like
On 5/9/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to hear you what you think about
> http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/demo/eduroam.nl/
Loads in PocketPC PocketIE (Windows Mobile Edition 2003, HP iPaq).
There is a broken image in the blue bar under the "Eduroam" logo.
The
** Private ** wrote:
> looks like i would expect it to look on a phone.
> scrunched, crappy, not good, but thats just
> the nature of phones.
The important thing is that they can read the content. Whether the colors look
nice and the image is smooth is really not important.
> anyway, i use this
looks like i would expect it to look on a phone.
scrunched, crappy, not good, but thats just
the nature of phones.
anyway, i use this to determine a phone in one
of my new little beta apps...
are you doing the same kinda thing to change the layout, jochem?
tw
On 5/9/06, Jochem van
** Private ** wrote:
> looks like crap in lynx.
Lynx on which device? It looks as well as may be expected in Lynx in Putty on
my PDA.
Jochem
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206405
Archives: http://ww
looks like crap in lynx.
woo hoo! I finally got to say that to Jochem.
On 5/9/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry if you get this twice, but I don't see the first try in the
> archives.
>
>
> I would like to hear you what you think about
> http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl
I just reviewed all.
>Hey folks, it's time for me to beg for more site reviews for my Web
>Scripting & Authoring students. I have 13 sites that need reviews for
>a grade. Your comments were a good source of insight for the last
>batch you reviewed and I sincerely appreciate your assistance. Thi
18 just didnt do one? wtf?
tw
ps. funny that my first site was for a band... maybe that person is destined
for web geekness after all!
On 4/23/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Those were a few of the stand outs. Thank god some of the people that put
> > ZERO effort into the
> Those were a few of the stand outs. Thank god some of the people that put
> ZERO effort into them aren't out there for sight of those not in the
> industry :)
The scary thing is that there are 13 sites in the review list this
time... and 31 students between two classes.
~~~
atton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 11:45 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Site Review Time Again
On 4/23/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some are really good, some should be failed.
I should have also mentioned that some of the students decid
On 4/23/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some are really good, some should be failed.
I should have also mentioned that some of the students decided to use
this project to actually create sites that friends and/or family
members have been asking them to. The band site and the web hosting
s
il 23, 2006 10:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Site Review Time Again
> If you're interested in participating simply go to
> http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/
I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet
Explorer. I did *not* make cross-browser compatabili
i just finished reviewing all.
tw
On 4/23/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're interested in participating simply go to
> > http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/
>
> I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet
> Explorer. I did *not* make cross-
> If you're interested in participating simply go to
> http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/
I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet
Explorer. I did *not* make cross-browser compatability a requirement
so I cannot count off for that (haven't even mentioned it, actually
LOL.. Damn typos... Got to hate them
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review
You keep fucking up the addresses, and I keep thinking it's me, damn you
Dr.
Akins, let the fat just b
The color blind guy says the first one.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review
Sorry actual links:
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com (first one)
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com/test/index.htm
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.comm/test/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Adkins,
4:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Site Review
>
> I like the first one best.
>
> Are you 'mindkeeper'? If so --a while back I bought your file manager for a
> client and customized it for their Intranet. What a great product!! Well
> done!
>
> >S
Actually is it all CSS.
No TABLEs, TD, or such.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:56 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review
I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the
amount of HTML
Actually is it all CSS.
No TABLEs, TD, or such.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:56 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review
I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the
amount of HTML used
Thank you very much. Yes. Mindkeeper is mine.
I do greatly appreciate the comments.
-Original Message-
From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Site Review
I like the first one best.
Are you 'mindkeeper&
I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the
amount of HTML used to create the page!
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduko
| | |
-
"C code. C code run. Run
me too, but I think I'd like it better with a white background on the text.
On 3/29/06, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I like the first one best.
>
> Are you 'mindkeeper'? If so --a while back I bought your file manager for
> a client and customized it for their Intranet. What a g
I like the first one best.
Are you 'mindkeeper'? If so --a while back I bought your file manager for a
client and customized it for their Intranet. What a great product!! Well done!
>Sorry actual links:
>http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com (first one)
>
>http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com/test
The third link was still wrong, but I figured it out.
OK,
I like the background body color, menu and nav tabs of the first one.
I like the matching color of the site title and the hr line above the
nav on design 2 and 3
I like the white background better under the text in version 2
I like the lig
Ok now that I have seen all three. (There is still a typo, an extra "m" in
.comm in the third link)
I would say I liked the addition of the contrasting color, and preferred the
second one the most. The white background for the text just seemed cleaner.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Program
Only the first link worked for me.
I'm not a color guy. They seem fine to me, if a bit monochrome.
But I was a bit put off for some reason by the repeat links on the bottom that
exactly mirrored the top menu. Since the top menu is not, at least currently,
images. Nor does the page scroll sin
Sorry actual links:
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com (first one)
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com/test/index.htm
http://www.wilkinsonplastering.comm/test/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM
To: CF-Commu
I am only seeking advice on the colors.. I know
I will change the color of the text to flow,
but looking at the other colors primarily.
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Site Review
ok no
The second and third link are bad for me (404 errors)
On 3/29/06, Adkins, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok now it is my turn to toss something out:
>
> Here is a site I am working on and well I was told the first
> one was a bit boring on the colors and since the business is
> located in Flor
I tried to send the screen shot to your [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it
bounced. Email?
On 11/1/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Tony. This is my first site done using CSS.
> There is only one section where I had problems using CSS
> for tabulated data so I had to break down
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> either way, dope site. esp. like the flash in the middle...
> the green flash.
I don't like the computer tower in the flash it looks out of place to
me.
~|
Find out how CFTicket
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Site Review
> >
> > I like the new one a lot.
> >
> > I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well.
> >
&
: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Site Review
yes, VERY nice site man.
tony
On 10/30/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for their comments!!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
yes, VERY nice site man.
tony
On 10/30/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for their comments!!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM
> To: CF-Community
Thanks to everyone for their comments!!
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Site Review
I like the new one a lot.
I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well.
Cheers
I like the new one a lot.
I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well.
Cheers!
On 10/28/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok since I sit back and only join in at times, hopefully
> you can give me your opinion on this site.
>
> OLD SITE:
> http://ww
I like the design of the new site better, although the graphic takes up a
lot of valuable real estate.
Also, in Netspace, the three books at the bottom of the page (basic design,
advanced design, e-commerce plan) overlap the previous paragraph and do not
display entire content of the box.
I have
er typo, I meant typo, honest...
Dana
On 10/28/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> only have time for a quick look, but yes, the new site is better. I like
> the graphic (why green though)
> A couple of nits I should probably pick,
> You spell website and web site, you should probably
only have time for a quick look, but yes, the new site is better. I like the
graphic (why green though)
A couple of nits I should probably pick,
You spell website and web site, you should probably pick one or the other
Advantages in *Some advanatages of having a web site*:
you also have this
The old site I knew you were a development shop.
The new site I knew you were a packaged software sales shop.
The design and elements of the new design fit my likes very well.
I really like it.
On 10/28/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok since I sit back and only join in at
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> I clicked on the first link on the left and got stuck. I didn't want
> to go through the "wizard"-type configuration thing but going to that
> section replaced all the usefull navigation with something specific to
> the configuration steps. I quit after that.
All of the navig
Paul Vernon wrote:
>
> In terms of accessibility and browser compatibility, the site uses a LOT
> of js scripts which can cause problems if not properly coded and where
> the ommission of the noscript tags is prevalent like with this site, on
> can only assume the worst for those browsers that don'
Probably coming in late here, but at first glance - the content of the
"Alerting Service" box on the right all sort of flows together. Maybe
putting in a little more space between each link, or alternating row
colors or something?
- Jim
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>http://resnet.tudelft.nl/
>
>
I clicked on the first link on the left and got stuck. I didn't want
to go through the "wizard"-type configuration thing but going to that
section replaced all the usefull navigation with something specific to
the configuration steps. I quit after that.
-Kevin
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:17:05 -0400,
Oh, why didn't you say so? I was being polite!
I've donned my Jakob Nielsen hat so here are some comments about site and
structure...
HTH... Paul
If it's meant to be XHTML then it really should have DOCTYPE declarations in
all the pages... There are more alt attributes missing than you can shake
Paul Vernon wrote:
> I got it here in the UK... The entire site validates reasonably well...
> Looks good to me!
I was hoping for some more negative comments.
The design was forced upon the site, and for a number of reason I believe it is a mess. Originally it didn't have compliant XHTML or CSS.
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Just tried going to the site and got a site not found message.
I get it fine, even from shell servers in the US.
Assuming a recent Windows, could you tell me the outcome of the following command sequence:
nslookup
set debug
resnet.tudelft.nl
server 130.161.180.1
I got it here in the UK... The entire site validates reasonably well...
Looks good to me!
Paul
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Just tried going to the site and got a site not found message.
larry
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:17:05 -0400, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://resnet.tudelft.nl/
>
> Jochem
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations
Kevin,
I prefer feedback with meat, positive or negative. I'll have to ponder your
comments. Thanks for taking the time.
DRE
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subj
lly.
Jim Davis
> -Original Message-
> From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:08 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: site review part deux
>
> Bla! I liked the old one better. I think the exclamation point smacks
of
>
t: RE: site review
Andre,
I like the architectural rendering feel. I'd worry a little about
implementation though. I know this is just a graphic, but is it going to
be fixed-width or flexy? Right now it feels small and I don't know if
it's 1:1 scale or not. And what's happeni
- I think Kevin
called it "architectural style."
-Deanna
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Turrettini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: site review part
31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: site review
>
>
> Nice design, clean yet elegant.
>
> Just for fun (we've been working on this ourselves lately).
> I ran it through a color blind simulator. Didn't expect any
> problem, and there where none with this des
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: site review part deux
>
>
> Ok, I've livened it up a bit. See now.
>
> http://webmachineinc.com/
>
> ps, its full flexy and youre probably right about the blo
Nice design, clean yet elegant.
Just for fun (we've been working on this ourselves lately). I ran it
through a color blind simulator. Didn't expect any problem, and there where
none with this design.
I find this service to be very invaluable.
Information on Color blindness: http://www.vischeck
Yup..I like that one,
It gives it more feeling :-)
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: site review part deux
Ok, I've livened it up a bit. See now.
It's nice. Simple.
Perhaps it could do with a little depth and warmth though?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
what do you guys think??
graphics for a side consulting company I'm starting.
http://webmachineinc.com/
~~
ineinc.com/
>
> ps, its full flexy and youre probably right about the blog.
>
> Thanks in advance. DRE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: site re
What did you have in mind? Can you flesh that out a bit? I'm guessing the
warmth is to add perhaps another color.
Appreciated.
DRE
> -Original Message-
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
&g
Andre,
I like the architectural rendering feel. I'd worry a little about
implementation though. I know this is just a graphic, but is it going to
be fixed-width or flexy? Right now it feels small and I don't know if
it's 1:1 scale or not. And what's happening with the ruled line at the
bottom? I h
I like it
Andre Turrettini writes:
> what do you guys think??
>
> graphics for a side consulting company I'm starting.
>
> http://webmachineinc.com/
>
> DRE
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forum
ers a bit of ummph...to make it seem a little bit more...alive?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: site review
What did you have in mind? Can you flesh that out a bit? I'
Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2235
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
Tim,
Do you have a good cf based browser-sniff to handle this? We're putting
one
04, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
>
> I know, I was trying to extend the joke throwing in Netscape 1 I enjoy
> the fact that one could, if they really wanted to go through the trouble,
> get NS 1 from their archive site and use it..
Hey, now, he asked us to look at it with earlier browsers. I just complied.
;)
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critiqu
Um. That was Kevin, not me.
-- Ben Doom
Programmer & General Lackey
Moonbow Software, Inc
: -Original Message-
: From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:30 AM
: To: CF-Community
: Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
:
:
: Ian, that w
Tim,
Do you have a good cf based browser-sniff to handle this? We're putting
one together but any input is appreciated.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:09 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subj
.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
Ian, that was a joke in response to Ben's comment about not designin
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
>
>
> Ok, I've got ask, where do you have a computer that still
> runs IE 2.0 and why not Netscape 1.0
>
> Actually, all messed up is not good, and I'll try and look at
> that. It may not be prett
Ian, that was a joke in response to Ben's comment about not designing for
NS4..
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
Ok, I've got ask, where do you have
e) browser.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:24 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
Your site looks all messed up in MSIE 2.0. :)
-Origin
Your site looks all messed up in MSIE 2.0. :)
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Site Review/Critique
Yes, that would be very helpful.
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ian
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
