Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Tony
Productivity Enhancement -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Tony
Enhancement -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Dana
, Adam Phillip Churvis President Productivity Enhancement -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Tony
2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf On 11/27/07, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the transcripts when someone posted the link

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Scott Stewart
- From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here probably luck and the difference between being in the DC suburbs and on the eastern shore. IANAL but that's my thought. Also, the dude in the case I'm

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Adam Churvis
Churvis President Productivity Enhancement -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Tony
: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:20 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here um ya. Dana. i have a VERY good friend who was being robbed (doesnt matter what was going on) the intruder was in his house, he shot him in the back, as he was runing out the door. terry, got nothing

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Dana
: we are always SO on topic here um ya. Dana. i have a VERY good friend who was being robbed (doesnt matter what was going on) the intruder was in his house, he shot him in the back, as he was runing out the door. terry, got nothing. so, im not sure what other extenuating

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-28 Thread Adam Churvis
Phillip Churvis President Productivity Enhancement -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:03 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here oddly enough. he is dead now. he was shot by a relative of the man he shot

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Greg Morphis
They came in the front yard with me, man if he's referring to his front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property then I believe he has the right. If they were not on his property, then I can't see the self-defense there. I don't think burglary should be punishable by death.

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Jerry Johnson
I don't think he should get off totally without penalty. It was his neighbors property, and the police told him to let it go. He should at least have to take a gun-owners rights course, or pay an unlawful discharge of a firearm. And maybe an assault charge. I don't think I want my neighbors to

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Jerry Johnson
You've obviously never been burgled. On Nov 27, 2007 11:42 AM, Greg Morphis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They came in the front yard with me, man if he's referring to his front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property then I believe he has the right. If they were not on his

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Casey Dougall
On Nov 27, 2007 11:42 AM, Greg Morphis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They came in the front yard with me, man if he's referring to his front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property then I believe he has the right. If they were not on his property, then I can't see the

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I don't know about this scenario. It's got a vigilante justice feel to it. If I were investigating, I'd be making sure that he didn't shoot first and then drag them over to his property. snip Caller: Boom. You're dead. (Sounds of gunshots) Get the law over here quick. I've managed to get one of

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread William Bowen
And the thieves should still be prosecuted for the break in. umm... they got the death penalty. -- will If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable. - Carrie Fisher ~| Get the answers

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Crow T. Robot
I am torn by this. I agree we should have a society where all laws should be obeyed by everyone, but dammit, this stuff pisses me off. Seems like the criminals have more rights than the citizens. What else was he supposed to do? Watch? You know the police weren't ever going to arrive in time

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Dana
I read the transcripts when someone posted the link here. It sounded to me like he was just antsy to use his gun. Self-defence is supposed to be when you personally are in danger, not when your neighbor had a burglar. If we were talkng about some tiny toon where the nearest law was an hour away

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Peterson, Chris
Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:42 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here They came in the front yard with me, man if he's referring to his front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property then I believe he has

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Tony
isnt the goal of any laws to stop offenders? if so, and this is how this guy did it, why should he be prosecuted? if in fact they were NOT, then get him, but if they are prosecuted, fuck em. tw On 11/27/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know about this scenario. It's got a

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Tony
THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf On 11/27/07, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the transcripts when someone posted the link here. It sounded to me like he was just antsy to use his gun. Self-defence is supposed to be when you

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
we need to rewrite the law then so that the death penalty is the appropriate punishment for burglary. On 11/27/07, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf On 11/27/07, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Jerry Johnson
Do you really want a 70 year old neighbor with an itchy trigger deciding who is and who is not burglarizing your property, and having absolutely no jeopardy when he shoots the pool guy or the grocery delivery guy. Because remember, it is not that there is actual danger, it is just if the neighbor

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Dana
exactly -- he used deadly force in a situation which did not require it. On 11/27/07, Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you really want a 70 year old neighbor with an itchy trigger deciding who is and who is not burglarizing your property, and having absolutely no jeopardy when he

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Adam Churvis
PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf On 11/27/07, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the transcripts when someone posted the link here. It sounded to me like he was just antsy

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Dana
] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE all bets off table for them at that point. wtf On 11/27/07, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the transcripts when someone posted the link

RE: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Adam Churvis
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:38 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here um, ya. Tony, you might want to be aware that I know someone who got twenty years, in the state of Maryland, for shooting someone who came into his house and was beating up his

Re: we are always SO on topic here

2007-11-27 Thread Dana
Enhancement -Original Message- From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:38 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here um, ya. Tony, you might want to be aware that I know someone who got twenty years, in the state of Maryland, for shooting