UPS and FedEx seem to be doing quite well...
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 12:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Jerry
"
I'd say the opposite. Shareholders own the company. It's up to them to
police the company and punish the company by selling stock and investing
elsewhere. Those who don't do their job lose money when the company fail."
So explain Wall Street Jerry? Even before the bailout, as Wall Street w
"I think we have a misunderstanding there. I mean that I want private
industry to try and do the things that government does better and cheaper.
If they can, great, private industry should do it. I want both industry and
government to be as efficient, cost-effective, responsive and responsible as
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I want to see government keep private industry in check and vice-versa."
>
> The government has some responsibility to keep private industry in check. I
> do NOT want private industry keeping the government in check. That is
> lobbying by
"Thus far the only consistency is that you seem to be 'against socialism'."
What gave it away?
"You seem to think that Single Payer is socialist as well"
"As for the so-called Public Option, do you consider that socialist?"
The public option is just a step towards single payer which is a step
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Regardless of the argument changes, I may want to stop. My premise is the
> same and this is the same old circle of arguments that come up all of the
> time. I should just find a link to any of the old threads and say go read
> this.
>
>
> W
"An assumption of altruism on the part of companies and corporate is way too
pie-in-the-sky for me."
Preach it.
"I cannot think of a single company that cares more for their customers than
their profits. "
Amen
"They may take care of a customer because doing so increases their profit,
but as
"Just pick an argument and stick with it Jerry."
Hard to advance an argument without some change. I even admitted that you
were right. Insurance companies would not go bankrupt. This alone resulted
in some changes to my arguments.
The main problem is I started out too big in scope and I have
You think they give a rats ass now? Why do you think the insurance
companies pushed so hard for government guaranteed customers. You
thought service was bad before? See what happens now.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The fact that it is all about profit and nothing el
An assumption of altruism on the part of companies and corporate is
way too pie-in-the-sky for me.
I cannot think of a single company that cares more for their customers
than their profits. They may take care of a customer because doing so
increases their profit, but as soon as that customer bec
care about it's customers
needs to go join the dinosaurs.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:01 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
"Ah, right. Please go check th
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Ah, right. Please go check the earnings statements for health insurance
> companies and tell me which ones are going bankrupt."
>
> I'm no fan of insurance companies. Â They seem to be the embodiment of
> greed. Â This greed helped open the
"Ah, right. Please go check the earnings statements for health insurance
companies and tell me which ones are going bankrupt."
I'm no fan of insurance companies. They seem to be the embodiment of
greed. This greed helped open the door for health care deform.
That being said, you're right. The
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Judah, if you bankrupt the insurance companies, it will come.
Just to explicitly follow up on this really incredibly wrong point,
let us review:
Largest private health insurance companies in the US:
UnitedHealth Group: http://finance.yaho
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "At this point I have to question your intelligence Jerry."
>
> Judah, I get it. I'm stupid because I don't agree with you.
I apologized for this statement in a different email, fyi. It was
wrong of me to say that.
>
> Judah, you got me.
I dont think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the
health care bill. You know why? Its statutory language. We hire
experts.
- Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) one of the chief authors of the new health care law
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> So glad you read it.
"At this point I have to question your intelligence Jerry."
Judah, I get it. I'm stupid because I don't agree with you.
" I followed the bill progress very closely because 1) It is a long standing
interest of mine. I was knocking on doors in 1994 for health care reform and
2) this is the indus
So glad you read it. Did it help?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> There's 2700 pages and $trillions of reasons why people don't like Obamacare.
> But we must be stupid
>
> So I found this article for stupid people:
There's 2700 pages and $trillions of reasons why people don't like Obamacare.
But we must be stupid
So I found this article for stupid people:
Explaining ObamaCare To Stupid
http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/23/obamacare-democrats-elections-opinions-columnists-merrill-matthews.html?boxes=financechan
Glad she is doing well. How much longer will she need the tube?
I had two preemies so I know the strain of sick kids. Both are in the
their 30s now. The oldest is going through some rough medical stuff
now, and I'm still only a mom with a sick kid. Just can't rock this
one to sleep any more.
Kids force the gushing ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:webmas...@sstwebworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:40 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
She seems to be ok with the tube, she doesn't r
eeech)
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:43 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
Gush away my friend. Sorry to hear that the medical stuff is messed up
but I'm g
ulting.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:48 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
>
>
> Glad she is ok...that trach tube is going to be rough on a kid though. I
> can't imagine my daughters dealing with
ever and the more I laugh
the more irritated she gets..
Sorry for gushing about my kid :)
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:ow...@threeravensconsulting.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teaba
It is boilerplate opposition rhetoric, and I too cannot help but
boggle when really smart people allow themselves to be used to spread
it, especially since in some cases it is not really the message they
want to spread.
Their real concern is with the cost and ineffectiveness of the health
care bi
Roberts
wrote:
>
> And remember...I was questioning his intelligence long before anyone else
> ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:31 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: intersting op
t: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
Fortunately my daughter is ok, she'll need a Trach-Tube for a while
but at least she's breathing
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
>>
>> &
And remember...I was questioning his intelligence long before anyone else
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:31 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
On Wed
Is there a difference? They all want to make the US a corporatist state.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
WSJ not fascist
It felt to me like they were far more concerned with "Lets make sure
we don't get sued" than "Let's help our patients get better" Give me
the damn data and let me decide whether or not I want or need to
process it. I *will* participate in my daughter's health care whether
they like it or not..
Th
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> "Communication and transparency would help lots. That's part of why
> I'm not anti-government-involvement in health care. We need some
> regulation and a lot more reform.
> "
> Yeah.. my daughter was back in the hospital and the PICU at UN
Fortunately my daughter is ok, she'll need a Trach-Tube for a while
but at least she's breathing
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Scott Stewart
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Communication and transparency would help lots. That's part of why
>> I'm not anti
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> "It still has nothing to do with socialism."
>>
>> Ahh, but it does. The bill itself is a socialist ideal. The health care
>> system will come to resemble European health care system
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> "Communication and transparency would help lots. That's part of why
> I'm not anti-government-involvement in health care. We need some
> regulation and a lot more reform.
> "
> Yeah.. my daughter was back in the hospital and the PICU at U
I'm just playing with you.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> that is your loss then.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> After serious consideration I decided to decline.
>>
>> Thanks you anyway.
that is your loss then.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> After serious consideration I decided to decline.
>
> Thanks you anyway.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Sam wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll consider that.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>>
>>> You
"Communication and transparency would help lots. That's part of why
I'm not anti-government-involvement in health care. We need some
regulation and a lot more reform.
"
Yeah.. my daughter was back in the hospital and the PICU at UNC Chapel
hill was the epitome of non-transparency I literally had
Nah..I already said we abolish the lobbyists and fire the bureaucrats.
Try to keep up.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> what and let the bureaucrats and lobbyists have even more power than
> they do now?
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>> "W
Having been through two medical malpractice lawsuits, I think you
overstate the frequency and ease of filing.You may phone a lawyer
at the "slightest negative side effect form a drug or procedure" but
as you obviously discovered, you have to have both cause and harm to
file or win. The reali
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
...
> On a somewhat related note: my wife almost died form a ruptured
> ectopic pregnancy as she laid in a hospital room for 2 days while her
> dip shit doctors tried to figure out what was wrong (when they finally
> did, they discovered during s
"http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/goals/objectivity/pollsummary.html among others
I found."
I like this one better:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. - Mark Twain
The
OK, that made me literally laugh out loud.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> After serious consideration I decided to decline.
>
> Thanks you anyway.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Sam wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll consider that.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons
"What's also highly amusing is that according to these statistics over 54
million people in the United States are NOT covered by any sort of medical
system.'"
The 54 million number is kind of like the attendance to Glenn Beck's rally.
It depends on who you ask. One side will say significantly lo
"what and let the bureaucrats and lobbyists have even more power than they
do now?"
Imprison them too. It can be the French Revolution all over again.
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. - Mark Twain
The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous
After serious consideration I decided to decline.
Thanks you anyway.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Sam wrote:
> Thanks, I'll consider that.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> You know Sam, your replies would have a lot more credibility if you
>> didn't engage in
what and let the bureaucrats and lobbyists have even more power than
they do now?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "We should impose term limits on all politicians. Two terms, at most. One
> term in office, then one term in prison."
>
> Nice. I like it.
>
>
> J
>
> -
>
>
http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/goals/objectivity/pollsummary.html among
others I found.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> " And they are a lot more objective than FAUX news."
>
> According to whom?
>
> J
>
> -
>
> No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislat
Thanks, I'll consider that.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> You know Sam, your replies would have a lot more credibility if you
> didn't engage in this sort of name calling.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfu
"We should impose term limits on all politicians. Two terms, at most. One
term in office, then one term in prison."
Nice. I like it.
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. - Mark Twain
The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in go
"It is a bad thing because it removes the ability of large corporations to
make obscene profits off the suffering and disease of people."
I am no fan of insurance companies and those milking the health care system.
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
se
"Not really, the countries are comparable. But the point I was making is
that Jerry had lumped all the EU countries into one socialized medicine
monolith. When clearly they are not."
True.
There is not one huge health system in Europe. Each country has its own
flavor.
J
-
No man's life,
You know Sam, your replies would have a lot more credibility if you
didn't engage in this sort of name calling.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Typical useful idiot response.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> At this point I have to question your in
" And they are a lot more objective than FAUX news."
According to whom?
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. - Mark Twain
The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and
provisions should be made to prevent its ascendan
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Most citizens don't care, either way."
>
> They care after the fact. Kind of like Arthur Dent. All he had to do was
> go to the galactic planning system and lodge a complaint. But did he? No.
> He waited for the Vogons to show up before
Are you a clinger?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> WSJ not fascist. Most like propaganda organ for Saudi royal family and
> Murdoch, the owners.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh yeah...the fascist street journal...home to "we wouldn't know
That reads like an Obama Press release.
Except for the part where Obama himself revised the number down to 30 million.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/opinion/23sun1.html?_r=1
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the Department of
Health and Human Services estimates that 28 milli
Typical useful idiot response.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> At this point I have to question your intelligence Jerry. I followed
> the bill progress very closely because 1) It is a long standing
> interest of mine. I was knocking on doors in 1994 for health care
> re
u have to have insurance. Why do you
>> think hospitals charge 30/pill for a .02 pill?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sisk, Kris [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:26 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: RE: intersting opin
so that you have to have insurance. Why do you
> think hospitals charge 30/pill for a .02 pill?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sisk, Kris [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:26 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: intersting opinio
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> "It still has nothing to do with socialism."
>
> Ahh, but it does. The bill itself is a socialist ideal. The health care
> system will come to resemble European health care systems unless the bill is
> repealed.
At this point I have to ques
WSJ not fascist. Most like propaganda organ for Saudi royal family and
Murdoch, the owners.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Oh yeah...the fascist street journal...home to "we wouldn't know objective
> journalism that didn't favor the interests of the rich if it bitchslap
01, 2010 12:26 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
Meh, insurance has never been the problem with American health care.
It's cost. When you can go across the border (either of them) and get
the exact same medicine from the exact
ommunity
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
This just in:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703369704575461840575037482.ht
ml
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote
and Limbaugh told
you...nevermind.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:45 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>
Agreed, but instead of fixing the problems we created new ones and
made the whole thing worse.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Meh, insurance has never been the problem with American health care.
> It's cost. When you can go across the border (either of them) and get
> th
10:45 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> What's also highly amusing is that according to these statistics over
> 54 million people in the United States are NOT covered by any sort o
This just in:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703369704575461840575037482.html
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>> "The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the pundits
>> who sl
We should impose term limits on all politicians. Two terms, at most.
One term in office, then one term in prison.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "The representatives never listen to their constituents. They listen to
> whomever is putting the most money in their pockets
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> What's also highly amusing is that according to these statistics over
> 54 million people in the United States are NOT covered by any sort of
> medical system.'
It's more like 30 million without insurance.
We have 10 million people are unemploye
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> It is a bad thing because it removes the ability of large corporations
> to make obscene profits off the suffering and disease of people.
You do realize this bill was put together by big pharma and insurance
co's, not the republicans?
> It also
What's also highly amusing is that according to these statistics over
54 million people in the United States are NOT covered by any sort of
medical system.'
LOL!
Sucks to be those people hahaha!
They should have studied harder eh? :-)
Pfft..and anyway, 54 million out of 302 million people is l
It is a bad thing because it removes the ability of large corporations
to make obscene profits off the suffering and disease of people.
It also affects the entrepreneurial drive of corporate executives to
find new and inventive ways to package insurance policies, and ensure
that the firms do not
pean systems listed is a bad thing.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8:27 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
>
>
> forgo
So what facts are facts. And they are a lot more objective than FAUX news.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "NPR"
>
> National Progressive Radio
>
> J
>
> -
>
> No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
> session. - Mark Twain
>
> The artifici
resembles that of any
of the European systems listed is a bad thing.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
forgot to mention the
"NPR"
National Progressive Radio
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. - Mark Twain
The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and
provisions should be made to prevent its ascendancy. - Thomas Jefferson
~~
forgot to mention the NPR site also has a point by point comparison of
various EU countries, Switzerland, Japan and the US in terms of health
care coverage and costs:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997469
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Do you ha
Do you have any idea what the European nations have for health care?
France's is very different than England's, and both are very different
than Germany's. Before you start ranting about European socialist
medical care, you really ought to know what you're talking about.
Yes Britain's health care
"The representatives never listen to their constituents. They listen to
whomever is putting the most money in their pockets. Still doesn't make
them socialists."
Sometimes they listen. Representatives usually listen for a small time
frame every two years. Senators listen during a small windo
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Whether you agree with the content of the bill or not, and I don't, health
> care legislation was voted on and passed by duly elected representatives of
> the Republic. Nothing socialist about that."
>
> Yes, it was voted on by representati
;t want to vote on
a republican bill solely because the democrats put it forward.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:10 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
"
y did something
instead of just vote for pork barrels projects like the Bridge to Nowhere.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:40 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging
"Wow, you call 9 months of hearings, wrangling, markup, kowtowing to the
Gang of 6 (half Republicans) and tossing aside anything that had any slight
smell of appealing to health care reform advocates (even the watered down
public option) as 'ramming through'?"
Yes. Yes I do.
There are the payof
"Whether you agree with the content of the bill or not, and I don't, health
care legislation was voted on and passed by duly elected representatives of
the Republic. Nothing socialist about that."
Yes, it was voted on by representatives.
Interestingly enough, the representatives were not listeni
to:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:02 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the pundits
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the pundits
> who slid into using the word when they realized they could no longer scare
> the masses by labeling someone a liberal."
>
> Sure.
>
> Just as a small reminder, in c
Whether you agree with the content of the bill or not, and I don't,
health care legislation was voted on and passed by duly elected
representatives of the Republic. Nothing socialist about that.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Just as a small reminder, in case you forgot
"The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the pundits
who slid into using the word when they realized they could no longer scare
the masses by labeling someone a liberal."
Sure.
Just as a small reminder, in case you forgot, the current administration
rammed through health car
You said you got a rainbow farting unicorn with your new job. Maybe
you were drunk when you said that?
Judah
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Yeah. America is about as far from socialism as I am from a rainbow farting
> unicorn.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Maureen w
Yeah. America is about as far from socialism as I am from a rainbow farting
unicorn.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the
> pundits who slid into using the word when they realized they could no
> longer scare the m
The only slide to socialism that is really happening is from the
pundits who slid into using the word when they realized they could no
longer scare the masses by labeling someone a liberal.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> At least Obama's rapid move towards European soc
"I've been griping about those dang Republicrats for years. How they keep
most of the public thinking they're separate parties is beyond me."
There are small differences. That's about it.
People bitch about Obama. McCain would have been just as bad. He would
have continued the slide to Europe
intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
Some people argue that the two parties are just branches of the same
party.
If so, it would be called the corruptacrats.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
"They said government should recognize any marriages and only recognize
civil unions, whether they be between opposite sex or same sex. "
Should have been
They said government should not recognize any marriages and only recognize
civil unions, whether they be between opposite sex or same sex.
"Most citizens don't care, either way."
They care after the fact. Kind of like Arthur Dent. All he had to do was
go to the galactic planning system and lodge a complaint. But did he? No.
He waited for the Vogons to show up before he started bitching.
"Yes. Of course, we probably never woul
carrier.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:49 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: intersting opinion piece on Beck and the teabagging party
"Posting a reward for it is slimy. It's potential existence...yuck."
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote
>
>> "The really scary stuff went down with the last Administration. This one is
>> just not wanting to give the power back."
>
> They started some things that are not good for citizen rights.
Most citizens don't care, either way.
>
>> "This o
Right on! Laughter is good for the heart!
:Den
--
Lend yourself to others, but give yourself to yourself.
Michel de Montaigne
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Hey Den,
>
> I found the racist tea partier
>
> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/08/30/matthews-and-madd
Not sure I agree with you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:16 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
>>
>> NBC is about as far to the left as Fox is to the right. Ditto for most
>> of the other major news corps. None
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> NBC is about as far to the left as Fox is to the right. Ditto for most
> of the other major news corps. None of them approach the center unless
> they've changed since I got fed up with them all several years back.
>
CNN is really not that
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
