e's statistic.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
oddly enough.
he is dead now. he w
am Phillip Churvis
> > President
> > Productivity Enhancement
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:20 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic her
Enhancement
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:20 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
>
> um ya. Dana.
> i have a VERY good friend who was being
> robbed (doesnt matter wha
riginal Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
probably luck and the difference between being in the DC suburbs and on the
eastern shore. IANAL but that's my thought. Also, the
yperson's
> > misinterpretation), but it's good to hear how different states' self
> > defense
> > laws contrast and compare.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Adam Phillip Churvis
> > President
> > Productivity Enhancement
> >
>
ws work (according
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > attorney you retain for guidance -- not through your own naïve
> > layperson's
> > > > misinterpretation), but it's good to hear how different states' self
> > > > defense
&g
gt; laws contrast and compare.
> > >
> > > Respectfully,
> > >
> > > Adam Phillip Churvis
> > > President
> > > Productivity Enhancement
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ttorney you retain for guidance -- not through your own naïve layperson's
> > > misinterpretation), but it's good to hear how different states' self
> > > defense
> > > laws contrast and compare.
> > >
> > > Respectfully,
> > >
> > &g
), but it's good to hear how different states' self
> > defense
> > laws contrast and compare.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Adam Phillip Churvis
> > President
> > Productivity Enhancement
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> Respectfully,
>
> Adam Phillip Churvis
> President
> Productivity Enhancement
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:38 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
>
> u
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:38 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
um, ya. Tony, you might want to be aware that I know someone who got twenty
years, in the state of Maryland, for shooting someone who came into his
house and was beating up his
hurvis
> President
> Productivity Enhancement
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
>
> THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE
&
uesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE
all bets off table for them at that point.
wtf
On 11/27/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read the transcripts when someone posted the link he
exactly -- he used deadly force in a situation which did not require it.
On 11/27/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you really want a 70 year old neighbor with an itchy trigger
> deciding who is and who is not burglarizing your property, and having
> absolutely no jeopardy when h
Do you really want a 70 year old neighbor with an itchy trigger
deciding who is and who is not burglarizing your property, and having
absolutely no jeopardy when he shoots the pool guy or the grocery
delivery guy.
Because remember, it is not that there is actual danger, it is just if
the neighbor
we need to rewrite the law then so that the death penalty is the
appropriate punishment for burglary.
On 11/27/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE
>
> all bets off table for them at that point.
>
> wtf
>
>
> On 11/27/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
THEY WERE BURGLARIZING SOMEONES HOUSE
all bets off table for them at that point.
wtf
On 11/27/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read the transcripts when someone posted the link here. It sounded to me
> like he was just antsy to use his gun. Self-defence is supposed to be when
> you perso
isnt the goal of any laws to stop offenders?
if so, and this is how this guy did it, why should he be prosecuted?
if in fact they were NOT, then get him, but if they are prosecuted, fuck em.
tw
On 11/27/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know about this scenario. It's got
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: we are always SO on topic here
"They came in the front yard with me, man" if he's referring to his
front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property
then I believe he ha
I read the transcripts when someone posted the link here. It sounded to me
like he was just antsy to use his gun. Self-defence is supposed to be when
you personally are in danger, not when your neighbor had a burglar. If we
were talkng about some tiny toon where the nearest law was an hour away eve
I am torn by this. I agree we should have a society where all laws should
be obeyed by everyone, but dammit, this stuff pisses me off. Seems like the
criminals have more rights than the citizens. What else was he supposed to
do? Watch? You know the police weren't ever going to arrive in time t
> And the thieves should still be prosecuted for the break in.
umm... they got the death penalty.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Get the answe
I don't know about this scenario. It's got a vigilante justice feel
to it. If I were investigating, I'd be making sure that he didn't
shoot first and then drag them over to his property.
Caller: "Boom. You're dead." (Sounds of gunshots) "Get the law over
here quick. I've managed to get one of t
On Nov 27, 2007 11:42 AM, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "They came in the front yard with me, man" if he's referring to his
> front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property
> then I believe he has the right. If they were not on his property,
> then I can't see the
You've obviously never been burgled.
On Nov 27, 2007 11:42 AM, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "They came in the front yard with me, man" if he's referring to his
> front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property
> then I believe he has the right. If they were not o
I don't think he should get off totally without penalty. It was his
neighbors property, and the police told him to let it go.
He should at least have to take a gun-owners rights course, or pay an
"unlawful discharge of a firearm". And maybe an assault charge.
I don't think I want my neighbors to
"They came in the front yard with me, man" if he's referring to his
front yard, then yeah I have to agree.. If they were on his property
then I believe he has the right. If they were not on his property,
then I can't see the self-defense there. I don't think burglary should
be punishable by death.
Funny were talking about this the other day. Anyone read this? Honestly, I
think this guy should get off scot-free. But he'll probably get fucked in
the end, and while he's in jail, some shit-dick will break into his house
and steal all his shit.
Protecting Neighbor's Home Self-Defense?Testing
28 matches
Mail list logo
