On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Robert Harrison
wrote:
> Because the best links I got out of my previous email were at best bleak.
> The best link prompted an on-list response that we have 4 years to learn a
> new language.
Bear in mind that Microsoft introduced ASP at the end of 1996 and
esse
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
>> Well, there ya go, we got another 4 years to learn new languages... Adobe,
>> way to set a bleak future for your own product!
> Adobe didn't write that, Gartner did. And overall, it's a pretty
> positive whitepaper.
Particularly since Gartne
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
> That is not checked by default, and hasn't been enabled by default since CF
> 6.x.
Hmm, I'm sure I've seen it checked since then but I'll take your word
for it that I'm hallucinating :)
Glad Glyn solved the caching issue even if my suggestio
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> One co-worker wants to create a branch of every release (we have about a
> 3-month release cycle) and develop changes for the next release in that
> branch while day-to-day hot fixes get committed directly to the trunk
> for immediate deployment.
>
> I w
I responded on the ColdBox list and suggested looking at Server
Settings > Caching > Cache web server paths to make sure it's
unchecked (I believe it's checked by default?).
Sean
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Glyn Jackson
wrote:
>
> Having a strange issue since we upgraded our server from C
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Glenn Hartong wrote:
> Has anyone successfully used fckeditor and FW/1? Specifically the image
> uploader.
>
> I have a working version on my server in a Non-FW/1 site and it works great.
> I've copied over to my FW/1 sites and I'm getting the following error:
>
Why not use per-application mappings?
In Application.cfc, you can set this.mappings[ '/mysite' ] to either
the production or dev CFC root as needed...
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
>
>
> I've started using two different folders on my servers for each site.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Raymond Camden wrote:
> Railo doesn't implement any RDS apis? RDS is just a HTTP hit. You
> could always just look at the network communication and mimic it. ;)
> (Ok, I know, non-trivial.) The RDS stuff in Dreamweaver for example
> uses JavaScript.
Sounds like a
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Hey Sean, how do you feel about using CFBuilder with Railo?
It works pretty well for me, to be honest.
Sure, it doesn't know how to stop / start Tomcat (my preferred
container for Railo) but it really doesn't get in the way either.
I actua
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM, denstar wrote:
> I've had the same instance running for like a month, so I plumb forgot! ;)p
Yeah, on my 3 yr old MBP it takes about 28 seconds to start (I just
timed it) but since it stays open for weeks at a time that's just not
an issue. On my new desktop it o
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Brad Wood wrote:
> One of the most common scenarios for me is when I've downloaded some bit of
> code or UDF off the Internet. Since it's not part of any actual site yet and
> probably laying on my desktop in a zip file, I'll just want to quickly open
> it up
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
> When you go to a new OS,
> it is always best to do a clean install rather than an upgrade.
On Windows, probably. On a Mac, upgrades are pretty much always very
straightforward and quick (and Mac OS upgrades are normally pretty
cheap by compar
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
> I'm starting to dig into HTML 5, and so far, apart from some of the
> CSS3 attributes, I don't see anything that jumps out and says "ready
> for prime time". The browser support is spotty at best, let's be real
> does it really matter if Ope
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Les Mizzell wrote:
> The graphic designers I work with need to get out of their "print mode"
> when doing layouts!!! ... and they get the darned designs approved by
> the client *before* sending to me and going "see any issues here".
I sympathize. Over the years,
If you know how many characters will fit in the box (which may be font
dependent?), then start there and work back to the next space and
truncate there. That way you'll always have complete words and the
number of words will vary depending on the total number of characters.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 a
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
> "locks aren't necessary for simple reads" to prevent memory
> corruption. They ARE necessary if you have a potential race
> condition.
It's also worth noting that whether you need to lock or not depends on
the type of data being shared
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:41 PM, andy matthews wrote:
> Are you and Barney speaking English?
Nanu nanu :)
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Pete Ruckelshaus
wrote:
> However, beg to differ on the CFBuilder example. If you're not working in a
> project, go file > new > coldfusion page. If you're not in a project, you
> can't do a thing. Useless. I realize that this is an Eclipse behavior, but
> it'
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
> This purity of environment only works completely in academia, but a
> very close approximation can be created that is useful for real-world
> problems. Clojure (a JVM-based Lisp dialect) is an example of this,
> leveraging Actors to deal
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Pete Ruckelshaus
wrote:
> Dreamweaver's code completion is broken. And by broken, I mean it isn't
> there. I want to type and have it automatically create as
> soon as I type the last caret in the opening tag. It doesn't do that.
Sure it does. Go to Prefere
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Phillip Perry wrote:
> Thank you. I that helps alot. Totally missed the selected=selected
> error ><. Can I use the same code for the radio options?
checked="checked" (same for checkbox and radio button)
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, I
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:37 PM, DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT)
wrote:
>
> checked="checked" />
>
>
> Personal
How do people feel about this:
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:55 AM, C S wrote:
> That's great. This is the best news for me. Even if it doesn't mean it will
> be deleted from other copies, your effort means a world to me. Tomorrow is
> just fine. I really really appreciate your effort and can't thank you enough.
Just so you're
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Brad Haas wrote:
> The fields on my form are the same as in my database so I was wanting to loop
> over the form fields and populate the setters in a bean. So basically the
> methods are dynamic. Here's what I've been trying but it doesn't work but it
> does
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Matt Quackenbush wrote:
>
>
>
>
Won't work. Once you pull a method out of an object, you lose the
context (THIS / VARIABLES scopes).
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
An Architect's View -- http://co
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Brad Haas wrote:
> But isn't it a problem to use CFINVOKE with getters and setters? Wouldn't
> the object be reinstantiated for every single method call? Am I wrong in
> assuming this?
When component= specifies an existing object, there is no instantiation.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Martin, Dustin W
wrote:
> Has anyone ever upgraded from the 32bit to 64bit version of CF8? Does that
> require us pay for an upgrade is that free to do?
Someone pointed me at this (old) blog post today and I wondered if
folks here had any more up to date experie
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Wil Genovese wrote:
> Version 2 of CFBuilder is in the planning stages. I think they are calling
> it Storm? Or was that the code name for the next version of ColdFusion server?
Storm is ColdFusion Builder 2. ColdFusion "10" is Link.
--
Sean A Corfield -- (90
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Terry Troxel wrote:
> My question is how much of a learning curve should I expect and are there
> tags out there for the Linux version as well as the windows?
CFML itself will be the same on all platforms (modulo some stuff
around the 'obviously' Windows-specific
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Aaron Neff wrote:
>
> www.hosting.com
Formerly HostMySite. See my other post in this thread about a decline
in support (and stability too). I could not recommend them - and I'd
been with them for years, initially on shared hosting, then on a VPS
(after they kille
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jason Fisher wrote:
> Wow, CrystalTech has been nothing but great for me. Solid beta of CF9 before
> they released it commercially, too, so they are definitely on the ColdFusion
> train. Not sure why you got a bad tech there, but that has certainly never
> be
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William Seiter wrote:
> I bought mine through amazon a couple weeks ago. Can you let us know what
> was wrong with the original so that we can verify we didn't receive a
> corrupted copy?
Chapter 7 is missing (and the 'Part 2' intro page appears between
chapte
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Joe None wrote:
> I've noticed Adobe's recent patch indicates instructions for versions 8, 8.01
> and 9, but I did not see any mention of 7.02 or earlier. Is this because
> Adobe no longer supports earlier versions?
Core support for CFMX 7 ended earlier this ye
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Coldspring is very important, though I haven't run into a situation
> (personally) using Coldbox where I've needed anything other than Luis'
> built in DI framework (which just got the name WireBox). I'm sure they
> exist and then Coldspring
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
> One of the best things is to spruce up your linkedin profile. My dad does
> tech recruiting (and has done so for many years) was telling me that
> Monster, Careerbuilder, etc...are becoming nominally useful and that most
> jobs(both perm an
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:34 AM, John M Bliss wrote:
> So I thought I'd revisit this three months later (SEE OP for context):
>
> Integers are number of explicit "hits" on indeed.com:
I think it just proves how unscientific any use of indeed.com can be :)
> - Framework - 11/16 hits - 2/21 hits
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brian McCairn
wrote:
> replace commas with another arbitrary separator?
Doesn't solve the problem.
>
>
> #listLen(replacenocase(lsttext,',','||'), '||')#
That just replaces the first , - in the "string" with || and so you
get a listLen() of 2:
"this is one||
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Matt Quackenbush wrote:
> The official mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/coldbox.
>
> (Is there even an HoF ColdBox list?)
Yes, Michael tends to create a HoF list for everything under the sun
although the vast majority get near-zero traffic:
http://ww
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Williams
wrote:
> Right... I'm thinking back to the release of 8 (or 8.01) with an early
> version of JVM 6. This JVM had known issues with classes and such with
> CFC and memory scope intensive apps.
Functionally, the supported JVM worked just fine and
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, bill turner
wrote:
> we are migrating to both cf9 and coldbox. we have not used any framework
> previously. when i look at the coldbox site, it appears that version 3 is the
> one to go with. however, since this is not yet an official release, i have
> concerns
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Andrew Scott wrote:
> I take that back then, I was wondering why SmartGit didn't support it. And
> made the assumption based from them that it didn't exist.
A bunch of the GUI tools for git don't support all operations.
If you only view git thru the GUI tools, yo
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Carey Duryea wrote:
> and i was referring to that. i am down to contribute my time and my limited
> abilities for the sheer learning experience it would be for me. and i think
> it would be very rewarding. and i'm just saying i would have no problem
> helping
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Carey Duryea wrote:
> i dont' know what we are talking about funding
No one is talking about financial contributions. We're talking about
contributing time and effort to open source projects.
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http
Good to see a voice of reason in this debate. Thanx Judah!
Macromedia was talking about the mobile market for years, Adobe has
talked about the mobile market for a few years too. We might finally
be seeing a deliverable with Flash Player 10.1 (and that's great). The
reality is that a lot of the m
Yup, I'll second that. If you contribute to an open source project,
you have a traceable footprint on the 'net and your capabilities can
be examined. When I'm an employer interviewing people, I Google them
to see what they've done publicly...
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Carey Duryea wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Justin Scott
wrote:
> "I checked out some books at the library" isn't nearly as attractive as
> "Earned Web Programming Certificate from The University of Illinois" on your
> resume. Hitting the library may show some initiative, but employers need to
> know you ca
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
> What's the relevance of that to the original poster's problem, though?
It was a dig at Brad's attempt to derail the discussion into the tired
old Adobe vs Apple debate that everyone seems to enjoy having at the
moment. In other words, it was in
Hmm, I guess you missed the whole ECMAScript 3 / ECMAScript 4 debacle
around ActionScript then?
Here's a joke: What's the difference between an ActionScript
programmer and an Objective-C programmer? The Objective-C programmer
doesn't care that you program in ActionScript!
(The original joke is "
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:29 PM, David McGuigan wrote:
> I was really disappointed to see that the two frameworks with the most
> momentum ( impression ) and that I'm most excited to learn about aren't
> covered in the book ( ColdBox and CFWheels ), while a few less relevant
> topics are ( Reac
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Matthew Lowrey wrote:
> Sean - Not to get off this subject, but I noticed your signature and realized
> my boss and myself were on your site (getrailo.com) reviewing it because we
> have been looking into trying to get some kind of internal wiki for mainly
> hav
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> You can nest ternary operators, I believe, but it is going to start
> getting pretty unreadable quickly. If you have more logic to run, I'd
> suggest pulling it up out of the sql statement, figuring out the final
> result, then using that re
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Alan Rother wrote:
> That looks like a great ColdFusion book. Nice work guys!
As one of the technical reviewers (and contributing authors), I can
definitely say that it was a lot of work! I'm very glad to see it out
in the wild now!
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 3
Since you're on CF9:
The (new in CF9) ?: operator only evaluates the true-expr if the
condition is true.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Matthew Lowrey wrote:
> This is getting to be quite an interesting challenge. All the examples I've
> seen logically make sense but none of them have work
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Mike Kear wrote:
> In every previous version, when there was a syntax or other error in
> my code in a CFC, I'd get an error message that would point me to the
> line containing the problem. Now, with CF9 Enterprise, I get a
> result from my CFCs or I get nothi
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, David Mineer Jr wrote:
> this is an already existing workspace, so I guess that wouldn't apply as I
> switch between the two and I did try it but it did not work.
So it was a workspace created by something other than ColdFusion
Builder? That's probably why it doe
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Andrew Scott wrote:
> Ok so there is one package you can buy in Flash Builder were you don't, I
> don't think it is a bad thing that this is what they have done. But what I
> do disagree with is that I am forced to pay $299.00 or $50.00 extra for an
> upgrade to F
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Rick Faircloth
wrote:
> I agree that it would be a good price for those who want to do Flash work.
Flash Builder is about Flex, not Flash - in terms of "fancy graphics".
Andrew said:
> In other words, right now they are banking on everyone upgrading to Flash
> B
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ben Alembick wrote:
> The more i think about this the more i don't understand how its is all meant
> to work. I have EGIT installed and have kinda gotten the hang of committing,
> adding to version control & resource history on a local project stored on my
> ma
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Emmit Larson wrote:
> ... Said the person who sold $65,000 of his stuff to cover his bills.
>
> I feel for ya man. I really do.
>
> I lost my house.
That really does suck. The economy has been brutal for most of us this
last year and some have fared much worse th
software to improve my
productivity, that's a reasonable business expense.
With our personal loses in 2009, at least a tax refund is in our future! :)
Sean
On Wednesday, March 24, 2010, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Apparently not all of us make as much as you do Sean ;-)
>
> Eric
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Kris Sisk wrote:
> $300 cheap for any software? What kind of Kool Aid have you been drinking?
Since folks have repeatedly referred to Dreamweaver as $300 let me
correct them and point out DW is $399. Let me also remind folks that
people seemed perfectly happy to
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Adrocknaphobia
wrote:
> This is my personal opinion, so please take it with a grain of salt, but I
> don't believe the shared hosting model will be around much longer.
I agree with Adam. I don't speak to anywhere near as many hosting
companies as he does but pret
I'm just curious: don't you need to separate the statements with
semicolons? I've never seen multiple SQL statements without semicolons
before.
As others have noted tho', this behavior is driver-specific anyway...
Sean
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Dominic Watson
wrote:
>
> I recently switch
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Well, yes and no. Adobe did have a decent user group system but then
> they consolidated them and it all changed. We had a Portland CF
> Usergroup but then it got changed by Adobe to a PDX RIA group and most
> all of the content and discuss
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Eric Nicholas Sweeney
wrote:
> So if you think Marketing by "Acme Inc." has nothing to do with it - that's
> crazy talk. (I know you were just generalizing) But since we're really
> talking about Adobe - that's super crazy talk. It's not like they released
> CF9 a
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Scott wrote:
> We don't have the luxury of the conferences like you guys over their,
> although one individual has taken it upon himself to try to change this.
webDU?
Web on the Piste?
cf.Objective(ANZ)?
MXDU/webDU is pretty much a fixture on the calend
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Eric Nicholas Sweeney
wrote:
> Maybe it's my marketing background, but that story just doesn't hold up. The
> success rate of anything based on that sort of fairytale/whimsical/lucky
> business plan is extremely low. I am sure you can all point to one or two
> tha
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Mike Kear wrote:
> And dont start talking about bloody LiveCycle. It was the Adobe
> LiveCycle guy at WebDU who told me that he would never allow my
> company to have anything to do with selling LiveCycle.
Perhaps it was your attitude? :)
(sorry, Mike, I could
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
> You know who's in a position to DO SOMETHING? It's you, not Adobe.
> You're not satisfied with how Adobe markets their product? Market your
> services with that product! You're not satisfied with their presence
> in user groups and conferences?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Justin Scott
wrote:
> When it comes to usergroups and conferences, and even the kinds of companies
> that use ColdFusion, it has a lot to do with the culture around it. PHP,
> Perl, Python, Lisp, C, Ruby, ASP.Net, Groovy, and most other languages are
> free to us
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Mike Kear wrote:
> I had an Adobe guy tell me a while back "we're in the
> IDE and Development Tool business not the server business. I dont
> know why we have ColdFusion at all." That was a bit disquieting at
> the time, and I wonder . what if that feeling
Well then maybe the Australian market in completely unique in the
entire world and has different problems that the rest of the world
does not?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Andrew Scott wrote:
> If anyone wishes to reflect that we are in a recession then please Explain
> how the jobs for Cold
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Bryn Parrott
wrote:
> I've observed the same thing over a period of 10 years or so. The Cold
> Fusion market is mature, there are fewer newbies out there asking dumb
> questions.
That would seem to mesh with the results for CFUnited "State of the CF
Union" su
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Ben Shelden wrote:
> I was speaking with a recruiter and she was telling me that she found it
> interesting how the job opportunities for different languages seemed to
> center around different geographical locations. She told me there were a lot
> of Java jobs
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Mike Kear wrote:
> I know that's a 'Chicken Little" kind of subject line. I hope my
> impressions are wrong. Might be - i have been wrong before. I
> remember i was wrong once when i thought i was incorrect, but i wasnt.
Ah, Mike, how long's it been since you
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
> Three tier architecture is about physically separating your
> presentation code (typically an MVC application) from your business
> logic (typically a set of business objects) and your persistence layer
> (a database) onto different hardw
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Eric Nicholas Sweeney
wrote:
> I would also add - that this probably doesn't exactly fall into the
> "Premature" category. The code is completed and it works. Now am I
> wondering the different ways it could or should be improved upon...
"improved upon" is pret
You have not var'd q_programs - use local.q_programs otherwise every
concurrent request will be overwriting the same variable and you'll
get unpredictable results.
Sean
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Jonathan Price
wrote:
>
> Yeah, we're on CF8 for better or worse. So I redid the previous f
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
> I'm using GoDaddy for hosting (cause it's cheap)
>
It's also terrible. You'll spend so much more of your time on it than you'll
save by paying less each month!
Consider Alurium and their $7/month hosting package (yes, it uses Railo,
which
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Samson Shewandagne wrote:
> Does coldfusion 9 support tomcat? I can't install IIS in my pc and I want
> to go for tomcat for my web application server. I read some documentation
> and I am wondering coldfusion 9 support tomcat.
>
The ORM embedded in CF9 requires
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Jon Sala wrote:
> I've got an XMPP gateway instance set up and working nicely (I use it as a
> debugging tool to send my IM client variable values, etc.).
>
> I'd like to call this same CFC as a web service, from a different machine -
> is this possible?
>
Sinc
Mach-II calls them listeners - and uses a XML tag to call methods
on them.
As of release 1.6, Mach-II also supports the publish/subscribe model that
Model-Glue uses.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Chad Gray wrote:
>
> I am studying Model-Glue and MachII by reading the docs and presentations
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Judith Dinowitz
wrote:
> From what I can see, the last thing posted on the CFCUnit website is dated
> 2006. Is CFCUnit still a going concern? What Unit-Testing Frameworks are
> people using in the CF community?
As others have said, MXUnit now rules the roost. I
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Gerald Guido wrote:
> While I put a high premium on autodidacticism, there is some thing to be
> said having a college degree. Namely, that during the period of life when
> one is most prone to screwing up, they managed to commit to some thing and
> follow through
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Rob Barthle wrote:
> I need to install CFMX7 on OS X. We still use this at work, soon to upgrade
> to either CF8 or CF9. I read that with 7.01 there is a Mac OS X full
> installer, but Adobe points to the trial page which now is all CF9.
>
> Does anyone know whe
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Dave Hatz wrote:
> I am looking for a good site on how to Configure/Tune Coldfusion 7/8 running
> on JRun. I have found a couple good sites, but wanted to see if I might be
> missing any?
Blogs by Steven Erat and Brandon Purcell are good places to start.
Mik
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Azadi Saryev wrote:
> if you are on CF8, use RESULT attribute of tag and then get
> GENERATED_KEY from that result:
>
> INSERT ...
>
>
As an aside, the generated key is placed into a different element of
the result struct for each different database in CF8 (
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Rob Barthle wrote:
> I have a simple view that I created using Navicat and saved. When I try to
> call the view with CFQUERY though, I get the following error:
>
> "Table 'bettybarthle_com.vListingsSale' doesn't exist"
Is MySQL on Windows or Linux?
On Linux MyS
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Kevin Pepperman wrote:
> Using an init() method, although not required, is considered best practice
> in the CF world for initializing components because cfc's don't have true
> constructors like JAVA (yet).
Just a couple of points to elaborate on this...
We use
It happened to a Linux site that I maintain that runs Apache... Here's
how it happened:
Another user had the FTP credentials in Front Page (but I suspect it
could have been any "standard" Windows FTP program) and they visited a
malware site, got a virus on their machine and it found the ability
F
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Peter Boughton wrote:
> Though this one is not just the CF community - plenty of people all round
> don't really know what Singletons (and even design patterns in general)
> actually are.
Remember that Singleton is a DESIGN pattern. The complexities we see
in muc
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Mike Kear wrote:
> I tried putting the CFCs into the XML file in alphabetical order, and
> that didn't really work. It improved things a bit, but what worked
> most was to put CFCs related to different parts of the application
> together - all the USER cfcs tog
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Glyn Jackson wrote:
> what are the benefits of working this way, am just ignorant having never used
> it or AOP before in CF. Any docs online you can point me to (I dont know what
> I would be looking for)
As the number of CFCs being created / initialized increa
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Phillip B wrote:
> So I guess I spent all this time trying to get something to work that isn't
> meant to be used in production or anywhere else for that matter. Well that is
> just great. I'm trying to make ColdFusion important to the company so they
> don't s
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Glyn Jackson wrote:
> I think I have it now in my handler...
>
> variables.oUserService =
> getPlugin("ioc").getBean("UserService").getUserGateway();
>
> and i now see all common.cfc methods is this right?
If it has autowire by name enabled. Otherwise you need a
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Glyn Jackson wrote:
> PS would i also not have to change my User Service as all i want to do is
> call my User Service and have common available otherwise I dont see the point
> i can set this in init method. i.e would it be something like so only the
> user ser
Common.cfc has to be managed by ColdSpring for the dependency
injection to take place. I.e., you need:
... etc ...
And you need to get the "common" bean from ColdSpring wherever you use it.
Your XML has the bean named userGateway which doesn't seem right
(since you have a property injector me
> not suggesting not to make the switch but think twice or better talk
> to the key person of the product you intend to switch to and possibly
> strike a deal or at least obtain his/her support first otherwise your
> conversion/switch would be at the mercy of others.
Anyone switching vendors
I saw several people jump on the "free" part without actually answering Pete's
original questions:
>desktops. Does anyone know what the policy will be for the "free for
>academic" licensing for CF9? Is it limited to colleges and universities, or
>can primary and secondary schools use that licen
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with CF8 & ActiveMQ integration?
Yes (I wrote the event gateway).
> I was attempting to set up activeMQ 5.1 and leverage the ActiveMQ event
AMQ5.1 won't work. AMQ4.1 will. Not sure what they fubar'
201 - 300 of 1362 matches
Mail list logo
