Re: issue with PIX and dhcp ? [7:39269]

2002-03-23 Thread Gaz
Is this down to the fact that a Pix doesn't do a gratuitous ARP on boot up? (Or does it) I know that if you replace a router with a pix of the same IP address, that this causes problems, which can normally be rectified by rebooting the other end device. Of course you've not always got that luxury,

Re: Catalyst 6509 [7:39192]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Larry, According to Ken Kaminski at Lexington office, you are vulnerable to Vlan hopping. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > we have been pruning or clearing Vlan 1 from our data vlans

Re: ICS7750 experience... [7:39281]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I've had experience with it. The new one released in Dec. is fine now. It's also running the same rev. Call Manager as the regualer 7800 series servers and it's a great price. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Paul Forbes"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:

Ipexpert's Lab 7 questions. [7:39292]

2002-03-23 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi all, I am running into some issues in the Lab 7 ( Redistribution ) of Ipexpert's lab notes : Can somebody help me with the following items? 1. Item 2 : I couldn't get the following things properly : R2 should have the summarized entry in its routing table if either R5 or R6 fails. 2. I

Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]

2002-03-23 Thread Lomker Michael
> described. The information you received from Cisco pertains to ISL > trunks, > which require a 100mb interface. This was a good discussion. When I took my switching course, three years ago, they were quite adamant that trunking could not be done on a 10 mb interface. Of course, that was be

RE: Free PIX command trainer [7:39226]

2002-03-23 Thread Mike Sweeney
Ole- Thanks for the useful programs :) MikeS www.packetattack.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39294&t=39226 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misco

RE: CCNP exams [7:39172]

2002-03-23 Thread Mike Sweeney
> Real life is: > > > > You need over 5 years experience, Certifications and a 4 year > B.S. > degree computer related. > > No- this is not accurate. I do pretty well without the 4 year degree in Computer Science or EE(original path) There are *some* companies that use the 4 year as a fil

Re: issue with PIX and dhcp ? [7:39269]

2002-03-23 Thread bergenpeak
Hi John, Cable companies often configure their provisioning (DHCP) severs to verify that the incoming DHCP request is from a MAC which is known. Couple of things to try. * Power cycle the CM and then have the PIX attempt to do DHCP. Do you get a DHCP OFFER? * After you power cycle the modem,

TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have read the white paper on this. Does anyone know of a good study source on this topic other than the white paper itself? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39297&t=39297 -- FAQ, list archives, and subsc

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
cs_plus -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have read the white paper on this. Does anyone know of a good study > source on this topic other than the white paper itself? > > Thanks Message Posted at:

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Random characters to block url filter:apfho hfopiqwhj987489-123749 hd7634y 9y98yu*&^&^%*(%^*&^*(& 89yx9823749-8127c4 8977899^*%&^T&*(^&^%&^%*(&^*&(^*(&%^&^$C %^TYBVR%%R http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:Taca cs_plus -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: ht

MTU figures ? [7:39301]

2002-03-23 Thread John Green
MTU for Ethernet is 1500 bytes SLIP is 576 bytes Frame Relay ??? Token Ring ??? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards. http://movies.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Kent Hundley
IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server from Cisco, install it on Linux and play around with it. You'll learn much more about how TACACS+ works by implementing it and trying different things than any WP (it helps a lot if you have a router to work with as well).

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I think cisco stopped the DL of the free tacacs server a while ago. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Kent Hundley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server > from Cisc

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Patrick Ramsey
Then take that same server and turn it into your dhcp/dns server and start the creep into the enterprise :) >>> "Kent Hundley" 03/23/02 12:53PM >>> IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server from Cisco, install it on Linux and play around with it. You'll lear

Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]

2002-03-23 Thread Patrick Ramsey
dude...what elce can I guy do to show you that it works heh... That's ios right there in his example... I would hate to think he typed it in notepad and cut and pasted...C'mon >>> "Danny Andaluz, CCNP" 03/22/02 10:24PM >>> no you can't. I got straight from cisco that they have to be 100

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Mike Sweeney
Come by my site.. I have a few different flavors of TACACS+ for downloading along with docs and white papers. I have a link to the TACACS stuff in the news columm. MikeS www.packetattack.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39305&t=39297

RE: IS-IS [7:39283]

2002-03-23 Thread s vermill
Danny, I tried to learn the basics of IS-IS last year through reading RFCs. I've never slept so good in my life. I understand that Cisco Press has a new book out on the subject but I haven't heard from anyone who has finished it. There is a pretty good chapter on IS-IS in Routing TCP/IP, Vol 1

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Kent Hundley
The download still works fine for me from ftp-eng.cisco.com/pub/tacacs. (anonymous login) ftp> get tac_plus.F4.0.4.alpha.tar.Z local: tac_plus.F4.0.4.alpha.tar.Z remote: tac_plus.F4.0.4.alpha.tar.Z 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for tac_plus.F4.0.4.alpha.tar.

Re: IS-IS [7:39283]

2002-03-23 Thread Danny Andaluz
Thanks, Scott. Ciscopress books are the most boring books there are, but I'll try it. Danny ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Danny, > > I tried to learn the basics of IS-IS last year through reading RFCs. I've > never slept so good in my life. I un

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Cool. thanks! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Kent Hundley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The download still works fine for me from ftp-eng.cisco.com/pub/tacacs. > (anonymous login) > > ftp> get tac_plus.F4.0.4.alpha.tar.Z > loc

ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Andaluz Danny
Mangement just approved us getting ACS for Windows. Anyone have any tips or tricks they might want to share. We have over 100 routers in our network, so it's going to be one hell of a project. TIA Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39310&t=39310 -

RE: Catalyst 6509 [7:39192]

2002-03-23 Thread Ali, Abbas
Hello Maverick, You mentioned that isolating managment vlan from traffic vlans helps when there is a broadcast storm which will allow you to connect to your managment port since the management port is in a different vlan. I thought about this last night and need some clarification if my logic is

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Patrick Ramsey
You mean take a long time? One script could have all 100 routers done in minutes... if you have ciscoworks, use that. -Patrick >>> "Andaluz Danny" 03/23/02 02:43PM >>> Mangement just approved us getting ACS for Windows. Anyone have any tips or tricks they might want to share. We have over 10

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Danny Andaluz
We don't have Cisco Works. I know what you mean. The actual configuration is pretty simple. It's just the number of routers. Oh well, copy paste. ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You mean take a long time? One script could have all 100 router

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Audy Bautista
I setup, configured, and rolled out Secure ACS for over 80 routers and switches in our network. The hardest part was the router and switch AAA commands associated with Tacacs authentication. After I tweeked and tested the AAA configs on the routers and switches in my test network, I put the conf

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Danny Andaluz
I already have a template as I have tested this is a lab. I should be OK. I did make one stupid mistake though. In the GUI, I managed to lock myself out of administrative privileges. I called Cisco and they told me I had to reinstall. Pretty funny, huh? Thanks, Danny ""Audy Bautista"" wrote

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Patrick Ramsey
download kiwi cattools This software will alllow you to enter whatever commands you wish in it will maintain a listing of all devices on yoru network...then all you have to do is select the device you wish to configure and BAM all done http://www.kiwisyslog.com -Patrick >>> "Danny

RE: VPN Setup - Pix 515 and Pix 501 - The Same? [7:39230]

2002-03-23 Thread Bautista, Audy
I just did the same thing and it worked perfect. I took the configs of a 515 I configured some months back, and I cut and paste. No problems at all. Thanks. Audy -Original Message- From: Don Claybrook To: Audy Bautista Sent: 3/22/02 6:04 PM Subject: Re: VPN Setup - Pix 515 and Pix 50

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Danny Andaluz
I actually have Cattools already. We use it to back up configs daily. I don't trust it though. It has shown to be very buggy. I wouldn't want to screw around with AAA commands. Manual is safer. Thanks, Danny ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >

Re: IS-IS [7:39283]

2002-03-23 Thread nrf
I read the Ciscopress book. It's all-right, it's not great. And once again, it's a great cure for insomnia. ""Danny Andaluz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks, Scott. Ciscopress books are the most boring books there are, but > I'll try it. > > Danny > "

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Greg Jones
Danny, Depending on the criticality of having ACS operational (i.e. mission critical routers, etc), make sure you have a secondary ACS server in a seperate location. ACS does a very good job of replicating to a secondary server, and have a good system backup process in place. Also make sure your a

Re: Catalyst 6509 [7:39192]

2002-03-23 Thread Lomker Michael
> VLAN 1 first to reach to VLAN 10 where I have my management port. > Question > is if VLAN 1 is already attacked with Broadcast storm then how I will > reach > to the managment VLAN. Use a console cable on the nearest switch and telnet to the others. The point is to avoid having to walk to

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread Lomker Michael
> I actually have Cattools already. We use it to back up configs > daily. I > don't trust it though. It has shown to be very buggy. Really? I've never had a problem with it on anything important. I've also worked with the author on a couple minor additions and he seems like a great guy.

RE: MGX 8250 [7:39022]

2002-03-23 Thread Angel Leiva
Komy, The SRM card is primarily used when N:1 redundancy is required. In cases of 1:1 redundancy (using two similar cards) the SRM is not needed. Keep in mind also that the SRM cards provide N:1 redundancy support only to the modules connected in the same shelf (top or bottom) as the SRM is inst

Sup III Problems ??? [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Phil Lorenz
After catching heck with version 6.3 boot variable and a few other newer commands with the 6509s @ work, I decided to upgrade my home lab from a Sup I Cat5k with a Sup III tote'n Cat55k. Problem: I fired up the switch and it goes through the POST perfectly, but there is no output on the Hyper

Re: Sup III Problems ??? [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Wow
one of my favorite cisco gotcha's--the cable that you use to connect to the console port on a 55XX is different from the regular rollover cable on every other cat sup engine. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/9.html#Cat5000III Dennis ""Phil Lorenz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:

Re: Sup III Problems ??? [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Wow
console port on a 55XX supIII engine is what i meant to say. ""Wow"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > one of my favorite cisco gotcha's--the cable that you use to connect to the > console port on a 55XX is different from the regular rollover cable on every > other

RE: Sup III Problems ??? [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Larry Letterman
The Cat 5000 supervisor needs a regular patch cable for the console connection, not the flat satin cable or the rolled type. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil Lorenz Sent: Saturday, M

RE: Catalyst 6509 [7:39192]

2002-03-23 Thread Larry Letterman
A console server network works well for this issue if you have a large network. we use console servers extensively at cisco for this exact issue. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lomker Mi

RE: Sup III Problems ??? Epilogue [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Phil Lorenz
Well isn't that a fine "how-do-ya-do ???" Console> Show Version WS-C5505 Software, Version McpSW: 4.5(12) NmpSW: 4.5(12) Copyright (c) 1995-2001 by Cisco Systems NMP S/W compiled on Apr 19 2001, 17:56:40 MCP S/W compiled on Apr 19 2001, 17:54:16 System Bootstrap Version: 3.1.2 Hardware Version:

RE: Sup III Problems ??? Epilogue [7:39324]

2002-03-23 Thread Circusnuts_1999
Well isn't that a fine "how-do-ya-do ???" Console> Show Version WS-C5505 Software, Version McpSW: 4.5(12) NmpSW: 4.5(12) Copyright (c) 1995-2001 by Cisco Systems NMP S/W compiled on Apr 19 2001, 17:56:40 MCP S/W compiled on Apr 19 2001, 17:54:16 System Bootstrap Version: 3.1.2 Hardware Version:

Re: issue with PIX and dhcp ? [7:39269]

2002-03-23 Thread Audy Bautista
I'm having the same problem with a PIX 501 and cable modem. I'm probably just going to take the IP received from the PC by the ISP and just put it statically on the outside interface on the PIX. Does anyone foresee any issues with this setup? ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Ipexpert's Lab 7 questions. [7:39292]

2002-03-23 Thread Engelhard M. Labiro
Rajesh > 1. Item 2 : I couldn't get the following things properly : R2 should > have the summarized entry in its routing table if either R5 or R6 > fails. R5 and R6 are ABR for area 1, and requirements is network on area 1 should be summarized before its enter the area 0. Think of the comman

Basic ACL Q [7:39334]

2002-03-23 Thread IT Guy
Hi everyone, Just wondering how I can block whole range from 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 using one ACL?? My guess is it shoud be , access-list 90 permit 172.16.0.0 0.240.255.255 ?? Please comment?? Thkx Tom _ Get your FREE

Re: ciscoSecure ACS 3.0 [7:39310]

2002-03-23 Thread dildog
You can set a single key in the ACS server, then have all devices configured with a single key... this will keep you from having to enter every single device in to the ACS settings. Most people use the same key on all devices so it is not that much of an issue. I entered all my devices so I know

test [7:39336]

2002-03-23 Thread cage
test Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39336&t=39336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Basic ACL Q [7:39334]

2002-03-23 Thread Ouellette, Tim
Think you want something like this access-list deny 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 That'll deny everything from 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 -Original Message- From: IT Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Basic ACL Q [7:39334] Hi

1760s [7:39338]

2002-03-23 Thread William Pearch
Has anyone used the 1760 routers? Thoughts, comments, suggestions? TTFN, Bill in Anchorage [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39338&t=39338 --

RE: Basic ACL Q [7:39334]

2002-03-23 Thread IT Guy
Thanks for the help, it worked >From: "Ouellette, Tim" >Reply-To: "Ouellette, Tim" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Basic ACL Q [7:39334] >Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 01:11:38 -0500 > >Think you want something like this > >access-list deny 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 > >That'll deny everything from

Challenge Question from Karl solia Practical studies [7:39339]

2002-03-23 Thread IT Guy
Hi guys, I did a search on Karl solie End book Labs and here is the tough extract for you guys to get your help and comments. Q1.A Main frame resides on Vlan2 with three IP Addresses which coreesponds to single MAC address. Configure Router R4(vlan2) to suppot forwarding traffice to single M

Re: Basic ACL Q [7:39334]

2002-03-23 Thread Leslie McIntosh
Tom, That looks right except change the permit to deny: access-list 90 DENY 172.16.0.0 0.240.255.255 Don't forget that the ACL works from the top down, so this may need to be one of the first statements for you. Les --- IT Guy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just wondering how I can block whole

ISDN Problem [7:39342]

2002-03-23 Thread Ali, Abbas
In simplest ISDN configuration I should be able to ping, but unfortunetly I can't. This week is very tough nothing seems to work I guess. I have two routers connected through ISDN. Here is the config. I should be able to ping, but can't ping the local and the remote interface. Any Clue. R

Re: you American need to think [7:38323]

2002-03-23 Thread nrf
As a Brit, you're going to lecture the United States on morality? Excuse me, but let's ask, say, the Irish or the Indians about the vaunted British morality. You know what they say about people who live in glass houses... And besides, let's be honest here. We both know that, if not for the US

Main Backbone [7:39344]

2002-03-23 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
I need to know what is the right equipment I should use , I have to order two quantity per main site as a primary and secondary connected via dual Giga-bit Ethernet modules for load sharing and redundancy in case one fails. Each backbone must have a Giga-bit Ethernet switch fabrics with a minimum