Ivan,
Take a look at the subject (CCIE written question)
that Dennis responded to on May 20.
He is a great source for this group.
Thanks
Reza
""Ivan"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I have a interest question, doesn't any one know the answer?
>
>
I take it this is something to do with testing the default gateway.
Does it make sure the gateway is still there, otherwise tries for something
that will respond with a proxy ARP?
Can you change the default gateway to the 6509 and let it route to the
firewall if necessary.
Not going to stop the pi
I'm with you 100% on this. I said that bit swapping is as easy as writing
your name backwards. Maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, so to speak,
because you do have to do hex to binary and back, but only for a four-digit
binary number. So it's as easy as writing your name backwards in Pig Lat
The BGP paths are used differently than the equal-cost paths to the
destination. Assume you have two T1's which run to Neighbor A, and one T1
which runs to Neighbor B. If Neighbor A's BGP route advertisement is
preferred over Neighbor B's, then the router will distribute traffic over
both equal-co
Michael Williams wrote:
>
> Correct... I took the beta, then took the current written
> and passed Still don't know about passing the beta because
> it takes them 6-8 weeks to get you the results (actually, the
> last beta I took, I saw the results on their tracking site a
> week before
If you passed are you able to transfer the Networkers slot (for a fee?) ;)
-Original Message-
From: Frank Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passed the written... Now on to the lab!! [7:2]
Michael Williams wrote
"This particular address is one that I don't recognize though. It may be
used for a proprietary (non-standard) function on the Token Ring side."
4000.. addresses are often used for mainframe connectivity - TIC
addresses, APPN end nodes, etc. I don't know whether there is any
particula
hi,
I just now came across two jargons :-)
"intelligent switch" and "non intelligent switch".
Now what is the exact difference between them..
And does "non intelligent" switch not have an IP Address.
Thanks,
ashish
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44903&t=4490
Hi,
Is it possible to get the IP addresses of all the boxes attached to a port in
the switch.
If there are 2 boxes attached to a hub and that hub is attached is attached
to
a switch.
Now is it possible to get the IP addresses of those 2 boxes by just looking
at
the switch...
thru SNMP or some oth
At 07:03 PM 5/23/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>"This particular address is one that I don't recognize though. It may be
>used for a proprietary (non-standard) function on the Token Ring side."
>
>4000.. addresses are often used for mainframe connectivity - TIC
>addresses, APPN end nodes, e
I happened to purchase the CCIE 350-001 ExamCram from them when they were
going under as I got it for $7.00 (what the hell, eh?)
After receiving it and reading it, I was amazed at how many errors there
were. The good thing is that I spotted so many errors, meaning that I knew
the material well e
- Original Message -
From: "George Siaw"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco CallManager - ip phone registration [7:44530]
> Thanks for your response. Checked the phones configs and it's all as
> expected i.e. IP's for cm server, tftp server etc are just fine.
>
At 3:33 PM -0400 5/23/02, Ron Trunk wrote:
>Howard and dre,
>First of all, thanks for the excellent thread!
First, thanks for letting me know you are still around!
>You've given me a great deal
>of information about service provider issues. I was dimly aware of some of
>them, but now I see how
I can't seem to find anything about the Spanish Inquisition project on
the cisco.com website.
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44906&t=44906
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstud
Hi,
You may want to download a trial version of fluke software, Network
Inspector, from
http://www.flukenetworks.com/us/LAN/Monitoring+Analysis+Diagramming/Network+Inspector/_software.htm,
which will tell all the ip address connected a port in the switch. I don't know there
is a built-in comman
Now now, be nice ;-)
I have a Cisco product catalogue from 1994 (don't ask). The NP-2E and
NP-1E were around then, and I don't think any Cisco router supported
full-duplex. Or Fast Ethernet. Not even the top-of-the-line 7000 family
(that's 7000, not 7200 or 7500, and "top-of-the-line" is Ci
> module 2 is not supported
>
> afterward with a show mod is shows 0 ports and status unknown
> or it will not
> see the module at all.
>
> Bootrom is version 2.2 and version is 4.5
>
> I checked on Cisco and the module appears to be supported by
> the software.
It's clearly telling you above
ouch... please ignore this question..
- Original Message -
From: ashish
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: intelligent vs non-intelligent switch [7:44903]
> hi,
> I just now came across two jargons :-)
> "intelligent switch" and "non intelligent switch".
> Now what is
I always go to the switch and look through the CAM table. I pull out the MAC
Addresses associated with a port, then I take those MAC addresses to a host
that has an ARP database, arp -a | grep in unix, or show ip arp
on IOS. Basically, you could have your host ping all known IP
addresses so it A
Comments in-line...
Phil Lorenz wrote:
>
> I'm a little confused by configs I see in production that
> appear to be
> contrary to how I think HSRP works.
>
> What is the significance of the preempt statement on Switch #2
> in this
> example below ???
In your example there isn't a preempt c
At 07:56 PM 5/23/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Now now, be nice ;-)
>
>I have a Cisco product catalogue from 1994 (don't ask). The NP-2E and
>NP-1E were around then, and I don't think any Cisco router supported
>full-duplex.
>Or Fast Ethernet. Not even the top-of-the-line 7000 family
>(that's 70
What are the the philosophical reasons that would make it difficult? I must
be that youngester that dosen't understand ; ) Honestly, I can't imagine it
being that hard. It would be a lot like advertising static routes. Once
you config the local dial-peer, you advertise it, and the other router
Yeah.. in the switch, get the MACs of all of the devices attached to
that port, then go to the router that acts as the gateway for that subnet
that those devices are in, and do a 'show arp' then (hopefull you have a
good terminal program to) search through and find the IPs that go with the
MAC
Thanks to Ebay and other sources of equipment I would strongly recommend
against going to a bootcamp like that, especially for $8000. You will get a
much better return on investment buying books and equipment to use at your
convenience. The drawback would be that you would not get the input of an
Thanks Alfredo. That helped. IT works now.
Just needed to remove crypto map before access-list.
--- Alfredo Pulido wrote:
> You will solve this problem if you first remove the
> "crypto map xxx" in the
> interface where you attach this "crypto map xxx",
> then you can remove
> access-list or ch
Thanks to Ebay and other sources of equipment I would strongly recommend
against going to a bootcamp like that, especially for $8000. You will get a
much better return on investment buying books and equipment to use at your
convenience. The drawback would be that you would not get the input of an
Thanks Alfredo. That helped. IT works now.
Just needed to remove crypto map before access-list.
--- Alfredo Pulido wrote:
> You will solve this problem if you first remove the
> "crypto map xxx" in the
> interface where you attach this "crypto map xxx",
> then you can remove
> access-list or ch
At 08:57 PM 5/23/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>What are the the philosophical reasons that would make it difficult?
Phone networks haven't been very dynamic before and telephony people don't
adopt changes very quickly. And you might be putting PBX administrator
types out of work...
> I must
>b
>hi,
>I just now came across two jargons :-)
>"intelligent switch" and "non intelligent switch".
>Now what is the exact difference between them..
>And does "non intelligent" switch not have an IP Address.
>
>Thanks,
>ashish
The major difference probably is that the salesman you are talking to
s
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 08:57 PM 5/23/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> >What are the the philosophical reasons that would make it difficult?
>
> Phone networks haven't been very dynamic before and telephony people don't
> adopt cha
Ive purchased over the last few years some books from Coriolis - the Exam
Cram series and found them to be not bad.
Looks like their sites have been down for the last few weeks. Anyone know
what happend to them? They go belly-up?
Thanks,
Keith
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
Hey group!
Early versions of the 2600 came with only 16 megs DRAM. Then it was changed
to 32 meg.
How can I tell if 32 megs is 1x32 or 2x16 without taking off the top?
Need to upgrade to 64 meg and want to get the correct package.
Kevin Wigle
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
Keith Woodworth wrote:
>
> Ive purchased over the last few years some books from Coriolis
> - the Exam
> Cram series and found them to be not bad.
>
> Looks like their sites have been down for the last few weeks.
> Anyone know
> what happend to them? They go belly-up?
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
>
This behavior changed in 12.0T I believe, so it would be seen in 12.1
mainline and beyond. The RIP default route is no longer automagically
redistributed into RIP. You need to do it manually with redistribute
static...or use ip default-network...
Chris
""John Dorffler"" wrote in message
[EMAI
This is a very common design in a campus backbone to track the vlan uplink
from the distribution layer to the core layer. In that design, there is
only one port at L2 that is in the uplink vlan (i.e. it is a point-to-point
L3 vlan). So, when that one port goes down, auto-state brings the vlan do
I would recommend connecting a loopback plug or cable to the DSU and see if
the interface comes up up (looped) if it does you equipment is okay. If not
the telco has a problem.
""beth shriver"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello friends, I am having a little pr
Hey,
I have a pix to pix vpn that was working fine. I changed the outside ip
address on one of the Pix's for a ISP reasons. I then made all the
necessary changes on the remote Pix(set peer, and isakmp key.) I
also performed a "clear xlate" on both firewalls. tonight i can vpn to both
AFAIK, if it came with 16, then that means they only populated one of
the two DRAM slots. To go to 64 though, you'll need to remove the 16,
and then add 2 x 32MB to get what you want.
This comes from the experience of upgrading 2620s that were purchased 2,
almost 3 years ago for VoIP Gateways, a
Neither do I like to see!
But any thoughts on the possible causes?
Thanks,
Sujal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Interface Resets [7:44791]
Zero
I wonder if you can write the isdn lines off as a learning expense.
Equipment might be harder to do though. If you can't write it off, the sim
comes out ahead because it's portable and has resale value. (but that could
change)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Also default-information originate will generate 0.0.0.0
but this was introduced back in 11.2.
Elmer
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Camplejohn"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: RIP default routing [7:44863]
> This behavior changed in 12.0T I believe, so it wou
Suhal,
I am assuming that you are referring to Serial Interface Resets. If that is
the case, then take a look at the following CCO URLs:
Serial Lines: Increasing Interface Resets on Serial Link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1915.htm#xtocid195
577
Internetwork Troubl
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
