Hello people,
I have a Merge ISDN Simulator that I would like to get rid off for
1100$. It has all manual. Please contact me directly if you are
interested. Thanks.
Jose Martos
Network Engineer
Loud Packet, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ask a question in our Tech Forum:
Are each of these a class c subnet?
-Original Message-
From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2002 04:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
191.72.4.0
191.72.12.0
191.72.21.0
Am I
not quite john..
using your example, a correct example would be something like:
191.72.0.0 /24 (0 = )
191.72.1.0 /24
191.72.2.0 /24
191.72.3.0 /24
::
:: all combinations /24 networks
::
191.72.221.0 /24
191.72.222.0 /24
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
you can than summarise the above
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be
summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
well yes just a typo :-)
and it is true in chuck's addendum. however it might give the
impression to the orignal poster that this is ok to do all the time
;-)
Mark.
-Original Message-
From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 28
Thanks for your suggestions. I will try them this afternoon.
Cisco's own example for this shows IP address on the interfaces (not the
same one's I used) so I put them on.
I was also hoping to route the traffic accross the WAN in addition to
bridging between PC's but I will get to that after I
Passed the exam yesterday, thanks to all on this list. Just silently
lurking in the background, reading relevant posts has helped a lot when
studying.
2 more to go for CCNP, BCRAN and Support, should be the easiest two.
Cheers,
Symon
Message Posted at:
I just use show tech-support when I want my running-config without page
breaks. I need the Page breaks due to the nifty feature of HyperTerminal
with XP scambling the buffer once it gets full...
Les
-Original Message-
From: Tim Metz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 9/27/2002
Dear Joel -
I read in the Switching Services Configuration Guide, page XC-15, that
Fast switching is not supported on serial interfaces using encapsulations
other than HDLC. This contradicts earlier examples, particularly where fast
switching is enabled on the hub side of a frame relay
depending on the device and how many slots are populated, show tech can be
quite overwhelming ;-)
-Original Message-
From: McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Tim Metz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Show running-config
I should have specified. I meant using an IP phone regularly, by pluging it
into a switch. But a crossover cable would work I guess. FXO/FXS to IP
Phones = no.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You can take a Cisco IP
Hi
You can use the 'terminal length 0' (priviledges mode) to remove
pausing form a 'sho run'
And you can use the 'sho tech page' command
to get a paged version of it (if terminal length is not 0)
So you can have it any way you like it
regs
Haakon Claassen
EMEA - IT Transport Services
Hi John,
I'm not sure whether using Key rotation, please advice where I can apply the
LEAP?
Please advice as I'm having trouble on this issue.
Once again, Thanks
Rgds,
Steiven
- Original Message -
From: John Jackson
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:30 PM
Subject: RE: Aironet
Team,
Are there any good textbooks or other reference materials that explaining
the intracate details on Content Engines to the CN certification? I've
found material on Cisco's web site but I'm not able to find any textbooks.
Thanks for the help.
Travis Bolton
Network Engineer II
CCNP,CCDA
Hello,
Anyone any thought on the following lab Im working on,
AS 1 and AS2 are connected to AS3 via EBGP as well as each other.
(Triangular fashion)
AS1 and AS2 both originate and advertise the network 81.0.0.0/8 in to EBGP
to AS3
Objective:
Ensure that AS3 routes to 81.0.0.0/8 via AS 1.
take a look @ www.routerchief.com
Vicuna, Mark wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It depends on the flash chips, some older boot roms do not recognise the
newer chips.
Call cisco to get some upgraded roms if you have a contract or you can
get them cheap from
IP Helpering? lol
Have you thrown a sniffer on the different segments yet? Sniff both sides
of the router and check out your packets. Got any ACL's on the routers?
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS / Security)
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware)
Chuck's
You know what, I just went to the Cisco site to get the link pointing
towards the
book and guess what I saw? Cisco has finally decided to update the site
for the new written exam, but I noticed that the book is not in the update
and
they also included IGRP, RIP, RIPv2, IPX, token ring.
I thought
I'm currently studying for routing. It looks to me as if OSPF is going to
give me the most trouble (I use EIGRP at work, also have used RIP, versions
1 and 2). How bad was it? Give it to me straight, Doc!
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Passed the
I see I should have made this one a Friday Folly :-
In a Big Flat Bridged Network, a mobile user unplugs the laptop at one
office, drives over to the next office, plugs back in, and no further action
is required. The Windoze PC has retained it's IP address, and the network
doesn't care about
First of all, there are no unusual questions regarding BGP.
BGP is all about doing bizarre things in order to meet SLA's or fulfill
contractual obligations and customer requirements.
One might conclude that there is nothing usual or normal about BGP
Focus on how BGP installs a route, and then
Those items were removed from the Lab exam, not the written.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54433t=54398
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
You could try Mobile IP. That would require more design and configuration on
your part than perhaps you wanted to get into, though, espeically if there
are lots of mobile users. But it's proven to be quite useful for wirless
mobile users who have the same problem that you're describing, of
Check this out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/fcpa.html
AND
http://www.fieldcertification.org
AND
http://www.fieldcertification.org/Membership/Pre_Qualification.htm
Now you can get a certification that certifies that you are certified!!!
--
mobile IP!!! Thanks, Cil
I'll throw that one out to the folks I'm working with!
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You could try Mobile IP. That would require more design
I am looking into buying a Catalyst 5509 for the core of our network, I
am however confused by the part numbers I will need.
I need about 12 + Gigabit Ethernet (Copper) ports, 48 10/100BaseT ports,
a GBIC uplink to some 2950G-EIs we have, and an RSM to provide intervlan
routing.
Can anyone
Casey, Paul (6822) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
Anyone any thought on the following lab Im working on,
AS 1 and AS2 are connected to AS3 via EBGP as well as each other.
(Triangular fashion)
AS1 and AS2 both originate and advertise the network
I would think about going with a 6509, the 5500 series has been eol'd, but
the last support dates are a while away yet.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Confused about Catalyst
Your customer would probably be gravely offended and unbelieving at the
prospect that most major changes in digital computing connectivity involve a
trade-off of some kind, but that doesn't render it any less accurate.
In this case, since the trade-off is between exposure to non-unicast traffic
hi all,
I have a UFM card with 12 PVCs configured and running. I need to upgrade the
firmware of the card which would take round 10 mins. and the then the card
will be resetted. Will the data traffic get affected during the upgrade
period??
anyone knows.
Message Posted at:
Hi Kevin,
Sounds like your facing a well known problem in a switched network in my
opinion.
I guess your clients where previous on a shared network ? So 9/10 there
was no STP running on every port.
But in a switched network all port's will run STP.
The problem that you will get on switched
Not sure I saw any new certifications, just a new org. to certify
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Check this out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/fcpa.html
AND
http://www.fieldcertification.org
AND
If you want to return the PIX to its default configuration just do a 'write
erase' and 'reload'. You can then start afresh.
Regards
Wayne
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I don't have the config you want, but how about a link for configuration
Lupi, Guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would think about going with a 6509, the 5500 series has been eol'd, but
the last support dates are a while away yet.
CL: Lorda mercy!!! you sound like almost all of the Cisco sales guys I
know ;- Mention the word
check further into the site:
http://www.fieldcertification.org/Field_Certification.htm
read all about field certification
also
http://www.fieldcertification.org/How_It_Works.htm
sure looks like a whole new level of certification to me.
not that I disagree with the principal here. But the
I guess you are correct. I wonder if it will ever take off.
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
check further into the site:
http://www.fieldcertification.org/Field_Certification.htm
read all about field certification
also
Comments inline...
--- Chuck's Long Road wrote:
Lupi, Guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would think about going with a 6509, the 5500
series has been eol'd, but
the last support dates are a while away yet.
CL: Lorda mercy!!! you sound like almost
Good points, Erik - some thoughts below:
Erick B. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Comments inline...
snipp for brevety
CL: 12 copper gig ports and 48x10/100 ports fits
nicely into a 4006, which
conveniently now sells with an L3 blade.. Use the
Were all the servers on the same card and CEF on? I had issues with that,
so we re-engineered the traffic to keep as much as possible on individual
cards, as the bus on the 4006 is only 2GB, as opposed to the 64 the
marketing department claims.
Erick B. wrote in message
[EMAIL
why is that ? we have segmented avvid network across our campus. The
laptops are all W2K and they work just
fine without any issues on DHCP...The routers are all running hsrp and
work correctly..
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
I see I should have made this one a Friday Folly :-
In a Big Flat
Thanks again guys, I think I should have put all the subnets 191.72.1.0
thru 191.72.31.0 to be summarized to 191.72.0.0/19. If I am wrong let me
know.
Vicuna, Mark wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
well yes just a typo :-)
and
Buy a 4003/4006...the 5000 will be overdriven after 2 or 3 gig ports are
in use...
especially for the core of the network...
Stuart Pittwood wrote:
I am looking into buying a Catalyst 5509 for the core of our network, I
am however confused by the part numbers I will need.
I need about 12 +
check further into the site:
http://www.fieldcertification.org/Field_Certification.htm
read all about field certification
also
http://www.fieldcertification.org/How_It_Works.htm
sure looks like a whole new level of certification to me.
not that I disagree with the principal here. But the
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
check further into the site:
http://www.fieldcertification.org/Field_Certification.htm
read all about field certification
also
http://www.fieldcertification.org/How_It_Works.htm
sure looks like a
Darrell, I appreciate your comments on this. just a couple of things below:
--
Darrell Newcomb wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Inline...
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
One of my coworkers was telling me about
it always gets back to the chicken somehow
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 29 September 2002 09:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lookee Lookie - new certifications [7:54435]
check further into the site:
If you read further into the site you will that the FCPA is proposing to
deliver hands-on testing at both junior and senior levels of certification.
They have buy in from the major vendors such as Cisco, Microsoft, Novell and
Red Hat.
Both Novell and Red Hat and talking it up as the capstone to
Kevin Wigle wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If you read further into the site you will that the FCPA is proposing to
deliver hands-on testing at both junior and senior levels of
certification.
They have buy in from the major vendors such as Cisco, Microsoft,
Hello Puro.
The UFM will still pass traffic during the burning of firmware.
However, be aware that it can always go wrong. We usually do the
burning of firmware in spare slots and then exchange the cards
physically.
But perhaps this is because I'm working for one of the users
of larger
Because pre-W2K windows didn't automatically try to renew a lease when the
ethernet interface comes back up after being down. So...if the old lease
hadn't come up for renewal during the time the machine moved from point A to
B.the users don't automatically get connectivity.
Lots of options
Originally, they were and I had them divide them among
the cards and it was better but then they added more
servers. I'm a support guy so I try to fix peoples
problems after the fact if possible.
Here's the Mpps numbers...
4006 w/sup3 or sup4 -- 48 Mpps
4006 w/sup2 -- 18 Mpps
Also, I'm told
I don't think it's accurate to say that Cisco, Microsoft and Novell have
contributed to the paper cert syndrome. They simply created
certifications in an effort to distinguish those who are familiar with their
products from those who don't. The people who use brain-dumps and boot
camps are the
True chuck, comments below...
--- Chuck's Long Road wrote:
Good points, Erik - some thoughts below:
snipp for brevety
CL: according to the specs, the 4006 has a 64 gig
backplane, superior to the
65xx's advertised 32 gig out of the box.
Also, take the Mpps numbers into consideration. I
Chuck,
Have you tried to shorten the DHCP lease time?
--- Larry Letterman wrote:
why is that ? we have segmented avvid network across
our campus. The
laptops are all W2K and they work just
fine without any issues on DHCP...The routers are
all running hsrp and
work correctly..
Yes that darn business driver of selling more transport. Reminds me of my
days at a PTT doing research for applications to drive transport. Seeing
the big picture is usually very helpful, people don't buy transport for no
reason. If you're not the PTT or cable based telco then selling
Hi all,
Have 2 networks in branch office, one for voice other for data. Have it
setup on a 3524 that phones are vlan 2 and pc on vlan1.
Here is my config of ports. This config works to the point where the phones
work no problem.I can get 1 laptop user with a modern laptop also working
from
What about modify the MED of the route?
-Original Message-
From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unusual BGP question. [7:54429]
Hello,
Anyone any thought on the following lab Im working on,
AS
some thoughts below:
--
John Brandis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
Have 2 networks in branch office, one for voice other for data. Have it
setup on a 3524 that phones are vlan 2 and pc on vlan1.
Here is my config of ports. This config works to the
This is how my interfaces work for voice and data on the below
3524XL with data being on vlan 152 and voice being vlan 155..
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 152
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,152,155,1002-1005
switchport mode trunk
59 matches
Mail list logo
