**
visit http://www.solution6.com
UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
*
This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
hi eb,
I met a problem here:
a Cicsco 2611#:
Router#show running-config
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname Router
!
!
ip subnet-zero
!
interface
Dear Group,
If I want to differentiate the traffic flowing through two diff serial ports
based on HTTP only (1 serial port) and SMTP only (2nd serial port)then what
are the possible ways to configure it ??
Many thanks in advance..
Regds
Hitesh
DISCLAIMER:
Information contained and
Hi all,
I have been asked to look into VoIP with Cisco hardware/software, can anyone
recomend any good books/resources relating to the cisco Voice Hardware and
software (Call Manager etc).
I am looking through the Cisco site and the information there on these
products seems to be quite well
Hi.. I checked from the log of my cat5505 switch, I found the following.
What is the meaning? But there was no impact at all. I have enable the
portfast on those ports but why those port still create spanning tree msg?
Oct 5 00:00:05 57.198.45.252 2002 Oct 04 17:35:13
Hi,
Looking at this, there appears to be no dynamic routing happening. The
gateway of last resort is on a different network than E0/0 and E0/1.
Can you actually reach 10.1.255.254 by any other means ?
Regards
Richard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55542t=55537
you may want to have a look at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
093dcb.shtml
Good luck!
-Original Message-
From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: what is
Hi,
The answer is NO, you don't need to deny ospf as interesting traffic in the
ACL.
In fact , having read rfc 1793 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1793.txt)which
explains demand ccts and I think that by doing this you will break the
demand cct feature. OSPF requires that initially the database
Stuart,
This should get you started in your quest.
http://cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/prod_instructions_guides.html
Stuart Pittwood wrote:
Hi all,
I have been asked to look into VoIP with Cisco hardware/software, can anyone
recomend any good books/resources relating to
if the backplace is a CO version as this does require the special 'TELCO'
feature set available from CCO
Hope that helps ;-)
Claudia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hamid Ali Asgari
Sent: 13 October 2002 22:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have Internet connection to IPS and I don't know what QoS politic to
choose.
I have now 4 classes and CBWFQ:
gold ( SMTP , POP 3) etc.
silver HTTP
bronse ( FTP)
default ( fail-queue)
and service-policy out.
Is there any sense to use CBWFQ on a serial interface like service-policy in
?
My ISP
I have a PIX 525. I am trying bring it up on my network. It is installed
virtually betrween my router and my ISP's router. While testing, I noticed
that from an inside host, I could ping my inside interface on the PIX, but
not the outside interface. From the ISP, they could ping my outside
Dear All,
I will install an AS5300 tomorrow; it has 120 modems and Octal E1/PRI
connections, four of these E1 lines will be connected as ISDN-PRI lines,
I need to know the easiest and simplest way to configure it, if there is
a URL with examples this will be highly appreciated,
Kindest Regards,
Dear All
I have a ISDN pri line ( 30 channels ) terminated on cisco 2610 routers. I
have
14 other remote loactions which are having cisco 1750 routers and having bri
lines. I want to make a connectivity between isdn bri lines and pri lines by
dialing out from bri to pri lines. Since pri has 30
Two comments I would like to make.
1. Richard, the gateway of last resort IS on the same network as E0/0. The
subnet mask is 255.255.0.0.
2. The route you added tells the router that 1.1.1.1 is out interface E0/0.
It's on E0/1. So that definitely won't work.
If you remove the NAT statements,
So I haven't seen anyone who passed newly revised CCIE exam yet. Do you know
anyone who passed new CCIE written exam?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3t=3
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Any body know how to clear cef stats on an interface?
I need to be able to clear the counters showed by the command
sho int serial4/2 stats
We've got an interface that seems to be process switching 80% of it's
traffic and we're trying to nail down why.
K. Hunt
Message Posted at:
Naomi,
Try adding the following lines to your config
access-list acl_outside permit icmp any any echo-reply (hitcnt=7515)
access-list acl_outside permit icmp any any time-exceeded (hitcnt=911)
access-list acl_outside permit icmp any any unreachable (hitcnt=34292)
As far as pinging from outside
sorry Robert,I did add the route of 1.1.1.1 on interface e0/1
at 14 Oct 2002 14:08:08 - , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert
Edmonds) wrote:
--
Two comments I would like to make.
1. Richard, the gateway of last resort IS on the same network as E0/0. The
subnet mask is 255.255.0.0.
2. The route
CORE_A#
CORE_A#sho ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 4500 Software (C4500-JK9S-M), Version 12.2(12), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 20-Aug-02 23:40 by pwade
Image text-base: 0x60008948, data-base: 0x610B2000
ROM: System
You have not mentioned any issues though. So I will guess you are somehow
unhappy with the default Pix behavior. Did you want to deny all icmp
requests? By default, after a certain rev of Pix code, icmp allows
are on by default.
icmp deny any outside
icmp deny any inside
Once you place these
snipping a little for clarity and brevity. response below
--
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
snip
I am getting confused at this point, should it be possible to
have IP,
IPX and QoS all at the same time?
CL: sure, they can all be
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Are you pinging directly from the router where the QoS stuff is
configured,
or are the pings going through the router?
CL: Side_1frame_relay--QoS_Router---token_ringSide_2
I ping from routers
I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office on
October 15, 2002.
Thanks,
Danny
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55562t=55562
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
The link below goes over configuration parameters in pretty good detail, I
found it pretty useful in the field I hope you do to
(CCO login required, of course)
HTH,
Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC MPS Packet Data
Richard,
Can't be. We geeks don't do that. And if we do, we never admit it.
Richard Botham wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Robert,
Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55565t=55537
Help!
Whilst configuring a Cisco 2900 switch I receive the following error after
typing a copy run start
%error parsing start (no such device)
Can anyone help please?
Thanks for your time,
-
John Campbell - Aker Kvaerner
Robert,
Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55564t=55537
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Technology isn't necessarily heading in that direction - Cisco is
driving it there. Bottom line is this: Cisco is traditionally a router
and switch manufacturer, and no one buys routers and switches these
days, at least not enough to provide continued growth for Cisco.
Company infrastructures
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please confirm (conf#99c2dc97cc6fe1343691b05392e865ac)
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because the
Hello Group,
Could someone please give me an overview on 802.1s/w (MST/RSTP) protocols.
Are they IEEE standards for portfast/backbonefast and PVST?
Thanks
Albert
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55568t=55568
--
JM wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have Internet connection to IPS and I don't know what QoS politic to
choose.
I have now 4 classes and CBWFQ:
gold ( SMTP , POP 3) etc.
silver HTTP
bronse ( FTP)
default ( fail-queue)
and service-policy out.
Is there any
Maybe I should say IP Telephony, not VoIP. How many uncompressed,
toll-quality calls can you push out simultaneously over a T1??? Have
you done the math? 24? Maybe 23 on a good day. Sure, if you use
compression you can squeeze in quite a bit more, but you can't deny that
IPT is
Good to hear. Where are you vactioning? Any chance I could hitch a ride??
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Cevallos
To:
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2293 (Out of the Office)
[7:55562]
I will on vacation starting October 5 and
Amen Brotha
But as long were not broke and get to play (i mean work) with bleeding edge
tech, and companies can afford this stuff,
Then Drive on Cisco, Drive on!
Mark Snow
CCNP, CCDP, CQS - CIPT Design, CIPT Support
-Original Message-
From: Joe A
To: 'Nathan Chessin'; 'Albert Lu';
Don't have much experience with them, but I would think that either
Route-Maps or Map-Classes would be your tool for doing this.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Hitesh Pathak R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: http smtp
Hi,
Anybody know
1)Why in the 7500 router in my lab, I can't save the existing configuration?
2)why dir command doesn't show anything?
3)Why my serial console doesn't work, but Telnet works.
For all the above I am getting always device Busy.What's going on ??
I am running IOS 12.0 and I
You might try plugging into the console, rebooting and trying to break
into rommon as it boots up.
If you can break into rommon and access flash, etc. then I would guess
it's a code bug, not hardware.
If you can't even break into rommon it may be hardware related.
If you DO break into
What is the value of your config register? I'd expect 0x2102
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help !! [7:55575]
Hi,
Anybody know
1)Why in the 7500 router
Hello Mark.
I'd like to pass EVODD.
Can you advise me some book for prepare EVODD
and you opinion about this exam?
WBR,
Aleksey Alekseev
Mark Snow
CCNP, CCDP, CQS - CIPT Design, CIPT Support
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55578t=55573
Is it the right approach to do spantree-load balancing with HSRP redundancy
I have 4 users Vlans tied to subnets, vlan 10
172.16.10.0 vlan 11 172.16.11.0vlan 20
172.16.20.0 vlan 21 172.16.21.0 Server Farm Vlans vlan
101 172.16.101.0vlan 102
That is the normal behavior of the PIX. You'll not be able to change it...
If you want to test the connectivity through the PIX, do not ping the
outside interface of the PIX from the inside, but ping the default gateway
of the PIX.
-- Lidiya White
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hello all,
i am trying to get as much as i can out of a single public IP on the outside
interface of a PIX 515e-R-DMZ-Bun (3 interfaces). i have set up static
routes and conduits to pass access along for the different ports as shown in
the example that follows but i am not able to access the
John Neiberger wrote:
JM wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have Internet connection to IPS and I don't know what QoS
politic to
choose.
I have now 4 classes and CBWFQ:
gold ( SMTP , POP 3) etc.
silver HTTP
bronse ( FTP)
default ( fail-queue)
Azhar,
Your messages are arriving looking like a James Joyce novel on steroids,
with no punctuation. If you wonder why you're not getting a lot of answers,
it's because of the dense formatting, the huge amount of detail, and the
stream of consicousness style. These make your messages too hard to
inline
At 10:43 PM 10/13/2002 +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
See Inline..
- Original Message -
From: Howard C. Berkowitz
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Nanog Post: redistribute bgp considered harmful [7:54961]
At 4:13 PM + 10/13/02, Peter van Oene wrote:
Ref. Frame-relay traffic shaping
frame-relay cir = Physical port speed
frame-relay mincir = Carrier enforced cir ie providers cir
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55587t=55284
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I don't want anyone to violate the agreement, but I'd like to find out if
the 700 series router is still on the Remote Access test. I've checked the
cisco site and don't see it in the exam outline, but I'd like to be a bit
more sure. I've heard it's not on tests anymore because they're not
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network a
little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty fundamental problem solving tools
IMHO
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 14/10/2002 2:26 AM
To: [EMAIL
Can try to block port 1863...
if on a windows machine, just use the netstat command to see what port you
are using to connect to the service...
msgr-cs147.msgr.hotmail.com:1863 ESTABLISHED
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55588t=55445
Since you are trying to 'copy running-config startup-config' I would assume
then that it's a 2900XL series switch, and not one of the 2900 series
switches that runs CatOS? (2901, 2902, 2926, CiscoPro 2200, etc..)
Not that I necessarily have an answer for you, but just wanting to make
certain you
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their
public network a little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty
fundamental problem solving tools IMHO
I'm not certain if it's still true or not, but if you mean on links to
customer sites, then in the past several
B.J. Wilson wrote:
Apply logic, not rules.
Priscilla, how would you like a very high management position
at EDS? Your
philosophy would be a breath of much-needed fresh air... ;-)
I would like that. My geeky husband pointed out that my statement better not
be a rule. If it is, then it
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their
public network a little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty
fundamental problem solving tools IMHO
Traceroute is fundamental but it's not reliable. ISPs have been infamous for
years for hiding hops to make it look
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network
a
little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty fundamental problem solving tools
IMHO
Well then I suppose that means you would be suspicious of
This is correct.
And while you are at it, why not just eliminate pings to the interface
once the PIX goes into production for increased security?
Just makes it a little little bit harder for the Kiddies.
Theo
Lidiya White
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/2002 03:44 AM
Please respond to
Group,
Hoping that someone can help me out with a VoIP QoS issue that I am
currently dealing with. I work for a service provider, and I am currently
troubleshooting a VoIP over frame relay quality complaint. My end user has a
768K host with four 256K drops dedicated solely to VoIP traffic. My
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little as
8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS score as G.711, which is
toll quality. Even though it's not officially toll quality I
Check your IOS. I had this problem with 6.0. I downgraded to 5.2 and had
no problem.
Theo
Timur Snoke
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/2002 04:27 AM
Please respond to Timur Snoke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:outside PAT on a 515e-R? [7:55581]
LLQ would be his best option, not WFQ. If he is using it, that's probably
his issue.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
lamb stephen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Group,
Hoping that someone can help me out with a VoIP QoS issue that I am
currently dealing with. I
Hello,
Does the suppress-map work along with the summary-only keyword?
I would only like to see the summary 13.0.0.0/8 but I keep seeing the rest
of the networks.
Here is the config:
R7-FR(config)#aggregate-address 13.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 suppress-map CHECK
summary-only
route-map CHECK permit
I think the aggregate address has to be in your routing table first.
Someone please correct me if i'm wrong, as I'm trying to get it right from
memory.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
Does the suppress-map work along
THe only reason I can see using QoS is to limit traffic to certain amouts of
BW. Even then it's tricky becasuse in CBWFQ, you are guaranteing a minimum,
not a maximum amout of BW for a class. You could police certain classes of
traffic to never exceed a BW, but that can be crummy as well,
I think you need to look at analog/digital gateways, and how they interact
with a trunk connection on the different systems. At least thats how you
tackle the problem from the cisco side. Or maybe the other VoIP solutions
are H.323 compliant, and maybe you can get lucky and try that approach.
Passed the DQoS exam today.
60 questions, 60 minutes, can't review questions, for those of you who can't
live without this kind of information.
Let me say that after my recent hellish experience with the CIPT exam, I
found it a pleasure to take a test in which all of the questions were based
on
If you issue the command dir, do you see the file that you loaded via tftp?
John Brandis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
**
visit http://www.solution6.com
UK Customers -
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP
telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little
as
8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS score as
I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some would get
through while others wouldn't. Then to ensure that important calls got
through during these periods, there was the priority network that gov't
officials
I remeber what that emergency network is: GETS.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some would
Hi group,
I am trying to configure PIX .It has 3 Ethernet Interface and three
networks are used.
LAN (inside) : 192.168.11.0
DMZ (perimeter)) : 192.168.23.0
Outside:66.x.x.x
Problem : users from Inside and Perimeter network are able to browse, but
the inside and Perimeter network cannot talk
Thanks very much Chris .
Chris Headings wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can try to block port 1863...
if on a windows machine, just use the netstat command to see what port
you
are using to connect to the service...
msgr-cs147.msgr.hotmail.com:1863
The image is working on other 3662 routers, but do are they the EXACT
same configuration.
Do they all have exactly the same network modules and WIC cards in them?
Are all of the module and cards the same code revision?
I would try a different version of the IOS.
-Original Message-
All,
I've listed two pieces of equipment from my Home lab for auction on
ebay, here are the links.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2061687376
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2061687561
Additionally, these devices will give you everything you need to
I'd agree. Even if he's raised the IP Precedence of the VoIP traffic WFQ
isn't the best choice. LLQ is the way to go.
There may also be problems with the vendor equipment. Nortel, as an
example, has an issue with their ITG-2 product that causes it to use up more
bandwidth than is necessary,
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some would get
through while others wouldn't.
CL: yes. true. however, decades ago the
Basically it means that the server or whatever connected it flapping. Try
hard coding the speed and duplex to match if set to auto.
Ronnie
Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi.. I checked from the log of my cat5505 switch, I found the following.
Hi theo, and all,
I am giving the configuration.
global (outside) 1 66.x.x.x - 66.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.224
global (perimeter) 1 192.168.23.10-192.168.23.20
nat (inside) 1 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
nat (perimeter) 1 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
static (inside,outside) 66.x.x.x
Nothing
Are you trying to test with ping? The you need an acl applied to the
perimeter interface to allow the echo-replies. If you have no acl
applied to inside and perimeter interfaces, tcp sessions should be
flowing - try to telnet from inside to the perimeter for instance
-Original
Well I will take it that you didn't include the ip address x.x.x.x
x.x.x.x commands for convience.
I was looking for the NAT commands. They look okay. I can't identify one
problem with this although I have to admit that last year I had the same
problem.
Your global perimeter and nat
79 matches
Mail list logo
