Hallo,
I've heard rumors that there are now 2 x 3550 in the new (post Nov 4, 2002)
CCIE lab.
Can anyone confirm this ?
Thomas M|ller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
Message Post
hi
i am working at ISP
i think your isp forgot to add your lan ip's to their backbone router...
please contact your isp
Brian wrote:
>ok if you can ping your isps name server by ip, then you have
>connectivity.
>
>On the router, if you want dns to work there, you need a couple lines.
>
>ip d
of course you can use ip precedence for QoS. ip precedence is used to
specify the importance of one traffic and enable the appropriate policies
for it. but on your side, i'm not quite sure on how you would use the ip
precedence set by the customer on their packets going to your side. i think
it onl
Supposedly by end of the month. Docs and stuff are slowly trickling out,
but noting good yet.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""supernet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Several months ago, Cisco TAC told me that CallManager 3.3 would be
> released in Nov. this year.
Well guy's add another to the list
Wrote my 640-901 this morning , PASS!!!
Cool, two down two to go !
This sight rocks!!
-Original Message-
From: John McCartney
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/13/02 5:27 AM
Subject: RE: Passed 640-901 today [7:59108]
Congrats! If you though
I am getting many output and input errors between 2 brand new 4006s (version
12.1(8a)EW1) and 3640 routers. First of all what exactly are output and
input errors (please give more than what it says on the Cisco site) and why
are they caused? How do I fix them or do I need to???
Here is the "show
The "show int" is on the 4006 ports NOT the 3640.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59172&t=59172
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondiscl
These errors are probably occurring simply because you are running
half-duplex.
If you can bring the lines up to 100/full I believe it will clean up. Are
these
errors happening continuously or in spurts during heavy traffic (that would
be
my guess)? If they are happening continuously, it may be a b
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 05:59, Sara Li wrote:
> Dear all, I am doing the cyscoexpert sample lab.
> R1--area12--R2---Area51---R5---Area0 area 12 cant receive lsa type 5
> routes, so it need to be either a nssa or stub, however, there is virtual
> link between r2 and r5, can r2 be configured with stub
i once encountered the same problem when i did a practice lab. well i think
you should put a tunnel from r2 to r5 to connect area 12 to area 0. don't
put a virtual link for them because you won't be able to make area 12
stubby. hope that helps :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:25, Casey, Paul (6822) wrote:
> Use a GRE tunnel to create a virtual link through a NSSA, it the only
> way,.,,
With a tunnel, you will obviate the need for the VL in the first place.
>
> Check cisco web site for this...!!!
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
I've been messing with IPsec encapsulation of GRE based tunnels on a
wireless network and I'm really starting to hit some brick walls. In
this case I've got a pair of 2620s at each location, a private T1
between them, and wireless ISP service on each end to back them.
CDP does not flow over GR
For those inquiring about the 3550 study guide, the one on IPExpert is
.AWESOME! And it's FREE! And it can be done using
their rackwhich I promise to Rent online, now. Thank you, IPExpert!! Now,
if Chuck can let us have access to his 3550 guide to complement this, it
wou
Can you post the URL please?
Thanks,
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Cisco Nuts
Sent: 12/13/02 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3550 Study Guide - IPExpert --Awesome!! [7:59178]
> For those inquiring about the 3550 study guide, the one on IPExpert is
.AWESOME! And i
Free, my a**! If no one else can advertise their stuff on this board, then
this guy shouldn't be doing it either. By the way, what's your CCIE number?
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PRO
It's
www.ipexpert.net
I have included the .pdf file and hopefully the solution :-)
>From: "B.J. Wilson" >Reply-To: "B.J. Wilson" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 3550 Study Guide - IPExpert --Awesome!! [7:59178]
>Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:54:09 GMT > >Can you post the URL please
I have just been given the task of setting up a website with load
balancing.
T1 ---> 3640>Pix 515 UR+4E-->Load balancer
T1 ---> 3640--->Pix 515 UR+4E>Load balancer
The Pix 515 are separate full units, I got another on because I know you
cannot use the failover as a
Hi,
I am new to this group.A big Great hello to every one.
Now my problem...
I have leased line back to back routers.I have configured dialer
interface although dialer interface is mostly used on switched ckts.But
I am using here on leased line bavck to back.Now what happens after
restting the int
Hi ,
Can anybody tell some good links not only on cisco site but any where
about T1 and E1 concepts all including CCS and CAS.
I would be very thankful for the same.
Regards,
Munit
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59185&t=59185
---
As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to keep
a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link., this
can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
Why was EIGRP designed this way?
Actually, management change the diagram on me :(
T1--->3640--->515UR with failover
T1--->3640--->^
Both T1s going into a single 515UR with a standby unit.
I figured out the first scenario, I just thought of it as it as being in
different locations and use global load balancing on the LBs.
This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> These errors are probably occurring simply because you are
> running half-duplex.
> If you can bring the lines up to 100/full I believe it will
> clean up.
I agree.
> Are these
> errors happening continuously or in spurts during heavy traffic
> (that would be
> my g
nettable_walker wrote:
>
> Thank you.
> What I really need is a recomendation for hardware.
> A linkbuilder ? or something else ?
> I am guessing that is the only piece of euipment I still need
> (other than
> MMF cable)
You can do it with no hardware and just cables. FDDI can be built as an
act
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5
> packets) to keep
> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a
> routed link., this
> can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
>
> OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more
I don't know if you will ever receive the answer to "why". There is a
discussion of EIGRP vs OSPF in the Cisco Press book "EIGRP Network Design
Solutions" by Ivan Pepelnjak. ISBN 1578701651
See page 109.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Fr
I have a router with only one registered outside
address. I needs to translate to different inside
addresses on different ports. I have PCAnywhere
running on clients on the inside and I changed the
ports that they listen on. I only have one registered
IP.
-Dave
___
The Boson test is probably good and also probably right to focus on theory
rather than the real world, considering it's a Cisco test. :-)
I also have a free practice CIT test at my Troubleshooting Networks Web
site. That's the companion Web site for my book Troubleshooting Campus
Networks, which I
McGraw hill is comming out with a CCSP all in one guide in January.
Lance
""jeff duncan"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Are there any Study guides such as exam-cram for CSS1 exams?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59194&t=59
At 7:40 PM + 12/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5
>> packets) to keep
>> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a
>> routed link., this
>> can be a prime issue for "black hole" ro
I have heard there are two, but then again if you ask the ccie team they
won't tell you directly, at least they wouldn't tell me a week ago what the
exact number of each peice of equipment was.
Jason
""Thomas Muller"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hallo,
>
> I've
Hi Dave,
Yes it could be done easily provided you redirect requests on different
machines with
different port numbers.
According to me at the same time you can access internet also by
overloading(take care
that these port numbers are not used in Dynamic overload nat used for
internet
access).Just y
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to
keep
> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link.,
this
> can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
>
> OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more se
Better yet for a low cost distributed sniffer just use VNC or WTS on older
PCs and use the folowing free sniffers that are pretty damn good:
www.packetyzer.comshows packets in real time
http://analyzer.polito.it/ capture and post review like sniffer.
Have fun
/JS
Message Posted at:
Thanks guys, yeah my partner only had a 10k budget. What Ted mentioned made
sense and maybe he meant if you are able to get one of thoses Cells/frams
modules for a 4500/3600 with integrated csu, but those are way expensive,
even used. My partner does not want used so he is looking into the cisco
so
Can you please post Router 2 config
Ronnie
""Munit Singla"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> I am new to this group.A big Great hello to every one.
> Now my problem...
>
> I have leased line back to back routers.I have configured dialer
> interface althoug
Hi Ronnie,
thanx for the reply.see router 2 configuration is almost same.I am sorry i
have just
removed that test bed I have to setup again.The confguration you can ge if u
just to go
the link mentioned at the end of this mail ,Just same configuration I used
except
multilink.
If u still did not get
Try changing the dialer list
- Original Message -
From: Munit Singla
To: Ronnie Higginbotham
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Hi problem regarding PPP HELP [7:59184]
Hi Ronnie,
thanx for the reply.see router 2 configuratio
Hi ronnie.
i have checked changing Dialer list also.Actually the problem is there
is one idle disconnect timer which u say I have
set here 30 sec.Now if I transfer packets within 30 sec when interface
was up.then this timer gets reset and working
fine.Now if dont transfer anything the timer will ti
Priscilla - I can say that I have used it and I will tonight before going to
bed. It's a very good test, as I'm taking the Support test tomorrow
afternoon. You rock!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59205&t=59103
--
F
Try using the show environment cmd. They will show the normal temperatures
""Hamed Sedighi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> What is the best Temperature for Routers(2511 & 3661)?
> I'm using 'MRTG" for drawing Graph about my Routers Temperature but I
don'
A bunch of people would object to this, but I would reading Bruno's book.
It's kind of light on some topics, but some of the more esoteric stuff is
doesnt really appear anywhere else. It will at least give you a
superficial overview of all the topics, and you can fill in the details
using the bo
Hello,
I have a problem telneting from r5 to r2 when reflexive ip access list is
configured. Without the reflexive access list, the telnet will work fine.
The two routers are directly connect via their ethernet 0 interfaces. Could
some one find out what is wrong with my configuration. Both routers
sh env by itself only shows out of spec values, you need sh env all to see
temps regardless of thresholds.
Bri
- Original Message -
From: "Router Man"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: Router Temperature [7:59054]
> Try using the show environment cmd. They
John,
By default packets sourced by the router will not be affected by an
outbound ACL. Since the outbound ACL does not "see" the telnet traffic
sourced by the router, the router does not add an entry to the inbound
ACL to allow the traffic to return. Try telneting from behind R5.
Brian Dennis, CC
I tried that too and it did not work.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dennis"
To: "'John Tafasi'" ; "'Cisco Group Study'"
; "'ccielab'"
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: problem with reflexive access list
> John,
> By default packets sourced by the router will not
45 matches
Mail list logo
