Re: CCNP recertification [7:65292]

2003-03-17 Thread David L. Blair
Per Cisco's website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-851.html Questions for the CCNP Recertification exam are drawn from the BSCI, Switching, Remote Access, and Support exams currently in use for CCNP certification. Refer to those exams for a

Re: windows syslog server [7:65232]

2003-03-17 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
Symon Thurlow wrote: > Kiwisyslog.com > >> I am looking for a good free ware PIX / CISCO syslog server on windows >> platform. Any recommendations??? The 3Com 3-in-1 utility (TFTP, FTP & syslog) is pretty useful as well: http://support.3com.com/software/utilities_for_windows_32_bit.htm

RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314]

2003-03-17 Thread Symon Thurlow
Redistribute static and redistribute connected are two separate commands. Both self explanatory. Symon -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with EIGRP [7:65314] Wanting to have this output in rout

OSPF Virtual link authentication - observations [7:65628]

2003-03-17 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit more experience might add their wisdom, not to mention their corrections. The ospf virtual link being what it is, it follows rules similar to any other interface. It does appear, though, that in terms of structure, it looks s

Re: OSPF Authentication Reference Chart [7:65601]

2003-03-17 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Glad you like it. You may want to check again, as I noticed that my text box did not make it through. I rewrote the page to include some helpful text. -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""NKP"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Chuck , it has cleared my d

RE: ATM LS100 PROBLEM! [7:65585]

2003-03-17 Thread Sales
Hi Xy, Here is a sample command to add pvc 2/48 to the ls100 ports #0 and #2 pvc est 1 2 0 2 48 512 0 155 2 2 48 512 0 155 Thanks, Ian http://www.ccie4u.com -Original Message- From: Xy Hien Le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Su

RE: ATM LS100 PROBLEM! [7:65585]

2003-03-17 Thread Sales
Hi Xy, I had sent you configuration information for the LS100 using NSAPs and thought you had it working now. Is this a new issue? If so it should be a straight matter of just setting up a bidirectional pvc on the ls100 for your pvc. Bear in mind there are reserved ranges for vpi's/vci's when c

Wireless LAN Support Exam [7:65625]

2003-03-17 Thread Duncan Wallace
I was wondering if anyone out there has attempted the Wireless LAN Support yet, and if so, what study materials you used (other than the web site). I have been going over the CWNA for a solid background, but was looking for something with more of a Cisco flavor. Thanks in advance, Duncan Wa

Re: any windows 2000 mailing list? [7:65544]

2003-03-17 Thread NKP
msnews.microsoft.com ""Carol smith"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi... Group > > Personally I feel this cisco mailing list is very good. Do u know is there > any windows 2000 mailing list to recommend me? > > Thanks > > > > > > - > Do you Yahoo!? > Y

Re: OSPF Authentication Reference Chart [7:65601]

2003-03-17 Thread NKP
thanks Chuck , it has cleared my doubts on OSPF authentication. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF > authentication reference chart on my web site: > > http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Au

RE: Unable to delete flash [7:65529]

2003-03-17 Thread Emilia Lambros
try doing a "squeeze" on the flash to get rid of the deleted file.. -Original Message- From: Sales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 17 March 2003 12:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Unable to delete flash [7:65529] Some possible things to try would be to use the /force swi

Re: Trouble with PA-MC-8TE1+ (ISDN PRI) [7:65540]

2003-03-17 Thread sumitsood
It is 7204VXR running 12.2.15B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65621&t=65540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to

RE: ISDN Config Problem? [7:65315]

2003-03-17 Thread Jenny McLeod
Not necessarily the case for basic-net3 switch type. I have seen basic rate ETSI interfaces actuallly appear to be dead - at L1 as well as L2. Put a call through and up it comes. Pain in the neck, because you can't tell if the service is cactus without actually making a call. If anyone has any s

Re: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Clay Auch
on the address 199.66.15.252/27 ... think of your bit boundary. clay - Original Message - From: "Roger Lu" To: Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:06 PM Subject: RE: Simple IP address question [7:65597] > You should get 8 subnets rather than 6. The two additions: 1-30 & > 225-254. > > Roge

Re: CCIE [7:65426]

2003-03-17 Thread Scott Roberts
yes definitly a knock, couldn't remember where I had heard a lot of this before, but the link reminded me. still parts of this were good, some though need some work. perhaps we could all rewrite part of this to come up with a really good job description? I'd change the part "at the same time, per

Re: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread s vermill
Darrell Newcomb wrote: > > > As others are saying, get the carrier involved. Do some > loopbacks with > their > > help. (Do loopbacks still make sense with DS3? I've only > worked with DS1). > > Regardless, I think you've done the requisite testing and > swapping on your > > side. Time to hassle t

RE: Voice VLAN [7:65606]

2003-03-17 Thread CCIE #6746
Yes you really should. Bandwidth is never an answer to realtime traffic consistency, it's really a question of queue management. You should still use QoS on the gig links. On this laptop I don't have the CCO links handy but there are plenty out there if you do a quick search. The 2950's are dif

Re: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Larry Letterman
The network is 199.66.15.224/27... your basing your info on classfull teaching in the ccna. the address listed in your example works fine.. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Sam To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:02 AM

Voice VLAN [7:65606]

2003-03-17 Thread Azhar Teza
I have this setup: 6509 switch connected to multiple 2950 switches. In each IDF I will have atleat (20) 2950 connected to 6500 switch. 6509 then will be connected to 3700 series router for WAN Connectivity. 6509 will also be connected to Nortel CSE1000 IP phone server. The question is: In each bran

RE: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Williams, Dave
You also get the subnet that the address is on. In this case, the subnet is 199.66.15.225 - 199.66.15.254 with a broadcast of 199.66.15.255. Hope this helps. Dave Williams, CCDA, CCNA, CCSA Director - Network Engineering (402) 661-2143 -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: OSPF Topology Question - Parkhurst's Book [7:65532]

2003-03-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Parkhurst's example didn't work on my routers either, for what it's worth. With the spoke configured with a neighbor it tried to elect a BDR and DR, using unicast packets to its neighbor. The hub router, which was using subinterfaces, seemed to ignore these pleas to be neighborly. They didn't bec

Re: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread Darrell Newcomb
> As others are saying, get the carrier involved. Do some loopbacks with their > help. (Do loopbacks still make sense with DS3? I've only worked with DS1). > Regardless, I think you've done the requisite testing and swapping on your > side. Time to hassle the carrier. > I haven't been reading group

RE: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Lu
You should get 8 subnets rather than 6. The two additions: 1-30 & 225-254. Roger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Sent: 17 March, 2003 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Simple IP address question [7:65597] Hey there I had a sim

Re: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread Darrell Newcomb
> As others are saying, get the carrier involved. Do some loopbacks with their > help. (Do loopbacks still make sense with DS3? I've only worked with DS1). > Regardless, I think you've done the requisite testing and swapping on your > side. Time to hassle the carrier. > I haven't been reading group

Voice VLAN [7:65606]

2003-03-17 Thread Azhar Teza
I have this setup: 6509 switch connected to multiple 2950 switches. In each IDF I will have atleat (20) 2950 connected to 6500 switch. 6509 then will be connected to 3700 series router for WAN Connectivity. 6509 will also be connected to Nortel CSE1000 IP phone server. The question is: In each bran

RE: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Williams, Dave
You also get the subnet that the address is on. In this case, the subnet is 199.66.15.225 - 199.66.15.254 with a broadcast of 199.66.15.255. Hope this helps. Dave Williams, CCDA, CCNA, CCSA Director - Network Engineering (402) 661-2143 -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Larry Letterman
The network is 199.66.15.224/27... your basing your info on classfull teaching in the ccna. the address listed in your example works fine.. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Sam To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:02 AM

RE: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Biff Terrific
No, you get eight subnets. Subnet zero and the all-ones subnet are legal under current standards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65600&t=65597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/

Re: Can PIX redirect a packet from its outside in [7:65570]

2003-03-17 Thread Curious
I dont quite understand your question or the senario. If you want to enable traffic between Host 1 and Host 2 and Host2 is connected to the PIX OutSide Interace LAN, then why you need IPSEC tunnel between Router and PIX. If you looking in to security point of view then either move host 2 behind the

OSPF Authentication Reference Chart [7:65601]

2003-03-17 Thread The Long and Winding Road
For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF authentication reference chart on my web site: http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Authentication.htm While visiting, you might also want to read through the essay I wrote on this topic a couple of months back on Groupstudy. h

Re: Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""Sam"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hey there > > I had a simple question. > > I came across this router which had an ip address of 199.66.15.252/27 > > I wonder how that is possible because it doesn't seem a legal address. > With a subnet mask of 27, you get 6 subnets as follows: >

RE: how to spoof a IP? [7:65559]

2003-03-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Steve Dispensa wrote: > > A couple of amplifications: And a few more comments. See below. > > On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 20:51, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > Alan Stone wrote: > > > > > > Hi.. Group > > > > > > I always heard of those hacker spoof a IP and hack other > people > > > system. D

Simple IP address question [7:65597]

2003-03-17 Thread Sam
Hey there I had a simple question. I came across this router which had an ip address of 199.66.15.252/27 I wonder how that is possible because it doesn't seem a legal address. With a subnet mask of 27, you get 6 subnets as follows: 32-64 64-96 96-128 128-160 160-192 192-224 Thx, Sam Message

Re: IOS for MPLS [7:65586]

2003-03-17 Thread Peter van Oene
At 02:25 PM 3/17/2003 +, Michael wrote: >Dear all > >Can anybody suggest a stable vesion that supports >MPLS? Try your SE team. It's all a balance of platforms/features/interfaces/VIPs/PA's etc :) >We are in a process of running MPLS though our network >on C7507 routers and we tried a few v

Re: Back-to-back FR P2P circuits with Different Dlci's [7:65595]

2003-03-17 Thread Scott Roberts
that command isn't necessary with back-to-back cabling. the interface's controller can determine the cablings orientation and set the interface to the correct type automatically. what I don't see is the dce providing a clocking rate. scott ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECT

Site to Site VPN on VPN Concentrator 3005 [7:65596]

2003-03-17 Thread Curious
Guys- I have setup VPN (Site to Site & Cisco VPN Client) on PIX, now we are moving in off from the PIX and buying a Cisco VPN concentrator 3005. I have heard that Cisco VPN concentrator is not a good choice for Site to Site VPN connection. Please tell me is it true and why a dedecated VPN device is

RE: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > I logged into the routers and did some ping tests, pinging the > > routers own serial interface I still get the 1% packet loss. > > It may surprise you to learn that when you ping from a router's > serial interface to the router's own serial interface, the

RE: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread Stephen Bailey
Thanks, We will speak to the Carrier today and find out what their configuration is. We have 3 other DS3 45mbps circuits on the Network connecting through another Carrier and we are NOT seeing the same problems. I'll keep you updated. Thanks Stephen s vermill wrote: > > Stephen, > > Thanks

RE: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread s vermill
Stephen, Thanks for the update. It sounds as if this circiut is not back-to-back. Since there is a carrier involved, you might want to think about how the service might be provisioned. For example, the carrier may have all the transport equipment set up to accept a "channelized" DS3 and you mig

Can PIX redirect a packet from its outside interf [7:65484]

2003-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, This must be an easy one for the PIX experts. I have a topoloy as shown below. Host1---Router ==IPSEC Tunnel==(outside)PIXFirewall(inside) | |

RE: Can PIX redirect a packet from its outside in [7:65570]

2003-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IPSec tunnel is between the Router and the PIX. Only Host1's traffic is encrypted upto the PIX . Host2 is on the LAN attached to the PIX's outside interface. Cheers Simon -Original Message- From: Walker, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 11:08 PM To: [E

RE: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread s vermill
Stephen, Also, what has the carrier told you about this circuit? Most "carrier-class" transport equipment can report the types of errors being incurred and where they first appear in the network. For instance, coding violations, framing errors/violations, simple FCS failure, etc. Also, did your

RE: Can PIX redirect a packet from its outside in [7:65501]

2003-03-17 Thread Walker, Todd
Are you saying BOTH host1 and host2 have IPSec tunnels to PIX? If so, the PIX cannot decrypt and re-encrypt back out the same interface. Look through the Networker's presentations for Enterprise VPN Design - there are a few slides on the issue. If host2 is just on outside interface without IPS

Re: Network design product selecion question [7:65564]

2003-03-17 Thread Thomas Larus
If you are really serious about your budget being small, then perhaps an old Cat 5000 or 5500 or two, with a RSM in one of them to deal with VLANs if you really insist on having VLANs for so few users. People are giving the things away these days. Okay, you guys, you can stop laughing now. Best

RE: CCNP Recommendations [7:65514]

2003-03-17 Thread Utz Ralph
You might wanna add a little in your post about how much experience you have, but regardless you can always go to ciscopress.com and browse a couple of the books. The tests are generally taken with the BSCI first. Groupstudy is a great site as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://w

RE: Network design product selecion question [7:65564]

2003-03-17 Thread Mustafa Furat
yes... ebay.com :) -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network design product selecion question [7:65564] Hi All, once again, I am back designing a network for my company (scary). The bud

RE: OSPF over frame relay quick reference document [7:65517]

2003-03-17 Thread Utz Ralph
nice layout Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65588&t=65517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how to spoof a IP? [7:65559]

2003-03-17 Thread Nnanna Obuba
I of course assume, you need to spoof packets for a legitimate reason, so I'll point you in the direction of a tool you can use for just that... Download and install TrafficGen from www.nantech.com .Limits you to packets to prevent malicious use --- Steve Dispensa wrote: > A couple of ampli

IOS for MPLS [7:65586]

2003-03-17 Thread Michael
Dear all Can anybody suggest a stable vesion that supports MPLS? We are in a process of running MPLS though our network on C7507 routers and we tried a few versions IOS but we face various and different problems between the version . We face problems with interface statistics, with web browising

ATM LS100 PROBLEM! [7:65585]

2003-03-17 Thread Xy Hien Le
Hi all, I have an LS100 ATM LIGHTSTREAM (NOT LS1010) in between 2 ATM routers configured as follow: interface ATM2/0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint map-group atm atm pvc 1 0 16 ilmi atm pvc 2 2 48 aal5snap no atm ilmi-keepalive map-list atm ip 10.1.1

RE: trying to understand how this works. [7:65555]

2003-03-17 Thread Utz Ralph
my guess would be that they have the firewall changing the addresses Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65584&t=6 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report miscon

RE: DS3 slow connection problem. [7:65491]

2003-03-17 Thread Stephen Bailey
Hello all, I am a collegue of Mark's who has been working on this fault over the weekend with Mark. We have done some further tests today and we are still experiencing errors on the line, here are some of the results we have seen: 1.) Each time we have changed the clocking on the line, we have b

no mails [7:65581]

2003-03-17 Thread Binoy K L
I am a new member to this group I am not getting any message. ___ Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - Click here to know more! http://r.rediff.com/r?http://clients.rediff.com/odomos/Odomos.htm&&odomos&&wn

RSVP Proxy - PATH and AND RESV messages - is that right? [7:65580]

2003-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Source is generating multicast packets with destination address 239.192.20.20 ||---||||---|| Source Router ARouter B Receiver 10.10

RE: Network design product selecion question [7:65564]

2003-03-17 Thread Symon Thurlow
Hi John, I designed and evolved a network on the same sort of basis over time. It started out with 2 3548 switches, then we added another (all daisychained via fibre) then when another was added I recommended they put in a 3550-12G to act as a core, they did this, and have added more switches to

RE: PIX 520 Xlate Problem [7:63087]

2003-03-17 Thread Danial Morison
Problem is still persists..getting panic as the users are unable to connect from 10's other network with ID tag 4 in the configuration mentioned earlier. HELP.. >From: "Greg Owens Jr" >To: "'Danial Morison'" , >Subject: RE: PIX 520 Xlate Problem [7:63087] >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:48:09 -0500

Re: OSPF Topology Question - Parkhurst's Book [7:65532]

2003-03-17 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""Mike"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Since the spoke routers are NBMA, multicast hello's will not locate the > neighbor. The ospf router neighbor command must be used to manually identify > the neighbor so routing updates can be exchanged. I'm not sure why you > would want to implem

RE: Load blanacing - VERY URGENT [7:65567]

2003-03-17 Thread Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
RIP v1 or v2 will load balance automatically accross different paths with the same hop-count to the destination network. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65574&t=65567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt